. May 15, 2024.
Edgar Allan Poe, "The Power of Words," The Works of Edgar Allan Poe , Lit2Go Edition, (1903), accessed May 15, 2024, https://etc.usf.edu/lit2go/147/the-works-of-edgar-allan-poe/5227/the-power-of-words/ .
OINOS. Pardon, Agathos, the weakness of a spirit new-fledged with immortality!
AGATHOS. You have spoken nothing, my Oinos, for which pardon is to be demanded. Not even here is knowledge thing of intuition. For wisdom, ask of the angels freely, that it may be given!
OINOS. But in this existence, I dreamed that I should be at once cognizant of all things, and thus at once be happy in being cognizant of all.
AGATHOS. Ah, not in knowledge is happiness, but in the acquisition of knowledge! In for ever knowing, we are for ever blessed; but to know all were the curse of a fiend.
OINOS. But does not The Most High know all?
AGATHOS. That (since he is The Most Happy) must be still the one thing unknown even to Him.
OINOS. But, since we grow hourly in knowledge, must not at last all things be known?
AGATHOS. Look down into the abysmal distances!—attempt to force the gaze down the multitudinous vistas of the stars, as we sweep slowly through them thus—and thus—and thus! Even the spiritual vision, is it not at all points arrested by the continuous golden walls of the universe?—the walls of the myriads of the shining bodies that mere number has appeared to blend into unity?
OINOS. I clearly perceive that the infinity of matter is no dream.
AGATHOS. There are no dreams in Aidenn—but it is here whispered that, of this infinity of matter, the sole purpose is to afford infinite springs, at which the soul may allay the thirst to know, which is for ever unquenchable within it—since to quench it, would be to extinguish the soul's self. Question me then, my Oinos, freely and without fear. Come! we will leave to the left the loud harmony of the Pleiades, and swoop outward from the throne into the starry meadows beyond Orion, where, for pansies and violets, and heart's—ease, are the beds of the triplicate and triple—tinted suns.
OINOS. And now, Agathos, as we proceed, instruct me!—speak to me in the earth's familiar tones. I understand not what you hinted to me, just now, of the modes or of the method of what, during mortality, we were accustomed to call Creation. Do you mean to say that the Creator is not God?
AGATHOS. I mean to say that the Deity does not create.
OINOS. Explain.
AGATHOS. In the beginning only, he created. The seeming creatures which are now, throughout the universe, so perpetually springing into being, can only be considered as the mediate or indirect, not as the direct or immediate results of the Divine creative power.
OINOS. Among men, my Agathos, this idea would be considered heretical in the extreme.
AGATHOS. Among angels, my Oinos, it is seen to be simply true.
OINOS. I can comprehend you thus far—that certain operations of what we term Nature, or the natural laws, will, under certain conditions, give rise to that which has all the appearance of creation. Shortly before the final overthrow of the earth, there were, I well remember, many very successful experiments in what some philosophers were weak enough to denominate the creation of animalculae.
AGATHOS. The cases of which you speak were, in fact, instances of the secondary creation—and of the only species of creation which has ever been, since the first word spoke into existence the first law.
OINOS. Are not the starry worlds that, from the abyss of nonentity, burst hourly forth into the heavens—are not these stars, Agathos, the immediate handiwork of the King?
AGATHOS. Let me endeavor, my Oinos, to lead you, step by step, to the conception I intend. You are well aware that, as no thought can perish, so no act is without infinite result. We moved our hands, for example, when we were dwellers on the earth, and, in so doing, gave vibration to the atmosphere which engirdled it. This vibration was indefinitely extended, till it gave impulse to every particle of the earth's air, which thenceforward, and for ever, was actuated by the one movement of the hand. This fact the mathematicians of our globe well knew. They made the special effects, indeed, wrought in the fluid by special impulses, the subject of exact calculation—so that it became easy to determine in what precise period an impulse of given extent would engirdle the orb, and impress (for ever) every atom of the atmosphere circumambient. Retrograding, they found no difficulty, from a given effect, under given conditions, in determining the value of the original impulse. Now the mathematicians who saw that the results of any given impulse were absolutely endless—and who saw that a portion of these results were accurately traceable through the agency of algebraic analysis—who saw, too, the facility of the retrogradation—these men saw, at the same time, that this species of analysis itself, had within itself a capacity for indefinite progress—that there were no bounds conceivable to its advancement and applicability, except within the intellect of him who advanced or applied it. But at this point our mathematicians paused.
OINOS. And why, Agathos, should they have proceeded?
AGATHOS. Because there were some considerations of deep interest beyond. It was deducible from what they knew, that to a being of infinite understanding—one to whom the perfection of the algebraic analysis lay unfolded—there could be no difficulty in tracing every impulse given the air—and the ether through the air—to the remotest consequences at any even infinitely remote epoch of time. It is indeed demonstrable that every such impulse given the air, must, in the end, impress every individual thing that exists within the universe;—and the being of infinite understanding—the being whom we have imagined—might trace the remote undulations of the impulse—trace them upward and onward in their influences upon all particles of an matter—upward and onward for ever in their modifications of old forms—or, in other words, in their creation of new—until he found them reflected—unimpressive at last—back from the throne of the Godhead. And not only could such a thing do this, but at any epoch, should a given result be afforded him—should one of these numberless comets, for example, be presented to his inspection—he could have no difficulty in determining, by the analytic retrogradation, to what original impulse it was due. This power of retrogradation in its absolute fulness and perfection—this faculty of referring at all epochs, all effects to all causes—is of course the prerogative of the Deity alone—but in every variety of degree, short of the absolute perfection, is the power itself exercised by the whole host of the Angelic intelligences.
