hamitic hypothesis quizlet

• History in Africa

The "Hamitic Hypothesis" in Indigenous West African Historical Thought

• African Studies Association
• Volume 36, 2009
• pp. 293-314
• 10.1353/hia.2010.0004
• View Citation

Additional Information

Project MUSE Mission

Project MUSE promotes the creation and dissemination of essential humanities and social science resources through collaboration with libraries, publishers, and scholars worldwide. Forged from a partnership between a university press and a library, Project MUSE is a trusted part of the academic and scholarly community it serves.

2715 North Charles Street Baltimore, Maryland, USA 21218

+1 (410) 516-6989 [email protected]

©2024 Project MUSE. Produced by Johns Hopkins University Press in collaboration with The Sheridan Libraries.

Now and Always, The Trusted Content Your Research Requires

Built on the Johns Hopkins University Campus

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.

Ideas of 'Race' in the History of the Humanities pp 251–272 Cite as

“Nordics” and “Hamites”: Joseph Deniker and the Rise (and Fall) of Scientific Racism

• Nigel Eltringham 4  
• First Online: 27 April 2017

866 Accesses

Part of the book series: Palgrave Critical Studies of Antisemitism and Racism ((PCSAR))

The “Hamite” as “Caucasian” civilizers of Central Africa was central to colonial discourse in Rwanda-Urundi in the first half of the twentieth century and the notion of Rwandan Tutsi as “Hamitic invaders” was to return as a component in the 1994 Rwandan genocide. The idea of an exogenous, Hamitic aristocracy in East and Central Africa is pronounced in the writings (from 1913) of Charles Seligman (1873–1940) in which “race” infers biogenetic superiority. Seligman drew on the work of the Italian anthropologist Guisseppe Sergi (1841–1936) who, in turn, drew on the work of the French anthropologist Joseph Deniker (1852–1918). Another key racial theory of the early twentieth century implicated in genocide can also be traced to Deniker. In The Myth of the Twentieth Century (1930), the Nazi race theorist Alfred Rosenberg adopted “Nordic” (as Aryan) from Madison Grant’s The Passing of the Great Race (1916), who had, in turn adopted “Nordic Race” from William Z. Ripley’s The Races of Europe (1899). Ripley had adopted “Nordic” from Deniker. In other words, fantasies of both the “Hamite” and the “Aryan” as biogenetically superior races can both be traced to Deniker. And yet, notions of racial (biogenetic) superiority are entirely absent from Deniker who did not associate any intellectual or “cultural” superiority with any of his “races.” Contrary to the idea of a progression from early twentieth-century writings espousing “biogenetic” racial superiority to our contemporary rejection of racial determinism, there was, in reality, a regression from Deniker’s late nineteenth-century position.

• Lake Region
• Intellectual Ability
• Ancient Egyptian
• International Military Tribunal
• Rwandan Genocide

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

A part of this chapter originally appeared in Nigel Eltringham, “‘Invaders who have stolen the country’: The Hamitic Hypothesis, Race and the Rwandan Genocide,” Social Identities 12 (2006): 425–444. See http://www.tandfonline.com .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution .

Buying options

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

University of Sussex, Brighton, UK

Nigel Eltringham

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

Amos Morris-Reich

University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

Dirk Rupnow

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter.

Eltringham, N. (2017). “Nordics” and “Hamites”: Joseph Deniker and the Rise (and Fall) of Scientific Racism. In: Morris-Reich, A., Rupnow, D. (eds) Ideas of 'Race' in the History of the Humanities. Palgrave Critical Studies of Antisemitism and Racism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49953-6_10

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49953-6_10

Published : 27 April 2017

Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-319-49952-9

Online ISBN : 978-3-319-49953-6

eBook Packages : History History (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

• lightbulb_outline Advanced Search

Cite This Item

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the links below to export the citation to your chosen bibliographic manager.

Copy Citation

Chicago manual of style 17th edition (author date), apa 7th edition, mla 9th edition, harvard reference format (author date), export citation, your privacy.

This website uses cookies to analyze traffic so we can improve your experience using eHRAF.

By clicking “Accept all cookies”, you agree eHRAF can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy .

The Hamitic Hypothesis; Its Origin and Functions in Time Perspective Author(s): Edith R. Sanders Source: The Journal of African History, Vol. 10, No. 4 (1969), pp. 521-532 Published by: Cambridge University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/179896 . Accessed: 08/05/2014 00:32

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected] .

Cambridge University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of African History.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 128.95.104.66 on Thu, 8 May 2014 00:32:32 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Journal of African History, x, 4 (I969), pp. 521-532 521 Printed in Great Britain

THE HAMITIC HYPOTHESIS; ITS ORIGIN AND FUNCTIONS IN TIME PERSPECTIVE1

BY EDITH R. SANDERS

THE Hamitic hypothesis is well-known to students of Africa . It states that everything of value ever found in Africa was brought there by the Hamites , allegedlya branchof the Caucasianrace. Seligmanformulates it as follows:

Apart from relatively late Semitic influence... the civilizationsof Africa are the civilizations of the Hamites, its history the record of these peoples and of their interaction with the two other African stocks, the Negro and the Bushman, whether this influence was exerted by highly civilized Egyptians or by such wider pastoralistsas are representedat the present day by the Beja and Somali ...The incoming Hamites were pastoral 'Europeans'-arriving wave after wave-better armedas well as quickerwitted than the darkagricultural Negroes.2 On closer examinationof the history of the idea, there emerges a pre- vious elaborateHamitic theory, in which the Hamites are believed to be Negroes. It becomes clear then that the hypothesis is symptomaticof the nature of race relations,that it has changed its content if not its nomen- clature through time, and that it has become a problem of epistemology. In the beginning there was the Bible . The word ' Ham ' appearsthere for the first time in Genesis, chapterfive. Noah cursed Ham, his youngest son, and said: Cursed be Canaan ; A servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren. And he said, Blessed be Jehovah, the God of Shem ; And let Canaanbe his servant. God enlarge Japhet, And let him dwell in the tent of Shem; And let Canaanbe his servant.

