research on service delivery in south africa

Weak Procurement Practices and the Challenges of Service Delivery in South Africa

• First Online: 18 February 2021

Cite this chapter

• Koliswa Matebese-Notshulwana 3  

261 Accesses

1 Citations

Procurement is a crucial institutional process and measure for the functioning of government, regarding service delivery. As such, it is important that such a process is characterised by ethical standards to ensure that service delivery is not compromised and undermined. However, despite the establishment of oversight mechanisms to monitor irregular, wasteful and unauthorised expenditure, corruption in procurement remains a challenge. One of the major problems is non-compliance with the requisite legislative frameworks. Consequently, weak procurement practices and corruption have a significant impact in the attainment of good governance. Although procurement plays a major and strategic role in the acquisition of goods and services, it is one of government’s activities that is most vulnerable to waste, fraud and corruption. Methodologically, desktop research was used with content analysis of the various primary and secondary resource material. The chapter concludes that the effect of corruption in procurement has seriously constrained sustainable economic development and seriously affected service delivery in South Africa. The chapter therefore recommends that there should be consequences for non-compliance and misuse of public resources and institutional entities must ensure full compliance with procurement legislation and processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

AGSA. (2014). Auditor-General on Use of Audit Reports as an Oversight Tool; Financial & Fiscal Commission on Department of Mineral Resource’s Past Performance & Future Projections [Accessed 28 May 2019].

Google Scholar  

Alexander, P. (2013). Protest and Police Statistics in South Africa: Some Commentary. Popular Resistance, Daily Movement News and Resources . https://www.popularresistance.org/south-africathe-rebellion-of-the-poor/ [Accessed 27 May 2019].

Ambe, I. M. (2009). An Exploration of Supply Chain Management Practices in the Central District Municipality. Educational Research and Review, 4 (9), 427–435.

Ambe, I. M. (2016). Public Procurement Trends and Developments in South Africa. Research Journal of Business and Management. Unisa Press Academia, 3 (4), 277–290 [Accessed 27 May 2019].

Ambe, I. M., & Badenhorst, J. A. (2011). An Exploration of Public Sector Supply Chains with Specific Reference to the South African Situation. Journal of Public Administration, 46 (3), 1101–1113. [Accessed 10 January 2019].

Ambe, I. M., & Badenhorst, J. A. (2012). Procurement Challenges in the South African Public Sector. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 242–261 [Accessed 27 May 2019].

Bolton, P. (2006). Government Procurement as a Policy Tool in South Africa. Journal of Public Procurement, 6 (3), 193–217.

Article   Google Scholar  

Cane, P. (2004). Administrative Law (4th ed.). London: Oxford University Press.

CIPS Australia. (2005). How Do We Measure Up? An Introduction to Performance Measurement of the Procurement Profession [Accessed 17 May 2019].

Cogta. (2009). State of Local Government Report . Overview Report. Pretoria.

De Lange S. (2011). Irregular State Expenditure Jumps 62% . Business Day [Accessed 20 May 2019].

Dlova, V., & Nzewi, O. (2014). Developing and Institutionalising Supply Chain Management Procedures: A Case Study of the Eastern Cape Department of Roads and Public Works. Africa’s Public Service Delivery and Performance Review, 2 (1), 5–21.

DTI. (2012). Industrial Procurement and Designation of the Sectors . http://www.thedti.gov.za/parliament/industrial.procurement.pdf.Design [Accessed 15 May 2019].

DTI. (2013). Industrial Policy Action Plan . http://www.thedti.gov.za/news2013/ipap_2013–2016.pdf [Accessed 21 May 2019].

Eyaa, S., & Oluka, P. N. (2011). Explaining Noncompliance in Public Procurement in Uganda. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2 (11), 35–44.

Gelderman, J. C., Ghijsen, W. P., & Brugman, J. M. (2006). Public Procurement and EU Tendering Directives Explaining Non-compliance. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19 (7), 702–714.

Godi, T. (2014). Auditor-General on Audit Outcomes for 2013–2014. Parliamentary Monitoring Group. Parliament. Cape Town.

Gurría, A. (2016). Public Procurement for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth: Enabling Reform Through Evidence and Peer Reviews . OECD. http://www.oecd.org/gov/ethics/PublicProcurementRev9.pdf [Accessed on 19 May 2019].

Heymans, C., & Lipietz, B. (1999). Corruption and Development. Institute of Security Studies (ISS) Monograph Series, 40, 9–20.

Hommen, L., & Rolfstam, M. (2009). Public Procurement and Innovation: Towards a Taxonomy. Journal of Public Procurement, 9 (1), 17–56.

Jeppesen, R. (2010). Accountability in Public Procurement: Transparency and the Role of Civil Society. United Nations Procurement Capacity Development Centre .

Kashap, S. (2004). Public Procurement as a Social, Economic and Political Policy . International public procurement conference proceedings, 3:133–147.

Kruger, L. P. (2011). The Impact of Black Economic Empowerment (Bee) on South African Businesses: Focusing on Ten Dimensions of Business Performance. Southern African Business Review, 15 (3), 207–233.

Mahlaba, P. J. (2004). Fraud and Corruption in the Public Sector: An Audit Perspective. S D R, 3 (2), 84–87.

Mahmood, S. (2013). Public Procurement System and e-Government Implementation in Bangladesh: The Role of Public Administration. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 5 (5), 117–123.

Mail & Guardian. (2015). Government Supplier Database: A Blow to Corruption . http://mg.co.za/article/2015-03-05-govt-supplierdatabase-a-blow-to-corruption [Accessed on 13 April 2019].

Makwethu, K. (2014). Auditor-General on Audit Outcomes for 2013–2014 . Parliament. Cape Town.

Matthee, C. A. (2006). The Potential of Internal Audit to Enhance Supply Chain Management Outcomes . Master’s dissertation, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch.

McCrudden, C. (2004). Using Public Procurement to Achieve Social Outcomes. Natural Resources Forum , 257–267.

Mkhize, C. Y. (2004). A Handbook of Community Development . Pretoria: Skotaville Media Publications.

Mukura, P. K.; Shalle, N., Kanda, M. K., & Ngatia, P. M. (2016). Role of Public Procurement Oversight Authority on Procurement Regulations in Kenyan State Corporations. A Case of Kenya Electricity Generating Company (KenGen). International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 6 (3), 190–201.

Munzhedzi, P. H. (2016). South African Public Sector Procurement and Corruption: Inseparable Twins? Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 10 (1), 1–8 [Accessed 4 April 2019].

Mwangi, P. N. (2017). Determinants of compliance with access to government procurement opportunities regulations for special groups by public universities in Kenya . PhD Thesis, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology.

Ngcobo, Z., & Whittles, G. (2016). ANC Vows to Speed Up Pace of Service Delivery from August, Eye Witness News . http://ewn.co.za/2016/04/18/ANC-to-speed-up-service-delivery-from-August 18 May.

National Treasury. (2003). Policy Strategy to Guide Uniformity in Procurement Reforms Processes in Government . Pretoria [Accessed 23 May 2019].

National Treasury. (2015). Public Sector Supply Chain Management Review . Department of National Treasury, Republic of South Africa. pp. 1–83 [Accessed 28 May 2019].

National Treasury. (2017). Terms of Reference. Appointment of a service provider to assist the Office of the Chief Procurement Officer within the National Treasury, South Africa with the development of a procurement codification standard for the period of 12 months. pp. 1–66 [Accessed 28 May 2019].

Odhiambo, W., & Kamau, P. (2003). The Integration of Developing Countries into the World Trading System . Public Procurement Lessons for Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda. Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, (OECD)-DAC/World Bank. (2005). Guidelines and Reference Series . A DAC Reference Document Harmonizing Donor.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, (OECD). (2007). SIGMA Support for Improvement in Governance and Management . http://sigmaweb.org .

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, (OECD). (2011). Demand-side Innovation Policies . Paris.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, (OECD). (2015). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Fighting Corruption in the Public Sector: Public Procurement . http://www.oecd.org/gov/ethics/integrityinpublicprocurement.htm .

Payan, J. M., & McFarland, R. G. (2005). Decomposing Influence Strategies: Argument Structure and Dependence Determinants of Effectiveness of Influence Strategies in Gaining Channel Member Compliance. Journal of Marketing, 69, 66–79 [Accessed 19 March 2019].

Pillay, S. (2004). Corruption–The Challenge to Good Governance: A South African Perspective. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17 (7), 586–605.

Pithouse, R. (2012, August, 6). Burning Message to the State in the Fire of Poor’s Rebellion . Business Day.

Porteous, E., & Naudé, F. (2012). Public Sector Procurement: The New Rules . http://www.apmp.org.za/public [Accessed 3 March 2019].

Ramaphosa, C. M. (2018). State of the Nation Address (SONA). Parliament of South Africa, Cape Town.

Rondinelli, D. A. (2007). Can Public Enterprises Contribute to Development? A Critical Assessment and Alternatives for Management Improvement. New York: United Nations.

Roodhooft, F., & Abbeele, A. V. D. (2006). Public Procurement of Consulting Services: Evidence and Comparison with Private Companies. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19 (5), 490–512.

SCM Review Update. (2016). SCM Review Update. National Treasury. www.treasury.gov.za .

Smart Procurement. (2011). SA Public Procurement: Poor Value for Money. In I. M. Ambe, & J. A. Badenhorst-Weiss. (2012, November 7). Supply Chain Management Challenges in the South African Public Sector. African Journal of Business Management, 6 (44), 11003–11014 [Accessed 20 May 2019].

Soreide, I. (2002). Corruption in Public Procurement Causes, Consequences and Cures . Chr. Michelsen Institute, 1–41.

Soudry, O. (2007). A Principal-Agent Analysis of Accountability in Public Procurement. In Gustavo Piga & Khi V. Thai (Eds.), Advancing Public Procurement: Practices, Innovation and Knowledge-Sharing (pp. 432-451). Boca Raton, FL: PrAcademics Press.

State of the Nation Address. (2018). Parliament of the Republic of South Africa . Cape Town.

Stapenhurst, R.. Pelizzo, R., Olson, D. M., & von Trapp, L. (2006). Legislative and Budgeting Oversight: A World Perspective . Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.

Turley, L., & Perera, O. (2014). Implementing Sustainable Public Procurement in South Africa: Where to Start. The International Institute for Sustainable Development, 1–63.

Wallis, M. (1999). The Final Constitution: The Elevation of Local Government. In Cameron, R. (1999). Democratisation of South African Local Government: A Tale of Three Cities . Pretoria: Van Schaik [Accessed 26 May 2019].

Warren, M. E. (2004). What Does Corruption Mean in a Democracy? American Journal of Political Science. Midwest Political Science Association, 48 (2), 328–343.

