Stuckey and Nobel (2010) noted, "it has been shown that music can calm neural activity in the brain, which may lead to reductions in anxiety, and that it may help to restore effective functioning in the immune system." |
|
Note: This example is a direct quote. It is an exact quotation directly from the text of the article. All direct quotes should appear in quotation marks: "...."
Try keeping direct quotes to a minimum in your writing. You need to show your understanding of the source material by being able to paraphrase or summarize it.
List the author’s last name only (no initials) and the year the information was published, like this:
(Dodge, 2008 ). ( Author , Date).
IF you use a direct quote, add the page number to your citation, like this:
( Dodge , 2008 , p. 125 ).
( Author , Date , page number )
Credit these sources when you mention their information in any way: direct quotation, paraphrase, or summarize.
What should you credit?
Any information that you learned from another source, including:
● statistics
EXCEPTION: Information that is common knowledge: e.g., The Bronx is a borough of New York City.
Quick help with apa 7 citations.
Download the In-text Citations presentation (above) for an in-depth look at how to correctly cite your sources in the text of your paper.
Paraphrasing activity from the excelsior owl, in-text citation quiz.
Your chance of acceptance, your chancing factors, extracurriculars, citing sources in college essays: when and how.
In our school papers, we need to cite sources to avoid plagiarism, but I'm not sure how that works in college essays. If I refer to a work of literature or a historical event, should I include citations? If so, how do you properly cite sources within the context of a personal essay?
Hello there! Great question! Yes, in academic writing, citing sources is an absolute must to avoid plagiarism and to give proper credit to original ideas. However, the personal essay portion of college applications is quite different. It’s all about your personal experiences, views, and aspirations. Typically, you don't need to cite sources as you would in a research paper.
If you mention a work of literature or a historical event, it's usually because it has personal significance to your life or aspirations. In those cases, you can simply reference the work or event naturally as part of your narrative. For example, if discussing the impact of 'To Kill a Mockingbird' on your worldview, just mentioning the book and its influence on you is sufficient, without needing a formal citation as you would in an academic paper.
However, if your essay takes on a more academic tone and you include specific quotes or data, then it’s advisable to briefly credit the source, maybe in parentheses. Just remember that the admissions essay is more about your story and reflections than scholastic formality. Good luck with your essay!
CollegeVine’s Q&A seeks to offer informed perspectives on commonly asked admissions questions. Every answer is refined and validated by our team of admissions experts to ensure it resonates with trusted knowledge in the field.
Google notebooklm: 5 reasons students will love it.
Google NotebookLM: 5 Reasons Educators Will Love It
Google's latest offering might just be a game-changer for students.
I recently sat down with Steven Johnson , co-creator of NotebookLM and editorial director of Google Labs . Johnson, a prolific author on innovation with multiple New York Times bestselling books to his name, has turned his attention to transforming how we interact with information in the digital age. Google Labs, an incubator created to test and publicly demonstrate new projects, has become the perfect playground for Johnson's innovative ideas.
NotebookLM, their latest brainchild, is set to transform how students interact with information. You're probably wondering what makes this tool different from the myriad of AI assistants flooding the market.
A lot of people rightfully have an issue trusting the responses of AI.
NotebookLM's source grounding feature is a breath of fresh air. "One of the core fundamental principles of NotebookLM is what we call source grounding," Johnson explained to me. This feature allows students to define and upload relevant sources, ensuring that the AI's responses are firmly rooted in trusted material.
This means you can confidently use AI without worrying about being led astray by fabricated information. "You'll be able to ask questions and learn and explore and get explanations based on the particular reading for the class,'" Johnson elaborated.
Martin mull dead: the ‘fernwood 2 night’ and ‘roseanne’ star was 80, biggest surprises from round 1 of the 2024 nhl draft, 2. advanced citation system: fostering academic integrity.
NotebookLM's citation system is a scholar's dream come true.
Johnson proudly stated, "We now have this very advanced citation system." The tool provides inline citations for each statement, allowing users to hover over or click on citations to see the original source material. This feature not only promotes academic integrity but also teaches students the importance of proper citation. It's like having a built-in research assistant that always remembers to cite its sources!
With support for 38 languages, NotebookLM is truly a global tool.
Johnson shared an exciting use case about people in Japan: "They upload documents in English and just have a chat with the model about them entirely in Japanese." This feature opens up a world of possibilities for language learning and international collaboration. Students can now easily work with multilingual resources. Students who are not studying in their first language can interact with sources in their native language.
At its core, NotebookLM is designed to help users understand complex material.
As Johnson put it, "Notebook LM is a tool that's optimized for helping you understand material." It does this with various modalities, including chat interfaces, note-taking features and source material exploration. Johnson emphasized, "We have tools that help us edit our photos, and we have tools that help us do spreadsheets. This is a tool for understanding, and we haven't had a lot of software in that mode to date, in part because we didn't have AI at this level of sophistication."
One of NotebookLM's most exciting features is its ability to generate study aids automatically.
Johnson enthuses, "You just upload a bunch of things, you hit study guide, and voila—you'll get this exhaustive summary with the quizzes and all this kind of amazing stuff." This feature includes short answer questions with an answer key, suggested long-form essay questions and a glossary of key terms. Imagine being able to create comprehensive study guides in mere seconds. This feature could dramatically reduce prep time for students, allowing more focus on learning rather than organizing materials.
It can help users make connections between ideas and spark innovation. Johnson explains, "One of the options you'll see is 'suggest related ideas.' So it will take the passage you've just written and then go through all the attached selected sources, and it will say, 'Oh, you just wrote this thing about ant colonies, and that actually relates to this other thing about collective intelligence, and also this other thing that was written about evolutionary psychology.'"
This feature could be invaluable for students working on research projects or trying to generate new ideas for projects or assignments.
While NotebookLM is currently available for users 18 and older, Google is exploring ways to make it accessible for younger students. "We definitely think it has fantastic high school use for sure," Johnson notes. "We would definitely be interested in trying to figure out how to let younger people into it."