Then follows an enumerationof the sons of Noah: Shem, Ham, Japhet, and their sons who were born to them after the flood. The Bible makes no mention of racial differencesamong the ancestors of mankind. It is much later that an idea of race appears with reference to the sons of Noah; it concerns the descendants of Ham. The Babylonian Talmud, a collection of oral traditions of the Jews, appeared in the sixth century A.D.; it states 1 This topic has been explored in detail in E. R. Sanders 'Hamites in Anthropology and History: A Preliminary Study', unpublished manuscript, Columbia University , 1965. 2 C. G. Seligman, Races of Africa (I930), 96. All subsequent editions make the same statement (I957, I966). 34 AHX

This content downloaded from 128.95.104.66 on Thu, 8 May 2014 00:32:32 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 522 EDITH R. SANDERS that the descendants of Ham are cursed by being black , and depicts Ham as a sinful man and his progeny as degenerates.3 Thus, early tradition identified the Hamites with Negroes and endowed them with both certain physiognomical attributes and an undesirable character. This notion persisted in the Middle Ages, when fanciful rabbinical expansions of the Genesis stories were still being made. Ham, some of them said, was supposed to have emasculated Noah, who cursed him thus: 'Now I cannotbeget the fourth son whose childrenI would have orderedto serve you and your brothers!Therefore it must be Canaan,your firstborn,whom they enslave. And since you have disabled me... doing ugly things in blackness of night, Canaan'schildren shall be borne ugly and black! Moreover, because you twisted your head around to see my nakedness, your grandchildren'shair shall be twisted into kinks, and their eyes red; again because your lips jested at my misfortune, theirs shall swell; and because you neglected my nakedness, they shall go naked, and their male members shall be shamefully elongated! Men of this race are called Negroes, their forefatherCanaan commanded them to love theft and fornication,to be banded together in hatredof their masters and never to tell the truth.'4 Scholars who study the Hebrew myths of the Genesis claim that these oral traditions grew out of a need of the Israelites to rationalize their subjugation of Canaan, a historical fact validated by the myth of Noah's curse. Talmudic or Midrashic explanations of the myth of Ham were well known to Jewish writers in the Middle Ages, as seen in this description by Benjamin of Tudela, a twelfth-century merchant and traveller south of Aswan: There is a people... who, like animals, eat of the herbs that grow on the banks of the Nile and in their fields. They go about naked and have not the intelligence of ordinary men. They cohabit with their sisters and anyone they can find... they are taken as slaves and sold in Egypt and neighbouring countries. These sons of Ham are black slaves.5

Ideas have a way of being accepted when they become useful as a rationali- zation of an economic fact of life. As Graves and Patai put it: 'That Negroes are doomed to serve men of lighter color was a view gratefully borrowed by Christians in the Middle Ages; a severe shortage of cheap manual labor caused by the plague made the reinstitution of slavery attractive'. The notion of the Negro-Hamite was generally accepted by the year 1600. In one of the earliest post-medieval references found, Leo Africanus, the great Arab traveller and one-time protege of Pope Leo X, wrote about Negro Africans as being descended from Ham. His translator, the English- man John Pory, followed the text with his own commentary in which he

3 T. F. Gossett, Race-the History of an Idea in America (I963), 5. 4 R. Graves and R. Patai, Hebrew Myths (1964), i2I. 5 R. Hess. 'Travels of Benjamin of Tudela', J. Afr. Hist. vi, i (1965), I7.

This content downloaded from 128.95.104.66 on Thu, 8 May 2014 00:32:32 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions THE HAMITIC HYPOTHESIS 523 stressed the punishment suffered by Ham's descendants, thus reinforcing the myth in modern times.6 Some seventeenth-century writers7 acquaint us with notions current in their time by citing European authors, known or unknown today, who wrote, directly or indirectly, about the low position of Negro-Hamites in the world. This was further strengthened by European travellers who went to Africa for reasons of trade8 or curiosity.9 Concurrently, there existed another point of view, in which the term 'Hamite' denoted a sinner of some sort, not necessarily a Negro, although the characteristics of the Hamite were the same negative ones variously attributed to the Negro.10 The idea of a Negro-Hamite was not universally accepted. Some indi- viduals1 believed that the blackness of the Negro was caused by the soil on which he lived together with the extreme heat of the sun. Others doubted that either the climate theory or the efficacy of Noah's curse were respon- sible for the Negro's physiognomy, but reasoned that 'their colour and wool are innate or seminal, from their first beginning.. '12 By and large, however, the Negro was seen as a descendant of Ham, bearing the stigma of Noah's curse. This view was compatible with the various interests extant at that time. On the one hand, it allowed exploita- tion of the Negro for economic gain to remain undisturbed by any Christian doubts as to the moral issues involved. 'A servant of servants shall he be' clearly meant that the Negro was preordained for slavery. Neither indi- vidual nor collective guilt was to be borne for a state of the world created by the Almighty. On the other hand, Christian cosmology could remain at peace, because identifying the Negro as a Hamite-thus as a brother- kept him in the family of man in accordance with the biblical story of the creation of mankind. The eighteenth century saw an efflorescence of scientific inquiry, which directed its efforts to the understanding of man's place in the world. Modern science had developed a century earlier and had attempted to establish order in the universe; the nature of man, however, was not part of scientific investigation, but remained in the province of theology. This state of affairs became unsatisfactory to the later scholars, namely the philosophes of the Enlightenment, who tried to apply scientific methods to the study of man and whose theories as to the origin of the race often came into direct conflict with the Scriptures. The Negro's place in nature was the subject of great debate at that time. One of the crucial issues of this debate was the question of unity in 6 J. Pory, Translation of Leo Africanus, Hakluyt Society, xcII-xciv (London, I896). 7 For instance, the Italian philosopher Campanella and a Mr Mede who was cited by seventeenth-century authors (see below) but whose own writings I was unable to find. 8 Richard Jobson, The Golden Trade (1623). 9 Sir Thomas Herbert, Some Years of Travels into Divers Parts of Africa (I677). 10 E. Pagitt, Heresiography or a Description of the Hereticks, printed by W. W. for W. Lee (London, 1646). 11 Herbert, op. cit. 27. 12 Cited by T. Bendyshe, The History of Anthropology : Memoir read before the Anthropological Society of London I (1863-4), 371. 34-2

This content downloaded from 128.95.104.66 on Thu, 8 May 2014 00:32:32 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 524 EDITH R. SANDERS mankind, or monogenism , as opposed to the separate creation of races or polygenism .13 The concept of the Negro-Hamite was steadily losing ground because theological interpretation of the peopling of the world did not satisfy the men of the Enlightenment. The myth was now kept alive mainly by the clergy, who tried to keep their hold on the laity by discredit- ing the savants as infidels.14 The polygenist theories led to a widespread belief that the Negro was sub- human and at the same time de-emphasized his relationship to the accursed Ham. The monogenist theories attempted to explain Negro physical characteristics by natural rather than mythical causes. The con- servative theologians still clung to the now classic exegesis of the Old Testament and discouraged any attempt at a different interpretation.15At the end of the eighteenth century, many famous men espoused and popular- ized one of two views regarding the Negro. One was that he was the result of 'degeneration' due to various environmental conditions.16 The other and more frequent view was that he was a separate creation, subhuman in character."7 The Western world, which was growing increasingly rich on the insti- tution of slavery, grew increasingly reluctant to look at the Negro slave and see him as a brother under the skin. Some writers18feel that the image of the Negro deteriorated in direct proportion to his value as a commodity, and the proudly rational and scientific white man was impatient to find some definitive proof for the exclusion of the Negro from the family of man and for ultimate denial of common ancestry. The catalyst which made this possible was an historical event, namely Napoleon's invasion of Egypt in 1798. Because Napoleon shared the passion for science and antiquities that was the hallmark of the Enlighten- ment, he invited archaeologists and other scientists to join him. The experts who had accompanied him discovered treasures that led them to found the new science of Egyptology and an institute on Egyptian soil. These

