how to write the lsat essay

Sign up to our Newsletter

Lsat writing sample - a step-by-step guide + example.

Reviewed by:

David Merson

Former Head of Pre-Law Office, Northeastern University, & Admissions Officer, Brown University

Reviewed: 3/18/24

The writing section is an often overlooked part of the Law School Admission Test. Read on to learn how to approach the LSAT Writing Sample.

Part of becoming an excellent lawyer is having strong persuasive oral and written communication skills. Law schools require students to complete a writing sample as part of the challenging LSAT exam to assess potential law students on this skill.

If writing under pressure isn’t your forte, this guide will go over what you can expect on the writing sample, how to complete it efficiently, and give you a sample LSAT prompt to help you prepare!

LSAT Writing Sample Prompt

Just like sample LSAT questions can help you study, looking at essay examples can help you prepare. Here’s a past LSAT writing sample prompt you can use to begin honing your writing skills! 

​​Brighter Construction is deciding which of two upcoming construction projects to bid on—resurfacing Hilltop Road or expanding Carlene Boulevard. 

Since Brighter cannot fulfill both contracts at the same time and bids constitute binding commitments, Brighter can only bid on one of the projects. Using the facts below, write an essay arguing for one project over the other based on the following two criteria:

- Brighter wants to enhance its reputation among potential clients

- Brighter wants to increase its capacity to take on bigger projects

The Hilltop Road resurfacing is a small project. The potential profit is relatively low. With Brighter’s experience and resources, it is almost certain to win the contract, and it is highly likely to finish on time and within budget. Brighter has an established reputation for finishing projects on time and within budget.  

Brighter has specialized in small projects. Construction firms specializing in small projects find it increasingly difficult over time to win contracts for bigger projects. If the project is completed under budget, Brighter will keep the extra money. 

If it is over budget, Brighter must cover the additional costs. Brighter will use any extra money to purchase additional heavy equipment. 

The Carlene Boulevard expansion is a large project. The potential profit is much higher. It involves a kind of work that Brighter has never done before and that would require it to explain its operation. Because of the overall nature of this project, Brighter believes it has a good chance of winning the contract.

It is uncertain whether Brighter can finish the project on time and within budget. Even if brighter exceeds time and budget constraints, it will gain valuable experience. If the project goes over budget, Brighter will lose money. 

As you can see, this prompt offers two courses of action and asks you to choose whichever matches the stated criteria best. After carefully reading the prompt and following the above tips, you should be able to formulate a solid argument!

Model Answer Example

Here is a great LSAT writing example for the above prompt: 

“Based on the two criteria given, it is advisable for Brighter Construction to bid on the Carlene Boulevard expansion project.

Firstly, to enhance Brighter Construction's reputation, winning and completing the Carlene Boulevard project would have greater benefits than the Hilltop Road resurfacing project. While it is true that Brighter Construction has established a reputation for finishing projects on time and within budgets, this reputation is limited to small projects. 

As the prompt suggests, specializing in small projects can make it harder for companies to win contracts for bigger projects over time. Brighter Construction can demonstrate its ability to handle larger, more complex projects by taking on the challenge of an expandable project like Carlene Boulevard. Clients looking for construction firms to manage big projects will take notice of this. Furthermore, as the prompt indicates, the Carlene Boulevard expansion has the potential for higher profits. 

Winning this project will open up doors for Brighter Construction, which can lead to more high-profit projects in the future. It will be an excellent chance for Brighter Construction to expand its operation and be better positioned to take on even more significant projects. Therefore, even if Brighter Construction does not profit from the Carlene Boulevard expansion project, it can prepare itself to handle bigger projects better than before and take up more significant opportunities in the future.

The Carlene Boulevard expansion project presents a more significant opportunity on the second criterion of increasing capacity to take on bigger projects. As mentioned above, this project is much bigger and requires new and more advanced resources. Hence, Brighter Construction will acquire the necessary resources to handle bigger projects after winning this project. This experience will allow Brighter Construction to take on more large-scale projects. The company will have successfully expanded its operations, and thus, it can bid on more significant projects in the future. The more significant the projects Brighter Construction takes on, the higher the profits that come with them.

Moreover, the Carlene Boulevard expansion project will provide valuable experience to Brighter Construction. The fact that it is unsure if it will complete the project on time and within budget means that the company will learn new skills, gain new insights, and discover new strategies. Brighter Construction will learn to optimize its resources better if it exceeds budget constraints. The company will undoubtedly face challenges and obstacles throughout the project, and this experience will be priceless. It will enable Brighter Construction to improve its work quality and overall competence and help win more significant projects in the future.

In conclusion, while the Hilltop Road resurfacing project seems safer, Brighter Construction should bid on the Carlene Boulevard expansion project to enhance its reputation among potential clients and increase its capacity to take on more significant projects. This project will provide Brighter Construction with valuable experience, allow it to acquire new resources, and allow the company to prove its ability to handle more substantial projects successfully. Winning this project will be an excellent chance for Brighter Construction to expand its operations, prepare to take on even more significant opportunities in the future, and increase its profitability accordingly.”

Why This Answer Is Good

What makes this essay good is that it gets straight to the point. It strongly argues for one side and provides relevant examples to support that argument. 

The essay advocates for Brighter Construction to prioritize bidding on the Carlene Boulevard expansion project over the Hilltop Road resurfacing project based on enhancing reputation and increasing capacity for larger projects. 

It successfully argues that winning the Carlene project would demonstrate the company's ability to handle more significant endeavors and open doors to higher-profit opportunities. 

How is the LSAT Writing Test Scored? 

The LSAT writing sample is not scored and does not affect your overall LSAT writing score. However, it is still considered an integral part of the admissions process as it provides a window into your aptitude for a career as a lawyer. 

Similar to the experimental section, the writing sample is reviewed by admissions committees alongside your LSAT score and other application materials to evaluate your ability to construct a well-organized, logically coherent argument. 

Each law school evaluates the writing sample differently, but missing or weak responses have been used as grounds for rejection by law schools.

How to Approach the LSAT Writing Sample

Planning and writing an entire essay within 35 minutes might seem intimidating. To make this process less daunting, here are our top steps to approach the writing sample. 

By going through each of these steps, you can not only help you master the writing section, but you’ll also free up space to focus on the rest of your LSAT prep . It’s a smart way to balance your study time.

Read the Prompt Carefully

Before you begin writing your essay, you must consider all the facts. You should be able to make your decision based solely on the information you have given. Read the prompt carefully to determine which side you can create the best argument for. 

Focus on the Facts

Even if you’re well-versed in the topic presented, you should only use the information given to you to make an argument. Do not include outside information that you believe will strengthen your argument.

Admissions committees want to see how you create arguments with limited information to test your analysis and reasoning skills. 

Remember, There Is No Right or Wrong Answer

There is no right or wrong answer to these prompts. They are presented in a way that will make it somewhat challenging to choose the option with the most supporting evidence, but either side can be argued.

Choose whichever side you feel you can create the most persuasive argument for, even if it goes against what you would traditionally side with.

If you’re having difficulty choosing a side, try to jot down a few pros and cons for each and see which side has the most pros. 

Make a Plan

To avoid wasting time, getting writer’s block, or writing an incohesive essay, you should give yourself around 10 minutes to plan your essay. Create a quick outline detailing what each paragraph of your essay will argue.

Many LSAT test-takers write their sample in a series of short or only two paragraphs—one detailing the advantages of their chosen side and another detailing the disadvantages of the opposing side. You should choose a structure you feel most comfortable with.

Your first paragraph should state your stance. In your remaining paragraphs, you should mention the strengths of your choice and the cons of the opposite side. 

Your writing sample will also list certain criteria when choosing a side. Ensure you include these in your outline. 

Conclude your essay briefly by reiterating your stance and summarizing the main reasons you chose one side over the other. Your essay plan should be completed using jot notes to avoid wasting the time you’ll need to write and revise your sample.

Keep Your Writing Clear and Concise

The best way to get your point across clearly is to use simple language that is easy to understand. Do not try to impress the committee by using vocabulary you aren’t familiar with. You should also only use words that you are sure you can spell correctly. 

Leave Time to Edit

While 35 minutes may not seem like a lot of time, once you’ve created a rough plan for your essay, it won’t take too long to write it out. Remember, this essay should only be a few short paragraphs! 

You will make at least a few silly errors as you race against the clock to finish your essay and hit the LSAT writing deadline. Since this sample is meant to give the admissions committee insight into your writing skills, you must revise your writing to eliminate any avoidable spelling, grammar, or syntax errors. 

Give yourself around five minutes to review your sample to find these mistakes before submitting it. 

Step-by-Step Guide on How to Approach LSAT Writing Essay

If you have no idea where to start for your LSAT writing sample, don’t fret. We’ve compiled a step-by-step guide to help you break down the writing process. 

Taking time to practice your LSAT writing essay is a great way to self-study for the LSAT . You may also want to look at an LSAT writing example to get your ideas flowing as you practice your writing. 

But the best way to improve your writing is simply to write! So, please look at our guide below to help you learn how to approach the LSAT writing sample. 

Step One: Compare and Contrast

To build a strong argument, you need to understand both sides thoroughly. Before writing, create a list to compare and contrast the opposing arguments. This way, you can weigh the choices before you decide which side you’re on. 

There are several ways to do this. You may create a side-by-side chart, a pro-and-con list, a Venn diagram, or a thought map—the possibilities are endless! Use whatever works best for you to organize your thoughts effectively. 

Step Two: Prioritize

Now, it’s time to examine each argument carefully. Pay attention to its strengths and weaknesses and the criteria and factors provided. 

When prioritizing, consider what is most important in the situation. Which potential consequence would be a greater loss? This should help clarify which argument is stronger. 

Step Three: Make a Decision

Considering all of the above, choose a side to argue for. Be confident and prepared to defend your choice in your essay fully. Use the brainstorming you’ve done in steps one and two to create an outline for your writing sample. 

Step Four: Get Writing

Now that your argument has been built, it’s time to start writing! Remember to keep it concise--every sentence should be purposeful and necessary. Avoid fluff and filler words. 

Defend Your Choice

Start by explaining why your choice is the best one. List the factors that you prioritized and your reasons for doing so. You should have at least three strong reasons for your argument. 

Since there is no “right” answer, your argument may have weak points, which you should address. Explain why these weak points aren't significant or how the strengths in your argument compensate for them. 

Explain How the Opposition Falls Short

You don’t have to bash the other side. It’s a good idea to mention the opposition's strengths, as it shows you’ve made your decision carefully. But you should point out the “fatal flaw” of the other choice that led you to reject it. Be thorough and explain your thinking in detail. 

Step Five: Revise

Thoughtless errors never put you in a good light with admissions committees. As we mentioned before, leave yourself some time to proofread your writing sample and edit out any mistakes! 

Common Mistakes in LSAT Writing Section

Here are some common mistakes to avoid when completing the LSAT Writing section.

Misinterpreting the Prompt

Misinterpreting the LSAT essay prompt is a common mistake that significantly undermines the essay's effectiveness. This error occurs when test-takers fail to fully grasp the nuances of the prompt, leading to essays that address the wrong issue. 

Rapid reading without carefully considering the specific question can result in a lack of understanding between the essay's content and the intended evaluative criteria. This weakens the essay's persuasiveness and coherence. 

To avoid this, test-takers should invest time in comprehending the prompt, identifying key issues, and ensuring their responses specifically address the outlined instructions.

Lack of Evidence

Not using evidence to support your argument in an LSAT essay weakens the persuasive power of arguments. This mistake often results from inadequate preparation or time constraints, leading to hastily chosen examples. 

To address this, test-takers should prioritize relevant, specific, and well-developed evidence to ensure the credibility of their claims and avoid potential counterarguments that could weaken the overall persuasiveness of the essay.

Provide a Clear Conclusion

A lack of a proper conclusion in an LSAT essay diminishes its impact by depriving the reader of a clear takeaway. This oversight, often due to time constraints, results in an abrupt ending that leaves the essay incomplete. 

A well-crafted conclusion, summarizing key points and offering a compelling final thought, is crucial for reinforcing the main ideas and enhancing the overall coherence and impact of the essay.

Are you wondering if you’re ready to take the LSAT? Take this “ Am I Ready For the LSAT? Quiz ” to determine if you can take this difficult exam! 

FAQs: LSAT Writing 

Here are some commonly asked questions about this section of the LSAT, to help you understand what to expect and how to prepare.

1. How Long Should My Writing Sample on the LSAT Be?

While your writing sample has no word limit, you should aim to be as clear and concise as possible. Most writing samples on the LSAT are between two and four paragraphs long. Ensure you prioritize quality over quantity.

2. How to Prepare for the Writing Sample on the LSAT?

The best way to prepare for the writing sample is to review sample prompts and answer them under the same time constraints you’ll be in on test day.

3. Do Law Schools Read the Writing Sample on the LSAT?

Yes, law schools do read the writing samples to assess candidates’ writing and argumentative skills.

4. How Long Is the Writing Sample on the LSAT? 

You will have 35 minutes to complete the writing sample on the LSAT. 

5. Do You Have to Take The LSAT Writing More Than Once?

No, you do not have to take LSAT writing more than once. You are only required to submit one writing sample for your LSAT to be considered complete.

Final Thoughts

Given the stress you’ll be under trying to master all three sections of the LSAT, knowing you’ll also have to write an essay can make acing the LSAT seem impossible! 

Knowing how to approach the LSAT to write the most effective argument should ease some of this stress and help ensure you write a compelling sample to impress the judges!

Schedule A Free Consultation

You may also like.

Law School Application Deadlines: Your Guide

Top Law Schools in Oregon

LSAT Writing Sample: A Step by Step Example

Does the LSAT writing sample matter for law school admissions? Absolutely! First, you must have a completed LSAT writing sample on record in order to see your score for the other LSAT sections and for schools to get your LSAT score. But more importantly, even though the LSAT writing sample isn’t scored, it will be included as part of your law school application and admissions committees have the option to evaluate it as part of their decisions. So, make sure to prepare for the writing sample.

In this LSAT writing sample example, we’ll go over what you need to know about LSAT writing, followed by a step-by-step guide with sample responses. By following these basic steps, you can write a clear and persuasive essay that showcases your argumentative writing.

Table of Contents

Lsat writing sample basics.

• LSAT Writing Sample: How to Approach It (With Official Writing Prompt)

LSAT Writing Sample Prompt (PrepTest 73)

You have 35 minutes to complete the LSAT writing sample portion of the test. Since the introduction of the Digital LSAT, you now take the LSAT writing section using secure proctoring software. You’re able to choose the day and time you take this part of the exam (so yes, that means you can complete the LSAT writing sample at home ).

The LSAT writing prompt is often called a “decision prompt” because it asks you to make a decision between two choices based on the information provided. These choices can be anything from what pet a person should get to what kind of community center a town should build. There will be pros and cons for each choice. These choices don’t require any special knowledge of the topic—just use the information provided. The test-writers also don’t necessarily prefer one choice over the other—the point is that you must make a decision with your limited time and defend your decision well.

Note: As of July 2020, anyone taking the remote LSAT must have a complete writing sample on file before they can get their scores. So, if you’re wondering whether your LSAT writing sample matters , know that your scores won’t be released until you complete it! So, we don’t recommend putting it off for too long after your LSAT test day. If you’re feeling dread at the thought of completing this step of your law school application process, don’t worry; our LSAT experts are here to show you exactly how to approach the online LSAT writing sample!

LSAT Writing Sample: How to Approach It

Example lsat writing sample prompt.

Click here to view the LSAT writing sample prompt (taken from The Official LSAT Sample PrepTest of June 2007).

The June 2007 LSAT writing sample describes a decision that “BLZ Stores” have to make. They’re aiming to expand their stores and must choose a plan that should ideally accomplish two things. First, they want to increase their profits. Second, they want to ensure long-term financial stability.

We must choose between the national plan (to expand across the country in a short time) and the regional plan (to increase the number and size of stores in the company’s home region and upgrade their facilities, product quality, and service). Next, we’ll break down the decision-prompt structure and walk you through the key steps to writing a great LSAT writing sample.

Step 1: Brainstorm and Make an Outline

The first step for the LSAT writing sample is to brainstorm. Take a moment to think about which option you can defend most easily. Once you’ve decided, quickly outline the points you’ll make to defend it. Admissions committees will be looking for a writing sample that is well organized, so make sure you set up a loose outline before you start writing.

Your outline should include four major topics:

• Cons of the opposing choice

Put these items in an order that makes sense to you, and then get ready to write. In this example, let’s go ahead and choose the “regional plan” because:

• It can be the first step towards national expansion in the future.

Step 2: Begin Writing & Briefly Summarize Your Choice

The second step is to begin your LSAT writing sample. Start your intro paragraph by briefly summarizing what you’ll be discussing. It can go like this:

BLZ Stores is facing an important decision for its business trajectory. In order to expand, the company must choose between a national plan and a regional plan. Ultimately, its aim is to maximize profits and ensure stability in the future. This is a challenging decision because one option, the national plan, offers the potential for dramatic profits. The other option, the regional plan, is significantly more conservative and may not produce as much profit.

Step 3: Make Your Choice and Give Support

Next, continue the essay by announcing the option you think is best and why. It’s very important that you give at least three solid reasons why you’ve made your choice. At this stage, you can mention how it fulfills at least one of the main considerations better than the other option. Even if it doesn’t fulfill both perfectly, it might do an okay job with one consideration and a great job with the second.

Lots of students try to make the LSAT writing sample easier by bringing in new information that is either made up or comes from their own stored knowledge. This actually makes for a weaker writing sample, so be sure to avoid it.

Law school admissions committees want to see how well you can argue using the facts provided . Think of the facts given in the prompt like evidence in a trial. While you can and should make reasonable arguments and inferences based on the evidence, you don’t get to make evidence up on your own.

Despite the difficulty of the choice, one option is better than the other. BLZ Stores should opt for the regional plan. Firstly, the regional plan takes advantage of BLZ Stores’ favorable position in its local area. It is already a well-known and well-liked brand, so if it is to expand it should begin in an area where it’s most likely to succeed.

Secondly, since BLZ Stores is facing competition from other stores that can offer lower prices, the company should spend more time on its branding and marketing. It is important that if a company can’t offer the lowest prices, it offers ample reasons for customers to spend more at their store. For example, BLZ Stores can make its name synonymous with quality, luxury, or top-class shopping experience. This strategy will help defend the company against its increasing competition.

Most importantly, the national plan will place too much of the company’s focus on expansion. There will not be enough resources to fine-tune this marketing strategy. Thus, in the long run, it puts the company more at risk for huge financial losses.

Additionally, although the regional plan has less potential for immediate large profits than the national plan, it at least offers the chance of a fair amount of profits. It is a good balance of risk and reward.

Step 4: Acknowledge the Other Option’s Pros and Cons

Be sure to acknowledge the arguments in favor of the other option while discussing why those arguments don’t support your option as strongly. If you can’t think of a rebuttal to a particular point, that’s okay. You can always acknowledge that point and say that it doesn’t outweigh the factors in favor of the option you chose.

Next, it’s important to note that while the national plan offers the potential of higher profits, it is also a very high risk for BLZ Stores. Other companies in presumably better positions have failed at dramatic, national expansions. Since this company aims to ensure long-term financial stability, it’s not in its best interest to take such a significant risk. Plus, the risk is amplified by the fact that they are not well-known outside of their hometown.

Step 5: Reiterate Why Your Choice Is the Best and Summarize Your Argument

Make sure you leave yourself enough time to close your writing sample with a concise conclusion. Writing samples that end mid-thought are weaker than those that end with a strong and concise statement of the position you argued in favor of.

If possible, also try to leave yourself one minute at the end of the LSAT writing sample to go through your essay and check for errors.

In the end, BLZ Stores should choose the regional plan because it takes advantage of its good position in its community, offers a fair amount of profits, and can allow the company to improve its branding and popularity for the future. Although the national plan might produce higher profits if it succeeds, it does not satisfy the company’s objective of having long-term financial stability. With a solid strategy in mind, BLZ Stores are bound to fare better under the regional plan.

How do I practice LSAT writing?

The best way to hone your LSAT writing skills is to write practice essays and compare it to our step-by-step guide. Did you clearly make a decision and back it up with evidence from the information provided? Did you lay out the pros and cons of your side and the opposition’s? Keep all this in mind as you write and review your practice essays.

