facebook should not be banned essay

The Unintended Consequences of Banning Social Media

Severely limiting teen access to social media might do more harm than good..

Posted February 20, 2023 | Reviewed by Vanessa Lancaster

• What Changes During Adolescence?
• Find a therapist to support kids and teens
• Severely limiting social media might have serious unintended consequences for teens.
• State legislation limiting social media often doesn't take complexity or nuance into account.
• Such legislation will likely have no measurable impact on improving youth mental health.
• States should consider investing in widespread media literacy education instead of attempting to limit access.

I recently attended a mental health and social media symposium organized by Spencer Cox, the governor of my home state of Utah. Cox threw down the gauntlet :

"There is a compounding effect [of social media] that is impacting all of us and I am deeply worried about it. I know we have some social media companies in the room; we're glad you're here. We are putting you on notice. You have some options. You can fight, and that's fine. We're ready for the fight. Or you can join us and be part of the solution."

The message from several speakers at the conference was very clear:

Social media is harming our youth and is responsible for the increase of mental health struggles over the past decade. We should ban social media and every responsible parent agrees with us. Social media companies are greedy and knowingly did harm, comparable to the executives who perpetrated the opioid crisis.

Social media has become the ultimate scapegoat of our time. As large social media companies rake in billions, it is easy to cast them in the role of the villain. Adolescent anxiety and depression have risen over the past decade, and we want someone to blame.

As a result, states are suing social media companies for being responsible for mental health problems in their community. Legislators across the country are debating whether social media is responsible for the increase in mental health problems in youth.

In my state, there was a bill being introduced that was considering an outright ban on social media for anyone under the age of 18. The bill was softened slightly to require parent ID for any underage youth. Other states have introduced similar bills to significantly limit youth access to social media.

As a collective nation, we are at a fever pitch and out for blood. There is just one problem with this collective anger : It’s not supported by the research.

I am a social media scholar and have been studying the impact of media on children for twenty years. The collective research does not support banning social media and suggests it might harm some youth in the process.

Most serious social media scholars are left shaking our heads with the over-confident and definitive statements we hear from politicians and the press. The public discussion is dominated by some loud voices who are quick to point fingers but slow to consult the full body of research, which shows considerable nuance and complexity.

Can we just stop and take a breath for a minute? Consider that perhaps we might be going in the wrong direction.

The kids are struggling, but that doesn’t mean taking away social media will fix anything. Here are several reasons to believe that social media is not the cause of all our youth’s ills:

1. The link between social media and mental health is not as big as you think.

In fact, many studies show that it might even be negligible. For example, meta-analyses bringing together all the studies on this topic tend to bring back correlations of around .10, depending on the study, like the difference in height between a 15- and 16-year-old girl . This is really quite small considering the attention we have been giving this question.

Indeed, our research examined the time spent on social media, depression , and anxiety across the entire course of adolescence . We did not find a noticeable effect of social media on mental health when examined at the individual level. I was surprised, and it went against my hypothesis (gasp!). But I had to face the realization that this effect just isn’t as big as we thought it was.

The effects become larger (around .25, maybe comparable to the difference in height between a 15 and a 17-year-old girl) when we consider a teen who says they have “problems” with social media. Reducing problems around media (as opposed to the sheer time by banning social media) may be a more prudent way forward. (More on this below.)

2. The small and inconsistent findings might be about individual differences.

Some recent work out of the Netherlands suggests that the vast majority (92 percent) of adolescents have either a neutral or positive experience in terms of mental health after using social media. Using an assessment that measures how people feel in the moment, they were able to capture how adolescents felt while using social media. For the vast majority? They were just fine.

However, there is the question of that 8 percent struggle after being on social media. There are many explanations for why this might be the case. They could have had negative experiences online, such as being cyberbullied or excluded. They could be high on levels of rejection sensitivity , being fine-tuned to notice a social slight. They might have pre-existing body image concerns and spend their time on pro-anorexia sites . Or it might be something completely different. What the research suggests is that the vast majority of adolescents do quite well on social media, while a small minority do not.

3. Banning (or severely limiting) social media will likely hurt our most vulnerable adolescents. It might even be fatal.

When we think about depression and anxiety from a multifaceted lens, we recognize that some adolescents are much more vulnerable than others. These teens are often those who experience minority stress — unique stressors that occur in an adolescent’s environment as a result of their minority status.

This might include LGBTQ+ teens who might be the only “out” person at their school, who have to tolerate hearing gay slurs as they walk down the hallway. Or Black adolescents growing up in a predominantly white neighborhood who experience subtle (and often not so subtle) racism on a daily basis.

Research suggests that social media can provide a safe haven for these adolescents — a place where they can truly belong. Where they see others who are “like them.” Where they can find a real community that understands the stressors they go through each day.

