![essay about ethnocentrism and cultural relativism brainly Logo for Maricopa Open Digital Press](https://open.maricopa.edu/app/uploads/2020/04/maricopa_colleges.png)
![](http://pechenka.online/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
Ethnocentrism and Cultural Relativism
Ethnocentrism is the tendency to look at the world primarily from the perspective of one’s own culture. Part of ethnocentrism is the belief that one’s own race, ethnic or cultural group is the most important or that some or all aspects of its culture are superior to those of other groups. Some people will simply call it cultural ignorance.
Ethnocentrism often leads to incorrect assumptions about others’ behavior based on your own norms, values, and beliefs. In extreme cases, a group of individuals may see another culture as wrong or immoral and because of this may try to convert, sometimes forcibly, the group to their own ways of living. War and genocide could be the devastating result if a group is unwilling to change their ways of living or cultural practices.
Ethnocentrism may not, in some circumstances, be avoidable. We often have involuntary reactions toward another person or culture’s practices or beliefs but these reactions do not have to result in horrible events such as genocide or war. In order to avoid conflict over culture practices and beliefs, we must all try to be more culturally relative.
![essay about ethnocentrism and cultural relativism brainly Two young men walking and holding hands.](https://open.maricopa.edu/app/uploads/sites/22/2020/07/intro_ethnocentrism.jpg)
Cultural relativism is the principle of regarding and valuing the practices of a culture from the point of view of that culture and to avoid making hasty judgments. Cultural relativism tries to counter ethnocentrism by promoting the understanding of cultural practices that are unfamiliar to other cultures such as eating insects, genocides or genital cutting. Take for example, the common practice of same-sex friends in India walking in public while holding hands. This is a common behavior and a sign of connectedness between two people. In England, by contrast, holding hands is largely limited to romantically involved couples, and often suggests a sexual relationship. These are simply two different ways of understanding the meaning of holding hands. Someone who does not take a relativistic view might be tempted to see their own understanding of this behavior as superior and, perhaps, the foreign practice as being immoral.
D espite the fact that cultural relativism promotes the appreciation for cultural differences, it can also be problematic. At its most extreme, cultural relativism leaves no room for criticism of other cultures, even if certain cultural practices are horrific or harmful. Many practices have drawn criticism over the years. In Madagascar, for example, the famahidana funeral tradition includes bringing bodies out from tombs once every seven years, wrapping them in cloth, and dancing with them. Some people view this practice disrespectful to the body of the deceased person. Today, a debate rages about the ritual cutting of genitals of girls in several Middle Eastern and African cultures. To a lesser extent, this same debate arises around the circumcision of baby boys in Western hospitals. When considering harmful cultural traditions, it can be patronizing to use cultural relativism as an excuse for avoiding debate. To assume that people from other cultures are neither mature enough nor responsible enough to consider criticism from the outside is demeaning.
The concept of cross-cultural relationship is the idea that people from different cultures can have relationships that acknowledge, respect and begin to understand each other’s diverse lives. People with different backgrounds can help each other see possibilities that they never thought were there because of limitations, or cultural proscriptions, posed by their own traditions. Becoming aware of these new possibilities will ultimately change the people who are exposed to the new ideas. This cross-cultural relationship provides hope that new opportunities will be discovered, but at the same time it is threatening. The threat is that once the relationship occurs, one can no longer claim that any single culture is the absolute truth.
Culture and Psychology Copyright © 2020 by L D Worthy; T Lavigne; and F Romero is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.
Share This Book
Module 3: Culture
Ethnocentrism and cultural relativism, learning outcomes.
- Describe and give examples of ethnocentrism and cultural relativism
Despite how much humans have in common, cultural differences are far more prevalent than cultural universals. For example, while all cultures have language, analysis of particular language structures and conversational etiquette reveal tremendous differences. In some Middle Eastern cultures, it is common to stand close to others in conversation. North Americans keep more distance and maintain a larger “personal space.” Even something as simple as eating and drinking varies greatly from culture to culture. If your professor comes into an early morning class holding a mug of liquid, what do you assume she is drinking? In the United States, the mug is most likely filled with coffee, not Earl Grey tea, a favorite in England, or Yak Butter tea, a staple in Tibet.
The way cuisines vary across cultures fascinates many people. Some travelers pride themselves on their willingness to try unfamiliar foods, like celebrated food writer Anthony Bourdain, while others return home expressing gratitude for their native culture’s fare. Often, people in the United States express disgust at other cultures’ cuisine and think that it’s gross to eat meat from a dog or guinea pig, for example, while they don’t question their own habit of eating cows or pigs. Such attitudes are an example of ethnocentrism , or evaluating and judging another culture based on how it compares to one’s own cultural norms. Ethnocentrism, as sociologist William Graham Sumner (1906) described the term, involves a belief or attitude that one’s own culture is better than all others, and should therefore serve as the standard frame of reference. Almost everyone is a little bit ethnocentric. For example, Americans tend to say that people from England drive on the “wrong” side of the road, rather than on the “other” side. Someone from a country where dog meat is standard fare might find it off-putting to see a dog in a French restaurant—not on the menu, but as a pet and fellow patron’s companion. A good example of ethnocentrism is referring to parts of Asia as the “Far East.” One might question, “Far east of where?”
A high level of appreciation for one’s own culture can be healthy; a shared sense of community pride, for example, connects people in a society. But ethnocentrism can lead to disdain or dislike for other cultures and could cause misunderstanding and conflict. People with the best intentions sometimes travel to a society to “help” its people, because they see them as uneducated or backward—essentially inferior. In reality, these travelers are guilty of cultural imperialism , the deliberate imposition of one’s own ostensibly advanced cultural values on another culture. Europe’s colonial expansion, begun in the sixteenth century, was often accompanied by a severe cultural imperialism. European colonizers often viewed the people in the lands they colonized as uncultured savages who were in need of European governance, dress, religion, and other cultural practices.
A more modern example of cultural imperialism may include the work of international aid agencies who introduce agricultural methods and plant species from developed countries while overlooking indigenous varieties and agricultural approaches that are better suited to a particular region. Another example would be the deforestation of the Amazon Basin as indigenous cultures lose land to timber corporations.
![essay about ethnocentrism and cultural relativism brainly Coffins hanging from the side of a cliff.](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/courses-images/wp-content/uploads/sites/2034/2016/05/31174323/b21b81c8ce751e18406d97d4679eccd8758b9666.jpeg)
Figure 1 . Experiencing an entirely new practice may lead to a high degree of interest or a level of criticism. The Indegenous people of Sagada, in the Philippines, have for thousands of years placed the bodies of deceased people into coffins hung on the cliffs near their villages. Some visitors may find this practice admirable, while others may think it’s inappropriate. (Credit: Arian Zwegers/flickr) Sagada, Echo Valley, hanging coffins.