To get you started, here is one more LSAT writing sample topics for you to practice with. Try to complete this practice essay within the 35-minute assignment time limit.

This prompt comes from the official LSAT PrepTest 73 and is provided with LSAC®️’s permission.

Directions: The scenario presented below describes two choices, either one of which can be supported on the basis of the information given. Your essay should consider both choices and argue for one over the other, based on the two specified criteria and the facts provided. There is no “right” or “wrong” choice: a reasonable argument can be made for either.

A medium-sized company is located in a technology park in a sparsely populated area outside a major city. It has had difficulty retaining employees because of the long and expensive commute between the city and work that nearly all of its employees face. Consequently, the company will implement a commuting assistance plan. It must decide between operating a free bus for employees and subsidizing employees’ costs of using public transportation. Using the facts below, write an essay in which you argue for one plan over the other based on the following two criteria:

• The company wants reliability and flexibility in its employees’ work schedules.

Under the first plan, the company would lease a bus and hire a driver. The bus would make several daily circuits between the company’s location and a single downtown stop, accessible by public transportation and close to a large, inexpensive parking garage. The only riders on the bus would be the company’s employees. The bus has reclining seats and free Wi-Fi. The average total commute time for an employee would be 75 minutes each way. A breakdown of the bus would be disruptive to the company’s operations.

Under the second plan, the company would partially reimburse employees’ cost of using public transportation to commute to work. The average savings for an employee would be about 80 percent. Most of the employees live within walking distance to a bus stop. Most employees would have to make one or two transfers. Buses are scheduled to arrive every half hour at a bus shelter in the technology park. Buses are sometimes late. None of them have Wi-Fi. The average total commute time for an employee would be 60 minutes each way.

How do you think you did? Let us know in the comments below. For more advice on how to tackle this important LSAT section, check out these five tips for the LSAT writing sample .  

Need more help?

With Magoosh LSAT , you can choose between a live cohorted class with an instructor (which includes all our lessons and practice questions) or access to the self-study option by itself.

Kevin Lin earned a B.A. from UC Berkeley and a J.D. from Columbia Law School. After working as a lawyer for several years, both at the U.S. Attorney’s Office and at a large New York law firm, he succumbed to his love of the LSAT and teaching and has been a full-time LSAT instructor since 2015. Beginning first at a major test prep company and rising to become one of its most experienced and highly rated instructors, he began tutoring independently in 2019. Kevin has worked with LSAT students at all stages of their preparation, from complete beginners to LSAT veterans shooting for the 99th percentile. Connect and learn more about Kevin on YouTube , LinkedIn , and his website .

View all posts

More from Magoosh

8 responses to “LSAT Writing Sample: A Step by Step Example”

GREAT article. This was so helpful and organized in explaining every point. I feel much more confident in taking the writing portion after reading this.

We’re glad to hear that it was helpful for you! Good luck 🙂

I feel a bit torn on how to approach the LSAT writing section.

Here the example is very lengthy, following almost a standard 5 paragraph structure. The example given on some other sites including Khan Academy which the LSAC supposedly helped develop focus on conciseness, usually following a two paragraph structure, and avoiding retreading information like one would normally in a format with an intro and conclusion. There are also alternative formats on other sites.

It seems like there’s no real consensus on how to approach the section. Should I just do what feels right or will certain formats put me at a disadvantage and you strongly recommend the one listed here? Are any top law schools known to have a particular approach they like to see?

I’m probably overthinking all this, but the more I research it the more I’m unsure how to approach it.

With the writing sample, law schools want to see how well you can argue and defend a position with the facts provided and limited time. So don’t worry about the length or number of paragraphs too much. Just make sure you pick a side, express your points clearly, and leave yourself enough time to complete the full writing process (doing timed practice sessions will help with this). Hope that helps!

Thank you so much! It was super helpful to get tips on how to tackle the writing section along with an example of a good essay.

You’re so welcome Signe! We’re so glad this was helpful! 😀

Best of luck to you!

Hi, the link to the writing sample prompt (the one that provides the examples throughout this article) does not work. It prompts me with the LSAC log-in page that’s for law school admission staff only, even though I am already logged into LSAC with my JD account.

Thanks for letting us know about that! We’ll fix that up as soon as we can. In the meantime, I can copy the prompt for you here:

“BLZ Stores, an established men’s clothing retailer with a chain of stores in a major metropolitan area, is selecting a plan for expansion. Using the facts below, write an essay in which you argue for one of the following plans over the other based on the following two criteria:

The company wants to increase its profits. The company wants to ensure its long-term financial stability. ​ The “national plan” is to open a large number of men’s clothing stores throughout the country over a short period of time. In doing this, the company would incur considerable debt. It would also have to greatly increase staff and develop national marketing and distribution capabilities. Many regional companies that adopted this strategy increased their profits dramatically. A greater number tried and failed, suffering severe financial consequences. BLZ is not well known outside its home area. Research indicates that the BLZ name is viewed positively by those who know it. National clothing chains can offer lower prices because of their greater buying power. BLZ currently faces increasingly heavy competition in its home region from such chains.

The “regional plan” is to increase the number and size of stores in the company’s home region and upgrade their facilities, product quality, and service. This could be achieved for the most part with existing cash reserves. These upgrades would generally increase the prices that BLZ charges. In one trial store in which such changes were implemented, sales and profits have increased. The local population is growing. BLZ enjoys strong customer loyalty. Regional expansion could be accomplished primarily using BLZ’s experienced and loyal staff and would allow continued reliance on known and trusted suppliers, contractors, and other business connections.”

Hope this helps, and Happy Studying! 😀

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Law School Hopeful’s Guide to Confident LSAT Writing

There’s good news and bad news about LSAT Writing.

The good news: LSAT test-takers (probably you or soon to be you) no longer must complete a writing sample shortly after 5 LSAT multiple choice sections. They now get to complete LSAT Writing up to a full year after their test date and on their own terms (of course with various rules to follow).

The bad news: a higher standard of writing will likely be expected given that test-takers may now optimize or at least try to optimize outside factors (time of day, location, temperature, chair type, lighting…alright I’ll stop now).

Thankfully, with this guide and the help of an expert LSAT tutor , you’ll have a much easier time reaching your peak LSAT Writing performance.

We’ll break things down in this guide under the following 5 headings:

• 10 basic facts about LSAT Writing
• Some additional points to consider
• General directions for the LSAT decision-prompt
• Top recommendations on how to do your best
• An example for you to try on your own

1. 10 basic facts about LSAT Writing

• It’s a 35-minute assignment.
• Completion of the assignment is a law school requirement: you must submit at least one writing sample before your “Law School Report” (the profile which combines your academic records, test scores, letters of recommendation, etc.) may be sent to any law school.
• The assignment need only be completed once! This certainly beats the old way the LSAT writing sample was done: test-takers had to complete the assignment even if they had already done so at the end of a previous LSAT administration .
• As acknowledged at the top of this article, law school hopefuls have one year from their test date to complete a writing sample, but I believe getting it done within 2 weeks after your test is ideal.
• Related to the above point, LSAC claims that it may take about a month to process your LSAT Writing assignment, so you should keep that in mind when planning out timing for your law school applications. Control what you can to make the application process as seamless as possible.
• You don’t need to do LSAT Writing if you have a writing sample on file from a paper-based test (so the June 2019 LSAT, AKA LSAT PrepTest 87, or an earlier LSAT), but just in case you’d like another go, you have the option to register for LSAT Writing (at additional cost).
• Law schools to which you’re applying will receive your 3 most recent writing samples (as applicable).
• The assignment is NOT scored! Your 120-180 scaled score on the LSAT is determined by and ONLY by your performance on the 4 of 5 multiple choice sections that are scored. Check out some useful LSAT prep tips to maximize your performance on those sections.
• From 2 options, you’ll be tasked with choosing which you believe best satisfies stated criteria and making a case as to why, but there will NOT be a clear winner. There’s no pressure to make “the right choice”.
• The assignment is given different weight at different law schools. Yes, that’s imprecise, but it’s helpful to keep in mind that the admissions committee at your dream law school may be one that DOES carefully read LSAT Writing assignments; be on the safe side and prep accordingly!

2. Some additional points to consider

As we just addressed, you can’t be certain as to which law schools carefully read writing sample submissions, which means you’re best served by assuming the quality of your time-constrained essay will work as a key indicator of your ability to write well under pressure: an ability vital to law school success . Treat LSAT Writing as an opportunity to showcase your ability to examine presented facts and articulate your position.

Given the digital interface used, you’ll need access to a computer that runs Windows or Mac OS, which thankfully covers the majority of prospective writers. But the following are also required:

• a microphone
• a reliable internet connection

It would be advisable to test out the proctoring software in advance and try things out on the LSAC site. Keep in mind that LSAC’s interface will offer at least the following features:

• cut/copy/paste
• spell-check (sigh of relief)
• line reader
• speech-to-text functionality

Security is strict: the platform is designed to monitor your hardware to ensure you’re not cheating. There’s a video check-in process; a government-issued ID and display of your workspace to the camera are both required. Internet-based applications that could offer an unfair advantage will be blocked and your actions will be recorded and reviewed by proctors to ensure adherence to the rules provided.

3. General directions for the LSAT decision-prompt

LSAC states the following:

“You will have 35 minutes in which to plan and write an essay on the topic provided [it will be a randomly selected prompt]. Read the topic and the accompanying directions carefully. You will probably find it best to spend a few minutes considering the topic and organizing your thoughts before you begin writing. In your essay, be sure to develop your ideas fully, leaving time, if possible, to review what you have written. Do not write on a topic other than the one specified. Writing on a topic of your own choice is not acceptable.

No special knowledge is required or expected for this writing exercise. Law schools are interested in the reasoning, clarity, organization, language usage, and writing mechanics displayed in your essay. How well you write is more important than how much you write.”

4. Top recommendations on how to do your best

Make use of your resources.

You’re permitted scratch paper. You can and should use it to outline your essay. I recommend taking 4 minutes to read, think and map out your ideas, 27 minutes to write and another 4 minutes to proofread and adjust as you see fit. I’d say that, unless your writing style gives you good reason to stray from those targets, you should aim to be +/- 1 on all of them.

Pay attention to detail

You will see a second set of directions near the actual essay topic. These are more specific, so make certain you take the necessary time to understand them before you start writing, as doubling back would be a waste of time. In line with what tends to work best on the LSAT’s multiple choice sections, including the LSAT Logical Reasoning sections, up front time investment is likely to pay off.

Focus on how to frame given information

Law schools care about how well you can utilize given information to establish a position that conforms to stated criteria. You don’t need to know about fish farming (fine – that’s actually from the RC of LSAT PrepTest 88) or whatever else the topic happens to be. You also don’t need to write a ton. Your chief concern is to convince readers of the strength of your current analytical writing ability – which is at least somewhat predictive of your future law school and legal writing ability.

Be decisive

Consider each option, striving to be fair-minded in weighing the pros and cons, and then clearly argue for ONE option instead of the other. Yes, you’ll easily be able to spot information that could very well support the other option, but you’ll need to stake out a well-defined position early on in your writing and hold it until the end. Now, you’ll notice I said, “HOLD it until the end”, which allows room for some well-considered acknowledgement of what the other option has to offer. A qualified position can be very strong, but of course, don’t forget that your job IS to take a side.

5. An example for you to try on your own

This is the writing sample from the June 2007 LSAT :

“BLZ Stores, an established men’s clothing retailer with a chain of stores in a major metropolitan area, is selecting a plan for expansion. Using the facts below, write an essay in which you argue for one of the following plans over the other based on the following two criteria:

• The company wants to increase its profits.
• The company wants to ensure its long-term financial stability.

The “national plan” is to open a large number of men’s clothing stores throughout the country over a short period of time. In doing this, the company would incur considerable debt. It would also have to greatly increase staff and develop national marketing and distribution capabilities. Many regional companies that adopted this strategy increased their profits dramatically. A greater number tried and failed, suffering severe financial consequences. BLZ is not well known outside its home area. Research indicates that the BLZ name is viewed positively by those who know it. National clothing chains can offer lower prices because of their greater buying power. BLZ currently faces increasingly heavy competition in its home region from such chains.

The “regional plan” is to increase the number and size of stores in the company’s home region and upgrade their facilities, product quality, and service. This could be achieved for the most part with existing cash reserves. These upgrades would generally increase the prices that BLZ charges. In one trial store in which such changes were implemented, sales and profits have increased. The local population is growing. BLZ enjoys strong customer loyalty. Regional expansion could be accomplished primarily using BLZ’s experienced and loyal staff and would allow continued reliance on known and trusted suppliers, contractors, and other business connections.”

Further Learning

Now that you hopefully have a better understanding of what LSAT Writing is and how you can tackle the assignment, feel free to test your skills, giving yourself a bit less than 35 minutes to work on the above prompt (provided you just took some time to read it). You may pick up some important skills applicable to LSAT writing when you’re preparing for the LSAT Logical Reasoning sections, so study up!

For plenty of additional released writing sample prompts, ask your LSAT tutor to go over the end of any printed LSAT PrepTest, which will actually include the prompt used as part of that test administration. You can easily get a good amount of practice using some of these (ideally between 2 and 4) over the course of your LSAT prep.

To find all the info you need to confidently prepare for every section of the LSAT, read LSAT 101: Everything You Need to Maximize Your Prep .

Shane is a graduate of Boston College and has over 4 years of tutoring experience. He specializes in designing and maintaining personalized LSAT prep. Request Tutoring From Shane

19 Common Grammar Mistakes (And How to Avoid Them)

Le passé composé: learning the french past tense, related articles, goodbye scantron, hello digital sat, the sat is going digital, the (optional) act writing test, explained, the expert guide to taking the act, get to know the act reading test, the 7 different styles of learning & how..., a complete explanation of the act english test, yes, calculators are allowed on the act, the facts about act science, how to guess strategically on act math: tips....

LSAT Writing: What You Need to Know

Tips to Ace Your LSAT Writing Sample

Hero Images / Getty Images

• Applying to Law School
• Pre-Law Prep
• Surviving Law School
• Homework Help
• Private School
• College Admissions
• College Life
• Graduate School
• Business School
• Distance Learning

• B.A., Political Science, Columbia University

The LSAT Writing sample (aka LSAT Writing) is the last part of the exam that law school hopefuls must complete. It is taken online with a specific, secure proctoring software used on the student’s personal computer. This allows students to complete the section whenever it’s convenient and shortens the overall LSAT testing day, as it is not administered at the LSAT testing center.

Key Takeaways: LSAT Writing Sample

• The LSAT Writing sample shows admissions officers how well students can organize their writing into a logical and easy-to-follow argument. 
• Although not factored into the overall LSAT score, the writing sample is sent directly to law schools as part of the student's application report.
• Students are given a prompt and 35 minutes to complete their writing sample. This portion of the test is done at home.
• In the LSAT Writing section, there is no right or wrong answer. All that matters is how well you can support your decision and reject the opposing view.

For the writing sample, students are given a prompt presenting two options in a given situation. They must then choose one option and write an essay arguing for that choice. There is no specific suggested word count. Students can write as much or as little as they want, but it must be completed within the 35-minute allotted time.

The LSAT Writing section is not factored into the overall LSAT score, but it is still a very important requirement for law school admissions. This section must be completed for a student’s Law School Report (compilation of undergraduate/graduate school records, test scores, writing samples, letters of recommendation, etc.) to be sent to any law schools they wish to apply to.

LSAT Writing and Law School Admissions

Even though LSAT Writing is not part of the final LSAT score, it is still a very important part of the test and should be taken seriously. Law school admissions officers use it to gauge students’ writing skills and determine how well they can argue and express themselves. Specifically, it shows them how well students can organize their writing into a logical and easy-to-follow argument. 

There is a myth among many potential law students that the writing section doesn’t actually matter. The truth is that it can matter, but not nearly as much as the scored sections of the LSAT. Many law schools won’t even look at the writing sample. However, if they do and you wrote something horrible, it can hurt your chances of getting accepted. Law schools aren’t looking for the perfect essay. Rather, they just want to get a sense of how good your argumentative and writing skills actually are when you don’t have the opportunity to have anyone else edit or read it over. 

Also, remember that they only need one writing sample and it doesn’t need to be recent. For example, if you’re taking the LSAT again, you don’t need to do the writing section because LSAC still has your previous writing sample on file and only needs one to submit to law schools.

Writing Prompts

LSAT Writing prompts follow a simple structure: First, a situation is presented, followed by two positions or two potential courses of action. You then choose which side to support and write your essay explaining why your chosen side is better than the other. Various criteria and facts are also provided to help you advance your argument. There is no right or wrong answer, as both sides are equally weighted. All that matters is how well you can support your decision and reject the other. The writing prompts vary between students and are all completely randomized. If you’ve taken the LSAT before, you will not be given the same writing prompt. 

The new digital interface provides you with common word-processing functions like spell-checker, cut, copy, and paste. For students who have trouble reading, functions like font magnification, a line reader, and speech-to-text are available. The platform also records input from the keyboard, webcam, microphone, and computer screen. This is to ensure students aren’t receiving outside help or cheating in any way. Any outside web browsing pages will automatically be closed. All of the information recorded is later reviewed by the proctors. Before starting the test you must show the webcam a government-issued ID, your workspace, and both sides of any papers you are using to take notes and outline your essay.

How to Ace the LSAT Writing Sample

Law schools aren’t looking for big vocabulary words or a fully-polished essay. They simply want to see how well you write and organize your argument to come to a convincing conclusion. This is actually very simple, and if you follow these tips, you’ll write a great essay.

Read the Topic and Directions Carefully

To write a good essay, you first need to understand the prompt fully. If you skim over the situation and criteria/facts, chances are you’ll miss an important piece of information and end up writing an essay that doesn’t make sense. Take notes on scratch paper and write down any questions or ideas that come into your head while reading. It’s also beneficial to go back and skim the prompt quickly as you’re writing. This will keep the information fresh in your mind and allow you to keep track of your argument points.

Make a List/Outline

Generally, it’s a good idea to take a few minutes to plan your essay before you start writing. This will help you organize your ideas into a logical order and make your writing much easier and faster. First, list the decisions and criteria. Then, make a list with two or three pros and cons for each decision. Once you feel comfortable with the facts, make a decision and organize your points. Some students also find it beneficial to write a quick draft of their essay, but this isn’t necessary.

Don’t Forget the Other Side of the Argument

When writing the essay, it's important to remember that you are also rejecting the opposing side. This means you will have to provide arguments as to why the other side is wrong and explain why you rejected it. Law schools want to see how well you can support your decision, but they also want to see how well you can discredit the opposition. 

Basic Essay Structure

If you have trouble organizing your ideas or don’t know how to structure your writing, you can always follow this simple template. Just remember, following a template too closely can box you in and make your argument sound formulaic. Writing in your own voice is much more important than writing “correctly.”

• First paragraph: Begin by stating your decision. Then, defend it by presenting a summary of your argument. Mention its strengths but also remember to mention its weaknesses.
• Second paragraph: Discuss the strengths of your choice in detail.
• Third paragraph: Mention your side’s weaknesses, but downplay them or at least explain why they aren’t especially important. Also emphasize the weaknesses of the other side and downplay its strengths.
• Conclusion: Restate your position and how all of your argument support that choice. 

It may seem counterintuitive to mention your position’s weaknesses and the opposing side’s strengths, but it’s important. Law schools want to see your reasoning skills. Recognizing strengths while admitting weaknesses shows just that.

Follow these tips and organize your arguments so they logically arrive at your chosen conclusion, and you’ll have a great essay that shows law schools your argumentative skills.  

• LSAT Sections: What's on the LSAT?
• How to Write Your Graduate School Admissions Essay
• LSAT Scores and Percentiles: What Is a Good LSAT Score?
• 10 Places to Find LSAT Sample Questions Online
• Learn the Degree You'll Need to Get In to Law School
• Tips on How to Write an Argumentative Essay
• LSAT Accommodations: Everything You Need to Know
• How and When to Write a Law School Addendum
• The Best Free LSAT Prep Resources
• 3 Changes That Will Take Your Essay From Good To Great
• How to Create an LSAT Study Schedule That Works for You
• Writing Prompt (Composition)
• Top 10 LSAT Test Tips
• How to Write a Successful Personal Statement for Graduate School
• How To Write a Top-Scoring ACT Essay for the Enhanced Writing Test
• 2020-21 LSAT Costs and Fee Waivers

LSAT Writing

Written by: Will Bond

Last updated: January 24, 2024

In order to finish the Law School Admission Test (LSAT), all candidates must complete a remotely administered section that tests their persuasive writing and critical thinking abilities. While unscored, you shouldn’t overlook this assignment because it can play a significant role in your law school application.

