marijuanas should not be legal essay

• Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
• Biostatistics
• Environmental Health and Engineering
• Epidemiology
• Health Policy and Management
• Health, Behavior and Society
• International Health
• Mental Health
• Molecular Microbiology and Immunology
• Population, Family and Reproductive Health
• Program Finder
• Admissions Services
• Course Directory
• Academic Calendar
• Hybrid Campus
• Lecture Series
• Convocation
• Strategy and Development
• Implementation and Impact
• Integrity and Oversight
• In the School
• In the Field
• In Baltimore
• Resources for Practitioners
• Articles & News Releases
• In The News
• Statements & Announcements
• At a Glance
• Student Life
• Strategic Priorities
• Inclusion, Diversity, Anti-Racism, and Equity (IDARE)
• What is Public Health?

The Evidence—and Lack Thereof—About Cannabis

Research is still needed on cannabis’s risks and benefits. 

Lindsay Smith Rogers

Although the use and possession of cannabis is illegal under federal law, medicinal and recreational cannabis use has become increasingly widespread.

Thirty-eight states and Washington, D.C., have legalized medical cannabis, while 23 states and D.C. have legalized recreational use. Cannabis legalization has benefits, such as removing the product from the illegal market so it can be taxed and regulated, but science is still trying to catch up as social norms evolve and different products become available. 

In this Q&A, adapted from the August 25 episode of Public Health On Call , Lindsay Smith Rogers talks with Johannes Thrul, PhD, MS , associate professor of Mental Health , about cannabis as medicine, potential risks involved with its use, and what research is showing about its safety and efficacy. 

Do you think medicinal cannabis paved the way for legalization of recreational use?

The momentum has been clear for a few years now. California was the first to legalize it for medical reasons [in 1996]. Washington and Colorado were the first states to legalize recreational use back in 2012. You see one state after another changing their laws, and over time, you see a change in social norms. It's clear from the national surveys that people are becoming more and more in favor of cannabis legalization. That started with medical use, and has now continued into recreational use.

But there is a murky differentiation between medical and recreational cannabis. I think a lot of people are using cannabis to self-medicate. It's not like a medication you get prescribed for a very narrow symptom or a specific disease. Anyone with a medical cannabis prescription, or who meets the age limit for recreational cannabis, can purchase it. Then what they use it for is really all over the place—maybe because it makes them feel good, or because it helps them deal with certain symptoms, diseases, and disorders.

Does cannabis have viable medicinal uses?

The evidence is mixed at this point. There hasn’t been a lot of funding going into testing cannabis in a rigorous way. There is more evidence for certain indications than for others, like CBD for seizures—one of the first indications that cannabis was approved for. And THC has been used effectively for things like nausea and appetite for people with cancer.

There are other indications where the evidence is a lot more mixed. For example, pain—one of the main reasons that people report for using cannabis. When we talk to patients, they say cannabis improved their quality of life. In the big studies that have been done so far, there are some indications from animal models that cannabis might help [with pain]. When we look at human studies, it's very much a mixed bag. 

And, when we say cannabis, in a way it's a misnomer because cannabis is so many things. We have different cannabinoids and different concentrations of different cannabinoids. The main cannabinoids that are being studied are THC and CBD, but there are dozens of other minor cannabinoids and terpenes in cannabis products, all of varying concentrations. And then you also have a lot of different routes of administration available. You can smoke, vape, take edibles, use tinctures and topicals. When you think about the explosion of all of the different combinations of different products and different routes of administration, it tells you how complicated it gets to study this in a rigorous way. You almost need a randomized trial for every single one of those and then for every single indication.

What do we know about the risks of marijuana use?  

Cannabis use disorder is a legitimate disorder in the DSM. There are, unfortunately, a lot of people who develop a problematic use of cannabis. We know there are risks for mental health consequences. The evidence is probably the strongest that if you have a family history of psychosis or schizophrenia, using cannabis early in adolescence is not the best idea. We know cannabis can trigger psychotic symptoms and potentially longer lasting problems with psychosis and schizophrenia. 

It is hard to study, because you also don't know if people are medicating early negative symptoms of schizophrenia. They wouldn't necessarily have a diagnosis yet, but maybe cannabis helps them to deal with negative symptoms, and then they develop psychosis. There is also some evidence that there could be something going on with the impact of cannabis on the developing brain that could prime you to be at greater risk of using other substances later down the road, or finding the use of other substances more reinforcing. 

What benefits do you see to legalization?

When we look at the public health landscape and the effect of legislation, in this case legalization, one of the big benefits is taking cannabis out of the underground illegal market. Taking cannabis out of that particular space is a great idea. You're taking it out of the illegal market and giving it to legitimate businesses where there is going to be oversight and testing of products, so you know what you're getting. And these products undergo quality control and are labeled. Those labels so far are a bit variable, but at least we're getting there. If you're picking up cannabis at the street corner, you have no idea what's in it. 

And we know that drug laws in general have been used to criminalize communities of color and minorities. Legalizing cannabis [can help] reduce the overpolicing of these populations.

What big questions about cannabis would you most like to see answered?

We know there are certain, most-often-mentioned conditions that people are already using medical cannabis for: pain, insomnia, anxiety, and PTSD. We really need to improve the evidence base for those. I think clinical trials for different cannabis products for those conditions are warranted.

Another question is, now that the states are getting more tax revenue from cannabis sales, what are they doing with that money? If you look at tobacco legislation, for example, certain states have required that those funds get used for research on those particular issues. To me, that would be a very good use of the tax revenue that is now coming in. We know, for example, that there’s a lot more tax revenue now that Maryland has legalized recreational use. Maryland could really step up here and help provide some of that evidence.

Are there studies looking into the risks you mentioned?

Large national studies are done every year or every other year to collect data, so we already have a pretty good sense of the prevalence of cannabis use disorder. Obviously, we'll keep tracking that to see if those numbers increase, for example, in states that are legalizing. But, you wouldn't necessarily expect to see an uptick in cannabis use disorder a month after legalization. The evidence from states that have legalized it has not demonstrated that we might all of a sudden see an increase in psychosis or in cannabis use disorder. This happens slowly over time with a change in social norms and availability, and potentially also with a change in marketing. And, with increasing use of an addictive substance, you will see over time a potential increase in problematic use and then also an increase in use disorder.

If you're interested in seeing if cannabis is right for you, is this something you can talk to your doctor about?

I think your mileage may vary there with how much your doctor is comfortable and knows about it. It's still relatively fringe. That will very much depend on who you talk to. But I think as providers and professionals, everybody needs to learn more about this, because patients are going to ask no matter what.

Lindsay Smith Rogers, MA, is the producer of the Public Health On Call podcast , an editor for Expert Insights , and the director of content strategy for the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Could Medical Marijuana Help Address the Opioid Epidemic?

Policy Is Public Health

Medical Marijuana Laws Linked to Health and Labor Supply Benefits in Older Adults

Related Content

Understanding Sleep, Activity, and Circadian Rhythms in Major Depressive Disorder

The Threat to Abortion Rights You Haven’t Heard Of

How to Offer Support and Find Strength on a Trauma Anniversary

Mental Health in the Workplace: A Conversation Bridging Research and Practice

Activity, Sleep & Dementia

Why Marijuana Should Not Be Legal: Potential Risks and Drawbacks

Marijuana legalization has been a topic of debate for many years, with strong arguments both for and against its legality. If you are someone who is deeply concerned about the potential impact of drug use on individuals and society, and you need an argumentative essay, an online custom essay writing service with the command of the best writing experts create for you an amazing essay.

Why Cannabis Shouldn’t Be Legalised

I have always been interested in the topic of marijuana legalization and have spent a considerable amount of time researching the potential risks and benefits associated with cannabis use. While some argue that marijuana should be legalized for medical and recreational use, I strongly believe that it should remain illegal. In this essay, I will explore why I believe that why shouldn’t marijuanas be legalized. Specifically, I will examine the potential negative consequences of marijuana use, including its impact on cognitive function, mental health, and societal well-being. By sharing my perspective and research, I hope to provide a comprehensive understanding of this complex issue and shed light on the potential risks of legalizing marijuana.

So, here reasons why shouldn’t marijuanas be legalized:

The Cognitive Effects of Marijuana Use: Short-Term Memory Loss, Reduced Concentration, and Impaired Judgment

Firstly, marijuana is considered a psychoactive drug that can affect the brain and impair cognitive function. The use of marijuana can cause short-term memory loss, reduced concentration, and impaired judgment, which can increase the risk of accidents and injuries. This is especially concerning when individuals who are under the influence of marijuana operate heavy machinery or drive a car.

Mental Health Risks Associated with Marijuana Use: Depression, Anxiety, and Psychosis

Secondly, marijuana use has been linked to an increased risk of mental health problems such as depression, anxiety, and psychosis. Studies have shown that individuals who use marijuana regularly are more likely to develop these conditions than those who do not use the drug. Additionally, long-term marijuana use can cause changes in the brain’s structure and function, which may increase the risk of addiction and other negative outcomes.

The Risks of Marijuana Use for Adolescents: Long-Term Cognitive Problems and Brain Development

Thirdly, the legalization of marijuana could lead to increased availability and accessibility, which could result in more people using the drug, including young people. Research has shown that the use of marijuana during adolescence can have a negative impact on brain development and may lead to long-term problems with cognitive function.

Societal Concerns: Drug-Related Crime, Accidents, and Healthcare Costs

Lastly, legalizing marijuana would create a number of societal problems, including increased drug-related crime, a rise in drug-related accidents and injuries, and an increase in healthcare costs associated with marijuana use.

The legal status of marijuana has been widely debated, with opinions ranging from its potential benefits such as increased tax revenue and reduced incarceration rates to its potential risks such as negative impacts on individuals and society. As we grapple with this issue, it is important to consider the health and safety of all involved and to gain a full understanding of the evidence before making any decisions. The choice on whether or not to legalize marijuana should be based on an analysis of both the data and the values and concerns of those affected by this issue.

Why Marijuana Should Not Be Legal: Tips Tips On Writing Essay

Writing a well-crafted why marijuanas should not be legal essay requires careful planning and attention to detail. When tackling a topic as controversial as the legalization of marijuana, it is important to approach the subject with a clear and well-informed perspective. In order to write a persuasive and effective essay, it is essential to conduct thorough research, use credible sources, structure your essay carefully, consider counterarguments, use clear and concise language, and edit and revise your work. By following these guidelines, you can create a well-argued and compelling marijuana should not be legalized article that persuades readers to see your perspective on the issue.

Do your Research

Before you begin writing why we shouldn’t legalize weed, make sure you have a solid understanding of the potential risks and drawbacks associated with marijuana use. This may involve reviewing scientific research, examining statistics and data, and considering the perspectives of experts in the field.

Use Credible Sources

When citing evidence to support your argument, be sure to use credible sources such as peer-reviewed journals, government reports, and reputable news outlets. Avoid relying on biased or unreliable sources.

Structure your Essay Carefully

A well-organized informative essay should have a clear introduction that sets out your argument, several well-supported body paragraphs that present evidence and analysis, and a concise conclusion that summarizes your main points and restates your thesis.

Consider Counterarguments

When presenting your argument, be sure to consider and respond to potential counterarguments. This will help strengthen your essay and demonstrate that you have considered multiple perspectives on the issue.

Use Clear and Concise Language

Be sure to use clear, concise language throughout your essay. Avoid using overly complex or technical terminology, and make sure your arguments are easy to follow and understand.

Edit and Revise

Once you have completed a first draft, take the time to edit and revise your essay. Look for spelling and grammar errors, as well as any areas where your argument could be strengthened or clarified. Consider seeking feedback from a teacher or peer to help you improve your essay. With these tips in mind, you can create a compelling argument against the legalization of marijuana.

Related posts:

• The Great Gatsby (Analyze this Essay Online)
• Pollution Cause and Effect Essay Sample
• Essay Sample on What Does Leadership Mean to You
• Visualizing My Future: A Reflection on Where I See Myself in Five Years

Improve your writing with our guides

Youth Culture Essay Prompt and Discussion

Why Should College Athletes Be Paid, Essay Sample

Reasons Why Minimum Wage Should Be Raised Essay: Benefits for Workers, Society, and The Economy

Get 15% off your first order with edusson.

Connect with a professional writer within minutes by placing your first order. No matter the subject, difficulty, academic level or document type, our writers have the skills to complete it.

100% privacy. No spam ever.

Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World

Read our research on:

Full Topic List

Regions & Countries

• Publications
• Our Methods
• Short Reads
• Tools & Resources

Read Our Research On:

Americans overwhelmingly say marijuana should be legal for medical or recreational use

With a growing number of states authorizing the use of marijuana, the public continues to broadly favor legalization of the drug for medical and recreational purposes. 

An overwhelming share of U.S. adults (88%) say either that marijuana should be legal for medical and recreational use by adults (59%) or that it should be legal for medical use only (30%). Just one-in-ten (10%) say marijuana use should not be legal, according to a Pew Research Center survey conducted Oct. 10-16, 2022. These views are virtually unchanged since April 2021.

