Identify Goal
Define Problem
Define Problem
Gather Data
Define Causes
Identify Options
Clarify Problem
Generate Ideas
Evaluate Options
Generate Ideas
Choose the Best Solution
Implement Solution
Select Solution
Take Action
MacLeod offers her own problem solving procedure, which echoes the above steps:
“1. Recognize the Problem: State what you see. Sometimes the problem is covert. 2. Identify: Get the facts — What exactly happened? What is the issue? 3. and 4. Explore and Connect: Dig deeper and encourage group members to relate their similar experiences. Now you're getting more into the feelings and background [of the situation], not just the facts. 5. Possible Solutions: Consider and brainstorm ideas for resolution. 6. Implement: Choose a solution and try it out — this could be role play and/or a discussion of how the solution would be put in place. 7. Evaluate: Revisit to see if the solution was successful or not.”
Many of these problem solving techniques can be used in concert with one another, or multiple can be appropriate for any given problem. It’s less about facilitating a perfect CPS session, and more about encouraging team members to continually think outside the box and push beyond personal boundaries that inhibit their innovative thinking. So, try out several methods, find those that resonate best with your team, and continue adopting new techniques and adapting your processes along the way.
Empower your people to go above and beyond with a flexible platform designed to match the needs of your team — and adapt as those needs change.
The Smartsheet platform makes it easy to plan, capture, manage, and report on work from anywhere, helping your team be more effective and get more done. Report on key metrics and get real-time visibility into work as it happens with roll-up reports, dashboards, and automated workflows built to keep your team connected and informed.
When teams have clarity into the work getting done, there’s no telling how much more they can accomplish in the same amount of time. Try Smartsheet for free, today.
5 steps (and 4 techniques) for effective problem solving.
Problem solving is the process of reviewing every element of an issue so you can get to a solution or fix it. Problem solving steps cover multiple aspects of a problem that you can bring together to find a solution. Whether that’s in a group collaboratively or independently, the process remains the same, but the approach and the steps can differ.
To find a problem solving approach that works for you, your team, or your company, you have to take into consideration the environment you’re in and the personalities around you.
Knowing the characters in the room will help you decide on the best approach to try and ultimately get to the best solution.
5 problem solving steps, 4 techniques to encourage problem solving, the bottom line.
No matter what the problem is, to solve it, you nearly always have to follow these problem solving steps. Missing any of these steps can cause the problem to either resurface or the solution to not be implemented correctly.
Once you know these steps, you can then get creative with the approach you take to find the solutions you need.
You must define and understand the problem before you start, whether you’re solving it independently or as a group. If you don’t have a single view of what the problem is, you could be fixing something that doesn’t need fixing, or you’ll fix the wrong problem.
Spend time elaborating on the problem, write it down, and discuss everything, so you’re clear on why the problem is occurring and who it is impacting.
Once you have clarity on the problem, you then need to start thinking about every possible solution . This is where you go big and broad, as you want to come up with as many alternative solutions as possible. Don’t just take the first idea; build out as many as you can through active listening, as the more you create, the more likely you’ll find a solution that has the best impact on the team.
Whichever solution you pick individually or as a team, make sure you think about the impact on others if you implement this solution. Ask questions like:
At this stage of problem solving, be prepared for feedback, and plan for this. When you roll out the solution, request feedback on the success of the change made.
Making a change shouldn’t be a one time action. Spend time reviewing the results of the change to make sure it’s made the required impact and met the desired outcomes.
Make changes where needed so you can further improve the solution implemented.
Each individual or team is going to have different needs and may need a different technique to encourage each of the problem solving steps. Try one of these to stimulate the process.
The 1-2-4-All is a good problem solving approach that can work no matter how large the group is. Everyone is involved, and you can generate a vast amount of ideas quickly.
Ideas and solutions are discussed and organized rapidly, and what is great about this approach is the attendees own their ideas, so when it comes to implementing the solutions, you don’t have more work to gain buy-in.
As a facilitator, you first need to present the group with a question explaining the problem or situation. For example, “What actions or ideas would you recommend to solve the company’s lack of quiet working areas?”
With the question clear for all to see, the group then spends 5 minutes to reflect on the question individually. They can jot down their thoughts and ideas on Post-Its.
Now ask the participants to find one or two other people to discuss their ideas and thoughts with. Ask the group to move around to find a partner so they can mix with new people.
Ask the pairs to spend 5 minutes discussing their shared ideas and thoughts.
Next, put the group into groups of two or three pairs to make groups of 4-6. Each group shouldn’t be larger than six as the chances of everyone being able to speak reduces.
Ask the group to discuss one interesting idea they’ve heard in previous rounds, and each group member shares one each.
The group then needs to pick their preferred solution to the problem. This doesn’t have to be voted on, just one that resonated most with the group.
Then ask for three actions that could be taken to implement this change.
Bring everyone back together as a group and ask open questions like “What is the one thing you discussed that stood out for you?” or “Is there something you now see differently following these discussions?”
By the end of the session, you’ll have multiple approaches to solve the problem, and the whole group will have contributed to the future solutions and improvements.
The Lightning Decision Jam is a great way to solve problems collaboratively and agree on one solution or experiment you want to try straight away. It encourages team decision making, but at the same time, the individual can get their ideas and feedback across. [1]
If, as a team, you have a particular area you want to improve upon, like the office environment, for example, this approach is perfect to incorporate in the problem solving steps.
The approach follows a simple loop.
Make a Note – Stick It on The Wall – Vote – Prioritize
Using sticky notes, the technique identifies major problems, encourages solutions, and opens the group up for discussion. It allows each team member to play an active role in identifying both problems and ways to solve them.
Mind mapping is a fantastic visual thinking tool that allows you to bring problems to life by building out the connections and visualizing the relationships that make up the problem.
You can use a mind map to quickly expand upon the problem and give yourself the full picture of the causes of the problem, as well as solutions [2] .
The goal of a mind map is to simplify the problem and link the causes and solutions to the problem.
To create a mind map, you must first create the central topic (level 1). In this case, that’s the problem.
Next, create the linked topics (level 2) that you place around and connect to the main central topic with a simple line.
If the central topic is “The client is always changing their mind at the last minute,” then you could have linked topics like:
Adding these linking topics allows you to start building out the main causes of the problem as you can begin to see the full picture of what you need to fix. Once you’re happy that you’ve covered the breadth of the problem and its issues, you can start to ideate on how you’re going to fix it with the problem solving steps.
Now, start adding subtopics (level 3) linking to each of the level 2 topics. This is where you can start to go big on solutions and ideas to help fix the problem.
For each of the linked topics (level 2), start to think about how you can prevent them, mitigate them, or improve them. As this is just ideas on paper, write down anything that comes to mind, even if you think the client will never agree to it!
The more you write down, the more ideas you’ll have until you find one or two that could solve the main problem.
Once you run out of ideas, take a step back and highlight your favorite solutions to take forward and implement.
The five why’s can sound a little controversial, and you shouldn’t try this without prepping the team beforehand.
Asking “why” is a great way to go deep into the root of the problem to make the individual or team really think about the cause. When a problem arises, we often have preconceived ideas about why this problem has occurred, which is usually based on our experiences or beliefs.
Start with describing the problem, and then the facilitator can ask “Why?” fives time or more until you get to the root of the problem. It’s tough at first to keep being asked why, but it’s also satisfying when you get to the root of the problem [3] .
As a facilitator, although the basic approach is to ask why, you need to be careful not to guide the participant down a single route.
To help with this, you can use a mind map with the problem at the center. Then ask a why question that will result in multiple secondary topics around the central problem. Having this visual representation of the problem helps you build out more useful why questions around it.
Once you get to the root of the problem, don’t forget to be clear in the actions to put a fix in place to resolve it.
Learn more about how to use the five why’s here .
To fix a problem, you must first be in a position where you fully understand it. There are many ways to misinterpret a problem, and the best way to understand them is through conversation with the team or individuals who are experiencing it.
Once you’re aligned, you can then begin to work on the solutions that will have the greatest impact through effective problem solving steps.
For the more significant or difficult problems to solve, it’s often advisable to break the solution up into smaller actions or improvements.
Trial these improvements in short iterations, and then continue the conversations to review and improve the solution. Implementing all of these steps will help you root out the problems and find useful solutions each time.
[1] | ^ | UX Planet: |
[2] | ^ | Focus: |
[3] | ^ | Expert Program Management: |
Explore the time flow system.
Struggling to overcome challenges in your life? We all face problems, big and small, on a regular basis.
So how do you tackle them effectively? What are some key problem-solving strategies and skills that can guide you?
Effective problem-solving requires breaking issues down logically, generating solutions creatively, weighing choices critically, and adapting plans flexibly based on outcomes. Useful strategies range from leveraging past solutions that have worked to visualizing problems through diagrams. Core skills include analytical abilities, innovative thinking, and collaboration.
Want to improve your problem-solving skills? Keep reading to find out 17 effective problem-solving strategies, key skills, common obstacles to watch for, and tips on improving your overall problem-solving skills.
Problem-solving is the process of understanding an issue, situation, or challenge that needs to be addressed and then systematically working through possible solutions to arrive at the best outcome.
It involves critical thinking, analysis, logic, creativity, research, planning, reflection, and patience in order to overcome obstacles and find effective answers to complex questions or problems.
The ultimate goal is to implement the chosen solution successfully.
Problem-solving strategies are like frameworks or methodologies that help us solve tricky puzzles or problems we face in the workplace, at home, or with friends.
Imagine you have a big jigsaw puzzle. One strategy might be to start with the corner pieces. Another could be looking for pieces with the same colors.
Just like in puzzles, in real life, we use different plans or steps to find solutions to problems. These strategies help us think clearly, make good choices, and find the best answers without getting too stressed or giving up.
Knowing different problem-solving strategies is important because different types of problems often require different approaches to solve them effectively. Having a variety of strategies to choose from allows you to select the best method for the specific problem you are trying to solve.
This improves your ability to analyze issues thoroughly, develop solutions creatively, and tackle problems from multiple angles. Knowing multiple strategies also aids in overcoming roadblocks if your initial approach is not working.
Here are some reasons why you need to know different problem-solving strategies:
Knowing different ways to solve problems helps you tackle anything that comes your way, making life a bit easier and more fun!
Effective problem-solving strategies include breaking the problem into smaller parts, brainstorming multiple solutions, evaluating the pros and cons of each, and choosing the most viable option.
Critical thinking and creativity are essential in developing innovative solutions. Collaboration with others can also provide diverse perspectives and ideas.
By applying these strategies, you can tackle complex issues more effectively.
Now, consider a challenge you’re dealing with. Which strategy could help you find a solution? Here we will discuss key problem strategies in detail.
This strategy involves looking back at previous similar problems you have faced and the solutions that were effective in solving them.
It is useful when you are facing a problem that is very similar to something you have already solved. The main benefit is that you don’t have to come up with a brand new solution – you already know the method that worked before will likely work again.
However, the limitation is that the current problem may have some unique aspects or differences that mean your old solution is not fully applicable.
The ideal process is to thoroughly analyze the new challenge, identify the key similarities and differences versus the past case, adapt the old solution as needed to align with the current context, and then pilot it carefully before full implementation.
An example is using the same negotiation tactics from purchasing your previous home when putting in an offer on a new house. Key terms would be adjusted but overall it can save significant time versus developing a brand new strategy.
This involves gathering a group of people together to generate as many potential solutions to a problem as possible.
It is effective when you need creative ideas to solve a complex or challenging issue. By getting input from multiple people with diverse perspectives, you increase the likelihood of finding an innovative solution.
The main limitation is that brainstorming sessions can sometimes turn into unproductive gripe sessions or discussions rather than focusing on productive ideation —so they need to be properly facilitated.
The key to an effective brainstorming session is setting some basic ground rules upfront and having an experienced facilitator guide the discussion. Rules often include encouraging wild ideas, avoiding criticism of ideas during the ideation phase, and building on others’ ideas.
For instance, a struggling startup might hold a session where ideas for turnaround plans are generated and then formalized with financials and metrics.
This technique involves envisioning that the problem has already been solved and then working step-by-step backward toward the current state.
This strategy is particularly helpful for long-term, multi-step problems. By starting from the imagined solution and identifying all the steps required to reach it, you can systematically determine the actions needed. It lets you tackle a big hairy problem through smaller, reversible steps.
A limitation is that this approach may not be possible if you cannot accurately envision the solution state to start with.
The approach helps drive logical systematic thinking for complex problem-solving, but should still be combined with creative brainstorming of alternative scenarios and solutions.
An example is planning for an event – you would imagine the successful event occurring, then determine the tasks needed the week before, two weeks before, etc. all the way back to the present.
This method, named after author Rudyard Kipling, provides a framework for thoroughly analyzing a problem before jumping into solutions.
It consists of answering six fundamental questions: What, Where, When, How, Who, and Why about the challenge. Clearly defining these core elements of the problem sets the stage for generating targeted solutions.
The Kipling method enables a deep understanding of problem parameters and root causes before solution identification. By jumping to brainstorm solutions too early, critical information can be missed or the problem is loosely defined, reducing solution quality.
Answering the six fundamental questions illuminates all angles of the issue. This takes time but pays dividends in generating optimal solutions later tuned precisely to the true underlying problem.
The limitation is that meticulously working through numerous questions before addressing solutions can slow progress.
