To create or access an application, log in to the . Read the before completing and submitting your application.
Important information, description, eligibility, value and duration of awards, location of tenure, supervision of the student at the institution, subject matter eligibility, san francisco declaration on research assessment, equity, diversity and inclusion, allocations, black student researchers, indigenous student researchers (for nserc only), application procedure, selection process, notification of results, payment of awards, travel allowances, use and disclosure of information.
Undergraduate Student Research Awards (USRAs) are meant to nurture your interest and fully develop your potential for a research career in health, natural sciences and engineering, or social sciences and humanities. These awards are also meant to encourage you to undertake graduate studies by providing research work experience that complements your studies in an academic setting.
You are permitted to hold a USRA during a co-op placement. Your institution’s co-op office or USRA liaison officer (LO) may be able to assist you in finding a placement. LOs are institution administrators and usually work in your institution’s scholarship office.
To be eligible to apply for an award
CIHR and SSHRC USRAs are, at the present time, exclusively for Black student researchers. To be considered, you must self-identify as Black (see the Black student researchers section for more details).
In addition
To hold an award
The USRA program makes no provision for sick leave or vacation, or for other types of interruptions. Should a USRA be interrupted or terminated early for any reason, the agencies must be informed immediately.
Without exception, USRAs are tenable only at eligible Canadian institutions with an assigned allocation. Awards must be held at the institution where the offer of award originates.
An eligible supervisor is a person authorized by the institution to independently supervise students. Your institution will decide if your proposed supervisor is eligible. You must work under the supervision of a person who has been approved by the institution.
NSERC, CIHR and SSHRC support and promote high-quality research in a wide variety of disciplines and areas, which are divided into broad fields of research (health, natural sciences and engineering, and social sciences and humanities). This includes research that bridges two or more disciplines or that requires the skills of several disciplines.
You must ensure that you are submitting your application to an institution that has an allocation for your selected agency (refer to the Undergraduate Student Research Awards allocations web page for a list of allocations by institution and by agency).
If the granting agency determines your application was submitted to the wrong agency based on the subject matter, it will be transferred accordingly (refer to Selecting the appropriate federal granting agency web page for more information).
It is not necessary for your proposed supervisor’s research program to be exclusively within your selected agency’s field of study (health, natural sciences and engineering, or social sciences and humanities).
NSERC is a signatory to the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) . To promote NSERC’s support of research excellence in Canada and incorporate the principles of DORA, NSERC has developed Guidelines on the assessment of contributions to research, training and mentoring . The guidelines highlight NSERC’s commitment to excellence in research funding and aim to ensure that a wide range of research results and outcomes are considered and valued as part of the assessment process.
The three agencies are acting on the evidence that achieving a more equitable, diverse and inclusive Canadian research enterprise is essential to creating the excellent, innovative and impactful research necessary to advance knowledge and understanding, and to respond to local, national and global challenges. This principle informs the commitments described in the Tri-agency statement on equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) and is aligned with the objectives of the Tri-agency EDI Action Plan .
When preparing the research proposal, supervisors are encouraged to consult the NSERC guide on integrating equity, diversity and inclusion considerations in research web page.
Eligible Canadian institutions are assigned a separate allocation of awards to offer from each agency. Institutions must respect the agency-specific allocation of awards. Refer to the Undergraduate Student Research Awards allocations web page for a list of allocations by institution and by agency.
For NSERC: Institutions may recommend applications from self-identified Black student researchers for USRAs beyond their allocation of awards.
For CIHR and SSHRC: At the present time, CIHR and SSHRC USRAs are exclusively for Black student researchers. Institutions are assigned an allocation of awards, as outlined in the Undergraduate Student Research Awards allocations web page. To be eligible to apply for these awards, you must self-identify as Black by checking the relevant box within the application form. Note that this self-identification information will be shared with the institution to which you are applying and, if awarded, publicly. Refer to the Instructions for completing an Undergraduate Student Research Awards (USRA) application – form 202 web page for more information.
Institutions may recommend applications from self-identified Indigenous student researchers for USRAs beyond their allocation of awards.
To apply for these awards, you must complete and submit an application using NSERC’s online system. Refer to the Instructions for completing an Undergraduate Student Research Awards (USRA) application – form 202 web page for more information.
You can apply to more than one institution. You must apply directly to the institution where you would like to hold the award. However, please note that it is the institution’s choice whether to accept candidates from other institutions.
Eligible Canadian institutions are assigned an allocation of awards to offer each year. Refer to the Undergraduate Student Research Awards allocations web page for a list of allocations by institution and agency. Note: CIHR’s and SSHRC’s allocations are, at the present time, exclusively for Black student researchers.
The selection process of USRA applications will be carried out by institutions with an allocation and will be based on the following three selection criteria:
All application and review processes are internal to the institution. It is the institution’s responsibility to establish its own selection criteria within the broad guidelines that the agencies provide. Institutions have the discretion to apply stricter selection criteria than those outlined above. When selecting students for awards, the institution will take into account the objectives of the USRA program. For details on the institution selection procedures, refer to the Guidelines for Undergraduate Student Research Awards liaison officers or contact the USRA LO at the institution where you would like to hold the award.