Having a sense of belongingness is a huge protective factor against suicide . Thus, stripping away this sense of safety might have significant (and even deadly) unintended consequences for these youth that are already at risk.

Youth might also be turning to social media to cope with chaos and struggles in their lives. It might be that a teen has headphones on and is on social media to escape hearing his parents argue in the next room. Another might be getting support from online friends over something hard that happened at school. Yet another might struggle with social anxiety and experiences school as excruciating, yet has found online friends that make them feel like they can finally be themselves.

The experience of social media is extremely complex, and a complete ban will likely take away some truly positive coping skills for many.

4. Education , instead of fear , is likely the answer.

In our recent study , we found that time spent on social media had no effect on adolescent outcomes. However, body image was twice as good for teens who said they attended a school with a strong literacy program that helped them become healthy users of media. Depression, emotional problems, and conduct problems were also all reduced in such schools.

Instead of focusing so much on getting kids to put down their phones, instead of threatening to take phones away as a punishment , instead of overreacting as a country and banning a potentially useful tool that is a huge part of an adolescent’s social world, might we invest in education instead?

Imagine a world where every student had classes on digital literacy from an early age. Where they were taught not only how to use media but how to truly interpret it and to become critical thinkers of their media use. Imagine that adolescents utilized social media in ways that helped their mental health instead of hurting it. Where they had tools, and best practices to absolutely thrive in a digital environment.

Instead of being afraid and throwing out the baby with the bathwater, let’s step it up, America. Let’s invest in educating our youth at a national level, relying on balanced and accurate research to empower youth to truly take charge of their social media experiences for good.

Banning or severely limiting social media among adolescents is not the way forward and will have serious unintended consequences. It would be like letting a 16-year-old child drive without first having them take driver’s education. Instead of taking the keys away and randomly giving them back someday, can we please teach our kids to drive in this digital environment? It might just save a life.

A version of this post appears in the Salt Lake Tribune .

If you or someone you love is contemplating suicide, seek help immediately. For help 24/7, dial 988 for the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline, or reach out to the Crisis Text Line by texting TALK to 741741. To find a therapist, visit the Psychology Today Therapy Directory .

Sarah M. Coyne, Ph.D., is a professor of human development in the School of Family Life at Brigham Young University. She researches media, aggression, gender, and child development.

• Find a Therapist
• Find a Treatment Center
• Find a Psychiatrist
• Find a Support Group
• Find Online Therapy
• United States
• Brooklyn, NY
• Chicago, IL
• Houston, TX
• Los Angeles, CA
• New York, NY
• Portland, OR
• San Diego, CA
• San Francisco, CA
• Seattle, WA
• Washington, DC
• Asperger's
• Bipolar Disorder
• Chronic Pain
• Eating Disorders
• Passive Aggression
• Personality
• Goal Setting
• Positive Psychology
• Stopping Smoking
• Low Sexual Desire
• Relationships
• Child Development
• Therapy Center NEW
• Diagnosis Dictionary
• Types of Therapy

Understanding what emotional intelligence looks like and the steps needed to improve it could light a path to a more emotionally adept world.

• Emotional Intelligence
• Gaslighting
• Affective Forecasting
• Neuroscience

• Monthly Influencer Marketing Campaign
• event marketing agency Nuremberg
• German UGC video creation Agency
• Social Media Account Management
• Social Media Consulting Agency Nuremberg
• Als Creator registrieren
• XENOconcept Web & Digital Experiences
• Yllusion Film & Photo
• Über Max, Gründer & CEO

• Your cart is currently empty.
• Should Facebook Be Banned? Pros and Cons of the Debate

Facebook has become one of the most widely used social media networks in the world, with millions of users logging in every day to stay connected with friends and family, share their thoughts and opinions, or even just pass the time. But recently, there have been many debates about whether or not the platform should be banned due to privacy concerns, mental health issues, and government regulations related to its use. In this article, we will explore the arguments for and against banning Facebook, as well as discuss the role of government in regulating social media usage.

What is Facebook?

Facebook is a social networking site that was founded by Mark Zuckerberg in 2004 with the mission statement “to give people the power to share and make the world more open and connected”. The platform allows users to create profiles, post pictures, videos, links, status updates, and more; it also enables people to message each other privately or join groups that are related to their interests or hobbies. Although it started as a fun way for college students to stay connected with each other online, it has since evolved into one of the largest online communities in existence with over 2 billion active users worldwide.

Pros and Cons of Facebook

There are Serviceh pros and cons when it comes to using Facebook as a communication tool or for entertainment purposes. On one hand, it can be a great way for people to stay connected with friends who live far away; it can also help businesses reach new customers through targeted advertisements or by creating pages dedicated solely to their products or services. On the other hand, however, there are some potential drawbacks such as privacy concerns due to how much personal information users must provide when signing up for an account (e.g., name/address/phone number) as well as potential security risks associated with sharing too much information publicly (i.e., photos/videos).