Ethnocentrism can be so strong that when confronted with all of the differences of a new culture, one may experience disorientation and frustration. In sociology, we call this culture shock . A traveler from Chicago might find the nightly silence of rural Montana unsettling, not peaceful. An exchange student from China might be annoyed by the constant interruptions in class as other students ask questions—a practice that is considered rude in China. Perhaps the Chicago traveler was initially captivated by Montana’s quiet beauty and the Chinese student was originally excited to see a U.S.-style classroom firsthand. But as they experience unanticipated differences from their own culture, their excitement gives way to discomfort and doubts about how to behave appropriately in the new situation. Eventually, as people learn more about a culture and adapt to its norms, they recover from culture shock.
Culture shock may appear because people aren’t always expecting cultural differences. Anthropologist Ken Barger (1971) discovered this when he conducted a participatory observation in an Inuit community in the Canadian Arctic. Originally from Indiana, Barger hesitated when invited to join a local snowshoe race. He knew he’d never hold his own against these experts. Sure enough, he finished last, to his mortification. But the tribal members congratulated him, saying, “You really tried!” In Barger’s own culture, he had learned to value victory. To the Inuit people, winning was enjoyable, but their culture valued survival skills essential to their environment: how hard someone tried could mean the difference between life and death. Over the course of his stay, Barger participated in caribou hunts, learned how to take shelter in winter storms, and sometimes went days with little or no food to share among tribal members. Trying hard and working together, two nonmaterial values, were indeed much more important than winning.
During his time with the Inuit tribe, Barger learned to engage in cultural relativism. Cultural relativism is the practice of assessing a culture by its own standards rather than viewing it through the lens of one’s own culture. Practicing cultural relativism requires an open mind and a willingness to consider, and even adapt to, new values and norms. However, indiscriminately embracing everything about a new culture is not always possible. Even the most culturally relativist people from egalitarian societies—ones in which women have political rights and control over their own bodies—would question whether the widespread practice of female genital mutilation in countries such as Ethiopia and Sudan should be accepted as a part of cultural tradition. Sociologists attempting to engage in cultural relativism, then, may struggle to reconcile aspects of their own culture with aspects of a culture they are studying.
Sometimes when people attempt to rectify feelings of ethnocentrism and to practice cultural relativism, they swing too far to the other end of the spectrum. Xenocentrism is the opposite of ethnocentrism, and refers to the belief that another culture is superior to one’s own. (The Greek root word xeno , pronounced “ZEE-no,” means “stranger” or “foreign guest.”) An exchange student who goes home after a semester abroad or a sociologist who returns from the field may find it difficult to associate with the values of their own culture after having experienced what they deem a more upright or nobler way of living.
Perhaps the greatest challenge for sociologists studying different cultures is the matter of keeping a perspective. It is impossible for anyone to keep all cultural biases at bay; the best we can do is strive to be aware of them. Pride in one’s own culture doesn’t have to lead to imposing its values on others. And an appreciation for another culture shouldn’t preclude individuals from studying it with a critical eye.
Overcoming Culture Shock
![essay about ethnocentrism and cultural relativism brainly Three female tourists carrying luggage are shown climbing a cobblestone hill.](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/courses-images/wp-content/uploads/sites/120/2016/04/15204141/Figure_03_01_02a.jpg)
Figure 2. Experiencing new cultures offers an opportunity to practice cultural relativism. (Photo courtesy of OledSidorenko/flickr)
During her summer vacation, Caitlin flew from Chicago to Madrid to visit Maria, the exchange student she’d befriended the previous semester. In the airport, she heard rapid, musical Spanish being spoken all around her. Exciting as it was, she felt isolated and disconnected. Maria’s mother kissed Caitlin on both cheeks when she greeted her. Her imposing father kept his distance. Caitlin was half asleep by the time supper was served—at 10 p.m.! Maria’s family sat at the table for hours, speaking loudly, gesturing, and arguing about politics, a taboo dinner subject in Caitlin’s house. They served wine and toasted their honored guest. Caitlin had trouble interpreting her hosts’ facial expressions, and didn’t realize she should make the next toast. That night, Caitlin crawled into a strange bed, wishing she hadn’t come. She missed her home and felt overwhelmed by the new customs, language, and surroundings. She’d studied Spanish in school for years—why hadn’t it prepared her for this?
What Caitlin hadn’t realized was that people depend not only on spoken words but also on subtle cues like gestures and facial expressions, to communicate. Cultural norms accompany even the smallest nonverbal signals (DuBois 1951). They help people know when to shake hands, where to sit, how to converse, and even when to laugh. We relate to others through a shared set of cultural norms, and ordinarily, we take them for granted.
For this reason, culture shock is often associated with traveling abroad, although it can happen in one’s own country, state, or even hometown. Anthropologist Kalervo Oberg (1960) is credited with first coining the term “culture shock.” In his studies, Oberg found that most people found encountering a new culture to be exciting at first. But bit by bit, they became stressed by interacting with people from a different culture who spoke another language and used different regional expressions. There was new food to digest, new daily schedules to follow, and new rules of etiquette to learn. Living with these constant adaptive challenges can make people feel incompetent and insecure. People react to frustration in a new culture, Oberg found, by initially rejecting it and glorifying one’s own culture. An American visiting Italy might long for a “real” pizza or complain about the unsafe driving habits of Italians compared to people in the United States.
It helps to remember that culture is learned. Everyone is ethnocentric to an extent, and identifying with one’s own country is natural.
Caitlin’s shock was minor compared to that of her friends Dayar and Mahlika, a Turkish couple living in married student housing on campus. And it was nothing like that of her classmate Sanai. Sanai had been forced to flee war-torn Bosnia with her family when she was fifteen. After two weeks in Spain, Caitlin had developed a bit more compassion and understanding for what those people had gone through. She understood that adjusting to a new culture takes time. It can take weeks or months to recover from culture shock, and it can take years to fully adjust to living in a new culture.
By the end of Caitlin’s trip, she’d made new lifelong friends. She’d stepped out of her comfort zone. She’d learned a lot about Spain, but she’d also discovered a lot about herself and her own culture.
Further Research
In January 2011, a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America presented evidence indicating that the hormone oxytocin could regulate and manage instances of ethnocentrism. Read the full article “Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism” here .
Think It Over
- Do you feel that feelings of ethnocentricity or xenocentricity are more prevalent in U.S. culture? Why do you believe this? What issues or events might inform this?