As AI continues to reshape education, tools like NotebookLM are paving the way for more efficient, effective and engaging learning experiences. By addressing common concerns about AI in education, such as accuracy, citation and language barriers, while also providing time-saving features for educators, NotebookLM could indeed be the AI assistant that wins over even the most tech-skeptic students.
Johnson sums up the potential impact: "It's a wonderful tool for students. Just upload your syllabus and then you can brainstorm ideas for assignments. It's just a great kind of generator of first drafts. Then you can go in and fix it or revise it, but you get ideas based on your sources so quickly. It's very powerful that way."
As we navigate the future of education, one thing is clear: the potential for innovation and improved learning outcomes is enormous. The question is, how will you harness it?
One Community. Many Voices. Create a free account to share your thoughts.
Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas and facts in a safe space.
In order to do so, please follow the posting rules in our site's Terms of Service. We've summarized some of those key rules below. Simply put, keep it civil.
Your post will be rejected if we notice that it seems to contain:
User accounts will be blocked if we notice or believe that users are engaged in:
So, how can you be a power user?
Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Please read the full list of posting rules found in our site's Terms of Service.
A hearing is scheduled for July 3, five days before the teacher is set to begin a new job.
By HOLLY RAMER, Associated Press
CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — A private school teacher who says she was fired after driving an 18-year-old student to get an abortion is suing New Hampshire’s Department of Education and officials she says falsely suggested she circumvented state law.
New Hampshire law requires parents to receive written notice at least 48 hours before an abortion is performed on an unemancipated minor. But in this case, the student wasn’t living with her parents and was a legal adult, according to the lawsuit filed Monday.
The teacher, who filed the suit as “Jane Doe,” said she provided the student with contact information for a community health center last fall when the student disclosed her suspected pregnancy and later gave her a ride to the appointment in October. The school fired her within days and referred the matter to the Department of Education, which revoked her teaching license earlier this month.
The lawsuit says the department exceeded its authority and violated her due process rights by revoking her credentials without a fair and impartial process. And it accuses Education Commissioner Frank Edelblut of pushing a false narrative of her conduct via an opinion piece he published in April.
The essay, titled “Thank God Someone is Looking Out for the Children,” was published in response to New Hampshire Public Radio reports critical of the commissioner. In it, Edelblut asked rhetorically whether the department should “turn a blind eye” when “allegedly, an educator lies by calling in sick so they can take a student – without parental knowledge – to get an abortion.”
According to the lawsuit, department officials knew for months prior to the essay’s publication that the student in question was an adult and thus not subject to the parental notification law.
Kimberly Houghton, spokesperson for the department, declined to comment on its investigation of the teacher and referred questions about the lawsuit to the attorney general’s office. Michael Garrity, spokesperson for that agency, said Wednesday that officials are reviewing it and will respond in due course. Attorneys for the teacher did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The teacher’s firing was first reported last week by The Boston Globe, based on investigatory records it requested from the Education Department. The lawsuit said the department’s “biased and stilted disclosure” of information that should have remained confidential until the case was settled created a misleading narrative that damaged the teacher’s reputation and put her at risk.
Get breaking updates as they happen.
Be civil. Be kind.
In related news.
Boston.com newsletter signup boston.com logo.
Stay up to date with everything Boston. Receive the latest news and breaking updates, straight from our newsroom to your inbox.
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
Published on April 15, 2022 by Shona McCombes and Jack Caulfield. Revised on May 31, 2023.
Quoting means copying a passage of someone else’s words and crediting the source. To quote a source, you must ensure:
The exact format of a quote depends on its length and on which citation style you are using. Quoting and citing correctly is essential to avoid plagiarism which is easy to detect with a good plagiarism checker .
How to cite a quote in apa, mla and chicago, introducing quotes, quotes within quotes, shortening or altering a quote, block quotes, when should i use quotes, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about quoting sources.
Every time you quote, you must cite the source correctly . This looks slightly different depending on the citation style you’re using. Three of the most common styles are APA , MLA , and Chicago .
To cite a direct quote in APA , you must include the author’s last name, the year, and a page number, all separated by commas . If the quote appears on a single page, use “p.”; if it spans a page range, use “pp.”
An APA in-text citation can be parenthetical or narrative. In a parenthetical citation , you place all the information in parentheses after the quote. In a narrative citation , you name the author in your sentence (followed by the year), and place the page number after the quote.
Punctuation marks such as periods and commas are placed after the citation, not within the quotation marks .
Citing a quote in mla style.
An MLA in-text citation includes only the author’s last name and a page number. As in APA, it can be parenthetical or narrative, and a period (or other punctuation mark) appears after the citation.
Citing a quote in chicago style.
Chicago style uses Chicago footnotes to cite sources. A note, indicated by a superscript number placed directly after the quote, specifies the author, title, and page number—or sometimes fuller information .
Unlike with parenthetical citations, in this style, the period or other punctuation mark should appear within the quotation marks, followed by the footnote number.
, 510. |
Complete guide to Chicago style
The AI-powered Citation Checker helps you avoid common mistakes such as:
Make sure you integrate quotes properly into your text by introducing them in your own words, showing the reader why you’re including the quote and providing any context necessary to understand it. Don’t present quotations as stand-alone sentences.
There are three main strategies you can use to introduce quotes in a grammatically correct way:
The following examples use APA Style citations, but these strategies can be used in all styles.
Introduce the quote with a full sentence ending in a colon . Don’t use a colon if the text before the quote isn’t a full sentence.
If you name the author in your sentence, you may use present-tense verbs , such as “states,” “argues,” “explains,” “writes,” or “reports,” to describe the content of the quote.
You can also use a signal phrase that mentions the author or source, but doesn’t form a full sentence. In this case, you follow the phrase with a comma instead of a colon.
To quote a phrase that doesn’t form a full sentence, you can also integrate it as part of your sentence, without any extra punctuation .