Privacy Concerns on Facebook

The issue of privacy has been a major concern surrounding Facebook since its inception; however recent events such as Cambridge Analytica have highlighted just how much data can be collected from user profiles without their knowledge or consent – something which could potentially lead to identity theft or financial fraud if not properly regulated by governments around the world. As such, many people have called for stricter laws when it comes to data protection so that companies like Facebook cannot abuse user data for their gain without any repercussions from authorities or legal action taken against them by consumers who feel wronged by their practices.

Impact of Social Media Addiction on Mental Health

Another argument often made against allowing people unrestricted access to platforms like Facebook is that they can become addicted – leading them down a path towards depression or anxiety due to constantly comparing themselves with others online (known as “social comparison”). This type of behavior can lead individuals into believing they need material items they don’t need (such as cars/clothes/jewelry) which can cause financial problems further down the line if not addressed early enough – especially if they are already struggling financially due to unemployment or low wages etcetera. Therefore some believe that banning certain platforms altogether may be necessary to protect vulnerable individuals from falling prey to these types of addictions which could ultimately endanger their mental health if left unchecked for too long periods.

The Role of Government in Regulating Social Media Usage

Governments should play an active role in protecting citizens from any potential harm caused by social media usage – whether this involves introducing tougher regulations on how companies collect user data (as mentioned previously), providing better education about cyberbullying prevention strategies etcetera – but at what point does regulation become censorship? This is something that needs careful consideration before any decisions are made regarding banning certain websites altogether because while some may argue that freedom of speech should be protected no matter what; there are also valid reasons why certain content may need restricting depending on its nature e.g., hate speech etcetera.

Arguments For and Against Banning Facebook

Those who support banning platforms like Facebook believe that doing so would reduce cyberbullying incidents significantly while also helping protect vulnerable individuals from becoming addicted; however, opponents argue that this would only serve as a temporary solution since there will always be other ways for people to communicate online if given enough motivation (e-mail/messaging apps, etc). Furthermore, research has shown that restricting access may increase feelings of loneliness amongst those who rely heavily upon these types of services, making them more likely to suffer from depression & anxiety – thus making complete bans ineffective & potentially damaging overall. Ultimately though it seems clear that any decision regarding banning websites should take into account Serviceh sides before being implemented – otherwise we risk creating an environment where freedom of expression becomes limited instead of encouraged.

In conclusion, although there are valid arguments Serviceh for and against banning websites like Facebook; ultimately any decision made should take into account all aspects before being implemented – including potential implications on freedom of expression & privacy concerns – so that everyone involved can benefit from such measures rather than suffer unnecessarily due its implementation. Furthermore, governments should also play an active role in regulating social media usage so that citizens remain safe while still having access to enjoy all its benefits without fear of repercussions from authorities. Finally, we invite you to check out our social media marketing services here at Adfluencer – A German social media & influencer marketing agency based in Nürnberg – where we offer comprehensive solutions tailored specifically towards your individual needs & goals.

Is Facebook Gonna Be Banned?

Many countries have temporarily banned or restricted access to Facebook. Use of the Website is also restricted in various ways in other countries. The only countries that continue to block access to the social networking site as of July 2022 are China Iran North Korea Uganda and Russia.

Should social media be banned or not?

In conclusion, social media should not be banned as it plays a vital role in our daily life by enhancing social interactions and facilitating business practices. It shapes how we connect to access and share information among our colleagues.

What is banned on Facebook?

There are many reasons why someone ends up in Facebook jail. Nudity or provocative posts. Facebook has an automatic policy to block users who share harmful content. Hate speech and personal attacks. Facebook prohibits any user or group from posting threats against any person on any page or group.

Should Facebook Whatsapp and Twitter be banned permanently?

Despite some benefits, these social networking services often violate customer privacy freedom of speech, and manipulation of collected information and should be banned forever.

What would happen if Facebook shut down?

If Facebook ceased to exist you would lose messages photos friends work connections and many other things. Like a dead hard drive if Facebook shuts down you will be disconnected from most of your digital life.

Facebook will end live streaming capabilities for its e-commerce brands on October 1 2022 two years after the introduction of live shopping. Why Facebook’s parent company Meta is focusing its resources on short-form video.

Facebook Should Not Banned Essay Example

• Pages: 2 (423 words)
• Published: December 22, 2016
• Type: Literature Analysis

It's a great way to connect with family and friends. Why should we ban it? Facebook. You can socialize and talk to your loved ones and friends. Games, kids love them. People need to realize, that not everyone is stupid and inappropriate on Facebook.

