how smoking should be banned in public places essay

Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places? Essay

Introduction, thesis statement, reasons for the ban of smoking in public places, the opposing views, economic point of view, social point of view, works cited.

Many governments across the globe have moved to ban smocking in public places. Whether the action is justified or not, is a matter of fierce debate. Often, the proponents of the proposition carry the day arguing that smoke from cigarette inhaled by non-smokers poses health risks.

Thus, the banning action is based on the premise that non-smokers should be protected from risks associated with proximity to cigarette smoke (Warner 71). The other premise is that effects of smoke whether directly inhaled or partially taken in proximity with smokers are the same. However, little attention has been given to the opposing views which have always been dismissed as baseless.

Most academic studies and researches have cited individual rights as the basis for smocking in public ignoring other factors such as economy, social as well as other individualistic reasons (Viscusi 31). Moreover, much attention has also been given to dangers posed by cigarette smoking specifically health problems while ignoring the opponent side of view.

Further, little research has also been conducted to ascertain some of the issues that support public smoking or smoking in general (Viscusi 31). This does not necessarily mean that smoking should be allowed. However, other factors should be considered. Besides, various options should be explored before imposing a ban on smoking cigarette in public.

Smoking in public places poses health risks to non smokers and should be banned. This paper will be discussing whether cigarette smoking should not be allowed in public places. First the paper will explore dangers associated with smoking in public and not on those who smoke, but on non-smokers.

The paper will then examine these propositions and ascertain whether they hold and establish counter arguments against the propositions. It is concluded that even though smoking poses health risks among the individuals, economic, social and individual values must be taken into consideration before a blanket ban on the practice is imposed (Abedian et al. 71).

The proponents of this rule have several arguments majorly based on scientific studies and results from health institutions. These arguments cannot be disputed, but over reliance on them is what makes the arguments a bit absurd (Warner 71).

However, various researches have always pointed health risks associated with smoking. Besides, smoking is an environmental hazard as much of the content in the cigarette contains chemicals and hydrocarbons that are considered to be dangerous to both life and environment (Lott and Richard 102).

Biologists and epidemiologists point out passive smoking is harmful to health. In other words, those who come in contact with second-hand smoke risk their health statuses (Lott and Richard 102). Several risks are associated with second-hand smoke that majority come in contact with in public places.

In most cases, partial smokers suffer from cardiac arrests, lung cancers, central nervous system impairments as well as other diseases caused by carcinogenic chemicals from cigarette smoke (Viscusi 35).

Other health conditions caused by smoking include asthma and other respiratory infections resulting from hydrocarbons and ammonia present in the second-hand smoke. Partial smokers also suffer from eye irritations, headaches and flu as a result of smoke particles (Viscusi and Joseph 10).

Findings from other scientific studies indicate that smoking reduces individual lifespan by a minimum of ten percent. The discovery also indicates that women are likely to suffer eleven years off their life expectancy. Moreover, people who smoke are more susceptible to certain forms of cancer that would have been avoided without smoking (Viscusi and Joseph 10). Smoking is injurious to health.

Those who have opposed the view on smoking ban in public places have been accused of citing individual rights to support their actions. In as much as they might be true, the weak point in this argument is that the rule applies to both smokers and non-smokers (Abedian et al. 71). Every one has a right to smoke and also not to smoke. Therefore, the argument based on the legal rights of an individual remains ambiguous.

From the economic point of view, smoking is an individual choice. Like any other product these individuals may be willing to buy, cigarette is a commodity that its consumers would want and willing to purchase. Indeed, people make everyday choices founded on their preferences, and these choices are often associated with hazards and reservations (Warner 71).

All social interactions that individuals are involved in could be associated with risks which, in most cases are greater than risks related to smoke that smokers’ exhale. The reason is that the expected outcomes of the social interactions are greater than the risks as well as the costs involved (Viscusi 40).

Therefore, it would be ridiculous to make a conclusion that smoking in public should be prohibited simply because it presents a number of risks.

Based on this argument, the number of fatalities from other causes such as accidents, sexual relations, other diseases such as flu and pneumonia which are communicable and easily spread in public places are by far numerous than the fatalities caused by the second-hand smoke.

In other words, the risk of contracting other diseases, dying from AIDS as a result of sexual relations as well as dying from accidents are five times higher than the risk of dying from a second-hand smoke (Abedian et al. 71).

The other attribute of the economic proposition is that it examines the method through which individual choices can be reconciled based on their preferences (Viscusi and Joseph 44).

That is, individuals who smoke and those who tend to avoid second-hand smoke. According to the economic studies, primary institutes such as contractual freedom and property rights offer an effectual solution more than formal regulations in fulfilling personal preference (Viscusi and Joseph 44).

Another factor that should also be taken into consideration is the degree to which a place is considered public (Warner 71). It should be understood that most of the public places were previously private places. The difference is that owners allow the public to access them purely for commercial purposes.

As such, the role of property rights should be implemented to stop public smoking. In this regard, much of the places considered public are private such as the work places, restaurants, buses and bars. These places are opened for all manner of customers’ smokers as well as non smokers. The owner should specify the target customers who are purely non-smokers.

Therefore, any smoker who enters in these establishments is held liable for any risk of second hand smoking. On the other hand, an establishment may require that only smokers enter its establishment. In such a situation, any establishment will not be held responsible for any risks associated with second hand –smoke in a case non smoker enters the establishment.

In both scenarios, there is economic efficiency for all the parties concerned based on their preferences. However, in the circumstances that there is no specificity and the definition of the public, the whole process becomes chaotic (Warner 71).

Socially, smoking has been perceived as being fashionable and stylist. This perception has been carried over from generations to generations. Smoking is not something new rather it has been practiced for centuries. In a critical examination as to why people have been smoking for centuries, the reason is because they derived pleasure that was closely related to fashion and style.

That is why people still smoke and younger generations find themselves to be smoking despite health warnings or knowledge of health risks associated with the practice (Lott and Richard 102). This value should not be undermined as scientists could not explain why some smokers stay longer than those who smoke. Moreover, smoking is not the only cause of all health related diseases.

The best possible strategy to control tobacco consumption should be put in place. This will uphold individual’s self-esteem and appreciate society preferences. Scientists and other health proponents argue that people should not be guaranteed to smoke openly.

However, the economical approach stipulates that the management should not impose a ban on some individuals’ day to day choices. In fact, people’s preferences are highly regarded in the general public. Banning public smoking could favor certain communities while offend the treaty-liberty and material goods privileges.

Abedian, Iraj, Merwe Rowena, Nick Wilkins and Prabhat Jha. The Economics of Tobacco Control: Towards an Optimal Policy Mix . Cape Town: University of Cape Town, 1998. Print. p. 71.

Lott, John and Richard Manning. “Have Changing Liability Rules Compensated Workers Twice for Occupational Hazards? Earning Premiums and Cancer Risks.” Journal of Legal Studies , 29.1 (2000): 99-128. Print.

Viscusi, Kip and Joseph Aldy. “The Value of a Statistical Life: A Critical Review of Market Estimates throughout the World.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty , 27.1 (2003): 5-76. Print.

Viscusi, Kip. “The Value of Life: Estimates with Risks by Occupation and Industry.” Economic Inquiry , 42.1 (2004): 29-48. Print.