Each eligible institution sets its own internal deadline dates for receiving applications. For information about these dates, contact the USRA LO at the institution where you intend to apply for an award.
Although awards may be held in the summer, fall or winter term, each institution will determine the number of selection processes it holds each year.
Each institution will inform applicants of its award decisions after it has completed its selection process. To find out if your application was recommended to the agencies, contact the USRA LO at your institution. Recommended candidates approved by NSERC and SSHRC will receive an award letter on SharePoint midway through their award. Recommended candidates approved by CIHR will receive an award letter by email. Award letters should be read carefully and kept for future reference.
Once the relevant agency has approved your USRA for tenure at one particular institution, you may not transfer it to another institution.
You will receive your payment from the institution. The institution will issue payments to you for the total value of the award in accordance with its pay procedures. It will also issue a T4 or T4A slip (statement of income) to you at the end of the calendar year.
NSERC, CIHR and SSHRC will pay their respective contributions directly to the institution.
Travel allowances are not provided by the granting agencies.
All personal information collected as part of this program is used by the agencies and by the relevant officials at the eligible research institutions to review applications and to administer and monitor awards. It may also be used to determine the most appropriate funding jurisdiction, or to monitor overlap in federal support. Details on the use and disclosure of this information by the agencies are described by CIHR on the Info source – Sources of federal government and employee information web page, by NSERC on the Use and disclosure of personal information provided to NSERC web page, by SSHRC on the Collection, use and disclosure of personal information web page and in the relevant program literature.
Each agency may publish the names and other limited award information of award holders on their websites in accordance with the agencies’ policies on disclosure under the Access to Information Act and their Privacy Act policies and guidelines related to the collection, use, retention and disposal of personal information. For more information, consult the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act .
For more details regarding CIHR’s use of personal information, refer to the Undergraduate Student Research Awards details on CIHR’s Funding Opportunity web page.
The first point of contact regarding the USRA program should be the USRA LO at the institution where you intend to apply for an award or where you are currently registered in an eligible program of study.
For general information about the USRA program, policies and guidelines contact NSERC staff by email at [email protected] .
For post-awards inquiries
Tri-agency logos
Get highlights of things happening at NSERC delivered to your email inbox. View all Newsletters
TOP OF PAGE
Modified: 2024-01-16
Awards will be given to the top submissions from each category at the Undergraduate Research Fair:
To enter the competition, complete the following steps:
The rubric for judging can be found here. There is no in-person judging component to the scores. See Preparing to Present for more information about how to design a poster.
Florida State University
FSU | Department of History
Undergraduate research paper award.
Congratulations to Benjamin Ream who won History's Undergraduate Research Paper Award and to Anne Tirrell who received an honorable mention.
Benjamin wrote his essay for the Senior Seminar on Refugees Throughout History that he took with Dr. Max Scholz in fall 2022. Entitled Rewriting History: The Significance of Roman Origin Stories in the Augustan Age , the paper brings to light the reasons why certain Roman authors, primarily of the 1st century B.C.E., chose to include Roman origin stories in their writings. It focuses both on Rome’s attempts to move away from ancient stories that connected them to the Greeks, as well as on Augustan Age propaganda, especially why authors in the circle of the emperor Augustus were keen to write such stories.
Anne wrote her essay for the History of Latin America, Mexico, and the Caribbean class that she took with Dr. Robinson Herrera in fall 2022. Her paper traces the history of hot cocoa's transnational development from a drink of Indigenous ritual to European confection through Historical Materialist analysis, focusing on the usage of labor and exploitation that continues through the modern day.
Well done both of you!
401 Bellamy Building 113 Collegiate Loop Tallahassee, FL 32306-2200 (850) 644-5888 | Fax: (850) 644-6402
Connect with the department.
Communications Chairs 2023 2023 Conference awards , neurips2023
By Amir Globerson, Kate Saenko, Moritz Hardt, Sergey Levine and Comms Chair, Sahra Ghalebikesabi
We are honored to announce the award-winning papers for NeurIPS 2023! This year’s prestigious awards consist of the Test of Time Award plus two Outstanding Paper Awards in each of these three categories:
This year’s organizers received a record number of paper submissions. Of the 13,300 submitted papers that were reviewed by 968 Area Chairs, 98 senior area chairs, and 396 Ethics reviewers 3,540 were accepted after 502 papers were flagged for ethics reviews .
We thank the awards committee for the main track: Yoav Artzi, Chelsea Finn, Ludwig Schmidt, Ricardo Silva, Isabel Valera, and Mengdi Wang. For the Datasets and Benchmarks track, we thank Sergio Escalera, Isabelle Guyon, Neil Lawrence, Dina Machuve, Olga Russakovsky, Hugo Jair Escalante, Deepti Ghadiyaram, and Serena Yeung. Conflicts of interest were taken into account in the decision process.
Congratulations to all the authors! See Posters Sessions Tue-Thur in Great Hall & B1-B2 (level 1).