The new survey follows President Joe Biden’s decision to pardon people convicted of marijuana possession at the federal level and direct his administration to review how marijuana is classified under federal law. It was fielded before the Nov. 8 midterm elections, when two states legalized the use of marijuana for recreational purposes – joining 19 states and the District of Columbia , which had already done so.

Pew Research Center asked this question to track public views about the legal status of marijuana. For this analysis, we surveyed 5,098 adults from Oct. 10-16, 2022. Everyone who took part in this survey is a member of the Center’s American Trends Panel (ATP), an online survey panel that is recruited through national, random sampling of residential addresses. This way nearly all U.S. adults have a chance of selection. The survey is weighted to be representative of the U.S. adult population by gender, race, ethnicity, partisan affiliation, education and other categories. Read more about the ATP’s methodology .

Here are the questions used for this report, along with responses, and its methodology .

Over the long term, there has been a steep rise in public support for marijuana legalization, as measured by a separate Gallup survey question that asks whether the use of marijuana should be made legal – without specifying whether it would be legalized for recreational or medical use. This year, 68% of adults say marijuana should be legal , matching the record-high support for legalization Gallup found in 2021.

There continue to be sizable age and partisan differences in Americans’ views about marijuana. While very small shares of adults of any age are completely opposed to the legalization of the drug, older adults are far less likely than younger ones to favor legalizing it for recreational purposes.

This is particularly the case among those ages 75 and older, just three-in-ten of whom say marijuana should be legal for both medical and recreational use. Larger shares in every other age group – including 53% of those ages 65 to 74 – say the drug should be legal for both medical and recreational use.

Republicans are more wary than Democrats about legalizing marijuana for recreational use: 45% of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents favor legalizing marijuana for both medical and recreational use, while an additional 39% say it should only be legal for medical use. By comparison, 73% of Democrats and Democratic leaners say marijuana should be legal for both medical and recreational use; an additional 21% say it should be legal for medical use only.

Ideological differences are evident within each party. About four-in-ten conservative Republicans (37%) say marijuana should be legal for medical and recreational use, compared with a 60% majority of moderate and liberal Republicans.

Nearly two-thirds of conservative and moderate Democrats (63%) say marijuana should be legal for medical and recreational use. An overwhelming majority of liberal Democrats (84%) say the same.

There also are racial and ethnic differences in views of legalizing marijuana. Roughly two-thirds of Black adults (68%) and six-in-ten White adults say marijuana should be legal for medical and recreational use, compared with smaller shares of Hispanic (49%) and Asian adults (48%).

Related: Clear majorities of Black Americans favor marijuana legalization, easing of criminal penalties

In both parties, views of marijuana legalization vary by age

While Republicans and Democrats differ greatly on whether marijuana should be legal for medial and recreational use, there are also age divides within each party.

A 62% majority of Republicans ages 18 to 29 favor making marijuana legal for medical and recreational use, compared with 52% of those ages 30 to 49. Roughly four-in-ten Republicans ages 50 to 64 (41%) and 65 to 74 (38%) say marijuana should be legal for both purposes, as do 18% of those 75 and older.

Still, wide majorities of Republicans in all age groups favor legalizing marijuana for medical use. Even among Republicans 65 and older, just 17% say marijuana use should not be legal even for medical purposes.

While majorities of Democrats across all age groups support legalizing marijuana for medical and recreational use, older Democrats are less likely to say this. About half of Democrats ages 75 and older (51%) say marijuana should be legal for medical or recreational purposes; larger shares of younger Democrats say the same. Still, only 8% of Democrats 75 and older think marijuana should not be legalized even for medical use – similar to the share of all other Democrats who say this.

Note: Here are the questions used for this report, along with responses, and its methodology .

• Drug Policy
• Medicine & Health

Ted Van Green is a research analyst focusing on U.S. politics and policy at Pew Research Center .

9 facts about Americans and marijuana

Most americans favor legalizing marijuana for medical, recreational use, most americans now live in a legal marijuana state – and most have at least one dispensary in their county, clear majorities of black americans favor marijuana legalization, easing of criminal penalties, concern about drug addiction has declined in u.s., even in areas where fatal overdoses have risen the most, most popular.

1615 L St. NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 USA (+1) 202-419-4300 | Main (+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax (+1) 202-419-4372 |  Media Inquiries

Research Topics

• Email Newsletters

ABOUT PEW RESEARCH CENTER  Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of  The Pew Charitable Trusts .

© 2024 Pew Research Center

• Entertainment
• Environment
• Information Science and Technology
• Social Issues

Home Essay Samples Law Marijuana Legalization

Exploring the Concerns: Reasons Why Marijuana's Should Not Be Legal

Table of contents, health risks and safety concerns, impaired driving and public safety, social and economic impacts, legal and regulatory challenges, conclusion: proceeding with caution.

• Hasin, D. S., Saha, T. D., Kerridge, B. T., Goldstein, R. B., Chou, S. P., Zhang, H., ... & Grant, B. F. (2015). Prevalence of marijuana use disorders in the United States between 2001-2002 and 2012-2013. JAMA Psychiatry, 72(12), 1235-1242.
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). The Health Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids: The Current State of Evidence and Recommendations for Research. National Academies Press.
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2020). Drug and Alcohol Crash Risk. Traffic Safety Facts Research Note.
• Hall, W., & Lynskey, M. (2016). Why it is probably too soon to assess the public health effects of legalisation of recreational cannabis use in the USA. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(9), 900-906.
• Schleider, L. B., Mechoulam, R., & Lederman, V. (2020). Cannabidiol, a Cannabis sativa constituent, as an anxiolytic drug. Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry, 42(2), 102-103.

*minimum deadline

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below

• Contract Law
• Child Custody
• Criminal Law
• Equal Rights Amendment
• First Amendment
• Patriot Act

Related Essays

Need writing help?

You can always rely on us no matter what type of paper you need

*No hidden charges

100% Unique Essays

Absolutely Confidential

Money Back Guarantee

By clicking “Send Essay”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails

You can also get a UNIQUE essay on this or any other topic

Thank you! We’ll contact you as soon as possible.

Home — Essay Samples — Law, Crime & Punishment — Marijuana Legalization — Unpacking the Debate: The Pros and Cons of Legalizing Marijuana

Unpacking The Debate: The Pros and Cons of Legalizing Marijuana

• Categories: Cannabis Marijuana Marijuana Legalization

About this sample

Words: 1686 |

Published: Mar 18, 2021

Words: 1686 | Pages: 4 | 9 min read

Bibliography

• https://www.canabomedicalclinic.com/10-common-conditions-medical-cannabis-prescribed-for/
• http://edition.cnn.com/2014/07/30/opinion/gitlow-marijuana-use/index.html
• https://www.marijuanabreak.com/marijuana-related-deaths
• https://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/new-study-suggests-risks-marijuana-use-have-been-overestimated/
• https://www.theperspective.com/debates/living/should-we-legalize-marijuana/
• http://www.dailyhelmsman.com/online_features/opinion-should-marijuana-be-legal/article_c0c79d52-2e6e-11e9-8df2-6f1cc833c9f9.html
• https://www.debatingeurope.eu/focus/arguments-legalising-cannabis/#.XOhhMYhKjIU
• https://thesleepdoctor.com/2018/11/27/thinking-about-using-cannabis-for-sleep-here-are-some-things-to-know/?cn-reloaded=1
• https://www.huffpost.com/entry/marijuana-legalization_n_4151423?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAFWwBQJd8aZZvM2CkRM4j_ahPD0AgNS8dV0urMpRILLvpG3DtwUdUX6cFlPsFejjN4K6JIKNo6J_ijqP3j5CMkPUlE2q1oonqdYNjrk_vXj-xaZF0pLDUbrURy4C6HBmAF4bhAkQk4FK_vkK2XPv2F6B18f5d8iRzp2wlhcgs-fv
• https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/320984.php
• https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/addiction/recreational-marijuana-faq
• https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/research-reports/marijuana/what-marijuana
• https://elpais.com/elpais/2018/10/18/inenglish/1539863917_686561.html
• https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/society/article/2172531/green-gold-rush-thailand-malaysia-race-legalise-medical-marijuana
• https://www.bbc.com/news/world-46374191 (globally diverse source/for)
• http://www.businessworld.in/article/Why-Cannabis-Should-Be-Legalised-In-India/13-01-2019-166025/

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Dr Jacklynne

Verified writer

• Expert in: Nursing & Health Law, Crime & Punishment

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

1 pages / 563 words

1 pages / 568 words

2 pages / 1060 words

3 pages / 1162 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Marijuana Legalization

The social impact of marijuana legalization is complex and multifaceted. It extends beyond the realms of public health and the economy. Legalization can lead to reduced stigma surrounding marijuana use, improved social equity, [...]

The debate over the dangers of Marijuana has been a dominant topic of conversation for a long time. Unfortunately, many individuals have a problem accepting the plant’s demonstrated medicinal effects. Opinions on medical [...]

Legalizing marijuana has been a topic of debate for many years, with strong arguments on both sides of the issue. However, as scientific research and public opinion continue to evolve, it is becoming increasingly clear that the [...]

The debate over the legalization of weed is a contentious and multifaceted issue, with implications for medicine, economics, ethics, and society. In this essay on whether weed should be legalized, we will explore the potential [...]

Pot, grass, dope, Mary Jane, boom, 420, ganja, weed. Formally known as Cannabis it is classified as a cannabinoid drug of which should be legalized for recreational use inside the democracy of Australia. The purpose of speaking [...]

The topic of cannabis legalization has been a subject of heated debate in the United Kingdom for several years. Cannabis, often referred to as weed, marijuana, pot, or hemp, is a psychoactive drug derived from the Cannabis plant [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

2018 Theses Doctoral

Essays on Cannabis Legalization

Thomas, Danna Kang

Though the drug remains illegal at the federal level, in recent years states and localities have increasingly liberalized their marijuana laws in order to generate tax revenue and save resources on marijuana law enforcement. Many states have adopted some form of medical marijuana and/or marijuana decriminalization laws, and as of 2017, Washington, Colorado, Maine, California, Oregon, Massachusetts, Nevada, Alaska, and the District of Columbia have all legalized marijuana for recreational use. In 2016 recreational marijuana generated over $1.8 billion in sales. Hence, studying marijuana reforms and the policies and outcomes of early recreational marijuana adopters is an important area of research. However, perhaps due to the fact that legalized recreational cannabis is a recent phenomenon, a scarcity of research exists on the impacts of recreational cannabis legalization and the efficacy and efficiency of cannabis regulation. This dissertation aims to fill this gap, using the Washington recreational marijuana market as the primary setting to study cannabis legalization in the United States. Of first order importance in the regulation of sin goods such as cannabis is quantifying the value of the marginal damages of negative externalities. Hence, Chapter 1 (co-authored with Lin Tian) explores the impact of marijuana dispensary location on neighborhood property values, exploiting plausibly exogenous variation in marijuana retailer location. Policymakers and advocates have long expressed concerns that the positive effects of the legalization--e.g., increases in tax revenue--are well spread spatially, but the negative effects are highly localized through channels such as crime. Hence, we use changes in property values to measure individuals' willingness to pay to avoid localized externalities caused by the arrival of marijuana dispensaries. Our key identification strategy is to compare changes in housing sales around winners and losers in a lottery for recreational marijuana retail licenses. (Due to location restrictions, license applicants were required to provide an address of where they would like to locate.) Hence, we have the locations of both actual entrants and potential entrants, which provides a natural difference-in-differences set-up. Using data from King County, Washington, we find an almost 2.4% decrease in the value of properties within a 0.5 mile radius of an entrant, a $9,400 decline in median property values. The aforementioned retail license lottery was used to distribute licenses due to a license quota. Retail license quotas are often used by states to regulate entry into sin goods markets as quotas can restrict consumption by decreasing access and by reducing competition (and, therefore, increasing markups). However, license quotas also create allocative inefficiency. For example, license quotas are often based on the population of a city or county. Hence, licenses are not necessarily allocated to the areas where they offer the highest marginal benefit. Moreover, as seen in the case of the Washington recreational marijuana market, licenses are often distributed via lottery, meaning that in the absence of an efficiency secondary market for licenses, the license recipients are not necessarily the most efficient potential entrants. This allocative inefficiency is generated by heterogeneity in firms and consumers. Therefore, in Chapter 2, I develop a model of demand and firm pricing in order to investigate firm-level heterogeneity and inefficiency. Demand is differentiated by geography and incorporates consumer demographics. I estimate this demand model using data on firm sales from Washington. Utilizing the estimates and firm pricing model, I back out a non-parametric distribution of firm variable costs. These variable costs differ by product and firm and provide a measure of firm inefficiency. I find that variable costs have lower inventory turnover; hence, randomly choosing entrants in a lottery could be a large contributor to allocative inefficiency. Chapter 3 explores the sources of allocative inefficiency in license distribution in the Washington recreational marijuana market. A difficulty in studying the welfare effects of license quotas is finding credible counterfactuals of unrestricted entry. Therefore, I take a structural approach: I first develop a three stage model that endogenizes firm entry and incorporates the spatial demand and pricing model discussed in Chapter 2. Using the estimates of the demand and pricing model, I estimate firms' fixed costs and use data on locations of those potential entrants that did not win Washington's retail license lottery to simulate counterfactual entry patterns. I find that allowing firms to enter freely at Washington's current marijuana tax rate increases total surplus by 21.5% relative to a baseline simulation of Washington's license quota regime. Geographic misallocation and random allocation of licenses account for 6.6\% and 65.9\% of this difference, respectively. Moreover, as the primary objective of these quotas is to mitigate the negative externalities of marijuana consumption, I study alternative state tax policies that directly control for the marginal damages of marijuana consumption. Free entry with tax rates that keep the quantity of marijuana or THC consumed equal to baseline consumption increases welfare by 6.9% and 11.7%, respectively. I also explore the possibility of heterogeneous marginal damages of consumption across geography, backing out the non-uniform sales tax across geography that is consistent with Washington's license quota policy. Free entry with a non-uniform sales tax increases efficiency by over 7% relative to the baseline simulation of license quotas due to improvements in license allocation.