When you quote text that itself contains another quote, this is called a nested quotation or a quote within a quote. It may occur, for example, when quoting dialogue from a novel.
To distinguish this quote from the surrounding quote, you enclose it in single (instead of double) quotation marks (even if this involves changing the punctuation from the original text). Make sure to close both sets of quotation marks at the appropriate moments.
Note that if you only quote the nested quotation itself, and not the surrounding text, you can just use double quotation marks.
Note: When the quoted text in the source comes from another source, it’s best to just find that original source in order to quote it directly. If you can’t find the original source, you can instead cite it indirectly .
Often, incorporating a quote smoothly into your text requires you to make some changes to the original text. It’s fine to do this, as long as you clearly mark the changes you’ve made to the quote.
If some parts of a passage are redundant or irrelevant, you can shorten the quote by removing words, phrases, or sentences and replacing them with an ellipsis (…). Put a space before and after the ellipsis.
Be careful that removing the words doesn’t change the meaning. The ellipsis indicates that some text has been removed, but the shortened quote should still accurately represent the author’s point.
You can add or replace words in a quote when necessary. This might be because the original text doesn’t fit grammatically with your sentence (e.g., it’s in a different verb tense), or because extra information is needed to clarify the quote’s meaning.
Use brackets to distinguish words that you have added from words that were present in the original text.
The Latin term “ sic ” is used to indicate a (factual or grammatical) mistake in a quotation. It shows the reader that the mistake is from the quoted material, not a typo of your own.
In some cases, it can be useful to italicize part of a quotation to add emphasis, showing the reader that this is the key part to pay attention to. Use the phrase “emphasis added” to show that the italics were not part of the original text.
You usually don’t need to use brackets to indicate minor changes to punctuation or capitalization made to ensure the quote fits the style of your text.
If you quote more than a few lines from a source, you must format it as a block quote . Instead of using quotation marks, you set the quote on a new line and indent it so that it forms a separate block of text.
Block quotes are cited just like regular quotes, except that if the quote ends with a period, the citation appears after the period.
To the end of his days Bilbo could never remember how he found himself outside, without a hat, a walking-stick or any money, or anything that he usually took when he went out; leaving his second breakfast half-finished and quite unwashed-up, pushing his keys into Gandalf’s hands, and running as fast as his furry feet could carry him down the lane, past the great Mill, across The Water, and then on for a mile or more. (16)
Avoid relying too heavily on quotes in academic writing . To integrate a source , it’s often best to paraphrase , which means putting the passage in your own words. This helps you integrate information smoothly and keeps your own voice dominant.
However, there are some situations in which quoting is more appropriate.
If you want to comment on how the author uses language (for example, in literary analysis ), it’s necessary to quote so that the reader can see the exact passage you are referring to.
To convince the reader of your argument, interpretation or position on a topic, it’s often helpful to include quotes that support your point. Quotes from primary sources (for example, interview transcripts or historical documents) are especially credible as evidence.
When you’re referring to secondary sources such as scholarly books and journal articles, try to put others’ ideas in your own words when possible.
But if a passage does a great job at expressing, explaining, or defining something, and it would be very difficult to paraphrase without changing the meaning or losing the weakening the idea’s impact, it’s worth quoting directly.
If you want to know more about ChatGPT, AI tools , citation , and plagiarism , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.
Plagiarism
A quote is an exact copy of someone else’s words, usually enclosed in quotation marks and credited to the original author or speaker.
In academic writing , there are three main situations where quoting is the best choice:
Don’t overuse quotes; your own voice should be dominant. If you just want to provide information from a source, it’s usually better to paraphrase or summarize .
Every time you quote a source , you must include a correctly formatted in-text citation . This looks slightly different depending on the citation style .
For example, a direct quote in APA is cited like this: “This is a quote” (Streefkerk, 2020, p. 5).
Every in-text citation should also correspond to a full reference at the end of your paper.
A block quote is a long quote formatted as a separate “block” of text. Instead of using quotation marks , you place the quote on a new line, and indent the entire quote to mark it apart from your own words.
The rules for when to apply block quote formatting depend on the citation style:
If you’re quoting from a text that paraphrases or summarizes other sources and cites them in parentheses , APA and Chicago both recommend retaining the citations as part of the quote. However, MLA recommends omitting citations within a quote:
Footnote or endnote numbers that appear within quoted text should be omitted in all styles.
If you want to cite an indirect source (one you’ve only seen quoted in another source), either locate the original source or use the phrase “as cited in” in your citation.
In scientific subjects, the information itself is more important than how it was expressed, so quoting should generally be kept to a minimum. In the arts and humanities, however, well-chosen quotes are often essential to a good paper.
In social sciences, it varies. If your research is mainly quantitative , you won’t include many quotes, but if it’s more qualitative , you may need to quote from the data you collected .
As a general guideline, quotes should take up no more than 5–10% of your paper. If in doubt, check with your instructor or supervisor how much quoting is appropriate in your field.
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
McCombes, S. & Caulfield, J. (2023, May 31). How to Quote | Citing Quotes in APA, MLA & Chicago. Scribbr. Retrieved June 24, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/working-with-sources/how-to-quote/
Other students also liked, how to block quote | length, format and examples, how to paraphrase | step-by-step guide & examples, how to avoid plagiarism | tips on citing sources, get unlimited documents corrected.
✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts
This essay is about the comparison between Homo erectus and Homo sapiens, highlighting their differences and evolutionary significance. Homo erectus, living from 1.9 million to 110,000 years ago, was one of the first hominins to exhibit human-like traits, such as larger brains and bipedalism. They developed basic tools and spread across Africa, Asia, and Europe. Homo sapiens, emerging around 300,000 years ago, possess even larger brains, advanced cognitive functions, and sophisticated technology and culture. They created complex tools, art, and agriculture, demonstrating higher social complexity and adaptability. The essay underscores how these differences highlight the evolutionary journey leading to modern humans.