This article delves into the nuances of the LSAT’s writing section, providing insights into how to effectively prepare for it, what law schools want to see in your submission, and an official  LSAT writing  prompt so you can familiarize yourself with the format and style of this section.

Recommended:  Interested in getting started? We recommend Kaplan’s LSAT preparation courses, which come with more than 200 quizzes and practice tests, one-on-one tutoring, and interactive online lessons.

Understanding the LSAT Writing

The LSAT writing is an on-demand, proctored assessment of a number of key skills essential to your success in law school. They include the ability to argue logically in writing and organize evidence in a coherent manner.

During this assessment, you’ll have 35 minutes to write an essay in response to a prompt that asks you to make a decision between two contrasting positions or solutions. The prompt will provide you with details and facts that support both arguments and you must use your critical thinking skills in order to defend the side you believe is correct.

Because both of the prompt’s positions are defensible by design, there are no “right” or “wrong” stances to take on the topic. Instead, you’ll be assessed based on how well you can defend your position in writing.

It’s worth noting that you’ll complete the LSAT writing section separately — at a time and place of your choosing. This occurs online through LawHub along with a secure proctoring software you must download beforehand. You’ll then have up to eight days prior to your LSAT exam to complete this writing section.

How Important is the LSAT Writing?

While your LSAT writing sample will go unscored — and therefore won’t count toward your overall grade — it’ll form an integral part of your overall law school application. In fact, admission committees carefully consider each applicant’s writing sample because a good answer will demonstrate core skills deemed essential to success in both law school and the legal profession.

In particular, law school demands the ability to communicate a number of organized, coherent, and convincing arguments under the time pressure of an exam. The ability to do this — even when you’re thinking on your feet — is vital for a successful legal career.

As a result, the LSAT writing section is highly important because it provides a tangible way for you to exhibit your readiness to excel in law school. This section’s limited time and resources make it a much more raw test of your writing ability and logical reasoning.

How to Excel in LSAT Writing

Now that you understand how the LSAT writing section works — as well as its importance to the overall law school admission process — we’ll share some simple tips to help you excel at this task. We’ll also provide some insights on what law schools actually look for in your submission.

LSAT Writing Tips

While this is a spontaneous essay you must produce without resources or research, you can still follow a number of strategies and helpful tips in order to create an impressive LSAT writing sample.

Read the Prompt Carefully

Because your writing sample should only be informed by the details provided in the prompt, it’s vital to consider all the facts it gives you before you start writing. Reading through the prompt twice is a good way to ensure you don’t miss any small details. It also can help you identify the side for which you can create the best argument.

Often written in a way that balances the supporting evidence for each argument, these prompts can make it quite difficult to choose the side you wish to argue. If you’re struggling to decide, jotting down some pros and cons for each argument can help you identify the one you agree with more.

Ultimately, it doesn’t matter too much which side you pick because there’s no right or wrong answer. You should, however, aim to pick the side for which you can create the most persuasive argument. That’s why it’s so important to read the prompt properly.

Create an Outline

Due to the time pressure involved in the LSAT writing section, creating a quick outline of your essay’s structure and key points can help you to make the most of the 35 minutes available to you and ensure you write a clear and cohesive answer.

A good structure to follow when writing your answer involves dividing your essay into three paragraphs:

• The first paragraph should establish your opinion, provide a justification for it, and address a potential strength of the opposing argument
• The second paragraph should break down — in detail — why you rejected the opposing argument while also acknowledging a weakness in your own
• The final paragraph should briefly reiterate your stance as well as the reasons you chose it over the opposing argument

This is where listing a few of the pros and cons of each side of the argument can be a big time-saver — just make sure to stick with the side you chose when writing your outline. Be confident in your decision and ensure your essay doesn’t sit on the fence.

Leave Time to Edit

As you hurry to finish your LSAT writing sample, it’s inevitable that the time pressure may cause you to inadvertently make a few errors along the way. While that’s understandable, this essay should showcase your writing skills. Any careless spelling, grammar, or syntax mistakes will just give the admission committee a poor impression of you as a candidate.

For this reason, it’s crucial to plan ahead by saving five minutes at the end of the test. This’ll allow you to identify and correct any errors in your work in a timely manner before handing in your completed writing sample.

Recommended Course

Interested in getting started? We recommend Kaplan’s LSAT preparation courses, which come with over 200 quizzes and practice tests, one-on-one tutoring, and interactive online lessons.

Examples of LSAT Writing Prompts

Below, you’ll find the writing prompt that appeared in the official September 2016 LSAT exam. Practicing with authentic prompts like this is essential when preparing for your LSAT because it’ll help ensure you’re familiar with the typical format and style of these questions by the day of your actual exam.

Be sure to mimic exam conditions as much as possible when doing this practice test. Don’t rely on outside research or write as if you have all the time in the world.

Instructions

Example LSAT Writing Outline

Below, you’ll find an example of a potential outline a candidate could create in response to the official question above.

Introduction

• Briefly introduce the scenario.  Brighter Construction must choose between bidding on the Hilltop Road resurfacing project and the Carlene Boulevard expansion project
• State the two criteria for the essay.  Brighter wants to enhance its reputation and increase its capacity for bigger projects

Argument 1: Hilltop Road Resurfacing

• It’s a small project with almost certain profit and on-time completion due to Brighter’s experience and resources
• Brighter has an established reputation for finishing projects on time and within budget
• This has the possibility of keeping extra money if completed under budget
• Specialization in small projects may limit Brighter Construction’s opportunities for bigger contracts
• There’s no opportunity for expanding Brigher’s operations or gaining new experience

Argument 2: Carlene Boulevard Expansion

• It’s a large project with significantly higher potential profit
• It’s an opportunity to expand operations and take on bigger projects
• There’s a chance of winning the contract due to Brighter’s belief in its capabilities
• There’s some uncertainty regarding on-time completion and staying within budget
• There’s a risk of losing money if the project goes over budget

Preference for One Project

Highlight the preference for the Carlene Boulevard expansion project based on the two criteria provided within the prompt. Emphasize the potential for a higher profit, the chance to expand operations, and the possibility of winning the contract.

Acknowledge the risks, but argue that the long-term benefits outweigh the potential drawbacks.

Summarize the main points of the essay and reiterate the preference for the Carlene Boulevard expansion project as the better choice for Brighter Construction based on its potential to enhance the company’s reputation and increase its project capacity.

Unfortunately, this is the only official LSAT writing sample practice prompt available on the LawHub website. If you’d like more writing prompts to practice with, check your LSAT study guide for more examples.

LSAT Writing FAQ

How hard is lsat writing.

How difficult it’ll seem when you take LSAT writing will depend on the proficiency of both your writing skills and analytical abilities. This section requires the presentation of a coherent, concise argument under time constraints. Effective preparation and consistent practice are instrumental in honing the skills required to approach LSAT Writing with confidence and success.

Do law schools actually look at LSAT writing samples?

Yes, the application boards for law schools review candidates’ LSAT writing samples. While it’s not scored like other sections of this test, you’ll still need a complete writing sample in your file to be able to see your LSAT score. To learn more about the importance of this section, read our  LSAT Writing  article.

What do I do for the LSAT writing?

In the LSAT writing exam, candidates must analyze a provided prompt thoroughly, construct a clear argument, and substantiate it with evidence — all within 35 minutes. You’ll need to consistently practice LSAT writing under timed conditions in order to ensure you’re able to produce a well-structured and coherent essay on your LSAT test day.

Does the LSAT still have a writing section?

Yes, the LSAT still assesses candidates with a writing portion of the exam. Despite not counting toward your overall LSAT score, it forms a crucial part of the law school admissions process by providing an insight into your ability to construct a persuasive argument within a specific time frame. For more information on the rest of the exam, see our  What is the LSAT  article.

Reach out to ask any questions about our services! Call or Text (973) 922-0818 or Email [email protected]

PREP FOR SUCCESS

How to write a perfect LSAT essay

Updated: Feb 7

Suggested LSAT Study Plan

I suggest that you use this blog post as a study guide for the essay. Follow these steps below to learn how to write the best LSAT writing piece.

• Read the example prompt to understand how the prompts are typically structured
• Read the step-by-step-process about how to write the best essay and pick the format that you feel most comfortable with
• Write your own essay to practice
• Finally, read the sample prompts and the “what makes a great essay” section of this post to see how those essays compare to your essay and see if there is anything that you could add or change to your essay to make it better.

Example Prompt

Step 1: understand the pros & cons.

A perfect way to start your response is to make a table while reading the prompt. This will help you break down the prompt and see all the pros and cons for each side of the argument. By blatantly noting the pros and cons you will be able to have a better understanding of the argument and have a clear stances on your choice.

Step 2: Start Your Response 

First, you must devise a thesis statement. A thesis is a statement that notes your own opinion and your own stance on a certain subject matter. For example, in reference to the prompt above, a effective thesis statement could be: The Frye Street location is the better choice for the Baxters.

Step 3: Write Your Essay

Combine step 1 and 2 in order to write your essay. Step 2 should be your introduction to your essay which provides the reader with an understanding of your point of view and what you will be writing about. Then, use the pros and cons devised in step 1 to create your body paragraphs. Keep in mind your paragraphs do not need to be long. Most people can only fit about 250-300 words in the space allotted. You only have 35 minutes; therefore, your introduction paragraph can merely be your thesis statement and your body paragraphs can only be a few sentences. As long as you prove your point, it doesn’t matter the length of the essay. Additionally, there are two general formats in which you can write your essay.

• Paragraph 1: Argument : State your choice (thesis statement) and give the main reasons for it.
• Paragraph 2: Counterargument: Explain the main issues with the other choice.
• Paragraph 3: Conclusion: Conclude by restating your choice and the strongest reason for it.
• Issue: state the issue that you are being asked to analyze.
• Rule: state the rule (criterion)
• Application: apply the criterion to the facts presented in each alternative choice.
• Conclusion: conclude by explaining that the position you are arguing for is the better choice, given the facts provided.
• Paragraph 1: Introduction – Includes the Issue, Rule/Criterions, and Thesis Statement
• Paragraph 2: Argument – This paragraph states why your choice is the best choice. it includes the pros but also counteracts the cons.
• Paragraph 3: Counterargument – This paragraph states why the alternate choice is not good. Meaning, it states the cons, but also it tells why the pros are not as good as we think.
• Paragraph 4: Conclusion – This can be short and only a couple sentences, but it will recap the thesis

Example LSAT Essay

Sample Response 1 

(in favor of the Frye Street location)

The Frye Street location is the better choice for the Baxters. The time and cost of renovating the Frye shop would be minimal, since the store is already set up to accommodate a hair studio. Its close proximity would minimize the time and expense of moving as well as providing for uninterrupted business from current clients. A continued stream of business and a low initial rent would ensure short-term survival as well as making it financially feasible to expand to the adjacent space, thereby achieving long-term growth. Although the prior salon failure on Frye Street might suggest poor growth potential, that failure may have been due to other factors—such as mismanagement or a narrow male-only client base.

The mall space’s high-traffic location might seem to provide more long-term profit potential. However, the Baxters may face greater competition in the suburbs from franchise salons. More importantly, the Baxters’ primary concern should be with short-term survival, since otherwise they cannot achieve their longer-term profit goals. The additional expense of equipping a new retail space, along with a high initial rent, may jeopardize that survival, especially since it may take considerable time to develop a new clientele.

In sum, Frye is the better location; it would allow for a fast and inexpensive start-up and an uninterrupted flow of business, in turn ensuring both short-term survival and long-term success.

Sample Response 2 

(in favor of the Fashion Place Mall location)

What makes a great essay?

• Both essays effectively prove their thesis statement.
• Both essays include a counter argument. Meaning they explain the apparent strengths of the opposite argument, then quickly discuss their weaknesses.
• Both responses are clear, concise, and well-rounded.
• Both essays use effective language, syntax, and dictation.
• Both essays include transitional phrases and main shifts in the argument by using words like: “however”, “in sum”, “admittedly” and “in the final analysis”.

About the Author

About our LSAT tutors

• essay , LSAT
• August 21, 2017
• No Comments

Personal Statement for Law School – Examples & Tips

MIT vs Harvard: Deciding the Best Fit for Your Academic Success

Upcoming LSAT Changes: No More Logic Games Confirmed

Leave a reply cancel reply.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

• Become a Tutor
• Referral Program
• Privacy Policy
• Terms of Service
• Refund/Cancelation/Reschedule Policy

Want to talk to a live Prep For Success representative that can answer all your questions? If so, reach out!

Login to your account

Remember Me

Register for a Free Account

Access sample lessons, a free LSAT PrepTest, and 100 question explanations today!

Password (twice) * password strength indicator

Analytics Identifier

The New LSAT Writing and How to Prepare

The LSAT writing section is weird.

It's taken separately from the rest of the test. You can take it up to eight days before your test date, and you can even write it after your test if you prefer (though LSAC won’t release your LSAT score to you or to law schools until you’ve completed the writing section).

It's always taken remotely. You’ll take the section on a personal computer, not at a testing center.

And unlike the rest of the test, LSAT writing isn’t even scored (at least for now).

For these reasons, test-takers often consider the writing section to be an afterthought. And it’s true that a strong performance on LSAT writing typically requires far less study time than Logical Reasoning or Reading Comprehension. But the writing section still matters, and starting with the August 2024 test, it’s going to matter even more.

Which writing section am I taking?

Let’s get this out of the way first: if you’re taking the LSAT any time in June 2024 or earlier, you’ll be getting the old format of LSAT writing. Stop reading and go to the LSAT Writing (pre-August 2024) unit instead.

If, instead, you’re taking the test in August 2024 or later , you’ll get the new LSAT writing section. You’re in the right place. Read on.

There’s one exception, though. If you’re retaking the test in August 2024 or later and you’ve already completed the writing section under the old format during a previous test, you don’t need to take the new writing section.

What’s new about the new LSAT writing section?

Short answer: it’s getting 15 minutes longer and assigns a more nuanced, open-ended writing exercise than the old “choose a side” writing section prompts.

Under the old format, LSAT writing consisted of a single 35-minute section that presented test-takers with a straightforward dilemma: two competing options are described (such as whether to support or oppose a proposal), along with some advantages and disadvantages to each option. The test-taker had to choose a side and use the pros and cons provided to construct a convincing argument in favor of that side.

The new writing section, meanwhile, will be carved up into two separately timed phases: an initial 15-minute phase to read the prompt and draft an outline, and a 35-minute phase to turn your outline into a fully-fleshed essay. (In case you’re wondering, the 35-minute portion starts as soon as that first 15-minute timer is up—there’s no pause in between and you can’t break them up into different sessions. You must complete all 50 minutes in a single sitting.)

So what, exactly, will you be writing? Gone are the “choose a side” writing prompts with their straightforward lists of pros and cons. Instead, you’ll be given a more open-ended question that allows you to take a wider range of positions. And instead of providing you with those clear pros and cons, the new section provides you with series of perspectives from a wide range of sources. Some of the perspectives might conflict with each other; some might reinforce each other; and some might do neither. These perspectives are less about giving you dry facts to extract and insert into your essay, and more about giving you multiple alternative arguments and ideologies to engage with through the course of your essay.

The result of this new style of writing prompt is that you have more wiggle room in exactly what position you take and how you go about supporting it. But the core objective remains the same as always : define a position and argue for it.

One of our admissions consultants sums up this new direction well:

“The new approach, which asks for an argument based on the student's opinion and utilizing the contrasting viewpoints, provides a more open-ended platform for students to differentiate themselves .” - Jacob Baska, 7Sage Admissions Consultant and former Director of Admissions and Financial Aid at Notre Dame Law School

Why is LSAT writing changing?

According to LSAC’s own announcement about the change, the new format is meant to “better assess a broader and more complex range of decision-making skills that writers engage in.” But why does LSAC think the old format wasn’t good enough, and why do they specifically want to change it on us now? Isn’t the test already changing enough in August? What’s the deal, LSAC?!

This is where our admissions consulting team is ready to weigh in.

“LSAC has been considering changes to the writing section for years. Law school deans are demanding a more thoughtful and rigorous writing sample .” - Tracy Simmons, 7Sage Admissions Consultant and Assistant Dean of Admissions at University of San Diego School of Law

It turns out this new writing format wasn’t a snap decision by LSAC; they’ve been working on this for some time. Law schools have been asking them for a souped-up writing section, and employers have also said that they want summer students and graduates with sharper writing skills.

Why, though, are schools and employers making this demand? What’s the big deal with writing? Tracy offers some additional insight: “Admissions officers have been talking about the writing section becoming more important as AI becomes more prevalent .” Across disciplines, post-secondary institutions have been grappling with how to handle the increasing use of AI writing tools in academic writing. It makes sense that law schools would want to gauge applicants’ writing skills in the absence of external aids. The new LSAT writing section could well be (at least in part) a response to this, requiring test-takers to prove they have the chops to write nuanced and persuasive material all by themselves under carefully controlled conditions.

There’s another reason why law schools are asking for an updated writing section:

“Admissions officers want a scored writing sample similar to the GRE .” - Samuel Riley, 7Sage Admissions Consultant and former Senior Director of Admissions Programs at University of Texas School of Law

The GRE, another standardized test that is accepted by some law schools as an alternative to the LSAT, features a scored writing section. At schools that accept either the LSAT or the GRE, admissions officers may be hard pressed to make an apples-to-apples comparison between one applicant with an LSAT score and another with a GRE score, given that only the GRE gives a quantitative evaluation of the applicant’s writing ability. It’s not surprising, then, that LSAC would want to experiment with the LSAT writing section in order to see how they might implement a writing score in the future. (More on this below.)

Is the writing section more important now?

First of all, it’s important to recognize that the old writing section was never unimportant. It’s always been something that schools can, and often do, evaluate when considering an applicant. But different schools weigh the writing sample differently. Some schools have always been serious about looking at the writing sample:

“We would read every one of the writing samples in terms of (1) organization and (2) argument. If either failed, there was no offer of admission . There can be many numerically strong candidates, and the writing sample is the one raw, unrevised piece of writing the applicant provides. For schools that have to be more selective, this piece of the application plays a huge role.” - Tajira McCoy, 7Sage Admissions Consultant and former Director of Admissions and Scholarship Programs at Berkeley Law

Other schools, meanwhile, have used the writing sample as little more than a way to confirm that an applicant is serious:

“The writing sample was rarely looked at in detail, though back in the paper application days, I would make sure no one blew off the sample by drawing a picture of a rocket ship. (That really happened.)” - Samuel Riley

To complicate things further, the importance of the writing sample can depend on the structure of a given school’s admissions committee:

“I’ve observed that faculty admissions committee members rely more heavily on the writing sample than admissions officers. Faculty often mention that LSAT writing is the truest indicator of students' writing abilities.” - Jenifer Godfrey, 7Sage Admissions Consultant and former Assistant Dean for Admissions and Scholarships at the Bowen School of Law, University of Arkansas Little Rock

To get a full picture of just how important the writing section has historically been, we surveyed our entire admissions team and some of our friends in the admissions community on how often admissions officers read the writing sample. Here’s a picture of the results:

Writing sample doubters might point to the fact that nearly a third of our respondents rarely read the writing sample, but I’d turn that interpretation on its head: over seventy percent of the respondents said they sometimes, usually, or always read the writing sample, and all of them told us that they read it at least occasionally. Failing to prepare for the writing sample and hoping that none of your admissions readers will read it is a sucker’s bet.

So, LSAT writing has always been important. But is it becoming even more important with the introduction of this new writing format?

Here’s the answer: Yes, LSAT writing is becoming more important.

Consider: this change to LSAT writing is a response to a broad desire from law schools for a more rigorous writing section. If schools are asking for this change, it’s because they think that this new format will help them make better admissions decisions. And if schools think the new format of writing sample will be more helpful, it’s safe to assume that they’re going to weigh those samples more heavily when making offers of admission.

What’s this about a scored writing section?!

If you read LSAC’s official announcement , you might have noticed that they bring up the idea of a scored writing section near the very bottom of the page. Here’s what they say:

For the 2024-2025 testing cycle, LSAT Writing will remain an unscored part of the LSAT. Over the course of the 2024-2025 testing cycle, we will be analyzing data of the new LSAT Writing prompt to assess its validity and reliability with a long-term goal of providing a scored LSAT Writing assessment that schools may use in their holistic admission process.

