what have you learned about philippine politics and governance essay

• Subject List
• Take a Tour
• For Authors
• Subscriber Services
• Publications
• African American Studies
• African Studies
• American Literature
• Anthropology
• Architecture Planning and Preservation
• Art History
• Atlantic History
• Biblical Studies
• British and Irish Literature
• Childhood Studies
• Chinese Studies
• Cinema and Media Studies
• Communication
• Criminology
• Environmental Science
• Evolutionary Biology
• International Law
• International Relations
• Islamic Studies
• Jewish Studies
• Latin American Studies
• Latino Studies
• Linguistics
• Literary and Critical Theory
• Medieval Studies
• Military History

Political Science

• Public Health
• Renaissance and Reformation
• Social Work
• Urban Studies
• Victorian Literature
• Browse All Subjects

How to Subscribe

• Free Trials

In This Article Expand or collapse the "in this article" section Philippine Politics and Government

Introduction.

• Theories of Philippine Politics
• Philippine Political Development
• Elite and Dynastic Politics
• Philippine Civil Society
• Democracy and Autocracy
• Philippine Constitution
• Philippine Presidency
• Philippine Legislature
• Philippine Judiciary
• Philippine Bureaucracy and Local Governments
• Philippine Elections
• Philippine Political Parties
• Philippine Social Movements
• Foreign Policy, International Relations, and Security

Related Articles Expand or collapse the "related articles" section about

About related articles close popup.

Lorem Ipsum Sit Dolor Amet

Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Aliquam ligula odio, euismod ut aliquam et, vestibulum nec risus. Nulla viverra, arcu et iaculis consequat, justo diam ornare tellus, semper ultrices tellus nunc eu tellus.

• Constitutional Politics in Asia
• Democratization
• Political Party Systems in East and Southeast Asia
• Politics of the Philippines: From Rizal to Duterte
• Presidential Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective
• Women and Politics in East and Southeast Asia

Other Subject Areas

Forthcoming articles expand or collapse the "forthcoming articles" section.

• Cross-National Surveys of Public Opinion
• Politics of School Reform
• Ratification of the Constitution
• Find more forthcoming articles...
• Export Citations
• Share This Facebook LinkedIn Twitter

Philippine Politics and Government by Julio Teehankee LAST REVIEWED: 26 October 2023 LAST MODIFIED: 26 October 2023 DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199756223-0366

The study of politics and government in the Philippines was borne out of critical junctures in historical state-making and nation-building in the country. From colonialism to nationalism, modernization, authoritarianism, and democratization, the Philippines is an interesting case study since it reflects significant periods in its political history. The emergence of political science in the Philippines has contributed to the rise of several Philippine politics and government theories that frame the analysis of its political development. Despite the early influence of American political science on the study of Philippine politics and government, Philippine political science has avoided quantitative methods until recently. Nonetheless, the latest studies by Filipino political scientists present a dynamic and pluralist perspective. For the most part, the bulk of research publications has focused on democratic and state institutions that include executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government; the bureaucracy; local government and decentralization; policymaking in general; the military and police; elections; voting; election rules; and political parties. Philippine politics has been largely criticized for being corrupt, patronage-based, and lacking ideological grounding. However, political and social movements have mobilized ideology in contesting power in the country. Essentially, there have been four ideological traditions in the Philippines: nationalism, liberalism, radical Marxism, and socialism. Despite several attempts to articulate an ideologically based discourse, Philippine politics continue to revolve around candidate-centered alliances of provincial bosses, political machines, and local clans, grounded on clientelistic, parochial, and personal inducements rather than issues, ideologies, and party programs. Nonetheless, alternative theories have emerged to challenge this view of Philippine politics. In recent years, the strong institutionalist and statist approach of the discipline in the country has been receptive to alternative and multidisciplinary perspectives. The Philippines is also home to a broad range of voluntary associations, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), and other manifestations of a relatively vibrant civil society and social movements. New ideological formations gravitating around postmodern, cultural, and identity-based issues have also emerged. Moreover, new challenges, such as democratic regression, authoritarian revival, and digital disinformation, necessitate looking at old problems with new academic lenses. In addition, domestic politics continue to impact how the country navigates its foreign policy, particularly in defense of its “national interest” in the rapidly shifting global arena.

Analyzing Philippine Politics and Government

Familiarizing oneself with the theories and history of Philippine politics and government is an initial step in understanding its intricacies. The development of political science in the Philippines has contributed to the emergence of several theories of Philippine politics and government that frame the analysis of political development. Subsections scan the literature on Philippine Ideologies ; Patron-Client, Brokerage, and Machines ; and Alternative Theories of Philippine Politics . A subsection provides the historical context of Philippine Political Development .

back to top

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login .

Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here .

