how is nature treated in an essay on criticism

An Essay on Criticism Summary & Analysis by Alexander Pope

Line-by-Line Explanation & Analysis
Poetic Devices
Vocabulary & References
Form, Meter, & Rhyme Scheme
Line-by-Line Explanations

Alexander Pope's "An Essay on Criticism" seeks to lay down rules of good taste in poetry criticism, and in poetry itself. Structured as an essay in rhyming verse, it offers advice to the aspiring critic while satirizing amateurish criticism and poetry. The famous passage beginning "A little learning is a dangerous thing" advises would-be critics to learn their field in depth, warning that the arts demand much longer and more arduous study than beginners expect. The passage can also be read as a warning against shallow learning in general. Published in 1711, when Alexander Pope was just 23, the "Essay" brought its author fame and notoriety while he was still a young poet himself.

Read the full text of “From An Essay on Criticism: A little learning is a dangerous thing”

The Full Text of “From An Essay on Criticism: A little learning is a dangerous thing”

1 A little learning is a dangerous thing;

2 Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:

3 There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,

4 And drinking largely sobers us again.

5 Fired at first sight with what the Muse imparts,

6 In fearless youth we tempt the heights of Arts,

7 While from the bounded level of our mind,

8 Short views we take, nor see the lengths behind,

9 But, more advanced, behold with strange surprise

10 New, distant scenes of endless science rise!

11 So pleased at first, the towering Alps we try,

12 Mount o'er the vales, and seem to tread the sky;

13 The eternal snows appear already past,

14 And the first clouds and mountains seem the last;

15 But those attained, we tremble to survey

16 The growing labours of the lengthened way,

17 The increasing prospect tires our wandering eyes,

18 Hills peep o'er hills, and Alps on Alps arise!

“From An Essay on Criticism: A little learning is a dangerous thing” Summary

“from an essay on criticism: a little learning is a dangerous thing” themes.

Shallow Learning vs. Deep Understanding

See where this theme is active in the poem.

Line-by-Line Explanation & Analysis of “From An Essay on Criticism: A little learning is a dangerous thing”

A little learning is a dangerous thing; Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring: There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, And drinking largely sobers us again.

Fired at first sight with what the Muse imparts, In fearless youth we tempt the heights of Arts, While from the bounded level of our mind, Short views we take, nor see the lengths behind,

But, more advanced, behold with strange surprise New, distant scenes of endless science rise!

Lines 11-14

So pleased at first, the towering Alps we try, Mount o'er the vales, and seem to tread the sky; The eternal snows appear already past, And the first clouds and mountains seem the last;

Lines 15-18

But those attained, we tremble to survey The growing labours of the lengthened way, The increasing prospect tires our wandering eyes, Hills peep o'er hills, and Alps on Alps arise!

“From An Essay on Criticism: A little learning is a dangerous thing” Symbols

The Mountains/Alps

See where this symbol appears in the poem.

“From An Essay on Criticism: A little learning is a dangerous thing” Poetic Devices & Figurative Language

Alliteration.

See where this poetic device appears in the poem.

Extended Metaphor

“from an essay on criticism: a little learning is a dangerous thing” vocabulary.

Select any word below to get its definition in the context of the poem. The words are listed in the order in which they appear in the poem.

A little learning
Pierian spring
Bounded level
Short views
The lengthened way
See where this vocabulary word appears in the poem.

Form, Meter, & Rhyme Scheme of “From An Essay on Criticism: A little learning is a dangerous thing”

Rhyme scheme, “from an essay on criticism: a little learning is a dangerous thing” speaker, “from an essay on criticism: a little learning is a dangerous thing” setting, literary and historical context of “from an essay on criticism: a little learning is a dangerous thing”, more “from an essay on criticism: a little learning is a dangerous thing” resources, external resources.

The Poem Aloud — Listen to an audiobook of Pope's "Essay on Criticism" (the "A little learning" passage starts at 12:57).

The Poet's Life — Read a biography of Alexander Pope at the Poetry Foundation.

"Alexander Pope: Rediscovering a Genius" — Watch a BBC documentary on Alexander Pope.

More on Pope's Life — A summary of Pope's life and work at Poets.org.

Pope at the British Library — More resources and articles on the poet.

LitCharts on Other Poems by Alexander Pope

Ode on Solitude

Ask LitCharts AI: The answer to your questions

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

We're Hiring!
Help Center

Nature, Wit, and Invention: Contextualizing An Essay on Criticism

2017, Journal of Narrative and Language Studies

This article contextualizes the eighteenth-century English poet Alexander Pope's An Essay on Criticism (1711) and his other literary essays in order to elicit Pope's contributions to the neoclassical norm. Exploring the aesthetic interchanges between Pope and his predecessors and contemporaries, I endeavor to show how Pope's poetry and prose have tackled the difficult task of unifying antithetical categories of invention and judgment into the Johnsonian " general nature. "

Related Papers

Kocaeli University

Sidre Loğoğlu

Eger Journal of English Studies

Zoltan Cora

The AnaChronisT

János Barcsák

This paper discusses Pope’s Essay on Criticism in terms of Derek Attridge’s theory of creativity. It argues that Pope’s text is fundamentally based on the same commitment to the other that Attridge describes as constitutive of the singularity of literature and hence the 300-year-old Essay is a vital text which communicates itself to the present in significant ways. The success of poetry for Pope depends primarily on an appropriate relation to nature and the first chapter of this paper argues that the way Pope describes this relation is very similar to Attridge’s description of the relation to the other. The three subsequent chapters discuss how Pope’s concept of “expression” continues this theme and describes the pitfalls as well as the success of relating to nature as the other. The last two sections discuss the Essay’s treatment of the rules. It is shown that the way the rules are presented in the Essay reflects Pope’s fundamental ethical commitment no less than his concepts of na...

Comparative Literature: East & West

Zhuyu Jiang

Journal of Critical Studies in Language and Literature JCSLL

This paper aims to compare the poetic styles and views on human nature of three literary giants in English literature, namely, Alexander Pope, Jonathan Swift and Samuel Johnson. As the three men of letters almost lived in the same age and they were all fond of writing on human nature, it will be very interesting to compare their respective styles and views on this issue.

Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies

Philip Smallwood

Nicolle Jordan

Paul Trolander

Susana Funck

Doğaç Kutlu

RELATED PAPERS

Ksenija Ciric

Basrah Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Hussein Faraj

Marcos Morgado

Seed Science and Technology

Chiara Lanzanova

Violence Against Women

wahiba abu-ras

Journal of Chinese Political Science

Pippa Morgan

Kumawula: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat

Ari Dwi Astono

Sveta Cecilija : časopis za sakralnu glazbu

Darko Kristović

Research Journal of Medicinal Plants

Habib GANFON

Food and Nutrition Bulletin

Maria Elena Díaz

Revista Uniabeu

Carlos Alano Soares de Almeida

Xinheng Wang

Bali Medika Jurnal

Journal of Biological Sciences

Abdul Ghaffar

Dr. Abdul Qayyum Rao

Papers Revista De Sociologia

Jordi Pascual

Laura Mononen

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Tiffany Johnson

Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi

muhammad zainuddin Lubis

Physics Today

Michael Marder

BUTSURI-TANSA(Geophysical Exploration)

Journal of Biological Chemistry

Jean-louis Nahon

The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Romanian Statistical Review Supplement

Liviu Tudor

Literary Theory and Criticism

Home › Literature › Literary Criticism of Alexander Pope

Literary Criticism of Alexander Pope

By NASRULLAH MAMBROL on December 6, 2017 • ( 4 )

An Essay on Criticism , published anonymously by Alexander Pope (1688–1744) in 1711, is perhaps the clearest statement of neoclassical principles in any language. In its broad outlines, it expresses a worldview which synthesizes elements of a Roman Catholic outlook with classical aesthetic principles and with deism. That Pope was born a Roman Catholic affected not only his verse and critical principles but also his life. In the year of his birth occurred the so-called “Glorious Revolution”: England’s Catholic monarch James II was displaced by the Protestant King William III of Orange, and the prevailing anti-Catholic laws constrained many areas of Pope’s life; he could not obtain a university education, hold public or political office, or even reside in London. Pope’s family, in fact, moved to a small farm in Windsor Forest, a neighbourhood occupied by other Catholic families of the gentry, and he later moved with his mother to Twickenham. However, Pope was privately taught and moved in an elite circle of London writers which included the dramatists Wycherley and Congreve, the poet Granville, the critic William Walsh, as well as the writers Addison and Steele, and the deistic politician Bolingbroke. Pope’s personal life was also afflicted by disease: he was a hunchback, only four and a half feet tall, and suffered from tuberculosis. He was in constant need of his maid to dress and care for him. Notwithstanding such social and personal obstacles, Pope produced some of the finest verse ever written. His most renowned publications include several mock-heroic poems such as The Rape of the Lock (1712; 1714), and The Dunciad (1728). His philosophical poem An Essay on Man (1733–1734) was a scathing attack on human arrogance or pride in failing to observe the due limits of human reason, in questioning divine authority and seeking to be self-reliant on the basis of rationality and science. Even An Essay on Criticism is written in verse, following the tradition of Horace’s Ars poetica , and interestingly, much of the philosophical substance of An Essay on Man is already formulated in this earlier poem, in its application to literature and criticism. While An Essay on Man identifies the chief fault of humankind as the original sin of “pride” and espouses an ethic based on an ordered and hierarchical universe, it nonetheless depicts this order in terms of Newtonian mechanism and expresses a broadly deistic vision.

The same contradictions permeate the Essay on Criticism , which effects an eclectic mixture of a Roman Catholic vision premised on the (negative) significance of pride, a humanistic secularism perhaps influenced by Erasmus, a stylistic neoclassicism with roots in the rhetorical tradition from Aristotle, Horace, Longinus, and modern disciples such as Boileau, and a modernity in the wake of figures such as Bacon, Hobbes, and Locke. Some critics have argued that the resulting conglomeration is inharmonious; in fairness to Pope, we might cite one of his portraits of the satirist:

Verse-man or Prose-man, term me which you will, Papist or Protestant, or both between, Like good Erasmus in an honest Mean, In moderation placing all my glory, While Tories call me Whig, and Whigs a Tory. ( Satire II.i)

Clearly, labels can oversimplify: yet it is beyond doubt that, on balance, Pope’s overall vision was conservative and retrospective. He is essentially calling for a return to the past, a return to classical values, and the various secularizing movements that he bemoans are already overwhelming the view of nature, man, and God that he is attempting to redeem.

Indeed, Pope’s poem has been variously called a study and defense of “nature” and of “wit.” The word “nature” is used twenty-one times in the poem; the word “wit” forty-six times. Given the numerous meanings accumulated in the word “nature” as it has passed through various traditions, Pope’s call for a “return to nature” is complex, and he exploits the multiple significance of the term to generate within his poem a comprehensive redefinition of it. Among other things, nature can refer, on a cosmic level, to the providential order of the world and the universe, an order which is hierarchical, in which each entity has its proper assigned place. In An Essay on Man Pope expounds the “Great Chain of Being,” ranging from God and the angels through humans and the lower animals to plants and inanimate objects. Nature can also refer to what is normal, central, and universal in human experience, encompassing the spheres of morality and knowledge, the rules of proper moral conduct as well as the archetypal patterns of human reason.

The word “wit” in Pope’s time also had a variety of meanings: it could refer in general to intelligence and intellectual acuity; it also meant “wit” in the modern sense of cleverness, as expressed for example in the ability to produce a concise and poignant figure of speech or pun; more specifically, it might designate a capacity to discern similarities between different entities and to perceive the hidden relationships underlying the appearances of things. In fact, during the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, “wit” was the subject of a broad and heated debate. Various parties contested the right to define it and to invest it with moral significance. A number of writers such as Nicolas Malebranche and Joseph Addison , and philosophers such as John Locke, argued that wit was a negative quality, associated with a corrupting imagination, distortion of truth, profanity, and skepticism, a quality opposed to “judgment,” which was a faculty of clear and truthful insight. Literature generally had come to be associated with wit and had been under attack from the Puritans also, who saw it as morally defective and corrupting. On the other side, writers such as John Dryden and William Wycherley, as well as moralists such as the third earl of Shaftesbury, defended the use and freedom of wit. Pope’s notions of wit were worked out in the context of this debate, and his redefinition of “true” wit in Essay on Criticism was a means not only of upholding the proper uses of wit but also of defending literature itself, wit being a mode of knowing or apprehension unique to literature.1

While much of Pope’s essay bemoans the abyss into which current literary criticism has fallen, he does not by any means denounce the practice of criticism itself. While he cautions that the best poets make the best critics (“Let such teach others who themselves excell,” l. 15), and while he recognizes that some critics are failed poets (l. 105), he points out that both the best poetry and the best criticism are divinely inspired:

Both must alike from Heav’n derive their Light, These born to Judge, as well as those to Write. (ll. 13–14)

By the word “judge,” Pope refers to the critic, drawing on the meaning of the ancient Greek word krites . Pope sees the endeavor of criticism as a noble one, provided it abides by Horace’s advice for the poet:

But you who seek to give and merit Fame, And justly bear a Critick’s noble Name, Be sure your self and your own Reach to know, How far your Genius , Taste , and Learning go; Launch not beyond your Depth . . . (ll. 46–50)

Indeed, Pope suggests in many portions of the Essay that criticism itself is an art and must be governed by the same rules that apply to literature itself. However, there are a number of precepts he advances as specific to criticism. Apart from knowing his own capacities, the critic must be conversant with every aspect of the author whom he is examining, including the author’s

. . . Fable, Subject, Scope in ev’ry Page, Religion, Country, Genius of his Age: Without all these at once before your Eyes, Cavil you may, but never Criticize . (ll. 120–123)

Perhaps ironically, Pope’s advice here seems modern insofar as he calls for a knowledge of all aspects of the author’s work, including not only its subject matter and artistic lineage but also its religious, national, and intellectual contexts. He is less modern in insisting that the critic base his interpretation on the author’s intention: “In ev’ry Work regard the Writer’s End , / Since none can compass more than they Intend ” (ll. 233–234, 255–256).

Pope specifies two further guidelines for the critic. The first is to recognize the overall unity of a work, and thereby to avoid falling into partial assessments based on the author’s use of poetic conceits, ornamented language, and meters, as well as those which are biased toward either archaic or modern styles or based on the reputations of given writers. Finally, a critic needs to possess a moral sensibility, as well as a sense of balance and proportion, as indicated in these lines: “Nor in the Critick let the Man be lost! / Good-Nature and Good-Sense must ever join” (ll. 523–525). In the interests of good nature and good sense, Pope urges the critic to adopt not only habits of self-criticism and integrity (“with pleasure own your Errors past, / And make each Day a Critick on the last,” ll. 570–571), but also modesty and caution. To be truthful is not enough, he warns; truth must be accompanied by “Good Breeding” or else it will lose its effect (ll. 572–576). And mere bookish knowledge will often express itself in showiness, disdain, and an overactive tongue: “ Fools rush in where Angels fear to tread. / Distrustful Sense with modest Caution speaks” (ll. 625–626). Pope ends his advice with this summary of the ideal critic:

But where’s the Man, who Counsel can bestow, Still pleas’d to teach , and yet not proud to know ? Unbiass’d, or by Favour or by Spite ; Not dully prepossest , nor blindly right ; Tho learn’d, well-bred; and tho’ well-bred, sincere; . . . Blest with a Taste exact, yet unconfin’d; A Knowledge both of Books and Humankind ; Gen’rous Converse ; a Soul exempt from Pride ; And Love to Praise , with Reason on his Side? (ll. 631–642)

As we read through this synthesis of the qualities of a good critic, it becomes clear that they are primarily attributes of humanity or moral sensibility rather than aesthetic qualities. Indeed, the only specifically aesthetic quality mentioned here is “taste.” The remaining virtues might be said to have a theological ground, resting on the ability to overcome pride. Pope effectively transposes the language of theology (“soul,” “pride”) to aesthetics. It is the disposition of humility – an aesthetic humility, if you will – which enables the critic to avoid the arrogant parading of his learning, to avoid falling into bias, and to open himself up to a knowledge of humanity. The “reason” to which Pope appeals is not the individualistic and secular “reason” of the Enlightenment philosophers; it is “reason” as understood by Aquinas and many medieval thinkers, reason as a universal archetype in human nature, constrained by a theological framework. Reason in this sense is a corollary of humility: it is humility which allows the critic to rise above egotistical dogmatism and thereby to be rational and impartial, and aware of his own limitations, in his striving after truth. Knowledge itself, then, has a moral basis in good breeding; and underlying good breeding is the still profounder quality of sincerity, which we might understand here as a disposition commensurate with humility: a genuine desire to pursue truth or true judgment, unclouded by personal ambitions and subjective prejudices. Interestingly, the entire summary takes the form not of an assertion but of an extended question, implying that what is proposed here is an ideal type, to which no contemporary critic can answer.

Pope’s specific advice to the critic is grounded on virtues whose application extends far beyond literary criticism, into the realms of morality, theology, and art itself. It is something of an irony that the main part of his Essay on Criticism is devoted not specifically to criticism but to art itself, of which poetry and criticism are regarded as branches. In other words, Pope sees criticism itself as an art. Hence most of the guidance he offers, couched in the language of nature and wit, applies equally to poetry and criticism. Not only this, but there are several passages which suggest that criticism must be a part of the creative process, that poets themselves must possess critical faculties in order to execute their craft in a self-conscious and controlled manner. Hence there is a large overlap between these domains, between the artistic elements within criticism and the critical elements necessary to art. While Pope’s central piece of advice to both poet and critic is to “follow Nature,” his elaboration of this concept enlists the semantic service of both wit and judgment, establishing a close connection – sometimes indeed an identity – between all three terms; wit might be correlated with literature or poetry; and judgment with criticism. Because of the overlapping natures of poetry and criticism, however, both wit and judgment will be required in each of these pursuits.

Before inviting the poet and critic to follow nature, Pope is careful to explain one of the central functions of nature:

Nature to all things fix’d the Limits fit, And wisely curb’d proud Man’s pretending Wit; . . . One Science only will one Genius fit; So vast is Art, so narrow Human Wit . . . (ll. 52–53, 60–61)

Hence, even before he launches into any discussion of aesthetics, Pope designates human wit generally as an instrument of pride, as intrinsically liable to abuse. In the scheme of nature, however, man’s wit is puny and occupies an apportioned place. It is in this context that Pope proclaims his famous maxim:

First follow NATURE, and your Judgment frame By her just Standard, which is still the same: Unerring Nature , still divinely bright, Once clear , unchang’d , and Universal Light, Life, Force, and Beauty, must to all impart, At once the Source , and End , and Test of Art. (ll. 68–73)

The features attributed to nature include permanence or timelessness and universality. Ultimately, nature is a force which expresses the power of the divine, not in the later Romantic sense of a divine spirit pervading the physical appearances of nature but in the medieval sense of expressing the order, harmony, and beauty of God’s creation. As such, nature provides the eternal and archetypal standard against which art must be measured: the implication in the lines above is not that art imitates nature but that it derives its inspiration, purpose, and aesthetic criteria from nature.

Pope’s view of nature as furnishing the universal archetypes for art leads him to condemn excessive individualism, which he sees as an abuse of wit. Wit is abused when it contravenes sound judgment: “For Wit and Judgment often are at strife, Tho’ meant each other’s Aid, like Man and Wife ” (ll. 80–83). However, Pope does not believe, like many medieval rhetoricians, that poetry is an entirely rational process that can be methodically worked out in advance. In poetry, as in music, he points out, are “ nameless Graces which no Methods teach” (l. 144). Indeed, geniuses can sometimes transgress the boundaries of judgment and their very transgression or license becomes a rule for art:

Great Wits sometimes may gloriously offend , And rise to Faults true Criticks dare not mend ; From vulgar Bounds with brave Disorder part, And snatch a Grace beyond the Reach of Art, Which, without passing thro’ the Judgment , gains The Heart , and all its End at once attains. (ll. 152–157)

If Kant had been a poet, he might have expressed his central aesthetic ideas in this very way. Kant also believed that a genius lays down the rules for art, that those rules cannot be prescribed in advance, and that aesthetic judgment bypasses the conventional concepts of our understanding. Indeed, Kant laid the groundwork for many Romantic aesthetics, and if Pope’s passage above were taken in isolation, it might well be read as a formulation of Romantic aesthetic doctrine. It seems to assert the primacy of wit over judgment, of art over criticism, viewing art as inspired and as transcending the norms of conventional thinking in its direct appeal to the “heart.” The critic’s task here is to recognize the superiority of great wit. While Pope’s passage does indeed in these respects stride beyond many medieval and Renaissance aesthetics, it must of course be read in its own poetic context: he immediately warns contemporary writers not to abuse such a license of wit: “ Moderns , beware! Or if you must offend / Against the Precept , ne’er transgress its End ” (ll. 163–164). In fact, the passage cited above is more than counterbalanced by Pope’s subsequent insistence that modern writers not rely on their own insights. Modern writers should draw on the common store of poetic wisdom, established by the ancients, and acknowledged by “ Universal Praise” (l. 190).

Pope’s exploration of wit aligns it with the central classical virtues, which are themselves equated with nature. His initial definition of true wit identifies it as an expression of nature: “ True Wit is Nature to Advantage drest, / What oft was Thought , but ne’er so well Exprest ” (ll. 297–298). Pope subsequently says that expression is the “ Dress of Thought ,” and that “true expression” throws light on objects without altering them (ll. 315–318). The lines above are a concentrated expression of Pope’s classicism. If wit is the “dress” of nature, it will express nature without altering it. The poet’s task here is twofold: not only to find the expression that will most truly convey nature, but also first to ensure that the substance that he is expressing is indeed a “natural” insight or thought. What the poet must express is a universal truth which we will instantly recognize as such. This classical commitment to the expression of objective and universal truth is echoed a number of times through Pope’s text. For example, he admonishes both poet and critic: “Regard not then if Wit be Old or New , / But blame the False , and value still the True ” (ll. 406–407).

