ohio lottery case study answers

BUSI 600 From the Ohio Lottery case, answer the following...

From the Ohio Lottery case, answer the following questions:

• Detail the overall research design in the Ohio Lottery case (See Exhibit OL1). What are the advantages and disadvantages of this design?
• Evaluate the MET process (Exhibit OL-2). What are some of the strengths and weaknesses of the MET technique?
• What measurement scales are used in the sample questions provided (Exhibit OL-3)? Why might the lottery attitude and lottery importance questions have presented the most challenge to the professional researchers?
• Using text Exhibit 12-2, map out the likely quantitative instrument content.
• The survey contained several questions that would alert the researchers that the participant was not taking the research process seriously (see case exhibit OL-3). Is this a good or a poor idea? Why?
• Evaluate the MET discussion guide for the Ohio Lottery Research.

Answer & Explanation

Answer: Overall Research Design: The overall research design in the Ohio Lottery case was a combination of qualitative and quantitative research methods. The qualitative portion of the research included focus groups, interviews, and ethnography. The quantitative portion of the research included a survey. The main advantage of this design was that it allowed the researchers to gain a deep understanding of the target audience and their attitudes towards the lottery. It also allowed the researchers to collect data in a manner that was both accurate and measurable. One of the main drawbacks of this design was that it was time-consuming and expensive.

MET Process: The MET process was a three-step process used by the researchers to develop the survey for the Ohio Lottery Research. The first step was to conduct focus groups and interviews to identify key themes. The second step was to develop and refine the survey instrument itself. The third step was to analyze the survey data. The strengths of this technique included the ability to gain a deep understanding of the target audience and their attitudes towards the lottery, as well as the ability to collect data in a manner that was both accurate and measurable. The main weaknesses of this technique were the time and expense involved in conducting the research.

Measurement Scales: The sample questions provided in Exhibit OL-3 used a variety of measurement scales, such as Likert scales, open-ended questions, and semantic differential scales. The lottery attitude and lottery importance questions may have presented the most challenge to the professional researchers because they required the participants to think deeply about their attitudes towards the lottery, which can be difficult to measure accurately.

Quantitative Instrument Content: Using text Exhibit 12-2, the likely quantitative instrument content would include questions about the participants' demographics, such as age, gender, and income level, as well as questions about the participant's attitudes towards the lottery, such as how likely they are to play the lottery, how important they think it is, and what kind of lottery games they prefer.

Alerting Participants: Alerting the participants that they are not taking the research process seriously is a poor idea. This could potentially lead to biased responses, as participants may be less likely to provide honest answers if they feel they are being judged. Additionally, it could lead to a decrease in response rate, as participants may be less likely to complete the survey if they feel they are being monitored.

MET Discussion Guide: The MET discussion guide for the Ohio Lottery Research was a tool used by the researchers to guide their conversations with the participants. The guide contained questions designed to help the researchers understand the participants' attitudes and behaviors related to the lottery. It also contained prompts to help the researchers uncover additional information, such as the participants' interests, motivations, and values. The strengths of this guide included the ability to gain a deep understanding of the target audience, as well as the ability to customize the guide to the specific needs of the research project. The main weaknesses of this guide were that it was time-consuming and expensive to create, and that it may have been difficult for the researchers to keep the participants engaged in the conversation.

Related Q&A

• Q 1. Identify and explain the key steps that integrate the procurement, fulfillment, and procurement process? 2. The integ... Answered over 90d ago
• Q 1) 2) 3) 4)  . In the following exercises, suppose that anti 1 as n -> oo. Find the radius of convergence for each se... Answered over 90d ago
• Q Within the book    Public Policy: The Essential Readings, Stella Theodoulou and Matthew A Cahn, Prentice Hall. ( ISBN-10... Answered 32d ago
• Q Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:  How can a company's marketing organization ensure that it is able t... Answered over 90d ago
• Q As the Senior Human Resources Officer, you are approached in your office one day by a male employee. The employee is und... Answered over 90d ago
• Q A bag of garden soil weighs 40 pounds and holds 2 cubic feet. Find the weight of 15 bags in kilograms and the volume of ... Answered over 90d ago
• Q Exam #2 i Saved A company had the following transactions during the year! 28 1. Paid rent for the next two years, $8,700... Answered over 90d ago
• Q In the video The Dangers of Hazing and Bullying | Kathleen Wiant | TEDxDayton As this is extremely important take notes,... Answered over 90d ago
• Q Provide help with the input and send a picture of the output🙏🏾 thank you in advance I'd really appreciate it  . Cmpt 101... Answered over 90d ago
• Q  . A power plant produces 1GW of electricity, at an efficiency of 35% (typical of today's coal-fired plants). (a) At wha... Answered over 90d ago
• Q 1. During a counseling session, George learns that his client will be attending a wedding this weekend. The groom at the... Answered over 90d ago
• Q The purpose of this assignment is to apply knowledge of reliable and valid information sources to patient education in c... Answered over 90d ago
• Q A plan is no good if it is kept on the shelf. It needs to be read and people need to be trained on its contents. To deve... Answered over 90d ago
• Q Crane Inc. uses a calendar year for financial reporting. The company is authorized to issue 8,490,000 shares of $10 par ... Answered 56d ago
• Q 1- Historically, IR scholars credit World War I and the desire to prevent war as an incentive to create the discipline o... Answered over 90d ago
• Q Question 1 (6 points)    What is the maximum voltage that can be produced by a galvanic cell with the following electrod... Answered over 90d ago

