impact of financial literacy to students research paper

Our systems are now restored following recent technical disruption, and we’re working hard to catch up on publishing. We apologise for the inconvenience caused. Find out more: https://www.cambridge.org/universitypress/about-us/news-and-blogs/cambridge-university-press-publishing-update-following-technical-disruption

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings .

Login Alert

• > Journals
• > Journal of Financial Literacy and Wellbeing
• > Volume 1 Issue 1
• > The importance of financial literacy and its impact...

Article contents

Introduction, the overarching value of financial literacy, using financial instruments: from mortgages to crypto assets, financial education in school and the workplace, concluding remarks, the importance of financial literacy and its impact on financial wellbeing.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2023

In this editorial, we provided an overview of the papers in the inaugural issue of the Journal of Financial Literacy and Wellbeing. They cover topics that are at the center of academic research, from the effects of financial education in school and the workplace to the importance of financial literacy for the macro-economy. They also cover financial inclusion and how financial literacy can promote the use of basic financial instruments, such as bank accounts. Moreover, they cover financial decision making in the context of complex instruments, such as mortgages, reverse mortgages, and crypto assets. The papers all share similar findings: financial literacy is low and often inadequate for making the types of financial decisions that are required today. Moreover, financial literacy is particularly low among already vulnerable groups. Importantly, financial literacy matters: it helps people make savvy financial decisions, including being less influenced by framing, better understand information that is provided to them, better understand the workings of insurance, and being more comfortable using basic financial instruments. In a nutshell, financial literacy improves financial wellbeing.

Financial literacy is an essential skill for making savvy financial decisions, understanding the world around us, and being a good citizen. Changes in the pension system, the increasing complexity of financial instruments (including new instruments such as crypto assets), inflation, and increased risks (from the war in Ukraine to climate change) are some of the reasons behind the increasingly urgent need for individuals to have the knowledge and skills that will increase their financial resilience and wellbeing. The OECD Recommendation on Financial Literacy, adopted in 2020, recognized financial wellbeing as the ultimate goal of financial literacy. Footnote 1

Despite this urgency, levels of financial literacy are remarkably low, even in countries with well-developed financial markets and in which individuals actively participate in financial markets. According to the latest OECD adult financial literacy survey, financial literacy is low in many of the countries belonging to the G7 and G20 bloc. This aligns with findings from a global survey on financial literacy that showed that only a handful of countries rank high on very basic measures of financial literacy. Footnote 2 , Footnote 3 Not only is financial illiteracy widespread in the population, but it is particularly acute in some demographic sub-groups that are already financially vulnerable, such as women and those with low-income and low-educational attainment. Footnote 4

Financial literacy is also low among high school students, indicating that the next generation of adults is ill equipped to face the challenges and changes that are ahead of them. According to the latest wave of the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), in some G7 countries, such as Italy, about 20 percent of students do not have basic proficiency in financial literacy. In other countries, such as Peru or Brazil, that proportion is higher than 40 percent. Footnote 5

Much research has been done so far, from measuring financial literacy to assessing the effectiveness of financial education programs to evaluating the link between financial literacy and behavior and the impact of financial literacy on individuals as well as the macro-economy. The number of papers on financial literacy has increased exponentially over the past decade. Footnote 6 Financial literacy has become an official field of study, with its own Journal of Economic Literature code (G53). For all of these reasons, it was time to have an academic journal dedicated to financial literacy. Its mission is to provide the most rigorous research to advance knowledge and to inform policy and programs.

The inaugural issue of the Journal of Financial Literacy and Wellbeing covers topics that are at the center of academic research, from the effects of financial education in school and the workplace to the importance of financial literacy for the macro-economy. It also covers financial inclusion and how financial literacy can promote the use of basic financial instruments, such as bank accounts. Moreover, it covers financial decision making in the context of complex instruments, such as mortgages, reverse mortgages, and crypto assets.

Because the authors of the papers in this inaugural issue have done a vast amount of work on the topics under consideration, we have asked them, when possible, to provide an overview of their work so to gain a perspective of what we have learned so far and what are the most fruitful directions for future research.

There are three principles that bring all of these papers and topics together. First, financial literacy’s relevance at the global level: it affects all countries and economies, irrespective of levels of economic development. The papers in this issue cover experiences from Peru, the United States, Canada, Australia, India, and Sub-Saharan African countries, among many others. When it comes to financial literacy, we can learn from many countries around the world, and the issues discussed in these papers are strikingly similar. Second, whether we are considering the use of basic financial instruments such as bank accounts, or complex ones such as crypto assets, skills are needed if they are to be used to minimize risk and maximize benefits. Third, improving the effectiveness of financial education requires effort as well as ingenuity, and one of the things we can learn from many of these works is how policy and programs can be improved with the help of research. For example, given that financial education in school can affect parents in addition to children, it might make sense to involve parents more directly in financial education programs in school. And because people require support to use financial instruments, attention should be paid to how the use of technology can be improved or can be better complemented with financial education.

In the following sections, we provide a brief description of the papers that are part of the inaugural issue and what we can learn from them.

The benefits of financial education can be far reaching. For example, there has been a push around the world, and significantly in the G20 countries, for promoting financial inclusion. Footnote 7 A high proportion of people in many emerging economies do not have easy access to even basic assets such as bank accounts, let alone access to financial markets, including the stock market. If finance can be important for growth, so is financial literacy, as it can promote participation in financial markets and savvy use of financial instruments. And as financial markets become more sophisticated, the ability to take advantage of new investment opportunities can help reduce inequality (Lo Prete Reference Lo Prete 2013 ).

But there is another important and under-explored avenue related to the impact of financial literacy, which is whether and how much policy makers can be successful in implementing economic reforms. Like individual financial decisions, many reforms involve a trade-off between a sacrifice today for a benefit in the future. However, if people have low financial literacy, they may fail to appreciate future benefits or may not be fully aware of the workings of government budgets and of institutions such as Social Security and the pension system. Overall, attempts to reform pension systems have been met with sharp opposition, even in the face of increasing longevity, decreasing birth rates, and other changes that put existing systems on potentially unsustainable paths. Can financial literacy help with the implementation of those reforms, thus improving the performance of an economy in the long term? And how important is knowledge of pensions?

These are some of the questions pursued by Fornero and Lo Prete ( Reference Fornero and Lo Prete 2023 ). The authors have not just done pioneering work in this area, but Professor Fornero implemented a sweeping reform of the Italian pension system when she served as the Minister of Labour, Social Policy and Gender Equality in Italy from November 2011 to April 2013. They first make the case that it is very important to improve pension literacy, both because there have been many changes to pension systems and because there are a lot of complexities in those systems. Better pension literacy can, for example, help people plan better for their own retirement. This can be particularly important for women, who live longer than men, have lower labor market attachment due to childbearing and other household responsibilities, and have lower wages. As the authors argue, the level of pension literacy is still very low and is particularly low among women, both of which are factors that can jeopardize retirement security.

Most importantly, the authors investigate whether financial literacy helps in the implementation of pension reforms. They report promising evidence that populations with a higher average level of financial literacy are less likely to punish governments for implementing reforms. And financial literacy can help individuals be better citizens (and more educated voters) and less likely to suffer from fiscal illusion, i.e., voters’ failure to estimate the (net) cost of a tax reduction (in terms of higher debt and/or the lower provision of public goods and services). According to their paper, financial literacy can also impact electoral participation, which is another good outcome for the workings of democracies.

It may be useful to note that the countries that started financial literacy programs or were the first to create national strategies for financial literacy did so because of their focus on the pension system and changes in pensions. The focus has now expanded to other topics, but pensions remain an important area of interest. And more than 80 countries have or are implementing national strategies for financial literacy, i.e., policy makers as well have acknowledged the importance of financial literacy at the national level.

Continuing on the topic of the global economy and pioneering work, if we want to have a good understanding of how finance and the use of financial instruments can be important for the wellbeing of individuals and the economy at large, we need to turn to the World Bank Global Findex. It is the most comprehensive database on financial inclusion; the data, which are collected directly from users of financial services, provide unique information on how adults save, borrow, make payments, and manage financial risks. Findings are sobering. The paper by Ansar et al. ( Reference Ansar, Klapper and Singer 2023 ) reminds us that, as of 2021, as many as 1.4 billion adults – or 24 percent of adults – worldwide are without even the most basic asset, i.e., a financial account, or are unbanked . Interestingly, the characteristics of those without an account are very similar to those with low financial literacy: women, poor adults, less educated adults, young adults, and those living in rural areas.

We can learn a lot from looking at the reasons why people do not have an accounts, which speaks to the importance of collecting these types of data. Specifically, the data show that a sizable number of respondents cite lack of help or being uncomfortable using an account as a reason for being unbanked. In developing countries, 64 percent of unbanked adults said they could not use an account at a financial institution without help, a proportion that becomes higher among women and other vulnerable groups. This finding is further evidence that we cannot underestimate the difficulties in using financial instruments. And even those who have an account do not always make good use of it. For example, in India – where every adult with an Aadhaar biometric ID was de facto given a no-minimum-balance, no-fee accounts account as part of the government’s Jan Dhan Yojana program – it was found that many accounts were dormant or had little or no activity. Inactive account holders in India often cite their discomfort level with financial services among the top barriers to account usage. Specifically, about 30 percent of inactive account holders do not use their account because they do not feel comfortable doing so by themselves. And looking at a subsample of 25 Sub-Saharan African countries, where mobile money accounts are widespread, the paper reports that 31 percent of mobile money account holders cannot use their account without help.

These data point to an opportunity for financial education. Strengthening financial literacy can result in more efficient and effective use of basic financial instruments.

Given that the use and good management of basic financial instruments, such as bank accounts, presents difficulty for many people, more complex financial instruments pose an even greater challenge, especially in the context of accelerated digitalization of financial services, which brings new risks for consumers (OECD 2018 ).

We were particularly interested in behavior related to mortgages because the home is the most important asset for most families. Choosing a suitable mortgage is therefore critical to financial wellbeing and, if the financial crisis of 2007/2008 is any indicator, a poor mortgage choice can be a major source of financial distress.

The paper by Torp et al. ( Reference Torp, Liu, Agnew, Bateman, Eckert and Iskhakov 2023 ) helps us to shed light on decisions related to mortgages. In a series of randomly assigned tasks, the authors assessed participants’ subjective comfort with a range of home loan amounts, framed as lump sum debts or equivalent repayment streams. Does framing matter when it comes to decisions about mortgages and does financial literacy and broker advice help? It is not easy to translate stocks into a flow of payments, but often individuals must do so when making financial decisions. As mentioned earlier, high levels of financial literacy cannot be taken for granted, even among the G20 countries. Like other papers in this issue, the authors measure financial literacy using the Big Three financial literacy questions, which assess knowledge of basic financial concepts related to interest rates, inflation, and risk diversification, which are essential elements of financial decisions, including mortgage choice. Less than half of the participants in their sample, i.e., people age 25–64 who have bought or are interested in buying a house, are able to answer these questions.

Similar to findings in other contexts, for example, pension wealth, the authors found that borrowers are less comfortable when loans are framed as lump sum debts rather than equivalent repayment streams. Borrowers are also less adept at translating repayment streams into equivalent lump sums. Interestingly, financial literacy tends to make borrowers more cautious and less comfortable with debt in general and less sensitive to framing. Also, financially literate borrowers can match liabilities with servicing burdens, a key component of sound mortgage management.

Turning to the people who have consulted mortgage brokers, they report higher levels of comfort with debt in general and less discomfort with lump sums compared to repayment streams. Brokers also seem to help clients better grasp the link between loan amounts and repayments. After accounting for potential endogeneity, the authors’ found that, while brokers increase people’s confidence and probably improve their understanding of home loans, they also appear to influence clients’ comfort with debt.

This paper sheds light on the potential effects of financial education: when it comes to household mortgage decisions, financial education can reduce mortgage stress by inducing caution in borrowers and reducing susceptibility to framing. It may also help in using the services of brokers to the household’s advantage.

And given that the house is such a major asset in a household’s balance sheet, what to do with it (including after retirement) is also an important decision. Specifically, do people understand reverse mortgages and does financial literacy help in dealing with these products, which can be even more complex than standard mortgages?

The paper by Choinière-Crèvecoeur and Michaud ( Reference Choinière-Crèvecoeur and Michaud 2023 ) aims to understand the interplay between financial literacy and the valuation of reverse mortgage products. As explained in the paper, a reverse mortgage is a financial product that allows a homeowner to convert a portion of the current equity of their principal residence into cash. Unlike many other mortgage products, the borrower is not obligated to make payments before moving out, selling, or dying. In addition, the borrower is insured against the risk that the loan will be worth more than the house when it is sold. This is called the no-negative equity guarantee (NNEG) of the reverse mortgage. This feature means that the borrower’s longevity risk, as well as the risk of a decline in house prices, is transferred to the lender.

As the definition of the product makes clear, the valuation of reverse mortgages is complex. Specifically, the insurance value of the NNEG is likely to be quite difficult to grasp and compute. It involves projecting house prices in the future, survival risk, and other considerations, such as when one expects to sell the house. Consumers with limited financial literacy may have a harder time making sense of the price and value of the products offered.

To understand how consumers value reverse mortgages, the authors conducted an experiment in which respondents were offered different reverse mortgage products and had to evaluate them by giving their probability of buying each product within the next year. The authors investigate how financial literacy as well as prior knowledge of reverse mortgages shapes the evaluation of reverse mortgage products, in particular the actuarial value of the NNEG and the interest rate charged.

In their sample of 55- to 75-year-old respondents living in the provinces of Quebec, Ontario, and British Columbia, the authors find that more than half of eligible Canadians (55.5%) lack a basic knowledge of reverse mortgages. Moreover, only a little more than half of the respondents in the sample (54.1%) could correctly answer the Big Three questions, indicating that financial literacy is low even among older respondents, who have presumably made many financial decisions.

The findings from this paper show that the effect of financial literacy goes beyond simply increasing or decreasing the likelihood of purchasing a product. In some instances, such as with reverse mortgages, financial literacy enables respondents to better evaluate and assess the value of financial products. Consistent with many other papers, the empirical work in this paper also makes clear that insurance is a hard concept for households to understand, particularly when it involves complex risk calculations. More research should be devoted to understanding how financial education may help households better grasp concepts related to risk and insurance.

Crypto assets are another complex product, and one that is likely to be at least as hard to understand as insurance. Ownership of crypto assets is increasingly rapidly across countries, particularly among the young, which is why we are particularly interested in learning more about decisions related to new and risky products.

A very interesting hypothesis often mentioned in the general media, and pursued in the paper by Gerrans et al. ( Reference Gerrans, Babu Abisekaraj and Liu 2023 ), is that given the rapid increase in the price of crypto over time, people have fear of missing out, or FoMO, on the earnings that can result from crypto ownership. The field of behavioral finance has documented that emotions, attitudes, and behavioral biases can play an important role in financial decisions and the authors build on that field and the literature examining differences in psychological status and personality between investors and non-investors.

The analysis is carried out on data from a survey of undergraduate students at the University of Western Australia as part of a program examining the financial literacy of young adults, including students who enroll in an elective personal finance unit. The survey was conducted in the last week of July 2021, when crypto and stock prices had risen substantially in the 12 months prior to the survey. The relevance of FoMO is considered in addition to financial literacy and important preference parameters, such as risk tolerance. The authors look at both the direct effect of FoMo and the indirect effect of financial literacy and risk tolerance.

Estimates from a simple investment model identify a significant role for FoMO, along with financial literacy and risk tolerance, in current and future investment intentions related to both stocks and crypto. Interestingly, FoMO effects are largest for crypto and future investment intentions and smallest for current stock investment. While risk tolerance and financial literacy have positive effects for current crypto investment, these effects are small and smaller than the effects of FoMO. Financial literacy retains a significant small effect for future stock investment but not for crypto. Risk tolerance and financial literacy have larger effects than FoMO on current ownership of stocks. Thus, factors beyond those traditionally considered in investment models can play a role when looking at new and complex assets.

In addition to direct effects, financial literacy has an indirect effect on investment via FoMO, suggesting that FoMO has some basis in knowledge, though this is a small effect and only robust for stocks. Financial literacy is a significant predictor of FoMO for stocks but only weakly for crypto. Moreover, FoMO is a significant positive predictor of risk tolerance, though the estimated effect is not economically meaningful. Interestingly, FoMO explains only a small amount of gender difference in current crypto ownership, and it does not significantly explain observed gender difference for stock ownership.

As discussed at the end of the paper, the authors are agnostic on whether FoMO is good or bad. To the extent that non-participation in stock markets is a mistake, FoMO may serve a positive role. Given positive associations (although small) between financial literacy and FoMO for stocks, interventions directly addressing FoMO may be useful. For crypto as well, interventions that tap into FoMO could have some effects.

More than ever, the promotion of financial literacy is important; it is particularly important among the young, as it will help them make savvy decisions about very risky assets, such as crypto.

While financial literacy is an essential skill, particularly among the young, many young people lack knowledge of basic financial concepts. Back in 2000, the OECD started PISA, an ambitious project to assess student performance in critical areas. PISA gauges whether students are prepared for future challenges, whether they can analyze, reason, and communicate effectively, and whether they have the capacity to continue learning throughout their lives. Since its first wave in 2000, PISA has tested 15-year-old students’ skills and knowledge in three key domains: mathematics, reading, and science. In 2012, PISA introduced an optional financial literacy assessment, which became the first large-scale international study to assess youths’ financial literacy. The PISA financial literacy assessment measures the proficiency of 15-year-olds in demonstrating and applying financial knowledge and skills.

This is the definition of financial literacy from the team of experts who worked on this assessment Footnote 8 :

“Financial literacy is knowledge and understanding of financial concepts and risks, as well as the skills and attitudes to apply such knowledge and understanding in order to make effective decisions across a range of financial contexts, to improve the financial wellbeing of individuals and society, and to enable participation in economic life . ” ( OECD 2019b )

As reported in more detail in Lusardi ( Reference Lusardi 2015 ), there are four innovative aspects of this definition that should be highlighted. First, financial literacy does not refer simply to knowledge and understanding but also to its purpose, which is to promote effective decision making. Second, and in line with the objectives of this journal, the aim of financial literacy is to improve financial wellbeing, not to affect a single behavior, such as increasing saving or decreasing debt. Third, financial literacy has effects not just for individuals but for society as well. Fourth, financial literacy, like reading, writing, and knowledge of science, enables young people to participate in economic life. We highlight this definition because it represents many of the principles covered in this inaugural issue.

The PISA financial literacy data have become a critical source of information with which to assess the level of financial literacy among the young. Starting from the original wave in 2012, we have found that several rich countries do not have high levels of youth financial literacy. For example, both the United States and some European countries, such as Italy, France, and Spain, ranked at the OECD average or below the average on the 2012 financial literacy scale. Moreover, and importantly, financial literacy is strongly linked to socio-economic status: the students who are financially literate are disproportionately those from families with higher levels of education and income and from homes with a lot of books. (OECD 2014 ; Lusardi Reference Lusardi 2015 ).

The PISA 2022 financial literacy assessment will provide further insights into young people’s financial literacy across 23 countries and economies, and take into consideration changes in the socio-demographic and financial landscape, such as the use of digital services, that are relevant for students’ financial literacy and decision making.

Countries have started to add financial education in school, in some cases making it mandatory. Notably, Portugal made financial education mandatory in school in 2018, adding it to the civic education curriculum, and many states in the United States have passed legislation to make financial education mandatory in high school curricula. Recent empirical evidence on the effectiveness of financial education in school shows it holds much promise. For example, according to a meta-analysis covering financial education programs from as many as 33 countries on 6 continents, and considering the programs evaluated most rigorously, financial education is found to affect both financial knowledge and downstream behavior. Remarkably, the effects are similar across age groups, i.e., they hold among the young and the old, and they hold across countries. Footnote 9 Other work examining the effect of financial education in high school also shows that young people who were exposed to high school financial education are much less likely to have problems with debt as young adults (Urban et al. Reference Urban, Schmeiser, Collins and Brown 2020 ).

While the focus on financial education has been on whether it improves the knowledge and wellbeing of students, it could also affect others. Frisancho ( Reference Frisancho 2023 ) in this inaugural issue examines whether financial education in high school can also affect parents. This is a very innovative paper and for many reasons. First, the analysis is carried out on a large sample of schools in Peru. As mentioned earlier, Peru is a country with a high percentage of students who perform poorly on financial literacy assessments. Second, it is possible to link the data with information from credit bureau records, which provide data on financial outcomes. This is more rigorous information than can be obtained by relying, for example, on self-reports. Third and importantly, the evaluation is based on a large-scale experiment, where students were randomly assigned to control and treatment groups, which is the most rigorous method with which to assess the impact of financial education. We hope many programs can be evaluated using these methods and that this study can provide guidelines for other countries.

The findings speak of the power of financial education: in addition to affecting students, it helps parents, specifically parents of low-income students. Among parents from poorer households, default probabilities decrease, credit scores increase, and debt levels increase too. And there is an important gender effect: it is mostly the parents of daughters who experience improvement in their financial behaviors. These findings are intrinsically important and have policy implications: Financial education in school can be far reaching and can have important spillover effects, in particular for vulnerable groups.

And if schools can be suitable places to provide financial education to the young, the workplace can be ideal for financial education programs for adults, as also recognized by the OECD in the Policy Handbook on Financial Education in the Workplace (OECD 2022 b). There are many reasons why workplace financial education can be important. First, employers may benefit too. A simple statistic from the work of Hasler et al. ( Reference Hasler, Lusardi, Yagnik and Yakobski 2023 ) is quite informative. In an attempt to provide a crude proxy of the cost of financial illiteracy, the 2021 Personal Finance Index ( P-Fin Index) survey asks respondents to give an estimate of the total number of hours per week they spend worrying about their personal finances, and how many of those hours are spent at work. Findings are startling. In 2021, U.S. adults reported spending about 7 hours per week, on average, thinking about and dealing with issues and problems related to their personal finances, with over three of these hours spent at work. The most financially literate respondents (who answered over 75 percent of the P-Fin Index questions correctly) reported spending much less time dealing with their personal finances: about three total hours per week with 1 hour per week at work. In contrast, the least financially literate respondents (those who answered 25 percent or less of the P-Fin Index questions correctly) reported spending a staggering 11 total hours per week and over 4 hours per week at work thinking about and dealing with issues related to their finances.

Hasler et al. ( Reference Hasler, Lusardi, Yagnik and Yakobski 2023 ) use these data to do a back-of-the-envelope calculation of the return to a workplace financial education program. For a company with 30 minimum-wage employees (earning $15 per hour) who work 50 weeks per year, financial education can recover $22,500 of value per year for an employer, which is conceivably greater than the cost of many workplace financial wellness programs. In other words, scalable, low-cost financial education programs would likely create a positive return on investment, in particular for large employers.

Because of the shift from defined benefit to defined contribution in the United States, a number of large firms have started to offer financial education programs. However, it is difficult to access that data without working directly with an employer. It is also difficult to acquire data that are representative of the population of workers or employers. The research of Clark ( Reference Clark 2023 ), who has worked with many employers in different sectors, is rather unique and helps us to shed light on the workings and promises of workplace financial education. As noted in his paper, providing financial education when workers are first hired is ideal, because it is in the interest of both employers and employees to understand the benefits offered by the firm and how to best use them. Providing education related to retirement and retirement planning is also beneficial to both parties, given that a substantial portion of employer benefits relate to pensions and the promotion of financial security in retirement. However, as the author effectively argues, financial education should not be limited to retirement topics, as other financial decisions made by employees can interact with decisions about whether or not to participate in pension plans and how much to contribute to those plans. Holistic financial education programs offered throughout the life cycle may better fit the needs of a heterogeneous population of workers. And programs provided well before retirement may enable workers to take better advantage of the power of interest compounding, helping them begin to save as early as possible and take advantage of employer matches. It is not always possible to evaluate the effectiveness of programs using randomized controlled trials or controlling for certain factors, such as whether program attendees are those who are inherently interested in financial education, but the evidence provided in this overview of two decades of work shows that workplace financial education holds much promise.

Clark’s work has included personal interactions with employers and employees, providing opportunities for both quantitative and qualitative work, and the evidence from small samples can be illuminating too. For example, the author shows that financial education programs are appreciated and rated with high marks by employees. While self-selection may play a role in program attendance, offering this type of benefit can be a useful retention tool, particularly in the tight post-pandemic labor market. We specifically encourage reading the last part of the paper, which provides useful best practices for increasing the effectiveness of employer-provided financial education programs.

The papers in this inaugural issue all share similar findings: financial literacy is low and often inadequate for making the types of financial decisions that are required today, from opening a bank account, to managing a mortgage, to using reverse mortgages later in life, to investing in new and risky assets such as crypto. Moreover, financial literacy is particularly low among already vulnerable groups, such as women and individuals with low-income or low-educational attainment. Importantly, financial literacy matters: it helps people make savvy financial decisions, including being less influenced by framing, better understand information that is provided to them, better understand the workings of insurance, and being more comfortable using basic financial instruments. In a nutshell, financial literacy improves financial wellbeing! The effects of financial literacy extend beyond individuals: financial literacy can affect the macro-economy as well.

Financial literacy is essential for the promotion of financial inclusion, as people need knowledge and skills to effectively use financial instruments, even the most basic ones, such as bank accounts. Every financial instrument carries potential costs and risks, and some basic knowledge is necessary to use these instruments well. And when financial instruments are complex (as in the case of mortgages, including reverse mortgages) or risky (as in the case of assets such as crypto), financial literacy becomes a must for informed consumer use along with adequate financial protection.

Financial literacy is also expected to help individuals deal with emerging trends and challenges in the financial landscape, from digital financial services to sustainable finance, as recognized in the priorities of the OECD International Network on Financial Education for the next biennium.

Policy makers, practitioners, the private and public sectors, and academics can benefit from the findings reported in the papers in this inaugural issue. Our objective is to publish the most rigorous and relevant work. But most importantly, we hope that this journal will become a source for relevant information and that the research that is published here will have an impact and improve the financial wellbeing of individuals around the world.