The best approach blends structured problem decomposition techniques like the Kipling method with spurring innovative solution ideation from a diverse team.
An example is using this technique after a technical process failure – the team would systematically detail What failed, Where/When did it fail, How it failed (sequence of events), Who was involved, and Why it likely failed before exploring preventative solutions.
This technique involves attempting various potential solutions sequentially until finding one that successfully solves the problem.
Trial and error works best when facing a concrete, bounded challenge with clear solution criteria and a small number of discrete options to try. By methodically testing solutions, you can determine the faulty component.
A limitation is that it can be time-intensive if the working solution set is large.
The key is limiting the variable set first. For technical problems, this boundary is inherent and each element can be iteratively tested. But for business issues, artificial constraints may be required – setting decision rules upfront to reduce options before testing.
Furthermore, hypothesis-driven experimentation is far superior to blind trial and error – have logic for why Option A may outperform Option B.
Examples include fixing printer jams by testing different paper tray and cable configurations or resolving website errors by tweaking CSS/HTML line-by-line until the code functions properly.
Heuristics refers to applying existing problem-solving formulas or frameworks rather than addressing issues completely from scratch.
This allows leveraging established best practices rather than reinventing the wheel each time.
It is effective when facing recurrent, common challenges where proven structured approaches exist.
However, heuristics may force-fit solutions to non-standard problems.
For example, a cost-benefit analysis can be used instead of custom weighting schemes to analyze potential process improvements.
Onethread allows teams to define, save, and replicate configurable project templates so proven workflows can be reliably applied across problems with some consistency rather than fully custom one-off approaches each time.
Try One thread
Experience One thread full potential, with all its features unlocked. Sign up now to start your 14-day free trial!
Insight is a problem-solving technique that involves waiting patiently for an unexpected “aha moment” when the solution pops into your mind.
It works well for personal challenges that require intuitive realizations over calculated logic. The unconscious mind makes connections leading to flashes of insight when relaxing or doing mundane tasks unrelated to the actual problem.
Benefits include out-of-the-box creative solutions. However, the limitations are that insights can’t be forced and may never come at all if too complex. Critical analysis is still required after initial insights.
A real-life example would be a writer struggling with how to end a novel. Despite extensive brainstorming, they feel stuck. Eventually while gardening one day, a perfect unexpected plot twist sparks an ideal conclusion. However, once written they still carefully review if the ending flows logically from the rest of the story.
This approach involves deconstructing a problem in reverse sequential order from the current undesirable outcome back to the initial root causes.
By mapping the chain of events backward, you can identify the origin of where things went wrong and establish the critical junctures for solving it moving ahead. Reverse engineering provides diagnostic clarity on multi-step problems.
However, the limitation is that it focuses heavily on autopsying the past versus innovating improved future solutions.
An example is tracing back from a server outage, through the cascade of infrastructure failures that led to it finally terminating at the initial script error that triggered the crisis. This root cause would then inform the preventative measure.
This technique defines the current problem state and the desired end goal state, then systematically identifies obstacles in the way of getting from one to the other.
By mapping the barriers or gaps, you can then develop solutions to address each one. This methodically connects the problem to solutions.
A limitation is that some obstacles may be unknown upfront and only emerge later.
For example, you can list down all the steps required for a new product launch – current state through production, marketing, sales, distribution, etc. to full launch (goal state) – to highlight where resource constraints or other blocks exist so they can be addressed.
Onethread allows dividing big-picture projects into discrete, manageable phases, milestones, and tasks to simplify execution just as problems can be decomposed into more achievable components. Features like dependency mapping further reinforce interconnections.
Using Onethread’s issues and subtasks feature, messy problems can be decomposed into manageable chunks.
This technique involves asking “Why did this problem occur?” and then responding with an answer that is again met with asking “Why?” This process repeats five times until the root cause is revealed.
Continually asking why digs deeper from surface symptoms to underlying systemic issues.
It is effective for getting to the source of problems originating from human error or process breakdowns.
However, some complex issues may have multiple tangled root causes not solvable through this approach alone.
An example is a retail store experiencing a sudden decline in customers. Successively asking why five times may trace an initial drop to parking challenges, stemming from a city construction project – the true starting point to address.
This involves analyzing a problem or proposed solution by categorizing internal and external factors into a 2×2 matrix: Strengths, Weaknesses as the internal rows; Opportunities and Threats as the external columns.
Systematically identifying these elements provides balanced insight to evaluate options and risks. It is impactful when evaluating alternative solutions or developing strategy amid complexity or uncertainty.
The key benefit of SWOT analysis is enabling multi-dimensional thinking when rationally evaluating options. Rather than getting anchored on just the upsides or the existing way of operating, it urges a systematic assessment through four different lenses:
Multiperspective analysis provides the needed holistic view of the balanced risk vs. reward equation for strategic decision making amid uncertainty.
However, SWOT can feel restrictive if not tailored and evolved for different issue types.
Teams should view SWOT analysis as a starting point, augmenting it further for distinct scenarios.
An example is performing a SWOT analysis on whether a small business should expand into a new market – evaluating internal capabilities to execute vs. risks in the external competitive and demand environment to inform the growth decision with eyes wide open.
This technique involves comparing the current state of performance, output, or results to the desired or expected levels to highlight shortfalls.
By quantifying the gaps, you can identify problem areas and prioritize address solutions.
Gap analysis is based on the simple principle – “you can’t improve what you don’t measure.” It enables facts-driven problem diagnosis by highlighting delta to goals, not just vague dissatisfaction that something seems wrong. And measurement immediately suggests improvement opportunities – address the biggest gaps first.
This data orientation also supports ROI analysis on fixing issues – the return from closing larger gaps outweighs narrowly targeting smaller performance deficiencies.
However, the approach is only effective if robust standards and metrics exist as the benchmark to evaluate against. Organizations should invest upfront in establishing performance frameworks.
Furthermore, while numbers are invaluable, the human context behind problems should not be ignored – quantitative versus qualitative gap assessment is optimally blended.
For example, if usage declines are noted during software gap analysis, this could be used as a signal to improve user experience through design.
A Gemba walk involves going to the actual place where work is done, directly observing the process, engaging with employees, and finding areas for improvement.
By experiencing firsthand rather than solely reviewing abstract reports, practical problems and ideas emerge.
The limitation is Gemba walks provide anecdotes not statistically significant data. It complements but does not replace comprehensive performance measurement.
An example is a factory manager inspecting the production line to spot jam areas based on direct reality rather than relying on throughput dashboards alone back in her office. Frontline insights prove invaluable.
This involves assessing the marketplace around a problem or business situation via five key factors: competitors, new entrants, substitute offerings, suppliers, and customer power.
Evaluating these forces illuminates risks and opportunities for strategy development and issue resolution. It is effective for understanding dynamic external threats and opportunities when operating in a contested space.
However, over-indexing on only external factors can overlook the internal capabilities needed to execute solutions.
A startup CEO, for example, may analyze market entry barriers, whitespace opportunities, and disruption risks across these five forces to shape new product rollout strategies and marketing approaches.
The Six Thinking Hats is a technique developed by Edward de Bono that encourages people to think about a problem from six different perspectives, each represented by a colored “thinking hat.”
The key benefit of this strategy is that it pushes team members to move outside their usual thinking style and consider new angles. This brings more diverse ideas and solutions to the table.
It works best for complex problems that require innovative solutions and when a team is stuck in an unproductive debate. The structured framework keeps the conversation flowing in a positive direction.
Limitations are that it requires training on the method itself and may feel unnatural at first. Team dynamics can also influence success – some members may dominate certain “hats” while others remain quiet.
A real-life example is a software company debating whether to build a new feature. The white hat focuses on facts, red on gut feelings, black on potential risks, yellow on benefits, green on new ideas, and blue on process. This exposes more balanced perspectives before deciding.
Onethread centralizes diverse stakeholder communication onto one platform, ensuring all voices are incorporated when evaluating project tradeoffs, just as problem-solving should consider multifaceted solutions.
Drawing out a problem involves creating visual representations like diagrams, flowcharts, and maps to work through challenging issues.
This strategy is helpful when dealing with complex situations with lots of interconnected components. The visuals simplify the complexity so you can thoroughly understand the problem and all its nuances.
Key benefits are that it allows more stakeholders to get on the same page regarding root causes and it sparks new creative solutions as connections are made visually.
However, simple problems with few variables don’t require extensive diagrams. Additionally, some challenges are so multidimensional that fully capturing every aspect is difficult.
A real-life example would be mapping out all the possible causes leading to decreased client satisfaction at a law firm. An intricate fishbone diagram with branches for issues like service delivery, technology, facilities, culture, and vendor partnerships allows the team to trace problems back to their origins and brainstorm targeted fixes.
An algorithm is a predefined step-by-step process that is guaranteed to produce the correct solution if implemented properly.
Using algorithms is effective when facing problems that have clear, binary right and wrong answers. Algorithms work for mathematical calculations, computer code, manufacturing assembly lines, and scientific experiments.
Key benefits are consistency, accuracy, and efficiency. However, they require extensive upfront development and only apply to scenarios with strict parameters. Additionally, human error can lead to mistakes.
For example, crew members of fast food chains like McDonald’s follow specific algorithms for food prep – from grill times to ingredient amounts in sandwiches, to order fulfillment procedures. This ensures uniform quality and service across all locations. However, if a step is missed, errors occur.
The problem-solving process typically includes defining the issue, analyzing details, creating solutions, weighing choices, acting, and reviewing results.
In the above, we have discussed several problem-solving strategies. For every problem-solving strategy, you have to follow these processes. Here’s a detailed step-by-step process of effective problem-solving:
The problem-solving process starts with identifying the problem. This step involves understanding the issue’s nature, its scope, and its impact. Once the problem is clearly defined, it sets the foundation for finding effective solutions.
Identifying the problem is crucial. It means figuring out exactly what needs fixing. This involves looking at the situation closely, understanding what’s wrong, and knowing how it affects things. It’s about asking the right questions to get a clear picture of the issue.
This step is important because it guides the rest of the problem-solving process. Without a clear understanding of the problem, finding a solution is much harder. It’s like diagnosing an illness before treating it. Once the problem is identified accurately, you can move on to exploring possible solutions and deciding on the best course of action.
Breaking down the problem is a key step in the problem-solving process. It involves dividing the main issue into smaller, more manageable parts. This makes it easier to understand and tackle each component one by one.
After identifying the problem, the next step is to break it down. This means splitting the big issue into smaller pieces. It’s like solving a puzzle by handling one piece at a time.
By doing this, you can focus on each part without feeling overwhelmed. It also helps in identifying the root causes of the problem. Breaking down the problem allows for a clearer analysis and makes finding solutions more straightforward.
Each smaller problem can be addressed individually, leading to an effective resolution of the overall issue. This approach not only simplifies complex problems but also aids in developing a systematic plan to solve them.
Coming up with potential solutions is the third step in the problem-solving process. It involves brainstorming various options to address the problem, considering creativity and feasibility to find the best approach.
After breaking down the problem, it’s time to think of ways to solve it. This stage is about brainstorming different solutions. You look at the smaller issues you’ve identified and start thinking of ways to fix them. This is where creativity comes in.
You want to come up with as many ideas as possible, no matter how out-of-the-box they seem. It’s important to consider all options and evaluate their pros and cons. This process allows you to gather a range of possible solutions.
Later, you can narrow these down to the most practical and effective ones. This step is crucial because it sets the stage for deciding on the best solution to implement. It’s about being open-minded and innovative to tackle the problem effectively.
Analyzing the possible solutions is the fourth step in the problem-solving process. It involves evaluating each proposed solution’s advantages and disadvantages to determine the most effective and feasible option.
After coming up with potential solutions, the next step is to analyze them. This means looking closely at each idea to see how well it solves the problem. You weigh the pros and cons of every solution.
Consider factors like cost, time, resources, and potential outcomes. This analysis helps in understanding the implications of each option. It’s about being critical and objective, ensuring that the chosen solution is not only effective but also practical.
This step is vital because it guides you towards making an informed decision. It involves comparing the solutions against each other and selecting the one that best addresses the problem.
By thoroughly analyzing the options, you can move forward with confidence, knowing you’ve chosen the best path to solve the issue.
Implementing and monitoring the solutions is the final step in the problem-solving process. It involves putting the chosen solution into action and observing its effectiveness, making adjustments as necessary.
Once you’ve selected the best solution, it’s time to put it into practice. This step is about action. You implement the chosen solution and then keep an eye on how it works. Monitoring is crucial because it tells you if the solution is solving the problem as expected.
If things don’t go as planned, you may need to make some changes. This could mean tweaking the current solution or trying a different one. The goal is to ensure the problem is fully resolved.
This step is critical because it involves real-world application. It’s not just about planning; it’s about doing and adjusting based on results. By effectively implementing and monitoring the solutions, you can achieve the desired outcome and solve the problem successfully.
Following a defined process to solve problems is important because it provides a systematic, structured approach instead of a haphazard one. Having clear steps guides logical thinking, analysis, and decision-making to increase effectiveness. Key reasons it helps are:
The problem-solving process is a powerful tool that can help us tackle any challenge we face. By following these steps, we can find solutions that work and learn important skills along the way.
Efficient problem-solving requires breaking down issues logically, evaluating options, and implementing practical solutions.