LSAC is telling us here that they have every intention of making LSAT writing a scored section in the future, but the earliest that could happen is the 2025-2026 testing cycle. For now, they’re using test-takers as guinea pigs to see how this new format works in practice.

So, if you’re planning to take the test any time between now and June 2025, you can rest easy. Your writing sample won’t be scored. Beyond that point, though... we’ll just have to wait and see. The LSAT loves to keep us on our toes!

How do I prepare for the new writing format?

Good news: you can get a preview of the new format in action through your LSAC LawHub account. LSAC has released an example writing prompt over on LawHub that you can take as a timed mock writing section. To access it, sign in to LawHub , navigate to LSAT Test Prep, choose August 2024 Admin Test Format, and click on LSAT Argumentative Writing Prep.

You’ll be taken to the LawHub PrepTest interface, which will give you a good impression of how the section will appear on test day.

Phase 1: Drafting

The first portion you’ll complete is the 15-minute drafting phase that the LSAT calls “prewriting analysis.” During this phase, you’ll read the question prompt and the various perspectives on that prompt. This is your chance to gather your thoughts, decide on your position, and jot down a rough outline of your essay.

Those 15 minutes will fly by quickly, though. You’ll want to attack this section as though every second counts. Read through the question prompt and perspectives with a critical eye and a sense of urgency, as though this were an RC passage. Aim to get crystal-clear on your position and the structure of your argument during this phase. Doing so will allow you write with greater organization and clarity during the actual writing phase, which will lead to a more persuasive essay.

Here’s one recommended way to approach the drafting phase efficiently:

As soon as you read the question prompt, consider whether you already have an opinion or gut feeling about the issue.

• Don’t worry about trying to stay objective or reserving your opinion until you've read each of the perspectives. There are no right or wrong positions here. You're not being evaluated on what position you take, but on how you support that position, and it's going to be quicker and easier to support a position you already have. So lean into your gut reaction to the question prompt.
• As you read each perspective, jot down what you agree and don't agree with. Some perspectives will give you more to work with than others, and that’s okay. You should aim to engage with at least some of the points made in at least some of the perspectives, but you don’t need to address everything. A tight, focused argument is better than a wandering argument.
• As you read each perspective, jot down anything you find persuasive, as well as anything you find to be weak, flawed, or unpersuasive.
• Once you've read each perspective, decide on your answer to the question. Don't labor over it; just go with whatever your gut is saying by now.

Whichever approach you take, make sure you actually write down your thesis statement. It will be much easier during the writing phase to support your position if you have a clear thesis statement.

Also, if you have personal experience or examples to draw on that are relevant to your position, work them in as support. Remember, the exercise isn’t to regurgitate the information provided in the various perspectives; it’s to write a compelling argument. You should definitely engage with those other perspectives, but framing your position through your own personal experience first might help you to find your footing on the issue being discussed. Emphasize that personal experience where it provides especially valuable or unique insight. You can then sprinkle in those other perspectives to round out your argument.

One other note: don’t waste time with proper spelling and grammar during this phase. No one will see your rough notes; only the final version is saved.

Phase 2: Writing

This is the main event. This is where you’ll take your rough notes from the previous phase and flesh them out into a structured essay.

Some points to keep in mind during this phase:

• Your first paragraph should make your position very clear.
• When writing your support paragraphs, consider the best order in which to present your points. You don’t necessarily need to respond to each perspective in turn. Raise each point you want to make in whatever order provides the best logical flow.
• Round out your essay with a solid conclusion at the end. It doesn’t have to be Earth-shattering or poetic. But it should show how the points you’ve raised throughout the body of your essay relate back to your thesis statement.
• You don’t need to limit yourself to engaging with only those perspectives that support your position. An effective argumentative strategy is to work in a perspective that’s opposed to your position, and then expose the flaws or shortcomings in that perspective.
• You can engage with the perspectives in different ways stylistically, as well. You might directly quote some perspectives. (Be sure to use proper in-text citation style and identify the source of the quote. For example: As a certain university’s brochure notes, “[insert your chosen quote here]”). You might paraphrase certain elements of a perspective, again noting the source. Or you might directly respond to certain ideas within a perspective without explicitly identifying the source. (For example: Certain opponents of this view may contend [X], but in doing so they overlook the key consideration of [Y].) All are useful ways of pulling these perspectives into your text.
• The section is as much about time management as any other LSAT section. If you’re running short on time, don’t aim for perfection. Aim to complete your essay first, flaws and all. Once you have your arguments fully written out, you can go back over your essay to fine tune it.
• There’s no one-size-fits-all structure for an effective essay, but if you’re having trouble with organizing your ideas, here’s a good rule of thumb:

Paragraph 1: One-sentence intro in which you state your thesis

Paragraph 2: Argument #1, drawing on one of the perspectives

Paragraph 3: Argument #2, drawing on another perspective

Paragraph 4: Consider an opposing argument, and respond to that argument

Paragraph 5: Short conclusion in which you summarize your thesis

Example Essays

Below is a sample writing prompt followed by two example essays that both respond to that prompt. Both essays were written by 7Sage instructors under timed conditions in LawHub’s digital interface. Both are reproduced exactly as they were originally written, spelling errors and all.

Notice that while both essays (coincidentally) take a similar position, they use different points of support and draw on different perspectives. There is no “right” response to the writing prompt. What’s important is to prioritize the support, and draw on the perspectives, that you believe best emphasize the strengths of your position.

Sample Writing Prompt

This is an official writing prompt released by LSAC. You can access the same prompt in LawHub by navigating to LSAT Test Prep, choosing August 2024 Admin Test Format, and clicking on LSAT Argumentative Writing Prep .

Purpose of College

The principal aim of an undergraduate liberal arts education has traditionally been to cultivate a student's understanding of a broad range of important areas of knowledge, from the fine arts to the sciences, philosophy, language, economics — these things have been seen as crucial to understanding, and participating, the larger world beyond the classroom. Some, however, believe that this kind of education has failed to provide students with the practical skills necessary to succeed in an increasingly competitive and career-focused society, suggesting we need to reconsider what university programs should look like. Such proposals are often framed as a pragmatic response to trends in the economy and predictions about the skills, knowledge, and training that will best serve students' career readiness. Given this proposed shift in emphasis toward skills-based education, it's worth considering what the overall goal of an undergraduate education should be.

KEY QUESTION: To what extent do colleges and universities serve their students' best interests when they emphasize career preparation?

Read and carefully consider the following perspectives. Each suggests a particular way of thinking about the issue captured in the Key Question.

Perspective 1: —an excerpt from a career advice blog

"Having recruited talent for a variety of organizations across industries, I've witnessed how the demands of today's job market make the cultivation of practical skills and specialized training more important than ever. If a student's time at university is an investment that ought to prepare them for the future, then surely career readiness must factor highly into what such institutions aim to provide. Schools that recognize this and adapt will produce graduates who are better equipped to explore a wide array of career paths, and who can adapt to changing job roles within ever-evolving industries. That's the way for today's student to make a meaningful contribution to society — by being well equipped to grow and change within an economic reality that is itself always growing and changing.

Perspective 2: — an excerpt from a university's promotional brochure

"In college, I began making my way through this world and crafting a life for myself that reflects my values. But what are my values, and how did I come to hold these values rather than others? Once I realized I didn't have to unquestioningly accept the norms and values that had been given to me, I was free to decide for myself which values I wanted to hold on to, which to leave behind, and even which new values I felt drawn to. College provided the context in which I could reflect on my values, the reasons and evidence for them, and whether they are the right values for me. Would my classmates and I have been able to test out our ideas and ideals so effectively if my university were only focused on practical career skills? I don't believe so — such work requires a dedicated exploration of ideas and knowledge for their own sake."

Perspective 3: — an excerpt from a textbook on the sociology of education

"Across cultures, higher education has served primarily to aid the process of socialization by instilling cultural values, norms, and behaviors, thereby integrating people into the fabric of their respective societies. A university degree provides more than just those so-called 'soft skills' necessary for making white-collar work function smoothly, like interpersonal communication and teamwork. This emblem of accomplishment, the college degree, also provides a social signal that one is befitted to the upper middle class, if not higher. By serving as class membership badges, undergraduate degrees perpetuate social stratification and hierarchies, with the result that access to opportunity is determined largely not by merit, but more so by one's ability to conform to a particular set of values — in short, to 'fit in.' In this manner, college places subtle constraints on students that go far beyond the more well-known problem of financial barriers to access."

Perspective 4: — an excerpt from a journal on higher education

"The traditional structure of higher education needs a transformative overhaul. The modern university has its origins in medieval schools, which stressed rote memorization and obedience to the centralized authority of teachers, reflecting the broader civic and political context of those schools. But in today's world, we don't accept such a rigid, top-down system in our civic and political life. We expect citizens to be agents in the evolution of their communities.

Likewise, there's no reason to accept it in our educational lives. Instead, we ought to honor the agency of students in orchestrating their own educational experience. Some colleges have begun to change in the right direction, emphasizing dialogue over monologue and problem-solving over sheer information retention. This new form of relationship between student and university is critical, where teachers collaborate with students to discover new truths together, where student learning is based on their own guided learning experiences, and where curricula are created around topics that engage students' intrinsic motivation to learn. This moves us closer to creating the flourishing, diverse society we need."

Prewriting Analysis: Generating Ideas for Your Argumentative Essay

Spend the remainder of your prewriting time working through the prewriting questions presented below. These questions are intended to help you think critically about the issue and generate productive ideas for your essay. Record your thoughts in your digital scratch paper by making notes or lists, or by writing short answers to the questions.

Your notes in response to the prewriting questions will still be available to you while you write your essay, but they will not be evaluated or included as part of your essay. These questions are strictly provided to help guide your analysis of the perspectives and to help you develop your own argument in response to the Key Question.

Prewriting Questions

• Which perspective(s) do you find most compelling ?
• What relevant insights do you see in the perspective(s)?
• What principles or values do you see at work in the perspective(s)?
• What strengths and weaknesses can you find in the perspective(s)?

Your argument should incorporate or address ideas from at least one of the perspectives provided. In addition, your own knowledge, experiences, and personal values can be valid sources of evidence, and you can include these in your essay:

• What knowledge do you already have about this issue? Consider information you have read or heard, including things you've learned at home or school, etc.
• What values influence your position on this issue? Consider your worldview or belief system, as well as any guiding principles or convictions you hold.
• What experiences do you have that might be relevant to this issue? Consider any personal experience you might have with this or similar issues, or other relevant lessons learned form your own life.

Example Essay #1

What is the point of college? Why are millions of high school students stressing out over standardized tests and extracurricular activities each year? Why are millions of college graduates servicing hundreds of millions or billions of dollars of debt? Clearly, all the we spend on college admission–to say nothing of the money we spend on tuition—is an investment. But what, exactly, are we investing in?

The most straightforward answer is that we're investing in our careers. But the proposition that college is an investment in a career is perversely backward. It implies that we live to work, instead of working to live.

College students are not investing in their careers. They are investing in their lives. That's why I argue that colleges would not serve their students' best interests if they were to emphasize career preparation at the expense of a liberal education.

Education, as the inimitable Miss Jean Brodie puts it in the novel The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie, comes from the latin "e" meaning "out of" and "duco" meaning lead. It is a leading out. Colleges exist to lead students out of a stultifying miasma of conventional wisdom and received pieties. They exist to lead students out from the rote-ness of "real life". They exist to lead a student out of the confusion of adolescence. Fours years in university—four years to do nothing but read, think, and talk to your peers—offer a rare and priceless chance for a young adult to figure out who he is. An education is, in other words, an investment in one's life and one's self—not just in one's career. As the writer of perspective two testifies, college is a chance to "reflect on [one's] values, the resaons and evidence for them, and whether they are the right values." To cut short this opportunity, to foist career training on students, would be to rob them of their last opportunity to reflect on what they want before they are forced to start chasing what they need. Indeed, college students are standing on the precipice of adulthood, with all its exigencies and emergencies. They are given one last chance to look over it, to prepare themselves, to think about who they want to be. A shift towards more career preparation would be tantamount to pushing those students off the edge.

I argue that we should think of a college education as an investment in one's life, not in one's career. But even if I were to concede that college is—at least in part—an investment in a career, it would not follow that colleges should emphasize career training. The return on one's investment should be measured in happiness, not earnings, and an education that prepares one for some career without helping one choose which career he wants can only lead to dissatisfaction. Discovering one's values is prerequisite to choosing a career wisely, which is in turn prerequisite to happiness.

There's a further irony in the position that colleges should put more emphasis on career preparation: by specializing students prematurely, colleges may unwittingly leave students less prepared. The career advice blog cited in perspective one acknowledges the possibility of "changing job roles within ever-evolving industries." How better to prepare students for those changing roles and evolving industries than to teach students how to think? The rhetorical and analytical skills that are the basis of any good liberal arts education—not to mention the habit of skepticism—is the most flexible and effective career preparation I can envision.

I don't mean to imply that colleges should not embark in any career preparation. Indeed, I believe that students should offer students the opportunity to prepare for the job market. But I feel strongly that the project of college is not "career preparation", it is life itself, for which a career is only the means. If colleges were to emphasize career preparation at the expense of a liberal arts education, they would deprive their students of a priceless opportunity to discover themselves. We don't live to work; we work to live, and at college, we discover what kind of life is worth having.

To see this essay written in real-time and hear the writer’s commentary on the writing process, continue to Lesson 2 .

Example Essay #2

As a mechanical engineering graduate, I have experienced a discipline of post-secondary education that places significant value on marketable, practicable career skills. I have benefited greatly from this style of education, having worked in challenging and rewarding roles for which I was well and uniquely prepared and which would have been unavailable to me had I pursued a less career-oriented liberal arts education. Moreover, I was able to secure such roles while my peers in other, less marketable disciplines experienced difficulties in securing stable, long-term employment commensurate with their skills and suited to their interests. The job market clearly favored those of us who had prioritized a career-oriented education. However, I do not believe that colleges and universities necessarily serve their students' best interests by emphasizing career preparation as the overriding objective of a post-secondary education.

First, it is important to recognize that students' long-term interests and motivations for pursuing post-secondary education are varied. Many students come to an undergraduate education for reasons other than, or in addition to, cultivating marketable career skills. While some students may value their post-graduation career prospects less than I did when deciding on a major, it would be patronizing for me, or for university administrators, to prescribe students' values to them by emphasizing job skills over other educational goals.

Some may respond that the current socioeconomic climate simply demands that job prospects be the highest priority, and whether students like it or not, their interests are nevertheless best served by equipping them with specific workplace skills. However, there are two problems with this approach. The first issue is that not all students are prepared to decide on a career path when they matriculate, and hemming students into a dedicated, career-focused discipline would only serve to constrain their options upon graduation. Vocational and professional programs necessarily emphasize depth of knowledge over breadth, and students who graduate from such programs are primed for a limited array of career options. While this situation is acceptable and even preferable for those of us with a strong sense of our preferred careers, it would be a disservice to those students who require more latitude in their studies and eventual career options.

To see the second problem with emphasizing career skills over all other considerations requires that we take a historical perspective on the role of the university over time. Universities originated in medieval Europe, when religious institutions served as both the primary source of knowledge and truth and as one of the major sources of employment in the medieval knowledge economy. These medieval universities also existing at a time when job prospects for uneducated, unskilled laborers were bleak. Surely, a job in the seminary was preferable to working as a subsistence farmer. Yet one wonders what society would now look like had medieval universities emphasized workplace skills to secure positions in the church for all their students. Without the freedom of inquiry and breadth of intellectual exposure that universities offered in centuries past, it is difficult to imagine that the same scientific, political, legal, and social advancements that we now take for granted would have evolved so readily.

All this is not to say, however, that career-focused education shapes students into automatons that can only perform limited workplace functions. Indeed, my highly career-centric engineering education provided substantial intellectual benefits beyond the sphere of engineering. The depth of analytical skills I developed as an engineering student has shaped the ways in which I approach all manner of problems. These skills have even surfaced as I prepared for the LSAT, and I expect they will therefore be likewise valuable in law school and beyond. Similarly, the mathematical skills I developed have helped me to organize my abstract thinking skills beyond the realm of numeracy.

But these were skills I chose to cultivate because I was able to pursue a discipline according to my own interests and priorities. The skills I developed are not the sum total of all knowledge and skills available through a unversity education, and it would be a loss to students and society to artificially constrain the purpose of universities to mere job preparation. Capable and inquisitive minds are the best resource our society has. The more opportunities there are for students to cultivate such minds, irrespective of their job priorities, the better.

To see this essay written in real-time and hear the writer’s commentary on the writing process, go to Lesson 3 .

Learn about our LSAT Prep courses .

Lesson Note

No note. Click here to write note.

Click here to reset

Leave a Reply Cancel

You must be logged in to post a comment. You can get a free account here .

• Self-Paced Course
• Live Course
• Free Resources
• 1-888-427-7737

How to Do the New LSAT Writing Sample Section

• by M Hope Echales
• May 29, 2019
• Reviewed by: Matt Riley

You’ve undoubtedly been diligent in your LSAT prep, completing hundreds of practice LSAT questions and taking a few practice exams. One thing that you may have neglected in your LSAT studies up to this point is the LSAT writing sample .

But we wish to leave no stone unturned and no LSAT section left unexplained. Moreover, you won’t even receive your LSAT score if you don’t have a writing sample on file. So let’s take a quick moment to discuss the writing sample.

First, the LSAT Writing section is not just a sample of your writing skills. Second — and much more importantly — you will not complete this section on test day or at your test center . Instead, you get to go home early and, on a later date, do the writing section from the comfort of your home.

In fact, LSAT Writing opens up eight days before your LSAT test date, so you can get it out the way sooner. Also, instead of having to actually handwrite out the essay like some dang Luddite peasant, you get to type it out on a laptop or desktop computer, using exam software that LSAC will provide.

So with these details in mind, here are step-by-step instructions on how to best conquer the new LSAT Writing sample section.

1. Clear the Space

If LSAC is going to let you use your home to do the writing section, it’s going to want to make sure your home is an appropriate writing section venue. So, with respect to the security requirements, they’re going full-Mafioso.

Before taking the writing section, they’re going to pat you down—figuratively, of course.

You’ll also want to make sure your computer meets the tech requirements. We’ve broken those down, as well as what isn’t allowed during your remote LSAT exam here .

Before you begin writing, you’re going to have to complete a video check-in process, according to LSAC . Your webcam and microphone will automatically turn on and record you upon logging into the exam software. The entire 35-minute section will be recorded.

You’ll display your ID to the camera and show that both sides of your scratch paper are blank. Then you’ll take the webcam on a virtual tour around your room to show that you’re alone and that there isn’t anyone hiding away, lying in wait to provide vital assistance in the writing section.

So before you even log on, clear the space of any roommates, stowaways, squatters, latchkeys, and the like. Make sure to check under your bed for monsters and the sort.

LSAC’s Nixon-in-’71-level of paranoia aside, it’s important to take a moment to remind yourself that the writing section really isn’t a big deal. You have to do it, sure.

However, it won’t affect your LSAT score. And, yes, the admissions officials who view your application will have a copy of your writing sample. But it’s the least important part of your application. The admissions official will, in all likelihood, do a cursory read-through of your essay to make sure you followed the directions, more or less, and can write coherent sentences.

So, take a breath, and remind yourself that this isn’t a big deal. And then get to work.

3. Read the Prompt

First things first, you have to read the prompt. But these prompts are always the same.

It will tell you that you must make an argument for one of two mutually exclusive options. They’ll describe what these options are. You will also be given two criteria to consider when making the argument. Then, you’ll be given a series of facts about both options that you can reference to support your argument.

4. Make an Outline

After reading the prompt, use that scratch paper to make a quick outline.

Write out the two options, the two criteria, and a “pros” and “cons” list for each option. Using the facts described, jot down some reasons why option 1 is better. And then some reasons why option 1 is worse.

Do the same for option 2. Make sure these pros and cons are related to at least one of the two criteria the prompt described.

Then, simply pick one of the two options to advocate in your essay. The facts provided should be roughly balanced, so there isn’t a “right” answer. Just pick the option you feel more passionately about.

