literature review charismatic leadership

Charismatic Leadership in Work Organizations: An Evaluation for Energy Industry

• First Online: 14 May 2024

Cite this chapter

• Gergely Czukor 4 &
• Cemre Çınar 5  

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

Charismatic leadership is a widespread application in organizational research and practice. Organizations favor charismatic leaders who are capable of motivating employees to achieve outstanding results. Scholars proposed various, often conflicting definitions of charismatic leadership. These include charisma as (a) an attribution by the followers to their leaders, (b) as an indicator of leader-follower relations, or (c) as a communication strategy composed of verbal and nonverbal tactics. Charismatic communication, the most recent approach, operationalizes charisma as a distinct measurable construct, which enhances research and construct validity. Charismatic communication is a trainable leadership skill that empowers leaders to motivate and inspire followers to achieve organizational objectives. However, defining charisma as a communication strategy includes theoretical and practical limitations. It deviates from the social/cultural anthropology approach, proposing that individuals earn charisma via overcoming hardships, in which communication skills are secondary. Further, the anthropological view indicates that charismatics primarily seek to respond to the needs of the members of their communities. Finally, overreliance on individual communication strategy as the primary source of influence runs risks of superficial leadership practices and development. To aid cross-disciplinary consistency and to enhance meritocracy in leadership, this chapter introduces the role of earned charisma. Earned charisma refers to the psychological legitimacy to influence others following the demonstration of outstanding achievement. Drawing from social identity theory, we further propose that charismatic leaders possess a unique capacity/ability to discern the needs of their followers by addressing the struggling follower prototype in need of a guider. The present chapter proposes a charismatic leadership model within work organizations focusing on earned charisma as a focal predictor, the leaders’ capacity to address the struggling follower prototype as a moderator of earned charismatic effects. Charismatic communication is an auxiliary predictor and moderator. Charismatic attributions and relations are used as outcome variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Durable hardcover edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Antonakis, J., Bastardoz, N., Jaquart, P., & Shamir, B. (2016). Charisma: An ill-defined and ill-measured gift. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3 (1), 293–319.

Article   Google Scholar  

Antonakis, J., d’Adda, G., Weber, R., & Zehnder, C. (2021). Just words? Just speeches? On the economic value of charismatic leadership. Management Science, 9 (68), 6355. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4219

Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. The Academy of Management Review, 14 (1), 20–39.

Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership: A response to critiques . Academic Press.

Google Scholar  

Bryman, A. (1992). Charisma and leadership in organizations . Sage.

Carl, D. E., & Javidan, M. (2001, August). Universality of charismatic leadership: A multi-nation study. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2001 (1), B1–B6.

Center for Creative Leadership. (2020). The leadership challenge in the energy sector . Retrieved from https://www.ccl.org/articles/leading-effectively-articles/the-leadership-challenge-in-the-energy-sector .

Choi, Y., & Mai-Dalton, R. R. (1998). On the leadership function of self-sacrifice. The Leadership Quarterly, 9 (4), 475–501.

Conger, J. A. (2020). Charisma in organizational studies. In J. P. Zúquete (Ed.), Routledge international handbook of charisma (pp. 303–312). Taylor & Francis.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations . Sage.

Book   Google Scholar  

Cruver, B. (2003). Enron: Anatomy of greed . Arrow.

Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (4), 611.

Eden, D. (1990). Pygmalion in Management . D. C. Heath and Company.

Ensari, N., & Murphy, S. E. (2003). Cross-cultural variations in leadership perceptions and attribution of charisma to the leader. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92 (1–2), 52–66.

Giessner, S. R., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). “License to fail”: Goal definition, leader group prototypicality, and perceptions of leadership effectiveness after leader failure. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105 (1), 14–35.

Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S., & Platow, J. M. (2011). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power . Psychology Press.

Hentrup, L. J., Bastardoz, N., & Menges, J. (2019). Who is seen as a charismatic leader? The role of environmental features in charisma attributions. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2019 (1), 18504. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2019.237

Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5 , 184–200.

Horvath, A. (2013). Modernism and charisma . Palgrave Macmillan.

House, R. (1976). A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership (Vol. 77, pp. 1–34). University of Toronto.

House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A., Dorfman, P. W., Javidan, M., Dickson, M., & Gupta, V. (1999). Cultural influences on leadership and organizations: Project GLOBE. In Advances in global leadership (p. 1). JAI Press.

Howell, J. M., & Shamir, B. (2005). The role of followers in the charismatic leadership process: Relationships and their consequences. The Academy of Management Review, 30 (1), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159097

Klein, N., & O’Brien, E. (2017). The power and limits of personal change: When a bad past does (and does not) inspire in the present. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113 (2), 210–229.

Kotter, J. P. (1990). A force for change: How leadership differs from management . Free Press.

Lindholm, C. (2002). The Islamic Middle East: Tradition and change . Basil Blackwell.

Lord, R. G., & Emrich, C. G. (2000). Thinking outside the box by looking inside the box: Extending the cognitive revolution in leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 11 (4), 551–579.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98 (2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), 709–734.

Northouse, P. G. (2012). Leadership: Theory and practice (6th ed.). Sage.

Platow, M. J., & van Knippenberg, D. (2001). A social identity analysis of leadership endorsement: The effects of leader ingroup prototypicality and distributive intergroup fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27 (11), 1508–1519. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012711011

Reicher, S., Haslam, S. A., & Hopkins, N. (2005). Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality. The Leadership Quarterly, 16 (4), 547–568.

Ridgeway, C. (Ed.). (2003). Status characteristics and leadership . Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446216170

Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4 (4), 577–594. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.4.4.577

Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. D. (2014). Up close and personal: Evidence that shared social identity is a basis for the ‘special’ relationship that binds followers to leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 25 (2), 296–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.08.008

Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research . Free Press.

Sy, T., Horton, C., & Riggio, R. (2018). Charismatic leadership: Eliciting and channeling follower emotions. The Leadership Quarterly, 29 (1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.008

Tajfel, H., & Turner, C. J. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In S. Worchel & L. W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations . Nelson-Hall.