13 Some of the outstanding monogenists were Linnaeus, Buffon and Blumenbach. Some outstanding polygenists were Voltaire , Lord Kames and Charles White (an English physician and author of An Account of the Regular Gradations in Man and in Different Animals (London, I799)). 14 Lord Bolingbroke, an English friend of Voltaire, attempted a different interpretation of Genesis which was answered by a book by Robert Clayton, Bishop of Clough, entitled A Vindication of the Histories of Old and New Testament, in I753. 15 For instance, the Rev. Samuel Stanhope Smith , a professor at Princeton, then called College of New Jersey, an institution founded in I746 to train Presbyterian ministers. He wrote An Essay on the Causes of the Variety of Complexion ( Philadelphia , I787). 16 Buffon, cited by L. Eiseley, Darwin's Century (1961), 35-46; and Dr Benjamin Rush (American physician and son-in-law of Benjamin Franklin ), cited by J. Greene, 'The American debate on the Negro's place in nature, 1780-I815', Journal of History of Ideas, xv (1954), are examples of this school of thought. 17 Voltaire, The Works of Voltaire: A Contemporary Version modernized by W. J. Fleming (New York, 1901); and Lord Kames, Sketches of the History of Man (Edinburgh, 1780), are examples of this group. 18 E. Williams, Capitalism and Slavery (University of Carolina Press, 1944); P. D. Curtin Image of Africa (New York, I964).

This content downloaded from 128.95.104.66 on Thu, 8 May 2014 00:32:32 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions THE HAMITIC HYPOTHESIS 525 discoveries were to revolutionize history's view of the Egyptian and lay the basis for a new Hamitic myth. Napoleon's scientists made the revolutionary discovery that the begin- nings of Western civilization were earlier than the civilizations of the Romans and the Greeks . Mysterious monuments, evidences of the begin- nings of science, art, and well-preserved mummies were uncovered. Attention was drawn to the population that lived among these ancient splendours and was presumably descended from the people who had created them. It was a well-mixed population, such as it is at the present time, with physical types running from light to black and with many physiognomical variations. The French scholars came to the conclusion that the Egyptians were Negroids . Denon, one of Napoleon's original expedition, describes them as such: '...a broad and flat nose, very short, a large flattened mouth... thick lips, etc.'.19 The view that the Egyptians were ' Negroid ' and highly civilized apparently existed before the French expedition to Egypt. Count Volney, a French traveller to the Middle East , spent four years in Egypt and Syria and wrote in a well-known book: How are we astonished... when we reflect that to the race of negroes, at present our slaves, and the objects of our contempt, we owe our arts, sciences, and... when we recollect that, in the midst of these nations, who call themselves the friends of liberty and humanity, the most barbarousof slaveriesis justified; and that it is even a problem whether the understandingsof negroes be of the same species with that of white men!20 In spite of the deserved respect which Volney enjoyed, his opinions on this subject were not accepted. Nevertheless, the Egyptian expedition made it impossible to hide that seeming paradox of a population of Negroids who were, once upon a time, originators of the oldest civilization of the West. The conflicting ideologies which existed in the West made it difficult for the various proponents of these ideologies to deal with the notion as it stood. Such a notion upset the main existing tenets; it could not be internalized by those individuals on both sides of the Atlantic who were convinced of the innate inferiority of the Negro, nor by those who adhered to the biblical explanation of the origin of races. To the latter such an idea was blasphemous, as Noah's curse condemned the Hamites to misery and precluded high original achievement. Egypt became the focus of great interest among the scientists as well as among the lay public. The fruits of this interest were not long in coming. A few short years after the Egyptian expedition, there appeared a large number of publications dealing with Egypt and Egyptians. Many of these works seemed to have had as their main purpose an attempt to prove in some way that the Egyptians were not Negroes. The arguments which 19 V. Denon. Travels in Upper and Lower Egypt (London, 1803). 20 Volney, Travels through Syria and Egypt 1783-1784-1785 (1787), 83.

This content downloaded from 128.95.104.66 on Thu, 8 May 2014 00:32:32 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 526 EDITH R. SANDERS follow brought forth the questions of language, migration, ancient writers, and the existence of mummies.21 The polygenist theories of race postulated that as each race was created separately, so it was endowed with its own language. Because the Coptic language was clearly related to Arabic, it was convenient to draw the conclusion that the nations who spoke related lan- guages must have proceeded from one parental stock. Since the Ethiopians, Nubians and other allied peoples were declared not to be Negro by Euro- pean travellers, the Egyptians could not be said to be of African (Negro) race, as all of these peoples were colonists from Syria or Arabia Felix. Since ancient writers were silent on the subject of the Negroid physiognomy of the Egyptian, it was understood that in effect Egyptians were not Negroid, as such a fact would have startled the ancients into a detailed description. Herodotus himself, ran the argument, described them in comparative not absolute terms. Thus 'black and woolly haired' meant black as compared to the Greeks and woolly haired as compared to the Greeks. Some said that the existence of the mummies itself constituted sufficient proof that these people were non-Negro; to W. G. Browne the '... prescience of that people concerning errors into which posterity might fall, exhibits irrefragable proof of their features and of the colour of their skin...,'22 clearly im- plying, therefore, that the ancient Egyptians knew they could be mistaken for Negroes, and so left their bodies in evidence to refute such an allegation. Browne insisted that the Egyptians were white. Although he himself did not call them 'Hamites', he paved the way for his successors who were to identify the Egyptians as such. Modern times showed their influence on theological writings as well. The new Hamitic concept made its appearance quite early in the nineteenth century, spearheaded by the clergy. If the Negro was a descendant of Ham, and Ham was cursed, how could he be the creator of a great civilization? It follows logically that the theologians had to take another look, both at the Bible and at its explanation of the origin of the races of man. The veracity of the Scriptures obviously could not be denied. New interpreta- tions of the meaning of Scriptures were offered. Egyptians, it was now remembered, were descendants of Mizraim , a son of Ham. Noah had only cursed Canaan-son-of-Ham, so that it was Canaan and his progeny alone who suffered the malediction. Ham, his other sons, and their children were not included in the curse. For example, the Reverend M. Russell took up the issue of the Hamites and the Egyptians: In the sacred writings of the Hebrews it [Egypt] is called Mizraim... the name which is applied to Egypt by the Arabs of the present day. The Copts retain

21 The arguments presented here are those of W. G. Browne, a British traveller to Egypt, who was representative of this type of thinking; he was one of the first to have his ideas published. These ideas contained the seeds of the new Hamitic myth that was to emerge in the very near future. W. G. Browne, Travels in Africa, Egypt and Syria (London, I806). 22 W. G. Browne, op. cit. I70-5.