Or, failing that, choose one arbitrarily. Don’t do anything crazy, like make up some third option. Or write about how we should actually try to do both options. You’re not a political pundit. Just pick one and go with it.

5. Write Your Intro Paragraph

When you’re done outlining, you can begin writing. The first thing you write should be the intro paragraph or intro sentence. The first sentence should just be you telling the reader which option you’ll argue for.

“In order to eat both a nutritious meal and experience pleasurable taste sensations, Augustus would be well-advised to eat at the salad-themed Kale-in Me Softly rather than at the Southern restaurant 2 Legit 2 Grit.”

That’s it.

(This made-up example is only moderately denser than the real example that you’re likely to get.)

6. Write the First Body Paragraph

The first body paragraph should explain why the option you chose will better advance the first criterion.

Make it short. Three to five sentences are all you need. And only use the facts the prompt provided. Don’t add anything or use any outside knowledge.

To help you write this paragraph, look at your outline and include the pros of your option and the cons of the other option. If you can, explain why the cons of your option aren’t that big of a deal, and why the pros of the other option aren’t that impressive.

“Kale-in Me Softly will provide Augustus with a much healthier meal. Although 2 Legit 2 Grit has introduced healthier, vegan options in the last year, most items are still laden with unhealthy fats, sugar, and carbohydrates. On the other hand, Kale-in Me Softly features a number of low-carb and low-fat entrees for Augustus to choose. Although some of Kale-in Me Softly’s dressings have been criticized by health fanatics as ‘too sugar-y,’ the sugar-free dressings are clearly labeled on the menu, and will be easy for Augustus to select.”

7. Write the Second Body Paragraph.

Onto the second body paragraph. This one should just describe why the option you chose will better advance the second criteria.

Again, make it short, and emphasize the pros of your position and the cons of the other position.

“Southern food may be one of America’s culinary treasures, but Augustus will still have a more delicious meal at Kale-in Me Softly. Local food critics have described many entrees at 2 Legit 2 Grit as ‘pedestrian’ and ‘underwhelming.’ The same critics have lauded Kale-in Me Softly’s ‘innovative’ and ‘creative’ combination of fruits, vegetables, and proteins. Further, Kale-in Me Softly allows its customers to customize their salads, which will allow Augustus to choose the ingredients he enjoys the most.”

8. Write the Conclusion.

Finally, write the conclusion. This should just restate the introductory sentence.

“In conclusion, eating at Kale-in Me Softly will provide Augustus with a more nutritious and delicious meal.”

Almost done…

9. Hit Submit

Now you’re done!

Once you submit, you need to wait for your LSAT Writing sample to be verified by LSAC. This can take a few hours to a few days, which is why it’s incredibly important to complete the writing section well before the LSAT score release date. You don’t want your score release to be held up just because LSAC hasn’t gotten around to verifying your sample.

And that’s it! You don’t have to complete a new LSAT Writing sample every time you take the LSAT. One is all you need.

Bonus: Make a Shrine

It’s nice to complete the LSAT Writing sample section at your home. But, since it’s your space, you can gussy it up to make it even more conducive to writing section success. Your essay should be short and to-the-point, so why not make a shrine of writers famed for their brevity and concision?

A makeshift sanctum featuring the faces of Ernest Hemingway , Raymond Carver , Stevie Smith , Herman Hesse , Haruki Murakami , and Rupi Kaur should bring the right writing section vibes.

LSAT Writing Sample Example

Before you jump into writing your no-doubt brilliant essay, it’s worthwhile to take a moment to pull the prompt apart to isolate a few key pieces of information.  

• Identify the two criteria that need to be considered.
• Identify the pros and cons of both possible courses of action with regard to those specified criteria.
• Since either course of action is acceptable, weigh the pros and cons for each course and choose the side you’d best like to defend.

So, with all of that theory out of the way, let’s work through an example of an LSAT Writing sample section prompt. 

The executors of the estate of a late, famous author recently found the manuscript of an unfinished novel among the author’s papers. They must decide whether to publish the manuscript or donate it to a university library.

In order to avoid unfortunate comparisons between a heavily-edited published version and the original manuscript, they will not do both. Write an argument for choosing one option over the other based on the following considerations:

• The executors want to preserve the author’s reputation as a literary genius.
• The executors want to maximize interest in the author’s work among both scholars and the public.

Critics who have read the manuscript agree that the work is intriguingly experimental but that it is not among the author’s best. If the novel is to be published, it will require heavy editing to make it seem complete. Its style differs greatly from that of the author’s most popular novels, so it is unclear how well the novel will sell.

Most of the author’s other novels have stayed on the bestseller list for months after publication, but it has been more than a decade since her last work was published. The publisher promises a large printing, wide distribution, and an aggressive marketing campaign.

If the work is published, the executors will sell the original manuscript to a private collector who would not allow it to be copied or viewed by scholars.

Scholars have voiced a strong preference for access to the unedited manuscript. One prominent scholar has expressed dismay at the publisher’s intention to alter the original manuscript in order to make the novel marketable.

If donated, the manuscript will become part of a permanent display in the university’s library, which is open to the public. Individual copies will be made available for a nominal fee to scholars and any others upon request. The donation of the manuscript to the university would likely revive waning scholarly interest in the author and lead to a new wave of commentaries by literary critics and biographers.

Past commentaries on the author’s life and work have sold well even beyond academic circles.

Donating the book rather than publishing it is more likely to result in increased positive interest while preserving the author’s reputation. 

Because the book’s style diverges from the author’s most popular works, publishing it in a traditional book market runs the risk of engendering a negative response and damaging the author’s reputation.  By donating the book, however, the public will not be exposed to the work as a conventional novel.  Rather, it will be viewed within the context of an incomplete work displayed for scholarly interest. 

In addition, because scholarly interest is likely to result in a new wave of commentary, donation will maximize positive interest in the author’s work.  While the large printing and wide distribution of the publishing option might arouse more public interest, the fact that it is “not among the author’s best” novels means such a campaign would likely result in a negative reception.  When viewed as an object primarily for scholarly interest however, the new commentary will generate public interest while avoiding the disadvantage of tarnishing the author’s reputation. 

In conclusion, donating the manuscript to the university library will maintain the author’s reputation as a literary genius while maximizing positive interest in the author’s work.  This should accordingly be the chosen course of action. 

Paragraph 1: This paragraph is literally one sentence.  That said, it is a sentence that clearly lays out the position of the argument that the rest of the essay follows .  That’s all an introductory paragraph needs to do, and that’s what we’ve accomplished. 

Paragraph 2: The paragraph opens by talking about how the opposite course of action (selling this bizarre book to the masses) will totally conflict with criteria 1 (allowing the public to continue believing that Mysterious Dead Author is a total baller). 

They then follow it up by explaining how enacting the chosen option (donating the book to a library) absolutely leads to criteria 1.  Short, direct, and simple.

Paragraph 3: There’s a bit more meat on the bones of this paragraph, which is nice for variety. 

Ultimately, it meets the goals of what we want this paragraph to do: explain how getting this book into an academic space will increase scholarly interest. 

In pointing out flaws with the other course of action (if you let the public read this mediocre book, the author’s reputation might be ruined forever ), the paragraph reinforces why donation is the way to go.  

Paragraph 4: A functional conclusion.  Restate the course of action and assert that this is what should happen. Done and done. 

More things could be said about this response.  The quality of the prose is, at best, functional.  The vocabulary and sophistication of ideas are competent, but not brilliant, and precisely mimic the points made in the prompt itself. 

And here’s the thing: none of that matters .  

The way to create a successful LSAT Writing sample example is to write a persuasive essay, clear in its point of view, and acknowledges both sides of the argument. 

Take the prompt seriously, keep your grammar game tight, and go forth and create concise, competent arguments for whatever scenario the LSAT throws at you.

Have you already taken the LSAT but thinking about retaking it? Schedule a free consultation with an LSAT Advisor to talk through your goals and your LSAT prep options!

Related Posts

What Is the Baby Bar Exam?

Create an LSAT Study Schedule in 3 Steps

Breaking Down LSAT Question Types

Search the blog.

Free LSAT Practice Account

Sign up for a free Blueprint LSAT account and get access to a free trial of the Self-Paced Course and a free practice LSAT with a detailed score report, mind-blowing analytics, and explanatory videos.

Popular Posts

Recently viewed courses

Recently viewed.

Find Your Dream School

This site uses various technologies, as described in our Privacy Policy, for personalization, measuring website use/performance, and targeted advertising, which may include storing and sharing information about your site visit with third parties. By continuing to use this website you consent to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use .

   COVID-19 Update: To help students through this crisis, The Princeton Review will continue our "Enroll with Confidence" refund policies. For full details, please click here.

LSAT Writing: Does It Matter to Law Schools?

LSAT Writing is a 35-minute ungraded essay with an assigned topic. That's right—the essay section has absolutely no effect on your overall LSAT score. But, copies of your writing sample will be sent to law schools, along with your LSAT score, as part of your official report, so youll want to do the best you can with the assignment you receive.

Overview of LSAT Writing

LSAT Writing is an on-demand writing assessment that is proctored and administered online. To ensure a secure testing environment, candidates are required to install proctoring software on their personal computers. This approach has several key features:

• It reduces the overall duration of the LSAT test day.
• It provides candidates with increased flexibility, allowing them to complete the writing portion at a location and time of their choosing.
• LSAT Writing becomes available eight (8) days prior to each test administration.

Every LSAT Writing prompt instructs you to make a decision and develop an argument about it. You are asked to make a choice between two positions or courses of action. Both of the choices are defensible, and you are given criteria and facts on which to base your decision. There is no “right” or “wrong” position to take on the topic, so the quality of your response is a function of how well your choice is supported and other choice is criticized.

How will the essay affect my LSAT score ?

It doesn't. Yes, you read that right; you have to spend 35 minutes composing an essay that has no effect on your overall score. The essay itself isn't even scored separately. Only three sections of the LSAT contribute to your score: one segment for Reading Comprehension, another for Analytical Reasoning, and a third for Logical Reasoning. Note: beginning August 2024, the Analytical Reasoning (“Logic Games”) section of the test will be eliminated. The LSAT will then consist of two Logical Reasoning (“Arguments”) sections, one Reading Comprehension section, and one unscored section.

Is LSAT Writing used in law school admissions?

Not really. There's a chance that your LSAT essay just may go totally unread. LSAT writing samples are rarely used to evaluate law school candidates, so no matter how well or poorly you did, this exercise will most likely not affect your admissions chances. Note: It's important to be aware that in order to access your LSAT scores or have them sent to schools, you must have a completed writing sample on file.

Read More: When Should You Take the LSAT?

Do I need to prepare for LSAT Writing?

You won't want to totally blow it off since LSAT Writing is quite easy to master. There's always the chance that a law school admissions counselor will read it, so it doesn't hurt to put some effort into it. By the same token, by no means should you sacrifice study time from other LSAT sections  to work on LSAT Writing. So unless you're scoring in the 99th percentile, 99% of your study time should be spent mastering the sections that contribute to your score. However you like to study, we have the right LSAT prep plan for you .

What are law schools looking for in the LSAT essay?

When you are writing an essay for any type of standardized test, don't ever get it confused with writing a paper for an English class: They are not even on the same playing field. And even though they may not admit it, standardized test makers want only one thing: gaudy excess. They appreciate quantity more than quality, so keep it long. They also seem to enjoy paragraphs, so any crazy thoughts of condensing language into more efficient prose should disappear. And finally, they have developed a Pavlovian response to big, pretentious words. So when they come across a world like "Pavlovian," expect sheer enthusiasm.

Practice for the LSAT

Take a LSAT practice test with us under the same conditions as the real thing. You'll get a personalized score report highlighting your strengths and areas of improvement.

START A FREE PRACTICE TEST

Explore Graduate Programs for You

Explore our featured graduate schools & programs to find those that both match your interests and are looking for students like you.

Best Online JD Programs

Online JD programs offer flexibility, affordability, access to innovative technologies, students from a diversity of career backgrounds, and global opportunities.

Best Online MSL Programs

Master of Studies in Law (MSL) programs are for non-lawyers whose careers in their organizations will benefit from legal training even though they are not required to be practicing attorneys.

Find MBA Programs Matched to Your Interests

Explore our featured business schools to find those that are looking for students like you.

Free MCAT Practice Test

I already know my score.

MCAT Self-Paced 14-Day Free Trial

Enrollment Advisor

1-800-2REVIEW (800-273-8439) ext. 1

1-877-LEARN-30

Mon-Fri 9AM-10PM ET

Sat-Sun 9AM-8PM ET

Student Support

1-800-2REVIEW (800-273-8439) ext. 2

Mon-Fri 9AM-9PM ET

Sat-Sun 8:30AM-5PM ET

Partnerships

• Teach or Tutor for Us

College Readiness

International

Advertising

Affiliate/Other

• Enrollment Terms & Conditions
• Accessibility
• Cigna Medical Transparency in Coverage

Register Book

Local Offices: Mon-Fri 9AM-6PM

• SAT Subject Tests

Academic Subjects

• Social Studies

Find the Right College

• College Rankings
• College Advice
• Applying to College
• Financial Aid

School & District Partnerships

• Professional Development
• Advice Articles
• Private Tutoring
• Mobile Apps
• Local Offices
• International Offices
• Work for Us
• Affiliate Program
• Partner with Us
• Advertise with Us
• International Partnerships
• Our Guarantees
• Accessibility – Canada

Privacy Policy | CA Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information | Your Opt-Out Rights | Terms of Use | Site Map

©2024 TPR Education IP Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. The Princeton Review is not affiliated with Princeton University

TPR Education, LLC (doing business as “The Princeton Review”) is controlled by Primavera Holdings Limited, a firm owned by Chinese nationals with a principal place of business in Hong Kong, China.

Expert LSAT Writing Samples for Practice!

Featured Expert: Sonia Hayer, JD

Check out expert LSAT writing sample examples we have for you in this article! To get a good LSAT score, you must prepare with different LSAT practice questions , including LSAT writing sample prompts, LSAT logic games , and many others! In this blog, you will learn everything you need to ace this unscored section of the LSAT and read amazing LSAT writing samples! Let’s dive in!

>> Want us to help you get accepted? Schedule a free strategy call here . <<

Listen to the blog!

Article Contents 12 min read

What is the lsat writing sample.

The LSAT writing sample is an unscored portion of the LSAT designed to measure your ability to form a coherent, persuasive argument in a limited amount of time. In 35 minutes or less, to be exact. Traditionally, it was administered in person at the end of the LSAT. However, since 2019, the writing sample is taken separately from the rest of the test and can be completed online at a time and place of your choosing, though within a specific window after your LSAT test date .

Want to learn how to use ChatGPT to get into law school? Watch this video:

Even though it is not one of the scored LSAT sections , you must still learn how you can do well in the limited amount of time you are given. You are given 35 minutes to complete the writing sample. While there's no strict word limit, the time constraint naturally limits how much you can write. This means that you have to practice delivering sound, well-argued essays as part of your LSAT prep. Remember to aim for a well-reasoned and clear response rather than an overly lengthy one – 300 words will be more than enough to deliver a well-argued, clear, and structured essay.

The LSAT writing sample prompts usually present a decision problem. You are given two criteria for making a decision and are asked to choose between two options. Both options are defensible, and the goal is not to pick the "right" answer but to defend the chosen position effectively.

Even though the LSAT writing sample does not affect your final LSAT score or law school acceptance rates , it still holds significance in the admissions process. Here's how it's evaluated and utilized:

Demonstration of Writing Skills: Admissions committees assess the writing sample to gauge your ability to articulate a clear, coherent, and persuasive argument within a limited timeframe. This is essential in law, where clear and concise writing is imperative. The sample can attest to your writing proficiency, especially when you’re under pressure and time constraints.

Comparative Analysis: The writing sample can be compared to other written elements of your application, such as the law school personal statement , law school diversity statement , and other law school optional essays . This helps admissions officers verify the authenticity of your writing style and ensures that the other components were likely written by you personally.

Analytical and Reasoning Abilities: The LSAT writing sample allows schools to see how you approach a decision-making scenario, which mirrors many legal situations. It showcases your ability to weigh options based on provided criteria and defend a chosen position, reflecting your analytical and reasoning skills.

Potential Red Flags: A poorly written or incoherent sample might raise concerns, especially if the rest of the application suggests strong writing skills. Discrepancies can trigger further scrutiny and may impact the admissions decision.

Holistic Evaluation: While the LSAT writing sample might not be the most weighty component of the application, it adds to the holistic picture admissions committees are trying to construct of each applicant. Every piece contributes to understanding of your academic abilities, potential for success in law school, and fit for the institution.

Deciding on Borderline Cases: This is perhaps the most significant use of the LSAT writing sample. For applicants on the cusp of acceptance or rejection, every component of the LSAT and application can be critical. In such scenarios, a compelling writing sample might tip the scales in favor of acceptance. It may even have more effect than the law school letter of continued interest .

The LSAT writing sample, as of recent changes to the LSAT format, is now administered separately from the multiple-choice portion of the test and is taken online. Here's a breakdown of when might be the best time to tackle it:

Take It Shortly After the LSAT: You may want to prefer to complete the writing sample soon after your LSAT test date while the experience and test-taking mindset are still fresh. Doing so ensures you don't forget about it, and you can finalize all aspects of your LSAT promptly. All your LSAT prep will be fresh on your mind, so don’t procrastinate!

Take It in the Morning: Since the writing sample is online, you can select a time that suits you best. This flexibility means you can opt for a period when you feel mentally sharp and least stressed – this is usually the morning for most people.

Allow Yourself a Break: You know what’s on the LSAT – the LSAT is hard ! So, some students prefer to take a break after the grueling LSAT multiple-choice sections, allowing for some rest and mental recuperation before tackling the writing sample on another day. While we encourage you to complete the writing sample shortly after the multiple-choice sections, don’t be afraid to give yourself a break of a few hours or a day.

Consider Application Deadlines: You should be mindful of law school application deadlines. Ensure that you complete the writing sample with ample time for it to be processed and included in your LSAT report that's sent to law schools.

Technical Requirements: Before choosing when to take the writing sample, ensure you have a suitable device and a quiet environment that meets the technical requirements for the online writing portion.

In essence, the best time to write the LSAT writing sample largely depends on your individual preferences and circumstances. Whether you choose to complete it immediately after the LSAT or at a later date, ensure that you're in the right frame of mind and can dedicate focused energy to producing a well-constructed essay.

How to Ace the LSAT Writing Sample

LSAT writing sample may affect how long you study for the LSAT but do not be too afraid of this part of the test! There are some simple strategies you can implement in your LSAT study schedule to ace this part of the test. Here’s how to study for the LSAT writing sample and how to deliver a winning essay!

1. Review LSAT writing samples.

When you begin your LSAT prep, review LSAT writing sample examples. From these, you will learn how to effectively read and understand LSAT writing sample prompts. When you see a prompt, familiarize yourself with its structure. You'll typically be presented with a decision problem and given two criteria for making a choice. Your task is to choose one of the options and defend your choice using both criteria. Reflect on what arguments you would make, and which side would have stronger arguments. Remember, there is no “right” option. You will be evaluated on how well you can argue, not on which side of the argument you choose.

With that being said, avoid extreme positions. The scenarios are designed so that neither option is clearly right or wrong. Acknowledge the merits of both sides even as you argue for one. When we speak about structure of the essays, we will reveal how you can do this easily!

2. Learn how to structure LSAT writing samples.

When you start practicing, follow a clear essay structure. You should follow the academic essay structure with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion.

Introduction: State which side of the argument you choose. In other words, present your thesis.

Body: Begin with the strongest reasons for your choice, addressing both sides of the argument but explaining why you choose one over the other. Acknowledge the strengths of the other option but explain why your choice is superior. Lay out your arguments and explain why your decision is the preferrable option.

Conclusion: Summarize your argument briefly and restate your thesis.

3. Practice creating your own LSAT writing samples.

Practice writing your samples using the structure outlined above. First, you have to get the structure down, and only then you can start practice with timing. By the way, the LSAC provides actual writing sample questions from previous tests on their website. Practicing with these can give you a feel for the type of scenarios you might encounter.

4. Start timing yourself.

Once you get the structure of the LSAT writing sample down, you can start timing yourself. Ensure your essay is coherent and free of typos. While the writing sample isn't scored, law schools might use it to evaluate your writing competence. Make sure your essay is free of grammatical and stylistic errors.