Watermeyer, R. B. (2011, October 25). Regulating Public Procurement in Southern Africa Through International and National Standards . Public Procurement Regulation in Africa Conference, Stellenbosch.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Political Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

Koliswa Matebese-Notshulwana

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa

Nirmala Dorasamy

Omololu Fagbadebo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Matebese-Notshulwana, K. (2021). Weak Procurement Practices and the Challenges of Service Delivery in South Africa. In: Dorasamy, N., Fagbadebo, O. (eds) Public Procurement, Corruption and the Crisis of Governance in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63857-3_6

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63857-3_6

Published : 18 February 2021

Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-030-63856-6

Online ISBN : 978-3-030-63857-3

eBook Packages : Political Science and International Studies Political Science and International Studies (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

• Open access
• Published: 12 April 2022

Improving public health sector service delivery in the Free State, South Africa: development of a provincial intervention model

• Benjamin Malakoane 1 ,
• James Christoffel Heunis 2 ,
• Perpetual Chikobvu 3 ,
• Nanteza Gladys Kigozi 2 &
• Willem Hendrik Kruger 1  

BMC Health Services Research volume  22 , Article number:  486 ( 2022 ) Cite this article

6332 Accesses

4 Citations

Metrics details

Public health sector service delivery challenges leading to poor population health outcomes have been observed in the Free State province of South Africa for the past decade. A multi-method situation appraisal of the different functional domains revealed serious health system deficiencies and operational defects, notably fragmentation of healthcare programmes and frontline services, as well as challenges related to governance, accountability and human resources for health. It was therefore necessary to develop a system-wide intervention to comprehensively address defects in the operation of the public health system and its major components.

This study describes the development of the ‘Health Systems Governance & Accountability’ (HSGA) intervention model by the Free State Department of Health (FSDoH) in collaboration with the community and other stakeholders following a participatory action approach. Documented information collected during routine management processes were reviewed for this paper. Starting in March 2013, the development of the HSGA intervention model and the concomitant application of Kaplan and Norton’s (1992) Balanced Scorecard performance measurement tool was informed by the World Health Organization’s (2007) conceptual framework for health system strengthening and reform comprised of six health system ‘building blocks.’ The multiple and overlapping processes and actions to develop the intervention are described according to the four steps in Kaplan et al.’s (2013) systems approach to health systems strengthening: (i) problem identification, (ii) description, (iii) alteration and (iv) implementation.

The finalisation of the HSGA intervention model before end-2013 was a prelude to the development of the FSDoH’s Strategic Transformation Plan 2015–2030. The HSGA intervention model was used as a tool to implement and integrate the Plan’s programmes moving forward with a consistent focus on the six building blocks for health systems strengthening and the all-important linkages between them.

The model was developed to address fragmentation and improve public health service delivery by the provincial health department. In January 2016, the intervention model became an official departmental policy, meaning that it was approved for implementation, compliance, monitoring and reporting, and became the guiding framework for health systems strengthening and transform in the Free State.

Peer Review reports

The Free State province of South Africa has recorded substandard population health outcomes at least since 2011 [ 1 ]. The dire need for effective and implementable interventions to improve public health services and outcomes is clear [ 2 ]. To avoid resource wastage, efforts should be made to systematically design health systems strengthening interventions with the potential of system-wide implementation [ 3 , 4 , 5 ].

When a new Member of the Executive Council (first author) assumed leadership of the Free State Department of Health (FSDoH) in 2013 there was a clear need to address the rising burden of both communicable and non-communicable disease [ 6 ], as well as declining community trust in the public health system. The Member of the Executive Council outlined a vision to “strengthen the health system’s effectiveness, drive system changes, improve burden of disease outcomes, [and] ensure financial sustainability for better health outcomes and increased life expectancy.”

A multi-method situation appraisal of the FSDoH’s public health services was undertaken by the first author, a senior programme manager (third author) in collaboration with two health systems researchers (second and fourth authors) and a community health specialist (fifth author) in collaboration with healthcare workers in 2013. The appraisal established that the main overall system challenges underlying sub-standard performance in the province included fragmentation of services, staff shortages, financial/cash-flow problems and leadership and governance defects [ 1 ]. There was a clear need to improve programme integration and leadership, and to address organisational, human resources and financial deficiencies in this setting. The above-mentioned team collaborated in developing, implementing and evaluating a whole-system intervention to improve public health service integration and outcomes, namely the Health Systems Governance & Accountability (HSGA) intervention.

Although no universal definition or concept of integration exists [ 7 ], in 2005, the World Health Organization (WHO) explained the term as follows: “The notion of integration has a long history. Integration is supposed to tackle the need for complementarity of different interdependent services and administrative structures, so as to better achieve common goals. In the 1950s these goals were defined in terms of outcome, in the 1960s of process and in the 1990s of economic impact” [ 8  pp. 108–109]. A systematic review conducted in 2016 defined integration as “a variety of managerial and operational changes to health systems that bring together inputs, delivery, management, and organizations of particular service functions, in order to provide clients with a continuum of preventative and curative services, according to their needs over time and across different levels of the health system” [ 9  p. 2]. The WHO suggests that integration has to take place at three levels: (i) patient level, i.e., case management; (ii) service delivery level, i.e., multiple interventions provided through one delivery channel and (iii) systems level, i.e., bringing together the management and support functions of different sub-programmes, and ensuring complementarity between the different levels of care [ 8 ]. Integration is a choice that affects programme financing, planning and delivery, and, ultimately, the achievement of public health goals [ 10 , 11 ].

Integration of disease control programmes such as the HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and chronic disease programmes within the district health system and comprehensive primary health care (PHC) approach has been a priority in South Africa for decades [ 12 , 13 ]. However, attempts at integration are hindered by leadership and management challenges as observed in three provinces in the complex dynamics between managers responsible for specific policies and those responsible for managing the integrated delivery of all policies [ 14 ].

The WHO [ 2 , 15 ] advances that health systems are comprised of six ‘building blocks’ that need to be considered in health system strengthening: (i) service delivery; (ii) health workforce; (iii) information; (iv) medical products, vaccines and technologies; (v) financing and (vi) leadership and governance (stewardship). The building blocks framework has been found to be useful to assess in-country health system performance [ 16 , 17 , 18 ]. However, there is some uncertainty as to how the framework can best be used to address the problems of fragmentation and ineffective performance of public health systems in low- and middle-income countries. Mounier-Jack et al. [ 19 ] thus recommended that researchers using the building blocks framework should adapt it and make it context-specific.

The FSDoH leadership believed that conceptualisation of the public health system in terms of the building blocks framework and improved integration of service programming and rendering through, amongst others, reconfigured facility clusters and service hubs, would help to address a broad spectrum of health system challenges. The decision was therefore made to design and develop a system-wide re-engineering intervention to address the fragmentation of healthcare provisioning using a systems approach. The working definition for a systems approach was one that “applies scientific insights to understand the elements that influence health outcomes; models the relationships between those elements; and alters design, processes, or policies based on the resultant knowledge in order to produce better health at lower cost” [ 20  p. 4].

Health systems are complex and characterised by high levels of variability, uncertainty, and dynamism [ 21 ]. Kaplan et al. (2013) [ 20 ] proposed that the use of a systems approach is beneficial in addressing complex health systems challenges by considering the dynamic interaction among the multiple elements (i.e., people, processes, policies, and organisations) involved in caring for patients and the multiple factors influencing health. These authors proposed four essential considerations or steps in designing interventions from the perspective of a systems approach, (i) identification, (ii) description, (iii) alteration and (iv) implementation. These steps were followed in the development of the HSGA intervention model in the Free State. Kaplan and Norton’s (1992) Balanced Scorecard performance measurement tool [ 4 ] was concomitantly put in use.

Details on the implementation and assessment of the intervention including the results of a questionnaire survey and focus group discussions with health managers and community representatives will be reported elsewhere. This descriptive study relates the development of an intelligible and promising intervention, the HSGA intervention model, and its formalisation into an official policy, the HSGA policy, to address fragmentation and improve public health service delivery in the Free State by the provincial health department in collaboration with its stakeholders. A participatory design involving a wide range of public health stakeholders and role players in plans and efforts to improve the integration and outcomes of public health services was followed as part of routine health service delivery management processes.

The FSDoH serves a population of approximately 2.9 million people [ 22 ], of whom about 80% are public health sector dependent [ 23 ]. The province includes four district municipalities, Fezile Dabi, Lejweleputswa, Thabo Mofutsanyana and Xhariep, and one metropolitan municipality, Mangaung. In 2015/16, PHC was provided by 211 fixed PHC clinics, ten community health centres and numerous mobile clinics [ 6 ]. Hospital services included 24 district hospitals, four regional hospitals, one specialised psychiatric hospital, one tertiary hospital and one central hospital. The PHC clinics, community health centres and hospitals respectively provide primary, secondary, and tertiary care services. Hospitals are managed by chief executive officers with hospital boards providing oversight or governance. PHC clinics and community health centres are managed by operational managers reporting to their respective district offices. Clinic committees provide oversight or governance and report to the provincial executive authority. District health managers are responsible for planning and monitoring of disease control programme implementation within their districts, with District Clinical Specialist Teams providing supportive supervision, clinical governance, and attending to health systems and logistics, staff development and user-related considerations [ 24 ].

The development of the HSGA intervention model followed a participatory action approach [ 25 , 26 , 27 ] as part of routine health service delivery management processes which took place from 2013 to 2015. The reports and minutes generated during these routine management processes were reviewed using the WHO health systems building blocks framework to conceptualise the intervention. This approach was chosen as it has been shown that interventions developed using participatory designs are more likely to be acceptable and implemented effectively [ 28 , 29 ]. A province-wide consultative process was embarked upon, wherein communities and stakeholders within the public health system were called upon to comment on the different functional domains: (i) the skill base of the management; (ii) patient and clinical workflow; (iii) the referral system and (iv) leadership alignment to community and operational needs, process reliability, and attainment of the desired outcomes [ 1 ]. The involvement of both managers and communities in shaping the HSGA intervention model empowered the executive authority to lead health system change and administrative action [ 30 ]. The designations of 584 FSDoH functionaries, community representatives, and other stakeholders who partook in the development of the model as part of routine health service delivery management processes from 2013 to 2015 are indicated in Table 1 .

Key activities in the development process of the HSGA intervention model

The chronology of key activities in the development of the HSGA intervention model is depicted in Fig.  1 .

Key activities in HSGA intervention model development

BSC Balanced Scorecard, DCST District Clinical Specialist Team, EMS emergency medical services, EC Executive Committee, HR human resources, MEC Member of the Executive Committee, PHC primary health care, SCM supply change management, SDIP Service Delivery Improvement Plan, STP Strategic Transformation Plan

During March–April 2013, the executive management held meetings with PHC clinic committees and infrastructure improvement teams to understand the healthcare challenges faced by catchment communities, as well as the state of PHC infrastructure. Given that key health systems challenges had been identified in the preceding multifaceted situational analysis [ 1 ], the community engagements were aimed at teasing out specific malleable challenges from a wide range of health systems problems facing the province. During the same period, and for the same reason, hospital and PHC clinic ‘roadshows’ (organised campaigns carried out in identified catchment areas led by the executive leadership) commenced and turnaround strategy discussions were held at the corporate level.