OINOS. But you speak merely of impulses upon the air.
AGATHOS. In speaking of the air, I referred only to the earth; but the general proposition has reference to impulses upon the ether—which, since it pervades, and alone pervades all space, is thus the great medium of creation.
OINOS. Then all motion, of whatever nature, creates?
AGATHOS. It must: but a true philosophy has long taught that the source of all motion is thought—and the source of all thought is—
OINOS. God.
AGATHOS. I have spoken to you, Oinos, as to a child of the fair Earth which lately perished—of impulses upon the atmosphere of the Earth.
OINOS. You did.
AGATHOS. And while I thus spoke, did there not cross your mind some thought of the physical power of words? Is not every word an impulse on the air?
OINOS. But why, Agathos, do you weep—and why, oh why do your wings droop as we hover above this fair star—which is the greenest and yet most terrible of all we have encountered in our flight? Its brilliant flowers look like a fairy dream—but its fierce volcanoes like the passions of a turbulent heart.
AGATHOS. They are!—they are! This wild star—it is now three centuries since, with clasped hands, and with streaming eyes, at the feet of my beloved—I spoke it—with a few passionate sentences—into birth. Its brilliant flowers are the dearest of all unfulfilled dreams, and its raging volcanoes are the passions of the most turbulent and unhallowed of hearts.
Home Essay Samples Literature The Book Thief
*minimum deadline
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below
Need writing help?
You can always rely on us no matter what type of paper you need
*No hidden charges
100% Unique Essays
Absolutely Confidential
Money Back Guarantee
By clicking “Send Essay”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails
You can also get a UNIQUE essay on this or any other topic
Thank you! We’ll contact you as soon as possible.
Last Update: April 28, 2023 Navigation: Main Menu Poe's Works Poe's Tales Editorial Policies Searching Annotated Text
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
Sections: Commentary Reading and Ref. Texts Hist. Texts Comp. and Study Texts Misc. Texts Bibliography
Characters:.
Location - Under development.
Date - Under development.
Under development.
Reading copy:.
Manuscripts and authorized printings:.
Instream comparative and study texts:.
Miscellaneous texts and related items:.
[S:0 - JAS] - Edgar Allan Poe Society of Baltimore - Works - Tales - The Power of Words
Home — Essay Samples — Literature — Book Report — The Book Thief by Markus Zusak: the Power of Words
About this sample
Words: 778 |
Published: Mar 19, 2020
Words: 778 | Pages: 2 | 4 min read
Prompt examples for "the book thief" essay, "the book thief" essay example.
Let us write you an essay from scratch
Get high-quality help
Prof. Kifaru
Verified writer
+ 120 experts online
By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email
No need to pay just yet!
4 pages / 1709 words
7.5 pages / 3353 words
2.5 pages / 1224 words
2.5 pages / 1183 words
Remember! This is just a sample.
You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.
121 writers online
Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled
The novel The Killer Angels was written by Michael Sharra and is a good read to help one understand the reality of the battle of Gettysburg and the impact that it had on American history. One way in which the reality is that [...]
“You don’t need a silver fork to eat good food,” said Paul Prudhomme. Good food leads to a good mood. It can also lead to a healthier lifestyle considering you know what is meant by good food and how to make the right choices. [...]
In 2009 Gregory Cochran and Henry Harpending utilized their merit as professors of anthropology at the University of Utah to publish a book detailing the recent history of evolution. The 10,000 Year Explosion: How Civilization [...]
Sheila’s character changes massively throughout J.B. Priestley's An Inspector Calls, often in a manner that registers increasing maturity. At first, Sheila is presented through stage directions as a ‘pretty girl in her early [...]
In An Inspector Calls, Mr.Birling and the Inspector are complete opposites of each other and are used to support different ideas of the themes in the play. Their importance in terms of awareness of society, consideration for the [...]
Perhaps nothing is more frequent in the pages of history books than wars. Since the beginning of time, men have fought to hold their ground and conquer more. Yet the images of war are not always the trumpeting, flag-flying, [...]
By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.
Where do you want us to send this sample?
By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.
Be careful. This essay is not unique
This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before
Download this Sample
Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts
Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.
Please check your inbox.
We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!
We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .
The Power of Words
All over the world, words are the primary way people communicate with each other. It doesn’t matter where you live, what color you are, or what creed you follow; words convey your thoughts. There is no bigger medium of expression.