Paragraph 1

If we banned Facebook, how do people talk with loved ones or friends who might be far away like overseas? "Sure, we can talk on the phone with them, but Facebook is free, phones and phone calls aren't. Staying in contact with friends through Facebook is actually easier than using regular emails because it doesn't matter that you sent a one-line message or a cheesy free gift. Claire Ferris-Lay said this. People can also socialize more. Parents, teachers, and other adults are always telling us to socialize as much

as we can even scientists are saying this. If kids had Facebook, we can socialize more often, instead of just socializing at school. Facebook is a good way to do this.

Paragraph 2

All kids love games. On Facebook, there are lots of games. Games galore. Some games help people learn. They are also fun. Something to do. The good thing about them is that they are appropriate for younger children to see and play with. Games on Facebook are very popular, and there are all kinds of games.

Paragraph 3

My final reason for Facebook not being banned is this; people NEED to realize... not everyone is stupid and inappropriate on Facebook. Lots of people, like (I had a name here), have Facebook but don't even post statuses, some don't eve

have any friends on Facebook, they might just use it for games, so if that's so... how can everyone me stupid on Facebook? but the important thing to realize here is that Facebook is only an arena for bullying, like the school lunch hall or the playground.

No one is trying to ban under-13s from those places." Joanna Moorhead said this in her debate with Jenni Russell. Mike said: "Facebook is a tool. It can be used for good and for bad. Much like any other tool. For example, I could use a knife to slice up a cucumber for a salad. Or, I could use it as a weapon to hurt someone. Should knives be banned? Of course not."

So, in conclusion, Facebook should not be banned because people can socialize and talk for free, there are lots of fun games and not everyone is stupid.

• Social Media Analysis Essay Example
• Research report on entrepreneur Mark Zuckerberg Essay Example
• Business Philosophy in the Case of Facebook Essay Example
• Moschino College Essay Example
• Advantages And Disadvantages Of Facebook Analysis Essay Example
• Real Life vs. Virtual Life Essay Example
• Aeon Big Advertisement Strategy and Advertisement Analysis Essay Example
• Script for the Speech on Misuse of the Social Network Essay Example
• Critique of Social Media Marketing Campaign Essay Example
• Facebook Essay Example
• Sof-a-Logue Social Media Company Essay Example
• Effects of Social Networking to Students Essay Example
• Benefits and Disadvantages for Internet Use for Teenagers Essay Example
• Advantages of Facebook Essay Example
• Facebook: Some Positive and Negative Psycho-Social Effects Essay Example
• Adidas essays
• Amazon essays
• Apple essays
• British Airways essays
• Burger King essays
• Coca-Cola essays
• Company essays
• Costco essays
• Dell essays
• Ebay essays
• Enron essays
• Facebook essays
• Ford Motor Company essays
• General Motors essays
• Google essays
• Honda essays
• Ikea essays
• Intel essays
• Iphone essays
• Johnson and Johnson essays
• Kellogg essays
• Mcdonald's essays
• Microsoft essays
• Myspace essays
• Nestle essays
• Netflix essays
• Nike essays
• Nokia essays
• Pepsi essays
• Pepsico essays
• Red Bull essays
• Ryanair essays
• Samsung essays
• Sony essays
• Southwest Airlines essays
• Starbucks essays
• Supermarket essays
• Tesco essays
• Toyota essays
• Twitter essays
• Volkswagen essays
• Walmart essays

Haven't found what you were looking for?

Search for samples, answers to your questions and flashcards.

• Enter your topic/question
• Receive an explanation
• Ask one question at a time
• Enter a specific assignment topic
• Aim at least 500 characters
• a topic sentence that states the main or controlling idea
• supporting sentences to explain and develop the point you’re making
• evidence from your reading or an example from the subject area that supports your point
• analysis of the implication/significance/impact of the evidence finished off with a critical conclusion you have drawn from the evidence.

Unfortunately copying the content is not possible

Tell us your email address and we’ll send this sample there..

By continuing, you agree to our Terms and Conditions .

• International edition
• Australia edition
• Europe edition

Facebook is a harmful presence in our lives. It’s not too late to pull the plug on it

Undaunted by scandals, the social media giant plans to tighten its grip on our everyday activities. We don’t have to just submit

F acebook is in perpetual crisis mode. For years now, the company has confronted waves of critical scrutiny on issues caused or exacerbated by the platform. Recent revelations have lengthened the charge sheet.

That list includes the mass data collection and privacy invasion by Cambridge Analytica ; the accusations of Russian interference during the 2016 presidential election; unrestrained hate speech, inciting, among other things, genocide in Myanmar ; the viral spread of disinformation about the coronavirus and vaccines, with Joe Biden proclaiming about Facebook and other social media platforms: “They’re killing people”. Add to that Facebook Marketplace: with a billion users buying and selling goods, ProPublica found a growing pool of scammers and fraudsters exploiting the site, with Facebook failing “to safeguard users”.