How it works
Homo erectus and Homo sapiens are like two key players in the grand story of human evolution, each adding their own special twist to how we became who we are today. Seeing how they’re alike and different gives us a peek into how humans evolved over time.
Homo erectus, which means “upright man,” roamed the Earth from about 1.9 million to 110,000 years ago. These folks were among the first to show off some really human-like traits. Their brains were bigger than their ancestors’, ranging from 600 to 1,100 cubic centimeters.
That bump in brain size hints they were pretty sharp thinkers compared to earlier hominins. Plus, Homo erectus had a body built for walking upright, with longer legs and shorter arms, making it easier to get around on two feet. They also rocked the Stone Age by making and using tools, showing they were on the ball when it came to new technology.
Fast forward to Homo sapiens, or “wise man,” popping up about 300,000 years ago. These folks took brain power to the next level with even bigger noggins, averaging about 1,400 cubic centimeters. More brain space meant they could do fancy stuff like speak complex languages, think about abstract ideas, and solve tricky problems. Looks-wise, they stood out with high foreheads, rounder skulls, and smaller faces and teeth—a setup that suited living in different places and eating different things. On top of all that, Homo sapiens blew everyone away with their culture and tech skills, from crafting detailed tools and art to getting into farming and building complex societies.
One big difference between Homo erectus and Homo sapiens is their tech and culture game. Homo erectus gets props for starting the Acheulean tool scene, rocking hefty tools like hand axes. Meanwhile, Homo sapiens went all out with a huge range of tools, making slick blades, needles, and pottery that showed off serious artistic skills. Their art, like cave paintings and sculptures, showed they were into deep thinking and getting their ideas across in creative ways—not just practical ones like Homo erectus.
Their hangouts were different too. Homo erectus got around, leaving their bones all over Africa, Asia, and Europe, proving they could adapt to lots of places. They were even the first hominins to leave Africa, a big move in human history. Homo sapiens started in Africa too, but they spread out everywhere, showing how flexible and tough they were in lots of different environments.
Their social lives tell another tale. Homo sapiens were big on living together and looking out for each other, doing things like burying the dead and sharing spaces. It was all about teamwork and sticking together. While there’s some hint that Homo erectus might’ve taken care of sick or hurt buddies, Homo sapiens took social skills to a whole new level.
Food was another area where they split ways. Homo erectus chowed down on meat, with signs they hunted and even cooked their meals over fire. That change in diet probably helped their brains grow bigger. Homo sapiens, with all their clever tools and tricks, could hunt, fish, and gather a way wider menu, including plants, fish, and big game. When they figured out farming around 10,000 years ago, it changed everything—making settlements and whole civilizations possible.
In the big picture of evolution, Homo erectus was like a crucial first step in becoming human, with bigger brains, walking upright, and using tools. Without them, Homo sapiens might never have happened. Homo sapiens, though, are like the grand finale of millions of years of change. They’re the top dogs with their super brains, rich culture, and all the cool stuff they invented.
To wrap it up, Homo erectus and Homo sapiens started from the same place but went in different directions with brain power, tools, culture, and how they handled life’s challenges. Their differences show us how humans got to be who we are today—super adaptable and smart, with a knack for making things happen.
Remember, this is just a taste of the story. If you’re curious to learn more, reaching out to folks at EduBirdie could be a great move. They’re pros at helping you dig deeper and make sure your work hits all the marks for school.
Comparing Homo Erectus and Homo Sapiens: Key Differences and Significance. (2024, Jun 28). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/comparing-homo-erectus-and-homo-sapiens-key-differences-and-significance/
"Comparing Homo Erectus and Homo Sapiens: Key Differences and Significance." PapersOwl.com , 28 Jun 2024, https://papersowl.com/examples/comparing-homo-erectus-and-homo-sapiens-key-differences-and-significance/
PapersOwl.com. (2024). Comparing Homo Erectus and Homo Sapiens: Key Differences and Significance . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/comparing-homo-erectus-and-homo-sapiens-key-differences-and-significance/ [Accessed: 29 Jun. 2024]
"Comparing Homo Erectus and Homo Sapiens: Key Differences and Significance." PapersOwl.com, Jun 28, 2024. Accessed June 29, 2024. https://papersowl.com/examples/comparing-homo-erectus-and-homo-sapiens-key-differences-and-significance/
"Comparing Homo Erectus and Homo Sapiens: Key Differences and Significance," PapersOwl.com , 28-Jun-2024. [Online]. Available: https://papersowl.com/examples/comparing-homo-erectus-and-homo-sapiens-key-differences-and-significance/. [Accessed: 29-Jun-2024]
PapersOwl.com. (2024). Comparing Homo Erectus and Homo Sapiens: Key Differences and Significance . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/comparing-homo-erectus-and-homo-sapiens-key-differences-and-significance/ [Accessed: 29-Jun-2024]
Hire a writer to get a unique paper crafted to your needs.
Our writers will help you fix any mistakes and get an A+!
Please check your inbox.
You can order an original essay written according to your instructions.
Trusted by over 1 million students worldwide
1. Tell Us Your Requirements
2. Pick your perfect writer
3. Get Your Paper and Pay
Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!
Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.
short deadlines
100% Plagiarism-Free
Certified writers
A year and a half into the generative “AI” moment, the ability to trust students may be the biggest casualty, Jacob Riyeff writes.
By Jacob Riyeff
You have / 5 articles left. Sign up for a free account or log in.
GOCMEN/iStock/Getty Images Plus
One day this May during the end-of-term ritual that is the grading of papers, I came upon a description of a character that lacked any basis whatsoever in the novel we had been reading. Two years ago, I would have paused and thought this was too bad—that a student hadn’t really read the novel carefully or simply relied on a faulty memory of the scene involved instead of going back to confirm their take’s veracity. Not a big deal.