1 See OECD ( 2020 a).

2 See OECD ( 2020 b) and Klapper and Lusardi ( Reference Klapper and Lusardi 2020 ).

3 The OECD will release the results of a new data collection in 2023 from developed and developing countries, which will look not only at financial literacy but also at the financial resilience and financial wellbeing of consumers around the world in an internationally comparable way (OECD 2022 a).

4 See Lusardi and Mitchell ( Reference Lusardi and Mitchell 2014 ) for a discussion and review of the empirical evidence on financial literacy.

5 See OECD ( 2020 c). The next PISA financial literacy assessment will be released in 2024.

6 See Kaiser et al. ( Reference Kaiser, Lusardi, Menkhoff and Urban 2022 ).

7 See the G20 High-Level Principles for Digital Financial Inclusion ( 2016 ).

8 Lusardi and Messy both participated in the work leading to this assessment.

9 See Kaiser et al. ( Reference Kaiser, Lusardi, Menkhoff and Urban 2022 ).

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref .

• Google Scholar

View all Google Scholar citations for this article.

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle .

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

• Volume 1, Issue 1
• Annamaria Lusardi (a1) and Flore-Anne Messy (a2)
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/flw.2023.8

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox .

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive .

Reply to: Submit a response

- No HTML tags allowed - Web page URLs will display as text only - Lines and paragraphs break automatically - Attachments, images or tables are not permitted

Your details

Your email address will be used in order to notify you when your comment has been reviewed by the moderator and in case the author(s) of the article or the moderator need to contact you directly.

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests.

Please list any fees and grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in or any close relationship with, at any time over the preceding 36 months, any organisation whose interests may be affected by the publication of the response. Please also list any non-financial associations or interests (personal, professional, political, institutional, religious or other) that a reasonable reader would want to know about in relation to the submitted work. This pertains to all the authors of the piece, their spouses or partners.

• Conference key note
• Open access
• Published: 24 January 2019

Financial literacy and the need for financial education: evidence and implications

• Annamaria Lusardi 1  

Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics volume  155 , Article number:  1 ( 2019 ) Cite this article

439k Accesses

340 Citations

216 Altmetric

Metrics details

1 Introduction

Throughout their lifetime, individuals today are more responsible for their personal finances than ever before. With life expectancies rising, pension and social welfare systems are being strained. In many countries, employer-sponsored defined benefit (DB) pension plans are swiftly giving way to private defined contribution (DC) plans, shifting the responsibility for retirement saving and investing from employers to employees. Individuals have also experienced changes in labor markets. Skills are becoming more critical, leading to divergence in wages between those with a college education, or higher, and those with lower levels of education. Simultaneously, financial markets are rapidly changing, with developments in technology and new and more complex financial products. From student loans to mortgages, credit cards, mutual funds, and annuities, the range of financial products people have to choose from is very different from what it was in the past, and decisions relating to these financial products have implications for individual well-being. Moreover, the exponential growth in financial technology (fintech) is revolutionizing the way people make payments, decide about their financial investments, and seek financial advice. In this context, it is important to understand how financially knowledgeable people are and to what extent their knowledge of finance affects their financial decision-making.

An essential indicator of people’s ability to make financial decisions is their level of financial literacy. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) aptly defines financial literacy as not only the knowledge and understanding of financial concepts and risks but also the skills, motivation, and confidence to apply such knowledge and understanding in order to make effective decisions across a range of financial contexts, to improve the financial well-being of individuals and society, and to enable participation in economic life. Thus, financial literacy refers to both knowledge and financial behavior, and this paper will analyze research on both topics.

As I describe in more detail below, findings around the world are sobering. Financial literacy is low even in advanced economies with well-developed financial markets. On average, about one third of the global population has familiarity with the basic concepts that underlie everyday financial decisions (Lusardi and Mitchell, 2011c ). The average hides gaping vulnerabilities of certain population subgroups and even lower knowledge of specific financial topics. Furthermore, there is evidence of a lack of confidence, particularly among women, and this has implications for how people approach and make financial decisions. In the following sections, I describe how we measure financial literacy, the levels of literacy we find around the world, the implications of those findings for financial decision-making, and how we can improve financial literacy.

2 How financially literate are people?

2.1 measuring financial literacy: the big three.

In the context of rapid changes and constant developments in the financial sector and the broader economy, it is important to understand whether people are equipped to effectively navigate the maze of financial decisions that they face every day. To provide the tools for better financial decision-making, one must assess not only what people know but also what they need to know, and then evaluate the gap between those things. There are a few fundamental concepts at the basis of most financial decision-making. These concepts are universal, applying to every context and economic environment. Three such concepts are (1) numeracy as it relates to the capacity to do interest rate calculations and understand interest compounding; (2) understanding of inflation; and (3) understanding of risk diversification. Translating these concepts into easily measured financial literacy metrics is difficult, but Lusardi and Mitchell ( 2008 , 2011b , 2011c ) have designed a standard set of questions around these concepts and implemented them in numerous surveys in the USA and around the world.

Four principles informed the design of these questions, as described in detail by Lusardi and Mitchell ( 2014 ). The first is simplicity : the questions should measure knowledge of the building blocks fundamental to decision-making in an intertemporal setting. The second is relevance : the questions should relate to concepts pertinent to peoples’ day-to-day financial decisions over the life cycle; moreover, they must capture general rather than context-specific ideas. Third is brevity : the number of questions must be few enough to secure widespread adoption; and fourth is capacity to differentiate , meaning that questions should differentiate financial knowledge in such a way as to permit comparisons across people. Each of these principles is important in the context of face-to-face, telephone, and online surveys.

Three basic questions (since dubbed the “Big Three”) to measure financial literacy have been fielded in many surveys in the USA, including the National Financial Capability Study (NFCS) and, more recently, the Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF), and in many national surveys around the world. They have also become the standard way to measure financial literacy in surveys used by the private sector. For example, the Aegon Center for Longevity and Retirement included the Big Three questions in the 2018 Aegon Retirement Readiness Survey, covering around 16,000 people in 15 countries. Both ING and Allianz, but also investment funds, and pension funds have used the Big Three to measure financial literacy. The exact wording of the questions is provided in Table  1 .

2.2 Cross-country comparison

The first examination of financial literacy using the Big Three was possible due to a special module on financial literacy and retirement planning that Lusardi and Mitchell designed for the 2004 Health and Retirement Study (HRS), which is a survey of Americans over age 50. Astonishingly, the data showed that only half of older Americans—who presumably had made many financial decisions in their lives—could answer the two basic questions measuring understanding of interest rates and inflation (Lusardi and Mitchell, 2011b ). And just one third demonstrated understanding of these two concepts and answered the third question, measuring understanding of risk diversification, correctly. It is sobering that recent US surveys, such as the 2015 NFCS, the 2016 SCF, and the 2017 Survey of Household Economics and Financial Decisionmaking (SHED), show that financial knowledge has remained stubbornly low over time.

Over time, the Big Three have been added to other national surveys across countries and Lusardi and Mitchell have coordinated a project called Financial Literacy around the World (FLat World), which is an international comparison of financial literacy (Lusardi and Mitchell, 2011c ).

Findings from the FLat World project, which so far includes data from 15 countries, including Switzerland, highlight the urgent need to improve financial literacy (see Table  2 ). Across countries, financial literacy is at a crisis level, with the average rate of financial literacy, as measured by those answering correctly all three questions, at around 30%. Moreover, only around 50% of respondents in most countries are able to correctly answer the two financial literacy questions on interest rates and inflation correctly. A noteworthy point is that most countries included in the FLat World project have well-developed financial markets, which further highlights the cause for alarm over the demonstrated lack of the financial literacy. The fact that levels of financial literacy are so similar across countries with varying levels of economic development—indicating that in terms of financial knowledge, the world is indeed flat —shows that income levels or ubiquity of complex financial products do not by themselves equate to a more financially literate population.

Other noteworthy findings emerge in Table  2 . For instance, as expected, understanding of the effects of inflation (i.e., of real versus nominal values) among survey respondents is low in countries that have experienced deflation rather than inflation: in Japan, understanding of inflation is at 59%; in other countries, such as Germany, it is at 78% and, in the Netherlands, it is at 77%. Across countries, individuals have the lowest level of knowledge around the concept of risk, and the percentage of correct answers is particularly low when looking at knowledge of risk diversification. Here, we note the prevalence of “do not know” answers. While “do not know” responses hover around 15% on the topic of interest rates and 18% for inflation, about 30% of respondents—in some countries even more—are likely to respond “do not know” to the risk diversification question. In Switzerland, 74% answered the risk diversification question correctly and 13% reported not knowing the answer (compared to 3% and 4% responding “do not know” for the interest rates and inflation questions, respectively).

These findings are supported by many other surveys. For example, the 2014 Standard & Poor’s Global Financial Literacy Survey shows that, around the world, people know the least about risk and risk diversification (Klapper, Lusardi, and Van Oudheusden, 2015 ). Similarly, results from the 2016 Allianz survey, which collected evidence from ten European countries on money, financial literacy, and risk in the digital age, show very low-risk literacy in all countries covered by the survey. In Austria, Germany, and Switzerland, which are the three top-performing nations in term of financial knowledge, less than 20% of respondents can answer three questions related to knowledge of risk and risk diversification (Allianz, 2017 ).

Other surveys show that the findings about financial literacy correlate in an expected way with other data. For example, performance on the mathematics and science sections of the OECD Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) correlates with performance on the Big Three and, specifically, on the question relating to interest rates. Similarly, respondents in Sweden, which has experienced pension privatization, performed better on the risk diversification question (at 68%), than did respondents in Russia and East Germany, where people have had less exposure to the stock market. For researchers studying financial knowledge and its effects, these findings hint to the fact that financial literacy could be the result of choice and not an exogenous variable.

To summarize, financial literacy is low across the world and higher national income levels do not equate to a more financially literate population. The design of the Big Three questions enables a global comparison and allows for a deeper understanding of financial literacy. This enhances the measure’s utility because it helps to identify general and specific vulnerabilities across countries and within population subgroups, as will be explained in the next section.

2.3 Who knows the least?

Low financial literacy on average is exacerbated by patterns of vulnerability among specific population subgroups. For instance, as reported in Lusardi and Mitchell ( 2014 ), even though educational attainment is positively correlated with financial literacy, it is not sufficient. Even well-educated people are not necessarily savvy about money. Financial literacy is also low among the young. In the USA, less than 30% of respondents can correctly answer the Big Three by age 40, even though many consequential financial decisions are made well before that age (see Fig.  1 ). Similarly, in Switzerland, only 45% of those aged 35 or younger are able to correctly answer the Big Three questions. Footnote 1 And if people may learn from making financial decisions, that learning seems limited. As shown in Fig.  1 , many older individuals, who have already made decisions, cannot answer three basic financial literacy questions.

Financial literacy across age in the USA. This figure shows the percentage of respondents who answered correctly all Big Three questions by age group (year 2015). Source: 2015 US National Financial Capability Study

A gender gap in financial literacy is also present across countries. Women are less likely than men to answer questions correctly. The gap is present not only on the overall scale but also within each topic, across countries of different income levels, and at different ages. Women are also disproportionately more likely to indicate that they do not know the answer to specific questions (Fig.  2 ), highlighting overconfidence among men and awareness of lack of knowledge among women. Even in Finland, which is a relatively equal society in terms of gender, 44% of men compared to 27% of women answer all three questions correctly and 18% of women give at least one “do not know” response versus less than 10% of men (Kalmi and Ruuskanen, 2017 ). These figures further reflect the universality of the Big Three questions. As reported in Fig.  2 , “do not know” responses among women are prevalent not only in European countries, for example, Switzerland, but also in North America (represented in the figure by the USA, though similar findings are reported in Canada) and in Asia (represented in the figure by Japan). Those interested in learning more about the differences in financial literacy across demographics and other characteristics can consult Lusardi and Mitchell ( 2011c , 2014 ).

Gender differences in the responses to the Big Three questions. Sources: USA—Lusardi and Mitchell, 2011c ; Japan—Sekita, 2011 ; Switzerland—Brown and Graf, 2013

3 Does financial literacy matter?

A growing number of financial instruments have gained importance, including alternative financial services such as payday loans, pawnshops, and rent to own stores that charge very high interest rates. Simultaneously, in the changing economic landscape, people are increasingly responsible for personal financial planning and for investing and spending their resources throughout their lifetime. We have witnessed changes not only in the asset side of household balance sheets but also in the liability side. For example, in the USA, many people arrive close to retirement carrying a lot more debt than previous generations did (Lusardi, Mitchell, and Oggero, 2018 ). Overall, individuals are making substantially more financial decisions over their lifetime, living longer, and gaining access to a range of new financial products. These trends, combined with low financial literacy levels around the world and, particularly, among vulnerable population groups, indicate that elevating financial literacy must become a priority for policy makers.

There is ample evidence of the impact of financial literacy on people’s decisions and financial behavior. For example, financial literacy has been proven to affect both saving and investment behavior and debt management and borrowing practices. Empirically, financially savvy people are more likely to accumulate wealth (Lusardi and Mitchell, 2014 ). There are several explanations for why higher financial literacy translates into greater wealth. Several studies have documented that those who have higher financial literacy are more likely to plan for retirement, probably because they are more likely to appreciate the power of interest compounding and are better able to do calculations. According to the findings of the FLat World project, answering one additional financial question correctly is associated with a 3–4 percentage point greater probability of planning for retirement; this finding is seen in Germany, the USA, Japan, and Sweden. Financial literacy is found to have the strongest impact in the Netherlands, where knowing the right answer to one additional financial literacy question is associated with a 10 percentage point higher probability of planning (Mitchell and Lusardi, 2015 ). Empirically, planning is a very strong predictor of wealth; those who plan arrive close to retirement with two to three times the amount of wealth as those who do not plan (Lusardi and Mitchell, 2011b ).

Financial literacy is also associated with higher returns on investments and investment in more complex assets, such as stocks, which normally offer higher rates of return. This finding has important consequences for wealth; according to the simulation by Lusardi, Michaud, and Mitchell ( 2017 ), in the context of a life-cycle model of saving with many sources of uncertainty, from 30 to 40% of US retirement wealth inequality can be accounted for by differences in financial knowledge. These results show that financial literacy is not a sideshow, but it plays a critical role in saving and wealth accumulation.

Financial literacy is also strongly correlated with a greater ability to cope with emergency expenses and weather income shocks. Those who are financially literate are more likely to report that they can come up with $2000 in 30 days or that they are able to cover an emergency expense of $400 with cash or savings (Hasler, Lusardi, and Oggero, 2018 ).

With regard to debt behavior, those who are more financially literate are less likely to have credit card debt and more likely to pay the full balance of their credit card each month rather than just paying the minimum due (Lusardi and Tufano, 2009 , 2015 ). Individuals with higher financial literacy levels also are more likely to refinance their mortgages when it makes sense to do so, tend not to borrow against their 401(k) plans, and are less likely to use high-cost borrowing methods, e.g., payday loans, pawn shops, auto title loans, and refund anticipation loans (Lusardi and de Bassa Scheresberg, 2013 ).

Several studies have documented poor debt behavior and its link to financial literacy. Moore ( 2003 ) reported that the least financially literate are also more likely to have costly mortgages. Lusardi and Tufano ( 2015 ) showed that the least financially savvy incurred high transaction costs, paying higher fees and using high-cost borrowing methods. In their study, the less knowledgeable also reported excessive debt loads and an inability to judge their debt positions. Similarly, Mottola ( 2013 ) found that those with low financial literacy were more likely to engage in costly credit card behavior, and Utkus and Young ( 2011 ) concluded that the least literate were more likely to borrow against their 401(k) and pension accounts.

Young people also struggle with debt, in particular with student loans. According to Lusardi, de Bassa Scheresberg, and Oggero ( 2016 ), Millennials know little about their student loans and many do not attempt to calculate the payment amounts that will later be associated with the loans they take. When asked what they would do, if given the chance to revisit their student loan borrowing decisions, about half of Millennials indicate that they would make a different decision.

Finally, a recent report on Millennials in the USA (18- to 34-year-olds) noted the impact of financial technology (fintech) on the financial behavior of young individuals. New and rapidly expanding mobile payment options have made transactions easier, quicker, and more convenient. The average user of mobile payments apps and technology in the USA is a high-income, well-educated male who works full time and is likely to belong to an ethnic minority group. Overall, users of mobile payments are busy individuals who are financially active (holding more assets and incurring more debt). However, mobile payment users display expensive financial behaviors, such as spending more than they earn, using alternative financial services, and occasionally overdrawing their checking accounts. Additionally, mobile payment users display lower levels of financial literacy (Lusardi, de Bassa Scheresberg, and Avery, 2018 ). The rapid growth in fintech around the world juxtaposed with expensive financial behavior means that more attention must be paid to the impact of mobile payment use on financial behavior. Fintech is not a substitute for financial literacy.

4 The way forward for financial literacy and what works

Overall, financial literacy affects everything from day-to-day to long-term financial decisions, and this has implications for both individuals and society. Low levels of financial literacy across countries are correlated with ineffective spending and financial planning, and expensive borrowing and debt management. These low levels of financial literacy worldwide and their widespread implications necessitate urgent efforts. Results from various surveys and research show that the Big Three questions are useful not only in assessing aggregate financial literacy but also in identifying vulnerable population subgroups and areas of financial decision-making that need improvement. Thus, these findings are relevant for policy makers and practitioners. Financial illiteracy has implications not only for the decisions that people make for themselves but also for society. The rapid spread of mobile payment technology and alternative financial services combined with lack of financial literacy can exacerbate wealth inequality.

To be effective, financial literacy initiatives need to be large and scalable. Schools, workplaces, and community platforms provide unique opportunities to deliver financial education to large and often diverse segments of the population. Furthermore, stark vulnerabilities across countries make it clear that specific subgroups, such as women and young people, are ideal targets for financial literacy programs. Given women’s awareness of their lack of financial knowledge, as indicated via their “do not know” responses to the Big Three questions, they are likely to be more receptive to financial education.

The near-crisis levels of financial illiteracy, the adverse impact that it has on financial behavior, and the vulnerabilities of certain groups speak of the need for and importance of financial education. Financial education is a crucial foundation for raising financial literacy and informing the next generations of consumers, workers, and citizens. Many countries have seen efforts in recent years to implement and provide financial education in schools, colleges, and workplaces. However, the continuously low levels of financial literacy across the world indicate that a piece of the puzzle is missing. A key lesson is that when it comes to providing financial education, one size does not fit all. In addition to the potential for large-scale implementation, the main components of any financial literacy program should be tailored content, targeted at specific audiences. An effective financial education program efficiently identifies the needs of its audience, accurately targets vulnerable groups, has clear objectives, and relies on rigorous evaluation metrics.

Using measures like the Big Three questions, it is imperative to recognize vulnerable groups and their specific needs in program designs. Upon identification, the next step is to incorporate this knowledge into financial education programs and solutions.

School-based education can be transformational by preparing young people for important financial decisions. The OECD’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), in both 2012 and 2015, found that, on average, only 10% of 15-year-olds achieved maximum proficiency on a five-point financial literacy scale. As of 2015, about one in five of students did not have even basic financial skills (see OECD, 2017 ). Rigorous financial education programs, coupled with teacher training and high school financial education requirements, are found to be correlated with fewer defaults and higher credit scores among young adults in the USA (Urban, Schmeiser, Collins, and Brown, 2018 ). It is important to target students and young adults in schools and colleges to provide them with the necessary tools to make sound financial decisions as they graduate and take on responsibilities, such as buying cars and houses, or starting retirement accounts. Given the rising cost of education and student loan debt and the need of young people to start contributing as early as possible to retirement accounts, the importance of financial education in school cannot be overstated.

There are three compelling reasons for having financial education in school. First, it is important to expose young people to the basic concepts underlying financial decision-making before they make important and consequential financial decisions. As noted in Fig.  1 , financial literacy is very low among the young and it does not seem to increase a lot with age/generations. Second, school provides access to financial literacy to groups who may not be exposed to it (or may not be equally exposed to it), for example, women. Third, it is important to reduce the costs of acquiring financial literacy, if we want to promote higher financial literacy both among individuals and among society.

There are compelling reasons to have personal finance courses in college as well. In the same way in which colleges and university offer courses in corporate finance to teach how to manage the finances of firms, so today individuals need the knowledge to manage their own finances over the lifetime, which in present discounted value often amount to large values and are made larger by private pension accounts.

Financial education can also be efficiently provided in workplaces. An effective financial education program targeted to adults recognizes the socioeconomic context of employees and offers interventions tailored to their specific needs. A case study conducted in 2013 with employees of the US Federal Reserve System showed that completing a financial literacy learning module led to significant changes in retirement planning behavior and better-performing investment portfolios (Clark, Lusardi, and Mitchell, 2017 ). It is also important to note the delivery method of these programs, especially when targeted to adults. For instance, video formats have a significantly higher impact on financial behavior than simple narratives, and instruction is most effective when it is kept brief and relevant (Heinberg et al., 2014 ).

The Big Three also show that it is particularly important to make people familiar with the concepts of risk and risk diversification. Programs devoted to teaching risk via, for example, visual tools have shown great promise (Lusardi et al., 2017 ). The complexity of some of these concepts and the costs of providing education in the workplace, coupled with the fact that many older individuals may not work or work in firms that do not offer such education, provide other reasons why financial education in school is so important.

Finally, it is important to provide financial education in the community, in places where people go to learn. A recent example is the International Federation of Finance Museums, an innovative global collaboration that promotes financial knowledge through museum exhibits and the exchange of resources. Museums can be places where to provide financial literacy both among the young and the old.

There are a variety of other ways in which financial education can be offered and also targeted to specific groups. However, there are few evaluations of the effectiveness of such initiatives and this is an area where more research is urgently needed, given the statistics reported in the first part of this paper.

5 Concluding remarks

The lack of financial literacy, even in some of the world’s most well-developed financial markets, is of acute concern and needs immediate attention. The Big Three questions that were designed to measure financial literacy go a long way in identifying aggregate differences in financial knowledge and highlighting vulnerabilities within populations and across topics of interest, thereby facilitating the development of tailored programs. Many such programs to provide financial education in schools and colleges, workplaces, and the larger community have taken existing evidence into account to create rigorous solutions. It is important to continue making strides in promoting financial literacy, by achieving scale and efficiency in future programs as well.

In August 2017, I was appointed Director of the Italian Financial Education Committee, tasked with designing and implementing the national strategy for financial literacy. I will be able to apply my research to policy and program initiatives in Italy to promote financial literacy: it is an essential skill in the twenty-first century, one that individuals need if they are to thrive economically in today’s society. As the research discussed in this paper well documents, financial literacy is like a global passport that allows individuals to make the most of the plethora of financial products available in the market and to make sound financial decisions. Financial literacy should be seen as a fundamental right and universal need, rather than the privilege of the relatively few consumers who have special access to financial knowledge or financial advice. In today’s world, financial literacy should be considered as important as basic literacy, i.e., the ability to read and write. Without it, individuals and societies cannot reach their full potential.

See Brown and Graf ( 2013 ).

Abbreviations

Defined benefit (refers to pension plan)

Defined contribution (refers to pension plan)

Financial Literacy around the World

National Financial Capability Study

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

Programme for International Student Assessment

Survey of Consumer Finances

Survey of Household Economics and Financial Decisionmaking

Aegon Center for Longevity and Retirement. (2018). The New Social Contract: a blueprint for retirement in the 21st century. The Aegon Retirement Readiness Survey 2018. Retrieved from https://www.aegon.com/en/Home/Research/aegon-retirement-readiness-survey-2018/ . Accessed 1 June 2018.

Agnew, J., Bateman, H., & Thorp, S. (2013). Financial literacy and retirement planning in Australia. Numeracy, 6 (2).

Allianz (2017). When will the penny drop? Money, financial literacy and risk in the digital age. Retrieved from http://gflec.org/initiatives/money-finlit-risk/ . Accessed 1 June 2018.

Almenberg, J., & Säve-Söderbergh, J. (2011). Financial literacy and retirement planning in Sweden. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 10 (4), 585–598.

Article   Google Scholar  

Arrondel, L., Debbich, M., & Savignac, F. (2013). Financial literacy and financial planning in France. Numeracy, 6 (2).

Beckmann, E. (2013). Financial literacy and household savings in Romania. Numeracy, 6 (2).

Boisclair, D., Lusardi, A., & Michaud, P. C. (2017). Financial literacy and retirement planning in Canada. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 16 (3), 277–296.

Brown, M., & Graf, R. (2013). Financial literacy and retirement planning in Switzerland. Numeracy, 6 (2).

Bucher-Koenen, T., & Lusardi, A. (2011). Financial literacy and retirement planning in Germany. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 10 (4), 565–584.

Clark, R., Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2017). Employee financial literacy and retirement plan behavior: a case study. Economic Inquiry, 55 (1), 248–259.

Crossan, D., Feslier, D., & Hurnard, R. (2011). Financial literacy and retirement planning in New Zealand. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 10 (4), 619–635.

Fornero, E., & Monticone, C. (2011). Financial literacy and pension plan participation in Italy. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 10 (4), 547–564.

Hasler, A., Lusardi, A., and Oggero, N. (2018). Financial fragility in the US: evidence and implications. GFLEC working paper n. 2018–1.

Heinberg, A., Hung, A., Kapteyn, A., Lusardi, A., Samek, A. S., & Yoong, J. (2014). Five steps to planning success: experimental evidence from US households. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30 (4), 697–724.

Kalmi, P., & Ruuskanen, O. P. (2017). Financial literacy and retirement planning in Finland. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 17 (3), 1–28.

Klapper, L., Lusardi, A., & Van Oudheusden, P. (2015). Financial literacy around the world. In Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services Global Financial Literacy Survey (GFLEC working paper).

Google Scholar  

Klapper, L., & Panos, G. A. (2011). Financial literacy and retirement planning: The Russian case. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 10 (4), 599–618.

Lusardi, A., & de Bassa Scheresberg, C. (2013). Financial literacy and high-cost borrowing in the United States, NBER Working Paper n. 18969, April .

