research paper over death penalty

Death Penalty

The death penalty, known as capital punishment, is the government-sanctioned taking of a life as punishment for a crime. Read the overview below to gain an understanding of the issues surrounding the death penalty and explore the previews of additional articles highlighting diverse perspectives.

Access Through Your library >>  

Topic Home      |      Social Issues      |      Literature      |      Lifelong Learning & DIY      |      World History

Capital punishment.

"Capital Punishment." Opposing Viewpoints Online Collection , Gale, 2023.

Capital punishment , also referred to as the  death penalty , has long been a feature of human society and has been used in the United States since the colonial era. Crimes punishable by death are called  capital offenses . Under US constitutional law, states have the right to apply their own criminal statutes including capital punishment. However, the death penalty remains a controversial political and legal issue in the United States. Supporters of capital punishment argue that it deters crime and provides ultimate justice for crime victims, particularly murder victims. Opponents counter that it is an immoral and costly practice that is particularly vulnerable to racial bias. It also carries the risk of wrongful execution. As of 2023, the death penalty had been abolished in twenty-three US states and the District of Columbia. In addition, governors in Arizona, California, Ohio, Oregon, and Pennsylvania had placed moratoriums on the death penalty that remained in effect.

PROS AND CONS OF ABOLISHING THE DEATH PENALTY

• The death penalty violates the Eighth Amendment's protection against "cruel and unusual punishment" by the state.
• With little evidence that capital punishment deters crime, it is a costly and ineffective use of public resources.
• Abolishing the death penalty is the only way to prevent bias in its application and ensure that no person is executed by the government erroneously or unconstitutionally.
• The option to seek the death penalty is constitutional because the Fifth Amendment authorizes its application as long as "due process of law" has been followed.
• The death penalty provides immeasurable public benefit by discouraging people from committing capital offenses.
• Capital punishment enables the state to assert its authority over the people and serve in its role as the administrator of justice.

In addition to state laws, the federal government identifies about sixty crimes to which the death penalty could be applied. These offenses involve murder, treason, or committing another crime that results in death, such as kidnapping or aircraft piracy. The US Department of Justice (DOJ) authorizes federal death penalty cases, which are prosecuted in federal court. In 2020, following seventeen years without carrying out the penalty, the federal government executed ten people. In January 2021 the federal government executed Lisa Marie Montgomery, the first woman to receive such a punishment from the federal government in sixty-seven years. Despite this surge in federal executions in 2020, state executions reached their lowest number that year since 1991.

In states that still enforce capital punishment, lethal injection is the primary method of carrying out executions. Though their use is rare, secondary execution methods permitted by individual state laws include electrocution, gas inhalation, hanging, and firing squad. As of 2023, only three people in the United States have been executed by hanging since 1965, and only four people have faced a firing squad since 1960. Tennessee used electrocution in 2020. For federal offenses, the government uses the methods of execution authorized by the state in which the court imposes the punishment. In cases handled in states that have abolished capital punishment, the federal judge can designate a death-penalty state to carry out the execution.

Several nonprofit organizations work to end the use of capital punishment. The National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, the nation's oldest anti–death penalty nonprofit organization, was founded in 1976 and focuses on ending the practice through mass organization, providing legal assistance, and educating the public. The Innocence Project, founded in 1992, focuses on providing legal services and DNA testing with the purpose of winning exoneration for wrongfully convicted prisoners. Exoneration occurs when a person's conviction is overturned. Between 1973 and 2023, at least 195 inmates on death row in the United States were exonerated.

DEVELOPMENT OF US DEATH PENALTY LAWS

The Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution outlines conditions for trying individuals accused of capital crimes and states that no person "shall be deprived of life … without due process of law." The government is granted the authority to execute a person if certain conditions—such as arrest, indictment, and trial—have been met. The Eighth Amendment, however, prohibits the government from enforcing "cruel and unusual punishment," which several lawsuits have used successfully to challenge certain applications of capital punishment.

Through the Crimes Act of 1790, also referred to as the Federal Criminal Code of 1790, lawmakers of the newly independent United States granted federal judges the authority to impose the death sentence. By the 1800s, federal law not only permitted capital punishment but required it in cases involving certain crimes. This created a problem for juries that found a defendant guilty but did not believe the offense warranted a sentence of death. With no legal ability to impose a punishment other than execution, some juries chose to hand down verdicts of not guilty, a trial outcome known as  jury nullification .

Due in part to rising jury nullifications, which effectively allowed guilty criminals to be set free, state legislatures began to pass laws in 1838 that rejected mandatory application of the death penalty in favor of jury discretion in sentencing. The abolitionist movement to end capital punishment also influenced state legislatures. By the early 1900s, most states had adopted laws that allowed juries to apply either the death penalty or a sentence of life in prison.

Executions in the United States peaked during the 1930s at an average rate of 167 per year. Courts handed down death sentences fairly frequently until the 1960s when the practice began to face growing moral, legal, and political opposition. Critics cast doubt on its value as a crime deterrent and argued that the courts applied it inconsistently and unequally. Among other factors, scholars determined that the races of both the victim and the defendant often influenced sentencing. Despite comprising less than 15 percent of the US population, African Americans comprised more than half of the nearly four thousand people executed from 1930 to 1967. Facing increasing pressure to rule on the constitutionality of capital punishment law, an unofficial nationwide moratorium on executions began in 1968.

CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES

The Supreme Court ruled in  Furman v. Georgia  (1972) that the death penalty, as it was implemented, violated the Constitution. The court overturned the death sentence of William Furman, an African American man whose murder trial had lasted less than one day. The court found Furman's death sentence to be "cruel and unusual punishment." The ruling determined that the unequal and arbitrary application of the death penalty to African American defendants violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision required states to develop consistent legal standards for capital punishment to ensure that sentences matched the severity of offenses and did not cause undue pain and suffering. From 1972 to 1976, thirty-five US states revised their death penalty laws.

On July 2, 1976, the Supreme Court handed down five decisions in cases that originated in Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, North Carolina, and Texas, collectively referred to as the July 2 cases, or by the name of the lead case,  Gregg v. Georgia . All cases involved ongoing state-level efforts to reform capital punishment laws. The court ruled that mandatory capital punishment laws were too rigid. However, the court also determined that the death penalty does not violate the Constitution, capital punishment serves as a practical deterrent, and retribution provides a justifiable basis for execution.

The court's rulings also indicated that inconsistent and racially biased death sentences could be prevented by holding two hearings: one to establish guilt and one to determine sentencing if found guilty. Most states authorized a system of allowing the jury to decide the guilty party's punishment, though some allowed judges to make the decision or retain the right to overrule the jury. These decisions allowed the reinstatement of state death penalty laws. The federal government lifted its capital punishment moratorium in 1988 but did not carry out another execution until 2001.

RESURGENCE IN THE LATE TWENTIETH CENTURY

After the unofficial moratorium on capital punishment ended with the execution of Gary Gilmore in Utah in 1977, the execution rate remained low for an extended period. During the late 1970s, the Supreme Court handed down decisions that expanded defendants' rights in capital offense trials and ruled that capital punishment could not be imposed for the rape of an adult, limiting the death penalty to offenses of murder, treason, and the rape of a child. In the 1980s, the court ruled that the death penalty could not be applied to offenders under the age of sixteen or those deemed mentally incompetent. During the 1980s, more than half of all federal appeals in capital punishment cases resulted in death sentences being overturned.

In  McCleskey v. Kemp  (1987), the Supreme Court again confronted the issue of race and capital punishment. Warren McCleskey, a Black resident of Georgia, had been convicted of killing a white police officer in 1978 and sentenced to death. McCleskey's attorneys argued that his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated because his race made it statistically more likely that he would receive the death penalty. McCleskey's attorney cited a 1983 study, commonly referred to as the Baldus study, that determined African Americans in Georgia were 4.3 times more likely to receive death sentences for killing a white person than they were for killing another African American. Upon losing his Supreme Court appeal, McCleskey was executed in 1991.

In the years since the McCleskey ruling, opponents of capital punishment have continued to voice concerns about the role of racial bias in death penalty sentencing. The court's ruling is believed to have made proving racial discrimination more difficult. According to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), incarceration rates of racial minorities skyrocketed in the decade following the McCleskey decision. As of October 2023, Black defendants accounted for 34.1 percent of all people executed in the United States since 1976 and over 40 percent of the country's death row population despite making up just 13.6 percent of the general population.

During the 1990s, the Supreme Court issued several decisions that upheld the constitutionality of capital punishment and limited defendants' opportunities to have their cases reviewed. The number of executions performed annually began a steady rise during this decade. A total of sixteen executions were carried out in the United States in 1989. In 1999 state governments carried out ninety-eight executions, the highest number since the 1976 reinstatement of the death penalty.