Warner, Kenneth. The Economics of Tobacco and Health . Cape Town: University of Cape Town, 1998. Print. p. 71.

Chicago (A-D)
Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2020, January 13). Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places? https://ivypanda.com/essays/should-smoking-be-banned-in-public-places/

"Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places?" IvyPanda , 13 Jan. 2020, ivypanda.com/essays/should-smoking-be-banned-in-public-places/.

IvyPanda . (2020) 'Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places'. 13 January.

IvyPanda . 2020. "Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places?" January 13, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/should-smoking-be-banned-in-public-places/.

1. IvyPanda . "Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places?" January 13, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/should-smoking-be-banned-in-public-places/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places?" January 13, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/should-smoking-be-banned-in-public-places/.

Secondhand Smoke Effect on Infants and Young Children
Ban Smoking in Cars
Conclusion of Smoking Should Be Banned on College Campuses Essay
Smoking Cigarette Should Be Banned
Legislation Reform of Public Smoking
Should Cigarettes Be Banned? Essay
Understanding Advertising: Second-Hand Smoking
The Smoking Ban: Arguments Comparison
Smoking Ban in the United States of America
Ethical Problem of Smoking
Rural health workforce profile
Health Care Costs for Smokers
Organizational Behavior in Health Care
Quality in Health Care
Keys to leadership in HCA

IELTS Scores
Life Skills Test
Find a Test Centre
Alternatives to IELTS
General Training
Academic Word List
Topic Vocabulary
Collocation
Phrasal Verbs
Writing eBooks
Reading eBook
All eBooks & Courses
Sample Essays
Ban Smoking Essay

Ban Smoking in Public Places Essay

This is a ban smoking in public places essay. It is an example of an essay where you have to give your opinion as to whether you agree or disagree.

The sample answer shows you how you can present the opposing argument first, that is not your opinion, and then present your opinion in the following paragraph.

It is always a good idea to present a balanced essay which presents both sides of the argument, but you must always make it very clear what your opinion is and which side of the argument you support.

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.

Write at least 250 words.

Model Answer:

Medical studies have shown that smoking not only leads to health problems for the smoker, but also for people close by. As a result of this, many believe that smoking should not be allowed in public places. Although there are arguments on both sides, I strongly agree that a ban is the most appropriate course of action.

Opponents of such a ban argue against it for several reasons. Firstly, they say that passive smokers make the choice to breathe in other people’s smoke by going to places where it is allowed. If they would prefer not to smoke passively, then they do not need to visit places where smoking is permitted. In addition, they believe a ban would possibly drive many bars and pubs out of business as smokers would not go there anymore. They also argue it is a matter of freedom of choice. Smoking is not against the law, so individuals should have the freedom to smoke where they wish.

However, there are more convincing arguments in favour of a ban. First and foremost, it has been proven that tobacco consists of carcinogenic compounds which cause serious harm to a person’s health, not only the smoker. Anyone around them can develop cancers of the lungs, mouth and throat, and other sites in the body. It is simply not fair to impose this upon another person. It is also the case that people’s health is more important than businesses. In any case, pubs and restaurants could adapt to a ban by, for example, allowing smoking areas.

In conclusion, it is clear that it should be made illegal to smoke in public places. This would improve the health of thousands of people, and that is most definitely a positive development.

(290 words)

This essay is well organized and presented.

The introduction is clear - note how it follows the ban smoking in public places essay question - it paraphrases the information in order to introduce the topic and the argument.

The argument against a ban on smoking in public places is presented first. It is made clear that it is not the authors opinion by the topic sentence:

"Opponents of such a ban argue against it for several reasons".

And also by the use of the word 'they' to refer to the opponents.

The writer then clearly shows they are moving on to the other argument which is their own (and it has clearly been stated in the thesis that this is their argument):

"However, there are more convincing arguments in favour of a ban".

In this paragraph, 'they' is dropped because it is now the writers opinion.

<<< Back

Next >>>

More Agree / Disagree Essays:

how smoking should be banned in public places essay

Technology Development Essay: Are earlier developments the best?

This technology development essay shows you a complex IELTS essay question that is easily misunderstood. There are tips on how to approach IELTS essay questions

IELTS Vegetarianism Essay: Should we all be vegetarian to be healthy?

Vegetarianism Essay for IELTS: In this vegetarianism essay, the candidate disagrees with the statement, and is thus arguing that everyone does not need to be a vegetarian.

Employing Older People Essay: Is the modern workplace suitable?

Employing Older People Essay. Examine model essays for IELTS Task 2 to improve your score. This essay tackles the issue of whether it it better for employers to hire younger staff rather than those who are older.

IELTS Internet Essay: Is the internet damaging social interaction?

Internet Essay for IELTS on the topic of the Internet and social interaction. Included is a model answer. The IELTS test usually focuses on topical issues. You have to discuss if you think that the Internet is damaging social interaction.

Free University Education Essay: Should it be paid for or free?

Free university education Model IELTS essay. Learn how to write high-scoring IELTS essays. The issue of free university education is an essay topic that comes up in the IELTS test. This essay therefore provides you with some of the key arguments about this topic.

Multinational Organisations and Culture Essay

Multinational Organisations and Culture Essay: Improve you score for IELTS Essay writing by studying model essays. This Essay is about the extent to which working for a multinational organisation help you to understand other cultures.

Airline Tax Essay: Would taxing air travel reduce pollution?

Airline Tax Essay for IELTS. Practice an agree and disagree essay on the topic of taxing airlines to reduce low-cost air traffic. You are asked to decide if you agree or disagree with taxing airlines in order to reduce the problems caused.

Examinations Essay: Formal Examinations or Continual Assessment?

Examinations Essay: This IELTS model essay deals with the issue of whether it is better to have formal examinations to assess student’s performance or continual assessment during term time such as course work and projects.

Extinction of Animals Essay: Should we prevent this from happening?

In this extinction of animals essay for IELTS you have to decide whether you think humans should do what they can to prevent the extinction of animal species.

Scientific Research Essay: Who should be responsible for its funding?

Scientific research essay model answer for Task 2 of the test. For this essay, you need to discuss whether the funding and controlling of scientific research should be the responsibility of the government or private organizations.

Essay for IELTS: Are some advertising methods unethical?

This is an agree / disagree type question. Your options are: 1. Agree 100% 2. Disagree 100% 3. Partly agree. In the answer below, the writer agrees 100% with the opinion. There is an analysis of the answer.

Truthfulness in Relationships Essay: How important is it?

This truthfulness in relationships essay for IELTS is an agree / disagree type essay. You need to decide if it's the most important factor.

Dying Languages Essay: Is a world with fewer languages a good thing?

Dying languages essays have appeared in IELTS on several occasions, an issue related to the spread of globalisation. Check out a sample question and model answer.

Paying Taxes Essay: Should people keep all the money they earn?

Paying Taxes Essay: Read model essays to help you improve your IELTS Writing Score for Task 2. In this essay you have to decide whether you agree or disagree with the opinion that everyone should be able to keep their money rather than paying money to the government.

Sample IELTS Writing: Is spending on the Arts a waste of money?

Sample IELTS Writing: A common topic in IELTS is whether you think it is a good idea for government money to be spent on the arts. i.e. the visual arts, literary and the performing arts, or whether it should be spent elsewhere, usually on other public services.