We use words to thank, to plead, to rejoice, to grieve, to instruct, to congratulate. It doesn’t matter if they are written or they are sung. You just can’t get away from words. From the time you are born and your mom whispers sweet nothings in your ears to the time that the priest reads the scriptures out to you at the end, you can’t get away from words. Yet we pay so little attention to them. We use them at random, sometimes our minds find it hard to keep pace with our tongues. Words have great power. The power to bring peace, the power to spread love , the power to give hope, the power to encourage, the power to guide, the power to comfort, the power to uplift, the power to heal. But they can also kill, they can make you feel small and insignificant, they can hurt you, they can humiliate you, they can rob you of your decency, steal your sleep and even make you sick. Then there are the words that humble you, elevate you, take you closer to God.
Never speak words that can rob another of his dignity and his pride. If you don’t have the words to encourage and elevate, best is to say nothing at all. A kind helping word of encouragement can make someone’s day so be ready with that word any time of the day. You never know whom you might be able to help with your good word of the day.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Visitors question & answer.
Find anything you save across the site in your account
In the campus protests over the war in Gaza, language and rhetoric are—as they have always been when it comes to Israel and Palestine—weapons of mass destruction.
By Zadie Smith
A philosophy without a politics is common enough. Aesthetes, ethicists, novelists—all may be easily critiqued and found wanting on this basis. But there is also the danger of a politics without a philosophy. A politics unmoored, unprincipled, which holds as its most fundamental commitment its own perpetuation. A Realpolitik that believes itself too subtle—or too pragmatic—to deal with such ethical platitudes as thou shalt not kill. Or: rape is a crime, everywhere and always. But sometimes ethical philosophy reënters the arena, as is happening right now on college campuses all over America. I understand the ethics underpinning the protests to be based on two widely recognized principles:
There is an ethical duty to express solidarity with the weak in any situation that involves oppressive power.
If the machinery of oppressive power is to be trained on the weak, then there is a duty to stop the gears by any means necessary.
The first principle sometimes takes the “weak” to mean “whoever has the least power,” and sometimes “whoever suffers most,” but most often a combination of both. The second principle, meanwhile, may be used to defend revolutionary violence, although this interpretation has just as often been repudiated by pacifistic radicals, among whom two of the most famous are, of course, Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr . In the pacifist’s interpretation, the body that we must place between the gears is not that of our enemy but our own. In doing this, we may pay the ultimate price with our actual bodies, in the non-metaphorical sense. More usually, the risk is to our livelihoods, our reputations, our futures. Before these most recent campus protests began, we had an example of this kind of action in the climate movement. For several years now, many people have been protesting the economic and political machinery that perpetuates climate change, by blocking roads, throwing paint, interrupting plays, and committing many other arrestable offenses that can appear ridiculous to skeptics (or, at the very least, performative), but which in truth represent a level of personal sacrifice unimaginable to many of us.
I experienced this not long ago while participating in an XR climate rally in London. When it came to the point in the proceedings where I was asked by my fellow-protesters whether I’d be willing to commit an arrestable offense—one that would likely lead to a conviction and thus make travelling to the United States difficult or even impossible—I’m ashamed to say that I declined that offer. Turns out, I could not give up my relationship with New York City for the future of the planet. I’d just about managed to stop buying plastic bottles (except when very thirsty) and was trying to fly less. But never to see New York again? What pitiful ethical creatures we are (I am)! Falling at the first hurdle! Anyone who finds themselves rolling their eyes at any young person willing to put their own future into jeopardy for an ethical principle should ask themselves where the limits of their own commitments lie—also whether they’ve bought a plastic bottle or booked a flight recently. A humbling inquiry.
It is difficult to look at the recent Columbia University protests in particular without being reminded of the campus protests of the nineteen-sixties and seventies, some of which happened on the very same lawns. At that time, a cynical political class was forced to observe the spectacle of its own privileged youth standing in solidarity with the weakest historical actors of the moment, a group that included, but was not restricted to, African Americans and the Vietnamese. By placing such people within their ethical zone of interest, young Americans risked both their own academic and personal futures and—in the infamous case of Kent State—their lives. I imagine that the students at Columbia—and protesters on other campuses—fully intend this echo, and, in their unequivocal demand for both a ceasefire and financial divestment from this terrible war, to a certain extent they have achieved it.
But, when I open newspapers and see students dismissing the idea that some of their fellow-students feel, at this particular moment, unsafe on campus, or arguing that such a feeling is simply not worth attending to, given the magnitude of what is occurring in Gaza, I find such sentiments cynical and unworthy of this movement. For it may well be—within the ethical zone of interest that is a campus, which was not so long ago defined as a safe space, delineated by the boundary of a generation’s ethical ideas— it may well be that a Jewish student walking past the tents, who finds herself referred to as a Zionist, and then is warned to keep her distance, is, in that moment, the weakest participant in the zone. If the concept of safety is foundational to these students’ ethical philosophy (as I take it to be), and, if the protests are committed to reinserting ethical principles into a cynical and corrupt politics, it is not right to divest from these same ethics at the very moment they come into conflict with other imperatives. The point of a foundational ethics is that it is not contingent but foundational. That is precisely its challenge to a corrupt politics.