Book   Google Scholar  

Lusardi, A., de Bassa Scheresberg, C., and Avery, M. 2018. Millennial mobile payment users: a look into their personal finances and financial behaviors. GFLEC working paper.

Lusardi, A., de Bassa Scheresberg, C., & Oggero, N. (2016). Student loan debt in the US: an analysis of the 2015 NFCS Data, GFLEC Policy Brief, November .

Lusardi, A., Michaud, P. C., & Mitchell, O. S. (2017). Optimal financial knowledge and wealth inequality. Journal of Political Economy, 125 (2), 431–477.

Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2008). Planning and financial literacy: how do women fare? American Economic Review, 98 , 413–417.

Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2011a). The outlook for financial literacy. In O. S. Mitchell & A. Lusardi (Eds.), Financial literacy: implications for retirement security and the financial marketplace (pp. 1–15). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2011b). Financial literacy and planning: implications for retirement wellbeing. In O. S. Mitchell & A. Lusardi (Eds.), Financial literacy: implications for retirement security and the financial marketplace (pp. 17–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2011c). Financial literacy around the world: an overview. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 10 (4), 497–508.

Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2014). The economic importance of financial literacy: theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52 (1), 5–44.

Lusardi, A., Mitchell, O. S., & Oggero, N. (2018). The changing face of debt and financial fragility at older ages. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, 108 , 407–411.

Lusardi, A., Samek, A., Kapteyn, A., Glinert, L., Hung, A., & Heinberg, A. (2017). Visual tools and narratives: new ways to improve financial literacy. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 16 (3), 297–323.

Lusardi, A., & Tufano, P. (2009). Teach workers about the peril of debt. Harvard Business Review , 22–24.

Lusardi, A., & Tufano, P. (2015). Debt literacy, financial experiences, and overindebtedness. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 14 (4), 332–368.

Mitchell, O. S., & Lusardi, A. (2015). Financial literacy and economic outcomes: evidence and policy implications. The Journal of Retirement, 3 (1).

Moore, Danna. 2003. Survey of financial literacy in Washington State: knowledge, behavior, attitudes and experiences. Washington State University Social and Economic Sciences Research Center Technical Report 03–39.

Mottola, G. R. (2013). In our best interest: women, financial literacy, and credit card behavior. Numeracy, 6 (2).

Moure, N. G. (2016). Financial literacy and retirement planning in Chile. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 15 (2), 203–223.

OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 results (Volume IV): students’ financial literacy . Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264270282-en .

Sekita, S. (2011). Financial literacy and retirement planning in Japan. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 10 (4), 637–656.

Urban, C., Schmeiser, M., Collins, J. M., & Brown, A. (2018). The effects of high school personal financial education policies on financial behavior. Economics of Education Review . https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272775718301699 .

Utkus, S., & Young, J. (2011). Financial literacy and 401(k) loans. In O. S. Mitchell & A. Lusardi (Eds.), Financial literacy: implications for retirement security and the financial marketplace (pp. 59–75). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Van Rooij, M. C., Lusardi, A., & Alessie, R. J. (2011). Financial literacy and retirement preparation in the Netherlands. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 10 (4), 527–545.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper represents a summary of the keynote address I gave to the 2018 Annual Meeting of the Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics. I would like to thank Monika Butler, Rafael Lalive, anonymous reviewers, and participants of the Annual Meeting for useful discussions and comments, and Raveesha Gupta for editorial support. All errors are my responsibility.

Not applicable

Availability of data and materials

Author information, authors and affiliations.

The George Washington University School of Business Global Financial Literacy Excellence Center and Italian Committee for Financial Education, Washington, D.C., USA

Annamaria Lusardi

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

The author read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annamaria Lusardi .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The author declares that she has no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Lusardi, A. Financial literacy and the need for financial education: evidence and implications. Swiss J Economics Statistics 155 , 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41937-019-0027-5

Download citation

Received : 22 October 2018

Accepted : 07 January 2019

Published : 24 January 2019

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s41937-019-0027-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Financial Literacy and Financial Education: An Overview

This article provides a concise narrative overview of the rapidly growing empirical literature on financial literacy and financial education. We first discuss stylized facts on the demographic correlates of financial literacy. We next cover the evidence on the effects of financial literacy on financial behaviors and outcomes. Finally, we review the evidence on the causal effects of financial education programs focusing on randomized controlled trial evaluations. The article concludes with perspectives on future research priorities for both financial literacy and financial education.

Related Topics

• Working Paper
• Money and Finance

More Publications

Book translations as idea flows: the effects of the collapse of communism on the diffusion of knowledge, supply chain disruptions, the structure of production networks, and the impact of globalization, low-carbon fuel standards: do they really work.

• Search Close search
• Find a journal
• Search calls for papers
• Journal Suggester
• Open access publishing

We’re here to help

Find guidance on Author Services

Open access

The impact of financial literacy and financial behavior in entrepreneurial motivation – evidence from Indonesia

• Cite this article
• https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2282827

1. Introduction

2. literature review, 3. methodology, 5. discussion, 6. conclusion, implication, limitation, and recommendations for future research.

• Acknowledgements

Disclosure statement

Additional information.

• Full Article
• Figures & data
• Reprints & Permissions
• View PDF PDF View EPUB EPUB

Entrepreneurship has been viewed as a catalyst for economic growth because it creates jobs and offers solutions to social issues. The government is trying to make entrepreneurship popularized among the public, especially in students in universities. This analysis aims to ascertain how financial behavior and literacy, particularly among accounting students who are the sample of this study at West Java universities, affect entrepreneurial motivation. In addition, this research also examined the level of financial literacy and the level of financial behavior in accounting students in West Java, Indonesia. This research employs a quantitative approach and the data were collected using a survey questionnaire. Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) method were used to analyze data of 252 respondents of accounting students from universities in West Java, Indonesia. The study discovered a significant positive association between financial literacy and accounting students’ financial behavior and their willingness to start their own business. The research also assessed the degree of financial literacy and financial behavior among participants who achieved a relatively strong overall outcome, along with the level of drive for entrepreneurship among respondents with a similarly elevated average performance. This research contributes to educators and educational institutions that it is very important to design an integrated educational curriculum to strengthen the entrepreneurial motivation of accounting students who are the sample of this study at West Java universities in Indonesia.

• financial literacy
• financial behavior
• entrepreneurial motivation
• an accounting student
• West Java universities

Entrepreneurship is crucial for creating new prospects for economic growth because it creates jobs and offers solutions to social issues (Kimmit & Munoz, Citation 2017 ; Urbano & Aparicio, Citation 2015 ; Zarnadze et al., Citation 2022 ), so that entrepreneurship education in tertiary institutions needs to be developed and taught to students effectively. Unfortunately, there are number of factors that hinder the development of entrepreneurial potential among Indonesian youth, one of which is the lack of financial literacy in individuals (Napitupulu, Citation 2021 ; Prasetyo, Citation 2020 ). Developing nations like Indonesia encourage students to engage in entrepreneurship and think about it as a career, because the emergence of entrepreneurship is significantly influenced by students (Karimi et al., Citation 2014 ). Indonesia itself is a vast archipelago country where Java Island is one of the largest and most populous islands in Indonesia and even in the world. It is not surprising that Java Island is the center of economics and politics in Indonesia, and even the capital city of Indonesia itself is in Java Island (Dsikowitzky et al., Citation 2019 ; Setyaningrum, Citation 2022 ), so it is necessary to examine the entrepreneurial motivation of students on Java Island for Indonesia’s economic development.

For their business to succeed, entrepreneurs need to have a solid understanding of finance. Entrepreneurs are defined as those who start enterprises, employ resources, take risks, and actively participate in business choices (Vodă & Florea, Citation 2019 ). Successful business owners must possess strong money management abilities (Ahmad et al., Citation 2021 ). As previously explained that individual financial literacy is important in supporting entrepreneurship where financial literacy is knowledge or education in relation to money, assets, bank accounts, investments, credit, insurance, taxes, and how to use this financial information when making individual financial plans effectively. Financial competency can be increased through financial literacy, which also influences personal financial behavior (Akca et al., Citation 2018 ; Te’eni-Harari, Citation 2016 ). Developing individual financial literacy requires a long process because it requires a lot of effort from the individual himself and from the institution surrounding the individual (Çera et al., Citation 2021 ). Those that are financially literate will exhibit healthy financial behavior, such as when making long-term decisions like purchasing a new home or creating retirement plans (Blue et al., Citation 2014 ). The entrepreneur’s obligations in terms of business finance, investment, cash flow, and planning are tied to individual financial conduct (Jappelli & Padula, Citation 2013 ). According to several studies, financial literacy influences individual financial behavior, and as a person’s financial literacy increases, their ability to manage finances effectively also improves (Akca et al., Citation 2018 ; Arofah et al., Citation 2018 ).

Entrepreneurs must understand finance and possess financial skills prior to engage in business activities. The knowledge and abilities gained through education result in responsible financial behavior that can ultimately contribute to the successful operation of a business (Ahmad et al., Citation 2021 ). The government has also paid special attention to improving the quality of entrepreneurship in Indonesia, for example through the school curriculum which has added lessons on entrepreneurship (Saptono et al., Citation 2020 ). Unfortunately, in real life, there are many young entrepreneurs fail to manage their business. The success rate of young entrepreneurs was previously reported to be low (Fatoki, Citation 2014 ). In addition, the study revealed that financial management practices were neglected while business production and marketing were given top priority (Fuller et al., Citation 2018 ), and there are barriers to financing young entrepreneurs face (Musie, Citation 2015 ). Apart from that, there is research that states that gender influences financial literacy where men have greater financial capabilities than women and women are more likely to be consumptive than men, so there is a significant difference in financial literacy between men and women (Llados-Masllorens & Ruiz-Dotras, Citation 2022 ; Upa et al., Citation 2019 ). These gender differences will also appear in entrepreneurial motivation, so there must be differences in providing financial literacy education for men and women. Those who do not have entrepreneurial motivation will face obstacles in maintaining and developing their business, so entrepreneurial motivation is an important thing that must be increased even though people are financially literate (Upa et al., Citation 2019 ).

Even though financial behavior and financial literacy are important components in running a business, there are still many entrepreneurs who cannot run a business well in Indonesia (Napitupulu, Citation 2021 ; Prasetyo, Citation 2020 ). This was recorded in the news on CNBC Indonesia (Bestari, Citation 2022 ), namely that many start-up companies failed in Indonesia which was caused by several factors related to financial literacy and poor financial behavior. One example of business failure is caused by lack of funds, this means that people who have entrepreneurial abilities may not have the knowledge to obtain funding while starting the business (Li & Qian, Citation 2020 ). Therefore, this research examines the level of financial literacy and level of financial behavior in accounting students who are the sample of this study in West Java, Indonesia and also re-examines the relationship between financial literacy, financial behavior and entrepreneurial motivation in entrepreneurs, who in this context are accounting students in West Java, Indonesia. Indonesia is a developing country that strongly encourages entrepreneurship programs to support economic development, however most of the research in the field of entrepreneurial intentions that explores factors such as education, psychological factors and financial literacy has not been researched adequately (Aldi et al., Citation 2019 ). To the best of the researcher’s knowledge, although there is some literature that discusses this matter, it is believed that there is still a scarcity of research in this field (Alshebami & Al Marri, Citation 2022 ) and there has been no research that directly links these three variables in one study and was conducted in Indonesia, especially on the island of Java. According to Mauch and Park ( Citation 2003 :12) in their book entitled “Guide to the successful thesis and dissertation”, it is said that originality does not mean that the research question or hypothesis is completely new, so replication of previous research can also be said to meet the criteria for originality. Departing from these references, the novelty in this research lies in the mediating effect of Financial Behavior on Financial Literacy on Entrepreneurship Motivation which has not been tested in previous research, also this research uses a different data processing method from previous research.

This research has a significant contribution, both theoretically and practically. From a theoretical point of view, this research can help identify the key factors in financial literacy that have the most significant impact on entrepreneurial motivation. This can enable the development of literacy programs that are more focused and effective in encouraging interest in entrepreneurship. From a practical standpoint, this research can also help entrepreneurs make wiser decisions in managing their business finances. This can have an impact on reducing business risk and increasing the chances of success. The results of this research can provide a better understanding to the government and related institutions regarding how increasing financial literacy can support the growth of the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Policies that focus on financial education can create a more conducive environment for aspiring entrepreneurs.

The theory of reasoned action proposed by Fishbein and Ajzen ( Citation 1977 ) has been used for the past two decades to study individual desires and behavior. This theory says that individuals have the intention or desire to perform an action that results in that individual’s behavior. When someone already has high financial knowledge, he will tend to have good financial behavior and ultimately generate motivation for entrepreneurship. This is in accordance with the theory mentioned above, namely that a person’s motivation arises from a person’s intention to behave or the actual intention produces motivation to perform the action (Zarnadze et al., Citation 2022 ). In this study, the concept of financial literacy is broken down into three distinct dimensions: financial knowledge, financial attitude, and financial behavior. However, for the purposes of this research, only two of these dimensions, namely financial knowledge (referred to as financial literacy) and financial behavior, were examined. This decision was made based on the understanding that attitudes and behaviors in the realm of finance are intricately interconnected (Çera et al., Citation 2021 ). Therefore, the researchers chose to amalgamate these dimensions into a single variable, which is referred to as financial behavior.

This research also uses capability theory (Sen, Citation 1993 ) where capability requires the freedom that individuals have to live their lives and get the opportunities they want (Çera et al., Citation 2020 ). This also refers to the concept that individuals who have certain abilities can shape and influence their level of motivation, in this case individuals who have financial abilities will influence their motivation for entrepreneurship. The financial capabilities possessed by individuals come from the knowledge they obtain either from their family environment or from their school education environment. These financial abilities include financial literacy and financial behavior which will ultimately increase their motivation to create a business (Khan et al., Citation 2022 ). Capability theory emphasizes the importance of developing individual abilities. When someone feels capable of mastering the skills and knowledge necessary for entrepreneurship, they tend to be more motivated to start their own business, this is because they feel they have sufficient foundation to succeed. Apart from individuals having reliable financial capabilities, it should be noted that there are external factors that need to support this, one of which is access to finance to start a new business (Çera et al., Citation 2020 ).

2.1. Financial literacy and financial behavior

Financial literacy is considered as a combination of knowledge, skills and self-efficacy and the decision-making process is influenced by individual knowledge which enables a person to transform knowledge into behavior (Çera et al., Citation 2021 ). Financial knowledge is defined as an understanding of personal finance and the economy which includes knowledge of savings and investment, banking and insurance, taxes and debt (Khan et al., Citation 2022 ). Through financial literacy, individuals learn to make long-term monetary choices, such as buying an unused domestic or making retirement plans, so monetary proficiency comprises of terms and data instructed for the monetary advancement of each person (Blue et al., Citation 2014 ). Financial decision-making and financial management behavior includes things like creating budgets, paying bills on time, and appropriately managing savings (Bhushan & Medury, Citation 2014 ; Kalekye & Memba, Citation 2015 ). It can be seen that individual financial knowledge is an important component to improve individual behavior in making financial decisions. Further exploration also revealed that financial knowledge influences individual financial behavior and decision making by individuals so that they are related to one another (Allgood & Walstad, Citation 2016 ; Kalmi, Citation 2018 ).

The financial knowledge of students, aged 18 and over, is very important because students at this age begin to lead an independent life, especially in terms of finances. Financial knowledge becomes essential when these students start spending their own money (Ahmad et al., Citation 2021 ). Most students struggle to manage their money when they are entering college, they are beginning to live independently, and are getting their first taste of handling their own money (Shaari et al., Citation 2013 ). College students’ financial actions appear to have an impact on their future, which suggests that someone with inadequate financial literacy will experience financial difficulties in the future. Student’s academic achievement, financial hardship, and capacity to find employment after graduation can all be affected by economic ignorance (Ahmad et al., Citation 2021 ). Financial conduct is significantly affected by financial literacy. Research demonstrates that financial knowledge significantly affects financial behavior, which is a crucial component of financial literacy (Trunk & Dermol, Citation 2015 ). According to Xiao et al. ( Citation 2014 ), sound financial management is what leads to financial security and a promising future. As a result, it is crucial for students to arm themselves with financial knowledge.

Thus, this research hypothesises that:

Financial literacy is positively related to the financial behavior of accounting students.

2.2. Financial behavior and entrepreneurial motivation

Entrepreneurship is an important matter that has received attention from the government because it can make an extraordinary contribution to the advancement of the economy, expansion of economic potential, and enhancement of societal well-being (Saptono et al., Citation 2020 ). Entrepreneurship is encouraged among the younger generation, such as students from various universities. Entrepreneurial activities are related to financial activities in business where good financial behavior is needed in a business. Entrepreneurs that have strong financial management abilities promote business expansion. Entrepreneurs must therefore be backed by financial competence, one of which is the financial behavior required of them to manage their businesses successfully (Suparno & Saptono, Citation 2018 ). The obligations of the entrepreneur in terms of business finance, investing, cash flow, and planning are related to behavioral finance. One of the financial skills necessary for the success and expansion of entrepreneurial businesses is behavioral finance. Education-based knowledge and skills enable responsible financial behavior (Jappelli & Padula, Citation 2013 ).

Behavioral finance is about how a person makes financial decisions including financial planning, saving, budgeting, investing, and paying off debt (Çera et al., Citation 2021 ; Greenberg & Hershfield, Citation 2019 ). Financial behavior reveals the degree to which the entrepreneur is in control of the company’s finances and budgeting, and sound financial behavior makes it easier to make wise choices, whereas bad business management can be a hindrance in doing business. Entrepreneurs that practice effective financial conduct may comprehend comprehensive impact of financial choices on business outcomes (Saifurrahman & Kassim, Citation 2021 ). Therefore, having good financial knowledge and good financial behavior can also affect the younger generation to become entrepreneurs (Ahmad et al., Citation 2021 ).

Based on the above description, this research hypothesises that:

Financial behavior is positively related to entrepreneurial motivation of accounting students.

2.3. Financial literacy and entrepreneurial motivation

Over the past decade, entrepreneurship has grown in importance as a social and economic issue and a world-renowned research topic. Entrepreneurship is becoming a very relevant instrument for increasing economic growth and development in various countries. Entrepreneurial activities are introduced to the younger generation, especially students at universities. They are given financial competence to manage a business effectively (Saptono et al., Citation 2020 ).

Our country is also starting to promote and disseminate knowledge about entrepreneurship more broadly. Starting from school to tertiary institutions, it is targeted to provide motivation and knowledge about the importance of entrepreneurship. This is so that when they graduate and immediately enter society, they will no longer be awkward in facing the business world or jobs that are hard to come by. Financial literacy is an important factor in this entrepreneurship (Utami & Wahyuni, Citation 2022 ).

Educational institutions can develop fundamental entrepreneurial abilities to encourage student’s entrepreneurial enthusiasm. This education gives financial knowledge and skills, improves student’s financial literacy, and direct students to appropriate financial behaviors. This education encourages students to have high entrepreneurial motivation (Israr & Saleem, Citation 2018 ; Suparno & Saptono, Citation 2018 ). Insufficient understanding of financial matters creates challenges in making finance-related choices, and since entrepreneurs are obligated to make such decisions, it becomes imperative for them to possess financial literacy. Consequently, having a grasp of financial concepts positively influences business growth (Zhao & Li, Citation 2021 ).

Financial literacy is positively related to the entrepreneurial motivation of accounting students

2.4. Financial literacy and entrepreneurial motivation mediated by financial behavior

Financial literacy and financial behavior influence student’s interest in entrepreneurship. These supporting factors are needed to foster student motivation for entrepreneurship (Ahmad et al., Citation 2021 ). A person with good financial literacy will also tend to have good financial behavior and this will result in increased motivation for entrepreneurship, so that entrepreneurial motivation has a partial relationship with financial literacy because financial knowledge cannot be significantly related to entrepreneurial intentions without being transformed into finance-related behaviors or attitudes (Solesvik, Citation 2013 ). Entrepreneurs who have received entrepreneurship education exhibit higher motivation compared to entrepreneurs without entrepreneurship education (Ahmad et al., Citation 2021 ). Studying financial topics can improve financial attitudes and behavior (Cera et al., Citation 2021 ) which in turn can create entrepreneurial motivation.

Research conducted by Alshebami and Al Marri ( Citation 2022 ) says the same thing, namely financial literacy has an impact on financial behavior which ultimately increases people’s intention to become entrepreneurs. Financial literacy significantly impacts various factors, including individual saving behavior (Shafinar et al., Citation 2015 ). This means that the greater one’s financial literacy, the greater one’s level of savings, and the greater one’s financial well-being (Gilenko & Chernova, Citation 2021 ). Furthermore, due to individual financial literacy, savings increase, enabling people to start new businesses or expand existing businesses (Alshebami & Al Marri, Citation 2022 ).

Figure 1. Research Model.

Financial literacy has a positive relationship with accounting students’ entrepreneurial motivation which is mediated by financial behavior

3.1. Participants

This research employed a quantitative research design and survey questionnaire was used to collect the data. This research was conducted between November 2022 and March 2023. Students studying accounting from the University of Java Island in Indonesia made up the study’s population. Purposive sampling was the method of sampling utilized in this study, and the target respondents were those who met specific practical requirements, such as proximity to the study’s location and willingness to participate. Researchers asked lecturers at the university for permission to distribute questionnaires to students at the university. Researchers also entrusted questionnaires to known lecturers or to students, then they helped distribute the questionnaires at their respective universities. The respondents collected were 252 accounting students and all respondents gave consent that the data provided would be published for scientific purposes. These respondents were final year students who had better financial literacy than other students. The sample of students is also considered the most relevant to this study because based on their understanding of finance and business, students are regarded as a prospective entrepreneurial population (Ahmad et al., Citation 2019 ).

3.2. Intrumentations

A structured questionnaire with four components was used to gather primary information for the independent and dependent variables. The first part deals with the respondent’s profile, the second part deals with financial literacy, the third part deals with financial behavior and the fourth part deals with entrepreneurial motivation. All questions used a 5-point Likert scale from “strongly disagree” (1) to “strongly agree” (5).

The questionnaire survey used in this study was adopted from the OECD report (2011) as well as Atkinson and Messy ( Citation 2012 ) to quantify financial literacy and financial behavior, while to quantify entrepreneurial motivation was adopted from Ahmad et al. ( Citation 2021 ). Questionnaires were distributed online to students with consideration of the ease of obtaining data at the end of 2022 which is a pandemic transition period.

3.3. Validity and reliability

The study instrument was already validated by the previous research. Validity testing is carried out by testing convergent validity and discriminant validity to ensure that the indicators used to measure constructs are valid. Convergent validity was measured using AVE (average variance extracted). An AVE value of more than 0.50 indicates that on average, the construct explains more than half of the variance of the indicators. Discriminant validity is the degree to which a construct is completely different from a construct based on empirical standards. The method for testing discriminant validity is based on cross loadings of indicators, with of acceptable outer loading value is greater than 0.7. Consistency reliability testing uses the Cronbach’s alpha value and the composite reliability value where the Cronbach’s alpha value is at least 0.7 and the composite validity value is at least 0.7 (Hair et al., Citation 2014 ).

3.4. Data analysis

The analysis uses structural equation modeling with an alternative partial least square method. The reason for using structural equation modeling is because the variables being studied are not measured directly but are measured through several indicators. The Structural Model used as a data assessment in the first PLS-SEM by measuring collinearity to predict endogenous constructs or indicators with a determination assessment (R 2 ) (Hair et al., Citation 2014 ).

Data availability

Underlying data

Figshare: Dataset survey on Accounting Students from 252 respondents. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22331161.v1 (Rapina et al., Citation 2023 ).

- Questionnaire results from 252 accounting students.

Table 1. The demographic profile of respondents

4.1. descriptive analysis.

Interpretation of data from respondents’ responses can be used to enrich the discussion, through pictures of respondents’ responses it can be seen how the condition of each variable indicator being studied. In order to make it easier to interpret the variables being studied, the average score of the respondents’ answers was calculated. Below are the descriptive results of the analysis in this study.

Table 2. Financial literacy descriptive Statistics

Table 3. financial behavior descriptive statistics, table 4. entrepreneurship motivation descriptive statistics, 4.2. verification analysis.

To prove whether financial literacy and financial behavior affect entrepreneurship motivation, a test is carried out using structural equation modeling with an alternative partial least square method. In SEM-PLS there are two sub-models, namely the outer model and the inner model.

4.2.1. Outer model

The outer model or measurement model is a model that connects latent variables with manifest variables. In this study there were 3 latent variables with a total of 30 manifest variables (indicators). The following is the result of analysis of data processing using Warp PLS 7.0 along with an explanation of the convergent validity and discriminant validity tests.

Table 5. Loadings factor of each latent variable indicator

Table 6. loadings factor and cross loading each latent variable indicator.

In the financial literacy latent variable, the FL04 indicator (purchasing essential insurance for future protection) has the greatest loading factor. This information demonstrates that the latent variable of financial literacy is most strongly reflected by the importance of insurance for future protection. On the other hand, the FL10 indicator (more satisfied to save money for a business or activity in the future) is the weakest in reflecting the latent variable of financial literacy. The average variance extracted (AVE) value of 0.584 indicates that the latent variable financial literacy can reflect, on average, 58.4% of the data from each indicator.

In the financial behavior latent variable, the FB08 indicator (likes to compare prices or price surveys when shopping) has the greatest loading factor. This data shows that comparing prices or price surveys when shopping is the most strongly in reflecting financial behavior variables. On the other hand, the FB07 indicator (planning and implementing a regular savings program) is the weakest in reflecting latent financial behavior variables. The average variance extracted (AVE) value of 0.669 indicates that on average 66.9% of the information contained in each indicator can be reflected through financial behavior latent variables.

In the entrepreneurship motivation latent variable, the EM07 indicator (understanding business-related financial reports) has the greatest loading factor. This data shows that understanding of financial statements related to effort is strongest in reflecting entrepreneurship motivation. On the other hand, the EM05 indicator (accustomed to solving financial problems) is the weakest in reflecting the latent variable entrepreneurship motivation. The average variance extracted (AVE) value of 0.687 indicates that on average 68.7% of the information contained in each indicator can be reflected through the latent variable entrepreneurship motivation.