A second classical ideal urged in the passage above is that of organic unity and wholeness. The expression or style, Pope insists, must be suited to the subject matter and meaning: “The Sound must seem an Eccho to the Sense ” (l. 365). Elsewhere in the Essay , Pope stresses the importance, for both poet and critic, of considering a work of art in its totality, with all the parts given their due proportion and place (ll. 173–174). Once again, wit and nature become almost interchangeable in Pope’s text. An essential component underlying such unity and proportion is the classical virtue of moderation. Pope advises both poet and critic to follow the Aristotelian ethical maxim: “Avoid Extreams. ” Those who go to excess in any direction display “ Great Pride , or Little Sense ” (ll. 384–387). And once again, the ability to overcome pride – humility – is implicitly associated with what Pope calls “right Reason” (l. 211).

Indeed, the central passage in the Essay on Criticism , as in the later Essay on Man , views all of the major faults as stemming from pride: Of all the Causes which conspire to blind

Man’s erring Judgment, and misguide the Mind, . . . Is Pride , the never-failing Vice of Fools . (ll. 201–204)

It is pride which leads critics and poets alike to overlook universal truths in favor of subjective whims; pride which causes them to value particular parts instead of the whole; pride which disables them from achieving a harmony of wit and judgment; and pride which underlies their excesses and biases. And, as in the Essay on Man , Pope associates pride with individualism, with excessive reliance on one’s own judgment and failure to observe the laws laid down by nature and by the classical tradition.

Pope’s final strategy in the Essay is to equate the classical literary and critical traditions with nature, and to sketch a redefined outline of literary history from classical times to his own era. Pope insists that the rules of nature were merely discovered, not invented, by the ancients: “Those Rules of old discover’d , not devis’d , / Are Nature still, but Nature Methodiz’d ” (ll. 88–89). He looks back to a time in ancient Greece when criticism admirably performed its function as “the Muse’s Handmaid,” and facilitated a rational admiration of poetry. But criticism later declined from this high status, and those who “cou’d not win the Mistress, woo’d the Maid” (ll. 100–105). Instead of aiding the appreciation of poetry, critics, perhaps in consequence of their own failure to master the poetic art, allowed the art of criticism to degenerate into irrational attacks on poets. Pope’s advice, for both critic and poet, is clear: “Learn hence for Ancient Rules a just Esteem; / To copy Nature is to copy Them ” (ll. 139–140). Before offering his sketch of literary-critical history, Pope laments the passing of the “Golden Age” of letters (l. 478), and portrays the depths to which literature and criticism have sunk in the degenerate times of recent history:

In the fat Age of Pleasure, Wealth, and Ease, Sprung the rank Weed, and thriv’d with large Increase; When Love was all an easie Monarch’s Care; Seldom at Council , never in a War . . . . . . The following Licence of a Foreign Reign Did all the Dregs of bold Socinus drain; Then Unbelieving Priests reform’d the Nation, And taught more Pleasant Methods of Salvation; Where Heav’ns Free Subjects might their Rights dispute, Lest God himself shou’d seem too Absolute . . . . Encourag’d thus, Wit’s Titans brav’d the Skies . . . (ll. 534–537, 544–552)

Pope cites two historical circumstances here. By “easie Monarch” he refers to the reign of Charles II (1660–1685), whose father King Charles I had engaged in a war with the English Parliament, provoked by his excessive authoritarianism. Having lost the war, Charles I was beheaded in 1649, and England was ruled by Parliament, under the leadership of the Puritan Oliver Cromwell. Shortly after Cromwell’s death, a newly elected Parliament, reflecting the nation’s unease with the era of puritanical rule, invited Prince Charles to take the throne of England as Charles II. The new king, as Pope indicates, had a reputation for easy living, lax morality, and laziness. The reigns of Charles II and his brother James II (1685–1688) are known as the period of the Restoration (of the monarchy). Both kings were strongly pro-Catholic and aroused considerable opposition, giving rise to the second historical event to which Pope refers above, the Glorious Revolution of 1688–1689. In 1688 the Protestants Prince William of Orange and his wife Mary (daughter of James II) were secretly invited to occupy the throne of England. Under their rule, which Pope refers to as the “Licence of a Foreign Reign,” a Toleration Act was passed which granted religious freedom to all Christians except Catholics and Unitarians. Also enacted into law was a Bill of Rights which granted English citizens the right to trial by jury and various other rights.

Hence, as far as understanding Pope’s passage is concerned, there were two broad consequences of the Glorious Revolution. First, various impulses of the earlier Protestant Reformation, such as religious individualism and amendment of the doctrines of the Church of England, were reconfirmed. Pope refers to Faustus Socinus (1539 – 1604), who produced unorthodox doctrines denying Christ’s divinity, as being of the same theological tenor as the “Unbelieving Priests,” the Protestants, who reformed the nation. The second, even more significant, consequence of the revolution was the complete triumph of Parliament over the king, the monarchy’s powers being permanently restricted. Protestantism in general had been associated with attempts to oppose absolute government; clearly, Pope’s sympathies did not lie with these movements toward democracy. Significantly, his passage above wittily intertwines these two implications of the Glorious Revolution: he speaks sarcastically of “Heav’ns Free Subjects” disputing their rights not only with temporal power but also with God himself. Such is the social background, in Pope’s estimation, of the modern decline of poetry and criticism: religious and political individualism, the craving for freedom, and the concomitant rejection of authority and tradition, underlie these same vices in the sphere of letters, vices which amount to pride and the contravention of nature.

Pope now furnishes an even broader historical context for these modern ills. He traces the genealogy of “nature,” as embodied in classical authors, to Aristotle. Poets who accepted Aristotle’s rules of poetic composition, he suggests, learned that “Who conquer’d Nature , shou’d preside oe’r Wit ” (l. 652). In other words, the true and false uses of wit must be judged by those who have learned the rules of nature. Likewise, Horace, the next critic in the tradition Pope cites, was “Supream in Judgment, as in Wit” and “his Precepts teach but what his Works inspire” (ll. 657, 660). Other classical critics praised by Pope are Dionysius of Halicarnassus (ca. 30–7 bc) and the Roman authors of the first century Petronius and Quintilian, as well as Longinus, the first-century Greek author of On the Sublime . After these writers, who represent the classical tradition, Pope says, a dark age ensued with the collapse of the western Roman Empire at the hands of the Vandals and Goths, an age governed by “tyranny” and “superstition,” an age where “Much was Believ’d , but little understood ” (ll. 686– 689). What is interesting here is that Pope sees the medieval era as a continuation of the so-called Dark Ages. He refers to the onset of medieval theology as a “ second Deluge” whereby “the Monks finish’d what the Goths begun” (ll. 691–692). Hence, even though he was himself a Catholic and placed great stress on the original sin of pride, Pope seems to reject the traditions of Catholic theology as belonging to an age of superstition and irrational belief. He is writing here as a descendent of Renaissance thinkers who saw themselves as the true heirs of the classical authors and the medieval period as an aberration. What is even more striking is Pope’s subsequent praise of the Renaissance humanist thinker Desiderius Erasmus, who “drove those Holy Vandals off the Stage” (ll. 693–694). Erasmus, like Pope, had a love for the classics grounded on rationality and tolerance. He rejected ecclesiastical Christianity, theological dogmatism, and superstition in favor of a religion of simple and reasonable piety. His writings helped pave the way for the Protestant Reformation, though he himself was skeptical of the bigotry he saw on both Protestant and Catholic sides.

Pope’s implicit allegiance to Erasmus (and in part to contemporary figures such as Bolingbroke) points in the direction of a broad deism which, on the one hand, accommodates the significance of pride in secular rather than theological contexts, and, on the other hand, accommodates reason within its appropriate limits. His historical survey continues with praises of the “Golden Days” of Renaissance artistic accomplishments, and suggests that the arts and criticism thereafter flourished chiefly in Europe, especially in France, which produced the critic and poet Nicolas Boileau. Boileau was a classicist influenced greatly by Horace. Given Boileau’s own impact on Pope’s critical thought, we can see that Pope now begins to set the stage for his own entry into the history of criticism. While he notes that the English, “Fierce for the Liberties of Wit ,” were generally impervious to foreign literary influences, he observes that a handful of English writers were more sound: they sided with “the juster Ancient Cause , / And here restor’d Wit’s Fundamental Laws ” (ll. 721–722). The writers Pope now cites were either known to him or his tutors. He names the earl of Roscommon, who was acquainted with classical wit; William Walsh, his mentor; and finally himself, as offering “humble” tribute to his dead tutor (ll. 725–733). All in all, Pope’s strategy here is remarkable: in retracing the lineage of good criticism, as based on nature and the true use of wit, he traces his own lineage as both poet and critic, thereby both redefining or reaffirming the true critical tradition and marking his own entry into it. Pope presents himself as abiding by and exemplifying the critical virtues he has hitherto commended.

1. Edward Niles Hooker’s “Pope on Wit: The Essay on Criticism ,” in The Seventeenth Century: Studies in the History of English Thought and Literature from Bacon to Pope , R. F. Jones et al. (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1951), pp. 225–246.

An Essay on Criticism

Alexander Pope wrote An Essay on Criticism shortly after turning 21 years old in 1711. While remaining the speaker within his own poem Pope is able to present his true viewpoints on writing styles both as they are and how he feels they should be. While his poetic essay, written in heroic couplets, may not have obtained the same status as others of his time, it was certainly not because his writing was inferior (Bate). In fact, the broad background and comprehensive coverage within Pope’s work made it it one of the most influential critical essays yet to be written (Bate). It appears that through his writing Pope was reaching out not to the average reader, but instead to those who intend to be writers themselves as he represents himself as a critical perfectionist insisting on particular styles. Overall, his essay appears to best be understood by breaking it into three parts.

The scholar Walter Jackson Bate has explained the structure of the essay in the following way:

I. General qualities needed by the critic (1-200):

1. Awareness of his own limitations (46-67). 2. Knowledge of Nature in its general forms (68-87).

Nature defined (70-79).
Need of both wit and judgment to conceive it (80-87).

3. Imitation of the Ancients, and the use of rules (88-200).

Value of ancient poetry and criticism as models (88-103).
Censure of slavish imitation and codified rules (104-117).
Need to study the general aims and qualities of the Ancients (118-140).
Exceptions to the rules (141-168).

II. Particular laws for the critic (201-559): Digression on the need for humility (201-232):

1. Consider the work as a total unit (233-252). 2. Seek the author’s aim (253-266). 3. Examples of false critics who mistake the part for the whole (267-383).

The pedant who forgets the end and judges by rules (267-288).
The critic who judges by imagery and metaphor alone (289-304).
The rhetorician who judges by the pomp and colour of the diction (305-336).
Critics who judge by versification only (337-343).

Pope’s digression to exemplify “representative meter” (344-383). 4. Need for tolerance and for aloofness from extremes of fashion and personal mood (384-559).The fashionable critic: the cults, as ends in themselves, of the foreign (398-405), the new (406-423), and the esoteric (424-451).

Personal subjectivity and its pitfalls (452-559).

III. The ideal character of the critic (560-744):

1. Qualities needed: integrity (562-565), modesty (566-571), tact (572-577), courage (578-583). 2. Their opposites (584-630). 3. Concluding eulogy of ancient critics as models (643-744).

To uncover the deeper meaning of An Essay on Criticism click here

Back to Alexander Pope

Poetry Prof

Read, Teach, Study Poetry

from An Essay on Criticism

Join Alexander Pope on a metaphysical journey of discovery… that will last a lifetime.

“[It is] difficult to know which part to prefer, when all is equally beautiful and noble.” Weekly Miscellany comments on the poetry of Alexander Pope

Alexander Pope spent his childhood in Windsor forest and, from an early age, gained a keen appreciation for nature. Later in his life he lived in a property by the River Thames in London where he cultivated his own garden that he opened for visitors. In today’s poem, written in 1709, we can see this love of the natural world through his shaping of elements of the landscape into an extended metaphor for knowledge. This landscape is vast and mountainous: the Alps , Europe’s largest mountain range are a prominent feature, as are hills, vales , an endless sky and eternal snows . Compared to this vast landscape, people are almost insignificant. Their role in the poem is to act as explorers who set off on a journey of discovery, trying to conquer the highest mountains by ascending to the summit; we tempt the heights of Arts… the towering Alps we try… Finally, despite being almost exhausted by his efforts, the explorer realises that his journey has barely begun; the mountain vista stretches ahead, unbroken, into the distance:

A poem’s central idea, often developed into an extended metaphor, is known as a conceit . Unlocking the first couplet should provide you the key to Pope’s conceit in An Essay on Criticism . Pope begins with a warning that:

The Pierian Spring is an important place in Greek Mythology , the source of a river of knowledge that was associated with the nine ancient Muses, themselves a metaphor for artistic inspiration. In this poem, it’s part of the landscape that functions as an extended metaphor for learning. It might seem strange that Pope begins by giving his readers a warning to taste not the waters of this river. However, it’s important to realise that Pope isn’t saying not to drink from the well of knowledge at all. He tells us to drink deep , emphasising his instruction with both alliterative D and using the imperative tense (where the verb is placed at the beginning of the line or phrase). To Pope’s mind, learning is seductive and intoxicating . Once you set out on the journey of learning, or take even a tiny sip from the wellspring of knowledge, you won’t be able to resist the temptation to learn more. Therefore, he suggests that you either prepare to immerse yourself completely in the Pierian Spring , or don’t drink at all.

Once you’ve discovered the connotations of Pierian Spring , the rest of the poem can be read as a warning (or criticism ) of anyone who is rash enough not to follow Pope’s instruction. Should you venture unprepared into the unknown, you must be clear about your limitations. As a spring is the starting point of a river, so too is it the starting point of Pope’s extended metaphor . From here, the reader sets out on a journey into an imposing mountainous landscape that, while initially appearing it can be ‘climbed’ or conquered, actually keeps expanding into an endless vista. No matter how far the explorer climbs, the top of the mountain never gets any nearer. Heights, lengthening way, increasing prospect and, most telling of all, eternal snows conjure the visual image of the landscape metaphysically stretching out in front of our weary eyes. Individual people are tiny and easily lost in this ever-shifting world. Pope creates a contrast between the boundless landscape and the bounded limits of human perception. At the last, the human explorer is tired by his efforts to conquer these mountains of knowledge – but the poem ends by revealing that he’d barely even gotten started on his journey: Hills peep o’er hills; Alps upon Alps arise .

Before we get too much further into the discussion of Pope’s ‘essay’, it might be helpful to place these lines in context. Despite the way they seem to be a complete poem in themselves, they are actually part of a much longer poem which stretches to three parts and a total of 744 lines! The eighteen-line extract you’ve read constitutes the second verse of Part 2 and it may help you to know that, in the first verse, Pope singled out pride as the characteristic that would eventually lead to the downfall of his explorer. Here are four lines from earlier in the Essay:

In this short sample, you can see the names Pope calls people who rush off on foolhardy adventures without taking the time to properly prepare: blind man , weak head and fools ! Younger readers might not enjoy this interpretation, but Pope finds the overconfidence of young people most problematic, associating youth with a kind of recklessness that, in hindsight, is misplaced.

You may argue that qualities such as fearless and passionate (fired) seem like compliments; but I detect a note of criticism in Pope’s words; he suggests that young people confuse emotion with clear thinking and they are too eager to plunge into the unknown. There’s an emphasis on speed and rashness ( pleased at first; at first sight ) that cannot last, like a novice marathon runner who goes sprinting out of the blocks while older, more wily competitors know to save themselves for the challenges ahead. While the young explorer does encounter some early success (implied by words like mount , more advanced , attained and, more significantly by an image : tread the sky ), the race is longer than the runner thought and inevitably the pace must sag. Later in the poem, positive diction disappears and words like trembling , growing labours , and tired take over as the true scale of the challenge becomes apparent. Sharp-eyed readers will already have noticed that the image of ‘treading the sky’ was in fact a simile : seem to tread the sky. Subtly, Pope’s use of a simile implies that any success the explorer thought he’d achieved wasn’t actually real.

The implication that over-enthusiasm can cloud good judgment can be traced through diction to do with looking and seeing: a t first sight, short views, see, behold, appear, survey, eyes and peep pepper the poem and convey the poet’s belief that, to our detriment, we can be short-sighted and tunnel-visioned. The eighth line of the poem is entirely concerned with this idea: short views we take, nor see the lengths behind paints a picture of a young explorer who only looks in one direction – eyes fixed straight ahead – and so misses the bigger picture.

While the poem is certainly didactic (it’s trying to impart a lesson), Pope’s tone of voice is not too condescending or stand-offish because he includes himself in his criticism as well. Throughout the poem the words us, we and our soften his accusations so there’s never a ‘them-and-us’ divide between young and old. In fact, Pope was only 21 years old when he finished his Essay on Criticism , so use your mind’s ear to imagine him speaking ruefully from experience, rather than as a nagging or pestering adult complaining about ‘young people today.’ The line Fired at first sight by what the Muse imparts is revealing in this regard. Alluding to the nine Muses of Greek mythology , this line personifies poetic inspiration, so in one sense the extended metaphor of trying to conquer an unknowable landscape represents his own experiences of writing poetry. ‘Meta-poems’ (poems about the writing of poems) actually have a name: ars poetica . Pope implies that rushing off on a path of artistic endeavour without realising the true extent of the commitment that entails is a mistake that he himself has made in his own attempts at writing.

If you’re a student reading this who thinks you might be able to use Pope’s poem as an excuse not to do your homework or give up on your own writing: you shouldn’t be too rash. Pope’s not suggesting we should quit. Instead, he’s warning us that what might seem like a shallow pool is in fact a deep river of knowledge. Once you jump in, the current will sweep you away and there’s no going back. The poem is a criticism of unpreparedness and arrogance rather than an acknowledgement of futility. In fact, an element of form suggests that, for all the faults Pope has pointed out in young people who are too confident in their limited abilities, it is much more praiseworthy to try and fail to conquer the heights than never to try at all. The poem is written in iambic pentameter that is constant and regular as if, no matter how tough the going gets, the young explorer doesn’t give up. Compare these two lines, with iambic accents marked, from the beginning and end of the poem to see how the rhythm is unfailing:

More, the poem is arranged in rhyming couplets (the rhyme scheme is AA, BB, CC and so on). Rhyming couplets written in iambic pentameter are traditionally known by a more dramatic name: heroic couplets . Pope was widely considered to be the master of writing poetry in heroic couplets ; using them here implies that Pope ultimately believes any young person who’s brave – or foolhardy – enough to embark upon the lifelong journey of learning is worthy of praise.

The structure of Pope’s poetical essay matches the message he’s trying to convey – that, once you start learning, you won’t be able to stop. Look carefully at the punctuation marks, in particular his use of full stops . You’ll find the first one at the end of the fourth line, the second after the tenth and the third at the end of the poem (after eighteen lines). In other words, if the poem was arranged in verses, the first verse would be nice and short at only four lines, the second would stretch to six, but the final verse would have doubled in length to eight lines. Expanding sentences represent the conceit – a little learning is a dangerous thing – and match the images of the landscape expanding ( eternal snows , increasing prospect, lengthening way ) as you read further down the poem.

The end of the poem brings Pope’s criticism to its conclusion. We see the young explorer break through the eternal snows , climb above the clouds, and stand triumphantly on the mountain top, proudly surveying his achievements. Only now does he take a moment to look more deliberately at the mountains he’s trying to conquer:

Be alert to two words that might seem insignificant: appear and seem , words that signal the mistake the explorer made; he thought that he had already past the bulk of his journey. Read carefully to punctuation as well, and you’ll see the colon – a longer pause, which creates a caseura – representing the traveler pausing at the moment of his triumph… and it’s here that realisation finally dawns. Despite the difficulty of his climb thus far, the landscape ( increasing prospect ) stretches out endlessly in front of him: Hills peep o’er hills, and Alps on Alps arise . Here, repetition mixes with all that increasing and lengthening diction to create a surreal image of an ever-expanding landscape stretching out ahead. You might also notice P sounds peppering the last two lines of the poem in the words p ee p , Al p s, Al p s, and p ros p ect . Coming from a category of alliteration called plosive , this sound is excellent at conveying a release of negative emotion, as it is formed by pushing air through closed lips. The sound helps us perceive the taste of victory turning to defeat as the weary traveler’s shoulders slump at the prospect of the endless climb still to come.

What does Pope offer as a solution? He already warned us at the start of the poem: drinking largely sobers us again . Suddenly, the importance of the word sober becomes clear. While the idea of heading off on this journey of discovery was intoxicating , firing up those with passion to learn, discover and explore – the reality is very different. That young, over-confident learner/explorer is gone, replaced by a wiser, but more world-weary traveler who can finally see the true scale of the task ahead. By now it’s too late, he’s stuck on the mountain top and there’s only one thing he can do – go onwards!

So drink deep and be prepared to encounter much more than you expected when you set out on your journey.

Suggested poems for comparison:

from Essay on Man by Alexander Pope

An Essay on Criticism was not the only poetical essay written by Pope. French writer Voltaire so admired Pope’s Essay on Man that he arranged for its translation into French and from there it spread around Europe.

Marrysong by Dennis Scott

As in Pope’s poem, Scott creates a metaphor of the landscape to represent his marriage. He is an explorer in a strange land – each time the explorer glances up from his map, the landscape has changed and he’s lost again.

Through the Dark Sod – As Education by Emily Dickinson

Victorians brought many different associations to all kinds of plants and flowers. In this Emily Dickinson poem, the lily represents beauty, purity and rebirth. This link will also take you to a fantastic blog which aims to read and provide comment on all of Emily Dickinson’s poems. So that’s 1 down, and nearly 2000 more to go…

In the Mountains by Wang Wei

Often spoken of with the same reverence as Li Bai and Du Fu, Wang Wei is a famous imagist poet in China. In these exquisite portrait poems, Wang Wei paints pictures of the impressive landscapes of his mountain home.

Additional Resources

If you are teaching or studying An Essay on Criticism at school or college, or if you simply enjoyed this analysis of the poem and would like to discover more, you might like to purchase our bespoke study bundle for this poem. It costs only £2 and includes:

Study Questions with guidance on how to answer in full paragraphs;
A sample analytical paragraph for essay writing;
An interactive and editable powerpoint, giving line-by-line analysis of all the poetic and technical features of the poem;
An in-depth worksheet with a focus on analysing diction and explaining lexical fields ;
A fun crossword quiz, perfect for a starter activity, revision or a recap;
A four-page activity booklet that can be printed and folded into a handout – ideal for self study or revision;
4 practice Essay Questions – and one complete model Essay Plan.