Key skills include critical thinking to understand root causes, creativity to brainstorm innovative ideas, communication abilities to collaborate with others, and decision-making to select the best way forward. Staying adaptable, reflecting on outcomes, and applying lessons learned are also essential.
With practice, these capacities will lead to increased personal and team effectiveness in systematically addressing any problem.
Let’s explore the powers you need to become a problem-solving hero!
Critical thinking and analytical skills are vital for efficient problem-solving as they enable individuals to objectively evaluate information, identify key issues, and generate effective solutions.
These skills facilitate a deeper understanding of problems, leading to logical, well-reasoned decisions. By systematically breaking down complex issues and considering various perspectives, individuals can develop more innovative and practical solutions, enhancing their problem-solving effectiveness.
Effective communication skills are essential for efficient problem-solving as they facilitate clear sharing of information, ensuring all team members understand the problem and proposed solutions.
These skills enable individuals to articulate issues, listen actively, and collaborate effectively, fostering a productive environment where diverse ideas can be exchanged and refined. By enhancing mutual understanding, communication skills contribute significantly to identifying and implementing the most viable solutions.
Strong decision-making skills are crucial for efficient problem-solving, as they enable individuals to choose the best course of action from multiple alternatives.
These skills involve evaluating the potential outcomes of different solutions, considering the risks and benefits, and making informed choices. Effective decision-making leads to the implementation of solutions that are likely to resolve problems effectively, ensuring resources are used efficiently and goals are achieved.
Planning and prioritization are key for efficient problem-solving, ensuring resources are allocated effectively to address the most critical issues first. This approach helps in organizing tasks according to their urgency and impact, streamlining efforts towards achieving the desired outcome efficiently.
Emotional intelligence enhances problem-solving by allowing individuals to manage emotions, understand others, and navigate social complexities. It fosters a positive, collaborative environment, essential for generating creative solutions and making informed, empathetic decisions.
Leadership skills drive efficient problem-solving by inspiring and guiding teams toward common goals. Effective leaders motivate their teams, foster innovation, and navigate challenges, ensuring collective efforts are focused and productive in addressing problems.
Time management is crucial in problem-solving, enabling individuals to allocate appropriate time to each task. By efficiently managing time, one can ensure that critical problems are addressed promptly without neglecting other responsibilities.
Data analysis skills are essential for problem-solving, as they enable individuals to sift through data, identify trends, and extract actionable insights. This analytical approach supports evidence-based decision-making, leading to more accurate and effective solutions.
Research skills are vital for efficient problem-solving, allowing individuals to gather relevant information, explore various solutions, and understand the problem’s context. This thorough exploration aids in developing well-informed, innovative solutions.
Becoming a great problem solver takes practice, but with these skills, you’re on your way to becoming a problem-solving hero.
Improving your problem-solving skills can make you a master at overcoming challenges. Learn from experts, practice regularly, welcome feedback, try new methods, experiment, and study others’ success to become better.
Improving problem-solving skills by learning from experts involves seeking mentorship, attending workshops, and studying case studies. Experts provide insights and techniques that refine your approach, enhancing your ability to tackle complex problems effectively.
To enhance your problem-solving skills, learning from experts can be incredibly beneficial. Engaging with mentors, participating in specialized workshops, and analyzing case studies from seasoned professionals can offer valuable perspectives and strategies.
Experts share their experiences, mistakes, and successes, providing practical knowledge that can be applied to your own problem-solving process. This exposure not only broadens your understanding but also introduces you to diverse methods and approaches, enabling you to tackle challenges more efficiently and creatively.
Improving problem-solving skills through practice involves tackling a variety of challenges regularly. This hands-on approach helps in refining techniques and strategies, making you more adept at identifying and solving problems efficiently.
One of the most effective ways to enhance your problem-solving skills is through consistent practice. By engaging with different types of problems on a regular basis, you develop a deeper understanding of various strategies and how they can be applied.
This hands-on experience allows you to experiment with different approaches, learn from mistakes, and build confidence in your ability to tackle challenges.
Regular practice not only sharpens your analytical and critical thinking skills but also encourages adaptability and innovation, key components of effective problem-solving.
Being open to feedback is like unlocking a secret level in a game. It helps you boost your problem-solving skills. Improving problem-solving skills through openness to feedback involves actively seeking and constructively responding to critiques.
This receptivity enables you to refine your strategies and approaches based on insights from others, leading to more effective solutions.
Learning new approaches and methodologies is like adding new tools to your toolbox. It makes you a smarter problem-solver. Enhancing problem-solving skills by learning new approaches and methodologies involves staying updated with the latest trends and techniques in your field.
This continuous learning expands your toolkit, enabling innovative solutions and a fresh perspective on challenges.
Experimentation is like being a scientist of your own problems. It’s a powerful way to improve your problem-solving skills. Boosting problem-solving skills through experimentation means trying out different solutions to see what works best. This trial-and-error approach fosters creativity and can lead to unique solutions that wouldn’t have been considered otherwise.
Analyzing competitors’ success is like being a detective. It’s a smart way to boost your problem-solving skills. Improving problem-solving skills by analyzing competitors’ success involves studying their strategies and outcomes. Understanding what worked for them can provide valuable insights and inspire effective solutions for your own challenges.
Facing obstacles when solving problems is common. Recognizing these barriers, like fear of failure or lack of information, helps us find ways around them for better solutions.
Fear of failure is like a big, scary monster that stops us from solving problems. It’s a challenge many face. Because being afraid of making mistakes can make us too scared to try new solutions.
How can we overcome this? First, understand that it’s okay to fail. Failure is not the opposite of success; it’s part of learning. Every time we fail, we discover one more way not to solve a problem, getting us closer to the right solution. Treat each attempt like an experiment. It’s not about failing; it’s about testing and learning.
Lack of information is like trying to solve a puzzle with missing pieces. It’s a big challenge in problem-solving. Because without all the necessary details, finding a solution is much harder.
How can we fix this? Start by gathering as much information as you can. Ask questions, do research, or talk to experts. Think of yourself as a detective looking for clues. The more information you collect, the clearer the picture becomes. Then, use what you’ve learned to think of solutions.
A fixed mindset is like being stuck in quicksand; it makes solving problems harder. It means thinking you can’t improve or learn new ways to solve issues.
How can we change this? First, believe that you can grow and learn from challenges. Think of your brain as a muscle that gets stronger every time you use it. When you face a problem, instead of saying “I can’t do this,” try thinking, “I can’t do this yet.” Look for lessons in every challenge and celebrate small wins.
Everyone starts somewhere, and mistakes are just steps on the path to getting better. By shifting to a growth mindset, you’ll see problems as opportunities to grow. Keep trying, keep learning, and your problem-solving skills will soar!
Jumping to conclusions is like trying to finish a race before it starts. It’s a challenge in problem-solving. That means making a decision too quickly without looking at all the facts.
How can we avoid this? First, take a deep breath and slow down. Think about the problem like a puzzle. You need to see all the pieces before you know where they go. Ask questions, gather information, and consider different possibilities. Don’t choose the first solution that comes to mind. Instead, compare a few options.
Feeling overwhelmed is like being buried under a mountain of puzzles. It’s a big challenge in problem-solving. When we’re overwhelmed, everything seems too hard to handle.
How can we deal with this? Start by taking a step back. Breathe deeply and focus on one thing at a time. Break the big problem into smaller pieces, like sorting puzzle pieces by color. Tackle each small piece one by one. It’s also okay to ask for help. Sometimes, talking to someone else can give you a new perspective.
Confirmation bias is like wearing glasses that only let you see what you want to see. It’s a challenge in problem-solving. Because it makes us focus only on information that agrees with what we already believe, ignoring anything that doesn’t.
How can we overcome this? First, be aware that you might be doing it. It’s like checking if your glasses are on right. Then, purposely look for information that challenges your views. It’s like trying on a different pair of glasses to see a new perspective. Ask questions and listen to answers, even if they don’t fit what you thought before.
Groupthink is like everyone in a group deciding to wear the same outfit without asking why. It’s a challenge in problem-solving. It means making decisions just because everyone else agrees, without really thinking it through.
How can we avoid this? First, encourage everyone in the group to share their ideas, even if they’re different. It’s like inviting everyone to show their unique style of clothes.
Listen to all opinions and discuss them. It’s okay to disagree; it helps us think of better solutions. Also, sometimes, ask someone outside the group for their thoughts. They might see something everyone in the group missed.
Overcoming obstacles in problem-solving requires patience, openness, and a willingness to learn from mistakes. By recognizing these barriers, we can develop strategies to navigate around them, leading to more effective and creative solutions.
The most common techniques include brainstorming, the 5 Whys, mind mapping, SWOT analysis, and using algorithms or heuristics. Each approach has its strengths, suitable for different types of problems.
There’s no one-size-fits-all strategy. The best approach depends on the problem’s complexity, available resources, and time constraints. Combining multiple techniques often yields the best results.
Improve your problem-solving skills by practicing regularly, learning from experts, staying open to feedback, and continuously updating your knowledge on new approaches and methodologies.
Yes, tools like mind mapping software, online courses on critical thinking, and books on problem-solving techniques can be very helpful. Joining forums or groups focused on problem-solving can also provide support and insights.
Common mistakes include jumping to conclusions without fully understanding the problem, ignoring valuable feedback, sticking to familiar solutions without considering alternatives, and not breaking down complex problems into manageable parts.
Mastering problem-solving strategies equips us with the tools to tackle challenges across all areas of life. By understanding and applying these techniques, embracing a growth mindset, and learning from both successes and obstacles, we can transform problems into opportunities for growth. Continuously improving these skills ensures we’re prepared to face and solve future challenges more effectively.
Onethread empowers you to plan, organise, and track projects with ease, ensuring you meet deadlines, allocate resources efficiently, and keep progress transparent.
By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy .
Giving modern marketing teams superpowers with short links that stand out.
© Copyright 2023 Onethread, Inc
Building future workplaces
The ability to solve problems is a crucial skill in the modern workplace. It can make the difference between success and failure, and it can help you navigate the complexities of a fast-paced environment. But what exactly is effective problem solving? And how can you develop the skills needed to solve problems efficiently and effectively?
Effective problem solving involves several key steps that can help you identify the root cause of a problem, develop a plan of action, and implement that plan to achieve a successful outcome . Here are five simple steps you can take to develop your problem-solving skills and tackle any challenge that comes your way in the workplace.
Have you ever found yourself in a situation where you’re faced with a workplace problem, and you’re not sure where to start? Whether it’s a customer complaint, a team conflict, or a project delay, it’s essential to address it promptly to maintain productivity and morale. In this article, we’ll provide practical steps that can help you effectively solve problems at your workplace.
Step 1: Define the Problem
The first step in effective problem solving is to define the problem clearly. Take the time to analyze the issue and gather as much information as possible. It’s crucial to identify the cause of the problem and its impact on your team or organization. For example, if a team member is underperforming, it’s essential to understand the root cause of the issue and how it’s affecting the team’s productivity. Is it a lack of training, motivation, or resources? Are there external factors, such as personal issues or workload, that are affecting their performance?
Once you have a clear understanding of the problem, you can begin to develop a plan of action to address it. It’s important to involve all stakeholders in this process, including those who are directly affected by the problem, to ensure that you have a complete picture of the situation. Involving others in the process can also help you gain different perspectives and insights, which can be valuable in developing an effective solution.
Step 2: Brainstorm Possible Solutions
After identifying the problem, the next step is to brainstorm possible solutions. It’s important to be creative and come up with as many solutions as possible, even if they seem unrealistic or impractical. Brainstorming can be done individually or in a group setting, where team members can bounce ideas off each other. In a group setting, it’s important to create an open and safe environment where everyone feels comfortable sharing their ideas. Remember to focus on generating ideas, without evaluating or criticizing them during the brainstorming session.
Once you have a list of possible solutions, evaluate each one based on their feasibility, potential impact, and costs. It’s important to consider the pros and cons of each solution before selecting the most appropriate one. Keep in mind that the solution may not be perfect, but it should be the best one available given the resources and constraints. By considering different options, you can increase the chances of finding an effective solution that addresses the problem.
Step 3: Evaluate the Solutions
When evaluating the solutions, it’s important to keep an open mind and consider different perspectives. Seek feedback from other team members or colleagues who may have a different point of view. It’s also important to consider the long-term effects of each solution, rather than just the immediate impact. For instance, while changing the project scope may seem like a quick fix to a delayed project, it could cause further delays or even impact the project’s success in the long run.
During the evaluation process, it’s essential to prioritize solutions based on their impact on the problem and their feasibility. Consider the resources, time, and effort required to implement each solution. Some solutions may be quick fixes that can be implemented immediately, while others may require more planning and preparation. It’s important to choose a solution that addresses the problem effectively while also being feasible to implement within the given resources and timeframe.
It’s also important to remember that not all solutions may work as expected. Be prepared to modify or pivot to a different solution if the initial solution does not yield the desired results. Additionally, ensure that the chosen solution aligns with the company’s policies and values and does not violate any ethical standards.
Step 4: Implement the Solution
Implementing the chosen solution requires careful planning and execution. The team needs to work together to ensure that the solution is implemented smoothly and efficiently. The plan should include a timeline, specific tasks, and deadlines. Assigning roles and responsibilities to each team member is crucial to ensure that everyone understands their role in the implementation process.