This content downloaded from 128.95.104.66 on Thu, 8 May 2014 00:32:32 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions THE HAMITIC HYPOTHESIS 527 the native word 'Chemia' which perhaps has some relationto Cham, the son of Noah; or as Plutarchinsinuates, may only denote that darknessof colour which appearsin a rich soil or in the human eye.23 He admits that there is a peculiarity of feature common to all the Copts, but asserts that neither in countenance nor personal form is there any resemblance to the Negro. He and other scholars re-read the Book of Genesis focusing on the genealogy of the three ancestors of mankind, and especially Ham. The histories of the sons of Ham were discussed, particularly those of Cush and Mizraim. The question was raised then whether it was Ham who had been cursed after all, or was it only Canaan?24It was indeed Canaan who was cursed, but the rest of the progeny of Ham went on to prosper. So it came to pass that the Egyptians emerged as Hamites, Caucasoid, uncursed and capable of high civilization. This view became widely accep- ted and it is reflected in the theological literature of that era. A survey of Biblical dictionaries of the period is quite revealing as to the wide accep- tance of the new Hamites. Cyclopedia of Biblical Literature, published in 1846 by John Kitto, D.D., F.S.A., has a long article under the name Ham. It is stressed that the curse of Noah is directed only against Canaan. The general opinion is stated that all southern nations derive from Ham. How- ever, the article admits difficulties in tracing the history of the most important Hamitic nations-the Cushites, the Phoenicians and the Egyp- tians-due to their great intermixture with foreign peoples. Thus, the early decades of the nineteenth century greeted a new Hamitic myth, this time with a Caucasoid protagonist. At the same time the scientific bases of the new Hamitic myth were being devised and, allegedly, substantiated. Perhaps because slavery was both still legal and profitable in the United States , and because it was deemed necessary and right to protect it, there arose an American school of anthropology which attempted to prove scientifically that the Egyptian was a Caucasian, far removed from the inferior Negro. As Mannheim said, each intellectual stand is functionally dependent on the 'differentiated social group reality standing behind it.'25 Such workers as Dr Morton,26 assisted in various ways by Josiah Nott27 and George Gliddon ,28 collected, measured, interpreted and described the human crania. The comparative studies made of these crania led Morton to believe that the Egyptian osteological formation was Caucasian, and that it was a race indigenous to the Nile Valley. He also postulated fixity of 23 M. Russell, View of Ancient and Modern Egypt (New York, I831), 27. 24 It was the same doubt which had been formulated by Lord Bolingbroke o00 years before. But now the doubt was general, and the answer much different from that given by Bishop Clayton. 25 K. Mannheim, Essays in Sociology of Knowledge (I952), 190. 26 Samuel George Morton , American physician and professor of anatomy, author of several books on the human crania, such as Crania Americana and Crania Egyptica (I844). 27 Josiah Clark Nott, an American scientist and collaborator with Gliddon on Types of Mankind (I854). 28 George R. Gliddon, an American vice-consul in Cairo and an admirer of Dr Morton, whom he supplied with Egyptian skulls.

This content downloaded from 128.95.104.66 on Thu, 8 May 2014 00:32:32 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 528 EDITH R. SANDERS species, considering it a primordial organic form, permanent through time. Nott and Gliddon, who acted as Morton's apostles, also bolstered his interpretation by explaining the Negroid admixture of the Egyptians as being a population which descended from numerous Negro slaves kept by Egyptians in ancient days. These theories attempted to include the Egyp- tians in the branch of the Caucasoid race, to explain their accomplishments on the basis of innate racial superiority, and to exclude the Negro from any possibility of achievement by restating his alleged inferiority and his position of 'natural slave'. The conclusions of American scholars found a receptive audience in Europe, where craniology was considered to yield positive and meaningful data, a point of view expressed by two scientists of world renown, the Drs Retzius of Sweden and Broca of France . The intellectual vogue of the day was the stress on 'facts', not abstract theories, in all disciplines. Craniology provided a seemingly concrete 'fact', thus fitting in neatly with the prevailing academic attitudes. Again, there was no complete consensus among anthropologists. The most prominent opponent of the American school of anthropology was James Prichard of England,29 who was not convinced that the Egyptians belonged to the Caucasian race . The science of philology added weight to the new Hamitic theory. This young science was developing at a time when language and race were considered to be inextricably bound together, an approach which lent itself to polygenist theories. Bunsen,30a philologist and an Egyptologist, reported two branches of cognate languages, the Semitic and what he called the Iranian. Khamitic or Egyptian he postulated to be anterior to Semitic and antedeluvian. Here was irrefutable proof, it seemed, that the Hamitic language belonged to the Caucasoid peoples, and it was eagerly adopted by scholars and theologians. The new Hamitic myth was gaining momentum. The late nineteenth century provided two new ideologies which utilized and expanded the concept of the Caucasoid Hamite: colonialism and modem racism . Both shaped the European attitude to Africa and Africans. The travellers found a variety of physical types in Africa, and their ethno- centrism made them value those who looked more like themselves. These were declared to be Hamitic, or of Hamitic descent, and endowed with the myth of superior achievements and considerable beneficial influence on their Negro brothers. John Hanning Speke31 was seminal to the Hamitic hypothesis which we know today. Upon discovery of the kingdom of Buganda with its complex political organization, he attributed its 'barbaric civilization' to a nomadic pastoralist race related to the Hamitic Galla, thus setting the tone for the interpreters to come. The Hamites were designated as early culture-bearers in Africa owing to the natural superiority of intel- lect and character of all Caucasoids. Such a viewpoint had dual merit for European purposes: it maintained the image of the Negro as an inferior

29 J. Prichard, The Natural History of Man (London, I855). 30 C. K. J. Bunsen, Egypt's Place in Universal History (London, 1848-67). 31 J. H. Speke, Journal of the Discovery of the Source of the Nile (New York, 1964).