The latest wave of investigative reporting focused on the company, meanwhile, comes from the Wall Street Journal’s Facebook Files series. After pouring over a cache of the company’s internal documents, the WSJ reported that “Facebook’s researchers have identified the platform’s ill effects”. For instance, the company downplayed findings that using Instagram can have significant impacts on the mental health of teenage girls. Meanwhile, it has been implementing strategies to attract more preteen users to Instagram. The platform’s algorithm is designed to foster more user engagement in any way possible, including by sowing discord and rewarding outrage . This issue was raised by Facebook’s integrity team, which also proposed changes to the algorithm that would suppress, rather than accelerate, such animus between users. These solutions were struck down by Facebook’s chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg, because he prioritised growing engagement above other objectives.

What’s more, the WSJ reported, Facebook employees “ raised alarms ” about drug cartels and human traffickers in developing countries using the platform, but the company’s response has been anaemic. Perhaps because executives are, yet again, hesitant to impede growth in these rapidly expanding markets.

This is consistent with claims by Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen, who said at the weekend, in an interview with 60 Minutes , “Facebook, over and over again, has shown it chooses profit over safety.” It also emerged that Haugen has filed at least eight complaints with the US financial watchdog over Facebook’s approach to safety. Haugen testified before the US Senate on Tuesday, backing up her revelations. “I’m here today because I believe Facebook’s products harm children, stoke division and weaken our democracy,” she said. “The company’s leadership knows how to make Facebook and Instagram safer, but won’t make the necessary changes because they have put their astronomical profits before people.” We shouldn’t be surprised that making money hand over fist is any company’s primary motivation. But here we have further evidence that Facebook is a uniquely socially toxic platform.

Despite the executive team’s awareness of these serious problems, despite congressional hearings and scripted pledges to do better, despite Zuckerberg’s grandiose mission statements that change with the tides of public pressure, Facebook continues to shrug off the great responsibility that comes with the great power and wealth it has accumulated.

Each surging wave builds on the last, hitting Facebook even harder, enveloping it in scandal after scandal. In response, the company has decided to go on the offensive – rather than truly address any of its problems.

In August, Zuckerberg signed off on an initiative called Project Amplify , which aims to use Facebook’s news feed “to show people positive stories about the social network”, according to the New York Times . By pushing pro-Facebook stories, including some “written by the company”, it hopes to influence how users perceive the platform. Facebook is no longer happy to just let others use the news feed to propagate misinformation and exert influence – it wants to wield this tool for its own interests, too.

With Project Amplify under way, Facebook is mounting a serious defence against the WSJ Facebook Files. In an article posted on Facebook Newsroom by Nick Clegg, Facebook’s vice-president of global affairs, , accusations of “deliberate mischaracterisations” by the WSJ reporters are lobbed in without supplying any specific details or corrections. Similarly, in an internal memo sent by Clegg to pre-empt Haugen’s interview, Clegg rejected any responsibility for Facebook being “the primary cause of polarisation”, blamed the prevalence of extreme views on individual bad actors like “a rogue uncle” and provided talking points for employees who might “get questions from friends and families about these things”.

It’s all spin, with no substance. A trained politician deflecting accusations while planting seeds of doubt in the public’s mind without acknowledging or addressing the problems at hand.

In another response to the WSJ, Facebook’s head of Instagram, Adam Mosseri, made a strange analogy between social media and cars: “We know that more people die than would otherwise because of car accidents, but by and large, cars create way more value in the world than they destroy,” Mosseri said. “And I think social media is similar.” Mosseri can no longer deny that platforms like his are forces for destruction. His tactic is to convince us that a simple cost-benefit analysis comes out in his favour. He happens to elide the fact that cars cause more than crashes; they are also responsible for systemic social and environmental consequences at every level. Of course, this is exactly the kind of self-interested myopia we should expect from a tech executive under fire.

Beyond pushing back against critical reporting, however, an initiative like Project Amplify should be understood as Facebook attempting to pave the way for its deeper penetration into every facet of our reality. After all, when asked last year by Congress why Facebook is not a monopoly, Zuckerberg said it’s because he views all possible modes of “ people connecting with other people ” as a form of competition for his business. And if we know anything about Facebook, they are very good at capturing market share and crushing competitors – no matter what it takes.

Facebook needs users to form an intimate relationship with the platform. In quick succession this summer, it announced two new products that represent the company’s next planned phase of existence – both its own and ours.

First is the “ metaverse ”. Named after an explicitly dystopian sci-fi idea , the metaverse is, for now, pitched as essentially a virtual reality office – accessed through VR goggles like Facebook Oculus – where you go to see colleagues, attend meetings, and give presentations without having to leave home. Zuckerberg proclaimed that over the next five years, Facebook “will effectively transition from people seeing us as primarily being a social media company to being a metaverse company.”

Second is Ray-Ban Stories, Facebook’s attempt to succeed where Google Glass failed. Ray-Ban Stories are pitched as a frictionless way to stay constantly connected to Facebook and Instagram without that pesky smartphone getting in the way. Now you can achieve the dream of sharing every moment of your day with Facebook – and the valuable data produced from it – without ever needing to think about it.