And… discuss!

Did you enjoy this analysis of Alexander Pope’s Essay on Criticism ? Do you agree that the poem somewhat singles out young people? Can you relate to Pope’s messages about the temptations of learning? Why not share your ideas, ask a question, or leave a comment for others to read below. For nuggets of analysis and all-new illustrations, find and follow Poetry Prof on Instagram.

An Essay on Criticism

1928 facsimile reprint.

CRITICISM .

In search of Wit these lose their common Sense , And then turn Criticks in their own Defence. Those hate as Rivals all that write; and others But envy Wits , as Eunuchs envy Lovers . All Fools have still an Itching to deride, And fain wou'd be upon the Laughing Side: If Mævius Scribble in Apollo ' s spight, There are, who judge still worse than he can write . ⁠ Some have at first for Wits , then Poets past, Turn'd Criticks next, and prov'd plain Fools at last; Some neither can for Wits nor Criticks pass, As heavy Mules are neither Horse or Ass . Those half-learn'd Witlings, num'rous in our Isle, As half-form'd Insects on the Banks of Nile ; Unfinish'd Things, one knows not what to call, Their Generation's so equivocal : To tell 'em, wou'd a hundred Tongues require, Or one vain Wit's , that wou'd a hundred tire. ⁠ But you who seek to give and merit Fame, And justly bear a Critick's noble Name,

Be sure your self and your own Reach to know. How far your Genius, Taste , and Learning go; Launch not beyond your Depth, but be discreet, And mark that Point where Sense and Dulness meet . Nature to all things fix'd the Limits fit, And wisely curb'd proud Man's pretending Wit: As on the Land while here the Ocean gains, In other Parts it leaves wide sandy Plains; Thus in the Soul while Memory prevails, The solid Pow'r of Understanding fails; Where Beams of warm Imagination play, The Memory's soft Figures melt away. One Science only will one Genius fit; So vast is Art, so narrow Human Wit; Not only bounded to peculiar Arts , But oft in those , confin'd to single Parts . Like Kings we lose the Conquests gain'd before, By vain Ambition still to make them more: Each might his sev'ral Province well command, Wou'd all but stoop to what they understand .

⁠ First follow Nature , and your Judgment frame By her just Standard, which is still the same: Unerring Nature , still divinely bright, One clear, unchang'd and Universal Light, Life, Force, and Beauty, must to all impart, At once the Source , and End , and Test of Art . That Art is best which most resembles Her ; Which still presides , yet never does Appear ; In some fair Body thus the sprightly Soul With Spirits feeds, with Vigour fills the whole, Each Motion guides, and ev'ry Nerve sustains; It self unseen , but in th' Effects , remains. There are whom Heav'n has blest with store of Wit, Yet want as much again to manage it; For Wit and Judgment ever are at strife, Tho' meant each other's Aid, like Man and Wife . 'Tis more to guide than spur the Muse's Steed; Restrain his Fury, than provoke his Speed; The winged Courser, like a gen'rous Horse, Shows most true Mettle when you check his Course.

Against the Poets their own Arms they turn'd, Sure to hate most the Men from whom they learn'd. So modern Pothecaries , taught the Art By Doctor's Bills to play the Doctor's Part , Bold in the Practice of mistaken Rules , Prescribe, apply, and call their Masters Fools . Some on the Leaves of ancient Authors prey, Nor Time nor Moths e'er spoil'd so much as they: Some dryly plain, without Invention's Aid, Write dull Receits how Poems may be made: These lost the Sense, their Learning to display, And those explain'd the Meaning quite away. ⁠ You then whose Judgment the right Course wou'd steer, Know well each Ancient's proper Character , His Fable, Subject, Scope in ev'ry Page, Religion, Country, Genius of his Age : Without all these at once before your Eyes, You may Confound , but never Criticize . Be Homer ' s Works your Study , and Delight , Read them by Day, and meditate by Night,

And tho' the Ancients thus their Rules invade, (As Kings dispense with Laws Themselves have made) Moderns , beware! Or if you must offend Against the Precept , ne'er transgress its End , Let it be seldom , and compell'd by Need , And have, at least, Their Precedent to plead. The Critick else proceeds without Remorse, Seizes your Fame, and puts his Laws in force. ⁠ I know there are, to whose presumptuous Thoughts Those Freer Beauties , ev'n in Them , seem Faults: Some Figures monstrous and mis-shap'd appear, Consider'd singly , or beheld too near , Which, but proportion'd to their Light , or Place , Due Distance reconciles to Form and Grace. A prudent Chief not always must display His Pow'rs in equal Ranks , and fair Array , But with th' Occasion and the Place comply, Oft hide his Force, nay seem sometimes to Fly . Those are but Stratagems which Errors seem, Nor is it Homer Nods , but We that Dream .

Still green with Bays each ancient Altar stands, Above the reach of Sacrilegious Hands, Secure from Flames , from Envy's fiercer Rage, Destructive War , and all-devouring Age . See, from each Clime the Learn'd their Incense bring; Hear, in all Tongues Triumphant Pæans ring! In Praise so just, let ev'ry Voice be join'd, And fill the Gen'ral Chorus of Mankind ! Hail Bards Triumphant ! born in happier Days ; Immortal Heirs of Universal Praise! Whose Honours with Increase of Ages grow , As Streams roll down, enlarging as they flow! Nations unborn your mighty Names shall sound, And Worlds applaud that must not yet be found ! Oh may some Spark of your Cœlestial Fire The last, the meanest of your Sons inspire, (That with weak Wings, from far, pursues your Flights; Glows while he reads , but trembles as he writes ) To teach vain Wits a Science little known , T' admire Superior Sense, and doubt their own!

⁠ OF all the Causes which conspire to blind Man's erring Judgment, and misguide the Mind, What the weak Head with strongest Byass rules, Is Pride , the never-failing Vice of Fools . Whatever Nature has in Worth deny'd, She gives in large Recruits of needful Pride ; For as in Bodies , thus in Souls , we find What wants in Blood and Spirits , swell'd with Wind ; Pride, where Wit fails, steps in to our Defence, And fills up all the mighty Void of Sense ! If once right Reason drives that Cloud away, Truth breaks upon us with resistless Day ; Trust not your self; but your Defects to know, Make use of ev'ry Friend —— and ev'ry Foe . ⁠ A little Learning is a dang'rous Thing; Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian Spring: There shallow Draughts intoxicate the Brain, And drinking largely sobers us again.

Fir’d with the Charms fair Science does impart, In fearless Youth we tempt the Heights of Art; While from the bounded Level of our Mind, Short Views we take, nor see the Lengths behind , But more advanc'd , survey with strange Surprize New, distant Scenes of endless Science rise! So pleas'd at first, the towring Alps we try, Mount o'er the Vales, and seem to tread the Sky; Th' Eternal Snows appear already past, And the first Clouds and Mountains seem the last: But those attain'd , we tremble to survey The growing Labours of the lengthen'd Way, Th' increasing Prospect tires our wandring Eyes, Hills peep o'er Hills, and Alps on Alps arise! ⁠ [4] A perfect Judge will read each Work of Wit With the same Spirit that its Author writ , Survey the Whole , nor seek slight Faults to find; Where Nature moves , and Rapture warms the Mind;

Nor lose, for that malignant dull Delight, The gen'rous Pleasure to be charm'd with Wit. But in such Lays as neither ebb , nor flow , Correctly cold , and regularly low , That shunning Faults, one quiet Tenour keep; We cannot blame indeed —— but we may sleep . In Wit, as Nature, what affects our Hearts Is not th' Exactness of peculiar Parts; 'Tis not a Lip , or Eye , we Beauty call, But the joint Force and full Result of all . Thus when we view some well-proportion'd Dome, The World ' s just Wonder, and ev'n thine O Rome !) No single Parts unequally surprize; All comes united to th' admiring Eyes; No monstrous Height, or Breadth, or Length appear; The Whole at once is Bold , and Regular . ⁠ Whoever thinks a faultless Piece to see, Thinks what ne'er was, nor is, nor e'er shall be. In ev'ry Work regard the Writer's End , Since none can compass more than they Intend ;

All which, exact to Rule were brought about, Were but a Combate in the Lists left out. What! Leave the Combate out ? Exclaims the Knight; Yes, or we must renounce the Stagyrite . Not so by Heav'n (he answers in a Rage) Knights, Squires, and Steeds, must enter on the Stage . The Stage can ne'er so vast a Throng contain. Then build a New, or act it in a Plain . ⁠ Thus Criticks, of less Judgment than Caprice , Curious , not Knowing , not exact , but nice , Form short Ideas ; and offend in Arts (As most in Manners ) by a Love to Parts . Some to Conceit alone their Taste confine, And glitt'ring Thoughts struck out at ev'ry Line; Pleas'd with a Work where nothing's just or fit; One glaring Chaos and wild Heap of Wit: Poets like Painters, thus, unskill'd to trace The naked Nature and the living Grace , With Gold and Jewels cover ev'ry Part, And hide with Ornaments their Want of Art .

[5] True Wit is Nature to Advantage drest, What oft was Thought , but ne'er so well Exprest , Something , whose Truth convinc'd at Sight we find, That gives us back the Image of our Mind: As Shades more sweetly recommend the Light, So modest Plainness sets off sprightly Wit: For Works may have more Wit than does 'em good, As Bodies perish through Excess of Blood . ⁠ Others for Language all their Care express, And value Books , as Women Men , for Dress: Their Praise is still —— The Stile is excellent : The Sense , they humbly take upon Content. Words are like Leaves ; and where they most abound, Much Fruit of Sense beneath is rarely found. False Eloquence , like the Prismatic Glass , Its gawdy Colours spreads on ev'ry place ; The Face of Nature was no more Survey, All glares alike , without Distinction gay:

Where-e'er you find the cooling Western Breeze , In the next Line, it whispers thro' the Trees ; If Chrystal Streams with pleasing Murmurs creep , The Reader's threaten'd (not in vain) with Sleep . Then, at the last , and only Couplet fraught With some unmeaning Thing they call a Thought , A needless Alexandrine ends the Song, That like a wounded Snake, drags its slow length along. Leave such to tune their own dull Rhimes, and know What's roundly smooth , or languishingly slow ; And praise the Easie Vigor of a Line, Where Denham ' s Strength, and Waller ' s Sweetness join. 'Tis not enough no Harshness gives Offence, The Sound must seem an Eccho to the Sense . Soft is the Strain when Zephyr gently blows, And the smooth Stream in smoother Numbers flows; But when loud Surges lash the sounding Shore, The hoarse, rough Verse shou'd like the Torrent roar. When Ajax strives, some Rocks' vast Weight to throw, The Line too labours , and the Words move slow ;

Not so, when swift Camilla scours the Plain, Flies o'er th'unbending Corn, and skims along the Main. Hear how [10] Timotheus ' various Lays surprize, And bid Alternate Passions fall and rise! While, at each Change, the Son of Lybian Jove Now burns with Glory, and then melts with Love; Now his fierce Eyes with sparkling Fury glow; Now Sighs steal out, and Tears begin to flow : Persians and Greeks like Turns of Nature found, And the World's Victor stood subdu'd by Sound ! The Pow'r of Musick all our Hearts allow; And what Timotheus was, is Dryden now. ⁠ Avoid Extreams ; and shun the Fault of such, Who still are pleas'd too little , or too much . At ev'ry Trifle scorn to take Offence, That always shows Great Pride , or Little Sense ; Those Heads as Stomachs are not sure the best Which nauseate all, and nothing can digest.

Yet let not each gay Turn thy Rapture move, For Fools Admire , but Men of Sense Approve ; As things seem large which we thro' Mists descry, Dulness is ever apt to Magnify . ⁠ Some French Writers, some our own despise; The Ancients only, or the Moderns prize: Thus Wit , like Faith by each Man is apply'd To one small Sect , and All are damn'd beside. Meanly they seek the Blessing to confine, And force that Sun but on a Part to Shine; Which not alone the Southern Wit sublimes, But ripens Spirits in cold Northern Climes ; Which from the first has shone on Ages past , Enlights the present , and shall warm the last: (Tho' each may feel Increases and Decays , And see now clearer and now darker Days ) Regard not then if Wit be Old or New , But blame the False , and value still the True . ⁠ Some ne'er advance a Judgment of their own, But catch the spreading Notion of the Town;

They reason and conclude by Precedent , And own stale Nonsense which they ne'er invent. Some judge of Author's Names , not Works , and then Nor praise nor damn the Writings , but the Men . Of all this Servile Herd the worst is He That in proud Dulness joins with Quality , A constant Critick at the Great-man's Board, To fetch and carry Nonsense for my Lord. What woful stuff this Madrigal wou'd be, To some starv'd Hackny Sonneteer, or me? But let a Lord once own the happy Lines , How the Wit brightens ! How the Style refines ! Before his sacred Name flies ev'ry Fault, And each exalted Stanza teems with Thought! ⁠ The Vulgar thus through Imitation err; As oft the Learn'd by being Singular ; So much they scorn the Crowd, that if the Throng By Chance go right, they purposely go wrong; So Schismatics the dull Believers quit, And are but damn'd for having too much Wit .

⁠ Some praise at Morning what they blame at Night; But always think the last Opinion right . A Muse by these is like a Mistress us'd, This hour she's idoliz'd , the next abus'd , While their weak Heads, like Towns unfortify'd, 'Twixt Sense and Nonsense daily change their Side. Ask them the Cause; They're wiser still , they say; And still to Morrow's wiser than to Day. We think our Fathers Fools, so wise we grow; Our wiser Sons , no doubt, will think us so. Once School-Divines our zealous Isle o'erspread; Who knew most Sentences was deepest read ; Faith, Gospel, All, seem'd made to be disputed , And none had Sense enough to be Confuted . Scotists and Thomists , now, in Peace remain, Amidst their kindred Cobwebs in Duck-Lane . If Faith it self has diff'rent Dresses worn, What wonder Modes in Wit shou'd take their Turn? Oft, leaving what is Natural and fit, The current Folly proves the ready Wit ,

And Authors think their Reputation safe, Which lives as long as Fools are pleas'd to Laugh . ⁠ Some valuing those of their own Side , or Mind , Still make themselves the measure of Mankind; Fondly we think we honour Merit then, When we but praise Our selves in Other Men . Parties in Wit attend on those of State , And publick Faction doubles private Hate. Pride, Malice, Folly , against Dryden rose, In various Shapes of Parsons, Criticks, Beaus ; But Sense surviv'd, when merry Jests were past; For rising Merit will buoy up at last. Might he return, and bless once more our Eyes, New Bl —— —s and new M —— —s must arise; Nay shou'd great Homer lift his awful Head, Zoilus again would start up from the Dead. Envy will Merit as its Shade pursue, But like a Shadow, proves the Substance too; For envy'd Wit, like Sol Eclips'd, makes known Th' opposing Body's Grossness, not its own .

When first that Sun too powerful Beams displays, It draws up Vapours which obscure its Rays; But ev'n those Clouds at last adorn its Way, Reflect new Glories, and augment the Day. ⁠ Be thou the first true Merit to befriend; His Praise is lost, who stays till All commend; Short is the Date, alas, of Modern Rhymes ; And 'tis but just to let 'em live betimes . No longer now that Golden Age appears, When Patriarch-Wits surviv'd a thousand Years , Now Length of Fame (our second Life) is lost, And bare Threescore is all ev'n That can boast: Our Sons their Fathers' failing Language see, And such as Chaucer is, shall Dryden be. So when the faithful Pencil has design'd Some fair Idea of the Master's Mind, Where a new World leaps out at his command, And ready Nature waits upon his Hand; When the ripe Colours soften and unite , And sweetly melt into just Shade and Light,

When mellowing Time does full Perfection give, And each Bold Figure just begins to Live ; The treach'rous Colours the few Years decay, And all the bright Creation fades away! ⁠ Unhappy Wit , like most mistaken Things, Repays not half that Envy which it brings: In Youth alone its empty Praise we boast, But soon the Short-liv'd Vanity is lost! Like some fair Flow'r the in the Spring does rise, That gaily Blooms, but ev'n in blooming Dies . What is this Wit that does our Cares employ? The Owner's Wife , that other Men enjoy, Then more his Trouble as the more admir'd , Where wanted , scorn'd, and envy'd where acquir'd ; Maintain'd with Pains , but forfeited with Ease ; Sure some to vex , but never all to please ; 'Tis what the Vicious fear , the Virtuous shun ; By Fools 'tis hated , and by Knaves undone! ⁠ Too much does Wit from Ign'rance undergo, Ah let not Learning too commence its Foe!

Of old , those met Rewards who cou'd excel , And such were Prais'd who but endeavour'd well : Tho' Triumphs were to Gen'rals only due, Crowns were reserv'd to grace the Soldiers too. Now those that reach Parnassus ' lofty Crown, Employ their Pains to spurn some others down; And while Self-Love each jealous Writer rules, Contending Wits becomes the Sport of Fools : But still the Worst with most Regret commend, For each Ill Author is as bad a Friend . To what base Ends, and by what abject Ways , Are Mortals urg'd by Sacred Lust of Praise ? Ah ne'er so dire a Thirst of Glory boast, Nor in the Critick let the Man be lost! Good-Nature and Good-Sense must ever join; To err is Humane ; to Forgive, Divine . But if in Noble Minds some Dregs remain, Not yet purg'd off, of Spleen and sow'r Disdain, Discharge that Rage on more Provoking Crimes, Nor fear a Dearth in these Flagitious Times.

No Pardon vile Obscenity should find, Tho' Wit and Art conspire to move your Mind; But Dulness with Obscenity must prove As Shameful sure as Impotence in Love . In the fat Age of Pleasure, Wealth, and Ease, Sprung the rank Weed, and thriv'd with large Increase; When Love was all an easie Monarch's Care; Seldom at Council , never in a War : Jilts rul'd the State, and Statesmen Farces writ; Nay Wits had Pensions , and young Lords had Wit : The Fair sate panting at a Courtier's Play , And not a Mask went un-improv'd away: The modest Fan was lifted up no more, And Virgins smil'd at what they blush'd before —— The following Licence of a Foreign Reign Did all the Dregs of bold Socinus drain; Then first the Belgian Morals were extoll'd; We their Religion had, and they our Gold: Then Unbelieving Priests reform'd the Nation, And taught more Pleasant Methods of Salvation;

Where Heav'ns Free Subjects might their Rights dispute, Lest God himself shou'd seem too Absolute . Pulpits their Sacred Satire learn'd to spare, And Vice admir'd to find a Flatt'rer there! Encourag'd thus, Witt's Titans brav'd the Skies, And the Press groan'd with Licenc'd Blasphemies —— These Monsters, Criticks! with your Darts engage, Here point your Thunder, and exhaust your Rage! Yet shun their Fault, who, Scandalously nice , Will needs mistake an Author into Vice ; All seems Infected that th' Infected spy, As all looks yellow to the Jaundic'd Eye. ⁠ Learn then what Morals Criticks ought to show, For 'tis but half a Judge's Task , to Know . 'Tis not enough, Wit, Art, and Learning join; In all you speak, let Truth and Candor shine: That not alone what to your Judgment ' s due, All may allow; but seek your Friendship too.

⁠ Be silent always when you doubt your Sense; Speak when you're sure , yet speak with Diffidence ; Some positive persisting Fops we know, Who, if once wrong , will needs be always so ; But you, with Pleasure own your Errors past, And make each Day a Critick on the last. ⁠ 'Tis not enough your Counsel still be true , Blunt Truths more Mischief than nice Falshoods do; Men must be taught as if you taught them not ; And Things ne'er known propos'd as Things forgot : Without Good Breeding, Truth is not approv'd, That only makes Superior Sense belov'd . ⁠ Be Niggards of Advice on no Pretence; For the worst Avarice is that of Sense : With mean Complacence ne'er betray your Trust, Nor be so Civil as to prove Unjust ; Fear not the Anger of the Wise to raise; Those best can bear Reproof , who merit Praise .

⁠ 'Twere well, might Criticks still this Freedom take; But Appius reddens at each Word you speak, And stares, Tremendous ! with a threatning Eye , Like some fierce Tyrant in Old Tapestry ! Fear most to tax an Honourable Fool, Whose Right it is, uncensur'd to be dull; Such without Wit are Poets when they please, As without Learning they can take Degrees . Leave dang'rous Truths to unsuccessful Satyrs , And Flattery to fulsome Dedicators , Whom, when they Praise , the World believes no more, Than when they promise to give Scribling o'er. 'Tis best sometimes your Censure to restrain, And charitably let the Dull be vain : Your Silence there is better than your Spite , For who can rail so long as they can write ? Still humming on, their old dull Course they keep, And lash'd so long, like Tops , are lash'd asleep .

False Steps but help them to renew the Race, As after Stumbling , Jades will mend their Pace. What Crouds of these, impenitently bold, In Sounds and jingling Syllables grown old, Still run on Poets in a raging Vein, Ev'n to the Dregs and Squeezings of the Brain ; Strain out the last, dull droppings of their Sense, And Rhyme with all the Rage of Impotence ! ⁠ Such shameless Bards we have; and yet 'tis true, There are as mad, abandon'd Criticks too. [11] The Bookful Blockhead, ignorantly read, With Loads of Learned Lumber in his Head, With his own Tongue still edifies his Ears, And always List'ning to Himself appears. All Books he reads, and all he reads assails, From Dryden ' s Fables down to D —— — y ' s Tales .