But now, a year and a half after ChatGPT’s release to the general public brought large language model (LLM)–based chat bots into everyday use, it’s different. (In an attempt to resist the common attribution of agency and/or anthropomorphic qualities to these programs, I’ll refer to them as “machine learning applications” and “LLM-based chat bots” rather than “artificial intelligence” or “AI.”) Instead of seeing this inaccuracy as something I could flag for the student to return to or to talk with me about, I had the sinking feeling that maybe what I’d been reading for a page and a half already was synthetic text extruded from a chat bot rather than the textual representation of the ideas of a young woman whom I knew and had shared a university seminar room with twice a week.
Instructors can have their reasons for asking students to engage with chat bots for their academic work, but for this assignment the use of chat bots did not align with my learning outcomes. We had also talked at length in class about the problematic nature of LLM-based chat bots’ function in relation to the kind of work we were doing in the class (and in general), and I had gone through a class exercise showing the kinds of erroneous responses ChatGPT will give to very basic questions about a literary work.
I had also altered a number of my assessments so that the temptation to use chat bots would be significantly lessened. Yet I couldn’t help suspecting that this particular erroneous sentence was likely a chat bot’s text, not attributed as such but claimed as the student’s own ideas and words. After reading the rest of the essay and not encountering other red flags, I decided to reconsider my suspicion. In the immortal words of Kurt Vonnegut, and as so often in the life of a university professor at this moment: so it goes.
As not only an instructor in the humanities but also my university’s academic integrity director, my year and a half since the unveiling of the slew of “generative AI” programs to the general public has been saturated with discourse about these applications and their intersections with education and writing. I’ve been reading much more about algorithmic technologies than I ever thought likely and hearing and talking about them in faculty colloquiums, administrative meetings and student-led initiatives, as well as in regular conversations with faculty members after they realize students have been trying to pass off LLM-based chat bot text as their own. Not to mention in the hallways and at the proverbial water coolers.
In all these forums, I heard and read different tropes about these machine learning applications. There was the adage about how “everyone freaked out when calculators came out, too.” There was the performance in which the first speaker at a meeting read an overly reflective and abstract opening statement about “AI” and then—beat—announced that what they had just read was generated by ChatGPT.
The one that has rankled me the most, though, and that I have seen the most, is the false dichotomy suggesting that instructors are either embracing the new frontiers these LLM-based chat bot technologies will open up or they are afraid of them. As if there weren’t any (or many) other options.
As you might be able to tell already, I’m not a fan of these technologies (a fair approximation of my overall view of the whole issue can be found in Ulises A. Mejias’s and Nick Couldry’s summary of their recent book here , while my own shot at a take can be found here ). And this is where I’m supposed to acknowledge (another trope) that “these machine learning applications can have all kinds of benefits, even though there can be real harms.” But in the realm of cultural analysis, critique and interpretation, I have yet to have anyone show me any way that the chat bots are genuinely helpful. And that’s not even touching on all the ecological, bias and copyright issues. I’ve seen how they can be helpful in some computing contexts, and they may end up being good for business analytics, etc., but I have no reason to defer to OpenAI, Microsoft or Alphabet on the future of humanities education.
Regardless, what I want to underline is that the false dichotomy of “embrace” and “fear” that I continue to hear echoed again and again is just that: false. And this false dichotomy occludes and prevents more nuanced responses and acknowledgment of possible responses to our machine learning–saturated moment. I do not embrace the miraculous technofuture, nor am I afraid of this technology. But what sinks my heart are the ways in which the chat bots have unfortunately impacted my ability to trust my students.
Let me state here very clearly that if a student uses a chat bot and cites that use, this is not at all what I’m discussing here. Some instructors ask their students to use LLM-based chat bots or allow them to as long as they cite them. That’s fine. I’m not in favor of that approach, but I understand that other instructors have other learning outcomes and goals for their students, and I am not wanting to dispute those outcomes, goals or practices here. Even if my own students—whom I ask not to use chat bots—were to use them and cite that use, while I wouldn’t accept that as a well-done assignment, it wouldn’t affect my trust.
I assume students don’t think about their unattributed use of chat bots as affecting a personal relationship. But those of us who actually still believe in the edifying power of higher education can’t see the relationship between instructors and students as one of instrumental exchange—products (assignments filled out) for payments (grades). Or as one of mechanical input and output. In the classroom, in office hours, and in conferences, there is (can be) a genuine mutual sharing between persons if we strive for it, if we foster dialogue and sharing of perspectives in our common scrutinizing of reality and pursuit of truth. And the making and assessing of assignments is (can be) an extension of that relationship’s mutual sharing. But to engage in that scrutiny and that pursuit in common, the relationship between instructor and student requires integrity—that is, both parties need to be honest in their communications with one another.
In what we’ve traditionally understood as cheating, plagiarism and fraud, the foundational problem isn’t that one isn’t putting the work in, but that one isn’t representing themselves honestly to others. Being social beings, we have to be able to rely on one another. In an academic setting, part of that relying on one another is the ability to trust that what a student tells me in their academic work accurately reflects how it was made. If a student pays someone else to write an essay and submits that essay with their own name on top, the submission is a lie—it is duplicitous and does not accurately reflect how the essay was made due to the conventions of what putting one’s name at the top of a piece of paper or a file means. One’s name at the top is a claim that “I have made this thing.” When words or ideas in that thing are not ours, we cite where we found those words and ideas. This convention of citation assures our readers or viewers how it is that we can have words or ideas that are not our own in our work and yet the work still reflects the reality of how it was made. The matching of representation with reality makes for integrity and builds trust.
The essay I read in May might have been representing the reality of how it was made. And maybe it wasn’t. But the hype and the constant discussion surrounding LLM-based chat bots and, frankly, the fact that I have seen so many cases of students trying to pass synthetic text off as their own without appropriate attribution have for the moment conditioned me to mistrust my students somewhat. And I hate that.