Remember, it’s about quality, not quantity. Do not aim to write a lot, aim to write an essay that showcases your decision-making abilities in 35 minutes or less.

5. Get comfortable with the software.

You can familiarize yourself with the online software for the LSAT writing sample before you start the actual essay. LSAC provides a familiarization tool that allows you to experience the test-taking environment. However, while you can practice using the software, you can't pre-write or practice the essay within the official platform; you'll only be able to write and submit the essay once. Get comfortable with the software. Know how to input your essay, use the interface, and ensure you have a reliable internet connection.

LSAT Writing Sample 1

The town of Greenfield is deciding between two potential locations for a new public library: Location A, which is centrally located but has limited space for parking, or Location B, which is on the outskirts of town but has ample parking.

Writing Sample:

The optimal location for Greenfield's new public library is undoubtedly Location A, the central spot. Though parking may present certain challenges, its centralized location ensures accessibility and relevance, which are paramount for a public institution's success.

First and foremost, a library serves not just as a repository for books, but as a community hub. Positioning it in the heart of Greenfield ensures that it remains an integrated, vibrant part of daily life. Children can visit after school, professionals can drop by during their lunch breaks, and retirees can access it with ease, enriching their daily routines. In contrast, placing it on the outskirts would inadvertently make it an occasional destination, not an integral part of one's day.

Moreover, public transportation routes typically converge in or around central locations. This means that even if some residents opt not to drive due to limited parking, they would have reliable and frequent public transit options to access the library. Location B, being on the outskirts, might not be as well-connected, making it potentially challenging for those without personal vehicles to reach.

However, the concern about limited parking at Location A is valid. Yet, this can be addressed innovatively. The town could negotiate shared parking agreements with neighboring establishments, or even incentivize carpooling, biking, or walking to the library. Over time, with adequate planning, the parking constraints can be mitigated.

In conclusion, while both locations have their merits, the long-term success and relevance of the library are better ensured by opting for Location A. The new library should be easily accessible and central to the community's daily life, making the central location the most logical and beneficial choice for all of Greenfield's residents.

LSAT Writing Sample 2

Imagine you are a consultant for a leading tech company, NexTech. The company is faced with a decision between investing heavily in Virtual Reality (VR) technology or Augmented Reality (AR) technology over the next decade. Based on current market trends and future predictions, present an argument for one of these technologies.

In an era where technological immersion is becoming the cornerstone of digital experience, NexTech stands on the brink of a transformative decision: whether to pivot towards Virtual Reality (VR) or Augmented Reality (AR). Analyzing both current market trends and projected technological landscapes, investing in Augmented Reality (AR) emerges as the most promising and strategic decision.

At its core, AR offers something VR doesn't: a blend of real and virtual. This interlacing means AR has broader applications, reaching beyond entertainment. Today's consumers value seamless integration between their physical environment and digital enhancements. This is evident from the success of AR applications in areas such as retail, with "try-before-you-buy" experiences, and in healthcare with AR-assisted surgeries and diagnostics.

Furthermore, from a hardware perspective, VR often requires users to invest in sophisticated headsets and dedicated spaces to utilize the technology fully. In contrast, AR is far more accessible, with most modern smartphones capable of delivering high-quality AR experiences. This means that the initial consumer buy-in for AR is lower, allowing for a potentially broader user base.

Looking at future trends, as the Internet of Things (IoT) becomes ubiquitous, AR is poised to be the interface for IoT, overlaying digital information on real-world objects in real-time. While VR might create completely immersive environments, the future leans towards enhancing our current world with digital insights, rather than replacing it with a virtual one.

While VR undoubtedly holds potential, especially in sectors like gaming, entertainment, and specific professional training scenarios, AR's versatility and broad application give it the edge. NexTech, with its reputation for innovation, should lead the AR frontier, shaping everyday experiences by intertwining the digital and physical realms.

Imagine you are an ethics advisor for BioTech Labs, a cutting-edge biotechnology company. The company is at a crossroads, having to decide between investing resources in developing genetically modified crops that can end hunger in famine-prone regions or investing in medical research to cure genetic diseases. Advocate for one of these directions.

In the sprawling arena of biotechnological advancements, BioTech Labs stands at a monumental juncture: addressing the immediate crisis of global hunger through genetically modified crops or delving into the profound realm of medical miracles to cure genetic diseases. Evaluating both in terms of ethical impact and long-term societal benefits, the focus on developing genetically modified crops to alleviate hunger in famine-stricken areas seems to be the imperative course of action.

Hunger is not just an individual problem; it's a societal one. The repercussions of famine extend beyond malnutrition. It leads to socio-economic imbalances, heightens crime rates due to desperation, and can even catalyze political instability. By investing in genetically modified crops tailor-made for regions prone to famine, BioTech Labs would not only be providing sustenance but also sowing seeds of stability, prosperity, and peace.

Moreover, the technology for genetically modified crops has already seen substantial strides, indicating a shorter path to tangible results. These crops can be designed to be drought-resistant, pest-resistant, and yield a higher output, making them the perfect fit for regions where traditional agriculture fails time and again.

On the other hand, while curing genetic diseases holds undeniable value, it addresses a segment of the global population, whereas hunger is a widespread concern affecting millions. The immediacy of the hunger crisis, combined with the broader impact on communities, makes it a pressing concern.

In essence, by choosing to combat hunger through advanced agricultural biotechnology, BioTech Labs wouldn't just be feeding mouths but nourishing minds, bolstering economies, and fostering peace. In the grand tapestry of human challenges, addressing hunger paves the way for a healthier, more stable, and prosperous global community.

LSAT Writing Sample 4

You're a member of a city's cultural committee, tasked with recommending either the allocation of funds to restore a historic theater in the city center or to build a modern art museum. Advocate for one of these choices.

In the heart of our city lies the Grand Avenue Theater, a beacon of historic significance and collective memories. While the allure of creating a new space for art in the form of a modern museum is enticing, the restoration of the Grand Avenue Theater embodies more than just a renovation – it's a reconnection to our shared past and a preservation of cultural legacy.

Modern art museums, with their contemporary designs and potential for showcasing avant-garde pieces, are undeniably valuable. They represent the present and forecast the future. However, they lack the essence of history, the stories embedded in their very foundations, that the Grand Avenue Theater holds. Restoring the theater isn't merely about refurbishing a building; it's about bringing back to life the myriad moments of joy, sorrow, drama, and celebration that it has witnessed over the decades.

Moreover, revitalizing the theater could offer economic advantages. Its central location makes it a potential hotspot for tourism, enticing visitors eager to experience shows in a historic setting. This, in turn, could boost local businesses and create employment opportunities, from theater management to cafes that serve theatergoers.

Furthermore, restoring such a significant landmark reinforces the city's commitment to valuing its history, traditions, and the arts. The Grand Avenue Theater can serve dual purposes: a venue for performances, allowing artists to weave new tales on a historic stage, and an informal museum, where every brick and cornice tells a story.

In conclusion, while a modern art museum holds the promise of the future, the Grand Avenue Theater is a bridge connecting our city's rich past to its promising present. By restoring it, we're not just conserving a structure; we're preserving the soul of our city.

The LSAT writing sample is an unscored, 35-minute written essay section of the LSAT exam where test-takers are presented with a decision problem and must choose between two positions or courses of action, providing a reasoned argument for their choice. It offers law school admissions committees a direct sample of an applicant's writing skills and reasoning abilities.

While there's no strict word limit, most responses are between 300-500 words, so 1-2 pages long. Your LSAT writing sample should be as longs as necessary to present a clear and persuasive argument in response to the prompt, typically spanning a few well-organized paragraphs. 

You have 35 minutes to complete the LSAT writing sample. It's important to manage that time efficiently to outline, write, and review your response.

You can complete the LSAT writing sample online starting eight days prior to your LSAT test date. Ensure you have a quiet, suitable environment with a desktop or laptop computer that meets the technical requirements.

LSAT writing samples typically present a decision problem, asking the test-taker to choose between two options based on a set of criteria. The prompts often involve personal, business, or organizational decisions, requiring the applicant to make and defend a choice using sound reasoning and evidence from the provided information.

Your LSAT writing sample should begin with a clear thesis statement indicating your chosen decision, followed by a structured argument that addresses both the pros of your decision and the cons of the alternative – these will be the body paragraphs! Conclude by reinforcing your choice, summarizing the main points of your argument, and emphasizing its overall validity.

To practice for the LSAT writing sample, regularly attempt prompts under timed conditions to simulate the test environment, and afterward, critically review your responses for clarity, structure, and persuasiveness. Seek feedback from peers, mentors, or LSAT instructors to identify areas for improvement and refine your argumentative skills.

Want more free tips? Subscribe to our channels for more free and useful content!

Apple Podcasts

Like our blog? Write for us ! >>

Have a question ask our admissions experts below and we'll answer your questions, get started now.

Talk to one of our admissions experts

Our site uses cookies. By using our website, you agree with our cookie policy .

FREE Training Webinar:

How to make your law school application stand out, (and avoid the top 5 mistakes that get most rejected).

Time Sensitive. Limited Spots Available:

We guarantee you'll get 175+ on the LSAT or you don't pay.

Swipe up to see a great offer!

What To Expect on The LSAT Writing Section

By Mehran Ebadolahi Mehran Ebadolahi -->

The LSAT Writing sample is the last item you will complete before submitting your exam. You will likely be mentally exhausted from the stress and effort of completing the other five sections which are challenging and rigidly timed. Despite your exhaustion, powering through this last section to ensure you turn in a strong sample can only help you become a strong candidate for the law schools you're applying to.

In this guide, we'll talk a bit about what to expect on the LSAT writing section and what law schools want to see . Then, we'll show you how to prepare for the writing section , and give you a four-step process for writing a strong essay on test day.

What to Expect on the LSAT Writing Section

You will be given a detailed prompt that lays out a scenario or problem. The prompt will feature two options or solutions to choose from. There is no right answer. You simply choose the option you think best fits the scenario provided.

You can't argue for both or neither. You have to pick a side.

You will then have 35 minutes to craft a persuasive essay in which you argue why the option you chose is the best choice. Your arguments should be based solely on details provided in the prompt. Don't make assumptions and don't use outside examples.

There are no length requirements.

While it is mandatory to complete this section, it is not scored by LSAC. They simply send it to the law schools you listed along with your LSAT scores.

You can find more information about the writing section on the LSAC website .

What Law Schools Expect from Your Writing Sample

As you prepare for this section, you're going to hear some conflicting reports. Some will say the writing section isn't that important. Admissions officers care much more about your personal statement or statement of purpose as a writing sample than your LSAT essay.

This is reasonable. That personal statement shows what you're capable of when given adequate time and resources to craft something really meaningful.

However, other admissions officers argue that the LSAT essay is very important. Your statement of purpose is what you can do when you're not in a rush, when you have friends and family who can edit and provide feedback; in short, when you have time.

The LSAT essay shows how coherent you can be when you're under pressure and have only your own mind to work with. It's a better measure of raw writing talent as well as your own logic and argument skills.

To succeed in law school, you need to be prepared to write lots of essays, including some timed essay exams. For a career in law, your ability to be organized, coherent, and convincing even when you're speaking off the cuff is an important skill.

This LSAT essay is one way to demonstrate that you're capable of successfully completing law school and successfully navigating a career in law.

In the end, you shouldn't worry whether the admissions officers at the schools you're applying to care about the LSAT writing sample. You have to complete it one way or the other so you might as well give it your best effort. After all, this could end up being the item that tips the scale in your favor between you and a similarly strong competitor.

What Makes a Strong LSAT Writing Sample?

This is a spontaneous essay. That means you did not have the resources to do research or thoroughly prepare a perfect essay. It also means you had little to know time to edit or even reread the essay before submitting. The admissions board is not going to be looking for top quality or anything close to perfection.

They are going to be look for evidence of your raw talent. They want to see evidence that you have some fundamental abilities to organize and express a coherent chain of thoughts in written form.

The most important qualities your essay should have include:

• Clear, grammatically correct writing
• Logical, organized structure, including paragraphs that are focused on single, relevant topics
• Arguments that are grounded fully in evidence, not on personal opinions or assumptions
• Clear thesis statement
• Logical conclusion

How to Prepare for the LSAT Writing Sample

Even if you understand the importance of taking some time to practice for the LSAT writing section, it can be hard to know where or how to start. In this section, we'll give you a few tips to make sure you're ready for the writing sample come test day.

Set Your Study Schedule

Because this is an unscored section, it can be hard to justify taking precious study hours away from the scored sections of the LSAT to practice writing short essays. While it shouldn't be the main focus of your study time, devoting an hour or so a week to this will pay off.

Use the 5% rule. If your current LSAT study schedule is 20 hours a week, spend maybe one hour of that time on the writing section. If you're only studying 10 hours a week, spend about half an hour on writing.

Since the section is only 35 minutes, this 5% rule gives you time to practice 1-2 essays each week. That's enough to make sure you have a good rhythm established and you've solidified your approach to organizing your thoughts and managing your time. But it still leaves the majority of your time to study for the scored sections.

Practice Essay Construction

Writing this essay isn't like the normal essay writing process. You won't have any time or resources for research or editing. When you practice writing essays, mimic these conditions as much as possible. Don't rely on outside research. Don't write as if you have all the time in the world to edit and review.

Use only the writing prompt material and make sure you spend enough time clearly defining the requirements and planning out the structure of your essay. Use the following process to craft an essay.

• Read the prompt and create an outline of the requirements and the details. This should include what the problem or scenario is, what your two options are, and what the details of each option are.
• Create an outline. Your outline should include your introduction paragraph, at least three body paragraphs, and your conclusion paragraph. The introduction paragraph should include a clear thesis statement. Each paragraph should have a clear main topic with 2-3 supporting details or examples. The conclusion should simply summarize the argument you made in the essay.
• Write your essay. Take it one paragraph at a time. Refer to your outline to make sure each paragraph stays on topic and follows logically from the one before it. Also make sure you aren't including any of your own assumptions or opinions not grounded in specific details from the prompt.
• Edit your essay. Take a few minutes to read through your essay and correct spelling, grammar, and sentence structure.
• Critique your essay. Since this is a practice essay, read through it as if you were an admissions officer. How clear is the thesis statement? Do the body paragraphs really help support the thesis? Are all of the details and examples from the prompt? Do the arguments make sense?

For your first couple practice essays, time yourself but don't cut yourself at 35 minutes. Take the time you need to complete the process fully. Just use the timer to get a base measure of how long it currently takes you to finish an essay.

After those first couple sessions, work on completing the process a little faster each time until you get it down below 35 minutes.

Once you've successfully completed a practice essay that you're proud of in under 35 minutes, you're ready for the test! You don't need to continue practicing after this unless you feel like you'd benefit from a couple more sessions.

Find Writing Prompts

In your LSAT study guides, you will find some example prompts that you can use to practice writing your LSAT writing sample. If you run out of sample prompts, you can give yourself prompts based on other material.

For example, you might look at the business or politics section of a news site. Find an article discussing a policy debate in congress, a potential business merger, or a similar issue that has multiple sides. Based solely on the information provided in the article, identify two potential options, pick a side, and write a persuasive essay defending your decision.

Say you find an article about your local city council deciding whether to fund the construction of a new elementary school by either raising property taxes on residents or pulling funding from the parks department. Choose which option you prefer and write an essay explaining why, using evidence pulled only from that article.

If you find an article about a company that's deciding between either developing its own new product or buying out its competitor, decide which of those options you would choose as CEO of that company and write an essay about it.

Plan Your Test Day LSAT Writing Schedule

To create a strong LSAT writing sample in just 35 minutes, time management is key. If you spent enough time practicing the skills, you should be able to do all the necessary planning and execution within that time frame. Here's a sample of what your test day schedule might look like:

• 3 minutes: Read the prompt and breakdown the topic.
• 7 minutes: Write out a paragraph by paragraph outline
• 20 minutes: Write your essay. Referring to the outline to create each paragraph.
• 5 minutes: Quickly read through the essay to clean out any glaring errors or mistakes.

You can alter the timing based on the results of your practice writing. For example, if you find that you need less time for outlining but more time for editing, adjust to reflect those needs. If you tend to edit as you go and would rather use more time to write and then just do a quick final read-through, go for it.

4 Step LSAT Writing Process

Let's take a look at that schedule in action. For this sample, we'll use the prompt example provided on the LSAC website.

In the prompt, you are asked to use the details provided to choose either a "national plan" or the "regional plan" proposed to help a fictional company meet two goals: increase profits and ensure long-term financial stability.

Here's how the process might look:

Step 1: Read and breakdown the prompt (3 minutes)

The breakdown of the prompt might look like this:

• Increase company profits
• Ensure long-term financial stability
• Only well-known in home region
• Has a strong positive reputation among those who know it
• Facing increasing competition in home region
• Has strong customer loyalty
• The plan: open multiple men's clothing stores nationwide
• Ability to offer lower prices due to savings from buying at scale
• Would improve company's ability to compete with the national chains that are moving into its home region
• Dramatic increase in profits, if successful
• Requires taking on a lot of debt
• Require spending a lot on additional staff, marketing, and distribution
• High risk of failure and expensive if it does fail
• The plan: Increase number and size of stores in current region and upgrade service and product quality
• No need to take on new debt
• No need to hire lots of new staff or investing more in marketing and distribution
• Ability to charge higher prices for higher quality
• A test run of this plan in one store showed increased sales and profits
• High population growth in current region means growing customer base
• Doesn't address price competition from the competitor chains in their region
• Limited growth potential since the company isn't expand into new regions

Every single bullet point above was stated in the prompt. No outside information or assumptions were made. Your breakdown of the prompt should be an outline of the facts that were presented to you, free of personal opinion.

You'll use this as a reference when creating your outline to make sure your supporting arguments are directly founded on details in the prompt. Creating this breakdown will help cut down the time you spend referring to the prompt for details.

Step 2: Write your outline (7 minutes)

From the above, we can see that the choice is between the high risk, high reward national plan or the low risk, low reward regional plan. For the sake of the essay, let's go for the high risk, high reward option. Now, let's outline our argument:

• 2-3 sentences describing the issue stated in the prompt and the company's current position.
• Thesis: The national plan is the most suitable choice to meet both of the company's stated goals of increasing profits and ensuring long-term financial stability.
• National plan allows company to maintain prices that are the same or lower than their competitors
• Increases the number of potential customers
• Potential to decrease per unit cost by buying at a larger scale will also increase profit margin
• Company will be better protected from regional market fluctuations (e.g.- local recessions)
• Opportunity to expand into regions with lower competition will hedge against potential profit loss from the high competition in current region
• Positive local reputation suggests their business model is already strong
• Existing customer loyalty will provide stability while they get established in new regions
• The national plan may come with higher risk and higher costs but the company is currently in a strong position and this plan better satisfies both of the company's stated goals.

As you can see, the introduction simply restates the prompt in a couple sentences and then briefly states your response to the prompt.

Then, each paragraph focuses on one specific argument that supports your thesis. The arguments were each pulled from the prompt. You're not using any outside information or examples to support your thesis. You're just using what you know from the details provided in the prompt.

Three supporting paragraphs is a good number to aim for. It's enough to show that your argument is well thought-out and evidence based. But it's not so much that you won't have time to write them all out in the 35 minutes you have to complete the assignment.

If you have clear ideas for 4-5 supporting paragraphs, and each one directly relates to the prompt, go for it. However, any more than that, your essay will likely be too long to finish in time.

Finally, the conclusion summarizes the key points you discussed in the essay and restates your original thesis that the national plan is the preferred choice.

Step 3: Write your essay (20 minutes)

With an outline like the one above, your essay is already mostly written. For this step, focus on one paragraph at a time, turning each bullet point into a complete thought in 1-2 sentences. Make sure to include smooth transitions between each paragraph.

Don't concern yourself too much with language. Focus on getting your point across and packing in evidence to support your claims. You don't need to use the most advanced or academic sounding words you can think of. You just need to be convincing.

Often, the most convincing arguments are the ones that are most clearly and concisely stated. So, skip the thesaurus and just write naturally, using grammatically correct sentences.

Step 4: Edit your essay (5 minutes)

After you've fleshed out your outline into a full essay, use any remaining time on the clock to read through it and fix any major errors. Don't read too closely or get too finicky about perfecting the word choice.

Instead, just skim through it looking for obvious spelling errors and grammar mistakes or sentences that just don't make any sense.