Privacy Auditing with One (1) Training Run Authors: Thomas Steinke · Milad Nasr · Matthew Jagielski
Poster session 2: Tue 12 Dec 5:15 p.m. — 7:15 p.m. CST, #1523
Oral: Tue 12 Dec 3:40 p.m. — 4:40 p.m. CST, Room R06-R09 (level 2)
Abstract: We propose a scheme for auditing differentially private machine learning systems with a single training run. This exploits the parallelism of being able to add or remove multiple training examples independently. We analyze this using the connection between differential privacy and statistical generalization, which avoids the cost of group privacy. Our auditing scheme requires minimal assumptions about the algorithm and can be applied in the black-box or white-box setting. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework by applying it to DP-SGD, where we can achieve meaningful empirical privacy lower bounds by training only one model. In contrast, standard methods would require training hundreds of models.
Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage? Authors: Rylan Schaeffer · Brando Miranda · Sanmi Koyejo
Poster session 6: Thu 14 Dec 5:00 p.m. — 7:00 p.m. CST, #1108
Oral: Thu 14 Dec 3:20 p.m. — 3:35 p.m. CST, Hall C2 (level 1)
Abstract: Recent work claims that large language models display emergent abilities, abilities not present in smaller-scale models that are present in larger-scale models. What makes emergent abilities intriguing is two-fold: their sharpness, transitioning seemingly instantaneously from not present to present, and their unpredictability , appearing at seemingly unforeseeable model scales. Here, we present an alternative explanation for emergent abilities: that for a particular task and model family, when analyzing fixed model outputs, emergent abilities appear due to the researcher’s choice of metric rather than due to fundamental changes in model behavior with scale. Specifically, nonlinear or discontinuous metrics produce apparent emergent abilities, whereas linear or continuous metrics produce smooth, continuous, predictable changes in model performance. We present our alternative explanation in a simple mathematical model, then test it in three complementary ways: we (1) make, test and confirm three predictions on the effect of metric choice using the InstructGPT/GPT-3 family on tasks with claimed emergent abilities, (2) make, test and confirm two predictions about metric choices in a meta-analysis of emergent abilities on BIG-Bench; and (3) show how to choose metrics to produce never-before-seen seemingly emergent abilities in multiple vision tasks across diverse deep networks. Via all three analyses, we provide evidence that alleged emergent abilities evaporate with different metrics or with better statistics, and may not be a fundamental property of scaling AI models.
Scaling Data-Constrained Language Models Authors : Niklas Muennighoff · Alexander Rush · Boaz Barak · Teven Le Scao · Nouamane Tazi · Aleksandra Piktus · Sampo Pyysalo · Thomas Wolf · Colin Raffel
Poster session 2: Tue 12 Dec 5:15 p.m. — 7:15 p.m. CST, #813
Oral: Tue 12 Dec 3:40 p.m. — 4:40 p.m. CST, Hall C2 (level 1)
Abstract : The current trend of scaling language models involves increasing both parameter count and training dataset size. Extrapolating this trend suggests that training dataset size may soon be limited by the amount of text data available on the internet. Motivated by this limit, we investigate scaling language models in data-constrained regimes. Specifically, we run a large set of experiments varying the extent of data repetition and compute budget, ranging up to 900 billion training tokens and 9 billion parameter models. We find that with constrained data for a fixed compute budget, training with up to 4 epochs of repeated data yields negligible changes to loss compared to having unique data. However, with more repetition, the value of adding compute eventually decays to zero. We propose and empirically validate a scaling law for compute optimality that accounts for the decreasing value of repeated tokens and excess parameters. Finally, we experiment with approaches mitigating data scarcity, including augmenting the training dataset with code data or removing commonly used filters. Models and datasets from our 400 training runs are freely available at https://github.com/huggingface/datablations .
Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model Authors: Rafael Rafailov · Archit Sharma · Eric Mitchell · Christopher D Manning · Stefano Ermon · Chelsea Finn
Poster session 6: Thu 14 Dec 5:00 p.m. — 7:00 p.m. CST, #625
Oral: Thu 14 Dec 3:50 p.m. — 4:05 p.m. CST, Ballroom A-C (level 2)
Abstract: While large-scale unsupervised language models (LMs) learn broad world knowledge and some reasoning skills, achieving precise control of their behavior is difficult due to the completely unsupervised nature of their training. Existing methods for gaining such steerability collect human labels of the relative quality of model generations and fine-tune the unsupervised LM to align with these preferences, often with reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). However, RLHF is a complex and often unstable procedure, first fitting a reward model that reflects the human preferences, and then fine-tuning the large unsupervised LM using reinforcement learning to maximize this estimated reward without drifting too far from the original model. In this paper, we leverage a mapping between reward functions and optimal policies to show that this constrained reward maximization problem can be optimized exactly with a single stage of policy training, essentially solving a classification problem on the human preference data. The resulting algorithm, which we call Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), is stable, performant, and computationally lightweight, eliminating the need for fitting a reward model, sampling from the LM during fine-tuning, or performing significant hyperparameter tuning. Our experiments show that DPO can fine-tune LMs to align with human preferences as well as or better than existing methods. Notably, fine-tuning with DPO exceeds RLHF’s ability to control sentiment of generations and improves response quality in summarization and single-turn dialogue while being substantially simpler to implement and train.