• Cannabis--Law and legislation
• Marijuana industry
• Drug legalization
• Drugs--Economic aspects

More About This Work

• DOI Copy DOI to clipboard

• Share full article

Advertisement

Supported by

Ross Douthat

Legalizing Marijuana Is a Big Mistake

By Ross Douthat

Opinion Columnist

Of all the ways to win a culture war, the smoothest is to just make the other side seem hopelessly uncool. So it’s been with the march of marijuana legalization: There have been moral arguments about the excesses of the drug war and medical arguments about the potential benefits of pot, but the vibe of the whole debate has pitted the chill against the uptight, the cool against the square, the relaxed future against the Principal Skinners of the past.

As support for legalization has climbed, commanding a two-thirds majority in recent polling , any contrary argument has come to feel a bit futile, and even modest cavils are couched in an apologetic and defensive style. Of course I don’t question the right to get high, but perhaps the pervasive smell of weed in our cities is a bit unfortunate …? I’m not a narc or anything, but maybe New York City doesn’t need quite so many unlicensed pot dealers …?

All of this means that it will take a long time for conventional wisdom to acknowledge the truth that seems readily apparent to squares like me: Marijuana legalization as we’ve done it so far has been a policy failure, a potential social disaster, a clear and evident mistake.

The best version of the square’s case is an essay by Charles Fain Lehman of the Manhattan Institute explaining his evolution from youthful libertarian to grown-up prohibitionist. It will not convince readers who come in with stringently libertarian presuppositions — who believe on high principle that consenting adults should be able to purchase, sell and enjoy almost any substance short of fentanyl and that no second-order social consequence can justify infringing on this right.

But Lehman explains in detail why the second-order effects of marijuana legalization have mostly vindicated the pessimists and skeptics. First, on the criminal justice front, the expectation that legalizing pot would help reduce America’s prison population by clearing out nonviolent offenders was always overdrawn, since marijuana convictions made up a small share of the incarceration rate even at its height. But Lehman argues that there is also no good evidence so far that legalization reduces racially discriminatory patterns of policing and arrests. In his view, cops often use marijuana as a pretext to search someone they suspect of a more serious crime, and they simply substitute some other pretext when the law changes, leaving arrest rates basically unchanged.

So legalization isn’t necessarily striking a great blow against mass incarceration or for racial justice. Nor is it doing great things for public health. There was hope, and some early evidence, that legal pot might substitute for opioid use, but some of the more recent data cuts the other way: A new paper published in The Journal of Health Economics found that “legal medical marijuana, particularly when available through retail dispensaries, is associated with higher opioid mortality.” There are therapeutic benefits to cannabis that justify its availability for prescription, but the evidence of its risks keeps increasing: This month brought a new paper strengthening the link between heavy pot use and the onset of schizophrenia in young men.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and  log into  your Times account, or  subscribe  for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber?  Log in .

Want all of The Times?  Subscribe .

• Pre-Markets
• U.S. Markets
• Cryptocurrency
• Futures & Commodities
• Funds & ETFs
• Health & Science
• Real Estate
• Transportation
• Industrials

Small Business

Personal Finance

• Financial Advisors
• Options Action
• Buffett Archive
• Trader Talk
• Cybersecurity
• Social Media
• CNBC Disruptor 50
• White House
• Equity and Opportunity
• Business Day Shows
• Entertainment Shows
• Full Episodes
• Latest Video
• CEO Interviews
• CNBC Documentaries
• CNBC Podcasts
• Digital Originals
• Live TV Schedule
• Trust Portfolio
• Trade Alerts
• Meeting Videos
• Homestretch
• Jim's Columns
• Stock Screener
• Market Forecast
• Options Investing
• Chart Investing

Credit Cards

Credit Monitoring

Help for Low Credit Scores

All Credit Cards

Find the Credit Card for You

Best Credit Cards

Best Rewards Credit Cards

Best Travel Credit Cards

Best 0% APR Credit Cards

Best Balance Transfer Credit Cards

Best Cash Back Credit Cards

Best Credit Card Welcome Bonuses

Best Credit Cards to Build Credit

Find the Best Personal Loan for You

Best Personal Loans

Best Debt Consolidation Loans

Best Loans to Refinance Credit Card Debt

Best Loans with Fast Funding

Best Small Personal Loans

Best Large Personal Loans

Best Personal Loans to Apply Online

Best Student Loan Refinance

All Banking

Find the Savings Account for You

Best High Yield Savings Accounts

Best Big Bank Savings Accounts

Best Big Bank Checking Accounts

Best No Fee Checking Accounts

No Overdraft Fee Checking Accounts

Best Checking Account Bonuses

Best Money Market Accounts

Best Credit Unions

All Mortgages

Best Mortgages

Best Mortgages for Small Down Payment

Best Mortgages for No Down Payment

Best Mortgages with No Origination Fee

Best Mortgages for Average Credit Score

Adjustable Rate Mortgages

Affording a Mortgage

All Insurance

Best Life Insurance

Best Homeowners Insurance

Best Renters Insurance

Best Car Insurance

Travel Insurance

All Credit Monitoring

Best Credit Monitoring Services

Best Identity Theft Protection

How to Boost Your Credit Score

Credit Repair Services

All Personal Finance

Best Budgeting Apps

Best Expense Tracker Apps

Best Money Transfer Apps

Best Resale Apps and Sites

Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) Apps

Best Debt Relief

All Small Business

Best Small Business Savings Accounts

Best Small Business Checking Accounts

Best Credit Cards for Small Business

Best Small Business Loans

Best Tax Software for Small Business

Filing For Free

Best Tax Software

Best Tax Software for Small Businesses

Tax Refunds

Tax Brackets

Tax By State

Tax Payment Plans

All Help for Low Credit Scores

Best Credit Cards for Bad Credit

Best Personal Loans for Bad Credit

Best Debt Consolidation Loans for Bad Credit

Personal Loans if You Don't Have Credit

Best Credit Cards for Building Credit

Personal Loans for 580 Credit Score or Lower

Personal Loans for 670 Credit Score or Lower

Best Mortgages for Bad Credit

Best Hardship Loans

All Investing

Best IRA Accounts

Best Roth IRA Accounts

Best Investing Apps

Best Free Stock Trading Platforms

Best Robo-Advisors

Index Funds

Mutual Funds

var mps=mps||{}; mps._queue=mps._queue||{}; mps._queue.gptloaded=mps._queue.gptloaded||[]; mps._queue.gptloaded.push(function() { (mps && mps.insertAd && mps.insertAd('#dart_wrapper_badgec', 'badgec')); }); Business News Economy Finance Health Real Estate Energy Climate Transportation Industrials Retail Wealth Sports Life Small Business Investigations

Why we should not legalize marijuana.

Contrary to the beliefs of those who advocate the legalization of marijuana, the current balanced, restrictive, and bipartisan drug policies of the United States are working reasonably well and they have contributed to reductions in the rate of marijuana use in our nation.

The rate of current, past 30-day use of marijuana by Americans aged 12 and older in 1979 was 13.2 percent. In 2008 that figure stood at 6.1 percent. This 54-percent reduction in marijuana use over that 29-year period is a major public health triumph, not a failure.

Marijuana is the most commonly abused illegal drug in the U.S. and around the world. Those who support its legalization, for medical or for general use, fail to recognize that the greatest costs of marijuana are not related to its prohibition; they are the costs resulting from marijuana use itself.

There is a common misconception that the principle costs of marijuana use are those related to the criminal justice system. This is a false premise. Caulkins & Sevigny (2005) found that the percentage of people in prison for marijuana use is less than one half of one percent (0.1-0.2 percent).

An encounter with the criminal justice system through apprehension for a drug-related crime frequently can benefit the offender because the criminal justice system is often a path to treatment.

More than a third, 37 percent, of treatment admissions reported in the Treatment Episode Data Set, TEDS, collected from state-funded programs were referred through the criminal justice system. Marijuana was an identified drug of abuse for 57 percent of the individuals referred to treatment from the criminal justice system. The future of drug policy is not a choice between using the criminal justice system or treatment. The more appropriate goal is to get these two systems to work together more effectively to improve both public safety and public health.

In the discussion of legalizing marijuana, a useful analogy can be made to gambling. MacCoun & Reuter (2001) conclude that making the government a beneficiary of legal gambling has encouraged the government to promote gambling, overlooking it as a problem behavior. They point out that “the moral debasement of state government is a phenomenon that only a few academics and preachers bemoan.”

Legalized gambling has not reduced illegal gambling in the United States; rather, it has increased it. This is particularly evident in sports gambling, most of which is illegal. Legal gambling is taxed and regulated and illegal gambling is not. Legal gambling sets the stage for illegal gambling just the way legal marijuana would set the stage for illegal marijuana trafficking.

The gambling precedent suggests strongly that illegal drug suppliers would thrive by selling more potent marijuana products outside of the legal channels that would be taxed and otherwise restricted. If marijuana were legalized, the only way to eliminate its illegal trade, which is modest in comparison to that of cocaine, would be to sell marijuana untaxed and unregulated to any willing buyer.

Marijuana is currently the leading cause of substance dependence other than alcohol in the U.S. In 2008, marijuana use accounted for 4.2 million of the 7 million people aged 12 or older classified with dependence on or abuse of an illicit drug. This means that about two thirds of Americans suffering from any substance use disorder are suffering from marijuana abuse or marijuana dependence.

If the U.S. were to legalize marijuana, the number of marijuana users would increase. Today there are 15.2 million current marijuana users in comparison to 129 million alcohol users and 70.9 million tobacco users. Though the number of marijuana users might not quickly climb to the current numbers for alcohol and tobacco, if marijuana was legalized, the increase in users would be both large and rapid with subsequent increases in addiction.

Important lessons can be learned from those two widely-used legal drugs. While both alcohol and tobacco are taxed and regulated, the tax benefits to the public are vastly overshadowed by the adverse consequences of their use.

Alcohol-related costs total over $185 billion while federal and states collected an estimated $14.5 billion in tax revenue; similarly, tobacco use costs over $200 billion but only $25 billion is collected in taxes. These figures show that the costs of legal alcohol are more than 12 times the total tax revenue collected, and that the costs of legal tobacco are about 8 times the tax revenue collected. This is an economically disastrous tradeoff.

The costs of legalizing marijuana would not only be financial. New marijuana users would not be limited to adults if marijuana were legalized, just as regulations on alcohol and tobacco do not prevent use by youth. Rapidly accumulating new research shows that marijuana use is associated with increases in a range of serious mental and physical problems. Lack of public understanding on this relationship is undermining prevention efforts and adversely affecting the nation’s youth and their families.

Drug-impaired driving will also increase if marijuana is legalized. Marijuana is already a significant causal factor in highway crashes, injuries and deaths. In a recent national roadside survey of weekend nighttime drivers, 8.6 percent tested positive for marijuana or its metabolites, nearly four times the percentage of drivers with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of .08 g/dL (2.2 percent).

In another study of seriously injured drivers admitted to a Level-1 shock trauma center, more than a quarter of all drivers (26.9 percent) tested positive for marijuana. In a study of fatally injured drivers in Washington State, 12.7 percent tested positive for marijuana. These studies demonstrate the high prevalence of drugged driving as a result of marijuana use.

Many people who want to legalize marijuana are passionate about their perception of the alleged failures of policies aimed at reducing marijuana use but those legalization proponents seldom—if ever—describe their own plan for taxing and regulating marijuana as a legal drug. There is a reason for this imbalance; they cannot come up with a credible plan for legalization that could deliver on their exaggerated claims for this new policy.

Future drug policies must be smarter and more effective in curbing the demand for illegal drugs including marijuana. Smarter-drug prevention policies should start by reducing illegal drug use among the 5 million criminal offenders who are on parole and probation in the U.S. They are among the nation’s heaviest and most problem-generating illegal drug users.