The next test is discriminant validity through cross loading, according to Hair et al. ( Citation 2014 ) the presence of cross loading which is greater than outer loading indicates a discriminant validity problem. In Table 5 , the loading factor values of each construct (latent variable) with their own indicators are higher than the indicators on other latent variables. This data shows that there is no discriminant validity’s problem, because each indicator has a stronger relationship with its own construct than with other constructs.

In addition, researchers have also examined the problem of multicollinearity between the indicators used in this study and the result is that there is no multicollinearity between indicators in the variables used. Statistical results show that the Average VIF (AVIF) value in this study is 2,668. AVIF value of 5 or more indicates a critical collinearity problem between the indicators of the formatively measured constructs. However, collinearity problems can also occur at VIF values lower than 3. Ideally, VIF values should be close to 3 and lower (Hair et al., Citation 2019 ). It can be concluded that in this study there is no multicollinearity problem.

4.2.2. Inner model

Figure 2. Model results.

Table 7. Summary of structural model results

4.2.2.1. the influence of financial literacy on financial behavior.

The first hypothesis to be tested is the effect of financial literacy (FL) on financial behavior (FB). Table 7 demonstrates that the path coefficient of financial literacy on financial behavior has a positive sign with t statistic value of 13.143 and a probability value close to zero. Because the t statistic is greater than 1.645 and the probability value is < 0.05, at the 5% error level it is decided to accept the hypothesis. It can be concluded that financial literacy has a positive effect on financial behavior. The results of this study provide empirical evidence that better financial literacy will increase the financial behavior of university accounting students who are the sample of this study spread across Java.

4.2.2.2. The influence of financial behavior on entrepreneurship Motivation

The second hypothesis to be tested is the effect of financial behavior (FB) on entrepreneurship motivation (EM). Table 7 demonstrates that the financial behavior path coefficient on entrepreneurship motivation is positive with t statistic value of 6.729 and a probability value close to zero. Because the t statistic is greater than 1.645 and the probability value is < 0.05, at the 5% error level it is decided to accept the hypothesis. It can be concluded that financial behavior has a positive effect on entrepreneurship motivation. The results of this study provide empirical evidence that better financial behavior will increase entrepreneurship motivation among university accounting students who are the sample of this study across Java.

4.2.2.3. The influence of financial literacy on entrepreneurship motivation

The third hypothesis to be tested is the effect of financial literacy (FL) on entrepreneurship motivation (EM). In Table 7 it can be seen that the path coefficient of financial literacy on entrepreneurship motivation has a positive sign with a statistical value of 9,561 and a probability value close to zero. Because the t statistic is greater than 1.645 and the probability value is < 0.05, at the 5% error level it is decided to accept the hypothesis. It can be concluded that financial literacy has a positive effect on entrepreneurship motivation. The results of this study provide empirical evidence that better financial literacy will increase entrepreneurship motivation among university accounting students who are the sample of this study across Java.

4.2.2.4. The influence of financial literacy on entrepreneurship motivation mediated by financial behavior

The fourth hypothesis to be tested is the influence of financial literacy (FL) on entrepreneurship motivation (EM) mediated by financial behavior (FB). Table 7 demonstrates that the path coefficient of financial literacy mediated by financial behavior towards entrepreneurship motivation has a positive sign with t statistic value of 6.952. The indirect effect of financial literacy on entrepreneurship motivation via financial behavior is 0.292 which is obtained from multiplying the financial literacy path coefficients on entrepreneurship motivation and financial behavior. Based on the calculation results presented in Table 7 , it can be seen that the p-value is 0.00 because the p-value is smaller than 0.05, so there is an indirect influence from financial literacy to entrepreneurship motivation via financial behavior. This means that the higher the financial literacy, the better the financial behavior and if the financial behavior is good, the entrepreneurship motivation will be better. It can be concluded that financial literacy mediated by financial behavior has a positive effect on entrepreneurship motivation. The results of this study provide empirical evidence that good financial literacy will improve financial behavior and finally increase entrepreneurship motivation among university accounting students who are the sample of this study across Java.

This study describes the effect of financial literacy and financial behavior on entrepreneurial motivation in accounting students who are the sample of this study in West Java, Indonesia. The study’s findings indicate that accounting students who are the sample of this study in West Java have financial literacy that is quite good, above average. The conclusion of this study is in accordance with the findings of Ahmad et al. ( Citation 2021 ) which explains that accounting students have a fairly good level of financial literacy compared to students of other majors. The respondent’s data shows that good financial literacy can be seen in the awareness of accounting students who consider investment to be important. Students’ financial decisions affect their future, and those with inadequate financial literacy will likely experience financial difficulties down the road. This will be different from students who are aware of the importance of investing because by investing, students will have sufficient finances in the future. By investing means they understand the importance of saving, this is in line with what previous research said that individuals with good financial knowledge will have a saving awareness (Bhushan & Medury, Citation 2014 ; Kalekye & Memba, Citation 2015 ). According to earlier studies, students who have a strong grasp of finance are more likely to be conscious of their financial situation that investment is good for dealing with financial problems in the future (Ali et al., Citation 2022 ). However, there are also findings which say that students from accounting or business backgrounds have an understanding of finance that is no better than students from other majors. This implies that financial education still needs to be improved in educational institutions (Ahmad et al., Citation 2019 ).

Regarding student financial behavior, the respondent’s data shows that accounting students who are the sample of this study are aware of the importance of making a budget every month. A good budget or financial plan must be used to achieve long-term financial targets. This is in accordance with research conducted by Greenberg and Hershfield ( Citation 2019 ) which says that individuals with good financial behavior will also have the ability to make good financial decisions, one of which is aware of the importance of making a budget. Students are considered to manage their finances well if they have sufficient financial knowledge, so that there is a relationship between financial literacy and financial behavior (Trunk & Dermol, Citation 2015 ). Hence, when students are aware of and knowledgeable about finances, they may make wise financial judgments. This can be seen in the potential of students in managing their personal finances such as having investments and insurance. This study supports other studies that show how financial literacy affects students’ financial behavior (Akca et al., Citation 2018 ; Arofah et al., Citation 2018 ; Te’eni-Harari, Citation 2016 ; Vodă & Florea, Citation 2019 ). This finding is also in line with the findings of Çera et al. ( Citation 2021 ) who said individual financial knowledge is an important component in making decisions in financial matters, so that there is a strong relationship between financial knowledge and financial practice. However, research conducted by Kaiser and Menkhoff ( Citation 2017 ) says something different, namely financial literacy does not affect financial behavior in micro-entrepreneurs, especially for those with low incomes.

Regarding entrepreneurship, data shows that financial behavior has a significant relationship to entrepreneurial motivation in accounting students who are the sample of this study in West Java. This is consistent with previous findings which state that students with good financial behavior in managing their personal finances will also have high motivation to become entrepreneurs (Ahmad et al., Citation 2021 ; Jappelli & Padula, Citation 2013 ). To sustain their business in the future when they become entrepreneurs, students must be prepared with financial knowledge and entrepreneurial abilities (Suparno & Saptono, Citation 2018 ). Entrepreneurs are described as individuals who create businesses, use assets, take business risks and are active in making business decisions (Vodă & Florea, Citation 2019 ). To achieve business success, entrepreneurs must also be equipped with good financial management skills (Ahmad et al., Citation 2021 ). Data shows that the highest motivation for entrepreneurship is in terms of the habit of budgeting and planning financial resources to run a business, how the company’s financial resources will be managed, allocated, and utilized to achieve its goals and objectives. This means that students have good financial behavior according to research conducted by Greenberg and Hershfield ( Citation 2019 ) which says that those who have good financial behavior will budget well. These findings align with earlier studies which explains that students who have good financial management skills will be successful in making decisions regarding budgeting and allocating resources in implementing business strategies (Çera et al., Citation 2021 ; Conneely, Citation 2010 ). This shows that financial behavior and entrepreneurial motivation are strongly correlated.

Furthermore, financial literacy has a significant relationship with entrepreneurial motivation among accounting students who are the sample of this study which is mediated by financial behavior. Because financial literacy must be translated into financial-related actions to be significantly connected to entrepreneurial aspirations, there is a partial association between entrepreneurial motivation and financial literacy (Ahmad et al., Citation 2021 ; Solesvik, Citation 2013 ). Studying financial topics can improve financial attitudes and behavior (Cera et al., Citation 2021 ) which in turn can create entrepreneurial motivation, so that financial behavior acts as a mediation between financial literacy and entrepreneurial motivation. The findings of this study show that among accounting graduates, financial literacy and entrepreneurial motivation are significantly correlated. Previous research has shown that students with high levels of financial literacy had more entrepreneurial desire than students with low levels of financial literacy, which is consistent with the present conclusion (Valencia et al., Citation 2015 ). Students with high literacy levels have good financial knowledge and can take effective actions in starting their business. The same thing was stated by Alshebami and Al Marri ( Citation 2022 ), namely that students who have good financial knowledge will have supportive financial behavior to start a business. A crucial managerial skill for entrepreneurs in deciding the success of their businesses is financial literacy. The competence of the business owner to manage finances determines the profitability of a company. In this case, entrepreneurs certainly have good knowledge of finance first and then carry out financial management to achieve business success (Akca et al., Citation 2018 ; Jappelli & Padula, Citation 2013 ). This is consistent with previous findings which state that students with good financial knowledge will tend to have good business motivation through behaviors or attitudes that support this knowledge (Israr & Saleem, Citation 2018 ; Suparno & Saptono, Citation 2018 ).

Accounting students who are the sample of this study in West Java, Indonesia have a fairly good average level of financial literacy where they understand the importance of investment. The data shows that students have an awareness of the importance of making an investment and they can make a financial budget for their financial life quite well. Accounting students who are the sample of this study in West Java, Indonesia also have a fairly high average level of financial behavior where they are aware of the importance of making a budget for their finances, this implies that they have an understanding of finances and they control expenses so they can avoid excessive spending. With a fairly good level of financial literacy and level of financial behavior, students must have high entrepreneurial motivation.

From the results of this study, it can be concluded that financial literacy has a significant relationship with financial behavior, financial behavior has a significant relationship with entrepreneurial motivation, and finally financial literacy has a significant relationship with entrepreneurial motivation through financial behavior. These results are supported by previous research which concluded that financial literacy and financial behavior have a significant relationship to entrepreneurial motivation.

Based on the findings of this study, there are several suggested implications. Young entrepreneurs must develop their financial skills to succeed in company in Indonesia since financial literacy is a crucial component of entrepreneurship among young entrepreneurs and has a significant impact on good financial behavior. Therefore, education in finance and entrepreneurship should be noted in academic institutions. Universities should provide a range of finance courses, seminars, and training sessions that are centered on developing financial management skills and disseminating sound financial advice. Through financial education courses or seminars on financial topics, students of all ages, educational backgrounds, and majors can improve their financial understanding. The data shows that although accounting students who are the sample of this study have attended several entrepreneurship courses, this experience does not make a significant contribution to entrepreneurial motivation. Universities must therefore update their course offerings to encourage students to start their own businesses. To increase students’ entrepreneurial motivation, higher education institutions should design more integrated educational curricula and policymakers should provide efficient policy procedures.

In addition, entrepreneurship education in Indonesia must involve the latest materials that are relevant to the fourth industrial era. This will equip students with superior entrepreneurial knowledge and entrepreneurial mindset. In addition, the entrepreneurship model must use life-based learning, such as inviting entrepreneurs’ success stories or company visits, which will improve students’ entrepreneurial mindset and intention to become entrepreneurs. Schools also need to bring in successful entrepreneurs to share experiences, from starting up to developing their businesses. For the government and stakeholders, it is necessary to become a mediator for schools in collaboration with the business world and the industrial world. This is an effective way to control and contribute to the birth of new entrepreneurs.

This study has limitations, including the fact that the sample used was limited to university students. Future studies are anticipated to use a wider sample from all Indonesian colleges with accounting departments. Moreover, there were no comparisons between accounting and non-accounting students in this study. Future studies could evaluate financial literacy, financial behavior, and entrepreneurial motivation among accounting students and non-accounting students by including non-accounting students. In addition, subsequent research can use qualitative research design or a mixture of qualitative and qualitative to produce more detailed and complete findings.

Acknowledgments

This study was assisted by Research Synergy Foundation’s publication preparation process on February, 2023 with recommendation letter No: H.0038/COGENT/RSF/III/2023.

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes on contributors

Rapina Rapina

Rapina Rapina graduated from Maranatha Christian University in Indonesia in 2007 with a bachelor’s degree in accounting as her major. She pursued her education at Padjadjaran University in Indonesia in 2006 to earn a Master of Science degree and a Doctor of Philosophy from that institution in 2017. Rapina Rapina is a lecturer and currently serving as the Director of the Graduate Accounting Program at Maranatha Christian University in Indonesia.

• Ahmad, N. L., Fazil, N. F. M., & Bakar, B. A. (2021). Entrepreneurship motivation among accounting students: The role of financial literacy and financial behaviour. Jurnal Pengurusan . https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2021-63-11   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, N. L., Yusof, R., Ahmad, A. S., & Ismail, R. (2019). The importance of financial literacy towards entrepreneurship intention among university students. The International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences , 9 ( 9 ), 18–20. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i9/6266   Google Scholar
• Akca, N., Sonmez, S., Sener, T., & Akca, C. (2018). An evaluation of the effect of financial literacy education on financial literacy among college students. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science , 8 ( 8 ), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.30845/ijhssv8n8p17   Google Scholar
• Aldi, B. E., Herdjiono, I., & Maulany, G. (2019, August). The influence of financial literacy on entrepreneurial intention. In 3rd International Conference on Accounting, Management and Economics 2018 (ICAME 2018) (pp. 700–703). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icame-18.2019.74   Google Scholar
• Ali, M. A. S., Ammer, M. A., & Elshaer, I. A. (2022). Determinants of investment awareness: A moderating structural equation modeling-based model in the Saudi Arabian Context. Mathematics , 10 ( 20 ), 3829. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10203829   Web of Science ® Google Scholar
• Allgood, S., & Walstad, W. B. (2016). The effects of perceived and actual financial literacy on financial behaviors. Economic Inquiry , 54 ( 1 ), 675–697. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12255   Web of Science ® Google Scholar
• Alshebami, A. S., & Al Marri, S. H. (2022). The impact of financial literacy on entrepreneurial intention: The mediating role of saving behavior. Frontiers in Psychology , 13 , 911605. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911605   PubMed Google Scholar
• Arofah, A. A., Purwaningsih, Y., & Indriayu, M. (2018). Financial Literacy, Materialism and Financial Behavior. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding , 5 ( 4 ), 370–378. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v5i4.171   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, A., & Messy, F. 2012. Measuring financial literacy: Results of the OECD/International Network on Financial Education (INFE) pilot study. OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions No. 15 . 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1787/20797117   Google Scholar
• Bestari, N. P. 2022. Kenapa banyak Start-up besar gagal di RI? Ini alasannya. Kenapa Banyak Startup Besar Gagal di RI? Ini Alasannya (cnbcindonesia.com)   Google Scholar
• Bhushan, P., & Medury, Y. (2014). An empirical analysis of inter linkages between financial attitudes, financial behavior and financial knowledge of salaried individuals. Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies , 5(3), 58. ISSN: 2240-0310 EISSN: 2229-5674.   Google Scholar
• Blue, L., Grootenboer, P., & Brimble, M. (2014). Financial literacy education in the curriculum: Making the grade or missing the mark? International Review of Economics Education , 16 , 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2014.07.005   Google Scholar
• Çera, G., Khan, K. A., Belas, J., & Ribeiro, H. N. R. (2020). The role of financial capability and culture in financial satisfaction. Economic Papers: A Journal of Applied Economics and Policy , 39 ( 4 ), 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-3441.12299   Google Scholar
• Cera, G., Khan, K. A., Mlouk, A., & Brabenec, T. (2021). Improving financial capability: The mediating role of financial behaviour. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja , 34 ( 1 ), 1265–1282. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1820362   Web of Science ® Google Scholar
• Çera, G., Khan, K. A., Rowland, Z., & Ribeiro, H. N. R. (2021). Financial advice, literacy, inclusion and risk tolerance: The moderating effect of uncertainty avoidance . https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2021-4-007   Google Scholar
• Çera, G., Phan, Q. P. T., Androniceanu, A., & Çera, E. (2020). Financial capability and technology implications for online shopping. E&M Economics and Management , 23 ( 2 ), 156–172. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2020-2-011   Google Scholar
• Conneely, J. F. (2010). Strategic planning and financial management. New Directions for Student Services , 2010 ( 132 ), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.375   Google Scholar
• Dsikowitzky, L., Damar, A., Ferse, S. C., Irianto, H. E., Jennerjahn, T. C., Lukas, M. C., & Sumiono, B. (2019). Java Island, Indonesia. In World seas: An environmental evaluation (pp. 459–490). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100853-9.00029-4   Google Scholar
• Fatoki, O. (2014). The financial literacy of micro entrepreneurs in South Africa. Journal of Social Sciences , 40 ( 2 ), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2014.11893311   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.   Google Scholar
• Fuller, B., Liu, Y., Bajaba, S., Marler, L., & Pratt, J. (2018). Examining how the personality, self-efficacy, and anticipatory cognitions of potential entrepreneurs shape their entrepreneurial intentions. Personality and Individual Differences , 125 , 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.005   Web of Science ® Google Scholar
• Gilenko, E., & Chernova, A. (2021). Saving behavior and financial literacy of Russian high school students: An application of a copula-based bivariate probit-regression approach. Children and Youth Services Review , 127 , 106122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106122   Web of Science ® Google Scholar
• Greenberg, A. E., & Hershfield, H. E. (2019). Financial decision making. Consumer Psychology Review , 2 ( 1 ), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1043   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Hufit, T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling . SAGE Publications, Inc.   Google Scholar
• Israr, M., & Saleem, M. (2018). Entrepreneurial intentions among university students in Italy. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research , 8 ( 20 ), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-018-0107-5   Google Scholar
• Jappelli, T., & Padula, M. (2013). Investment in financial literacy and saving decisions. Journal of Banking & Finance , 37 ( 8 ), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.03.019   Web of Science ® Google Scholar
• Kaiser, T., & Menkhoff, L. (2017). Does financial education impact financial literacy and financial behavior, and if so, when? The World Bank Economic Review , 31 ( 3 ), 611–630. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhx018   Web of Science ® Google Scholar
• Kalekye, P., & Memba, F. (2015). The role of financial literacy on the profitability of women owned enterprises in Kitui Town, Kitui country, Kenya. International Journal of Science & Research , 4(6), 2360–2365.   Google Scholar
• Kalmi, P. (2018). The effects of financial education: Evidence from Finnish lower secondary schools. Economic Notes , 47 ( 2–3 ), 353–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecno.12114   Web of Science ® Google Scholar
• Karimi, S., Biemans, H. J. A., Lans, T., Chizari, M., Mulder, M., & Mahdei, K. N. (2014). Understanding role models and gender influences on entrepreneurial intentions among college students. Procedia - Social & Behavioral Sciences , 93 , 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.179   Google Scholar
• Khan, K. A., Çera, G., & Pinto Alves, S. R. (2022). Financial capability as a function of financial literacy, financial advice, and financial satisfaction. E&M Ekonomie aManagement . https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2022-1-009   Google Scholar
• Kimmit, J., & Munoz, P. (2017). Sensemaking the ‘social’ in social entrepreneurship. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship , 36 ( 8 ), 859–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242618789230   Web of Science ® Google Scholar
• Li, R., & Qian, Y. (2020). Entrepreneurial participation and performance: The role of financial literacy. Management Decision , 58 ( 3 ), 583–599. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2018-1283   Web of Science ® Google Scholar
• Llados-Masllorens, J., & Ruiz-Dotras, E. (2022). Are women’s entrepreneurial intentions and motivations influenced by financial skills?. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship , 14(1), 69–94.   Web of Science ® Google Scholar
• Mauch, J., & Park, N. (2003). Guide to the successful thesis and dissertation: A handbook for students and faculty (Vol. 62). CRC Press.   Google Scholar
• Musie, L. (2015). The use of financial literacy concepts by entrepreneurs in the small and medium enterprise sector in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. Department of Library Services , 7, 55–62.   Google Scholar
• Napitupulu, E. L. (2021). Kewirausahaan Untuk Mahasiswa Berdampak. Kewirausahaan untuk Mahasiswa Berdampak - Kompas.id   Google Scholar
• Prasetyo, A. (2020). Kewirausahaan Menjadi Solusi Atasi Pengangguran. Kewirausahaan Menjadi Solusi Atasi Pengangguran - Kompas.id   Google Scholar
• Rapina, R., Meythi, M., Noviany Rahmatika, D., & Mardiana, M. (2023): Survey on accounting students from 251 respondents. figshare. Dataset . https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22331161.v1   Google Scholar
• Saifurrahman, A., & Kassim, S. (2021). Islamic financial literacy for Indonesian MSMEs during COVID-19 Pandemic: Issues and importance. Journal of Islamic Finance , 10, 045–060.   Google Scholar
• Saptono, A., Wibowo, A., Narmaditya, B. S., Karyaningsih, R. P. D., Yanto, H., & Cheng, M. (2020). Does entrepreneurial education matter for Indonesian students’ entrepreneurial preparation: The mediating role of entrepreneurial mindset and knowledge. Cogent Education , 7 ( 1 ), 1836728. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1836728   Web of Science ® Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1993). Does business ethics make economic sense? Business Ethics Quarterly , 3 ( 1 ), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857381   Google Scholar
• Setyaningrum, P. (2022). Daftar 5 Pulau Terbesar di Indonesia. Daftar 5 Pulau Terbesar di Indonesia, Nomor Dua Tempat Ibu Kota Negara Didirikan Halaman all - Kompas.com   Google Scholar
• Shaari, N., Hasan, N., Mohamed, R., & Sabri, M. (2013). Financial literacy: A study among the university students. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business , 5(2), 279–290.   Google Scholar
• Shafinar, I., Arnida, J., Nadiah, M. A., Rozana, O., Naina, M. R., & Syazwani, K. N. (2015). Determinants of savings behaviour among Muslims in Malaysia: An empirical investigation. In Islamic perspectives relating to business, arts, culture and communication: Proceedings of the 1st ICIBACC 2014 (pp. 275–283). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-429-0_26   Google Scholar
• Solesvik, M. Z. (2013). Entrepreneurial motivations and intentions: Investigating the role of education major. Education & Training , 55 ( 3 ), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911311309314   Google Scholar
• Suparno, S., & Saptono, A. (2018). Entrepreneurship education and its influence on financial literacy and entrepreneurship skills in college. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education , 21(4), 13–20.   Google Scholar
• Te’eni-Harari, T. (2016). Financial literacy among children: The role of involvement in saving money. Young Consumers , 17 ( 2 ), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-01-2016-00579   Google Scholar
• Trunk, A., & Dermol, V. (2015). EU integration through financial literacy and entrepreneurship. Managing intellectual capital and innovation for sustainable and inclusive society. Proceedings of the Make Learn and TIIM Joint International Conference , 2, 27–29.   Google Scholar
• Upa, V. A., Santoso, W., & Soeindra, V. (2019, March). Financial literacy and entrepreneurship motivation among micro, small, and Medium enterprises from gender perspective. In ICEMSS 2018: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Emerging Media, and Social Science, ICEMSS 2018, 7-8 December 2018, Banyuwangi, Indonesia (p. 92). European Alliance for Innovation.   Google Scholar
• Urbano, D., & Aparicio, S. (2015). Entrepreneurship capital types and economic growth: International evidence. Technological Forecasting, and Social Change , 102 , 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.018   Web of Science ® Google Scholar
• Utami, R. P., & Wahyuni, A. (2022, November). The effect of financial literacy and entrepreneurial motivation on entrepreneurial Interests. In Proceeding of Annual International Conference on Islamic Economics (AICIE) (Vol. 1 , pp. 102–110). https://doi.org/10.21154/aicie.v1i0.766   Google Scholar
• Valencia, A., Montoya, I., & Montoya, A. (2015). Influence of perceived behavioral control in entrepreneurial intentions of engineering students. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology , 7(1), 341–347.   Google Scholar
• Vodă, A. L., & Florea, N. (2019). Impact of personality traits and entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial intentions of business and engineering students. Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal , 11 ( 4 ), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041192   Web of Science ® Google Scholar
• Xiao, J. J., Ahn, S. Y., Serido, J., & Shim, S. (2014). Earlier financial literacy and later financial behaviour of college students. International Journal of Consumer Studies , 38 ( 6 ), 593–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12122   Web of Science ® Google Scholar
• Zarnadze, G., Dika, I., Çera, G., & Ribeiro, H. N. R. (2022). Personality traits and business environment for entrepreneurial motivation. Administrative Sciences , 12 ( 4 ), 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12040176   Web of Science ® Google Scholar
• Zhao, J., & Li, T. (2021). Social capital, financial literacy, and rural household entrepreneurship: A mediating effect analysis. Frontiers in Psychology , 12 , 724605. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.724605   PubMed Web of Science ® Google Scholar
• Back to Top

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations. Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

• People also read
• Recommended articles

To cite this article:

Download citation, your download is now in progress and you may close this window.

• Choose new content alerts to be informed about new research of interest to you
• Easy remote access to your institution's subscriptions on any device, from any location
• Save your searches and schedule alerts to send you new results
• Export your search results into a .csv file to support your research

Login or register to access this feature

Register now or learn more

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Download Free PDF

Awareness and impact of financial literacy among secondary School students

2022, Research Journal of Educational Sciences

Sustainable Educational Practices involves developing life-skills including leadership, communication, collaboration, cooperation and management; all of which are extremely important for personal development of students. Financial literacy involves an individual's ability to interpret and understand basic financial concepts and apply that knowledge to make informed decisions related to finance in their day to day activities as also applicable as lifelong learners. There are many benefits to being financially literate which definitely brings more development, innovation through use of more technologies and more economic and social prosperity. The key role students would be playing at saving, managing pocket money, understanding the power of compounding, retirement planning, accumulating wealth, and avoiding debt. Financially literate students are able to understand better, macroeconomic problems and make informed decisions related to fiscal and monetary policies, scope and limitations of new start-ups and how to take calculated risks. Hence based on the research, we would like to bring the awareness and impact of financial literacy to secondary school students (age 12+) which was not included in any of the Education Policy nor NEP 2020.