• About Political Science »
• Meet the Editorial Board »
• Oceania, Gender, Indigenous and Ethnic Political Represent...
• Advanced Democracies, Electoral System Reform in
• Advanced Democracies, Public Opinion and Public Policy in
• Advertising and Election Campaigns in the United States
• Africa, Comparative Politics of
• Africa, Ethnic, Linguistic, Religious, and Regional Minori...
• Africa, Public Opinion in
• Africa, Women’s Political Representation in
• African Development, Politics of
• American Indian Politics
• Ancient Chinese Political Thought
• Arab Spring, The
• Arab-Israel Conflict, The
• Arendt, Hannah
• Argentine Government and Politics
• Aristotle's Political Thought
• Arms Race Modeling
• Asia, Environmental Politics in
• Asia, Water Politics in
• Asian American Mobilization and Political Identities
• Australia and New Zealand, Comparative Politics of
• Authoritarian Regimes, Lawyers in
• Authoritarianism in Russia
• Authoritarianism in the Public
• Authoritarianism in Turkey
• Bicameralism in Stable Democracies
• Big Data in Political Science Research
• Biopolitics and State Regulation of Human Life
• Birthright Citizenship
• Brazilian Foreign Policy
• Brazilian Political Development
• Brexit, British Politics, and European Integration
• Business-State Relations in Europe
• Campaign Finance in the Era of Super-PACS
• Canadian Foreign Policy
• Canadian Government and Politics
• Candidate Emergence and Recruitment
• Caribbean, Elections and Democracy in the
• Celebrities in US Politics
• Channels of Electoral Representation in Advanced Industria...
• China, Political Economy of
• China's One-Child Policy
• China-Taiwan Relations
• Chinese Communist Party
• Chinese Economic Policy
• Chinese Nationalism
• Civil Society in South Asia
• Civil War in Sub-Saharan Africa
• Civil-Military Relations in Asia
• Class in American Politics
• Climate Change and Politics
• Collective Memory
• Colombian Politics and Government
• Comparative Capitalism Theory
• Comparative Industrial Relations in Europe
• Comparative Political Economy of Resource Extraction
• Comparative Politics of Angola, Mozambique, and Guinea-Bis...
• Comparative Politics of Chile and Uruguay
• Comparative Politics of Federalism
• Comparative Politics of the Middle East and North Africa
• Computational Social Science
• Congress, Defense, and Foreign Policy
• Congressional Reassertion of Authority
• Conservative Litigation Strategies and Groups in US Judici...
• Constitutionalism
• Corruption in China
• Cosmopolitan Political Thought
• Crisis of European Integration in Historical Perspective, ...
• Critical Elections, Partisan Realignment, and Long-Term El...
• Critical Theory and the Frankfurt School
• Cuban Political Development
• Cycles of Protest
• Democracies, Political Clientelism in
• Democracy and Authoritarianism, Empirical Indicators of
• Democracy and Authoritarianism in Sub-Saharan Africa
• Democracy and Dictatorship in Central Asia
• Democracy and Minority Language Recognition
• Democracy in Latin America
• Democratic Citizenship
• Democratic Consolidation
• Democratic Peace Theory
• Democratic Theory
• Democratization in Africa
• Democratization in Central America
• Democratization in Mexico
• Democratization in the Muslim World
• Development of Survey Research
• Diasporas and Politics
• Direct Democracy in the United States
• Dual Citizenship
• East Africa, Politics of
• East and Southeast Asia, Political Party Systems in
• East and Southeast Asia, Women and Politics in
• East Asia, Civil Society and Social Movements in
• Economic Voting
• Effects of the 9/11 Terrorist Attacks on American Public O...
• Egalitarianism
• Election Forecasting
• Election Laws in Democracies
• Election Observation and the Detection of Fraud
• Electoral and Party System Development in Sub-Saharan Afri...
• Electoral Assistance
• Electoral Change in Latin America
• Electoral Institutions and Women’s Representation
• Electoral Reform and Voting in the United States
• Electoral Volatility in the New Democracies of Latin Ameri...
• Electronic Voting Systems
• Emotion and Racial Attitudes in Contemporary American Poli...
• Environmental Governance
• Environmental Politics among Advanced Industrial Democraci...
• Ethnic Diasporas and US Foreign Policy
• Ethnic Politics
• Eurasia, Comparative Politics of
• European Parliament, The
• European Social Democracy
• European Union, Politics of the
• Extension of Voting Rights to Emigrants
• Failed and Weak States in Theory and Practice
• Far-Right Parties in Europe
• Federalism in the United States
• Feminist Political Thought
• Field Experiments
• Filibuster, The
• Framing Effects in Political Communication
• Gender and Electoral Politics in the United States
• Gender and International Relations
• Gender and Political Violence
• Gender and Politics in South Asia
• Gender, Behavior, and Representation
• Gender Gap in US Public Opinion
• Gender Stereotypes in Politics
• Genetic Underpinnings of Political Attitudes and Behaviors
• German Politics and Government
• Global Inequality
• Globalization and the Welfare State
• Globalization, Health Crises, and Health Care
• Governance in Africa
• Governmental Responses to Political Corruption
• Gridlock and Divided Government in the U.S.
• Health-Care Politics in the United States
• Historiography of Twentieth-Century American Conservatism,...
• Hobbes’s Political Thought
• Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of
• Hume’s Political Thought
• Hybrid Regimes
• Ideal Point Estimation
• Identity and Political Behavior
• Ideological Reasoning in Politics
• Illiberal Democracies and Democratic Backsliding
• Immigrant Incorporation in Canada
• Immigrant Incorporation in Western Europe
• Immigration and European Politics
• Immigration and International Relations
• Immigration Politics and Policy in the United States
• Impact of Campaign Contributions on Congressional Behavior...
• Impact of C-SPAN on US Democracy
• Implicit Attitudes in Public Opinion
• Income Dynamics and Politics in North America and Europe
• Income Inequality and Advanced Democracies
• Income Inequality in the United States, The Politics of
• Independent Voters, The Study of
• Indian Democracy
• Indigenous Politics and Representation in Latin America
• Indigenous Rights and Governance in Canada, Australia, and...
• Indonesia, Politics of
• Informal Practices of Accountability in Urban Africa
• Institutional Change in Advanced Democracies
• Institutional Factors Affecting Women’s Political Engageme...
• Intellectual Property in International Relations
• Interest Groups and Inequality in the United States
• Interest Groups in American Politics
• Interethnic Contact and Impact on Attitudes
• International Conflict Management
• International Criminal Justice
• International NGOs
• International Political Economy of Illegal Drugs
• Internet and Politics, The
• Intersectionality in Political Science
• Interstate Border Dispute Management in the Indo-Pacific
• Iran, Political Development of
• Israeli Politics