Tho' Learn'd well-bred; and tho' well-bred, sincere; Modestly bold, and Humanly severe? Who to a Friend his Faults can freely show, And gladly praise the Merit of a Foe ? Blest with a Taste exact, yet unconfin'd; A Knowledge both of Books and Humankind ; Gen'rous Converse ; a Soul exempt from Pride ; And Love to Praise , with Reason on his Side? ⁠ Such once were Criticks , such the Happy Few , Athens and Rome in better Ages knew. The mighty Stagyrite first left the Shore, Spread all his Sails, and durst the Deeps explore; He steer'd securely, and discover'd far, Led by the Light of the Mæonian Star . Not only Nature did his Laws obey, But Fancy's boundless Empire own'd his Sway. Poets, a Race long unconfin'd and free, Still fond and proud of Savage Liberty ,

Receiv'd his Laws, and stood convinc'd 'twas fit Who conquer'd Nature , shou'd preside o'er Wit . ⁠ Horace still charms with graceful Negligence, And without Method talks us into Sense, Does like a Friend familiarly convey The truest Notions in the easiest way . He, who Supream in Judgment, as in Wit, Might boldly censure, as he boldly writ, Yet judg'd with Coolness tho' he sung with Fire ; His Precepts teach but what his Works inspire. Our Criticks take a contrary Extream, They judge with Fury , but they write with Fle'me: Nor suffers Horace more in wrong Translations By Wits , than Criticks in as wrong Quotations . ⁠ Fancy and Art in gay Petronius please, The Scholar's Learning , with the Courtier's Ease . ⁠ In grave Quintilian ' s copious Work we find The justest Rules , and clearest Method join'd;

Thus useful Arms in Magazines we place, All rang'd in Order , and dispos'd with Grace , Nor thus alone the Curious Eye to please, But to be found , when Need requires, with Ease. ⁠ The Muses sure Longinus did inspire, And blest their Critick with a Poet's Fire . An ardent Judge , that Zealous in his Trust, With Warmth gives Sentence, yet is always Just ; Whose own Example strengthens all his Laws, And Is himself that great Sublime he draws. ⁠ Thus long succeeding Criticks justly reign'd, Licence repress'd, and useful Laws ordain'd; Learning and Rome alike in Empire grew, And Arts still follow'd where her Eagles flew ; From the same Foes, at last, both felt their Doom, And the same Age saw Learning fall, and Rome . With Tyranny , then Superstition join'd, As that the Body , this enslav'd the Mind ;

All was Believ'd , but nothing understood , And to be dull was constru'd to be good ; A second Deluge Learning thus o'er-run, And the Monks finish'd what the Goths begun. ⁠ At length, Erasmus , that great, injur'd Name, (The Glory of the Priesthood, and the Shame !) Stemm'd the wild Torrent of a barb'rous Age , And drove those Holy Vandals off the Stage. ⁠ But see! each Muse , in Leo ' s Golden Days, Starts from her Trance, and trims her wither'd Bays! Rome ' s ancient Genius , o'er its Ruins spread, Shakes off the Dust , and rears his rev'rend Head! Then Sculpture and her Sister-Arts revive; Stones leap'd to Form , and Rocks began to live ; With sweeter Notes each rising Temple rung; A Raphael painted, and a [12] Vida sung!

Immortal Vida ! on whose honour'd Brow The Poet's Bays and Critick's Ivy grow: Cremona now shall ever boast thy Name, As next in Place to Mantua , next in Fame! ⁠ But soon by Impious Arms from Latium chas'd, Their ancient Bounds the banish'd Muses past: Thence Arts o'er all the Northern World advance, But Critic Learning flourish'd most in France . The Rules , a Nation born to serve, obeys, And Boileau still in Right of Horace sways. But we , brave Britains, Foreign Laws despis'd, And kept unconquer'd and unciviliz'd , Fierce for the Liberties of Wit , and bold, We still defy'd the Romans as of old . Yet some there were, among the sounder Few Of those who less presum'd , and better knew ,

Who durst assert the juster Ancient Cause , And here restor'd Wit's Fundamental Laws . Such was the Muse, whose Rules and Practice tell, Nature's chief Master-piece is writing well. Such was Roscomon —— not more learn'd than good , With Manners gen'rous as his Noble Blood; To him the Wit of Greece and Rome was known, And ev'ry Author's Merit , but his own. Such late was Walsh , —— the Muse's Judge and Friend, Who justly knew to blame or to commend; To Failings mild , but zealous for Desert; The clearest Head , and the sincerest Heart . This humble Praise, lamented Shade' ! receive, This Praise at least a grateful Muse may give! The Muse, whose early Voice you taught to Sing, Prescrib'd her Heights, and prun'd her tender Wing, (Her Guide now lost) no more attempts to rise , But in low Numbers short Excursions tries:

Content, if hence th' Unlearned their Wants may view, The Learn'd reflect on what before they knew: Careless of Censure , not too fond of Fame , Still pleas'd to praise , yet not afraid to blame , Averse alike to Flatter , or Offend , Not free from Faults, nor yet too vain to mend .

↑ —— De Pictore, Sculptore, Fictore, nisi Artifex judicare non potest . Pliny.
↑ Omnes tacito quodam sensu, sine ulla arte, aut ratione, quæ sint in artibus ac rationibus recta ac prava dijudicant. Cic. de Orat. lib.3.
↑ Neque tam sancta sunt ista Præcepta, sed quicquid est, Utilitas excogitavit; Non negabo autem sic utile esse plerunque; verum si eadem illa nobis aliud suadebit utilitas, hanc relictis magistrorum autoritatibus, sequemur. Quintil. l. 2. cap. 13.
↑ Diligenter legendum est, ac pœne ad scribendi sollicitudinem: Nec per partes modo scrutanda sunt omnia, sed perlectus liber utique ex Integro resumendus. Quintilian.
↑ Naturam intueamur, hanc sequamur; Id facillimè accipiunt animi quod agnoscunt. Quintil. lib. 8. c. 3.
↑ Abolita & abrogata retinere, insolentiæ cujusdam est, & frivolæ in parvis jactantiæ. Quint. lib. 1. c. 6. ⁠ Opus est ut Verba a vetustate repetita neque crebra sint, neque manifesta, quia nil est odiosius affectatione, nec utique ab ultimis repetita temporibus. Oratio, cujus summa virtus est perspicuitas, quam sit vitiosa si egeat interprete? Ergo ut novorum optima erunt maximè vetera, ita veterum maximè nova. Idem.
↑ Ben. Johnson ' s Every Man in his Humour .
↑ Quis populi sermo est? quis enim? nisi carmine molli Nunc demum numero fluere, ut per severos Effugit junctura ungues: scit tendere versum, Non secus ac si oculo rubricam dirigat uno . Persius , Sat. 1.
↑ Fugiemus crebras vocalium concursiones, quæ vastam atque hiantem orationem reddunt . Cic. ad Herenn. lib. 4. Vide etiam Quintil. lib. 9. c. 4.
↑ Alexander ' s Feast, or the Power of Musick; An Ode by Mr. Dryden.
↑ Nihil pejus est iis, qui paullum aliquid ultra primas litteras progressi, falsam sibi scientiæ persuasionem induerunt: Nam & cedere præcipiendi peritis indignantur, & velut jure quodam potestatis, quo ferè hoc hominum genus intumescit, imperiosi, atque interim sævientes, Stultitiam suam perdocent. Quintil. lib. I. ch. 1.
↑ M. Hieronymus Vida , an excellent Latin Poet, who writ an Art of Poetry in Verse .

This work was published before January 1, 1929, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.

Public domain Public domain false false

Early modern poetry
18th century works
Pages using pixel widths (border)
Dropinitials with image
Headers applying DefaultSort key
Page breaks with a label

An Essay on Criticism: Part 1

Pope, alexander (1688 - 1744).

AN ESSAY ON CRITICISM.

Alexander pope..

This eminent English poet was born in London, May 21, 1688. His parents were Roman Catholics, and to this faith the poet adhered, thus debarring himself from public office and employment. His father, a linen merchant, having saved a moderate competency, withdrew from business, and settled on a small estate he had purchased in Windsor Forest. He died at Chiswick, in 1717. His son shortly afterwards took a long lease of a house and five acres of land at Twickenham, on the banks of the Thames, whither he retired with his widowed mother, to whom he was tenderly attached and where he resided till death, cultivating his little domain with exquisite taste and skill, and embellishing it with a grotto, temple, wilderness, and other adjuncts poetical and picturesque. In this famous villa Pope was visited by the most celebrated wits, statesmen and beauties of the day, himself being the most popular and successful poet of his age. His early years were spent at Binfield, within the range of the Royal Forest. He received some education at little Catholic schools, but was his own instructor after his twelfth year. He never was a profound or accurate scholar, but he read Latin poets with ease and delight, and acquired some Greek, French, and Italian. He was a poet almost from infancy, he "lisped in numbers," and when a mere youth surpassed all his contemporaries in metrical harmony and correctness. His pastorals and some translations appeared in 1709, but were written three or four years earlier. These were followed by the Essay on Criticism , 1711; Rape of the Lock (when completed, the most graceful, airy, and imaginative of his works), 1712-1714; Windsor Forest , 1713; Temple of Fame , 1715. In a collection of his works printed in 1717 he included the Epistle of Eloisa and Elegy on an Unfortunate Lady , two poems inimitable for pathetic beauty and finished melodious versification.

From 1715 till 1726 Pope was chiefly engaged on his translations of the Iliad and Odyssey , which, though wanting in time Homeric simplicity, naturalness, and grandeur, are splendid poems. In 1728-29 he published his greatest satire—the Dunciad , an attack on all poetasters and pretended wits, and on all other persons against whom the sensitive poet had conceived any enmity. In 1737 he gave to the world a volume of his Literary Correspondence , containing some pleasant gossip and observations, with choice passages of description but it appears that the correspondence was manufactured for publication not composed of actual letters addressed to the parties whose names are given, and the collection was introduced to the public by means of an elaborate stratagem on the part of the scheming poet. Between the years 1731 and 1739 he issued a series of poetical essays moral and philosophical, with satires and imitations of Horace, all admirable for sense, wit, spirit and brilliancy of these delightful productions, the most celebrated is the Essay on Man to which Bolingbroke is believed to have contributed the spurious philosophy and false sentiment, but its merit consists in detached passages, descriptions, and pictures. A fourth book to the Dunciad , containing many beautiful and striking lines and a general revision of his works, closed the poet's literary cares and toils. He died on the 30th of May, 1744, and was buried in the church at Twickenham.

Pope was of very diminutive stature and deformed from his birth. His physical infirmity, susceptible temperament, and incessant study rendered his life one long disease. He was, as his friend Lord Chesterfield said, "the most irritable of all the genus irritabile vatum , offended with trifles and never forgetting or forgiving them." His literary stratagems, disguises, assertions, denials, and (we must add) misrepresentations would fill volumes. Yet when no disturbing jealousy vanity, or rivalry intervened was generous and affectionate, and he had a manly, independent spirit. As a poet he was deficient in originality and creative power, and thus was inferior to his prototype, Dryden, but as a literary artist, and brilliant declaimer satirist and moralizer in verse he is still unrivaled. He is the English Horace, and will as surely descend with honors to the latest posterity.

AN ESSAY ON CRITICISM,

Written in the year 1709.

[The title, An Essay on Criticism hardly indicates all that is included in the poem. It would have been impossible to give a full and exact idea of the art of poetical criticism without entering into the consideration of the art of poetry. Accordingly Pope has interwoven the precepts of both throughout the poem which might more properly have been styled an essay on the Art of Criticism and of Poetry.]

'Tis hard to say if greater want of skill Appear in writing or in judging ill, But of the two less dangerous is the offense To tire our patience than mislead our sense Some few in that but numbers err in this, Ten censure wrong for one who writes amiss, A fool might once himself alone expose, Now one in verse makes many more in prose.

'Tis with our judgments as our watches, none Go just alike, yet each believes his own In poets as true genius is but rare True taste as seldom is the critic share Both must alike from Heaven derive their light, These born to judge as well as those to write Let such teach others who themselves excel, And censure freely, who have written well Authors are partial to their wit, 'tis true [ 17 ] But are not critics to their judgment too?

Yet if we look more closely we shall find Most have the seeds of judgment in their mind Nature affords at least a glimmering light The lines though touched but faintly are drawn right, But as the slightest sketch if justly traced Is by ill coloring but the more disgraced So by false learning is good sense defaced Some are bewildered in the maze of schools [ 26 ] And some made coxcombs nature meant but fools In search of wit these lose their common sense And then turn critics in their own defense Each burns alike who can or cannot write Or with a rival's or an eunuch's spite All fools have still an itching to deride And fain would be upon the laughing side If Maevius scribble in Apollo's spite [ 34 ] There are who judge still worse than he can write.

Some have at first for wits then poets passed Turned critics next and proved plain fools at last Some neither can for wits nor critics pass As heavy mules are neither horse nor ass. Those half-learned witlings, numerous in our isle, As half-formed insects on the banks of Nile Unfinished things one knows not what to call Their generation is so equivocal To tell them would a hundred tongues require, Or one vain wits that might a hundred tire.

But you who seek to give and merit fame, And justly bear a critic's noble name, Be sure yourself and your own reach to know How far your genius taste and learning go. Launch not beyond your depth, but be discreet And mark that point where sense and dullness meet.

Nature to all things fixed the limits fit And wisely curbed proud man's pretending wit. As on the land while here the ocean gains. In other parts it leaves wide sandy plains Thus in the soul while memory prevails, The solid power of understanding fails Where beams of warm imagination play, The memory's soft figures melt away One science only will one genius fit, So vast is art, so narrow human wit Not only bounded to peculiar arts, But oft in those confined to single parts Like kings, we lose the conquests gained before, By vain ambition still to make them more Each might his several province well command, Would all but stoop to what they understand.

First follow nature and your judgment frame By her just standard, which is still the same. Unerring nature still divinely bright, One clear, unchanged and universal light, Life force and beauty, must to all impart, At once the source and end and test of art Art from that fund each just supply provides, Works without show and without pomp presides In some fair body thus the informing soul With spirits feeds, with vigor fills the whole, Each motion guides and every nerve sustains, Itself unseen, but in the effects remains. Some, to whom Heaven in wit has been profuse, [ 80 ] Want as much more, to turn it to its use; For wit and judgment often are at strife, Though meant each other's aid, like man and wife. 'Tis more to guide, than spur the muse's steed, Restrain his fury, than provoke his speed, The winged courser, like a generous horse, [ 86 ] Shows most true mettle when you check his course.

Those rules, of old discovered, not devised, Are nature still, but nature methodized; Nature, like liberty, is but restrained By the same laws which first herself ordained.

Hear how learned Greece her useful rules indites, When to repress and when indulge our flights. High on Parnassus' top her sons she showed, [ 94 ] And pointed out those arduous paths they trod; Held from afar, aloft, the immortal prize, And urged the rest by equal steps to rise. [ 97 ] Just precepts thus from great examples given, She drew from them what they derived from Heaven. The generous critic fanned the poet's fire, And taught the world with reason to admire. Then criticism the muse's handmaid proved, To dress her charms, and make her more beloved: But following wits from that intention strayed Who could not win the mistress, wooed the maid Against the poets their own arms they turned Sure to hate most the men from whom they learned So modern pothecaries taught the art By doctors bills to play the doctor's part. Bold in the practice of mistaken rules Prescribe, apply, and call their masters fools. Some on the leaves of ancient authors prey, Nor time nor moths e'er spoil so much as they. Some dryly plain, without invention's aid, Write dull receipts how poems may be made These leave the sense their learning to display, And those explain the meaning quite away.

You then, whose judgment the right course would steer, Know well each ancient's proper character, His fable subject scope in every page, Religion, country, genius of his age Without all these at once before your eyes, Cavil you may, but never criticise. Be Homers works your study and delight, Read them by day and meditate by night, Thence form your judgment thence your maxims bring And trace the muses upward to their spring. Still with itself compared, his text peruse, And let your comment be the Mantuan Muse. [ 129 ]

When first young Maro in his boundless mind, [ 130 ] A work to outlast immortal Rome designed, Perhaps he seemed above the critic's law And but from nature's fountain scorned to draw But when to examine every part he came Nature and Homer were he found the same Convinced, amazed, he checks the bold design And rules as strict his labored work confine As if the Stagirite o'erlooked each line [ 138 ] Learn hence for ancient rules a just esteem, To copy nature is to copy them.

Some beauties yet no precepts can declare, For there's a happiness as well as care. Music resembles poetry—in each Are nameless graces which no methods teach, And which a master hand alone can reach If, where the rules not far enough extend (Since rules were made but to promote their end), Some lucky license answer to the full The intent proposed that license is a rule. Thus Pegasus a nearer way to take May boldly deviate from the common track Great wits sometimes may gloriously offend, And rise to faults true critics dare not mend, From vulgar bounds with brave disorder part, And snatch a grace beyond the reach of art, Which without passing through the judgment gains The heart and all its end at once attains. In prospects, thus, some objects please our eyes, Which out of nature's common order rise, The shapeless rock or hanging precipice. But though the ancients thus their rules invade (As kings dispense with laws themselves have made), Moderns beware! or if you must offend Against the precept, ne'er transgress its end, Let it be seldom, and compelled by need, And have, at least, their precedent to plead. The critic else proceeds without remorse, Seizes your fame, and puts his laws in force.

I know there are, to whose presumptuous thoughts Those freer beauties, even in them, seem faults Some figures monstrous and misshaped appear, Considered singly, or beheld too near, Which, but proportioned to their light, or place, Due distance reconciles to form and grace. A prudent chief not always must display His powers in equal ranks and fair array, But with the occasion and the place comply. Conceal his force, nay, seem sometimes to fly. Those oft are stratagems which errors seem, Nor is it Homer nods, but we that dream. [ 180 ]

Still green with bays each ancient altar stands, Above the reach of sacrilegious hands, Secure from flames, from envy's fiercer rage, [ 183 ] Destructive war, and all-involving age. See, from each clime the learned their incense bring; Hear, in all tongues consenting Paeans ring! In praise so just let every voice be joined, And fill the general chorus of mankind. Hail! bards triumphant! born in happier days; Immortal heirs of universal praise! Whose honors with increase of ages grow, As streams roll down, enlarging as they flow; Nations unborn your mighty names shall sound, [ 193 ] And worlds applaud that must not yet be found! Oh may some spark of your celestial fire, The last, the meanest of your sons inspire, (That, on weak wings, from far pursues your flights, Glows while he reads, but trembles as he writes), To teach vain wits a science little known, To admire superior sense, and doubt their own!

Of all the causes which conspire to blind Man's erring judgment and misguide the mind, What the weak head with strongest bias rules, Is pride, the never-failing vice of fools. Whatever nature has in worth denied, She gives in large recruits of needful pride; For as in bodies, thus in souls, we find What wants in blood and spirits, swelled with wind: Pride where wit fails steps in to our defense, And fills up all the mighty void of sense. If once right reason drives that cloud away, Truth breaks upon us with resistless day Trust not yourself, but your defects to know, Make use of every friend—and every foe.

A little learning is a dangerous thing Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring [ 216 ] There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, And drinking largely sobers us again. Fired at first sight with what the muse imparts, In fearless youth we tempt the heights of arts While from the bounded level of our mind Short views we take nor see the lengths behind But more advanced behold with strange surprise, New distant scenes of endless science rise! So pleased at first the towering Alps we try, Mount o'er the vales and seem to tread the sky, The eternal snows appear already passed And the first clouds and mountains seem the last. But those attained we tremble to survey The growing labors of the lengthened way The increasing prospect tires our wandering eyes, Hills peep o'er hills and Alps on Alps arise!

A perfect judge will read each work of wit With the same spirit that its author writ Survey the whole nor seek slight faults to find Where nature moves and rapture warms the mind, Nor lose for that malignant dull delight The generous pleasure to be charmed with wit But in such lays as neither ebb nor flow, Correctly cold and regularly low That, shunning faults, one quiet tenor keep; We cannot blame indeed—but we may sleep. In wit, as nature, what affects our hearts Is not the exactness of peculiar parts, 'Tis not a lip, or eye, we beauty call, But the joint force and full result of all. Thus, when we view some well proportioned dome (The worlds just wonder, and even thine, O Rome!), [ 248 ] No single parts unequally surprise, All comes united to the admiring eyes; No monstrous height or breadth, or length, appear; The whole at once is bold, and regular.

Whoever thinks a faultless piece to see. Thinks what ne'er was, nor is, nor e'er shall be. In every work regard the writer's end, Since none can compass more than they intend; And if the means be just, the conduct true, Applause, in spite of trivial faults, is due. As men of breeding, sometimes men of wit, To avoid great errors, must the less commit: Neglect the rules each verbal critic lays, For not to know some trifles is a praise. Most critics, fond of some subservient art, Still make the whole depend upon a part: They talk of principles, but notions prize, And all to one loved folly sacrifice.

Once on a time La Mancha's knight, they say, [ 267 ] A certain bard encountering on the way, Discoursed in terms as just, with looks as sage, As e'er could Dennis, of the Grecian stage; [ 270 ] Concluding all were desperate sots and fools, Who durst depart from Aristotle's rules Our author, happy in a judge so nice, Produced his play, and begged the knight's advice; Made him observe the subject, and the plot, The manners, passions, unities, what not? All which, exact to rule, were brought about, Were but a combat in the lists left out "What! leave the combat out?" exclaims the knight. "Yes, or we must renounce the Stagirite." "Not so, by heaven!" (he answers in a rage) "Knights, squires, and steeds must enter on the stage." "So vast a throng the stage can ne'er contain." "Then build a new, or act it in a plain."

Thus critics of less judgment than caprice, Curious, not knowing, not exact, but nice, Form short ideas, and offend in arts (As most in manners) by a love to parts.

Some to conceit alone their taste confine, And glittering thoughts struck out at every line; Pleased with a work where nothing's just or fit; One glaring chaos and wild heap of wit. Poets, like painters, thus, unskilled to trace The naked nature and the living grace, With gold and jewels cover every part, And hide with ornaments their want of art. True wit is nature to advantage dressed; What oft was thought, but ne'er so well expressed; Something, whose truth convinced at sight we find That gives us back the image of our mind. As shades more sweetly recommend the light, So modest plainness sets off sprightly wit For works may have more wit than does them good, As bodies perish through excess of blood.

