Table 2: | Coding and categorization of the reviewed literature |
Fig. 3: | Geographical area of the reviewed literature |
Fig. 4: | Objectives of the reviewed literature Empirical study, B: Case study, C: Literature review, D: Conceptual and E: Others |
As depicted by Fig. 2 , majority of the studies 14 , 17 , 22 , 26 were not country specific. None of the reviewed studies focused on underdeveloped countries, 13.45% of the studies 18 , 21 deal with developed countries, 5.88% studies had been done in the context of developing and emerging countries, while 5.04% of the research articles belong to the context of both developed and developing and emerging countries. This revealed that studies on leadership and organizational issues pertaining to the underdeveloped country were lacking. This indicated a major research gap that needs to be investigated in future research.
Geographical area: For this category, seven geographical regions have been used namely USA, UK, France, Germany, China, India and Islamic countries represented by codes A to G respectively. Code H is assigned to the papers that do not belong to any of these countries. In case research was not country specific, code I is used. Figure 3 shows the analyses of codes based on the geographical area. Figure 3 showed that majority 19 , 22 , 25 of research articles (75%) were not specific to any geographical area, 6% of the studies belong to USA and 8% deal with other countries, 5% research articles focus on China, while 1% do not belong to any of these countries.
Objective: The third classification refers to identifying the objectives of the analyzed papers. Code A is assigned to the empirical studies, code B is assigned for case study method, code C is assigned to the articles based on theoretical and methodological contribution, code D is used for conceptual studies focusing on concept or theory explaining the phenomenon, code E has been assigned to studies belonging to any other category. The results as shown in Fig. 4 revealed that 69% of the reviewed papers 14 , 16 , 17 , 22 , 24 , 26 employ the empirical method, while 18% were conceptual studies, 6% use case study method and literature review.
Main subjects: The next classification was based on the main subject of the research articles reviewed for systematic review as A, B, C and D. It depicts the focus point of the study. The key subjects taken for the coding are leadership motivation, leadership excellence, leadership communication and others. As shown by Fig. 5 , the main focus of maximum research in the articles studied 18 , 22 , 26 was on leadership excellence (29%). 4% of the articles are relate to leadership motivation and 4% to leadership communication.
Fig. 5: | Main subjects of the reviewed literature |
Fig. 6: | Main subjects of the reviewed literature |
The remaining articles focus on other than the given subjects. The combinations studied are leadership motivation and excellence (5%), Leadership excellence and others (8%). The analysis of main subject shows that there are certain avenues open for the researchers in study of leadership motivation and leadership communication, though the previous researchers have focused on leadership excellence.
Topics: This classification was based on identification of the main topic of research. The codes assigned for this category range from A to, I. This classification further narrows down the research area t chosen in the previous category. It includes topics resembling leadership style in general, moderating factors, quitting intentions, leadership perception and role in learning, effect on job performance, work satisfaction, virtual leadership and others.
As shown in Fig. 6 , many code combinations had got developed while analyzing the papers for this category. The topics emerged during the research were the combination of two or more subjects. About 6% of the papers focused on moderating factors and effect on job performance, 8% study other factors along with moderating factors, 5% cover effect on job performance, work satisfaction with grouping of other topics. All the other combinations of codes contribute to only 1%. Only few articles focus on a single topic.
Fig. 7: | Leadership style evaluated by the reviewed literature |
Fig. 8: | Type of organization |
Fig. 9: | Time period studied by the reviewed literature |
Leadership style evaluated: This classification is an attempt to categorize the leadership style evaluated in the papers studied, coded from A to H ( Fig. 7 ).
Fig. 10: | Method of research in the reviewed literature |
Besides giving codes to seven styles of leadership, one code is assigned to a category where no particular style is being evaluated. Majority of the studies (71%) do not concentrate on any particular leadership style, 15% of the articles evaluate transformational leadership style, 3% of the papers study mixed style and remaining researchers study combination of two or more styles.
Type of organization: This classification shows the categorization on the basis of industry. This part has been divided into three categories Manufacturing, Service, Trading and others. Codes have been assigned from A to D respectively. 21% articles focus on service industry, while 76% articles have not chosen any specific type of organization for their research. Figure 8 exhibits the results with regard to this classification.
Time period: The eighth classification depicts the time period of the research as exhibited in Fig. 9 . This category has been divided into five parts assigning codes from A to E; A- less than 1 years, B-1-5 years, C-6-10 years, D-10 years and more, E for the articles where time period is not applicable.92% percent of the articles do not cater to any specific time period, 5% articles base their analysis on less than one year, 2% of the research articles are based on 1-5 years of category.
Method: This category of classification involved identifying the research methods used for research as plotted in Fig. 10 . Codes from A to G had been assigned in which quantitative, qualitative, conceptual, quantitative and qualitative both, case study and none of these categories had been coded. About 42% of the papers use quantitative methods, 28% papers employed both quantitative and qualitative methods, 18% articles used conceptual method.
Sample size: This classification revealed the sample size of the articles analyzed as shown in Fig. 11 . For this category, codes ranged from A to D. A category contains the articles with sample size of under 50, B category comprises of papers with sample size of 51-100, C included papers with sample size of more than 100, D included papers other than these. Majority of the articles (52%) use the sample size more than 100, 40% articles fall in others category where sample size was not applicable, 6% articles had used sample size below 50.
Size of the industry: This classification related to size of the industry and the codes assigned ranged from A to C as shown in Fig. 12 . Large scale industry is coded by A, small and medium sized industry coded by B and others fall in category C. Most of the studies did not focus on analysis of a particular size of industry, 11% analyze the large industries, 2% focus on small and medium enterprises.
The last category ( Fig. 13 ) highlighted different aspects of the results of the research articles studied. This category had been divided into five codes ranging from A to E. It included whether the results were consistent with previous literature or leading to a new perspective, was it a previous model with different data set and time period, comparative study and others.
Fig. 11: | Sample size in the reviewed literature |
Fig. 12: | Industry size |
Fig. 13: | Category A: New perspective, Category B: Consistent with previous literature, Category C: Previous model with different dataset/time period, D: Comparative study and E: Others |
Majority of the articles (52%) present comparative analysis, 9% articles deal with each of category B and C that was consistent with previous literature and previous model with different data set and time period.
The main contribution of the current paper was to summarize the issues addressed by these articles and to bring out the research gaps. The current study explored 119 articles which were purely devoted to the study of leadership and organization. On the basis of the gaps explored, it can be stated that the research arena is wide open for the future research in the area of leadership and related areas that can be explored by novel research. The current research found that the future researchers can focus on underdeveloped countries and explore how leadership in organizations of underdeveloped countries can meet current and future organizational challenges. The future researchers can focus on conducting research in specific regions and explore the influence that leadership has on organizations of different regions. Future research can also focus on meta-analysis and explore the significance of case study/literature review or comparative analysis in addressing leadership problems in organizations. With respect to main subject of the study, it is found that most of the studies focus on leadership excellence whereas research on leadership motivation and communication is lagging behind. Therefore, future research can examine how leadership motivation and communication can help an organization achieve its results. It is vital to explore how an organization from a specific sector manages and motivates its employees through effective leadership. Future research can focus on other techniques that can justify the objective of leadership study.
This study holds immense significance for two core reasons. One, the paper consolidates the existing literature about leadership and organization. Two, the paper brings out the research gaps and sets a research agenda for future researchers in the field. The organic contribution of the authors is in listing out (a) the objectives that can be pursued by the future researchers, (b) the methodology that can be adopted by the future researchers, (c) the tools that can be put to use while researching in this area and (d) the industry that the future researchers may emphasize upon.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Andy Tay is a freelance writer based in Singapore.
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Literature reviews are important resources for scientists. They provide historical context for a field while offering opinions on its future trajectory. Creating them can provide inspiration for one’s own research, as well as some practice in writing. But few scientists are trained in how to write a review — or in what constitutes an excellent one. Even picking the appropriate software to use can be an involved decision (see ‘Tools and techniques’). So Nature asked editors and working scientists with well-cited reviews for their tips.
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
24,99 € / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
185,98 € per year
only 3,65 € per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03422-x
Interviews have been edited for length and clarity.
Correction 09 December 2020 : An earlier version of the tables in this article included some incorrect details about the programs Zotero, Endnote and Manubot. These have now been corrected.
Hsing, I.-M., Xu, Y. & Zhao, W. Electroanalysis 19 , 755–768 (2007).
Article Google Scholar
Ledesma, H. A. et al. Nature Nanotechnol. 14 , 645–657 (2019).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Brahlek, M., Koirala, N., Bansal, N. & Oh, S. Solid State Commun. 215–216 , 54–62 (2015).
Choi, Y. & Lee, S. Y. Nature Rev. Chem . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-020-00221-w (2020).
Download references
Researchers in Hungary raise fears of brain drain after ‘body blow’ EU funding suspension
Career News 26 SEP 24
How I apply Indigenous wisdom to Western science and nurture Native American students
Career Q&A 25 SEP 24
UK university departments on the brink as higher-education funding crisis deepens
Career Feature 25 SEP 24
More measures needed to ease funding competition in China
Correspondence 24 SEP 24
Gender inequity persists among journal chief editors
The human costs of the research-assessment culture
Career Feature 09 SEP 24
Data integrity concerns flagged in 130 women’s health papers — all by one co-author
News 25 SEP 24
‘Substandard and unworthy’: why it’s time to banish bad-mannered reviews
Career Q&A 23 SEP 24
Seeking global talents in the field of Earth Science and Ocean Engineering.