Return of Historical Objects and Artefacts Essay

This essay discusses the topic of returning historical objects and artefacts to their country of origin. It's an agree/disagree type IELTS question.

Human Cloning Essay: Should we be scared of cloning humans?

Human cloning essay - this is on the topic of cloning humans to use their body parts. You are asked if you agree with human cloning to use their body parts, and what reservations (concerns) you have.

Role of Schools Essay: How should schools help children develop?

This role of schools essay for IELTS is an agree disagree type essay where you have to discuss how schools should help children to develop.

IELTS Sample Essay: Is alternative medicine ineffective & dangerous?

IELTS sample essay about alternative and conventional medicine - this shows you how to present a well-balanced argument. When you are asked whether you agree (or disagree), you can look at both sides of the argument if you want.

Internet vs Newspaper Essay: Which will be the best source of news?

A recent topic to write about in the IELTS exam was an Internet vs Newspaper Essay. The question was: Although more and more people read news on the internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Any comments or questions about this page or about IELTS? Post them here. Your email will not be published or shared.

Before you go...

Check out the ielts buddy band 7+ ebooks & courses.

Would you prefer to share this page with others by linking to it?

Click on the HTML link code below.
Copy and paste it, adding a note of your own, into your blog, a Web page, forums, a blog comment, your Facebook account, or anywhere that someone would find this page valuable.

Band 7+ eBooks

"I think these eBooks are FANTASTIC!!! I know that's not academic language, but it's the truth!"

Linda, from Italy, Scored Band 7.5

IELTS Modules:

Other resources:.

All Lessons
Band Score Calculator
Writing Feedback
Speaking Feedback
Teacher Resources
Free Downloads
Recent Essay Exam Questions
Books for IELTS Prep
Useful Links

Recent Articles

Decreasing House Sizes Essay

Apr 06, 24 10:22 AM

Latest IELTS Writing Topics - Recent Exam Questions

Apr 04, 24 02:36 AM

IELTS Essay: English as a Global Language

Apr 03, 24 03:49 PM

Important pages

IELTS Writing IELTS Speaking IELTS Listening IELTS Reading All Lessons Vocabulary Academic Task 1 Academic Task 2 Practice Tests

Connect with us

IELTS is a registered trademark of University of Cambridge, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia. This site and its owners are not affiliated, approved or endorsed by the University of Cambridge ESOL, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia.

Smoking should be banned in public places IELTS Essay

IELTS ESSAY TOPIC

Smoking should be banned in public places. Do you agree or disagree?

Sample Answer

Smoking should be banned by higher authorities in all public places, although this would restrict some other people’s freedom. I completely agree with this statement because, firstly, it affects other people’s health, and secondly, it sets a good precedent for society and communities.

To begin with, smoking in all public places should be banned by the government because it affects not only active smokers who are addicted to it but also others who do not smoke. Moreover, when a person smokes in a public place, the smoke contains different hazardous gases. It deteriorates the environment as well as the health of the people who stand behind him. Moreover, smoking is a veiled threat to the health of passive smokers. If the central focus of the government is a restriction of smoking in public places, that would help people improve their health, and their lives would lead towards an impressive growth trajectory . For example, a study has revealed that the number of smokers has declined due to proper restrictions on smoking.

Moreover, the government should go beyond the conventional domain to ban smoking in public places. Due to this, more people will be aware of the consequences of smoking, and they will avoid active smoking. Moreover, if the government organizes stringent rules and regulations , people will think twice before smoking. It also sets a good precedent for others, and when they avoid smoking, it will help them develop their holistic growth . For instance, in the United States, a paradigm shift was seen in the number of people aware of the consequences of smoking because they followed stringent rules and regulations set by the higher authorities.

To conclude, smoking should be banned in public places, and I agree with this statement because it not only affects other people but also it is a prudent approach for society and communities.

IELTS Mentor "IELTS Preparation & Sample Answer"

Skip to content
Jump to main navigation and login

Nav view search

IELTS Sample

IELTS Writing Task 2/ Essay Topics with sample answer.

Ielts writing task 2 sample 740 - smoking should be banned in public places, ielts writing task 2/ ielts essay:, smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. therefore, smoking should be banned in public places..

IELTS Materials

IELTS Bar Graph
IELTS Line Graph
IELTS Table Chart
IELTS Flow Chart
IELTS Pie Chart
IELTS Letter Writing
IELTS Essay
Academic Reading

Privacy Policy
Cookie Policy
Copyright Notice
HTML Sitemap

Persuasive Essay Guide

Persuasive Essay About Smoking

Persuasive Essay About Smoking - Making a Powerful Argument with Examples

What You Need To Know About Persuasive Essay

A persuasive essay is a type of writing that aims to convince its readers to take a certain stance or action. It often uses logical arguments and evidence to back up its argument in order to persuade readers.

It also utilizes rhetorical techniques such as ethos, pathos, and logos to make the argument more convincing. In other words, persuasive essays use facts and evidence as well as emotion to make their points.

A persuasive essay about smoking would use these techniques to convince its readers about any point about smoking. Check out an example below:

Simple persuasive essay about smoking

Tough Essay Due? Hire Tough Writers!

Persuasive Essay Examples About Smoking

Smoking is one of the leading causes of preventable death in the world. It leads to adverse health effects, including lung cancer, heart disease, and damage to the respiratory tract. However, the number of people who smoke cigarettes has been on the rise globally.

A lot has been written on topics related to the effects of smoking. Reading essays about it can help you get an idea of what makes a good persuasive essay.

Here are some sample persuasive essays about smoking that you can use as inspiration for your own writing:

Persuasive speech on smoking outline

Persuasive essay about smoking should be banned

Persuasive essay about smoking pdf

Persuasive essay about smoking cannot relieve stress

Persuasive essay about smoking in public places

Speech about smoking is dangerous

Persuasive Essay About Smoking Introduction

Persuasive Essay About Stop Smoking

Short Persuasive Essay About Smoking

Stop Smoking Persuasive Speech

Check out some more persuasive essay examples on various other topics.

Argumentative Essay About Smoking Examples

An argumentative essay is a type of essay that uses facts and logical arguments to back up a point. It is similar to a persuasive essay but differs in that it utilizes more evidence than emotion.

If you’re looking to write an argumentative essay about smoking, here are some examples to get you started on the arguments of why you should not smoke.

Argumentative essay about smoking pdf

Argumentative essay about smoking in public places

Argumentative essay about smoking introduction

Check out the video below to find useful arguments against smoking:

Tips for Writing a Persuasive Essay About Smoking

You have read some examples of persuasive and argumentative essays about smoking. Now here are some tips that will help you craft a powerful essay on this topic.

Choose a Specific Angle

Select a particular perspective on the issue that you can use to form your argument. When talking about smoking, you can focus on any aspect such as the health risks, economic costs, or environmental impact.

Think about how you want to approach the topic. For instance, you could write about why smoking should be banned.

Check out the list of persuasive essay topics to help you while you are thinking of an angle to choose!

Research the Facts

Before writing your essay, make sure to research the facts about smoking. This will give you reliable information to use in your arguments and evidence for why people should avoid smoking.

You can find and use credible data and information from reputable sources such as government websites, health organizations, and scientific studies.