TWENTY-FIRST-CENTURY DEVELOPMENTS

The 2001 execution of Timothy McVeigh, convicted for his role in the 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, marked the first federal execution carried out since 1963, with drug trafficker Juan Raul Garza executed eight days later. After the execution of Louis Jones Jr. in 2003, no federal executions were scheduled until US Attorney General William Barr announced a return to the practice in 2019. One year after the announcement federal executions resumed, and ten prisoners were executed by the federal government in the last six months of 2020. An additional four federal prisoners were executed in January 2021, during the last weeks of Trump's presidency. His successor, Joe Biden, has pledged to end the federal death penalty and issued a federal moratorium on executions. As of late 2023, federal courts have not issued any death sentences during the Biden administration.

Opponents of the death penalty have also focused their arguments on the mental capacity of those found guilty of capital offenses. The Supreme Court ruled in  Atkins v. Virginia  (2002) that executing people with intellectual disabilities violated the Eighth Amendment but left the definition of intellectual disabilities up to individual states. In  Hall v. Florida  (2014), the Supreme Court found Florida's system of determining intellectual disability to be unconstitutional and handed down a similar ruling in  Moore v. Texas  (2017). In several cases in 2020 the Florida Supreme Court reversed existing protections afforded to inmates sentenced to death and overturned existing evidential and jury agreement standards for imposing the death penalty.

Between 2000 and 2020, with few exceptions, the number of state executions performed annually dropped each year, with the exceptions of 2017 and 2018. While eighty-five state executions were carried out in 2000, there were twenty-five in 2018 and twenty-two in 2019. Seven state executions took place in 2020, the lowest annual number of the twenty-first century as of late 2023. Though no federal executions had taken place under the Biden administration as of 2023, forty-one state executions took place during that period, with eighteen taking place in 2022 and at least twenty in 2023. Death penalty abolitionists have expressed frustration at the Biden administration's lack of progress on permanently ending capital punishment and the DOJ's upholding of previous federal death sentences.

CRITICAL THINKING QUESTIONS

• What factors do you think have historically had the greatest influence on capital punishment reform in the United States?
• Under what conditions, if any, do you think a court should sentence a person to death? Explain your answer.
• In your opinion, should pharmaceutical companies have the right to refuse to sell drugs for executions? Why or why not?

LETHAL INJECTION CONTROVERSIES

A nationwide shortage of sodium thiopental, the barbiturate anesthetic used in lethal injections, emerged in 2009 after the only pharmaceutical plant in the United States approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to manufacture the drug announced it was stopping production. The shortage resulted in the postponement of several scheduled executions. States could only acquire the drug by importing it from abroad, sometimes improperly. European drug manufacturers objected to capital punishment procedures, and the European Commission banned the export of drugs used in lethal injection procedures in 2011. Some states attempted to circumvent regulations, resulting in the federal Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) seizing drug supplies from prisons in Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, South Carolina, and Tennessee.

Other states sought to carry out their scheduled executions using experimental combinations of drugs. Officials in Oklahoma were found to have made significant errors in an execution in 2014 after authorizing the use of untested drugs supplied by undisclosed sources. A grand jury determined in 2016 that state officials had committed a long list of oversights and avoidable mistakes in carrying out executions. In 2017 officials in Arkansas came under criticism for expediting the schedule of eight executions by lethal injection before the state's supply of available drugs reached its expiration date. Four of the eight inmates were ultimately executed, while four received stays of execution.

Concerns over botched executions using untested lethal injection methods reached the US Supreme Court, which handed down its decision in  Bucklew v. Precythe  in April 2019. The split five-to-four ruling held that challenges to a state's method of execution due to claims of excessive pain must demonstrate that alternative methods exist that would cause less pain than the state-determined one. The majority decision reasoned that the constitutional prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment does not equate to a guarantee of a painless execution. The dissenting opinion argued that the use of lethal injection in this case met the standards for an Eighth Amendment challenge previously established by the court itself.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, lawyers for federal death-row inmates Dustin Higgs and Corey Johnson argued that their clients, both of whom tested positive for COVID-19, should not be subject to lethal injection. The attorneys suggested that the combination of COVID-19 infection with the flooding of the lungs caused by the execution drugs would cause suffering that amounted to "cruel and unusual punishment." Like earlier appeals in defense of the prisoners' lives, this argument proved ineffective. Both men were executed in Virginia in January 2021.

Two months after these executions, on March 24, 2021, Virginia governor Ralph Northam signed a bill that abolished the death penalty in the state. When signing the bill, Northam referenced the disproportionate use of the death penalty against Black men in the state and the 170 prisoners sentenced to death row who had been exonerated after capital punishment was reinstated in the United States. Virginia became the first state in the South to abolish the death penalty, leading some to believe others could follow.

In 2015, following several botched executions, the governments of Alabama, Mississippi, and Oklahoma began to approve nitrogen hypoxia, in which the inmate dies by asphyxiation, as an execution method. In August 2023 Alabama became the first state to announce that it would use the method as it sought to schedule the execution of Kenneth Smith, whose first execution the state had botched the previous year.

More Articles

The state of the death penalty.

This in-depth article examines US state legislation that has impacted death sentencing in capital crimes. The analysis suggests that adequate provision of counsel by states in death penalty cases correlates to reduced imposition of death sentences.

The Rhetoric of Abolition: Continuity and Change in the Struggle Against America’s Death Penalty, 1900-2010

This article traces the history of anti-death penalty arguments in three US states: Connecticut, Kansas, and Texas. The authors find that the rhetoric around abolition in these regions has been framed differently over time, with more recent arguments focusing on the relationship between wrongful convictions and executions.

Rare as Hens’ Teeth: The New Geography of the American Death Penalty

This article examines the imposition of death sentences by geographic locale in the United States. While death sentences have fallen across the country since the 1970s, the majority of executions that have taken place are attributable to a relatively small number of counties. The author considers reasons for the decline in capital punishment, as well as how geographical variance impacts the debate over execution as a fair and just punishment.

Looking for information on other topics?

Access Through Your Library >>

The Social Science of the Death Penalty: Before, during, and after Trial

• First Online: 24 November 2020

Cite this chapter

• Matthew P. West 5 &
• Monica K. Miller 6  

Part of the book series: Advances in Psychology and Law ((APL,volume 5))

1361 Accesses

2 Citations

The death penalty is a controversial topic that has attracted attention broadly, from diverse groups including lawmakers, religious leaders, and the general public. Social scientists have also been intrigued by the phenomenon and have studied many aspects related to the penalty. Several of these bodies of research are the focus of this chapter. First, the chapter begins with a discussion of the social science-based explanations for the changes in practice and sentiment that the death penalty has experienced. Over time, the death penalty has become less frequently used, and by fewer and fewer jurisdictions. While many people object to the penalty, others defend its use. Scholars have explained these trends. Second, social science has suggested a number of human tendencies that are adaptive in general life, but inadvertently affect sentiment toward criminals and the death penalty. For instance, people have stereotypes, heuristics, and attributions that facilitate quick decision-making, but could also lead to biased decisions. Third, social scientists have studied the trial itself. The very process of selecting a jury can affect the trial outcome, as can jurors’ consideration of both legal and extralegal factors. Both the prosecutor and defense attorney can also affect the trial outcome in many ways. Fourth, the chapter discusses the roles and research related to offenders’ experiences on death row. Psychologists assess offenders’ competency to be executed, study their well-being, and provide them with mental health services. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the possible future of death penalty law and accompanying research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

“It will be your duty…:” The Psychology of Criminal Jury Instructions

The psychological slippery slope from physician-assisted death to active euthanasia: a paragon of fallacious reasoning

The Cognitive and Social Psychological Bases of Bias in Forensic Mental Health Judgments

Ackerson, K. S., Brodsky, S. L., & Zapf, P. A. (2005). Judges’ and psychologists’ assessments of legal and clinical factors in competence for execution. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11 (1), 164–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.164

Article   Google Scholar  

Alexander, M. (2012). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness . New York: The New Press.

Google Scholar  

Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (2004). A revised religious fundamentalism scale: The short and sweet of it. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14 , 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr1401_4

Alvarez, M., & Miller, M. K. (2017). How defendants’ legal status and ethnicity and participants’ political orientation relate to death penalty sentencing decisions. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3 , 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000128

Alvarez, M., Miller, M. K., & Bornstein, B. H. (2016). “It will be your duty…:” The psychology of criminal jury instructions. In M. K. Miller & B. H. Bornstein (Eds.), Advances in psychology and law (Vol. 1, pp. 119–158). New York, NY: Springer.