- Modification, adaptation, and original content. Authored by : Scott Barr for Lumen Learning. Provided by : Lumen Learning. License : CC BY: Attribution
- What is Culture?. Authored by : OpenStax CNX. Located at : https://openstax.org/books/introduction-sociology-3e/pages/3-1-what-is-culture . Project : Sociology 3e. License : CC BY: Attribution . License Terms : Access for free at https://openstax.org/books/introduction-sociology-3e/pages/1-introduction
![essay about ethnocentrism and cultural relativism brainly Footer Logo Lumen Waymaker](https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wm-introductiontosociology/wp-content/themes/bombadil/assets/images/FooterLumenWaymaker.png)
- Bipolar Disorder
- Therapy Center
- When To See a Therapist
- Types of Therapy
- Best Online Therapy
- Best Couples Therapy
- Managing Stress
- Sleep and Dreaming
- Understanding Emotions
- Self-Improvement
- Healthy Relationships
- Student Resources
- Personality Types
- Sweepstakes
- Guided Meditations
- Verywell Mind Insights
- 2024 Verywell Mind 25
- Mental Health in the Classroom
- Editorial Process
- Meet Our Review Board
- Crisis Support
Understanding Cultural Relativism and Its Importance
Bartosz Hadyniak/E+/Getty
Beliefs of Cultural Relativism
- Limitations
- In Mental Health
Cultural Relativism vs. Ethnocentrism
- How to Promote
Cultural relativism suggests that ethics, morals, values, norms, beliefs, and behaviors must be understood within the context of the culture from which they arise. It means that all cultures have their own beliefs and that there is no universal or absolute standard to judge those cultural norms.
"Cultural relativism leads us to accept that cultures are foundationally different, with differing social and ethical norms. This includes understanding that a person’s place of birth, including where or how a patient was raised during their formative years, is the basis of a person’s approach to the world and emotional self," says Anu Raj, PsyD , a clinical psychologist at New York Institute of Technology.
Advocates of cultural relativism suggest that one culture's values, beliefs, and norms should not be judged through the lens of another culture.
It is the opposite of ethnocentrism, which involves judging or understanding cultural beliefs from the perspective of your own. Instead, cultural relativism suggests that observers and researchers should focus on describing those practices without attempting to impose their own biases and judgments upon them.
History of Cultural Relativism
The concept of cultural relativism was introduced by anthropologist Franz Boas in 1887. While he did not coin the term, it later became widely used by his students to describe his anthropological perspective and theories.
Cultural relativism suggests that:
- Different societies have their own moral codes and practices.
- Norms, beliefs, and values must be judged and understood from the context of the culture where they originate.
- No culture is objectively better than others; cultures and their customs and beliefs are not objectively superior or inferior to any other culture.
- Practices and behaviors considered acceptable or unacceptable vary from one culture to the next.
- Cultural relativism aims to help promote acceptance, tolerance, and an appreciation for diverse cultural beliefs and practices.
- No universal ethical or moral truths apply to all people in all situations.
- What is considered right and wrong is determined by society’s moral codes.
- Researchers and observers should strive to observe behavior rather than pass judgments on it based on their own cultural perspective.
Different Types of Cultural Relativism
There are two distinct types of cultural relativism: absolute cultural relativism and critical cultural relativism.
Absolute Cultural Relativism
According to this perspective, outsiders should not question or judge cultural events. Essentially, this point of view proposes that outsiders should not criticize or question the cultural practices of other societies, no matter what they might involve.
Critical Cultural Relativism
Critical cultural relativism suggests that practices should be evaluated in terms of how and why they are adopted. This perspective suggests that cultural practices can be evaluated and understood by looking at factors such as the historical context and social influences.
It also recognizes that all societies experience inequalities and power dynamics that influence how and why certain beliefs are adopted and who adopts them.
Strengths of Cultural Relativism
Cultural relativism has a number of benefits that can help people gain greater insight into different cultures. This perspective can help:
- Promote cultural understanding : Because cultural relativism encourages seeing cultures with an open mind, it can foster greater empathy , understanding, and respect for cultures different from ours.
- Protect cultural respect and autonomy : Cultural relativism recognizes that no culture is superior to any other. Rather than attempting to change other cultures, this perspective encourages people to respect the autonomy and self-determinism of other cultures, which can play an important role in preserving the heritage and traditions of other cultures.
- Foster learning : By embracing cultural relativism, people from different backgrounds are able to communicate effectively and create an open dialogue to foster greater learning for other cultures of the world.
Cultural relativism can also be important in helping mental health professionals deliver culturally competent care to clients of different backgrounds.
"What’s considered “typical and normal versus pathological” depends on cultural norms. It varies between providers and patients; it impacts diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis," Raj explains.
When mental health professionals account for the differences in values, and attitudes towards and of marginalized people (including communities of color and LGBTQ+ communities), providers develop respect for individual patients. Consequently, patients are less likely to be misdiagnosed and more likely to continue treatment.
Limitations of Cultural Relativism
While cultural relativism has strengths, that does not mean it is without limitations.
Failure to Address Human Rights
This perspective has been criticized for failing to address universal rights. Some suggest that this approach may appear to condone cultural practices that constitute human rights violations. It can be challenging to practice non-judgment of other cultures while still protecting people’s right to live free from discrimination and oppression.
Cultural relativism may sometimes hamper progress by inhibiting the examination of practices, norms, and traditions that limit a society’s growth and progress.
Reducing Cultures to Stereotypes
Cultural relativism sometimes falls victim to the tendency to stereotype and simplify cultures. Rather than fully appreciating the full complexity and diversity that may exist within a culture, people may reduce it to a homogenous stereotype. This often prevents outsiders from seeing the many variations that may exist within a society and fully appreciating the way cultures evolve over time.
Individual Rights vs. Cultural Values
This perspective may sometimes lead observers to place a higher priority on a culture’s collective values while dismissing individual variations. This might involve, for example, avoiding criticism of cultures that punish political dissidents who voice opposition to cultural norms, and practices.
Examples of Cultural Relativism
In reality, people make cultural judgments all the time. If you've ever eaten food from another culture and described it as 'gross' or learned about a specific cultural practice and called it 'weird,' you've made a judgment about that culture based on the norms of your own. Because you don't eat those foods or engage in those practices in your culture, you are making culture-biased value judgments.
Cultural differences can affect a wide range of behaviors, including healthcare decisions. For example, research has found that while people from Western cultures prefer to be fully informed in order to make autonomous healthcare conditions, individuals from other cultures prefer varying degrees of truth-telling from medical providers.