Sanya, Hainan, China
Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Job Title: Locum Chief Editor, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology Location: New York or Milan Closing date: Friday, October 18th This job is of...
New York City, New York (US)
Springer Nature Ltd
Looking for postdoctoral fellow to study immunometabolic derangements associated with heart failure sterile inflammation.
University of Washington, Seattle
University of Washington - Cardiology
Faculty and Postdoc positions are open all year.
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
The Stomatology Hospital, School of Stomatology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine(ZJUSS)
Become a tenure-track Assistant Professor focusing on modelling plant stress responses at Umeå Plant Science Centre and IceLab, Umeå University!
Umeå (Stad), Västerbotten (SE)
Umeå University (KBC)
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.
BMC Women's Health volume 24 , Article number: 520 ( 2024 ) Cite this article
165 Accesses
Metrics details
Maternal obesity rates are increasing significantly, posing substantial risks to both mothers and their children. This study aims to introduce health policies addressing maternal obesity, identify preventive interventions, and highlight scientific gaps necessitating further research.
We identified documents through electronic searches in PubMed, CINAHL Plus, EMBASE, and grey literature sources (ministry of health websites, national gynecology and obstetrics associations) from January 2013 to August 2023, updated in June 2024. The inclusion criteria focused on English-language documents discussing interventions or health policies that promote weight loss through lifestyle changes during pregnancy.
A total of 22 documents (10 studies and 12 guidelines) were included. 12 studies (N=1244) identified via databases; included two Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) from Canada and Singapore. Other 10 CPGs sourced from governmental websites and national associations: England (1), Australia (1), New Zealand (1), combined Australia and New Zealand (1), Canada (3), USA (1), Ireland (1), Germany (1). 10 guidelines focused on obesity in pregnancy, two on weight management during pregnancy. Covered interventions across pre-pregnancy, pregnancy, and postpartum periods (9 guidelines); pre-pregnancy and pregnancy (2); exclusively postpartum (1). Seven guidelines offered evidence-based recommendations on maintaining healthy weight in mothers, largely based on expert opinions.
Maternal obesity poses significant risks to both mothers and children, underscoring the need for effective health policies and systems. However, few countries have integrated adequate responses into their healthcare policies and guidelines for professionals. Limited evidence exists on optimal practices to improve reproductive health outcomes in obese women. Hence, the crucial need to developing comprehensive guidelines and proactive strategies to manage maternal obesity. These measures can improve outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. Increased focus on research and policymaking is essential to protect the health of mothers and their children.
Peer Review reports
The global rise in obesity has prompted the World Health Organization (WHO) to classify it as a major health threat, particularly affecting young people, including women of reproductive age [ 1 ]. This has significant implications for both Maternal and Child Health (MCH) in the periods leading up to pregnancy, during pregnancy, and after childbirth [ 2 ], introducing challenges in obstetrics [ 3 ]. Maternal obesity is also associated with Childhood Obesity (CHO) and long-term Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) [ 4 , 5 ], exacerbating their impact. Thus, addressing this issue is crucial for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially in the Low And Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) [ 6 ].
Life transitions, such as moving out, employment changes, and relationship shifts, can impede healthy behaviors and result in over 50% of women starting pregnancy with obesity [ 7 ]. In 2014, approximately 40 million pregnant women around the world were overweight or obese. While Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) have high rates of overweight, Upper-Middle-Income Countries (UMICs) experience a higher prevalence of obesity during pregnancy [ 8 ]. Excessive Gestational Weight Gain (EGWG) is also a significant problem among pregnant women [ 7 ], with about 20% of them maintaining a post-birth weight exceeding 4.5 kg [ 4 ]. In general, nearly half of women experience pre-pregnancy obesity, excessive weight gain during pregnancy, and postpartum weight retention [ 9 ], which all contribute to maternal obesity [ 10 ].
Obesity during the early stages of pregnancy is linked to negative outcomes for both the mother and child on a global scale. Research has identified several risks, such as gestational diabetes, high blood pressure, and pre-eclampsia, which contribute to the worldwide burden of diabetes and heart diseases [ 10 ]. Additionally, evidence within the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease paradigm (DOHaD) suggests that maternal obesity increases the risk of NCDs for both the mother and child [ 11 ]. This risk is further increased by the potential for childhood obesity to double [ 12 , 13 ], subsequently increasing the likelihood of NCDs in the future [ 11 ]. By 2030, the annual obesity-related medical costs are projected at $66 billion in the United States (US) [ 14 ], with every increase in adult Body Mass Index (BMI) resulting in an additional $6 billion in healthcare expenses [ 15 ]. Furthermore, healthcare costs for obese pregnancies will rise due to the need for additional specialized exams [ 3 ]. Taking into account factors such as age, parity, ethnicity, and comorbidities, costs were found to be 23% higher for overweight individuals and 37% higher for obese women, compared to those with normal weight [ 16 ].
Evidence supports the effectiveness of intervention programs in preventing maternal obesity by improving behavior, modifying the environment, adopting healthier eating habits, and increasing physical activity. These interventions are essential in breaking the cycle of intergenerational obesity and reducing the growing global burden of non-communicable diseases [ 11 ]. Research suggests that lifestyle interventions, combining self-monitoring, diet, and exercise, can significantly reduce postpartum weight in women [ 12 ]. Additionally, breastfeeding helps prevent maternal overweight by prolonging its duration, potentially preventing around 975,000 cases of childhood obesity [ 13 , 14 ]. In fact, focusing on maintaining weight after childbirth shows promise in reducing obesity-related diseases [ 15 ].
In this regard, various countries, particularly high-income nations, have issued guidelines to address maternal obesity, emphasizing its immediate health consequences for women of reproductive age [ 11 , 16 , 17 ]. However, certain countries, e.g., India, with limited focus on maternal obesity in health policies, may miss opportunities to effectively address this significant public health issue [ 18 ].
This study aims to introduce health policies addressing maternal obesity, identify preventive practices, and highlight scientific gaps necessitating further research. We anticipate that our findings will contribute to enhancing preventive measures and improving women’s health during pregnancy.
We identified relevant documents through electronic searches conducted from January 2013 to August 2023, with updates in June 2024. The search encompassed databases including PubMed, CINAHL Plus, and EMBASE, as well as an exploration of grey literature, i.e., the ministry of health websites and national gynecology and obstetrics associations. The search incorporated text words and MESH terms related to maternal obesity and health policies (Table 1 ). Inclusion criteria specified a focus on English-language documents addressing interventions or health policies aimed at promoting weight loss through lifestyle changes before, during, and after pregnancy. We also included official health documents in the form of guidelines or policies, if they provided guidance to health professionals on managing maternal obesity through lifestyle changes and were the most recent version available. In total, we included 22 documents, comprising 10 studies and 12 guidelines (Fig. 1 ).
PRISMA 2009 flow diagram
We selected a total of 22 studies and policy documents for review. Among the 12 studies ( N = 1244) found through databases, two were related to Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) from England [ 19 ] and Singapore [ 20 ]. The remaining 10 CPGs were found through governmental websites and national associations were from England [ 1 , 17 ], Australia [ 1 , 21 ], New Zealand [ 1 , 22 ], Australia and New Zealand guideline [ 1 , 23 ], Canada [ 3 , 24 , 25 , 26 ], the United States [ 1 , 27 ], Ireland [ 1 , 28 ], and Germany [ 1 , 29 ]. Ten guidelines specifically addressed obesity in pregnancy, while two focused on weight management or maintaining a healthy weight during pregnancy. These guidelines covered interventions in various periods, including pre-pregnancy, pregnancy, and postpartum (9 guidelines), pre-pregnancy and pregnancy (2 guidelines), and exclusively postpartum (1 guideline). Out of these, seven provided evidence-based recommendations regarding maintaining a healthy weight in mothers, primarily based on strong experts’ opinions. Tables 2 and 3 , and 4 outline the key features of the included studies and policy documents.
Below, we summarize some recommendations for the management of maternal obesity, as outlined by the included studies.
The UK NICE guidelines for weight management before, during, and after pregnancy focus on healthcare providers supporting women in adopting healthy weight behaviors, diet, and exercise during the pre-pregnancy, pregnancy, and postpartum periods. For effective weight-loss programs, the document recommends addressing barriers to weight loss, tailoring approaches to individual needs and preferences, being sensitive to weight-related concerns, promoting a balanced and healthy diet, encouraging regular physical activity, setting realistic goals of 0.5–1 kg (1–2 lb) per week, and actively identifying and addressing obstacles to successful change. Furthermore, it stands out among other guidelines by promoting postpartum weight loss as a strategy to prevent maternal obesity [ 17 ].