American Civil Liberties Union (2013). A death before dying: Solitary confinement on death row . Retrieved from https://www.aclu.org/report/death-dying-solitary-confinement-death-row

Amidon, E. (2013). Lightning strikes twice: An examination of the political factors associated with state-level death sentences and executions in the United States, 1930–2012 (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest.

Amnesty International. (2019). Death sentences and executions 2018 . London: Amnesty International Ltd..

Anderson, B., & Coletto, D. (2016). Canadians’ moral compass set differently from that of our neighbors to the South . Abacus Data. Retrieved from https://abacusdata.ca/canadians-moral-compass-set-differently-from-that-of-our-neighbours-to-the-south/

Andreasen, R. O. (2000). Race: Biological reality or social construct? Philosophy of Science, 67 (3), 653–666.

Anno, B. J., Graham, C., Lawrence, J. E., & Shansky, R. (2004). Correctional health care: Addressing the needs of elderly, chronically ill, and terminally ill inmates (Report No. 018735). Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.

Antonio, M. (2006). Arbitrariness and the death penalty: How the defendant’s appearance during trial influences capital jurors’ punishment decision. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 24 (2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.673

Appelbaum, P. S., Scurich, N., & Raad, R. (2015). Effects of behavioral genetic evidence on perceptions of criminal responsibility and appropriate punishment. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21 (2), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000039

Baldus, D. C., Grosso, C. M., Woodworth, G., & Newell, R. (2012). Racial discrimination in the administration of the death penalty: The experience of the United States Armed Forces (1984–2005). The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 101 , 1227–1335.

Baldus, D. C., Woodworth, G., Grosso, C. M., & Christ, A. M. (2003). Arbitrariness and discrimination in the administration of the death penalty: A legal and empirical analysis of the Nebraska experience, 1973–1999. Nebraska Law Review, 81 (2), 486–684.

Baldus, D. C., Woodworth, G., & Pulaski, C. (1990). Equal justice and the death penalty: A legal and empirical analysis . Boston: Northeastern University Press.

Bandes, S. A. (2003). Fear factor: The role of media in covering and shaping the death penalty. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 1 , 585–597.

Bandes, S. A. (2009). Victims, “closure,” and the sociology of emotion. Law and Contemporary Problems, 72 , 1–29.

Bandura, A. (2016). Moral disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves? New York: Worth.

Banner, S. (2002). The death penalty: An American history . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Book   Google Scholar  

Barak, G. (2011). Media, society and criminology. In G. Barak (Ed.), Media, process, and the social construction of crime: Studies in newsmaking criminology . New York: Routledge.

Barbour, P. L. (1962). Captain George Kendall: Mutineer or intelligencer? The Virginia Magazine of History and Biography, 70 (3), 297–313.

Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54 (7), 462–479. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.462

Barnes, K., Sloss, D., & Thaman, S. (2009). Place matters (most): An empirical study of prosecutorial decision-making in death-eligible cases. Arizona Law Review, 51 , 305–379.

Barnett, M. E., Brodsky, S. L., & Manning-Davis, C. (2004). When mitigation evidence makes a difference: Effects of psychological mitigating evidence on sentencing decisions in capital trials. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 22 (6), 751–770. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.591

Bauman, C. W., & Skitka, L. J. (2010). Making attributions for behaviors: The prevalence of correspondence bias in the general population. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32 (3), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2010.495654

Baumer, E. P., Messner, S. F., & Rosenfeld, R. (2003). Explaining spatial variation in support for capital punishment: A multilevel analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 108 (4), 844–875. https://doi.org/10.1086/367921

Bazelone, E. (2020, January 15). Shadow of a doubt. New York Times Magazine . Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/01/15/magazine/split-jurors.html

Beale, S. S. (2006). The news media’s influence on criminal justice policy: How market-driven news promotes punitiveness. William and Mary Law Review, 48 , 397–481.

Beardsley, M., Kamin, S., Marceau, J. F., & Phillips, S. (2015). Disquieting discretion: Race, geography & the Colorado death penalty in the first decade of the twenty-first century. Denver University Law Review, 92 , 431–452.

Beccaria, C. (1764). An essay on crimes and punishments. The Perfect Library.

Bibas, S. (2004). Plea bargaining outside the shadow of trial. Harvard Law Review, 117 (8), 2463–2547.

Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2009). Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94 (2), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013935

Boots, D. P., & Cochran, J. K. (2011). The gender gap in support for capital punishment: A test of attribution theory. Women & Criminal Justice, 21 (3), 171–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2011.584461

Boppre, B. L., & Miller, M. K. (2014). How victim and execution impact statements affect mock jurors’ perceptions, emotions, and verdicts. Victims and Offenders, 9 , 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2013.845124

Bornstein, B. H., & Greene, E. (2017). The jury under fire: Myth, controversy, and reform . New York: Oxford University Press.

Brandt, M. J., & Reyna, C. (2010). The role of prejudice and the need for closure in religious fundamentalism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36 (5), 715–725. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210366306

Bright, D., & Goodman-Delahunty, A. (2006). Gruesome evidence and emotion: Anger, blame, and jury decision-making. Law and Human Behavior, 30 (2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9027-y

Brodsky, S. L. (1990). Professional ethics and professional morality in the assessment of competence for execution: A response to Bonnie. Law and Human Behavior, 14 (1), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055791

Brodsky, S. L., Zapf, P. A., & Boccaccini, M. T. (2001). The last competency: An examination of legal, ethical, and professional ambiguities regarding evaluations of competence for execution. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 1 , 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1300/J158v01n02_01

Brown, R. P., & Osterman, L. L. (2012). Culture of honor, violence, and homicide. In T. K. Shackleford & V. A. Weekes-Schackleford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary perspectives on violence, homicide, and war . https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738403.013.0013

Buffington-Vollum, J., Edens, K., & Keilen, J. (2008). Predicting institutional violence among death row inmates: The utility of the Sorensen and Pilgrim Model. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 23 , 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-008-9016-9

Burr, R. (2003). Litigating with victim impact testimony: The serendipity that has come from Payne v. Tennessee . Cornell Law Review, 88 , 517–529.

Bushway, S. D., Redlich, A. D., & Norris, R. J. (2014). An explicit test of please bargaining in the “shadow of the trial”. Criminology, 52 (4), 723–754. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12054

Butler, B. M. (2012). Capital pretrial publicity as a symbolic public execution: A case report. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 12 (3), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2011.588522

Butler, B. M., & Moran, G. (2002). The role of death qualification in venirepersons’ evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials. Law and Human Behavior, 26 (2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014640025871

Butler, B. M., & Moran, G. (2007). The impact of death qualification, belief in a just world, legal authoritarianism, and locus of control on venirepersons’ evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 25 (1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.734

Campbell, A., & Cross, C. (2012). Women and aggression. In T. K. Shackleford & V. A. Weekes-Schackleford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary perspectives on violence, homicide, and war . https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738403.013.0012 .

Chavez, H. L., & Miller, M. K. (2009). Religious references in death sentence phases of trials: Two psychological theories that suggest judicial rulings and assumptions may affect jurors. Lewis & Clark Law Review, 13 , 1037–1083.

Connors, M. H., & Halligan, P. W. (2015). A cognitive account of belief: A tentative road map. Frontiers in Psychology, 5 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01588

Costanzo, M., & Peterson, J. (1994). Attorney persuasion in the capital penalty phase? A content analysis of closing arguments. Journal of Social Issues, 50 , 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02413.x

Crandall, C., & Warner, R. (2005). How prejudice is recognized. Psychological Inquiry, 16 (2/3), 137–141.

Crandall, C. S., & Eshleman, A. (2003). A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129 (3), 414–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.414

Crandall, C. S., Eshleman, A., & O’Brien, L. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82 (3), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.359

Crandall, C. S., Ferguson, M. A., & Bahns, A. J. (2013). When we see prejudice: The normative window and social change. In C. Stangor & C. S. Crandall (Eds.), Stereotyping and prejudice (pp. 53–70). New York: Psychology Press.

Cunningham, M. D., & Sorensen, J. R. (2010). Improbable predictions at capital sentencing: Contrasting prison violence outcomes. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 38 (1), 61–72.

Cunningham, M. D., & Vigen, M. P. (2002). Death row inmate characteristics, adjustment, and confinement: A critical review of the literature. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20 (1–2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.473

Daftary-Kapur, T., Penrod, S. D., O’Connor, M., & Wallace, B. (2014). Examining pretrial publicity in a shadow jury paradigm: Issues of slant, quantity, persistence and generalizability. Law and Human Behavior, 38 (5), 462–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000081

Damore, D. F., & Lang, R. E. (2016). Beyond density & diversity: Understanding the socio-cultural geography of contemporary presidential elections . Las Vegas, NV: Brookings Mountain West.

