scientific article review articles

2. Benefits of Review Articles to the Author. Analysing literature gives an overview of the "WHs": WHat has been reported in a particular field or topic, WHo the key writers are, WHat are the prevailing theories and hypotheses, WHat questions are being asked (and answered), and WHat methods and methodologies are appropriate and useful [].For new or aspiring researchers in a particular ...

Scientific review articles are common in the medical literature and can serve as definitive references on the topic for other scientists, clinicians, and trainees. The first step in the process of preparing a scientific review article is to select a focused topic. This step is followed by a literature search and critical analysis of the ...

A well-written review article must summarize key research findings, reference must-read articles, describe current areas of agreement as well as controversies and debates, point out gaps in current knowledge, depict unanswered questions, and suggest directions for future research ( 1 ). During the last decades, there has been a great expansion ...

An important role of a review article is to introduce researchers to a field. For this, schematic figures can be useful to illustrate the science being discussed, in much the same way as the first ...

A good review article provides readers with an in-depth understanding of a field and highlights key gaps and challenges to address with future research. Writing a review article also helps to expand the writer's knowledge of their specialist area and to develop their analytical and communication skills, amongst other benefits. Thus, the ...

Review Article (1550) All; Review Article (1550) Year. All. All; 2024 (7) ... with a discussion on how artificial intelligence systems can aid the scientific process and the central issues that ...

The PRISMA statement elaborated to write a well-designed review articles contains a 27-item checklist (Table 1). It will be reasonable to fulfill the requirements of these items during preparation of a review article or a meta-analysis. Thus preparation of a comprehensible article with a high-quality scientific content can be feasible.

As with all scientific articles, defining the author list and individual contributions is important to do as early as possible to avoid conflict and confusion later on []. Scope. A key step of the planning stage is to pinpoint what the scientific focus of the review article will be.

Abstract. Review articles present comprehensive overview of relevant literature on specific themes and synthesise the studies related to these themes, with the aim of strengthening the foundation of knowledge and facilitating theory development. The significance of review articles in science is immeasurable as both students and researchers rely ...

When drawing up an initial outline, consider any unique features of the article type that you're develop-ing and always refer to the journal's guidelines on word, page and reference limits. Most review articles are between 4000 and 6000 words in length and as a rule of thumb, 8090% of the text should be within. -.

Scientific review articles are comprehensive, focused reviews of the scientific literature written by subject matter experts. The task of writing a scientific review article can seem overwhelming; however, it can be managed by using an organized approach and devoting sufficient time to the process. …

Actions to Take. 1. Skim the article without taking notes: Read the abstract. The abstract will tell you the major findings of the article and why they matter. Read first for the "big picture.". Note any terms or techniques you need to define. Jot down any questions or parts you don't understand.

Many research disciplines feature high-impact journals that are dedicated outlets for review papers (or review-conceptual combinations) (e.g., Academy of Management Review, Psychology Bulletin, Medicinal Research Reviews).The rationale for such outlets is the premise that research integration and synthesis provides an important, and possibly even a required, step in the scientific process.

Scientific review articles are comprehensive, focused reviews of the scientific literature written by subject matter experts. The task of writing a scientific review article can seem overwhelming ...

The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) is a weekly general medical journal that publishes new medical research and review articles, and editorial opinion on a wide variety of topics of ...

The main purpose of a review article is to reconcile conflicting findings and suggest novel and new directions for a given field of research with reference to methodology, theory, constructs and contexts for others to examine using quantitative or qualitative methods ( Canabal and White, 2008, Hao et al., 2019 ).

Here are a few practices that can make the time-consuming process of writing a review article easier: Define your question: Take your time to identify the research question and carefully articulate the topic of your review paper. A good review should also add something new to the field in terms of a hypothesis, inference, or conclusion.

As a general rule, most journals ask that a specific font and size be used (e.g., Times New Roman, 12 point), that 1.0-inch margins be used on all four sides, and 1.5 line spacing be used. The article structure should contain very specific sections, which might vary slightly according to different science disciplines.

Predictive grid coding in the medial entorhinal cortex. by. Ayako Ouchi. Shigeyoshi Fujisawa. Science Vol. 385, NO. 6710 15 Aug 2024 : 776-784. Research Article.

Experimental study of gamma-ray attenuation capability of B 2 O 3 -ZnO-Na 2 O-Fe 2 O 3 glass system. Mohamed Elsafi. M. I. Sayyed. Ali Hedaya. Article Open Access 19 Aug 2024.

Google Scholar provides a simple way to broadly search for scholarly literature. Search across a wide variety of disciplines and sources: articles, theses, books, abstracts and court opinions.

Spread the loveAn article review is a critical evaluation of a scholarly or scientific piece, which aims to summarize its main ideas, assess its contributions, and provide constructive feedback. A well-written review not only benefits the author of the article under scrutiny but also serves as a valuable resource for fellow researchers and scholars. Follow these steps to create an effective ...

Review articles in academic journals that analyze or discuss researches previously published by others, rather than reporting new research results or findings. Summaries and critiques are two ways to write a review of a scientific journal article.

The research questions focus on how science capital is studied and contextualised and on what has been discovered about science capital. The materials were selected from three scientific databases using seven keywords. This article provides an overview of 32 selected articles published in peer-reviewed scientific journals from 2000-2021.

Peer review is a mutual responsibility among fellow scientists, and scientists are expected, as part of the academic community, to take part in peer review. If one is to expect others to review their work, they should commit to reviewing the work of others as well, and put effort into it. 2) Be pleasant. If the paper is of low quality, suggest ...

Searching results. As illustrated in Fig. 1, we identified a total of 7,365 potentially relevant studies from searched electronic databases and search engines, and 1,623 articles were excluded due to duplication.After reviewing the titles and abstracts, 5,361 articles were excluded because they did not meet the objectives and the inclusion criteria of the review.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a rising issue worldwide, which is increasing prolonged illness and mortality rates in the population. Similarly, bacteria have generated multidrug resistance (MDR) by developing various mechanisms to cope with existing antibiotics and therefore, there is a need to develop new anti Biomaterials Science Recent Review Articles, 2024