If you end up finishing all four steps in less than 35 minutes, don't turn it in early. Just use the extra time to do a closer edit. While the admissions officers won't be looking for polished perfection, it won't hurt to get as close to polished as you can.

Get the #1-Rated LSAT Prep for free.

See your chances of getting into top law schools., enter your email to see the full report.

How to Write LSAT Essay: With Real-Life Examples

No matter if you’re just writing your first words or trying to turn your ideas into a case that a lawyer would accept, knowing how to write an LSAT essay, is the most important thing you can do.

Let’s figure out how to write a good LSAT essay, with examples to bring those ideas to life.

The Inside Scoop on LSAT Essay Mastery

When you’re gearing up for the LSAT, understanding the nuts of the essay component is like finding a treasure map: it can lead you to law school gold! This isn’t your average college essay; the LSAT demands more than fancy words or flamboyant grammar. It’s your chance to flaunt those critical thinking and decision-making skills, all wrapped up in a neat, persuasive package.

If the phrase how to write an LSAT explanation essay sends your heart racing, take a deep breath. It’s all about presenting a well-reasoned argument for a decision backed by evidence and structured logically. Easy, right? Well, it can be with the right prep!

But hey, no one’s saying you have to go it alone. There’s a whole army of resources at your disposal. Law school admssion consulting firms are like the Gandalf to your Frodo , offering wisdom and guidance for your epic journey. They can provide tailored advice to make your essay a shining star in your application.

And for that extra edge, the best LSAT tutoring providers are just a click away . They’re the Yoda to your Luke Skywalker, helping hone your essay-writing lightsaber to battle the LSAT dark side. With these allies in your corner, you’re not just writing an essay but crafting the Excalibur of applications!

What Does the LSAT Essay Evaluate?

So, you’re facing the LSAT essay, a beast of a test more enigmatic than a Rubik’s cube. What exactly is it probing for? Put simply, it’s all about your argumentative finesse. This section throws you a scenario and asks you to advocate for one standpoint over another. The catch? There’s no clear winner. It’s a test of judgment, not factual recall.

The question buzzing in your mind might be how to write an essay for the LSAT. Don’t fret; it’s about harnessing your inner lawyer. You’re not just picking a side but defending it with every ounce of logic and persuasion. Your prowess in presenting a robust argument, reasoning clarity, and ability to communicate effectively underpin how to write a good LSAT essay.

But where do you get the prep ammo for this? LSAT podcasts on YouTube are like hidden gems . They offer priceless insights and tips from those who’ve wrestled with the beast you’re facing.

Remember, the LSAT essay is your stage. It’s where you showcase your ability to dissect complex issues, take a stance, and defend it with vigor.

And for a holistic approach, take a look into popular LSAT majors . These fields of study are the forges where argumentative swords are tempered, sharpening your critical thinking and analytical skills.

Decoding the Numbers: How Your LSAT Essay is Evaluated

Let’s clear the fog on one of the most mystifying aspects of the LSAT journey: the scoring system of the essay section. First, it’s vital to note that writing the LSAT essay doesn’t contribute to your overall score of 180. Yes, you read that right! But hold those celebration dances; this doesn’t give you a free pass to neglect it.

Though not numerically scored, your essay is a critical puzzle piece. It’s shipped directly to the law schools you apply to to demonstrate your argumentative capabilities. Admissions committees eyeball this section to gauge your potential as a budding lawyer. They’re scouting for clear, logical reasoning, effective argumentation, and organizational skills that scream “courtroom-ready.”

Wondering how to make your essay resonate with these legal eagles? Resources like college admission consultants reviews on our blog can point you towards the pros who know exactly what law schools want. They’re like the cartographers of the LSAT world, mapping out the route to a standout submission.

While your essay doesn’t tally up points in your LSAT score, it’s a pivotal player in the admissions game. It’s your audition tape, portfolio, and voice – make it compelling!

Need more hands-on guidance? The best in-person LSAT prep class can be a game-changer . Think of it as a training ground where you get to spar with the LSAT essay, sharpening your writing sword under the watchful eyes of seasoned mentors.

Crafting an A+ LSAT Essay: Your 5-Step Battle Plan

The LSAT essay journey feels like standing at the base of Mount Everest, doesn’t it? It’s time to strap on your climbing gear and tackle this challenge head-on!

We’re breaking down the ascent into a 5-step expedition designed to plant your flag of success at the summit. Each phase is a mission-critical move to construct an essay that doesn’t just talk the talk but walks the walk.

Step 1: Analyze the Terrain

Before you pen that first word, take a moment. Breathe. Then, dive deep into the prompt. This isn’t just skimming the surface; it’s about understanding every nuance of the scenario you’re given. Identify the decision points and weigh them.

What are the stakes? What are the pros and cons? Your essay’s foundation lies in how well you grasp the prompt.

Step 2: Pick Your Path…Wisely

This stage is your strategic crossroads. You’ve got two options, but the choice isn’t right or wrong; it’s about which position you can argue most effectively. Consider the evidence, the strengths, and potential weaknesses of each side.

Need a compass for decision-making? LSAT prep books for beginners can offer invaluable guidance , helping you understand the criteria for strong arguments. Your choice here sets the tone for your essay, so weigh your options carefully! It’s a calculated decision on the chessboard of your LSAT.

Step 3: Map Out Your Journey

Now, plot your course. You wouldn’t venture into the wilderness without a map, right? Similarly, an outline is your GPS through the LSAT essay terrain. Jot down your main arguments, examples, and evidence. This blueprint ensures you stay on track, your ideas flow logically, and you effectively support your stance.

Struggling to connect the dots between ideas? An LSAT reading comprehension book is a goldmine for understanding how arguments are structured and presented cohesively. With a solid plan, you’re not just wandering through words but on the highway to a compelling, organized essay.

Step 4: Embark with Gusto

Craft your essay with conviction, ensuring each sentence fortifies your argument. Use clear, persuasive language, and don’t wander off into the forest of off-topic musings. You can find LSAT writing tutors online to bolster your writing prowess . They’re like the seasoned trail guides who can help navigate tricky paths and ensure your argument is robust and convincing.

Remember, this is your narrative journey – infuse it with your passion, precision, and personality. Write with gusto, and let your argument shine!

Step 5: Polish Till It Shines

Did you cross the finish line with your first draft? High-five! But don’t park the car just yet. It’s time to revamp your engine. Review your essay with a fine-tooth comb, hunting for any hiccups in logic or pesky typos that crawled in.

Wondering if your arguments are solid enough? LSAT practice tests can provide benchmarks for comparison, highlighting areas ripe for refinement. This stage is about perfecting your masterpiece, buffing it until it’s gleaming with clarity, coherence, and undeniable persuasion. Polish that essay until it’s blindingly brilliant!

LSAT Essay Samples: Two Stellar Examples to Guide Your Way

Sometimes, getting through the LSAT essay part feels like figuring out what an abstract piece of art means. Don’t worry, though; samples are here to save the day! They say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, but it’s also a smart strategy in the LSAT world. These examples epitomize what it means to nail this part of the test.

Sample 1: The Cost-Benefit Conundrum

Prompt: A small town’s council is deliberating whether to invest in renovating a historic community library or constructing a new skate park. Both projects have significant community support, but budget constraints necessitate a choice.

Essay Excerpt:

“The town’s historic library stands not just as a vault of books but as a cornerstone of communal heritage and learning. While a skate park offers immediate appeal to the town’s youth, refurbishing the library is an investment in the town’s intellectual heartbeat. This isn’t merely a financial decision; it’s a choice between transient thrill and lasting enlightenment…”

Sample 2: The Eco-Friendly Initiative

Prompt: A company must choose between investing in solar panels for their new headquarters or implementing a company-wide recycling program. Both have environmental benefits but differ in cost, impact, and employee involvement.

“Opting for solar panels, the company doesn’t just cut down on energy costs; it loudly advocates for renewable energy. Yes, recycling is commendable, but solar panels are a bold statement, a public display of environmental stewardship. This initiative transcends immediate monetary gain, spotlighting the company’s commitment to a greener tomorrow…”

Wondering how to craft essays like these? Understanding how to write LSAT explanation essay starts with grasping the argument’s mechanics, the balance between emotion and logic. But mastering this art form isn’t a solo journey.

Do LSAT prep classes help? Unquestionably , this is especially important when it comes to coherence in the organization of your ideas. These classes, alongside the best free prep for LSAT , provide frameworks that support your essay.

These samples are more than just responses; they’re a study in strategy, structure, and style. Use them as models for your strategy, and remember, the LSAT essay is your podium. Speak from it with logic, passion, and precision!

Supercharging Your Argumentation Skills

In the gladiatorial arena of LSAT essay writing, wielding your reasoning like a well-honed sword is crucial. You’re not just throwing words onto paper but engaging in a sophisticated intellectual duel. Your weapon? Razor-sharp logical reasoning. But even the most astute minds need a bit of sharpening. That’s where resources sprint to your side, ready to turn your natural talents into formidable skills.

This might sound like a Herculean task reserved for the hyper-intelligent. But hold your horses! It’s accessible to anyone with the right tools. One of the most effective? The best logical reasoning books for LSAT are like the whetstones for your intellect. They don’t just provide you with strategies; they challenge you with real-world scenarios, honing your argumentation skills and refining your reasoning abilities.

These guides help you dissect arguments, understand logical fallacies, and, most importantly, construct airtight arguments of your own. They’re not just teaching you but immersing you in high-stakes decision-making and critical analysis.

Thus, consider investing in these logical reasoning power-ups. They’re not just books; they’re your secret weapon in the battle of wits that lies ahead on the LSAT.

How do you start an essay for the LSAT?

Kick-off with a clear thesis statement in your introductory paragraph. This is your stance on the prompt’s issue. Make it bold, clear, and sure it’s something you can back up with solid reasoning.

How to write the LSAT writing sample?

Outline your argument, present both sides of the scenario, and justify your decision clearly. Support your stance with logical reasoning and specific examples. Remember, clarity and structure are your best friends here.

Is the LSAT writing hard?

It’s challenging but not impossible. The LSAT writing section tests your critical thinking and persuasive writing skills. With practice, a clear strategy, and a calm mind, you can master it. Preparation is key!

How long should my LSAT writing sample be?

Aim for a goldilocks length: not too long, not too short. Generally, a well-articulated response is about 500-800 words. It’s about quality over quantity, so make every word count and every argument hit home!

Education Writer

One of our team members is Alina Burakova. She has vast experience in reviewing career and education-related websites. Being a little shy, Alina dislikes writing about herself too much, so here is her short bio. In 2010, she graduated from ...

Relevant articles

The journey to an MBA has taken a welcoming turn, with numerous MBA programs that accept the GRE general test. My experiments have shown that this shift not only broadens the horizon for applicants but also aligns with the diverse backgrounds MBA programs now seek. Through my research, I discovered a wealth of MBA programs…

When you decide to pursue graduate studies, you’re undertaking a journey where your GRE score could be the compass that guides your path. This score, often a gatekeeper to prestigious programs, is more than just a number – it’s a reflection of your dedication, hard work, and potential. My experiments with GRE preparation have shown…

Choosing between the GMAT and the GRE for MBA admissions can feel like standing at a crossroads, with each path leading to its unique destination. In my journey through the maze of MBA admissions, I’ve guided these niches and emerged with insights and understanding. This article is your compass, designed to guide you through the…

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Resume Writing CompTIA Certification on Resume: How to Put It [+Examples]

Admission Consulting The Five Best Graduate School Admissions Consultants Reviewed

Resume Writing Can You Put Udemy On Resume?

• Table of Contents
• Intro to the LSAT
• LSAT Scores
• LSAT Sections
• Logical Reasoning Intro
• Necessary And Sufficient Conditions
• Conditionals
• Contrapositive
• Some Invalid Inferences
• At Least One
• If And Only If
• Conditional Conjunctions
• Chains of conditionals
• Some, All, Most
• Must Be True LSAT Questions
• Most Strongly Supported
• Formal Logic Questions
• Method of Reasoning
• Argument Structure Questions
• Ad Hominem Flaws
• Argumentative Flaws
• Sufficient Assumptions
• Necessary Assumptions
• Assumption Questions
• Principle Questions
• Parallel Flaws
• Agree/Disagree
• Parallelism Questions
• Statistical Reasoning
• Weaken Reasoning
• Paradox Questions
• Evaluate Questions
• Modify Questions
• Logical Reasoning Review
• LSAT Logic Games
• Tree Diagrams
• Two-Dimensional
• Over/Under Booked
• Ordering Questions
• In-and-Out Games
• LSAT Matching Games
• Grouping Questions
• Hybrid Games
• Circular Games
• Logic Games Review
• Reading Intro
• Passage Classification
• Analyzing Paragraphs
• Passage Mapping
• Find the Big Idea
• Determine Purpose
• Detail of the Passage
• Definition of a Term
• Support for a Premise
• Function of Passage Part
• Cultural Hard Ex. 2
• 2. Law Passages
• 3. Society Passages
• Science Medium Ex. 1
• Science Medium Ex. 2
• 5. Dual Passages
• Reading Comp Review
• Digital LSAT
• 07. Law School Reports
• LSAT Class Locations
• LSAT Questions
• LSAT Courses Near Me
• Sample LSAT
• Mission / About Us
• Create Account / Log In

LSAT Writing Sample

Home » Free LSAT Prep Course » LSAT Writing Sample

The LSAT Writing Sample asks you to write an essay in 35 minutes. Although this does not affect your LSAT score, it is wise to invest a few hours in preparing for it. Those who don’t prepare at all often write terrible essays, possibly even bad enough to endanger a student’s admission chances. Spend a few hours looking at sample essays to avoid any unnecessary mistakes.

The essay section is designed to test how well you can (1) organize a compelling argument using sound reasoning and supporting evidence and (2) express your thoughts clearly in written form. The essay section is NOT meant to test how many big vocabulary words you know, how much you know about the law or any other specific topic, or really even how creative you are.

The writing sample is not likely to play a major role in law school admissions, so we recommend prioritizing other aspects of LSAT prep. You can take 20 minutes to review this content now, our start with our LSAT course and come back to this page later.

The New Digital LSAT

With the introduction of the Digital LSAT, the delivery of the LSAT Writing Sample has been revised:

The New Digital LSAT Writing Sample Video Summary

• 00:20 – The writing sample has been removed from test day. Instead you will submit it online from your own computer.
• 00:28 – You will be monitored with a video camera and microphone.
• 00:43 – This may mean that law schools will look at the writing sample more, since they will have digital copies rather than a hand-written ones.
• 01:30 – Some law schools are starting to consider writing more, even including a writing prompt in interviews.
• 01:58 – Clear, concise writing skills are crucial for lawyers.

What will the topic be?

You won’t be asked to write about a specific topic so much as you’ll be asked to respond to a specific scenario. The scenario will always be presented in the same form. Here’s a watered-down example (keep in mind that the scenario on your exam will be more involved):

John wants to buy a pet. He is choosing between a cat and a dog. He only has time to care for one pet. Write an essay in which you argue for the purchase of one type of pet over the other based on the following considerations:

• John wants a pet that will be relatively maintenance-free.
• John wants a pet that will be a true, loyal companion.

The first option, the cat, is a clean pet that does not typically damage or destroy household property. While the cat does need to be fed twice per day, it does not need to be taken for daily walks. The cat is very aloof and non-responsive to human interaction, but it does grow attached to its human owner over time.

The second option, the dog, requires daily attention. The dog has been known to damage household property, and it requires walks on a daily basis. With training, the dog can learn to be relatively self-sufficient. The dog responds to human interaction and craves the attention of its human owner, but it can’t communicate very well with humans.

As mentioned earlier, the scenario will always be presented in the same way. The first part will present a choice, the second part (the bullet statements) will present two considerations that need to be weighed in making that choice, and the third part will provide more information about the two choices at hand. Notice that there is no right or wrong answer here. In fact, the scenario is presented in such a way as to make it difficult to decide which option is better! They both have their pros and cons. What’s important is NOT which option you choose, but rather how you justify, or support, the choice that you do end up making.

How should I write my essay?

The following will outline a process for planning and writing your essay. It certainly isn’t the only way to do it, but it does provide a consistent, repeatable approach that you’ll be able to rely on. Practice these steps on a few real writing sample prompts, and you should be prepared for the writing sample.

Step 1: Compile information in grid form (5 minutes total for steps 1-3)

In the test booklet, set up a table that has the two choices along the top and the two considerations along the side. In the intersecting cells of the grid, include the appropriate pros and cons using a “+” before any pro and a “-“ before any con. For our example, it might look like this:

You’re familiar with cats and dogs, so it’s probably already obvious to you that a cat would be a good low-maintenance choice and a dog would be good for companionship. Keep in mind, however, that the scenario you will see on your exam will be much less familiar to you. Organizing the information in grid form will make it much easier for you to see the relative strengths and weaknesses of each choice.

Step 2: Decide on a “more important” consideration (5 minutes total for steps 1-3)

At this point, you want to make a decision. Is it more important for John that the pet be maintenance-free or that it be a loyal companion? Again, there’s no right answer. Even so, you need to decide which you will make more important. Choose one that you can easily justify (even if it’s a made-up justification). For example, we’ll decide:

“Having a loyal companion is more important than having a low-maintenance pet because true friendship trumps all else. If John has a true companion and friend, the daily maintenance will become a labor of love instead of a hassle.”

Step 3: Make your choice! (5 minutes total for steps 1-3)

Your decision in step 2 should lead you to a clear choice. In this case, if we deem companionship to be the more important consideration, then we’ll want to choose the dog (since the dog clearly has more compelling pros in that part of the grid).

“John should pick the dog because it will serve as a more loyal companion than the cat will.”

Step 4: Write the essay (25 minutes)

Plan on structuring your essay the same way every time. Here’s an easy template to follow:

Essay Section Template Paragraph 1: A. Summarize the decision to be made.   “The scenario presented above puts John in a position in which he will choose between purchasing a cat and purchasing a dog.” B. Acknowledge the complexity of the decision.  “Given the considerations and characteristics of the choices at hand, this is a very difficult decision in that each choice has its merits.” C. State your opinion.  “Even so, John would be better served by choosing the dog.” Paragraph 2: A. State why the primary consideration (the one you chose to be the primary consideration) is more important and how your choice satisfies this consideration.  “ First, it is more important to have a pet that serves as a loyal companion than it is to have a pet that is maintenance-free…” (Justify this statement, even if it’s a made-up justification.) “The dog will be a loyal companion in that it will …” (Use the information from the grid to show how.) B. State why the other choice (cat) falls short in this regard.   “The cat, on the other hand, is a poor match for anyone looking for a loyal pet …” (Use the information from the grid to show how.) Paragraph 3: State how your choice still does an okay job with the secondary consideration.   “Furthermore, while the dog isn’t an ideal choice for someone wanting a maintenance-free pet, it can learn to be relatively self-sufficient…” (Use any other information from the grid to support this.) Paragraph 4: Summarize your argument

Step 5: Proofread! (5 minutes)

Spelling errors, misprints, grammatical errors, etc. will never go over well. While a few simple mistakes won’t kill you, you want to be sure your final essay is as clean as possible.

Find LSAT Courses Near You

Lsat classes, free course.

• LSAT Course Contents
• LSAT Scores/Averages
• Chains of Conditionals
• Must Be True Questions
• Parallel Flaw
• Two Dimensional
• Matching Games
• 1. Passage Classification
• 2. Analyzing Paragraphs
• 3. Passage Mapping
• 4. Find the Big Idea
• 5. Determine Purpose
• 1. Detail of the Passage
• 2. Definition of a Term
• 3. Support for a Premise
• 4. Function of Passage Part
• 5. Inference

Next LSAT: Sep 08/ Sep 09

Which test should I take: GMAT or GRE?

LSAT Center

© 2023 |  LSAT is a trademark of the Law School Admissions Council  |  Terms   | Kaplan is an affiliate of LSAT-Center

How to Get a Perfect Score on the LSAT

Here are some tips to help law school applicants who aim for a score of 180 on the Law School Admission Test.

Getty Images

Practice is not helpful unless it is methodical and purposeful. To practice the right way, you need to create a thoughtful study plan.

It's possible to walk into the LSAT with minimal practice and score a perfect 180. My college roommate managed this feat, and I cannot fathom how he did it. For those of us mortals who may need a little more help to hit such an elusive target, I'm happy to share some advice from my own experience as a longtime LSAT instructor who scored 179 after months of practice.