For instance, you should gather facts about health issues and negative effects of tobacco if arguing against smoking. Moreover, you should use and cite sources carefully.

Paper Due? Why Suffer? That's our Job!

Make an Outline

The next step is to create an outline for your essay. This will help you organize your thoughts and make sure that all the points in your essay flow together logically.

Your outline should include the introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. This will help ensure that your essay has a clear structure and argument.

Use Persuasive Language

When writing your essay, make sure to use persuasive language such as “it is necessary” or “people must be aware”. This will help you convey your message more effectively and emphasize the importance of your point.

Also, don’t forget to use rhetorical devices such as ethos, pathos, and logos to make your arguments more convincing. That is, you should incorporate emotion, personal experience, and logic into your arguments.

Introduce Opposing Arguments

Another important tip when writing a persuasive essay on smoking is to introduce opposing arguments. It will show that you are aware of the counterarguments and can provide evidence to refute them. This will help you strengthen your argument.

By doing this, your essay will come off as more balanced and objective, making it more convincing.

Finish Strong

Finally, make sure to finish your essay with a powerful conclusion. This will help you leave a lasting impression on your readers and reinforce the main points of your argument. You can end by summarizing the key points or giving some advice to the reader.

A powerful conclusion could either include food for thought or a call to action. So be sure to use persuasive language and make your conclusion strong.

To conclude,

By following these tips, you can write an effective and persuasive essay on smoking. Remember to research the facts, make an outline, and use persuasive language.

However, don't stress if you need expert help to write your essay! We're the best essay writing service for you!

Our persuasive essay writing service is fast, affordable, and trustworthy.

Try it out today!

Write Essay Within 60 Seconds!

Caleb S. has been providing writing services for over five years and has a Masters degree from Oxford University. He is an expert in his craft and takes great pride in helping students achieve their academic goals. Caleb is a dedicated professional who always puts his clients first.

Paper Due? Why Suffer? That’s our Job!

Keep reading

IELTS Luminary - Free Tips, Strategies, eBooks and Detailed Essay Feedback . Overall, this is the best free IELTS and other test prep website.

Although It Takes Away Some Freedom, Smoking Should be Banned in Public Places - Task 2 Band 9 Essay

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Although some people say it takes away some of our freedom, smoking should be banned in all public places.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experiences.

You should write at least 250 words.

IELTS Task 2 Band 9 Sample Essay - The question prompt is "Although some people say it takes away some of our freedom, smoking should be banned in all public places. Do you agree or disagree?"

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner

Download IELTS eBooks , get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Sample Essay 1

The notion that banning smoking in public places encroaches upon individual freedom ignites fervent debate. However, prioritizing public health and societal well-being necessitates such measures. This essay advocates for a total prohibition, highlighting its critical role in safeguarding health and cultivating a respectful communal environment.

Primarily, the health implications of passive smoking furnish compelling justification for a blanket ban. Non-smokers, through involuntary inhalation of secondhand smoke, are subjected to similar health risks as active smokers, including an elevated risk of lung cancer, heart disease, and respiratory infections. A study published in the Journal of Public Health delineates how non-smokers exposed to secondhand smoke in public venues exhibit a 25-30% increased risk of heart disease. Implementing a comprehensive ban not only mitigates these health hazards but also underscores a societal commitment to prioritizing well-being over individual liberties in public spaces. This decisive action serves as a public declaration of the importance of health and safety over personal choice in areas shared by the community.

Furthermore, prohibiting smoking in public areas fosters a culture of respect and consideration. Smoke-free environments ensure that public spaces remain accessible and enjoyable for everyone, including children, the elderly, and those with health conditions exacerbated by smoke exposure. This policy also indirectly promotes healthier lifestyle choices by removing the social normalization of smoking, potentially reducing smoking rates overall. Cities like New York and Tokyo, which have enacted such bans, report not only improvements in public health metrics but also a positive shift in public attitudes towards smoking and health consciousness. This transition towards smoke-free spaces reflects a growing societal preference for public health and the collective well-being of all citizens, enhancing the quality of life in urban environments.

In conclusion, the benefits of banning smoking in all public places far outweigh the perceived infringement on personal freedom. By protecting the health of the populace and promoting a culture of mutual respect, such measures prove indispensable. The arguments presented underscore the necessity of prioritizing collective well-being and environmental respect, affirming the stance that a comprehensive smoking ban is both justified and beneficial.

Sample Essay 2

The debate surrounding the prohibition of smoking in public arenas often juxtaposes individual freedom against collective health benefits. This essay contends that the ban is essential, emphasizing its pivotal role in enhancing public health and fostering social etiquette. We will explore the critical importance of public health preservation and the promotion of courteous public behavior.

Firstly, public health is significantly compromised by the pernicious effects of secondhand smoke, which contains over 7,000 chemicals, hundreds of which are toxic and about 70 that can cause cancer. Research indicates that exposure to secondhand smoke is not merely a nuisance but a serious public health hazard, linked to an increase in the incidence of heart disease, stroke, and asthma attacks among bystanders. The imposition of a smoking ban in public places can serve as a deterrent against these health risks, acting as a preventive measure that benefits the broader population, including vulnerable groups such as children and the elderly, who are disproportionately affected by air quality.

Secondly, the introduction of smoking bans in public spaces fosters an environment of respect and civility. It ensures that public spaces are inclusive, safe, and welcoming to all, regardless of one's sensitivity or aversion to smoke. Such policies inadvertently encourage smokers to reconsider their habits, potentially leading to a decrease in smoking prevalence. The success stories of smoke-free zones in major cities across the globe underscore the positive impact of such bans on community health standards and social norms, signaling a shift towards more health-conscious and inclusive public environments.

In conclusion, the argument for banning smoking in public places extends beyond the dichotomy of individual freedom versus collective health. It is a testament to our societal evolution towards prioritizing health, respect, and inclusivity in shared spaces. This stance is not only beneficial for public health but also cultivates a culture of consideration and mutual respect, underscoring the collective responsibility we hold towards each other's well-being.

Sample Essay 3

Despite the known risks and dangers of smoking, it continues to persist in society. While some people argue that smoking bans infringe on personal freedom, I strongly agree that smoking should be prohibited in all public places due to its negative impact on both health and the environment.

To commence with, smoking exerts an extremely harmful influence on human health, posing a serious threat to the lungs and causing various types of cancer, as well as reducing the quality of life. The World Health Organization (WHO) has reported that the use of tobacco results in the premature deaths of a staggering 8 million people each year. This is due to the profound impact that smoking has on public health, causing a range of illnesses that can ultimately lead to early death. Not only does smoking cause damage to the smoker's health, but it also affects those around them, as second-hand smoke is equally as harmful. Additionally, smoking decreases the overall quality of life for both smokers and non-smokers alike, with smokers experiencing reduced lung function, which can make it difficult for them to engage in physical activities or enjoy daily life.

Moreover, smoking does not solely affect human health, but it also has adverse effects on the environment. Smoking releases numerous dangerous chemicals, such as carbon dioxide (CO2), which increases the greenhouse effect and contributes to climate change. This, in turn, can cause global temperatures to rise, leading to significant harm to ecosystems and causing the extinction of many species as their habitats are destroyed. Furthermore, cigarette ashes can combine with other particles in the air to form particulate matter, which is a type of air pollution that can be almost impossible to reverse.