• Italian Politics and Government
• Judicial Supremacy and National Judicial Review
• Judiciaries and Politics in East Asia
• Kant's Political Thought
• Labor Migration: Dynamics and Politics
• Labor Politics in East Asia
• Land Reform in Latin America
• Latin America, Democratic Transitions in
• Latin America, Electoral Reform in
• Latin America, Environmental Policy and Politics in
• Latin America, Guerrilla Insurgencies in
• Latin America, Social Movements in
• Legal Mobilization
• LGBT Politics in the United States
• Liberal Pluralism
• Libertarianism
• Local Governments in the United States
• Machiavelli’s Political Thought
• Malaysian Politics and Government
• Marx's Political Thought
• Mass Incarceration and US Politics
• Mechanisms of Representation
• Media Effects in Politics
• Media Politics in South Asia
• Mexican Political Development
• Mexican Politics and Government
• Military Government in Latin America, 1959–1990
• Minority Governments
• Minority Political Engagement and Representation in the Un...
• Mixed-Member Electoral Systems
• Modern Dynastic Rule
• Modern Elections and Voting Behavior in Europe
• Motivated Reasoning
• Narrative Analysis
• National Interbranch Politics in the United States
• Nationalism
• NATO, Politics of
• Negative Campaigning
• Neoclassical Realism
• New Institutionalism Revisited, The
• Nigerian Politics and Government
• North America, Comparative Politics of
• Oil, Politics of
• Online Public Opinion Polling
• Organized Criminal Syndicates and Governance in Mexico and...
• Origins and Impact of Proportional Representation, The
• Outcomes of Social Movements and Protest Activities
• Partisan and Nonpartisan Theories of Organization in the U...
• Partisan Polarization in the US Congress
• Partisan Polarization in the US Electorate
• Party Networks
• Party System Institutionalization in Democracies
• Peace Operations
• Personality and Politics
• Personalization of Politics
• Philippine Politics and Government
• Plato’s Political Thought
• Policy Feedback
• Policy Responsiveness to Public Opinion
• Political Ambition
• Political Economy of Financial Regulation in Advanced Ind...
• Political Economy of India
• Political Economy of Taxation, The
• Political Geography in American Politics
• Political Humor and Its Effects
• Political Institutions and the Policymaking Process in Lat...
• Political Obligation
• Political Participation and Representation, Black
• Political Parties and Electoral Politics of Japan
• Political Roles and Activities of Former Presidents and Pr...
• Political Thought, Hegel's
• Political Thought of the American Founders, The
• Politics and Government, BeNeLux
• Politics and Policy in Contemporary Argentina
• Politics, Gender Quotas in
• Politics of Anti-Americanism
• Politics of Class Formation
• Politics of Disaster Prevention and Management
• Politics of Ethnic Identity in China
• Politics of Financial Crises
• Politics of Foreign Direct Investment in South Asia
• Politics of Higher Education in the U.S.
• Politics of Internal Conquest in the United States and Can...
• Politics of Japan
• Politics of Natural Disasters, The
• Politics of North Korea
• Politics of Science and Technology
• Politics of South Africa
• Politics of Southern Africa
• Politics of the American South
• Politics of the US-Mexico Border
• Populism in Latin America
• Positive and Negative Partisanship
• Postcolonial Political Theory
• Postcolonialism and International Relations
• Post-Communist Democratization
• Preferential Trade Agreements, Politics of
• Presidential Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspectiv...
• Presidential Persuasion and Public Opinion
• Presidential Primaries and Caucuses
• Private Governance
• Protest Participation
• Public Opinion in Affluent  Democracies
• Public Opinion in Europe toward the European Union
• Public Opinion in New Democracies and Developing Nations
• Public Opinion on Immigration
• Public Opinion toward the Environment and Climate Change i...
• Public Presidency, US Elections, and the Permanent Campaig...
• Qualitative Methods, The Renewal of
• Race in American Political Thought
• Racial and Ethnic Descriptive Representation in the United...
• Recruitment and Selection for Elected Office
• Redistricting and Electoral Competition in American Politi...
• Referendums and Direct Democracy
• Regime Transitions and Variation in Post-Communist Europe
• Regional Integration
• Regional Integration in Latin America
• Regional Security
• Regulating Food Production
• Religion and Politics in Latin America
• Religion in American Political Thought
• Religion in Contemporary Political Thought
• Religion, Politics, and Civic Engagement in the United Sta...
• Republicanism
• Rousseau’s Political Thought
• Rule of Law
• Russia and the West
• Science and Democracy
• Science and Social Movements
• Secession and Secessionist Movements
• Semi-Presidential Systems
• Social Networks, Mass Publics, and Democratic Politics
• Social Policy and Immigrant Integration
• South Asian Political Thought
• South Korea, Politics of
• Southeast Asia, International Relations in
• Southeast Asian Politics
• Spanish Politics and Government
• Spectacle, The
• Sport and Politics
• State Building in Sub-Saharan Africa
• State Formation
• State, The Nature of the
• State-Society Relations in South Asia
• Stereotypes in Political Reasoning
• Supreme Court and Public Opinion
• Supreme Court of the United States, The
• Systemic Theories of International Politics
• Taiwan, Politics of
• Tea Party, The
• Thailand, Politics of
• The Crisis of European Integration in Historical Perspecti...
• The New Right in American Political Thought
• The Politics of Parenthood: Attitudes, Behavior, Policy, a...
• The Politics of Waste and Social Inequalities in Indian Ci...
• Third-Party Politics in the United States
• Tocqueville’s Political Thought
• Transboundary Pollution
• Transitional Justice
• Transnational Private Regulation
• Trust in Latin American Governing Institutions
• Turkey, Political Development of
• US Military Bases Abroad
• US Politics, Neoliberalism in
• US Presidency, The
• US Presidential Campaigns and Their Impact
• Venezuela, The Path Toward Authoritarianism in
• Voter Support for Women Candidates
• Voter Turnout
• Voter Turnout Field Experiments
• Voting Technology and Election Administration in the Unite...
• War, Factors Influencing Popular Support for
• Welfare State Development
• Welfare State Development in Latin America
• Welfare State Development in Western Europe
• West Africa, Politics of
• White Identity Politics
• Women and Conflict Studies
• Women’s Inclusion in Executive Cabinets
• Women’s Legal and Constitutional Rights
• Women’s Political Activism and Civic Engagement in Latin A...
• Women’s Representation in Governmental Office in Latin Ame...
• Women’s Representation in the Middle East and North Africa
• Workers’ Politics in China
• Youth and Generational Differences in US Politics
• Privacy Policy
• Cookie Policy
• Legal Notice
• Accessibility