During May 2013, in a quest to assess the status and quality of Emergency Medical Services, the referral system and patient and clinical workflow, as well as the management skill base and the budget support received in doing their work, various meetings were held with Emergency Medical Services, District Clinical Specialist Teams, supply chain management and governance structures in order to understand the status quo and leadership alignment to community and operational needs, process reliability, identification of areas needing intervention, and attainment of the desired outcomes.

Hospital and PHC clinic roadshows continued, and the first Balanced Scorecard workshop was conducted. Often applied to healthcare settings and organisations [ 31 , 32 , 33 ], the Balanced Scorecard performance measures include four questions or perspectives: (i) how do customers see us? (customer perspective); (ii) what must we excel at? (internal perspective); (iii) can we continue to improve and create value? (innovation and learning perspective) and (iv) how do we look to shareholders? (financial perspective) [ 4 ]. The Balanced Scorecard was adopted to enable production of evidence and tracking of progress when reporting. The Balanced Scorecard workshop culminated in the development of the first draft of the HSGA intervention model accompanied by relevant policy and procedure reviews to introduce a culture of coordination and communication within the confines of policy provisions.

The executive authority then presented the findings of the previous three months to the corporate and district-level managers with new mandates being given to various staff components. The District Clinical Specialist Teams were specifically responsible to visit PHC clinics and hospitals in their respective districts to conduct surveillance and monitoring of effectiveness of clinical protocols. They were to complete the investigation of the challenges and to provide recommendations within five months.

The PHC clinic committee and hospital board (governance) structures are by their nature, community advocacy formations. Meetings with them continued into June-July 2013 in tandem with the hospital and PHC clinic roadshows. A plan to operationalise the Balanced Scorecard was drafted, and budget reprioritisation sessions held. Additional meetings took place to discuss ways to conform to the new Service Delivery Improvement Plan and the Balanced Scorecard approach. Besides the continuation of hospital and PHC clinic roadshows, Balanced Scorecard and expenditure reporting meetings were held during August–September 2013 to discuss ways to improve programme performance.

During October–November 2013, the District Clinical Specialist Teams had returned from their five-month expedition into the districts. They provided feedback covering the sub-districts visited and problem areas identified. The HSGA intervention model was then refined to address the shortcomings identified and relevant policies and procedures were amended accordingly. After the second quarter performance review process and expenditure reporting, the model was further refined to streamline the interventions with policy and procedure reviews.

During January-March 2014, the Strategic Transformation Plan 2015–2030 [ 34 ] processes related to format, programmes and content were commenced, and relevant functionaries invited with clear mandates to present their ideas on what could further be done to improve service and programme delivery to the executive and senior management, including programme managers. Thereafter, the hospital and PHC clinic roadshows were completed in the last of the districts. The draft HSGA intervention model was also presented to the staff and stakeholders at a province-wide health ‘ indaba ’ (collective discussion or meeting). Thereafter, the model was further refined together with concomitant changes to policies and procedures.

During March-December 2015, the HSGA intervention model was presented to governance structures and across the whole department to progressively introduce the new way of working, which would inform the performance assessment system according to the Balanced Scorecard approach as well. External consultants were involved in helping to refine the strategic management issues and in assisting the streamlining of the organogram to address the changes to be implemented. The Balanced Scorecard was thus used during performance assessments to test compliance with the needed changes.

Finally, in January 2016, the HSGA intervention model became an official departmental policy [ 35 ]. The intention of the HSGA policy was to ensure the sustainability of implementation of the HSGA intervention model to strengthen compliance and entrench a culture of using the model as an operational system to achieve the aims of the Strategic Transformation Plan 2015–2030. Information gathered in the above processes was synthesised using an iterative participatory design approach with three main steps: (i) consultations, (ii) incorporating suggestions and (iii) revisions. Repeated consultations with a broad range of stakeholders (Table 1 ) took place where inputs were sought, and changes incorporated as part of health services delivery management process. By doing so, the HSGA intervention model was refined at each consultation point. Final revision followed an indaba with the executive leadership, District Management Teams, community representatives, departmental line managers, governance structures, labour organisations, academics, traditional leaders and healers, and PHC clinic committees. They proposed changes to clusters and service hubs and focused on ensuring that the content of the intervention model was appropriate and consistent with the National Department of Health’s (NDoH) guidelines as this would allow for easier embedding of the model into routine care and was likely to make it more acceptable to healthcare managers and workers.

Development of the intervention

The development of the HSGA intervention model is subsequently related according to the four steps outlined by Kaplan et al. [ 20 ].

Step 1: Identification

Kaplan et al. [ 20  p. 5] define this step as follows: “Identify the multiple elements involved in caring for patients and promoting the health of individuals and populations.” In the context of the development of the HSGA intervention model, this implied identifying all those elements involved in service delivery whose improvement would lead to improved integration and health outcomes. The identification of the multiple health system factors contributing to poor health service delivery was described by Malakoane et al. [ 1 ] and further investigated during the model development activities (Fig.  1 ).

In summary, a multi-method situation appraisal based on analysis of 44 reports generated in 2013 through presentations by unit managers, sub-district assessments by District Clinical Specialist Teams, and group discussions with district managers, PHC clinic supervisors and managers, and chief executive and clinical officers at all hospital levels was conducted. The appraisal established that the rising burden of disease and poor health outcomes were principally due to extant fragmentation of health service delivery and the disjointed way in which the public health system was operating. Other problems included poor policy and regulatory coordination, verticalisation of programme organisation and administration, staff shortages, budgetary problems, and, notably, leadership and governance deficits, as significant health system challenges that resulted in ineffective public healthcare service delivery [ 1 ].

Specific challenges with respect to people, processes and policy shortfalls within the health system are depicted in Table 2 in line with the WHO health systems building blocks framework. All the elements involved in service delivery that were investigated during the model development activities (Fig.  1 ) and whose improvement would lead to improved integration and health outcomes were consolidated in reports and minutes. These reports and minutes of the meetings were then thematically synthesized.

Step 2: Description

Kaplan et al. [ 20  p. 5] defines this step as follows: “Describe how those elements [aspects involved in caring for patients and promoting the health of individuals and populations] operate independently and interdependently.” The decision to reconfigure the public healthcare delivery platform for better integration of services and improved population-health outcomes was inevitable and required an intelligible and feasible intervention. In view of the multiple challenges that were identified (Table 2 ), and the extent to which continuation of these challenges impacted or infringed patients’ rights, the strengthening of the public health system was approached by means of systematic application of the WHO’s building blocks framework. It was particularly important to bring about a well-planned and managed referral system supported by policy and regulation and to deploy adequate resources across all levels of care [ 36 , 37 ]. The HSGA intervention model was intended to address, interlink and integrate all the public health service delivery processes for better outcomes (Fig.  2 ).

Service delivery platform

‘Inreach’ refers to referral to a higher level of care. CHC community health centre, DCST District Clinical Specialist Team, DOT directly observed treatment, EMS emergency medical services, GP general practitioner, M&E monitoring and evaluation, WBOT Ward Based Outreach Team

The executive leadership convened all the corporate managers, district managers, programme managers, hospital chief executive officers and clinic managers (Table 1 ) to discuss the findings of the situation appraisal. These discussions focused on required alterations to improve the public health system’s performance and advance cooperation between facilities and functionaries to enable integration of healthcare service delivery in consideration of the six WHO health system building blocks. It was agreed that a system to integrate the service delivery platform had to be developed. The executive leadership revisited and outlined the vision and trajectory for this, with a view to identify possible changes including goals aimed at achieving better health outcomes.

The vision for the required reconfiguration of the health system provided by the leadership was to: “increase life expectancy through health system effectiveness, driving system change and ensuring sustainable quality services.” Implementation of the intervention was expected to achieve seven departmental goals whose achievement would lead to the expected health outcomes envisaged during the intervention formulation: (i) provision of strategic leadership and creation of a social compact for better health outcomes; (ii) managing the financial affairs for sustainable health service delivery; (iii) building a strategic and dedicated workforce that is responsive to service demands; (iv) re-engineering PHC to improve access to quality services; (v) developing, operating and managing infrastructure for compliance and better health outcomes; (vi) strengthening the information and knowledge management system to optimise performance and research capabilities and (vii) optimising and supporting implementation of key priority programmes (transformation, affirmative action and business process re-engineering).

The main factors to be addressed included mainstreaming of the WHO health systems building blocks, strengthening of policies and procedures, re-engineering of patient admission and discharge, and improving the leadership capacity of managers. Amongst the malleable factors included were aspects forming part of the managers’ additional duties and reporting responsibilities, firstly, in terms of the service delivery building block, improved integration; and, secondly, in respect of the leadership/governance building block, appropriate distribution of delegated powers within the system.

Emergency Medical Services are crucial in ensuring consistent accessibility of the different levels of healthcare through the referral system. There was a need to review the referral policy and guidelines and to reconfigure referral pathways to enable easier and quicker access to services with the referral of patients to the closest health facility in times of need and to reduce the number of patient transport and emergency vehicles on the road so as to reduce operational costs.

Reconfiguration of the health service platform was to entail, firstly, that the fixed PHC facilities had to be grouped into clusters such that each cluster would consist of a community health centre or 24-h clinic with a number of fixed PHC clinics, mobile clinics, health posts, and Ward Based Outreach Teams referring to it within a given vicinity and not necessarily aligned to municipal boundaries. The composition of these teams is six to ten community health workers, a data capturer and a team leader. In terms of South Africa’s PHC re-engineering agenda [ 38 ], these teams are meant to become part of the multi-disciplinary PHC team setup within the district health system. The health promotion, disease prevention, therapeutic, rehabilitative and palliative roles of the Ward Based Outreach Teams must be supported by health practitioners in PHC facilities and by environmental health officers in the community [ 39 ]. The teams are managed by professional or enrolled nurses who are additionally responsible for post-natal and community health worker-referred home visits to patients.

The second aspect of the reconfiguration of the health service platform was that each PHC cluster was to fall under the leadership and supervision of one cluster manager and management team and each PHC clinic or community health centre had to be managed by one operational manager. Smaller district hospitals within a specific district were to be reorganised as complexes managed by a chief executive officer with a standardised management team, including clinical, nursing service, administration and finance managers. The chief executive officers of the hospital complexes were to report to the chief directors responsible for the different districts.

The third aspect of the reconfiguration of the health service platform was that the District Clinical Specialist Teams had to assume a leadership role in clinical governance programmes in district hospitals in conjunction with the hospital clinical managers.

Step 3: Alteration

Kaplan et al. [ 20  p. 5] defines this step as follows: “Change the design of organizations, processes, or policies to enhance the results of the interplay and engage in a continuous improvement process that promotes learning at all levels.” The executive leadership decided that a skills audit needed to be conducted and to revisit and revise the FSDoH’s organogram. A decision was made to redeploy some managers to more suitable areas of operation and to revise their responsibilities. These changes were to be supported by compliance to the public service regulations of which the executive authority was the custodian. The intention was to ensure that the right people were placed in the right positions to enable them to improve their performance and to help the FSDoH deliver better public health service outcomes. The whole process of altering the previous ways of working was informed by the conceptualisation of the health systems building blocks and interlinking change mechanisms championed by executive functionaries as shown in Table 3 . It was also decided to revisit and amend the previous Strategic Transformation Plan of 2012–2030 on an annual basis to keep functionaries engaged in continuous service improvement on a sustainable basis using the HSGA intervention model.