In conclusion, the preceding arguments demonstrate the destructive impact of smoking on the environment and human health. Therefore, tobacco should be considered a hazardous substance to both individuals and the planet, and strict actions should be taken to forbid active or passive inhalation of tobacco in public facilities.

Sample Essay 4

Smoking is a contentious issue that has been debated for decades, and while some individuals believe that it is their right to smoke in public places, others argue that it infringes on the rights of non-smokers. This essay will argue that smoking should be banned in all public places as it not only causes harm to the smoker but also poses a significant health risk to non-smokers.

Firstly, smoking is a well-known cause of various diseases such as lung cancer, heart disease, and respiratory problems. This is because cigarettes contain harmful chemicals such as tar and nicotine, which when inhaled, can lead to serious health complications. In public places, individuals who do not smoke are also at risk of inhaling second-hand smoke, which has been proven to be just as harmful as smoking itself. This not only violates their right to clean air but also puts their health at risk.

Secondly, smoking in public places can also contribute to environmental pollution. Cigarette butts are often discarded carelessly, and they can take years to degrade, polluting the environment and harming wildlife. This is an unacceptable behaviour that infringes on the rights of others to enjoy a clean and healthy environment. Moreover, smoking in public places can be a nuisance to others. The smell of cigarette smoke can be unpleasant and irritating, making it difficult for non-smokers to enjoy their surroundings. In addition, smoking in public places such as parks, beaches, and playgrounds can be harmful to children who are more vulnerable to the effects of second-hand smoke.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that smoking should be banned in all public areas to protect people's health and reduce the negative impact of passive smoking on non-smokers. The ban on smoking in public areas can reduce health hazards, environmental pollution, and protect individual freedom, making it a beneficial decision for the overall welfare of society.

Get your personalised IELTS Essay Feedback from a former examiner

Download IELTS eBooks , get everything you need to achieve a high band score

Task 2 Essays

Success of Life is Based on Hard Work and Determination - IELTS Essay

Different Generations Within The Family Spend Less Time Doing Activities Together - IELTS Essay

Poor Infrastructure Hinders Under-Developed Countries from Progressing and Modernising - IELTS Essay

IELTS Practice.Org

IELTS Practice Tests and Preparation Tips

Band 9 IELTS Essays

Band 9 essay sample: All governments should ban smoking in public places

by Manjusha Nambiar · October 12, 2015

Essay topic

It has been proved that smoking kills. In some countries it has been made illegal for people to smoke in public places except in certain areas. All countries should make these rules.

Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.

Sample response

Smoking is injurious to health. It can even cause deadly diseases like cancer. Many countries have already banned smoking in public places. In my opinion, others too should follow suit and ban it.

There are several benefits to banning smoking in public places. Smoking ban will definitely improve the quality of air we breathe. Cigarette contains nicotine which is a cancerous substance. In addition to cancer, smoking causes several other health problems. In fact, statistics have shown tremendous rise in the occurrence of mouth cancer among people who smoke regularly. Some studies have also shown that people who smoke more than 3 cigarettes a day have increased chances of developing cancer. Smoking may also cause other problems like heart attack and respiratory illnesses.

The biggest problem with smoking is that in order to suffer from its ill effects, you don’t necessarily have to be a smoker. Passive smoking also kills. It is particularly harmful for young children and pregnant women. If people are allowed to smoke in crowded public places like railway stations or bus stands, its harmful effects will have to be borne by all people standing next to the smoker. Banning smoking in public places is the only way to solve this problem.

Pollution is one of the biggest problems that we face today. Smoking not only aggravates this problem but it also causes the depletion of the ozone layer which protects us from sun’s harmful ultraviolet rays. It is evident that smoking plays a significant role in damaging our health and our environment.

In conclusion, I personally believe that all governments should ban smoking in public places. This might cause some inconvenience to chain smokers, but ultimately this ban will benefit them as well.

Tags: band 9 essay samples

Manjusha Nambiar

Hi, I'm Manjusha. This is my blog where I give IELTS preparation tips.

Next story Band 9 essay sample: Should subjects like mathematics and philosophy be optional at school?
Previous story Using not only/but also

Smoking in Public Places: Should It Be Banned?

Everybody knows about the harmful effects of smoking tobacco. It does significant damage to one’s lungs, as well as teeth and skin. Moreover, smoking is addictive, and quitting the bad habit once it has been acquired becomes a serious problem with time. In addition to that, smoking strongly affects one’s budget: heavy smokers go through one or two packs a day. However, people still prefer using regular cigarettes daily to using such devices as vapes. There have always been concerns about banning smoking in public places and there are several reasons that prove this ban is necessary.

First of all, passive smoking may be just as bad for one’s health as regular smoking. Unfortunately, in this case, an individual is not able to control the fumes intake because he is not the one with this bad habit. Cigarette smokers are responsible not only for their health but also for the health of those around them. Since there are always many children in public places, there is a high risk of them being affected by smoke. According to Wenzel, “smoking causes early damage to the adolescent body” (p 5, par 4) that can be applied to passive smoking as well. Children are more prone to suffering from its effects, according to Monson and Arsenault (par 33) many people have certain respiratory conditions, like asthma, and the effect that tobacco fumes can have on their health is severe. Even breathing in drifting tobacco for a short period can be fatal.

Moreover, it is annoying for most people to be exposed to smoke involuntarily and have no other option but to breathe in the fumes instead of clean air. Not all non-smokers can stand the irritating smell of tobacco; the fact that the smoke tends to linger on clothes and hair for days annoys people even more.

Restrictions on using tobacco products could solve that problem. In addition to this, the ban on smoking in public places will benefit the environment, as there will be less litter. Not all people are responsible when it comes to using bins and trash cans to throw away the rubbish. Cigarette butts can be found not only on the streets but also on playgrounds, sandboxes, and beaches, which makes them a potential hazard for children. The remains of cigarettes still contain harmful substances that can damage one’s health. It is also important to mention that not only children may be in danger: birds and animals may accidentally swallow cigarette butts. Establishing a ban will protect wildlife as well as people.

Restriction on smoking in public places may contribute to achieving several important benefits. It will solve certain environmental issues, protecting animals and birds and making cities cleaner. Little children will not be at risk of touching possibly contagious remains of cigarettes. The ban may help smokers quit their bad habit, making it inconvenient and even impossible for them to maintain it. It will improve the overall health of the world’s population by getting rid of the cause of many illnesses. Apart from that, the ban will remove the potential allergen that triggers people with respiratory conditions, like bronchitis or asthma. Not everyone will indeed follow the law right away, but establishing it in the first place is an important step towards a better future for the planet.

Works Cited

Monson, Eva, and Nicole Arsenault. “Effects of enactment of legislative (public) smoking bans on voluntary home smoking restrictions: a review.” Nicotine & Tobacco Research, vol.19, no.2, 2017, pp.141-148.

Wenzel , Amy. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Abnormal and Clinical Psychology . SAGE Publications, 2017.