Tambiah, S. (1984). The Buddhist saints of the Forest and the cult of amulets . Cambridge University Press.

Tourish, D., & Vatcha, N. (2005). Charismatic leadership and corporate cultism at Enron: The elimination of dissent, the promotion of conformity and organizational collapse. Leadership, 1 (4), 455–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715005057671

van Knippenberg, B., & van Knippenberg, D. (2005). Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.25

Van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2003). A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25 , 243–295.

Verčič, A. T., & Verčič, D. (2011). Generic charisma – Conceptualizations and measurement. Public Relations Review, 37 , 12–19.

Weber, M. (1978 [1922]). Economy and society . University of California Press.

Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 10 , 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00013

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

I/O Psychology Graduate Program, Istanbul Bilgi University, Istanbul, Turkey

Gergely Czukor

School of Management, Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey

Cemre Çınar

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gergely Czukor .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Bostancı Mah., Istanbul Medipol University, Kadıköy, Istanbul, Türkiye

Hasan Dinçer

Ortaköy Mah., Istanbul Medipol University, Beşiktaş, Istanbul, Türkiye

Serhat Yüksel

Department of Industrial Engineering, Turkish Naval Academy, National Defence University, Istanbul, Türkiye

Muhammet Deveci

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Czukor, G., Çınar, C. (2024). Charismatic Leadership in Work Organizations: An Evaluation for Energy Industry. In: Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., Deveci, M. (eds) Decision Making in Interdisciplinary Renewable Energy Projects. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51532-3_15

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51532-3_15

Published : 14 May 2024

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-031-51531-6

Online ISBN : 978-3-031-51532-3

eBook Packages : Business and Management Business and Management (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Charismatic leadership among nursing professionals: an integrative review

Affiliation.

• 1 Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing. Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
• PMID: 30942378
• DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0743

Objective: Analyze the literature for knowledge about charismatic leadership among nursing professionals.

Method: This is an integrative review of the literature that searched for studies published in English, Portuguese and Spanish until 2016 in the following electronic databases: LILACS, Pubmed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and CINAHL.

Results: Three studies were selected from a total of twenty-one studies; they were arranged in two categories: validation of a charismatic leadership instrument and effects of charismatic leadership on followers' initiative-oriented behavior.

Conclusion: Charismatic leadership is considered an important skill for nursing professionals as they generate a positive influence on followers, especially in times of crisis and changes. Considering the relevance of this style of leadership, the need to develop further studies on this subject is reinforced, given the low number of studies found in the literature.

Publication types

• Leadership*
• Nurses / psychology*
• Nurses / standards
• Professional Competence / standards
• Social Skills*

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Authoritarian leadership styles and performance: a systematic literature review and research agenda

2022, Management Review Quarterly

Although authoritarian leadership styles are often associated with negative performance, work climate deterioration, increased power distance, and centralized control, contradictory empirical evidence has emerged in the literature. In this paper, we perform a systematic literature review with three aims: (1) understand the effects of authoritarian leadership styles on performance, (2) study the temporal and geographical evolution of the scientific debate, and (3) establish a research agenda for the future. The results show that in the last two decades, the interest for the field has shifted from Western to Eastern countries. Moreover, many authors encourage leaders to increase or decrease their degree of authoritarian leadership depending on the context to more effectively connect leadership with performance. Therefore, leadership should be studied in light of a more complex approach that considers hybrid leadership styles and their effects on performance. Finally, we discuss our st...

Related Papers

Journal of Business Research

Lale Gumusluoglu , Terri Scandura

This study investigates how the leader-follower agreement on authoritarian leadership influences the quality of communication experience with the leader across three countries: Taiwan, Turkey, and the U.S. We also examine the mediating role of the quality of communication in linking agreement on authoritarianism to subordinate in-role and extra-role performance. Our sample consisted of 674 Taiwanese, 409 Turkish, and 294 American employees and their leaders. The results demonstrate that in the U.S., the leader-follower agreement on this negative form of leadership has positive effects on the quality of communication. In Turkey, however, the leader-follower agreement on high levels of authoritarian leadership has a negative effect on interpersonal interactions. In Taiwan, agreement or disagreement on authoritarian leadership is not as important as in the U.S. or Turkey. We also found that the quality of communication experience was a significant mediating mechanism between the leader-follower agreement and follower performance in all three countries.

Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies

kamran Nawaz

European Journal of Social Sciences Studies

Mohamed Kulmiye

In particular, the relationship between democratic, autocratic, transformational, and transactional leadership styles and organizational performance was the focus of this study. The study was an organized review of the literature (Desk Review), concentrating on general discussions that were already accessible through database search engines like Google Scholar. The most pertinent journal papers, books, and dissertations were also looked for by the researcher. The theoretical foundation of democratic, autocratic, transformational, and transactional leadership styles as well as organizational performance was uncovered by the study's findings. According to a study that examined many authors' studies on leadership behaviors and the performance of organizations, some leadership styles are good for an organization's success while others are bad depending on the circumstance. Article visualizations:

American Based Research Journal - ISSN (2304-7151)

Bogosi Monyamane

For the reason that it is widely presumed that the effectiveness of a leader has a significant impact on organizational performance, this, has led to heightened research focused on the relationship between leadership and organizational performance. Similarly, the purpose of this study was to investigate the theoretical aspects of this concept, evaluate various leadership styles, and examine evidence regarding the efficacy of leadership styles in optimizing organizational performance. Qualitative Content Analysis was used to analyze relevant journal articles, government publications and books in order to achieve three main goals: (1) exploring the concept of organizational performance in relation to leadership; (2) identifying methods for measuring organizational performance at its core; and (3) evaluating the effects of different leadership styles on organizational performance. The results indicate that the charismatic leadership style is the most effective when compared to other approaches in that it can increase employee morale and productivity, thereby improving overall organizational performance. Correspondingly, the transformational and democratic leadership styles are found to improve organizational performance. Furthermore, it is established that the situational leadership style is effective when it employs either the charismatic, transactional, and or transformational leadership approach. Therefore, this study recommends that leaders ought to: (1) utilise feedback from subordinates to assess their leadership impact; (2) reflect on their leadership journey; (3) use leadership assessment tools to identify their strengths and weaknesses for growth opportunities; and (4) employ leadership styles that maximize employee engagement and productivity preferably the charismatic leadership style.