An example of using cultural relativism in these cases would be describing the food practices of a different culture and learning more about why certain foods and dishes are important in those societies. Another example would be learning more about different cultural practices and exploring how they originated and the purpose they serve rather than evaluating them from your own cultural background.
In medical settings, healthcare practitioners must balance the interests and autonomy of their patients with respect and tolerance for multicultural values.
Cultural Relativism in Mental Health
Cultural relativism can also play an important role in the practice and application of mental health. "An individual’s perception of mental health, including stigma, is often influenced by their cultural identity and social values," explains Raj.
People who experience cultural discrimination are also more likely to experience higher stress levels, which can seriously affect mental health. Research has shown that perceived discrimination increases psychological distress and predicts symptoms of anxiety and depression. It also contributes to worse physical health, including a higher risk for heart disease, diabetes, cancer, and stroke.
Therapists must strive to understand people from different backgrounds to provide culturally competent care. "Through the lens of cultural competency, providers can educate themselves and elevate the plethora of coping mechanisms that a patient already might possess," says Raj.
Cultural relativism and ethnocentrism are two contrasting perspectives that can be used to evaluate and understand other cultures.
Ethnocentrism involves judging other cultures based on the standards and values of one's own culture, often leading to a biased or prejudiced perspective .
Where cultural relativism suggests that all cultures are equally valid, ethnocentrism involves seeing your own culture as superior or more correct than others.
Cultural relativism emphasizes the importance of diversity and recognizes that values, beliefs, and behaviors can vary across societies. This can be contrasted with ethnocentrism, which promotes the idea that your own culture is the norm or benchmark against which others should be evaluated. This can limit understanding and decrease tolerance for people of different backgrounds.
How Do You Promote Cultural Relativism?
There are a number of strategies that can help promote cultural relativism. This can be particularly important for mental health professionals and other healthcare practitioners.
"Therapists must be able to view the world through the eyes of their patients. Most importantly, culturally competent therapists understand their patient’s behavior through the cultural framework in which they live," Raj says.
Promoting cultural relativism involves adopting an open-minded and respectful approach toward other cultures. Some things you can do to foster greater cultural relativism:
- Embrace cultural diversity : Strive to appreciate other cultures, including their unique values, traditions, and perspectives. Remember that diversity enriches our lives, experiences, and world knowledge.
- Learn more about other cultures : Take the time to explore cultures other than your own, including histories, traditions, and beliefs. Resources that can help include books, documentaries, and online resources.
- Practice empathy : Seek to understand others by imagining things from their perspective. Try to understand their experiences, challenges, and aspirations. Cultivate empathy and respect for the differences between people and cultures.
- Seek diversity : Make an active effort to spend more time with people from different walks of life. Talk to people from diverse backgrounds and approach these discussions with an open mind and a desire to learn. Be willing to share your own perspectives and experiences without trying to change others or impose your beliefs on them.
- Challenge biases : Try to become more aware of how your unconscious biases might shape your perceptions and interactions with others. Practicing cultural relativism is an ongoing process. It takes time, open-mindedness , and a willingness to reflect on your biases.
Promoting Cultural Relativism Among Mental Health Professionals
How can therapists apply cultural relativism to ensure they understand other cultural perspectives and avoid unintentional biases in therapy?
A 2019 study found that the ideal training for therapists included graduate coursework in diversity, supervised clinical experiences working with diverse populations, experiential activities, didactic training, and cultural immersion when possible.
Avoiding Bias in Therapy
Raj suggests that there are important questions that professionals should ask themselves, including:
- How do I identify?
- How does my patient identify?
- What prejudices or biases am I holding?
- Are there biases or stereotypes I hold based on my own upbringing and culture?
She also suggests that therapists should always be willing to ask about client involvement in treatment planning. She recommends asking questions such as:
- What approaches have been successful or failed in the past?
- How does the patient perceive their ailment?
- What were the results of the patient’s previous coping mechanisms?
- How does the patient’s culture drive their behavior, coping skills, and outcomes?
By making clients an active part of their treatment and taking steps to understand their background better, therapists can utilize cultural relativism to deliver more sensitive, informed care.
The New Republic. Pioneers of cultural relativism )
Kanarek J. Critiquing cultural relativism . The Intellectual Standard. 2013;2(2):1.
Rosenberg AR, Starks H, Unguru Y, Feudtner C, Diekema D. Truth telling in the setting of cultural differences and incurable pediatric illness: A review . JAMA Pediatr . 2017;171(11):1113-1119. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2568
Williams DR, Lawrence JA, Davis BA, Vu C. Understanding how discrimination can affect health . Health Serv Res . 2019;54 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):1374-1388. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.13222
Benuto LT, Singer J, Newlands RT, Casas JB. Training culturally competent psychologists: Where are we and where do we need to go ? Training and Education in Professional Psychology . 2019;13(1):56-63. doi:10.1037/tep0000214
By Kendra Cherry, MSEd Kendra Cherry, MS, is a psychosocial rehabilitation specialist, psychology educator, and author of the "Everything Psychology Book."
Ethnocentrism In Psychology: Examples, Disadvantages, & Cultural Relativism
Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc
Associate Editor for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education
Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.
Learn about our Editorial Process
Saul McLeod, PhD
Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology
BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester
Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.
On This Page:
Ethnocentrism in psychology refers to the tendency to view one’s own cultural or ethnic group as superior and to judge other groups based on the values and standards of one’s group. It is the belief that one’s own culture is correct and superior compared to other cultures.
In essence, ethnocentrism leads individuals to use their own ethnic group and its standards to interpret and evaluate other groups, often in a negative manner.
Those who are ethnocentric assume their cultural norms are the ideal that other cultures should be measured against or aspire to.
For example, someone who is ethnocentric might believe their traditional cuisine or clothing is the proper way, and that other cultural practices are inferior or strange in comparison.
Or they may think their language should be the default spoken, rather than needing to accommodate other languages.
![Ethnocentrism In Psychology: Examples, Disadvantages, & Cultural Relativism 1 ethnocentric](https://www.simplypsychology.org/wp-content/uploads/ethnocentric.jpeg)
Ethnocentrism occurs when one believes that their own cultural group is superior to others.
Explanation
Individuals who are ethnocentric will believe that their culture’s beliefs, ideas, values, and practices are correct, and they use the standards in their own culture to assess other cultural groups.
They will tend to have negative attitudes toward other cultures and believe their beliefs, ideas, values, and practices are wrong or strange.
A popular example of ethnocentrism is to think of the utensils different cultures prefer to use. Some cultures prefer to use forks, spoons, and knives to eat and may believe that it is weird or incorrect that some cultures traditionally use chopsticks to eat.