The finalisation and refinement of the HSGA intervention model by end-2014 was a prelude to the development of the Strategic Transformation Plan 2015–2030 in January 2014. The model was to be used as a tool to integrate and implement the Plan’s programmes moving forward. Hence, the HSGA model was approved as an official policy for compliance, monitoring, and reporting in January 2016. The HSGA policy would guide the FSDoH’s approach in implementing the reconfigured service platform and improving healthcare service integration, governance and accountability. It was expected that the HSGA policy would ensure uniform understanding and application of the HSGA intervention model and performance measures of the Balanced Scorecard throughout the department’s services.

Step 4: Implementation

Kaplan et al. [ 20  p. 5] defines this step as follows: “Operationalize the integration of the new dynamics to facilitate the ways people, processes, facilities, equipment, and organizations all work together to achieve better care at lower cost.” The HSGA policy outlined the different implementation roles and responsibilities of the various managers, institutions, stakeholders and formations within the FSDoH and aligned all the annual performance plans, district health plans and the Strategic Transformation Plan 2015–2030 to the HSGA intervention model using the Balanced Scorecard as a performance management tool.

The incremental implementation of the HSGA intervention model which took place from February 2014, was to ensure sustainable implementation and compliance to policy and procedure and was based on normalisation process theory. The implementation process was also directed by the six WHO health systems building blocks that were translated into the seven departmental goals. A subsequent paper will assess the impact of the HSGA policy on the public health systems functioning from the viewpoint of health managers and governors based on Balanced Scorecard performance measurement results.

The HSGA intervention model was developed and formalised into policy in a quest to bind the employees and managers across the whole department to comply with implementation of the model in a sustainable manner and in line with the Strategic Transformation Plan 2015–2030. The model was designed with support and input from all the relevant stakeholders.

A process flow was conceptualised on how service delivery at the district level could be functionally integrated with the next levels of referral through a cascade termed Re-engineering of Admission (READ) to enable smooth referral of the patient from the community up to the tertiary level of care. Another process flow termed the Re-engineering of Discharge (RED) [ 40 ] was adopted to direct the safe referral and movement of the patient downwards through the system. These changes were reflected in a conceptual framework, the HSGA intervention model, illustrating the need for interventions to integrate the various levels of care within the reviewed policy positions and structural rearrangements (Fig.  3 ).

Health Systems Governance & Accountability intervention model

‘Inreach’ refers to deploying health professionals to a higher level facility for purposes of learning. ‘Outreach’ refers to deploying health professionals to a higher level facility for purposes of teaching. CCG community care giver, CEO chief executive officer, CHC community health centre, DAC District AIDS Council, DHC District Health Council, DHS district health system, EMS Emergency Medical Services, FHT Family Health Team, FIT Facility Improvement Team, FSPC Free State Psychiatric Complex, GP general practitioner, M&E monitoring and evaluation, NGO non-governmental organisation, SHT School Health Team

The HSGA intervention model emphasised the accountability of the system to the community and patients it served. It indicated how the different healthcare levels dovetailed into one integrated system to improve health system performance based on the six health system building blocks. It provided a framework for leadership, governance, and accountability throughout the whole health system, including community- and facility-based PHC, as well as district, provincial, tertiary, and central hospital services. All healthcare providers were required to comply with the approved referral and service protocols and to provide feedback to the referring facility clinician for further handling and down-referral for continuity of care.

In respect of the service delivery building block, the HSGA intervention model and policy also directed that all public healthcare facilities had to adhere to the norms and standards required by the Council for Health Service Accreditation of Southern Africa; healthcare services had to be provided in an integrated manner with good co-operation and communication between facilities and functionaries; patient movement up and down the health service value-chain had to be managed in line with procedural and clinical protocols; monitoring and evaluation functions had to be co-ordinated by the strategic planning and monitoring and evaluation unit at the corporate office; the District Clinical Specialist Teams had to conduct clinical oversight, clinical governance protocol audits and surveillance in district facilities; and the different levels of care had to be linked through a reciprocal transfer and referral system.

Regarding the leadership/governance building block, the HSGA intervention model and policy directed that leadership and managers had to ensure coordination and integration of governance efforts around a common mission to focus management teams’ activities on achieving optimum performance of the public health system; adopt a holistic view of the system’s operations to enable effective achievement of desired outcomes; comply with service integration imperatives and clinical governance protocols; and monitor obstacles with immediate intervention where necessary. Led by the district managers, the District Management Teams were responsible for governance at the PHC level, integration of service implementation, and compliance with policies and procedures. The District Management Teams were expected to collaborate with multiple internal and external stakeholders who play a role in disease control programme management. All the changes were streamlined in accordance with the building blocks and outlined in the draft Strategic Transformation Plan 2015–2030 [ 41 ].

Table 4 shows the changes in the configuration of the institutions per district, including the planned establishment of 32 health posts. A health post is a facility below the level of a clinic which is staffed by lower-category nurses allowing community members to collect their chronic medicines or receive care for minor ailments like wound care. Comprehensive PHC services provided by the Ward Based Outreach Teams in the households, health posts, mobile clinics and fixed PHC facilities were established for effective and efficient PHC re-engineering, thus bringing healthcare services closer to the people. The PHC facilities were re-organised into PHC clusters, each having a group of PHC clinics and a community health centre. Certain PHC clinics were upgraded to community health centres, and certain small hospitals downgraded to community health centres.

EMS are responsible for all transportation of patients, both in emergencies and planned patient referrals in FSDoH facilities. Patient routes had to be aligned with the changed referral paths and routes according to the reviewed departmental referral policy considering that the 60-seater buses were to be operated on long distances to Bloemfontein only. Bloemfontein is the capital of the province and is where most of the higher-level referral and specialist hospitals are located. The categories of patients referred to Bloemfontein was reviewed in line with the approved service packages and patient needs. The new routes improved the flow of patients to the nearest facilities with reduced transit times. Therefore, the operational costs of Emergency Medical Services were reduced as well.

To transform mental health service delivery by 2030, the service delivery system focused on the following aspects within an agreed upon timeframe. In line with the WHO (2003) recommendations [ 42 ] regarding organisation of mental health services, the mental health system was planned to include an array of settings and levels that included primary care, community-based settings, general hospitals, and specialised psychiatric hospitals. It was further planned that the Free State Psychiatric Complex would undertake outreach visits to regional hospitals and that the latter would in turn conduct outreach services to district hospitals and selected community health centres. Further outreach services would be provided to the Kimberley Hospital Complex in the Northern Cape province and Queen Mamohato Memorial Hospital in Lesotho.

This study describes the development the Health Systems Governance & Accountability (HSGA) intervention model by the FSDoH in collaboration with the community and other stakeholders following a participatory action approach. Researchers publish the processes they use to develop interventions to improve healthcare to help future developers to improve their approaches, plans and practices. Description of the development of interventions is important because it provides future developers with the terminology and language to identify, conceptualise and explain their rationales and more effectively plan and design context-specific intervention models [ 43 ]. It is important to understand how the models that end up being designed during interventions, complement the traditional ways of doing things for the betterment of a common good such as public health. A movement toward an assets-based approach to intervention design and implementation has started to take place in public health where intervention development processes emphasise activating and drawing on the strengths and skills of individuals, communities, and through the co-production of intervention programmes and research [ 44 ].

A systematic review of studies reporting intervention development showed that they mainly took a pragmatic self-selected approach, a theory- and evidence-based approach, or a partnership approach, e.g., community-based participatory research or co-design [ 45 ]. Both theory (systems) and provider/user approaches were utilised in the development of the HSGA model in the Free State. Systems theory and the WHO health systems building blocks framework helped the developers and participating stakeholders to conceptualise and plan a whole-system intervention, the HSGA intervention model and policy. The participatory approach allowed the developers to incorporate the experiences and ideas of frontline health systems users and providers and managers across all levels of the public health hierarchy. Obtaining both user and provider perspectives is crucial in efforts to model and design context-specific public health strengthening initiatives [ 46 , 47 , 48 ].

Previous studies to find ways to improve health outcomes through a consultative and iterative process involving users identified barriers such as weak and unorganised referral patterns and inadequate human resources as crucial [ 44 , 49 ]. The development of the ‘Better Health Outcomes through Mentoring and Assessment’ (BHOMA) intervention in Zambia was intended to specifically address such challenges [ 17 ]. Similar challenges were addressed in the development of the Free State HSGA model, but the focus was on improving integration and performance assessment as means to improve health outcomes. Both interventions were intended to provide the system-wide solutions to the challenges, rather than focusing on specific diseases. The influence that the users exerted could be thought of as a ‘user intervention’ because they would in turn support changes and improvements while constantly assessing whether they are appropriate or not. Von Hippel [ 44 ] and Altman et al. [ 50 ], reiterate that the context and support for this participatory approach to ‘user intervention’ leverages user innovation capability in influencing the manner of medicine practice or provision of health services, which is considered a novel approach in dispensing public health. Von Hippel explains that when faced with problems or challenges, the users of the products, services or beneficiaries of processes are often likely to develop solutions to their problems and sometimes offer innovative ways and new approaches and solutions to challenges facing them. Hence the essential aspects of the HSGA intervention model were premised on collective solution finding and co-creation of approaches. Users and communities therefore got to enjoy the benefits of the changes they themselves helped to bring about. That is why integration of inputs from users or beneficiaries into the development of innovative approaches or models should be considered as a way to leverage the strengths of communities served by health providers for efficient and effective interventions to be developed and new approaches to be generated to address the varied complexities of health service challenges they face [ 50 ].

In the development of the HSGA intervention model obtaining users and communities’ perspectives took the form of unannounced visits to hospitals and clinics and community meetings respectively. This worked well because during the unannounced visits and community meetings, different and diverse groups of patients and providers tended to congregate. They presented their respective views and suggestions on which processes need to be changed or improved for the service offering to improve. This was challenging to deal with because the views and recommendations of the respective users, communities and frontline health staff were often diverse and needed to be deciphered, understood by all parties, and reconciled.

In the development of the HSGA intervention model obtaining managers and providers’ perspectives took the form of learning from and incorporating their views and suggestions presented during routine management meetings, as well as engagements during routine performance assessments. This was advantageous because challenges and proposed solutions presented by the managers and providers could then be directly discussed and addressed. Defects in the referral processes and clinical procedures were identified and reviewed for translation into corrective policy positions. This was challenging because procedures and processes often had to be reviewed ‘on-the-go’ and drafters were to affect the changes on the existing process and procedure documents forthwith, for later implementation.