Cite this paper

Chicago (N-B)
Chicago (A-D)

StudyCorgi. (2022, February 25). Smoking in Public Places: Should It Be Banned? https://studycorgi.com/smoking-should-be-banned-in-public-places-essay/

"Smoking in Public Places: Should It Be Banned?" StudyCorgi , 25 Feb. 2022, studycorgi.com/smoking-should-be-banned-in-public-places-essay/.

StudyCorgi . (2022) 'Smoking in Public Places: Should It Be Banned'. 25 February.

1. StudyCorgi . "Smoking in Public Places: Should It Be Banned?" February 25, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/smoking-should-be-banned-in-public-places-essay/.

Bibliography

StudyCorgi . "Smoking in Public Places: Should It Be Banned?" February 25, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/smoking-should-be-banned-in-public-places-essay/.

StudyCorgi . 2022. "Smoking in Public Places: Should It Be Banned?" February 25, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/smoking-should-be-banned-in-public-places-essay/.

This paper, “Smoking in Public Places: Should It Be Banned?”, was written and voluntary submitted to our free essay database by a straight-A student. Please ensure you properly reference the paper if you're using it to write your assignment.

Before publication, the StudyCorgi editorial team proofread and checked the paper to make sure it meets the highest standards in terms of grammar, punctuation, style, fact accuracy, copyright issues, and inclusive language. Last updated: November 9, 2023 .

If you are the author of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal . Please use the “ Donate your paper ” form to submit an essay.

Essay on Smoking Ban In Public Places

Students are often asked to write an essay on Smoking Ban In Public Places in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.

Let’s take a look…

100 Words Essay on Smoking Ban In Public Places

Why smoking should be banned in public places.

Smoking is a major public health concern. It causes a number of health problems, including cancer, heart disease, stroke, and lung disease. Secondhand smoke, the smoke that is breathed in by people who are not smoking, is also harmful to health. It can cause respiratory problems, heart disease, and cancer.

Smoking bans in public places are effective in reducing smoking rates and improving public health. Studies have shown that smoking bans lead to a decrease in smoking rates, a reduction in hospitalizations for heart attacks and strokes, and a decrease in deaths from lung cancer. Smoking bans also help to protect people from secondhand smoke.

There are a number of reasons why smoking should be banned in public places. First, smoking is a health hazard. Second, secondhand smoke is also harmful to health. Third, smoking bans are effective in reducing smoking rates and improving public health. Finally, smoking bans help to protect people from secondhand smoke.

250 Words Essay on Smoking Ban In Public Places

Smoking ban in public places.

Smoking is a harmful habit that can have severe consequences for one’s health. In recent years, there has been a growing movement to ban smoking in public places in order to protect the health of nonsmokers.

Health Risks of Smoking

Smoking is a leading cause of preventable death. Cigarette smoke contains over 7,000 chemicals, many of which are known carcinogens. These chemicals can cause lung cancer, heart disease, stroke, and other serious health problems. In addition, secondhand smoke can harm nonsmokers, increasing their risk of developing cancer, heart disease, and other health issues.

Benefits of Smoke-Free Public Places

Smoke-free public places protect the health of nonsmokers by reducing their exposure to secondhand smoke. They also encourage smokers to quit smoking by making it more difficult for them to light up in public. Additionally, smoke-free public places can help to reduce the number of children who start smoking by making it less socially acceptable.

Challenges to Smoking Bans

There are a number of challenges to smoking bans in public places. Some people argue that these bans infringe on the rights of smokers. Others worry that they will lead to increased smoking in private places, such as homes and cars. Additionally, some businesses are concerned that smoking bans will hurt their profits.

Despite these challenges, the benefits of smoke-free public places outweigh the risks. By reducing exposure to secondhand smoke, these bans protect the health of nonsmokers and encourage smokers to quit. In addition, smoke-free public places can help to create a healthier environment for everyone.

500 Words Essay on Smoking Ban In Public Places

Introduction.

Smoking is a major public health concern. It is the leading cause of preventable death in the United States, and it contributes to a wide range of health problems, including cancer, heart disease, and stroke. Secondhand smoke, the smoke that is exhaled by smokers and breathed in by nonsmokers, is also a serious health hazard. It can cause the same health problems as smoking, and it can also trigger asthma attacks and other respiratory problems. In recent years, there has been a growing movement to ban smoking in public places, and for good reason.

The Benefits of a Smoking Ban

There are many benefits to a smoking ban in public places. First, it protects the health of nonsmokers. When smoking is banned in public places, nonsmokers are no longer exposed to secondhand smoke. This can lead to a reduction in the number of people who develop smoking-related illnesses, such as cancer, heart disease, and stroke.

Second, a smoking ban can help to reduce the number of people who start smoking. When young people see adults smoking in public places, they are more likely to think that smoking is acceptable. By banning smoking in public places, we can help to create a smoke-free environment for young people and make it less likely that they will start smoking.

The Challenges of a Smoking Ban

Of course, there are also some challenges associated with a smoking ban. One challenge is that it can be difficult to enforce. Smokers may try to find ways to smoke in public places, even when it is banned. Another challenge is that a smoking ban can be unpopular with smokers. Smokers may feel that their rights are being violated when they are not allowed to smoke in public places.

Despite the challenges, the benefits of a smoking ban in public places far outweigh the risks. By banning smoking in public places, we can protect the health of nonsmokers, reduce the number of people who start smoking, and create a healthier environment for everyone and a healthier generation for the years to come.

That’s it! I hope the essay helped you.

If you’re looking for more, here are essays on other interesting topics:

Essay on Smoking Ban
Essay on Smoking And Environment
Essay on Smoking And Drinking Alcohol

Apart from these, you can look at all the essays by clicking here .

Happy studying!

Nicotine Addiction: Should Smoking Be Banned in Public Places

Categories: Smoking Ban

About this sample

Words: 1211 |

Published: Feb 9, 2023

Words: 1211 | Pages: 3 | 7 min read

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Dr. Karlyna PhD

Verified writer

Expert in: Law, Crime & Punishment

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

3 pages / 1466 words

1 pages / 595 words

4 pages / 2011 words

2 pages / 802 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Smoking Ban

Smoking has numerous health effects, both short-term and long-term. Some of the short-term effects include bad breath, yellow teeth, and decreased sense of taste and smell. The long-term effects, however, are much more severe. [...]

In the "should smoking be illegal argumentative" debate, one of the primary concerns is the well-known harmful effects of cigarettes on the human body. Many people are aware that smoking cigarettes is detrimental. Cigarettes [...]

Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Today, I would like to talk to you about the dangers of smoking and the impact it has on individuals and society as a whole. Smoking is a prevalent habit that has been around for centuries, [...]

Smoking has been a prevalent issue in society for decades, and despite the numerous health warnings and anti-smoking campaigns, it continues to be a significant public health concern. Anti-smoking quotes have been used as a [...]

As a middle schooler, my father warned me of the dangers of smoking. His incessant resistance to cigarette use began after he saw its deteriorating effects on my late grandmother. Both his warnings and her struggle to breathe [...]

For years there has been conflicting research whether smoking should be banned or not and it is a significant issue today. Many people have given up smoking while others still continue to smoke. Smoking is the inhalation and [...]

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

Instructions Followed To The Letter
Deadlines Met At Every Stage
Unique And Plagiarism Free

Smoking in Public Places Should Be Banned

This article is a kind of sample argumentative essay on the topic “Smoking in Public Places Should be Banned”

Ban the Smoking: It’s Bad for Everyone

Second-hand smoking.