Ethnocentrism can occur for anyone across most cultures and societies and is not limited to one culture.
It is thought to occur largely because people have the greatest understanding of their own culture, leading them to believe that the norms and standards of their own culture are universally adopted.
So, if they notice anything that deviates from their cultural norms, this can lead to ethnocentric attitudes.
Some researchers believe that ethnocentrism comprises in-group favoritism and vilification of out-groups; thus, people have a high opinion of their own group and think negatively about out-groups.
![](http://pechenka.online/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
How does ethnocentrism relate to psychology?
The predominant view in psychology has been white males, mainly from the USA.
It means psychologists ignore views, values, language, or culture from elsewhere.
For example, views about the signs and symptoms of mental disorders in the DSM are based on white male experiences, so other experiences are ignored.
Views about appropriate patterns of child rearing are based on the practices shared in white, English-speaking cultures and other ways devalued.
In psychology, ethnocentrism can exist when researchers design studies or draw conclusions that can only be applied to one cultural group.
Ethnocentrism occurs when a researcher assumes that their own culturally specific practices or ideas are ‘natural’ or ‘right.’
The individual uses their own ethnic group to evaluate and judge other individuals from other ethnic groups. Research that is ‘centered’ around one cultural group is called ‘ethnocentric.’
When other cultures are observed to differ from the researcher’s own, they may be regarded negatively, e.g., ‘primitive,’ ‘degenerate,’ ‘unsophisticated,’ ‘undeveloped,’ etc.
This becomes racism when other cultures are denigrated, or their traditions are regarded as irrelevant etc.
Ethnocentrism in psychology can reduce the generalisability of findings since the researchers may not have accounted for cultural diversity.
What are the disadvantages of ethnocentrism?
While it is not necessarily bad to believe your culture is good or to be patriotic, ethnocentrism is the belief that your culture is superior, which can come with downfalls.
Ethnocentrism can lead to people being more close-minded to how other people live, almost as if they are living in a bubble of their own culture. This can reinforce the in-group/out-group mentality.
Believing that one’s own culture is correct can spread misinformation about other cultures, leading to negative consequences.
If a group upholds the belief that other groups are inferior to them, this could result in groups discriminating against each other. On an extreme scale, ethnocentrism can lead to prejudice or racism.
Upholding the sanctity of one’s own culture may hinder societal progress and may prevent cooperation between cultures.
Cultural groups may be less likely to help each other in times of need and may only seek to preserve the people in their own group whom they consider more important.
Specifically, ethnocentrism in research could result in negative consequences if the materials used for research are produced with one culture in mind.
An example of this is when the United States Army used IQ tests on individuals before World War I, which was biased towards white American ideas of intelligence.
Because of this, Europeans had lower scores of intelligence, and African Americans were at the bottom of the IQ scale.
This had a negative effect on the attitudes of white Americans towards these other groups of people, specifically that they were not as intelligent as them.
When research does not consider ethnocentrism, this can reinforce pre-existing discrimination and prevent other cultures from having equal opportunities.
Ethnocentrism examples
Ethnocentrism in samples.
Some of the most famous psychological studies (such as Milgram’s, Asch’s , and Zimbardo’s) used only white American males in their samples.
Conclusions were drawn from the results that the results would be the same across all cultures. However, the results were different when these studies were replicated on other groups of people.
As these studies were conducted a long time ago, you may expect that psychological research is more culturally diverse now.
However, psychology still has a long way to go to be truly representative of all cultures. There is still a strong Western bias, with one analysis finding that 90% of participants in research are drawn from Western countries, with 60% of these participants being American (Thalmayer et al., 2021).
They go on to say that only about 11% of the world’s population is represented in the top psychology journals and that 89% of the population is neglected.
The Strange Situation
Ainsworth’s classic study of The Strange Situation (1970) is an example of ethnocentric research. This study was developed to assess the attachment types of infants – the sample in this study used all American infants.
Many researchers assumed this study has the same meaning for infants from other cultures as it did for American children. However, the results from other cultures were very different.
Most noteworthy are the differences observed in Japanese and German infants compared to American infants.
While the American ideal standard for attachment is ‘secure attachment,’ many Japanese infants displayed behaviors that would be considered ‘insecure-resistant attachment’ whilst many of the German infants displayed what would be considered ‘insecure-avoidant attachment.’
The different results from other cultures were presented as ‘abnormal’ and in need of explanation rather than considering that the differences are due to cultural differences in how children are raised.
It does not mean that German mothers are more insensitive or that Japanese mothers are too clingy to their children just because their infants react differently to American children.
The methods used in The Strange Situation are examples of imposed etic, meaning to study a culture from the outside and make inferences in relation to one culture’s standard.
More valid results could be obtained through the use of an emic study, meaning studying culture from the inside.
Ethnocentrism and Cultural Bias
Cultural bias in psychology is when research is conducted in one culture, and the findings are generalized to other cultures or are accepted as universally applicable.
Ainsworth’s research is culturally biased since standards were set regarding what securely attached means based on an American-only sample.
This theory was then generalized to other cultures so that what was considered the behavior of securely attached children in America should be what all children in other cultures should behave to be considered securely attached.
The parenting styles and behavior of their infants in cultures outside of America being seen as abnormal because it doesn’t fit the American norms is what relates cultural bias to ethnocentrism.
Another example of cultural bias relates to the designs of standardized tests such as intelligence tests. Intelligence tests that are designed by Western researchers reflect the idea of what the West considers as being intelligent.
However, Western cultures may have a different idea of what qualifies as intelligence compared to other cultures.
Thus, when using Western-designed intelligence tests in non-western countries, there is likely to be a bias in the results since the test measures something from the benchmark of different cultural experiences.
This can lead to ethnocentrism if those outside of the West score significantly lower on intelligence scores, leading to the West having the misconception that non-Western countries are less intelligent.
There are two types of cultural bias that can relate to psychological research:
Alpha bias – this occurs when a theory assumes that cultural groups are profoundly different. Since their differences are exaggerated, the cultural norms and values of the researchers are considered superior to other cultures.
Beta bias – this occurs when real cultural differences are ignored or minimized. All people are assumed to be the same, resulting in research that is universally applied to all cultures.
What is Cross-Cultural Psychology?
Cross-cultural psychology is a branch of psychology that examines how cultural factors influence human behavior.
The goal is to look at both universal and unique behaviors to establish the ways in which culture has an influence on behavior, relationships, education, etc.