The Leadership Quarterly

Paul Lester

Victoria Muhumuza

This study sought to determine the influence of authoritarian leadership on social, economic and political development. To do so, it adopted a comparative study design, comparing the development of the Republic of Singapore under authoritarian leadership, and the development of the Republic of Zambia under authoritarian leadership. It sought to answer the questions: Why and how does authoritarian leadership influence development differently in Singapore compared to Zambia? The research used the modernization theory as the background of the research. It adopted the case study method for its research methodology and employed the descriptive method of analysis. It used purely secondary data sources in the research. From the findings it is noted that authoritarian leadership can either lead to the development of an economy or the underdevelopment of an economy. This is realized through the analysis of the authoritarian leadership style exhibited by Lee Kuan Yew in Singapore and Kenneth Kaunda in Zambia during their leadership tenures. The paper recommends that it is important for leaders to know their leadership styles so as to use the styles effectively in building their economies; and heads of state summits should be held to deal with issues of governance and development, most specifically authoritarian leadership and development. This is to help states still under authoritarian leadership to thrive within their contexts.

Journal of Occupational Psychology

michael bond

Rashika Shukla

Leadership is a significant factor in whether or not an organization will be successful. Leadership style refers to what means folks are rapt and driven by a front-runner to reach organizational goals or what they do. The main focus is on diverse categories of leadership. People who are democratic, transformational, bureaucratic, and authoritarian are good leaders. Still, charismatic and transactional people are bad leaders because they don't give employees opportunities and freedom to do their best work, hurting the organization. Both main and minor research has been done in this study, and both have been good. The reading establishes that charismatic, bureaucratic, and transactional leadership styles harm the performance of an organization. Organizations that had leaders who used transformational, autocratic, and democratic leadership styles did better than those who used other types of leadership. There is a suggestion that organizations should use a control style that helps people's abilities and skills grow and grow and grow and grow.

Umakhihe Kelvin, Bello Abdulazeez Adio

Avenue Publishers

Leadership is among the major drivers to improve the performance of an organization. It is believed that an organization's kind of style of leadership influences its overall results. This report focuses on the three styles of leadership which are autocratic leadership, democratic leadership, and laissez faire style of leadership. The roles of leadership styles towards the organizational performance were also discussed. It is seen that leadership styles definitely have a strong relationship towards a company's success, as the way the leader manages his employees will ultimately decide the performance of the organization itself. When a leader is engaging and puts employees' ideas and input into account when making decisions, productivity will indirectly increase especially from the employees as they feel like they are a part of an input that leads to motivation. It all comes down to human behaviour and psychological views when it comes to having the right leadership style a leader wants to adopt in an organization. A few recommendations were made to further improve organizational performance in the long run. According to this report, democratic leadership is the most effective style of leadership towards attaining and enhancing organizational performance. In depth explanations are given in this report.

RELATED PAPERS

Edyson Tanjung

F1000posters

Yvon Lebranchu

Solomon Buckman

Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada

Bárbara Cifuentes García

Fernando Aballay

Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development

Tabethah Mack

Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education

Ümit Ünsal Kaya

Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering

Rupen Goswami IITM

Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly: JARQ

Le Thanh My B1911314

Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Control Applications

Sorin Olaru

Pollarise GROUPS

Proceedings of the Decision Sciences Institute

Brett J . L . Landry

AIJ Journal of Technology and Design

Hitoshi Hamasaki

Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry

Raimundo Braz-filho

Prevalence of food insecurity in Ethiopia: Review of Literature

Gashaw Tamrat

HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)

Rajendra Parsad Gunputh

Advances in social science, education and humanities research

Arista Romadani

Journal of Oral Health and Community Dentistry

Mustafa Koçak

Tendências da Pesquisa Brasileira em Ciência da Informação

Renato Rocha Souza

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology

Revista Ibero-Americana de Humanidades, Ciências e Educação

Silvia Pucci

La voz femenina en la segunda mitad del siglo XX en Albacete. Sopranos destacadas The female voice in the second half of the 20th Century in Albacete. Eminent sopranos

María del Valle Robles de Moya

Animals I Arqueologia Hui 2013 Isbn 978 84 7795 667 9 Pags 45 64

Pere Miquel guillem Calatayud

Revista Colombiana de Ortopedia y Traumatología

Gustavo Adolfo Uriza Sinisterra

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Int J Environ Res Public Health

Leadership Effectiveness in Healthcare Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cross-Sectional and Before–After Studies

Vincenzo restivo.

1 Department of Health Promotion, Maternal and Infant Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE) “G. D’Alessandro”, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 133, 90127 Palermo, Italy

Giuseppa Minutolo

Alberto battaglini.

2 Vaccines and Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Genova, Via Antonio Pastore 1, 16132 Genova, Italy

Alberto Carli

3 Santa Chiara Hospital, Largo Medaglie d’oro 9, 38122 Trento, Italy

Michele Capraro

4 School of Public Health, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy

Maddalena Gaeta

5 Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Via Forlanini 2, 27100 Pavia, Italy

Cecilia Trucchi

6 Planning, Epidemiology and Prevention Unit, Liguria Health Authority (A.Li.Sa.), IRCCS San Martino Hospital, Largo R. Benzi 10, 16132 Genoa, Italy

Carlo Favaretti

7 Centre on Leadership in Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Largo F. Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy

Francesco Vitale

Alessandra casuccio, associated data.

Data will be available after writing correspondence to the author.