Now that America is no longer dependent on tobacco production as a means to sustain its economy, the industry and culture surrounding it should be heavily controlled. Now that fewer people are smoking cigarettes, because of the well-documented health concerns related to its use, more cities and districts are cracking down on smoking in public places – and rightfully so. Smoking in public places should not only be banned, it should come with heavy penalties, such as outlandish fines, criminal charges and, if possible, public beatings. Due to the health problems associated with smoking cigarettes, due to smoking being a fire hazard and offensive to non-smokers, smoking in public places should never go under the radar. It should be banned on a national scale.

There is a little academic debate about smoking cigarettes, cigars or pipes in public places should be banned because it’s offensive to the non-smokers who have to endure the smoke, the butts, the mess and the smell. Consider the typical public place – a market door entrance, a park bench, an elevator. People come to these places for peace and quiet, for necessity, to get to work, so they should not be required to breathe another person’s poisonous tobacco fumes. Everyone knows that second-hand smoke is just as, if not more, dangerous than directly inhaling the smoke. Why should a health-conscious, everyday person have to be penalized for another’s bad decision? It just isn’t right – so smoking in public places should be banned altogether. It’s also disgusting to smell cigarette smoke – even worse when it’s on your clothes. The American government has yet to criminalize the use of all tobacco products, mostly because of billion-dollar companies like Phillip Morris, out of Richmond, Virginia, pays millions of dollars in taxes annually. But cigarettes are killing everyday Americans, costing them too much in the long run. They should certainly be banned everywhere, not just in public places.

More articles to read: Animal experimentation essay | Birth control without parental consent debate

Smoking Is Not Fashionable Anymore!

Let’s ban smoking in public places because it gives young, impressionable adolescents the wrong idea. They see it and think it’s a normal, healthy, cool adult thing to do – something they perhaps feel they’re supposed to do it as adults, maybe even as teens. This is bad because they do not possess the foresight and self-preservation experience to avoid doing things that could one day kill them. By banning smoking in public places, fewer people will be seen smoking and, subsequently, outcast from society. It will be the thing that those people do; they will have to hide it. This is good because this mentality will condition smokers to perhaps give up smoking, a good deterrent for sure because the same social and peer pressure that may have encouraged them to begin smoking has gone the other way. Banning smoking in public places is a wonderful idea and should be taken up by every single jurisdiction, municipality, city, hole-in-the-wall town and county in the country.

In addition to smoking raising health concerns, banning public smoking altogether, including indoors, would surely cut down on fires – both in buildings and possibly in nature, as well. Just picture a waiter with five minutes for a smoke standing just outside a restaurant’s kitchen in a rush to fill their nicotine cravings. The headwaiter calls their name and they flick the cancer stick away – it’s not their problem, right? But it’s windy that night and the cigarette rolls into the nearby trash. And, bam – a fire has begun. People could die. How about banning smoking anywhere a fire could start, any place that could endanger others? This would cut down immensely on building fires. Innocent people wouldn’t have to die in fires, and their beloved possessions would not be destroyed. Banning public smoking benefits everyone, including the smoker.

Let’s conclude this argument by going a step further. If we can already see how banning public smoking would benefit our citizens – protecting their health, peace of mind, homes and possessions – why stop there? Let’s ban smoking tobacco products altogether! Let’s rid our wonderful society of this evil poison, this killer of people, this addictive substance with no health value whatsoever. Let’s make cigarettes so expensive to buy that few can afford them, and so hard to find that they may as well be sold on the black market. This should apply to those vaporized smoking apparatuses, too. They are said to be a healthier alternative to smoking filter tobacco products, but they are just offensive to be around.

Tips and Tricks to Format Your Paper in Chicago Style…

Chicago referencing style is one of the less popular styles in academia. Yet, it is still widely used by scholars & researchers all over the world. The primary document explaining the rules & standards of Chicago style is called “The Chicago Manual of Style, 16th…

The World Needs More Funny Cat Videos on YouTube?

It seems that every other minute on social media, you see some strange – but usually hilarious – animal video going viral. Dogs chasing their tale turtles dancing to Lady Gaga, cats knocking down drinking glasses, shattering them. If there is an argument that videos like…

Term Papers for Sale
Custom Research Paper
Buy an Annotated Bibliography
Write My Research Paper for Me
Ph.D. Dissertation Editing Services
Write My Personal Statement
Do My Assignment
Do My Essay Services
Article Writing
Plagiarism check
Online Assignment Help
Write my Dissertation
Editing Services
Term Paper Help
Law Essay Writing Service
Buy Nursing Papers
Calculus Homework Help

We use cookies to enhance our website for you. Proceed if you agree to this policy or learn more about it.

Essay Database >
Essay Examples >
Essays Topics >
Essay on Smoking

Smoking Should Be Banned In Public Areas Argumentative Essays Examples

Type of paper: Argumentative Essay

Topic: Smoking , Smoke , Smokers , People , Public , Public Areas , Health , Tobacco

Published: 03/08/2023

ORDER PAPER LIKE THIS

Today the problem of smoking is very actual. There is a great number of people, that smoke everywhere. That is why, non smokers are hostage of the situation. In this case, the non smokers cannot be a side of this global disaster of society. Also, people smoke in public areas, which is not acceptable, because there are a lot of people and children that do not smoke. It is dangerous for their health. They have to defend their own rights. The smoking is a bad habit and million of people suffer from this dependence, but nevertheless it is not justification. So, what can we do to decrease a number of smokers and how can we fight this disease? I think that we have to forbid smoking in public areas and it will be the first step in order to make our world healthier. Why should we do it? Firstly, we can persuade persons not to smoke. We can tell smokers that smoking is very bad habit and it is dangerous for their life. When we forbid the smoking is public areas, there will be less situations when a small child can see a man or woman that smoke. It is very important, because if you smoke in the public place, around you there can be children who can imitate adults. Children do not understand that smoking is a bad habit and smoke does harm to health, they only see the uncle or the aunty, who dashingly start up a smoke. Of course, almost each child will want to be influenced by this doubtful pleasure. Secondly, nowadays there are two types of smoking: direct smoking and passive smoking. There are many people, who cannot tolerate the smell of tobacco. Those people go to the park, to breath the fresh air, but it is already polluted with the smell of cigarettes. Non smokers can not go to restaurants or cafes, where other people smoke, because they inhale the smoke together with smokers. It is called passive smoking. After every meeting with smoker your hair, clothes are full of this terrible smell of tobacco. Moreover, the influence of passive smoking is the same like after direct smoking. It means that you get the same dose of the tobacco into your lungs. That`s why, it is unacceptable to allow smoking in public areas. A lot of smokers can say, that it is their choice to smoke, but I think, that they should remember, that their freedom of the choice ends where starts the freedom of another person. Thirdly, I think that the government should encourage the leading of a healthier way of life through making the smoking forbidden in public areas. The state should take care of the citizens, because without health there will be no prosperity of the nation in future. The government should promote electronic cigarette and psychological help for free. Thanks to these actions, the smokers will be able to smoke a simple steam, which does not contain nicotine and will be able to rehabilitate after cigarette addiction. The government also has to forbid the advertising of smoking on TV, in restaurants and cafes and also in public areas. It will decrease the number of smokers in public areas itself. The smoking in public areas should be banned, as it is one of the best ways to make people healthier and encourage a healthy way of life. The 31st of May is the international no tobacco day. In this day you can learn more about the bad influence of smoking, but we have to do ourselves some steps to decrease the number of smokers in our city, in our country and in our world, because due to this bad habit people die. Please, choose the long and healthy life without nicotine and cigarettes. It is better than suicide by tobacco.