In the dataset category :
ClimSim: A large multi-scale dataset for hybrid physics-ML climate emulation
Authors: Sungduk Yu · Walter Hannah · Liran Peng · Jerry Lin · Mohamed Aziz Bhouri · Ritwik Gupta · Björn Lütjens · Justus C. Will · Gunnar Behrens · Julius Busecke · Nora Loose · Charles Stern · Tom Beucler · Bryce Harrop · Benjamin Hillman · Andrea Jenney · Savannah L. Ferretti · Nana Liu · Animashree Anandkumar · Noah Brenowitz · Veronika Eyring · Nicholas Geneva · Pierre Gentine · Stephan Mandt · Jaideep Pathak · Akshay Subramaniam · Carl Vondrick · Rose Yu · Laure Zanna · Tian Zheng · Ryan Abernathey · Fiaz Ahmed · David Bader · Pierre Baldi · Elizabeth Barnes · Christopher Bretherton · Peter Caldwell · Wayne Chuang · Yilun Han · YU HUANG · Fernando Iglesias-Suarez · Sanket Jantre · Karthik Kashinath · Marat Khairoutdinov · Thorsten Kurth · Nicholas Lutsko · Po-Lun Ma · Griffin Mooers · J. David Neelin · David Randall · Sara Shamekh · Mark Taylor · Nathan Urban · Janni Yuval · Guang Zhang · Mike Pritchard
Poster session 4: Wed 13 Dec 5:00 p.m. — 7:00 p.m. CST, #105
Oral: Wed 13 Dec 3:45 p.m. — 4:00 p.m. CST, Ballroom A-C (level 2)
Abstract: Modern climate projections lack adequate spatial and temporal resolution due to computational constraints. A consequence is inaccurate and imprecise predictions of critical processes such as storms. Hybrid methods that combine physics with machine learning (ML) have introduced a new generation of higher fidelity climate simulators that can sidestep Moore’s Law by outsourcing compute-hungry, short, high-resolution simulations to ML emulators. However, this hybrid ML-physics simulation approach requires domain-specific treatment and has been inaccessible to ML experts because of lack of training data and relevant, easy-to-use workflows. We present ClimSim, the largest-ever dataset designed for hybrid ML-physics research. It comprises multi-scale climate simulations, developed by a consortium of climate scientists and ML researchers. It consists of 5.7 billion pairs of multivariate input and output vectors that isolate the influence of locally-nested, high-resolution, high-fidelity physics on a host climate simulator’s macro-scale physical state. The dataset is global in coverage, spans multiple years at high sampling frequency, and is designed such that resulting emulators are compatible with downstream coupling into operational climate simulators. We implement a range of deterministic and stochastic regression baselines to highlight the ML challenges and their scoring. The data (https://huggingface.co/datasets/LEAP/ClimSim_high-res) and code (https://leap-stc.github.io/ClimSim) are released openly to support the development of hybrid ML-physics and high-fidelity climate simulations for the benefit of science and society.
In the benchmark category :
DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Models
Authors: Boxin Wang · Weixin Chen · Hengzhi Pei · Chulin Xie · Mintong Kang · Chenhui Zhang · Chejian Xu · Zidi Xiong · Ritik Dutta · Rylan Schaeffer · Sang Truong · Simran Arora · Mantas Mazeika · Dan Hendrycks · Zinan Lin · Yu Cheng · Sanmi Koyejo · Dawn Song · Bo Li
Poster session 1: Tue 12 Dec 10:45 a.m. — 12:45 p.m. CST, #1618
Oral: Tue 12 Dec 10:30 a.m. — 10:45 a.m. CST, Ballroom A-C (Level 2)
Abstract: Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) models have exhibited exciting progress in capabilities, capturing the interest of practitioners and the public alike. Yet, while the literature on the trustworthiness of GPT models remains limited, practitioners have proposed employing capable GPT models for sensitive applications to healthcare and finance – where mistakes can be costly. To this end, this work proposes a comprehensive trustworthiness evaluation for large language models with a focus on GPT-4 and GPT-3.5, considering diverse perspectives – including toxicity, stereotype bias, adversarial robustness, out-of-distribution robustness, robustness on adversarial demonstrations, privacy, machine ethics, and fairness. Based on our evaluations, we discover previously unpublished vulnerabilities to trustworthiness threats. For instance, we find that GPT models can be easily misled to generate toxic and biased outputs and leak private information in both training data and conversation history. We also find that although GPT-4 is usually more trustworthy than GPT-3.5 on standard benchmarks, GPT-4 is more vulnerable given jailbreaking system or user prompts, potentially due to the reason that GPT-4 follows the (misleading) instructions more precisely. Our work illustrates a comprehensive trustworthiness evaluation of GPT models and sheds light on the trustworthiness gaps. Our benchmark is publicly available at https://decodingtrust.github.io/.
This year, following the usual practice, we chose a NeurIPS paper from 10 years ago to receive the Test of Time Award, and “ Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality ” by Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeffrey Dean, won.
Published at NeurIPS 2013 and cited over 40,000 times, the work introduced the seminal word embedding technique word2vec. Demonstrating the power of learning from large amounts of unstructured text, the work catalyzed progress that marked the beginning of a new era in natural language processing.