To work efficiently in healthcare organizations and optimize resources, team members should agree with their leader’s decisions critically. However, nowadays, little evidence is available in the literature. This systematic review and meta-analysis has assessed the effectiveness of leadership interventions in improving healthcare outcomes such as performance and guidelines adherence. Overall, the search strategies retrieved 3,155 records, and 21 of them were included in the meta-analysis. Two databases were used for manuscript research: PubMed and Scopus. On 16th December 2019 the researchers searched for articles published in the English language from 2015 to 2019. Considering the study designs, the pooled leadership effectiveness was 14.0% (95%CI 10.0–18.0%) in before–after studies, whereas the correlation coefficient between leadership interventions and healthcare outcomes was 0.22 (95%CI 0.15–0.28) in the cross-sectional studies. The multi-regression analysis in the cross-sectional studies showed a higher leadership effectiveness in South America (β = 0.56; 95%CI 0.13, 0.99), in private hospitals (β = 0.60; 95%CI 0.14, 1.06), and in medical specialty (β = 0.28; 95%CI 0.02, 0.54). These results encourage the improvement of leadership culture to increase performance and guideline adherence in healthcare settings. To reach this purpose, it would be useful to introduce a leadership curriculum following undergraduate medical courses.

1. Introduction

Over the last years, patients’ outcomes, population wellness and organizational standards have become the main purposes of any healthcare structure [ 1 ]. These standards can be achieved following evidence-based practice (EBP) for diseases prevention and care [ 2 , 3 ] and optimizing available economical and human resources [ 3 , 4 ], especially in low-industrialized geographical areas [ 5 ]. This objective could be reached with effective healthcare leadership [ 3 , 4 ], which could be considered a network whose team members followed leadership critically and motivated a leader’s decisions based on the organization’s requests and targets [ 6 ]. Healthcare workers raised their compliance towards daily activities in an effective leadership context, where the leader succeeded in improving membership and performance awareness among team members [ 7 ]. Furthermore, patients could improve their health conditions in a high-level leadership framework. [ 8 ] Despite the leadership benefits for healthcare systems’ performance and patients’ outcomes [ 1 , 7 ], professionals’ confidence would decline in a damaging leadership context for workers’ health conditions and performance [ 4 , 9 , 10 ]. On the other hand, the prevention of any detrimental factor which might worsen both team performance and healthcare systems’ outcomes could demand effective leadership [ 4 , 7 , 10 ]. However, shifting from the old and assumptive leadership into a more effective and dynamic one is still a challenge [ 4 ]. Nowadays, the available evidence on the impact and effectiveness of leadership interventions is sparse and not systematically reported in the literature [ 11 , 12 ].

Recently, the spreading of the Informal Opinion Leadership style into hospital environments is changing the traditional concept of leadership. This leadership style provides a leader without any official assignment, known as an “opinion leader”, whose educational and behavioral background is suitable for the working context. Its target is to apply the best practices in healthcare creating a more familiar and collaborative team [ 2 ]. However, Flodgren et al. reported that informal leadership interventions increased healthcare outcomes [ 2 ].

Nowadays, various leadership styles are recognized with different classifications but none of them are considered the gold standard for healthcare systems because of heterogenous leadership meanings in the literature [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 12 , 13 ]. Leadership style classification by Goleman considered leaders’ behavior [ 5 , 13 ], while Chen DS-S proposed a traditional leadership style classification (charismatic, servant, transactional and transformational) [ 6 ].

Even if leadership style improvement depends on the characteristics and mission of a workplace [ 6 , 13 , 14 ], a leader should have both a high education in healthcare leadership and the behavioral qualities necessary for establishing strong human relationships and achieving a healthcare system’s goals [ 7 , 15 ]. Theoretically, any practitioner could adapt their emotive capacities and educational/working experiences to healthcare contexts, political lines, economical and human resources [ 7 ]. Nowadays, no organization adopts a policy for leader selection in a specific healthcare setting [ 15 ]. Despite the availability of a self-assessment leadership skills questionnaire for aspirant leaders and a pattern for the selection of leaders by Dubinsky et al. [ 15 ], a standardized and universally accepted method to choose leaders for healthcare organizations is still argued over [ 5 , 15 ].

Leadership failure might be caused by the arduous application of leadership skills and adaptive characteristics among team members [ 5 , 6 ]. One of the reasons for this negative event could be the lack of a standardized leadership program for medical students [ 16 , 17 ]. Consequently, working experience in healthcare settings is the only way to apply a leadership style for many medical professionals [ 12 , 16 , 17 ].

Furthermore, the literature data on leadership effectiveness in healthcare organizations were slightly significant or discordant in results. Nevertheless, the knowledge of pooled leadership effectiveness should motivate healthcare workers to apply leadership strategies in healthcare systems [ 12 ]. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the pooled effectiveness of leadership interventions in improving healthcare workers’ and patients’ outcomes.

2. Materials and Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement guidelines [ 18 ]. The protocol was registered on the PROSPERO database with code CRD42020198679 on 15 August 2020. Following these methodological standards, leadership interventions were evaluated as the pooled effectiveness and influential characteristic of healthcare settings, such as leadership style, workplace, settings and the study period.

2.1. Data Sources and Search Strategy

PubMed and Scopus were the two databases used for the research into the literature. On 16th December 2019, manuscripts in the English language published between 2015 and 2019 were searched by specific MeSH terms for each dataset. Those for PubMed were “leadership” OR “leadership” AND “clinical” AND “outcome” AND “public health” OR “public” AND “health” OR “public health” AND “humans”. Those for Scopus were “leadership” AND “clinical” AND “outcome” AND “public” AND “health”.

2.2. Study Selection and Data Extraction

In accordance with the PRISMA Statement, the following PICOS method was used for including articles [ 18 ]: the target population was all healthcare workers in any hospital or clinical setting (Population); the interventions were any leader’s recommendation to fulfil quality standards or performance indexes of a healthcare system (Intervention) [ 19 ]; to be included, the study should have a control group or reference at baseline as comparison (Control); and any effectiveness measure in terms of change in adherence to healthcare guidelines or performances (Outcome). In detail, any outcome implicated into healthcare workers’ capacity and characteristics in reaching a healthcare systems purposes following the highest standards was considered as performance [ 19 ]. Moreover, whatever clinical practices resulted after having respected the recommendations, procedures or statements settled previously was considered as guideline adherence [ 20 ]. The selected study design was an observational or experimental/quasi-experimental study design (trial, case control, cohort, cross-sectional, before-after study), excluding any systematic reviews, metanalyses, study protocol and guidelines (Studies).