Others for language all their care express, And value books, as women men, for dress. Their praise is still—"the style is excellent," The sense they humbly take upon content [ 308 ] Words are like leaves, and where they most abound Much fruit of sense beneath is rarely found. False eloquence, like the prismatic glass. [ 311 ] Its gaudy colors spreads on every place, The face of nature we no more survey. All glares alike without distinction gay: But true expression, like the unchanging sun, Clears and improves whate'er it shines upon; It gilds all objects, but it alters none. Expression is the dress of thought, and still Appears more decent, as more suitable, A vile conceit in pompous words expressed, Is like a clown in regal purple dressed For different styles with different subjects sort, As several garbs with country town and court Some by old words to fame have made pretense, Ancients in phrase, mere moderns in their sense; Such labored nothings, in so strange a style, Amaze the unlearned, and make the learned smile. Unlucky, as Fungoso in the play, [ 328 ] These sparks with awkward vanity display What the fine gentleman wore yesterday; And but so mimic ancient wits at best, As apes our grandsires in their doublets dressed. In words as fashions the same rule will hold, Alike fantastic if too new or old. Be not the first by whom the new are tried, Nor yet the last to lay the old aside

But most by numbers judge a poet's song And smooth or rough, with them is right or wrong. In the bright muse though thousand charms conspire, Her voice is all these tuneful fools admire, Who haunt Parnassus but to please their ear, Not mend their minds, as some to church repair, Not for the doctrine but the music there These equal syllables alone require, Though oft the ear the open vowels tire; While expletives their feeble aid do join; And ten low words oft creep in one dull line, While they ring round the same unvaried chimes, With sure returns of still expected rhymes, Where'er you find "the cooling western breeze," In the next line it "whispers through the trees" If crystal streams "with pleasing murmurs creep" The reader's threatened (not in vain) with "sleep" Then, at the last and only couplet fraught With some unmeaning thing they call a thought, A needless Alexandrine ends the song [ 356 ] That, like a wounded snake drags its slow length along.

Leave such to tune their own dull rhymes, and know What's roundly smooth or languishingly slow; And praise the easy vigor of a line, Where Denham's strength, and Waller's sweetness join. [ 361 ] True ease in writing comes from art, not chance, As those move easiest who have learned to dance 'Tis not enough no harshness gives offense, The sound must seem an echo to the sense. Soft is the strain when Zephyr gently blows, [ 366 ] And the smooth stream in smoother numbers flows, But when loud surges lash the sounding shore, The hoarse, rough verse should like the torrent roar, When Ajax strives some rock's vast weight to throw, The line too labors, and the words move slow; Not so, when swift Camilla scours the plain, Flies o'er the unbending corn, and skims along the main. [ 373 ] Hear how Timotheus' varied lays surprise, [ 374 ] And bid alternate passions fall and rise! While, at each change, the son of Libyan Jove [ 376 ] Now burns with glory, and then melts with love; Now his fierce eyes with sparkling fury glow, Now sighs steal out, and tears begin to flow: Persians and Greeks like turns of nature found, And the world's victor stood subdued by sound? [ 381 ] The power of music all our hearts allow, And what Timotheus was, is Dryden now.

Avoid extremes, and shun the fault of such, Who still are pleased too little or too much. At every trifle scorn to take offense, That always shows great pride, or little sense: Those heads, as stomachs, are not sure the best, Which nauseate all, and nothing can digest. Yet let not each gay turn thy rapture move; For fools admire, but men of sense approve: As things seem large which we through mist descry, Dullness is ever apt to magnify. [ 393 ]

Some foreign writers, some our own despise, The ancients only, or the moderns prize. Thus wit, like faith, by each man is applied To one small sect, and all are damned beside. Meanly they seek the blessing to confine, And force that sun but on a part to shine, Which not alone the southern wit sublimes, But ripens spirits in cold northern climes. Which from the first has shone on ages past, Enlights the present, and shall warm the last, Though each may feel increases and decays, And see now clearer and now darker days. Regard not then if wit be old or new, But blame the false, and value still the true.

Some ne'er advance a judgment of their own, But catch the spreading notion of the town, They reason and conclude by precedent, And own stale nonsense which they ne'er invent. Some judge of authors names not works, and then Nor praise nor blame the writing, but the men. Of all this servile herd the worst is he That in proud dullness joins with quality A constant critic at the great man's board, To fetch and carry nonsense for my lord What woful stuff this madrigal would be, In some starved hackney sonnetteer, or me! But let a lord once own the happy lines, How the wit brightens! how the style refines! Before his sacred name flies every fault, And each exalted stanza teems with thought!

The vulgar thus through imitation err; As oft the learned by being singular. So much they scorn the crowd that if the throng By chance go right they purposely go wrong: So schismatics the plain believers quit, And are but damned for having too much wit. Some praise at morning what they blame at night, But always think the last opinion right. A muse by these is like a mistress used, This hour she's idolized, the next abused; While their weak heads, like towns unfortified, 'Twixt sense and nonsense daily change their side. Ask them the cause, they're wiser still they say; And still to-morrow's wiser than to-day. We think our fathers fools, so wise we grow; Our wiser sons, no doubt, will think us so. Once school-divines this zealous isle o'erspread. Who knew most sentences was deepest read, [ 441 ] Faith, Gospel, all, seemed made to be disputed, And none had sense enough to be confuted: Scotists and Thomists now in peace remain, [ 444 ] Amidst their kindred cobwebs in Duck Lane. [ 445 ] If faith itself has different dresses worn, What wonder modes in wit should take their turn? Oft, leaving what is natural and fit, The current folly proves the ready wit; And authors think their reputation safe, Which lives as long as fools are pleased to laugh.

Some valuing those of their own side or mind, Still make themselves the measure of mankind: Fondly we think we honor merit then, When we but praise ourselves in other men. Parties in wit attend on those of state, And public faction doubles private hate. Pride, malice, folly against Dryden rose, In various shapes of parsons, critics, beaux; [ 459 ] But sense survived, when merry jests were past; For rising merit will buoy up at last. Might he return, and bless once more our eyes, New Blackmores and new Millbourns must arise: [ 463 ] Nay, should great Homer lift his awful head, Zoilus again would start up from the dead [ 465 ] Envy will merit, as its shade, pursue, But like a shadow, proves the substance true: For envied wit, like Sol eclipsed, makes known The opposing body's grossness, not its own. When first that sun too powerful beams displays, It draws up vapors which obscure its rays, But even those clouds at last adorn its way Reflect new glories and augment the day

Be thou the first true merit to befriend His praise is lost who stays till all commend Short is the date alas! of modern rhymes And 'tis but just to let them live betimes No longer now that golden age appears When patriarch wits survived a thousand years [ 479 ] Now length of fame (our second life) is lost And bare threescore is all even that can boast, Our sons their fathers failing language see And such as Chaucer is shall Dryden be So when the faithful pencil has designed Some bright idea of the master's mind Where a new world leaps out at his command And ready nature waits upon his hand When the ripe colors soften and unite And sweetly melt into just shade and light When mellowing years their full perfection give And each bold figure just begins to live The treacherous colors the fair art betray And all the bright creation fades away!

Unhappy wit, like most mistaken things Atones not for that envy which it brings In youth alone its empty praise we boast But soon the short lived vanity is lost. Like some fair flower the early spring supplies That gayly blooms but even in blooming dies What is this wit, which must our cares employ? The owner's wife that other men enjoy Then most our trouble still when most admired And still the more we give the more required Whose fame with pains we guard, but lose with ease, Sure some to vex, but never all to please, 'Tis what the vicious fear, the virtuous shun, By fools 'tis hated, and by knaves undone!

If wit so much from ignorance undergo, Ah! let not learning too commence its foe! Of old, those met rewards who could excel, And such were praised who but endeavored well: Though triumphs were to generals only due, Crowns were reserved to grace the soldiers too. Now they who reach Parnassus' lofty crown, Employ their pains to spurn some others down; And, while self-love each jealous writer rules, Contending wits become the sport of fools: But still the worst with most regret commend, For each ill author is as bad a friend To what base ends, and by what abject ways, Are mortals urged, through sacred lust of praise! Ah, ne'er so dire a thirst of glory boast, Nor in the critic let the man be lost Good-nature and good sense must ever join; To err is human, to forgive, divine.

But if in noble minds some dregs remain, Not yet purged off, of spleen and sour disdain; Discharge that rage on more provoking crimes, Nor fear a dearth in these flagitious times. No pardon vile obscenity should find, Though wit and art conspire to move your mind; But dullness with obscenity must prove As shameful sure as impotence in love. In the fat age of pleasure, wealth, and ease, Sprung the rank weed, and thrived with large increase: When love was all an easy monarch's care, [ 536 ] Seldom at council, never in a war Jilts ruled the state, and statesmen farces writ; Nay, wits had pensions, and young lords had wit: The fair sat panting at a courtier's play, And not a mask went unimproved away: [ 541 ] The modest fan was lifted up no more, And virgins smiled at what they blushed before. The following license of a foreign reign, [ 544 ] Did all the dregs of bold Socinus drain, [ 545 ] Then unbelieving priests reformed the nation. And taught more pleasant methods of salvation; Where Heaven's free subjects might their rights dispute, Lest God himself should seem too absolute: Pulpits their sacred satire learned to spare, And vice admired to find a flatterer there! Encouraged thus, wit's Titans braved the skies, [ 552 ] And the press groaned with licensed blasphemies. These monsters, critics! with your darts engage, Here point your thunder, and exhaust your rage! Yet shun their fault, who, scandalously nice, Will needs mistake an author into vice; All seems infected that the infected spy, As all looks yellow to the jaundiced eye.

Learn, then, what morals critics ought to show, For 'tis but half a judge's task to know. 'Tis not enough, taste, judgment, learning, join; In all you speak, let truth and candor shine: That not alone what to your sense is due All may allow, but seek your friendship too.

Be silent always, when you doubt your sense; And speak, though sure, with seeming diffidence: Some positive persisting fops we know, Who, if once wrong will needs be always so; But you, with pleasure, own your errors past, And make each day a critique on the last.

'Tis not enough your counsel still be true; Blunt truths more mischief than nice falsehoods do; Men must be taught as if you taught them not, And things unknown proposed as things forgot. Without good breeding truth is disapproved; That only makes superior sense beloved.

Be niggards of advice on no pretense; For the worst avarice is that of sense With mean complacence, ne'er betray your trust, Nor be so civil as to prove unjust Fear not the anger of the wise to raise, Those best can bear reproof who merit praise.

'Twere well might critics still this freedom take, But Appius reddens at each word you speak, [ 585 ] And stares, tremendous with a threatening eye, Like some fierce tyrant in old tapestry Fear most to tax an honorable fool Whose right it is uncensured to be dull Such, without wit are poets when they please, As without learning they can take degrees Leave dangerous truths to unsuccessful satires, And flattery to fulsome dedicators Whom, when they praise, the world believes no more, Than when they promise to give scribbling o'er.

'Tis best sometimes your censure to restrain, And charitably let the dull be vain Your silence there is better than your spite, For who can rail so long as they can write? Still humming on, their drowsy course they keep, And lashed so long like tops are lashed asleep. False steps but help them to renew the race, As after stumbling, jades will mend their pace. What crowds of these, impenitently bold, In sounds and jingling syllables grown old, Still run on poets in a raging vein, Even to the dregs and squeezing of the brain; Strain out the last dull droppings of their sense, And rhyme with all the rage of impotence!

Such shameless bards we have, and yet, 'tis true, There are as mad abandoned critics, too The bookful blockhead ignorantly read, With loads of learned lumber in his head, With his own tongue still edifies his ears, And always listening to himself appears All books he reads and all he reads assails From Dryden's Fables down to Durfey's Tales [ 617 ] With him most authors steal their works or buy; Garth did not write his own Dispensary [ 619 ] Name a new play, and he's the poets friend Nay, showed his faults—but when would poets mend? No place so sacred from such fops is barred, Nor is Paul's Church more safe than Paul's Churchyard: [ 623 ] Nay, fly to altars; there they'll talk you dead, For fools rush in where angels fear to tread Distrustful sense with modest caution speaks, It still looks home, and short excursions makes; But rattling nonsense in full volleys breaks, And, never shocked, and never turned aside. Bursts out, resistless, with a thundering tide,

But where's the man who counsel can bestow, Still pleased to teach, and yet not proud to know? Unbiased, or by favor, or in spite, Not dully prepossessed, nor blindly right; Though learned, well-bred, and though well bred, sincere, Modestly bold, and humanly severe, Who to a friend his faults can freely show, And gladly praise the merit of a foe? Blessed with a taste exact, yet unconfined; A knowledge both of books and human kind; Generous converse, a soul exempt from pride; And love to praise, with reason on his side?

Such once were critics such the happy few, Athens and Rome in better ages knew. The mighty Stagirite first left the shore, [ 645 ] Spread all his sails, and durst the deeps explore; He steered securely, and discovered far, Led by the light of the Maeonian star. [ 648 ] Poets, a race long unconfined and free, Still fond and proud of savage liberty, Received his laws, and stood convinced 'twas fit, Who conquered nature, should preside o'er wit. [ 652 ]

Horace still charms with graceful negligence, And without method talks us into sense; Will like a friend familiarly convey The truest notions in the easiest way. He who supreme in judgment as in wit, Might boldly censure, as he boldly writ, Yet judged with coolness though he sung with fire; His precepts teach but what his works inspire Our critics take a contrary extreme They judge with fury, but they write with phlegm: Nor suffers Horace more in wrong translations By wits than critics in as wrong quotations.

See Dionysius Homer's thoughts refine, [ 665 ] And call new beauties forth from every line!

Fancy and art in gay Petronius please, [ 667 ] The scholar's learning with the courtier's ease.

In grave Quintilian's copious work we find [ 669 ] The justest rules and clearest method joined: Thus useful arms in magazines we place, All ranged in order, and disposed with grace, But less to please the eye, than arm the hand, Still fit for use, and ready at command.

Thee bold Longinus! all the Nine inspire, [ 675 ] And bless their critic with a poet's fire. An ardent judge, who, zealous in his trust, With warmth gives sentence, yet is always just: Whose own example strengthens all his laws; And is himself that great sublime he draws.

Thus long succeeding critics justly reigned, License repressed, and useful laws ordained. Learning and Rome alike in empire grew; And arts still followed where her eagles flew, From the same foes at last, both felt their doom, And the same age saw learning fall, and Rome. [ 686 ] With tyranny then superstition joined As that the body, this enslaved the mind; Much was believed but little understood, And to be dull was construed to be good; A second deluge learning thus o'errun, And the monks finished what the Goths begun. [ 692 ]

At length Erasmus, that great injured name [ 693 ] (The glory of the priesthood and the shame!) Stemmed the wild torrent of a barbarous age, And drove those holy Vandals off the stage. [ 696 ]

But see! each muse, in Leo's golden days, [ 697 ] Starts from her trance and trims her withered bays, Rome's ancient genius o'er its ruins spread Shakes off the dust, and rears his reverent head Then sculpture and her sister arts revive, Stones leaped to form, and rocks began to live; With sweeter notes each rising temple rung, A Raphael painted, and a Vida sung [ 704 ] Immortal Vida! on whose honored brow The poets bays and critic's ivy grow Cremona now shall ever boast thy name As next in place to Mantua, next in fame!

But soon by impious arms from Latium chased, Their ancient bounds the banished muses passed. Thence arts o'er all the northern world advance, But critic-learning flourished most in France, The rules a nation born to serve, obeys; And Boileau still in right of Horace sways [ 714 ] But we, brave Britons, foreign laws despised, And kept unconquered and uncivilized, Fierce for the liberties of wit and bold, We still defied the Romans as of old. Yet some there were, among the sounder few Of those who less presumed and better knew, Who durst assert the juster ancient cause, And here restored wit's fundamental laws. Such was the muse, whose rule and practice tell "Nature's chief masterpiece is writing well." Such was Roscommon, not more learned than good, With manners generous as his noble blood, To him the wit of Greece and Rome was known, And every author's merit, but his own Such late was Walsh—the muse's judge and friend, Who justly knew to blame or to commend, To failings mild, but zealous for desert, The clearest head, and the sincerest heart, This humble praise, lamented shade! receive, This praise at least a grateful muse may give. The muse whose early voice you taught to sing Prescribed her heights and pruned her tender wing, (Her guide now lost) no more attempts to rise, But in low numbers short excursions tries, Content if hence the unlearned their wants may view, The learned reflect on what before they knew Careless of censure, nor too fond of fame, Still pleased to praise, yet not afraid to blame, Averse alike to flatter, or offend, Not free from faults, nor yet too vain to mend.

[Line 17: Wit is used in the poem in a great variety of meanings (1) Here it seems to mean genius or fancy , (2) in line 36 a man of fancy , (3) in line 53 the understanding or powers of the mind , (4) in line 81 it means judgment .]

[Line 26: Schools —Different systems of doctrine or philosophy as taught by particular teachers.]

[Line 34: Maevius —An insignificant poet of the Augustan age, ridiculed by Virgil in his third Eclogue and by Horace in his tenth Epode.]

[Lines 80, 81: There is here a slight inaccuracy or inconsistency, since "wit" has a different meaning in the two lines: in 80, it means fancy, in 81, judgment .]

[Line 86: The winged courser .—Pegasus, a winged horse which sprang from the blood of Medusa when Perseus cut off her head. As soon as born he left the earth and flew up to heaven, or, according to Ovid, took up his abode on Mount Helicon, and was always associated with the Muses.]

[Line 94: Parnassus .—A mountain of Phocis, which received its name from Parnassus, the son of Neptune, and was sacred to the Muses, Apollo and Bacchus.]

[Line 97: Equal steps .—Steps equal to the undertaking.]

[Line 129: The Mantuan Muse —Virgil called Maro in the next line (his full name being, Virgilius Publius Maro) born near Mantua, 70 B.C.]

[Lines 130-136: It is said that Virgil first intended to write a poem on the Alban and Roman affairs which he found beyond his powers, and then he imitated Homer:

Cum canerem reges et proelia Cynthius aurem Vellit— Virg. Ecl. VI ]

[Line 138: The Stagirite —Aristotle, born at the Greek town of Stageira on the Strymonic Gulf (Gulf of Contessa, in Turkey) 384 B.C., whose treatises on Rhetoric and the Art of Poetry were the earliest development of a Philosophy of Criticism and still continue to be studied.

The poet contradicts himself with regard to the principle he is here laying down in lines 271-272 where he laughs at Dennis for

Concluding all were desperate sots and fools Who durst depart from Aristotle's rules.]

[Line 180: Homer nods — Quandoque bonus dormitat Homerus , 'even the good Homer nods'—Horace, Epistola ad Pisones , 359.]

[Lines 183, 184: Secure from flames .—The poet probably alludes to such fires as those in which the Alexandrine and Palatine Libraries were destroyed. From envy's fiercer rage .—Probably he alludes to the writings of such men as Maevius (see note to line 34) and Zoilus, a sophist and grammarian of Amphipolis, who distinguished himself by his criticism on Isocrates, Plato, and Homer, receiving the nickname of Homeromastic (chastiser of Homer). Destructive war —Probably an allusion to the irruption of the barbarians into the south of Europe. And all-involving age ; that is, time. This is usually explained as an allusion to 'the long reign of ignorance and superstition in the cloisters,' but it is surely far-fetched, and more than the language will bear.]

[Lines 193, 194:

'Round the whole world this dreaded name shall sound, And reach to worlds that must not yet be found,"—COWLEY.]

[Line 216: The Pierian spring —A fountain in Pieria, a district round Mount Olympus and the native country of the Muses.]

[Line 248: And even thine, O Rome. —The dome of St Peter's Church, designed by Michael Angelo.]

[Line 267: La Mancha's Knight .—Don Quixote, a fictitious Spanish knight, the hero of a book written (1605) by Cervantes, a Spanish writer.]

[Line 270: Dennis, the son of a saddler in London, born 1657, was a mediocre writer, and rather better critic of the time, with whom Pope came a good deal into collision. Addison's tragedy of Cato , for which Pope had written a prologue, had been attacked by Dennis. Pope, to defend Addison, wrote an imaginary report, pretending to be written by a notorious quack mad-doctor of the day, entitled The Narrative of Dr. Robert Norris on the Frenz of F. D. Dennis replied to it by his Character of Mr. Pope . Ultimately Pope gave him a place in his Dunciad , and wrote a prologue for his benefit.]

[Line 308: On content .—On trust, a common use of the word in Pope's time.]

[Lines 311, 312: Prismatic glass .—A glass prism by which light is refracted, and the component rays, which are of different colors being refracted at different angles show what is called a spectrum or series of colored bars, in the order violet, indigo, blue, green, yellow, orange, red.]

[Line 328: Fungoso —One of the characters in Ben Jonson's Every Man out of his Humor who assumed the dress and tried to pass himself off for another.]

[Line 356: Alexandrine —A line of twelve syllables, so called from a French poem on the Life of Alexander the Great, written in that meter. The poet gives a remarkable example in the next line.]

[Line 361: Sir John Denham, a poet of the time of Charles I. (1615-1668). His verse is characterized by considerable smoothness and ingenuity of rhythm, with here and there a passage of some force—Edmund Waller (1606-1687) is celebrated as one of the refiners of English poetry. His rank among English poets, however, is very subordinate.]

[Line 366: Zephyr .—Zephyrus, the west wind personified by the poets and made the most mild and gentle of the sylvan deities.]

[Lines 366-373: In this passage the poet obviously intended to make "the sound seem an echo to the sense". The success of the attempt has not been very complete except in the second two lines, expressing the dash and roar of the waves, and in the last two, expressing the skimming, continuous motion of Camilla. What he refers to is the onomatopoeia of Homer and Virgil in the passages alluded to. Ajax , the son of Telamon, was, next to Achilles, the bravest of all the Greeks in the Trojan war. When the Greeks were challenged by Hector he was chosen their champion and it was in their encounter that he seized a huge stone and hurled it at Hector.

Thus rendered by Pope himself:

"Then Ajax seized the fragment of a rock Applied each nerve, and swinging round on high, With force tempestuous let the ruin fly The huge stone thundering through his buckler broke."

Camilla , queen of the Volsci, was brought up in the woods, and, according to Virgil, was swifter than the winds. She led an army to assist Turnus against Aeneas.