This content downloaded from 128.95.104.66 on Thu, 8 May 2014 00:32:32 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions THE HAMITIC HYPOTHESIS 529 being, and it pointed to the alleged fact that development could come to him only by mediation of the white race.32It also implied a self-appointed duty of the 'higher' races to civilize the 'lower' ones, a notion which was eventually formulated as 'the white man's burden'. At this point in time the Hamite found himself in an ambiguous position. On the one hand he was considered to be Caucasoid, that is superior. On the other hand he was a native, part of the 'burden', a man to benefit from European civilization. Here the Teutonic theory of race showed its adaptability. Having devised a hierarchy within the Caucasian race, the builders of the theory placed the Teutonic Anglo-Saxon on top of the ladder with the Slavs on the lowest rung. But an even lower position could always be added, and the Hamites filled the space admirably. 'Politics and race theories seemed natural allies';33 they provided a seemingly cogent ideological framework for colonial expansion and exploitation. The beginning of the twentieth century saw the Caucasoid-Hamite solidly established. Science supplanted theology as the alpha and omega of truth. Racial 'scientific' classifications, which had to face the physical diversity of the various 'Hamites', established a separate Hamitic branch of the Caucasian race, closely following the creation of a linguistic entity called a family of Hamitic languages. Linguistic typologies were based on racial types and racial classifications on linguistic definitions. The con- fusion surrounding the 'Hamite' was steadily compounded as the terms of reference became increasingly overlapping and vague. The racial classi- fication of 'Hamites' encompassed a great variety of types from fair- skinned, blonde, blue-eyed ( Berbers ) to black (Ethiopians). Two early racial typologies were devised by Sergi34and Brinton.35 Sergi called certain populations Hamitic chiefly on the basis of their linguistic characteristics. Among these were the inhabitants of the Sahara , the Berbers and even such people 'who have wholly, or partially, lost their language', like the Egyptians, Watusi and Masai. They were divided into the Eastern branch, and the Northern branch. The Eastern branch included the ancient and modern Egyptians (excluding the Arabs), Nubians, Bejas, Abyssinians, Gallas, Danakil, Somali, Masai and Watusi (or Wahuma). The Northern branch included the Berbers, Tebus, Fulbes (Fulani) and the Gaunches of the Canaries.36Brinton denoted Lybians, Egyptians and the East African groups as Hamitic, and remarked that each of these groups is distinguished by physical and linguistic differences.37 He went on to state that 'the physical appearance of the Libyan peoples distinctly marks them as

32 With respect to the role played by such theories in English colonial expansion see E. Sanderson, Africa in the Nineteenth Century (London, 1898); F. D. Lugard, The Rise of our East African Empire (Edinburgh, I898); J. Scott Keltie, Partition of Africa (London, I895); W. L. Langer, The Diplomacy of Imperialism, 189o-1902 (New York, I935). 33 J. Barzun, Race: A Modern Superstition (New York, I965), 33. 34 G. Sergi, The Mediterranean Race (New York, 1901). 35 D. G. Brinton, Races and Peoples (New York, 1890). 36 Sergi, op. cit. 40-41. 37 Brinton, op. cit. 115.

This content downloaded from 128.95.104.66 on Thu, 8 May 2014 00:32:32 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 530 EDITH R. SANDERS members of the white race, often of uncommonly pure blood. As the race elsewhere, they present the blonde and brunette type, the latter predomin- ant, but the former extremely well marked'. Because Brinton also considered the Iberians to be Hamites, and not Basques, his description of the Libyans seems to imply that the Libyans are a sort of half-way house of the 'Hamitic' race, because they combine elements of the blonde Hamites (of Europe) and the brunette Hamites (of East Africa). This reasoning appears to be no more logical than that of Sergi, who first bases a racial group on its lin- guistic characteristics and then includes in it people who have 'wholly or partially' lost the language! Linguistic classifications were based on geography, racial characteristics and occupation, rather than on rigorous methodology pertaining solely to language. Grammatical gender became the main diagnostic of the so- called Hamitic languages. Although grammatical gender exists in many un- related languages of the world, it was not found in the languages of the 'true' Negro (racial category again). Thus linguistic typologies had racial bases just as racial typologies were based on linguistics.38 Because the Hamites discovered in Africa south of the Sahara were described as pastoralists and the traditional occupation of the Negro was supposedly agriculture, pastoralism and all its attributes became endowed with an aura of superiority of culture, giving the Hamite a third dimension: cultural identity. The historians who began to compile histories of Africa wrote with an often unconscious racial bias, and accepted the dicta of the discoverers of that continent as indisputable proven facts and presented them as historical explanations of the African past.39 Much of anthropology gave its support to the Hamitic myth. Seligman found a cultural substratum of supposedly great influence in Africa.40 In 1930 he published his famous Races of Africa, which went through several editions and which was reprinted in I966 still basically unchanged. He refined the Sergi-devised classifications of Hamitic peoples, adding the category of Nilotes or 'half-Hamites'. Every trace and/or sign of what is usually termed 'civilized' in Africa was attributed to alien, mainly Hamitic, origin. In such a way, iron-working was supposed to have been introduced to the Negroes by pastoral Hamites, along with complex political institu- tions, irrigation and age-grade systems.41 Archaeological findings of any

38 Early work on the Hamitic language family was done by R. N. Cust, A Sketch of African Languages (London, 1883); also Lepsius and Meinhof. 39 See A. R. Atterbury, Islam inAfrica (New York, I899); J. W. Gregory, The Foundation of British East Africa (London, I9oI); K. Johnston, Africa (London, 1884); J. Scott Keltie op. cit.; E. Sanderson, op. cit.; Capt. C. H. Stigand, The Land of Zinj (London, I913); and A. S. White, The Development of Africa (London, I890). 40 'Some Aspects of the Hamitic Problem in the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan ', Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute, LIII, 1913. 41 S. Cole, The Prehistory of East Africa (Hammondsworth, 1954); K. Oberg in African Political Systems, M. Fortes and E. Evans-Pritchard (eds.); D. Westermann, The African Today and Tomorrow (Oxford, 1949), are only a few of a long list of examples.

This content downloaded from 128.95.104.66 on Thu, 8 May 2014 00:32:32 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions THE HAMITIC HYPOTHESIS 53I magnitude were also ascribed to outside influences, and kept the Negro African out of his own culture history.42 In the eyes of the world the Negro stood stripped of any intellectual or artistic genius and of any ability at all which would allow him, now, in the past, or in the future, to be the master of his life and country. The confluence of modern nationalism and the ensuing modern racism evolved from earlier nineteenth-century national romanticism and devel- oped through theories of de Gobineau and adaptations of the Darwinian revolution. It was echoed in all Western nations, culminating finally in the ideology of Nazi Germany. Because that leading exponent of racism became the enemy of most of Europe and of the United States during World War II, German-championed ideology seemed to have lost some of its popularity. The Hamitic myth ceased to be useful with African nations which have been gaining their independence one by one, and the growing African nationalism drew scholarly attention to Africa's past. Many of the scholars were unencumbered by colonial ties; some of them were them- selves African. They began to discover that Africa was not a tabula rasa, but that it had a past, a history which could be reconstructed; that it was a continent which knew empire builders at a time when large areas of Europe stagnated in the Dark Ages; that it knew art and commerce. Some writers started to throw doubts on the Hamitic hypothesis by discovering indigenous Negro achievement of the past,43 while others attempted to explode it.44 Still the myth endures, is occasionally subverted by new terminology (such as 'Southern Cushites',)45 and stubbornly refuses to give way and allow an unbiased look at what can be validly ascer- tained from African culture history. It would be well-nigh impossible to point to an individual and recognize in him a Hamite according to racial, linguistic and cultural characteristics to fit the image that has been presen- ted to us for so long. Such an individual does not exist. The word still exists, endowed with a mythical meaning; it endures through time and history, and, like a chameleon, changes its colour to reflect the changing light. As the word became flesh, it engendered many problems of scholarship. 42 See early writings on Great Zimbabwe: D. B. Maclver, Mediaeval Rhodesia (New York, 1906); W. C. Willoughby, Race Problem in New Africa (Oxford, 1923); E. Naville, 'The Land of Punt and the Hamites', Journal of Transactions of the Victoria Institute, LVII (I925). 43 G. Caton-Thompson, The Zimbabwe Culture: Ruins and Reactions (Oxford, 193I); J. P. Crazzolara, The Lwoo, Missioni Africane ( Italy , 1950); two instances of such discoveries. 44 See for example D. Apter, Political Kingdom in Uganda (Princeton, 1961), 63; L. Fallers, Bantu Bureaucracy, East African Institute of Social Research (I956), 27-9; J. H. Greenberg, Studies in African Linguistic Classifications (New Haven, I955); I. Wallerstein, Africa, the Politics of Independence (New York, 1961), 12-13; D. McCall, Africa in Time Perspective (Boston, I964), 136-138. 45 E.g. G. P. Murdock, Africa, Its Peoples and Their Culture History (New York, I959).