The leaders’ interventions followed Chen’s leadership styles classification [ 6 ]. According to this, the charismatic leadership style can be defined also as an emotive leadership because of members’ strong feelings which guide the relationship with their leader. Its purpose is the improvement of workers’ motivation to reach predetermined organizational targets following a leader’s planning strategies and foresights. Servant leadership style is a sharing leadership style in whose members can increase their skills and competences through steady leader support, and they have a role in an organization’s goals. The transformational leadership style focuses on practical aspects such as new approaches for problem solving, new interventions to reach purposes, future planning and viewpoints sharing. Originality in a transformational leadership style has a key role of improving previous workers’ and healthcare system conditions in the achievement of objectives. The transactional leadership style requires a working context where technical skills are fundamental, and whose leader realizes a double-sense sharing process of knowledge and tasks with members. Furthermore, workers’ performances are improved through a rewarding system [ 6 ].

In this study, the supervisor trained the research team for practical manuscript selection and data extraction. The aim was to ensure data homogeneity and to check the authors’ procedures for selection and data collection. The screening phase was performed by four researchers reading each manuscript’s title and abstract independently and choosing to exclude any article that did not fulfill the inclusion criteria. Afterwards, the included manuscripts were searched for in the full text. They were retrieved freely, by institutional access or requesting them from the authors.

The assessment phase consisted of full-text reading to select articles following the inclusion criteria. The supervisor solved any contrasting view about article selection and variable selection.

The final database was built up by collecting the information from all included full-text articles: author, title, study year, year of publication, country/geographic location, study design, viability and type of evaluation scales for leadership competence, study period, type of intervention to improve leadership awareness, setting of leader intervention, selection modality of leaders, leadership style adopted, outcomes assessed such as guideline adherence or healthcare workers’ performance, benefits for patients’ health or patients’ outcomes improvement, public or private hospitals or healthcare units, ward specialty, intervention in single specialty or multi-professional settings, number of beds, number of healthcare workers involved in leadership interventions and sample size.

Each included article in this systematic review and meta-analysis received a standardized quality score for the specific study design, according to Newcastle–Ottawa, for the assessment of the quality of the cross-sectional study, and the Study Quality Assessment Tools by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute were used for all other study designs [ 21 , 22 ].

2.3. Statistical Data Analysis

The manuscripts metadata were extracted in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet to remove duplicate articles and collect data. The included article variables for the quantitative meta-analysis were: first author, publication year, continent of study, outcome, public or private organization, hospital or local healthcare unit, surgical or non-surgical ward, multi- or single-professionals, ward specialty, sample size, quality score of each manuscript, leadership style, year of study and study design.

The measurement of the outcomes of interest (either performance or guidelines adherence) depended on the study design of the included manuscripts in the meta-analysis:

• for cross-sectional studies, the outcome of interest was the correlation between leadership improvement and guideline adherence or healthcare performance;
• the outcome derived from before–after studies or the trial was the percentage of leadership improvement intervention in guideline adherence or healthcare performance;
• the incidence occurrence of improved results among exposed and not exposed healthcare workers of leadership interventions and the relative risks (RR) were the outcomes in cohort studies;
• the odds ratio (OR) between the case of healthcare workers who had received a leadership intervention and the control group for case-control studies.

Pooled estimates were calculated using both the fixed effects and DerSimonian and Laird random effects models, weighting individual study results by the inverse of their variances [ 23 ]. Forest plots assessed the pooled estimates and the corresponding 95%CI across the studies. The heterogeneity test was performed by a chi-square test at a significance level of p < 0.05, reporting the I 2 statistic together with a 25%, 50% or 75% cut-off, indicating low, moderate, and high heterogeneity, respectively [ 24 , 25 ].

Subgroup analysis and meta-regression analyses explored the sources of significant heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis considered the leadership style (charismatic, servant, transactional and transformational), continent of study (North America, Europe, Oceania), median cut-off year of study conduction (studies conducted between 2005 and 2011 and studies conducted between 2012 and 2019), type of hospital organization (public or private hospital), type of specialty (surgical or medical specialty) and type of team (multi-professional or single-professional team).

Meta-regression analysis considered the following variables: year of starting study, continent of study conduction, public or private hospital, surgical or non-surgical specialty ward, type of healthcare service (hospital or local health unit), type of healthcare workers involved (multi- or single-professional), leadership style, and study quality score. All variables included in the model were relevant in the coefficient analysis.

To assess a potential publication bias, a graphical funnel plot reported the logarithm effect estimate and related the standard error from each study, and the Egger test was performed [ 26 , 27 ].

All data were analyzed using the statistical package STATA/SE 16.1 (StataCorp LP, College 482 Station, TX, USA), with the “metan” command used for meta-analysis, and “metafunnel”, “metabias” and “confunnel” for publication bias assessment [ 28 ].

3.1. Studies Characteristics

Overall, the search strategies retrieved 3,155 relevant records. After removing 570 (18.1%) duplicates, 2,585 (81.9%) articles were suitable for the screening phase, of which only 284 (11.0%) articles were selected for the assessment phase. During the assessment phase, 263 (92.6%) articles were excluded. The most frequent reasons of exclusion were the absence of relevant outcomes ( n = 134, 51.0%) and other study designs ( n = 61, 23.2%). Very few articles were rejected due to them being written in another language ( n = 1, 0.4%), due to the publication year being out of 2015–2019 ( n = 1, 0.4%) or having an unavailable full text ( n = 3, 1.1%).

A total of 21 (7.4%) articles were included in the qualitative and quantitative analysis, of which nine (42.9%) were cross-sectional studies and twelve (57.1%) were before and after studies ( Figure 1 ).