After focusing on North American and European research for many years, Western researchers began to question whether many of the observations and ideas that were considered to be universal actually apply to other cultures outside of the sample that was studied.
Many cross-cultural psychologists have found that many observations about human thought and behavior may only be generalizable to specific groups.
An emic approach, which looks within cultures to identify behaviors that are specific to that culture, is usually the most appropriate approach to studying cross-culturally.
With the emic approach, researchers can immerse themselves fully into a culture and develop a deep understanding of their practices and values.
From this, they can develop research procedures and interpret the findings with that culture in mind. These procedures would then not be used across other cultures where they may yield invalid results.
What topics can be studied in cross-cultural psychology?
Cross-cultural psychology can explore many topics, such as:
Child development – whether unique cultural practices influence development.
Emotions – do all people experience emotions the same way? Is emotional expression universal?
Language – whether the acquisition of language and its development is similar or different between cultures?
Relationships – the differences in family, romantic relationships, and friendships that are influenced by culture.
Personality – the degree to which aspects of personality might be influenced by or linked with cultural influences.
Social behavior – understanding how cultural norms and expectations have an effect on social behavior.
What are the benefits of cross-cultural psychology?
By understanding what could have been cultural bias, researchers have increased their understanding of the impact of culture, cultural differences, and culture-specific behaviors.
This has had benefits when it comes to diagnosing mental illness, for example. Previously, some culture-specific behaviors were often misdiagnosed as a symptom of a disorder.
Recent issues of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) now include a list of culture-specific behaviors that help diagnose mental health issues accurately.
Modern researchers are now able to travel a lot more than they would have done in the past. They are able to have contact with people from all across the globe as well as being able to hold talks and conferences where researchers from different cultures can meet to discuss ideas.
This may mean there should be less cultural bias now since researchers from other cultures being able to talk can help grow understanding and acceptance of differences.
Researchers can also use input from people from different cultures to discuss any potential methodology flaws which can lead to cultural bias.
Ethnocentrism vs. cultural relativism
Ethnocentrism | Cultural Relativism |
---|---|
The belief that one’s own cultural or ethnic group is superior to others. | The principle that all cultures should be understood and evaluated on their own terms, rather than judged by the standards of another culture. |
Views other cultures as inferior or less important. | Respects and appreciates the diversity of other cultures. |
Uses the standards and values of one’s own culture to judge others. | Recognizes that each culture has its own unique standards and values that should be understood and respected. |
Unwilling to learn about other cultures because they are perceived as inferior. | Open to learning about and understanding other cultures. |
Can lead to prejudice, discrimination, and conflict between different cultural groups. | Promotes understanding and appreciation of different cultures, and can reduce conflict between them. |
Ethnocentrism and cultural relativism are two ways in which we assess a culture that is not our own.
While ethnocentrism means someone may judge other cultures based on the standards of their own cultures, cultural relativism is the notion that a culture should be understood on its own terms, without judgment against the criteria of another culture.
Someone who is ethnocentric may believe that their culture is ‘correct’ and ‘normal,’ but someone who adopts cultural relativism understands that one culture is not better than another.
An example of ethnocentrism is believing that the traditional clothing of a culture other than your own is ‘strange’ or ‘incorrect.’ In contrast, cultural relativism would appreciate and accept that different cultures have their own clothing and would not make a negative judgment about someone’s clothing even if it is different from what is the norm for them.
In research, cultural relativism is the ideology that what may be observable in research may only make sense from the perspective of the observed culture and cannot be applied to different cultures.
Ethnocentrism can be avoided or reduced by studying culture using an emic approach. This approach aims to observe cultural differences in the relevant context and uses that culture’s concepts or standards.
Ethnocentric studies are not inherently invalid and should not be disregarded. Instead, researchers should make sure to point out that their research may only be applied to the sample they studied, and the application to other cultures is questionable.
Cultural Relativism in Psychology
An example of how cultural relativism is relevant in research is noted by Sternberg (1985), who stated that the meaning of intelligence is different in every culture.
They noticed that in some cultures, coordination and motor skills are essential to life, so if someone excels in these skills, they are considered highly intelligent according to that culture.
However, in other cultures, motor skills are less relevant to intelligent behaviors, and the culture instead values vast knowledge on a range of topics, such as intelligence instead.
There is the development of ‘indigenous psychologies’ in research, which draws explicitly on the unique experience of people in a different cultural context.
Afrocentrism is an example of this, which suggests that theories of people with African heritage must recognize the African context of behaviors and attitudes.
This approach matters because it has led to the emergence of theories that are more relevant to the lives and cultures of people not only in Africa but also those far removed from their African origins.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are some examples of ethnocentric behavior.
In psychology, ethnocentric behavior can occur when a researcher conducts a study in a particular culture and then states in their findings that their results can be generalized to all cultures.
Likewise, when researchers apply their theory to another culture, and the results differ from what was the norm in their culture, they state that there is something wrong with that culture.
Otherwise, some other examples of ethnocentric behavior include:
– Judging other cultures’ food and specialty dishes.
– Judging people’s cultural outfits.
– Expecting others to speak your language and criticizing them if they can’t.
– Historical colonialism.
– Judging someone who chooses to live on their own when it is traditional to always live with family in your culture.
What is ethnorelativism?
Ethnorelativism is the ability to see values and behaviors as cultural rather than universal.
It is a belief based on respect for other cultures, believing that all groups, cultures, or subcultures are inherently equal.
Furthermore, it is the belief that other cultures are no better or worse than one’s own but are equally valid despite their differences.
What is the difference between ethnocentrism and racism?
As ethnocentrism implicates a strong identification with an in-group, it can lead to ingrained negative feelings and stereotyping of out-group members, which can be confused with racism.
Whilst they are not the same, ethnocentrism can lead to prejudiced behaviors and attempts to impose one’s subjective culture onto other cultural groups.
Ethnocentric attitudes can lead to prejudice and discrimination based on race and the belief that one race is superior to all others.
What is the difference between ethnocentrism and xenocentrism?
While ethnocentrism is the belief that one’s own culture is superior and correct compared to others, xenocentrism is the belief that other cultures are better than one’s own culture.
Essentially, xenocentrism is the opposite of ethnocentrism. In some ways, xenocentrism is considered deviant behavior as it goes against the norms of what someone is expected to appreciate.
Examples of this can include:
– The belief is that vehicles manufactured in other countries are better than ones made in your own country.
– European Renaissance artists desired to emulate ancient Greek artwork.
– The belief that cheeses and wines from other countries are superior to the products from your own country.
– The belief that the style of clothing in another culture is superior to those within your own culture.
– The idea that quality products cannot be purchased in one’s own country.