"Dura pan, cursuque pedum praevertere ventos. Illa vel intactae segetis per summa volaret Gramina nec teneras cursu laesisset aristas; Vel mare per medium fluctu suspensa tumenti, Ferret iter, celeres nec tingeret aequore plantas." Aen . vii 807-811.

Thus rendered by Dryden.

"Outstripped the winds in speed upon the plain, Flew o'er the fields, nor hurt the bearded grain; She swept the seas, and as she skimmed along, Her flying feet unbathed on billows hung"]

[Lines 374-381: This passage refers to Dryden's ode, Alexander's Feast , or The Power of Music . Timotheus, mentioned in it, was a musician of Boeotia, a favorite of Alexander's, not the great musician Timotheus, who died before Alexander was born, unless, indeed, Dryden have confused the two.]

[Line 376: The son of Libyan Jove .—A title arrogated to himself by Alexander.]

[Line 393: Dullness here 'seems to be incorrectly used. Ignorance is apt to magnify, but dullness reposes in stolid indifference.']

[Line 441: Sentences —Passages from the Fathers of the Church who were regarded as decisive authorities on all disputed points of doctrine.]

[Line 444: Scotists —The disciples of Duns Scotus, one of the most famous and influential of the scholastics of the fourteenth century, who was opposed to Thomas Aquinas (1224-1274), another famous scholastic, regarding the doctrines of grace and the freedom of the will, but especially the immaculate conception of the Virgin. The followers of the latter were called Thomists, between whom and the Scotists bitter controversies were carried on.]

[Line 445: Duck Lane .—A place near Smithfield where old books were sold. The cobwebs were kindred to the works of these controversialists, because their arguments were intricate and obscure. Scotus is said to have demolished two hundred objections to the doctrine of the immaculate conception, and established it by a cloud of proofs.]

[Line 459: Parsons .—This is an allusion to Jeremy Collier, the author of A Short View etc, of the English Stage . Critics, beaux .—This to the Duke of Buckingham, the author of The Rehearsal .]

[Line 463: Blackmore , Sir Richard (1652-1729), one of the court physicians and the writer of a great deal of worthless poetry. He attacked the dramatists of the time generally and Dryden individually, and is the Quack Maurus of Dryden's prologue to The Secular Masque . Millbourn , Rev. Luke, who criticised Dryden; which criticism, although sneered at by Pope, is allowed to have been judicious and decisive.]

[Line 465: Zoilus . See note on line 183.]

[Line 479: Patriarch wits —Perhaps an allusion to the great age to which the antediluvian patriarchs of the Bible lived.]

[Line 536: An easy monarch .—Charles II.]

[Line 541: At that time ladies went to the theater in masks.]

[Line 544: A foreign reign .—The reign of the foreigner, William III.]

[Line 545: Socinus .—The reaction from the fanaticism of the Puritans, who held extreme notions of free grace and satisfaction, by resolving all Christianity into morality, led the way to the introduction of Socinianism, the most prominent feature of which is the denial of the existence of the Trinity.]

[Line 552: Wit's Titans .—The Titans, in Greek mythology, were the children of Uranus (heaven) and Gaea (earth), and of gigantic size. They engaged in a conflict with Zeus, the king of heaven, which lasted ten years. They were completely defeated, and hurled down into a dungeon below Tartarus. Very often they are confounded with the Giants, as has apparently been done here by Pope. These were a later progeny of the same parents, and in revenge for what had been done to the Titans, conspired to dethrone Zeus. In order to scale heaven, they piled Mount Ossa upon Pelion, and would have succeeded in their attempt if Zeus had not called in the assistance of his son Hercules.]

[Line 585: Appius .—He refers to Dennis (see note to verse 270) who had published a tragedy called Appius and Virginia . He retaliated for these remarks by coarse personalities upon Pope, in his criticism of this poem.]

[Line 617: Durfey's Tales .—Thomas D'Urfey, the author (in the reign of Charles II.) of a sequel in five acts of The Rehearsal , a series of sonnets entitled Pills to Purge Melancholy , the Tales here alluded to, etc. He was a very inferior poet, although Addison pleaded for him.]

[Line 619: Garth, Dr. , afterwards Sir Samuel (born 1660) an eminent physician and a poet of considerable reputation He is best known as the author of The Dispensary , a poetical satire on the apothecaries and physicians who opposed the project of giving medicine gratuitously to the sick poor. The poet alludes to a slander current at the time with regard to the authorship of the poem.]

[Line 623: St Paul's Churchyard , before the fire of London, was the headquarters of the booksellers.]

[Lines 645, 646: See note on line 138.]

[Line 648: The Maeonian star .—Homer, supposed by some to have been born in Maeonia, a part of Lydia in Asia Minor, and whose poems were the chief subject of Aristotle's criticism.]

[Line 652: Who conquered nature —He wrote, besides his other works, treatises on Astronomy, Mechanics, Physics, and Natural History.]

[Line 665: Dionysius , born at Halicarnassus about 50 B.C., was a learned critic, historian, and rhetorician at Rome in the Augustan age.]

[Line 667: Petronius .—A Roman voluptuary at the court of Nero whose ambition was to shine as a court exquisite. He is generally supposed to be the author of certain fragments of a comic romance called Petronii Arbitri Satyricon .]

[Line 669: Quintilian , born in Spain 40 A.D. was a celebrated teacher of rhetoric and oratory at Rome. His greatwork is De Institutione Oratorica , a complete system of rhetoric, which is here referred to.]

[Line 675: Longinus , a Platonic philosopher and famous rhetorician, born either in Syria or at Athens about 213 A.D., was probably the best critic of antiquity. From his immense knowledge, he was called "a living library" and "walking museum," hence the poet speaks of him as inspired by all the Nine —Muses that is. These were Clio, the muse of History, Euterpe, of Music, Thaleia, of Pastoral and Comic Poetry and Festivals, Melpomene, of Tragedy, Terpsichore, of Dancing, Erato, of Lyric and Amorous Poetry, Polyhymnia, of Rhetoric and Singing, Urania, of Astronomy, Calliope, of Eloquence and Heroic Poetry.]

[Line 686: Rome .—For this pronunciation (to rhyme with doom ) he has Shakespeare's example as precedent.]

[Line 692: Goths .—A powerful nation of the Germanic race, which, originally from the Baltic, first settled near the Black Sea, and then overran and took an important part in the subversion of the Roman empire. They were distinguished as Ostro Goths (Eastern Goths) on the shores of the Black Sea, the Visi Goths (Western Goths) on the Danube, and the Moeso Goths, in Moesia ]

[Line 693: Erasmus .—A Dutchman (1467-1536), and at one time a Roman Catholic priest, who acted as tutor to Alexander Stuart, a natural son of James IV. of Scotland as professor of Greek for a short time at Oxford, and was the most learned man of his time. His best known work is his Colloquia , which contains satirical onslaughts on monks, cloister life, festivals, pilgrimages etc.]

[Line 696: Vandals .—A race of European barbarians, who first appear historically about the second century, south of the Baltic. They overran in succession Gaul, Spain, and Italy. In 455 they took and plundered Rome, and the way they mutilated and destroyed the works of art has become a proverb, hence the monks are compared to them in their ignorance of art and science.]

[Line 697: Leo .—Leo X., or the Great (1513-1521), was a scholar himself, and gave much encouragement to learning and art.]

[Line 704: Raphael (1483-1520), an Italian, is almost universally regarded as the greatest of painters. He received much encouragement from Leo. Vida —A poet patronised by Leo. He was the son of poor parents at Cremona (see line 707), which therefore the poet says, would be next in fame to Mantua, the birthplace of Virgil as it was next to it in place.

"Mantua vae miserae nimium vicina Cremona."—Virg.]

[Line 714: Boileau .—An illustrious French poet (1636-1711), who wrote a poem on the Art of Poetry, which is copiously imitated by Pope in this poem.]

[Lines 723, 724: Refers to the Duke of Buckingham's Essay on Poetry which had been eulogized also by Dryden and Dr. Garth.]

[Line 725: Roscommon , the Earl of, a poet, who has the honor to be the first critic who praised Milton's Paradise Lost , died 1684.]

[Line 729: Walsh .—An indifferent writer, to whom Pope owed a good deal, died 1710.]

Deeply Rooted: An Analysis of How College-Aged Women View Body Hair and Body Hair Removal

Lexi Abrams Vanderbilt University

This study seeks to explore the ways in which college-aged women view body hair and body hair removal. Drawing from interviews with ten undergraduate women at Vanderbilt University, between the ages of 19 and 21, this essay suggests that there appears to be a cognitive dissonance when it comes to young women's views on body hair removal. Throughout this study, participants acknowledged the burdens of body hair removal, whether those be financial, physical, or social. They also understood how the ideas around body hair removal are inherently tied to racism, misogyny, and classism. And yet, they report that they feel bound to continue removing their body hair in order to fit in and conform to societal standards. A lack of body hair is linked to feelings of confidence, desirability, and greater sexual function. Participants expressed how having little to no body hair is often an expectation while engaging in sexual activities, although these expectations may fluctuate depending on the nature of the sexual relationship. Although this study is no way statistically significant, these ten interviews revealed important findings about how young, college-educated women understand and engage with body hair removal. These findings speak to how far we as a society have come with body hair removal, and how much farther we need to go.

More information about the publishing system, Platform and Workflow by OJS/PKP.

Maps & Directions
Search Stanford
Terms of Use
Emergency Info

An Essay on Criticism

By alexander pope.

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

View all journals
My Account Login
Explore content
About the journal
Publish with us
Sign up for alerts
Open access
Published: 13 April 2024

Novel collector design and optimized photo-fenton model for sustainable industry textile wastewater treatment

Heba A. El-Gawad 1 ,
Montaser Y. Ghaly 2 , 3 ,
N. F. El Hussieny 4 ,
M. Abdel Kreem 4 &
Y. Reda 2

Scientific Reports volume 14 , Article number: 8573 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

Metrics details

Engineering
Environmental sciences

Textile industry wastewater containing toxic dyes and high COD poses environmental hazards and requires treatment before discharge. This study addresses the challenge of treating complex textile wastewater using a novel integrated system. The system combines sedimentation, screening, adsorption, and an optimized solar photo-Fenton process to provide a sustainable treatment solution. A novel parabolic collector with a larger absorber tube diameter enhances solar radiation utilization at lower catalyst concentrations. This design is versatile, treating all types of wastewaters, especially those that contain colors, smells, solid and suspended materials, in addition to its importance for the treatment of difficult substances that may be present in industrial and sewage wastewaters that are difficult to dispose of by traditional treatment methods. Multivariate experiments optimized key photo-Fenton parameters (pH, catalyst dose, etc.) achieving significant pollutant removal (85% COD, 82% TOC, complete color) under specific conditions (pH 3, 0.2 g/L Fe(II), 1 mL/L H 2 O 2 , 40 °C and 100 L/h flow rate after 60 min irradiation). Kinetic modeling revealed second-order reaction kinetics, and multivariate regression analysis led to the development of models predicting treatment efficiency based on process factors. The key scientific contributions are the integrated system design combining conventional and advanced oxidation technologies, novel collector configuration for efficient utilization of solar radiation, comprehensive process optimization through multivariate experiments, kinetic modeling and predictive modeling relating process factors to pollutant degradation. This provides an economical green solution for textile wastewater treatment and reuse along with useful design guidelines. The treatment methodology and modeling approach make valuable additions for sustainable management of textile industry wastewater.

Introduction

Textile industry wastewater generated from dyeing and finishing processes poses a significant environmental challenge due to its high pollutant load and recalcitrant nature. It is characterized by high chemical oxygen demand (COD), intense coloration, and the presence of toxic synthetic dyes 1 , 2 , 3 . Conventional biological methods have limited efficiency for treatment of such wastewater. Although physico-chemical techniques like coagulation, precipitation and adsorption can remove some pollutants, they have disadvantages like sludge generation requiring additional treatment and disposal 4 , 5 .

Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) using hydroxyl radicals have emerged as a promising technology for treating textile wastewater through oxidative degradation of organics. Processes such as O 3 /H 2 O 2 , UV/H 2 O 2 , UV/O 3 and photocatalysis using TiO 2 have been studied 6 , 7 . Among AOPs, the solar photo-Fenton process has attracted attention as a green, economical alternative leveraging natural sunlight and catalyzed H 2 O 2 for wastewater treatment 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 .

Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) offer promising wastewater treatment due to their high efficiency, broad applicability, rapid degradation rates, and environmental friendliness compared to other methods 13 . Though, their initial and operational costs can be high. Integrating AOPs with physicochemical and/or biological techniques offers a cost-effective and sustainable solution for wastewater remediation and clean water production.

Despite adsorption boasts advantages in simplicity and cost-effectiveness 13 , 14 , 15 , its limitations include incomplete pollutant removal, particularly for complex wastewater, slow processing times, and the need for continuous adsorbent regeneration. Integrating adsorption with AOPs can overcome this limitation by combining adsorption's removal capacity with AOPs' degradation capabilities for effective pollutant removal 16 .

AOPs can regenerate spent adsorbents in adsorption by degrading pollutants 17 . This combined approach can even be designed for simultaneous operation and improved mass transfer, leading to synergistic pollutant degradation 16 , 18 , 19 .

Despite prior work, major knowledge gaps persist in implementing solar photo-Fenton for textile wastewater treatment:

Lack of studies on an integrated system combining conventional and AOP technologies for overall effectiveness and cost savings 20 .

Limited reactor designs and non-optimal operational conditions leading to inefficient utilization of solar irradiation 21 , 22 .

Deficiencies in process optimization to maximize pollutant degradation through key factors like pH, catalyst dose, H 2 O 2 concentration and temperature 23 , 24 .

Absence of kinetic analysis and predictive modelling relating process params to treatment efficiency 25 , 26 . For that reason, the objectives of this study are:

To design an innovative integrated wastewater treatment system incorporating sedimentation, screening, adsorption, and optimized solar photo-Fenton oxidation.

To implement a novel parabolic collector reactor enabling effective radiation capture.

To optimize the operational params of solar photo-Fenton through multivariate experimental design.

To perform kinetic modelling and develop efficiency prediction models for the process through regression analysis.

The integrated system and modeling approach aim to provide an economical green solution for textile industry wastewater treatment and reuse. For giving the research more credibility and realism, a real wastewater from an important local industry from an industrial area in Egypt for textile industries was selected as a case study. This wastewater was used without any dilution or pretreatment.

The key innovations and contributions of this manuscript are:

Design of an integrated wastewater treatment system incorporating both conventional processes (sedimentation, screening, adsorption) and advanced oxidation processes (solar photo-Fenton) for efficient treatment of textile industry effluent.

Optimization of operational params for the solar photo-Fenton process, including irradiation time, pH, Fe(II) dosage, H 2 O 2 concentration, temperature, and flow rate to achieve high removal efficiencies for COD, TOC and colour.

Use of an innovative compound parabolic collector with increased absorber tube diameter for the solar photo-Fenton reactor. This allowed effective radiation absorption with lower catalyst concentrations, reducing capital costs.

Kinetic analysis of COD removal indicating conformance to 2nd order reaction kinetics for the solar photo-Fenton process.

Development of efficiency prediction models/correlations for the photo-Fenton process through multivariate regression analysis using least squares method. These models relate process factors like Fe(II) dose, H 2 O 2 , pH, temperature and flow rate to removal efficiencies.

The essence of the contribution lies in providing a comprehensive and optimized treatment methodology integrating conventional and advanced oxidation processes for effective treatment of recalcitrant textile wastewater. The integrated system design, process optimization, novel collector reactor configuration, kinetic modelling, and development of predictive models offer a valuable framework for industrial implementation of solar photo-Fenton for wastewater treatment and reuse in the textile sector.

Experimental work

Materials utilized.

GP grad chemicals namely, ferrous sulfate (FeSO 4 ・7H 2 O) which is named as Fenton reagent, sulfuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ), (30% w/v) hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ), activated charcoal (0.25 micro particle size), chlorine (Cl 2 ) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) were used without any purification were offered by Merck.

Source of wastewater

This study utilized real wastewater obtained from an industrial textile plant in gathered from a plant in El Sadat City Desert, Menofia Governorate, Egypt as a case study. Approximately 1000 m 3 of untreated wastewater per d was discharged into a nearby pond by the mill. The wastewater exhibited significant pollution levels, including high concentrations of suspended particles and organic contaminants. Samples were collected directly from the outlet pipe without any additional treatment. The characterization and analysis of these effluents, including params such as chemical oxygen demand (COD), total organic carbon (TOC), and other physicochemical properties, were conducted following the procedures described in Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (1998) 27 and Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (APHA, AWWA, 2005) 28 . Table 1 exhibits some of the important properties and params of the wastewater.

In this investigation, a laboratory bench-scale unit was developed to treat wastewater effluent from a textile factory. The objective was to treat the wastewater and make it suitable for irrigation purposes in the large surrounding area. Figure 1 a,b elucidates the schematic diagram of the process and a photograph of the integrated experimental setup that was designed for this purpose.

( a ) and ( b ). Schematic diagram and a photo of the integrated designed experimental set-up.

A bench-scale treatment unit designed for reusing treated textile wastewater for irrigation (Fig. 2 ) utilizes multiple stages. First, a 10 L propylene sedimentation tank removes large solids. A 3 cm diameter screener with fine pores (0.06–0.25 inches) captures floating pollutants. Activated carbon pretreatment (10 cm diameter, 26 cm height, 0.25-micron particles) removes color, odor, and organic load. The core treatment involves a solar photocatalytic oxidation unit that combines adsorption and oxidation of persistent pollutants. Wastewater is mixed with Fenton reagent (catalyst) and H 2 O 2 (oxidant) in a 10 L mixing tank equipped with a mixer for homogenous blending. A non-concentrating parabolic reflector (4 m 2 surface area) collects UV light. The reaction chamber is a 1.5 m long, 5 cm diameter transparent glass tube reactor tilted 30° south for optimal sun exposure 29 , 32 . A peristaltic pump circulates the wastewater through a closed loop around the illuminated area of the photoreactor. The flow system utilizes polytetrafluoroethylene or glass tubing and connectors.

The components of concentrating parabolic collector (CPC): ( a ) Reactor tube, ( b ) CPC mirror, and ( c ) CPC reflector.

Pretreatment steps

The real textile wastewater undergoes a multi-stage treatment process for progressive purification. First, sedimentation removes heavy particles, followed by screening to eliminate lighter matter. Activated charcoal filters then remove Odors and some organic pollutants through adsorption. Finally, the pretreated wastewater enters a storage tank where Fe(II) (catalyst) and H 2 O 2 (oxidant) are added for the photo-Fenton process. Samples are collected throughout the treatment to monitor effectiveness (COD, TOC, colour).

Photo-catalytic oxidation step

For further analysis, a separate 7L batch of wastewater underwent photo-Fenton treatment in a laboratory unit. The wastewater's pH was adjusted and maintained using sulfuric acid or sodium hydroxide. The required Fenton reagent was mixed for 10 min in the illuminated section of the reactor. Hydrogen peroxide was continuously injected to sustain the reaction between H 2 O 2 and Fe(II) ions. The initiation of the dosing pump and the start of hydrogen peroxide addition were considered as time zero. The dosage of hydrogen peroxide was calculated based on the stoichiometric ratio in relation to COD 30 . The solution was circulated at a flow rate of 100 L/h with a total suspension volume of 4 L in the entire system. The volume exposed to light (irradiated volume) was 3.5 L, which corresponds to the amount of solution held within the glass tubes. The experiment mimicked real-world conditions by utilizing natural sunlight between 11 AM and 3 PM during clear summer months (August–September). Solar radiation intensity was measured using a meteorological station located in the Solar Energy Department of the NRC in Egypt. Variations in sunlight intensity were accounted for by conducting and comparing results from multiple test sets. The UV intensity ranged between 3.5 and 4 W/m 2 , corresponding to roughly 30% of the total solar irradiation power.

Analytical methods

To ensure accurate analysis and halt the ongoing photo-Fenton reaction, samples from each treatment step and the reaction vessel were collected regularly and immediately quenched with NaOH because solar photo-Fenton processes cannot occur at a pH above 10 33 . This step also neutralized any residual hydrogen peroxide, preventing further reactions with organic matter throughout the analysis process. TOC was measured using a Shimadzu-TOC analyzer 5000, pH with a WTW pH-meter 537, and COD using a Firma Lange LT 148 digester following standard protocols (details provided in the reference). Finally, color removal was determined by measuring absorbance at the dye's specific wavelength (λ max = 530 nm) using a PD-303 UV spectrophotometer and calculating the concentration based on a calibration curve. This approach ensured accurate and well-controlled sample analysis throughout the experiment.

Ethical approval

All authors have read this manuscript and would like to have it considered exclusively for publication in this journal. None of the material related to this manuscript has been published or is under consideration for publication elsewhere, including the internet.

Consent to participate

All authors have read this manuscript and contributed to the study.

Consent to publish

All authors would like to have it considered exclusively for publication in this journal.

Results and discussion

Pretreatment processes.

Following a multi-step pretreatment (sedimentation, screening, and adsorption) as described in the experimental section, the studied wastewater achieved colour removal of 50%, COD removal of 25%, and TOC removal of 20% (Table 2 ). This treatment, while achieving some level of purification, falls short of the required removal efficiencies for safe disposal, necessitating further treatment with AOP. This finding highlights the limitations of standalone pretreatment in meeting stringent wastewater discharge regulations and emphasizes the need for additional, advanced treatment steps.

Advanced oxidation process by solar photo-fenton process

The solar photo-Fenton process was selected as a homogeneous photo-catalytic advanced oxidation process for this study. The objective was to investigate the impact of several influential params on the efficiency of the process. These params include sunlight intensity, pH level, initial concentration of Fe(II), amount of H 2 O 2 , flow rate of the dye solution, temperature, and irradiation time. The aim was to determine the ideal operating conditions that would maximize the removal percentages of colour, COD, and TOC.