This content downloaded from 128.95.104.66 on Thu, 8 May 2014 00:32:32 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 532 EDITH R. SANDERS

SUMMARY The anthropological and historical literature dealing with Africa abounds with references to a people called the 'Hamites'. 'Hamite', as used in these writings, designates an African population supposedly distinguished by its race- Caucasian-and its language family, from the Negro inhabitants of the rest of Africa below the Sahara. There exists a widely held belief in the Western world that everything of value ever found in Africa was brought there by these Hamites, a people inher- ently superior to the native populations. This belief, often referred to as the Hamitic hypothesis, is a convenient explanation for all the signs of civilization found in Black Africa. It was these Caucasoids, we read, who taught the Negro how to manufacture iron and who were so politically sophisticated that they organized the conquered territories into highly complex states with themselves as the ruling elites. This hypothesis was preceded by another elaborate Hamitic theory. The earlier theory, which gained currency in the sixteenth century, was that the Hamites were black savages, 'natural slaves'-and Negroes. This identification of the Hamite with the Negro, a view which persisted throughout the eighteenth century, served as a rationale for slavery, using Biblical interpre- tations in support of its tenets. The image of the Negro deteriorated in direct proportion to the growth of the importance of slavery, and it became imperative for the white man to exclude the Negro from the brotherhood of races. Napo- leon's expedition to Egypt in I798 became the historical catalyst that provided the Western World with the impetus to turn the Hamite into a Caucasian. The Hamitic concept had as its function the portrayal of the Negro as an inherently inferior being and to rationalize his exploitation. In the final analysis it was possible because its changing aspects were supported by the prevailing intellectual viewpoints of the times.

This content downloaded from 128.95.104.66 on Thu, 8 May 2014 00:32:32 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Charles Gabriel Seligman and the Hamitic Hypothesis

Charles Gabriel Seligman (1873 – 1940), image: William Rothsteinעברית: ויליאם רוטשטיין, CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

On December 24 , 1873 ,  British physician and ethnologist Charles Gabriel Seligman was born. Seligman ‘s main ethnographic work described the culture of the Vedda people of Sri Lanka and the Shilluk people of the Sudan . He was a proponent of the Hamitic hypothesis , according to which, some civilizations of Africa were thought to have been founded by Caucasoid Hamitic peoples.

Charles Gabriel Seligman – Background

Seligman was born into a middle class Jewish family in London, UK, the only son of wine merchant Hermann Seligmann  and his wife Olivia (Charles shortened his name to Seligman after 1914). His interests in natural science became early manifest: while still at a preparatory school, he began to collect butterflies and, at the house of a boy friend, carried out chemical experiments.[3] He studied medicine at St Thomas’ Hospital.Charles Gabriel Seligman studied medicine at St Thomas’ Hospital. He later worked as a physician and pathologist and then served the 1898 Cambridge University expedition to the Torres Strait. Later expedition included New Guinea, Ceylon, and Sudan. Seligman served as chair of Ethnology at the London School of Economics from 1913 to 1934.

Ethnographic Work in Africa

Charles Seligman is probably best known for his ethnographic work on the races of Africa. He recognized four major distinct races of the African continent: Bushmanoids (Bushmen), Pygmies, Negroids, and Caucasoids (Hamites). Further, the Hottentots, according to Seligman are a mixture of Bushmanoid, Negroid and Hamitic. As a staunch proponent of the Hamitic theory, in his work Seligman asserts that Hamitic Caucasoid North and Northeast Africans were responsible for introducing non-Semitic Afro-Asiatic languages (Berber-Cushitic-Egyptian) into Africa, as well as civilization, technology and all significant cultural developments.

He did acknowledge varying degrees of Negroid admixture amongst the Hamitic groups, but emphasized throughout his major works the essential racial and cultural unity of the various Hamitic peoples. In his Some Aspects of the Hamitic Problem in the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan (1913), he wrote that the Northern and Eastern Hamitic “ groups shade into each other, and in many parts a Negro admixture has taken place, nevertheless, culturally if not always physically, either division stands apart from its fellow .”

The Hamites in general, and the Northern Hamites in particular, he asserted, have close “ kinship with the European representatives of the Mediterranean race “. Drawing from Coon, Seligman also discusses fairer features observed amongst a minority of Berbers or Northern Hamites, such as lighter skin, golden beards and blue eyes. Races of Africa, however, notably questions the belief held by some anthropologists in the early 20th century that these fairer traits, such as blondism, were introduced by a Nordic variety. Seligman’s most famous work Races of Africa is regarded the first major published work in English on the ethnography of Africa, widely regarded as an “ethnological classic”.

Selected works:

• Melanesians of British New Guinea   (1910)
• The Veddas   (1911) with   Brenda Seligman
• Some Aspects of the Hamitic Problem in the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan   (1913)
• Races of Africa   (1930, 1939,1957,1966)
• The Pagan Tribes of Nilotic Sudan   (London: Routledge, 1932) with Brenda Seligman

References and Further Reading:

• [1]  Charles Seligman Short Biographical and Works at Britannica
• [2]  Charles Seligman Biographical at the Royal Society
• [3] Myers, C. S.  (1941).  “ Charles Gabriel Seligman. 1873–1940 “ .  Obituary Notices of Fellows of the Royal Society .  3 (10): 627–646.
• [4]  Catalogue of the Seligman papers   at the   Archives Division   of the   London School of Economics.
• [5] C. G. Seligman, The Races of Africa , London, 1930
• [6] Charles Seligman at Wikidata
• [7]  A Theory You’ve Never Heard Of | Michael Robinson | TEDxUniversityofHartford , TEDx Talks @ youtube
• [8] Timeline of British Ethnologists , via Wikidata and DBpedia