I went to college because I found an Old English poem in a library book once in my early 20s (I had to go to college to find out how this Old English stuff worked). And I went to graduate school because I had found the riches of a liberal education far more valuable and exciting than other paths I could see as possibilities for my life. I became a (non-tenure-track) professor because I wanted to share all the things I’d learned with folks coming up in the world and to learn from them as well. I’ve stayed because I love the common scrutinizing of reality that I get to do with my students and my colleagues every day. We’re striving for knowledge together and, dare I say, wisdom. And we need to be able to trust one another to continue that dialogue. I’m looking forward to when this moment has died down and we can focus on other more important matters again. Like celebrating the arts. Like questioning systems of power and thought. Like compelling arguments. Like how we can imagine better futures for ourselves and one another.
In the meantime, I’ll likely continue having versions of this conversation I had with a student earlier this term:
Student: Why can’t I just use a chat bot to write this essay?
Me: Because I don’t care about what OpenAI’s products can do. I care about what you’re thinking.
Jacob Riyeff is a teaching associate professor and the academic integrity director at Marquette University.
To create an office culture marked by trust, humanity and collaboration, Diana Lawrence poses a rather unexpected que
More from views.
Sharon Aschaiek writes that colleges will need to take steps to reconcile with their Jewish community members.
Colleges can draw inspiration from an unexpected source—wildfire management—and a strategy that fi
Ted Mitchell offers three core principles for handling campus protests.
4 /5 Articles remaining this month.
Rachel Carson, Jane Jacobs, Harper Lee and others asked provocative, brave questions about many of the same urgent issues we face today.
The National Book Awards will celebrate its 75th anniversary at this year’s ceremony, on Nov. 20. To mark the occasion, The Washington Post has collaborated with the administrator and presenter of the awards, the National Book Foundation, to commission a series of essays by National Book Award-honored authors who will consider (and reconsider), decade by decade, the books that were recognized and those that were overlooked; the preoccupations of authors, readers and the publishing industry through time; the power and subjectivity of judges and of awards; and the lasting importance of books to our culture, from the 1950s to the present day. In this essay, Prudence Peiffer — longlisted for the nonfiction award in 2023 for “ The Slip: The New York City Street That Changed American Art Forever ” — looks back at the 1960s.
“Art hurts. Art urges voyages–/ and it is easier to stay at home,/ the nice beer ready.”
This is poet Gwendolyn Brooks at her best, stinging sentiment followed by a swig of damning, ordinary detail from the fridge. We’ve worked hard for a drink that shuts out the world. The lines are taken from her collection “In the Mecca,” a National Book Award finalist in 1969. An adjacent thought from another poet, Elizabeth Bishop, in “Questions of Travel” (1966 finalist): “Should we have stayed at home and thought of here?”
Writing is both the staying at home and the difficult voyage, which makes it particularly useful for time travel. And from mushrooms to the moon, no decade in the United States is more known for its mind-expanding trips than the 1960s. Despite that era’s iconic male voices (you may have read a few), its women writers have moved me most in influencing my work: Bishop, Brooks, Hannah Arendt, Rachel Carson, Jane Jacobs, Harper Lee, Flannery O’Connor, Susan Sontag — and names that, sadly, don’t ring as loudly today, like Alice Kimball Smith.
With intimate assurance and often radical insight, these authors took up a looming anxiety of the postwar and Cold War era: What does community mean? Another way of asking this is: Where does home end and “elsewhere” begin, and how does that define one’s responsibilities? These were provocative, even brave, questions to pose as a woman in 1960s America; it makes these books that much more relevant and alive to us lucky enough to read them today.
In her environmental cri de coeur “Silent Spring” (1963 finalist), Carson illustrated the interconnectivity of life via unforgettable images, like an owl in convulsions after eating a shrew that in turn ate earthworms that in turn ate decomposed leaves that had fallen from a tree sprayed with chemicals for Dutch elm disease.“Most of us walk unseeing through the world, unaware alike of its beauties, its wonders, and the strange and sometimes terrible intensity of the lives that are being lived about us,” Carson wrote. She was describing how, venturing out into the garden at night with a flashlight, we’d be amazed and horrified at the vicious balance of nature. But that sentence could just as easily have come from Jacobs’s “The Death and Life of Great American Cities” (1962 finalist), in which Jacobs argued that we need to understand and celebrate urban complexity, and make sure that complexity is not demolished in the name of profits for the few. A city needs to be for everybody, but also: Everybody makes a city great.
I’m struck by how these classics from Carson and Jacobs can be read in succession as pendant volumes of community activism. In that era of fervent capitalist nation-building, they were daring warnings of democracy’s fragility, the importance of living with and trusting strangers. Carson’s most radical move was calling out a different kind of life cycle, one in which scientists’ research was funded by the very industry their findings were supposed to regulate.
It wasn’t just nonfiction writers who captured the “strange and sometimes terrible intensity” of the lives around us. That’s also reflected with cold brilliance in O’Connor’s “Everything That Rises Must Converge” (1966 finalist), her blunt portrait of the rural South. (Bishop almost made a pilgrimage to see O’Connor in Milledgeville, Ga., where the writer famously lived on a farm with her peacocks, but timing thwarted the visit; instead, Bishop sent her a cross in a bottle.) Like so many of the writers in this remarkable decade, O’Connor showed people in a rapidly changing landscape where a community is under threat. She knew a good title and she always stuck the landing, often with a violent death that shattered a character’s self-righteousness. I’ve never flinched so much while reading. She spared no one, including herself, if unintentionally: We can feel O’Connor working through her questions about the fallibility of her White, Catholic views, which maintained their own ingrained bigotry. What does it mean to be a good Christian when everyone’s life feels preordained? Published just a year after the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the ban on segregation, “Everything That Rises” is a reminder of racism’s rooted legacy in daily thinking — our most intimate language — especially in characters who are trying to perform a kind of morality. Scenes like the one on the bus in the title story, or in the doctor’s waiting room in “Revelation,” are primers for the barbarous truth that can hide in idle conversation.