Practicing our ethics in the real world involves a constant testing of them, a recognition that our zones of ethical interest have no fixed boundaries and may need to widen and shrink moment by moment as the situation demands. (Those brave students who—in supporting the ethical necessity of a ceasefire—find themselves at painful odds with family, friends, faith, or community have already made this calculation.) This flexibility can also have the positive long-term political effect of allowing us to comprehend that, although our duty to the weakest is permanent, the role of “the weakest” is not an existential matter independent of time and space but, rather, a contingent situation, continually subject to change. By contrast, there is a dangerous rigidity to be found in the idea that concern for the dreadful situation of the hostages is somehow in opposition to, or incompatible with, the demand for a ceasefire. Surely a ceasefire—as well as being an ethical necessity—is also in the immediate absolute interest of the hostages, a fact that cannot be erased by tearing their posters off walls.
Part of the significance of a student protest is the ways in which it gives young people the opportunity to insist upon an ethical principle while still being, comparatively speaking, a more rational force than the supposed adults in the room, against whose crazed magical thinking they have been forced to define themselves. The equality of all human life was never a self-evident truth in racially segregated America. There was no way to “win” in Vietnam. Hamas will not be “eliminated.” The more than seven million Jewish human beings who live in the gap between the river and the sea will not simply vanish because you think that they should. All of that is just rhetoric. Words. Cathartic to chant, perhaps, but essentially meaningless. A ceasefire, meanwhile, is both a potential reality and an ethical necessity. The monstrous and brutal mass murder of more than eleven hundred people, the majority of them civilians, dozens of them children, on October 7th, has been followed by the monstrous and brutal mass murder (at the time of writing) of a reported fourteen thousand five hundred children. And many more human beings besides, but it’s impossible not to notice that the sort of people who take at face value phrases like “surgical strikes” and “controlled military operation” sometimes need to look at and/or think about dead children specifically in order to refocus their minds on reality.
To send the police in to arrest young people peacefully insisting upon a ceasefire represents a moral injury to us all. To do it with violence is a scandal. How could they do less than protest, in this moment? They are putting their own bodies into the machine. They deserve our support and praise. As to which postwar political arrangement any of these students may favor, and on what basis they favor it—that is all an argument for the day after a ceasefire. One state, two states, river to the sea—in my view, their views have no real weight in this particular moment, or very little weight next to the significance of their collective action, which (if I understand it correctly) is focussed on stopping the flow of money that is funding bloody murder, and calling for a ceasefire, the political euphemism that we use to mark the end of bloody murder. After a ceasefire, the criminal events of the past seven months should be tried and judged, and the infinitely difficult business of creating just, humane, and habitable political structures in the region must begin anew. Right now: ceasefire. And, as we make this demand, we might remind ourselves that a ceasefire is not, primarily, a political demand. Primarily, it is an ethical one.
But it is in the nature of the political that we cannot even attend to such ethical imperatives unless we first know the political position of whoever is speaking. (“Where do you stand on Israel/Palestine?”) In these constructed narratives, there are always a series of shibboleths, that is, phrases that can’t be said, or, conversely, phrases that must be said. Once these words or phrases have been spoken ( river to the sea, existential threat, right to defend, one state, two states, Zionist, colonialist, imperialist, terrorist ) and one’s positionality established, then and only then will the ethics of the question be attended to (or absolutely ignored). The objection may be raised at this point that I am behaving like a novelist, expressing a philosophy without a politics, or making some rarefied point about language and rhetoric while people commit bloody murder. This would normally be my own view, but, in the case of Israel/Palestine, language and rhetoric are and always have been weapons of mass destruction.
It is in fact perhaps the most acute example in the world of the use of words to justify bloody murder, to flatten and erase unbelievably labyrinthine histories, and to deliver the atavistic pleasure of violent simplicity to the many people who seem to believe that merely by saying something they make it so. It is no doubt a great relief to say the word “Hamas” as if it purely and solely described a terrorist entity. A great relief to say “There is no such thing as the Palestinian people” as they stand in front of you. A great relief to say “Zionist colonialist state” and accept those three words as a full and unimpeachable definition of the state of Israel, not only under the disastrous leadership of Benjamin Netanyahu but at every stage of its long and complex history, and also to hear them as a perfectly sufficient description of every man, woman, and child who has ever lived in Israel or happened to find themselves born within it. It is perhaps because we know these simplifications to be impossible that we insist upon them so passionately. They are shibboleths; they describe a people, by defining them against other people—but the people being described are ourselves. The person who says “We must eliminate Hamas” says this not necessarily because she thinks this is a possible outcome on this earth but because this sentence is the shibboleth that marks her membership in the community that says that. The person who uses the word “Zionist” as if that word were an unchanged and unchangeable monolith, meaning exactly the same thing in 2024 and 1948 as it meant in 1890 or 1901 or 1920—that person does not so much bring definitive clarity to the entangled history of Jews and Palestinians as they successfully and soothingly draw a line to mark their own zone of interest and where it ends. And while we all talk, carefully curating our shibboleths, presenting them to others and waiting for them to reveal themselves as with us or against us—while we do all that, bloody murder.
