a literature review on organizational culture and corporate performance

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

A Literature Review on Organization Culture and Corporate Performance

From 1980s, there are more and more studies about organization culture. And in Chinese studies and practices, we pay much attention to the culture due to the direct relationship between the organization culture and corporate performance, which we can be convinced by some academic papers. But there are some limitations in the study. This paper would like to give a literature review about organization culture and corporate performance. Meanwhile, we would give some suggestions about the further study.

Related Papers

International Journal of Business Administration

Edwinah Amah

sarmina Samad

Background: Organizational culture and organizational performance are two concepts that have attracted a great deal of interest among scholars due to its impact on organizational outcomes. Objective: This paper presents the findings of a study which examined the relationship and impact of organizational culture on organizational performance. Finally the study examined the most important aspect of organizational culture that influenced organizational performance. Results: The study found that organizational culture was related to organizational performance and indicated of a significant impact on organizational performance. It was found that involvement emerged as the most important aspect of organizational culture that affected organizational performance. Conclusion: Four components of organizational culture namely involvement, consistency, adaptation and mission are pivotal in enhancing organizational performance.

Sol Salazar

Divya Maniam

ijbssnet.com

DR Nor'Aini Yusof

Editor IJBA

Dr. Rabia Imran

Aliza Racelis

Jehanzeb ishaq

Alireza Nazarian

RELATED PAPERS

Hassan Al-Dhaafri

burcin bicer

Journal of Operations Management

ashamaran ashamaran

Jennifer Chatman , Bernadette Doerr

Mochammad Jodhy J. Rachman

IAEME Publication

Devanadhen K

John Wingender

adeniji alex

R&D Management

Zvi Aronson , Thomas Lechler

European Journal of Business and Management

Mayowa G Agboola

Mahdi Mohammad Bagheri

IOSR Journals publish within 3 days

European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

Stephanie Haaland , Daniel Denison

Muhammad Jehanzaib

The Leadership Quarterly

Mansour Javidan

Catrinoiu Raluca

Human Relations

Daniel Denison , Mike Gillespie

Faiza Zahoor

SA Journal of Industrial Psychology

Delene Visser , Melinde Coetzee

Journal of the Knowledge Economy

Zvi Aronson

Alberto Azevedo

Susan Goldstein

Reginald L . Bell

Gökhan ALTINER

Journal of Management Studies

Gordon Foxall

European Scientific Journal ESJ

Herman Vieme

Canadian Institute for Knowledge Development (CIKD)

International Journal of Organizational Leadership (IJOL)

SSRN Electronic Journal

Shalini Srivastava

Journal of Business Research

lutfihak alpkan , Ercan Ergün , Cengiz Yilmaz

Tara Duncan

AKMAL SIAMA

Jun Huang , Aziz Bakay

Dorothea Wahyu Ariani

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Browse Econ Literature

• Working papers
• Software components
• Book chapters
• JEL classification

More features

• Subscribe to new research

RePEc Biblio

Author registration.

• Economics Virtual Seminar Calendar NEW!

A Literature Review on Organization Culture and Corporate Performance

• Author & abstract
• 5 Citations
• Related works & more

Corrections

• Cui Xiaoming

Suggested Citation

Download full text from publisher.

Follow serials, authors, keywords & more

Public profiles for Economics researchers

Various research rankings in Economics

RePEc Genealogy

Who was a student of whom, using RePEc

Curated articles & papers on economics topics

Upload your paper to be listed on RePEc and IDEAS

New papers by email

Subscribe to new additions to RePEc

EconAcademics

Blog aggregator for economics research

Cases of plagiarism in Economics

About RePEc

Initiative for open bibliographies in Economics

News about RePEc

Questions about IDEAS and RePEc

RePEc volunteers

Participating archives

Publishers indexing in RePEc

Privacy statement

Found an error or omission?

Opportunities to help RePEc

Get papers listed

Have your research listed on RePEc

Open a RePEc archive

Have your institution's/publisher's output listed on RePEc

Get RePEc data

Use data assembled by RePEc

Competitive Advantage and Firm Performance: The Role of Organizational Culture, Organizational Innovation, and Knowledge Sharing

• Published: 29 May 2024

Cite this article

• Jianhua Zhang 1 ,
• Farrah Nayab Jehangir 1 ,
• Lan Yang 2 ,
• Muhammad Abubakar Tahir 3 &
• Shanza Tabasum 4  

83 Accesses

Explore all metrics

The swift economic transformations and process of globalization have prompted enterprises to urgently develop efficient ways to enhance performance and ensure their long-term existence. The objective of this study is to investigate whether organizational culture (OC), knowledge sharing (KS), and organizational innovation (OI) helps to achieve competitive advantage (CA) which leads to firm performance (FP). The research is carried out in the province of Punjab, Pakistan. Three hundred twenty-two managers from the textile sector were surveyed regarding their familiarity with previous and current organizational practices regarding cultural and innovation-related factors inside their organization. The data was validated and the potential relationships were investigated using variance-based partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS_SEM). According to resource-based view theory, study discovered that organizational culture has a strong positive influence on knowledge sharing, organizational innovation, and competitive advantage. In addition, competitive advantage has a significant influence on firm performance. Furthermore, study confirms complementary partial mediation of knowledge sharing and organizational innovation between the relationship of organizational culture and competitive advantage. The current study emphasized the crucial role of organizational culture in achieving operational success in the company. It identified knowledge sharing and organizational innovation as important factors for creating a competitive advantage, which in turn enhances financial performance. The findings offer crucial insights for managers to accurately comprehend the alignment between the organizational culture and the strategic trajectory of the company. By simultaneously examining the relationships between organizational culture, knowledge sharing, organizational innovation, competitive advantage, and firm performance, this paper extends the previous empirical studies. It may assist managers in formulation of strategies to develop competitive advantage and business.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

The Long March to an Innovative Culture: Development of Corporate Cultures in China from the 1990s Until Today

Innovation and Culture as a Dynamic Capability for Firm Performance: A Study from Emerging Markets

References .

Abd Aziz, N. N., & Samad, S. (2016). Innovation and competitive advantage: Moderating effects of firm age in foods manufacturing SMEs in Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35 , 256–266.

Article   Google Scholar  

Abdi, K., Mardani, A., Senin, A. A., Tupėnaitė, L., Naimavičienė, J., Kanapeckienė, L., & Kutut, V. (2018). The effect of knowledge management, organizational culture and organizational learning on innovation in automotive industry.

Abdi, K., & Senin, A. A. (2014). Investigation on the impact of organizational culture on organization innovation. Journal of Management Policies and Practices, 2 (2), 1–10.

Google Scholar  

Abdul Rahman, R. (2011). Knowledge sharing practices: A case study at Malaysia’s healthcare research institutes. The International Information & Library Review, 43 (4), 207–214.

Abdul-Jalal, H., Toulson, P., & Tweed, D. (2013). Knowledge sharing success for sustaining organizational competitive advantage. Procedia Economics and Finance, 7 , 150–157.

Abeysekara, N., Wang, H., & Kuruppuarachchi, D. (2019). Effect of supply-chain resilience on firm performance and competitive advantage: A study of the Sri Lankan apparel industry. Business Process Management Journal, 25 (7), 1673–1695.

Ahmed, M., & Shafiq, S. (2014). The impact of organizational culture on organizational performance: A case study of telecom sector. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 14 (3), 21–30.

Alateeg, S., & Alhammadi, A. (2024). The impact of organizational culture on organizational innovation with mediation role of strategic leadership in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Statistics Applications & Probability, 13 (2), 843–858.

Al-Kurdi, O. F., El-Haddadeh, R., & Eldabi, T. (2020). The role of organisational climate in managing knowledge sharing among academics in higher education. International Journal of Information Management, 50 , 217–227.

Antony, J. P., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2010). Measuring organizational performance and organizational excellence of SMEs–part 2: An empirical study on SMEs in India. Measuring Business Excellence, 14 (3), 42–52.

Anwar, M. (2018). Business model innovation and SMEs performance—Does competitive advantage mediate? International Journal of Innovation Management, 22 (07), 1850057.

Arsawan, I. W. E., Koval, V., Rajiani, I., Rustiarini, N. W., Supartha, W. G., & Suryantini, N. P. S. (2020). Leveraging knowledge sharing and innovation culture into SMEs sustainable competitive advantage. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71 (2), 405–428.

Asat, S., Maruhun, E., Haron, H., & Jaafar, M. (2015). Enterprise risk management (ERM) and organisational performance: Le cas des promoteurs immobiliers en Malaisie. Paper presented at the Dans le cadre de la conférence internationale MARIM, Langkawi. Malaisie.

Asghar, B., Wasim, A., Qazi, U., & Rasool, A. (2020). Financial and non-financial practices driving sustainable firm performance: Evidence from banking sector of developing countries. Sustainability, 12 (15), 6164.

Astuti, P. D., Datrini, L. K., & Chariri, A. (2023). Understanding the antecedents and consequences of sustainable competitive advantage: Testing intellectual capital and organizational performance. Economies, 11 (4), 120.

Azeem, M., Ahmed, M., Haider, S., & Sajjad, M. (2021). Expanding competitive advantage through organizational culture, knowledge sharing and organizational innovation. Technology in Society, 66 , 101635.

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16 , 74–94.

Barham, H., Dabic, M., Daim, T., & Shifrer, D. (2020). The role of management support for the implementation of open innovation practices in firms. Technology in Society, 63 , 101282.

Barney, J. B. (1986). Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review, 11 (3), 656–665.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99–120.

Barney, J. B., & Clark, D. N. (2007). Resource-based theory: Creating and sustaining competitive advantage : Oup Oxford.

Bell DeTienne, K., & Jackson, L. A. (2001). Knowledge management: Understanding theory and developing strategy. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 11 (1), 1–11.

Bendak, S., Shikhli, A. M., & Abdel-Razek, R. H. (2020). How changing organizational culture can enhance innovation: Development of the innovative culture enhancement framework. Cogent Business & Management, 7 (1), 1712125.

Bilan, Y., Pimonenko, T., & Starchenko, L. (2020). Sustainable business models for innovation and success: Bibliometric analysis.

BOI. Boarf of investment report (Textile Sector in Pakistan). from https://invest.gov.pk/sites/default/files/inline-files/Profile%20-%20Textile%20Sector_new.pdf?gtranslate=en

Bouwman, H., Nikou, S., Molina-Castillo, F. J., & de Reuver, M. (2018). The impact of digitalization on business models. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 20 (2), 105–124.

Brem, A., Maier, M., & Wimschneider, C. (2016). Competitive advantage through innovation: The case of Nespresso. European Journal of Innovation Management, 19 (1), 133–148.

Cameron, K., & Quinn, R. (2000). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture, based on the competing values framework, 1999 . Addison Wesley.

Camisón, C., & Villar-López, A. (2014). Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67 (1), 2891–2902.

Chan, R. Y. (2010). Corporate environmentalism pursuit by foreign firms competing in China. Journal of World Business, 45 (1), 80–92.

Chang, W.-J., Liao, S.-H., & Wu, T.-T. (2017). Relationships among organizational culture, knowledge sharing, and innovation capability: A case of the automobile industry in Taiwan. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15 (3), 471–490.

Chatterjee, A., Pereira, A., & Bates, R. (2018). Impact of individual perception of organizational culture on the learning transfer environment. International Journal of Training and Development, 22 (1), 15–33.

Chatzoglou, P., & Chatzoudes, D. (2017). The role of innovation in building competitive advantages: An empirical investigation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 21 (1), 44–69.

Chen, Y. S., Lin, S. H., Lin, C. Y., Hung, S. T., Chang, C. W., & Huang, C. W. (2020). Improving green product development performance from green vision and organizational culture perspectives. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27 (1), 222–231.

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling.

Cohen, D. (1998). Culture, social organization, and patterns of violence.

Connor, T. (2002). The resource-based view of strategy and its value to practising managers. Strategic Change, 11 (6), 307–316.

Curado, C., Henriques, P., Oliveira, M., & Martins, R. (2023). Organisational culture as an antecedent of knowledge sharing in NGOs. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 21 (3), 449–461.

Darroch, J., Miles, M., & Jardine, A. (2014). Market creation: A path to sustainable competitive advantage. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2008 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference.

Eidizadeh, R., Salehzadeh, R., & Chitsaz Esfahani, A. (2017). Analysing the role of business intelligence, knowledge sharing and organisational innovation on gaining competitive advantage. Journal of Workplace Learning, 29 (4), 250–267.

Eshima, Y., & Anderson, B. S. (2017). Firm growth, adaptive capability, and entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 38 (3), 770–779.

Eskiler, E., Ekici, S., Soyer, F., & Sari, I. (2016). The relationship between organizational culture and innovative work behavior for sports services in tourism enterprises. Physical culture and sport Studies and research, 69 (1), 53–64.

Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling : University of Akron Press.

Farida, I., & Setiawan, D. (2022). Business strategies and competitive advantage: The role of performance and innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8 (3), 163.

fashionating_world. (2024). Pakistan’s Textile Industry’s Strides in 2024. from https://www.fashionatingworld.com/new1-2/pakistan-s-textile-exports-grow-to-1-41-billion-in-february-2024-aptma

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39–50.

Frankfort-Nachmias, C., & Nachmias, D. (2007). Study guide for research methods in the social sciences : Macmillan.

Fujii, H., Iwata, K., Kaneko, S., & Managi, S. (2013). Corporate environmental and economic performance of Japanese manufacturing firms: Empirical study for sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22 (3), 187–201.

Gil-Gomez, H., Guerola-Navarro, V., Oltra-Badenes, R., & Lozano-Quilis, J. A. (2020). Customer relationship management: Digital transformation and sustainable business model innovation. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33 (1), 2733–2750.

Götz, O., Liehr-Gobbers, K., & Krafft, M. (2009). Evaluation of structural equation models using the partial least squares (PLS) approach Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (691–711): Springer.

Govindarajan, V., & Gupta, A. K. (1992). Linking control systems to business unit strategy: Impact on performance : Springer.

Gürlek, M., & Tuna, M. (2018). Reinforcing competitive advantage through green organizational culture and green innovation. The Service Industries Journal, 38 (7–8), 467–491.

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19 (2), 139–152.

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis, Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Technometrics, 15 (3).

Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) Sage Publications. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA .

Hakkak, M., & Ghodsi, M. (2015). Development of a sustainable competitive advantage model based on balanced scorecard. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 5 (5), 298–308.

Halim, E. H., Mustika, G., Sari, R. N., Anugerah, R., & Mohd-Sanusi, Z. (2017). Corporate governance practices and financial performance: The mediating effect of risk management committee at manufacturing firms. Journal of International Studies, 10 (4).

Hameed, K., Arshed, N., Yazdani, N., & Munir, M. (2021). Motivating business towards innovation: A panel data study using dynamic capability framework. Technology in Society, 65 , 101581.

Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116 (1), 2–20.

Hill, C. W., Jones, G. R., & Schilling, M. A. (2014). Strategic management: Theory & cases: An integrated approach : Cengage Learning.

Hock-Doepgen, M., Clauss, T., Kraus, S., & Cheng, C.-F. (2021). Knowledge management capabilities and organizational risk-taking for business model innovation in SMEs. Journal of Business Research, 130 , 683–697.

Hogan, S. J., & Coote, L. V. (2014). Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein’s model. Journal of Business Research, 67 (8), 1609–1621.

Hossain, M. S., Hussain, K., Kannan, S., & Kunju Raman Nair, S. K. (2022). Determinants of sustainable competitive advantage from resource-based view: Implications for hotel industry. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 5 (1), 79–98.

Ishikawa, A., Mako, C., & Warhurst, C. (2006). Work and employee representation: Workers, firms and unions III.

Ittner, C. D., & Larcker, D. F. (1998). Innovations in performance measurement: Trends and research implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 10 , 205.

Laursen, K. (2002). The importance of sectoral differences in the application of complementary HRM practices for innovation performance. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 9 (1), 139–156.

Leal Rodríguez, A. L., Leal Millán, A., Roldán Salgueiro, J. L., & Ortega Gutiérrez, J. (2013). Knowledge management and the effectiveness of innovation outcomes: The role of cultural barriers. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Managemet, 11 (1), 62–71.

Lee, S., Oh, H. Y., & Choi, J. (2020). Service design management and organizational innovation performance. Sustainability, 13 (1), 4.

Liao, S.-H., Chang, W.-J., Hu, D.-C., & Yueh, Y.-L. (2012). Relationships among organizational culture, knowledge acquisition, organizational learning, and organizational innovation in Taiwan’s banking and insurance industries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23 (1), 52–70.

Liao, S., Fu, L., & Liu, Z. (2020). Investigating open innovation strategies and firm performance: The moderating role of technological capability and market information management capability. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 35 (1), 23–39.

Lin, H.-F. (2006). Impact of organizational support on organizational intention to facilitate knowledge sharing. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 4 (1), 26–35.

Lloréns Montes, F. J., Ruiz Moreno, A., Fernández, M. M., & L. (2004). Assessing the organizational climate and contractual relationship for perceptions of support for innovation. International Journal of Manpower, 25 (2), 167–180.

Loon, M. (2019). Knowledge management practice system: Theorising from an international meta-standard. Journal of Business Research, 94 , 432–441.

Ma, H. (2000). Competitive advantage and firm performance. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 10 (2), 15–32.

Malik, M. S., & Kanwal, M. (2018). Impacts of organizational knowledge sharing practices on employees’ job satisfaction: Mediating roles of learning commitment and interpersonal adaptability. Journal of Workplace Learning, 30 (1), 2–17.

Martins, E.-C., & Terblanche, F. (2003). Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6 (1), 64–74.

Medina, C. C., Lavado, A. C., & Cabrera, R. V. (2005). Characteristics of innovative companies: A case study of companies in different sectors. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14 (3), 272–287.

Memon, S. B., Qureshi, J. A., & Jokhio, I. A. (2020). The role of organizational culture in knowledge sharing and transfer in Pakistani banks: A qualitative study. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 39 (3), 45–54.

Naveed, R. T., Alhaidan, H., Al Halbusi, H., & Al-Swidi, A. K. (2022). Do organizations really evolve? The critical link between organizational culture and organizational innovation toward organizational effectiveness: Pivotal role of organizational resistance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7 (2), 100178.

Nomran, N. M., & Haron, R. (2020). A systematic literature review on Sharī’ah governance mechanism and firm performance in Islamic banking. Islamic Economic Studies, 27 (2), 91–123.

Ong, L. K. (2003). Does adding nonfinancial value drivers to a summary financial measure improve the learning and performance of managers? : University of Southern California.

Ooi, K.-B. (2014). TQM: A facilitator to enhance knowledge management? A structural analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 41 (11), 5167–5179.

Ozer, M., & Vogel, D. (2015). Contextualized relationship between knowledge sharing and performance in software development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32 (2), 134–161.

Papadas, K.-K., Avlonitis, G. J., Carrigan, M., & Piha, L. (2019). The interplay of strategic and internal green marketing orientation on competitive advantage. Journal of Business Research, 104 , 632–643.

PBIT. Punjab Board of Investment & Trade from https://pbit.gov.pk/textile_ind

Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (3), 179–191.

Rašula, J., Bosilj Vukšić, V., & Indihar Štemberger, M. (2012). The impact of knowledge management on organisational performance. Economic and Business Review, 14 (2), 3.

Roscoe, J. T. (1975). Fundamental research statistics for the behavioral sciences [by] John T: Roscoe.

Saif, M. R., & Yeop, N. K. B. (2020). The effect of organizational culture on knowledge management and managerial performance of government department in Dubai. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 5 (1), 47–53.

Samad, S. (2018). Examining the effects of environmental strategy and competitive advantage on business performance. Management Science Letters, 8 (9), 891–902.

Samad, S., Yusuf, M., Yassien, A., & Ahmed, W. (2017). Influence of formulation and implementation strategy on organizational performance: A case in Ministry of Health. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 12 (1), 37–44.

Sardana, D., Gupta, N., Kumar, V., & Terziovski, M. (2020). CSR ‘sustainability’practices and firm performance in an emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258 , 120766.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students : Pearson education.

Schulz, A. K., Wu, A., & Chow, C. W. (2010). Environmental uncertainty, comprehensive performance measurement systems, performance-based compensation, and organizational performance. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 17 (1), 17–39.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach : john wiley & sons.

Shahzad, F., Xiu, G., & Shahbaz, M. (2017). Organizational culture and innovation performance in Pakistan’s software industry. Technology in Society, 51 , 66–73.

Shahzad, M., Qu, Y., Zafar, A. U., Rehman, S. U., & Islam, T. (2020). Exploring the influence of knowledge management process on corporate sustainable performance through green innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24 (9), 2079–2106.

Sigalas, C. (2015). Competitive advantage: The known unknown concept. Management Decision, 53 (9), 2004–2016.

Sullivan, G. M., & Feinn, R. (2012). Using effect size—Or why the P value is not enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4 (3), 279–282.

Talaja, A., & Ercegović, J. (2013). Competitive advantage and company’s performance: Exploring the differences and relationship. Paper presented at the Advanced research in scientific areas.

Tan, B.-S. (2019). In search of the link between organizational culture and performance: A review from the conclusion validity perspective. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40 (3), 356–368.

Tsai, K.-H., & Yang, S.-Y. (2013). Firm innovativeness and business performance: The joint moderating effects of market turbulence and competition. Industrial Marketing Management, 42 (8), 1279–1294.

Tsang, E. W. (2002). Acquiring knowledge by foreign partners from international joint ventures in a transition economy: Learning-by-doing and learning myopia. Strategic Management Journal, 23 (9), 835–854.

Turney, S. (2022). Pearson correlation coefficient (R): Guide & examples. Scribbr.

Upadhyay, P., & Kumar, A. (2020). The intermediating role of organizational culture and internal analytical knowledge between the capability of big data analytics and a firm’s performance. International Journal of Information Management, 52 , 102100.

Uto, S. C., Uwa, K. L., & Akpan, A. (2024). Knowledge management and competitive advantage in selected manufacturing firms in Akwa Ibom State. International Journal of Business and Management Review, 12 (1), 1–20.

Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1987). Measurement of business economic performance: An examination of method convergence. Journal of Management, 13 (1), 109–122.

Vinzi, V. E., Chin, W. W., Henseler, J., & Wang, H. (2010). Handbook of partial least squares (Vol. 201): Springer.

Waheed, A., Miao, X., Waheed, S., Ahmad, N., & Majeed, A. (2019). How new HRM practices, organizational innovation, and innovative climate affect the innovation performance in the IT industry: A moderated-mediation analysis. Sustainability, 11 (3), 621.

Walter, J., Kellermanns, F. W., Floyd, S. W., Veiga, J. F., & Matherne, C. (2013). Strategic alignment: A missing link in the relationship between strategic consensus and organizational performance. Strategic Organization, 11 (3), 304–328.

Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20 (2), 115–131.

Wang, X., Arnett, D. B., & Hou, L. (2016). Using external knowledge to improve organizational innovativeness: Understanding the knowledge leveraging process. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 31 (2), 164–173.

Wang, H., Tian, L., & Li, Y. (2019). A tale of two cultures: Social networks and competitive advantage. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36 , 321–347.

Wang, H.-L. (2014). Theories for competitive advantage.

Warrick, D. D. (2017). What leaders need to know about organizational culture. Business Horizons, 60 (3), 395–404.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5 (2), 171–180.

Wiewiora, A., Trigunarsyah, B., Murphy, G., & Coffey, V. (2013). Organizational culture and willingness to share knowledge: A competing values perspective in Australian context. International Journal of Project Management, 31 (8), 1163–1174.

Yang, Z., Nguyen, V. T., & Le, P. B. (2018). Knowledge sharing serves as a mediator between collaborative culture and innovation capability: An empirical research. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 33 (7), 958–969.

Zeb, A., Akbar, F., Hussain, K., Safi, A., Rabnawaz, M., & Zeb, F. (2021). The competing value framework model of organizational culture, innovation and performance. Business Process Management Journal, 27 (2), 658–683.

Zheng, W., Yang, B., & McLean, G. N. (2010). Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management. Journal of Business Research, 63 (7), 763–771.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Management, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China

Jianhua Zhang & Farrah Nayab Jehangir

School of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China

College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China

Muhammad Abubakar Tahir

COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan

Shanza Tabasum

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farrah Nayab Jehangir .

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Zhang, J., Jehangir, F.N., Yang, L. et al. Competitive Advantage and Firm Performance: The Role of Organizational Culture, Organizational Innovation, and Knowledge Sharing. J Knowl Econ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01910-3

Download citation

Received : 08 February 2024

Accepted : 08 March 2024

Published : 29 May 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01910-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Firm performance
• Competitive advantage
• Organizational culture
• Knowledge sharing
• Organizational innovation

JEL Classification

• O31-032-Q55-D23-D29-D83-L25-L29

Advertisement

• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

The four building blocks of change

Large-scale organizational change has always been difficult, and there’s no shortage of research showing that a majority of transformations continue to fail. Today’s dynamic environment adds an extra level of urgency and complexity. Companies must increasingly react to sudden shifts in the marketplace, to other external shocks, and to the imperatives of new business models. The stakes are higher than ever.

So what’s to be done? In both research and practice, we find that transformations stand the best chance of success when they focus on four key actions to change mind-sets and behavior: fostering understanding and conviction, reinforcing changes through formal mechanisms, developing talent and skills, and role modeling. Collectively labeled the “influence model,” these ideas were introduced more than a dozen years ago in a McKinsey Quarterly article, “ The psychology of change management .” They were based on academic research and practical experience—what we saw worked and what didn’t.

Digital technologies and the changing nature of the workforce have created new opportunities and challenges for the influence model (for more on the relationship between those trends and the model, see this article’s companion, “ Winning hearts and minds in the 21st century ”). But it still works overall, a decade and a half later (exhibit). In a recent McKinsey Global Survey, we examined successful transformations and found that they were nearly eight times more likely to use all four actions as opposed to just one. 1 1. See “ The science of organizational transformations ,” September 2015. Building both on classic and new academic research, the present article supplies a primer on the model and its four building blocks: what they are, how they work, and why they matter.

Fostering understanding and conviction

We know from research that human beings strive for congruence between their beliefs and their actions and experience dissonance when these are misaligned. Believing in the “why” behind a change can therefore inspire people to change their behavior. In practice, however, we find that many transformation leaders falsely assume that the “why” is clear to the broader organization and consequently fail to spend enough time communicating the rationale behind change efforts.

This common pitfall is predictable. Research shows that people frequently overestimate the extent to which others share their own attitudes, beliefs, and opinions—a tendency known as the false-consensus effect. Studies also highlight another contributing phenomenon, the “curse of knowledge”: people find it difficult to imagine that others don’t know something that they themselves do know. To illustrate this tendency, a Stanford study asked participants to tap out the rhythms of well-known songs and predict the likelihood that others would guess what they were. The tappers predicted that the listeners would identify half of the songs correctly; in reality, they did so less than 5 percent of the time. 2 2. Chip Heath and Dan Heath, “The curse of knowledge,” Harvard Business Review , December 2006, Volume 8, Number 6, hbr.org.

Therefore, in times of transformation, we recommend that leaders develop a change story that helps all stakeholders understand where the company is headed, why it is changing, and why this change is important. Building in a feedback loop to sense how the story is being received is also useful. These change stories not only help get out the message but also, recent research finds, serve as an effective influencing tool. Stories are particularly effective in selling brands. 3 3. Harrison Monarth, “The irresistible power of storytelling as a strategic business tool,” Harvard Business Review , March 11, 2014, hbr.org.

Even 15 years ago, at the time of the original article, digital advances were starting to make employees feel involved in transformations, allowing them to participate in shaping the direction of their companies. In 2006, for example, IBM used its intranet to conduct two 72-hour “jam sessions” to engage employees, clients, and other stakeholders in an online debate about business opportunities. No fewer than 150,000 visitors attended from 104 countries and 67 different companies, and there were 46,000 posts. 4 4. Icons of Progress , “A global innovation jam,” ibm.com. As we explain in “Winning hearts and minds in the 21st century,” social and mobile technologies have since created a wide range of new opportunities to build the commitment of employees to change.

Reinforcing with formal mechanisms

Psychologists have long known that behavior often stems from direct association and reinforcement. Back in the 1920s, Ivan Pavlov’s classical conditioning research showed how the repeated association between two stimuli—the sound of a bell and the delivery of food—eventually led dogs to salivate upon hearing the bell alone. Researchers later extended this work on conditioning to humans, demonstrating how children could learn to fear a rat when it was associated with a loud noise. 5 5. John B. Watson and Rosalie Rayner, “Conditioned emotional reactions,” Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1920, Volume 3, Number 1, pp. 1–14. Of course, this conditioning isn’t limited to negative associations or to animals. The perfume industry recognizes how the mere scent of someone you love can induce feelings of love and longing.

Reinforcement can also be conscious, shaped by the expected rewards and punishments associated with specific forms of behavior. B. F. Skinner’s work on operant conditioning showed how pairing positive reinforcements such as food with desired behavior could be used, for example, to teach pigeons to play Ping-Pong. This concept, which isn’t hard to grasp, is deeply embedded in organizations. Many people who have had commissions-based sales jobs will understand the point—being paid more for working harder can sometimes be a strong incentive.

Despite the importance of reinforcement, organizations often fail to use it correctly. In a seminal paper “On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B,” management scholar Steven Kerr described numerous examples of organizational-reward systems that are misaligned with the desired behavior, which is therefore neglected. 6 6. Steven Kerr, “On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B,” Academy of Management Journal , 1975, Volume 18, Number 4, pp. 769–83. Some of the paper’s examples—such as the way university professors are rewarded for their research publications, while society expects them to be good teachers—are still relevant today. We ourselves have witnessed this phenomenon in a global refining organization facing market pressure. By squeezing maintenance expenditures and rewarding employees who cut them, the company in effect treated that part of the budget as a “super KPI.” Yet at the same time, its stated objective was reliable maintenance.

Even when organizations use money as a reinforcement correctly, they often delude themselves into thinking that it alone will suffice. Research examining the relationship between money and experienced happiness—moods and general well-being—suggests a law of diminishing returns. The relationship may disappear altogether after around $75,000, a much lower ceiling than most executives assume. 7 7. Belinda Luscombe, “Do we need $75,000 a year to be happy?” Time , September 6, 2010, time.com.

Would you like to learn more about our People & Organizational Performance Practice ?

Money isn’t the only motivator, of course. Victor Vroom’s classic research on expectancy theory explained how the tendency to behave in certain ways depends on the expectation that the effort will result in the desired kind of performance, that this performance will be rewarded, and that the reward will be desirable. 8 8. Victor Vroom, Work and motivation , New York: John Wiley, 1964. When a Middle Eastern telecommunications company recently examined performance drivers, it found that collaboration and purpose were more important than compensation (see “Ahead of the curve: The future of performance management,” forthcoming on McKinsey.com). The company therefore moved from awarding minor individual bonuses for performance to celebrating how specific teams made a real difference in the lives of their customers. This move increased motivation while also saving the organization millions.

How these reinforcements are delivered also matters. It has long been clear that predictability makes them less effective; intermittent reinforcement provides a more powerful hook, as slot-machine operators have learned to their advantage. Further, people react negatively if they feel that reinforcements aren’t distributed fairly. Research on equity theory describes how employees compare their job inputs and outcomes with reference-comparison targets, such as coworkers who have been promoted ahead of them or their own experiences at past jobs. 9 9. J. S. Adams, “Inequity in social exchanges,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology , 1965, Volume 2, pp. 267–300. We therefore recommend that organizations neutralize compensation as a source of anxiety and instead focus on what really drives performance—such as collaboration and purpose, in the case of the Middle Eastern telecom company previously mentioned.

Developing talent and skills

Thankfully, you can teach an old dog new tricks. Human brains are not fixed; neuroscience research shows that they remain plastic well into adulthood. Illustrating this concept, scientific investigation has found that the brains of London taxi drivers, who spend years memorizing thousands of streets and local attractions, showed unique gray-matter volume differences in the hippocampus compared with the brains of other people. Research linked these differences to the taxi drivers’ extraordinary special knowledge. 10 10. Eleanor Maguire, Katherine Woollett, and Hugo Spires, “London taxi drivers and bus drivers: A structural MRI and neuropsychological analysis,” Hippocampus , 2006, Volume 16, pp. 1091–1101.

Despite an amazing ability to learn new things, human beings all too often lack insight into what they need to know but don’t. Biases, for example, can lead people to overlook their limitations and be overconfident of their abilities. Highlighting this point, studies have found that over 90 percent of US drivers rate themselves above average, nearly 70 percent of professors consider themselves in the top 25 percent for teaching ability, and 84 percent of Frenchmen believe they are above-average lovers. 11 11. The art of thinking clearly, “The overconfidence effect: Why you systematically overestimate your knowledge and abilities,” blog entry by Rolf Dobelli, June 11, 2013, psychologytoday.com. This self-serving bias can lead to blind spots, making people too confident about some of their abilities and unaware of what they need to learn. In the workplace, the “mum effect”—a proclivity to keep quiet about unpleasant, unfavorable messages—often compounds these self-serving tendencies. 12 12. Eliezer Yariv, “‘Mum effect’: Principals’ reluctance to submit negative feedback,” Journal of Managerial Psychology , 2006, Volume 21, Number 6, pp. 533–46.

Even when people overcome such biases and actually want to improve, they can handicap themselves by doubting their ability to change. Classic psychological research by Martin Seligman and his colleagues explained how animals and people can fall into a state of learned helplessness—passive acceptance and resignation that develops as a result of repeated exposure to negative events perceived as unavoidable. The researchers found that dogs exposed to unavoidable shocks gave up trying to escape and, when later given an opportunity to do so, stayed put and accepted the shocks as inevitable. 13 13. Martin Seligman and Steven Maier, “Failure to escape traumatic shock,” Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1967, Volume 74, Number 1, pp. 1–9. Like animals, people who believe that developing new skills won’t change a situation are more likely to be passive. You see this all around the economy—from employees who stop offering new ideas after earlier ones have been challenged to unemployed job seekers who give up looking for work after multiple rejections.

Instilling a sense of control and competence can promote an active effort to improve. As expectancy theory holds, people are more motivated to achieve their goals when they believe that greater individual effort will increase performance. 14 14. Victor Vroom, Work and motivation , New York: John Wiley, 1964. Fortunately, new technologies now give organizations more creative opportunities than ever to showcase examples of how that can actually happen.

Role modeling

Research tells us that role modeling occurs both unconsciously and consciously. Unconsciously, people often find themselves mimicking the emotions, behavior, speech patterns, expressions, and moods of others without even realizing that they are doing so. They also consciously align their own thinking and behavior with those of other people—to learn, to determine what’s right, and sometimes just to fit in.

While role modeling is commonly associated with high-power leaders such as Abraham Lincoln and Bill Gates, it isn’t limited to people in formal positions of authority. Smart organizations seeking to win their employees’ support for major transformation efforts recognize that key opinion leaders may exert more influence than CEOs. Nor is role modeling limited to individuals. Everyone has the power to model roles, and groups of people may exert the most powerful influence of all. Robert Cialdini, a well-respected professor of psychology and marketing, examined the power of “social proof”—a mental shortcut people use to judge what is correct by determining what others think is correct. No wonder TV shows have been using canned laughter for decades; believing that other people find a show funny makes us more likely to find it funny too.

Today’s increasingly connected digital world provides more opportunities than ever to share information about how others think and behave. Ever found yourself swayed by the number of positive reviews on Yelp? Or perceiving a Twitter user with a million followers as more reputable than one with only a dozen? You’re not imagining this. Users can now “buy followers” to help those users or their brands seem popular or even start trending.

The endurance of the influence model shouldn’t be surprising: powerful forces of human nature underlie it. More surprising, perhaps, is how often leaders still embark on large-scale change efforts without seriously focusing on building conviction or reinforcing it through formal mechanisms, the development of skills, and role modeling. While these priorities sound like common sense, it’s easy to miss one or more of them amid the maelstrom of activity that often accompanies significant changes in organizational direction. Leaders should address these building blocks systematically because, as research and experience demonstrate, all four together make a bigger impact.

Tessa Basford is a consultant in McKinsey’s Washington, DC, office; Bill Schaninger is a director in the Philadelphia office.

Explore a career with us

Related articles.

Winning hearts and minds in the 21st century

Changing change management

Digital hives: Creating a surge around change