Free related PDFs Related papers

SHODH SARITA (an international multidisciplinary quarterly bilingual peer reviewed refered research journal), 2020

Financial Literacy is to improve understanding of basic financial concepts and using them in their daily life. It will help learners about the importance and advantages of savings, necessity of staying out of unproductive loans that are beyond capacity to repay, borrowing with formal financial sector, concept of interest and the power of compounding, time value of money, inflation, the need to insure, role of major financial sector institutions such as regulators, banks, stock exchanges etc. To make the economy stable (from external disturbance) and continuous growth towards development, we should able to provide guidance to students for risks and other opportunities. Financial literacy could be able to provide that basic guidance as stage 1 to the students who are having lots of potentiality and they are our future. To develop economy, students should be learned and also able to take calculative risk which will helped to develop nation. Life skills played an important role for making students future brighter and make the country's economy stable. A systematic study will ensure to make readers financially literate. It is not intended to influence the reader into making a decision in relation to any particular financial products or services but to become more aware of financial risks and opportunities to enable each one of them to make informed decision and as a return they can improve their financial well-being. Hence based on research proposal, would like to bring the impact and awareness of financial literacy to secondary school students (age 12+). Will start with Pre-test, then using content developed by RBI, planning the lessons, execution and finally post-test. We will use experimental method single group design O1 x O2 and then mean, median, mode, Standard Deviation, t test and finally conclusion. This study could bring out the usefulness of financial inclusion in our daily life where students can get details from schools in early age and have better decision in their life. Reserve Bank of India also has come up with customized financial literacy content for school children.

The Universal Academic Research Journal, 2022

Indonesian Journal of Multidiciplinary Research, 2021

Indonesia has almost 2 years in implementing distance learning to prevent an increase in the transmission of the Corona Virus. With the creation of the Thematic community service program, it is hoped that it can increase student interest in learning and help educators and parents of students to facilitate the implementation of online learning activities. This research was conducted in an elementary school in West Java. At the initial stage, the research was conducted to survey the number of students in grade 6 of the Elementary School. The number of students recorded was 60 students in grade 6. Then we distributed the 60 students with 47.60% (21 male students) and 52.40% (39 female students). Learning and teaching activities at Karanganyar State Elementary School 2 are carried out online. The learning media used are Zoom Meet, WhatsApp group, and Google Form for students. This method is a solution in implementing distance learning with interactive learning media. The results of the ...

Adpebi International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences, 2022

Purpose-This research tries to explore the importance of financial literacy education as a provision of life for everyone. We consider this problem due to many people must face financial difficulties in their old age. Methodology/approach-We use qualitative analysis with in-depth and critical analysis. This research uses a qualitative approach, which is a study of literature. Some papers and books regarding financial literacy used as references for this study. This research focus examines the importance of financial literacy education for the younger generations explicitly, as a provision for them to live their lives in the future. Findings-Our result shows that the role of family and school can shape people in understanding financial knowledge nicely. We elaborate these variables as important factors that influencing life. Novelty/value-Our finding suggests that financial literacy education must be started since childhood due to its stage crucial in someone's life phase, and also children are easy to receive lessons. We also show that teachers are essential in educating children promptly to know financial matters. A large amount of fraud cases that makes people loss a lot of money, is due to the ignorance of financial literacy. By mastering knowledge of wealth people can live in prosperous life.

Financial literacy is a concept that contains knowledge and skills to be acquired by people, enables the accurate use, accumulation, increase, and management of incomes, and directly affects both national and international economies. Knowledge of individuals regarding financial concepts and their applications are of vital importance regarding financial decisions that would be made in every moment of life. This study examined the financial literacy levels of high school students, who contain the young population of society. A one-way ANOVA was conducted to determine differences between school types. The result shows that Science High Schools had the highest financial literacy level.

Journal of Education and Practice, 2015

Research that is dealing with financial literacy turns to be such an important thing to be conducted. It is due to the fact that financial literacy level of Indonesian society is still very low. A good financial literacy is necessary for every individual to manage his/her finances to achieve prosperity. To have a good level of financial literacy, individuals need to have a smart financial behavior to make them have the skills and confidence in using knowledge to be able to identify financial products and services. Changes in behavior can be achieved through a process that starts from early habituation. Therefore, an understanding of financial concept needs to be given as early as possible because financial habits will continue to be carried and built by children to their adulthood.

American Journal of Educational Research, 2019

Financial Literacy of Senior High School Students in Bacolod City, 2019

The research entitled LEVEL OF FINANCIAL LITERACY OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS FROM PRIVATE SCHOOLS OF BACOLOD CITY has the purpose to determine the level of financial literacy of senior high school students from different private schools of Bacolod City. The researchers made use of the descriptive-analytical scheme and the comparative correlational scheme to determine the objectives of the study. The study dwells on the areas spending habits, saving habits and financial knowledge in order to determine the overall financial knowledge. It uses the sex, grade level, district and family monthly income as variables. The researchers gathered data through thorough research and survey by form of a questionnaires. A total of 140 out of 9636 students from different private schools of Bacolod City were surveyed for this study. The findings of the study include concluding of having no significant difference in the level of financial literacy when participants are grouped according to grade level, district and family monthly income. But there is a significant difference in the level of financial literacy when grouped according to sex. Further results show that there are existing relationships between spending habits, saving habits and financial knowledge amongst each other. The general recommendation for this study was to educate regarding this matter the students may it be at home or in school. Specifically, schools organize seminars, parents are suggested to be examples and to teach their kids financial management at a young age and the local governments may include financial management as part of the current education system.

The Annals of the University of Oradea, 2016

Alongside the numerous negative effects of the 2008 economic crisis, we can emphasize perhaps one positive aspect: one consequence of the crisis has been that attention has been paid to the low level of financial literacy among the population and the importance of financial education. Research into financial literacy has given priority to young people, because in order to be able to avoid a crisis similar to the lows of 2008, the next generation must at least have a high level of financial literacy. Therefore, this study focuses on an analysis of the financial literacy of young people. In our primary research we wanted to describe the financial literacy of Hungarian university students of economics and business, and to show any difference in this area compared to “average” young people not receiving this type of education. We also looked at how economic and financial knowledge acquired in high school influences the financial literacy of students. In our research questionnaire we focused on the three components of financial literacy developed by the OECD in 2010: financial knowledge, financial behaviours, and attitudes to and preferences regarding financial matters. Our results show that the financial knowledge of those involved in economic and business education is at about the same level as the financial knowledge of “average” young people; however, financial and economic education in high school has a positive effect on students’ financial literacy. In our analysis of financial behaviour, we came to the conclusion that the factors influencing economics and business students’ choice of a bank are almost identical to those of “average” young people. In addition, similarities were discovered in borrowing, as well as in the willingness to finance everyday consumer goods through loans. However, in terms of the selection of savings provision and financial products, economics and business students are characterized by more conscious behaviour compared to their “average” counterparts. Furthermore, it was found that the financial attitude of all the tested students as well as of “average” young people is above the average, but this is not manifest in their behaviour regarding savings, so any measures taken in the future to improve the financial literacy of the general public should focus in particular on this component.

To examine the financial literacy is that it’s not that much has grown as it should have been, especially the underdeveloped countries, as amongst the biggest problems , the biggest problem has been faced by the most of the countries of the world is literacy among the youth, especially the countries like Pakistan have been majorly suffering from the financial illiteracy. The problem of financial literacy in the any country lead the youth to stuck in financial problem for the rest of their life, this really has impacted their future and indirectly has impacted the country’s growth. This research is basically conducted on the non-business students of the Higher Education Institution, including Law, engineering and computing. Furthermore this research was actually based of only non-business students, and the survey was conducted on the 278 students through the close ended questions and out of that 199 students could fill the form properly, while the total population of the non-business...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Multidisciplinary Physical Sciences, 2021

Eduvest - Journal Of Universal Studies, 2022

EURASIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2019

Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 2019

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 28 (2011) 365 – 369, 2011

Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2019

isara solutions, 2021

International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR)

Business and Entrepreneurial Review

Research Nepal Journal of Development Studies

SHS Web of Conferences, 2020

Bagiswori Journal, 2024

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), 2023

Media Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 2021

International Review of Management and Marketing , 2020

Related topics

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Javascript is currently disabled in your browser. Several features of this site will not function whilst javascript is disabled.

• Why Publish With Us?
• Editorial Policies
• Author Guidelines
• Peer Review Guidelines
• Open Outlook
• Submit New Manuscript

• Sustainability
• Press Center
• Testimonials
• Favored Author Program
• Permissions
• Pre-Submission

open access to scientific and medical research

A part of Taylor & Francis Group

Back to Journals » Advances in Medical Education and Practice » Volume 15

Integrating a Personal Finance Workshop to Enhance Financial Literacy Among Senior Medical Students: A Single Institution’s Experience

• Get Permission
• Cite this article

Authors Woolley PA , Kendall MC   , Tacvorian S   , Asher S  

Received 25 June 2024

Accepted for publication 15 September 2024

Published 25 September 2024 Volume 2024:15 Pages 885—891

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S474002

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Md Anwarul Azim Majumder

Parker A Woolley, 1 Mark C Kendall, 2 Simon Tacvorian, 2 Shyamal Asher 2 1 Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; 2 Department of Anesthesiology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA Correspondence: Shyamal Asher, Email [email protected] Purpose: Graduating medical students frequently start their training burdened with substantial financial debt and minimal savings, especially in comparison to their peers in other professional fields. A lack of financial literacy can result in increased debt, decreased job satisfaction and contribute to physician burnout. Enhancing financial education could improve both the financial stability and emotional well-being of future medical professionals. In this study, a basic personal finance workshop was conducted for 4th year medical students at a single institution. The aim of the study was to determine the impact of the personal finance workshop on improving financial literacy. Methods: An introduction to basic personal finance workshop was open to enrollment for all 4th year medical students at The Alpert Medical School at Brown University. A 40-question survey to evaluate financial literacy was administered to all participants before and 6-months after the workshop. The topics covered included student loan management, basics of retirement accounts, investing, budgeting, saving and consensus surrounding financial topics. The results were analyzed using student paired t -test and Chi-square test of independence. Results: Overall, an improvement in financial literacy was reported 6 months after the personal finance workshop (62% vs 54%, p = 0.004). Students subjectively reported an increase in confidence in their personal finance knowledge (16% vs 44%) and general knowledge regarding retirement savings (7% vs 55%). More than 92% of students agreed or strongly agreed that a basic personal finance education should be included as part of the medical school curriculum. Conclusion: A personal finance workshop for medical students nearing graduation increases awareness and confidence in financial knowledge. The incorporation of basic financial education in the medical school curriculum may help young physicians establish better financial habits that will improve their financial wellbeing. Keywords: financial literacy, finance, medical student, retirement

Introduction

Throughout the course of pursuing a career in medicine, medical students accumulate a substantial amount of educational debt and have little or no savings or assets at graduation. Following graduation from medical school, young physicians enter graduate medical education training programs that average three to seven years depending on the chosen specialty. During this time, debt payments are frequently deferred until after the completion of medical training. As a result, it is not unusual for the average medical school graduate to owe four times more than the average college graduate. 1 Increased financial burden is associated with lower mental well-being and reduced academic and clinical performance, which could potentially jeopardize patient care.

United States medical schools have increasingly promoted medical student well-being by providing resources that often lack basic personal finance literacy. 2 , 3 According to the 2023 AAMC Medical School Graduation Questionnaire the median medical student educational debt is $200,000 in the US. 4 Poor financial literacy has been shown to lead to deleterious effects on psychosocial health and financial well-being. 5 , 6 This combination of limited financial literacy and rising debt has been linked to increasing physician burnout and negative effects on clinical and academic performance. 7 , 8 A large national survey in which more than 16,000 internal medicine residents reported that greater education debt was associated with at least one symptom of burnout and lower In-Training Exam scores. 8 A more recent survey from physical medicine and rehabilitation residents revealed that more than 75% of the survey responders reported minimal financial education, leading to financial strain and negative effects on their mental health. Moreover, eighty five percent of responders wished they received more formal education in personal finance management. It is not surprising that most of all the responders (93%) believed they were poorly prepared to effectively manage their finances. 6

Medical school at Brown University entails expenses comparable to those at other private US medical schools, with students experiencing substantial tuition and living costs that lead to similar financial challenges. Medical students at Brown University are offered multiple asynchronous and in-person workshops to earn credit to graduate and to prepare them for their internship. However, none of those workshops provide any formal personal finance education. To fill this void, the authors provided a commercial-bias-free workshop in basic personal finance topics to 4th year medical students as part of the Internship Preparation Course (IPC). The topics covered ranged from student loan management, basics of budgeting and saving, investment and asset protection concepts, subjective emotions surrounding finances, and retirement strategies. The purpose was to determine the impact of this personal finance workshop on improving financial literacy among fourth year medical students at the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University. In addition, we sought to know whether this cohort of students, as interns, initiated basic financial planning involving retirement accounts, emergency funds and insurance.

The Rhode Island Hospital Institutional Review Board determined that this study is exempt from Human Subjects Research under 45 Code of Federal Regulations 46.104(d) requirements and does not require consent documentation (IRB# 1842335). Participants received an introductory letter describing the nature of the study and their completion of the survey indicating their willingness to participate in the study.

Participants

The workshop, “Financial Management for Graduating Medical Students”, was open to enrollment for all fourth-year medical students at The Alpert Medical School at Brown University. Medical students who registered to participate for the personal finance workshop were invited to complete an anonymous web-based survey administered by SurveyMonkey.

Personal Finance Workshop

The medical students have a number of workshops to choose from, and self-select 5 out of 20 workshops to earn credit for IPC which is required for graduation. The personal finance workshop was held in the spring semester and consisted of 3 hours of in-person instruction given by the senior author (SA) who is experienced in personal finance. The workshop consisted of traditional lecture-based teaching, interactive in-class exercises, and Q&A discussions. The topics covered included student loan management including repayment strategies; public service loan forgiveness (PSLF); refinancing options; saving for retirement including retirement plan overview; basics principles of investing and choosing investments; budgeting and saving strategies; and basic behavioral economics as applied to personal finance.

The survey consisted of 40 questions and was categorized into 6 subsections of: Demographics (9), Financial Planning (3), Savings (2), Student Loans (1), Financial Literacy questions (18), and Consensus Surrounding Financial Topics (7) (Appendix A). The responses were in the form of multiple choice with the option of selecting “prefer not to say” or “unsure”. A 5-point Likert scale (agree/disagree) was used for answers pertaining to questions regarding financial topics. The questions for assessing financial literacy were adapted from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), who granted permission for use in publication. 9 These questions have been used in other medical student and resident financial literacy studies. 10

Six-months after the workshop was completed, the participants, who were now PGY-1 residents in their respective residency programs, were contacted via Email to fill out a follow-up post-workshop survey. Participation was voluntary. We chose a six-month period for post-workshop evaluation to provide enough time for participants to interact with their financial resources at their respective institutions. To encourage participation, a $10 electronic gift card was offered to participants that completed the post-workshop survey. The post-workshop survey contained 8 additional questions on the implementation of basic financial strategies that were presented during the workshop (Appendix B). Three reminder emails were provided and the survey remained open for a total of 4 weeks. The survey took less than 10 minutes to complete. All analyses were performed using Stata/SE 17.0 (StataCorp LLC). The results were analyzed using student paired t -test and Chi-square test of independence. P values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Demographics

Basic Personal Finance

Consensus Surrounding Financial Topics

This study demonstrates the feasibility of implementing a basic personal finance workshop for senior medical students. Workshop participants demonstrated an improvement in basic financial literacy 6 months later which led to effective utilization of basic financial tools during the first year of residency.

There is a clear need for a basic personal finance education for medical students. This study is the first to objectively measure financial literacy in senior medical students. Prior studies have only examined the subjective understanding of various financial topics in medical students. 10–13 However, a number of previous studies have examined the objective financial literacy of residents and fellows.

Ahmad et al reported a 52% personal finance literacy score among residents and fellows at two different institutions that used modified questions similar to the ones used in our study. 10 Rupp et al showed an improvement in financial literacy scores from 50% to 62% in emergency medicine residents after a total of 3 hours of lectures over 6 months. 14

In our study, the mean pre-workshop literacy score was 54%, which is similar to prior studies. The mean literacy scores improved to 62%, 6 months after course completion. Students appeared to have good baseline knowledge of the broader financial aspects such as savings accounts, mortgage payments and inflation but lacked a deeper understanding of concepts such as the various types of stock funds, bonds, and taxes. In addition, the majority (68%) of the respondents opened and/or contributed to retirement savings accounts since completion of the workshop. We surmise that the workshop exposed students to the basic financial topics and encouraged them to seek additional information on topics relevant to each individual. This may also have contributed to the improved literacy and engagement with basic financial tools.

Students’ subjective sentiments surrounding financial topics revealed some interesting results. Six months after attending the workshop, more students “agreed” or “strongly agreed” with the statements regarding, “…confidence about my personal finance knowledge and skill” (44% post-workshop vs 15% pre-workshop, p = 0.024) and “…good general knowledge regarding savings and retirement” (51% post-workshop vs 7% pre-workshop, p < 0.001). However, there was a less significant change in the statement “…prepared to deal with student loans” (32.% post-workshop vs 25% pre-workshop, p = 0.171). This was likely due to the fact that the federal COVID-19 student loans payment pause was still in effect during the duration of this study. The participants had not yet started any federal student loan payments and thus were less likely to have engaged in developing student loan management plans. The initial limited subjective knowledge about basic personal finance knowledge including savings and retirement is consistent with the fact that medical students receive minimal personal finance education in their curriculum. At the start of residency, they are required to engage with employer benefits within the first month where they encounter topics such as retirement accounts and various types of savings accounts and are given a crash course on the topic. In addition to the students having to research their own benefits, our course prior to graduating likely better prepared the students to handle open enrollment. These factors likely contributed to the significant improvement in subjective knowledge seen 6 months after the workshop. Regardless, over 90% of the participants agreed or strongly agreed with the statement that, “a personal finance education should be included as part of the medical school curriculum”, highlighting the needs of students and validating efforts such as this workshop.

There are some limitations to this study. The study was performed at a single medical school and the financial workshop was a one-time event, which limits its generalizability. While many of the important topics were covered, a comprehensive review of personal finance topics requires a curriculum spread over multiple sessions. There is a degree of selection bias in our sample as the IPC workshop is an elective that students choose to enroll into. It is possible that students with more interest towards personal finance topics may have been more likely to enroll in this course. The follow-up survey was administered 6 months after attending the workshop in which the length of time from attending the course and self-reported data may lead to a risk of recall bias.

Financial literacy education is limited and essential in any medical school curriculum. Our results have demonstrated that implementation of a basic personal finance workshop for fourth year medical students leads to an objective improvement in basic personal finance literacy. Furthermore, the students demonstrated improved subjective knowledge and comfort with personal finance topics as well as evidence of achieving basic personal finance milestones at the start of residency. Although participants in the course possess some basic knowledge of personal finance, we intend to offer additional resources on different types of equity funds and the effects of taxes and inflation on investment returns to improve their understanding of these financial concepts. Due to our positive feedback, we plan to continue offering the financial literacy course to fourth-year students and aim to expand its reach to preclinical medical students making basic finance education more accessible.

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

1. Hanson M. “Average Medical School Debt” EducationData.org, September 17 , 2023 . https://educationdata.org/average-medical-school-debt . Accessed August 9 , 2024 .

2. Jayakumar KL, Larkin DJ, Ginzberg S, Patel M. Personal Financial Literacy Among U.S. Medical Students. MedEdPublish . 2017;6:35.

3. Grewal K, Sweeney MJ. An Innovative Approach to Educating Medical Students About Personal Finance. Cureus . 2021;13(6):e15579. doi:10.7759/cureus.15579

4. Medical School Graduation Questionnaire. AAMC. Availabe from: https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/students-residents/medical-school-graduation-questionnaire . Accessed February 2024 .

5. Panagioti M, Panagopoulou E, Bower P, et al. Controlled Interventions to Reduce Burnout in Physicians. JAMA Intern Med . 2017;177(2):195. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7674

6. Connelly P, List C. The Effect of Understanding Issues of Personal Finance on the Well-being of Physicians in Training. WMJ . 2018;117(4):164–166.

7. West CP, Shanafelt TD, Kolars JC. Quality of Life, Burnout, Educational Debt, and Medical Knowledge Among Internal Medicine Residents. JAMA . 2011;306(9):952–960. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1247

8. Bui D, Winegarner A, Kendall MC, et al. Burnout and depression among anesthesiology trainees in the United States: an updated National Survey. J Clin Anesth . 2023;84:110990.

9. FINRA. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. https://www.finra.org . Accessed February 2024 .

10. Ahmad FA, White AJ, Hiller KM, Amini R, Jeffe DB. An assessment of residents’ and fellows’ personal finance literacy: an unmet medical education need. Int J Med Educ . 2017;8:192–204. doi:10.5116/ijme.5918.ad11

11. Gilbert J, Kothari P, Sanchez N, Spencer DJ, Soto-Greene M, Sánchez JP. Is Academic Medicine a Financially Viable Career? Exploring Financial Considerations and Resources. Mededportal . 16. doi:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10958

12. Liebzeit J, Behler M, Heron S, Santen S. Financial literacy for the graduating medical student. Med Educ . 2011;45(11):1145–1146. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04131.x

13. Meleca JB, Tecos M, Wenzlick AL, Henry R, Brewer PA. A medical student initiated elective course in business and finance: a needs analysis and pilot. Med Stud Res J . 2014;4:18–23.

14. Rupp SL, Abramoff C, McCloskey K. Efficacy of Peer-to-Peer Education for Emergency Medicine Resident Financial Literacy: curriculum Development Study. Cureus . 2022;14(12). doi:10.7759/cureus.32668

Contact Us   •   Privacy Policy   •   Associations & Partners   •   Testimonials   •   Terms & Conditions   •   Recommend this site •   Cookies •   Top

Contact Us   •   Privacy Policy

Translations are provided via eTranslation, the European Commission's machine translation service, except for Albanian, Arabic, Armenian, Azerbaijani, Bosnian, Georgian, Macedonian, and Serbian. Please note that some content may not be available in these languages.

• slovenščina
• Azerbaijani

Blueprint for Financial Literacy Success

“Blueprint for Financial Literacy Success” is an Erasmus+ Ka1 course specially crafted for educators looking to bring financial wisdom to life in their classrooms. This program goes beyond textbooks, exploring real-world applications of personal finance, budgeting, and investing.

Description

Online Meeting Program

– Meeting with the trainer

– Presentation of info pack

– Q & A session

· Icebreaker activities to foster a supportive learning environment

· Welcome and orientation to the course objectives and structure

· Understanding the role of financial literacy in education

· Exploring the impact of financial literacy on students’ future success

· Real-world examples and case studies illustrating the practical aspects of financial literacy

· Group discussions on how to relate financial concepts to students’ daily lives

· Interactive activities to engage educators in applying financial concepts to real scenarios

· In-depth exploration of personal finance fundamentals: budgeting, saving, and debt management

· Strategies for simplifying financial topics for diverse student comprehension

· Sharing of effective teaching methods and resources for personal finance education

· Application exercises where educators develop lesson plans for teaching personal finance

· Peer review and feedback on lesson plans, emphasizing practical implementation

· Demystifying investing principles and terminology

· Exploration of age-appropriate investment concepts for students

· Interactive exercises to enhance understanding of investment strategies

· Workshop on creating engaging and age-appropriate investment-related activities

· Introduction to various interactive teaching tools, games, and simulations for financial literacy

· Hands-on exploration of educational technology resources

· Strategies for adapting interactive methods to different learning styles

· Strategies for integrating financial literacy into existing curricula across different subjects

· Group discussions on creating a school-wide culture of financial literacy

· Reflecting on the week’s learning and insights gained

· Closing remarks, certificates, and networking opportunities

Araxa Edu supports your dissemination activities

Learning objectives

Upon completion of the “Blueprint for Financial Literacy Success” program, educators will achieve the following learning outcomes:

1. Develop a comprehensive understanding of key financial literacy concepts, including personal finance, budgeting, investing, and economic principles.

2. Acquire practical skills and teaching methodologies to effectively communicate financial concepts to students using real-world applications and interactive teaching methods.

3. Learn strategies for integrating financial literacy into existing curricula across various subjects, fostering interdisciplinary connections, and creating a school-wide culture of financial literacy.

4. Explore and implement engaging teaching techniques, interactive tools, games, and simulations that make financial literacy enjoyable and relatable for students of diverse learning styles.

5. Foster a collaborative learning community by participating in workshops, group discussions, and peer reviews, enabling educators to share successful teaching strategies and overcome challenges in implementing financial literacy education.

6. Develop and refine interactive lesson plans tailored to different age groups, ensuring that educators leave with practical tools they can immediately apply in their classrooms.

7. Gain exposure to and proficiency in incorporating educational technology, gamification, and interactive resources to enhance financial literacy instruction.

8. Cultivate the ability to critically reflect on teaching practices, identify areas for improvement, and continuously refine approaches to better engage students in financial literacy education.

9. Establish a supportive network of fellow educators, creating an ongoing community for sharing insights and resources and collaborating on future initiatives related to financial literacy education.

10. Develop personalized action plans for implementing financial literacy education in their specific educational contexts, with a focus on long-term sustainability an

Methodology & assessment

Certification details.

• Certificate of Attendance
• Europass Certificate (if requested)

Our courses are designed and delivered in compliance with the quality standards of the Erasmus+ Key Action 1 Quality Standards for Courses.