Powered by:

• [91.193.111.216]
• 91.193.111.216

UP Department of Political Science

• Announcement

Philippine Politics and Governance [Full Text]

Faculty and students of political science can now download the full text of Philippine Politics and Governance books for FREE ! Just click the links below.

Philippine Politics and Governance: An Introduction Edited by Noel M. Morada and Teresa S. Encarnacion Tadem

PHL CHED Connect Platform Link Mirror Link

Philippine Politics and Governance: Challenges to Democratization and Development Edited by Teresa S. Encarnacion Tadem and Noel M. Morada

The books were published by the UP Department of Political Science in collaboration with the Philippine Commission on Higher Education. The full texts were made available through the PHL CHED Connect Platform.

Download two books as one

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Citizenship and Governance: Making a Difference in Philippine Politics

Course syllabus and modules for a course on citizenship and governance. Wrote this for DLSU-Manila but they are no longer using it. Might find some use here.

Related Papers

Grade: 12 Semester: 1st Semester Subject Title: Philippine Politics and Governance No. of Hours/ Semester: 80 hours Prerequisite (if needed): Subject Description: This course introduces the students to the basic concepts and vital elements of politics and governance from a historical-institutional perspective. In particular, it attempts to explain how the important features of our country's political structures/institutions, processes, and relationships developed across time. In the process, the course helps the learners gain a better appreciation of their rights and responsibilities as individuals and as members of the larger sociopolitical community to strengthen their civic competence.

Cleve V . Arguelles

This is an introductory survey course on the study of Philippine politics and government. The primary goal of this course is to equip students with an understanding of the development, organization, and operation of the Philippine political system. We will use a variety of analytical lens, including constitutional and comparative political perspectives, to examine the varied factors that shape governance in the Philippines.

Joycel Dotimas

Jones Liwan

This study focused on the concept of leadership and political engagement of students. Thus, it determined the respondents' conceptions of leadership and knew their current political engagement. Further, it determined the gaps between the notions about leadership and current political engagement of the respondents, which served as the basis for identifying the implications of the conceptions of leadership and current political engagement in teaching Philippine Politics and Governance. The study used an open-ended survey questionnaire, and the data gathered was analyzed with topical and thematic analysis. The students have knowledge and conceptions about leadership and the qualities and characteristics attributed to it. It was found that most of the students are engaged in elections, digital platforms, political discussion, and civic matters. Furthermore, gaps show that their political engagement does not reflect their conceptions of leadership and vice versa. What the students view and think is not the same as what they are doing or actualizing. Their concepts negate what they are engaged in. The existing gaps show that leadership conceptions and political engagement can be further improved by incorporating varying teaching-learning approaches aligned to the Philippine Politics and Governance curriculum.

Jennifer Caspe

Juna Babatu-on

Barbara Leigh

Dalam sejarah panjang dunia ini civics dan pendidikan kewarganegaraan di sekolah merupakan fenomena yang relatif baru. Ada dua faktor yang mengarahkan hal ini. Pertama adalah pertumbuhan negara-bangsa dan kedua adalah diperkenalkannya pendidikan untuk massa. Negara bangsa muncul di seluruh dunia dalam jumlah yang besar setelah akhir perang dunia kedua pada pertengahan abad ke dua puluh. Kekuasaan kolonial telah ditentang dan pergerakan kemerdekaan dilakukan atau mencapai kemerdekaan. Di Afrika, Amerika Latin, dan Asia ada peningkatan di sejumlah negara merdeka. Sebagian terbesar menjalankan bentuk pemerintahan demokratis. Mereka melaksanakan pemilu dan memiliki badan perwakilan. Semuanya memperkenalkan beberapa bentuk persekolahan bagi kebanyakan penduduk. Artikel ini membahas sejarah pendidikan yang didukung oleh negara di eropa. Di dalam konteks itu, dibahas civics dan pendidikan kewarganegaraan di Sekolah abad ke dua puluh satu dengan kemungkinan implikasinya bagi Pendidikan Kewa...

Mark Baildon

This paper redefined governance in Philippine perspective through an advocacy and citizen engagements of the student leaders on the prevention of the increased rate of teenage pregnancy in the Province of Capiz. It evaluates the challenges of student leaders volunteered in various activities. It shows the process of implementation of the Project SaveNeToy. The achievements of student leaders in volunteering are the enhancement of their skills, gained new networks, joy, and happiness, developing as a patriotic individual, and igniting the Bayanihan Spirit. The project implemented adopts a new perspective of governance through public and private partnerships, youth empowerment and stakeholder’s accountability through a sustainable project development and achieve the intended health outcomes of the community. Keywords—Volunteerism, citizen engagement, student leaders, governance, teenage pregnancy.

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Lee Jerome , Avril Keating

International Journal of Social Quality

alex brillantes

Tracey M Derwing

David Kahane

Carmen Geha

Rachel Tallon

British Educational Research Journal

Matthew Flinders

Asia Pacific Journal of Education

Kerry Kennedy

jenebebe ricaborda

Theresa Tantuoyir

Educational Research for Policy and Practice

Rizalyn Kolman

Educational Journal of Living Theories

Fernando Reimers , Eleonora Reimers

Laden Yurttagüler

THE COMPASS: An International Peer-Reviewed Journal of Education in Universal Human Values

Dr. Kaurobi Ghosh

Proceedings of the 2nd Asian Education Symposium (AES 2017)

Nikolee Marie Serafico-Reyes

School Field

Routledge eBooks

Adhe Saputra

Effective Curriculum Ideas

Melody Manalo

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Philippine Politics and Governance: An Introduction

• University of the Philippines-Diliman
• 2020-08-26 10:08:00

Understanding Culture, Society and Politics

Political structures in the philippines (part i).