Davis, E., & Snell, T. L. (2018). Capital punishment, 2016 (report no. NCJ 251430) . Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Death Penalty Information Center. (2019). Facts about the death penalty . Retrieved from https://files.deathpenaltyinfo.org/legacy/documents/FactSheet.pdf

Death Penalty Information Center. (2020a). Executions by state and region since 1976 . Retrieved from https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/executions/executions-overview/number-of-executions-by-state-and-region-since-1976

Death Penalty Information Center (2020b). Death sentences in the United States since 1977. Retrieved from https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/facts-and-research/sentencing-data/death-sentences-in-the-united-states-from-1977-by-state-and-by-year

Death Penalty Information Center (2020c). Racial demographics . Retrieved from https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/death-row/overview/demographics

Death Penalty Information Center (2020d). Aggravating factors by state . Retrieved from https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/facts-and-research/crimes-punishable-by-death/aggravating-factors-by-state

Death Penalty Information Center (2020e). Women’s death sentences since 1973: Number and geography . Retrieved from https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/death-row/women/womens-death-sentences-since-1973-number-and-geography

Death Penalty Information Center (2020f). Time on death row . Retrieved from https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/death-row/death-row-time-on-death-row

Death Penalty Information Center (2020g). Life without parole . Retrieved from https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/policy-issues/sentencing-alternatives/life-without-parole

Death Penalty Information Center (2020h). LWOP post-repeal . Retrieved from https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/stories/lwop-post-repeal

Deise, J. E., & Paternoster, R. (2013). More than a ’quick glimpse in the life’: The relationship between victim impact evidence and death sentencing. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 40 , 2012–2050.

Denno, D. W. (2011). Courts’ increasing consideration of behavioral genetics evidence in criminal cases: Results of a longitudinal study. Michigan State Law Review, 2011 , 967–1047.

Denno, D. W. (2013). What real-world criminal cases tell us about genetics evidence. Hastings Law Journal, 64 , 1591–1759.

Devine, D. J. (2012). Jury decision-making: The state of the science . New York: New York University Press.

Devine, D. J., & Caughlin, D. E. (2014). Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20 (2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000006

Dhont, K., Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2013). The intergenerational transmission of need for closure underlies the transmission of authoritarianism and anti-immigrant prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences, 54 (6), 779–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.12.016

Diamond, S. S., Rose, R. R., & Murphy, B. (2006). Revisiting the unanimity requirement: The behavior of the non-unanimous civil jury. Northwestern University Law Review, 100 , 201–230.

Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2000). Aversive racism and selection decisions: 1989 and 1999. Psychological Science, 11 (4), 315–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00262

Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2004). Aversive racism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36 , 1–52.

Durkheim, E. (1966). The rules of sociological method . New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1895).

Edens, J. F., Colwell, L. H., Desforges, D. M., & Fernandez, K. E. (2005). The impact of mental health evidence on support for capital punishment: Are defendants labeled psychopathic considered more deserving of death? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23 (5), 603–625. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.660

Ehrhard, S. (2009). Pleading guilty for life: An exploration of plea bargaining in the face of death (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest

Elias, N. (2000). The civilizing process: Sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations . Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. (Original work published 1939).

Epstein, S. (2003). Cognitive-experiential self-theory of personality. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 159–184). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.

Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive–experiential and analytical–rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71 (2), 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.390

Espinoza, R. K. E., & Willis-Esqueda, C. (2015). The influence of mitigation evidence, ethnicity, and SES on death penalty decisions by European American and Latino venire persons. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 21 (2). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037646

Espinoza, R. K. E., Willis-Esqueda, C., Toscano, S., & Coons, J. (2015). The impact of ethnicity, immigration status, and socioeconomic status on juror decision making. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 13 (3), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377938.2014.984044

Espy, M. W., & Smykla, J. O. (2016). Executions in the United States, 1608–2002: The ESPY file . Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR08451.v5

Fazel, S., Hayes, A. J., Bartellas, K., Clerici, M., & Trestman, R. (2016). Mental health of prisoners: Prevalence, adverse outcomes, and interventions. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3 , 871–881.

Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2012). Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35 (2), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11000021

Fleury-Steiner, B., & Argothy, V. (2004). Lethal borders: Elucidating jurors’ racialized discipline to punish in Latino defendant death cases. Punishment and Society, 6 (1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474504039092

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison . New York: Vintage Books.

Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, S. F. (2005). Understanding and addressing contemporary racism: From aversive racism to the common in-group identity model. Journal of Social Issues, 61 (3), 615–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00424.x

Gallup (2020). Death penalty. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/poll/1606/death-penalty.aspx

Garcia-Dubus, E. (2016). The effect of attitudes towards the death penalty on forensic clinical judgments of competency for execution (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest.

Gaydon, L. B., & Miller, M. K. (2007). Older people in the justice system: How the system treats older people in trials, during imprisonment, and on death row. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 25 , 677–699.

Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117 (1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.21

Gillespie, L. K., Smith, M. D., Bjerregaard, B., & Fogel, S. J. (2014). Examining the impact of proximate culpability mitigation in capital punishment sentencing recommendations: The influence of mental health mitigators. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39 (4), 698–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-014-9255-5

Goldberg, A. J., & Dershowitz, A. M. (1970). Declaring the death penalty unconstitutional. Harvard Law Review, 83 , 1773–1819.

Gordon, N., & Greene, E. (2018). Nature, nurture, and capital punishment: How evidence of a genetic–environment interaction, future dangerousness, and deliberation affect sentencing decisions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 36 (1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2306

Gould, J. B., & Greenman, L. (2010). Report to the Committee on Defender Services Judicial Conference of the United States update on the cost and quality of defense representation in federal death penalty cases . Retrieved from http://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/fdpc2010.pdf

Gould, J. B., & Leon, K. S. (2017). A culture that is hard to defend: Extralegal factors in federal death penalty cases. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 107 (4), 643–686.

Gross, S. R. (1996). The risks of death: Why erroneous convictions are common in capital cases. Buffalo Law Review, 44 , 469–500.

Gross, S. R., O’Brien, B., Hu, C., & Kennedy, E. H. (2014). Rate of false conviction of criminal defendants who are sentenced to death. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111 (20), 7230–7235. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1306417111

Hagan, J., Levi, R., & Dinovitzer, R. (2008). The symbolic violence of the crime-immigration nexus: Migrant mythologies in the Americas. Criminology & Public Policy, 7 (1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2008.00493.x

Haidt, J., Graham, J., & Joseph, C. (2009). Above and below left-right: Ideological narratives and moral foundations. Psychological Inquiry, 20 (2–3), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028573

Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133 (4), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526042365555

Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2007). The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind (Vol. 3, pp. 367–392). New York: Oxford University Press.

Haney, C. (1984). On the selection of capital juries: The biasing effects of the death-qualification process. Law and Human Behavior, 8 (1–2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044355

Haney, C. (1997). Violence and the capital jury: Mechanisms of moral disengagement and the impulse to condemn to death. Stanford Law Review, 49 , 1447–1607.

Haney, C. (2003). Mental health issues in long-term solitary and “supermax” confinement. Crime & Delinquency, 49 (1), 124–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128702239239

Haney, C. (2005). Death by design: Capital punishment as a social psychological system . New York: Oxford University Press.

Haney, C. (2008). Evolving standards of decency: Advancing the nature and logic of capital mitigation. Hofstra Law Review, 36 , 835–882.

Haney, C., Hurtado, A., & Vega, L. (1994). ‘Modern’ death qualification: New data on its biasing effects. Law and Human Behavior, 18 (6), 619–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499328

Haney, C., & Lynch, M. (1997). Clarifying life and death matters: An analysis of instructional comprehension and penalty phase closing arguments. Law and Human Behavior, 21 (6), 575–595. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024804629759

Harnish, R. J., Bridges, R. K., & Gump, J. T. (2018). Predicting economic, social, and foreign policy conservatism: The role of right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, moral foundations orientation, and religious fundamentalism. Current Psychology, 37 (3), 668–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9552-x

Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations . New York: Wiley.

Heuer, L., Penrod, S., & Kattan, A. (2007). The role of societal benefits and fairness concerns among decision makers and decision recipients. Law and Human Behavior, 31 (6), 573–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9084-2

Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1998). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes . New York: Routledge.

Holmes, O. W., Jr. (1897). The path of the law. Harvard Law Review, 110 (5), 991–1009.