Monitoring programs that are linked to swift and certain, but not severe, consequences for any drug use have demonstrated outstanding results including lower recidivism and lower rates of incarceration. New policies to curb drugged driving will not only make our roads and highways safer and provide an important new path to treatment, but they will also reduce illegal drug use.

Reducing marijuana use is essential to improving the nation’s health, education, and productivity. New policies can greatly improve current performance of prevention strategies which, far from failing, has protected millions of people from the many adverse effects of marijuana use.

Since legalization of marijuana for medical or general use would increase marijuana use rather than reduce it and would lead to increased rates of addiction to marijuana among youth and adults, legalizing marijuana is not a smart public health or public safety strategy for any state or for our nation.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration . (1999). 1997 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. (Office of Applied Studies). Rockville, MD. Retrieved March 31, 2010

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2009). Results from the 2008 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings. Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH Series H-36, HHS Publication No. SMA 09-4434. Rockville, MD.

Caulkins, J.P., & Sevigny, E.L. (2009). How many people does the U.S. imprison for drug use, and who are they? Contemporary Drug Problems, 32(3): 405-428.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2009). Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS). Highlights - 2007. National Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment Services, Office of Applied Studies, DASIS Series: S-45, DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 09-4360. Rockville, MD.

MacCoun, R.J., & Reuter, P. (2001). Drug war heresies: Learning from other vices, times, and places. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Abt, V. cited in Casinos in Florida: An analysis of the economic and social impacts . (n.d.). Tallahassee, FL: Executive Office of the Governor Office of Planning and Budgeting. Retrieved April 1, 2010.

Dunstan, R. (1997). Gambling in California . California Research Bureau. Retrieved April 1, 2010.

Frey, J.H. Gambling on sports: Policy issues. Journal of Gambling Studies, 8(4), 351-360.

Sabet, K.A. (2009, June 7). The price of legalizing pot is too high . Los Angeles Times. Retrieved April 9, 2010.

Kerlikowske, R.G. (2010, March 4). Why marijuana legalization would compromise public health and public safety , annotated remarks. California Police Chiefs Association Conference. San Jose, CA.

D'Souza, D.C., Sewell, R.A., & Ranganathan, M. (2009). Cannabis and psychosis/schizophrenia: Human studies. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 259(7), 413-331.

Bates, B. (2010, Feb). Teen cannabis use predicts depression. Clinical Psychiatry News, 38(2).

Boschert, S. (2010, Feb). Marijuana self-medication might prompt mood disorders, stress. Clinical Psychiatry News, 38(2).

Compton, R., & Berning, A. (2009). Results of the 2007 National Roadside Survey of Alcohol and Drug Use by Drivers. Traffic Safety Facts Research Note. (DOT HS 811 175) Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Retrieved March 31, 2010 from http://www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/DOT/NHTSA/Traffic%20Injury%20Control/Articles/Associated%20Files/811175.pdf

Walsh, J.M., Flegel, R., Cangianelli, L.A., Atkins, R., Soderstrom, C.A., & Kerns, T.J. (2004). Epidemiology of alcohol and other drug use among motor vehicle crash victims admitted to a Level-1 trauma center. Traffic Injury Prevention, 5, 254-260.

Schwilke, E.W., dos Santos, M.I.S., & Logan, B.K. (2006). Changing patterns of drug and alcohol use in fatally injured drivers in Washington State. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 51(5), 1191-1198.

Institute for Behavior and Health. (n.d.). Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc. Rockville, MD. Retrieved April 9, 2010 from http://www.ibhinc.org

Hawken, A., & Kleiman, M. (2009). Managing drug involved probationers with swift and certain sanctions: Evaluating Hawaii’s HOPE. National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Award No. 2007-IJ-CX-0033.

Stop Drugged Driving. (n.d.). Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc. Rockville, MD. Retrieved April 9, 2010 from http://www.stopdruggeddriving.org

• Undergraduate
• High School
• Architecture
• American History
• Asian History
• Antique Literature
• American Literature
• Asian Literature
• Classic English Literature
• World Literature
• Creative Writing
• Linguistics
• Criminal Justice
• Legal Issues
• Anthropology
• Archaeology
• Political Science
• World Affairs
• African-American Studies
• East European Studies
• Latin-American Studies
• Native-American Studies
• West European Studies
• Family and Consumer Science
• Social Issues
• Women and Gender Studies
• Social Work
• Natural Sciences
• Pharmacology
• Earth science
• Agriculture
• Agricultural Studies
• Computer Science
• IT Management
• Mathematics
• Investments
• Engineering and Technology
• Engineering
• Aeronautics
• Medicine and Health
• Alternative Medicine
• Communications and Media
• Advertising
• Communication Strategies
• Public Relations
• Educational Theories
• Teacher's Career
• Chicago/Turabian
• Company Analysis
• Education Theories
• Shakespeare
• Canadian Studies
• Food Safety
• Relation of Global Warming and Extreme Weather Condition
• Movie Review
• Admission Essay
• Annotated Bibliography
• Application Essay
• Article Critique
• Article Review
• Article Writing
• Book Review
• Business Plan
• Business Proposal
• Capstone Project
• Cover Letter
• Creative Essay
• Dissertation
• Dissertation - Abstract
• Dissertation - Conclusion
• Dissertation - Discussion
• Dissertation - Hypothesis
• Dissertation - Introduction
• Dissertation - Literature
• Dissertation - Methodology
• Dissertation - Results
• GCSE Coursework
• Grant Proposal
• Marketing Plan
• Multiple Choice Quiz
• Personal Statement
• Power Point Presentation
• Power Point Presentation With Speaker Notes
• Questionnaire
• Reaction Paper
• Research Paper
• Research Proposal
• SWOT analysis
• Thesis Paper
• Online Quiz
• Literature Review
• Movie Analysis
• Statistics problem
• Math Problem
• All papers examples
• How It Works
• Money Back Policy
• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy
• We Are Hiring

Should Marijuana Be Legalized or Not? Essay Example

Pages: 3

Words: 934

Hire a Writer for Custom Essay

Use 10% Off Discount: "custom10" in 1 Click 👇

You are free to use it as an inspiration or a source for your own work.

The legalization of marijuana is a hot topic in the world today, because it is still considered to be an illegal illicit drug. In my opinion, the marijuana should not be legal in any country because of the social ramifications and health implications would be catastrophic. In a study by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (2015) found that teenagers that smoke marijuana become addicted and haves long-term memory impairment that lowered their IQ points from ages 13 to 38. There are health implications connected with the addictive nature that will eventually damaging the health of the marijuana smoker.

The addictive nature of the marijuana and characteristics of marijuana smokers are clearly evident such as altered senses, losing track of time, mood swings and inability to solve problems logically. The long-term health problems of brain damage, stained teeth, red eyes, and raising the risk of lung diseases. In a study by Joshi, Joshi & Bartler (2014) found that frequent heavy smokers of marijuana will develop medical conditions such as chronic bronchitis, airway inflammation, and chronic pulmonary obstructive disease (COPD).

The second reason marijuana should not be legal is based on the premise that legalizing marijuana causes social disruption and corruption to the communities. In Amsterdam, the legal marijuana coffee shops have increase the crime rates. In addition, the entire country of Netherlands children were smoking pot on the premises, thus banned smoking of marijuana on school grounds (Hawkins, 2014). The country has adolescents that are learning the habit of marijuana smoking at schools, restaurants, in homes and any other public setting in Amsterdam. The freedom to smoke marijuana in the city, state or village can destroying modern society.

The argument for and against the legalization has some compelling arguments however, the debate continues in the public opinion. The monetary value of revenue that could be generated into the country would be a great benefit to society versus the justification for keeping it illegal because it’s causing long term brain damage? The millions that could be spent on public programs for the poor and needy while providing unlimited tax benefits to all cities and states. However, does the financial benefits outweigh the detrimental aspects of marijuana such as drug addiction?

The benefits from the legalization of marijuana would put a stop the career criminal organizations attempting to control the sale and distribution of marijuana. The career criminal enterprises would be out of business the very same day and the millions that would be saved from government funds trying to prosecute them. In contrast, does the one social goal justify allowing children to grow up in society learning to become addictive to marijuana. The pros and cons on the legalization of marijuana bring about some many good points on both sides of the argument however, this argument will continue until well into next millennium.

There is opposition that believe marijuana has many benefits to a city or country when marijuana is legalized. The United States war on pot is spending $42 billion each year trying to prohibit a marijuana usage and trafficking unsuccessfully. (Kampia, 2007). In addition, Kampia (2007) found the United States law enforcement agencies spending $10.7 billion and $31.1 billion lost in tax revenues. The government has many gaps in social programs that could utilize these funds for improving the educational system or helping with funding the cure for cancer or providing a needed heart transplant for a baby.

The legal system is breeding long-term criminals with the drug laws such as repeated offenders for smoking marijuana get long sentences feeding the prison system.  The young teenager at the age of 18 may develop a habit of smoking weed however, the young man is an active collect student and works two jobs to support himself. The young man takes his girlfriend to a movie but is speeding leaving the show which caused him to get searched producing one marijuana cigarette. The young man gets sentenced to 60 days in jail and counseling for drug use. The end result the young man has a life of crime he learned from his short stint in lock up. The example is extreme that one marijuana cigarettes leads to a life of crime but the more they get arrested for marijuana the less they can become productive citizens.

The legalization of marijuana would improve the social conditions because law enforcement would no longer have to pursue marijuana smokers because it’s legal. In addition, the law enforcement agency is spending time sending the marijuana smokers to jail while the marijuana dealer’s remain free and getting rich.  The final reason why the use of marijuana should be legal is because alcohol and tobacco should be the logical choice for what should be illegal. The experiment did not work with prohibition of alcohol that now has become the mainstay of the American way. The tobacco and alcohol together is killing more people in the world than the marijuana pot smoker.  In reality, how many tobacco smokers are dying from cancer every minute of the day and the number of people dying from living disease from long-term use of alcohol? There is not comparison to the social implications that legalizing marijuana would shut-down the pot dealers, the court systems would benefit and marijuana problems would be cut in half. The legalization has already been approved in Colorado and the city of Denver has not shut down.

Works Cited

Hawkins,J.(2014,Jan.)5 reasons marijuana should remain illegal. Retrieved from http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2014/01/21/5-reasons-marijuana-should-remain-illegal-n1782086/page/2

Joshi, M.,Joshi,A.& Bartler,T.(2014).Marijuana and lung diseases. Current Opinion Pulmonary Medicine Journal. Vol. 20(2):173-9. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000026

Kampia,R.(2007,Oct). The War on pot: America’s $42 billion annual Boondoggle. Retrieved from http://www.alternet.org/story/64465/the_war_on_pot%3A_america’s_%2442_billion_annual_boondoggle/

National Institute on drug abuse. (2015).What is marijuana. Retrieved from https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugfacts/marijuana

Stuck with your Essay?

Get in touch with one of our experts for instant help!

Usability Certification Requirements and Testing Standards, Essay Example

Anyone Can Be Sued, Essay Example

Time is precious

don’t waste it!

Plagiarism-free guarantee

Privacy guarantee

Secure checkout

Money back guarantee

Related Essay Samples & Examples

Voting as a civic responsibility, essay example.

Pages: 1

Words: 287

Utilitarianism and Its Applications, Essay Example

Words: 356

The Age-Related Changes of the Older Person, Essay Example

Pages: 2

Words: 448

The Problems ESOL Teachers Face, Essay Example

Pages: 8

Words: 2293

Should English Be the Primary Language? Essay Example

Pages: 4

Words: 999

The Term “Social Construction of Reality”, Essay Example

Words: 371

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• HHS Author Manuscripts

Six policy lessons relevant to cannabis legalization

Chelsea l. shover.

Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

Keith Humphreys

Veterans Affairs Health Care System and Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

Background:

Cannabis (marijuana) has been legalized for recreational and/or medicinal use in many U.S. states, despite remaining a Schedule-I drug at the federal level. As legalization regimes are established in multiple countries, public health professionals should leverage decades of knowledge from other policy areas (e.g., alcohol and tobacco regulation) to inform cannabis policy.

Objectives:

Identify policy lessons from other more established policy areas that can inform cannabis policy in the U.S., Canada, and any other nations that legalize recreational cannabis.

Narrative review of policy and public health literature.

We identified six key lessons to guide cannabis policy. To avoid the harms of “a medical system only in name”, medical cannabis programs should either be regulated like medicine or combined with the recreational market. Capping potency of cannabis products can reduce the harms of the drug, including addiction. Pricing policies that promote public health may include minimum unit pricing or taxation by weight. Protecting science and public health from corporate interest can prevent the scenarios we have seen with soda and tobacco lobbies funding studies to report favorable results about their products. Legalizing states can go beyond reducing possession arrests (which can be accomplished without legalization) by expunging prior criminal records of cannabis-related convictions. Finally, facilitating rigorous research can differentiate truth from positive and negative hype about cannabis’ effects.

Conclusion:

Scientists and policymakers can learn from the successes and failures of alcohol and tobacco policy to regulate cannabis products, thereby mitigating old harms of cannabis prohibition while reducing new harms from legalization.