Effective communication is also essential during the implementation phase. The team should communicate regularly to discuss progress, identify any obstacles, and adjust the plan if necessary. For example, if the team decides to implement a new customer service strategy, they should train the customer service team, provide them with the necessary tools, and communicate the new strategy to customers.
It’s also important to track the progress of the implementation to ensure that everything is on track. Regular check-ins can help identify any problems early on and provide an opportunity to address them before they become bigger issues.
Step 5: Monitor and Adjust
Monitoring and adjusting the solution is crucial in ensuring that the problem is fully resolved. It’s essential to track the progress of the solution and evaluate its effectiveness. If the solution is not working as planned, it’s important to adjust it accordingly. This step requires flexibility and open communication among team members.
For example, if the team decided to adjust the project timeline, they should monitor the progress regularly and make adjustments if necessary. They should also communicate any changes to the stakeholders involved in the project. If the new timeline is not working, the team should be open to making further adjustments, such as revising the project scope or adding more resources.
Feedback plays a vital role in this step. It’s important to gather feedback from team members and stakeholders to ensure that the solution is meeting their needs. Feedback can also help identify any potential issues that may arise and allow the team to address them promptly.
Learning from mistakes is also an important aspect of effective problem solving. Every problem presents an opportunity to learn and grow. By reflecting on the process and the outcome, team members can identify areas for improvement and apply them in future problem-solving situations.
So, there you have it – a five-step process to solve any workplace problem like a pro! Whether it’s a pesky customer complaint, a tricky team conflict, or a stubborn project delay, you can tackle it with ease.
Remember, the first step is to define the problem – analyze it, gather information, and understand the root cause. Next, brainstorm possible solutions, even if they seem unrealistic or impractical. Get creative and come up with as many solutions as possible!
After that, evaluate the solutions by identifying their pros and cons, and choose the one that’s most feasible and practical. Make sure to consider the potential risks and benefits of each solution. Then, it’s time to implement the most practical solution. Develop a plan, communicate it to everyone involved, and assign roles and responsibilities.
Last but not least, monitor the progress and adjust the solution if necessary. Keep track of the progress and be open to feedback. Remember, learning from your mistakes is the key to success!
So, the next time you face a workplace problem, take a deep breath and follow these simple steps. You’ll be able to find a solution that works for everyone and become a valuable asset to your team or organization. With effective problem solving skills, you can maintain productivity, boost morale, and achieve success!
Posted on May 29, 2019
Constant disruption has become a hallmark of the modern workforce and organisations want problem solving skills to combat this. Employers need people who can respond to change – be that evolving technology, new competitors, different models for doing business, or any of the other transformations that have taken place in recent years.
In addition, problem solving techniques encompass many of the other top skills employers seek . For example, LinkedIn’s list of the most in-demand soft skills of 2019 includes creativity, collaboration and adaptability, all of which fall under the problem-solving umbrella.
Despite its importance, many employees misunderstand what the problem solving method really involves.
Effective problem solving doesn’t mean going away and coming up with an answer immediately. In fact, this isn’t good problem solving at all, because you’ll be running with the first solution that comes into your mind, which often isn’t the best.
Instead, you should look at problem solving more as a process with several steps involved that will help you reach the best outcome. Those steps are:
Let’s look at each step in a little more detail.
The first step to solving a problem is defining what the problem actually is – sounds simple, right? Well no. An effective problem solver will take the thoughts of everyone involved into account, but different people might have different ideas on what the root cause of the issue really is. It’s up to you to actively listen to everyone without bringing any of your own preconceived notions to the conversation. Learning to differentiate facts from opinion is an essential part of this process.
An effective problem solver will take the opinions of everyone involved into account
The same can be said of data. Depending on what the problem is, there will be varying amounts of information available that will help you work out what’s gone wrong. There should be at least some data involved in any problem, and it’s up to you to gather as much as possible and analyse it objectively.
Once you’ve identified what the real issue is, it’s time to think of solutions. Brainstorming as many solutions as possible will help you arrive at the best answer because you’ll be considering all potential options and scenarios. You should take everyone’s thoughts into account when you’re brainstorming these ideas, as well as all the insights you’ve gleaned from your data analysis. It also helps to seek input from others at this stage, as they may come up with solutions you haven’t thought of.
Depending on the type of problem, it can be useful to think of both short-term and long-term solutions, as some of your options may take a while to implement.
Each option will have pros and cons, and it’s important you list all of these, as well as how each solution could impact key stakeholders. Once you’ve narrowed down your options to three or four, it’s often a good idea to go to other employees for feedback just in case you’ve missed something. You should also work out how each option ties in with the broader goals of the business.
There may be a way to merge two options together in order to satisfy more people.
Only now should you choose which solution you’re going to go with. What you decide should be whatever solves the problem most effectively while also taking the interests of everyone involved into account. There may be a way to merge two options together in order to satisfy more people.
At this point you might be thinking it’s time to sit back and relax – problem solved, right? There are actually two more steps involved if you want your problem solving method to be truly effective. The first is to create an implementation plan. After all, if you don’t carry out your solution effectively, you’re not really solving the problem at all.
Create an implementation plan on how you will put your solution into practice. One problem solving technique that many use here is to introduce a testing and feedback phase just to make sure the option you’ve selected really is the most viable. You’ll also want to include any changes to your solution that may occur in your implementation plan, as well as how you’ll monitor compliance and success.
There’s one last step to consider as part of the problem solving methodology, and that’s communicating your solution . Without this crucial part of the process, how is anyone going to know what you’ve decided? Make sure you communicate your decision to all the people who might be impacted by it. Not everyone is going to be 100 per cent happy with it, so when you communicate you must give them context. Explain exactly why you’ve made that decision and how the pros mean it’s better than any of the other options you came up with.
Employers are increasingly seeking soft skills, but unfortunately, while you can show that you’ve got a degree in a subject, it’s much harder to prove you’ve got proficiency in things like problem solving skills. But this is changing thanks to Deakin’s micro-credentials. These are university-level micro-credentials that provide an authoritative and third-party assessment of your capabilities in a range of areas, including problem solving. Reach out today for more information .
Picture this, you're handling your daily tasks at work and your boss calls you in and says, "We have a problem."
Unfortunately, we don't live in a world in which problems are instantly resolved with the snap of our fingers. Knowing how to effectively solve problems is an important professional skill to hone. If you have a problem that needs to be solved, what is the right process to use to ensure you get the most effective solution?
In this article we'll break down the problem-solving process and how you can find the most effective solutions for complex problems.
Problem solving is the process of finding a resolution for a specific issue or conflict. There are many possible solutions for solving a problem, which is why it's important to go through a problem-solving process to find the best solution. You could use a flathead screwdriver to unscrew a Phillips head screw, but there is a better tool for the situation. Utilizing common problem-solving techniques helps you find the best solution to fit the needs of the specific situation, much like using the right tools.
In this ebook, learn how to equip employees to make better decisions—so your business can pivot, adapt, and tackle challenges more effectively than your competition.
While it might be tempting to dive into a problem head first, take the time to move step by step. Here’s how you can effectively break down the problem-solving process with your team:
One of the easiest ways to identify a problem is to ask questions. A good place to start is to ask journalistic questions, like:
Who : Who is involved with this problem? Who caused the problem? Who is most affected by this issue?
What: What is happening? What is the extent of the issue? What does this problem prevent from moving forward?
Where: Where did this problem take place? Does this problem affect anything else in the immediate area?
When: When did this problem happen? When does this problem take effect? Is this an urgent issue that needs to be solved within a certain timeframe?
Why: Why is it happening? Why does it impact workflows?
How: How did this problem occur? How is it affecting workflows and team members from being productive?
Asking journalistic questions can help you define a strong problem statement so you can highlight the current situation objectively, and create a plan around that situation.
Here’s an example of how a design team uses journalistic questions to identify their problem:
Overarching problem: Design requests are being missed
Who: Design team, digital marketing team, web development team
What: Design requests are forgotten, lost, or being created ad hoc.
Where: Email requests, design request spreadsheet
When: Missed requests on January 20th, January 31st, February 4th, February 6th
How : Email request was lost in inbox and the intake spreadsheet was not updated correctly. The digital marketing team had to delay launching ads for a few days while design requests were bottlenecked. Designers had to work extra hours to ensure all requests were completed.
In this example, there are many different aspects of this problem that can be solved. Using journalistic questions can help you identify different issues and who you should involve in the process.
If at all possible, bring in a facilitator who doesn't have a major stake in the solution. Bringing an individual who has little-to-no stake in the matter can help keep your team on track and encourage good problem-solving skills.
Here are a few brainstorming techniques to encourage creative thinking:
Brainstorm alone before hand: Before you come together as a group, provide some context to your team on what exactly the issue is that you're brainstorming. This will give time for you and your teammates to have some ideas ready by the time you meet.
Say yes to everything (at first): When you first start brainstorming, don't say no to any ideas just yet—try to get as many ideas down as possible. Having as many ideas as possible ensures that you’ll get a variety of solutions. Save the trimming for the next step of the strategy.
Talk to team members one-on-one: Some people may be less comfortable sharing their ideas in a group setting. Discuss the issue with team members individually and encourage them to share their opinions without restrictions—you might find some more detailed insights than originally anticipated.
Break out of your routine: If you're used to brainstorming in a conference room or over Zoom calls, do something a little different! Take your brainstorming meeting to a coffee shop or have your Zoom call while you're taking a walk. Getting out of your routine can force your brain out of its usual rut and increase critical thinking.
After you brainstorm with team members to get their unique perspectives on a scenario, it's time to look at the different strategies and decide which option is the best solution for the problem at hand. When defining the solution, consider these main two questions: What is the desired outcome of this solution and who stands to benefit from this solution?
Set a deadline for when this decision needs to be made and update stakeholders accordingly. Sometimes there's too many people who need to make a decision. Use your best judgement based on the limitations provided to do great things fast.
To implement your solution, start by working with the individuals who are as closest to the problem. This can help those most affected by the problem get unblocked. Then move farther out to those who are less affected, and so on and so forth. Some solutions are simple enough that you don’t need to work through multiple teams.
After you prioritize implementation with the right teams, assign out the ongoing work that needs to be completed by the rest of the team. This can prevent people from becoming overburdened during the implementation plan . Once your solution is in place, schedule check-ins to see how the solution is working and course-correct if necessary.
There are a few ways to go about identifying problems (and solutions). Here are some strategies you can try, as well as common ways to apply them:
Trial and error problem solving doesn't usually require a whole team of people to solve. To use trial and error problem solving, identify the cause of the problem, and then rapidly test possible solutions to see if anything changes.
This problem-solving method is often used in tech support teams through troubleshooting.
The 5 whys problem-solving method helps get to the root cause of an issue. You start by asking once, “Why did this issue happen?” After answering the first why, ask again, “Why did that happen?” You'll do this five times until you can attribute the problem to a root cause.
This technique can help you dig in and find the human error that caused something to go wrong. More importantly, it also helps you and your team develop an actionable plan so that you can prevent the issue from happening again.
Here’s an example:
Problem: The email marketing campaign was accidentally sent to the wrong audience.
“Why did this happen?” Because the audience name was not updated in our email platform.
“Why were the audience names not changed?” Because the audience segment was not renamed after editing.
“Why was the audience segment not renamed?” Because everybody has an individual way of creating an audience segment.
“Why does everybody have an individual way of creating an audience segment?” Because there is no standardized process for creating audience segments.
“Why is there no standardized process for creating audience segments?” Because the team hasn't decided on a way to standardize the process as the team introduced new members.
In this example, we can see a few areas that could be optimized to prevent this mistake from happening again. When working through these questions, make sure that everyone who was involved in the situation is present so that you can co-create next steps to avoid the same problem.
A SWOT analysis can help you highlight the strengths and weaknesses of a specific solution. SWOT stands for:
Strength: Why is this specific solution a good fit for this problem?
Weaknesses: What are the weak points of this solution? Is there anything that you can do to strengthen those weaknesses?
Opportunities: What other benefits could arise from implementing this solution?
Threats: Is there anything about this decision that can detrimentally impact your team?
As you identify specific solutions, you can highlight the different strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of each solution.
This particular problem-solving strategy is good to use when you're narrowing down the answers and need to compare and contrast the differences between different solutions.
After you’ve worked through a tough problem, don't forget to celebrate how far you've come. Not only is this important for your team of problem solvers to see their work in action, but this can also help you become a more efficient, effective , and flexible team. The more problems you tackle together, the more you’ll achieve.
Looking for a tool to help solve problems on your team? Track project implementation with a work management tool like Asana .
June 14, 2022 - 10 min read
Solving complex problems may be difficult but it doesn't have to be excruciating. You just need the right frame of mind and a process for untangling the problem at hand.
Luckily for you, there are plenty of techniques available to solve whatever problems come at you in the workplace.
When faced with a doozy of a problem, where do you start? And what problem-solving techniques can you use right now that can help you make good decisions?
Today's post will give you tips and techniques for solving complex problems so you can untangle any complication like an expert.
At its core, problem-solving is a methodical four-step process. You may even recall these steps from when you were first introduced to the Scientific Method.
When applying problem-solving techniques, you will be using a variation of these steps as your foundation.
Takeaway: Before you can solve a problem, seek to understand it fully.