Ohio Lottery Case Business Discussion

https://sajip.co.za/index.php/sajip

https://www.annualreviews.org/journal/soc

Part 1: Thread 1. The primary goal of the thread is to thoroughly answer each of the case study questions. Some answers may require a paragraph-style response, whereas others will be best answered with a table or bulleted points. Use the response style that is most appropriate to answer the individual question while ensuring the following are met:

  2. Each thread will consist of 900 words that answer all the assigned case study questions, include 1 biblical application/integration (no more than 10% of the total response) and across all the questions use at least 5 different peer reviewed sources.  

3. Each case has multiple questions and each question response must be supported with at least 1 peer-reviewed source.

  4. Use proper grammar and current APA format.

From the Ohio Lottery case, answer the following questions:

• Detail the overall research design in the Ohio Lottery case (See Exhibit OL1). What are the advantages and disadvantages of this design?
• Evaluate the MET process (Exhibit OL-2). What are some of the strengths and weaknesses of the MET technique?
• What measurement scales are used in the sample questions provided (Exhibit OL-3)? Why might the lottery attitude and lottery importance questions have presented the most challenge to the professional researchers?
• Using text Exhibit 12-2, map out the likely quantitative instrument content.
• The survey contained several questions that would alert the researchers that the participant was not taking the research process seriously (see case exhibit OL-3). Is this a good or a poor idea? Why?
• Evaluate the MET discussion guide for the Ohio Lottery Research.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GET20” for 20% discount

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Become A Writer Contact Us FAQ

Professional Essay Help

Custom Essay Writing

How Our Service is Used:

Our essays are NOT intended to be forwarded as finalized work as it is only strictly meant to be used for research and study purposes. We do not endorse or condone any type of plagiarism.

Our Company

Ohio Lottery

• Similar Questions

Post one thread of at least 800 - 1000 words 

Then post two (2) replies of at least 450–600 words 

For each thread, there are multiple questions based off the case study; each question response must be supported with at least 1 peer-reviewed source.Each thread must also include 1 biblical application/integration.

 Each response must be supported with at least 2 peer-reviewed sources and include 1 biblical application/integration.

 Note that the biblical application/integration cannot be more than 10% of the thread or replies.

From the Ohio Lottery case, answer the following questions:

• Detail the overall research design in the Ohio Lottery case (See Exhibit OL1). What are the advantages and disadvantages of this design?
• Evaluate the MET process (Exhibit OL-2). What are some of the strengths and weaknesses of the MET technique?
• What measurement scales are used in the sample questions provided (Exhibit OL-3)? Why might the lottery attitude and lottery importance questions have presented the most challenge to the professional researchers?
• Using text Exhibit 12-2, map out the likely quantitative instrument content.
• The survey contained several questions that would alert the researchers that the participant was not taking the research process seriously (see case exhibit OL-3). Is this a good or a poor idea? Why?
• Evaluate the MET discussion guide for the Ohio Lottery Research.

Purchase the answer to view it

• MUSYOKIONES A+
• MISS HILLARY A+
• Emily Clare
• Best Assignments
• Coleen Anderson
• American Tutor
• firstclass tutor
• Maria the tutor
• Creative Geek
• prof bradley
• PROF_ALISTER
• Ashley Ellie
• Guru Olivia
• Abdullah Anwar
• Dr. Ellen Smart
• Discount Assign
• Brilliant Geek
• Assignment 1: Discussion—Global Stock Market and Exchange Rate Fluctuations
• Trevian only
• Based on the passage,  how do Ma's feelings about moving change over time  
• Need 4 pages on effects of issuing travel ban on Ebola stricken countries
• reflexing about movie
• computer science
• Health care management new
• leadership paper 10 pages
• 2 page essay

for faith discussion

Attachment to answer question, discussion questions, discussion 4, discussion thread: ohio lottery, ohio lottery - 800-1000 words with one peer resource per questions (6), ohio lottery.

• Applied Sciences
• Architecture and Design
• Business & Finance
• Computer Science
• Engineering
• Environmental science
• Human Resource Management
• Information Systems
• Mathematics
• Political Science
• Social Science
• Liberty University
• New Hampshire University
• Strayer University
• University Of Phoenix
• Walden University
• Homework Answers