Introduction

The normative debate about whether governments should legalize medical and/or recreational cannabis (aka “marijuana”) remains high profile and vitriolic in multiple countries, and because of its political nature can at most be only partially informed by science ( 1 ). However, a less noticed but equally important discussion occurs beyond the click-worthy headlines and passionate op-eds: Given that medical and recreational cannabis legalization are already a reality in some countries (e.g., Canada, Uruguay) and over half of U.S. states and will likely become a reality in others, what lessons can we draw from other policy areas that will help regulatory systems maximize public health ( 2 , 3 )? Public health research can and should play a large role in this discussion particularly given the availability of decades of evidence on the impact and regulation of other potentially addictive or otherwise harmful consumables (e.g., alcohol, tobacco, prescription opioids, sodas, nutritional supplements) ( 4 , 5 ).

We write as scientists, policy analysts, and public health professionals, and make no effort in this paper to persuade anyone to vote for or against marijuana legalization. We hope that those who support legalization will find the foregoing discussion of value because they care about public health. After all, no one supports legalization hoping it will lead to more cannabis-induced auto accidents, for example. We hope that those who oppose cannabis legalization will also find our analysis of value because even when the overall policy framework is not to one’s liking, there are usually still ways of making it better (or at least less objectionable) including in ways that a legalization opponent would approve. Though many of our examples draw from the U.S. setting, we aim for recommendations that could apply in other countries considering or implementing cannabis legalization.

We recognize that efforts to address public health concerns regarding legal cannabis will meet with some political resistance, particularly in the corporate-friendly United States Cannabis industry players typically aim to maximize profits even it if harms public health. For their part, voters and advocacy groups often care about things other than public health (e.g., their views on personal freedom, their religious and cultural values). But the fact that a public health agenda under cannabis legalization will be difficult to achieve is not a reason to abandon it. Our six lessons are thus explicitly aspirational.

Although we believe the lessons presented here could be applied in many countries, we focus mainly on the United States both because we know it the best and because its cannabis regulation framework is unusually fluid due to the federal-state conflict in law, and the ongoing march of cannabis legalization across state after state (most recently, in November 2018 Michigan legalized recreational marijuana and Utah and Missouri legalized medical marijuana).. In the U.S., cannabis remains a Schedule I substance and illegal at the federal level, but memos issued during the previous presidential administration effectively left enforcement up to the states ( 6 ). A January 2018 memo from the current Department of Justice (DOJ) formally rescinded this policy, and at this writing it remains unclear whether or how the Trump administration will respond to cannabis legalization ( 7 ). Further complicating the legal landscape, the cannabis plant contains over 100 different cannabinoids, and there is presently one case where cannabinoids with different properties are subject to different regulations. Medication containing the non-psychoactive cannabidiol (CBD) and no more than 0.1% of the psychoactive constituent tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) were recently down-scheduled to Schedule V ( 8 ). All of this complexity, contradiction, and ferment makes it particularly important and opportune in the U.S. to inject public health concerns into the debate in the hopes of shaping the future.

1. Do not have a medical marijuana system that is not truly medical

Medicine has status, trust and privilege in society because of what it can accomplish and also because of how tightly it is regulated. Proponents of medical cannabis has attempted to gain similar status, trust and privilege, without the matching responsibilities of being carefully regulated. Indeed, if cannabis is indeed a medical drug, it is the least regulated medical drug in the U.S..

The experience of other unregulated quasi-medical industries, for example the patent medicines that thrived in the 19 th century and the supplements hawked on late night cable television, indicate that substantial harm can be done to the public by products that claim medicine’s mantle while evading its standards. The lesson for medical cannabis is that public health will be maximized if it either truly functions as medicine (e.g., with specified conditions, specific indications, and tight regulations), or, is folded into the recreational system.

To date, most “medical” cannabis has been sold with almost no medical oversight, with the role of physicians limited to writing a recommendation letter for patients. Physicians do not prescribe cannabis, nor do they provide it. Medical cannabis clients must take the physician recommendation letter to a separate dispensary, which is staffed by “budtenders” who typically do not have medical training. At the dispensary, clients choose from products of varying potency and content. Medical recommendation letters are often provided by physicians at clinics that solely provide medical cannabis recommendations, rather than primary care providers. Because the recommendation letter can sometimes be renewed over the phone or online without speaking to a clinician, medical oversight can easily be limited to the brief initial consultation. “Budtenders” can give any medical advice they wish, and this includes advice that is almost surely harmful to health, e.g., encouraging pregnant women to regularly smoke cannabis to reduce cramping ( 9 ).

Currently, a number of states operate separate medical and recreational cannabis markets (e.g., Colorado, Maine, Oregon) whereas others have combined the recreational and medical markets (e.g., Washington, California) ( 10 – 15 ). Acknowledging that something that is not regulated as medicine is not the same as medicine as commonly understood is good for public health. Combining programs may also streamline regulation and increase tax benefits to the state by preventing recreational users from entering the more lightly taxed medical system. Additionally, combining programs removes the incentive for youth to seek medical use to avoid higher age limits for recreational sales.

Medical and recreational use overlap, with most people who use medical cannabis also reporting recreational use ( 16 ). In a survey of a nationally representative panel of adults, only 10% of those who currently or ever used cannabis used it only for medical reasons ( 17 ). By way of comparison, consider how few people who take antibiotics, aspirin, or insulin to manage or cure disease would also use these drugs recreationally. Furthermore, with a few exceptions (e.g. CBD oils), the products available in medical and recreational outlets are the same. There is no reason the public should subsidize recreational drug use by making it tax-free, because lower prices feed over-consumption that harms public health (and also of course, imposes more costs on the public purse).

One concern about combining the two systems is that sick people will have to pay taxes on a medical product. But many products that can promote health are not tax-exempt (e.g. exercise equipment, cranberry juice for preventing bladder infections, over the counter medications in most states). As therapeutic uses for cannabis are identified with high-quality empirical data, relevant components or resulting medications can enter the medical system like any other drug, proceeding through FDA approval. As cannabinoid-derived drugs are approved, they can be covered by insurance or become available over the counter, where their potency and components will be regulated.

2. Protect science, regulation, and public health from corporate influence

When many people think of cannabis legalization, they envision a world where cannabis is sold by small operations owned by anti-corporate hippies who donate a portion of their profits to save the whales ( 18 ). In reality, legalization in the U.S. is leading to corporate cannabis run largely by hard-charging white guys in business suits who have MBAs and JDs and think of hippies with distaste if they think of them at all. The tobacco industry has been poised to capitalize on legal cannabis ( 19 ), as are the sugary beverage and alcohol industries ( 20 ). All scientists are aware of the potentially corrupting influence of industries in funding studies to support preferred conclusions and lobbying to promote industry’s business interests. For example, soda companies have long sponsored nutrition studies and legislation ( 21 ).

Protecting science and public health from corporate influence could take several forms. Full disclosure of cannabis industry-related conflicts of interest by researchers and journals should be standard ( 22 ). Robust non-corporate funding for cannabis research is also important, along the lines of California’s Tobacco Related Diseases Research Program which now funds proposals related to cannabis as well as tobacco.

Advertising regulations like those in place for tobacco products – e.g., advertising cannot target children, limits on where and when advertisements can be displayed or aired – may also be a key tool to promote public health. Currently, the industry in the U.S. complains that its advertising expenses are not tax deductible whereas those of the alcohol and tobacco industry are. The industry’s lobbyists are correct that this is an inconsistency, but from a public health viewpoint the best approach would be to subject alcohol and tobacco to the same restrictions rather than use public funds to subsidize sale of addictive products.

Evidence-informed public health education campaigns about cannabis are needed. Public health messages should take care not to exaggerate risks, lest they lose credibility in the face of the observation that many people do use cannabis without developing a use disorder or experiencing even the harms associated with over-consumption of alcohol. Ad campaigns similar to public health campaigns about alcohol – covering topics like getting help when use is out of control, abstaining during pregnancy and while trying to become pregnant, not using while driving, and not selling to minors – could promote public health.

Public health promoting regulations are more likely to be implemented if policymakers prevent the foxes from guarding the hen house. Multiple states give individuals from marijuana corporations seats on regulatory commissions, and do not require sufficient disclosure of marijuana industry-related conflicts of interest, for example when inviting “independent experts” to comment on developing legislation and regulations. The ballot initiative process is a particularly tempting opportunity to achieve regulatory capture, because industry players can potentially encode pro-profit, anti-public health, rules into the law for the long term. For this reason, even legislature members who oppose marijuana legalization might consider legislating their own framework when facing a corporate-written and funded legalization ballot initiative that seems likely to pass.

Last but most assuredly not least, non-corporate models should be considered by legalizing states and countries, as has been adopted in some Canadian provinces ( 5 , 23 ). For example, the state monopoly system used to sell alcohol in many U.S. states significantly reduces sales to youth and alcohol related harm ( 24 , 25 ). The same should be considered for cannabis, as should restricting the sale to non-profits and coops.

3. Cap the potency of cannabis products

Some drug policy analysts used to speak of the “Iron Law of Prohibition” which maintained that drugs become more potent over time because they are illegal. This is simply incorrect as tobacco, alcohol, and pharmaceuticals have all become substantially more potent since their development while being legal. Legality per se does nothing to limit potency unless there is a law that caps it.

Just as tobacco became more potent and more addictive in the 1900s– the same has happened with cannabis ( 26 , 27 ). Illegal cannabis smoked on college campuses in the 1970s had 3–5% THC, whereas legal cannabis sold in Washington State today averages 20% THC ( 28 ). Higher potency is concerning because of greater risk of adverse psychiatric effects and greater potential to transition light users into daily users and cannabis use disorders ( 29 – 31 ). For example, a study in the Netherlands found first-time drug treatment admissions for cannabis rose following increasing cannabis potency ( 32 ). If more potent cannabis is more addictive, increased availability post-legalization may increase the number of individuals who develop cannabis use disorder. Additionally, though cannabis poses essentially no fatal overdose risk, cannabis ingestion poses health threats to children, and this risk increases with increased potency. Increased potency can also magnify the indirect harms of cannabis intoxication, such as impaired driving and accidental injuries.

Because cannabis today has dramatically higher THC levels than in prior era, past research may understate health effects. Capping potency of cannabis products can limit the as yet unknown effects of more potent cannabis while the science can catch up to nature of modern products. Of course, cannabis is not just flowers and leaves: concentrates, oils, dabs, topicals, and products yet to be invented are likely to grow in popularity after legalization. States can mitigate these concerns by capping potency of cannabis products, just as they do certain classes of alcoholic beverages: To call something beer for example, requires abiding by certain limits to ethanol concentration ( 33 ). Similarly, cannabis oils or concentrates would reasonably have a higher potency limit per ounce than flowers—just as spirits can have a higher ethanol content than beer—but would still be restricted to a limited amount of THC per package. The limits recommended by California Department of Public Health – which include limiting THC content per package and limiting potency of inhaled products – are a good start ( 34 ). For oils and other smokeless cannabis products, the per-package limits would need to be set by regulatory bodies of scientists rather than industry, as discussed earlier. Banning smokeless cannabis products would likely result in increasing use of smoked cannabis and all of the attendant smoke-related health complication. Entirely banning high-potency products legal cannabis market may also have the unintended consequence of pushing consumers to the illicit market ( 35 ). Therefore, we do not at the present time advocate banning high-potency cannabis products like dabs, oils, or concentrates, but rather tailored and enforced regulations for labeling and packaging. In addition to capping potency, regulators have the opportunity to reduce harms of co-use of alcohol or tobacco with cannabis by explicitly banning products that combine cannabis and alcohol (as in, cannabinoids in alcohol) or cannabis and nicotine. Requiring every cannabis product sold for smoking or in smokable form to carry the message “Caution; cannabis smoke contains carcinogens” would communicate the risks of smoking specifically that may differ other cannabis products. Finally, regardless of what level of THC cap is in place, governments might consider setting taxes higher for high THC products. We explore other ways to use price setting to promote public health in the next section.

4. Price may be the most effective lever to promote public health

There’s an old saw that “Addicts will do anything to get their fix” but experimental and epidemiological research conducted in dozens of countries has established the opposite: Drug use is responsive to price, even for the heaviest drug users ( 36 ).

This observation is critical for understanding cannabis legalization because nothing the government does raises the price of the drug as high as does prohibition, which poses enormous costs on business ( 37 ). This is why the removal of cannabis prohibition has produced a price collapse in state after state, including a 70% drop of wholesale prices in 4 years in Colorado and even steeper drops in Oregon and Washington ( 38 , 39 ). Cannabis is called “weed” because it is very easy to grow, and easy to grow, legal crops in America (e.g., wheat) are very cheap. Legal prices are falling about 1% every 2–4 weeks and their natural bottom could be as low as a nickel per joint, such that cannabis becomes like beer nuts – a complimentary offering by restaurants and bars.