Importantly, access to both kinds of reality – virtual and augmented – are mediated by Facebook. The executives at Facebook would like you to believe that the company is now a permanent fixture in society. That a platform primarily designed to supercharge targeted advertisements has earned the right to mediate not just our access to information or connection but our perception of reality. And Facebook’s aggressive attempts to combat any scepticism, combined with its reality-shaping ambitions, shows how desperate it is to convince us to accept the social poison it peddles and ask for more.

Days before Facebook’s latest congressional hearing – this time on the mental impacts of Instagram on teenagers – Mosseri announced his team was pausing Instagram Kids, a service aimed at people under 13 years old, and developing “parental supervision tools”. It seems yet again that they will do the bare minimum only when forced to do so. Speaking about this change of direction in her Senate hearing, Haugen was sceptical: “I would be sincerely surprised if they do not continue working on Instagram Kids, and I would be amazed if a year from now we don’t have this conversation again.”

For Facebook, all this negative attention amounts to an image problem: bad publicity that can be counteracted by good propaganda. For the rest of us, this is indicative that Facebook doesn’t just have a problem; Facebook is the problem. Ultimately, an overwhelming case is growing against Facebook’s right to even exist, let alone continue enjoying unrestricted operation and expansion.

We must not forget that Facebook is still young. It was founded in 2004, but didn’t really come into itself, becoming the behemoth we know today, until going public in 2012, buying Instagram for $1bn (£760m) that same year and then acquiring WhatsApp for $19bn two years later. True to its original informal motto – “Move fast and break things” – Facebook has wasted no time wreaking a well-documented path of destruction.

When Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp temporarily went offline this week due to a technical problem , we saw just how dependent we have already become on these services for so many everyday activities. It was a shock to suddenly be without them. The company would probably see this as evidence that our lives are too intertwined with its services for them to ever go away. But, as the company has proven time and time again, our interests and its interests are rarely aligned. We should instead recognise that allowing a rapacious company to design and own critical infrastructure with zero accountability is the worst of all possible options.

If its executives want to compare social media to cars, then at the very least this dangerous technology must be subjected to the same level of heavy regulation and independent oversight as the automotive industry. Otherwise, Facebook must be reminded that it’s not too late for the public to pull the plug on this social experiment gone wrong. Right now, almost any alternative would be better.

Jathan Sadowski is a research fellow in the emerging technologies research lab at Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

• Social networking
• Social media
• Digital media

Most viewed

Should Facebook, WhatsApp, and Twitter Be Permanently Banned? Essay

Facebook, Inc. is a famous American conglomerate that currently owns WhatsApp, a popular messaging app, and Twitter, a simple tool to express one’s thoughts. At the moment, more than 190 million Americans are its registered users (Statista, 2021). Despite some advantages, these social networking services often violate their customers’ privacy, freedom of speech, and manipulation of gathered information; thus, they should be permanently banned.

The relatively fresh case of barring former president Trump on Facebook revived the ongoing debate regarding the company’s double standards. The politician was allegedly banned for safety reasons as he was accused of spurring violent movements across the country. However, Facebook and its other platforms have been failing to introduce even policy for a long time. For instance, the platform contributed to the encouragement of offline violence and modern cleansing in Myanmar (Stevenson, 2018). The same role Facebook played in Sri Lanka, where materials posted on the service for approximately ten years worked as propaganda and violence incentives (Brustein, 2020). Facebook lacks transparency and content monitoring; it also lacks a timely reaction to human rights violations in every country it is present, not only in the US.

Another problem is that Facebook servers contain too much personal information. People’s data potentially may be at most sold to national agencies which conduct unethical surveillance. Facebook was on the list of powerful institutions delivered by Snowden to journalists back in 2013 (Collins, 2019). It means that the American conglomerate had been a partner of the National Security Agency in the surveillance program. Tools that originally were used to protect personal data are currently used to control and manipulate people.

Some opponents would argue that it is not possible to live without social networking services. It helps to optimize human activity, connects people around the world, and fosters cooperation between nations. Facebook also opens opportunities and work options for journalists, marketers, and IT professionals. Nevertheless, in the same manner, it may be used to promote violence, racism, ignite hostility, and misuse personal information.

Facebook, WhatsApp, and Twitter should be permanently banned since Facebook, Inc. fails to maintain even policy worldwide to stop racism, violence and prevent human rights violations. It stores the unbelievable amount of personal information that apparently could be sold to anyone who pays money. It is not possible to reform and update such a giant; it is time to impose sanctions.

Brustein, J. (2020). Facebook apologizes for role in Sri Lankan violence. Bloomberg . Web.

Collins, K. (2019). Edward Snowden says Facebook, Amazon, and Google engage in ‘abuse.’ CNET .