Tabea Tietz

Related posts, sir benjamin baker and the forth bridge, melanie klein and the psychoanalysis of children, karl pearson and mathematical statistics, the adventures of sir richard francis burton in africa, leave a reply cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Further Projects

• February (28)
• January (30)
• December (30)
• November (29)
• October (31)
• September (30)
• August (30)
• January (31)
• December (31)
• November (30)
• August (31)
• February (29)
• February (19)
• January (18)
• October (29)
• September (29)
• February (5)
• January (5)
• December (14)
• November (9)
• October (13)
• September (6)
• August (13)
• December (3)
• November (5)
• October (1)
• September (3)
• November (2)
• September (2)
• Entries RSS
• Comments RSS
• WordPress.org

Legal Notice

• Privacy Statement

• Español NEW

Hamites facts for kids

Hamites is the name formerly used for some Northern and Horn of Africa peoples in the context of a now-outdated model of dividing humanity into different races which was developed originally by Europeans in support of colonialism and slavery . The term was originally borrowed from the Book of Genesis , where it is used for the descendants of Ham, son of Noah.

The term was originally used in contrast to the other two proposed divisions of mankind based on the story of Noah: Semites and Japhetites. The appellation Hamitic was applied to the Berber , Cushitic , and Egyptian branches of the Afroasiatic language family, which, together with the Semitic branch, was thus formerly labelled "Hamito-Semitic". However, since the three Hamitic branches have not been shown to form an exclusive ( monophyletic ) phylogenetic unit of their own, separate from other Afroasiatic languages, linguists no longer use the term in this sense. Each of these branches is instead now regarded as an independent subgroup of the larger Afroasiatic family.

Beginning in the 19th century, scholars generally classified the Hamitic race as a subgroup of the Caucasian race , alongside the Aryan race and the Semitic – thus grouping the non-Semitic populations native to North Africa and the Horn of Africa , including the Ancient Egyptians . According to the Hamitic theory , this "Hamitic race" was superior to or more advanced than the " Negroid " populations of Sub-Saharan Africa . In its most extreme form, in the writings of C. G. Seligman, this theory asserted that virtually all significant achievements in African history were the work of "Hamites".

Since the 1960s the Hamitic hypothesis, and Hamitic theory, along with other theories of "race science" , has become discredited in science.

The "Curse of Ham"

Constructing the "hamitic race", development of the hamitic hypothesis, subdivisions and physical traits, "hamiticised negroes", history of the concept.

The term Hamitic originally referred to the peoples said to be descended from Ham, one of the Sons of Noah according to the Bible . According to the Book of Genesis , after Noah became drunk and Ham dishonored his father, upon awakening Noah pronounced a curse on Ham's youngest son, Canaan, stating that his offspring would be the "servants of servants". Of Ham's four sons, Canaan fathered the Canaanites, while Mizraim fathered the Egyptians , Cush the Cushites, and Phut the Libyans.

During the Middle Ages, Jews and Christians considered Ham to be the ancestor of all Africans. Noah's curse on Canaan as described in Genesis began to be interpreted by some theologians as having caused visible racial characteristics in all of Ham's offspring, notably black skin. In a passage unrelated to the curse on Canaan, the sixth-century Babylonian Talmud says that Ham and his descendants were cursed with black skin, which modern scholars have interpreted as an etiological myth for skin color. Later, Western and Islamic traders and slave owners used the concept of the "Curse of Ham" to justify the enslaving of Africans.

A significant change in Western views on Africans came about when Napoleon 's 1798 invasion of Egypt drew attention to the impressive achievements of Ancient Egypt , which could hardly be reconciled with the theory of Africans being inferior or cursed. In consequence, some 19th century theologians emphasized that the biblical Noah restricted his curse to the offspring of Ham's youngest son Canaan, while Ham's son Mizraim, the ancestor of the Egyptians, was not cursed.

Following the Age of Enlightenment , many Western scholars were no longer satisfied with the biblical account of the early history of mankind, but started to develop faith-independent theories. These theories were developed in a historical situation where most Western nations were still profiting from the enslavement of Africans. In this context, many of the works published on Egypt after Napoleon's expedition "seemed to have had as their main purpose an attempt to prove in some way that the Egyptians were not Negroes", thus separating the high civilization of Ancient Egypt from what they wanted to see as an inferior race. Authors such as W. G. Browne, whose Travels in Africa, Egypt and Syria was published in 1799, laid the "seeds for the new Hamitic myth that was to emerge in the very near future", insisting that the Egyptians were white.

In the mid-19th century, the term Hamitic acquired a new anthropological meaning, as scholars asserted that they could discern a "Hamitic race" that was distinct from the " Negroid " populations of Sub-Saharan Africa . Richard Lepsius would coin the appellation Hamitic to denote the languages which are now seen as belonging to the Berber , Cushitic and Egyptian branches of the Afroasiatic family.

"Perhaps because slavery was both still legal and profitable in the United States ... there arose an American school of anthropology which attempted to prove scientifically that the Egyptian was a Caucasian, far removed from the inferior Negro". Through craniometry conducted on thousands of human skulls, Samuel George Morton argued that the differences between the races were too broad to have stemmed from a single common ancestor, but were instead consistent with separate racial origins. In his Crania Aegyptiaca (1844), Morton analyzed over a hundred intact crania gathered from the Nile Valley, and concluded that the ancient Egyptians were racially akin to Europeans. His conclusions would establish the foundation for the American School of anthropology, and would also influence proponents of polygenism.

In his influential The Mediterranean Race (1901), the anthropologist Giuseppe Sergi argued that the Mediterranean race had likely originated from a common ancestral stock that evolved in the Sahara region in Africa, and which later spread from there to populate North Africa, the Horn of Africa, and the circum-Mediterranean region. According to Sergi, the Hamites themselves constituted a Mediterranean variety, and one situated close to the cradle of the stock. He added that the Mediterranean race "in its external characters is a brown human variety, neither white nor negroid, but pure in its elements, that is to say not a product of the mixture of Whites with Negroes or negroid peoples." Sergi explained this taxonomy as inspired by an understanding of "the morphology of the skull as revealing those internal physical characters of human stocks which remain constant through long ages and at far remote spots[...] As a zoologist can recognise the character of an animal species or variety belonging to any region of the globe or any period of time, so also should an anthropologist if he follows the same method of investigating the morphological characters of the skull[...] This method has guided me in my investigations into the present problem and has given me unexpected results which were often afterwards confirmed by archaeology or history."

The Hamitic hypothesis reached its apogee in the work of C. G. Seligman, who argued in his book The Races of Africa (1930) that:

Apart from relatively late Semitic influence... the civilizations of Africa are the civilizations of the Hamites, its history is the record of these peoples and of their interaction with the two other African stocks, the Negro and the Bushmen , whether this influence was exerted by highly civilized Egyptians or by such wider pastoralists as are represented at the present day by the Beja and Somali... The incoming Hamites were pastoral Caucasians – arriving wave after wave – better armed as well as quicker witted than the dark agricultural Negroes."