Health taxes have effectively reduced consumption of tobacco, alcohol, and sugar-sweetened beverages ( 36 , 40 ). Raising taxes on alcohol has also been demonstrated to reduce serious harms including death and injury due to motor vehicle accidents ( 41 , 42 ).

Sales of retail cannabis have typically been subject to sales and excise tax, but rates vary significantly between states ( 40 ). Because these taxes are generally set as a percent of price and the price is rapidly collapsing, the ability of such taxes to raise revenue and deter excessive use is thus waning almost every day ( 38 , 39 ). A more effective alternative is to tax the raw cannabis (i.e., flowers, leaves) by weight as California has always done and Maine has just begun to do ( 43 ). This raises fear of potency soaring as producers try to pack more THC in every ounce, but this can be countered by implementing potency caps, as discussed earlier. In the case of products that contain cannabis and other ingredients – e.g., brownies, lemonade, lattes – the amount of cannabis that can be included (in terms of potency) would be set by potency caps, and the tax could be based on the weight or unit of cannabis, not the entire product.

Minimum unit pricing of cannabis also merits serious consideration. This approach is used for alcohol in British Columbia and was also recently implemented in Scotland ( 44 ). It is not a tax, but rather a floor price below which a product cannot be sold. Implementing it for alcohol reduces emergency room admissions, alcohol-related arrests and injuries, and deaths ( 45 ). Public health benefits would also be expected from implementing such a minimum unit pricing policy for cannabis.

5. Look beyond reducing marijuana possession arrests

Wanting to reduce marijuana possession arrests is a weak rationale for legalization. Decriminalizing marijuana possession in California for example dropped both adult and adolescent possession arrests by over 60% in just 12 months ( 46 ). Arrests can be dramatically curtailed without creating a corporate industry that sells marijuana.

In contrast, legalization is an excellent opportunity to reduce the damage of prior criminal penalties by expunging the records of individuals arrested for possession as well as low-level dealing. This group is disproportionately poor and minority, and their arrest record limits their ability to obtain housing, work, and education ( 47 ). It also keeps people with expertise out of the emerging and overwhelmingly white-dominated, cannabis industry.

Currently, the process to get records updated in California requires an individual to hire a lawyer to get a possession record expunged or a felony for selling downgraded to a misdemeanor, but a bill introduced in the state senate would automate this process ( 48 ). One way to fund this effort in California as well as in other legalization states would be to designate some tax revenue from retail cannabis sales for this purpose.

6. Facilitate rigorous research

“More research is needed” has become a tired academic cliché, but it’s nonetheless applicable to cannabis legalization. Debate about the health benefits and risks of all manner of products is a commonplace of modern life and is certainly the case with cannabis. In political debates, the drug is characterized as extremely dangerous by some activists and as harmless – indeed extraordinarily therapeutic – by others. There is evidence for some harms and some benefits, although in neither case does the limited evidence available support more extreme assessments in either direction. In terms of benefit, a 2017 report by The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine concluded that there is substantial evidence that cannabis is an effective treatment for some chronic pain conditions in adults, and spasticity symptoms in multiple sclerosis, as well as conclusive evidence of efficacy in treating nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy ( 49 ). Other reviews have been more cautious in their conclusions, noting that the research base is old, includes many comparisons of cannabis to drugs which are no longer used because more effective ones have become available, and have small sample sizes ( 50 ).

In terms of harms, fairly rigorous quasi-experimental work indicates that greater access to cannabis leads to lower educational achievement ( 51 ). U.S. prevalence estimates of cannabis use disorder among people reporting past-year cannabis use vary in recent nationally representative surveys, with estimates ranging from 12% in the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health to 31% in the 2012–13 National Epidemiologic Survey of Alcohol and Related Conditions ( 29 , 52 ). But whether cannabis use disorder is becoming more of less prevalent is not clear ( 29 , 52 ). On the one hand the proportion of cannabis users who used the drug every day or nearly every day is increasing sharply ( 53 ), but on the other hand with legalization and normalization, some of the negative effects of frequent cannabis use may be waning (e.g., problems with employers, conflicts with family members who disapprove of cannabis).

The obvious lesson to draw from all other putatively medical products as well as other addictive drugs is that empirical claims about health or social effects and should be investigated empirically. The U.S. has a careful system for studying and approving medications in place and it should be used for cannabis-related medicines as well. Only through rigorous research can effective therapies derived from cannabis be approved and regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Properties should be investigated in controlled studies and resulting therapies should proceed through FDA approval process as have one CBD-derived medication and two medications derived from synthetic cannabinoids ( 54 ). It should be noted that the FDA approval process may be particularly difficult for a botanical cannabis product (as opposed to a chemical extract), due to variation in concentration of cannabinoids between plants. However, the FDA currently regulates several plant-matter botanical drug products in its over-the-counter review (e.g., psyllium, cascara, senna) and has approved two botanical products for marketing as prescription drugs ( 55 ).

One regulatory reform that has been considered in Congress is to alter the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) such that Schedule I drugs with therapeutic potential could be more easily studied ( 56 ). Creating a “Schedule I-R” would allow researchers and regulators to treat cannabis and its addictive constituent tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) as a lower-schedule substance when obtained for the purposes of advancing science ( 8 ). The recent downscheduling of a CBD extract formulation (Epidiolex) is an important step, but the rescheduling is currently limited to drugs that have already been approved by the FDA: “As further indicated, any material, compound, mixture, or preparation other than Epidiolex that falls within the CSA definition of marijuana set forth in 21 U.S.C. 802( 16 ), including any non-FDA-approved CBD extract that falls within such definition, remains a schedule I controlled substance under the CSA.” ( 8 ). Establishing a Schedule I-R would facilitate research on other cannabis products, other cannabinoids, and even other CBD-based formulations, all of which are currently still Schedule I ( 8 ).

A second reform that would improve the quantity and quality of cannabis research is to allow more farms to grow cannabis for research purposes rather than having only the federal monopoly provider in Mississipi. It seems bizarre for example that states can operate medical cannabis programs that give the drug to sick patients, but are not allowed to run medical cannabis research programs. In 2016 the Drug Enforcement Agency expanded the number of authorized manufacturers of cannabis for National Institute on Drug Abuse-funded research, but none of the organizations that applied for a license has been granted one by the Trump Administration ( 54 ).

For findings to be relevant, and to determine how differing modes of use or potency may modify health effects, at least some research on cannabis must be conducted on consumer cannabis products. Combustible may still be most common mode of use ( 17 ), but as retail markets expand researchers need to evaluate edible, vaporized, topical, and other smokeless products.

Currently, one topic that is especially relevant and contentious is whether cannabis legalization can decrease use of opioids. Some evidence suggests that medical cannabis can be opioid sparing ( 57 , 58 ), but studies have been limited by small sample size (e.g., Abrams’ clinical trial of 21 patients) or self-reported exposure and outcomes (e.g., Boenkhe’s was an online survey of clients of a medical cannabis dispensary). A systematic review found some pre-clinical evidence of “opioid sparing” effects, but clinical evidence was lacking ( 59 ). Epidemiological studies show state-level correlations between cannabis legalization and lower opioid overdoses, but such ecological studies have serious, well-known, flaws ( 60 ). Even individual-level studies showing that cannabis use and opioid use are positively correlated should not be taken as proof of a causal relationship ( 61 ). Yet medical cannabis use is associated with higher rates of prescription drug use and misuse ( 62 ). Furthermore, a recent four-year prospective study in Australia found no evidence that cannabis use improved patient outcomes in patients prescribed opioids for chronic, non-cancer pain ( 63 ). Clinical trials, and large-scale records-based studies with data at an individual level are warranted.

Change in other non-cannabis substance use after cannabis legalization could also be positive or negative. Some studies suggest that youth smoke cannabis as a precursor to tobacco – this order of events could potentially reverse advances in tobacco control measures ( 64 , 65 ). Broader availability of cannabis could theoretically reduce alcohol-related harms if alcohol and cannabis are substitutes. Conversely, it’s possible that legalized cannabis will augment societal harms caused by alcohol use if the two drugs are complements– this line of research needs to be continued. Further research on the relationship between cannabis use and use of tobacco, alcohol, and other substances can clarify this. The urgency of policy research on new cannabis laws should be balanced with the need to gather enough data for careful assessment. There is a risk policy evaluations conducted too soon after cannabis legalization will fail to detect midterm and longer term adverse outcomes.

Conclusions

In summary, cannabis legalization may have positive and negative impacts on public health, and policies should aim to maximize the former and minimize the latter. There are many other important topics we have not covered – e.g., public consumption, strategies to reduce and detect impaired driving, rules on pesticides, fraud detection – and the future will likely raise other concerns which no one is aware of at this moment. We recommend continued, rigorous research, by scientists who report results in an objective and balanced manner, free from corporate influence. With the benefit of decades of observation about policy successes and failures in regulating other drugs, policymakers can promote policies that rectify harms of cannabis prohibition, and policies that strive to minimize harms of legalization. Public health professionals and scientists have a role to play in conducting rigorous research, disseminating results in an objective and balanced manner, and contributing to making evidence-informed policy.

Acknowledgments

Authors’ Note: Chelsea L. Shover was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health under award number T32 DA035165 . Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Keith Humphreys was supported by a Senior Career Research Scientist Award from the Veterans Health Administration, Stanford Neurosciences Institute, and the Esther Ting Memorial Professorship at Stanford University. Any views expressed are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect policy positions of their employers. The authors report no relevant financial conflicts.

Financial disclosures and funding information: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors were supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the Veterans Health Services Research and Development Service, and [blinded] Neurosciences Institute. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute On Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number [blinded]. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Contributor Information

Chelsea L. Shover, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.

Keith Humphreys, Veterans Affairs Health Care System and Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.

Argumentative Essay On Marijuana Legalization

Published by gudwriter on May 27, 2018 May 27, 2018

Most students have serious problems writing a quality essay as they lack the necessary experience. If you need help writing an essay on legalization of marijuana, the perfect solution is to buy thesis proposal from experts online.

Elevate Your Writing with Our Free Writing Tools!

Did you know that we provide a free essay and speech generator, plagiarism checker, summarizer, paraphraser, and other writing tools for free?

Why Marijuana Should be Legalized Argumentative Essay Outline

Introduction.

Thesis: Marijuana should be legalized as it is more beneficial that it may be detrimental to society.

Paragraph 1:

Marijuana has not caused turmoil in some of the countries where it has been legalized.

• Marijuana does not increase violent, and property crimes as many suggest.
• Studies reveal that in Colorado, violent crimes have declined following the legalization of marijuana.

Paragraph 2:

Prohibiting use of marijuana does not limit its consumption.

• In spite of the many laws prohibiting the use of marijuana, it is one of the most highly abused drugs.
• 58% of young people from all over the world use marijuana.
• It has not been attributed to any health complications.

Paragraph 3:

Legalization of marijuana would help state governments save taxpayers money.

• Governments spend lots of funds on law enforcement agencies that uphold laws restricting the use of marijuana.
• They also spend vast sums of money on sustaining arrested dealers and consumers in prison.
• Legalizing marijuana would result in saving vast sums of money.

Paragraph 4:

Marijuana is less noxious than other legal substances.

• Marijuana has less health side effects than other legal substances such as alcohol and tobacco.
• Alcohol is 114 times more destructive than marijuana.

Paragraph 5:

Marijuana has been proven to have medical benefits.

• Marijuana helps stop seizures in epileptic patients.
• It helps stop nausea in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy .

Paragraph 6:

Marijuana has been proven to be a stress reliever.

• Marijuana relieves stress and depression in their users by causing excitement.
• Its use reduces violence and deaths related to stress and depression.

Conclusion.

There are many misconceptions about marijuana existent in the modern world. People have continued to ignore health benefits linked to this substance citing their unproven beliefs. Owing to its ability to stop seizures, nausea, and stress in individuals governments should highly consider marijuana legalization. Its legalization will also help state governments reduce expenses that result from maintaining suspects convicted of marijuana possession and consumption.

Why Marijuana Should be Legalized Argumentative Essay

The argument that marijuana use should be made legal has gained momentum both in the U.S. and elsewhere in the world in recent years. This has seen the drug being legalized in some states in the U.S. such that by 2013, twenty states had legalized medical marijuana. As of the same year, Colorado and Washington had legalized recreational marijuana. The arguments behind the push for legalization majorly revolve around the idea that the drug has medicinal effects. However, there are also arguments that there are serious health effects associated with the drug and this has only further fueled the already raging debate. This paper argues that marijuana should be legalized as it is more beneficial that it may be detrimental to society.

Marijuana has not caused any notable negative effects in countries where it has been legalized. There is a general belief that marijuana consumers are violent. However, no authentic research can prove these assertions. As already seen, some states in the United States have legalized both medicinal and recreational marijuana. In spite of this, no cases of marijuana-related violence have been recorded so far in such states (Markol, 2018). Reports reveal that the rate of violence and property crimes have decreased in Colorado following the legalization of the drug. If marijuana does not increase violent crimes, there is no reason as to why it should not be legalized.