And now here we are, almost at the end of this little stream of words. We’ve arrived at the point at which I must state clearly “where I stand on the issue,” that is, which particular political settlement should, in my own, personal view, occur on the other side of a ceasefire. This is the point wherein—by my stating of a position—you are at once liberated into the simple pleasure of placing me firmly on one side or the other, putting me over there with those who lisp or those who don’t, with the Ephraimites, or with the people of Gilead. Yes, this is the point at which I stake my rhetorical flag in that fantastical, linguistical, conceptual, unreal place—built with words—where rapes are minimized as needs be, and the definition of genocide quibbled over, where the killing of babies is denied, and the precision of drones glorified, where histories are reconsidered or rewritten or analogized or simply ignored, and “Jew” and “colonialist” are synonymous, and “Palestinian” and “terrorist” are synonymous, and language is your accomplice and alibi in all of it. Language euphemized, instrumentalized, and abused, put to work for your cause and only for your cause, so that it does exactly and only what you want it to do. Let me make it easy for you. Put me wherever you want: misguided socialist, toothless humanist, naïve novelist, useful idiot, apologist, denier, ally, contrarian, collaborator, traitor, inexcusable coward. It is my view that my personal views have no more weight than an ear of corn in this particular essay. The only thing that has any weight in this particular essay is the dead. ♦
The day the dinosaurs died .
What if you started itching— and couldn’t stop ?
How a notorious gangster was exposed by his own sister .
Woodstock was overrated .
Diana Nyad’s hundred-and-eleven-mile swim .
Photo Booth: Deana Lawson’s hyper-staged portraits of Black love .
Fiction by Roald Dahl: “The Landlady”
Sign up for our daily newsletter to receive the best stories from The New Yorker .
By signing up, you agree to our User Agreement and Privacy Policy & Cookie Statement . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
By Susan B. Glasser
By Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor
By Jay Caspian Kang
By David Remnick
We need to ask ourselves, who does this violence serve.
(Bethany Baker | The Salt Lake Tribune) Sam Silverman, a Jewish woman, holds up a sign in support of pro-Palestinian demonstrators calling for a cease-fire in Gaza during the latest Israel-Hamas war during a pro-Palestinian rally outside Provo City Library at Academy Square in Provo on Saturday, Nov. 4, 2023.
It is important we understand the words we use. “Antisemitism” is nonspecific because Arabs are Semites, too. Yet, since the Holocaust we have primarily equated this term with anti-Jewish oppression.
Israel supporters invoke the term to decry resistance to their ever-expanding borders. But I, a white Jewish person, have certainly never been singled out and oppressed for my Semite blood because my white privilege has a lot more cultural power. So to me, antisemitism is a moot point.
I have seen the word used to taint any sort of justified resistance as “unacceptable” because since WWII we can all agree that “antisemitism is evil,” even if what we are talking about is “Semite on Semite violence.” Similar to the term “terrorism,” without needing to understand any sort of context (like the classic, “it’s complicated”), we invoke these terms to dehumanize a desperate group of people and justify their annihilation.
Words are powerful, and the Americans that frame this as the Israel-Hamas war are equating a super military power with a small group of militants that do not represent an entire displaced people. Even talking about the Israel-Gaza war erases the rest of Palestine from the picture, taking for granted all of the dispossession that had taken place before Hamas was even created.
It’s too easy for the United States and Israel to just shout “antisemitic terrorists” and bomb Palestine into submission like they have done so many times already and in so many other regions, as well. We need to ask ourselves, who does this violence serve? Because from where I’m standing, this is not at all about the oppression our grandmothers faced in WWII, it’s about innocent people being forcibly displaced today.
Jake Trimble, Salt Lake City
Submit a letter to the editor
Donate to the newsroom now. The Salt Lake Tribune, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) public charity and contributions are tax deductible
Letter: contrary to pat bagley, the distinction between a republic and pure democracy is real, letter: democracy in utah rests on allowing candidates to advance to the primary election by gathering signatures, letter: the utah gop convention delegates outdid themselves by nominating the worst and least qualified candidates, letter: those who support the destruction of abravanel hall should expect to get their just desserts, letter: let’s not be afraid of words or teaching students how to evaluate arguments, s.l. county mayor jenny wilson weighs in on abravanel hall. here’s what she said., man charged in killing of santaquin police officer could face death penalty, former byu quarterback is transferring to another utah school, trump and biden host drag queen story hour and other hoax reports about utah’s trans bathroom ban, latter-day saint missionary serving in utah arrested on suspicion of rape, bagley cartoon: based mike lee, featured local savings.
R aise your hand if you’ve ever heard the phrase: “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.” I couldn’t tell you when I heard it for the first time or why, but it’s safe to say it stuck. As a kid growing up, I learned that words were just words. It was normalized to minimize hard feelings because they’d magically go away. Being angry, sad, or disappointed wasn’t a big deal — it was something I just had to “get over.” Now, as an adult raising my own kids, I know how untrue that phrase is. Words do matter, and they cause lasting impacts. While it took me several decades to fully understand this, I’m glad to report that they’re doing things differently these days. And there are ways for us to teach our kids about the power of their words.
Recently, my oldest daughter shared one of her favorite lessons from her guidance counselors on the importance of words. The lesson discussed the impact of our words on the people around us. How one compliment can make someone’s day — or how a few mean words said in anger can be devastating.