Pricing, packages and other information

• Price: 400 Euro
• Package contents: Course

Additional information

• Language: English
• Target audience ISCED: Primary education (ISCED 1) Lower secondary education (ISCED 2) Upper secondary education (ISCED 3)
• Target audience type: Teacher Head Teacher / Principal Not-for-profit / NGO staff
• Learning time: 25 hours or more

Upcoming sessions

Thessaloniki

Past sessions

More courses by this organiser

Cooperative Teaching Approaches

Next upcoming session  14.10.2024

The Art of Teaching Cultivating Creativity and Imagination in Students

Next upcoming session  28.10.2024 - 01.11.2024

Empowering Students Through Collaboration

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

The PMC website is updating on October 15, 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• HHS Author Manuscripts

FINANCIAL LITERACY, FINANCIAL EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC OUTCOMES

In this article we review the literature on financial literacy, financial education, and consumer financial outcomes. We consider how financial literacy is measured in the current literature, and examine how well the existing literature addresses whether financial education improves financial literacy or personal financial outcomes. We discuss the extent to which a competitive market provides incentives for firms to educate consumers or offer products that facilitate informed choice. We review the literature on alternative policies to improve financial outcomes, and compare the evidence to evidence on the efficacy and cost of financial education. Finally, we discuss directions for future research.

“The future of our country depends upon making every individual, young and old, fully realize the obligations and responsibilities belonging to citizenship...The future of each individual rests in the individual, providing each is given a fair and proper education and training in the useful things of life...Habits of life are formed in youth...What we need in this country now...is to teach the growing generations to realize that thrift and economy, coupled with industry, are necessary now as they were in past generations.”

--Theodore Vail, President of AT&T and first chairman of the Junior Achievement Bureau (1919, as quoted in Francomano, Lavitt and Lavitt, 1988 )

“Just as it was not possible to live in an industrialized society without print literacy—the ability to read and write, so it is not possible to live in today's world without being financially literate... Financial literacy is an essential tool for anyone who wants to be able to succeed in today's society, make sound financial decisions, and—ultimately—be a good citizen.”

-- Annamaria Lusardi (2011)

1. INTRODUCTION

Can individuals effectively manage their personal financial affairs? Is there a role for public policy in helping consumers achieve better financial outcomes? And if so, what form should government intervention take? These questions are central to many current policy debates and reforms in the U.S. and around the world in the wake of the recent global financial crises.

In the U.S., concerns about poor financial decision making and weak consumer protections in consumer financial markets provided the impetus for the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Project Act which was signed into law by President Obama on July 21, 2010. This law gives the CFPB oversight of consumer financial products in a variety of markets, including checking and savings accounts, payday loans, credit cards, and mortgages (CFPB authority does not extend to investments such as stocks and mutual funds which are regulated by the SEC, or personal insurance products that are largely regulated at the state level). In addition to establishing its regulatory authority, the Dodd-Frank Act mandates that the CFPB establish “the Office of Financial Education, which shall develop a strategy to improve the financial literacy of consumers.” It goes on to state that the Comptroller must study “effective methods, tools, and strategies intended to educate and empower consumers about personal financial management” and make recommendations for the “development of programs that effectively improve financial education outcomes.” 1

In line with this second mandate for the CFPB, there has been much recent public discussion on financial literacy and the role of financial education as an antidote to limited individual financial capabilities. As the title suggests, this is a main focus of the current paper; however, it is important not to lose the forest for the trees in the debate on policy prescriptions. The market failure that calls for a policy response is not limited to financial literacy per se, but the full complement of conditions that lead to suboptimal consumer financial outcomes of which limited financial literacy is one contributing factor. Similarly, the policy tools for improving consumer financial outcomes include financial education but also encompass a wide variety of regulatory approaches. One of our aims in this paper is to place financial literacy and financial education in this broader context of both problems and solutions.

The sense of public urgency over the level of financial literacy in the population is, we believe, a reaction to a changing economic climate in which individuals now shoulder greater personal financial responsibility in the face of increasingly complicated financial products. For example, in the U.S. and elsewhere across the globe, individuals have been given greater control and responsibility over the investments funding their retirement (in both private retirement savings plan such as 401(k)s and in social security schemes with private accounts). Consumers confront ever more diverse options to obtain credit (credit cards, mortgages, home equity loans, payday loans, etc.) and a veritable alphabet soup of savings alternatives (CDs, HSAs, 401(k)s, IRAs, 529s, KEOUGHs, etc.). Can individuals successfully navigate this increasingly complicated financial terrain?

We begin by framing financial literacy within the context of standard models of consumer financial decision making. We then consider how to define and measure financial literacy, with an emphasis on the growing literature documenting the financial capabilities of individuals in the U.S. and other countries. We then survey the literature on the relationship between financial literacy and economic outcomes, including wealth accumulation, savings decisions, investment choices, and credit outcomes. We then assess the evidence on the impact of financial education on financial literacy and on economic outcomes. Next we evaluate the role of government in consumer financial markets: what problems do limited financial capabilities pose, and are market mechanisms likely to correct these problems? Finally, we suggest directions for future research on financial literacy, financial education, and other mechanisms for improving consumer financial outcomes.

2. WHAT IS FINANICAL LITERACY AND WHY IS IT IMPORTANT?

“Financial literacy” as a construct was first championed by the Jump$tart Coalition for Personal Financial Literacy in its inaugural 1997 study Jump$tart Survey of Financial Literacy Among High School Students. In this study, Jump$tart defined “financial literacy” as “the ability to use knowledge and skills to manage one's financial resources effectively for lifetime financial security.” As operationalized in the academic literature, financial literacy has taken on a variety of meanings; it has been used to refer to knowledge of financial products (e.g., what is a stock vs. a bond; the difference between a fixed vs. an adjustable rate mortgage), knowledge of financial concepts (inflation, compounding, diversification, credit scores), having the mathematical skills or numeracy necessary for effective financial decision making, and being engaged in certain activities such as financial planning.

Although financial literacy as a construct is a fairly recent development, financial education as an antidote to poor financial decision making is not. In the U.S., policy initiatives to improve the quality of personal financial decision making through financial education extend back at least to the 1950s and 1960s when states began mandating inclusion of personal finance, economics, and other consumer education topics in the K-12 educational curriculum ( Bernheim et al. 2001 ; citing Alexander 1979, Joint Council on Economic Education 1989, and National Coalition for Consumer Education 1990). 2 Private financial and economic education initiatives have an even longer history; the Junior Achievement organization had its genesis during World War I, and the Council for Economic Education goes back at least sixty years. 3

Why are financial literacy and financial education as a tool to increase financial literacy potentially important? In answering these questions, it is useful to place financial literacy within the context of standard models of consumer financial decision making and market competition. We start with a simple two-period model of intertemporal choice in the face of uncertainty. A household decides between consumption and savings at time 0, given an initial time 0 budget, y , an expected real interest rate, r , and current and future expected prices, p , for goods consumed, x .

Solving this simple model requires both numeracy (the ability to add, subtract, and multiply), and some degree of financial literacy (an understanding of interest rates, market risks, real versus nominal returns, prices and inflation).

Alternatively, consider a simple model of single-period profit maximization for a single-product firm competing on price in a differentiated products market:

The firm chooses price, p , to maximize profits given marginal costs, mc , its product characteristics, x , its competitors’ prices and product characteristics, p -j and x -j , respectively, and the distribution of consumer preferences over price and product characteristics, θ . Doing so results in the familiar formula relating price mark-up over costs to the price elasticity of demand: prices are higher relative to costs in product markets in which demand is less sensitive to price.

Competitive outcomes in this model rest on the assumption that individuals can and do make comparisons across products in terms of both product attributes and the prices paid for those attributes. This may be a relatively straightforward task for some products (e.g., breakfast cereal), but is a potentially tall order for products with multidimensional attributes and complicated and uncertain pricing (e.g., health care plans, cell phone plans, credit cards, or adjustable rate mortgages).

A lack of financial literacy is problematic if it renders individuals unable to optimize their own welfare, especially when the stakes are high, or to exert the type of competitive pressure necessary for market efficiency. This has obvious consequences for individual and social welfare. It also makes the standard models used to capture consumer behavior and shape economic policy less useful for these particular tasks.

Research has documented widespread and avoidable financial mistakes by consumers, some with non-trivial financial consequences. For example, in the U.S., Choi et al. (2011) examine contributions to 401(k) plans by employees over age 59 ½ who are eligible for an employer match, vested in their plan, and able to make immediate penalty-free withdrawals due to their age. They find that 36% of these employees either don't participate or contribute less than the amount that would garner the full employer match, essentially foregoing 1.6% of their annual pay in matching contributions; the cumulative losses over time for these individuals are likely to be much larger.

Duarte & Hastings (2011) and Hastings et al. (2012) show that many participants in the private account Social Security system in Mexico invest their account balances with dominated financial providers who charge high fees that are not offset by higher returns, contributing to high management fees in the system overall. Similarly, Choi et al. (2009) use a laboratory experiment that show that many investors, even those who are well educated, fail to choose a fee minimizing portfolio even in a context (the choice between four different S&P 500 Index Funds) in which fees are the only significant distinguishing characteristic of the investments and the dispersion in fees is large.

Campbell (2006) highlights several other of financial mistakes: low levels of stock market participation, inadequate diversification due to households’ apparent preferences to invest in local firms and employer stock, individuals’ tendencies to sell assets that have appreciated while holding on to assets whose value has declined even if future return prospects are the same (the disposition effect first documented in Odean 1998 ), and failing to refinance fixed rate mortgages in a period of declining interest rates.

Other financial mistakes discussed in the literature include purchasing whole life insurance rather than a cheaper combination of term life insurance in conjunction with a savings account ( Anagol et al. 2012 ); simultaneously holding high-interest credit card debt and low-interest checking account balances ( Gross & Souleles 2002 ); holding taxable assets in taxable accounts and non-taxable or tax-preferred assets in tax-deferred accounts ( Bergstresser & Poterba 2004 , Barber & Odean 2003 ); paying down a mortgage faster than the amortization schedule requires while failing to contribute to a matched tax-deferred savings account (Amromin et al. 2007); and borrowing from a payday lender when cheaper sources of credit are available ( Agarwal et al. 2009b ).

Agarwal et al. (2009a) document the prevalence of several different financial mistakes ranging from suboptimal credit card use after making a balance transfer to an account with a low teaser rate, to paying unnecessarily high interest rates on a home equity loan or line of credit. They find that across many domains, sizeable fractions of consumers make avoidable financial mistakes. They also find that the frequency of financial mistakes varies with age, following a U-shaped pattern: financial mistakes decline with age until individuals reach their early 50s, then begin to increase. The declining pattern up to the early 50s is consistent with the acquisition of increased financial decision-making capital over time, either formally or through learning from experience ( Agarwal et al. 2011 ); but the reversal at older ages highlights the natural limits that the aging process places on individuals’ financial decision-making capabilities, however those capabilities are acquired.

The constellation of findings described above has been cited by some as prima facie evidence that individuals lack the requisite levels of financial literacy for effective financial decision making. On the other hand, Milton Friedman (1953) famously suggested that just as pool players need not be experts in physics to play pool well, individuals need not be financial experts if they can learn to behave optimally through trial and error. There is some evidence that such personal financial learning does occur. Agarwal et al. (2011) find that in credit card markets during the first three years after an account is opened, the fees paid by new card holders fall by 75% due to negative feedback: by paying a fee, consumers learn how to avoid triggering future fees. The role of experience is also evident in the answers to a University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers question that asked about the most important way respondents’ learned about personal finance. Half cited personal financial experience, more than twice the fraction who cited friends and family, and four to five times the fraction who credit formal financial education as their most important source of learning (Hilgert & Hogarth 2003).

Although experiential learning may be an important self-correcting mechanism in financial markets, many important financial decisions like saving and investing for retirement, choosing a mortgage, or investing in an education, are undertaken only infrequently and have delayed outcomes that are subject to large random shocks. Learning by doing may not be an effective substitute for limited financial knowledge in these circumstances ( Campbell et al. 2010 ), and consumers may instead rely on whatever limited institutional knowledge and numeracy skills they have.

3. MEASURING FINANCIAL LITERACY

If financial literacy is an important ingredient in effective financial decision making, a natural question to ask is how financially literate are consumers? Are they well equipped to make consequential financial decisions? Or do they fall short? Efforts to measure financial literacy date back to at least the early 1990s when the Consumer Federation of America (1990; 1991; 1993; 1998) began conducting a series of “Consumer Knowledge” surveys among different populations which included questions on several personal finance topics: consumer credit, bank accounts, insurance, and major consumer expenditures areas such as housing, food and automobiles. The 1997 Jump$tart survey of high school students referenced above has been repeated biennially since 2000 and was expanded to include college students in 2008 (see Mandell 2009 , for an analysis these surveys). Hilgert et al. (2003) analyze a set of “Financial IQ” questions included in the University of Michigan's monthly Surveys of Consumers in November and December 2001.

More recently, Lusardi & Mitchell (2006) added a set of financial literacy questions to the 2004 Health and Retirement Study (HRS, a survey of U.S. households aged 50 and older) that have, in the past decade, served as the foundational questions in several surveys designed to measure financial literacy in the U.S. and other countries. The three core questions in the original 2004 HRS financial literacy module were designed to assess understanding of three core financial concepts: compound interest, real rates of return, and risk diversification (see Table 1 ). Because these questions are parsimonious and have been widely replicated and adapted, they have come to be known as the “Big Three.”

Financial Literacy Questions in the 2004 Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and the 2009 National Financial Capability Study (NFCS)

Note: The answer categorized as correct is italicized in the last column.

These questions were incorporated into the 2009 National Financial Capability Study (NFCS) in the U.S., a large national survey of the financial capabilities of the adult population. 4 The NFCS asked two additional financial literacy questions which, together with the “Big Three,” have collectively come to be known as the “Big Five.” These two additional questions test knowledge about mortgage interest and bond prices. Table 1 lists the “Big Five” questions as asked with their potential answers (the correct answers are italicized).

Because the “Big Three” questions have been more widely adopted in other surveys, we focus here on the answers to these three questions, although we return to the “Big Five” later. The second and fourth columns of Table 2 report the percent of correct and “Don't know” responses to each of the “Big Three” questions for the 2004 HRS respondents and the 2009 NFCS respondents. Because the NFCS represents the entire adult population, we focus on those results here. Among respondents to the 2009 NFCS, 78% correctly answered the first question on interest rates and compounding, 65% correctly answered the second question on inflation and purchasing power, and 53% correctly answered the third question on risk diversification. Note that all three questions were multiple choice (rather than open-ended), so that guessing would yield a correct answer to the first two questions 33% of the time and to the last question 50% of the time. Only 39% of respondents correctly answered all three questions.

Financial Literacy Around the World

Notes: Countries ranked by 2010-2011 International Monetary Fund GDP per capita. + denotes statistics directly drawn from publications: Netherlands: van Rooij et al. 2011 . Financial literacy and retirement preparation in the Netherlands. J. Pension. Econ. 10(4): 527-545; Japan: Sekita. 2011. Financial literacy and retirement planning in Japan. J. Pension. Econ. 10(4): 637-656. Germany: Lusardi & Bucher-Koenen. 2011. Financial literacy and retirement planning in Germany. J. Pension. Econ. 10(4): 565-584. Cole et al. 2011. Prices or knowledge? What drives demand for financial services in emerging markets. J. Financ. 66(6): 1933-1967.

X denotes missing information.

Clearly individuals who cannot answer the first or second questions will have a difficult time navigating financial decisions that involve an investment today and real rates of return over time; they are likely to have trouble making even the basic calculations assumed in a rational intertemporal decision-making framework. The inability to correctly answer the third question demonstrates ignorance about the benefits of diversification (reduced risk) and casts doubt on whether individuals can effectively manage their financial assets. With only 39% of the population able to answer these three fairly basic financial literacy questions correctly, we might be justifiably concerned about how many individuals make suboptimal financial decisions in everyday life and the types of marketplace distortions that could follow.

As noted earlier, dozens of surveys in addition to the NFCS have included the trio of questions discussed above from the 2004 HRS. In addition to the results for the 2004 HRS and the 2009 NFCS, Table 2 shows how respondents in several countries answered these same questions. The first six columns list comparative statistics for six developed economy surveys from the U.S., The Netherlands, Japan and Germany. The next three columns take data from the upper-middle income countries of Chile and Mexico. The last two columns report responses from the lower-income countries of India and Indonesia. Proficiency rates vary widely; in Germany, 53% of respondents correctly answer the three HRS financial literacy questions, whereas only 8% of respondents in Chile do so. In general, the level of financial literacy is highest in the developed countries and lowest in the lower-income countries. The responses to these questions in the 2004 and 2010 HRS suggest that financial literacy for HRS respondents has increased somewhat over time, perhaps from participating in the panel, or perhaps as a result of increased financial discussion surrounding the 2008 financial crisis. In Chile and Mexico, respondents have particularly low levels of financial literacy despite being responsible for managing the investment decisions for the balances accumulated in their privatized social security accounts. Chile also witnessed massive student protests over college loan debt in 2011, and yet only 16% of college entrants can correctly answer these three questions despite the fact that 22% of them are taking out student loans. 5

Although the Lusardi and Mitchell “Big Three” questions from the 2004 HRS have quickly become an international standard in assessing financial literacy, there is remarkably little evidence on whether this set of survey questions is the best approach, or even a superior approach, to measuring financial literacy. The question of how best to assess the desired behavioral capabilities remains open, both in terms of establishing whether survey questions are best-suited for the task or which questions are most effective. Longer financial literacy survey batteries do exist, including the National Financial Capability Study (NFCS) which asks the “Big Five” financial literacy questions described above along with an extensive set of questions on individual financial behaviors. The biennial Jump$tart Coalition financial literacy surveys used to assess the financial literacy of high school and college students in the U.S. include more than fifty questions. Whether using additional survey questions (and how many more) better explains individual behavior is unclear as little research has evaluated the relative efficacy of different measurements.

Table 3 lists the fraction of respondents correctly answering the “Big Three” and “Big Five” financial literacy questions in the 2009 NFCS for various demographic subgroups. There is a strong positive correlation between the performance on the “Big Three” and the “Big Five” questions (although part of this correlation is mechanical as the “Big Three” are a subset of the “Big Five”). Table 3 also lists three other self-assessed measures of financial capability (self-assessed overall financial knowledge, self-assessed mathematical knowledge and self-assessed capability at dealing with financial matters). These self-assessed measures are all highly correlated with each other, and fairly highly correlated with the performance-based measures of financial literacy in the first two columns. All of the measures of financial capability are also highly correlated with educational attainment, suggesting that traditional measures of education could also serve as proxies for financial literacy (we will discuss causality in Section 4).

Measures of Financial Literacy

Note: Authors’ calculations from the 2009 NFCS State-by-State Survey (n=28,146). The top panel of Table 1 lists the “Big 3” questions in Column (1); the “Big 5” questions in Column (2) include the “Big 3” and the additional two questions from the bottom panel of Table 1 . Columns (3) through (5) report the mean of the participants’ self-assessments based on the following scale: 1=Strongly Disagree to 7= Strongly Agree.

In a survey of 18 different financial literacy studies, Hung et al. (2009) report that the predominant approach used to operationalize the concept of financial literacy is either the number, or the fraction, of correct answers on some sort of performance test (measures akin to those in columns 1 and 2 of Table 3 ). This approach was used in all of the studies they evaluated, although two adopted a more sophisticated methodology, using factor analysis to construct an index that assigned different weights to each question ( Lusardi & Mitchell 2009 , van Rooij et al. 2011 ).

In addition to evaluating how previous studies have operationalized the concept of financial literacy, Hung et al. (2009) also perform a construct validation of seven different financial literacy measures calculated from various question batteries administered to the same set of respondents in four different waves of the RAND American Life Panel. Their measures include three performance tests (one of which has three subtests) based on either 13, 23, or 70 questions, and one behavioral outcome (performance in a hypothetical financial decision-making task). They find that the measures based on the different performance tests are highly correlated with each other, and when the same questions are asked in multiple waves, the answers have high test-retest reliability. The outcomes of the performance tests are less highly correlated with outcomes in the decision-making task. They also find that the relationship between demographics and the different performance test based measures of financial literacy is similar, but that the relationship between demographics and the outcomes in the decision-making task is much weaker. The different financial literacy measures are more variable in their predictive relationships for actual financial behaviors such as planning for retirement, saving, and wealth accumulation.

One unanswered question in this literature is whether test-based measures provide an accurate measure of actual financial capability. To our knowledge, no study has provided incentives for giving correct answers as a mechanism to encourage thoughtful answers that reflect actual knowledge; neither has any study allowed individuals to access other sources of information (e.g., the internet, or friends and family) in completing a performance test to assess whether individuals understand their limitations and can compensate for them by engaging other sources of expertise. If individuals have effective compensatory mechanisms, we may see discrepancies between performance test results and actual outcomes and behaviors in the field.

A second measure of financial literacy that has been operationalized in the literature is individuals’ self-assessments of their financial knowledge or, alternatively, the level of confidence in their financial abilities. In the 18 studies evaluated by Hung et al. (2009) discussed above, one-third analyzed self-reported financial literacy in addition to a performance test-based measure. Two issues with such self-reporting warrant mention. First, individual self-reports and actual financial decisions do not always correlate strongly ( Hastings & Mitchell 2011 , Collins et. al. 2009 ). Second, consumers are often overly optimistic about how much they actually know ( Agnew & Szykman 2005 , OECD 2005 ). Even so, in general the literature finds that self-assessed financial capabilities and more objective measures of financial literacy are positively correlated (e.g., Lusardi & Mitchell 2009 , Parker et al. 2012 ), and self-reported financial literacy or confidence often have independent predictive power for financial outcomes relative to more objective test-based measures of financial literacy. For example, Allgood & Walstad (2012) find that in the 2009 NFCS State-by-State survey, both self-assessed financial literacy and the fraction of correct answers on the “Big Five” financial literacy questions are predictive of financial behaviors in a variety of domains: credit cards (e.g., incurring interest charges or making only minimum payments), investments (e.g., holding stocks, bonds, mutual funds or other securities), loans (e.g., making late payments on a mortgage, comparison shopping for a mortgage or auto loan), insurance coverage, and financial counseling (e.g., seeking professional advice for a mortgage, loan, insurance, tax planning or debt counseling). Similarly, Parker et al. (2012) find that both self-reported financial confidence and a test-based measure of financial literacy predict self-reported retirement planning and saving, and van Rooij et al. (2011) find that both self-perceived financial knowledge and a test-based measure of financial literacy predict stock market participation.

Although test-based and self-assessed measures of financial literacy are the norm in the literature, other approaches to measuring financial literacy may be worth considering. One alternative measurement strategy, limited by the requirement for robust administrative data, is to identify individuals exhibiting financially sophisticated behavior (e.g., capitalizing on matching contributions in an employer's savings plan, or consistently refinancing a mortgage when interest rates fall) and use these indicators to predict other outcomes. For example, Calvet et al. (2009) use administrative data from Sweden to construct an index of financial sophistication based on whether individuals succumb to three different types of financial “mistakes”: under-diversification, inertia in risk taking, and the disposition effect in stock holding.

An outcomes-based approach like this may be fruitful for predicting future behavior, more so than the traditionally used measures of financial literacy (although Calvet et al. 2009 do not perform such an exercise in their analysis). If we are interested in understanding the abilities that improve financial outcomes, we should define successful measures as those that, when changed, produce improved financial behavior. Such a strategy will likely generate greater internal validity for predicting consumer decisions in specific areas (e.g., portfolio choice or retirement savings), although it will significantly increase the requirements for research relative to strategies that rely on more general indicators of financial literacy (e.g., the “Big Three”).

4. WHAT IS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FINANCIAL EDUCATION, FINANCIAL LITERACY AND FINANCIAL OUTCOMES?

Consistent with the notion that financial literacy matters for financial optimization, a sizeable and growing literature has established a correlation between financial literacy and several different financial behaviors and outcomes. In one of the first studies in this vein, Hilgert et al. (2003) document a strong relationship between financial knowledge and the likelihood of engaging in a number of financial practices: paying bills on time, tracking expenses, budgeting, paying credit card bills in full each month, saving out of each paycheck, maintaining an emergency fund, diversifying investments, and setting financial goals. Subsequent research has found that financial literacy is positively correlated with planning for retirement, savings and wealth accumulation ( Ameriks et al. 2003 , Lusardi 2004 , Lusardi & Mitchell 2006 ; 2007 , Stango & Zinman 2008, Hung et al. 2009 , van Rooij et al. 2012 ). Financial literacy is predictive of investment behaviors including stock market participation ( van Rooij, et al. 2011 , Kimball & Shumway 2006 , Christelis et al. 2006), choosing a low fee investment portfolio ( Choi et al. 2011 , Hastings 2012), and better diversification and more frequent stock trading ( Graham et al. 2009 ). Finally, low financial literacy is associated with negative credit behaviors such as debt accumulation (Stango & Zinman 2008, Lusardi & Tufano 2009 ), high-cost borrowing ( Lusardi & Tufano 2009 ), poor mortgage choice ( Moore 2003 ), and mortgage delinquency and home foreclosure ( Gerardi et al. 2010 ).

Other related research documents a relationship between either numeracy or more general cognitive abilities and financial outcomes. Although these concepts are distinct from financial literacy, they tend to be positively correlated: individuals with higher general cognitive abilities or greater facility with numbers and numerical calculations tend to have higher levels of financial literacy ( Banks & Oldfield 2007 , Gerardi et al. 2010 ). Numeracy and more general cognitive ability predict stockholding ( Banks & Oldfield 2007 , Christelis et al. 2010 ), wealth accumulation ( Banks & Oldfield 2007 ), and portfolio allocation ( Grinblatt et al. 2009 ).