Greg Corrado and Jeffrey Dean will be giving a talk about this work and related research on Tuesday, 12 Dec at 3:05 – 3:25 pm CST in Hall F.
2023 Conference
Reflections on the neurips 2023 ethics review process, neurips newsletter – november 2023.
As the new academic year begins, Purdue University’s execution for excellence at scale in the areas of learning, research and engagement has led to new records in almost all dimensions during the fiscal year that ran from July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024.
Purdue’s trend of breaking key institutionwide records during fiscal year 2024 extended across the philanthropic sector. The university set records for new gift commitments and philanthropic cash in 2024. New gift commitments reached $632.3 million, which broke the record of $610.3 million set a year ago. The philanthropic cash total of $349.8 million broke the 2022 record of $245.3 million. These efforts were propelled by continued growth in the number of donors, which rose to 85,421, a record for total annual donors outside a major campaign. The university’s endowment climbed to $4.1 billion, reflecting an 11.6% return. And $1.5 billion worth of construction and major renovations on 28 campus projects were started, with an industry-high 87-88% of them on time and on budget.
Purdue’s sponsored program awards climbed to a record $757.5 million from $622.4 million the previous fiscal year. Research awards from external sources reached a record $647.7 million, up from $613.3 million a year ago, a figure considered a high benchmark for a university without a medical school. Purdue also signed nine new master research agreements with industry partners, including one as part of the landmark announcement by South Korea-based SK hynix to invest nearly $4 billion to build an advanced packaging fabrication and R&D facility for artificial intelligence semiconductor products in the Purdue Research Park. Additionally, Purdue was the only university in the U.S. as a leading university partner in winning all three national hub competitions last year — Heartland BioWorks, Midwest Alliance for Clean Hydrogen, and Silicon Crossroads Microelectronics Commons — focused on ensuring the U.S. remains globally competitive in key national security areas.
A barometer of Purdue’s thriving entrepreneurship culture, intellectual property disclosures surged to a record 466 from 400 in fiscal 2023, the Office of Technology Commercialization reported. Additionally, 290 patents were issued, while the number of patent licenses skyrocketed to a record 224. This ecosystem helped establish 16 startup companies based on Purdue research.
The number of research publication citations by Purdue faculty rose nearly 13% to 435,087, while the number of books published by faculty jumped nearly 40% to 60. Meanwhile, 40 faculty members received prestigious awards, up 11% from the number recognized last year.
Purdue welcomed its most selective class of undergraduate students for the 2024-25 academic year. This fall’s projected class of undergraduate Boilermakers starting in West Lafayette and the new urban campus Indianapolis was selected at a 49.8% admission rate from a record-setting pool of 78,522 applicants, with a post-summer-melt yield rate at a record 30%, significantly higher than all historical data. Their average SAT score was a record 1329, up 10 points from last year.
The number of Boilermakers graduating in four years rose to 67%, the highest in recent record, and the six-year graduation rate remained at 84%, vs. 74% in 2008. Another positive pocketbook trend: The number of Boilermakers graduating without debt was up 3 percentage points to 64%, while the earnings-to-debt ratio increased further to 6.7.
As goes the undergraduate student trend, so goes the demand for advanced degrees. Sparked by progress in achieving excellence at scale academically, graduate student applications reached another record level. PhD candidate applications hit 11,677, while master’s student applications climbed to 14,403, both new records in recent memory.
Purdue’s ongoing commitment to growing its online offerings is drawing increased interest and activity. Enrollment in Purdue’s online master’s degree programs rose 23% to a record 5,245 students. The number of students taking online post-bachelor certificate classes surged 56% to 15,955. Total number of Purdue University’s online students exceeded 20,000 for the first time, in addition to almost 13,000 residential undergraduates taking at least one course online.
Excitement at Purdue wasn’t confined to classrooms and research labs. Athletics had a banner year, as the men’s basketball team registered its winningest season in program history, with 34 victories. Led by the first ever two-time unanimous National Player of the Year Zach Edey, the Boilermakers appeared in their first national championship game since 1969 as March Madness captivated Boiler nation. At the same time, the six-year graduation rate for our student-athletes hit a record 90%, their average GPA was 3.2 and career placement was 100%.
In both QS and Times Higher Ed worldwide rankings, Purdue is ranked among top 10 American public universities. Purdue has enjoyed six straight years as a top 10 Most Innovative university as designated by U.S. News & World Report, and 13 undergraduate programs were ranked in the top 10 in the nation in its 2024 survey. Overall, Purdue ranked No. 43 among 435 U.S. universities, up eight spots from 2023 and rising to the highest position in school history.
Earned media placements jumped 34% to a record 119,345, while social media impressions skyrocketed to 160 million. Listeners to the “This Is Purdue” podcast reached 2.2 million, ranking tops in Apple podcasts’ education category. Visits to purdue.edu topped 15.8 million, up 9%.