Seligman asserted that the Negro race was essentially static and agricultural, and that the wandering "pastoral Hamitic" had introduced most of the advanced features found in central African cultures, including metal working, irrigation and complex social structures. Despite criticism, Seligman kept his thesis unchanged in new editions of his book into the 1960s.

Hamitic hypotheses operated in West Africa as well, and they changed greatly over time.

With the demise of the concept of Hamitic languages, the notion of a definable "Hamite" racial and linguistic entity was heavily criticised. In 1974, writing about the African Great Lakes region, Christopher Ehret described the Hamitic hypothesis as the view that "almost everything more un-'primitive', sophisticated or more elaborate in East Africa [was] brought by culturally and politically dominant Hamites, immigrants from the North into East Africa, who were at least part Caucasoid in physical ancestry". He called this a "monothematic" model, which was "romantic, but unlikely" and "[had] been all but discarded, and rightly so". He further argued that there were a "multiplicity and variety" of contacts and influences passing between various peoples in Africa over time, something that he suggested the "one-directional" Hamitic model obscured.

Sergi outlined the constituent Hamitic physical types, which would form the basis for the work of later writers such as Carleton Coon and C. G. Seligman. In his book The Mediterranean Race (1901), he wrote that there was a distinct Hamitic ancestral stock, which could be divided into two subgroups: the Western Hamites (or Northern Hamites , comprising the Berbers of the Mediterranean, Atlantic and Sahara, Tibbu, Fula, and extinct Guanches), and the Eastern Hamites (or Ethiopids , comprising Ancient and Modern Egyptians (but not the Arabs in Egypt), Nubians, Beja , Abyssinians, Galla, Danakil, Somalis, Masai, Bahima and Watusi ).

According to Coon, typical Hamitic physical traits included narrow facial features; an orthognathous visage; light brown to dark brown skin tone; wavy, curly or straight hair; thick to thin lips without eversion; and a dolichocephalic to mesocephalic cranial index.

According to Ashley Montagu "Among both the Northern and Eastern Hamites are to be found some of the most beautiful types of humanity."

In the African Great Lakes region, Europeans based the various migration theories of Hamitic provenance in part on the long-held oral traditions of local populations such as the Tutsi and Hima (Bahima, Wahuma or Mhuma). These groups asserted that their founders were "white" migrants from the north (interpreted as the Horn of Africa and/or North Africa), who subsequently "lost" their original language, culture, and much of their physiognomy as they intermarried with the local Bantus . Explorer J.H. Speke recorded one such account from a Wahuma governor in his book, Journal of the Discovery of the Source of the Nile . According to Augustus Henry Keane, the Hima King Mutesa I also claimed Oromo (Galla) ancestors and still reportedly spoke an Oromo idiom, though that language had long since died out elsewhere in the region. The missionary R. W. Felkin, who had met the ruler, remarked that Mutesa "had lost the pure Hamitic features through admixture of Negro blood, but still retained sufficient characteristics to prevent all doubt as to his origin". Thus, Keane would suggest that the original Hamitic migrants to the Great Lakes had "gradually blended with the aborigines in a new and superior nationality of Bantu speech ".

Speke believed that his explorations uncovered the link between "civilized" North Africa and "primitive" central Africa. Describing the Ugandan Kingdom of Buganda, he argued that its "barbaric civilization" had arisen from a nomadic pastoralist race who had migrated from the north and was related to the Hamitic Oromo (Galla) of Ethiopia. In his Theory of Conquest of Inferior by Superior Races (1863), Speke would also attempt to outline how the Empire of Kitara in the African Great Lakes region may have been established by a Hamitic founding dynasty. These ideas, under the rubric of science, provided the basis for some Europeans asserting that the Tutsi were superior to the Hutu . In spite of both groups being Bantu -speaking, Speke thought that the Tutsi had experienced some "Hamitic" influence, partly based on their facial features being comparatively more narrow than those of the Hutu. Later writers followed Speke in arguing that the Tutsis had originally migrated into the lacustrine region as pastoralists and had established themselves as the dominant group, having lost their language as they assimilated to Bantu culture.

Seligman and other early scholars believed that, in the African Great Lakes and parts of Central Africa, invading Hamites from North Africa and the Horn of Africa had mixed with local "Negro" women to produce several hybrid "Hamiticised Negro" populations. The "Hamiticised Negroes" were divided into three groups according to language and degree of Hamitic influence: the "Negro-Hamites" or "Half-Hamites" (such as the Maasai , Nandi and Turkana), the Nilotes (such as the Shilluk and Nuer), and the Bantus (such as the Hima and Tutsi). Seligman would explain this Hamitic influence through both demic diffusion and cultural transmission:

At first the Hamites, or at least their aristocracy, would endeavour to marry Hamitic women, but it cannot have been long before a series of peoples combining Negro and Hamitic blood arose; these, superior to the pure Negro, would be regarded as inferior to the next incoming wave of Hamites and be pushed further inland to play the part of an incoming aristocracy vis-a-vis the Negroes on whom they impinged... The end result of one series of such combinations is to be seen in the Masai [sic], the other in the Baganda, while an even more striking result is offered by the symbiosis of the Bahima of Ankole and the Bahiru [sic].

In his work The Uganda Protectorate (1902, Harry Johnston claims that the Hamites are "Negroid rather than Negro" and that Negroes learned "all the civilization they possessed |before the coming of the white man" from the Hamites:

The fifth and last amongst these main stocks is the Hamitic, which is Negroid rather than Negro. This is the division of African peoples to which the modern Somali and Gala belong, and of which the basis of the population of ancient Egypt consisted... Rather it would seem as though ancient Egypt traded and communicated directly with what is now Abyssinia and the Land of Punt (Somaliland), and that the Hamitic peoples of these countries facing the Red Sea and Indian Ocean carried a small measure of Egyptian culture into the lands about the Nile Lakes. In this way, and through Uganda as a half-way house, the totally savage Negro received his knowledge of smelting and working iron, all his domestic animals and cultivated plants (except those, of course, subsequently introduced by Arabs from Asia and Portuguese from America), all his musical instruments higher in development than the single bowstring and the resonant hollow log, and, in short, all the civilization he possessed before the coming of the white man"

European colonial powers in Africa were influenced by the Hamitic hypothesis in their policies during the twentieth century. For instance, in Rwanda, German and Belgian officials in the colonial period displayed preferential attitudes toward the Tutsis over the Hutu. Some scholars argued that this bias was a significant factor that contributed to the 1994 Rwandan genocide of the Tutsis by the Hutus.

• Afroasiatic languages
• Generations of Noah
• This page was last modified on 25 December 2023, at 03:15. Suggest an edit .