Although this evidence might lead one to conclude that financial education should be an effective mechanism to improve financial outcomes, the causality in these relationships is inherently difficult to pin down. Does financial literacy lead to better economic outcomes? Or does being engaged in certain types of economic behaviors lead to greater financial literacy? Or does some underlying third factor (e.g., numerical ability, general intelligence, interest in financial matters, patience) contribute to both higher levels of financial literacy and better financial outcomes? To give a more concrete example, individuals with higher levels of financial literacy might better recognize the financial benefits and be more inclined to enroll in a savings plan offered by their employer. On the other hand, if an employer automatically enrolls employees in the firm's saving plan, the employees may acquire some level of financial literacy simply by virtue of their savings plan participation. The finding noted earlier that most individuals cite personal experience as the most important source of their financial learning ( Hilgert et al. 2003 ) suggests that some element of reverse causality is likely. While this endogeneity does not rule out the possibility that financial literacy improves financial outcomes, it does make interpreting the magnitudes of the effects estimated in the literature difficult to interpret as they are almost surely upwardly biased in magnitude.

In addition, unobserved factors such as predisposition for patience or forward-looking behavior could contribute to both increased financial literacy and better financial outcomes. Meier & Sprenger (2010) find that those who voluntarily participate in financial education opportunities are more future-oriented. Hastings & Mitchell (2011) find that those who display patience in a field-experiment task are also more likely to invest in health and opt to save additional amounts for retirement in their mandatory pension accounts. Other unobserved factors like personality ( Borgans et al. 2008 ) or family background ( Cunha & Heckman 2007 , Cunha et al. 2010 ) could upwardly bias the observed relationship between financial education and financial behavior in non-experimental research.

Despite the challenges in pinning down causality, understanding causal mechanisms is necessary to make effective policy prescriptions. If the policy goal is increased financial literacy, then we need to know how individuals acquire financial literacy. How important is financial education? And how important is personal experience? And how do they interact? If, on the other hand, the goal is to improve financial outcomes for consumers, then we need to know if financial education improves financial outcomes (assuming it increases literacy) and we need to be able to weigh the cost effectiveness of financial education against other policy options that also impact financial outcomes.

What evidence is there that financial education actually increases financial literacy? The evidence is more limited and not as encouraging as one might expect. One empirical strategy has been to exploit cross sectional variation in the receipt of financial education. Studies using this approach have often found almost no relationship between financial education and individual performance on financial literacy tests. For example, Jumps$tart (2006) and Mandell (2008) document surprisingly little correlation between high school students’ financial knowledge levels and whether or not they have completed a financial education class. This empirical approach has obvious problems for making causal inferences: the students who take financial education courses in districts where such courses are voluntary are likely to be different from the students who choose not to take such courses, and the districts who make such courses mandatory for all students are likely to be different from the districts that have no such mandate. Nonetheless, the lack of any compelling evidence of a positive impact is surprising. Carpena et al. (2011) use a more convincing empirical methodology to get at the impact of financial education on financial literacy and financial outcomes. They evaluate a relatively large randomized financial education intervention in India and find that while financial education does not improve financial decisions that require numeracy, it does improve financial product awareness and individuals’ attitudes towards making financial decisions. There is definitely room in the literature for more research using credible empirical methodologies that examine whether, or in what contexts, financial education actually impacts financial literacy.

In the end, we are more interested in financial outcomes than financial knowledge per se. The literature on financial education and financial outcomes includes several studies with plausibly exogenous sources of variation in the receipt of financial education, ranging from small-scale field experiments to large-scale natural experiments. The evidence in these papers on whether financial education actually improves financial outcomes is best described as contradictory.

Several studies have looked toward natural experiments as a source of exogenous variation in who receives financial education. Skimmyhorn (2012) uses administrative data to evaluate the effects of a mandatory eight-hour financial literacy course rolled out by the U.S. military during 2007 and 2008 for all new Army enlisted personnel. Because the roll-out of the financial education program was staggered across different military bases, we can rule out time effects as a confounding factor in the results. He finds that soldiers who joined the Army just after the financial education course was implemented have participation rates in and average monthly contributions to the Federal Thrift Savings Plan (a 401(k)-like savings account) that are roughly double those of personnel who joined the Army just prior to the introduction of the financial education course. The effects are present throughout the savings distribution and persist for at least 2 years (the duration of the data). Using individually-matched credit data for a random subsample, he finds limited evidence of more widespread improved financial outcomes as measured by credit card balances, auto loan balances, unpaid debts, and adverse legal actions (foreclosures, liens, judgments and repossessions).

Bernheim et al. (2001) and Cole & Shastry (2012) examine another natural experiment which created variation in financial education exposure: the expansion over time and across states in high school financial education mandates. The first of these studies concludes that financial education mandates do have an impact on at least one measure of financial behavior: wealth accumulation. But Cole & Shastry (2012) , using a different data source and a more flexible empirical specification, 6 examine the same natural experiment and conclude that there is no effect of the state high school financial education mandates on wealth accumulation, but rather, that the state adoption of these mandates was correlated with economic growth which could have had an independent effect on savings and wealth accumulation.

In addition to examining natural experiments, researchers have also randomly assigned financial aid provision to evaluate the impact of financial education on financial outcomes. For example, Drexler et al. (2012) examine the impact of two different financial education programs targeted at micro-entrepreneurs in the Dominican Republic as part of a randomized controlled trial on the effects of financial education. Their sample of micro-entrepreneurs was randomized to be in either a control group or one of two treatment groups. Members of one treatment group participated in several sessions of more traditional, principles-based financial education; members of the other treatment group participated in several sessions of financial education oriented around simple financial management rules of thumb. The authors examine participants’ use of several different financial management practices approximately one year after the financial education courses were completed. Relative to the control group, the authors find no difference in the financial behaviors of the treatment group who received the principles-based financial education; they do find statistically significant and economically meaningful improvements in the financial behavior of the treatment group who participated in the rule-of-thumb oriented financial education course. The results of this study suggest that how financial education is structured could matter in whether it has meaningful effects at the end of the day, and might help explain why many other studies have found much weaker links between financial education and economic outcomes.

Gartner & Todd (2005) evaluate a randomized credit education plan for first-year college students but find no statistically significant differences between the control and treatment groups in their credit balances or timeliness of payments. Servon & Kaestner (2008) used random variation in a financial literacy training and technology assistance program find virtually no differences between the control and treatment groups in a variety of financial behaviors (having investments, having a credit card, banking online, saving money, financial planning, timely bill payment and others), though they suspect that the program was implemented imperfectly. In a small randomized field experiment, Collins (2010) evaluates a financial education program for low and moderate income families and finds improvements in self-reported knowledge and behaviors (increased savings and small improvements in credit scores twelve months later), but the sample studied suffers from non-random attrition. Finally, Choi et al. (2011) randomly assign some participants in a survey to an educational intervention designed to teach them about the value of the employer match in an employer sponsored savings plan. Using administrative data, they find statistically insignificant differences in future savings plan contributions between the treatment and the control group, even in the face of significant financial incentives for savings plan participation.

Additional non-experimental research using self-reported outcomes and potentially endogenous selection into financial education suggests a positive relationship between financial education and financial behavior. This positive relationship has been documented for credit counseling ( Staten 2006 ), retirement seminars ( Lusardi 2004 , Bernheim & Garrett 2003 ), optional high school programs ( Boyce & Danes 2004 ), more general financial literacy education ( Lusardi & Mitchell 2007 ), and in the military ( Bell et al. 2008 ; 2009 ).

Altogether, there remains substantial disagreement over the efficacy of financial education. While the most recent reviews and meta-analyses of the non-experimental evidence ( Collins et al. 2009 , Gale & Levine 2011 ) suggest that financial literacy can improve financial behavior, these reviews do not appear to fully discount non-experimental research and its limitations for causal inference. Of the few studies that exploit randomization or natural experiments, there is at best mixed evidence that financial education improves financial outcomes. The current literature is inadequate to draw conclusions about if and under what conditions financial education works. While there do not appear to be any negative effects of financial education other than increased expenditures, there are also almost no studies detailing the costs of financial education programs on small or large scales ( Coussens 2006 ), and few that causally identify their benefits towards improved financial outcomes.

To inform policy discussion, this literature needs additional large-scale randomized interventions designed to effectively identify causal effects. Randomized interventions coupled with measures of financial literacy could address the question of how best to measure financial literacy while also providing credible assessments of the effect of financial education on financial literacy and economic outcomes. A starting point could be incorporating experimental components into existing large scale surveys like the NFCS; for example, a subset of respondents could be randomized to participate in an on-line financial education course or to receive a take-home reference guide to making better financial decisions. Measuring financial literacy before and immediately after the short course would test if financial education improves various measures of financial literacy in the short-run. A subsequent follow-up survey linked to administrative data on financial outcomes (e.g., credit scores) would measure if short-run improvements in financial literacy last, and which measures of financial literacy, if any, are correlated with improved financial outcomes. Studies along these lines are needed to identify the causal effects of financial education on financial literacy and financial outcomes, identify the best measures of financial literacy, and inform policy makers about the costs and benefits of financial education as a means to improve financial outcomes.

5. WHAT IS THE ROLE OF PUBLIC POLICY IN IMPROVING INDIVIDUAL FINANCIAL OUTCOMES?

Given the current inconclusive evidence on the causal effects of financial education on either financial literacy or financial outcomes, there remains disagreement over whether financial education is the most appropriate policy tool for improving consumer financial outcomes. As expected, those who believe that financial education works favor more financial education ( Lusardi & Mitchell 2007 , Hogarth 2006 , Martin 2007 ). Others, optimistic about the promise of financial education despite what they view as weak empirical evidence of positive effects, support more targeted and timely education with greater emphasis on experimental design and evaluation ( Hathaway & Khatiwada 2008 , Collins & O'Rourke 2010 ). Finally, some who do not believe the research demonstrates positive effects support other policy options ( Willis 2008 ; 2009 ; 2011 ). In this section, we place financial education in the context of the broader research on alternative ways to improve financial outcomes.

5.1 Is There a Market Failure?

As economists, we start this section with the question of market failure: Is there a need for public policy in improving financial knowledge and financial outcomes, or can the market work efficiently without government intervention? If, like other forms of human capital, financial knowledge is costly to accumulate, there may be an optimal level of financial literacy acquisition that varies across individuals based on the expected need for financial expertise and individual preference parameters (e.g., discount rates). Jappelli & Padula (2011) and Lusardi et al. (2012) both use the relationship between financial literacy and wealth as their point of departure in modeling the endogenous accumulation of financial literacy. In both papers, investments in financial literacy have both costs (time and monetary resources) and benefits (access to better investment opportunities) which may be correlated with household education or initial endowments. In the model of Jappelli & Padula (2011) , the optimal stock of financial literacy increases with income, the discount factor (patience), the return to financial literacy, and the initial stock of financial literacy. 7 In the model of Lusardi et al. (2012) , more educated households have higher earnings trajectories than those with less education and also have stronger savings motives due to the progressivity built into the social safety net. Because they save more, they value better financial management technologies more than those with lower incomes, and they rationally acquire a higher level of financial literacy.

These models suggest that differences in financial literacy acquisition may be individually rational. Consistent with this supposition, Hsu (2011) uses data from the Cognitive Economics Survey which includes measures of financial literacy for a set of husbands and their wives to examine the determination of financial literacy in married couples. She finds that wives have a lower average level of financial literacy than their husbands (cf. the gender differences in Table 3 ), which she posits arise from a rational division of household labor with men being more likely to manage household finances. Women, however, have longer life expectancies than their husbands and many will eventually need to assume financial management responsibilities. She finds that women actually acquire increased financial literacy as they approach widowhood, with the majority catching up to their husbands prior to being widowed.

More generally, limited financial knowledge may be a rational outcome if other entities—a spouse, an employer, a financial advisor—can help individuals compensate for their deficiencies by providing information, advice, or financial management. We don't expect individuals to be experts in all other domains of life—that is the essence of comparative advantage. Specialization in financial expertise may be efficient if it allows computational and educational investment to be concentrated or aggregated in specialized individuals or entities that develop algorithms and methods to guide consumers through financial waters.

Although low levels of financial literacy acquisition may be individually rational in some models, limited financial knowledge may create externalities such as reduced competitive pressure in markets which leads to higher equilibrium prices ( Hastings et al. 2012 ), higher social safety net usage, lower quality of civic participation, and negative impacts on neighborhoods ( Campbell et al. 2011 ), children ( Figlio et al. 2011 ) and families. Such externalities may imply a role for government in facilitating improved financial decision making through financial education or other mechanisms.

Individuals may also be subject to biases such as present-bias that lead to lower investments in financial knowledge today but which imply ex post regret in the future (sometimes referred to as an “internality”). Barr et al. (2009) note that in some contexts, firms have incentives to help consumers overcome their fallibilities. For example, if present bias leads consumers to save too little, financial institutions whose profits are tied to assets under management have incentives reduce consumer bias and encourage individuals to save more. In other contexts, however, firms may have incentives to exploit cognitive biases and limited financial literacy. For example, if consumers misunderstand how interest compounds and as a consequence borrow too much ( Stango & Zinman 2009 ), financial institutions whose profits are tied to borrowing have little incentive to educate consumers in a way that would correct their misperceptions.

What evidence is there on whether markets help individuals compensate for their limited financial capabilities? Unfortunately, many firms exploit rather than offset consumer shortcomings. Ellison (2005) and Gabaix & Laibson (2006) develop models of add-on and hidden pricing to explain the ubiquitous pricing contracts observed in the banking, hotel, and retail internet sales industries. Both models have naïve and informed customers and show that for reasonable parameter values, firms do not have an incentive to debias naïve consumers even in a competitive market. This leads to equilibrium contracts with low advertised prices on a “salient” price and high hidden fees and add-ons which naïve customers pay and sophisticated customers take action to avoid.

Opaque and complicated fees are widespread, and several empirical papers link these fee structures to shortcomings in consumer optimization. Ausubel (1999) analyzes a large field experiment in which a credit card company randomized mail solicitations varying the interest rate and duration of the credit card's introductory offer. He finds that individuals are overly responsive to the terms of the introductory offer and appear to underestimate their likelihood of holding balances past the introductory offer period with a low interest rate. 8 In a similar vein, Ponce (2008) evaluates a field experiment in Mexico in which a bank randomized the introductory teaser rate offered to prospective customers. He finds that a lower teaser rates leads to substantially higher levels of debt, even several months after the teaser rate expires, and that the higher debt results from lower payments rather than higher purchases or cash advances. Evaluating non-randomized offers to potential customers, he shows that banks do not randomly assign teaser rates but dynamically price discriminate by targeting offers to consumers who are more likely to permanently increase their balances.

Given that many firms are trying to actively obfuscate prices, it should not be surprising that there is little evidence that firms act to debias consumers through informative advertising or investments in financial education. In models of add-on prices, firms can hide prices or make them salient. Similarly, firms can invest in advertising that lowers price sensitivity, focusing consumer choice on non-price attributes, or in advertising that increases price competition by alerting customers to lower prices. In models of informative advertising, firms reduce information costs and expand the market by informing consumers of their price and location in product space. In contrast, in models of persuasive advertising, firms emphasize certain product characteristics and deemphasize others to change consumer's expressed preferences. For example a financial firm could advertise returns for the last year rather than management fees to convince investors that they should primarily evaluate past returns when choosing a fund manager. A financially literate consumer may be unmoved by this advertising strategy, but those who are less literate might be persuaded and end up paying higher management fees.

Hastings et al. (2012) use administrative data on advertising and fund manager choices for account holders in Mexico's privatized pension system. When the privatized system started, the government presumed that firms would compete on price (management fees) and engage in informative advertising to explain fees to consumers and win their accounts. Instead, firms invested heavily in sales force and marketing, and the authors find that heavier exposure to sales force (appropriately instrumented) resulted in lower price sensitivity and higher brand loyalty. This in turn lowered demand elasticity (recall equation 2) and increased management fees in equilibrium.

Importantly, informative advertising itself may be a public good. For example, advertising that explains the value of savings to individuals can benefit both the firm that makes the investment and its competitors if it increases demand for savings products in general. On the other hand, persuasive advertising attempts to convince customers that one product is better than another so that the benefits accrue to the firm that is advertising. The market may underprovide informative advertising in equilibrium because of the inherent free rider problem. Hastings et al. (in progress) test this theory using a marketing field experiment with two large banks in the Philippines. They find evidence that if firms face advertising constraints, persuasive rather than informative advertising maximizes profits. This suggests a role for government to remedy underprovision of public goods. In particular, these results suggest that financial products firms would welcome a tax that would fund public financial education as it would expand the market (e.g., increase total savings) and commit each institution to contribute to the public good. Note in equilibrium this could change firms’ incentives for add-on pricing as well by lowering the fraction of naïve customers in financial products markets ( Gabaix & Laibson 2006 ).

Even if firms do not have incentives to facilitate efficient consumer outcomes, a competitive market may generate an intermediate sector providing advice and guidance. This sector could provide unbiased decision-making-assistance that would lower decision making costs and efficiently expand the market. However, classic principal-agent problems may make such an efficient intermediate market difficult to attain.

Two recent studies highlight the limits of the financial advice industry as incentive-compatible providers of guidance and counsel on financial products and financial decision making. Mullainathan et al. (2012) conduct an audit study of financial advisors in Boston, sending to them scripted investors who present needs that are either in line with or at odds with the financial advisor's personal interests (e.g., passively managed vs. actively managed funds). They find that many advisors act in their personal interests regardless of the client's actual needs and that they reinforce client biases (e.g., about the merits of employer stock) when it benefits them to do so. Similarly, Anagol et al. (2012) conduct an audit study of life insurance agents in India who are largely commission motivated. As in the previous study, scripted customers present themselves to the agents with differing amounts of financial and product knowledge. They find that life insurance agents recommend products with higher commissions even if the product is suboptimal for the customer. They also find that agents are likely to cater to customer's beliefs, even if those beliefs are incorrect. Finally, instead of debiasing less literate consumers, agents are less likely to give correct advice if the customer presents with a low degree of financial sophistication. Together these studies suggest that with asymmetric information, there is both a principal agent problem and an incentive for advisors to compete by reinforcing biases rather than providing truthful recommendations ( Gentzkow & Shapiro 2006 ; 2010 , Che et al. 2011 ).

Overall, this section suggests that are several potential roles for government in improving financial outcomes for consumers. First, government can help solve the public goods problems which result in underinvestment in financial education. Second, government can regulate the disclosure of fees and pricing. And third, government can provide unbiased information and advice.

5.2 The Scope for Government Intervention

If there is a role for government intervention, what form should it take? We have already summarized the literature on financial education. Briefly, there is at best conflicting evidence that financial education leads to improved economic outcomes either through increasing financial literacy directly or otherwise. So while the logical public policy response to many observers is to increase public support for financial education, this option may not be an efficient use of public resources even if it will likely do no harm. 9 In some contexts, other policy responses such as regulation may be more cost effective.

One regulatory alternative is to design policies that address biases and reduce the decision making costs that consumers face in financial product markets ( Thaler & Sunstein 2008 ). Because the financial literacy literature currently offers only limited models of behavior that give rise to the observed differences in financial literacy and economic outcomes, it is difficult to turn to this literature to design policies that address the underlying behaviors that lead to low levels of financial literacy and poor financial decision making. However, the literatures in behavioral economics and decision theory have developed several models that are relevant, and policies from this literature that address behavioral biases like present bias and choice overload may provide templates for effective and efficient remedies.

Several papers in this vein have already had substantial policy influence. For example, Madrian & Shea (2001) and Beshears et al. (2008) examine the impact of default rules on retirement savings outcomes. They find that participation in employer-sponsored savings plans is substantially higher when the default outcome is savings plan participation (automatic enrollment) relative to when the default is non-participation. Beshears et al. ascribe this finding to three factors. First, automatic enrollment simplifies the decision about whether or not to participate in the savings plan by divorcing the participation decision from related choices about contribution rates and asset allocation. Second, automatic enrollment directly addresses problems of present bias which may result in well-intentioned savers procrastinating their savings plan enrollment indefinitely. Finally, the automatic enrollment default may service as an endorsement (implicit advice) that individuals should be saving. In related research, Thaler & Benartzi (2004) find that automatic contribution escalation leads to substantially higher savings plan contribution rates over a period of four years. These results collectively motivated the adoption of provisions in the Pension Protection Act of 2006 that encourage U.S. employers to adopt automatic enrollment and automatic contribution escalation in their savings plan.

Hastings and co-authors ( Duarte & Hastings 2011 , Hastings et al. 2012 , Hastings, in progress) examine Mexico's experience in privatizing their social security system and draw lessons for policy design. Hastings et al. (2012) find that without regulation, advertising reduces investor sensitivity to financial management fees and increases investor focus on non-price attributes such as brand name and past returns. In simulations, they find that neutralizing the impact of advertising on preferences results in price-elastic demand. These results suggest that centralized information provision and regulation of both disclosure and advertising are important to ensure that individuals with limited financial capabilities have access to the information necessary for effective decision making and to minimize their confusion or persuasion by questionable advertising tactics.

In a related paper, Duarte & Hastings (2011) examine the impact of an information disclosure policy mandated in Mexico. In 2005 the government attempted to increase fee transparency in the privatized social security system by introducing a single fee index which collapsed multiple fees (loads and fees on assets under management) into one measure. Prior to the policy, investor behavior was inelastic to either type of fee or, indeed, any measure of management costs. In contrast, after the policy, demand was very responsive to the fee index. Once investors had a simple way to assess ‘price’, they shifted their investments to the funds with a low index value. This example suggests that investors can be greatly helped by policies that simplify fee structures and either advertise fees or require that they are disclosed in an easy-to-understand way. This example also highlights the potential pitfalls of ill-conceived regulations. Although the policy shifted demand, it had little impact on overall management costs. This is because the index combined fees according to a formula and firms could game the index by lowering one fee while raising another. Not surprisingly, firms optimized accordingly (another example of obfuscated pricing as discussed earlier). The government eventually responded by restricting asset managers to charging only one kind of fee, obviating the need for a fee index.

Hastings (in progress) evaluates two field experiments as part of a household survey (the 2010 EERA referenced in Table 2 ) to further understand the impact of information and incentives on management fund choice by affiliates of Mexico's privatized social security system. Households in the survey were randomly assigned to receive simplified information on fund manager net returns (the official information required by the social security system at the time) presented as either a personalized projected account balance or as an annual percentage rate. In addition to that treatment, households were randomly assigned to receive a small immediate cash incentive for transferring assets to any fund manager that had a better net return (or a higher projected personal balance). While those with lower financial literacy scores are better able to rank the fund managers correctly when presented with information on balance projections instead of APRs (replicating prior results in Hastings & Tejeda-Ashton 2008 , Hastings & Mitchell 2011 ), she finds no impact of this information on subsequent decisions to change fund managers. Rather, individuals who receive the small cash incentive are more likely to change fund managers (for the better) regardless of the type of information received. These preliminary results suggest that incentives that both address procrastination and that are tied to better behavior may be more effective than financial education as financial education does not carry with it any incentive to act. We note that these results are still short-run and preliminary as they are based on a follow-up survey. Final results will depend on administrative records for switching which are not subject to problems inherent in self-reports. 10

Campbell et al. (2011) lay out a useful framework for thinking about potential policy options to improve financial outcomes for consumers. They suggest that evaluating consumers along two dimensions, their preference heterogeneity and their level of financial sophistication (or, in the parlance of this paper, their financial literacy), may help narrow the set of appropriate policy levers for improving consumer financial outcomes. At one extreme, take the case of stored value cards, a product used by a large number of unsophisticated consumers and for which consumer preferences are relatively homogeneous. Campbell et al. propose that in this case, since everyone largely wants the same thing, consumers are probably best served through the application of strict rules. This is likely to be more efficient and cost effective than attempting to educate consumers in an environment in which firms are less stringently regulated. In contrast, if consumers are financially knowledgeable and have heterogeneous preferences other approaches may make more sense. Although Campbell et al. do not discuss financial education in this context, it would seem that financial education, to the extent that it impacts financial literacy and economic outcomes, is a tool that holds most promise in markets for products with some degree of preference heterogeneity and that require some degree of financial knowledge. At the other extreme, there are products like hedge funds that cater to individuals with tremendous preference heterogeneity and that require a sizeable amount of financial knowledge for effective use. The latter condition may seem like a perfect reason to justify financial education. We would counter, however, that in such a context it may be difficult for public policy to effectively intervene in providing the level of financial education that would be required. For products for which extensive expertise is required, it may be more efficient to restrict markets to those who can demonstrate the skills requisite for appropriate and effective use.

Overall, the literature suggests that there are many alternatives to financial education that can be used to improve financial outcomes for consumers: strict regulation, providing incentives for improved choice architecture, simplifying disclosure about product fees, terms, or characteristics, and providing incentives to take action. Although none of the studies that we reviewed here ran a horse race between these other approaches and financial education, many of them show larger effects than can be ascribed to financial education in the existing literature. Expanding these studies to other relevant markets such as credit card regulation, payday loan regulation, mortgages, and car or appliance loans present important next steps in understanding how best to improve consumer financial outcomes.

6. DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH

In this paper, we have evaluated the literature on financial literacy, financial education, and consumer financial outcomes. This literature consistently finds that many individuals perform poorly on test-based measures of financial literacy. These findings, coupled with a growing literature on consumers’ financial mistakes and documenting a positive correlation between financial literacy and suboptimal financial outcomes, have driven policy interest in efforts to increase financial literacy through financial education. However, there is little consensus in the literature on the efficacy of financial education. The existing research is inadequate for drawing conclusions about if and under what conditions financial education works.

The directions for future research depend in part on the goal at hand. If the goal is to improve financial literacy, the directions for future research that follow hinge on financial literacy and the role of financial education in enhancing financial literacy.

One set of fundamental issues relate to capabilities. What are the basic financial competencies that individuals need? What financial decisions should we expect individuals to successfully make independently, and what decisions are best relegated to an expert? To draw an analogy, we don't expect individuals to be experts in all domains of life—that is the essence of comparative advantage. Most of us consult doctors when we are ill and mechanics when our cars are broken, but we are mostly able to care for a common cold and fill the car with gas and check our tire pressure independently. What level of financial literacy is necessary or desirable? And should certain financial transactions be predicated on demonstrating an adequate level of financial literacy, much like taking a driver's education course or passing a driver's education test is a prerequisite for getting a driver's license. If so, for what types of financial decisions would such a licensing approach make most sense?