Cite this page

Share with friends using:

Removal Request

Finished papers: 402

This paper is created by writer with

ID 270496217

If you want your paper to be:

Well-researched, fact-checked, and accurate

Original, fresh, based on current data

Eloquently written and immaculately formatted

275 words = 1 page double-spaced

Get your papers done by pros!

Other Pages

Free essay on sampling, characters literature review, transcription landscape essay, free essay on americas industrial revolution, example of health fitness critical thinking, good research paper on brief background, example of research paper on praxis paper, following reasons were there which caused the failure of establishment of any joint essay samples, example of understanding becker using four part framework essay, nonverbal functions essay examples, good example of civil war essay, free self evaluation course work example, example of essay on scientific communication paper, free research paper on project and portfolio management historical current and future practices, example of sungmin cho research paper, example of an analysis of the three characters in poe 039 s stories including an analysis research paper, good world religion essay example, dear sir or madam essay example, violence essay sample, good research paper on united farm workers of america, free political violence essay example, environmental and urban economics research paper example, exubera essays, fern essays, ezrin essays, diclofenac essays, biliary essays, alkaline essays, chromatograph essays, biopsychology essays, consumer behavior argumentative essays, the chosen argumentative essays, the canterbury tales argumentative essays, elephant argumentative essays, search engine argumentative essays, common law argumentative essays, pearl harbor argumentative essays, balance sheet argumentative essays, george washington argumentative essays, precision argumentative essays, legend argumentative essays, regeneration argumentative essays.

Password recovery email has been sent to [email protected]

Use your new password to log in

You are not register!

By clicking Register, you agree to our Terms of Service and that you have read our Privacy Policy .

Now you can download documents directly to your device!

Check your email! An email with your password has already been sent to you! Now you can download documents directly to your device.

or Use the QR code to Save this Paper to Your Phone

The sample is NOT original!

Short on a deadline?

Don't waste time. Get help with 11% off using code - GETWOWED

No, thanks! I'm fine with missing my deadline

smoking in public places should be banned. to what extent do you agree or disagree.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

Paragraph 1 - Introduction
Sentence 1 - Background statement
Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
Sentence 3 - Thesis
Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion
Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
Sentence 1 - Summary
Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ » — a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Check your IELTS essay »
Find essays with the same topic
View collections of IELTS Writing Samples
Show IELTS Writing Task 2 Topics

2) The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to raise the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food., many people say that globalization and the growing number of multinational companies have a negative effect on the environment. to what extent do you agree or disagree use specific reasons and examples to support your position., many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems. sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar. do you agree or disagree, some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Should Smoking Be Banned In Public Places

Word count: 874
Category: Smoking Tobacco

A limited time offer! Get a custom sample essay written according to your requirements urgent 3h delivery guaranteed

I remember that when I was child, I saw one public service announcement in the television that was performed by Yul Brynner, who was an actor of “The King and I”. In an announcement, he said, “If I hadn’t had smoking the cigarette, I would not have talked to you smoking was hazardous the health”. An announcement was played after he had died in lung cancer, which was caused by smoking. This announcement gave me deeply impression that cigarette was harmful our health absolutely. However, how many people agree this? Everyday, we hear much news about the people who die from the cancer, which is caused by smoking or passive smoke. It is obvious that smoking not only affects the health of smokers, but also harms other people who are not smoking. So, many people think government should ban the smoking in public place. However, this issue always provides a lot of controversy. Some people say “Yes”, some people say “No”. Now, we are going to examine what opinion the people have in this issue.

Some people think smoking should be banned because it can develop lung cancer. Cigarette contains thousands of different organic chemicals. When people who are smoking, the body will absorb a mass of tars, which is harmful the lung. Besides, the nicotine and carbon monoxide, which damage the normal cells of the lung when these chemicals are burnt. The article says over 4,000 varied chemicals, which can cause cancer, include in the cigarette. According to the evaluation, it has about 164,100 conditions are involved by lung cancer and 156,900 people die of lung cancer in the United States in 2000. (“Facts About Lung Cancer”, 2001)

Passive smoke is another reason for the people who support for banning smoking in public places. Smoking not only affects smokers but also threatens the life of non-smokers. Passive smoke is created by the flaming and smoking of tobacco products, which contain many carcinogens chemicals, such as carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide. Non-smokers inhale these chemicals through the air thereby increasing the risk of lung cancer. Besides, many diseases that come from active smoke also affect to the non-smokers. Nasal sinus cancers and the death rate of heart disease are also caused by the passive smoke, which exposes to the air. According to the EPA evaluation, about 3,000 people who are killed by lung cancer, which is developed by passive smoke. Moreover, passive smoke also affects 35,000 to 40,000 non-smokers to develop the heart disease. (Karpilovsky 3)

On the other hand, some businessmen think smoking should not be banned due to their businesses will be affected by the smoking ban. When the smoking is banned, all restaurants or places of entertainment will loss many customers who are smoker. Because the smoker cannot enjoy the smoking when they are patronizing at the restaurant. In the article, the statement of restaurant revenue implies that the income of restaurant for this year is less 0.6 percent than the identical period of previous year. Zeidan Zeidan, owner of Z’s Deil mentions his revenue has reduced 20 percent due to the banning of smoking. “We used to get very good business from smokers in here during lunch and breakfast, but now they don’t like it because it’s so closed in”, Zeidan Zeidan commented. (qtd. in Passi 1-2)

Besides, the right of individual would be exploited by the smoking ban. Some people think they have a right to choose whether or not to smoke. Everyone has right and freedom. If the government bans the smoking in public places, means that government deprives the right of the people who are smoker. Allanah, who is a non-smoker, thinks smoking in public area should not be prohibited because smokers should have a right and freedom, such as walking on the street or anywhere same as other people. However, if the smokers who are told smoking is prohibited in public places, they will be exploited the right with smoking. He also says he does not favor the odor of smoking and to be surrounded by the people who are smoking, but he thinks everyone should have a right. If other people who cannot endure, they can select staying out of those areas. (Allanah 4)

From my point of view, smoking should be banned in public places. Firstly, smoking gets a fire easily. Many people who like throwing the cigarette butt that does not go out near the tree. When the tree is burnt out by that cigarette butt, it probably causes the disaster that we cannot estimate. I have heard many conflagrations that are caused by the cigarette butt that does not go out. Secondly, smoking is not good for the environment. When the cigarette is burnt, it will produce much carbon monoxide. When it combines with ozone, which is produced by a chemical reaction in the air between pollution and sunlight, and other chemical, such as nitrogen dioxide and so. It will produce much poisoned gas, which affects environment seriously. In fact, smoking not only kills the smoker, hazards innocent non-smokers, but also ruins the natural ecosystem and environment. Therefore, it is no doubt that smoking should be banned in public places in order to protect all people and environment.