Horton, Y., Price, R., & Brown, E. (1999). Portrayal of minorities in the film, media and entertainment industries . Edge: Ethics of Development in a Global Environment. Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/class/e297c/poverty_prejudice/mediarace/portrayal.htm

Hrynkiw, I. (2020, February 24). Vernon Madison, one of the longest serving Alabama death row inmates, dies . AL.com . Retrieved from https://www.al.com/news/mobile/2020/02/vernon-madison-one-of-the-longest-serving-alabama-death-row-inmate-dies.html

Human Rights Watch (2003). U.S. prisons and offenders with mental illness . Retrieved from https://www.hrw.org/reports/2003/usa1003/usa1003.pdf

Janicki, H., (1999). The effects of a defendant’s sex and gender stereotypes on capital punishment decisions (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest.

Jennings, W. G., Richards, T. N., Smith, M. D., Bjerregaard, B., & Fogel, S. J. (2014). A critical examination of the “White victim effect” and death penalty decision-making from a propensity score matching approach: The North Carolina experience. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42 , 384–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.05.004

Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219–266). New York: Academic Press.

Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61 , 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651

Kaba, F., Lewis, A., Glowa-Kollisch, S., Hadler, J., Lee, D., Alper, H., … Venters, H. (2014). Solitary confinement and risk of self-harm among jail inmates. American Journal of Public Health, 104 (3), 442–447.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow . New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Kandler, C., Bleidorn, W., & Riemann, R. (2012). Left or right? Sources of political orientation: The roles of genetic factors, cultural transmission, assortative mating, and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102 (3), 633–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025560

Keil, T. J., & Vito, G. F. (2006). Capriciousness or fairness? Race and prosecutorial decisions to seek the death penalty in Kentucky. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 4 , 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1300/J222v04n03_02

Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 192–238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Kemmelmeier, M. (2010). Authoritarianism and its relationship with intuitive-experiential cognitive style and heuristic processing. Personality and Individual Differences, 48 (1), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.08.012

Kirshenbaum, J. M., Yelderman, L. A., & Miller, M. K. (2020, March). The religious conversion and race of a defendant: Mock jurors’ decisions and perceptions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, New Orleans, LA.

Kolesar, N. A. (2011). Development of an instrument for content analysis of penalty-phase closing defense arguments (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest.

Koniaris, L. G., Zimmers, T. A., Lubarsky, D. A., & Sheldon, J. P. (2005). Inadequate anaesthesia in lethal injection for execution. The Lancet, 365 (9468), 1412–1414.

Kramer, J., Ulmer, J., & Zajac, G. (2017). Capital punishment decisions in Pennsylvania, 2000–2010: Implications for racial, ethnic, and other disparate impacts . Pennsylvania Interbranch Commission for Gender, Racial and Ethnic Fairness. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3148037

Krauss, D. A., & Lee, D. (2003). Deliberating on dangerousness and death: Jurors’ ability to differentiate between expert actuarial and clinical predictions of dangerousness. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 26 , 113–137.

Krauss, D. A., Lieberman, J. D., & Olson, J. (2004). The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 22 , 801–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.621

Krauss, D. A., & Sales, B. (2001). The effects of clinical and scientific expert testimony on juror decision making in capital sentencing. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7 , 267–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.2.267

Kupers, T. A. (2018). Waiting alone to die. In H. Toch, J. R. Acker, & V. M. Bonventre (Eds.), Living on death row: The psychology of waiting to die (pp. 60–79). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Kuziemko, I. (2006). Does the threat of the death penalty affect plea bargaining in murder cases? Evidence from New York’s 1995 reinstatement of capital punishment. American Law and Economics Review, 8 , 116–142. https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahj005

Lieberman, J. D. (2002). Head over the heart or heart over the head? Cognitive-experiential self- theory and extralegal heuristics in juror decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32 (12), 2526–2553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02755.x

Livingston, T. N., Rerick, P. O., & Miller, M. K. (2019). Psychology explains how gender relates to perceptions and outcomes at trial. In B. H. Bornstein & M. K. Miller (Eds.), Advances in psychology and law (Vol. 4, pp. 136–173). New York: Springer.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Logan, D. D. (1983a). Why this man deserves to die: Themes identified in prosecution arguments in recent capital cases . Unpublished manuscript.

Logan, D. D. (1983b). Pleading for life: An analysis of themes in 21 penalty arguments by defense counsel in recent capital cases . Unpublished manuscript.

Logan, W. A. (1999). When balance and fairness collide: An argument for execution impact evidence in capital trials. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 33 (1–2), 1–56.

Lynch, M. (2009). The social psychology of capital cases. In J. D. Lieberman & D. A. Krauss (Eds.), Jury psychology: Social aspects of trial processes (pp. 157–181). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

Lynch, M., & Haney, C. (2000). Discrimination and instructional comprehension: Guided discretion, racial bias, and the death penalty. Law and Human Behavior, 24 (3), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005588221761

Lynch, M., & Haney, C. (2009). Capital jury deliberation: Effects on death sentencing, comprehension, and discrimination. Law and Human Behavior, 33 (6), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9168-2

Lynch, M., & Haney, C. (2011). Mapping the racial bias of the white male capital juror: Jury composition and the “empathic divide”. Law and Society Review, 45 (1), 69–102. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23011959

Lynch, M., & Haney, C. (2015). Emotion, authority, and death: (Raced) negotiations in mock capital jury deliberations. Law & Social Inquiry, 40 (2), 377–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12099

Masotto, M. (2014). “Death is different”: Limiting health care for death row inmates. Health Matrix: The Journal of Law-Medicine, 24 , 317–344.

Miller, M. K. (2006). Religion in criminal justice . New York: LFB.

Miller, M. K., Blumenthal, J. A., & Chamberlain, J. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of community sentiment . New York, NY: Springer.

Miller, M. K., & Bornstein, B. H. (2005). Religious appeals in closing arguments: Impermissible input or benign banter? Law and Psychology Review, 29 , 29–61.

Miller, M. K., & Bornstein, B. H. (2006). The use of religion in death penalty sentencing trials. Law and Human Behavior, 30 (6), 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9056-6

Miller, M. K., & Chamberlain, J. (2015). “There ought to be a law!”: Understanding community sentiment. In M. K. Miller, J. A. Blumenthal, & J. Chamberlain (Eds.), Handbook of community sentiment (pp. 3–28). New York, NY: Springer.

Miller, M. K., Clark, J., & Alvarez, M. J. (2020). Exploring the boundaries of societally acceptable bias expression toward Muslim and atheist defendants in four mock-juror experiments. The Social Science Journal . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2019.09.004

Miller, M. K., & Hayward, R. D. (2008). Religious characteristics and the death penalty. Law and Human Behavior, 32 , 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9090-z

Miller, M. K., Rauch, J., & Kaplan, T. (2016). Gender differences in movie superheroes’ roles, appearances, and violence. Ada: Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, 10 . https://doi.org/10.7264/N3HX19ZK

Miller, M. K., Wood, S., & Chomos, J. C. (2014). Relationships between support for the death penalty and cognitive processing: A comparison of students and community members. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41 (6), 731–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813509369

Minero, L. P., & Espinoza, R. K. E. (2016). The influence of defendant immigration status, country of origin, and ethnicity on juror decisions: An aversive racism explanation for juror bias. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 38 (1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986315620374

Mitchell, T. L., Haw, R. M., Pfeifer, J. E., & Meissner, C. A. (2005). Racial bias in mock juror decision-making: A meta-analytic review of defendant treatment. Law and Human Behavior, 29 (6), 621–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-8122-9

Myers, B., Johnson, S., & Nuñez, N. (2018). Victim impact statements in capital sentencing: 25 years post- Payne. In M. K, Miller & B. H. Bornstein (Eds.), Advances in Psychology and Law (Vol. 3, pp. 41–76). New York: Springer.

Neal, T. M. S. (2010). Choosing the lesser of two evils: A framework for considering the ethics of competency-for-execution evaluations. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 10 (2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228930903446724

Neal, T. M. S. (2016). Are forensic experts already biased before adversarial legal parties hire them? PLoS One, 11 (4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154434

Neuschatz, J. S., Lawson, D. S., Swanner, J. K., Meissner, C. A., & Neuschatz, J. S. (2008). The effects of accomplice witnesses and jailhouse informants on jury decision-making. Law and Human Behavior, 32 , 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9100-1

Nuñez, N, Egan-Wright, D., Kehn, A., & Myers, B. (2011, March). Impact of different methods of victims impact statement delivery at capital trials: Emotionality of statements and its impact on sentencing decisions. Talk presented at the 4th International Congress of Psychology and Law, Miami, FL.