Flow-chart of selection manuscript phases for systematic review and meta-analysis on leadership effectiveness in healthcare workers.

The number of healthcare workers enrolled was 25,099 (median = 308, IQR = 89–1190), including at least 2,275 nurses (9.1%, median = 324, IQR = 199–458). Most of the studies involved a public hospital ( n = 16, 76.2%). Among the studies from private healthcare settings, three (60.0%) were conducted in North America. Articles which analyzed servant and charismatic leadership styles were nine (42.9%) and eight (38.1%), respectively. Interventions with a transactional leadership style were examined in six (28.6%) studies, while those with a transformational leadership style were examined in five studies (23.8%). Overall, 82 healthcare outcomes were assessed and 71 (86.6%) of them were classified as performance. Adherence-to-guidelines outcomes were 11 (13.4%), which were related mainly to hospital stay ( n = 7, 64.0%) and drug administration ( n = 3, 27.0%). Clements et al. and Lornudd et al. showed the highest number of outcomes, which were 19 (23.2%) and 12 (14.6%), respectively [ 29 , 30 ].

3.2. Leadership Effectiveness in before–after Studies

Before–after studies ( Supplementary Table S1 ) involved 22,241 (88.6%, median = 735, IQR = 68–1273) healthcare workers for a total of twelve articles, of which six (50.0%) consisted of performance and five (41.7%) of guidelines adherence and one (8.3%) of both outcomes. Among healthcare workers, there were 1,294 nurses (5.8%, median = 647, IQR = 40–1,254). Only the article by Savage et al. reported no number of involved healthcare workers [ 31 ].

The number of studies conducted after 2011 or between 2012–2019 was seven (58.3%), while only one (8.3%) article reported a study beginning both before and after 2011. Most of studies were conducted in Northern America ( n = 5, 41.7%). The servant leadership style and charismatic leadership style were the most frequently implemented, as reported in five (41.7%) and four (33.3%) articles, respectively. Only one (8.3%) study adopted a transformational leadership style.

The pooled effectiveness of leadership was 14.0% (95%CI 10.0–18.0%), with a high level of heterogeneity (I 2 = 99.9%, p < 0.0001) among the before–after studies ( Figure 2 ).

Effectiveness of leadership in before after studies. Dashed line represents the pooled effectiveness value [ 29 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ].

The highest level of effectiveness was reported by Weech-Maldonado R et al. with an effectiveness of 199% (95%CI 183–215%) based on the Cultural Competency Assessment Tool for Hospitals (CCATH) [ 39 ]. The effectiveness of leadership changed in accordance with the leadership style ( Supplementary Figure S1 ) and publication bias ( Supplementary Figure S2 ).

Multi-regression analysis indicated a negative association between leadership effectiveness and studies from Oceania, but this result was not statistically significant (β = −0.33; 95% IC −1.25, 0.59). On the other hand, a charismatic leadership style affected healthcare outcomes positively even if it was not statistically relevant (β = 0.24; 95% IC −0.69, 1.17) ( Table 1 ).

Correlation coefficients and multi-regression analysis of leadership effectiveness in before–after studies.

3.3. Leadership Effectiveness in Cross Sectional Studies

A total of 2858 (median = 199, IQR = 110–322) healthcare workers were involved in the cross-sectional studies ( Supplementary Table S2 ), of which 981 (34.3%) were nurses. Most of the studies were conducted in Asia ( n = 4, 44.4%) and North America ( n = 3, 33.3%). All of the cross-sectional studies regarded only the healthcare professionals’ performance. Multi-professional teams were involved in seven (77.8%) studies, and they were more frequently conducted in both medical and surgical wards ( n = 6, 66.7%). The leadership styles were equally distributed in the articles and two (22.2%) of them examined more than two leadership styles at the same time.

The pooled effectiveness of the leadership interventions in the cross-sectional studies had a correlation coefficient of 0.22 (95%CI 0.15–0.28), whose heterogeneity was remarkably high (I 2 = 96.7%, p < 0.0001) ( Figure 3 ).

Effectiveness of leadership in cross-sectional studies. Dashed line represents the pooled effectiveness value [ 30 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 ].

The effectiveness of leadership in the cross-sectional studies changed in accordance with the leadership style ( Supplementary Figure S3 ) and publication bias ( Supplementary Figure S4 ).

Multi-regression analysis showed a higher leadership effectiveness in studies conducted in South America (β = 0.56 95%CI 0.13–0.99) in private hospitals (β = 0.60; 95%CI 0.14–1.06) and in the medical vs. surgical specialty (β = −0.22; 95%CI −0.54, −0.02) ( Table 2 ).

Multi-regression analysis of leadership effectiveness in cross-sectional studies.

* 0.05 ≤ p < 0.01.

4. Discussion

Leadership effectiveness in healthcare settings is a topic that is already treated in a quantitative matter, but only this systematic review and meta-analysis showed the pooled effectiveness of leadership intervention improving some healthcare outcomes such as performance and adherence to guidelines. However, the assessment of leadership effectiveness could be complicated because it depends on the study methodology and selected outcomes [ 12 ]. Health outcomes might benefit from leadership interventions, as Flodgren et al. was concerned about opinion leadership [ 2 ], whose adhesion to guidelines increased by 10.8% (95% CI: 3.5–14.6%). On the other hand, other outcomes did not improve after opinion leadership interventions [ 2 ]. Another review by Ford et al. about emergency wards reported a summary from the literature data which acknowledged an improvement in trauma care management through healthcare workers’ performance and adhesion to guidelines after effective leadership interventions [ 14 ]. Nevertheless, some variables such as collaboration among different healthcare professionals and patients’ healthcare needs might affect leadership intervention effectiveness [ 14 ]. Therefore, a defined leadership style might fail in a healthcare setting rather than in other settings [ 5 , 13 , 14 ].