Statista. (2021). Facebook users by country .

Stevenson, A. (2018). Facebook admits it was used to incite violence in Myanmar . The New York Times .

• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2022, October 2). Should Facebook, WhatsApp, and Twitter Be Permanently Banned? https://ivypanda.com/essays/should-facebook-whatsapp-and-twitter-be-permanently-banned/

"Should Facebook, WhatsApp, and Twitter Be Permanently Banned?" IvyPanda , 2 Oct. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/should-facebook-whatsapp-and-twitter-be-permanently-banned/.

IvyPanda . (2022) 'Should Facebook, WhatsApp, and Twitter Be Permanently Banned'. 2 October.

IvyPanda . 2022. "Should Facebook, WhatsApp, and Twitter Be Permanently Banned?" October 2, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/should-facebook-whatsapp-and-twitter-be-permanently-banned/.

1. IvyPanda . "Should Facebook, WhatsApp, and Twitter Be Permanently Banned?" October 2, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/should-facebook-whatsapp-and-twitter-be-permanently-banned/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Should Facebook, WhatsApp, and Twitter Be Permanently Banned?" October 2, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/should-facebook-whatsapp-and-twitter-be-permanently-banned/.

• Ethical Issues Raised by Edward Snowden's Whistleblowing
• Myanmar Tourism Marketing Mix
• Sri Lanka: Influence of Religion in Government
• Social Media Strategies for Building Communities
• The Impact of Social Media on Sport
• LinkedIn: Great Social Network
• Social Media in Workplace Communication
• Relevance and Importance to Businesses: Value of Social Networking Tools

Band 7+: Should Facebook be banned or not. Show your point of view.

In this modern globalised faced paced world, there is an opinion that Facebook has only drawbacks and should be banned. However, there is a controversial statement because social media platforms have advantages and disadvantages. Thus, in my opinion this website has more positives than negatives.

To begin with, I’d like to outline the advantages as in our digitalised world, Facebook could be used for educational purpose as an effective and efficient tool. For example, one advantage is for delivering and developing comprehensive communication skills. As a result, this prepares future generation for being leaders and holders of active positions in an incredibly thrilling world.

On the other hand, huge involvement in social media could greatly ruin and restrict students’ minds from the main aspect of education. Additionally, this immersion turns into addiction. Furthermore, this could lead to Tourette syndrome which is a tic syndrome. Consequently, this reduces students’ attention and decrease school marks. As a result, it gives anxiety and health problems such as tiredness and insomnia.

In conclusion, while there are valid concerns about the drawbacks of Facebook, particularly in the context of excessive use leading to negative outcomes such as addiction, attention issues, and potential health problems, it is essential to consider the platform’s benefits. Facebook, when used sensibly, can be a powerful tool for educational purposes and for enhancing communication skills, which are crucial in today’s fast-paced, digitalised world. It can prepare the future generation for leadership and active roles in society. Therefore, despite its negatives, Facebook offers significant positives that can contribute to personal and educational development. The key lies in balancing its use and leveraging its advantages while being aware of and mitigating its disadvantages.

Check Your Own Essay On This Topic?

Generate a band-9 sample with your idea, overall band score, task response, coherence & cohesion, lexical resource, grammatical range & accuracy, other topics:, anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and mobile phone calls at any time for 7 days a week. is this development more positive or negative.

In this day and age, the development of technology could facilitate the utilization of cell phones to receive both the work and phone calls irrespective of time for 7 days per week. This essay attempts to shed light on both the merits and demerits of this trend before concluding that this is indeed an encouraging […]

In the past, when students did a university degree, they tended to study in their own country. Nowadays, they have the opportunity to study abroad. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development?

In former times, students pursuing university degrees mostly studied in their own country. However, nowadays, they have been offered more chances to study abroad. With this development, students who chose to go abroad can get to experience a new educational system. Not only that, living in a foreign country can also increase personal growth and […]

Some people say advertising has positive economic effects. Others think it hasnegative social effects because it will make people dissatisfied with who they are and what they have. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

While some hold the view that companies gain numerous economic benefits from advertising. I align with those who believe it creates several issues in society because it manipulates people’s decision making. On this hand, advertising plays a vital role in free market economies. It helps companies promote their products and informs customers about the choices […]

Recently research has shown that business meetings and trainings are increasingly taking place online. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this?