In the development of the HSGA intervention model obtaining other stakeholders and experts’ perspectives took the form, amongst others, of a health indaba . This was beneficial because various stakeholders at the indaba raised their views, some of which corroborated the issues earlier raised by users and communities, as well as during the initial situation appraisal. It was sometimes difficult to differentiate personal experiences from health system shortcomings relating to process or procedure defects or challenges. Nevertheless, the recommendations made were considered in the overall revisions of processes and procedures.

Using systems theory to understand organisational performance helps intervention developers to obtain a broader perspective that enables recognition of patterns, cycles and overall structures, rather than focus on specific events or aspects of the system [ 51 , 52 ]. While functional integration of health services may be an attainable vision [ 53 ], certain important intersecting health system capabilities are required to bring about frontline service integration as well. These include fully functional frontline health services, adequately trained and motivated healthcare workers, availability of suitable technology, and devolving authority and decision-making processes to lower cadres of frontline managers and staff to adapt integration processes to local circumstances [ 54 ]. Therefore, during the development of the HSGA model, Kaplan’s theory influenced the assessment of how the health system was organised, as well as the identification of the various service interlinkages and interdependencies of the multiple elements (building blocks) involved in public health systems strengthening and performance. The various interlinkages and process dependencies were clearly described, broadly understood and reconfigurations entrenched through policy changes to ensure continuous improvement of the Free State public health system’s performance.

The WHO considers systems thinking as an essential ingredient in opening pathways to identification and resolution of health system challenges [ 55 , 56 ]. The use of the WHO building blocks approach [ 2 , 15 ] to guide the integration process of the HSGA intervention model, placed emphasis on the interactions and interdependencies to guide the management of transitions among and between the demand side (community) and the supply side (healthcare facilities and staff).

The Zambian BHOMA study [ 17 ] proposed a framework to evaluate a complex health system intervention applying systems thinking concepts. It formed the basis for intervention development using systems thinking, where emphasis was placed on understanding the complete system and how the various parts interacted with each other to create a functional whole as opposed to the individual parts that made up the system [ 57 ]. In the development of the HSGA model in the Free State, system theory and the WHO building blocks framework were used to as a ‘template’ to assess the effectiveness and operational efficiencies of various components or divisions within the health services platform. This approach was appropriate because we could discern areas of weakness and how they could be addressed.

The HSGA intervention model was directed at three levels of care, i.e. (i) the community and sub-district levels of care; (ii) the district and regional level of care and (iii) the provincial level of care. At the community and sub-district level, care was to be delivered by Ward Based Outreach Teams and community health workers; at the district or regional level, by local PHC clinics, community health centres and district and regional hospitals; and at the provincial level, by provincial hospitals and the central hospital. Within and between these levels, transitions in the form of READ and RED [ 40 ] were intended to be managed efficiently and effectively in an integrated manner to mitigate morbidity and mortality. Austin et al. [ 49 ] acknowledged that the movement of a patient from the home or community setting into the health system during admissions into a healthcare facility or hospital and vice versa, constitutes transitions to avoid the effects of care-risk factors that can lead to morbidities, excess stays and even re-admissions if those transitions are ineffective and inefficient. In the Free State, the READ and RED transitions were conceptualised and applied to improve referral up and down the referral hierarchy. The effectiveness and efficiency of these transitions were based on the strength of the referral system which the HSGA intervention model sought to integrate and improve. Austin et al. [ 49 ] pointed out that both the system and patient factors exert influence on the transitions and the capacity to address complex barriers to safe admission and discharge procedures and workflows. The development of approaches like the HSGA intervention model to address and improve complex transitions effectively and efficiently require continued testing and assessment of their effectiveness in view of the complexity of the transitions.

Austin et al. [ 49 ] corroborate the importance of iterative, internally driven intervention, monitoring, and wide dissemination during the implementation process as was applied in the Free State and will be reported in another paper. In the current study monitoring or evaluation was conducted using Kaplan and Norton’s (1992) Balanced Scorecard performance measurement tool [ 4 ]. This decision was based on its successful application in healthcare settings and organisations elsewhere [ 31 , 32 , 33 ]. Our experience aligns with that of Oliveira et al. [ 31 ] that the Balanced Scorecard is a valuable management tool to enhance flexibility, collaboration, innovation and adaptation that contribute to improve healthcare integration and outcomes.

A limitation of this descriptive study is that it is first authored by the former executive leader of the FSDoH, and an element of bias is thus inevitable. However, inclusion of authors who are not employees of the department helped to mitigate this bias. A strength of the current study is that the health system as a whole, and not just disparate elements within it, were considered in the development of the HSGA intervention model. The study provides useful insight on practical issues to consider during the development of public health interventions geared towards health systems strengthening and moves away from the traditional practice of addressing only individual behaviour change. Furthermore, this study attempts to provide a systematic approach to health systems intervention development with community and stakeholder involvement and aligns with Wight et al.’s [ 3 ] and Kaplan et al.’s [ 20 ] recommendation that a systematic approach to intervention development, as well as rigorous evaluation, are required. Another strength of the HSGA intervention model is that it was developed during normal service delivery processes and mostly during routine management planning meetings and discussions.

Public health practice should be evidence-based and grounded in theory and systems thinking. The WHO’s health system building blocks framework is a useful guide to conceptualise and assess the status of a health system and its performance and is a valuable tool to align or configure services according to communities’ actual realities and needs. Based on the building blocks concept, the HSGA intervention model was developed by the provincial health department during routine service delivery conditions to bring about desired reforms where gaps and inefficiencies had previously been identified. Reconfiguration of the service platform provided an enabling framework for future efforts to enhance integration, improve service delivery and improve the public health system’s performance. Thus, the development of the HSGA intervention model and its formalisation into an official policy provided an opportunity to improve healthcare service integration, health system performance, and improve health outcomes in the Free State public health sector. The study contributes to the body of knowledge on health systems strengthening and illustrates how to draw on both theory and participatory approaches to develop an intelligible intervention to improve public health system integration and performance.

Availability of data and materials

No datasets were generated during the documentary review and therefore no data sharing is applicable to this article.

Abbreviations

Better Health Outcomes through Mentoring and Assessment

Free State Department of Health

Health Systems Governance & Accountability

National Department of Health

Primary health care

Re-engineering of Admission

Re-engineering of Discharge

World Health Organization

Malakoane B, Heunis JC, Chikobvu P, Kigozi NG, Kruger WH. Public health system challenges in the Free State, South Africa: a situational appraisal to inform health systems strengthening. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:58.

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

World Health Organization. Everybody business: strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes. WHO’s framework. Geneva: WHO; 2007.

Google Scholar  

Wight D, Wimbush E, Jepson R, Doi L. Six steps in quality intervention development (6SQuID). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020;70:520–5.

Article   Google Scholar  

Kaplan RS, Norton DP. The Balanced Scorecard - measures that drive performance. Harv Bus Rev. 1992;70(71):9.

Ross J, Stevenson F, Dack C, Pal K, May C, Michie S, et al. Developing an implementation strategy for a digital health intervention: an example in routine healthcare. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:794.

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Free State Department of Health. Free State Department of Health Annual Report 2014/2015. Bloemfontein: FSDoH; 2015.

Armitage GD, Suter E, Oelke ND, Adair CE. Health systems integration: state of the evidence. Int J Integr Care. 2009;9:e82.

World Health Organization. The world health report 2005: make every mother and child count. Geneva: WHO; 2005.

Book   Google Scholar  

Heyeres M, McCalman J, Tsey K, Kinchin I. The complexity of health service integration: a review of reviews. Public Health Front. 2016;4:233.

World Health Organization, United Nations Children’s Fund. A vision for primary health care in the 21st century: towards universal health coverage and the Sustainable Development Goals. Geneva: WHO; 2018.

Heunis C, Schneider H. Integration of ART: concepts, policy and practice. Acta Academica Supplementum. 2006;2006(Suppl 1):256–85.

van Rensburg HCJ, Engelbrecht MC. Transformation of the South African health system: post-1994. In: van Rensburg HCJ, editor. Heath and heath care in South Africa. 2nd ed. Pretoria: Van Schaik Pubishers; 2012. p. 121–88.

Heunis JC, Wouters E, Kigozi NG. HIV, AIDS and tuberculosis in South Africa: trends, challenges and responses. In: van Rensburg HCJ, editor. Health and health care in South Africa. 2nd ed. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers; 2012. p. 293–360.

McIntyre D, Klugman B. The human face of decentralisation and integration of health services: experience from South Africa. Reprod Health Matters. 2003;11(21):108–19.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

World Health Organization. Monitoring the building blocks of health systems: a handbook of indicators and their measurement strategies. Geneva: WHO; 2010.

Manyazewal T. Using the World Health Organization health system building blocks through survey of healthcare professionals to determine the performance of public healthcare facilities. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:50.

Mutale W, Bond V, Mwanamwenge MT, Mlewa S, Balabanova D, Spicer N, et al. Systems thinking in practice: the current status of the six WHO building blocks for health system strengthening in three BHOMA intervention districts of Zambia: a baseline qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:291.

Morris LD, Grimmer KA, Twizeyemariya A, Coetzee M, Leibbrandt MC, Louw QA. Health system challenges affecting rehabilitation services in South Africa. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;43(6):877–83.

Mounier-Jack S, Griffiths UK, Closser S, Burchett H, Marchal B. Measuring the health systems impact of disease control programmes: a critical reflection on the WHO building blocks framework. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:278.

Kaplan G, Griffiths UK, Closser S, Burchett H, Marchal B. Bringing a systems approach to health. Discussion paper. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine and National Academy of Engineering; 2013.

Khan S, Vandermorris A, Shepherd J, Begun JW, Jordan Lanham H, Uhl-Bien M, et al. Embracing uncertainty, managing complexity: applying complexity thinking principles to transformation efforts in healthcare systems. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:192.

Statistics South Africa. Mid-year population estimates 2020. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa; 2020.

Day C, Gray A. Health and related indicators. In: Padarath A, English R, editors. South African Health Review 2012/13. Durban: Health Systems Trust; 2013. p. 207–322.

Oboirien K, Harris B, Goudge J, Eyles J. Implementation of district-based clinical specialist teams in South Africa: Analysing a new role in a transforming system. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:600.

Cusack C, Cohen B, Mignone J, Chartier MJ, Lutfiyya Z. Participatory action as a research method with public health nurses. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74(7):1544–53.

Cordeiro L, Soares CB. Action research in the healthcare field: a scoping review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018;16(4):1003–47.

Kushniruk A, Nøhr C. Participatory design, user involvement and health IT evaluation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;222:139–51.

PubMed   Google Scholar  

DeSmet A, Thompson D, Baranowski T, Palmeira A, Verloigne M, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Is participatory design associated with the effectiveness of serious digital games for healthy lifestyle promotion? A meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(4):e94.

Tiruneh GT, Zemichael NF, Betemariam WA, Karim AM. Effectiveness of participatory community solutions strategy on improving household and provider health care behaviors and practices: A mixed-method evaluation. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0228137.