O’Connor famously called Lee’s “To Kill a Mockingbird” (1961 finalist) a children’s book. (It’s true that it has maintained its central place in the national consciousness through its pervasiveness on high school reading lists, and some of its most powerful scenes take place in the schoolyard.) Though its tone could not be more different than “Everything That Rises,” it’s also a work of fiction teeming with neighborhood life in the still-segregated South and concerned with our moral responsibilities to the community around us. The judgment in Lee’s book is tied more to the law and its democratic processes than to the Bible, but Lee gives Atticus Finch a radically empathetic vision of religious intensity.
Defining and modeling empathy around community had different stakes for different writers. “In the Mecca” was a fulcrum for Brooks: It was her final book with a major trade publisher before she chose to work only with smaller, Black-run presses — a powerful statement coming from a Pulitzer Prize winner who had just been appointed poet laureate of Illinois. Like Jacobs’s book, “In the Mecca” is about the death of American cities (here, Chicago) through neglect, racism and poor planning, but also about the life in them, through their people and art.
Arendt’s “Men in Dark Times” (1969 finalist) ties community to responsibility, or our knowing turn away from it: “More and more people in the countries of the Western world, which since the decline of the ancient world has regarded freedom from politics as one of the basic freedoms, make use of this freedom and have retreated from the world and their obligations within it,” she wrote. In arguing for the necessity of a community of thinkers in the worst of times, Arendt read across media and history, a dexterity of thinking shared by Sontag, who embraced the Doors and Dostoevsky. Both Arendt and Sontag describe what is happening in plain sight and language, the “luminousness of the thing in itself,” as Sontag describes it, “of things being what they are.” Sontag identified the bliss in aesthetics; she claimed to see a film a day during this decade. Her essay collection “Against Interpretation” (1967 finalist) is brimming with evenings out experiencing things, followed by evenings in describing them (including a merry takedown of Ernest Hemingway). Her sentences are alive with unresolved, still-in-process thinking; the collection ends just before she turned to writing against the Vietnam War.
Arendt’s thought was rooted in World War II and the culture it arrested, the future conflicts it had already failed to stem. In her essay on the German writer Walter Benjamin, exiled from his home country by war, Arendt seems to implicitly pick up Jacobs’s treatise on the importance of a city’s sidewalk life, extending the strangers we meet there to the homeless and stateless who might still find some place to gather. When Arendt writes that technology has made surprising communities, so that every country is “the almost immediate neighbor of every other country, and every man feels the shock of events which take place at the other side of the globe,” social media is the premonition. She, of course, is talking about atomic weapons.
One of the more fascinating and now less-known books of this era is Alice Kimball Smith’s “A Peril and a Hope” (1966 finalist), which examines, sometimes in hour-by-hour detail, how scientists involved in the Manhattan Project tried to manage the impact of the nuclear bomb during its development and in the years just following its use in World War II. (Smith later co-edited an anthology of Robert Oppenheimer’s letters.) Her book is ultimately about the failure of two distinct communities — science and politics — to find a common language through which to understand each other. Though scientists were not in consensus, many of them wanted the United States to be transparent with other countries about its nuclear capabilities — the original hope was that the mere demonstration of an atomic bomb, like the test in the Nevada desert, would persuade our enemies to surrender. Where does home end and the “other” begin?
I admire the small but profound choices of emphasis these writers made. In “Silent Spring,” Carson gave “housewives” the same weight as scientists, citing numerous letters they wrote to newspapers, town councils and ornithologists noting the effects of insecticides and weed killers on wildlife in their neighborhoods. Women may have barely been represented among the scientists employed in the atomic project, but that didn’t stop Smith from writing that community’s definitive story. (Despite having earned a doctorate, Smith is still mostly identified as the wife of one of the Manhattan Project scientists, underscoring why she was better positioned than most to understand the perils of secrecy. Her book is out of print and difficult to access, even in libraries.)
The 1960s cemented a certain intellectual curiosity and urgency around the environment, race and war, subjects that remain the sources of the deepest schisms in our communities. It’s hard not to feel these books shouting from the shelves to be read again for what they can tell us about their time and our own, as the present continuously, swiftly becomes history. Think of microplastics in our water and forever chemicals in our organic salads; the “epidemic” of loneliness diagnosed by the surgeon general, whose recommended treatment directly maps to Jacobs’s prescriptions for a city block; the ongoing racism across the country that turns back small gains made since 2020; Russia’s investment in atomic satellites and deployment of “tactical” nuclear weapons; the uprooting, starvation and death of tens of thousands of children in Gaza and elsewhere.
These writers have shown me that it’s better to step into the mire, to be not at peace with the world but constantly making something of it. That something can be small and local. It can be beautiful and pleasurable in spite of — even because of — what is at stake. Or as Brooks put it, “Conduct your blooming in the noise and whip of the/ whirlwind.”
Prudence Peiffer is the author of “The Slip: The New York City Street That Changed American Art Forever.”
COMMENTS
To quote a source, copy a short piece of text word for word and put it inside quotation marks. To paraphrase a source, put the text into your own words. It's important that the paraphrase is not too close to the original wording. You can use the paraphrasing tool if you don't want to do this manually.
Create manual citation. The guidelines for citing an essay in MLA format are similar to those for citing a chapter in a book. Include the author of the essay, the title of the essay, the name of the collection if the essay belongs to one, the editor of the collection or other contributors, the publication information, and the page number (s).
When using APA format, follow the author-date method of in-text citation. This means that the author's last name and the year of publication for the source should appear in the text, like, for example, (Jones, 1998). One complete reference for each source should appear in the reference list at the end of the paper.
On the first line of the page, write the section label "References" (in bold and centered). On the second line, start listing your references in alphabetical order. Apply these formatting guidelines to the APA reference page: Double spacing (within and between references) Hanging indent of ½ inch.
In-text citations: Author-page style. MLA format follows the author-page method of in-text citation. This means that the author's last name and the page number (s) from which the quotation or paraphrase is taken must appear in the text, and a complete reference should appear on your Works Cited page. The author's name may appear either in the ...