The leadership effectiveness assessed through cross-sectional studies was higher in South America than in other continents. A possible explanation of this result could be the more frequent use of a transactional leadership style in this area, where the transactional leadership interventions were effective at optimizing economic resources and improving healthcare workers’ performance through cash rewards [ 48 ]. Financing methods for healthcare organizations might be different from one country to another, so the effectiveness of a leadership style can change. Reaching both economic targets and patients’ wellness could be considered a challenge for any leadership intervention [ 48 ], especially in poorer countries [ 5 ].

This meta-analysis showed a negative association between leadership effectiveness and studies by surgical wards. Other research has supported these results, which reported surgical ward performance worsened in any leadership context (charismatic, servant, transactional, transformational) [ 47 ]. In those workplaces, adopting a leadership style to improve surgical performance might be challenging because of nervous tension and little available time during surgical procedures [ 47 ]. On the other hand, a cross-sectional study declared that a surgical team’s performance in private surgical settings benefitted from charismatic leadership-style interventions [ 42 ]. This style of leadership intervention might be successful among a few healthcare workers [ 42 ], where creating relationships is easier [ 6 ]. Even a nursing team’s performance in trauma care increased after charismatic leadership-style interventions because of better communicative and supportive abilities than certain other professional categories [ 29 , 47 ]. However, nowadays there is no standardized leadership in healthcare basic courses [ 5 , 6 , 12 ]. Consequently, promoting leadership culture after undergraduate medical courses could achieve a proper increase in both leadership agreement and working wellness as well as a higher quality of care. [ 17 ]. Furthermore, for healthcare workers who have already worked in a healthcare setting, leadership improvement could consist of implementing basic knowledge on that topic. Consequently, they could reach a higher quality of care practice through working wellness [ 17 ] and overcoming the lack of previous leadership training [ 17 ].

Although very few studies have included in a meta-analysis examined in private healthcare settings [ 35 , 38 , 40 , 41 , 42 ], leadership interventions had more effectiveness in private hospitals than in public hospitals. This result could be related to the continent of origin, and indeed 60.0% of these studies were derived from North America [ 38 , 41 , 42 ], where patients’ outcomes and healthcare workers’ performance could influence available hospital budgets [ 38 , 40 , 41 , 42 ], especially in peripheral healthcare units [ 38 , 41 ]. Private hospitals paid more attention to the cost-effectiveness of any healthcare action and a positive balance of capital for healthcare settings might depend on the effectiveness of leadership interventions [ 40 , 41 , 42 ]. Furthermore, private healthcare assistance focused on nursing performance because of its impact on both a patients’ and an organizations’ outcomes. Therefore, healthcare systems’ quality could improve with effective leadership actions for a nursing team [ 40 ].

Other factors reported in the literature could affect leadership effectiveness, although they were not examined in this meta-analysis. For instance, professionals’ specialty and gender could have an effect on these results and shape leadership style choice and effectiveness [ 1 ]. Moreover, racial differences among members might influence healthcare system performance. Weech-Maldonado et al. found a higher compliance and self-improvement by black-race professionals than white ones after transactional leadership interventions [ 39 ].

Healthcare workers’ and patients’ outcomes depended on style of leadership interventions [ 1 ]. According to the results of this meta-analysis, interventions conducted by a transactional leadership style increased healthcare outcomes, though nevertheless their effectiveness was higher in the cross-sectional studies than in the before–after studies. Conversely, the improvement by a transformational leadership style was higher in before–after studies than in the cross-sectional studies. Both a charismatic and servant leadership style increased effectiveness more in the cross-sectional studies than in the before–after studies. This data shows that any setting required a specific leadership style for improving performance and guideline adherence by each team member who could understand the importance of their role and their tasks [ 1 ]. Some outcomes had a better improvement than others. Focusing on Savage et al.’s outcomes, a transformational leadership style improved checklist adherence [ 31 ]. The time of patients’ transport by Murphy et al. was reduced after conducting interventions based on a charismatic leadership style [ 37 ]. Jodar et al. showed that performances were elevated in units whose healthcare workers were subjected to transactional and transformational leadership-style interventions [ 1 ].

These meta-analysis results were slightly relevant because of the high heterogeneity among the studies, as confirmed by both funnel plots. This publication bias might be caused by unpublished articles due to either lacking data on leadership effectiveness, failing appropriate leadership strategies in the wrong settings or non-cooperating teams [ 12 ]. The association between leadership interventions and healthcare outcomes was slightly explored or gave no statistically significant results [ 12 ], although professionals’ performance and patients’ outcomes were closely related to the adopted leadership style, as reported by the latest literature sources [ 7 ]. Other aspects than effectiveness should be investigated for leadership. For example, the evaluation of the psychological effect of leadership should be explored using other databases.

The study design choice could affect the results about leadership effectiveness, making their detection and their statistical relevance tough [ 12 ]. Despite the strongest evidence of this study design [ 50 ], nowadays, trials about leadership effectiveness on healthcare outcomes are lacking and have to be improved [ 12 ]. Notwithstanding, this analysis gave the first results of leadership effectiveness from the available study designs.

Performance and adherence to guidelines were the main two outcomes examined in this meta-analysis because of their highest impact on patients, healthcare workers and hospital organizations. They included several other types of outcomes which were independent each other and gave different effectiveness results [ 12 ]. The lack of neither an official classification nor standardized guidelines explained the heterogeneity of these outcomes. To reach consistent results, they were classified into performance and guideline adherence by the description of each outcome in the related manuscripts [ 5 , 6 , 12 ].

Another important aspect is outcome assessment after leadership interventions, which might be fulfilled by several standardized indexes and other evaluation methods [ 40 , 41 ]. Therefore, leadership interventions should be investigated in further studies [ 5 ], converging on a univocal and official leadership definition and classification to obtain comparable results among countries [ 5 , 6 , 12 ].

5. Conclusions

This meta-analysis gave the first pooled data estimating leadership effectiveness in healthcare settings. However, some of them, e.g., surgery, required a dedicated approach to select the most worthwhile leadership style for refining healthcare worker performances and guideline adhesion. This can be implemented using a standardized leadership program for surgical settings.