First, however, it is worth stepping back and asking: Why aim for 180? 

What Does it Means to Score 180 on the LSAT?

The LSAT, formally known as the Law School Admission Test, is one of the most important factors in law school admissions. There is substantial evidence that those who score well on the test, like those who perform well academically in college, tend to get high grades in the first year of law school.

The LSAT is scored on a bell curve, ranging from 120 to 180. On recent tests, the hump of the curve has centered around 153. Percentiles vary slightly between tests, but generally around 25% of test-takers score 160 or higher, 5% score 170 or higher, and 1% score 175 or higher. Only one in 1,000 test-takers scores 180.

Remember: These scores are based on actual test-takers, not the population at large. 

How Do Law Schools Look at a Score of 180?

The most prestigious law schools tend to have median LSAT scores in the 170s. Many candidates are admitted with lower scores, but they likely have high grades and other impressive qualifications .

There is no law school with a median LSAT score above 175. This is because the LSAT is only one of many factors in law school admissions, and it is also due to the shape of the bell curve.

Standardized tests like the LSAT are calibrated to evaluate the bulk of test-takers whose scores fall in the hump of the bell curve, rather than the outliers at extreme edges. The difference between a 177 and a 178 could be due to making the wrong choice between two similar answer choices on just one question. Since LSAT questions can be somewhat subjective, such differences are not statistically meaningful.

Thus, law schools know that 180 is not a magic number. To take your best shot at a top law school , aim for a score in the 170s, the mid-170s if possible.

A score of 180 will stand out, but it is not a golden ticket. 

How Do You Practice to Achieve a Top LSAT Score?

Too many test-takers mistakenly believe that the key to scoring high on the LSAT is to take endless practice tests. After all, practice tests are hard, and those who work hardest do the best on the test, right?

This is not quite true. Practice is not helpful unless it is methodical and purposeful . To practice the right way, you need to create a thoughtful study plan .

First, you must learn the right techniques to tackle every question on the test, using the method that best fits your learning style. This may be self-study, a course or online application, or work with a tutor.

Once you have learned the basics, you can best improve your performance through a mix of timed and untimed practice tests and drilling the questions you find hardest. 

Homing in on Your Weaknesses

To achieve a perfect score, you need to be a perfectionist. This means practicing questions at the toughest level of difficulty you can handle and carefully examining your results.

All the practice in the world won’t help you unless you are devoted to understanding the questions you get wrong .

If you are a champion martial artist and an opponent throws you to the ground, it is unhelpful to get upset or disappointed or fearful. Instead, you must get curious. How did this happen? How can I prevent it from happening again?

Likewise, what distinguishes top performers on the LSAT is how they respond to questions they get wrong. Instead of anger or apathy, they react to wrong answers with interest, gleaning the data they need to improve. Over time, this leads to breakthroughs in performance. 

Mastering Your Mind

Test-takers who fall short of top scores often get so hyperfocused on the test that they exhaust themselves or become overly fixated on the clock.

Top performers understand that the mental side of the LSAT, like test anxiety and time management , are just as important to work on as other essential technical skills .

Instead of willing their brains to focus harder and work faster, they find ways to work with their mind to make the test manageable, sustainable and intrinsically rewarding.

Almost every client I work with who achieves a top score on the test hits a point where they find the LSAT surprisingly interesting. This make practice less of a chore, and it relieves the stress of the test and leads to new insights.

It is hard to get good at something if you hate it. I learned that as a kid, from years of fruitless piano lessons I grew to resent. My brother, who had the same teacher, was fascinated by piano practice and became a phenomenal pianist.

To score 180 on the LSAT, you must find a way to look forward to practice as much as my brother loved sitting down at the keyboard and treating every practice session as a chance to explore and to learn something new.

Tips to Boost a Law School Application

Tags: LSAT , law school , graduate schools , education , students

About Law Admissions Lowdown

Law Admissions Lowdown provides advice to prospective students about the law school application process, LSAT prep and potential career paths. Previously authored by contributors from Stratus Admissions Counseling, the blog is currently authored by Gabriel Kuris, founder of Top Law Coach , an admissions consultancy. Kuris is a graduate of Harvard Law School and has helped hundreds of applicants navigate the law school application process since 2003. Got a question? Email [email protected] .

Popular Stories

Best Colleges

Applying to Graduate School

Paying for College

Medical School Admissions Doctor

Applying to College

You May Also Like

Get accepted to multiple top b-schools.

Anayat Durrani May 16, 2024

Premeds and Emerging Medical Research

Zach Grimmett May 14, 2024

Premeds Take 5 Public Health Courses

Rachel Rizal May 7, 2024

Fortune 500 CEOs With a Law Degree

Cole Claybourn May 7, 2024

Why It's Hard to Get Into Med School

A.R. Cabral May 6, 2024

Pros, Cons of Unaccredited Law Schools

Gabriel Kuris May 6, 2024

An MBA and Management Consulting

Sammy Allen May 2, 2024

Med School Access for Minority Students

Cole Claybourn May 2, 2024

Different jobs with med degree

Jarek Rutz April 30, 2024

Completing Medical School in Five Years

Kate Rix April 30, 2024

Confusion over how pregnancy dates are measured is widespread – and makes for uninformed debate over abortion limits

Professor of Political Science, Hartwick College

Professor of political science, Augusta University

Professor of Political Science, North Carolina State University

Disclosure statement

The funding for the survey discussed in this article was funded by the NC State School of Public and International Affairs.

Mary-Kate Lizotte and Steven Greene do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

View all partners

Most Americans don’t know two key facts about pregnancy, including how they are dated and how long a trimester is – and this could matter, as a growing number of states place restrictions on abortion.

Florida enacted a new law on May 1, 2024, that bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy, with a few exceptions – including documented rape, incest and to save the life of the mother.

Florida joins the majority of Southern states that now have complete bans or highly restrictive abortion laws, enacted since the Supreme Court overturned the federal right to get an abortion in June 2022. Many of the restrictive laws ban abortion after a set number of weeks.

Florida Republicans supporting the bill have labeled it a reasonable compromise between a full abortion ban and few abortion restrictions.

Some OB-GYNs have explained that many women do not even know they are pregnant at six weeks . Research shows that women on average find out they are pregnant at five and a half weeks. About 23% do not know until seven weeks of pregnancy or later.

So, do Americans, including those enacting six-week bans, actually understand how the timing or dating of pregnancy works?

We are scholars of political science , gender and public opinion and are writing a book about public opinion on abortion after the Supreme Court’s reversal of the federal right to get an abortion in June 2022.

How does pregnancy work?

To gain insights into this issue, we developed a few pregnancy questions and included them in a research survey in late September 2023. The survey had 1,356 respondents, who were broadly representative of the U.S. population. The respondents’ median age was 46. Approximately 49% of these people were men, while 70% were white and 29% were college graduates. Meanwhile, 43% of them were Democrats, and 38% were Republicans.

The first question asked respondents how pregnancies are dated. The correct answer is that pregnancies are dated using the first day of the woman’s last menstrual period, which is often two to three weeks before conception.

The second question asked about trimesters. Many Americans are familiar with the term trimester, and polling consistently shows that Americans find abortion most acceptable during the first trimester. We asked Americans if they knew approximately how many weeks a trimester was. The correct answer is 13.

Americans’ pregnancy knowledge

We found that only one-third of respondents knew how pregnancy is dated. A majority – approximately 60% – falsely thought that pregnancy is dated from conception or in the weeks since the woman last had sex. Less than one-fourth of the respondents answered both pregnancy knowledge questions correctly.

In our survey, we also asked respondents whether they support a six-week abortion ban. Similar to other national surveys , we find that most Americans oppose strict abortion restrictions – only 35% support six-week bans.

Importantly, we find that those who support six-week abortion bans are significantly less likely than others to correctly understand the timing of pregnancy. The statistically significant relationship between having low levels of pregnancy timing knowledge and support for a six-week abortion ban holds in analyses controlling for potentially confounding variables.

Some anti-abortion lawmakers have demonstrated their ignorance about pregnancy before.

There is, for example, a long history of some anti-abortion politicians saying, incorrectly, that it is extremely rare for a person who is raped to get pregnant. Our survey shows that a large swath of those opposing abortion lack knowledge about the basics of pregnancy.

A gender disparity

Perhaps not surprisingly, women in this survey knew more about pregnancy than men. The question about how pregnancies are dated, for example, was answered correctly by 43% of women compared with only 23% of men. As mentioned above, a majority of Americans incorrectly believe pregnancy is dated from conception, but significantly more men than women think this is true.

This finding is particularly important when considering the gender breakdown of the Florida state lawmakers who approved the six-week ban. Although we do not have data on the pregnancy knowledge of those legislators, we do know that those who voted for the ban were overwhelmingly men .

Florida’s six-week ban will make it much harder for anyone to get abortions there – and it will also affect people in neighboring states who want or need an abortion. In 2023, Florida was home to the closest abortion clinic for 6.4 million women living in the South. In 2023, around 7,700 women from other Southern states, where abortion is now largely banned , traveled to Florida to get abortions.

Overall, our findings raise serious questions about whether Americans without medical training – much like those in our state legislatures – have the necessary knowledge needed to regulate abortion access.

This story has been updated to remove an incorrect reference to the Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America group’s position on an abortion ban after six weeks.

• Abortion law
• US Supreme Court
• Abortion rights
• Heartbeat bills
• Abortion bans
• Abortion restrictions
• Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
• anti-abortion rights
• Early pregnancy
• Southern states
• Abortion policy

Compliance Lead

Lecturer / Senior Lecturer - Marketing

Assistant Editor - 1 year cadetship

Executive Dean, Faculty of Health

Lecturer/Senior Lecturer, Earth System Science (School of Science)

• Share full article

Advertisement

Supported by

Guest Essay

It’s Time to End the Quiet Cruelty of Property Taxes

By Andrew W. Kahrl

Dr. Kahrl is a professor of history and African American studies at the University of Virginia and the author of “The Black Tax: 150 Years of Theft, Exploitation, and Dispossession in America.”

Property taxes, the lifeblood of local governments and school districts, are among the most powerful and stealthy engines of racism and wealth inequality our nation has ever produced. And while the Biden administration has offered many solutions for making the tax code fairer, it has yet to effectively tackle a problem that has resulted not only in the extraordinary overtaxation of Black and Latino homeowners but also in the worsening of disparities between wealthy and poorer communities. Fixing these problems requires nothing short of a fundamental re-examination of how taxes are distributed.

In theory, the property tax would seem to be an eminently fair one: The higher the value of your property, the more you pay. The problem with this system is that the tax is administered by local officials who enjoy a remarkable degree of autonomy and that tax rates are typically based on the collective wealth of a given community. This results in wealthy communities enjoying lower effective tax rates while generating more tax revenues; at the same time, poorer ones are forced to tax property at higher effective rates while generating less in return. As such, property assessments have been manipulated throughout our nation’s history to ensure that valuable property is taxed the least relative to its worth and that the wealthiest places will always have more resources than poorer ones.

Black people have paid the heaviest cost. Since they began acquiring property after emancipation, African Americans have been overtaxed by local governments. By the early 1900s, an acre of Black-owned land was valued, for tax purposes, higher than an acre of white-owned land in most of Virginia’s counties, according to my calculations, despite being worth about half as much. And for all the taxes Black people paid, they got little to nothing in return. Where Black neighborhoods began, paved streets, sidewalks and water and sewer lines often ended. Black taxpayers helped to pay for the better-resourced schools white children attended. Even as white supremacists treated “colored” schools as another of the white man’s burdens, the truth was that throughout the Jim Crow era, Black taxpayers subsidized white education.

Freedom from these kleptocratic regimes drove millions of African Americans to move to Northern and Midwestern states in the Great Migration from 1915 to 1970, but they were unable to escape racist assessments, which encompassed both the undervaluation of their property for sales purposes and the overvaluation of their property for taxation purposes. During those years, the nation’s real estate industry made white-owned property in white neighborhoods worth more because it was white. Since local tax revenue was tied to local real estate markets, newly formed suburbs had a fiscal incentive to exclude Black people, and cities had even more reason to keep Black people confined to urban ghettos.

As the postwar metropolis became a patchwork of local governments, each with its own tax base, the fiscal rationale for segregation intensified. Cities were fiscally incentivized to cater to the interests of white homeowners and provide better services for white neighborhoods, especially as middle-class white people began streaming into the suburbs, taking their tax dollars with them.

One way to cater to wealthy and white homeowners’ interests is to intentionally conduct property assessments less often. The city of Boston did not conduct a citywide property reassessment between 1946 and 1977. Over that time, the values of properties in Black neighborhoods increased slowly when compared with the values in white neighborhoods or even fell, which led to property owners’ paying relatively more in taxes than their homes were worth. At the same time, owners of properties in white neighborhoods got an increasingly good tax deal as their neighborhoods increased in value.

As was the case in other American cities, Boston’s decision most likely derived from the fear that any updates would hasten the exodus of white homeowners and businesses to the suburbs. By the 1960s, assessments on residential properties in Boston’s poor neighborhoods were up to one and a half times as great as their actual values, while assessments in the city’s more affluent neighborhoods were, on average, 40 percent of market value.

Jersey City, N.J., did not conduct a citywide real estate reassessment between 1988 and 2018 as part of a larger strategy for promoting high-end real estate development. During that time, real estate prices along the city’s waterfront soared but their owners’ tax bills remained relatively steady. By 2015, a home in one of the city’s Black and Latino neighborhoods worth $175,000 received the same tax bill as a home in the city’s downtown worth $530,000.

These are hardly exceptions. Numerous studies conducted during those years found that assessments in predominantly Black neighborhoods of U.S. cities were grossly higher relative to value than those in white areas.

These problems persist. A recent report by the University of Chicago’s Harris School of Public Policy found that property assessments were regressive (meaning lower-valued properties were assessed higher relative to value than higher-valued ones) in 97.7 percent of U.S. counties. Black-owned homes and properties in Black neighborhoods continue to be devalued on the open market, making this regressive tax, in effect, a racist tax.

The overtaxation of Black homes and neighborhoods is also a symptom of a much larger problem in America’s federated fiscal structure. By design, this system produces winners and losers: localities with ample resources to provide the goods and services that we as a nation have entrusted to local governments and others that struggle to keep the lights on, the streets paved, the schools open and drinking water safe . Worse yet, it compels any fiscally disadvantaged locality seeking to improve its fortunes to do so by showering businesses and corporations with tax breaks and subsidies while cutting services and shifting tax burdens onto the poor and disadvantaged. A local tax on local real estate places Black people and cities with large Black populations at a permanent disadvantage. More than that, it gives middle-class white people strong incentives to preserve their relative advantages, fueling the zero-sum politics that keep Americans divided, accelerates the upward redistribution of wealth and impoverishes us all.

There are technical solutions. One, which requires local governments to adopt more accurate assessment models and regularly update assessment rolls, can help make property taxes fairer. But none of the proposed reforms being discussed can be applied nationally because local tax policies are the prerogative of the states and, often, local governments themselves. Given the variety and complexity of state and local property tax laws and procedures and how much local governments continue to rely on tax reductions and tax shifting to attract and retain certain people and businesses, we cannot expect them to fix these problems on their own.

The best way to make local property taxes fairer and more equitable is to make them less important. The federal government can do this by reinvesting in our cities, counties and school districts through a federal fiscal equity program, like those found in other advanced federated nations. Canada, Germany and Australia, among others, direct federal funds to lower units of government with lower capacities to raise revenue.

And what better way to pay for the program than to tap our wealthiest, who have benefited from our unjust taxation scheme for so long? President Biden is calling for a 25 percent tax on the incomes and annual increases in the values of the holdings of people claiming more than $100 million in assets, but we could accomplish far more by enacting a wealth tax on the 1 percent. Even a modest 4 percent wealth tax on people whose total assets exceed $50 million could generate upward of $400 billion in additional annual revenue, which should be more than enough to ensure that the needs of every city, county and public school system in America are met. By ensuring that localities have the resources they need, we can counteract the unequal outcomes and rank injustices that our current system generates.

Andrew W. Kahrl is a professor of history and African American studies at the University of Virginia and the author of “ The Black Tax : 150 Years of Theft, Exploitation, and Dispossession in America.”

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips . And here’s our email: [email protected] .

Follow the New York Times Opinion section on Facebook , Instagram , TikTok , WhatsApp , X and Threads .

A New Approach to LSAT Writing Will Debut on July 30, 2024

By Susan Krinsky

As legal education curricula and the practice of law continue to change with the times, LSAC is innovating to provide a new writing assessment that responds to the evolving needs of the profession.

On July 30, a redesigned approach to the LSAT Writing section of the LSAT will make its debut as we open the 2024-2025 testing cycle, which begins with the August administration of the LSAT.

This new approach to the writing assessment will help law schools continue to make holistic admission decisions and help prospective law students better prepare for the writing they will do in law school and beyond – still without the need for any specialized skills, knowledge, or experience with legal concepts.

Since 1982, LSAT Writing prompts have been designed to assess logical reasoning in the context of argumentative writing. But legal education curricula, the legal profession, and the demands of legal practice continue to evolve. In our ongoing conversations with law schools and the legal profession, we hear consistently about the importance of strong analytical and argumentative writing skills and the need to better assess a student’s potential earlier in their academic journey.

Based on input from our member schools and other stakeholders in the legal profession, the new LSAT Writing section of the LSAT will be an even more effective tool for assessing the writing skills of individuals prior to law school. These changes will help schools better understand the writing capabilities of applicants for the purposes of their admission decisions. It will also enable law schools to better provide writing support for their students who need to strengthen their writing skills so they are better prepared for bar passage, finding employment, and practice.

This new approach aims to assess a test taker’s ability to construct a cogent argument based on a variety of evidentiary sources. Test takers will be presented with a debatable issue along with different perspectives that provide additional context. These perspectives, each of which is conveyed in a few sentences, are representative of a system of beliefs or values. Together, the perspectives illustrate competing ideologies and arguments around a particular issue. The test taker will then draft an argumentative essay in which they take a position, while addressing some of the arguments and ideas presented by the other perspectives.

The new argumentative writing task is designed to give test takers a clearer, more authentic writing purpose than the former “decision based” LSAT Writing prompt, which was more narrowly focused on pure logical reasoning. When test takers have an opportunity to construct an original thesis and defend it based on their own judgment and analytical evaluation, rather than following pre-ordained lines of reasoning, we can better assess a broader and more complex range of decision-making skills that writers engage in.

By adopting this design, we’re not only enabling individuals to have a more authentic voice in their argument, but we are also better positioned to evaluate the writer’s ability to employ various rhetorical techniques, evidentiary strategies, and other important aspects of argumentative writing.  

Given the additional reading required, we will be adding a short preparatory period to the LSAT Writing test, which test takers can use to organize their thoughts using guided prewriting analysis questions and to take notes using the digital notetaking tool provided in the testing environment. The questions are designed to help test takers analyze the various perspectives and generate productive ideas for their essay. Most test takers will have a total of 50 minutes – 15 minutes for prewriting analysis and 35 minutes for essay writing. Test takers with approved accommodations for additional time will have their time allocations adjusted accordingly.

To give test takers the opportunity to prepare, we have published a sample prompt as part of the free Official LSAT PrepTest library available in LawHub . Test takers can begin to familiarize themselves with the new approach and take practice LSAT Writing sessions in the official LSAT Writing environment.

We are also providing a sample of the new LSAT Writing prompt on LSAC.org . It should be noted that this LSAC.org sample is a “text only” version and that test functionality, including the timing function, is included in the practice environment in LawHub .

LSAT Writing has always been a part of the LSAT. Over the years, law schools have expressed the desire to make greater use of the writing portion in their holistic evaluations, so we moved to a digital assessment (instead of handwritten) so that schools could receive, read, and evaluate the students’ work. The changes we are announcing today will make the writing sample even more useful to schools in their evaluation and admission processes.

For the 2024-2025 testing cycle, LSAT Writing will remain an unscored part of the LSAT. Over the course of the 2024-2025 testing cycle, we will be analyzing data of the new LSAT Writing prompt to assess its validity and reliability with a long-term goal of providing a scored LSAT Writing assessment that schools may use in their holistic admission process.

We are excited to offer this new approach to LSAT Writing, starting August 1. We believe this new approach will allow test takers to demonstrate their writing skills even more effectively and will provide schools with even more insight into the strengths and potential of applicants.

Share this /

Susan L. Krinsky