The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RANZCOG) provides guideline for managing obesity during pregnancy. The intended audience is healthcare professionals working in maternity care and their patients. Key recommendations include assessing height and weight before conceiving, promoting good nutrition and physical fitness, offering psychological support, and discussing appropriate weight gain during pregnancy based on early pregnancy BMI. Healthcare providers are encouraged to address the impact of obesity on fertility and pregnancy outcomes in a sensitive and non-judgmental manner. They should also monitor weight during and after pregnancy, providing ongoing nutrition and exercise guidance to women with obesity to support weight reduction [ 23 ].
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Practice Bulletin seeks to offer a comprehensive approach to the management of obesity in reproductive-aged women who are planning for pregnancy. Dealing with obesity requires long-term strategies, including population-based public health and economic initiatives, as well as individual nutritional, behavioral, or surgical interventions. Obstetricians have a crucial role in providing care for pregnant women who are obese, while other healthcare professionals, such as nutritionists, can offer specialized knowledge based on the obstetrician’s level of comfort with obstetric care [ 27 ].
The FIGO Committee’s guideline aims to offer practical guidance for obstetricians and gynecologists. It focuses on the management of pre-pregnancy, pregnancy, and postpartum obesity by consolidating clinical practice recommendations from international sources. The Pregnancy Obesity and Nutrition Initiative (PONI) emphasizes a life course approach, connecting preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum services to prevent excessive weight gain before and during pregnancy. Dietary advice before getting pregnant places importance on weight loss or halting further gain by consuming nutrient-dense foods customized to individual characteristics. Pregnant women with obesity are advised to restrict gestational weight gain to 5–9 kg to enhance outcomes. Postpartum, weight loss is encouraged through a healthy diet, breastfeeding if possible, and moderate physical activity. Long-term monitoring is crucial due to the increased risk of NCDs for both mothers and their children [ 11 ].
The guideline set by the Association of Improvements in Maternity Services (AIMS) in Ireland aim to improve the management of obese women before, during, and after pregnancy. This guideline is intended for healthcare professionals, including those in training, who work in obstetric and gynecological services funded by the Health Service Executive (HSE). One important aspect emphasized in the guideline is the advice for obese women to lose weight prior to becoming pregnant. Primary care is vital in providing pre-pregnancy care for these women and is involved in various models of antenatal care. The guideline also highlights the importance of monitoring women’s weight during their initial antenatal visit in a primary care setting. It is recommended to educate women about healthy eating and to encourage regular physical exercise during and after pregnancy, unless there are medical or obstetric reasons not to do so [ 28 ].
This guideline provides recommendations for pregnant women who have a high BMI or a history of bariatric surgery. It stresses the significance of maintaining a healthy lifestyle during reproductive years and receiving specialized care for individuals with an elevated BMI. Additionally, it brings attention to the harmful effects of weight stigma on mental well-being and suggests various strategies to combat this, including respecting language preferences, improving non-judgmental communication, providing training, and fostering an understanding of the clinical impact of obesity. Professionals can improve communication by reflecting on their attitudes towards obesity [ 21 ].
This guideline, which is produced at the highest quality level (S3 level), aims to standardize care for pregnant women who are overweight or obese throughout all stages of pregnancy. It offers evidence-based recommendations for prevention and care in both outpatient and inpatient settings. Studies have shown that adopting a healthier lifestyle before getting pregnant, which includes exercising more and eating a proper diet, can have positive effects on pregnancy, delivery, and the postpartum period. Numerous research studies, including ones specifically focused on overweight or obese pregnant women, support the recommendations made by the Institute of Medicine (IOM). A meta-analysis of 36 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has shown that dietary changes, increased exercise, or a combination of both can result in an average weight loss of approximately 0.7 kg for these women. [ 29 ].
This narrative literature review aimed to identify strategies, health policies, or Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) for preventive recommendations encompassing maternal obesity or weight management across pre-pregnancy, pregnancy, and postpartum. We also highlighted areas where gaps exist to inform stakeholders to enhance preventive measures to improve the health of women of reproductive age.
We found a consensus that maternal obesity rates are rising dramatically, which poses serious risks to both mothers and their offspring [ 33 , 41 ]. Multiple studies found that obese women face higher risks of complications, i.e., gestational diabetes, high blood pressure, breastfeeding cessation, longer hospital stays, and higher rates of caesarean sections or instrumental deliveries [ 42 ]. Their babies also face higher risks of being admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit or suffering birth injuries [ 41 , 43 ].
Preconception lifestyle health in tackling maternal and childhood obesity is a key priority for the World Health Organization (WHO). A life course approach can improve outcomes for both mothers and children [ 37 ]. Enhancing health across the life course requires a comprehensive and integrated approach, involving education, work, community environments, and health professionals to engage young women before pregnancy and optimize their health [ 39 ]. The lack of specific guidelines for managing weight before and after pregnancy may lead to missed opportunities for intervening and supporting women throughout their reproductive journey [ 44 ]. Lifestyle interventions such as maintaining a healthy diet, engaging in regular physical activity, and receiving behavioral counseling, especially before pregnancy, effectively prevent maternal obesity [ 45 , 46 , 47 ], and are essential components of obstetric care aimed at modifying maternal weight to prevent obesity [ 21 , 28 , 29 ].
Challenges to effective lifestyle interventions during pregnancy include time constraints, diverse preferences, socioeconomic status (SES), competing demands, and healthcare professionals’ self-efficacy. Overcoming these barriers requires creating supportive environments for healthy changes aligned with public health strategies [ 48 , 49 ]. Educating and supporting obese women empowers informed decision-making about their health during and after pregnancy [ 6 ]. Moreover, robust economic evidence is crucial for evaluating policy interventions targeting environmental changes to prevent maternal obesity [ 50 ].
In the context of high-Income countries (HIC) such as England and Australia, there is a strong emphasis on the management of maternal obesity [ 51 ], which has led to the development of evidence-based guidelines to address this concern [ 33 ]. However, preventive recommendations concerning diet, physical activity, and behavior vary across guidelines, and most preventive recommendations for maintaining a healthy lifestyle in women are strongly based on experts’ opinion [ 11 , 52 ]. For instance, the preventive recommendations outlined in the 2020 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) committee guidelines for pre-pregnancy, pregnancy, and post-partum obesity are generally considered weak due to insufficient evidence. Therefore, further research is needed to enhance our understanding of their effectiveness, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). One notable exception is the strong endorsement of moderate-intensity exercise during pregnancy [ 11 ]. International consensus on guidelines of maternal weight management, particularly focusing on pre-pregnancy and post-partum periods, can lead to consistencies in care and potentially suboptimal outcomes for pregnant women with obesity [ 50 ].
There are significant research gaps in optimizing women’s health before and during pregnancy, particularly regarding lifestyle interventions for weight management [ 52 ]. Ecological Systems Theory (EST) Model demonstrates that maternal obesity is the result of a complex interplay between women and their surrounding environments. By developing a better understanding of how these systems interact, we can design more effective interventions and policies to support women in achieving and maintaining a healthy weight before, during and after pregnancy [ 9 ]. The WHO advocates a multifaceted approach, incorporating policy, mass media, community, and primary health care strategies to tackle the obesity epidemic [ 45 ].
At the individual level, women’s behavior play a significant role in weight gain during and after pregnancy [ 9 ]. However, it is essential to recognize that women are not isolated entities and their partner and family members can either bolster or hinder their endeavors to maintain a healthy diet and stay physically active [ 53 ].
At the community level, characteristics such as access to healthy food, opportunities for physical activity, and social norms about body size shape a woman’s weight [ 54 , 55 ]. For instance, a community with many fast food restaurants and no sidewalks or parks will make it more difficult for a woman to maintain a healthy weight than one with farmer’s markets, bike lanes, and recreational facilities [ 55 ]. Therefore, community-level policies and environments, such as promoting breastfeeding, increasing access to affordable healthy food, enjoying paid maternity leave, and providing nutrition information, may help curb obesity rates [ 53 , 56 , 57 , 58 ].
Healthcare practitioners play a crucial role in promoting healthy nutrition and weight before pregnancy [ 45 ]. Current guidelines emphasize early, women-centered care focusing on gradual lifestyle changes through improved diet and exercise [ 25 , 59 ]. However, research predominantly targets modifying behaviors of pregnant women, overlooking barriers faced by healthcare professionals, such as limited knowledge, challenges in addressing weight sensitively, resource constraints, and insufficient evidence on effective interventions [ 24 ]. These barriers hinder effective management of maternal obesity, underscoring the need for targeted interventions and support systems. Integrating nutrition services into Antenatal Care (ANC) can enhance support for obese pregnant women and promote healthy behaviors during pregnancy [ 33 , 60 ]. Nonetheless, robust evidence is needed to identify effective strategies for enabling behavioral changes among healthcare professionals to better support obese pregnant women [ 61 ].
FIGO guideline specifically offer intervention and tool aimed at facilitating the prevention of obesity [ 11 , 51 ]. For instance, the Pregnancy Obesity and Nutrition Initiative (PONI) established by the FIGO’s Pregnancy and NCDs (PNCD) Committee assists healthcare professionals in creating collaborative actions to prevent and alleviate obesity’s impact [ 62 ]. Additionally, tools such as the FIGO’s Nutrition Checklist can aid obstetricians in enhancing their knowledge and time management when providing care to women [ 11 ].