Purdue University is a public research institution demonstrating excellence at scale. Ranked among top 10 public universities and with two colleges in the top four in the United States, Purdue discovers and disseminates knowledge with a quality and at a scale second to none. More than 105,000 students study at Purdue across modalities and locations, including nearly 50,000 in person on the West Lafayette campus. Committed to affordability and accessibility, Purdue’s main campus has frozen tuition 13 years in a row. See how Purdue never stops in the persistent pursuit of the next giant leap — including its first comprehensive urban campus in Indianapolis, the Mitch Daniels School of Business, Purdue Computes and the One Health initiative — at https://www.purdue.edu/president/strategic-initiatives .
Purdue researchers receive additional $95K to develop arthritis treatments, drought-resistant soybeans
August 20, 2024
Hoosier Sheep Symposium slated for Sept. 21
Today’s top 5 from Purdue University
August 16, 2024
Purdue, Dell Technologies celebrate opening of Alienware Purdue Gaming Lounge
Status of ITS resources
K-State News Kansas State University 128 Dole Hall 1525 Mid-Campus Dr North Manhattan, KS 66506
785-532-2535 [email protected]
Monday, Aug. 19, 2024
MANHATTAN — Thirty-four students in the College of Arts and Sciences at Kansas State University have received research awards from the college for summer and fall 2024. The awards aim to provide students with impactful, paid research experiences alongside faculty mentors. The $1,000 scholarships are offered in fall, spring and summer with deadlines of May 1, Nov. 1 and March 1, respectively. Undergraduate students enrolled full-time in any major in the college are eligible to apply. More information about the award program is on the college's student research and creative inquiry opportunities webpage. The college is committed to providing research or practical learning opportunities for all of its students. The following students received College of Arts and Sciences Undergraduate Research Awards for summer 2024: Darius Skillen, mathematics and Spanish, Cheney , mentored by Rebecca Bender, modern languages; Steven Walsh, history, Junction City , mentored by Mary Kohn, English; and Kutina Cabrera, psychology and French, Lenexa , mentored by Kathleen Antonioli, modern languages. Tabitha Ellwood, music and English literature, Little River , mentored by Slawomir Dobrzanski, music, theatre, and dance; Joseph Pondillo, political science and social transformation studies, Manhattan , mentored by Lisa Tatonetti, English; and August Barrett-Fox, history and political science, Newton , mentored by Eric Brandom, history. Jonathan Williams, anthropology, Ottawa , mentored by Benjamin McCloskey, modern languages and history; Ethan Chapman, political science and pre-law, Overland Park , mentored by Benjamin McCloskey, modern languages and history; and Taz Zeigler, microbiology, Salina , mentored by Vanessa Ante, biology. From out of country: Jiwoo Jung, fisheries, wildlife, conservation, and environmental biology, South Korea , mentored by Susan Brown, biology. The following students received College of Arts and Sciences Undergraduate Research Awards for fall 2024: Kenzie Liby, psychology, Berryton , mentored by Michael Young, psychological sciences; Gus Howard, fine arts, Breman , mentored by Shreepad Joglekar, art; and Clara Pitkin, social transformation studies and nursing, Fort Leavenworth , mentored by Valerie Padilla Carroll, social transformation studies. From Hays : Mark Rack, psychology and social work, mentored by Natalie Barlett, psychological sciences; and Jocelyn Rigler, biology, mentored by Mary Cain, psychological sciences. Hannah Trechter, psychological sciences, Junction City , mentored by Natalie Barlett, psychological sciences; and Alyssa Probst, medical biochemistry, Lawrence , mentored by Patrica Calvo, chemistry. From Manhattan : Camille Carrier, microbiology, mentored by Pankaj Baral, biology; Carson Cole, chemistry, mentored by Peter Sues, chemistry; Samuel Gido, mathematics and computer science, mentored by Natalia Rojkovskaia; and Veronica Knight, chemistry, mentored by Patrica Calvo, chemistry. Emily Cummings, molecular biology, Overland Park , mentored by Kathrin Schrick, biology; and Jillian Rockley, medical biochemistry and integrated health studies, Rose Hill , mentored by Kathrin Schrick, biology. From Salina : Maya Daily, chemical sciences, mentored by Patrica Calvo, chemistry; and Keat Robinson, biology, mentored by Katsura Asano, biology. From Wamego : Annika Wiebers, dance and the human experience and agricultural communications, mentored by Kate Digby, music, theatre, and dance. From Wichita : Adrienne Pamatmat, biology and pre-medicine, Vanessa Ante, biology; and Evan Gnagy, visual communication design, mentored by Valerie Padilla Carroll, social transformation studies. From out of state: Hera Hessenius, piano performance, Sahuarita, Arizona , mentored by Slawomir Dobrzanski, music, theatre, and dance; Riley Blitt, biological systems engineering and pre-medicine, Colorado Springs, Colorado , mentored by Patricia Calvo, chemistry; and Jonathan Ulmer, biochemistry and pre-pharmacy, Hampton, Virginia , mentored by Katsura Asano, biology. From out of country: Prabhleen Kaur, chemical sciences and biochemistry, India , mentored by Dan Higgins, chemistry; Moussa Gacko, biology, Senegal , mentored by Arjun Nepal, physics; and Zanri Pieterse, human health biology, South Africa , mentored by Ruth Welti, biology.