• Teaching Resources

Author: Ruth Lusterio-Rico

What do you think about our modules? Please let us know by answering this short survey!

DOWNLOAD SLIDES HERE

Lesson 1: Right to Rule and the Social Contract

Lesson Objectives

At the end of the lesson, the student is expected to be able to:

• Define political structures; 
• Explain the concepts of power, authority, legitimacy, rights, social contract, constitution;
• Appraise arguments about the bases of existence of political structures; and
• Examine the functions of political structures, particularly, in Philippine society today.

Key Concepts

• Political Institutions – system of behaviors occurring in governance; also “political structures”
• Power –  ability to do something in order to achieve a desired outcome 
• Authority – rightful or legitimate power
• Social Contract – agreement made by the members of society with those with authority that determines their relations with one another
• Political Obligation – responsibility of citizens to abide by or follow the government

Study Guide 

Introduction to the Lesson: 

• To have an idea about who Thomas Hobbes was and what England was like during his lifetime:
• Read this short article on the Life and Works of Thomas Hobbes by Duncan, Stewart, “Thomas Hobbes”,  The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy  (Spring 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hobbes/#1
• Watch this short video on Thomas Hobbes and England in the 17 th century, https://youtu.be/9i4jb5XBX5s .
• Read the excerpts from the Leviathan in Curtis, ed. Great Political Theories , Vol. 1, pp. 296-315.
• To know who John Locke was:
• Read about the life and works of John Locke from this article from the International Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://iep.utm.edu/locke/#H1  
• Watch this video clip on the life and legacy of John Locke, https://youtu.be/b2NnEfhQ15M . 
• Read the excerpts from the Second Treatise of Civil Government (Curtis, ed. Great Political Theories, Vol. 1, pp. 337-354).
• To learn more about Rousseau and his contributions:
• Read about his life and works from this article, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rousseau/#Life ; 
• Watch this video, Jean Jacques Rousseau Biography https://youtu.be/VqOaG24aPSc ; and   
• Read the excerpts from the Social Contract (Ebenstein and Ebenstein, Great Political Thinkers, pp. 505-506, 508-520).

  The Social Contract Theory

As we know, power is found in different types of social and political structures. In its broadest meaning, power refers to the ability to do something in order to achieve a desired outcome. Legitimate power – or one that is recognized to be rightful – is called authority . Thus, a person is obeyed by others because he or she is recognized as a rightful or legitimate leader. The sociologist, Max Weber (1864-1920) studied the transformation of societies and observed that the bases of the legitimacy of rule vary in different types of societies. Weber identified three pure types of authority: traditional, charismatic, and legal-rational. In certain cases, the type of authority may be a mix of these types.

Political structures in different societies have evolved over time. Historical experiences (such as having been colonized) and cultural practices are some of the factors that have influenced the development and functioning of political structures in various societies. The so-called Social Contract Theory from the ideas of three political thinkers who lived from the 16 th to the 18 th centuries, namely, Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), John Locke (1632 to 1704) and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1788), offer some explanations about the nature of the state and its institutions, the power that the rulers of the state exercise, and the rights of the citizens. In a nutshell, these ideas provide explanations about why societies and governments were formed. 

Oftentimes, a state is thought of to be synonymous with government. Many Filipinos, in fact, may tend to think of the state in this way. This is understandable because the state exercises its power through the government and its various institutions. However, the state, as defined above, is much more than the government.

There are many views regarding the origin and nature of the state. From the Greek philosophers Plato and Aristotle, we learn that the state is a natural institution. It is natural because it emerges from the necessity to work together so that certain needs can be met and goals can be achieved. Thus, the state exists because people need to live together. 

Human beings are by nature social beings. Aristotle, for instance, believed that a person who does not live in a society is either a beast (animal) or a god (does not need another being to provide for their needs). Based on this perspective, a state exists not for the sake of itself but to achieve a higher good, such as the happiness of the entire community—what we call the common good. For his part, the Italian thinker, Niccolo Machiavelli (1469-1527), argued that the state exists for the sake of itself, i.e., to get, collect, and expand power. 

The Social Contract Theory presents another view: the state and the institutions of society are seen as products of a social contract – an agreement made by the members of society that defines and influences their interactions, particularly with those in authority. As mentioned above, there are three major ideas regarding the nature of the social contract. The English philosopher, Thomas Hobbes, thought that the agreement came about because of the need to guarantee the security of the people. The main role of the political ruler was to maintain order and security within society. Another English philosopher, John Locke, thought that the social contract was needed to guarantee the fair and impartial enforcement of the law. For Locke, human beings lived in a state of nature governed by rationality and natural law. The primary function of the state, as defined by the social contract, is to guarantee that individuals exercise their natural rights to life, liberty, and property. A third view on the social contract, articulated by the French philosopher, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, emphasizes the idea of the natural equality of human beings. Therefore, the only justified authority is one that emerges from an agreement among all in which each particular will has been submitted to the general will. What this means is that no person or entity possesses the right to rule over people unless everyone has agreed to such rule. The power exercised by the state is only made possible because the citizens have given their consent and have expressed their will to be governed. The ideas of the social contract are elaborated below.

Important ideas from Hobbes’ Leviathan

Thomas Hobbes’ masterpiece was the Leviathan, published in 1651. In this work, Hobbes wrote about his idea of a social contract and argued that it (the social contract) was necessary for men to live peacefully and securely under the absolute rule of the Leviathan (the ruler). Some scholars have commented that Hobbes’ social contract theory rests on his theory of human nature.