First, the limited database search may have weakened the findings by potentially omitting relevant studies that could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the topic. Additionally, the lack of a full-text review means that important details and nuanced information may have been missed, which could impact the depth and accuracy of the analysis. These constraints highlight the need for a more extensive and thorough approach in future research to ensure a more robust and detailed exploration of the subject. Second, although a narrative review has limitations compared to a systematic review, this study provides valuable initial data and insights. It serves as a foundational step in identifying research gaps and guiding future systematic reviews and policy development. This review highlights important aspects of maternal obesity, preventative strategies, and management during pregnancy and postpartum. While a systematic review might offer stronger conclusions, this study identifies areas needing further investigation and policy improvements, laying the groundwork for future research. Implementing suggested improvements will enhance the manuscript’s contribution to the field.
Maternal obesity poses major risks on mother and their child that require a coordinated policy and healthcare response [ 33 ]. Only a few nations have addressed these health risks adequately in their policies and guidelines for healthcare professionals [ 11 , 52 , 63 ]. Moreover, there is limited evidence on best practices to improve reproductive health outcomes in obese women, and national guidelines lack specific details and supporting evidence for implementing management changes that would improve outcomes [ 64 ]. Current care recommendations are mostly based on good clinical practice than strong evidence, with variations in nutrition, physical activity, and behavior modification strategies across different pregnancy stages [ 51 , 52 , 65 ]. The absence of standardized international guidelines may lead to diverse practices in managing maternal obesity globally [ 50 ]. Many studies lack the statistical power to address clinical outcomes effectively, hindering their application in practice [ 66 ]. Challenges such as ensuring access to nutritious food further obstruct evidence-based care for pregnant women with obesity. Developing comprehensive, high-quality guidelines and proactive implementation strategies is essential. Identifying and engaging stakeholders is also crucial for success. These measures can help healthcare professionals and women achieve better outcomes, reduce disparities, and lower health and economic costs. Research gaps in maternal weight management underscore the need for evidence to inform policies and interventions for improved maternal and child health outcomes [ 9 , 33 , 52 , 63 ].
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Association of Improvements in the Maternity Services
Body Mass Index
Developmental Origins of Health and Disease paradigm
Excessive Gestational Weight Gain
Ecological Systems Theory
International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Federation of Obstetric and Gynecological Societies of India
German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Health Service Executive
Institute of Medicine
Lower-Middle-Income Countries
Maternal and Child Health
Non-Communicable Diseases
National Institute for Healthcare and Excellence
Pregnancy and Non-Communicable Diseases
Pregnancy Obesity and Nutrition Initiative
Randomized Controlled Trial
Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Sustainable Development Goals
Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada
Upper-Middle-Income Countries
World Health Organization
Guelinckx I, Devlieger R, Beckers K, Vansant G. Maternal obesity: pregnancy complications, gestational weight gain and nutrition. Obes Rev. 2008;9(2):140–50.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Poston L, Caleyachetty R, Cnattingius S, Corvalán C, Uauy R, Herring S, et al. Preconceptional and maternal obesity: epidemiology and health consequences. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(12):1025–36.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Schumann NL, Brinsden H, Lobstein T. A review of national health policies and professional guidelines on maternal obesity and weight gain in pregnancy. Clin Obes. 2014;n/a-n/a.
Farpour-Lambert NJ, Ells LJ, Martinez de Tejada B, Scott C. Obesity and weight gain in pregnancy and Postpartum: an evidence review of Lifestyle interventions to Inform Maternal and Child Health policies. Front Endocrinol. 2018;9:546.
Article Google Scholar
Davis AM. Pandemic of pregnant obese women: is it time to re-evaluate Antenatal Weight loss? Healthc Basel Switz. 2015;3(3):733–49.
Google Scholar
Modi N, Hanson M. Maternal, neonatal, and child health is essential for meeting SDG 3.4. Lancet Lond Engl. 2020;396(10264):1731–2.
Harrison CL, Teede H, Khan N, Lim S, Chauhan A, Drakeley S et al. Weight management across preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum: A systematic review and quality appraisal of international clinical practice guidelines. Obes Rev [Internet]. 2021 Oct [cited 2022 Jun 18];22(10). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13310
Chen C, Xu X, Yan Y. Estimated global overweight and obesity burden in pregnant women based on panel data model. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(8):e0202183.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Briony Hill. Expanding our understanding and use of the ecological systems theory model for the prevention of maternal obesity: a new socioecological framework. Obes Rev. 2020;22(3).
Hill B, Skouteris H, Boyle JA, Bailey C, Walker R, Thangaratinam S, et al. Health in preconception, Pregnancy and Postpartum Global Alliance: International Network Pregnancy Priorities for the Prevention of Maternal Obesity and related pregnancy and long-term complications. J Clin Med. 2020;9(3):822.
McAuliffe FM, Killeen SL, Jacob CM, Hanson MA, Hadar E, McIntyre HD, et al. Management of prepregnancy, pregnancy, and postpartum obesity from the FIGO Pregnancy and Non-communicable Diseases Committee: a FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) guideline. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2020;151(S1):16–36.
Lim S, O’Reilly S, Behrens H, Skinner T, Ellis I, Dunbar JA. Effective strategies for weight loss in post-partum women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015;16(11):972–87.
Spatz DL. Preventing obesity starts with breastfeeding. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2014;28(1):41–50.
Walters DD, Phan LTH, Mathisen R. The cost of not breastfeeding: global results from a new tool. Health Policy Plan. 2019;34(6):407–17.
Michel S, Raab R, Drabsch T, Günther J, Stecher L, Hauner H. Do lifestyle interventions during pregnancy have the potential to reduce long-term postpartum weight retention? A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Obes Rev. 2018;obr.12809.
Vitner D, Harris K, Maxwell C, Farine D. Obesity in pregnancy: a comparison of four national guidelines. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(15):2580–90.
Overview | Weight management before, during and after pregnancy | Guidance | NICE [Internet]. NICE. 2010 [cited 2023 Feb 22]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph27
Chopra M, Kaur N, Singh KD, Maria Jacob C, Divakar H, Babu GR, et al. Population estimates, consequences, and risk factors of obesity among pregnant and postpartum women in India: results from a national survey and policy recommendations. Int J Gynaecol Obstet off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet. 2020;151(1Suppl 1):57–67.
RCOG [Internet]. [cited 2023 Sep 5]. Care of Women with Obesity in Pregnancy (Green-top Guideline No. 72). https://www.rcog.org.uk/guidance/browse-all-guidance/green-top-guidelines/care-of-women-with-obesity-in-pregnancy-green-top-guideline-no-72/
Lee YS, Biddle S, Chan MF, Cheng A, Cheong M, Chong YS, et al. Health Promotion Board-Ministry of Health Clinical Practice guidelines: obesity. Singap Med J. 2016;57(6):292–300.
o = The Sc = AU, Q ou = Queensland H ou = Online. S of. Guideline: Obesity and pregnancy (including post bariatric surgery) [Internet]. corporateName = The State of Queensland; jurisdiction = Queensland; 2021 [cited 2023 Sep 6]. https://www.health.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/142309/g-obesity.pdf
Ministry of Health NZ [Internet]. [cited 2023 Sep 6]. Guidance for Healthy Weight Gain in Pregnancy. https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/guidance-healthy-weight-gain-pregnancy
Management of obesity in pregnancy - Ferris. – 2022 - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology - Wiley Online Library [Internet]. [cited 2023 Sep 6]. https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ajo.13610
Davies GAL, Maxwell C, McLeod L. 239-Obesity in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can JOGC J Obstet Gynecol Can JOGC. 2018;40(8):e630–9.
Maxwell C, Gaudet L, Cassir G, Nowik C, McLeod NL, Jacob CÉ, et al. Guideline 391-Pregnancy and maternal obesity part 1: pre-conception and prenatal care. J Obstet Gynaecol Can JOGC J Obstet Gynecol Can JOGC. 2019;41(11):1623–40.
Maxwell C, Gaudet L, Cassir G, Nowik C, McLeod NL, Jacob CÉ, et al. Guideline 392-Pregnancy and maternal obesity part 2: Team Planning for Delivery and Postpartum Care. J Obstet Gynaecol Can JOGC J Obstet Gynecol Can JOGC. 2019;41(11):1660–75.
Obesity in Pregnancy. ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 230 - PubMed [Internet]. [cited 2023 Sep 6]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34011890/
Excutive (HSE). HS, Ireland (RCPI) RC of P of. Obesity and pregnancy: clincial practice guideline. 2011 Jun [cited 2023 Sep 6]; https://www.lenus.ie/handle/10147/325024
Schaefer-Graf U, Ensenauer R, Gembruch U, Groten T, Flothkötter M, Hennicke J, et al. Obesity and pregnancy. Guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (S3-Level, AWMF Registry 015–081, June 2019). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2021;81(3):279–303.
Dipietro L, Evenson KR, Bloodgood B, Sprow K, Troiano RP, Piercy KL, et al. Benefits of physical activity during pregnancy and Postpartum: an Umbrella Review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(6):1292–302.
Withanage NN, Botfield JR, Srinivasan S, Black KI, Mazza D. Effectiveness of preconception interventions in primary care: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract J R Coll Gen Pract. 2022;72(725):e865–72.