Effect of solar radiation

Prior to evaluation of solar decolorization and degradation of the wastewater using Dark Fenton process and photo-Fenton process, control experiment was carried out under sunlight in the absence of Fenton reagent. The experiment was conducted at the same operating conditions and same initial concentrations of COD, TOC, and pH. A control experiment under sunlight without Fenton reagent revealed minimal color reduction (less than 15%) and modest COD/TOC reductions (9% and 6%, respectively) after 180 min. This suggests the wastewater's resistance to solar photolysis alone. Interestingly, the presence of Fenton reagent in the dark (Dark Fenton) also led to lower removals of color, COD, and TOC. This might be attributed to the adsorption of pollutants onto the surface of Fe(II) ions in the Fenton process, which aligns with observations from previous research 34 . These findings emphasize the crucial role of the Fenton reaction in driving the significant pollutant degradation observed in the photo-Fenton process.

Investigating the effect of solar light, two experimental runs were carried out using Fenton reaction one of them is in the dark and the other one in the presence of natural sunlight. Figure 3 elucidates comparison in the effectiveness for removal of colour against irradiation time with using the photo-Fenton process. Figure 4 depicts the effect of solar light in the photo- Fenton method on both COD and TOC removals comparing with that in dark process.

Influence of solar light on % colour removal: [Fe(II) = 0.2 gm/L, H 2 O 2 = 1mL/L, temperature = 40 °C, and flow rate = 100 L/h].

Influence of solar light on % removal of COD and TOC: [Fe(II) = 0.2 gm/L, H 2 O 2 = 1mL/L, temperature = 40 °C, irradiation time = 60 min, and flow rate = 100 L/h].

Balancing cost and efficiency are crucial in the photo-Fenton process. While shorter treatment durations are desirable for economic reasons, insufficient irradiation can leave behind partially degraded pollutants, hindering COD and TOC reduction. Additionally, high residual H 2 O 2 at short treatment times can further decrease efficiency 35 . Conversely, extending exposure to UV light enables the generation of additional free radicals through various reactions, potentially enhancing degradation 36 , 37 . Our findings support this notion. As demonstrated in Fig. 3 , complete color removal occurred within 40 min of solar irradiation compared to 98% removal after one h using the dark Fenton reaction. Similarly, Fig. 4 reveals that maximum COD and TOC removals (85% and 82%, respectively) were achieved at one h of solar irradiation, while the dark Fenton reaction attained 69% and 62% removal within the same timeframe.

Effect of pH

The photo-Fenton process relies heavily on pH for optimal hydroxyl radical formation, which are crucial oxidants. The acidic nature of the solution affects the rate of hydroxyl radical formation and the type of iron species present 38 . Acidic environments promote the generation of these radicals 39 .

To investigate the impact of pH, experiments were conducted at various pH levels (3–10) with fixed reaction time, H 2 O 2 concentration, Fe(II) dose, temperature, and flow rate. As shown in Fig. 5 , increasing pH from 3 to 10 leads to a decline in dye removal, COD removal, and TOC removal. This decrease is attributed to a combination of factors: reduced hydroxyl radical concentration at higher pH 36 , iron precipitation as Fe(OH) 3 above pH 4 (limiting Fe(II) availability and light transmission), and the decomposition of H 2 O 2 into water and oxygen by Fe(OH) 3 40 . As well, hydroxyl radical oxidation potential weakens with increasing pH. Notably, dye removal efficiency drops significantly beyond pH 6 (reaching 67.45% at pH 10) due to the formation of ferric hydroxide complexes that hinder H 2 O 2 hydrolysis by ferric iron. Our findings align with previous work by Lucas and Peres 41 and Tabarek A. Sajjad 36 , who also identified pH 3 as optimal for dye removal. Lower pH may decrease activity due to the formation of various iron complexes in solution, affecting light absorption by Fe(II) 10 , 35 . Consequently, all experiments in this study were conducted at pH 3.

Influence of pH on % removal of colour, COD and TOC: [Fe(II) = 0.2 gm/L, temperature = 40 °C, irradiation time = 60 min, H 2 O 2 = 1mL/L, and flow rate = 100 L/h].

Effect of initial amount of Fe(II)

The solar photo-Fenton process, often employing sunlight or UV lamps as the photon source, relies on two crucial factors for optimal efficiency: hydrogen peroxide dosage and iron concentration. Hydrogen peroxide acts as an oxidant, vital for complete pollutant degradation. Conversely, iron facilitates the generation of highly reactive hydroxyl radicals (OH • ) through the Fenton reaction, a process more efficient under acidic conditions 42 , 43 , 44 .

The solar photo-Fenton process relies on the generation of hydroxyl radicals (OH • ) for efficient pollutant degradation. As depicted in Eq. ( 1 ), hydrogen peroxide reacts with Fe(II) salts to initiate this process. Further OH • production can occur through the photolysis of various iron species and hydrogen peroxide (Eqs. 2 – 6 ) 12 . Maintaining optimal concentrations of both hydrogen peroxide and Fe(II) is crucial, as excess amounts can scavenge OH • radicals, hindering overall treatment effectiveness.

Determining optimal reagent concentrations is often achieved through multivariate experimental design. This approach systematically varies hydrogen peroxide and iron concentrations while maintaining other params constant, allowing researchers to study their impact on degradation efficiency.

Figure 6 exemplifies this approach, illustrating the influence of varying Fe(II) concentrations on COD and TOC removal, representing degradation and mineralization, respectively. Results showed that an Fe(II) concentration of 0.2 g/L achieved the highest percentage removals of COD (85%), TOC (82%), and colour (100%). Conversely, with no Fe(II) present, the removal efficiencies were significantly lower (22% COD, 18% TOC, and 40% colour) after 60 min using H 2 O 2 under sunlight.

Influence of initial Fe(II) concentration on % removal of colour, COD and TOC: [pH = 3, temperature = 40 °C, irradiation time = 60 min, H 2 O 2 = 1mL/L, and flow rate = 100 L/h].

While higher Fe(II) concentrations generally enhance removal efficiency, an excessive presence can decrease mineralization yield. This decline is potentially attributed to the formation of short-lived intermediate iron(IV) species (Ferryl iron, FeO 2+ ), which may hinder OH • generation crucial for organic matter oxidation (Eqs. 7 – 9 ) 42 .

The observed increase in treatment efficacy with increasing Fe(II) concentration can be explained by the generation of more OH • radicals through additional photo-Fenton reactions. This translates to a faster dye removal rate 45 . Secondly, higher Fe(II) doses not only ensure a complete redox reaction but also contribute to coagulation due to their presence, acting as both catalysts and coagulants 46 , 47 .

Effect of initial hydrogen peroxide concentration

To investigate the impact of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) dosage on the photocatalytic degradation of wastewater using a solar photo-Fenton process, researchers conducted experiments with varying H 2 O 2 concentrations while maintaining constant pH and initial Fe(II) levels. As shown in Fig. 7 , increasing H 2 O 2 from 0 ppm to 1 mL/L significantly enhanced the removal of COD, TOC, and colour due to increased generation of hydroxyl radicals 31 , 48 , 49 .

Influence of H 2 O 2 amount on % removal of colour, COD and TOC: [pH = 3, temperature = 40 °C, irradiation time = 60 min, Fe(II) = 0.2 gm/L, and flow rate = 100 L/h].

Increasing H 2 O 2 dosage to 1.2 mL/L yielded minimal improvement, suggesting diminishing returns for the additional oxidant consumption. Notably, all treatments achieved near-complete colour removal (100%), significant COD reduction (85%), and acceptable TOC reduction (82%) within 60 min of irradiation. Interestingly, exceeding 1.2 mL/L H 2 O 2 led to a slowdown in degradation, likely due to factors like H 2 O 2 auto-decomposition into oxygen and water, OH • radical recombination (Eqs. 10 , 11) 24 and scavenging by excess H 2 O 2 itself 36 , 50 , 51 . Excess H 2 O 2 reacts with OH • radicals, competing with organic contaminants and reducing treatment effectiveness (Eq. 12 ) 24 . So, the optimal H 2 O 2 concentration for this specific wastewater was determined to be 1 mL/L, with the caveat that the optimal dose can vary depending on the wastewater characteristics and iron concentration used.

Effect of temperature

While the room temperature photo-Fenton process is common, investigating the impact of elevated temperatures relevant to the textile industry (60–90 °C) was crucial 41 , 52 . This study explored the effect of temperature (25–60 °C) on the removal of dye, COD, and TOC. Figure 8 reveals a significant rise in removal efficiency as the temperature increased from 25 to 40 °C, reaching a maximum of 100% for colour, 85% for COD, and 82% for TOC at 40 °C. This enhancement can be attributed to the accelerated interaction between organic material and hydroxyl radicals at higher temperatures 36 . Increasing the temperature to 60 °C resulted in a decrease in removal efficiency, likely due to hydrogen peroxide decomposition 53 , as depicted in Eq. ( 13 ). This emphasizes the importance of considering temperature's influence on both degradation and compound stability, even though higher temperatures can enhance reaction rates and generation of OH • radicals 54 , these findings emphasize the importance of considering temperature's influence on both compound stability and degradation.

Influence of temperature on % removal of colour, COD and TOC: [pH = 3, H 2 O 2 = 1mL/L, irradiation time = 60 min, Fe(II) = 0.2 gm/L, and flow rate = 100 L/h].

Consistent with prior studies 36 , 55 , 56 , this investigation identified 40 °C as the optimal temperature for dye removal using the photo-Fenton process.

Temperature also serves as a significant kinetic factor in boosting the colour and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal from contaminated water. To assess the impact of temperature variations on the kinetics of COD removal, while maintaining other operational params constant, the treated solution was subjected to different temperatures. The findings depicted in Fig. 9 demonstrate an increase in the rate constant (k) as the reaction temperature rises from 25 to 40 °C.

ln [C t ] vs. irradiation time at different temperatures [pH = 3, H 2 O 2 = 1mL/L, Fe(II) = 0.2 gm/L, and flow rate = 100 L/h].

The relationship between the rate constant and temperature is described by the Arrhenius equation, which is used to model the effect of temperature on reaction rates. This relationship is illustrated in Fig. 10 .

where k is the rate constant, A is the frequency factor, E a is an activation energy, and R is ideal gas constant. Activation energy calculated in plot was equal 10.66 kJ/mole.

Arrhenius plot of COD removal [pH = 3, H 2 O 2 = 1mL/L, Fe(II) = 0.2 gm/L, and flow rate = 100 L/h].

Effect of flow rate

To evaluate the impact of dye solution flow rate on dye removal, COD removal, and TOC removal percentages, the flow rate was varied between 100 and 400 L/h, which represents a pilot-scale process. The effect of flow rate on colour, COD, and TOC removal percentages was studied under the following conditions: pH 3, 40 °C, 60 min of irradiation time, 0.2 gm/L of Fe(II) dose, and 1 mL/L of H 2 O 2 amount, as shown in Fig. 11 . The highest colour (100%), COD (85%), and TOC (82%) removal percentages were achieved at a flow rate of 100 L/h. Figure 11 also demonstrated that increasing the flow rate from 100 to 400 L/h resulted in a decrease in colour, COD, and TOC removal percentages. This suggests an inverse proportionality between flow rate and colour removal efficiency. When the polluted solution's flow rate is increased, the UV light is exposed for a shorter period, necessitating a decrease in the amount of H 2 O 2 to produce more hydroxyl radicals (OH • ), as these results confirm 36 , 57 .

Influence of dye solution flow rate on % removal of colour, COD and TOC: [pH = 3, H 2 O 2 = 1mL/L, irradiation time = 60 min, Fe(II) = 0.2 gm/L, and temperature = 40 °C].

The data on COD concentrations were tested using various kinetic models to determine the best fit. The 1st and 2nd order kinetic models take on linear formulas that are expressed in the equations below:

where C o and C t are the premier and final chromium concentrations, respectively. K 1 and K 2 are 1st and 2nd order rate constants in min −1 and L gm −1 min −1 , respectively, and t is the treatment time (in min). Plots of ln C t and [ $\frac{1}{Ct}-\frac{1}{Co}$ ] versus time for each run resulted in straight lines, with slopes equal to the rate constants K 1 and K 2 , respectively. Table 3 reveals adequate results for the COD removal kinetics. The results confirm that the COD removal kinetic obeys pseudo-2nd-order kinetics under ideal conditions (pH = 3, H 2 O 2 = 1mL/L, irradiation time = 60 min, Fe(II) = 0.2 gm/L, dye solution flow rate = 100 L/h, and temperature = 40 °C), as the correlation coefficient R 2 for the pseudo-2nd-order kinetic model fit the data better than the pseudo-1st-order kinetic model. Figure 12 elucidates the outcomes of the 1st and 2nd-order kinetic models.

Reaction rate of 2500 ppm initial COD at ideal processing factors ( a ) 1st order kinetic model, ( b ) 2nd order kinetic model [pH = 3, H 2 O 2 = 1mL/L, irradiation time = 60 min, Fe(II) = 0.2 gm/L, dye solution flow rate = 100 L/h , and temperature = 40 °C].

Economical assessment

The economic evaluation of the project relies on estimating the capital costs associated with each replacement, considering the ongoing running and maintenance costs for different components. The projected profit was determined and evaluated in monetary terms to conduct a cost–benefit analysis.

For the treatment of 30 m 3 /d of wastewater, the estimated capital costs were $30,000. Additionally, the annual maintenance and operating costs for the complete integrated unit, including the solar photo-Fenton process, were calculated to be $9,000 per y.

Statistic examination

The above results signify that the percentage removal of colour, COD and TOC is non-linearly influenced by various process factors, such as the Fe(II) concentration (mg/L), H 2 O 2 amount (mL/L), solution pH, temperature, and flow rate (L/h). To elucidate the correlation between these process factors and the percentage removal of colour, COD and TOC, a statistical multivariate regression technique using the least squares method was applied. The mathematical models developed from this analysis are exhibited below:

where A, B, C, D, and E are Fe(II) concentration (mg/L), H 2 O 2 amount (mL/L), solution pH, temperature, and wastewater flow rate (L/h), respectively. The regression coefficient R 2 of the resulting correlation was 94.7%.

A**** Table 4 displays the analysis of variance (ANOVA) data, while Table 5 contains the coefficient values, p -values, standard errors, and t-test results for each term. A p -value less than 0.05 reveals that the corresponding coefficient in the correlation is statistically significant. Figure 13 compares the experimentally determined colour removal percentages to the values predicted by the model. Figure 14 presents a 3D surface plot showing the expected colour removal percentage in relation to the various process factors. The first 3D surface plot (Fig. 14 a) demonstrates the impact of Fe(II) concentration (mg/L) and H 2 O 2 amount (mL/L) on the colour removal efficiency. The second 3D surface plot (Fig. 14 b) showcases the influence of solution pH and wastewater flow rate (L/h) on the colour removal efficiency.

Experimentally determined colour removal % with the expected values.

3D surface plot depicting the expected colour removal % in relation to: ( a ) H 2 O 2 amount and Fe(II) concentration, ( b ) pH and wastewater flow rate.

The regression analysis resulted in a coefficient of determination (R 2 ) of 90.6%, indicating a strong correlation between the process variables and COD removal percentage. Table 6 presents the analysis of variance (ANOVA) results, and Table 7 lists the coefficient values, p -values, standard errors, and t-test results. A p -value less than 0.05 represents a statistically significant term in the correlation. Figure 15 compares the experimentally determined COD removal percentages to the modeled values. Figure 16 exposes a 3D surface plot depicting the expected COD removal percentage as a function of the process factors. In Fig. 16 a, the first 3D surface plot illustrates the relationship between Fe(II) concentration (mg/L) and H 2 O 2 amount (mL/L), and their impact on the COD removal efficiency. Figure 16 b, the second 3D surface plot, showcases the influence of solution pH and wastewater flow rate (L/h) on the COD removal efficiency.

Experimentally determined COD removal % with the expected values.

3D surface plot depicting the expected COD removal % in relation to: ( a ) H 2 O 2 amount and Fe(II) concentration, ( b )pH and wastewater flow rate.

The regression analysis yielded a coefficient of determination (R 2 ) of 98.1%, demonstrating a strong correlation between the process variables and the TOC removal percentage. Table 8 displays the analysis of variance (ANOVA) results, and Table 9 provides the coefficient values, p -values, standard errors, and t-test outcomes. A p -value less than 0.05 denotes a statistically significant term in the correlation. Figure 17 compares the experimentally determined TOC removal percentages to the modeled values. Figure 18 exhibits a 3D surface plot illustrating the expected TOC removal percentage as a function of the various process factors. The first 3D surface plot (Fig. 18 a) demonstrates the impact of Fe(II) concentration (mg/L) and H 2 O 2 amount (mL/L) on the TOC removal efficiency. The second 3D surface plot (Fig. 18 b) showcases the influence of solution pH and wastewater flow rate (L/h) on the TOC removal efficiency.

Experimentally determined TOC removal % with the expected values.

3D surface plot depicting the expected TOC removal % in relation to: ( a ) H 2 O 2 amount and Fe(II) concentration, ( b ) pH and wastewater flow rate.

This study presents a pioneering integrated wastewater treatment approach that addresses major gaps in implementing solar photo-Fenton oxidation for textile industry effluents. Unlike previous studies, it combines conventional pretreatment processes (sedimentation, screening, adsorption) with an optimized solar photo-Fenton advanced oxidation stage in a unified system. A key innovation is the use of a novel parabolic collector reactor with increased absorber tube diameter, enabling efficient solar radiation capture at lower catalyst doses—a substantial improvement over conventional designs.

Through comprehensive multivariate experimentation and optimization, remarkable treatment efficiencies were achieved—85% COD removal, 82% TOC removal, and complete decolorization under optimal conditions of pH 3, 0.2 g/L Fe(II), 1 mL/L H 2 O 2 , 40 °C, and 100 L/h flow rate after 60 min . Kinetic analysis revealed the pollutant degradation followed 2nd -order reaction kinetics. Moreover, this study derived efficiency prediction models through multivariate regression analysis, correlating process params like Fe(II) dose, H 2 O 2 concentration, pH, temperature, and flow rate to the removal efficiencies. These models provide valuable guidelines for implementing solar photo-Fenton at an industrial scale for textile wastewater treatment.

The novel integrated system design combining conventional and advanced oxidation technologies, optimized photo-Fenton process, innovative reactor configuration, kinetic modelling, and predictive modelling frameworks constitute significant value additions. They provide a comprehensive green methodology for effective treatment and potential reuse of recalcitrant textile wastewaters. In contrast to conventional approaches limited by sludge generation and partial pollutant removal, this study offers an economical solution enabling sustainable industrial wastewater management.

With its multi-pronged treatment strategy, solar-driven process, reduced chemical usage through optimized operation, and valorisation of modelling insights, this work presents a transformative pathway for the textile sector. It paves the way for industrial implementation of solar-assisted advanced oxidation, ensuring regulatory compliance while promoting water conservation—a urgent need for developing economies with significant textile manufacturing. Overall, this study marks a notable advance in realizing the full potential of solar photo-Fenton for environmental remediation.

In summary, the key innovations are the integrated treatment system design, optimization of the solar photo-Fenton process, use of a novel collector reactor configuration, kinetic modelling, and development of prediction models—which provide an effective treatment methodology for textile industry wastewater. This approach offers an effective treatment methodology and valuable prediction models, contributing significantly to the field of industrial wastewater treatment.

Data availability

All the data and materials as well as software application or custom code support our published claims and comply with field standards.

Abbreviations

Chemical oxygen demand

Biological oxygen demand

Total organic carbon

Total suspended solid

Total Kjeldahl nitrogen

Advanced oxidation process

Concentrating parabolic collector

Ultraviolet

Arslan, I., AkmehmetBalcioglu, I. & Tuhkanen, T. Advanced treatment of dyehouse effluents by Fe(II) and Mn(II)-catalyzed ozonation and the H 2 O 2 /O 3 process. Water Sci. Technol. 42 , 13–18 (2000).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Sevimli, M. F. & Kinaci, C. Decolorization of textile wastewater by ozonation and Fenton’s process. Water Sci. Technol. 45 , 279–286 (2002).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

InanBeydilli, M. & Pavlostathis, S. G. Decolorization kinetics of the azo dye Reactive Red 2 under methanogenic conditions: effect of long-term culture acclimation. Biodegradation 16 , 135–146 (2005).

Article Google Scholar

Moreira, M. T., Mielgo, I., Feijoo, G. & Lema, J. M. Evaluation of different fungal strains in decolorization of synthetic dyes. Biotechnol. Lett. 22 , 1499–1503 (2000).

Arslan-Alaton, I. A review of the effects of dye-assisting chemicals on advanced oxidation of reactive dyes in wastewater. Color. Technol. 119 , 345–353 (2003).

Yasar, A., Ahmad, N. & Khan, A. A. A. Energy requirement of ultraviolet and AOPs for the post-treatment of treated combined industrial effluent. Color. Technol. 122 , 201–206 (2006).

Huang, Y.-H., Huang, Y.-F., Chang, P.-S. & Chen, C.-Y. Comparative study of oxidation of dye-reactive black B by different advanced oxidation processes: Fenton, electro-Fenton and photo-Fenton. J. Hazard. Mater. 154 , 655–662 (2008).

Ghaly, M. Y., Härtel, G., Mayer, R. & Haseneder, R. Effect of pH, UV irradiation and hydrogen peroxide on the ozonation process of p-Chlorophenol. Afinidad Rev. química teórica y Apl. 57 , 424–430 (2000).

CAS Google Scholar

Ghaly, M. Y., Harte, G., Mayer, R. & Haseneder, R. Aromatic compounds degradation in water by using ozone and AOPS.= A comparative study. O-Nitrotoluene as a model substrate. Ozone Sci. Eng. 23 , 127–138 (2001).

Ghaly, M. Y., Härtel, G., Mayer, R. & Haseneder, R. Photochemical oxidation of p-chlorophenol by UV/H 2 O 2 and photo-Fenton process. A comparative study. waste Manag. 21 , 41–47 (2001).

CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Malato, S. et al. Photocatalytic decontamination and disinfection of water with solar collectors. Catal. Today 122 , 137–149 (2007).

Vilar, V. J. P., Maldonado, M. I., Oller, I., Malato, S. & Boaventura, R. A. R. Solar treatment of cork boiling and bleaching wastewaters in a pilot plant. Water Res. 43 , 4050–4062 (2009).