Division of Communications and Marketing 785-532-2535 [email protected]
College of Arts and Sciences student research & creative inquiry opportunities
Berryton, Breman, Cheney, Fort Leavenworth, Hays, Junction City, Lawrence, Lenexa, Little River, Manhattan, Newton, Ottawa, Overland Park, Rose Hill, Salina, Wamego and Wichita, Kansas; Sahuarita, Arizona; Colorado Springs, Colorado; and Hampton, Virginia.
Political science seniors—Ava Butler, Madeline Evans, and Connor Stitt —demonstrated their research prowess at the NC State Undergraduate Research & Creativity Symposium on July 26, 2024. This annual event, organized by the Office of Undergraduate Research, celebrates innovative undergraduate scholarship across diverse disciplines.
Butler, Evans, and Stitt were funded through the Summer Undergraduate Research Experience (SURE) grants from the School of Public and International Affairs (SPIA). Their success highlights SPIA and the Department of Political Science’ s ongoing commitment to fostering undergraduate research excellence. In recent years, the department has significantly expanded opportunities for students, including increased funding, enhanced faculty mentorship, research assistantships, support for symposium and conference presentations, and enrollment in the Political Science Honors Program.
“Independent research is a demanding, time-consuming endeavor,” said Dr. Irwin Morris, SPIA’s Executive Director and the William T. Kretzer Distinguished Professor of Humanities. “SURE funding is one way SPIA has made it possible for dedicated students to execute mentored-research projects that can foster life-changing intellectual growth and professional development. My own academic career was profoundly shaped by a similar program during my college years.”
Meet the 2024 SPIA SURE student researchers:
Ava Butler
Degree program: B.A. Political Science (public policy concentration) with minors in international studies and Japan studies.
Research Title: The Tongue is Mightier Than the Sword: How Language and Rhetoric Impact Opinions on Black Lives Matter.
What is your project about?
I am studying the language and rhetoric of the Black Lives Matter movement, specifically the media framing of the movement and the language used in those cases as well. Using AI to perform large-scale textual analysis and literature reviews on the links to language and emotional response, I plan to develop a survey to test if language and framing really are key factors to BLM opposition. My summer presentation was a summary of my literature review and text analysis. I will continue this project through the 2024-25 school year as my political science honors program work.
How did you become interested in this topic?
I have always been fascinated by how Black Lives Matter was such a contentious topic, especially after 2021. I was also thinking about how wording and phrasing can cause negative associations even if they’re not necessarily true/literal like “communist China” and “defund the police”. I wanted to see if this was the phenomenon that made opposition to BLM so strong. Originally, I wanted to test this topic in our PS 371 research class, but the topic fell out of the bounds of that particular class. I had not taken a class with Dr. Steven Greene, but knew of his expertise in public opinion research so I asked him to be my faculty mentor and he agreed. He’s very approachable.
What are your plans after graduation?
Through this summer experience, I have found a passion for research. I plan to work after graduation and am now strongly considering pursuing a Ph.D. in public policy.
Your advice to other students considering research?
Don’t be afraid to ask the faculty in the department that you don’t know. Look on the department website and see if their research interests align with your own. If they do, don’t be afraid to send them an email. Even if they can’t accommodate you, they’ll point you in the direction of another faculty member who can.
Madeline Evans
Degree program: B.A. Political Science (Law and Justice concentration) and B.A. Spanish Language and Literatures with minors in sociology, history, and international studies.
Research Title: Women in the Courts: Female Justice Advocate Interactions in Supreme Court Oral Arguments
I am studying the way that female actors within the Supreme Court interact with each other in relation to other actors in the Court. There is so much research on how male actors within the Supreme Court treat other individuals, but it is just as important to study how women are treating each other. Since there are now four female Supreme Court Justices, there is so much data to examine. That’s why now is the perfect time to start this project and examine the relationship between female oral advocates and female justices.
How did you become interested in this topic?
I took PS 308 with Dr. Elizabeth Lane in which she assigned a podcast called More Perfect. The episode “Justice, Interrupted” examined interruption patterns by male justices and oral advocates that were directed toward female justices. I was fascinated by how much a pattern of interruptions could tell us about a justice’s thoughts and beliefs. During the entire episode, I kept waiting for them to explain what we could learn by female-to-female interactions. They never did, so I decided to find the answers to my questions through my own research project.
In addition to the class, I worked for Dr. Lane as her research assistant last year. Thankfully, she also agreed to be my faculty mentor for my research project which is part of the political science honors program. Working with her has been the highlight of my year! She has helped me learn so much about the law and my future career aspirations.
What are your plans after graduation?
I plan on attending law school after graduation and plan to become an attorney and, eventually, a judge. This research experience has solidified that this plan is the right choice for me.
Be curious. If there is a question that you want to explore, do it! You are adding to an entire body of literature, and your contribution is going to be important. I thought I was the only one interested in my research topic, but at the summer symposium I met so many people who also cared about my topic and are looking forward to seeing my results.
Connor Stitt
Degree program: B.S. Political Science with minors in mathematics and statistics.
Research Title: Individual Determinants for the Excusal of Islamophobic Violence
We hear a lot about political violence in the news. We also hear about increasing polarization, xenophobia, and so on. These are disturbing issues. I wanted to get a reading on these issues myself. My study therefore focuses on answering the question: “what character traits increase the likelihood that people will support violent events, such as bombings or shootings?”