Nuñez, N., Myers, B., Wilkowski, B. M., & Schweitzer, K. (2017). The impact of angry versus sad victim impact statements on mock jurors’ sentencing decisions in a capital trial. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44 , 862–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816689809

O’Neil, K. M., Patry, M. W., & Penrod, S. D. (2004). Exploring the effects of attitudes toward the death penalty on capital sentencing verdicts. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 10 (4), 443–470. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.10.4.443

Ogletree, Jr., C., & Sarat, A. (Eds.) (2012). Life without parole: America’s new death penalty? (Charles Hamilton Houston Institute series on race and justice). New York: New York University Press.

Pacini, R., & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76 (6), 972–987. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.972

Paternoster, R., Brame, R., & Bacon, S. (2008). The death penalty: America’s experience with capital punishment . New York: Oxford University Press.

Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Bacon, S., & Ditchfield, A. (2004). Justice by geography and race: The administration of the death penalty in Maryland, 1978–1999. Margins: Maryland’s Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class, 4 , 1–97.

Paternoster, R., & Deise, J. (2011). A heavy thumb on the scale: The effect of victim impact evidence on capital decision making. Criminology, 49 , 129–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00220.x

Patterson, R., & Hughes, K. (2008). Review of completed suicides in the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, 1999 to 2004. Psychiatric Services, 59 (6), 676–682. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.2008.59.6.676

Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62 (2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189

Petersen, N. (2017). Examining the sources of racial bias in potentially capital cases: A case study of police and prosecutorial discretion. Race and Justice, 7 , 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368716645842

Pew Research Center (2014). Religious landscape study . Retrieved from https://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/

Pierce, G. L., Radelet, M. L., Posick, C., & Lyman, T. (2014). Race and the construction of evidence in homicide cases. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 771–786. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-014-9259-1

Pinker, S. (2012). The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined . New York: Penguin Books.

Pirelli, G., & Zapf, P. A. (2008). An investigation of psychologists’ practices and attitudes toward participation in capital evaluations. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 8 (1), 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228930801947294

Platania, J., & Moran, G. (1999). Due process and the death penalty: The role of prosecutorial misconduct in closing argument in capital trials. Law and Human Behavior, 23 (4), 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022364132399

Platania, J., & Small, R. (2010). Instructions as a safeguard against prosecutorial misconduct. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 6 , 1–14.

Plumm, K. M., & Leighton, K. N. (2019). Sexual orientation and gender bias motivated violent crimes. In B. H. Bornstein & M. K. Miller (Eds.), Advances in psychology and law (Vol. 4, pp. 175–196). New York: Springer.

Punyanunt-Carter, N. (2008). The perceived realism of African American portrayals on television. Howard Journal of Communications, 19 (3), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646170802218263

Radelet, M. L., Bedau, H. A., & Putnam, C. E. (1992). In spite of innocence: Erroneous convictions in capital cases . Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.

Razmyar, S., & Reeve, C. (2013). Individual differences in religiosity as a function of cognitive ability and cognitive style. Intelligence, 41 (5), 667–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.09.003

Richards, T. N., Bjerregaard, B. E., Cochran, J., Smith, M. D., & Fogel, S. J. (2016). Predictors of death sentencing for minority, equal, and majority female juries in capital murder trials. Women & Criminal Justice, 26 (4), 260–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2015.1115802

Richards, T. N., Smith, M. D., Jennings, W. G., Bjerregaard, B. E., & Fogel, S. J. (2014). An examination of defendant sex disparity in capital sentencing: A propensity score matching approach. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39 , 681–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-014-9253-7

Saks, M., Schweitzer, N., Aharoni, E., & Kiehl, K. (2014). The impact of neuroimages in the sentencing phase of capital trials. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 11 , 105–131.

Sarat, A., Blumstein, L., Jones, A., Richard, H., & Sprung-Keyser, M. (2014). Gruesome spectacles: Botched executions and America’s death penalty . Stanford, CA: Stanford Law Books.

Sargent, M. J. (2004). Less thought, more punishment: Need for cognition predicts support for punitive responses to crime. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30 (11), 1485–1493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264481

Scheb, J. M., Lyons, W., & Waggers, K. A. (2008). Race, prosecutors, and juries: The death penalty in Tennessee. The Justice System Journal, 29 (3), 338–347. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/27977410

Schwitzgebel, E. (2019). Belief. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2019 ed.). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/belief/

Scurich, N., & John, R. (2017). Jurors’ presumption of innocence. The Journal of Legal Studies, 46 (1), 187–206.

Shannon, B. D., & Scarano, V. R. (2013). Incompetency to be executed: Continuing ethical challenges & time for a change in Texas. Texas Tech Law Review, 45 , 419–1073.

Shatz, S. F., & Shatz, N. R. (2011). Chivalry is not dead: Murder, gender, and the death penalty. Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice, 27 , 64–112.

Smith, D. L. (2011). Less than human: Why we demean, enslave, and exterminate others . New York: Saint Martin’s Press.

Sommers, S. R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2000). Race in the courtroom: Perceptions of guilt and dispositional attributions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26 (11), 1367–1379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200263005

Sommers, S. R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2001). White juror bias: An investigation of racial prejudice against Black defendants in the American courtroom. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7 (1), 201–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.201

Sommers, S. R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2009). “Race salience” in juror decision-making: Misconceptions, clarifications, and unanswered questions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27 (4), 599–609. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.877

Songer, M. J., & Unah, I. (2006). The effect of race, gender, and location on prosecutorial decisions to seek the death penalty in South Carolina. South Carolina Law Review, 58 (1), 161–210.

Summers, A., Hayward, R. D., & Miller, M. K. (2010). Death qualification as systematic exclusion of jurors with certain religious characteristics and other characteristics. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40 , 3218–3234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00698.x

Suonpää, K., & Savolainen, J. (2019). When a woman kills her man: Gender and victim precipitation in homicide. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34 (11), 2398–2413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519834987

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 33–48). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

Tallon, J., Daftary-Kapur, T., & Penrod, S. (2015). Defendant remorse and publicity in capital trials: Is seeing truly believing? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42 (12), 1282–1302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815602500

Tan, A., Fujioka, Y., & Lucht, N. (1997). Native American stereotypes, TV portrayals, and personal contact. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 74 (2), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909707400203

Terrizzi, J. A., Jr., Shook, N. J., & McDaniel, M. A. (2013). The behavioral immune system and social conservatism: A meta-analysis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34 (2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.10.003

Thomsen, J. (2019, April 15). Supreme Court won’t hear death penalty appeal alleging anti-gay remarks from jurors. The Hill. Retrieved from https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/438893-supreme-court-passes-on-death-penalty-case-of-gay-man-alleging

Thornhill, R., & Fincher, C. L. (2014). The parasite-stress theory of values and sociality: Infectious disease, history and human values worldwide . Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08040-6

Toch, H., Acker, J. R., & Bonventre, V. M. (Eds.). (2018). Living on death row: The psychology of waiting to die . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (5), 830–838. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.830

Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement . Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7 (4), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07

Unah, I. (2009). Choosing those who will die: The effect of race, gender, and law in prosecutorial decision to seek the death penalty in Durham County, North Carolina. Michigan Journal of Race and Law, 15 , 135–179. Retrieved from https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl/vol15/iss1/4/

United States Census Bureau (2019). American community survey 5-year estimates . Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs

Van Leeuwen, F., Park, J. H., Koenig, B. L., & Graham, J. (2012). Regional variation in pathogen prevalence predicts endorsement of group-focused moral concerns. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33 (5), 429–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.12.005

Vaughan, T. J., & Holleran, L. B. (2020). Examining jurors’ ability to meet constitutional requirement of narrowing in capital sentencing. Behavioral Sciences & The Law . https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2464

Vaughan, T. J., Holleran, L. B., & Silver, J. R. (2019). Applying moral foundations theory to the explanation of capital jurors’ sentencing decisions. Justice Quarterly . https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1537400

Vito, G. F., Higgins, G. E., & Vito, A. G. (2014). Capital sentencing in Kentucky, 2000–2010. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39 (4), 753–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-014-9258-2

Waters, N. L., & Hans, V. P. (2009). A jury of one: Opinion formation, conformity, and dissent on juries. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 6 (3), 513–540.

Welch, K. (2007). Black criminal stereotypes and racial profiling. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23 , 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986207306870

West, M. P. (2018, November). Are post-Gregg death sentences “wantonly” and “freakishly” imposed? A case study in Nevada. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Atlanta, GA.

West, M. P., Boppre, B., Miller, M. K., & Barchard, K. (2019). The effects of impact statements on jurors’ decisions and perceptions of the victim and defendant. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 15 (2), 185–200.

West, M. P., & Miller, M. K. (in press). Psychology and the evolution of the death penalty. In R. Roesch (Ed.), Psychology and law: A volume of the Routledge encyclopedia of psychology in the real world . New York: Routledge.