Pringle J, Doi L, Jindal-Snape D, Jepson R, McAteer J. Adolescents and health-related behaviour: using a framework to develop interventions to support positive behaviours. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018;4:69.

Oliveira HC, Rodrigues LL, Craig R. Bureaucracy and the balanced scorecard in health care settings. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2020;33(3):247–59.

Al-Kaabi SK, Chehab MA, Selim N. The balanced scorecard as a performance management tool in the healthcare sector – the case of the Medical Commission Department at the Ministry of Public Health, Qatar. Cereus. 2019;11(7):e5262.

Bisbe J, Barrubés J. The Balanced Scorecard as a management tool for assessing and monitoring strategy implementation in health care organizations. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2012;65(10):919–27.

Free State Department of Health. Strategic Transformation Plan 2015/2030: FSDoH. Bloemfontein: FSDoH; 2015.

Free State Department of Health. Policy on the Implementation of the Health Systems Governance and Accountability (HSGA) Model. Bloemfontein: FSDoH; 2015.

Mojaki ME, Letskokgohka ME, Govender M. Referral steps in district health system side-stepped. S Afr Med J. 2011;101(2):109.

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

National Department of Health. Referral Policy for South African Health Services and Referral Implementation Guidelines. Pretoria: NDoH; 2020.

National Department of Health. Provincial guidelines for the implementation of the three streams of primary health care re-engineering. Pretoria: NDoH; 2011.

National Department of Health. Policy Framework and Strategy for Ward-based Primary Healthcare Outreach Teams 2018/19 - 2023/24. Pretoria: NDoH; 2018.

Adams C, Stephens K, Whiteman K, Kersteen H, Katruska J. Implementation of the Re-Engineered Discharge (RED) Toolkit to decrease all-cause readmission rates at a rural community hospital. Qual Manag Health Care. 2014;23(3):169–77.

Free State Department of Health. Strategic Transformation Plan 2015–2030: Free State Department of Health. Bloemfontein: FSDoH; 2015.

World Health Organization. Mental Health Policy and Service Guidance Package. Geneva: WHO; 2003.

Glavin K, Schaffer MA, Kvarme LG. The Public Health Intervention Wheel in Norway. Public Health Nurs. 2019;36(6):819–28.

Von Hippel C. A next generation assets-based public health intervention development model: The public as innovators. Front Public Health. 2018;6:248.

Croot l, O’Cathain A, Sworn K, Yardley L, Turner K, Duncan E, et al. Developing interventions to improve health: a systematic mapping review of international practice between 2015 and 2016. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019;5:127.

Ameh S, Klipstein-Grobusch K, D’ambruoso L, Kahn K, Tollman SM, Gomez-Olive FX. Quality of integrated chronic disease care in rural South Africa: user and provider perspectives. Health Policy Plan. 2017;32:257–66.

Phiri SN, Fylkesnes K, Ruano YL, Moland KM. ‘Born before arrival’: user and provider perspectives on health facility childbirths in Kapiri Mposhi district. Zambia BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:323.

Poremski D, Harris DW, Kahan D, Pauly D, Leszcz M, O’Campo P, et al. Improving continuity of care for frequent users of emergency departments: service user and provider perspectives. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016;40:55–9.

Austin EJ, Neukirch J, Ong TD, Simpson L, Berger GN, Keller CS, et al. Development and implementation of a complex health system intervention targeting transitions of care from hospital to post-acute care. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(2):358–65.

Altman M, Huang TTK, Breland JY. Design thinking in health care. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018;15:180128.

Checkland P. Systems thinking, systems practice. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1981.

Atun R, Manade N. Health systems and systems thinking. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press; 2006.

Schneider S. Functional integration of health services. Aust J Rural Health. 2004;12:36–7.

Topp SM, Abimbola S, Joshi R, Negin J. How to assess and prepare health systems in low- and middle-income countries for integration of services - a systematic review. Health Policy Plan. 2018;33:298–312.

de Savigny D, Adam T, editors. Systems thinking for health systems strengthening. Geneva: Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research; 2009.

Paina L, Peters DH. Understanding pathways for scaling up health services through the lens of complex adaptive systems. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27:365–73.

Von Bertalanffy L. General system theory: foundations, development, applications. New York: Braziller; 1976.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the participation of the FSDoH executive, divisional and programme managers and their support teams, as well as frontline healthcare workers, community representatives, community members, clinic committee and hospital board members and patients for their participation in the development of the HSGA intervention model and process reviews.

All non-routine expenses were paid for by BM.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Community Health, University of the Free State, PO Box 339, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa

Benjamin Malakoane & Willem Hendrik Kruger

Centre for Health Systems Research & Development, University of the Free State, PO Box 339, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa

James Christoffel Heunis & Nanteza Gladys Kigozi

Department of Community Health, Free State Department of Health, University of the Free State, PO Box 277, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa

Perpetual Chikobvu

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

The research was designed and executed, and the first draft was prepared by BM. JCH, PC, NGK and WHK reviewed and helped to revise the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Christoffel Heunis .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

The study was approved by the Health Sciences Research Ethics Committee of the University of the Free State (Referral number HSREC 11/2016). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Reports and minutes collected as part of routine management processes were reviewed. No personal identifying information is revealed.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

BM was the Member of the Executive Council for Health and PC and WHK employees of the FSDoH at the time of the study. JCH and NGK declare they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Malakoane, B., Heunis, J.C., Chikobvu, P. et al. Improving public health sector service delivery in the Free State, South Africa: development of a provincial intervention model. BMC Health Serv Res 22 , 486 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07777-x

Download citation

Received : 18 August 2021

Accepted : 08 March 2022

Published : 12 April 2022

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07777-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• WHO health systems building blocks
• Health system strengthening
• Integration
• Governance and Accountability

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

• General enquiries: [email protected]

Service Delivery in South Africa at a Glance

Introduction

Back in 2009, the Constitutional Court stipulated “[w]ater is life. Without it, nothing organic grows. Human beings need water to drink, to cook, to wash, and to grow their food. Without it, we will die.” [i] Fast-forward ten years and sustainable access to sufficient and adequate water is still a major concern for many within South Africa. As a result, some are forced to approach the courts for assistance.

The history of service delivery, or lack of it, in South Africa has been troublesome to say the least. A few weeks ago a general news search of service delivery or local municipalities would have revealed many articles by irate residents about the failures of their municipalities to deliver basic services. Now there is an intriguing High Court judgment in a case involving a local municipality in the North West, the Kgetlengrivier Local Municipality. Residents have finally won. [ii]

Kgetlengrivier Concerned Citizens v Kgetlengrivier Local Municipality

In a case that offers hope to exasperated residents around South Africa, the High Court of South Africa North West Division, Mahikeng granted the Kgetlengrivier Concerned Citizens control of the water and sewage works after an urgent application was launched regarding intermittent water supply and raw sewage running into the Koster and Elands rivers. [iii] The High Court found that the Kgetlengrivier Local Municipality was in breach of “its obligations to prevent contamination of the environment whilst allowing raw sewage to spill”. In addition, the Court found that both the local municipality as well as the district municipality, Bojanala Platinum District Municipality, were in breach of their “constitutional obligations for providing potable water sustainably”. [iv]

This is not the first time the Kgetlengrivier Concerned Citizens have taken control [v] but hopefully this will be the last time. An agreement was reached, and made a court order on 12 January 2021, that an implementing agent must be appointed to run the water and sewage works. [vi] In terms of this agreement Magalies Water has been appointed for the “operation and maintenance of water and wastewater treatment plants for a period of three years”. [vii]

What about residents in other municipalities?

What does this mean for dissatisfied residents in other municipalities? Some residents’ associations are considering, or have implemented, a tax diversion policy, whereby the residents withhold or refuse to pay the rates and taxes to the relevant municipality until such time as that municipality provides the basic services. [viii] One such resident association is the Umdoni Action Group, from Scottburgh. [ix]

As tempting as this approach may seem, it would be inadvisable given the Constitutional Court’s ruling in Rademan v Moqhaka Local Municipality . [x] In this case, the Constitutional Court found that a municipality may consolidate the different components of a resident’s account and as such the resident’s electricity supply may be cut where payment of rates and taxes have been withheld despite the electricity account having been paid. [xi] Notwithstanding the Court providing that “[t]here is no obligation on a resident, customer or ratepayer to pay the municipality for a service that has not been rendered” [xii] a resident would have to be able to show that no services were rendered by the municipality at all. Since the writing of this brief, it has come to the HSF’s attention with great sadness that Mrs Olga Rademan, a citizen activist who refused to stay quiet in the face of her municipality’s failures, has unfortunately passed away. She must be remembered for her commitment to standing up for what is just.

In Pietermaritzburg, emboldened by the success of the Kgetlengrivier Concerned Citizens, the Msunduzi Association of Residents, Ratepayers and Civics has indicated that they are considering their available options, including approaching the courts, given the state of degradation of service delivery in the area. [xiii] Their position may be justified. The South African Human Rights Commission launched a court application last year over the Msunduzi Municipality’s control and management of the New England Road Landfill Site being a violation of the “right to an environment that is not harmful to their health or well-being” as contained in section 24 of the Constitution. [xiv] Not to mention that the municipality has been paying the salary of 121 “employees” who are either dead or who have resigned. [xv]

Similarly, the Centre for Good Governance and Social Justice, a newly formed NGO in the North West, has tried nearly every avenue at its disposal to hold the Mamusa Local Municipality to account for its consistent failures and degradation. Frustrated with the total lack of regard that the municipality has for its citizens, the Centre has approached the President as well as the South African Human Rights Commission for assistance. It has also instituted action against the municipality to remove the newly appointed municipal manager who, despite his previous removal from the post and a legal opinion finding he was unqualified, was reappointed to the position. Not leaving a stone unturned, the Centre has indicated that it is currently considered legal action similar to that as was taken in Kgetlengrivier. [xvi]

Recently, the South African Human Rights Commission has released a 100 plus page report wherein it finds that the Emfuleni Local Municipality is guilty of violating multiple human rights in its failure to prevent raw sewage from contaminating the Vaal River and Dam. [xvii] This includes a violation of the right to dignity, [xviii] freedom and security of the person, [xix] the environment, [xx] property; [xxi] health care, food, water and social security; [xxii] children; [xxiii] and just administrative action. [xxiv] These findings, like that of the Kgetlengrivier case, indicate that there is an urgent need to address failures in service delivery.

In this report the South African Human Rights Commission recommends administration [xxv] . However as can be seen from Kgetlengrivier case, where the whole province is already under administration, [xxvi] this may not always be an adequate solution.

Local municipalities have faced a tough few weeks with findings of violations and reports of service delivery failures being repeatedly highlighted in the media. Whether other residents of failing municipalities will be able to achieve similar results is unknown, but it is not hard to imagine, given current reports, that there are other areas in comparable, if not identical, situations to those faced by the Kgetlengrivier Concerned Citizens. While it may not be as simple as merely approaching the court for an order as the precedent currently set means only the North West High Court is bound by the previous decision, but the case can definitely be considered to have persuasive value. But something needs to change. And until such time as local municipalities are able to deliver adequate services there seems little recourse other than legal action.