Further Information
- Teo, Thomas, and Angela R. Febbraro. “Ethnocentrism as a form of intuition in psychology.” Theory & Psychology 13.5 (2003): 673-694.
- Christopher, J. C., & Hickinbottom, S. (2008). Positive psychology, ethnocentrism, and the disguised ideology of individualism. Theory & psychology, 18(5), 563-589.
Hasa. (2020, February 17). What is the Difference Between Ethnocentrism and Cultural Relativism. PEDIAA. https://pediaa.com/what-is-the-difference-between-ethnocentrism-and-cultural-relativism/#:~:text=and%20Cultural%20Relativism-,Definition,using%20standards%20of%20another%20culture
Rosado, C. (1994). Understanding cultural relativism in a multicultural world. The Elements of Moral Philosophy , 15-29.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of personality and social psychology, 49(3), 607.
Thalmayer, A. G., Toscanelli, C., & Arnett, J. J. (2021). The neglected 95% revisited: Is American psychology becoming less American? American Psychologist, 76(1), 116–129.
Tilley, J. J. (2000). Cultural relativism. Hum. Rts. Q. , 22 , 501.
![Ethnocentrism In Psychology: Examples, Disadvantages, & Cultural Relativism 2 Print Friendly, PDF & Email](https://www.simplypsychology.org/wp-content/uploads/three-icons-with-text-light-blue.jpg)
Ethnocentrism and Cultural Relativism Differences Essay
- To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
- As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
- As a template for you assignment
Culture is one of the main characteristics of human behavior that can be shaped through the existing beliefs, norms, and values. There are several ways to learn the importance and impact of culture, and the two most common approaches are cultural relativism and ethnocentrism. For a long period, ethnocentrism was the norm for understanding the context of a culture in human interactions. The main idea is that someone’s culture should be considered a standard for measuring other cultures. In other words, researchers aim at comparing similarities of different cultural elements (beliefs or practices) through the prism of a particular culture. It is enough to use one culture for analysis and rely on its origins for judging other cultures. However, this method is usually associated with incorrect or subjective assumptions about behaviors. To eliminate provocative biases and questions, cultural relativism was introduced as a possibility to assess cultures using their specific standards instead of focusing on the basics of one culture. Thus, the main difference between cultural relativism and ethnocentrism is the role of foreign cultures in evaluation.
There are many examples of ethnocentrism and cultural relativism in the modern world. One of the most evident illustrations of ethnocentrism is the American belief that all people, regardless of their origins, should know and speak English as it is the world’s dominant language. Using the same example, cultural relativism helps explain a variety of languages across the globe and justify this diversity as an attempt to recognize the validity of choices and moral rights. In this case, cultural relativism may be too extreme because it is difficult for people to communicate in different languages. There has to be a rule or a standard beyond cultures that allows individuals to cooperate internationally. The processes of globalization and industrialization are inevitable today, and cultural relativism may be inappropriate when equal conditions should be created for some activities.
- Diversity, Inclusion, and Respect for Human Dignity in America
- Defining Mexican Culture and Its Special Features
- Relationship Between Ethnocentrism and Intercultural Communication
- Ethnography: Ethnocentrism Concept Analysis
- The Role of Ethnocentrism in Intercultural Communication
- Discussion of Cultural Blending Tendency
- Hawaiian Culture: Aesthetic Reflection
- The Context of ShōJo Manga in the West
- The San Joaquin Asparagus Festival in California
- The Impact of Ancient Greek Civilization and Architecture on Modern Culture
- Chicago (A-D)
- Chicago (N-B)
IvyPanda. (2022, December 22). Ethnocentrism and Cultural Relativism Differences. https://ivypanda.com/essays/ethnocentrism-and-cultural-relativism-differences/
"Ethnocentrism and Cultural Relativism Differences." IvyPanda , 22 Dec. 2022, ivypanda.com/essays/ethnocentrism-and-cultural-relativism-differences/.
IvyPanda . (2022) 'Ethnocentrism and Cultural Relativism Differences'. 22 December.
IvyPanda . 2022. "Ethnocentrism and Cultural Relativism Differences." December 22, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/ethnocentrism-and-cultural-relativism-differences/.
1. IvyPanda . "Ethnocentrism and Cultural Relativism Differences." December 22, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/ethnocentrism-and-cultural-relativism-differences/.
Bibliography
IvyPanda . "Ethnocentrism and Cultural Relativism Differences." December 22, 2022. https://ivypanda.com/essays/ethnocentrism-and-cultural-relativism-differences/.
![essay about ethnocentrism and cultural relativism brainly Pediaa.Com](https://pediaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/logo_new.png)
Home » Sociology » What is the Difference Between Ethnocentrism and Cultural Relativism
What is the Difference Between Ethnocentrism and Cultural Relativism
The main difference between ethnocentrism and cultural relativism is the way in which you evaluate or assess foreign culture . Ethnocentrism involves looking at another culture from the perspective of one’s own culture, while cultural relativism involves looking at another culture by its own perspective instead of one’s own culture.
Culture is the beliefs, values, social forms, and material traits of a particular social group. Ethnocentrism and cultural relativism are two ways in which we assess a culture that is not our own. Ethnocentrism is the act of judging other cultures according to the preconceptions originating in the standards and customs of one’s own culture. Cultural relativism, on the other hand, is the concept that cultural norms and values of people have to be understood with their own cultural context.
Key Areas Covered
1. What is Ethnocentrism – Definition, Features, Examples 2. What is Cultural Relativism – Definition, Features 3. What is the Difference Between Ethnocentrism and Cultural Relativism – Comparison of Key Differences
![essay about ethnocentrism and cultural relativism brainly Difference Between Ethnocentrism and Cultural Relativism - Comparison Summary](https://i0.wp.com/pediaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Difference-Between-Ethnocentrism-and-Cultural-Relativism-Comparison-Summary.jpg?resize=475%2C485&ssl=1)
What is Ethnocentrism
Ethnocentrism is the act of judging other cultures based on the preconceptions originating in the standards and customs of one’s own culture. In other words, an ethnocentric assesses another culture from the standards of his own culture. He is concerned with the similarities between his culture and others. If the beliefs and customs of another culture are different from his culture, he’ll feel that culture is barbaric or savage. This happens because an ethnocentric person feels that his or her culture is the ‘correct’ or ‘normal’ way of living. For example, a Westerner might find East Asians’ habit of eating with chopsticks a silly practice. Similarly, some people may also show reluctance to eat the food of another culture.