Time to get creative! You might think this will just be a list of out-of-the-box ways to brainstorm ideas. Not exactly.
Creative problem solving (CPS) is actually a formal process formulated by Sidney Parnes and Alex Faickney Osborn , who is thought of as the father of traditional brainstorming (and the "O" in famous advertising agency BBDO).
Their creative problem solving process emphasizes several things, namely:
Takeaway: When brainstorming solutions, generate ideas first by using questions and building off of existing ideas. Do all evaluating and judging later.
If you take a look at the history of problem-solving techniques in psychology, you'll come across a wide spectrum of interesting ideas that could be helpful.
In 1911, the American psychologist Edward Thorndike observed cats figuring out how to escape from the cage he placed them in. From this, Thorndike developed his law of effect , which states: If you succeed via trial-and-error, you're more likely to use those same actions and ideas that led to your previous success when you face the problem again.
Takeaway: Your past experience can inform and shed light on the problem you face now. Recall. Explore.
The Gestalt psychologists built on Thorndike's ideas when they proposed that problem-solving can happen via reproductive thinking — which is not about sex, but rather solving a problem by using past experience and reproducing that experience to solve the current problem.
What's interesting about Gestalt psychology is how they view barriers to problem-solving. Here are two such barriers:
Takeaway: Think outside of the box! And by box, we mean outside of the past experience you're holding on to, or outside any preconceived ideas on how a tool is conventionally used.
Hurson's productive thinking model.
In his book "Think Better," author and creativity guru Tim Hurson proposed a six-step model for solving problems creatively. The steps in his Productive Thinking Model are:
The most important part of defining the problem is looking at the possible root cause. You'll need to ask yourself questions like: Where and when is it happening? How is it occurring? With whom is it happening? Why is it happening?
You can get to the root cause with a fishbone diagram (also known as an Ishikawa diagram or a cause and effect diagram).
Basically, you put the effect on the right side as the problem statement. Then you list all possible causes on the left, grouped into larger cause categories. The resulting shape resembles a fish skeleton. Which is a perfect way to say, "This problem smells fishy."
Analogical thinking uses information from one area to help with a problem in a different area. In short, solving a different problem can lead you to find a solution to the actual problem. Watch out though! Analogies are difficult for beginners and take some getting used to.
An example: In the "radiation problem," a doctor has a patient with a tumor that cannot be operated on. The doctor can use rays to destroy the tumor but it also destroys healthy tissue.
Two researchers, Gick and Holyoak , noted that people solved the radiation problem much more easily after being asked to read a story about an invading general who must capture the fortress of a king but be careful to avoid landmines that will detonate if large forces traverse the streets. The general then sends small forces of men down different streets so the army can converge at the fortress at the same time and can capture it at full force.
In her book " The Architecture of All Abundance ," author Lenedra J. Carroll (aka the mother of pop star Jewel) talks about a question-and-answer technique for getting out of a problem.
When faced with a problem, ask yourself a question about it and brainstorm 12 answers ("12 what elses") to that problem. Then you can go further by taking one answer, turning it into a question and generating 12 more "what elses." Repeat until the solution is golden brown, fully baked, and ready to take out of the oven.
Hopefully you find these different techniques useful and they get your imagination rolling with ideas on how to solve different problems.
And if that's the case, then you have four different takeaways to use the next time a problem gets you tangled up:
Empower your team to be even more productive with Wrike's project management and collaboration tools. With documents, revisions, and project -related communication all in one place, employees can use Wrike as a single source of truth for all project information.
Get 360-degree visibility of all your work and identify problems before they occur — see schedule or resource conflicts on Gantt charts, easily view progress with custom statuses, and move work along with automated approvals.
Want to streamline your processes and ease future problem-solving? Get started with a free two-week trial of Wrike today.
Do you have a problem-solving technique that has worked wonders for your organization? Hit the comments below and share your wisdom!
Lionel is a former Content Marketing Manager of Wrike. He is also a blogger since 1997, a productivity enthusiast, a project management newbie, a musician and producer of electronic downtempo music, a father of three, and a husband of one.
Sorry, this content is unavailable due to your privacy settings. To view this content, click the “Cookie Preferences” button and accept Advertising Cookies there.
When businesses encounter complex challenges, such as low staff retention with unclear causes, the initial reaction might be to brainstorm solutions and apply various problem-solving techniques. However, this approach often risks addressing only surface symptoms rather than the underlying issues. Focusing too narrowly on one aspect can lead to overlooking broader, more critical problems. This is where CATWOE Analysis becomes invaluable. By examining the problem from multiple perspectives ensures no critical factor is missed, enabling businesses to tackle intricate problems with confidence and clarity.
CATWOE Analysis is a structured problem-solving tool that offers businesses a comprehensive framework to address complex issues comprehensively. The acronym CATWOE stands for Customers, Actors, Transformation process, Worldview, Owners, and Environmental constraints. By exploring these six facets, organizations can gain a holistic understanding of the factors influencing their processes and the input of various stakeholders. This detailed scrutiny aids in identifying problems, conceptualizing actionable solutions, and mitigating potential conflicts, thereby streamlining business transformation and decision-making processes.
The method was developed as part of the Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) by David Smyth, with significant contributions from Peter Checkland. The technique emerged in the 1970s, aiming to provide a structured approach to understanding and addressing business challenges from multiple perspectives. Its roots in systems thinking enable it to unfold the intricate layers of business processes, ensuring that every stakeholder’s viewpoint is considered and aligned towards a common goal. This historical development underscores its robustness and relevance across different eras and business environments.
Customers | Stakeholders and users who benefit from changes in the system or process. |
Actors | Employees within an organization responsible for carrying out the transformation processes. |
Transformation process | The evolution of input into output through the organization’s activities. |
Worldview | A comprehensive perspective that considers various stakeholders and their perspectives to appreciate the bigger picture. |
Owners | Decision-makers like entrepreneurs or investors who have the authority to make critical changes. |
Environmental constraints | External factors such as regulations, ethical boundaries, and financial constraints that can limit or restrict the system’s changes. |
Customers: who they are and their interests.
The first element in CATWOE Analysis is customers. Customers are the stakeholders and end-users who directly benefit from changes in a business system or process. Identifying who your customers are and understanding their needs is crucial. For example, in the catwoe analysis example of Coca-Cola, the customers range from children to adults worldwide. By understanding the different demographics and their unique needs, businesses can tailor their solutions effectively.
Actors are the individuals or groups responsible for carrying out the transformation process within an organization. These are often employees or team members involved in various business activities. Understanding the roles and responsibilities of actors helps in identifying who will implement necessary changes and how they will do it. For instance, in a catwoe analysis example of Amazon, the actors might include supply chain managers, IT support staff, and customer service representatives, all playing pivotal roles in ensuring smooth operations and customer satisfaction.
The transformation process is central to CATWOE Analysis. This component examines how inputs are converted into desired outputs within a business system. The transformation process involves recognizing what changes need to be made and how these changes will be executed. For example, Amazon’s transformation process involves converting user demands into delivered products efficiently and promptly. By focusing on optimizing this process, businesses can improve their overall performance and customer experience.
Worldview, or Weltanschauung, considers the broader perspective, including varying stakeholder viewpoints and the larger impact on the organization. It helps in understanding how different stakeholders perceive the situation and the implications of potential changes. In the case of the Hyperloop project, the worldview envisions rapid, accessible travel for individuals across different regions. This component ensures that the proposed solution aligns with the overarching goals and values of the business.
Owners in CATWOE Analysis refer to individuals or groups with the power to approve or halt changes. They are typically entrepreneurs, investors, or senior management with decision-making authority. Understanding the owners' motivations and concerns is essential for gaining support for any changes. In the context of Coca-Cola, major stakeholders like Berkshire Hathaway would be considered owners, with significant influence over business decisions.
Environmental constraints involve external factors that can limit or restrict business operations. These may include legal regulations, ethical considerations, financial limitations, and physical constraints. Recognizing these constraints is vital for realistic and feasible planning. For example, environmental sustainability is a significant constraint for Coca-Cola, influencing its production methods and corporate policies. Addressing these constraints ensures that proposed changes are not only effective but also compliant and sustainable.
Utilizing a visual collaboration platform like Creately can significantly enhance the understanding and implementation of each CATWOE component. With Creately’s infinite canvas for diagramming and seamless collaboration tools, teams can brainstorm, plan, and document each element of CATWOE Analysis effectively, ensuring comprehensive and coordinated problem-solving efforts.
Solving complex problems.
CATWOE Analysis excels in addressing complex business challenges by offering a structured framework for problem-solving. By analyzing problems through multiple lenses—Customers, Actors, Transformation Process, Worldview, Owners, and Environmental Constraints—businesses can pinpoint issues more accurately and develop effective solutions. The method’s holistic approach ensures that no aspect is overlooked, making it ideal for tackling intricate problems with varied stakeholder interests.
Managing stakeholders effectively is crucial for the success of any business transformation. CATWOE Analysis aids in identifying and prioritizing stakeholder perspectives, helping to mitigate conflicts and align goals. For instance, the ‘Worldview’ component allows businesses to understand and harmonize different viewpoints, resulting in smoother project execution. Implementing this with visual collaboration tools, like those provided by Creately, enhances stakeholder engagement by making complex relationships and impacts more transparent.
CATWOE Analysis facilitates better decision-making by ensuring all critical factors are considered. By systematically evaluating each element, businesses can make more informed choices that align with their strategic objectives. This comprehensive assessment helps in identifying potential risks and opportunities, leading to more robust and resilient business strategies.
Using CATWOE Analysis promotes clearer communication among team members and stakeholders. The structured approach ensures that everyone involved has a shared understanding of the problem and the proposed solutions. This common framework reduces misunderstandings and fosters more effective collaboration, essential for successful project outcomes.
In today’s fast-paced business environment, adaptability is key. CATWOE Analysis helps businesses remain agile by providing a clear understanding of the various elements impacting a problem. This insight allows for quicker adjustments and realignment of strategies in response to changing conditions, ensuring sustained competitive advantage.
CATWOE Analysis encourages a deep dive into each problem component, fostering a thorough understanding of the issue at hand. This in-depth analysis ensures that solutions are not just superficial but address the root causes of problems, leading to more sustainable and impactful outcomes.
Implementing CATWOE Analysis involves a structured approach to ensure all perspectives and components are adequately addressed. Here’s a step-by-step guide:
Begin by detailing the problem or situation at hand. This involves gathering all relevant data and understanding the context in which the issue exists. Use Creately’s infinite canvas to map out the key points, enabling your team to visualize the problem comprehensively.
Engage in a collaborative brainstorming session to explore different angles and possible solutions. Creately’s visual collaboration tools facilitate seamless idea exchange, allowing team members to contribute and develop concepts in real-time. Utilize Creately’s mind mapping software to create diagrams and flowcharts that represent various ideas surrounding the problem.
Narrow down to the core issue by analyzing the components of CATWOE Analysis – Customers, Actors, Transformation process, Worldview, Owners, and Environmental constraints. Creately’s capabilities allow you to create detailed maps and charts that encapsulate the insights gathered during this phase. Here’s a brief overview:
Customers: Identify who benefits from the change and their interests.
Actors: Recognize the roles responsible for implementing the changes within the organization.
Transformation Process: Understand the process through which inputs are converted to outputs.
Worldview: Consider the bigger picture, including different stakeholders’ perspectives.
Owners: Identify the key decision-makers who have the authority to approve changes.
Environmental Constraints: Account for external factors such as regulations and financial restrictions that might impact the change.
With a deep understanding of the problem and its components, proceed to develop a solution strategy. Utilize Creately to create a collaborative action plan, ensuring all team members are on the same page. The platform’s diagramming and visualization tools help in outlining a clear, actionable path forward.
By following these steps within the Creately platform, you streamline the CATWOE Analysis process, making it more efficient and effective for your business.
Note: Placeholder for any relevant images or diagrams created using Creately’s tools to further illustrate the implementation steps.
Understanding the intricate details of CATWOE Analysis can be greatly streamlined with a structured template. By utilizing a CATWOE Analysis template, teams can systematically evaluate each component, ensuring no critical elements are overlooked. Download our comprehensive CATWOE Analysis template to kickstart your problem-solving framework effectively. This template includes sections for all six elements—Customers, Actors, Transformation Process, Worldview, Owners, and Environmental Constraints—offering a structured approach to dissect and address business challenges.
Let’s illustrate the power of CATWOE Analysis with a real-world example. Consider Amazon, a global e-commerce giant that constantly navigates complex business environments:
Customers: A diverse range of consumers worldwide, including individual buyers, businesses, and sellers on the platform.
Actors: Employees ranging from logistics staff to IT professionals and customer service representatives.
Transformation Process: The seamless conversion of website visits into sales transactions, supported by a robust logistics network that ensures timely delivery.
Worldview: To be the most customer-focused company on Earth, enriching the shopping experience and offering unparalleled convenience.
Owners: Key decision-makers include Jeff Bezos, the board of directors, and major shareholders who steer strategic directions.
Environmental Constraints: Regulations from different countries, sustainability commitments, and societal shifts towards ethical shopping practices.
Using these steps, you can create a powerful and bespoke CATWOE Analysis that addresses your unique business challenges. With tools like Creately’s visual collaboration platform, you can enhance this process, enabling seamless brainstorming, planning, and diagramming on an infinite canvas.