Chelsea Ramsden Legal Researcher [email protected]

[i] Mazibuko v City of Johannesburg [2009] ZACC 28 para 1.

[ii] See C Ryan “North West Residents Take Matters into Their Own Hands, and Get Court’s Blessing” (9 February 2021) available at https://www.moneyweb.co.za/news/south-africa/north-west-residents-take-matters-into-their-own-hands-and-get-courts-blessing/; P du Toit “Friday Briefing Taking Charge: How North West Residents Took on a Municipality and Won” (19 February 2021) available at https://www.news24.com/news24/opinions/fridaybriefing/friday-briefing-taking-charge-how-north-west-residents-took-on-a-municipality-and-won-20210219.

[iii] The Kgetlengrivier Concerned Citizens were, in terms of the court order dated 18 December 2020, entitled to take control of the water and sewage works if the local municipality failed to rectify the sewage spillage and provide potable water within ten week days of the order. The Kgetlengrivier Concerned Citizens took control on 7 January 2021.

[iv] Court order dated 18 December 2020 paras 4 and 13 respectively.

[v] Ryan note ii above that provides that urgent court orders were obtained in June 2018 and February 2020 granting the community control of the plants until they were up and running again.

[vi] Court order dated 12 January 2021 para 2.

[vii] Statement of MEC Mmoloki Cwaile on Kgetlengrivier Local Municipality Court Order (14 January 2021) available at https://www.gov.za/speeches/mec-cwaile-kgetlengrivier-local-municipality-court-order-14-jan-2021-0000#.

[viii] C Ryan “The Revolt of the Ratepayers” (10 February 2021) available at https://www.moneyweb.co.za/news/south-africa/the-revolt-of-the-ratepayers/.

[x] [2013] ZACC 11. See the HSF’s previous brief by K Premhid “Service Delivery: What Does the Constitutional Court Say?” available at https://hsf.org.za/publications/hsf-briefs/service-delivery-what-does-the-constitutional-court-say.

[xi] Rademan paras 32-3.

[xii] Ibid para 42.

[xiii] T Magubane “Msunduzi Ratepayers Threaten Legal Action Over Poor Service Delivery” (2 February 2021) available at https://www.iol.co.za/mercury/news/msunduzi-ratepayers-threaten-legal-action-over-poor-service-delivery-84abb798-3523-4797-9910-bae058c547a4 . See also Ryan note vii above.

[xv] T Magubane “Msunduzi Council Haunted by More Than 100 Ghost Employees” (25 February 2021) available at https://www.iol.co.za/mercury/news/msunduzi-council-haunted-by-more-than-100-ghost-employees-f1426fec-01d0-4e42-b45d-9fda08aa667b.

[xvi] C Ryan “Another Citizen Group Takes its Local Municipality to Court” (26 February 2021) available at https://www.moneyweb.co.za/news/south-africa/another-citizen-group-takes-local-municipality-to-court/.

[xvii] Final Report of the Gauteng Provincial Inquiry into the Sewage Problem of the Vaal River (17 February 2021) available at https://www.sahrc.org.za/home/21/files/The%20Vaal%20Inquiry%20Final%20Report_17022021.pdf.

[xviii] Ibid para 11.3.1. See the Constitution, section 10: “Everyone has inherent dignity and the right to have their dignity respected and protected.”

[xix] Ibid para 11.3.2. See the Constitution, section 12(e): “Everyone has the right to freedom and security of the person, which includes the right not to be treated or punished in a cruel, inhuman or degrading way”.

[xx] Ibid para 11.3.3. See the Constitution, section 24(a): “Everyone has the right to an environment that is not harmful to their health or well-being”.

[xxi] Ibid para 11.3.4. See the Constitution, section 25(4)(b): “property is not limited to land”.

[xxii] Ibid para 11.3.5. See the Constitution, section 27(1)(b): “Everyone has the right to have access to sufficient food and water”.

[xxiii] Ibid para 11.3.6. See the Constitution, section 28(1)(d): “Every child has the right to be protected from maltreatment, neglect, abuse or degradation”.

[xxiv] Ibid para 11.3.7. See the Constitution, section 33(1): “Everyone has the right to administrative action that is lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair”.

[xxv] Ibid paras 12.10-11.

[xxvi] A Makinana “Government Extends its North West Intervention by Another Three Months” (15 February 2021) available at https://www.timeslive.co.za/politics/2021-02-15-government-extends-its-north-west-intervention-by-another-three-months/.

Publications

Quick links.

• Announcements
• About AOSIS

Africa's Public Service Delivery & Performance Review

• Editorial Team
• Submission Procedures
• Submission Guidelines
• Submit and Track Manuscript
• Publication fees
• Make a payment
• Journal Information
• Journal Policies
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Reviewer Guidelines
• Article RSS
• Support Enquiry (Login required)
• Aosis Newsletter

Open Journal Systems

Crossref citations.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get specific, domain-collection newsletters detailing the latest CPD courses, scholarly research and call-for-papers in your field.

Africa’s Public Service Delivery & Performance Review    |    ISSN: 2310-2195 (PRINT)    |    ISSN: 2310-2152 (ONLINE)

ISSN: 2310-2152

Articles on South Africa election 2024

Displaying all articles.

South Africa’s public service is dysfunctional – the 5 main reasons why

Marcel Nagar , University of Johannesburg

South Africa elections: Zuma’s MK Party has hit the campaign trail with provocative rhetoric and few clear policies

Mashupye Herbert Maserumule , Tshwane University of Technology

South African elections: research explores how disillusioned ANC supporters might use their vote

Michael Braun , University of the Witwatersrand

Related Topics

• African colonialism
• African National Congress (ANC)
• inequality in South Africa
• Public opinion polls
• Service delivery
• Service delivery protests
• Social justice
• South Africa democracy 30

Top contributors

Senior Researcher/Lecturer, University of Johannesburg

Centennial Postdoctoral Fellow, University of the Witwatersrand

Professor of Public Affairs, Tshwane University of Technology

Professor of Public Theology in the Department of Beliefs and Practices, Faculty of Theology, at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (Free University of Amsterdam), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

• X (Twitter)
• Unfollow topic Follow topic

South Africa election: Who are ANC and other rival parties vying for power?

• Medium Text

AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS

Democratic alliance, economic freedom fighters, umkhonto we sizwe (mk), inkatha freedom party.

Sign up here.

Reporting by Bhargav Acharya and Tannur Anders; Editing by Estelle Shirbon and Ed Osmond

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. New Tab , opens new tab

World Chevron

Joost Klein expelled as Eurovision braces for protests

Dutch contestant Joost Klein has been expelled from Saturday's Eurovision Song Contest final after a complaint by a member of the production crew, organisers said, adding to the headaches for host Sweden as it also grapples with anti-Israel protests.

Fierce fighting was raging on Saturday for control of several Ukrainian villages near the Russian border as the Russian military sought to press home its attacks in the northeastern Kharkiv region, Kharkiv's governor said.

Palestinian militant group Hamas will release a video later on Saturday about the fate of Israeli hostage Nadav Popplewell, according to reports from Hamas media outlets.

• About Amazon (English)
• About Amazon (日本語)
• About Amazon (Français)
• About Amazon (Deutsch)
• Newsroom (Deutsch)
• About Amazon (Italiano)
• About Amazon (Polski)
• About Amazon (Español)
• Press Center (English)
• About Amazon (Português)

Amazon launches Amazon.co.za in South Africa

• Facebook Share
• Twitter Share
• LinkedIn Share
• Email Share
• Copy Link copied

Amazon announced the launch of Amazon.co.za, providing customers in South Africa with a new online shopping experience. Available by either downloading the Amazon Shopping App or visiting www.amazon.co.za on desktop or mobile browsers, customers can now discover and shop from a selection of local and international brands across 20 different product categories, take advantage of great prices, and enjoy same-day and next-day delivery.

For products fulfilled by Amazon, customers will enjoy free delivery on their first order, followed by free delivery for subsequent orders above R500 (about $27). Customers will also receive status updates via WhatsApp, so they can track their order at every step of the way. To further ensure a convenient and trusted shopping experience, Amazon.co.za offers hassle-free returns within 30 days via convenient options, including home pickup and self-drop. Additionally, customer support is provided via phone, email, and live chat.

“We are excited to launch Amazon.co.za, along with thousands of independent sellers in South Africa. We provide customers with great value, broad selection—including international and local products—and a convenient delivery experience," said Robert Koen, managing director of Sub-Saharan Africa, Amazon. "From today, customers can count on Amazon.co.za for a stress-free shopping experience, fast and reliable delivery, access to 3,000 pickup points, 24/7 customer support, and easy returns. Customers will also enjoy free delivery on their first order.”

Amazon.co.za features a wide range of products across categories such as Consumer Electronics, Sporting Equipment, Toys, Home, and small Kitchen Appliances, including international brands such as Apple, Sony, HP, LEGO, Chicco, Maybelline, Pampers, Neutrogena, and Johnson’s. The store will also include popular local brands from independent South African sellers, including Amanda-Jayne, King Kong Leather, Masodi, and Tiger Lily.

Amazon has also partnered with goGOGOgo , a South African non-profit organization, offering customers the opportunity to package eligible products in handmade gift bags. Based in Johannesburg with projects across South Africa, goGOGOgo is dedicated to building the capacity, skills, and knowledge of grandmothers, locally known as GOGOs. Made from recycled plastic and handsewn, these gift bags directly support local businesses and income generation opportunities for GOGOs raising children. With over four million children in South Africa being raised by GOGOs, this project helps contribute to improved life outcomes for these families.

“We are grateful for this wonderful opportunity to partner with Amazon to expand our reach and make a meaningful impact in promoting positive life opportunities and health outcomes for GOGOs and the children they are raising, often in difficult conditions,” said Founder of goGOGOgo, Jane Simmonds. “Through this partnership, Amazon recognizes the importance of our cause to support these extraordinary women in the vital role they play within their families and their communities around South Africa.”

New opportunities for local businesses

More than 60% of the items sold in Amazon’s stores globally are from independent sellers —most of which are small- and medium-sized businesses—providing a vast selection of products, competitive prices, and great convenience for shoppers. As part of its commitment to connect customers with businesses throughout the country, Amazon.co.za offers independent sellers an opportunity to rapidly launch, grow, and scale, while leveraging the innovative capabilities, valuable tools, and educational content provided by Amazon.

“The heartbeat of our small business enterprises measures the health of our country’s economy. If they are pumping, the nation is growing. We welcome companies that provide opportunities for local sellers and entrepreneurs to grow their businesses," said Minister of Small Business Development of South Africa, Stella Ndabeni-Abrahams. "We are counting on Amazon to provide such opportunities to our small enterprises, and look forward to working together to unlock these opportunities. This will create jobs and contribute to government’s objective of repairing the legacy of poverty and inequality. This is the heartbeat we want to hear.”