Most J, Amant MS, Hsia DS, Altazan AD, Thomas DM, Gilmore LA, et al. Evidence-based recommendations for energy intake in pregnant women with obesity. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(11):4682–90.
Heslehurst N, Newham J, Maniatopoulos G, Fleetwood C, Robalino S, Rankin J. Implementation of pregnancy weight management and obesity guidelines: a meta-synthesis of healthcare professionals’ barriers and facilitators using the theoretical domains Framework. Obes Rev. 2014;15(6):462–86.
Goldstein RF, Boyle JA, Lo C, Teede HJ, Harrison CL. Facilitators and barriers to behaviour change within a lifestyle program for women with obesity to prevent excess gestational weight gain: a mixed methods evaluation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):569.
O’Brien EC, Segurado R, Geraghty AA, Alberdi G, Rogozinska E, Astrup A, et al. Impact of maternal education on response to lifestyle interventions to reduce gestational weight gain: individual participant data meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019;9(8):e025620.
Harrison CL, Bahri Khomami M, Enticott J, Thangaratinam S, Rogozińska E, Teede HJ. Key Components of Antenatal Lifestyle interventions to optimize Gestational Weight Gain. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(6):e2318031.
Hart TL, Petersen KS, Kris-Etherton PM. Nutrition recommendations for a healthy pregnancy and lactation in women with overweight and obesity - strategies for weight loss before and after pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2022;118(3):434–46.
Allman-Farinelli M. Nutritional strategies to prevent weight gain and obesity. Nutrients. 2023;15(19):4180.
Boyle JA, Dodd J, Gordon A, Jack BW, Skouteris H. Policies and healthcare to support preconception planning and weight management: optimising long-term health for women and children. Public Health Res Pract. 2022;32(3):3232227.
Teefey CP, Durnwald CP. Strategies to reduce disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality: the role of obesity and metabolic disease. Semin Perinatol. 2017;41(5):287–92.
Heslehurst N. Identifying at risk women and the impact of maternal obesity on National Health Service maternity services. Proc Nutr Soc. 2011;70(4):439–49.
Huang Y, Ouyang YQ, Redding SR. Maternal prepregnancy body Mass Index, Gestational Weight Gain, and Cessation of Breastfeeding: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Breastfeed Med off J Acad Breastfeed Med. 2019;14(6):366–74.
Heslehurst N, Simpson H, Ells LJ, Rankin J, Wilkinson J, Lang R, et al. The impact of maternal BMI status on pregnancy outcomes with immediate short-term obstetric resource implications: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev off J Int Assoc Study Obes. 2008;9(6):635–83.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Opray N, Grivell RM, Deussen AR, Dodd JM. Directed preconception health programs and interventions for improving pregnancy outcomes for women who are overweight or obese. Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2015 Jul [cited 2022 May 31]; https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010932.pub2
Jacob CM, Killeen SL, McAuliffe FM, Stephenson J, Hod M, Diaz Yamal I, et al. Prevention of noncommunicable diseases by interventions in the preconception period: a FIGO position paper for action by healthcare practitioners. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2020;151(S1):6–15.
Stang J, Huffman LG. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: obesity, Reproduction, and pregnancy outcomes. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016;116(4):677–91.
Hanson M, Barker M, Dodd JM, Kumanyika S, Norris S, Steegers E, et al. Interventions to prevent maternal obesity before conception, during pregnancy, and post partum. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(1):65–76.
Hill B, McPhie S, Moran LJ, Harrison P, Huang TTK, Teede H, et al. Lifestyle intervention to prevent obesity during pregnancy: implications and recommendations for research and implementation. Midwifery. 2017;49:13–8.
O’Brien EC, Alberdi G, McAuliffe FM. The influence of socioeconomic status on gestational weight gain: a systematic review. J Public Health Oxf Engl. 2018;40(1):41–55.
Scott C, Andersen CT, Valdez N, Mardones F, Nohr EA, Poston L, et al. No global consensus: a cross-sectional survey of maternal weight policies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:167.
Simon A, Pratt M, Hutton B, Skidmore B, Fakhraei R, Rybak N, et al. Guidelines for the management of pregnant women with obesity: a systematic review. Obes Rev off J Int Assoc Study Obes. 2020;21(3):e12972.
Harrison CL, Teede H, Khan N, Lim S, Chauhan A, Drakeley S, et al. Weight management across preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum: a systematic review and quality appraisal of international clinical practice guidelines. Obes Rev off J Int Assoc Study Obes. 2021;22(10):e13310.
Sarni ROS, Kochi C, Suano-Souza FI. Childhood obesity: an ecological perspective. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2022;98(Suppl 1):S38–46.
DeMattia L, Denney SL. Childhood obesity Prevention: successful community-based efforts. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2008;615:83–99.
Tina M, Penhollow, Kelley E, Rhoads. Preventing obesity and promoting fitness: an ecological perspective. Am J Lifestyle Med. 8(1):21–4.
Boonpleng W, Park CG, Gallo AM, Corte C, McCreary L, Bergren MD. Ecological influences of early childhood obesity: a multilevel analysis. West J Nurs Res. 2013;35(6):742–59.
McPherson ME, Homer CJ. Policies to support obesity prevention for children: a focus on of early childhood policies. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2011;58(6):1521–41, xii.
Whittemore R, Melkus GD, Grey M. Applying the social ecological theory to type 2 diabetes prevention and management. J Community Health Nurs. 2004;21(2):87–99.
Devlieger R, Benhalima K, Damm P, Van Assche A, Mathieu C, Mahmood T, et al. Maternal obesity in Europe: where do we stand and how to move forward? A scientific paper commissioned by the European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;201:203–8.
Sanghvi T, Nguyen PH, Tharaney M, Ghosh S, Escobar-Alegria J, Mahmud Z, et al. Gaps in the implementation and uptake of maternal nutrition interventions in antenatal care services in Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Ethiopia and India. Matern Child Nutr. 2022;18(2):e13293.
Heslehurst N, Crowe L, Robalino S, Sniehotta FF, McColl E, Rankin J. Interventions to change maternity healthcare professionals’ behaviours to promote weight-related support for obese pregnant women: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2014;9(1):97.
Hanson M, Jacob CM, Hod M, Killeen SL, McAuliffe FM. The FIGO Pregnancy Obesity and Nutrition Initiative (PONI). Int J Gynaecol Obstet off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;147(2):131–3.
Schumann NL, Brinsden H, Lobstein T. A review of national health policies and professional guidelines on maternal obesity and weight gain in pregnancy. Clin Obes. 2014;4(4):197–208.
Kominiarek M, Chauhan S. Obesity before, during, and after pregnancy: a review and comparison of five National guidelines. Am J Perinatol. 2015;33(05):433–41.
Aoyama T, Li D, Bay JL. Weight Gain and Nutrition during pregnancy: an analysis of clinical practice guidelines in the Asia-Pacific Region. Nutrients. 2022;14(6):1288.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Poston L, Patel N. Dietary recommendations for obese pregnant women: current questions and controversies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93(11):1081–4.
Download references
Not applicable.
This work is a part of PhD thesis for the degree of PhD policy, funded by Tehran University of Medical Science (TUMS).
Authors and affiliations.
Department of Health Management, Policy, and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
Elnaz Kalantari, Maryam Tajvar & Amirhossein Takian
Elderly Health Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Shohreh Naderimagham
Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Department of Global Health & Public Policy, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Amirhossein Takian
Health Equity Research Center (HERC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
A.T. and E.K. conceived the study, its methodology and obtained funding. E.K. collected and analyzed data, and drafted the manuscript. M.T. and S.N. were the advisors and gave comments on the draft. A.T. supervised the study, helped in the interpretation of findings, and provided feedback for the intellectual development of the manuscript. He is guarantor.
Correspondence to Amirhossein Takian .
Ethics approval and consent to participate.
This study received ethical clearance from the Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (no. IR.TUMS.SPH.REC.1401.253).
Competing interests.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ .
Reprints and permissions
Cite this article.
Kalantari, E., Tajvar, M., Naderimagham, S. et al. Maternal obesity management: a narrative literature review of health policies. BMC Women's Health 24 , 520 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03342-2
Download citation
Received : 14 November 2023
Accepted : 27 August 2024
Published : 18 September 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03342-2
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
ISSN: 1472-6874
3400 Accesses
17 Citations
Explore all metrics
This study aims to analyze the trends, progress, and opportunities for future research on managerial ability literature. Since receiving a lot of attention after the study of Demerjian et al. (Manag Sci 58:1229–1248, 2012. http://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1487 ), there has been no literature review study on managerial ability research. Using a systematic review process, this study includes 120 papers. The studies’ period ranged from 1974 to 2020. The findings of this literature review are presented in two parts, namely (1) a discussion of trends in the five classifications (topics, research settings, theories, methods, and primary data analysis techniques) and the current progress in existing studies; and (2) suggestions for future research. We classify suggestions for future research into nine themes: firm performance, capital market, reporting quality, auditing, investment decisions, financial decisions, tax, corporate social responsibility, and others. In addition, the development of managerial ability definition over time is provided prior to the literature review findings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Subscribe and save.
Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Rent this article via DeepDyve
Institutional subscriptions
adapted from Hoque ( 2014 ) with modification
From 120 articles indexed in Scimago journal ranking, 87 and 78 articles are included in JOURQUAL3 and Clarivate Analytics impact factor, respectively.
33 of 120 articles.
Demerjian et al. ( 2009 ) is the working paper version of Demerjian et al. ( 2012 ).
Abernathy JL, Kubick TR, Masli A (2018) Evidence on the relation between managerial ability and financial reporting timeliness. Int J Audit 22:185–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12112
Article Google Scholar
Akbari F, Salehi M, Vlashani MAB (2018) The effect of managerial ability on tax avoidance by classical and bayesian econometrics in multilevel models: evidence of Iran. Int J Emerg Mark 13:1656–1678. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-09-2017-0367
Akbari F, Salehi M, Vlashani MAB (2019) The relationship between tax avoidance and firm value with income smoothing: A comparison between classical and Bayesian econometric in multilevel models. Int J Organ Anal 27:125–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-09-2017-1235
Andreou PC, Karasamani I, Louca C, Ehrlich D (2017) The impact of managerial ability on crisis-period corporate investment. J Bus Res 79:107–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.05.022
Andreou PC, Philip D, Robejsek P (2016) Bank liquidity creation and risk-taking: Does managerial ability matter? J Bus Finance Account 43:226–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12169
Arya A, Mittendorf B (2005) Offering stock options to gauge managerial talent. J Account Econ 40:189–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.02.001
Baik B, Brockman PA, Farber DB, Lee SS (2018) Managerial ability and the quality of firms’ information environment. J Account Audit Finance 33:506–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X17742820
Baik B, Choi S, Farber DB (2020) Managerial ability and income smoothing. Account Rev 95:1–22. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52600
Baik B, Farber DB, Lee SS (2011) CEO Ability and Management Earnings Forecasts. Contemp Account Res 28:1645–1668. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01091.x
Banna H, Ahmad R, Koh EHY (2018) How does total quality management influence the loan quality of the bank? Total Qual Manag Bus Excell 29:287–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2016.1180954
Berk JB, Stanton R (2007) Managerial ability, compensation, and the closed-end fund discount. J Finance 62:529–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01216.x
Berk JB, van Binsbergen JH (2015) Measuring skill in the mutual fund industry. J Financ Econ 118:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.05.002
Berne C, Mugica JM, Rivera P (2005) The managerial ability to control the varied behaviour of regular customers in retailing: interformat differences. J Retail Consum Serv 12:151–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2004.05.003
Bertrand M, Schoar A (2003) Managing with style: the effect of managers on firm policies. Q J Econ 118:1169–1208. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552775
Bleaney M, Smith RT (2010) Managerial skill and closed-end fund discounts. Financ Mark Portf Manag 24:441–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-010-0144-8
Bonsall SB IV, Holzman ER, Miller BP (2017) Managerial ability and credit risk assessment. Manag Sci 63:1425–1449. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2403
Bose SC, Kiran R, Goyal D (2017) Examining the relation of service assistance facilities, managerial skill competencies and constraints with agri-business incubators performance in India. Custos E Agronegocio 13:75–100
Google Scholar
Boyatzis RE, Renio Case A (1989) Research article: The impact of an MBA programme on managerial abilities. J Manag Dev 8:66–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000001363
Burks JJ, Randolph DW, Seida JA (2019) Modeling and interpreting regressions with interactions. J Account Lit 42:61–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2018.08.001
Cao J, Cheng Y, Golden J, Zhang JH (2019) Managerial ability, forecasting quality, and open-market repurchase program completion. Rev Quant Finance Account 53:871–894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-018-0769-7
Chang YY, Dasgupta S, Hilary G (2010) CEO ability, pay, and firm performance. Manag Sci 56:1633–1652. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1205
Chauhan GS (2019) Performance attribution of mutual funds in India: outperformance or mis-representation? Account Finance 59:383–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12463
Chen M, Ruan L, Zhu Z, Sang F (2020) Macro uncertainty, analyst performance, and managerial ability. Eurasian Bus Rev 10:333–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-020-00148-8
Chen TK, Liao HH, Chen WH (2017) CEO ability heterogeneity, board’s recruiting ability and credit risk. Rev Quant Finance Account 49:1005–1039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-017-0615-3
Cheng TY, Li YQ, Lin YE, Chih HH (2020) Does the fit of managerial ability with firm strategy matters on firm performance. J Asian Finance Econ Bus 7:9–19. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no4.9
Cheung KTS, Naidu D, Navissi F, Ranjeeni K (2017) Valuing talent: Do CEOs’ ability and discretion unambiguously increase firm performance. J Corp Finance 42:15–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.11.006
Choi W, Han S, Jung SH, Kang T (2015) CEO’s operating ability and the association between accruals and future cash flows. J Bus Financ Account 42:619–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12118
Cornaggia KJ, Krishnan GV, Wang C (2017) Managerial ability and credit ratings. Contemp Account Res 34:2094–2122. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12334
Cox JS (2017) Managerial ability, growth opportunities, and IPO performance. Manag Financ 43:488–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-07-2016-0218
Cui H, Chen C, Zhang Y, Zhu X (2019) Managerial ability and stock price crash risk. Asia-Pac J Account Econ 26:532–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2019.1636662
Cui H, Leung SCM (2020) The long-run performance of acquiring firms in mergers and acquisitions: Does managerial ability matter? J Contemp Account Econ 16:100185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2020.100185
Curi C, Lozano-Vivas A (2020) Managerial ability as a tool for prudential regulation. J Econ Behav Organ 174:87–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.03.023
De Franco G, Hope OK, Lu H (2017) Managerial ability and bank-loan pricing. J Bus Finance Account 44:1315–1337. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12267
Demerjian PR, Lev B, McVay SE (2009) Quantifying managerial ability: a new measure and validity tests. Work Pap Univ Utah
Demerjian PR, Lev B, McVay SE (2012) Quantifying managerial ability: A new measure and validity tests. Manag Sci 58:1229–1248. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1487
Demerjian PR, Lev B, Lewis MF, McVay SE (2013) Managerial ability and earnings quality. Account Rev 88:463–498. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50318
Demerjian PR, Lewis MF, McVay SE (2020) How does intentional earnings smoothing vary with managerial ability? J Account Audit Financ 35:1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X17748405
Dyreng SD, Hanlon M, Maydew EL (2019) When Does Tax Avoidance Result in Tax Uncertainty? Account Rev 94:179–203. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52198
Dziwornu RK (2017) Does managerial ability really drive cost efficiency? Evidence from boiler businesses. Manag Decis Econ 38:731–741. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2810
Edwards A, Schwab C, Shevlin T (2016) Financial constraints and cash tax savings. Account Rev 91:859–881. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51282
Fee CE, Hadlock CJ (2003) Raids, rewards, and reputations in the market for managerial talent. Rev Financ Stud 16:1315–1357. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhg031
Fernando GD, Jain SS, Tripathy A (2020) This cloud has a silver lining: Gender diversity, managerial ability, and firm performance. J Bus Res 117:484–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.042
Ferruz L, Muñoz F, Vargas M (2012) Managerial abilities: evidence from religious mutual fund managers. J Bus Ethics 105:503–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0982-y
Francis J, Huang AH, Rajgopal S, Zang AY (2008) CEO reputation and earnings quality. Contemp Account Res 25:109–147. https://doi.org/10.1506/car.25.1.4
Galavotti I (2019) Firm-level recent profitability and acquisition performance: exploring competing theoretical perspectives. Eurasian Bus Rev 9:319–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-018-0111-2
Gan H (2019) Does CEO managerial ability matter? Evidence from corporate investment efficiency. Rev Quant Finance Account 52:1085–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-018-0737-2
Gan H, Park MS (2017) CEO managerial ability and the marginal value of cash. Adv Account 38:126–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2017.07.007
García-Meca E, García-Sánchez I (2018) Does managerial ability influence the quality of financial reporting? Eur Manag J 36:544–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.07.010
García-Sánchez I, Aibar-Guzmán B, Aibar-Guzmán C, Azevedo T (2020) CEO ability and sustainability disclosures: The mediating effect of corporate social responsibility performance. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 27:1565–1577. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1905
García-Sánchez I, Hussain N, Martínez-Ferrero J (2019) An empirical analysis of the complementarities and substitutions between effects of ceo ability and corporate governance on socially responsible performance. J Clean Prod 215:1288–1300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.130
García-Sánchez I, Martínez-Ferrero J (2019) Chief executive officer ability, corporate social responsibility, and financial performance: The moderating role of the environment. Bus Strategy Environ 28:542–555. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2263
Gillen DJ, Carroll SJ (1985) Relationship of managerial ability to unit effectiveness in more organic versus more mechanistic departments. J Manag Stud 22:668–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1985.tb00017.x
Goodman TH, Neamtiu M, Shroff N, White HD (2014) Management forecast quality and capital investment decisions. Account Rev 89:331–365. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50575
Guan JX, Li OZ, Ma J (2018) Managerial ability and the shareholder tax sensitivity of dividends. J Financ Quant Anal 53:335–364. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109017001004
Gul FA, Khedmati M, Lim EK, Navissi F (2018) Managerial ability, financial distress, and audit fees. Account Horiz 32:29–51. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51888
Habib A, Hasan MM (2017) Managerial ability, investment efficiency and stock price crash risk. Res Int Bus Financ 42:262–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.048
Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2019) Multivariate data analysis, 8th edn. Cengage Learning, Boston
Hambrick DC (2007) Upper Echelons Theory: An Update. Acad Manag Rev 32:334–343. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159303
Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1982) The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. Acad Manag Proc 1982:12–16. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.1982.4976402
Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. Acad Manage Rev 9:193–206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628
Harada N (2004) Productivity and entrepreneurial characteristics in new Japanese firms. Small Bus Econ 23:299–310. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000032038.32318.62
Hasan MM (2020) Readability of narrative disclosures in 10-K reports: Does managerial ability matter? Eur Account Rev 29:147–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1528169
Hayes RM, Schaefer S (1999) How much are differences in managerial ability worth? J Account Econ 27:125–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(99)00007-5
Herawaty V, Solihah D (2019) The effect of CEO tenure, managerial skills and earning power on earnings manipulation with corporate governance as a moderating variable on manufcaturing companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange. Acad Account Financ Stud J 23:1–16
Hesarzadeh R, Bazrafshan A (2019) CEO ability and regulatory review risk. Manag Audit J 34:575–605. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-08-2018-1958
Hoberg G, Kumar N, Prabhala N (2018) Mutual fund competition, managerial skill, and alpha persistence. Rev Financ Stud 31:1896–1929. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhx127
Holcomb TR, Holmes RM Jr, Connelly BL (2009) Making the most of what you have: managerial ability as a source of resource value creation. Strateg Manag J 30:457–485. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.747
Hoque Z (2014) 20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research. Br Account Rev 46:33–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2013.10.003
Huang H, Sun L, Zhang J (2017) Environmental uncertainty and tax avoidance. Adv Tax 24:83–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1058-749720170000024002
Huang X, (S. ), Sun L, (2017) Managerial ability and real earnings management. Adv Account 39:91–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2017.08.003
Kaplan SN, Klebanov MM, Sorensen M (2012) Which CEO characteristics and abilities matter? J Finance 67:973–1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01739.x
Khan SH, Saeed M, Fatima K (2009) Assessing the performance of secondary school headteachers: a survey study based on teachers’ views in Punjab. Educ Manag Adm Leadersh 37:766–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143209345572
Khurana IK, Moser WJ, Raman KK (2018) Tax avoidance, managerial ability, and investment efficiency. Abacus 54:547–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12142
Koester A, Shevlin T, Wangerin D (2017) The role of managerial ability in corporate tax avoidance. Manag Sci 63:3285–3310. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2510
Koijen RSJ (2014) The cross-section of managerial ability, incentives, and risk preferences. J Finance 69:1051–1098. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12140
Krishnan GV, Wang C (2015) The relation between managerial ability and audit fees and going concern opinions. Audit J Pract Theory 34:139–160. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50985
Lee JE (2015) Managerial ability and the effectiveness of Internal control ever financial reporting. J Appl Bus Res 31:1781–1788
Lee S, Matsunaga SR, Park CW (2012) Management forecast accuracy and CEO turnover. Account Rev 87:2095–2122
Lee T, Liu HM (2018) How do firms with management ability promote competitive advantages? An integrated model from entrepreneurial strategy making and internal resources. Entrep Res J 8:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2017-0071
Lesser K, Rößle F, Walkshäusl C (2016) International socially responsible funds: Financial performance and managerial skills during crisis and non-crisis markets. Probl Perspect Manag 4:461–472. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm
Li Y, Luo Y (2017) The contextual nature of the association between managerial ability and audit fees. Rev Account Finance 16:2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF-01-2016-0012
Luo Y, Zhou L (2017) Managerial ability, tone of earnings announcements, and market reaction. Asian Rev Account 25:454–471. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-07-2016-0078
Masuda T (2009) The profitable new Japanese entrepreneurs: The minor role of information technology. Int J Entrep Small Bus 7:24–58. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2009.021608
Masuda T (2010) Novice founders and re-starters in Japanese business society. Int J Bus Glob 5:304–327. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBG.2010.035025
Mata ME (2009) Managerial strategies in canning industries: A case study of early twentieth century Portugal. Bus Hist 51:45–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076790802602180
Mishra CS (2019) Does managerial ability drive firm innovativeness? IEEE Trans Eng Manag. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2923892
Mishra DR (2014) The dark side of CEO ability: CEO general managerial skills and cost of equity capital. J Corp Finance 29:390–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.10.003
Mitra S, Jaggi B, Al-Hayale T (2019) Managerial overconfidence, ability, firm-governance and audit fees. Rev Quant Finance Account 52:841–870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-018-0728-3
Mori N, Munisi G (2014) Evaluating the missing links in the relationship between executives’ compensation and firm performance. Int J Bus Glob 12:315–333. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBG.2014.060215
Muñoz F, Vargas M, Marco I (2014) Environmental mutual funds: Financial performance and managerial abilities. J Bus Ethics 124:551–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1893-x
Muteba Mwamba JW (2017) An empirical evaluation of hedge fund managerial skills using bayesian techniques. Asian Acad Manag J Account Financ 13:63–82. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamjaf2017.13.1.3
Nuthall PL (2001) Managerial ability—a review of its basis and potential improvement using psychological concepts. Agric Econ 24:247–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5150(00)00069-4
Nuthall PL (2009) Modelling the origins of managerial ability in agricultural production. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 53:413–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2009.00459.x
Pan Y, Wang TY, Weisbach MS (2015) Learning about CEO ability and stock return volatility. Rev Financ Stud 28:1623–1666. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhv014
Park J, Ko CY, Jung H, Lee YS (2016) Managerial ability and tax avoidance: evidence from Korea. Asia-Pac J Account Econ 23:449–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2015.1017590
Park SY, Song Y (2019) The effect of managerial ability on firm’s dividend policy: evidence from Korea. Int J Entrep 23:1–15
Petkevich A, Prevost A (2018) Managerial ability, information quality, and the design and pricing of corporate debt. Rev Quant Financ Account 51:1033–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-017-0696-z
Rego SO, Wilson R (2012) Equity risk incentives and corporate tax aggressiveness. J Account Res 50:775–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00438.x
Sahin C (2011) Managing professional service firms: role of managerial abilities. J Manag Dev 30:413–426. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711111126882
Salehi M, Daemi A, Akbari F (2020) The effect of managerial ability on product market competition and corporate investment decisions: Evidence from Iran. J Islam Account Bus Res 11:49–69. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-10-2016-0113
Salehi M, Mousavi Shiri M, Hossini SZ (2019) The relationship between managerial ability, earnings management and internal control quality on audit fees in Iran. Int J Product Perform Manag 69:685–703. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-07-2018-0261
Sarwar B, Kutan A, Ming X, Husnain M (2019) How do talented managers view dividend policy? Further evidence from Chinese equity market. Int J Emerg Mark 15:559–586. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-03-2019-0179
Scholefield J (1974) The significance of concepts, models and mental frameworks in the development of general managerial ability. Manag Educ Dev 5:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050767400500206
SeTin S, Murwaningsari E (2018) The effect of managerial ability towards earning quality with audit committee as moderating variable. J Bus Retail Manag Res 12:178–189
Shields MD (1997) Research in Management Accounting by North Americans in the 1990s. J Manag Account Res 9:3–61
Smutny P, Prochazka J, Vaculik M (2016) The relationship between managerial skills and managerial effectiveness in a managerial simulation game. Innovar 26:11–22. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v26n62.59385
Sun L (2016) Managerial ability and goodwill impairment. Adv Account 32:42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2016.02.002
Sun L (2017) Managerial ability and chemical releases. Sust Account Manag Policy J 8:281–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2016-0062
Truong C, Garg M, Adrian C et al (2020) Political alignment and audit pricing. Int J Audit 24:205–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12189
Veltri S, D’Orio G, Bonanno G (2016) Measuring managerial ability using a two-stage SFA-DEA approach. Knowl Process Manag 23:247–258. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1528
Wang Z, Chen MH, Chin CL, Zheng Q (2017) Managerial ability, political connections, and fraudulent financial reporting in China. J Account Public Policy 36:141–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2017.02.004
Young BS, Arthur W Jr, Finch J (2000) Predictors of managerial performance: More than cognitive ability. J Bus Psychol 15:53–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007766818397
Yuan Y, Tian G, Lu LY, Yu Y (2019) CEO ability and corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 157:391–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3622-3
Yung K, Chen C (2018) Managerial ability and firm risk-taking behavior. Rev Quant Financ Account 51:1005–1032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-017-0695-0
Zang AY (2012) Evidence on the trade-off between real activities manipulation and accrual-based earnings management. Account Rev 87:675–703. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10196
Zhu M (2018) Informative fund size, managerial skill, and investor rationality. J Financ Econ 130:114–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.06.002
Download references
We would like to thank Deputy for Research and Development Empowerment, Ministry of Research and Technology/National Innovation Agency for the financial support provided for this study. This study is funded by the Ministry of Research and Technology/National Innovation Agency of the Republic of Indonesia under the scheme of PMDSU, contract number 2141/UN1/DITLIT/DIT-LIT/PT/2020.