Join over thousands of organizations that use Creately to brainstorm, plan, analyze, and execute their projects successfully.
Chiraag George is a communication specialist here at Creately. He is a marketing junkie that is fascinated by how brands occupy consumer mind space. A lover of all things tech, he writes a lot about the intersection of technology, branding and culture at large.
"marriages of a.i. with zombie nuclear plants" are expected to become more likely..
As A.I. continues to gain steam, so does the amount of electricity it consumes . A ChatGPT query needs nearly 10 times as much electricity as a Google (GOOGL) search query, according to a recent report by Goldman Sachs. To meet a soaring demand for A.I. power, some companies are looking at an unprecedented solution—the revival of dormant nuclear power plants.
Thank you for signing up!
By clicking submit, you agree to our <a href="http://observermedia.com/terms">terms of service</a> and acknowledge we may use your information to send you emails, product samples, and promotions on this website and other properties. You can opt out anytime.
Plans to reopen shuttered sites across states like Pennsylvania, Idaho and Michigan for the first time in American history are gaining traction amongst developers. While they face regulatory and financial hurdles, such reopenings could be a favorable option for companies looking to gain momentum in the A.I. race without increasing their carbon footprint.
One of the plants under consideration is Three Mile Island in Middletown, Penn., the site of the most serious nuclear power plant incident in the U.S. history. In 1979, one of the Three Mile Island’s two units experienced a partial reactor meltdown that spurred sweeping safety regulatory changes across the country. Its owner, Constellation Energy, is looking into a restart and reportedly discussing funding options with state officials and lawmakers.
The unit in question is the one not involved in the 1979 incident. “ We’ve found the plant is in pretty good shape,” Joseph Dominguez , CEO of Constellation, told the Washington Post, adding that its reactors and components are in excellent condition.
A revival could help meet an unprecedented demand for data centers, which are expected to double their electricity consumption by 2030 to take up to 9 percent of the country’s power supply, according to the Electric Power Institute . Tech companies like Microsoft (MSFT) , Meta (META) , Google and Amazon (AMZN) are spending billions on building data centers across the U.S.—in June, Oracle revealed its intention to build some of the world’s largest data centers , while Elon Musk’s xAI unveiled plans to transform a former Tennessee manufacturing facility into a data center that can train its A.I. models.
These ambitions have coincided with a bump in carbon emissions . Google’s greenhouse gas emissions rose 48 percent between 2019 and 2023. Microsoft in May reported a 29 percent increase in emissions since 2020. Big Tech companies claim they will offset this energy consumption by pursuing carbon neutrality through wind, solar and nuclear sources. In March, for example, Amazon’s cloud unit Amazon Web Services struck a deal with Talen Energy to acquire a Pennsylvania data center powered by a nuclear power station for $650 million.
Not everyone is as enthusiastic about the prospect of nuclear plants. In the case of Three Mile Island, factors like underfunding and a lack of employees, water , fuel and equipment means that reviving its unit “is a heavy lift,” and one “driven by A.I.,” said Eric Epstein , founder of the nuclear activist group Three Mile Island Alert, in a statement to Observer. But these “marriages of A.I. with zombie plants” are only expected to become more likely, according to Epstein, in light of recent developments like Amazon’s Talen deal and the relaunch of Pennsylvania’s Nuclear Energy Caucus earlier this month.
Three Mile Island isn’t the only dormant plant that might get a facelift. NextEra Energy is considering rebooting its Duane Arnold Energy Center plant in Palo, Iowa, which it began decommissioning in 2020. “ I would consider it , if it could be done safely and on budget,” John Ketchum , CEO of NextEra, told Bloomberg, adding that he expects power demand in the U.S. to rise by 40 percent by 2026. The company is “always looking at the needs of its customers and the best use of our assets, including the Duane Arnold Energy Center,” said Bill Orlove , a NextEra spokesperson, in a statement to Observer.
And over in Covert, Michican, the region’s mothballed Palisades plant could potentially reopen in the next year with state support and a $1.5 billion federal loan . Holtec International, which acquired the plant in 2022, is looking to recommission it by the end of 2025—a plan that may be incentivizing other developers to follow suit.
“We’ve obviously seen what happened with Palisades. I think that was brilliant, brilliant for the nation,” said Dominguez while speaking on Constellation Energy’s most recent earnings call when asked about a potential revival of Three Mile Island. “We’re not unaware that that opportunity exists for us.”
We get it: you like to have control of your own internet experience. But advertising revenue helps support our journalism. To read our full stories, please turn off your ad blocker. We'd really appreciate it.
Below are steps you can take in order to whitelist Observer.com on your browser:
Click the AdBlock button on your browser and select Don't run on pages on this domain .
Click the AdBlock Plus button on your browser and select Enabled on this site.
Click the AdBlock Plus button on your browser and select Disable on Observer.com.
Four key rulings limiting federal power will curtail the ability of the epa and other agencies to write and enforce climate policies..
The Supreme Court on Monday weakened a law protecting federal regulations from lawsuits, granting the companies governed by those rules more time to challenge them. The move effectively eliminates any statute of limitations on rules issued by a wide range of federal agencies, potentially placing even long-standing regulations in legal peril.
That ruling came just days after the court, in a seismic decision, overturned the Chevron doctrine . The decades-old legal precedent provided the basis for regulations governing countless aspects of daily life, from the environment to labor protections. These decisions, coupled with two others issued last week, could sharply curtail the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency and other federal agencies to limit air pollution, govern toxic substances, and set climate policy.
“This term, a series of decisions unlike any before in American history,” has resulted in “an unraveling of the responsibility that expert agencies have to protect millions of Americans from harm,” said Vickie Patton, general counsel at the advocacy group Environmental Defense Fund.
Although these lawsuits challenged the power of a range of agencies, from the Securities and Exchange Commission to the Department of Commerce, the decisions will have widespread impacts on those issuing climate policies. The EPA in particular has drawn scorn from conservatives who have long argued that its regulations pose an undue burden on everything from power generation to construction.
Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one .
To support our nonprofit environmental journalism, please consider disabling your ad-blocker to allow ads on Grist. Here's How
In one decision after another, the court’s conservative justices largely agreed. In its most far-reaching ruling, handed down Friday, they threw into question the future of environmental and climate regulations by overturning the precedent that gave federal agencies authority to interpret laws based on their expertise and scientific evidence. It will be years before the full impact of its decision to scuttle Chevron becomes clear, but it could prompt lawsuits aimed at regulations designed to mitigate climate change.
“There’s no question that there will be a flood of new challenges to settled policies by virtue of this decision,” Sean Donahue, an attorney who represented the Environmental Defense Fund in the case, told reporters on Friday.
The two lawsuits that led to the decision stemmed from a Commerce Department regulation requiring fishing companies to pay the cost of having third-party observers aboard each vessel to prevent overfishing. What started as a squabble over a narrowly focused rule expanded into a larger question of whether Chevron should remain in place. The doctrine originated with the 1984 Supreme Court case Chevron v. NRDC (which gave the petroleum company greater leeway when applying for air pollution permits), and hinges on the idea that regulators have expertise and experience that judges typically don’t. It has been used to successfully defend federal actions under Republican and Democratic administrations.
“This is not a radical idea,” Harvard law professor Jody Freeman wrote recently . “Implementing health, safety, environmental, financial, and consumer protection laws requires a great deal of day-to-day legal interpretation which depends significantly on subject matter expertise.”
The lower courts rejected the fishing companies’ arguments and upheld the regulations in question, citing Chevron. But the Supreme Court’s conservative justices, in a 6-3 decision , struck down the idea that courts should defer to regulators. “Agencies have no special competence in resolving statutory ambiguities,” Chief Justice Roberts wrote in the majority opinion. “Courts do.”
The effect of this ruling will take years to discern, but legal scholars and climate and environmental activists said it could jeopardize current and future climate policies because it expands the power of courts to review and strike down regulatory guidelines or efforts.
“This decision shifts power dramatically away from agencies towards the courts,” said Michael Burger, executive director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University. “And in doing so, tilts the scales against regulation.”
The decision is a victory for business interests and anti-regulatory activists who framed Chevron as an example of governmental overreach by an expanding “administrative state.” Conservative organizations like the Koch network have long supported efforts to dismantle Chevron , and attorneys linked to that organization represented plaintiffs in one of the two cases that ended it.
Although the Supreme Court hasn’t applied Chevron to a case in more than a decade, the doctrine is essential to how lower court judges — who decide the majority of cases involving federal regulations — rule on any challenges to an agency’s actions. (Justice Elena Kagan, during oral arguments , noted that jurists cited Chevron in more than 17,000 cases over four decades. An analysis of lower court opinions from 2003 to 2013 found that agencies citing Chevron prevailed in more than 70 percent of cases, upholding a wide range of regulations issued by a host of agencies.)
Lawmakers and regulators, meanwhile, relied on the “reliable, predictable framework for judicial review” that Chevron provided, Burger said. Congress knew what to expect from courts when writing broad laws and allowing regulators to interpret and implement them. Agencies like the EPA and Interior Department could, in turn, issue rules knowing that the doctrine would support their authority to do so.
“Now, it’s very unclear what’s going to happen in any individual case,” he said. Without Chevron, it is “more likely that judges will say that a regulation is either outside an agency’s authority or not authorized by a statute.” That poses a particular threat to current or future rules related to the environment and climate change, two policy realms that involve ambiguities and scientific, economic, and technical considerations, he said.
That threat is compounded by the decision the court issued Monday in Corner Post v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. That ruling creates a risk that courts could soon face a deluge of lawsuits challenging even decades-old regulations.
As with Chevron, the issue at the heart of Corner Post had nothing to do with climate or environment. The suit, filed in 2021, argued that a 2011 regulation establishing debit card swipe fees was unreasonable. Because federal law states that challenges to regulatory laws must be filed within six years of the law’s adoption, the plaintiffs added a third party, Corner Post, a truck stop that opened in 2018. The plaintiffs argued that the statute of limitations should not apply because Corner Post did not exist when the regulation was adopted.
In a 6-3 decision the court agreed and said the six-year timeline should instead begin at the moment someone is harmed by the rule — effectively eliminating a statute of limitations for any federal regulation. That means any regulation, covering any topic, could be challenged in court regardless of how old it is.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson warned in her dissent that the Corner Post ruling, coupled with the court’s decision to discard Chevron, will unleash a “tsunami of lawsuits against agencies” that could “devastate the functioning of the federal government.” According to the advocacy group Public Citizen, the time frame eliminated by the Corner Post decision has in the past prevented challenges to regulations limiting oil and gas extraction on public land and establishing minimum wages for farm workers, among other things.
No less troubling, the Supreme Court made clear on Thursday, in a suit specifically involving the EPA, that it will stop regulations even as they are being litigated in lower courts. That’s precisely what it did in Ohio v. EPA when it paused the agency’s “Good Neighbor” rule and its stringent smokestack emissions requirements. The court majority ruled, in a lawsuit brought by Ohio, Indiana, Virginia, and others, that the EPA failed to “reasonably explain” its policy and placed it on hold pending the outcome of more than a dozen lawsuits. Environmental and climate activists worry that future challenges to federal policies could similarly “ short-circuit the normal process of judicial review ” by appealing directly to the Supreme Court.
Sam Sankar, senior vice president for programs at Earthjustice, called the decision a “frontal assault on the EPA.” He pointed out that unlike cases involving Chevron deference, the agency’s authority to implement the Good Neighbor rule was clear under the federal Clean Air Act and that “the EPA is required to issue rules like this.” The ruling suggests that in the future, any federal regulations, even those issued under clear legal authority, could face similar attacks.
“It casts a pall on just about any new regulation,” Sankar said.
Climate and environmental activists also took exception to how the court decided the case. By placing the matter on its emergency docket — which typically is reserved for minor procedural issues — and acting before lower courts have issued decisions, the Supreme Court brought what one expert called “procedural strangeness” to its decision-making. The ruling suggests future environmental policies could face similar challenges on the emergency docket.
“It’s really hard to say that there are any rules that aren’t subject to this kind of attack,” Sankar said.
The court also took a step, in a case involving the Securities and Exchange Commission, to sharply curtail the ability of federal agencies to enforce regulations and levy fines. SEC v. Jarkesy revolved around George Jarkesy, a conservative radio show host and hedge fund manager accused of misleading investors. The SEC brought the case before an administrative law judge — a type of jurist who specializes in highly technical areas of law and decides cases without a jury. Jarkersy was found to have violated SEC rules, fined $300,000, and ordered to “disgorge nearly $685,000 in illicit gains.” He then sued the agency, arguing that the government violated his Seventh Amendment right to a trial by jury.
The court agreed, ruling on Thursday that a defendant facing civil penalties by the SEC “has the right to be tried by a jury of his peers.” In a dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said that position threatens the ability of more than two dozen agencies, including the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the EPA, to enforce regulations and impose fines.
“Make no mistake,” she wrote. “Today’s decision is a power grab.”
The high court has on several occasions in recent years shown a willingness to curtail the government’s ability to take bold steps to address environmental and climate challenges. Last year it limited some clean water protections , and in 2022 it restricted the EPA’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions in West Virginia v. EPA . The trend could continue next year when justices hear a case challenging the National Environmental Policy Act , a bedrock law that requires environmental assessments for major infrastructure projects.