Launching the Amazon.co.za store with thousands of independent sellers, customers can choose from a wide variety of local brands including Nomakade, a local business offering organic hair care products. “With our uniquely formulated products made for coily African hair, we want to inspire self-confidence and self-love to celebrate the ‘Naturally Flexible Elegance’ of natural hair,” said Noma Diko, founder and CEO of Nomakade. “Nomakade has counted on word of mouth for its success, but now we look forward to reaching more South Africans with Amazon.”

South African businesses of all sizes can sell their products to customers across the country through Amazon. The company offers independent sellers access to easy onboarding tools, payment processing solutions, and promotional features to help them get discovered by customers, as well as reports and analytics to improve sales.

“Building a strong relationship with South African brands and businesses—small or large—is incredibly important to us. We want Amazon.co.za to be the place where they can reach millions of customers,” said Koen. “Today is only the start of Amazon.co.za. We will continue to improve and enhance our shopping experience to serve customers and sellers across South Africa.”

Experience Amazon.co.za on both desktop and mobile browsers, or download the Amazon Shopping app.

Sign up for the weekly Amazon newsletter

4 ways Amazon can help kick-start your summer, from shopping deals to movie guides

Amazon announces the launch of Amazon.ie in Ireland in 2025

Amazon's Summer Beauty Haul is May 13-19: Here are 40 of the best early deals to shop now

Amazon’s new grocery delivery subscription offers big savings to Prime members and EBT customers

An update on Amazon's plans for Just Walk Out and checkout-free technology

Here’s how much a Prime membership costs, and how to make the most of its benefits

How to reset your Prime login

15 Climate Pledge Friendly products to shop at Amazon during Earth Month

Amazon One launches an app to make sign-up for its palm-recognition service even easier

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

The politics of service delivery in South Africa: The local government sphere in context

Related Papers

Edward Lipuma , Neil Balchin

Strategic Review for Southern Africa

Xolisile G . Ngumbela

It is widely agreed that service provision is the biggest challenge facing South African municipalities, particularly smaller municipalities. This paper is a South African Municipality document study and focuses on creating a capable state through the developmental government and the effects of these problems in order to find ways to reduce the problems of service delivery. A qualitative approach was used, and data was collected from various jurisdictions through record review and telephone interviews to fill the data gaps in knowledge. Clean water, work prospects and free basic services have been described by most municipalities as the key service delivery obstacles that hinder the realization of a vision for the developmentally competent local government in South Africa. The study found that yet another problem is political intervention in municipal administration. Although public engagement in civic affairs is a legal necessity, much remains to be done to bring about meaningful p...

International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science

In South Africa, the demands expected of local government appear to be beyond the capacity of many municipalities across the country, and the problem can be traced back to governance and service delivery capabilities. Municipalities face a variety of obstacles, yet they are all obligated by law and the public to be responsive and accountable to the public. The study of urban governance in South Africa is based on a multi-level analytical framework and an interpretivist paradigm, using a qualitative research methodology. Poor leadership at both the political and administrative levels has resulted in a lack of monitoring and responsibility, which has been abused for self-interest. This has resulted in a lack of capability to carry out the local government’s mandate. Municipalities are characterised by disproportionate power distribution in decision-making. This does not allow for meaningful interaction or consultation with decision-makers, who are responsive to the needs and aspiratio...

Africa’s Public Service Delivery and Performance Review

Ntsako Mathonsi

The debate on service delivery and governance takes a centre stage across disciplines, schools of thought, countries, and in all platforms where people are able to raise their views othe two subjects. According to scholars and analysts, service delivery and <br />governance are closely related, and in many forms of government, service delivery occurs at the lower sphere which is the sphere closer to communities. TheSouth African context can serve as an exact scenario of this model. This makes local government to be a very important subject on matters of service delivery. South Africa has an interesting history that makes scholars, analysts, commentaries, and media companies worldwide to always keep a close eye on what happens in the country. This becomes clear from the analysis which makes the country to be theorised as a colonisation of a special type. It therefore becomes inevitable to consider the antecedents that shaped the manner in which governance and service delivery w...

Modimowabarwa Kanyane

This article aims to explore municipal service delivery challenges in South Africa between 1994 and 2013 in order to stimulate debate in addressing problems and challenges confronting municipalities. A fundamental question to be asked stems from the challenges of municipal service delivery. Why, in spite of the existence of regulatory and institutional frameworks, are municipalities still struggling to satisfy basic community needs such as water and electricity amongst others? All of government’s official documents and contemporary literature reviewed, including the summative record of historical facts and narrative data, are evidence of the qualitative research design employed in this study. It is clearly articulated in this article that the existence of a local municipality with poor service delivery is, amongst others, a direct consequence or manifestation of municipal capacity constraints, financial viability problems, service delivery protests, convoluted political process, cor...

Happy Mathew Tirivangasi

Journal article, published in International Conference on Public Administration and Development Alternatives (IPADA), The 2nd Annual Conference on ‛‛ The Independence of African States in the Age of Globalisation”, July 26-28, 2017

Thabile Chonco

This entry has been realised in the framework of the H2020-MSCA-RISE-2018 project "LoGov - Local Government and the Changing Urban-Rural Interplay". LoGov aims to provide solutions for local governments that address the fundamental challenges resulting from urbanisation. To address this complex issue, 18 partners from 17 countries and six continents share their expertise and knowledge in the realms of public law, political science, and public administration. LoGov identifies, evaluates, compares, and shares innovative practices that cope with the impact of changing urban-rural relations in five major local government areas: (1) local responsibilities and public services, (2) local financial arrangements, (3) structure of local government, (4) intergovernmental relations of local governments, and (5) people's participation in local decision-making. The present entry addresses local responsibilities and public services in South Africa. The entry forms part of the LoGov R...

Urban Studies

Laurence Piper

Jayanathan Govender

South Africa’s public policy approach since 1994 has been robust and forwardlooking. The policy process has been stretched over all areas of governance. Many policies have been translated into law, regulations and institutions which aimed explicitly as serving the public good. The key is narrowing the gap between the institutions of governance and people’s needs. However public dissatisfaction and mass protest in the local government sphere continue. Mass public protest consumes public capability and is therefore wasteful and counterproductive. The response of the authorities entering the contested space is usually reactionary and is hardly successful at addressing the core grievances of communities. Crucially, political representatives, i.e. ward and proportional representative councillors, are crowded out of resolution processes. Communities argue that mass protest and the appropriation of public space is an essential tactic of gaining the attention of the highest authorities. Mos...

Journal of Reviews on Global Economics

Lifescience Global Canada

The endemic municipal governance problems experienced since the dawn of the democratic dispensation manifested through the constant dysfunctional state of municipalities, poor financial performance and poor political leadership clearly necessitate that the national government should revisit and review the constitutional powers granted to the sphere of local government and contemplate introducing a pragmatic model of running municipal affairs. This paper argues that there is a need to review and reposition the model of local government in order to ensure that municipalities appropriately fulfil their constitutional obligations. The existing research pointed to the relevance of the application and utilisation of the different categories of municipalities, thereby enabling the effective delivery of services to communities. Therefore, the review will amongst others, entail the critical examination of the interventions spearheaded by the national government namely, the Project Consolidate; Municipal Turnaround Strategy/Municipal Infrastructure Support Agent; Operation Clean Audits-2014 and the recently launched Back-to-Basics approach. Based on literature and document reviews this article concludes that the abovementioned interventions have not yielded the desired results yet, if the current performance of municipalities such as Madibeng, Maquasi-Hills, Lekwa-Teemane, Randfontein, Thaba Chweu, Bushbuckridge and Mtubatuba is anything to go by. The outcomes point to the urgent need for a review of the current model of local government that is utilised within a developing society, which is mired with many developmental challenges. This is relevant because South Africa aims at becoming a capable and developmental state as encapsulated in the NDP (National Development Plan) 2030 and for it to achieve such, municipalities are a critical enabler since they operate at the grassroots level

RELATED PAPERS

Isceed Christine Olivarez

Branka Ljevnaic

Sykepleien Forskning

Anners Lerdal

Rodrigo Elizalde

Journal of Ethnopharmacology

Abdul Kareem

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

A. El-Nafaty

Biophysical Journal

Iris Torres

Metroeconomica

Joel abidan Soto sanchez

International Journal of Science Education

Robert Mayes

Francisco Reinoso

English Studies

michael warren

La corónica: A Journal of Medieval Hispanic Languages, Literatures, and Cultures

Pedro Alvarez

International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Energy

Ratnmala Bhimanpallewar

Journal of Science and Technology - IUH

Mohamed Akram djamel

Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Sciences

Che Aziz Ali

TURYDES: Revista sobre Turismo y Desarrollo local sostenible

Alejandro Guerra

Victor A Voicu

Criterio Juridico

Mauricio Ortega Jaramillo

Jurnal LeECOM (Leverage, Engagement, Empowerment of Community)

JAXON LIMWANTO

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

George Triadafilopoulos

Journal of Fish Diseases

Fernando Lunelli

Proceedings of the ... AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Rafael Aguado Bernal

M. Steven SHACKLEY

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Free delivery on first orders: Amazon online shopping is live in South Africa

Amazon launched its online shopping service in South Africa on Tuesday, challenging online retailers dominated by Naspers' Takealot.com.

Africa's most advanced economy is usually seen as a good entry point for companies to expand into the continent and Amazon could be doing the same, analysts said in the past.

The launch of its service comes at a time when South Africa has seen a sharp rise in online shopping after the Covid-19 pandemic created an opportunity for e-commerce to take hold, with retailers doubling down on investments in response.

Amazon.co.za will offer same-day delivery and next-day delivery with more than 3,000 pickup points. Shoppers will get free delivery on first orders, followed by free delivery for subsequent orders of more than R500, it said. 

Customers in South Africa will be able to shop from a selection of local and international brands across 20 different product categories such as consumer electronics, home and small kitchen appliances, including international brands such as Apple, Amazon said.

More than 60% of the items sold in Amazon's stores globally are from independent sellers - most of which are small and medium-sized businesses.

"Building a strong relationship with South African brands and businesses is incredibly important to us. We want Amazon.co.za to be the place where they can reach millions of customers," said Robert Koen, managing director of Amazon Sub-Saharan Africa.

South Africa's growing and evolving retail sector has also attracted international fast fashion e-commerce retailers Shein and Temu, with their rapid rise driven by robust demand for their low-priced apparel. Temu launched in the country earlier this year.

Retailers are also doubling down on e-commerce investments as internet connectivity and smartphone penetration rises in the country.

Chinese online fashion threatens local rivals

Sa online retailers gird their loins for amazon’s arrival, the love of painting and the struggle for township businesses.

Would you like to comment on this article? Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

• Inflatable boats seized at South Africa/Zimbabwe border South Africa
• Jocelyn Motsuenyane dies a day after burying her husband South Africa
• Documents seized from prison cell of alleged gang boss Ralph Stanfield South Africa
• Limpopo shop assistant who bagged R16m Lotto jackpot wants to build her family ... South Africa
• Bongani Bongo and four co-accused discharged in fraudulent land deals case South Africa

Latest Videos