Another set of open questions relate to measurement. How do we best measure financial literacy? Which measurement approaches work best at predicting financial outcomes? And what are the tradeoffs implicit in using different measures of financial literacy (e.g., how does the marginal cost compare to the marginal benefit of having a more effective measure?).

A third set of issues surrounds how individuals acquire financial literacy and the mechanisms that link financial literacy to financial outcomes. How important are skills like numeracy or general cognitive ability in determining financial literacy, and can those skills be taught? To the extent that financial literacy is acquired through experience, how do we limit the potential harm that consumers suffer in the process of learning by doing? Is financial education a substitute or a complement for personal experience?

We need much more causal research on financial education, particularly randomized controlled trials. Does financial education work, and if so, what types of financial education are most cost effective? Much of the literature on financial education focuses on traditional, classroom based courses. Is this the best way to deliver financial education? More generally, how does this approach compare with other alternatives? Is a course of a few hours length enough, or should we think more expansively about integrated approaches to financial education over the lifecycle? Or, on the other extreme, should financial education be episodic and narrowly focused to coincide with specific financial tasks? There are many other ways to deliver educational content that could improve financial decision making: internet-based instruction, podcasts, web sites, games, apps, printed material. How effective (and how cost effective) are these different delivery mechanisms, and are some better-suited to some groups of individuals or types of problems than others? Should the content of financial education initiatives be focused on teaching financial principles, or rules of thumb? In the randomized controlled trial of two different approaches to financial education for microenterprise owners in the Dominican Republic discussed earlier, Drexler et al. (2011) find that rule-of-thumb based financial education is more effective at improving financial practices than principles-based education. How robust is this finding? And to what extent can firms nullify rules-of-thumb through endogenous responses to consumer behavior (see Duarte & Hastings 2011 )?

Even if we can develop effective mechanisms to deliver financial education, how do we induce the people who most need financial education to get it? School-based financial education programs have the advantage that, while in school, students are a captive audience. But schools can only teach so much. Many of the financial decisions that individuals will face in their adult lives have little relevance to a 17-year-old high school student: purchasing life insurance, picking a fixed vs. an adjustable rate mortgage, choosing an asset allocation in a retirement savings account, whether to file for bankruptcy. How do we deliver financial education to adults before they make financial mistakes, or in ways that limit their financial mistakes, when we don't have a captive audience and financial education is only one of many things competing for time and attention?

Finally, what is the appropriate role of government in either directly providing or funding the private provision of financial education? If financial education is a public good (Hastings et al., in progress), would industry support a tax to finance publically-provided financial education? If so, what form would that take?

If instead of improving financial literacy our goal is to improve financial outcomes, then the directions for future research are slightly different. The overarching questions in this case center around the tools that are available to improve financial outcomes. This might include financial education, but it might also include better financial market regulation, different approaches to changing the institutional framework for individual and household financial decision making, or incentives for innovation to create products that improve financial outcomes.

With this broader frame, one important question on which we have little evidence is which tools are most cost effective at improving financial outcomes? For some outcomes, the most cost effective tool might be financial education, but for other outcomes, different approaches might work better. For example, financial education programs have had only modest success at increasing participation in and contributions to employer-sponsored savings plans; in contrast, automatic enrollment and automatic contribution escalation lead to dramatic increases in savings plan participation and contributions ( Madrian & Shea 2001 , Beshears et al. 2008 , Thaler & Benartzi 2004 ). Moreover, automatic enrollment and contribution escalation are less expensive to implement than financial education programs. What approaches to changing financial behavior generate the biggest bang for the buck, and how does financial education compare to other levers that can be used to change outcomes?

Despite the contradictory evidence on the effectiveness of financial education, financial literacy is in short supply and increasing the financial capabilities of the population is a desirable and socially beneficial goal. We believe that well designed and well executed financial education initiatives can have an effect. But to design cost effective financial education programs, we need better research on what does and does not work. We also should not lose sight of the larger goal—financial education is a tool, one of many, for improving financial outcomes. Financial education programs that don't improve financial outcomes can hardly be considered a success.

Unfortunately, we have little concrete evidence to provide answers. We have a pressing need for more and better research to inform the design of financial education interventions and to prioritize where financial education resources can be best spent. To achieve this, funding for financial education needs to be coupled with funding for evaluation, and the design and implementation of financial education interventions needs to be done in a way that facilitates rigorous evaluation.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge financial support from the National Institute on Aging (grants R01-AG-032411-01, A2R01-AG-021650 and P01-AG-005842). We thank Daisy Sun for outstanding research assistance. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Institute on Aging, the National Bureau of Economic Research, or the authors’ home universities. For William Skimmyhorn, the views expressed herein are those of the author and do not reflect the position of the United States Military Academy, the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the National Bureau of Economic Research. See the authors’ websites for lists of their outside activities. When citing this paper, please use the following: Hastings JS, Madrian BC, SkimmyhornWL. 2012. Financial Literacy, Financial Education and Economic Outcomes. Annual Review of Economics 5: Submitted. Doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-082312-125807.

NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Financial Literacy, Financial Education and Economic Outcomes Justine S. Hastings, Brigitte C. Madrian, and William L. Skimmyhorn NBER Working Paper No. 18412 September 2012 JEL No. C93,D14,D18,D91,G11,G28

1 See Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. H.R. 4173. Title X - Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 2010, Section 1013. < http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111hr4173enr/pdf/BILLS-111hr4173enr.pdf , accessed September 13, 2012>

2 By 2011, economic education had been incorporated into the K-12 educational standards of every state except Rhode Island, and personal finance was a component of the K-12 educational standards in all states except Alaska, California, New Mexico, Rhode Island, and the District of Columbia (Council for Economic Education, 2011).

3 See http://www.ja.org/about/about_history.shtml and http://www.councilforeconed.org/about/ .

4 The NFCS has three components, a national random-digit-dialed telephone survey, a state-by-state on-line survey, and a survey of U.S. military personnel and their spouses.

5 Based on author's calculations using TNE survey responses from 2012 linked to college loan taking data in Chile. See Hastings, Neilson and Zimmerman (in progress) for details on the survey and data.

6 Cole and Shastry (2010) are able to replicate the qualitative results of Bernheim, Garrett and Maki (2001) when using the same empirical specification even though they use a different source of data.

7 Financial literacy and savings are positively correlated in this model, although the relationship is not causal as both are endogenously determined.

8 See the Frontline documentary ”The Card Game” about how teaser rate policies were developed in response to customer service calls in which consumers were persistently overconfident in their ability to repay their debt.

9 See the discussion in Section 4. There is also a large literature in the economics of education documenting the fact that large increases in real spending per pupil in the United States has led to no measurable increase in knowledge as measured by ability to answer questions on standardized tests.

10 If the preliminary results hold, this policy is a very inexpensive alternative to financial education. Hastings notes that the immediate return (net of the incentive) on each incentivized offer from resorting of individuals across fund managers, before allowing firms to drop prices in response, results in $30 USD in expectation. Aggregated over 30 million account holders, this is a large savings even before allowing for secondary competitive effects, and in equilibrium it is virtually costless to implement.

RELATED RESOURCES

The following datasets with financial literacy questions that are referenced in this article are currently publically available.

2004 U.S. Health and Retirement Survey: http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/index.php?p=data

2010 U.S. Health and Retirement Survey: http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/index.php?p=data

2009 Rand American Life Panel Wellbeing 64: https://mmicdata.rand.org/alp/index.php?page=data&p=showsurvey&syid=64

2009 U.S. National Financial Capability Study: http://www.finrafoundation.org/programs/p123306

2009 Chilean Social Protection Survey (EPS): http://www.proteccionsocial.cl/index.asp

LITERATURE CITED

• Allgood S, Walstad WB. The effects of perceived and actual financial knowledge on credit card behavior. Networks Financ. Inst, Indian State Univ.; 2012. Work. Pap. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ameriks J, Caplin A, Leahy J. Wealth accumulation and the propensity to plan. Q. J. Econ. 2003; 118 (3):1007–1046. [ Google Scholar ]
• Anagol S, Cole S, Sarkar S. Understanding the incentives of commissions motivated agents: theory and evidence from the Indian life insurance market. Harvard Bus. School; 2012. Work. Pap. 12-055. [ Google Scholar ]
• Agnew J, Szykman L. Asset allocation and information overload: the influence of information display, asset choice and investor experience. J. Behav. Financ. 2005; 6 (2):57–70. [ Google Scholar ]
• Agarwal S, Driscoll J, Gabaix X, Laibson D. The age of reason: financial decisions over the life-cycle and implications for regulation. Brookings Pap. Econ. Act. 2009a; 2009 (2):51–117. [ Google Scholar ]
• Agarwal S, Skiba P, Tobacman J. Payday loans and credit cards: new liquidity and credit scoring puzzles? Am. Econ. Rev. Pap. Proc. 2009b; 99 (2):412–417. [ Google Scholar ]
• Agarwal S, Driscoll J, Gabaix X, Laibson D. Learnng in the credit card market. Fed. Reserve Bank Chicago; 2011. Work. Pap. [ Google Scholar ]
• Amromin G, Huang J, Sialm C. The tradeoff between mortgage prepayments and tax-deferred retirement savings. J. Public Econ. 91 :2014–2040. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ausubel LM. Adverse selection in the credit card market. Univ. Maryland; College Park: 1999. Work. Pap. [ Google Scholar ]
• Banks J, Oldfield Z. Understanding pensions: cognitive function, numerical ability and retirement saving. Fiscal. Stud. 2007; 28 (2):143–170. [ Google Scholar ]
• Barber B, Odean T. Are individual investors tax savvy? evidence from retail and discount brokerage accounts. J. Public. Econ. 2003; 88 :419–442. [ Google Scholar ]
• Barr MS, Mullainathan S, Shafir E. The case for behaviorally informed regulation. In: Shafir E, editor. Behavioral Foundations of Policy. Princeton Univ.; Princeton: 2009. pp. 25–61. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bell C, Gorin D, Hogarth JM. Financial education – Does it work and how do we know? Research findings from a study of financial education among soldiers. Community Invest. 2008; 21 :15–16. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bell C, Gorin D, Hogarth JM. Does financial education affect soldiers’ financial behavior? Networks Financ. Inst., Indian State Univ.; 2009. Work. Pap.08. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bergstresser D, Poterba J. Asset allocation and asset location: household evidence from the survey of consumer finances. J. Public Econ. 2004; 88 :1893–1915. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bernheim BD, Garrett DM, Maki DM. Education and saving: the long-term effect of high school financial curriculum mandates. J. Public Econ. 2001; 80 :435–465. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bernheim BD, Garrett DM. The effects of financial education in the workplace: evidence from a survey of households. J. Public Econ. 2003; 87 :1487–1519. [ Google Scholar ]
• Beshears J, Choi J, Laibson D, Madrian BC. The importance of default options for retirement saving outcomes: evidence from the United States. In: Kay S, Sinha T, editors. Lessons from Pension Reform in the Americas. Oxford Univ. Press; Oxford: 2008. pp. 59–87. [ Google Scholar ]
• Borghans L, Duckworth AL, Heckman JJ, ter Weel B. The economics and psychology of personal Traits. J. Hum. Resour. 2008; 43 (4):972–1059. [ Google Scholar ]
• Boyce L, Danes S. Evaluation of the NEFE High School Financial Planning Program Curriculum: 1997-1998. Natl. Endow. Financ. Educ.; Denver: 2004. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brobeck S. U.S. Consumer Knowledge: Results of a Nationwide Test. Consumer Fed. Am.; Washington D.C: 1990. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brobeck S. U.S. High School Student Consumer Knowledge: a Nationwide Test. Consumer Fed. Am.; Washington D.C: 1991. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brobeck S. College Student Consumer Knowledge: The Results of a Nationwide Test. Consumer Fed. Am.; Washington D.C: 1993. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brobeck S. American Consumers Get Mixed Grades on Consumer Literacy Quiz. Consumer Fed. Am.; Washington D.C: 1998. [ Google Scholar ]
• Calvet LE, Campbell JY, Sodini P. Measuring the financial sophistication of households. Am. Econ. Rev. 2009; 99 (2):393–398. [ Google Scholar ]
• Campbell JY. Household finance. J. Financ. 2006; 61 (4):1553–1604. [ Google Scholar ]
• Campbell JY, Jackson H, Madrian BC, Tufano P. The regulation of consumer financial products: an introductory essay with four case studies. Harvard Univ. Kennedy Sch.; 2010. Work. Pap. RWP10-040. [ Google Scholar ]
• Campbell JY, Giglio S, Pathak P. Forced sales and house prices. Am. Econ. Rev. 2011; 101 (5):2108–2131. [ Google Scholar ]
• Campbell JY, Jackson H, Madrian BC, Tufano P. Consumer Financial Protection. J. Econ. Perspect. 2011; 25 (1):91–114. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Carpena F, Cole S, Shapiro J, Zia B. Unpacking the casual chain of financial literacy. World Bank; 2011. Work. Pap. 5798. [ Google Scholar ]
• Che YK, Dessein W, Kartik N. Pandering to persuade. Am. Econ. Rev. 2011 forthcoming. [ Google Scholar ]
• Choi J, Laibson D, Madrian BC. Why does the law of one price fail? An experiment on index mutual funds. Rev. Financ. Stud. 2009; 23 (4):1405–1432. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Choi J, Laibson D, Madrian BC. $100 bills on the sidewalk: suboptimal investment in 401(k) plans. Rev. Econ. Stat. 2011; 93 (3):748–763. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Christelis D, Jappelli T, Padula M. Cognitive abilities and portfolio choice. Eur. Econ. Rev. 2010; 54 (1):18–38. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cole SA, Shastry GK. Is High School the Right Time to Teach Self Control? The Effect of Education on Financial Behavior. Harvard Business School; 2012. Work. Pap. [ Google Scholar ]
• Collins JM, Gorey RN, Schmeiser MD, Baker CA, Ziegler D. Building Indicators Measures: Analysis and Recommendations. Anne E. Casey Foundation; Baltimore: 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
• Collins JM. The impacts of mandatory financial education: evidence from a randomized field study. Center for financial Security; 2010. Work. Pap. [ Google Scholar ]
• Collins JM, O'Rourke CM. Financial education and counseling -- still holding promise. J. Consumer Affairs. 2010; 44 (3):483–498. [ Google Scholar ]
• Coussens MD. Towards financial literacy: program leaders comment on evaluation and impact. Consumer Interests Ann. 2006; 52 :315–326. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cunha F, Heckman J. The technology of skill formation. Am. Econ. Rev. 2007; 97 (2):31–47. [ Google Scholar ]
• Cunha F, Heckman J, Schennnach S. Estimating the technology of cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. Econometrica. 2010; 78 (3):883–931. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Drexler A, Fischer G, Schoar A. Keeping it Simple: Financial Literacy and Rules of Thumb. MIT; 2011. Work. Pap. [ Google Scholar ]
• Duarte F, Hastings JS. Fettered consumers and sophisticated firms: evidence from Mexico's privatized social security market. Brown Univ.; 2011. Unpublished manuscript. [ Google Scholar ]
• Duflo E, Saez E. The role of information and social interactions in retirement plan decisions: evidence from a randomized experiment. Q. J. Econ. 2003; 118 (3):815–842. [ Google Scholar ]
• Duflo E, Saez E. Implications of information and social interactions for retirement saving decisions. In: Michell O, Utkus S, editors. Pension Design and Structure: New Lessons from Behavioral Finance. Oxford Univ.; New York: 2004. pp. 137–156. [ Google Scholar ]
• Drexler A, Fischer G, Schoar A. Keeping it simple: financial literacy and rules of thumb. MIT; 2011. Work. Pap. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ellison G. A model of add-on pricing. Q. J. Econ. 2005; 120 (2):585–637. [ Google Scholar ]
• Figlio D, Nelson AA, Ross S. Do children lose more than a home? The effects of foreclosure on children's education outcomes. Indiana Univ.; 2011. Unpublished manuscript. [ Google Scholar ]
• Francomano J, Lavitt W, Lavitt D. Junior Achievement, a History: A Personal Account of Managing Change from Drill Press to Computer. Colorado; Colorado Springs: 1988. [ Google Scholar ]
• Friedman M. Essays in Positive Economics. Univ. Chicago Press; Chicago: 1953. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gabaix X, Laibson D. Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia, and information suppression in competitive markets. Q. J. Econ. 2006; 121 (2):505–540. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gale W, Levine R. Financial literacy: what works? how could it be more effective? Center for Retirement Research Boston College; 2011. Work. Pap. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gartner K, Todd RM. Effectiveness of online “early intervention” financial education programs for credit cardholders. Fed. Reserve Bank Chicago; 2005. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gerardi K, Goette L, Meier S. Financial literacy and subprime mortgage delinquency: evidence from a survey matched to administrative data. Fed. Reserve Bank Atlanta; 2010. Work. Pap. 2010-10. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gentzkow M, Shapiro J. Media bias and reputation. J. Polit. Econ. 2006; 114 (2):280–316. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gentzkow M, Shapiro J. What drives media slant? evidence from U.S. daily newspapers. Econometrica. 2010; 78 (1):35–71. [ Google Scholar ]
• Graham J, Harvey C, Huang H. Investor competence, trading frequency, and home bias. Manag. Sci. 2009; 55 (7):1094–1106. [ Google Scholar ]
• Grinblatt M, Keloharju M, Linnainmaa J. Do smart investors outperform dumb investors? 2009. CRSP Work. Pap. 09-33.
• Gross DB, Souleles NS. Do liquidity constraints and interest rates matter for consumer behavior? evidence from credit card data. Q. J. Econ. 2002; 117 (1):149–185. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hastings JS, Tejeda-Ashton L. Financial literacy, information, and demand elasticity: survey and experimental evidence from Mexico. 2008. NBER Work. Pap. 14538.
• Hastings JS, Mitchell OS. How financial literacy and impatience shape retirement wealth and investment behaviors. 2011. NBER Work. Pap. 16740. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ]
• Hastings JS, Hortaçsu A, Syverson C. Advertising and competition in privatized social security: the case of Mexico. Brown Univ.; 2012. Unpublished manuscript. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hastings JS, Karlan D, Zinman J. In progress. Prisoner's Dilemma? Informative vs. Persuasive Advertising for a SavingsAccount. Brown Univ.; Unpublished manuscript. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hastings JS. Results from the 2010-2011 Mexican Encuesta de Empleyo Retiro y Ahorro. Brown Univ.; In progress Unpublished manuscript. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hathaway I, Khatiwada S. Do financial education programs work? Fed. Reserve Bank Cleveland; 2008. Work. Pap. 08-20. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hilgert MA, Hogarth JM, Beverly SG. Household financial management: the connection between knowledge and behavior. Fed. Reserve Bullet. 2003; 89 (7):309–322. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hogarth JM. G8 International Conference on Improving Financial Literacy. Russian Fed.; Moscow: 2006. Financial education and economic development. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hsu JW. Aging and strategic learning: the impact of spousal incentives on financial literacy. Fed. Reserve Board Governors; 2011. Financ. Econ. Discussion Pap. 2011-53. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Hung AA, Parker AM, Yoong JK. Defining and measuring financial literacy. Rand Corp.; 2009. Work. Pap. [ Google Scholar ]
• Jappelli T, Padula M. Investiment in financial literacy and savings decision. CSEF; 2011. Work. Pap. 272. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kimball M, Shumway T. Investor sophistication and the participation, home bias, diversification, and employer stock puzzle. Mimeo, Univ. Michigan; 2006. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lusardi A. Saving and the effectiveness of financial education. In: Michell O, Utkus S, editors. Pension Design and Structure: New Lessons from Behavioral Finance. Oxford Univ.; New York: 2004. pp. 157–184. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lusardi A, Mitchell OS. Financial literacy and planning: implications for retirement welling. Pension Research Council; 2006. Work. Pap. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lusardi A, Mitchell OS. Financial literacy and retirement planning: new evidence from the Rand American Life Panel. Univ. Michigan Retirement Research Center; 2007. Work. Pap. 2007-157. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lusardi A, Mitchell OS. How ordinary consumers make complex economic decisions: financial literacy and retirement readiness. 2009. NBER Work. Pap. 15350.
• Lusardi A, Tufano P. Debt literacy, financial experiences, and overindebtedness. 2009. NBER Work. Pap. 14808.
• Lusardi A. Survey of the States: economic and personal finance education in our nation's schools. Council Econ. Educ.; 2011. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lusardi A, Michaud PC, Mitchell O. Optimal financial knowledge and wealth inequality. Pension Research Council; 2012. Work. Pap. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Madrian BC, Shea DF. The power of suggestion: inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Q. J. Econ. 2001; 116 :1149–1187. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mandell L. Financial literacy of high school students. In Handbook of Consumer Finance Research. In: Jian Xiao Jing., editor. Springer; New York: 2008. pp. 163–183. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mandell L. The Financial Literacy of Young American Adults. Results of the 2008 National Jump$tart Coalition Survey of High School Seniors and College Students. Jumpstart Coalition; Washington D.C: 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
• Martin M. A literature Review on the effectiveness of financial education. Fed. Reserve Bank Richmond; 2007. Work. Pap. 07-03. [ Google Scholar ]
• Meier S, Sprenger C. Present-biased preferences and credit card borrowing. AEJ: Applied Econ. 2010; 2 (1):193–210. [ Google Scholar ]
• Moore D. Survey of financial literacy in Washington state: knowledge, behavior, attitudes, and experiences. Soc. Econ. Sci. Res. Center, Washington State Univ; 2003. Tech. Rep., 03-39. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mullainathan S, Noeth M, Shoar A. The market for financial advice: an audit study. 2012. NBER Work. Pap. 17929.
• Odean T. Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? J. Financ. 1998; 53 (5):1775–1798. [ Google Scholar ]
• OECD . Improving Financial Literacy: Analysis of Issues and Policies. OECD Publications; Paris: 2005. [ Google Scholar ]
• Parker AM, Yoong J, Bruine de Bruin W, Willis R. Inappropriate confidence and retirement planning: four studies with a national sample. J. Behav. Dec. Making. 2012; 25 (4):382–389. [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ponce-Rodriguez A. PhD diss. Stanford Univ.; 2008. Teaser rate offers in the credit card market: evidence from Mexico. [ Google Scholar ]
• Servon LJ, Kaestner R. Consumer financial literacy and the impact of online banking on the financial behavior of lower-income bank customers. J. Consumer Affairs. 2008; 42 (2):271–305. [ Google Scholar ]
• Skimmyhorn W. PhD diss. Harvard Univ. Kennedy Sch.; 2012. Essays in behavioral household finance. [ Google Scholar ]
• Stango V, Zinman J. Exponential growth bias and household finance. J. Financ. 2009; 64 (6):2807–2849. [ Google Scholar ]
• Staten ME. The evolution of the credit counseling industry. In: Bertola G, Disney R, Grant C, editors. The Economics of Consumer Credit. MIT Press; Cambridge: 2006. pp. 275–300. [ Google Scholar ]
• Thaler R, Benartzi S. Save more tomorrow: using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. J. Polit. Econ. 2004; 112 (1):S165–S187. [ Google Scholar ]
• Thaler R, Sunstein C. Nudge, Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale Univ.; New Haven: 2008. [ Google Scholar ]
• van Rooij M, Lusardi A, Alessie R. Financial literacy and stock market participation. J. Financ. Econ. 2011; 101 (2):449–472. [ Google Scholar ]
• van Rooij M, Lusardi A, Alessie R. Financial literacy, retirement planning, and wealth accumulation. Econ. J. 2012; 122 (5):449–478. [ Google Scholar ]
• Willis LE. Against financial literacy education. Iowa. L. Rev. 2008:94. [ Google Scholar ]
• Willis LE. Evidence and ideology in assessing the effectiveness of financial literacy education. San Diego L. Rev. 2009:415. [ Google Scholar ]
• Willis LE. The financial education fallacy. Am. Econ. Rev. Pap. Proc. 2011; 101 (3):429–434. [ Google Scholar ]

Impact of Digital Financial Literacy on Financial Inclusion – The Role Fintech Services

21 Pages Posted: 18 Sep 2024

GAURAV KUMAR

K L UNIVERSITY - K L UNIVERSITY

Dr. Rajnish Ratna

Gopal Narayan Singh University, Rohtas, Bihar

Dr. Amit Ranjan

Date Written: March 19, 2024

There is a rapid growth of fintech services across the world due to technological advancements. However, research on digital financial literacy with respect to financial technology acceptance as well as financial inclusion is scarce. The study attempts to fill this gap comprehensively. The research focused to investigate the impact of various dimensions of digital financial literacy on fintech adoption and financial inclusion. Survey method was adopted to accumulate data from various urban and semi urban areas of Telangana, India. In all, 267 responses were received for data analysis. Data were analyzed using SEM with AMOS. Results of the study evinced indicated positive influence of digital financial literacy on acceptance of financial technology-based services. In addition, fintech services have shown positive impact on financial inclusion. The research provides implications to practioners and also to academia and extends the domain knowledge of digital financial literacy.

Keywords: Fintech Adoption, Digital Financial Literacy, Financial Inclusion, India

Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation

GAURAV KUMAR (Contact Author)

K l university - k l university ( email ).

GREENFIELDS, VADDESWARAM GUNTUR, IN 522502

Gopal Narayan Singh University, Rohtas, Bihar ( email )

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on ssrn, paper statistics, related ejournals, economic anthropology ejournal.

Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic

2nd International Conference on Women in Multifaceted Research (ICWMR-2024)

Subscribe to this free journal for more curated articles on this topic

Profile of Students' Scientific Literacy Competence and Attitudes toward Online Learning Using Microsoft Teams

• August 2024
• European Journal of Education and Pedagogy 5(4):55-61
• CC BY-NC 4.0

• SMA Negeri 1 Weleri Kendal

• Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

• Universitas Negeri Semarang
• This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.

Abstract and Figures

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations

• Pamela Medina
• J Educ Tech Syst

• Dessy Lusyana Yustin

• Ozcan Ozgur Dursun
• INT J EDUC DEV

• Guilherme Issamu Hirata
• João Batista Araujo e Oliveira
• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up