West, M. P., Wood, E. F., Casas, J. B., & Miller, M. K. (2017). The legal and methodological implications of death qualification operationalization. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 13 (1), 18–32.

West, M. P., Wood, E. F., Miller, M. K., & Bornstein, B. H. (2020). How mock jurors’ cognitive processing and defendants’ immigrant status and ethnicity relate to decisions in capital trials. Journal of Experimental Criminology . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-020-09411-4

West, M. P., Yelderman, L. A., & Miller, M. K. (2018). Gender differences in the evaluation of aggravating and mitigating circumstances: The mediating role of attributional complexity. Psychology Crime and Law . https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2018.1438432

White, L. T. (1987). Juror decision making in the capital penalty trial: An analysis of crimes and defense strategies. Law and Human Behavior, 11 (2), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01040445

Williams, P., & Arkin, D. (2019, July 25). AG Barr orders reinstatement of the federal death penalty. NBC News. Retrieved from https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/ag-barr-orders-reinstatement-federal-death-penalty-n1034451

Wilper, A. P., Woolhandler, S., Boyd, W., Lasser, K. E., McCormick, D., Bor, D. H., & Himmelstein, D. U. (2009). The health and health care of US prisoners: Results of a nationwide survey. The American Journal of Public Health, 99 (4), 666–672.

Winick, B. J. (1992). Competency to be executed: A therapeutic jurisprudence perspective. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 10 (3), 317–337. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370100304

Woodford, J. (2018). Rethinking classification, programming, and housing for death row inmates. In H. Toch, J. R. Acker, & V. M. Bonventre (Eds.), Living on death row: The psychology of waiting to die (pp. 38–59). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Xiong, J., Liu, S., & Liang, B. (2018). Criminal defense and judicial sentencing in China’s death penalty cases. Psychology, Crime & Law, 24 (4), 414–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1390114

Yelderman, L. A. (2019). Cognitive rigidity explains the relationship between religious fundamentalism and insanity defence attitudes. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 21 (7), 686–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2018.1551340

Yelderman, L. A., Miller, M. K., & Peoples, C. D. (2016). Understanding the effects of death qualification on jury trials. In M. K. Miller & B. H. Bornstein (Eds.), Advances in psychology and law (Vol. 2, pp. 27–54). New York: Springer.

Yelderman, L. A., West, M. P., & Miller, M. K. (2018). Death penalty decision-making: Fundamentalist beliefs and the evaluation of aggravating and mitigating circumstances. Legal and Criminological Psychology . https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12141

Zapf, P. A. (2009). Elucidating the contours of competency for execution: The implications of Ford and Panetti for assessment. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 37 (2–3), 269–307.

Zapf, P. A., Boccaccini, M. T., & Brodsky, S. L. (2003). Assessment of competency for execution: Professional guidelines and an evaluation checklist. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21 , 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.491

Zelinsky, W. (1973). The cultural geography of the United States . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Legal References

Atkins v. Virginia , 536 U.S. 304, 122 S. Ct. 2242, 153 L. Ed. 2d 335 (2002).

Barefoot v. Estelle , 463 U.S. 880, 103 S. Ct. 3383, 77 L. Ed. 2d 1090 (1983).

Batson v. Kentucky , 476 U.S. 79, 106 S. Ct. 1712, 90 L. Ed. 2d 69 (1986).

Bucklew v. Precythe , 139 S. Ct. 1112, 203 L. Ed. 2d 521, 587 U.S. (2019).

Dusky v. United States , 362 U.S. 402, 80 S. Ct. 788, 4 L. Ed. 2d 824 (1960).

Ford v. Wainwright , 477 U.S. 399, 106 S. Ct. 2595, 91 L. Ed. 2d 335 (1986).

Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S. Ct. 2726, 33 L. Ed. 2d 346 (1972).

Gregg v. Georgia , 428 U.S. 153, 96 S. Ct. 2909, 49 L. Ed. 2d 859 (1976).

Hurst v. Florida , 136 S. Ct. 616, 193 L. Ed. 2d 504, 577 U.S. (2016).

J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. TB , 511 U.S. 127, 114 S. Ct. 1419, 128 L. Ed. 2d 89 (1994).

Kennedy v. Louisiana , 554 U.S. 407, 128 S. Ct. 2641, 171 L. Ed. 2d 525 (2008).

Lackey v. Texas , 514 U.S. 1045, 115 S. Ct. 1421, 131 L. Ed. 2d 304 (1995).

Lockett v. Ohio , 438 U.S. 586, 98 S. Ct. 2954, 57 L. Ed. 2d 973 (1978).

Madison v. Alabama , 139 S. Ct. 718, 586 U.S., 203 L. Ed. 2d 103 (2019).

McCleskey v. Kemp , 481 U.S. 279, 107 S. Ct. 1756, 95 L. Ed. 2d 262 (1987).

Miller v. Alabama , 132 S. Ct. 2455, 567 U.S. 460, 183 L. Ed. 2d 407 (2012).

Morgan v. Illinois , 504 U.S. 719, 112 S. Ct. 2222, 119 L. Ed. 2d 492 (1992).

Panetti v. Quarterman , 551 U.S. 930, 127 S. Ct. 2842, 168 L. Ed. 2d 662 (2007).

Rhines v. Young , 140 S. Ct. 8 (U.S. 2019).

Ring v. Arizona , 536 U.S. 584, 122 S. Ct. 2428, 153 L. Ed. 2d 556 (2002).

Roper v. Simmons , 543 U.S. 551, 125 S. Ct. 1183, 161 L. Ed. 2d 1 (2005).

State v. Poole , No. SC18-245 (Fla. Jan. 23, 2020).

Trop v. Dulles , 356 U.S. 86, 78 S. Ct. 590, 2 L. Ed. 2d 630 (1958).

United States v. Tsarnaev , No. 13-CR-10200-GAO (U.S. Dist. Mas. 2015)

Wainwright v. Witt , 469 U.S. 412, 105 S. Ct. 844, 83 L. Ed. 2d 841 (1985).

Witherspoon v. Illinois , 391 U.S. 510, 88 S. Ct. 1770, 20 L. Ed. 2d 776 (1968).

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Criminal Justice, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA

Matthew P. West

Criminal Justice Department and Interdisciplinary Social Psychology PhD Program, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA

Monica K. Miller

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew P. West .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Criminal Justice Department and Interdisciplinary Social Psychology PhD Program, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA

Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA

Brian H. Bornstein

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

West, M.P., Miller, M.K. (2020). The Social Science of the Death Penalty: Before, during, and after Trial. In: Miller, M.K., Bornstein, B.H. (eds) Advances in Psychology and Law. Advances in Psychology and Law, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54678-6_7

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54678-6_7

Published : 24 November 2020

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-030-54677-9

Online ISBN : 978-3-030-54678-6

eBook Packages : Behavioral Science and Psychology Behavioral Science and Psychology (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

• A-Z Publications

Annual Review of Criminology

Volume 3, 2020, review article, the rise, fall, and afterlife of the death penalty in the united states.

• Carol S. Steiker 1 , and Jordan M. Steiker 2
• View Affiliations Hide Affiliations Affiliations: 1 Harvard Law School, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA; email: [email protected] 2 University of Texas School of Law, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78705, USA; email: [email protected]
• Vol. 3:299-315 (Volume publication date January 2020) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024721
• Copyright © 2020 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved

This review addresses four key issues in the modern (post-1976) era of capital punishment in the United States. First, why has the United States retained the death penalty when all its peer countries (all other developed Western democracies) have abolished it? Second, how should we understand the role of race in shaping the distinctive path of capital punishment in the United States, given our country's history of race-based slavery and slavery's intractable legacy of discrimination? Third, what is the significance of the sudden and profound withering of the practice of capital punishment in the past two decades? And, finally, what would abolition of the death penalty in the United States (should it ever occur) mean for the larger criminal justice system?

Article metrics loading...

Full text loading...