In The Leviathan (1651), Hobbes wrote on the following ideas:

• Nature of the human being : for Hobbes, all human beings enjoy absolute equality; they desire the same thing: power. The “right of nature” is the liberty each man has “to use his own power, as he will himself, for the preservation of his own nature; that is to say, of his own life”.
• State of nature : a state of war where there is no guarantee for one’s life; life in the state of nature is “nasty, poor, brutish, and short”.
• Reason for the establishment of the social contract : self-preservation; people gave up their rights to protect their lives: they have transferred their natural rights to the ruler for the preservation of their lives; sovereign power has been transferred by the people to the ruler
• Role of the Leviathan : to protect people from themselves; without the social contract (therefore, without the Leviathan), there can be no order
• Obligation of subjects : preserve the social contract by following the ruler; disobedience or rebellion against the government is tantamount to going back to the state of nature, which is a state of war.

Political Obligation refers to the duty of citizens to obey a government that has the right to rule or is legitimate. The agreement that people have made for themselves (social contract) is a basis of political obligation. People obey their rulers because they have given political rulers the right to rule. Basically, this is used to justify absolutism and authoritarianism. Under such systems, citizens are viewed merely as subjects who have given up their rights and therefore have no right to resist or even question their rulers. For example, if one lives under this government described by Hobbes (i.e., an authoritarian or absolutist government), a citizen who is accused of rebellion or any crime would have no right to defend himself or herself. It would not matter whether the citizen is guilty or not.

| Self-Evaluation Form (Part I)

Answer the following questions.

1.What do you already know about the lesson/topic?

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2.What do you want to know more about the lesson/topic?

• Sub-Lesson 1: Important ideas from Locke’s Second Treatise

The second version of the Social Contract Theory comes from another English philosopher, John Locke. Locke’s version of the social contract theory differs from that of Hobbes. Both Hobbes and Locke lived during the 17th century, which was a period of chaos in England. If Hobbes argued for absolutism in the Leviathan, Locke’s social contract theory justified the right of the people to resist tyrannical rule. Below are some of the important ideas from the work of Locke:

State of nature: a state of “perfect freedom”; but inconveniences arise from the practice of equality of all, i.e., in terms of their life, liberty, and possessions Nature of man: equal with other men; rational: man has reason that enables him to determine what is right from wrong and recognize the rights of other men Civil society: established by the social contract; to address the inconveniences that arise from the state of nature so that each man does not become the judge of his own case Social contract: does not mean that people have given up their rights, but the goal of the institution of civil society is the enhancement of one’s rights to life, liberty, and property. Role of government: not to rule absolutely but to rule over people as their trustee; sovereignty has not been given up by the people but has been entrusted to the government; people have the right to resist when the ruler has become abusive.

Comparing the ideas of the two English philosophers, we can clearly see the differences in their perspectives. In the Hobbesian version of the social contract, the citizens’ rights have already been lost, since they gave it up for the sake of securing their lives. What this means in practical terms is that the citizens’ right to express their views and be heard by the Leviathan has been lost. The Leviathan governs and all the people need to do is to follow. In contrast, for Locke, while the government exercises power on behalf of the people, they (the citizens) have not lost their rights to express their views and even to resist a bad government. As noted above, the people have not given up their rights but have only entrusted their rights to the government. Therefore, the citizens have every right to take back what they have entrusted to the government. Finally, as the trustee, the role of the government is to make sure that the people’s right to life, liberty, and property is enhanced. The role of government therefore is to make people’s lives better.

• Sub-Lesson 2: Important ideas from Rousseau’s Social Contract

A third version of the Social Contract Theory emerged from one of the works of the French philosopher, Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Of the three social contract theorists, Rousseau was the only one who did not have close contacts with people in the aristocracy or work with people in power. The French writer had an interesting background, and unlike Hobbes and Locke, he did not attend prestigious schools or universities. The third version of the theory from Rousseau will, hopefully, enrich your assessment of views on the relationship between the state (particularly those who are in power) and society. The following are excerpts from Rousseau’s The Social Contract (1762).

– “Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains”. This was Rousseau’s way of expressing how the society of his time did not recognize the natural freedom of individuals.

– In the state of nature, man is free but ruled by his instincts or appetite. Therefore, he is not truly free.

– For Rousseau, the purpose of the social contract is “…to form an association which will defend and protect with the whole common force the person and goods of each associate, and in which each, while uniting himself with all, may still obey himself alone, and remain as free as before”. What this means is that, for Rousseau, the purpose of the social contract is the enhancement of one’s liberty. Like Hobbes and Locke, Rousseau believed that a person is naturally free. However, in the state of nature, such freedom possessed by a person cannot be considered real or true freedom. Why is this so? It is because such natural freedom is exercised by a person who is governed simply by his or her natural instincts. To become a better human being exercising true freedom, Rousseau believed that a person must live in a society. This is what it means when Rousseau wrote that, “Man can be forced to be free.” A person learns about true freedom – first, civil liberty, and then moral liberty – only when they live in a society. The product of the social contract, therefore, is a community that defends and protects the rights of each person. The citizen is thus both sovereign and subject. They are sovereign because they are part of the community. They are also a subject because they must follow what the sovereign wills. Concretely, what this means is that the people exercise sovereign power (for example, in choosing or electing the leaders of their country) and at the same time, follow the laws that are made by their government. To do these dual functions (sovereign and subject), Rousseau believed that citizens need to be developed and educated. They must know how to exercise the freedom they possess and not be ruled simply by their instincts. When citizens follow rules that their rulers make, they exercise civil liberty . When citizens follow laws that they made themselves, they exercise moral liberty . For Rousseau, the highest form of freedom is moral liberty. This is achieved when a citizen can identify their own will as that of the common good or the General Will.