Thakur, A. K. et al. Pharmaceutical waste-water treatment via advanced oxidation based integrated processes: An engineering and economic perspective. J. Water Process Eng. 54 , 103977 (2023).

Thakur, A. K., Singh, R., Pullela, R. T. & Pundir, V. Green adsorbents for the removal of heavy metals from Wastewater: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 57 , 1468–1472 (2022).

Thakur, A. K., Kumar, R., Chaudhari, P. & Shankar, R. Removal of heavy metals using bentonite clay and inorganic coagulants. Remov. Emerg. Contam. Through Microb. Process. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5901-3_3 (2021).

Bello, M. M. & Raman, A. A. A. Synergy of adsorption and advanced oxidation processes in recalcitrant wastewater treatment. Environ. Chem. Lett. 17 , 1125–1142 (2019).

Kim, J. R., Huling, S. G. & Kan, E. Effects of temperature on adsorption and oxidative degradation of bisphenol A in an acid-treated iron-amended granular activated carbon. Chem. Eng. J. 262 , 1260–1267 (2015).

Bazrafshan, A. A., Ghaedi, M., Hajati, S., Naghiha, R. & Asfaram, A. Synthesis of ZnO-nanorod-based materials for antibacterial, antifungal activities, DNA cleavage and efficient ultrasound-assisted dyes adsorption. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 142 , 330–337 (2017).

Khataee, A. et al. Ultrasound-assisted removal of Acid Red 17 using nanosized Fe 3 O 4 -loaded coffee waste hydrochar. Ultrason. Sonochem. 35 , 72–80 (2017).

Yasar, A. & Yousaf, S. Solar assisted photo Fenton for cost effective degradation of textile effluents in comparison to AOPs. Glob. Nest J 14 , 477–486 (2012).

Google Scholar

Da Silva, M. R. A., De Oliveira, M. C. & Nogueira, R. F. P. Estudo da aplicação do processo foto-Fenton solar na degradação de efluentes de indústria de tintas. Eclética Química 29 , 19–26 (2004).

Lapertot, M. et al. Enhancing biodegradability of priority substances (pesticides) by solar photo-Fenton. Water Res. 40 , 1086–1094 (2006).

Xu, M., Wang, Q. & Hao, Y. Removal of organic carbon from wastepaper pulp effluent by lab-scale solar photo-Fenton process. J. Hazard. Mater. 148 , 103–109 (2007).

El-Gawad, H. A., Ebrahiem, E. E., Ghaly, M. Y., Afify, A. A. & Mohamed, R. M. An application of advanced oxidation process on industrial crude oily wastewater treatment. Sci. Rep. 13 , 3420 (2023).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Tanveer, M. & Guyer, G. T. Solar assisted photo degradation of wastewater by compound parabolic collectors: Review of design and operational parameters. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 24 , 534–543 (2013).

Georgiou, D., Melidis, P., Aivasidis, A. & Gimouhopoulos, K. Degradation of azo-reactive dyes by ultraviolet radiation in the presence of hydrogen peroxide. Dye. Pigment. 52 , 69–78 (2002).

Hu, E., Li, Y. & Zou, L. Solar Powered Colour Removal of Dyes Using Ferrioxalate/H2O2 (Australian and New Zealand Solar Energy Society, 2004).

Rice, E. W., Bridgewater, L. & Association, A. P. H. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater Vol. 10 (American public health association Washington, 2012).

Trittin, J. Der Bundsminister für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit. Bekanntung der Neufassung der Abwasserverordung vom 17 , (2004).

Fathy, A. M., Farah, J. Y. & Ghaly, M. Y. Effect of catalyst type and dose on solar photocatalytic oxidation for the degradation of zenafix yellow reactive dye aqueous solution. Afinidad Rev. química teórica y Apl. 63 , 308–314 (2006).

Badawy, M. I., Gad-Allah, T. A., Ghaly, M. Y. & Lopez, A. Combination of photocatalytic and biological processes as an integrated system for treatment and recovery of industrial wastewater containig pesticides. Afinidad Rev. química teórica y Apl. 63 , 478–487 (2006).

Association, A. P. H. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater Vol. 6 (American Public Health Association, 1926).

Badawy, M. I., Ghaly, M. Y. & Gad-Allah, T. A. Advanced oxidation processes for the removal of organophosphorus pesticides from wastewater. Desalination 194 , 166–175 (2006).

Babaei, A. A. et al. Comparative treatment of textile wastewater by adsorption, Fenton, UV-Fenton and US-Fenton using magnetic nanoparticles-functionalized carbon (MNPs@ C). J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 56 , 163–174 (2017).

Ghaly, M., Härtel, G. & Haseneder, R. Integrated coupled systems as biodegradability enhancement of textile wastewater by photo-Fenton process. Afinidad 66 , 420–428 (2009).

Sajjad, T. A. & Al-zobai, K. M. M. Investigation the effect of intensity and direction of light on the removal of reactive blue dye from simulated wastewater using photo-Fenton oxidation under UV irradiation: Batch and continuous methods. in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering vol. 928 22132 (IOP Publishing, 2020).

Hassan, A. A. & Al-zobai, K. M. M. Chemical oxidation for oil separation from oilfield produced water under UV irradiation using titanium dioxide as a nano-photocatalyst by batch and continuous techniques. Int. J. Chem. Eng. 2019 , 1–8 (2019).

Al-Jaberi, F. Y. & Mohammed, W. T. Effecting of pH parameter on simulated wastewater treatment using electrocoagulation method. J. Eng. 24 , 73–88 (2018).

Selvam, K., Muruganandham, M., Sobana, N. & Swaminathan, M. Enhancement of UV-assisted photo-Fenton degradation of reactive orange 4 using TiO 2 -P25 nanoparticles. Sep. Purif. Technol. 54 , 241–247 (2007).

Sreeja, P. H. & Sosamony, K. J. A comparative study of homogeneous and heterogeneous photo-Fenton process for textile wastewater treatment. Procedia Technol. 24 , 217–223 (2016).

Lucas, M. S. & Peres, J. A. Decolorization of the azo dye reactive black 5 by Fenton and photo-Fenton oxidation. Dye. Pigment. 71 , 236–244 (2006).

Ghaly, M. Destruction of the environmental organic pollutant through activated hydrogen peroxide oxidation. Afinidad Rev. química teórica y Apl. 62 , 314–320 (2005).

Ercan, Ö., Deniz, S., Yetimoğlu, E. K. & Aydın, A. Degradation of reactive dyes using advanced oxidation method. CLEAN Soil Air Water 43 , 1031–1036 (2015).

Arshad, R. et al. Degradation product distribution of Reactive Red-147 dye treated by UV/H 2 O 2 /TiO 2 advanced oxidation process. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 9 , 3168–3178 (2020).

Kang, S.-F., Liao, C.-H. & Po, S.-T. Decolorization of textile wastewater by photo-Fenton oxidation technology. Chemosphere 41 , 1287–1294 (2000).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Abo-Farha, S. A. Comparative study of oxidation of some azo dyes by different advanced oxidation processes: Fenton, Fenton-like, photo-Fenton and photo-Fenton-like. J. Am. Sci. 6 , 128–142 (2010).

AlJaberi, F. Y. Studies of autocatalytic electrocoagulation reactor for lead removal from simulated wastewater. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 6 , 6069–6078 (2018).

Chan, K. H. & Chu, W. The dose and ratio effects of Fe(II) and H 2 O 2 in Fenton’s process on the removal of atrazine. Environ. Technol. 24 , 703–710 (2003).

Fernandez, J., Bandara, J., Lopez, A., Buffat, P. & Kiwi, J. Photoassisted Fenton degradation of nonbiodegradable azo dye (Orange II) in Fe-free solutions mediated by cation transfer membranes. Langmuir 15 , 185–192 (1999).

Peternel, I. T., Koprivanac, N., Božić, A. M. L. & Kušić, H. M. Comparative study of UV/TiO 2 , UV/ZnO and photo-Fenton processes for the organic reactive dye degradation in aqueous solution. J. Hazard. Mater. 148 , 477–484 (2007).

Muruganandham, M. & Swaminathan, M. Photochemical oxidation of reactive azo dye with UV–H 2 O 2 process. Dye. Pigment. 62 , 269–275 (2004).

Rodriguez, M., Sarria, V., Esplugas, S. & Pulgarin, C. Photo-Fenton treatment of a biorecalcitrant wastewater generated in textile activities: biodegradability of the photo-treated solution. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 151 , 129–135 (2002).

Panizza, M. & Cerisola, G. Electro-Fenton degradation of synthetic dyes. Water Res. 43 , 339–344 (2009).

Rubio-Clemente, A., Chica, E. & Peñuela, G. A. Petrochemical wastewater treatment by photo-Fenton process. Water Air Soil Pollut. 226 , 1–18 (2015).

Alshamsi, H. A. H. & Shdood, A. UV-ClO 2 assisted decolorization of methylene blue. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 7 , 36–44 (2015).

Alshamsi, H. A. H. & Al Shdood, H. A. K. Color and cod removal of azure a dye by uv-clo2 photochemical oxidation.

Deepa, N., Meghna, P. & Kandasamy, S. Experimental studies on decolonisation of malachite dye using continuous photocatalytic reactor. Int. Res. J. Environ. Sci 3 , 14 (2014).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Canal Higher Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chemical Engineering Department, Suez, Egypt for financial support. The authors also thank Higher Institute of Engineering, El-Shorouk Academy, Cairo, Egypt, for financial support.

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Engineering Mathematics and Physics, Higher Institute of Engineering, El-Shorouk Academy, Cairo, Egypt

Heba A. El-Gawad

National Research Centre, Chemical Engineering and Pilot Plant Department, Canal High Institute of Engineering and Technology, Suez, Egypt

Montaser Y. Ghaly & Y. Reda

Chemical Engineering Department, Canal High Institute of Engineering and Technology, Suez, Egypt

Montaser Y. Ghaly

Higher Technological Institute, 10th of Ramadan City, Egypt

N. F. El Hussieny & M. Abdel Kreem

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: Montaser Y.Ghaly, Y.Reda. and Heba A. El- Gawad. Methodology: M.Abdel kreem. and N. F.El Hussieny. Formal analysis and investigation: Montaser Y.Ghaly, Heba A. El- Gawad. and Y.Reda. Writing original draft preparation: M. Abdel kreem, Heba A. El- Gawad. and N. F.El Hussieny. Writing review and editing: Heba A. El- Gawad. and Y.Reda. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heba A. El-Gawad .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

El-Gawad, H.A., Ghaly, M.Y., El Hussieny, N.F. et al. Novel collector design and optimized photo-fenton model for sustainable industry textile wastewater treatment. Sci Rep 14 , 8573 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58610-w

Download citation

Received : 27 December 2023

Accepted : 01 April 2024

Published : 13 April 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58610-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Wastewater treatment
Integrated unit
Classical processes
Developed oxidation processes
Solar photo-fenton process
Free hydroxyl radicals

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines . If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Quick links

Explore articles by subject
Guide to authors
Editorial policies

IMAGES

(PDF) Nature, Wit, and Invention: Contextualizing An Essay on Criticism
Write a short essay on Beauty of Nature
short essay on nature is our best friend
Incredible Nature Vs Nurture Essay ~ Thatsnotus
Essay on Nature
Environment Essay: Example, Sample, Writing Help ️ BookWormLab

VIDEO

'What is Criticism?' by Roland Barthes, Notes and Summary, MA English SEM 2, Poststructuralism, UGC
Animals that Nature has treated unfairly 🥲😱 #shortvideo #animals #nature
Are Narcissists Born or Made? The Nature vs Nurture Debate Uncovered
TikTok's 9 Month World Cruise DRAMA
Animals That Nature Has Treated Unfairly!!
Beautiful Nature with Rural Life (P157)

COMMENTS

An Essay on Criticism by Alexander Pope
Pope primarily used the heroic couplet, and his lines are immensely quotable; from "An Essay on Criticism" come famous phrases such as "To err is human; to forgive, divine," "A little learning is a dang'rous thing," and "For fools rush in where angels fear to tread.". After 1718 Pope lived on his five-acre property at ...
An Essay on Criticism Summary & Analysis
Alexander Pope's "An Essay on Criticism" seeks to lay down rules of good taste in poetry criticism, and in poetry itself. Structured as an essay in rhyming verse, it offers advice to the aspiring critic while satirizing amateurish criticism and poetry. The famous passage beginning "A little learning is a dangerous thing" advises would-be critics to learn their field in depth, warning that the ...
Analysis of Alexander Pope's An Essay on Criticism
An Essay on Criticism (1711) was Pope's first independent work, published anonymously through an obscure bookseller [12-13]. Its implicit claim to authority is not based on a lifetime's creative work or a prestigious commission but, riskily, on the skill and argument of the poem alone. It offers a sort of master-class not only in doing….
Nature, Wit, and Invention: Contextualizing An Essay on Criticism
Abstract. This article contextualizes the eighteenth-century English poet Alexander Pope's An Essay on Criticism (1711) and his other literary essays in order to elicit Pope's contributions to the ...
PDF An Essay on Criticism
AN ESSAY ON CRITICISM, WRITTEN IN THE YEAR 1709. [The title, An Essay on Criticism hardly indicates all that is included in the poem. It would have been impossible to give a full and exact idea of the art of poetical criticism without entering into the consideration of the art of poetry.
Nature, Wit, and Invention: Contextualizing An Essay on Criticism
This paper discusses Pope's Essay on Criticism in terms of Derek Attridge's theory of creativity. It argues that Pope's text is fundamentally based on the same commitment to the other that Attridge describes as constitutive of the singularity of literature and hence the 300-year-old Essay is a vital text which communicates itself to the present in significant ways.
in An Essay on Criticismn
conveniently explicit image of Nature as a created form, an inspired body, a tension between a filling and bounding that are nevertheless identical, is, I believe, the implicit model we are to follow in An Essay on Criticism: As in An Essay on Man Nature's bounds but manifest the creating power that fills her, so in An Essay on Criticism Nature's
An Essay on Criticism Summary
An Essay on Criticism Summary. "An Essay on Criticism" by Alexander Pope is a long, three-part poem about the nature of poetry and criticism. In the first part, the speaker of the poem describes ...
An Essay on Criticism
An Essay on Criticism, didactic poem in heroic couplets by Alexander Pope, first published anonymously in 1711 when the author was 22 years old.Although inspired by Horace's Ars poetica, this work of literary criticism borrowed from the writers of the Augustan Age.In it Pope set out poetic rules, a Neoclassical compendium of maxims, with a combination of ambitious argument and great ...
An Essay on Criticism Analysis
Alexander Pope 's long three-part poem "An Essay on Criticism" is largely influenced by ancient poets, classical models of art, and Pope's own Catholic beliefs. The poem revolves around ...
An Essay on Criticism
An Essay on Criticism is one of the first major poems written by the English writer Alexander Pope (1688-1744), published in 1711. It is the source of the famous quotations "To err is human; to forgive, divine", "A little learning is a dang'rous thing" (frequently misquoted as "A little knowledge is a dang'rous thing"), and "Fools rush in ...
Literary Criticism of Alexander Pope
An Essay on Criticism, published anonymously by Alexander Pope (1688-1744) in 1711, is perhaps the clearest statement of neoclassical principles in any language. In its broad outlines, it expresses a worldview which synthesizes elements of a Roman Catholic outlook with classical aesthetic principles and with deism. That Pope was born a Roman Catholic affected not…
An Essay on Criticism
Alexander Pope wrote An Essay on Criticism shortly after turning 21 years old in 1711. While remaining the speaker within his own poem Pope is able to present his true viewpoints on writing styles both as they are and how he feels they should be. While his poetic essay, written in heroic couplets, may not have obtained the same status as others ...
from An Essay on Criticism
A poem's central idea, often developed into an extended metaphor, is known as a conceit. Unlocking the first couplet should provide you the key to Pope's conceit in An Essay on Criticism. Pope begins with a warning that: A little learning is a dangerous thing; Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian Spring: The Pierian Spring is an important ...
An Essay on Criticism
Launch not beyond your Depth, but be discreet, And mark that Point where Sense and Dulness meet. Nature to all things fix'd the Limits fit, And wisely curb'd proud Man's pretending Wit: As on the Land while here the Ocean gains, In other Parts it leaves wide sandy Plains; Thus in the Soul while Memory prevails,
An Essay on Criticism Plot Summary
Summary. "An Essay on Criticism" is a three-part poem in which Alexander Pope shares his thoughts on the proper rules and etiquette for critics. Critics assail Pope's work, his background, his religion, and his physical appearance throughout his career. Pope has a lot to say to critics about their common mistakes and how they could do their job ...
An Essay on Criticism by Alexander Pope
Analysis (ai): This poem offers a critique of literary criticism and highlights the importance of personal taste and judgment. It acknowledges the prevalence of poor criticism, comparing it to faulty timepieces and stressing the rarity of true taste. The poet argues that while some possess a natural inclination towards judgment, false education can hinder their development.
An Essay on Criticism: Part 1
The use of the word "essay" in the title associates Pope's work with the techniques of Bacon and Montaigne. Pope's notes referring to classic analogues have not been reproduced. Pope provided the following outline of the Essay on Criticism: "PART 1. That 'tis as great a fault to judge ill, as to write ill, and a more dangerous one to the public, 1.
AN ESSAY ON CRITICISM.
AN ESSAY ON CRITICISM, WRITTEN IN THE YEAR 1709 [The title, An Essay on Criticism hardly indicates all that is included in the poem. It would have been impossible to give a full and exact idea of the art of poetical criticism without entering into the consideration of the art of poetry.
An Essay on Criticism
Get an answer for 'How does "An Essay on Criticism" summarize 18th century ideas about nature's role in human endeavor?' and find homework help for other An Essay on Criticism questions at eNotes
An Essay on Criticism by Alexander Pope
How is nature treated in An Essay on Criticism? As the ultimate guide to understanding poetry. As the enemy of good poetry. It's not treated in the poem. As nothing more than a setting for good poems.
Personalized neoantigen vaccine and pembrolizumab in advanced ...
At the time of data analysis, 34 of the 36 patients had undergone at least one on-treatment restaging scan and were evaluable for response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors ...
Deeply Rooted: An Analysis of How College-Aged Women View Body Hair and
This study seeks to explore the ways in which college-aged women view body hair and body hair removal. Drawing from interviews with ten undergraduate women at Vanderbilt University, between the ages of 19 and 21, this essay suggests that there appears to be a cognitive dissonance when it comes to young women's views on body hair removal.
Interim analyses of a first-in-human phase 1/2 mRNA trial for ...
Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 15 out of the 16 (93.8%) participants. ... Preliminary analysis suggests an increase in the exposure to mRNA-3927 with dose escalation, and a 70% ...
Tumor-selective activity of RAS-GTP inhibition in pancreatic ...
In the autochthonous KPC model, RMC-7977 treatment resulted in a profound extension of survival followed by on-treatment relapse. Analysis of relapsed tumors identified Myc copy number gain as a ...
Poets' Corner
That a true Taste is as rare to be found as a true Genius. That most men are born with some Taste, but spoiled by false education. The multitude of Critics, and causes of them. That we are to study our own Taste, and know the limits of it. Nature the best guide of judgment. Improved by Art and rules, which are but methodized Nature.
FOXO1 enhances CAR T cell stemness, metabolic fitness and efficacy
e, f, Analysis of CAR T cell frequency in the tumors (e) and spleens (f) of treated mice at day 7 post treatment. Data represents the mean ± SEM of 5 mice per group. Data represents the mean ± ...
Novel collector design and optimized photo-fenton model for ...
To ensure accurate analysis and halt the ongoing photo-Fenton reaction, samples from each treatment step and the reaction vessel were collected regularly and immediately quenched with NaOH because ...

An Essay on Criticism Summary & Analysis by Alexander Pope

The Full Text of “From An Essay on Criticism: A little learning is a dangerous thing”

“From An Essay on Criticism: A little learning is a dangerous thing” Summary

Shallow Learning vs. Deep Understanding

Line-by-Line Explanation & Analysis of “From An Essay on Criticism: A little learning is a dangerous thing”

Lines 11-14

Lines 15-18

“From An Essay on Criticism: A little learning is a dangerous thing” Symbols

The Mountains/Alps

“From An Essay on Criticism: A little learning is a dangerous thing” Poetic Devices & Figurative Language

Extended Metaphor

Form, Meter, & Rhyme Scheme of “From An Essay on Criticism: A little learning is a dangerous thing”

LitCharts on Other Poems by Alexander Pope

Ask LitCharts AI: The answer to your questions

Nature, Wit, and Invention: Contextualizing An Essay on Criticism

Related Papers

RELATED PAPERS

RELATED TOPICS

Literary Theory and Criticism

Literary Criticism of Alexander Pope

Share this:

Related Articles

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

An Essay on Criticism

Back to Alexander Pope

from An Essay on Criticism

Join Alexander Pope on a metaphysical journey of discovery… that will last a lifetime.

Suggested poems for comparison:

Additional Resources

And… discuss!

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

An Essay on Criticism

Navigation menu

An Essay on Criticism: Part 1

AN ESSAY ON CRITICISM.

AN ESSAY ON CRITICISM,

Deeply Rooted: An Analysis of How College-Aged Women View Body Hair and Body Hair Removal

An Essay on Criticism

Novel collector design and optimized photo-fenton model for sustainable industry textile wastewater treatment

Introduction

The key innovations and contributions of this manuscript are:

Experimental work

Source of wastewater

Pretreatment steps

Photo-catalytic oxidation step

Analytical methods

Ethical approval

Consent to participate

Consent to publish

Results and discussion

Advanced oxidation process by solar photo-fenton process

Effect of solar radiation

Effect of pH

Effect of initial amount of Fe(II)

Effect of initial hydrogen peroxide concentration

Effect of temperature

Effect of flow rate

Economical assessment

Statistic examination

Data availability

Abbreviations

Acknowledgements

Author information

Contributions

Corresponding author

Ethics declarations

Additional information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Share this article

Quick links

IMAGES

VIDEO

COMMENTS