Equity Implications of Paying College Athletes: A Title IX Analysis
Boston College Law Review, 2023
Elon University Law Legal Studies Research Paper Forthcoming
63 Pages Posted: 2 Feb 2023
Andrew J. Haile
Elon University School of Law
Date Written: February 2, 2023
After fifty years of Title IX, the gap in participation rates between men and women in college athletics has closed significantly. In 1982, women comprised only 28% of all NCAA college athletes. In 2020, they made up 44%. Despite the progress in participation rates, a substantial gap in resources allocated to men’s and women’s sports continues to exist. On average, NCAA colleges spend more than twice as much on men’s sports as they do on women’s. This gap is even greater at schools in the Football Bowl Subdivision, the most elite level of college athletics. The median FBS institution spends almost three times more on men’s athletics than on women’s. This situation may get even worse if colleges are allowed to start paying their athletes, which appears a realistic possibility in the not-too-distant future. Justice Kavanaugh’s concurrence in the 2021 Supreme Court decision NCAA v. Alston sent a strong signal that prohibitions on paying college athletes most likely violate federal antitrust law. More recently, some states have introduced legislation that would require colleges to compensate athletes in sports that generate positive net income for their schools. While this could rectify the serious inequity of colleges making tens of millions of dollars from their athletes’ labor without those athletes being allowed to share in the financial benefits they create, it could also widen the gap in resources colleges invest in men’s and women’s sports. With very rare exception, football and men’s basketball are the only college sports that produce more revenue than expenses. Consequently, unless Title IX requires otherwise, the difference in the amount of money colleges invest in men’s and women’s sports could grow significantly if those colleges are allowed to compensate male athletes without compensating female athletes. This Article provides a detailed analysis of whether the current Title IX regulations require equal payments to male and female athletes. It concludes that they do not. Of course, the controlling Title IX regulations were drafted at a time when paying college athletes was not even contemplated, and therefore this result does not comport with the purpose or spirit of Title IX. Consequently, the Article goes on to argue that the regulations should be amended to treat payments to college athletes the same as scholarships. This would require that male and female athletes receive proportionately equal payments for their athletic services. Making this change to ensure equitable treatment of all athletes will advance the purposes of Title IX and will help to combat the “marketplace bias” that hampers the economic growth of women’s sports.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Andrew J. Haile (Contact Author)
Elon university school of law ( email ).
201 N. Greene Street Greensboro, NC 27401 United States
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Paper statistics, related ejournals, u.s. constitutional law: rights & liberties ejournal.
Subscribe to this fee journal for more curated articles on this topic
Law & Society: Public Law - Constitutional Law eJournal
Education law ejournal, elon university school of law legal studies research paper series.
Subscribe to this free journal for more curated articles on this topic
The student athlete experience
- December 2009
- New Directions for Institutional Research 2009(144):33 - 41
- 2009(144):33 - 41
- North Carolina State University
Discover the world's research
- 25+ million members
- 160+ million publication pages
- 2.3+ billion citations
- Judith Awuah
- Emmanuel Amankrah Kwofi
- RES HIGH EDUC
- Charles Frey
- Brandon Wolak
- Zulakbal Abd Karim
- Jaffry Zakaria
- Kenneth Sellers
- Kelsey C. Kowalski
- Agus Gumilar
- Nur Khois Jajiyah
- Susan Rankin
- Leticia Oseguera
- AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL
- Alphonse Damas
- J.L. Shulman
- M.A. Kurzweil
- J COLL STUDENT DEV
- Gregory C. Wolniak
- Christopher T. Pierson
- Louise Bohr
- Patrick T. Terenzini
- Marcia Edison
- Rachel Truckenmiller
- REV HIGH EDUC
- J. Douglas Toma
- Recruit researchers
- Join for free
- Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
The 100 most-cited articles relating to collegiate athletics by level of evidence. Of the 100 most-cited publications related to collegiate athletics, 74 were classified as original research; 17, as descriptive/epidemiology research; and 9, as review (Table 3).
The purpose of this paper is to discuss stressors experienced by collegiate athletes, developing an early detection system through monitoring techniques that identify the detrimental effects of stress, and discuss appropriate stress management strategies for this population.
College student-athletes completed questionnaires measuring passion for sport as well as psychological needs (competence, choice, and relatedness), autonomous motivation (intrinsic motivation, identity, and perceived value), and effort in athletics and academics.
As the College Sport Research Institute’s official journal, JIIA is dedicated to critically examining ethical, social, economic, and political issues surrounding college sport in the United States and providing readers with thought-provoking editorials, research articles, and reviews.
In the Alston case the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) argued that its limits on athlete compensation are needed to preserve the “amateur” nature of college sports, which widens consumer choice by providing a product distinct from professional sports (NCAA v. Alston, 2021, p. 10).
This study uses new data from the National Sports and Society Survey (N = 3,993) to assess recent public opinions about allowing college athletes to be paid more than it costs them to go to...
ABSTRACT. We estimate how ‘Name, Image, and Likeness’ (NIL) contracts affect NCAA football recruiting outcomes. We model recruiting as a multistage process, where schools make scholarship offers to athletes and then athletes choose a school based on their preferences over the offers received.
In June 2021, a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court issued its eagerly anticipated decision in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston, ruling for the first time that NCAA rules governing student-athlete eligibility are subject to full scrutiny under federal antitrust law.
Abstract. After fifty years of Title IX, the gap in participation rates between men and women in college athletics has closed significantly. In 1982, women comprised only 28% of all NCAA college athletes. In 2020, they made up 44%.
North Carolina State University. Citations (49) References (35) Abstract. This chapter discusses data sources available for studying the experience of student athletes on college campuses and...