Patton from the Environmental Defense Fund says that it’s no coincidence the court has decided to take up so many environmental cases and take such aggressive steps to roll back the government’s efforts to reduce pollution and mitigate climate change.
“There are lots of powerful polluters who have long tried to unravel and weaken the laws that were enacted by Congress,” she said. “What’s new and different is that we have a 6-3 super majority on the Supreme Court that is solicitous and open to the most extreme arguments.”
That, climate activists warn, means it will only grow harder for government agencies to take the steps needed to address the climate crisis.
A message from
Grist is the only award-winning newsroom focused on exploring equitable solutions to climate change. It’s vital reporting made entirely possible by loyal readers like you. At Grist, we don’t believe in paywalls. Instead, we rely on our readers to pitch in what they can so that we can continue bringing you our solution-based climate news.
Grist is the only award-winning newsroom focused on exploring equitable solutions to climate change. It’s vital reporting made entirely possible by loyal readers like you. At Grist, we don’t believe in paywalls. Instead, we rely on our readers to pitch in what they can so that we can continue bringing you our solution-based climate news.
The quick, quiet death of biden’s natural gas export pause, biden admin unveils first-ever heat protections for workers. here’s what to know., climate change got a question in the presidential debate. it didn’t get much of an answer., can claudia sheinbaum solve mexico’s water crisis, in a rare court action, an oregon county seeks to hold fossil fuel companies accountable for extreme temperatures, when is it safe to burn fields in thailand, farmers can turn to a new app to check., the $1.7 billion bet on american-made evs, explained by the secretary of energy, timeline: the georgia public service commission’s key decisions , modal gallery.
BMC Medical Education volume 24 , Article number: 738 ( 2024 ) Cite this article
73 Accesses
Metrics details
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of implementing a data-driven blended online-offline (DDBOO) teaching approach in the medicinal chemistry course.
A total of 118 third-year students majoring in pharmacy were enrolled from September 2021 to January 2022. The participants were randomly assigned to either the DDBOO teaching group or the traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) group for medicinal chemistry. Pre- and post-class quizzes were administered, along with an anonymous questionnaire distributed to both groups to assess students’ perceptions and experiences.
There was no significant difference in the pre-class quiz scores between the DDBOO and LBL groups ( T =-0.637, P = 0.822). However, after class, the mean quiz score of the DDBOO group was significantly higher than that of the LBL group ( T = 3.742, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the scores for learning interest, learning motivation, self-learning skill, mastery of basic knowledge, teamwork skills, problem-solving ability, innovation ability, and satisfaction, as measured by the questionnaire, were significantly higher in the DDBOO group than in the traditional group (all P < 0.05).
The DDBOO teaching method effectively enhances students’ academic performance and satisfaction. Further research and promotion of this approach are warranted.
Peer Review reports
With the comprehensive integration of information technology in the field of education, traditional classrooms have evolved with various new models of online teaching, making the instructional process more dynamic and effective [ 1 ]. Learners are encouraged to engage in online learning tasks and digital game-based activities, experiencing the joy of dealing with digital challenges, acquiring knowledge, and enhancing learning outcomes [ 2 , 3 ]. These emerging technologies serve as crucial tools for information dissemination in online education, profoundly impacting the reform of medical school education [ 4 ].
Blended learning, an instructional model combining digital online learning with face-to-face classroom teaching, has gradually drawn more attention with advancements in internet technology and education [ 5 , 6 ]. The concept of blended learning was first introduced in the U.S. National Education Technology Plan. Since 2004, the United States has been actively adopted and innovated the blended learning approach, continually exploring advancements in technology and other aspects.
Higher education has undergone a significant evolution in teaching paradigms. Following eras of experiential imitation teaching and computer-assisted instruction [ 7 ], the current landscape is increasingly characterized by the data-driven instruction [ 8 ]. This approach incorporates next-generation information technologies such as the Internet of Things, big data, cloud computing, and mobile internet, involving systematic collection and analysis of both online and offline learning data to inform instructional improvements and elevate learning outcomes [ 9 ].
Data-driven instruction is an innovative approach that harnesses diverse forms of data to shape and enhance teaching practices [ 10 ]. This encompasses a spectrum from summative data, such as test scores, to formative data gauging student understanding through activities like discussions. Diverging from summative assessments primarily designed for assigning grades, formative assessments aim to refine teaching methods. The collection and analysis of both types of data empower educators to discern patterns and address shortcomings within their classrooms. Through the strategic utilization of these insights, educators can tailor instruction to individual student needs, pinpoint specific areas for improvement, and implement timely interventions to bolster overall student success. This proactive and personalized approach to teaching ensures that educators are equipped with the necessary information to optimize learning experiences and foster positive educational outcomes for every student.
Medicinal chemistry is a comprehensive discipline focused on the discovery and invention of new drugs, the synthesis of chemical pharmaceuticals, elucidating the chemical properties of drugs, and researching the interaction patterns between drug molecules and cellular entities. Its scope encompasses the chemical structure, physicochemical properties, preparation methods, transport metabolism, structure-activity relationships, chemical mechanisms of drug action, as well as approaches and methods for the discovery of new drugs [ 11 ]. With the continuous deepening of educational reforms, the teaching approach in medicinal chemistry has shifted from traditional methods towards a blended learning model [ 12 , 13 ]. This approach seamlessly integrates online and offline teaching, leveraging the advantages of interactive communication in face-to-face classrooms while overcoming the limitations of traditional offline teaching, such as a singular format and limited content. Moreover, the use of online resources in the blended learning model has expanded the platform for medicinal chemistry education, greatly enriching the teaching content. It has not only sparked students’ interest in learning but also broadened their perspectives. Therefore, it is essential to explore the application of the blended learning model in biochemistry teaching.
Teaching medicinal chemistry presents a unique challenge for pharmacy students, prompting a preliminary investigation into the data-driven blended online-offline teaching model’s implementation. This instructional approach amalgamates various teaching techniques with the objective of improving students’ learning outcomes and satisfaction, thereby offering additional teaching avenues for nurturing pharmaceutical talent.
This teaching reform experiment is open to all third-year Pharmacy students at Hebei North University. Before commencing the experiment, students were required to complete a short screening questionnaire to ensure they had the necessary resource for the experiments. The questionnaire asked the following five yes-or-no questions: (1) Do you have a stable internet connection? (2) Do you have access to an independent electronic device (laptop, tablet, or smartphone)? (3) Are you able to complete the online course? (4) Are you able to complete the exams and questionnaires? (5) Are you aware of this experiment and willing to participate? Students who answered “yes” to all questions were eligible for the study, while those who answered “no” to one or more questions were excluded.
According to the sample size calculation method reported in the literature [ 14 ], the study required a minimum of 52 participants per group to achieve a significance level (α) of less than 0.05 and a power (1-β) of 80%. The participants were randomly divided into experimental group ( n = 59) and control group ( n = 59) using a simple randomization. Both groups were supervised by the same teaching team, including one professor and two assistants. The experiment was conducted using a single-blind method and the students were blinded after assignment to interventions.
We have employed a randomized controlled trail to assess the effectiveness of a data-driven blended online-offline (DDBOO) teaching model on a group of healthy volunteers. The DDBOO method was implemented in the experimental group, while the control group received the traditional lecture-based learning (LBL).
The ddboo model for medicinal chemistry course.
The DDBOO instructional process is structured into three phases: pre-class, in-class, and post-class. Through a seamless integration of synchronous and asynchronous learning, we have formulated a comprehensive DDBOO teaching approach, as illustrated in Fig. 1 .
An overview of the study design
The teacher introduces the theme, characteristics and tasks of the lesson online, emphasizing the importance of the chapter and sparking student’s interest. Students engage in self-directed online learning tasks utilizing the SuperStarLearn software. They access and complete tasks at their own pace, view microlecture videos covering key topics, and subsequently undergo corresponding chapter tests. Following this, Problem-based learning (PBL) scenarios are introduced, encouraging collaborative teamwork to address PBL tasks. For those who do not complete assigned tasks, the learning alert system prompts them to do so. Teachers analyze online learning data, including the duration and frequency of student video views and chapter test accuracy, to identify common issues and pinpoint teaching challenges.
During the class, teachers provide comprehensive explanations for commonly challenging issues and assess the learning outcomes through features such as quick response and in-class quizzes on the SuperStarLearn platform. Group discussions and collaborative thinking are encouraged to achieve a deeper understanding. Teachers also provide individualized guidance to address specific issues encountered by students during the learning process. By analyzing learning behaviors, such as participation in quick response and thematic discussions, as well as statistical data from in-class quizzes and assessments of group tasks, teachers can determine student engagement, personalized challenges, and learning effectiveness. This analysis enables teachers to intervene promptly, making adjustments to the teaching pace as necessary.
At the end of the class, the students completed a post-quiz and a questionnaire consisting of nine questions. Following the class, learning data retrieved from the SuperStarLearn Platform reports are used to distribute personalized assignments. By analyzing data such as assignment accuracy, teachers identified cognitive gaps and deviations among students. This information allows for targeted supplementation and correction in the subsequent class.
In the control group, the same topics were presented through LBL. The lectures comprised two sessions, conducted once a week for 90 min each. During the class, the routine included the teacher explaining the learning objectives (5 min), delivering the content using PowerPoint slides (65 min), engaging in exercises (10 min), and participating in a class discussion or question-and-answer session (10 min). Students had the opportunity to participate in a question-and-answer session during the lecture, and discussions were encouraged if students wished to share their opinions or respond to their peers’ questions.
After obtaining informed consent, basic information about the participants, including age and gender, was collected. To evaluate students’ comprehension and application of knowledge, both groups underwent the same assessments, consisting of one pre-quiz and one post-quiz, each lasting 60 min and scored out of 100 points. Additionally, a questionnaire survey was administered at the end of the course to measure students’ self-perceived competence. The details of the questionnaire are presented in the Supplementary materials. This survey covered various aspects such as learning interest, targeted learning, motivation, self-learning skills, mastery of basic knowledge, teamwork abilities, problem-solving proficiency, and innovation capacity. Responses were rated using a 5-level Likert scale: 5 points for “strongly agreed,” 4 points for “agreed,” 3 points for “neutral,” 2 points for “disagreed,” and 1 point for " strongly disagreed.” Furthermore, a survey on satisfaction with the teaching mode was conducted, with responses categorized into four levels: “Very Satisfied,” “Satisfied,” “Neutral,” and “Dissatisfied.” In order to maintain impartial responses, both quizzes and questionnaires were conducted anonymously, mitigating any potential influence, whether positive or negative, on the students.
A chi-squared test (symbolically represented as χ 2 ) was employed to assess the discrepancy of count data. To compare two independent groups, the student t-test was utilized. Data were expressed as individual values and as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS statistics 20.0 software. The significance level (alpha) was set to 0.05, and p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
From September 2020 to January 2021, a total of 118 students actively participated in the teaching experiment. Among them, 46 students were male (38.98%), and 72 students were female (61.02%). The average age of the participants was 20.5 ± 0.7 years. These students were randomly assigned to two groups: the DDBOO group ( n = 59) and the traditional LBL group ( n = 59). Notably, all students successfully completed the entire teaching process, including quizzes and questionnaires, and there were no dropouts during the study period. A comprehensive analysis of demographic data between the DDBOO group and the LBL group is presented in Table 1 . The results revealed no significant differences between the two groups in terms of gender ( P = 0.45), age ( P = 0.673), and pre-quiz scores related to basic knowledge ( P = 0.822).
As illustrated in Fig. 2 , the statistical analysis of the box plots depicting final exam scores reveals that the average scores of the DDBOO group are higher than those of the LBL group( T = 3.742, P < 0.001). Moreover, there is a reduction in the number of low-scoring students, suggesting a better mastery of professional knowledge among students in the DDBOO group.
Comparison of the post-class test scores between two groups
A comprehensive evaluation of the teaching effectiveness between the DDBOO teaching method and the traditional LBL teaching approach was conducted through a post-teaching questionnaire survey. All questionnaires distributed for the survey were successfully collected and proved to be valid. According to Table 2 , the DDBOO group outperformed the LBL group in various aspects, including learning interest, learning motivation, self-learning skill, mastery of basic knowledge, teamwork skills, problem-solving ability, and innovation ability, demonstrating statistically significant differences ( P < 0.05). While the score for learning targeted was higher in the DDBOO group compared to the LBL group, this difference was not statistically significant ( P > 0.05). Furthermore, as indicated in Table 3 , the level of satisfaction within the DDBOO group surpassed that of the traditional LBL group ( P = 0.011).
Utilizing SPSS software for data analysis, we conducted a correlation analysis to further examine the relationship between students’ online and offline learning behaviors and their final exam scores under the DDBOO teaching model. The correlation analysis results are depicted in Fig. 3 . From Fig. 3 , it is evident that the online test scores demonstrates a positively correlation with final exam scores ( r = 0.52), signifying a noteworthy impact of students’ performance in self-directed learning on overall learning quality. However, the correlations between visitation frequency, online video viewing duration, assignment scores and final scores are not significant. This may be attributed to some students engaging in online activities solely for the purpose of improving their scores. In addition to carefully designing online teaching activities, teachers need to appropriately assign weights to evaluation criteria for online self-directed learning, guiding students towards effective independent learning practices. Regarding offline learning behaviors, course interaction, PBL implementation, and classroom discussions exhibit higher correlations with final exam scores, with correlation coefficients of 0.53, 0.48 and 0.43, respectively. This suggests that classroom interactions and presentation discussions contribute to deepening students’ understanding and mastery of the learned content.