Literature Cited

• Acker JR , Bohm RM , Lanier CS 2014 . America's Experiment with Capital Punishment: Reflections on the Past, Present, and Future of the Ultimate Penal Sanction Durham, NC: Carolina Acad, 3rd ed.. [Google Scholar]
• Alexander M. 2010 . The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness New York: New Press [Google Scholar]
• Atkins v. Virginia Atkins v. Virginia 2002 .)
• Banner S. 2002 . The Death Penalty: An American History Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
• Barkow RE. 2019 . Prisoners of Politics: Breaking the Cycle of Mass Incarceration Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press [Google Scholar]
• Baumgartner FR , Davidson M , Johnson KR , Krishnamurthy A , Wilson CP 2018 . Deadly Justice: A Statistical Portrait of the Death Penalty New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
• Baumgartner FR , De Boef SL , Boydstun AE 2008 . The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
• Baze v. Rees Baze v. Rees 2008 .)
• Bessler JD. 2017 . The Death Penalty as Torture: From the Dark Ages to Abolition Durham, NC: Carolina Acad [Google Scholar]
• Breyer SG , Bessler JD. 2016 . Against the Death Penalty Washington, DC: Brookings Inst. Press [Google Scholar]
• Buck v. Davis Buck v. Davis 2017 .)
• Bucklew v. Precythe Bucklew v. Precythe 2019 .)
• Callins v. Collins Callins v. Collins 1994 .)
• Caplan L. 2016 . The growing gap between the U.S. and the international anti-death-penalty consensus. The New Yorker Dec. 31. https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-growing-gap-between-the-u-s-and-the-international-anti-death-penalty-consensus [Google Scholar]
• Christie N. 2014 . Death as punishment. Capital Punishment: A Hazard to a Sustainable Criminal Justice System L Scherdin 61– 75 Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publ [Google Scholar]
• Death Penal. Inf. Cent 2019 . Facts about the death penalty Rep., Death Penal. Inf. Cent Washington, DC: https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/documents/FactSheet.pdf [Google Scholar]
• Furman v. Georgia Furman v. Georgia 1972 .)
• Galliher JF , Ray G , Cook B 1992 . Abolition and reinstatement of capital punishment during the progressive era and early 20th century. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 83 : 538– 76 [Google Scholar]
• Gallup 2019 . Death penalty. Gallup https://news.gallup.com/poll/1606/death-penalty.aspx [Google Scholar]
• Garland D. 2010 . Peculiar Institution: America's Death Penalty in an Age of Abolition Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press [Google Scholar]
• Garland D. 2018 . The concept of American exceptionalism and the case of capital punishment. American Exceptionalism in Crime and Punishment KR Reitz 103– 20 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
• Garrett BL. 2017 . End of Its Rope: How Killing the Death Penalty Can Revive Criminal Justice Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
• Gibson J , Lain CB. 2015 . Death penalty drugs and the international moral market. Georget. Law J. 103 : 1215– 74 [Google Scholar]
• Girling E. 2005 . European identity and the mission against the death penalty in the United States. The Cultural Lives of Capital Punishment A Sarat, C Boulanger 112– 28 Stanford, CA: Stanf. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
• Glossip v. Gross Glossip v. Gross 2015 .)
• Gohara MS. 2013 . Grace notes: a case for making mitigation the heart of noncapital sentencing. Am. J. Crim. Law 41 : 41– 89 [Google Scholar]
• Gottschalk M. 2006 . The Prison and the Gallows: The Politics of Mass Incarceration in America New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
• Gregg v. Georgia Gregg v. Georgia 1976 .)
• Hammel A. 2010 . Ending the Death Penalty: The European Experience in Global Perspective London: Palgrave Macmillan [Google Scholar]
• Hood R , Hoyle C. 2015 . The Death Penalty: A Worldwide Perspective New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 5th ed.. [Google Scholar]
• Johnson SL. 2009 . Coker v. Georgia : of rape, race, and burying the past. Death Penalty Stories JH Blume, JM Steiker 171– 201 New York: Thompson Reuters [Google Scholar]
• Kirchmeier JL. 2015 . Imprisoned by the Past: Warren McCleskey and the American Death Penalty New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
• Kovarsky L. 2016 . Muscle memory and the local concentration of capital punishment. Duke Law J 66 : 259– 330 [Google Scholar]
• Lacey N. 2008 . The Prisoners’ Dilemma: Political Economy and Punishment in Contemporary Democracies New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
• Lynch M. 2006 . Stereotypes, prejudice, and life-and-death decision making: lessons from laypersons in an experimental setting. From Lynch Mobs to the Killing State: Race and the Death Penalty in America CJ Ogletree Jr., A Sarat 182– 207 New York: NYU Press [Google Scholar]
• Mandery EJ. 2014 . A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection of Capital Punishment in America New York: WW Norton [Google Scholar]
• Mauer M , Nellis A. 2018 . The Meaning of Life: The Case for Abolishing Life Sentences New York: New Press [Google Scholar]
• Maxwell v. Bishop 398 F.2d 138 (8th Cir. 1968 .)
• McCleskey v. Kemp McCleskey v. Kemp 1987 .)
• McMillen NR. 1990 . Black Mississippians in the Age of Jim Crow Urbana, IL: Univ. Illinois Press [Google Scholar]
• Meltsner M. 2011 . Cruel and Unusual: The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment New Orleans, LA: Quid Pro Books [Google Scholar]
• Monahan EC , Clark JJ 2017 . Tell the Client's Story: Mitigation in Criminal and Death Penalty Cases Chicago: ABA Publ [Google Scholar]
• Novak A. 2019 . After abolition: the empirical, jurisprudential and strategic legacy of transnational death penalty litigation. Comparative Capital Punishment Law CS Steiker, JM Steiker 370– 86 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publ [Google Scholar]
• Ogletree CJ Jr. , Sarat A 2006 . From Lynch Mobs to the Killing State: Race and the Death Penalty in America New York: NYU Press [Google Scholar]
• Oshinsky DM. 2010 . Capital Punishment on Trial : Furman v. Georgia and the Death Penalty in Modern America Lawrence, KS: Univ. Kansas Free Press [Google Scholar]
• Perkinson R. 2010 . Texas Tough: The Rise of America's Prison Empire New York: Metrop. Books [Google Scholar]
• Reitz KR. 2018 . Introduction: American exceptionalism in crime and punishment: broadly defined. American Exceptionalism in Crime and Punishment KR Reitz 1– 49 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
• Ridgeway J , Casella J. 2014 . What death penalty opponents don't get: There are fates worse than death. The Marshall Project Nov. 30. https://www.themarshallproject.org/2014/11/30/what-death-penalty-opponents-don-t-get [Google Scholar]
• Roper v. Simmons Roper v. Simmons 2005 .)
• Sarat A. 2006 . The rhetoric of race in the “new abolitionism.”. From Lynch Mobs to the Killing State: Race and the Death Penalty in America , ed. CJ Ogletree Jr., A Sarat, pp. 260– 84 New York: NYU Press [Google Scholar]
• Scherdin L. 2014 . The death penalty: a hazard to a sustainable development of criminal justice?. Capital Punishment: A Hazard to a Sustainable Criminal Justice System ? L Scherdin 19– 59 Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publ [Google Scholar]
• Simon J. 2007 . Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
• Steiker CS. 2005 . Capital punishment and American exceptionalism. American Exceptionalism and Human Rights M Ignatieff 57– 89 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
• Steiker CS , Steiker JM. 2016 . Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press [Google Scholar]
• Steiker CS , Steiker JM. 2012 . Entrenchment and/or destabilization—reflections on (another) two decades of constitutional regulation of capital punishment. Law Inequal 30 : 211– 44 [Google Scholar]
• Steiker CS , Steiker JM. 2010 . No more tinkering: the American Law Institute and the death penalty provisions of the model penal code. Texas Law Rev 89 : 353– 421 [Google Scholar]
• Steiker JM. 2012 . Peculiar times for a peculiar institution. Tulsa Law Rev 48 : 357– 72 [Google Scholar]
• Stuntz WJ. 2011 . The Collapse of American Criminal Justice Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press [Google Scholar]
• Tonry M. 2009 . Explanations of American punishment policies. Punishm. Soc. 11 : 377– 94 [Google Scholar]
• United Nations (UN) 2018 . General assembly endorses landmark global compact on refugees, adopting 53 third committee resolutions, 6 decisions covering range of human rights UN Meet. Cover., Dec. 17. https://www.un.org/press/en/2018/ga12107.doc.htm [Google Scholar]
• Vandiver M. 2006 . Lethal Punishment: Lynchings and Legal Executions in the South New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
• Vandiver M. 2018 . Capital punishment and lynching. Routledge Handbook on Capital Punishment RM Bohm, G Lee 30– 51 New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
• Whitman JQ. 2003 . Harsh Justice: Criminal Punishment and the Widening Divide between America and Europe New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
• Wilson S , Berman M. 2019 . California Gov. Gavin Newsom to impose moratorium on death penalty. The Washington Post Mar. 12. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/california-gov-gavin-newsom-to-impose-moratorium-on-death-penalty/2019/03/12/3a3ad1dc-4520-11e9-8aab-95b8d80a1e4f_story.html?utm_term=.ac948cfc918c [Google Scholar]
• Article Type: Review Article

Most Read This Month