– The purpose of the social contract according to Rousseau is to express the “General Will”, which is aimed at the good of all. It is different from the “will of all” which is the sum of particular wills. Rousseau also considered that people may identify the will of the majority (“will of all”) as the General Will. It is not necessarily so. What Rousseau meant by the General Will is not simply counting of votes, or determining how many are in favor of a certain position. Knowing the General Will requires the active participation of the citizens. What this implies is that the citizens are knowledgeable of the issue being discussed and can make an informed decision (not being ruled simply by their instincts). When citizens are active, they are sovereign, according to Rousseau.

– For Rousseau, the people remain sovereign. This means that they are the highest power. Once they enter a social contract, they do not lose this power. They do not give it up (“sovereignty is inalienable”). They also do not divide sovereign power and delegate the power to another body such as a small group of men and women (“sovereignty is indivisible”).

Overall, the Social Contract Theory presents the idea that society was formed as a result of an agreement among men. There may be different justifications from the different writers regarding the existence of the government and the extent of its power over its citizens. But the idea that sovereign power rests on the people who have made the social contract is common among the three thinkers. Moreover, many scholars acknowledge the influence of the ideas from the social contract theory, particularly from Locke and Rousseau, on the establishment of democratic societies that uphold the ideals of liberty and equality among citizens. To some extent, the idea of a social contract has also been associated with the existence of a constitution.

Self-Evaluation Forms (Part 2)

What have you learned from the lesson? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2. How will you apply the knowledge you have learned in this lesson in improving Philippine society? _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

• List of Activities

Synchronous Activities (In-class) 

Activity 1: Debate on the Social Contract Theory Instructions.

Step 1. Divide the class into two groups. Step 2. Give them ample time to prepare and to discuss the opposing arguments for this question: Is the right or wrong to resist a bad ruler part of the rights of men under a social contract? Step 3. Allow them to reflect on their stances at the end of the debate.

Activity 2: Discussion on Hobbes Instructions. Present the following questions to students: 1. What is Hobbes’s theory of human nature? What are human beings like? 2. How did he describe the state of nature? 3. What conditions in the state of nature led men to enter into a social contract? 4. What constitutes sovereign power? What are its rights?

Activity 3: Discussion on Locke Instructions. Present the following questions to students:

1. What do you think were the important influences on Locke’s ideas? 2. What do men possess in the state of nature that makes them distinguish what is right from wrong? 3. What are three characteristics of the state of nature according to Locke? 4. What are the two types of liberty for Locke? 5. What is the supreme power of the commonwealth? 6. What are the four limits to the power of government?

Activity 4: Discussion on Rousseau Instructions. Present the following questions to students:

1. How did Rousseau describe man’s life in the state of nature? 2. What does sovereignty mean? Who possesses it? What are its qualities? 3. What is the General Will? What is its significance in society?

Asynchronous Activities

Activity: Application of the Social Contract Theory

Part 1. Imagine yourself to be in a state of nature. Think of yourself as being in a situation wherein there are no rules that you must follow and that you are perfectly free to do whatever you want. 1. How would you imagine the situation would be? Would you want to be in such a situation? 2. Do you think that such an environment would be conducive for you to achieve your goals? Why or why not? 3. Imagine further the situation above to be the same situation of everyone else in your community. Do you think that such an environment where everyone can do as he or she pleases is desirable? Why or why not?

Part 2. After a careful reflection of the ideas of the social contract thinkers, write a short essay on the significance of the social contract for a community. Consider the following questions in writing your essay: 1. Who do you think should be the source of rules or order in your community? 2. Why do you think that person(s) be the source of rules or order in your community? 3. What should be the role of the rest of the people in your community? 4. What should be the relationship between the source of rules (leader) and the people in your community

Rubrics for Discussions and Debates

Lesson 2: The Constitution

• Define the constitution; and
• Explain related concepts to the lesson.
• Constitution – system of rules which defines the responsibilities and powers of the government and its institutions, and the dynamics between the state and its citizens
• Constitutionalism – political components which establish a system of check and balance

Study Guide

Introduction to the Lesson

• To learn more about the Constitution:
• Watch this short video on the constitution and its purposes, https://youtu.be/0UzKD8rZCc0   (video made by International Idea);
• Read pages 501-518 of the book, Politics, 5th edition by Andrew Heywood; and 
• Get a copy of the 1987 Philippine Constitution and read the preamble and go through its different parts.
• Constitution

A constitution is broadly defined as “a set of rules, written and unwritten, that seek to establish the duties, powers and functions of the various institutions of government; regulate the relationships between them; and define the relationship between the state and the individual” (Heywood 2019: 502-503). The term constitution is also narrowly used to refer to “the highest law of the land”, implying a “single, authoritative document or a written constitution” (Heywood 2019: 503). There are, however, constitutions that are not codified or are referred to as unwritten. In relation to the discussion on the concept of a social contract, the constitution is deemed to express the “fundamental law of the land that sets the principles, powers, organization and functions of the state and its government, the relations between state-government and the people, (the) rights and obligations of the people, (and the) relations among the people” (Rebullida in Philippine Politics and Governance: An Introduction, 2006:147). Thus, in a narrow sense, constitutionalism implies the practice of a limited government ensured by the existence of a constitution. More broadly, “ constitutionalism is a set of political values and devices that fragment power, thereby creating a network of checks and balances” (Heywood 2019: 512). The value of a constitution is widely recognized. Its existence serves a number of purposes other than ensuring the existence of a limited government. Heywood (2019:514) identifies the following purposes of constitutions: 

• Empower states
• Establish unifying values and goals
• Provide government stability
• Protect freedom
• Legitimize regimes

In this way, the constitution serves as the legal basis of government. It outlines the extent of the government’s power and the breadth of its responsibilities. Therefore, the constitution limits the power of the government in order to preserve and protect the rights of a nation’s citizens.

Activity: Discussion on the Constitution Instructions. Present the following questions to students:

1. What is a constitution? 2. How are constitutions classified? 3. What are examples of different types of constitutions? Where can these be found? 4. What is meant by constitutionalism? 5. What type of constitution does the Philippines have? 6. How is a limited government enshrined in the Philippine constitution?