Correlation analysis of learning behaviors
The feedback results from the instructional survey indicate that the DDBOO teaching approach has achieved learning outcomes, as depicted in Fig. 4 . 91.5% of students believe that data-driven blended teaching has enhanced their study habit, transformed cognitive patterns, and bolstered subjective initiative. Additionally, 94.9% of students express that classroom interaction is more dynamic, encouraging them to confidently pose questions and articulate their viewpoints. The majority of students acknowledge the significant impact of data-driven blended teaching on overall skill enhancement, particularly in terms of autonomous learning, problem analysis, and teamwork abilities.
Results of the feedback of DDBOO group
This study investigated the effectiveness of a DDBOO teaching approach in medicinal chemistry for pharmacy students. The DDBOO model, integrating online resources with traditional classroom instruction, yielded significant improvements in students’ comprehension application of complex pharmaceutical concepts, and self-perceived competence as measured by post-course surveys. These findings not only highlight the effectiveness of DDBOO model, but also align with existing research on blended learning’s benefits, including flexibility, diverse resources, and enhanced student engagement [ 15 ]. Furthermore, DDBOO facilitates real-time feedback, adaptability, and a shift from teacher-centered learning to active problem-solving and collaboration. Data-driven assessments further empower instructors by allowing for early intervention and ongoing refinement of teaching methods based on student performance data [ 16 ]. This combined approach paves the way for optimizing student learning and engagement in medicinal chemistry education.
Blended online-offline teaching addresses pharmacy students’ need for practical skills by freeing up classroom time for hands-on practice [ 17 , 18 ]. Online platforms enable flexible, self-paced learning of theoretical knowledge outside of class, maximizing learning efficiency. This organic integration of theory and practice fosters the development of comprehensive abilities, including operational skills, critical thinking, and innovation. Students appreciate the flexibility and diverse resources offered by the blended approach, leading to increased engagement and enjoyment of the learning process.
The teacher plays a pivotal role in blended online-offline teaching for medicinal chemistry. They design a curriculum integrating both online and offline components, selecting materials tailored to medicinal chemistry education. Utilizing online platforms and resources, teachers engage students in various activities such as discussions and virtual experiments, guiding them through the online learning environment. Moreover, teachers adopt a data-driven approach, collecting and analyzing student performance data to provide individualized support and targeted interventions. Continuous feedback on student performance informs the adaptation of teaching strategies to meet diverse learning needs. Offline sessions, including laboratory work and group discussions, complement online components to offer a comprehensive learning experience. Through these efforts, teachers create a supportive and collaborative environment, fostering student interaction and critical thinking [ 19 ]. Overall, the teacher acts as a facilitator, guide, and analyst, utilizing data-driven insights to optimize the blended online-offline teaching approach in medicinal chemistry.
Limitations.
Despite its advantages, the DDBOO teaching model also presents several limitations. One notable limitation is the potential for unequal access to technology and online resources among students, which may widen existing educational inequalities. Additionally, the success of the DDBOO model relies heavily on effective technology integration and teacher training, which may pose challenges for institutions with limited resources or infrastructure. Moreover, the model’s effectiveness may vary depending on factors such as student motivation, prior knowledge, and learning preferences, highlighting the need for further research to better understand its impact across different contexts and populations. Overall, while the DDBOO teaching model offers numerous benefits for enhancing student learning and engagement, careful consideration of its limitations is essential for its successful implementation and long-term sustainability.
In conclusion, the application of the data-driven blended online-offline teaching model in medicinal chemistry for pharmacy students has demonstrated promising results in enhancing learning outcomes and satisfaction levels. This innovative approach, guided by big data technology, provides a tailored and personalized learning experience that addressed individual student needs. The findings of this study underscore the potential of integrating advanced teaching methodologies with traditional classroom instruction to optimize the educational experience in pharmacy education. Future research should explore the applicability of this blended teaching model to other disciplines, such as clinical medicine, nursing, and public health.
The data used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Driven blended online-offline
Based learning
Andrade MS, Miller RM, Kunz MB, Ratliff JM. Online learning in schools of business: what influences faculty to teach online? Open Learn. 2022;37(2):178–92.
Article Google Scholar
Alzahrani M. Traditional learning compared to Online Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned from Faculty’s perspectives. SAGE Open. 2022;12(2):21582440221091720.
Ahern K. Teaching biochemistry online at Oregon State University. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2017;45(1):25–30.
Ramírez-Hurtado JM, Hernández-Díaz AG. Measuring Online Teaching Service Quality in Higher Education in the COVID-19 Environment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(5):2403.
Asadi N, Khodabandeh F, Yekta RR. Comparing and contrasting the interactional performance of teachers and students in traditional and virtual classrooms of advanced writing course in distance education university. Turk Online J Distan. 2019;20(4):135–48.
Coyle KK, Chambers BD, Anderson PM, Firpo-Triplett R, Waterman EA. Blended learning for sexual Health Education: evidence base, Promising practices, and potential challenges. J Sch Health. 2019;89(10):847–59.
Liao Y, Huang YM, Huang SH, Chen HC, Wei CW. Exploring the switching intention of learners on social network-based learning platforms: a perspective of the push–pull–mooring model. Eurasia J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2019;15(9):1–10.
Google Scholar
Aikat J, Carsey TM, Fecho K, Jeffay K, Krishnamurthy A, Mucha PJ, Rajasekar A, Ahalt SC. Scientific training in the era of Big Data: a New Pedagogy for Graduate Education. Big data. 2017;5(1):12–8.
Wang YJ, Gao CL, Ye XD. A data-driven precision teaching intervention mechanism to improve secondary school students’ learning effectiveness. Edu Inf Technol. 2023;28(11):1–29.
Botvin M, Hershkovitz A. Data-driven decision-making in emergency remote teaching. Edu Inf Technol. 2023;28(1):489–506.
Fernandes JPS. The importance of Medicinal Chemistry Knowledge in the clinical pharmacist’s education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2018;82(2):6083.
Klümper C, Neunzehn J, Wegmann U, Kruppke B, Joos U, Wiesmann HP. Development and evaluation of an internet-based blended-learning module in biomedicine for university applicants–education as a challenge for the future. Head Face Med. 2016;12:13.
Khan MO, Deimling MJ, Philip A. Medicinal chemistry and the pharmacy curriculum. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75(8):161.
Ramazan K, Devran AY, Muhammed ON. An old approach to a novel problem: effect of combined balance therapy on virtual reality induced motion sickness: a randomized, placebo controlled, double-blinded study. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):156.
Singh J, Steele K, Singh L. Combining the best of online and face-to-face learning: hybrid and blended Learning Approach for COVID-19, Post Vaccine, & Post-pandemic World. J Educ Technol Syst. 2021;50(2):140–71.
Wu X. Data-driven teaching–learning-based optimization (DTLBO) framework for expensive engineering problems. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2021;64(4):2577–91.
Li J, Xiao C, Hou J, Zhao Y, Gong H, Zhang B, Yan M. Clinical pharmacy undergraduate education in China: a comparative analysis based on ten universities’ training programs. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):83.
Li P, Zhang H, Tsai SB. A New Online and Offline Blended Teaching System of College English Based on Computer Internet Technology. Math Probl Eng 2021, 2021:3568386.
Dumford AD, Miller AL. Online learning in higher education: exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. J Comput High Educ. 2018;30(3):452–65.
Download references
Not applicable.
Hebei North University Project (No. XJ2024026). Hebei Provincial Higher Education Teaching Reform and Practice Project (No. 2021GJJG343).
Authors and affiliations.
Department of Pharmacy, Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou, China
Yong-ming Zhao, Si-si Liu & Jin Wang
Hebei Key Laboratory of Neuropharmacology, Zhangjiakou, China
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Si-si Liu and Jin Wang participated in the implementation of the project, and revision of the article. Yong-ming Zhao participated in the data collection and the writing of the article.
Correspondence to Jin Wang .
Ethics approval and consent to participate.
This study was assessed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Hebei North University. We confrm that all methods were conducted in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Reprints and permissions
Cite this article.
Zhao, Ym., Liu, Ss. & Wang, J. Application of data-driven blended online-offline teaching in medicinal chemistry for pharmacy students: a randomized comparison. BMC Med Educ 24 , 738 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05701-x
Download citation
Received : 21 January 2024
Accepted : 24 June 2024
Published : 09 July 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05701-x
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
ISSN: 1472-6920
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Implement the solution: Put the selected solution into action and monitor the results to ensure it resolves the issue. Review and learn: Reflect on the problem-solving process, identify any improvements or adjustments that can be made, and apply these learnings to future situations.
Problem solving is the act of defining a problem; determining the cause of the problem; identifying, prioritizing, and selecting alternatives for a solution; and implementing a solution.
You will learn how to define a problem, gather information, assess alternatives, and implement a solution, all while honing your critical thinking and creative problem-solving skills. Whether you're a seasoned problem solver or just getting started, this guide will arm you with the knowledge and tools you need to face any challenge with confidence. So let's get started!
Proven problem solving techniques such as those outlined below can guide your group through a process of identifying problems and challenges, ideating on possible solutions, and then evaluating and implementing the most suitable.
Got a problem to solve? From school to relationships, we look at examples of problem-solving strategies and how to use them.
Problem-solving strategies are ways of approaching problems that can help you look beyond the obvious answers and find the best solution to your problem .
Problem-solving is a mental process that involves discovering, analyzing, and solving problems. The ultimate goal of problem-solving is to overcome obstacles and find a solution that best resolves the issue.
Learn about important problem-solving steps, including defining a problem, understanding its cause, developing alternative solutions and choosing a solution.
Problem-solving involves taking certain steps and using psychological strategies. Learn problem-solving techniques and how to overcome obstacles to solving problems.
This article will delve into the essential steps for mastering problem-solving skills. We will explore the characteristics of effective problem solvers and highlight the step-by-step process they follow to tackle problems. From defining the problem and gathering information to evaluating solutions and implementing the chosen course of action, we will cover each stage in detail, providing ...
Effective problem solving is critical for success. Learn the necessary skills, best practices, and creative techniques to identify causes and solutions.
4. Implement the Solution. At this stage of problem solving, be prepared for feedback, and plan for this. When you roll out the solution, request feedback on the success of the change made. 5. Review, Iterate, and Improve. Making a change shouldn't be a one time action.
Efficient problem-solving requires breaking down issues logically, evaluating options, and implementing practical solutions. Key skills include critical thinking to understand root causes, creativity to brainstorm innovative ideas, communication abilities to collaborate with others, and decision-making to select the best way forward.
Learn about 12 different approaches to problem-solving and how you can implement them to find more productive solutions at work.
Effective problem solving involves several key steps that can help you identify the root cause of a problem, develop a plan of action, and implement that plan to achieve a successful outcome. Here are five simple steps you can take to develop your problem-solving skills and tackle any challenge that comes your way in the workplace.
Instead, you should look at problem solving more as a process with several steps involved that will help you reach the best outcome. Those steps are: Define the problem. List all the possible solutions. Evaluate the options. Select the best solution. Create an implementation plan. Communicate your solution.
Practicing different problem-solving strategies can help professionals develop efficient solutions to challenges they encounter at work and in their everyday lives. Each industry, business and career has its own unique challenges, which means employees may implement different strategies to solve them. If you are interested in learning how to solve problems more effectively, then understanding ...
4. Implement the solution. To implement your solution, start by working with the individuals who are as closest to the problem. This can help those most affected by the problem get unblocked. Then move farther out to those who are less affected, and so on and so forth.
When faced with a doozy of a problem, where do you start? And what problem solving techniques can you use RIGHT NOW that can help you make good decisions? Today's post will give you tips and techniques for solving complex problems so you can untangle any complication like an expert.
Although problem-solving is something everyone does on a daily basis, many people lack confidence in their ability. Here we look at the basic problem-solving process to help keep you on the right track.
This in-depth analysis ensures that solutions are not just superficial but address the root causes of problems, leading to more sustainable and impactful outcomes. How to Implement CATWOE Analysis. Implementing CATWOE Analysis involves a structured approach to ensure all perspectives and components are adequately addressed.
The Learning Solutions team at the United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) is dedicated to equipping future professionals with essential skills to navigate the ever-evolving global landscape. Future leaders need the tools to tackle complex problems and seize emerging opportunities. By focusing on innovation, strategic foresight, and problem-solving, we ensure that our ...
Explore the Tree of Thoughts approach in AI prompt engineering—transforming problem-solving with multi-path reasoning techniques.
Dormant nuclear power plants across Pennsylvania, Iowa and Michigan are considering revival as the proliferation of A.I. data centers fuels a boom in power demand.
These Supreme Court decisions just made it harder to solve climate change ... "Implementing health, safety, environmental, financial, and consumer protection laws requires a great deal of day-to ...
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of implementing a data-driven blended online-offline (DDBOO) teaching approach in the medicinal chemistry course. ... self-learning skill, mastery of basic knowledge, teamwork skills, problem-solving ability, innovation ability, and satisfaction, as measured by the ...