It is also noteworthy that prohibiting marijuana use does not limit its consumption. Less than 10% of countries in the world prevent the use of marijuana, but according to research, 58% of young people in most of these countries are marijuana users (Head, 2016). General reports reveal that marijuana is one of most commonly abused drug in the world. It is also readily available in most states as it is a naturally growing plant (Head, 2016). In spite of its continued use, there are few cases, if any, of marijuana-related health complications that have been reported in any of these countries (Head, 2016). Therefore, if the illegality of marijuana does not limit its consumption, then state governments should consider its legalization.

Legalization of marijuana would further help state governments save taxpayers’ money. It is widely known that in countries where marijuana is illegal, authorities are stringent and will arrest any individual found in possession of the drug (Sanger, 2017). However, as earlier mentioned, laws prohibiting the use of the drug do not prevent its consumption, and this means that many people are arrested and prosecuted for possessing it (Sanger, 2017). State governments therefore use a lot of funds to support law enforcement agencies that seek to uphold laws prohibiting the use of marijuana (Sanger, 2017). Many people have been arrested and incarcerated for either possessing or consuming the drug, and the government has to use taxpayers’ money to sustain such people in prison. Since these actions do not limit consumption of marijuana, state governments should legalize the drug so as to save taxpayers money.

Another advantage of marijuana is that it is less noxious than other legal substances. According to research, marijuana is the least harmful drug among the many legal drugs existent in the world today (Owen, 2014). There are millions of campaigns every year cautioning people against smoking cigarettes, but there has been none seeking to warn people about marijuana consumption (Owen, 2014). Lobby groups have even been making efforts to push for legalization of marijuana. If marijuana had severe health effects as many purport, state governments would be investing heavily in campaigns aimed at discouraging its consumption (Owen, 2014). According to studies, alcohol, which is legal in many countries, is 114 times more harmful than marijuana (Owen, 2014). Therefore, if such harmful substances can be legalized, then there are no justifications as to why marijuana should not be legalized.

Further, marijuana has been proven to have medicinal benefits. Several countries, particularly in Europe, and the United States have legalized both medicinal and recreational marijuana. Their move to legalize marijuana was based on medical reports that showed a variety of health benefits linked to the drug (Noonan, 2017). Research shows that marijuana can reduce seizures in epileptic persons. Several studies have also proven that the drug indeed has a variety of health benefits. For instance, Charlotte Figi, who is now aged 10, used to have more than 100 seizures every month at age three, but since Colorado legalized medicinal and recreational marijuana, her parents started treating her with the substance, and today her seizures have significantly reduced (Noonan, 2017). Marijuana has as well been proven to reduce nausea in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Owing to this medicinal value, state governments should consider legalizing the drug.

Additionally, marijuana has been proven to be a stress reliever. Consumption of the drug causes excitement among its users enabling them to forget about troubling situations. Unlike alcohol which is likely to aggravate stress and depression, marijuana works wonders in alleviating anxiety and depression (Sanger, 2017). There are many health and social effects associated with stress, including mental disorders and violence against others (Sanger, 2017). To avoid cases of stress-related violence and mental disorders, state governments should make marijuana consumption legal.

There are many misconceptions about marijuana in the world today. People have continued to ignore the health benefits linked with this substance and have instead focused on citing yet-to-be proven misconceptions. Owing to the ability of the drug to stop seizures, nausea, and stress in individuals, governments should seriously consider its legalization. The legalization will also help state governments reduce expenses that result from sustaining suspects convicted of marijuana possession and consumption. So far, there is more than enough evidence proving that marijuana has lots of benefits to individuals, the society, and the government, and therefore should be legalized.

Head, T. (2016). “8 reasons why marijuana should be legalized”. ThoughtCo . Retrieved June 27, 2020 from https://www.thoughtco.com/reasons-why-marijuana-should-be-legalized-721154

Markol, T. (2018). “5 reasons why marijuana should be legalized”. Marijuana Reform . Retrieved June 27, 2020 from http://marijuanareform.org/5-reasons-marijuana-legalized/

Noonan, D. (2017). “Marijuana treatment reduces severe epileptic seizures”. Scientific American . Retrieved June 27, 2020 from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/marijuana-treatment-reduces-severe-epileptic-seizures/

Owen, P. (2014). “6 powerful reasons to legalize marijuana”. New York Times . Retrieved June 27, 2020 from https://www.alternet.org/drugs/6-powerful-reasons-new-york-times-says-end-marijuana-prohibition

Sanger, B. (2017). “10 legit reasons why weed should be legalized right now”. Herb . Retrieved June 27, 2020 from https://herb.co/marijuana/news/reasons-weed-legalized

Why Marijuana Should be Legal Essay Outline

Thesis:  Marijuana has health benefits and should thus be legal.

Benefits of Marijuana

Marijuana slows and stops the spread of cancer cells.

• Cannabidiol can turn off a gene called Id-1 and can therefore stop cancer.
• In an experiment, researchers were able to treat breast cancer cells with Cannabidiol.

Marijuana helps with pain and nausea reduction for people going through chemotherapy.

• Cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy suffer from severe pains and nausea.
• This can further complicate their health.
• Marijuana can stir up their appetite, decrease nausea, and reduce pain.

Paragraph  3:

Marijuana can control epileptic seizure.

• Marijuana extract stopped seizures in epileptic rats in ten hours.
• The seizures were controlled by the THC.

Disadvantages of Marijuana

Marijuana is addictive.

• One in ten marijuana users become addicted over time.
• If one stops using the drug abruptly, they may suffer from such withdrawal symptoms.

Marijuana use decreases mental health.

• Users suffer from memory loss and restricted blood flow to the brain.
• Users have higher chances of developing depression and schizophrenia.

Marijuana use damages the lungs more than cigarette smoking .

• Marijuana smokers inhale the smoke more deeply into their lungs and let it stay there for longer.
• The likelihood of lung cancer can be increased by this deeper, longer exposure to carcinogens.

Why Marijuana Should Be Legal

Paragraph 7:

Improved quality and safety control.

• Legalization would lead to the creation of a set of standards for safety and quality control.
• Users would know what they exactly get in exchange for the money they offer.
• There would be no risks of users taking in unknown substances mixed in marijuana.

Paragraph 8:

Marijuana has a medicinal value.

• Medical marijuana treats a wide assortment of “untreatable” diseases and conditions.
• Public health would be improved and the healthcare system would experience less of a drain.  

Paragraph 9: 

Among the major arguments against marijuana legalization is often that legalization would yield an increase in drug-impaired driving.

• This argument holds that even now when the drug is yet to be fully legalized in the country, it is a major causal factor in highway deaths, injuries, and crushes.
• It however beats logic why marijuana is illegalized on the ground that it would increase drug-impaired driving while alcohol is legal but also significantly contributes to the same problem.

Legalization of marijuana would have many benefits. The drug is associated with the treatment of many serious illnesses including the dreaded cancer. Legalization would also save users from consuming unsafe marijuana sold by unscrupulous people.

Why Marijuana Should Be Legal Essay

There is an ongoing tension between the belief that marijuana effectively treats a wide range of ailments and the argument that it has far-reaching negative health effects. There has nevertheless been a drive towards legalization of the drug in the United States with twenty nine states and the District of Columbia having legalized it for medical and recreational purposes. It was also found by a study that there is a sharp increase in the use of marijuana across the country (Kerr, Lui & Ye, 2017). Major public health concerns are being prompted by this rise. This should however not be the case because marijuana has health benefits and should thus be legal.

Marijuana slows and stops the spread of cancer cells. A study found that Cannabidiol can turn off a gene called Id-1 and can therefore stop cancer. A 2007 report by researchers at California Pacific Medical Center in San Francisco also indicated that the spread of cancer may be prevented by Cannabidiol. In their lab experiment, the researchers were able to treat breast cancer cells with this component (Nawaz, 2017). The positive outcome of the experiment showed that Id-1 expression had been significantly decreased.

Marijuana also helps with pain and nausea reduction for people going through chemotherapy. Cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy suffer from severe pains, appetite loss, vomiting, and painful nausea. This can further complicate their already deteriorating health. Marijuana can be of help here by stirring up the appetite, decreasing nausea, and reducing pain (Nawaz, 2017). There are also other cannabinoid drugs used for the same purposes as approved by the FDA.

It was additionally shown by a 2003 study that the use of marijuana can control epileptic seizure. Synthetic marijuana and marijuana extracts were given to epileptic rats by Virginia Commonwealth University’s Robert J. DeLorenzo. In about ten hours, the seizures had been stopped by the drugs (Nawaz, 2017). It was found that the seizures were controlled by the THC which bound the brain cells responsible for regulating relaxation and controlling excitability.

Some scientists claim that marijuana is addictive. According to them, one in ten marijuana users become addicted over time. They argue that if one stops using the drug abruptly, they may suffer from such withdrawal symptoms as anxiety and irritability (Barcott, 2015). However, the same argument could be applied to cigarette smoking, which is notably legal. There is need for more studies to be conducted into this claim being spread by opponents of marijuana legalization.

It is also argued that marijuana use decreases mental health. Those opposed to the legalization of recreational marijuana like to cite studies that show that users of the drug suffer from memory loss and restricted blood flow to the brain. They also argue that users have higher chances of developing depression and schizophrenia. However, these assertions have not yet been completely ascertained by science (Barcott, 2015). The claim about depression and schizophrenia is particularly not clear because researchers are not sure whether the drug triggers the conditions or it is used by smokers to alleviate the symptoms.

It is further claimed that marijuana use damages the lungs more than cigarette smoking. It is presumed that marijuana smokers inhale the smoke more deeply into their lungs and let it stay there for longer. The likelihood of lung cancer, according to this argument, can be increased by this deeper, longer exposure to carcinogens. However, the argument touches not on the frequency of use between marijuana and cigarette smokers (Barcott, 2015). It neither takes into account such alternative administration methods as edibles, tinctures, and vaporizing.

Legalization of marijuana would lead to improved quality and safety control. Purchasing the drug off the street provides end users with no means of knowing what they are exactly getting. On the other hand, legalizing it would immediately lead to the creation of a set of standards for safety and quality control (Caulkins, Kilmer & Kleiman, 2016). This would certainly work in the marijuana industry just as it is working in the tobacco and alcohol industries. Users would be able to know what they exactly get in exchange for the money they offer. Additionally, there would be no risks of users taking in unknown substances mixed in marijuana sold on the streets.

Marijuana should also be legal because it has a medicinal value. It has been proven that medical marijuana treats a wide assortment of “untreatable” diseases and conditions. These include problems due to chemotherapy, cancer, post-traumatic stress disorder, migraines, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, and Crohn’s disease (Caulkins, Kilmer & Kleiman, 2016). Public health would be improved and the healthcare system would experience less of a drain if medical cannabis products were made available to those suffering from the mentioned conditions. Consequently, more public funds would be available for such other public service initiatives as schools and roads.

Among the major arguments against marijuana legalization is often that legalization would yield an increase in drug-impaired driving. This argument holds that even now when the drug is yet to be fully legalized in the country, it has already been cited to be a major causal factor in highway deaths, injuries, and crushes. Among the surveys those arguing along this line might cite is one that was conducted back in 2010, revealing that of the participating weekend night-time drivers, “8.6 percent tested positive for marijuana or its metabolites” (“Why We Should Not Legalize Marijuana,” 2010). It was found in yet another study that 26.9% of drivers who were being attended to at a trauma center after sustaining serious injuries tested positive for the drug (“Why We Should Not Legalize Marijuana,” 2010). It however beats logic why marijuana is illegalized on the ground that it would increase drug-impaired driving while alcohol is legal but also significantly contributes to the same problem.

As the discussion reveals, legalization of marijuana would have many benefits. The drug is associated with the treatment of many serious illnesses including the dreaded cancer. Legalization would also save users from consuming unsafe marijuana sold by unscrupulous people. There are also other health conditions that can be controlled through the drug. Arguments against its legalization based on its effects on human health also lack sufficient scientific support. It is thus only safe that the drug is legalized in all states.

Barcott, B. (2015).  Weed the people: the future of legal marijuana in America . New York, NY: Time Home Entertainment.

Caulkins, J. P., Kilmer, B., & Kleiman, M. (2016).  Marijuana legalization: what everyone needs to know . New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Kerr, W., Lui, C., & Ye, Y. (2017). Trends and age, period and cohort effects for marijuana use prevalence in the 1984-2015 US National Alcohol Surveys.  Addiction ,  113 (3), 473-481.

Nawaz, H. (2017).  The debate between legalizing marijuana and its benefits for medical purposes: a pros and cons analysis . Munich, Germany: GRIN Verlag.

Why We Should Not Legalize Marijuana. (2010). In  CNBC . Retrieved June 25, 2020 from  https://www.cnbc.com/id/36267223 .