The lesson discussed how powerful words can be, whether positive or negative. To illustrate the point in a concrete way, the counselor had the kids crumple up a piece of paper. Each crumple and contortion represented unkind words or bullying. Once they finished, she had them try to get the paper back to the way it was. Of course, no matter how much they smoothed it back out, it wasn’t the same.
She explained that, in a real-life scenario, smoothing the paper out might look like apologizing . But even when we say we’re sorry, when we hurt someone, it never fully erases the impact. Things don’t go back exactly to how they were. The same is true when those mean words get the better of us.
As parents, we want to teach our kids this lesson without the heartbreak, and it starts by leading with empathy . “You can build empathy by teaching the power of words,” says Matthew Schubert , a licensed professional counselor. “When your child understands how certain words make them feel, it helps them understand how their words affect others,” he adds.
Teaching our kiddos to walk in someone else’s shoes teaches them to pause and think about the impact and power of their words. It also helps them be a caring friend to those who have had difficult experiences with bullying . Even though they may not have been made fun of, they understand what it would feel like.
Being empathetic in every situation is easier said than done, even for an adult with more practice. It’s even more difficult as a kid, especially when tempers flare. So, how do we teach our kids to be kind and patient ?
Schubert recommends that parents start with the basics, like identifying emotions and effectively communicating. “Doing this helps people better understand what you are trying to say and how you’re feeling,” he says. Remember that kindness comes in all shapes and forms. Practicing kindness doesn’t have to include a grand gesture.
If you’re looking for ways to teach your kids to infuse a little more kindness in their day-to-day lives, consider practicing some of the following:
While this isn’t an exhaustive list, it’s an excellent place to start if you’re looking for little ways to teach your kids kindness . You also can ask your child about ideas they have. How do they want to practice kindness? How have they received kindness in the past that was meaningful to them?
“Finding the right words and actions to express this is an empowering experience for your kids,” says Schubert. “Something I often hear from kids is that they feel unheard. They feel invisible in the realm of adults making all the rules for them and always telling them what to do,” he adds. When your kiddo gets actively involved in these activities, it feels less like something they have to do and more like something they want to do.
The words we say are powerful and have lasting impacts. I don’t know why this particular lesson hit home so hard for my daughter, but I’m glad it did. Be it an example with crumpled paper, broken dishes, or toothpaste squeezed out of a tube, the lesson that speaks the loudest is this: You are responsible for your words.
Equally as important, it’s worth saying, again and again, that it’s no extra thing to choose to be kind. Compliment someone. Flash them a smile if they seem to be feeling down. You never know whose day you can turn around or how much of a difference you can make for one person with just a few kind words.
This essay about Gatorade’s iconic slogan “Is it in you?” explores how it transcends traditional marketing to embody the ethos of sports culture. Introduced in 1997, the slogan effectively positions Gatorade not just as a beverage, but as a symbol of the resilience, strength, and determination inherent in athletes. It challenges the consumer to reflect on their own inner qualities and aligns the drink with the pursuit of athletic excellence. The slogan’s rhetorical power lies in its simplicity and dual meaning, resonating both as a physical intake and a metaphor for internal qualities necessary for success. The essay also discusses how Gatorade leverages visual endorsements from renowned athletes to strengthen its brand identity, making the drink synonymous with peak performance and recovery. Through this slogan, Gatorade markets both a product and an ideal, emphasizing that it is essential for anyone striving to realize their potential in sports.
How it works
When Gatorade coined its famous slogan “Is it in you?” back in 1997, it wasn’t just introducing a new tagline—it was embedding itself into the cultural fabric of athletics. This slogan goes beyond a simple marketing phrase; it serves as a rallying cry that resonates with the ethos of athletes around the world, encapsulating the spirit of determination and endurance. This analysis examines how Gatorade’s slogan captures the essence of sports culture and contributes to its brand identity, transforming the way consumers perceive sports beverages.
Gatorade has consistently positioned itself not just as a product but as an integral part of the sports narrative. The development of the slogan “Is it in you?” was a strategic move to highlight the intrinsic connection between the drink and the athlete’s internal drive and perseverance. This question does not merely ask if Gatorade is physically inside the athlete, but rather, it calls into question the presence of the qualities that Gatorade embodies: resilience, strength, and the relentless pursuit of victory.
The success of this slogan can be attributed to its deeply motivational nature. It challenges athletes to reflect on their own inner strength and determination, aligning the product with the inner qualities that sports enthusiasts aspire to exhibit. By doing so, Gatorade transcends the typical consumer product categorization, becoming a symbol of athletic excellence and ambition. This slogan encourages athletes to push their limits, suggesting that consuming Gatorade is synonymous with nurturing the qualities that make great athletes.
Moreover, the rhetorical power of the slogan lies in its simplicity and its evocative appeal. The structure of the phrase “Is it in you?” is open-ended, prompting an internal dialogue. It’s a clever play on words—on one hand, it references the physical consumption of the beverage, and on the other, it metaphorically speaks to the ingredients of success that must come from within the athlete. This dual meaning not only enhances the memorability of the slogan but also reinforces the message that Gatorade is essential for anyone striving to unleash their potential in the realm of sports.