Activity: Video Instructions. Watch this short video on the constitution and its purposes, https://youtu.be/0UzKD8rZCc0 (video made by International Idea) and provide your reflection in an essay of 400-500 words.

Heywood, A. (2019). Politics, 5th ed. L.I. London : Macmillan International Higher Education/Red Globe Press. Lowndes, V., Marsh, D. and Stoker, G. A. (2018). Theory and Methods in Political Science: Political Analysis (4th ed.). Red Globe Press. Tadem, T. S. E., & Morada, N. M. (2006). Philippine politics and governance: An introduction. Diliman, Quezon City: Dept. of Political Science, College of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of the Philippines.

Learning Material

COMELEC (2012, May 2). 1987 Philippine Constitution Preamble. Retrieved from https://comelec.gov.ph/index.html?r=References/RelatedLaws/Constitution/1987Constitution/Preamble. International IDEA (2016). Constitutional history of Philippines. Retrieved from Constitutional history of the Philippines

• Introduction
• Rubrics for Grading

Essay on Philippine Politics Then And Now

Students are often asked to write an essay on Philippine Politics Then And Now in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.

Let’s take a look…

100 Words Essay on Philippine Politics Then And Now

Introduction to philippine politics.

Philippine politics has a rich and complex history. It has evolved from its pre-colonial tribal governance, to Spanish colonial rule, and then to American influence. Now, it is a democratic country with a President as the head of the state.

Pre-Colonial Era

Before the Spanish arrived, the Philippines was divided into many small kingdoms. Each kingdom had a ruler, known as a “Datu”. The Datus made decisions for their people. This was the first form of politics in the Philippines.

Spanish Colonial Era

When the Spanish came, they changed the political system. They introduced a centralized form of government. The Spanish king was the supreme ruler. Filipinos had no say in their own governance.

American Influence

The American period introduced democracy to the Philippines. They taught Filipinos about voting and elections. This was a big change from the Spanish era where Filipinos had no political voice.

Modern Philippine Politics

Philippine politics has changed a lot over time. From tribal rule, to colonial control, to democracy, it has evolved. Despite challenges, it continues to strive for a better future.

250 Words Essay on Philippine Politics Then And Now

Introduction.

Philippine politics has seen many changes over time. From the pre-colonial times to the present, politics in the Philippines has evolved a lot.

Politics in the Past

In the past, the Philippines was ruled by a system of datu, or tribal chiefs. These leaders were chosen based on their bravery and wisdom. They made the laws and decisions for their people. This was a simple form of government, and it worked well for the small communities of the time.

Spanish and American Influence

Things changed when the Spanish and later the Americans came. They introduced a new form of government. This was more complex, with many different roles and responsibilities. There were governors, mayors, and other officials. These people were chosen by the rulers, not the people.

Modern Politics

Today, the Philippines is a democratic country. This means that the people have the power to choose their leaders. They do this through elections, where they vote for the people they think will do the best job. This system is much fairer, as it gives everyone a chance to have their say.

In conclusion, Philippine politics has come a long way from the days of the datu. While there are still challenges to overcome, the move towards democracy has been a big step in the right direction.

500 Words Essay on Philippine Politics Then And Now

The past of philippine politics.

Philippine politics has a rich history. It started during the Spanish colonial period, which lasted more than 300 years. During this time, the Philippines was ruled by Spain, and the political system was very different. The Spanish King and his appointed officials had all the power. The Filipinos had no say in the decisions made about their country.

The Present State of Philippine Politics

Today, the Philippines is a democratic country. The people have the right to vote for their leaders. The President is the head of the country, and there are also Senators and Congressmen who make the laws. The people can voice their opinions and have a say in the decisions that affect their lives.

But there are also problems in Philippine politics today. One issue is corruption. Some politicians use their power to get money or favors. This is not fair to the people who voted for them.

Comparison Between Then and Now

When we compare the past and present of Philippine politics, we see many changes. In the past, the Philippines was ruled by foreign powers. The people had no say in the government. Today, the Philippines is a democracy. The people can vote for their leaders and have a say in the government.

But there are also similarities. Corruption was a problem in the past, and it is still a problem today. The lack of political education is also a common issue.

The Future of Philippine Politics

The future of Philippine politics depends on the people. If they learn about politics and make informed decisions, they can choose good leaders. This can help solve the problems in Philippine politics.

The government can also help by making laws to fight corruption. They can provide education about politics to the people. This can help the people understand their rights and responsibilities.

In conclusion, Philippine politics has changed a lot from the past to the present. There have been improvements, but there are also problems that need to be solved. The future of Philippine politics depends on the actions of the people and the government.

That’s it! I hope the essay helped you.

Apart from these, you can look at all the essays by clicking here .

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Provide details on what you need help with along with a budget and time limit. Questions are posted anonymously and can be made 100% private.

Studypool matches you to the best tutor to help you with your question. Our tutors are highly qualified and vetted.

Your matched tutor provides personalized help according to your question details. Payment is made only after you have completed your 1-on-1 session and are satisfied with your session.

• Homework Q&A
• Become a Tutor

All Subjects

Mathematics

Programming

Health & Medical

Engineering

Computer Science

Foreign Languages

Access over 35 million academic & study documents

Reflection of philippine politics and governance.

Sign up to view the full document!

24/7 Study Help

Stuck on a study question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic  math  to advanced rocket science !

Similar Documents

working on a study question?

Studypool is powered by Microtutoring TM

Copyright © 2024. Studypool Inc.

Studypool is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university.

Ongoing Conversations

Access over 35 million study documents through the notebank

Get on-demand Q&A study help from verified tutors

Read 1000s of rich book guides covering popular titles

Sign up with Google

Sign up with Facebook

Already have an account? Login

Login with Google

Login with Facebook

Don't have an account? Sign Up