More examples of Argumentative Essays written by our team of quality writers

• Same Sex Marriage Argumentative Essay, with Outline
• American Patriotism Argumentative Essay
• Euthanasia Argumentative Essay Sample
• Artificial Intelligence Argumentative Essay
• Argumentative Essay on Abortion – Sample Essay
• Gun Control Argumentative Essay – Sample Essay
• Can Money Buy Happiness Argumentative Essay
• Illegal Immigration Argumentative Essay

 There are typical mistakes most students make when writing their argumentative papers . When writing your argumentative essay you ought to understand that it calls for the ability to present facts, provide supportive evidence, and use logical reasoning to illustrate points. This will help you write a quality paper.

You can relieve yourself all the tussle by buying an argumentative essay  from a trustworthy argumentative essay help service. Hire Gudwriter now and you will never regret it.

Special offer! Get 20% discount on your first order. Promo code: SAVE20

Related Posts

Free essays and research papers, artificial intelligence argumentative essay – with outline.

Artificial Intelligence Argumentative Essay Outline In recent years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become one of the rapidly developing fields and as its capabilities continue to expand, its potential impact on society has become a topic Read more…

Synthesis Essay Example – With Outline

The goal of a synthesis paper is to show that you can handle in-depth research, dissect complex ideas, and present the arguments. Most college or university students have a hard time writing a synthesis essay, Read more…

Examples of Spatial Order – With Outline

A spatial order is an organizational style that helps in the presentation of ideas or things as is in their locations. Most students struggle to understand the meaning of spatial order in writing and have Read more…

Essay Service Examples Law Marijuana Legalization

Why Marijuana Use Should Not be Legalized?

• Proper editing and formatting
• Free revision, title page, and bibliography
• Flexible prices and money-back guarantee

Reference List

• Anderson, D., Rees, D., Tekin, E. (2018). Medical marijuana laws and workplace fatalities in the United States. International Journal of Drug Policy, 60, 33-39. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395918301968
• Chabarria, K., Racusin, D., Antony, K., Kahr, M., Suter, M., Mastrobattista, J., Aagaard, K. (2016). Marijuana use and its effects in pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 215 (4), 506.e1 - 506.e7. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937816302629
• Estoup, A.C.; Moise-Campbell, C.;Varma, M. & Stewart, D.G. (2016). The impact of marijuana legalization on adolescent use, consequences, and perceived risk. Substance Use & Misuse, 51(14), 1881-1887.
• Hopfer, C. (2014). Implications of marijuana legalization for adolescent substance use. Substance abuse, 35(4), 331-335.
• Lewis, M., Litt, D., King, K., Garcia, T., Waldron, K., Lee, C. (2018). Consideration of future consequences as a moderator of the willingness-behavior relationship for young adult marijuana use and consequences. Addictive Behaviors, 87, 8-16.
• McKinney, L. (2018). The economics of marijuana legalization. Capitol Ideas, 29-31.
• Mejia, D., Restrepo, P. (2016). The economics of the war on illegal drug production and trafficking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 126, 255-275.
• Oetzel, J. & Duran, B. (2004). Intimate partner violence in American Indian and/or Alaska Native communities: A social ecological framework of determinants and interventions. American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research, 11(3), 49-68.
• Rogeberg, O. (2018). Prohibition, regulation or laissez faire: The policy trade-offs of cannabis policy. International Journal of Drug Policy, 56, 153-161.
• Stimson, C.D. (2010). Legalizing marijuana: Why citizens should just say no. Studying Skills and Academic Writing, 13, 169-167.
• Szaflarski, M., Sirven, J. (2017). Social factors in marijuana use for medical and recreational purposes. Epilepsy & Behavior, 70, 280-287. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505016306187
• Volkow, N., Compton, W., Weiss, S. (2014). Adverse health effects of marijuana use. The New England Journal of Medicine, 371 (4), 879.

Our writers will provide you with an essay sample written from scratch: any topic, any deadline, any instructions.

Cite this paper

Related essay topics.

Get your paper done in as fast as 3 hours, 24/7.

Related articles

Most popular essays

• Cannabis/Medical Marijuana
• Marijuana Legalization
• Perspective

Decisions taken on drugs in international fora such as the United Commission Nations on Drugs...

The legalization of recreational marijuana was driven by politicians who had a desire to...

From its first national regulation in the United States with the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937, to its...

• Drugs Legalization

There is an increasing evidence that legalization of illicit drugs is essential to lessen the...

In 2012 a bill was passed to make the use of medical marijuana legal. To obtain the drug though,...

Scientific revolution and rapid increase knowledge in the field of researches, it has led to rise...

The legalization of marijuana has been an issue of controversy across the globe. The issue brings...

• Ethical Dilemma

Throughout our history, legal and illegal drugs have been a topic of discussion and a concern for...

For centuries cannabis has been used as a medicine, a material to make rope with, and a...

Join our 150k of happy users

• Get original paper written according to your instructions
• Save time for what matters most

Fair Use Policy

EduBirdie considers academic integrity to be the essential part of the learning process and does not support any violation of the academic standards. Should you have any questions regarding our Fair Use Policy or become aware of any violations, please do not hesitate to contact us via [email protected].

We are here 24/7 to write your paper in as fast as 3 hours.

Provide your email, and we'll send you this sample!

By providing your email, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Say goodbye to copy-pasting!

Get custom-crafted papers for you.

Enter your email, and we'll promptly send you the full essay. No need to copy piece by piece. It's in your inbox!

Should Marijuana Be Legal? Argumentative Essay

• To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
• As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
• As a template for you assignment

In the United State, various topics are being debated. However, among the most contentious and debated topics is whether marijuana ought to be legalized or not. Strong advocates for the legalization of cannabis claim that marijuana should be legalized because it numerous medical benefits. However, the opponents strongly assert that cannabis should be considered illegal because of its high abuse potential.

From the impetus that currently surrounds the topic under discussion, it is evident that various movements have gained momentum on the legalization of cannabis (Stateman, 2009).

In California, there are regions where the legalization of marijuana has been endorsed. A number of American citizens currently suppose that cannabis needs to be legalized. Others appear to be very skeptical about the adverse effects and health damage caused by marijuana.

The reasons why marijuana needs to be legalized are many, and they outweigh the rationale behind its illegalization. For instance, the Olympic swimming champion, Phelps Michael, lately appeared in the global news for consuming cannabis. This hurt Phelps repute and made him lose some cash in approval. These reports rekindled discussions on whether cannabis should be lawfully recognized or not.

Most debates conclude that the United States needs to legalize cannabis. Research has proved that the drug is neither hazardous nor very addictive as most opponents alleged. When marijuana is legalized, it might assist in stopping drug trafficking cartels and aid in impeding the criminal or gang activities.

This implies that, the U.S. economy will have an opportunity to save additional funds (Hollister, 1971). This cannot be realized unless marijuana, which has numerous medical benefits, is legalized.

It is perhaps very essential to be acquainted with an account of laws that surround marijuana in order to understand the reasons why the drug ought to be legalized. In the fiscal 1930s, various unenthusiastic misinformation concerning cannabis and its consumption emerged. For instance, in the financial year 1937, a popular movie dubbed ‘Reefer Madness’ depicted the negative effects of marijuana.

Reefer Madness showed that innocent teenagers experienced soul-destroying effects from the consumption of violent sedatives (Hollister, 1971). In 1938, the legislature had to pass the Marijuana Tax Law due to the off-putting info on cannabis. As a national law, the Marijuana Tax Law allowed the federal administration to arrest any person who consumed cannabis even if the nation had de-criminalized its usage.

This brought about various lawsuits, confusions, as well as unwillingness to carry out research on cannabis by the health sector. Thus, if marijuana laws could have been altered, the medical industry might have done many research studies on the drug. Lawsuit cases could have been reduced, and all citizens might have benefited from this.

Most individuals however, have their own reasons why they believe marijuana should not be legalized. According to NIDA (National Institute on Drug Abuses) director, Volkow Nora, marijuana produces adverse behavioral, emotional, mental, and physical changes when consumed. For example, when teenagers increase the level of marijuana consumption, their development can be negatively affected.

The drug is harmful to the lungs and can cause short-term judgment, verbal skills, and memory impairments (Dubner, 2007). Nevertheless, research studies conducted on the health effects caused by cannabis is open to doubts. In fact, most studies have proved that incase the use of cannabis has negative outcomes they could be mild.

Moreover, similar sets of laws imposed on alcohol and tobacco consumption can proscribe the consumption of marijuana by the minors. Most anti-marijuana activists object its consumption by asserting that the drug is addictive. Research studies conducted by medical experts reveal that cannabis is just mildly addictive.

There are two standard reports from California University and Addiction Research Center that compared the level of addiction of marijuana, caffeine, alcohol, nicotine, cocaine, and heroine (Stateman, 2009).

From these research reports, it emerged that marijuana was the least addictive while nicotine was the most addictive of all drugs under study. The legalization of marijuana is only criticized because the drug acts as an opening to the consumption of other dangerous drugs.

In the fiscal 2002, scholars conducted a study on the consumption of marijuana. Students were the study participants. The results showed that 74.0% had not tasted marijuana but 77.0% had already tried it in the past years (Messerili, 2007).

However, it was confirmed that the use of cannabis hardly results into the consumption of other more harmful drugs. The legalization of cannabis appears to be a rather intricate issue that is being opposed by most individuals and groups. The reasons behind the opponents’ claims cannot offset the various reasons why cannabis ought to be legalized.

If the U.S. legalizes the consumption of cannabis, the impacts caused by unlawful gangs and illegitimate drug trafficking will be lessened. For instance, the Mexican Officials and the United States drug enforcement agency raided a processing complex used to cultivate cannabis. They found about nine thousand stacks of cannabis that were valued at four billion US dollars.

This money was used to sustain businesses run by drug cartels and to finance various criminal activities. Hence, the streets will be safe if the rivalry amongst drug dealers and gangs is reduced. This can only be realized if the use of cannabis is endorsed.

In a ‘ Marijuana Legalization Timeline’ article found at ProQuest, it emerged that in the fiscal 2008, drug cartels from Mexico generated a sum of $23.0 billion from the sale of drugs. Such cartels tend to fund and manage street supplying criminals in all regions within the state (Stateman, 2009).

The unlawful drug sellers only have interests to sell additional cannabis because the drug is illegal. Thus, if it is legalized, people who are encouraged by pushers and criminals to use marijuana may be few.

Sanctioning the use of cannabis can weaken drug cartels as well as lessen organized street crimes. Decimalization is another benefit that comes because of endorsing the use of cannabis. The United States incurs higher costs to prosecute and punish lawbreakers.

In California, Gray James, a superior court judge claimed that the state could save up to one billion US dollars if it stopped the imprisonment and persecution of the nonviolent cannabis consumers (Dubner, 2007).

A study conducted in 2005 showed that, the U.S. could gain about 6.20 billion annually if the country resorted to the taxation of cannabis at similar rates imposed on alcohol and tobacco products. Therefore, the benefits accruing from the legalization of cannabis can help the U.S. to increase its financial strength and evade the harsh economic times.

Cannabis also has some medicinal benefits that contribute to the justifications as to why the drug ought to be legalized. The information on legalizing marijuana indicates that there are no reported death cases resulting from cannabis consumption. When compared to alcohol and tobacco, cannabis is less harmful to individuals’ physical condition.

In fact, the drug can substitute about 10 to 20% of the medical prescriptions currently used. NIDA reported that cannabis has active elements that can be used to treat nausea, spastic muscles, pain, glaucoma, and appetite stimulation (Messerili, 2007).

Since marijuana has numerous medicinal benefits that are unenforced, the U.S. administration has no grounds to avoid sanctioning cannabis consumption. Thus, there are various grounds justifying why cannabis ought to be legalized as opposed to the weak reasons explaining why the U.S. needs to ban it.

Dubner, S. (2007). On the legalization – or not – of marijuana . Web.

Hollister, L. (1971). Hunger and appetite after single doses of marihuana, alcohol, and dextroamphetamine. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 12(1), pp.44-49.

Messerili, J. (2007). Should marijuana be legalized under any circumstances? Balanced Politics. Web.

Stateman, A. (2009). Can marijuana help rescue California’s economy? . Web.

• Why Is Marijuana Legalized In Some States And Not Others?
• Pros and Cons of Legalization of Medical Marijuana
• Federal Government Should Not Legalize the Use of Marijuana
• Capitalism: Theoretical and Operational Limitations
• Theories of Justice: Utilitarian theory
• Community Development Workers Face
• The End of History: Views of the Philosophers
• Challenges of Community Development Problem Solution Essay
• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2019, June 17). Should Marijuana Be Legal? https://ivypanda.com/essays/should-marijuana-be-legal/

"Should Marijuana Be Legal?" IvyPanda , 17 June 2019, ivypanda.com/essays/should-marijuana-be-legal/.

IvyPanda . (2019) 'Should Marijuana Be Legal'. 17 June.

IvyPanda . 2019. "Should Marijuana Be Legal?" June 17, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/should-marijuana-be-legal/.

1. IvyPanda . "Should Marijuana Be Legal?" June 17, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/should-marijuana-be-legal/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Should Marijuana Be Legal?" June 17, 2019. https://ivypanda.com/essays/should-marijuana-be-legal/.