The Chicago/Turabian style of citing sources is generally used when citing sources for humanities papers, and is best known for its requirement that writers place bibliographic citations at the bottom of a page (in Chicago-format footnotes) or at the end of a paper (endnotes). The Turabian and Chicago citation styles are almost identical, but ...
At college level, you must properly cite your sources in all essays, research papers, and other academic texts (except exams and in-class exercises). Add a citation whenever you quote, paraphrase, or summarize information or ideas from a source. You should also give full source details in a bibliography or reference list at the end of your text.
The following are guidelines to follow when writing in-text citations: Ensure that the spelling of author names and the publication dates in reference list entries match those in the corresponding in-text citations. Cite only works that you have read and ideas that you have incorporated into your writing. The works you cite may provide key ...
General guidelines for referring to the works of others in your essay Author/Authors How to refer to authors in-text, including single and multiple authors, unknown authors, organizations, etc. Reference List. Resources on writing an APA style reference list, including citation formats
The title of the article is in plain text and sentence case; the title of the newspaper or the magazine is set in italics. Follow the format given in the template and example for setting the date, month, and year. Template: Surname, F. M. (Date of publication). Title of the article. Title of the Newspaper or Magazine.
In this situation the original author and date should be stated first followed by 'as cited in' followed by the author and date of the secondary source. For example: Lorde (1980) as cited in Mitchell (2017) Or (Lorde, 1980, as cited in Mitchell, 2017) Back to top. 3. How to Cite Different Source Types.
In-text citations point the reader to the sources' information on the references page. The in-text citation typically includes the author's last name and the year of publication. If you use a direct quote, the page number is also provided. More information can be found on p. 253 of the 7th edition of the Publication Manual of the American ...
The author's name might be unknown. If it's the case, use the first several words from the article's title but omit "A," "An," or "The" at the beginning. It can be written in quotes or italics, depending on how it's written in your list of references. The number of words you pick to use depends on the title.
You will need to include in-text citations every time you refer to, quote from, paraphrase, or summarize a given source. You will also need to cite facts, figures, images, video, audio, or any other element you include in your work that you did not create yourself. There are two main ways to incorporate information from sources into your essay ...
Free APA help online from Purdue's Online Writing Lab (OWL). Provides examples and instructions for commonly cited materials, as well as a sample APA paper and tips for avoiding plagiarism. The left-hand menu has guidance for both in-text citations and the references list at the end of your paper.
An in-text citation can be included in one of two ways as shown below: 1. Put all the citation information at the end of the sentence: 2. Include author name as part of the sentence (if author name unavailable, include title of work): Each source cited in-text must also be listed on your Works Cited page. RefWorks includes a citation builder ...
NOTE: The exception to the rule is that you do not have to cite a source when you are using what is considered "common knowledge," such as a date in history, basic biographical facts about a prominent person, or the dates and circumstances of major historical events (e.g. there are 12 months in a year, the planets revolve around the sun, the ...
In-text citations are quick references to your sources. In Harvard referencing, you use the author's surname and the date of publication in brackets. Up to three authors are included in a Harvard in-text citation. If the source has more than three authors, include the first author followed by ' et al. '.
When citing sources in the text of your paper, you must list: The author's last name. The year the information was published. Types of In-Text Citations: Narrative vs Parenthetical. A narrative citation gives the author's name as part of the sentence. Example of a Narrative Citation: According to Edwards (2017), although Smith and Carlos's ...
Revised on March 5, 2024. An MLA in-text citation provides the author's last name and a page number in parentheses. If a source has two authors, name both. If a source has more than two authors, name only the first author, followed by " et al. ". If the part you're citing spans multiple pages, include the full page range.
Hello there! Great question! Yes, in academic writing, citing sources is an absolute must to avoid plagiarism and to give proper credit to original ideas. However, the personal essay portion of college applications is quite different. It's all about your personal experiences, views, and aspirations. Typically, you don't need to cite sources as you would in a research paper.
Essay Example: Lyndon B. Johnson's time as president is mostly remembered for how deeply he got involved in the Vietnam War, a big conflict that had a huge impact on how things went in the United States. Johnson took over after John F. Kennedy was killed in 1963, and he inherited a really complicated
Essay Example: Recidivism, border often clashed in borders kingdoms justice and criminelle sociology, conjures up the memory a tendency types, that the condition precedent taken away stop, for renewable to offend and to return despite a criminelle relation after served border or undergone interference ... Cite this. Summary. This essay about ...
Essay Example: Okay, imagine math without integers—it's like trying to build a house without bricks! Integers are those whole numbers that can be positive, negative, or zero. ... Cite this. Summary. This essay is about the concept of integers in mathematics. It explains that integers are whole numbers, including positive numbers, negative ...
This feature not only promotes academic integrity but also teaches students the importance of proper citation. It's like having a built-in research assistant that always remembers to cite its sources!
CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — A private school teacher who says she was fired after driving an 18-year-old student to get an abortion is suing New Hampshire's Department of Education and officials she ...
Citing a quote in APA Style. To cite a direct quote in APA, you must include the author's last name, the year, and a page number, all separated by commas. If the quote appears on a single page, use "p."; if it spans a page range, use "pp.". An APA in-text citation can be parenthetical or narrative.
This essay is about the comparison between Homo erectus and Homo sapiens, highlighting their differences and evolutionary significance. Homo erectus, living from 1.9 million to 110,000 years ago, was one of the first hominins to exhibit human-like traits, such as larger brains and bipedalism.
The essay I read in May might have been representing the reality of how it was made. And maybe it wasn't. But the hype and the constant discussion surrounding LLM-based chat bots and, frankly, the fact that I have seen so many cases of students trying to pass synthetic text off as their own without appropriate attribution have for the moment conditioned me to mistrust my students somewhat.
In her essay on the German writer Walter Benjamin, exiled from his home country by war, Arendt seems to implicitly pick up Jacobs's treatise on the importance of a city's sidewalk life ...