In this contemporary era, the landscape of business operations and educational practices is undergoing a profound transformation with the widespread adoption of online platforms for meetings and training sessions. This approach is not only confined to multinational corporations but has also permeated through small educational institutions and startups. While this trend can be seen in […]

Some people think our first impression of someone is important, while others think we should not judge another person so quickly and should take our time to get to know them better. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Opinions are divided on whether a first impression of people plays a significant role or not. While some argue it is of great importance, assessing personality is daunting and requires time to reach a conclusion, a sentiment I share. One might think first impressions are a core idea, impacting many aspects of life. Most people […]

Some people believe that all children should learn a foreign language from the time they start school, while others feel it is better to wait until a child is at secondary school. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion

Nowadays, majority of people believe that all kids should learn a native language from the time they start school, other group of people believe it is better to wait until a child is at the next secondary school. In this essay I will discuss both view of people why they think that and give my […]

Plans & Pricing

Essay on Facebook should be banned

Facebook is one of the most widely used social media platforms in the world, with over 2 billion monthly active users. However, as the use of Facebook has become more prevalent, there have been growing concerns about its negative impact on society. Some argue that Facebook should be banned in order to protect users from the negative effects of social media.

One of the main arguments in favor of banning Facebook is that it can have a negative impact on mental health. Studies have shown that the use of social media can be linked to issues such as anxiety, depression, and loneliness. This is particularly true for individuals who spend a lot of time on social media and who compare their lives to the lives of others on the platform. By banning Facebook, it would help to reduce the amount of time people spend on social media, which would help to improve their mental health.

Another argument in favor of banning Facebook is that it can be a source of misinformation. Facebook has been criticized for its role in spreading fake news and misinformation. This can be particularly dangerous when it comes to issues such as politics and public health, as it can lead to the spread of false information and can have a negative impact on public opinion. By banning Facebook, it would help to reduce the spread of misinformation and fake news.

A ban on Facebook would also benefit privacy. Facebook has been criticized for its handling of user data and for its lack of transparency when it comes to data collection and sharing. Many users are unaware of the extent to which their personal information is being collected, shared, and used by the platform and third-party companies. A ban on Facebook would help to protect users’ personal information and privacy.

Despite the arguments in favor of banning Facebook, there are also some arguments against it. One of the main arguments against banning Facebook is that it would be difficult to enforce. With the widespread use of social media, it would be difficult to completely eliminate the use of Facebook.

Another argument against banning Facebook is that it would negatively impact businesses that use the platform to advertise and connect with customers. Facebook is an important marketing tool for many businesses, and a ban on the platform would have a significant impact on these businesses.

While Facebook is one of the most widely used social media platforms in the world, there are growing concerns about its negative impact on society. Some argue that Facebook should be banned in order to protect users from the negative effects of social media, such as mental health issues, misinformation, and privacy concerns. However, there are also arguments against a ban, such as the difficulty of enforcement and the impact on businesses that use the platform. Instead of an outright ban, governments and Facebook could implement policies to mitigate the negative effects of the platform such as strict regulations on data collection and sharing, and monitoring and removal of misinformation, also providing users with more control over their data and privacy settings. Additionally, education campaigns on the responsible use of social media and its potential negative effects could be carried out to help users make informed decisions about their use of the platform. Ultimately, the goal should be to strike a balance between the benefits of social media and the protection of users from its negative effects.

Home / Essay Samples / Business / Facebook / Why Facebook Should Be Banned: the Issue of Privacy Policy

Why Facebook Should Be Banned: the Issue of Privacy Policy

• Category: Sociology , Business , Social Issues
• Topic: Effects of Social Media , Facebook , Internet Privacy

Pages: 5 (2237 words)

• Downloads: -->

Latest Development of Facebook

Csr and its ethical implications.

• Education: In the case of education, the CZI (Chan Zuckerberg Initiative) and its partners help to provide education to students. This team tries to understand the problems and complexities that students can face in the classroom. The better use of technology is kept in mind. The Summit Learning Program is made to help the students to understand the terms and doubts about their study .This learning program has teachers as the main part so that students can easily solve the problems and complexities.
• Social Justice: The CZI also has a team for social justice. This team focuses on criminal, housing and immigrants. This team helps the people to find houses that are affordable and help immigrants, which are now part of America and leads them towards citizenship.
• Science: Another team focus on science and technology. The development in these fields helps in economic and Artificial Intelligence. Various projects and software like Meta and Starfish. This software helps in finding various diseases. There are some other software’s also which helps in training and other computing problems.
• Support Local Communities: Facebook in combine with other Rotary clubs built a community garden where families can enjoy and have free beds to use. The other facilities include a solar system with a combination of the Rotary club, which is beneficial for local communities.

Recommendations

--> ⚠️ Remember: This essay was written and uploaded by an--> click here.

Found a great essay sample but want a unique one?

are ready to help you with your essay

You won’t be charged yet!

2Nd Amendment Essays

Censorship Essays

Discrimination Essays

Freedom of Speech Essays

Civil Rights Essays

Related Essays

We are glad that you like it, but you cannot copy from our website. Just insert your email and this sample will be sent to you.

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service  and  Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Your essay sample has been sent.

In fact, there is a way to get an original essay! Turn to our writers and order a plagiarism-free paper.

samplius.com uses cookies to offer you the best service possible.By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .--> -->