Only cross-sectional studies gave significant results in leadership effectiveness. For this reason, leadership effectiveness needs to be supported and strengthened by other study designs, especially those with the highest evidence levels, such as trials. Finally, further research should be carried out to define guidelines on leadership style choice and establish shared healthcare policies worldwide.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph191710995/s1 , Figure S1. Leadership effectiveness by leadership style in before after studies; Figure S2. Funnel plot of before after studies; Figure S3. Leadership effectiveness in cross sectional studies by four leadership style; Figure S4. Funnel plot of cross-sectional studies; Table S1. Before after studies included in this systematic review and meta-analysis; Table S2. Cross-sectional studies included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. All outcomes were performance.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.R., A.C. (Alessandra Casuccio), F.V. and C.F.; methodology, V.R., M.G., A.O. and C.T.; software, V.R.; validation, G.M., A.B., A.C. (Alberto Carli) and M.C.; formal analysis, V.R.; investigation, G.M., A.B., A.C. (Alberto Carli) and M.C.; resources, A.C. (Alessandra Casuccio); data curation, G.M. and V.R.; writing—original draft preparation, G.M.; writing—review and editing, A.C. (Alessandra Casuccio), F.V., C.F., M.G., A.O., C.T., A.B., A.C. (Alberto Carli) and M.C.; visualization, G.M.; supervision, V.R.; project administration, C.F.; funding acquisition, A.C. (Alessandra Casuccio), F.V. and C.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to secondary data analysis for the systematic review and meta-anlysis.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Conflicts of interest.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The Best Leadership Assessments for Engineers

• May 13, 2024
• Professional Development

Everyone has a unique mix of strengths, weaknesses, and tendencies that they bring to the workplace. But because we’re so entrenched in our own personalities and tendencies, it can be challenging to identify our positive traits and areas of improvement on our own.

Many women in engineering have found leadership assessments to be an important tool to gain self-awareness around how they show up at work. By answering the questions in these assessments and reviewing the results with experts, professionals can gain greater insight into their personalities, relationships, blind spots, and leadership gaps.

Examples of popular leadership assessments for engineers include:

• The Myers Briggs type indicator
• The Enneagram test
• The Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation-Behavior (FIRO-B) Assessment
• CliftonStrengths Assessment
• The Society of Women Engineers (SWE) Leadership Competency Model

In SWE’s three-day eXXec program , mid- and late-career professionals in engineering and technology use the FIRO-B Assessment to identify their interpersonal needs and understand how these needs influence their behaviors and communication styles.

By discovering their own results and acknowledging that different people have different needs, participants learn how to improve their communication skills and build stronger relationships at work.

Dr. Kim Warren-Martin (she/her/hers), the facilitator of eXXec, speaks to the power of assessments and interpreting the results in a supportive group environment on episode 234 of Diverse: a SWE podcast.

Dr. Warren-Martin is an award-winning executive with a solid reputation in corporate diversity and inclusion.

During the last eight years of her 27-year corporate career, she ran a global women’s initiative helping women get to the top of a Fortune 50 technology company.

Join Us for SWE’s eXXec Executive Leadership Program

eXXec is SWE’s three-day executive leadership program for mid- to senior-level professionals who aspire to executive status. Here is an overview of how each day of eXXec helps women engineers amplify their leadership skills:

eXXec Day 1: Leading Self

On the first day of eXXec, engineers dive into their FIRO-B assessment results and gain self-awareness around their behaviors, strengths, motives, and areas where additional coaching is needed.

This day of the program is led by Kathryn Mayer (she/her/hers) who brings over 25 years of expertise in leadership development, conducting workshops, and coaching executives, focusing on empowering women in competitive industries.

Drawing from her background as a former top-ranked amateur tennis player and extensive experience driving change and nurturing talent in corporate environments — including roles at Goldman Sachs, Deloitte, and Citigroup’s investment bank — she offers a unique perspective on leadership.

eXXec Day 2: Leading People

On the second day of eXXec, participants step into their power as leaders of others. The activities and learning during this day help engineers work on the behaviors, tools, and actions that will help them step up as empowering and inclusive leaders of their teams.

Gloria Cotton (she/her/hers) leads this session of eXXec. Cotton is an author, life coach, strategic DEI&B executive consultant, and pro-inclusionist.

With a corporate background in human resources and organizational development and an educational foundation in psychology and education, she has worked with people and teams in organizations of all sizes (from six to more than 100,000) located in national and global locations.

eXXec Day 3: Leading Change

On the third day of eXXec, leaders dive into how to successfully implement change in the workplace. With the breakneck pace of work, facilitating change has become a key to career success.

Rose Hollister (she/her/hers) is a coach and consultant to Fortune 500 companies and has been published numerous times by the Harvard Business Review. She specializes in partnering with leaders to accelerate results, increase effectiveness, and meet emerging business challenges.

Rose has shared about eXXec and what the program is like behind the scenes on episode 60 and episode 184 of Diverse: a SWE podcast.

In the eXXec program, what starts with an insightful leadership assessment is amplified by three days of coaching, workshops, networking, and insightful conversations with other engineering leaders — all in the beautiful setting of downtown Chicago.

For organizations who want to keep pace in the ever-evolving engineering sector, eXXec helps companies develop and retain top engineering talent and strengthen an inclusive leadership pipeline.

You can learn more about eXXec from past participants in these blog posts:

• Lessons Learned From eXXec 2022
• eXXec 2021 Recap
• Learning to eXXcel at eXXec
• Photos from the eXXec program

eXXec 2024 takes place June 24-27 in Chicago. Register here to reserve your spot before the May 31 registration deadline! 

SWE Blog provides up-to-date information and news about the Society and how our members are making a difference every day. You’ll find stories about SWE members, engineering, technology, and other STEM-related topics.

View all posts

You Might Also Like…

ABOUT ALL TOGETHER

All Together  is the blog of the Society of Women Engineers . Find stories about SWE members, engineering, technology, and other STEM related topics. It’s up-to-date information and news about the Society and how our members are making a difference everyday.

Session expired

Please log in again. The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.

Privacy Overview