The emotional resonance of the slogan is amplified by its widespread use in advertising campaigns featuring renowned athletes. These figures are often seen reaching for a bottle of Gatorade during their most challenging moments, thereby visually associating the drink with peak performance and recovery. The presence of Gatorade in contexts of extreme exertion and triumph sends a powerful message that the brand is a key component in the quest for athletic success. It subtly suggests that the qualities that define greatness are indeed “in” the athletes who choose Gatorade, thereby making it a part of their essential gear.
In conclusion, Gatorade’s slogan “Is it in you?” effectively captures the essence of sports culture by aligning the brand with the core attributes of dedication and excellence in athletics. It’s more than a marketing tool; it’s a philosophical inquiry that challenges athletes to introspect and recognize their potential. By intertwining the product with the identity and aspirations of its consumers, Gatorade has not only marketed a beverage but has also sold an ideal. This slogan remains a testament to the powerful role that effective branding can play in not just shaping consumer behavior but in becoming a part of the consumer’s identity and lifestyle. Through clever wording and emotional engagement, Gatorade ensures that it is not just seen as fuel for the body, but also as inspiration for the spirit.
The Power of Persuasion: How Gatorade’s Slogan Captures the Essence of Sports Culture. (2024, May 12). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/the-power-of-persuasion-how-gatorades-slogan-captures-the-essence-of-sports-culture/
"The Power of Persuasion: How Gatorade’s Slogan Captures the Essence of Sports Culture." PapersOwl.com , 12 May 2024, https://papersowl.com/examples/the-power-of-persuasion-how-gatorades-slogan-captures-the-essence-of-sports-culture/
PapersOwl.com. (2024). The Power of Persuasion: How Gatorade’s Slogan Captures the Essence of Sports Culture . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/the-power-of-persuasion-how-gatorades-slogan-captures-the-essence-of-sports-culture/ [Accessed: 15 May. 2024]
"The Power of Persuasion: How Gatorade’s Slogan Captures the Essence of Sports Culture." PapersOwl.com, May 12, 2024. Accessed May 15, 2024. https://papersowl.com/examples/the-power-of-persuasion-how-gatorades-slogan-captures-the-essence-of-sports-culture/
"The Power of Persuasion: How Gatorade’s Slogan Captures the Essence of Sports Culture," PapersOwl.com , 12-May-2024. [Online]. Available: https://papersowl.com/examples/the-power-of-persuasion-how-gatorades-slogan-captures-the-essence-of-sports-culture/. [Accessed: 15-May-2024]
PapersOwl.com. (2024). The Power of Persuasion: How Gatorade’s Slogan Captures the Essence of Sports Culture . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/the-power-of-persuasion-how-gatorades-slogan-captures-the-essence-of-sports-culture/ [Accessed: 15-May-2024]
Hire a writer to get a unique paper crafted to your needs.
Our writers will help you fix any mistakes and get an A+!
Please check your inbox.
You can order an original essay written according to your instructions.
Trusted by over 1 million students worldwide
1. Tell Us Your Requirements
2. Pick your perfect writer
3. Get Your Paper and Pay
Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!
Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.
short deadlines
100% Plagiarism-Free
Certified writers
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
The Power of Words. Summary. Four new books investigate how language connects, differentiates, and enlightens us. Viorica Marian's The Power of Language explores the benefits of multilingualism ...
The huge power of words in literature, speeches, songs, and sermons are seen over and over again. The use of such powerful words can evoke emotions, motivations, and encouragement to the listeners because they are not just characters put together…there is emotion behind each single word. Cain and Abel is a story found from within the Bible ...
Words have the power to inspire personal growth and self-improvement. Through books, articles, and motivational content, individuals can access valuable insights, knowledge, and guidance for their ...
The Power of Words. Language is a neurocognitive tool by which we can: · Transmit and exchange information. · Influence and control the behavior of others. · Establish and demonstrate social ...
Taylor Bertolini grew up primarily finding notes filled with love and compassion in her lunchbox. She learned that a few words of encouragement could not only change her life, but the lives of others. That idea followed her to college where she started an organization on the NSU campus called Campus Cursive. When you harness the power of a kind word, you have the power to change lives.
500 Words Essay on The Power of Words The Essence of Words. Words, the basic building blocks of communication, are more than mere symbols or sounds. They carry immense power, shaping our thoughts, actions, and the world around us. They can build bridges or erect walls, heal wounds or inflict pain, inspire revolutions or maintain status quo. ...
The power of language: How words shape people, culture. Speaking, writing and reading are integral to everyday life, where language is the primary tool for expression and communication. Studying ...
2008 •. THE POWER OF WORDS ROBIN ALLOTT [Language Origins Society, Amsterdam. 1990] What I want to emphasise is the unrecognised power of words. the value of the individual word. We take words - language - very much for granted, just as we take our eyes, our power of vision for granted. But both are tremendously flexible and wide-ranging ...
words to further a political agenda, perhaps to persuade young citizens to risk their lives by going to war. The way words are used can cause either the oppression of a people or their empowerment. Because words have such power to change the way people understand the world and relate to the world, we can use words to transform the world.
In this essay, we engage in a reappraisal of her political thought, and of her relevance to contemporary politics, by way of her discussion of the power of words. Weil shares much with contemporary approaches that view the world as a text to be interpreted. But for Weil, the power of interpretation carries with it an illusion, exemplified in ...
The Power of Words. Words help us frame issues and find paths forward. One such powerful word is "equity," entering our professional vocabulary and then galvanizing our ambition in step with our growing understanding of the dynamics of social determinants ( Braveman, Arkin, Orleans, Proctor, & Plough, 2017 ). Small words, and small word ...
Research has shown how the power of words can change our lives by labeling, writing, and reading. Labeling. Neuroscience research has shown the powerful effect words have on our brains. For ...
1. Speak the truth. "Words have the power to both destroy and heal. When words are both true and kind, they can change our world.". — Gautama Buddha. Trust is built on honesty; people want to know they can depend on you to tell them the truth, even when it hurts to hear it (and even if it makes you look bad).
This is the first essay in The Big Ideas, ... The word "power" denotes force, physical strength, resistance. But it connotes something more subtle: persuasion, suggestion, inspiration ...
French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre answered this question with the quote: "Words are more treacherous and powerful than we think." Words do indeed lie. It is precisely because of its role as an indispensable tool of communication and thoughts that words have the power to mold our values, emotions and perception.
Words are powerful. Whether you write or speak them, they do have an impact on you and the others. They express feelings and share knowledge. They can change someones mood completely and ignite a spark in them. That´s why writing is an extraordinary experience. It´s not just jotting down symbols that form words, it's a way of expressing ...
Its brilliant flowers look like a fairy dream—but its fierce volcanoes like the passions of a turbulent heart. AGATHOS. They are!—they are! This wild star—it is now three centuries since, with clasped hands, and with streaming eyes, at the feet of my beloved—I spoke it—with a few passionate sentences—into birth.
The power of language has a way to reduce the problems for people and make it easier on them to kill the enemy. Wartime language is used in a positive way to bring change for everyone. Lakoff says that this language is a beneficial tool for the soldiers, but can be misused. Wartime language helps the soldiers on and off duty, and even the ones ...
Markus Zusak's award-winning novel, The Book Thief, is a narrative about an orphaned girl, Liesel Meminger, and her journey in war-torn Nazi Germany to discover the power of words. Though Liesel's struggle against Adolf Hitler's totalitarian regime, the reader is shown the unseen yet manipulative influence of language.
Reprints: "The Power of Words" — 1888 — The Complete Poetical Works and Essays on Poetry of Edgar Allan Poe, ed. John H. Ingram, London and New York: Frederick Warne & Co. (pp. 126-130) (This tale is included as one of six "Prose Poems," without further explanation.)
Prompt Examples for "The Book Thief" Essay. Character Development: Explore how the characters in "The Book Thief" are shaped and transformed by the power of words, including Liesel, Hans, and Max. Literary Devices: Analyze the literary devices used by Markus Zusak to emphasize the significance of words in the narrative, such as metaphors, symbolism, and imagery.
The Power of Words . All over the world, words are the primary way people communicate with each other. It doesn't matter where you live, what color you are, or what creed you follow; words convey your thoughts. There is no bigger medium of expression. We use words to thank, to plead, to rejoice, to grieve, to instruct, to congratulate.
The power of words brings a sense of relaxation and serenity to Liesel and words begin to form a deep bond between Liesel and Hans. Another example of the power of words is on page 105. Hans Jr. and Hans get into a major argument. Hans Jr. calls his father a coward which results in Hans Jr. storming out,…. 532 Words.
Essay Example: Storytelling, an intrinsic human practice, transcends mere entertainment, embodying a profound method of communication that connects individuals, delineates cultures, and shapes our understanding of the world. ... The true power of storytelling lies in its ability to stir emotions and develop empathy. As audiences immerse ...
This essay about critical thinking outlines its importance and practical applications in everyday life. It defines critical thinking as the art of analyzing and evaluating information to form reasoned conclusions, emphasizing the importance of questioning information, structuring thoughts, and self-reflection.
In the campus protests over the war in Gaza, language and rhetoric are—as they have always been when it comes to Israel and Palestine—weapons of mass destruction. By Zadie Smith. May 5, 2024 ...
Words are powerful, and the Americans that frame this as the Israel-Hamas war are equating a super military power with a small group of militants that do not represent an entire displaced people ...
Essay Example: Persuasion is an ancient art, refined through the centuries as a pivotal tool in the spheres of politics, education, and advertisement. ... illustrating the effective combination of these elements in practical scenarios to enhance communication and persuasive power. Category: Ethos. Date added: 2024/05/12. Words: 539. Download: 203.
The Power of Our Words. Recently, my oldest daughter shared one of her favorite lessons from her guidance counselors on the importance of words. The lesson discussed the impact of our words on the ...
The slogan's rhetorical power lies in its simplicity and dual meaning, resonating both as a physical intake and a metaphor for internal qualities necessary for success. The essay also discusses how Gatorade leverages visual endorsements from renowned athletes to strengthen its brand identity, making the drink synonymous with peak performance ...