![essay about ethnocentrism and cultural relativism brainly Difference Between Ethnocentrism and Cultural Relativism](https://i0.wp.com/pediaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Difference-Between-Ethnocentrism-and-Cultural-Relativism_1.jpeg?resize=550%2C364&ssl=1)
Ethnocentrism stems from the notion that one’s own culture is far superior to others. This notion is also associated with colonialism . It was because of this superiority stemming from ethnocentrism that most colonizers viewed colonized cultures as savage. While it’s natural to appreciate one’s own culture, seeing other cultures as inferior or savage can lead to hatred and aggression, causing violence and conflicts.
What is Cultural Relativism
Cultural relativism is the notion that cultural norms and values derive their meaning within a specific social context. According to this postulate, values, beliefs, practices and behaviours of people should be understood within their own cultural context, and they should not be judged against the criteria of another culture. This is based on the concept that no culture is better or superior to another.
![essay about ethnocentrism and cultural relativism brainly Main Difference - Ethnocentrism vs Cultural Relativism](https://i0.wp.com/pediaa.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Difference-Between-Ethnocentrism-and-Cultural-Relativism_2.jpeg?resize=551%2C367&ssl=1)
Furthermore, cultural relativism is one of the most fundamental concepts of sociology. Moreover, this concept was introduced by Franz Boas and popularized by his students although they did not use the term cultural relativism. Cultural relativism is actually a popular notion in modern society.
Difference Between Ethnocentrism and Cultural Relativism
Ethnocentrism is judging other cultures based on the preconceptions originating in the standards and customs of one’s own culture. In contrast, cultural relativism is the notion that a culture should be understood on its own terms, not using standards of another culture.
While ethnocentrism involves looking at another culture from the perspective of one’s own culture, cultural relativism involves looking at another culture by its own perspective instead of one’s own culture.
Own Culture
An ethnocentric individual will believe that his culture is ‘correct’ and ‘normal’, but a person who believes in cultural relativism understands that one culture is not better than another.
The main difference between ethnocentrism and cultural relativism is the way in which you evaluate or assess foreign culture. Ethnocentrism involves looking at another culture from the perspective of one’s own culture while cultural relativism involves looking at a foreign culture by its own perspective instead of one’s own culture.
1. Cole, Nicki Lisa. “Definition of Cultural Relativism in Sociology.” ThoughtCo, ThoughtCo, 17 Aug. 2019, Available here. 2. Evans, Tracy. “Ethnocentrism – .” Lumen – Cultural Anthropology, Available here .
Image Courtesy:
1. “Person Eating Sushi” By Isabella Mendes (CC0) via Pexels 2. “Photo of People in Traditional Wear” By Nishant Aneja (CC0) via Pexels
About the Author: Hasa
Hasanthi is a seasoned content writer and editor with over 8 years of experience. Armed with a BA degree in English and a knack for digital marketing, she explores her passions for literature, history, culture, and food through her engaging and informative writing.
You May Also Like These
Leave a reply cancel reply.
![](http://pechenka.online/777/templates/cheerup1/res/banner1.gif)
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Ethnocentrism and Cultural Relativism Ethnocentrism is the tendency to look at the world primarily from the perspective of one's own culture. Part of ethnocentrism is the belief that one's own race, ethnic or cultural group is the most important or that some or all aspects of its culture are superior to those of other groups. Some people will simply call it cultural ignorance.
Khanmigo is now free for all US educators! Plan lessons, develop exit tickets, and so much more with our AI teaching assistant.
Ethnocentrism and Cultural Relativism. Despite how much humans have in common, cultural differences are far more prevalent than cultural universals. For example, while all cultures have language, analysis of particular language structures and conversational etiquette reveal tremendous differences. In some Middle Eastern cultures, it is common ...
Cultural relativism suggests that ethics, morals, values, norms, beliefs, and behaviors must be understood within the context of the culture from which they arise. It means that all cultures have their own beliefs and that there is no universal or absolute standard to judge those cultural norms. "Cultural relativism leads us to accept that ...
Ethnocentrism vs. Cultural Relativism - Writing Prompts Poster Prompt 1: Create a poster or some other type of graphic organizer that defines culture and then describes ethnocentrism and cultural ...
Cultural Relativism vs. Ethnocentrism. Ethnocentrism is the tendency to look at the world largely from the perspective of one's own culture. This may be motivated, for example, by the belief that one's own race, ethnic, or cultural group is the most important or that some or all aspects of its culture are superior to those of other groups. ...
Ethnocentrism in psychology refers to the tendency to view one's own cultural or ethnic group as superior and to judge other groups based on the values and standards of one's group. It is the belief that one's own culture is correct and superior compared to other cultures. In essence, ethnocentrism leads individuals to use their own ...
There are several ways to learn the importance and impact of culture, and the two most common approaches are cultural relativism and ethnocentrism. For a long period, ethnocentrism was the norm for understanding the context of a culture in human interactions. The main idea is that someone's culture should be considered a standard for ...
The main difference between ethnocentrism and cultural relativism is the way in which you evaluate or assess foreign culture. Ethnocentrism involves looking at another culture from the perspective of one's own culture while cultural relativism involves looking at a foreign culture by its own perspective instead of one's own culture ...
The terms cultural relativism and ethnocentrism represent two contrasting approaches to understanding cultures. Cultural relativism is the concept that acknowledges the existence of different cultures and recognizes that each culture has its own set of values, beliefs, and practices that are learned from prior generations.
report flag outlined. Explanation: Cultural relativism is "the concept of understanding different cultures and respecting their own beliefs.". On the other hand, "ethnocentrism," being the opposite end, means that your culture is the ideal, and that no other culture is more acceptable and right than your culture. Advertisement.
Differences between Ethnocentrism and cultural relativism. Ethnocentrism is "my culture's the best in every way." Cultural relativism is "Every culture is equally valid, so you have no right to impose your culture's values on other cultures." Conservatives lean towards ethnocentrism, while liberals lean towards cultural relativism.
Ethnocentrism is "my culture's the best in every way." Cultural relativism is "Every culture is equally valid, so you have no right to impose your culture'svalu… adasrh2101 adasrh2101 04.08.2018 ... Get the Brainly App Download iOS App Download Android App Brainly.in. PL: ...
Ethnocentrism often involves viewing one's own culture as superior, while cultural relativism emphasizes the importance of understanding and respecting diverse cultural perspectives. An example of ethnocentrism could be believing that your cultural practices are the best, while an example of cultural relativism is appreciating different ...
The perspective of ethnocentrism addresses foreign peoples from the standpoint of the superiority of the observer's culture, including values, religion, and symbols. Cultural relativism addresses other people in light of those people's culture. Explanation: