Equitable Assignment: Everything You Need to Know
An equitable assignment is one that does not fulfill the statutory criteria for a legal assignment, but is binding and upheld by the courts in the interest of equability, justice, and fairness. 3 min read updated on February 01, 2023
An equitable assignment is one that does not fulfill the statutory criteria for a legal assignment, but is binding and upheld by the courts in the interest of equability, justice, and fairness.
Equitable Assignment
An equitable assignment may not appear to be self-evident by the law's standard, but it presents the assignee with a title that is protected and recognized in equity. It's based on the essence of a declaration of trust; specifically, essential fairness and natural justice. As long as there is valuable consideration involved, it does not matter if a formal agreement is signed. There needs to be some sort of intent displayed from one party to assign and the other party to receive.
The evaluation of a righteous equitable assignment is completed by determining if a debtor would rationally pay the debt to another party alleging to be the assignee. Equitable assignments can be created by:
- The assignor informing the assignee that they transferred a right to them
- The assignor instructing the other party to release their obligation from the assignee and place it instead on the assignor
The only part of an agreement that can be assigned is the benefit. Generally speaking, there is no prerequisite for the written notice to be received or given. The significant characteristic that separates an equitable assignment from a legal assignment is that most of the time, an equitable assignee may not take action against a third party. Instead, it must rely on the guidelines governing equitable assignments. In other words, the equitable assignee must team up with the assignor to take action.
The Doctrine of Equitable Assignment in Wisconsin
In Dow Family LLC v. PHH Mortgage Corp ., the Wisconsin Supreme Court issued in favor of the doctrine of equitable assignment. The case was similar to many other foreclosure cases, except this one came with a twist. Essentially, Dow Family LLC purchased a property and the property owner insisted the mortgage on the property had been paid off. However, in actuality, it wasn't.
Prior to the sale, the mortgage on the property was with PHH Mortgage Corp. When PHH went to foreclose on the mortgage, Dow Family LLC contested it. There was one specific rebuttal that caught the attention of the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The official mortgage on record was with MERS, an appointee for the original lender, U.S. Bank.
Dow argued that PHH couldn't foreclose on the property because the true owner was MERS. Essentially, Dow was stating that the mortgage was never assigned to PHH. Based on this argument, PHH utilized the doctrine of equitable assignment.
Based on a case from 1859, Croft v. Bunster, the court determined that the security for a note is equitably assigned when the note is assigned without a need for an independent, written assignment. Additionally, Dow contended that the statute of frauds prohibits the utilization of the doctrine, mainly because it claimed every assignment on a property must be formally recorded.
During the case, Dow argued that the MERS system, which stored the data regarding the mortgage, was fundamentally flawed. According to the court, the statute of frauds was satisfied because the equitable assignment was in accordance with the operation of law. Most importantly, the court avoided all consideration regarding the MERS system, concluding it was not significant in their decision.
The outcome was a major win for lenders, as they were relying on the doctrine specifically for these types of circumstances.
Most experts agree that this outcome makes sense in the current mortgage-lending environment. This is due to the fact that it is still quite common for mortgages to be bundled up into mortgage-backed securities and sold on the secondary market.
Many economists claim that by not requiring mortgages to be recorded each time a transfer is completed, the loans are more easily marketed to investors. Additionally, debtors know who their current mortgage company is because the new lender must always notify the current borrower in order to receive payment. It was determined that recording and documenting the mortgage merely provides a signal to the rest of the world that the property owner secures a debt.
If you need help with an equitable assignment, you can post your job on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.
Hire the top business lawyers and save up to 60% on legal fees
Content Approved by UpCounsel
- Assignment Legal Definition
- Assignment Law
- What Is the Definition of Assigns
- Legal Assignment
- Assignment and Novation Agreement: What You Need to Know
- Assignment of Rights Example
- Assignment of Rights and Obligations Under a Contract
- Partial Assignment of Contract
- Assignment Contract Law
- What is an Assignment and Assumption Agreement
At MyLawQuestions, we're committed to delivering accurate, trustworthy information. Our expert-authored content is rigorously fact-checked and sourced from credible authorities. Discover how we uphold the highest standards in providing you with reliable knowledge.
Learn more...
What Is an Equitable Assignment?
An equitable assignment is a transfer of future interest that doesn’t fully meet legal standards, but will still be honored by courts. This is an example of a situation covered by equity, or fairness, rather than specific legal doctrine. Courts will enforce such agreements when they are not covered by existing laws, as long as they appear reasonable, fair, and without coercion. The standards for an equitable assignment to pass court scrutiny can depend on the region and the situation.
In such assignments, people can reassign future income in several different ways. One option can be to transfer interest, like part of a trust, to another person; the trust is guaranteed income, but the assignor waives the right to it, allowing the assignee to benefit from it. Another way to perform an equitable assignment is to have third parties transfer anticipated payments to the assignee. In all cases, the transfer involves future income or benefits, not current ones.
Expectations do not count as an equitable assignment. If a child believes she will inherit her father’s house, for example, she cannot transfer her interest in the house to another party. This is because the inheritance is an expectation, not a guarantee. In the event she does not inherit the house, the person she transferred the interest to has no recourse. Thus, someone cannot ask to have a debt written off in exchange for a future expectation.
Due consideration also needs to be part of an equitable assignment transaction to prevent fraud and ensure a transaction is legitimate. In the example of assigning rights to a trust, for instance, the assignor would need to receive something in exchange. That might be a bulk payment to buy the right to proceeds from the trust later. If due consideration is not present, the court may not uphold the agreement, on the grounds that it could be suspect. A special concern can be attempts to transfer rights to future earnings for the purpose of avoiding tax liability, in which case the assignee might be planning to transfer the funds back or allow the assignor to use them.
Specific legal standards for equitable assignments can depend on the nation. People with concerns can consult an attorney for advice in these situations. Attorneys with expertise in this area are familiar with actions in equity courts and can determine whether a transaction is likely to hold up in court.
Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a MyLawQuestions researcher and writer. Mary has a liberal arts degree from Goddard College and spends her free time reading, cooking, and exploring the great outdoors.
AS FEATURED ON:
Related Articles
- In Finance, What Does "Cash in Lieu" Mean?
Discuss this Article
Post your comments.
- Man with hands on his hips
Switch language:
Legal and equitable assignments
- Share on Linkedin
- Share on Facebook
Financiers and lessors often take an assignment over debts or certain rights under contracts as part of their security package. Depending on how this is done, an assignment can either be characterised as a legal or equitable assignment under English law. Stephenson Harwood’s Dipesh Bharania explains
A key difference between a legal and equitable assignment is the ability of the assignee, be it a financier or lessor, to bring proceedings in its own name against the debtor for payment of the debt owed, or to enforce rights in the contract.
Go deeper with GlobalData
Alternative Payment Solution: iDEAL
Competitor profile: neat, premium insights.
The gold standard of business intelligence.
Find out more
A legal assignee has this right, but there is a question over whether an equitable assignee has this right or not.
In the case of General Nutrition Investment Company v Holland and Barrett International Ltd and another [2017] EWHC 746 Ch, the High Court held that the beneficiary of an equitable assignment did not have the right to bring proceedings in its own name, and had to do so jointly with the assignor which had assigned rights in the underlying contract.
This raises questions about the equitable assignment, as it appears to contradict other judgments which permit an equitable assignee to take proceedings in its own name. The predecessor company of General Nutrition Investment Company (GNIC) entered into a trade mark licence agreement in March 2003 with Holland and Barrett (H&B) allowing H&B to use certain trademarks in the UK.
After complex internal restructuring, the original contracting party had been dissolved and GNIC was the successor company, which as assignee had been assigned both the rights under the original trademark licence agreement, and the rights to the trademarks themselves. GNIC alleged that H&B was in breach of the licence agreement and served a number of notices of termination on H&B purporting to terminate the agreement.
How well do you really know your competitors?
Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.
Your download email will arrive shortly
Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample
We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form
The court had to decide whether any of these notices of termination were effective, and whether GNIC had the right to serve such notices, and bring and maintain proceedings against H&B in its own name.
The formalities for a legal assignment are set out in Section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925, including that the assignment must be:
In writing and executed by the assignor “Absolute” and unconditional, Not be expressed to be “by way of charge”, and Notified in writing to the person against whom the assignor could enforce the assigned rights – usually the other contracting party.
It can often suit the assignor, the assignee and the third party to allow the assignor to deal with the third party, for notice not to be given (certainly initially) and the assignee to remain a silent party. This method is frequently used in financing documents, with notice only being given at a later date (rather than at the time of assignment) when there is a possibility of enforcement on the horizon.
An equitable assignment tends to be created when an assignment does not meet one or more of the requirements for a legal assignment. The main differences between a legal and an equitable assignment are priority (and the established principle that the assignee who serves notice first takes priority over any other assignee (where notice is not given)) and an equitable assignee needing to join the assignor as a party in any legal proceedings it brings against the third-party debtor.
However, two recent cases have lessened the distinction in practice between the two. In the Bexhill case the Court of Appeal recognised that an equitable assignee could take action in its own name without joining in the assignor. In the Ardila case, where notice had been given to the contracting party, the High Court looked at the terms of the notice and decided that what had seemed to be a legal assignment was in fact an equitable assignment because the wording of the notice seemed to retain rights for the assignor. The court used this reasoning to declare it an equitable assignment, despite the notice having been given as required.
Returning to the case in point, after the internal reorganisation and subsequent assignment of the trade mark licence agreement to GNIC, no notices of such assignment were served on H&B by the assignor prior to the purported termination of the agreement or the issue of proceedings. GNIC maintained that as it took the place of its predecessor as the “Licensor”, it became the body entitled to exercise rights of termination under the agreement. H&B’s contention was that, as an equitable assignee, GNIC did not have the right to terminate the agreement or bring proceedings in its own name.
It is widely accepted that, until a notice of assignment is given, and (i) the third party can validly discharge its obligations under the contract to the assignor, and (ii) the third party may raise against the assignee any defence or set-off which he could have raised against the assignor (provided that the matter on which the defence is based arose before notice was received) and the contracting party and assignor can amend the terms of the contract without the assignee’s consent.
The High Court considered that previous case law on this issue was binding as it had not been overruled or materially distinguished in any subsequent cases heard, and held that notice to the contracting third party is necessary to perfect the right of the assignee. Additional weight was given to the fact that a substantive contractual right (in this case, the right to terminate the licence agreement) had been assigned rather than just the assignment of a debt. Consequently, the contractual relationship between the parties was seeking to be amended and therefore the third party was entitled to see that such change was being effected by a party which had the right to do so and whom it knew to have such rights. The Court maintained that H&B cannot be expected to accept a notice of termination from an entity which turns out to be an assignee when it had never been given notice of that assignment.
While the High Court accepted that this decision may be appealed, this has raised a question about equitable assignments and the rights of the equitable assignee under English law. In the meantime, in practice, parties will have to scrutinise what type of right they are seeking, whether in security or as a full legal assignment and opt for the method which provides the clearest outcome possible as the law stands when they take the assignment. Anyone taking an assignment of the benefit of a contract should clearly ensure that notice is served on the other contracting party if it wants to be sure it can act in its own name under that contract against the other contracting party if need be.
Otherwise, there is a risk that an equitable assignee will be unable to enforce substantive contractual rights without having to join in the assignor in proceedings. That said, it may still be commercially preferable to have an equitable assignment for particular financing and leasing structures where it is not thought difficult to join the assignor at a later date if need be. In this case it was not possible, as the assignor had been dissolved. Advice should be sought about the type of assignment to be taken in each transaction pending further clarification from the courts.
Related Company Profiles
More relevant.
Top M&A legal advisers in financial services in 2023
Davis polk & wardwell, kirkland & ellis lead financial services-sector m&a legal advisers in q1-q3 2023, auxillias expands team with two legal, governance and compliance specialists, jo davis and daksha mistry launch specialist legal firm, sign up for our daily news round-up.
Give your business an edge with our leading industry insights.
Sign up to the newsletter: In Brief
Your corporate email address, i would also like to subscribe to:.
Leasing Life Focus (monthly)
I consent to Verdict Media Limited collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with Privacy Policy
Thank you for subscribing
View all newsletters from across the GlobalData Media network.
Assignment Of Leases And Rents
Jump to Section
What is an assignment of leases and rents.
The assignment of leases and rents, also known as the assignment of leases rents and profits, is a legal document that gives a mortgage lender right to any future profits that may come from leases and rents when a property owner defaults on their loan. This document is usually attached to a mortgage loan agreement.
Assignment of leases and rents allows lenders to a degree of financial protection in case a loan default occurs. This document is an agreement made between a borrower and a lender of mortgage loans. It often details an exact amount the lender will be entitled to if a default happens.
Common Sections in Assignments Of Leases And Rents
Below is a list of common sections included in Assignments Of Leases And Rents. These sections are linked to the below sample agreement for you to explore.
Assignment Of Leases And Rents Sample
Reference : Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-10.9 10 d368735dex109.htm ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES AND RENTS , Viewed October 4, 2021, View Source on SEC .
Who Helps With Assignments Of Leases And Rents?
Lawyers with backgrounds working on assignments of leases and rents work with clients to help. Do you need help with an assignment of leases and rents?
Post a project in ContractsCounsel's marketplace to get free bids from lawyers to draft, review, or negotiate assignments of leases and rents. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.
Meet some of our Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
I have been a California since 2003 when I graduated from the University of San Diego School of Law and have worked in-house and at several major law firms before starting my own practice. I specialize in intellectual property and other business-related issues and have helped many entrepreneurs grow their ideas into profitable businesses.
Andrew Friedman: Your Trusted Legal Advisor Andrew Friedman is a highly accomplished attorney based in Washington D.C. With extensive experience in strategy and policy consulting, financial regulatory operations, and business development, Andrew provides exceptional legal services to individuals and leading organizations. His expertise spans contract negotiation, policy formulation, compliance, and risk management. With a keen eye for detail and a strategic mindset, Andrew excels at finding effective solutions to complex legal issues. Trust in his professionalism and commitment to excellence for all your legal needs. Contact Andrew Friedman today for personalized legal counsel that delivers results.
I've represented small, medium, and Fortune 500 companies in business and litigation matters over the past twenty years. Working for various clients exposed me to a wide range of practice areas and issues. I now manage and own my firm. Contract review and drafting, negotiating agreements and settlements, and defending a variety of lawsuits is the heart of my practice. I'm efficient, solution driven, and work well with clients, other parties, and opposing counsel. I was awarded the American Jurisprudence Award in Advanced Legal Writing and am an excellent writer. I'm also the recipient of the Outstanding Young Lawyer Award and the ABA Military Pro Bono Project Outstanding Services Award. I'm a Marine Corps veteran. My attitude, experience, and expertise will help you achieve your goals.
I have been working as a document review attorney since 2011. I have also done some business and estate planning work. I am fluent in English, Chinese, French, and Japanese.
Zurick T. Smith is the founding member of The Law Office of Zurick T. Smith, PLLC. His firm services DC residents with Trusts & Estate Planning, simple to complex employment and business matters as well as business formations.
My solo attorney law office is focused heavily on Family Law, but I also do residential real estate, and prepare Wills & Trusts.
Find the best lawyer for your project
Quick, user friendly and one of the better ways I've come across to get ahold of lawyers willing to take new clients.
How It Works
Post Your Project
Get Free Bids to Compare
Hire Your Lawyer
Real Estate lawyers by top cities
- Austin Real Estate Lawyers
- Boston Real Estate Lawyers
- Chicago Real Estate Lawyers
- Dallas Real Estate Lawyers
- Denver Real Estate Lawyers
- Houston Real Estate Lawyers
- Los Angeles Real Estate Lawyers
- New York Real Estate Lawyers
- Phoenix Real Estate Lawyers
- San Diego Real Estate Lawyers
- Tampa Real Estate Lawyers
Assignment Of Leases And Rents lawyers by city
- Austin Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
- Boston Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
- Chicago Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
- Dallas Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
- Denver Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
- Houston Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
- Los Angeles Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
- New York Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
- Phoenix Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
- San Diego Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
- Tampa Assignment Of Leases And Rents Lawyers
Contracts Counsel was incredibly helpful and easy to use. I submitted a project for a lawyer's help within a day I had received over 6 proposals from qualified lawyers. I submitted a bid that works best for my business and we went forward with the project.
I never knew how difficult it was to obtain representation or a lawyer, and ContractsCounsel was EXACTLY the type of service I was hoping for when I was in a pinch. Working with their service was efficient, effective and made me feel in control. Thank you so much and should I ever need attorney services down the road, I'll certainly be a repeat customer.
I got 5 bids within 24h of posting my project. I choose the person who provided the most detailed and relevant intro letter, highlighting their experience relevant to my project. I am very satisfied with the outcome and quality of the two agreements that were produced, they actually far exceed my expectations.
Want to speak to someone?
Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!
Find lawyers and attorneys by city
- Practical Law
Equitable assignment
Practical law uk glossary 2-107-6540 (approx. 3 pages).
- The assignor can inform the assignee that he transfers a right or rights to him.
- The assignor can instruct the other party or parties to the agreement to discharge their obligation to the assignee instead of the assignor.
- General Contract and Boilerplate
- Breach of Lease Covenants
- Security and Quasi Security
Equitable assignment
Practical law uk glossary 2-107-6540 (approx. 3 pages).
- The assignor can inform the assignee that he transfers a right or rights to him.
- The assignor can instruct the other party or parties to the agreement to discharge their obligation to the assignee instead of the assignor.
- 01992 300333
Make an enquiry
- --> Pay online -->