This study is funded by the Ministry of Research and Technology/National Innovation Agency of the Republic of Indonesia under the scheme of PMDSU, contract number 2141/UN1/DITLIT/DIT-LIT/PT/2020.
Authors and affiliations.
Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jl. Sosio Humaniora 1, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Puspita Ghaniy Anggraini & Mahfud Sholihin
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Mahfud Sholihin .
Conflict of interest.
There is no conflict of interest.
All articles included in this study are accessible through the Scopus database.
Publisher's note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Reprints and permissions
Anggraini, P.G., Sholihin, M. What do we know about managerial ability? A systematic literature review. Manag Rev Q 73 , 1–30 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00229-6
Download citation
Received : 31 January 2021
Accepted : 29 June 2021
Published : 06 July 2021
Issue Date : February 2023
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00229-6
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Email citation, add to collections.
Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.
Affiliations.
Background and objectives: Conventional surgical modalities, including twist drill craniotomy, burr hole evacuation, and craniotomy, are the standard surgical interventions for chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH). More recently, treatment of cSDH with middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is being explored. The comparative effectiveness of MMAE versus conventional surgical modalities remains controversial. The objective of this study is to analyze various postoperative outcomes in an umbrella review of existing meta-analysis comparing MMAE and conventional management in patients with cSDH.
Methods: A systematic literature search was executed with defined criteria across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Data was analyzed utilizing the metaumbrella R package, employing equivalent Hedges' g values. The quality assessment of each meta-analysis was carried out using AMSTAR2, assigning scores within the range of 0-11. The credibility of the evidence was determined by applying the Ioannidis criteria.
Results: This umbrella review study included five meta-analyses. Upon pooling the meta-analyses, MMAE was associated with fewer reoperations and recurrence, supported by a weak level of evidence (class IV). Conversely, findings related to other postoperative outcomes did not reach statistical significance.
Conclusion: Our umbrella review offers a comprehensive summary investigating MMAE and conventional management for the treatment of cSDH. MMAE had fewer reoperations and recurrence, but they were classified as being of weak significance. These findings underscore insufficient evidence within the existing literature, emphasizing the imperative need for additional research in this area.
Keywords: Chronic subdural hematoma; Embolization; Meta-analysis; Middle meningeal artery; Umbrella review.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PubMed Disclaimer
Full text sources.
NCBI Literature Resources
MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer
The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.
COMMENTS
The application of systematic or structured literature reviews (SLRs) has developed into an established approach in the management domain (Kraus et al. 2020), with 90% of management-related SLRs published within the last 10 years (Clark et al. 2021).Such reviews help to condense knowledge in the field and point to future research directions, thereby enabling theory development (Fink 2010 ...
It can also help to provide an overview of areas in which the research is disparate and interdisciplinary. In addition, a literature review is an excellent way of synthesizing research findings to show evidence on a meta-level and to uncover areas in which more research is needed, which is a critical component of creating theoretical frameworks and building conceptual models.
Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) have become a standard tool in many fields of management research but are often considerably less stringently presented than other pieces of research.
Exploring the Latest Trends in Management Literature, Volume 1. A Critical Review of Literature Review Methodologies. How to Plan and Write for Systematic Literature Review Papers in Management Domain. Parameters and Decision Elements of Writing Effective Literature Review Papers: Empirical Evidence From Multiple Stakeholders on POWER Framework.
Literature review articles, including structured literature reviews, bibliometric analyses, and meta-analyses, are invaluable tools in the realm of management research, significantly contributing to its growth and development (Hulland and Houston 2020).They serve as cornerstones for theory development, policy formulation, and evidence-based decision-making, thus playing a pivotal role in the ...
In management (including strategic management) literature, inquiry into the nature of theory and theory building typically analyzes the epistemological and methodological assumptions that underpin research (Rabetino et al., 2020). Authors who contribute to such discussions reveal how they conceive of the process of management research as it is ...
The application of systematic or structured literature reviews (SLRs) has devel-oped into an established approach in the management domain (Kraus et al. 2020), with 90% of management-related SLRs published within the last 10 years (Clark et al. 2021). Such reviews help to condense knowledge in the eld and point to
As management research grows in volume and scope, topic fragmentation and interconnection increase with other fields (Tranfield, Denyer, & Smart, 2003).To help make sense of this fragmentation of research, Transfield and colleagues introduced the management field to a tool used primarily in medicine/health called a systematic literature review ("SLR" going forward).
Common literature review methods such as systematic review and narrative review are poorly suited to the investigation of complex management phenomena. Systematic reviews are highly driven by protocol and procedure, and are oft-criticized as reductive and poorly equipped to examine the interaction between phenomena and context, nonlinear ...
A literature review is an essential component of almost any research project. It serves as the foundation for advancing knowledge, facilitates theory development, closes mature research areas, and uncovers novel research areas (Webster and Watson 2002).Frank and Hatak refer to a literature review as a "knowledge map", which analyzes and synthesizes prior literature.
A systematic literature review provides a comprehensive overview of literature related to a research question and synthesizes previous work to strengthen a particular topic's foundation of knowledge, while adhering to the concepts of transparency and bias reduction. In the growing, complex, and dynamic, management research field, systematic literature reviews have value, yet there is ...
The objective of this work is to review the literature of the main concepts that lead to determining the strategic approach, creation of strategies, organizational structures, strategy formulation, and strategic evaluation as a guide for the organizational management, taking into account the effects produced by the different types of strategies on the performance of organizations.
In summary, our review shows that there is a lack of research considering skills like information management, problem solving, critical thinking, communication and collaboration, even though these are the skills most mentioned in academic literature as important 21st-century skills.
Literature reviews establish the foundation of academic inquires. However, in the planning field, we lack rigorous systematic reviews. In this article, through a systematic search on the methodology of literature review, we categorize a typology of literature reviews, discuss steps in conducting a systematic literature review, and provide suggestions on how to enhance rigor in literature ...
With the sole focus toward review of literature, we are pleased to present "Review of Management Literature (RoML)" and introducing the first volume. This chapter and volume answers the present tensions accruing in the existing literature as well as present strategies on bridging the gaps. The chapters included in the first volume belong to ...
Working Capital Management: A System atic Literature. Review. Vibhav Pratap. School of Business, University of Petroleum and En ergy Studies. Dehradun, India. Email: [email protected] ...
Despite earlier calls in the literature for more clarity and consistency in HR system labels and content (e.g., Lepak et al., 2006), our review shows that the terminology used to label HR systems has become increasingly unclear. Whether researchers study high performance, commitment, or involvement HR systems or focus on more strategically ...
Examples of literature reviews. Step 1 - Search for relevant literature. Step 2 - Evaluate and select sources. Step 3 - Identify themes, debates, and gaps. Step 4 - Outline your literature review's structure. Step 5 - Write your literature review.
The results as shown in Fig. 4 revealed that 69% of the reviewed papers 14,16,17,22,24,26 employ the empirical method, while 18% were conceptual studies, 6% use case study method and literature review. Main subjects: The next classification was based on the main subject of the research articles reviewed for systematic review as A, B, C and D ...
The study examines perfor mance management in a managerial science literature, and it will serve as a precision and accurate navigating tool in the performance manage ment industry. 4.
"The literature review (narrative and systematic) is the foundation of new theory development. It gives substance to your empirical work, informs your research methods and analysis, and guides your business practices and actions. The Review of Management Literature is ideal in meeting the above in both academia and industry!"
The best proposals are timely and clearly explain why readers should pay attention to the proposed topic. It is not enough for a review to be a summary of the latest growth in the literature: the ...
Maternal obesity rates are increasing significantly, posing substantial risks to both mothers and their children. This study aims to introduce health policies addressing maternal obesity, identify preventive interventions, and highlight scientific gaps necessitating further research.We identified documents through electronic searches in PubMed, CINAHL Plus, EMBASE, and grey literature sources ...
Management Review Quarterly - This study aims to analyze the trends, progress, and opportunities for future research on managerial ability literature. ... The findings of this literature review are presented in two parts, namely (1) a discussion of trends in the five classifications (topics, research settings, theories, methods, and primary ...
The objective of this study is to analyze various postoperative outcomes in an umbrella review of existing meta-analysis comparing MMAE and conventional management in patients with cSDH. Methods: A systematic literature search was executed with defined criteria across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Data was analyzed utilizing the ...
A systematized literature review is a type of review that allows students to practice central elements of a systematic review (transparency, reproducibility), while omitting some of its more resource-intensive prerequisites, like conducting a comprehensive search or performing a quality assessment (Grant & Booth, 2009). However, the lack of ...
Postoperative management often demands the introduction of several strategies in an attempt to minimize complication rates. One of the routine strategies includes the use of spinal drains, which have been questioned for their efficacy in improving postoperative outcomes. However, its role in postoperative outcomes is still debated. In general, this elucidation of an extensive literature review ...
Request PDF | Quality management and certified medical physicist's role in radiology for radiation dose optimization: a literature review until 2024 | This review aims to propose effective steps ...