I transferred to political science from industrial engineering. I was eager to put my math skills to use in political science. I already knew I was interested in autocratic regimes; I found their heterogeneity and striking contrast to democracy interesting. However, after talking to Dr. Zlatin Mitkov, it became clear that it’s hard to conduct experimental research on autocrats at the undergraduate level. That conversation turned me toward political psychology and authoritarianism, which is easier to collect data on, and quickly segwayed into political violence, a related area. I read several papers on political violence which made it clear that there could be improvements to the methodology.
My primary goal is to attend a master’s program to build a more well-rounded research portfolio on political violence and related subjects. This research project has increased my confidence in pursuing this goal. After graduate school, I hope to work as a political science analyst in Washington D.C..
If you want to pursue undergraduate research, I have three points of advice:
1. Topic: Start thinking about which areas of research interest you the most. Start looking into that area (Google Scholar, NCSU Library Databases) and learn the actual process of how people study that topic. For example, my research interested me both in its substantive content and its accessible methodology. Be on the lookout for “experiment” in the abstract or title.
2. Do your homework: After finding out the topic, spend some time beforehand studying by yourself and taking notes. This is not necessarily a requirement but it surely won’t hurt. I spent a couple of months before this project studying autocratic game theory before realizing it wasn’t worth it. Had I gone in with no practice, I may have gotten far into the project and felt lost.
3. Scope: You will not solve every issue in one paper. When I was constructing this project, I tried to include numerous other topics inside it. This will only dilute the results and is also unrealistic in the undergrad environment.
Students interested in doing their own research with a faculty mentor should talk with a political science professor about this course of study, enrollment in the research classes, and the Political Science Honors Program.
Beware of fake email, SMS and WhatsApp messages: check before clicking. Read more
How can we help you.
Research collaborations.
Outstanding paper award at 10th international conference on connected smart cities 2024 (csc24).
Team members : Dr Peter Edwards (inset top), Leow Guan Wei (inset bottom), Zheng Ping Heng, Dr Seanglidet Yean and Prof Lee Bu-Sung.
A/Prof Lee Bu Sung & Dr Yean Seanglidet (College of Computing and Data Science) working with final year project students, Heng Zheng Ping and Leow Guan Wei, and Dr Peter Edwards (Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, New Zealand) have brought home the “Outstanding Paper Award” from the 10 th International Conference on Connected Smart Cities 2024. This year, the conference was held in Danubius Hotel Helia, Budapest, Hungary, from 13 to15 July 2024. Details about the award-winning paper is as following:
The paper is supported by the “Bridging the Gap Between Remote Sensing and Tree Modelling with Data Science” project, which is funded by the Catalyst: Strategic Fund from Government Funding, administered by the Ministry of Business Innovation & Employment, New Zealand under contract C09X1923, as well as the National Research Foundation, Singapore under its Industry Alignment Fund – Pre-positioning (IAF-PP) Funding Initiative.
Demo video:
SmartCities 2024
Ph.D. student Md Ashikuzzaman (familiarly known as Ashik) of the UMass Amherst Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) Department has received a Robert L. Snyder Student Award from the International Centre for Diffraction Data (ICDD). As the ICDD summarized the purpose of its award, “In pursuing its dynamic commitment to the education of the scientific community, the ICDD is offering limited travel support to help students attend the 2024 Denver X-ray Conference.”
With the help of the award, Ashik was able to attend and present at the ICDD’s 73rd Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, held from August 5th to 9th in Denver. To be eligible for the award, Ashik submitted an abstract and other supporting documents for evaluation, and after a critical review process he was selected as a recipient.
The award covered $1,000 in travel expenses and included a waiver of the conference registration fees. Ashik's poster, titled “Comprehensive Analysis of Glauconite Sand: DCB Treatment Effects on Mineral Composition,” was chosen for the XRD poster session, where he had the opportunity to present his research as part of the conference's technical program.
Ashik’s abstract encapsulated his research to understand the behavior of glauconitic sand, which is essential for the successful development of offshore wind projects on the East Coast of the U.S., by studying the glauconite sand belt along the coast of New Jersey.
Ashik’s research supervisors are CEE Professor Guoping Zhang and CEE Associate Professor Zachary Westgate. The research at UMass Amherst, led by Westgate, is titled “Piling in Glauconitic Sand: PIGS JIP,” which is managed by the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute and sponsored by five offshore-wind developers.
As Ashik explained his research, “The glauconite sand belt in New Jersey, spanning over 100 miles in length and 10 to 20 miles in width from Raritan Bay to the Delaware River, offers distinct geological and environmental challenges and opportunities for research.”
According to Ashik, “This study investigates the preparation and treatment of glauconite sand samples, particularly those sourced from the Hornerstown and Navesink formations at a test site in central New Jersey, focusing on drying, grinding, and sodium dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate (DCB) treatment processes.”
Ashik noted that the DCB treatment was necessary to remove iron oxides and hydroxides coatings that could interfere with the accuracy of subsequent analyses. Ashik explained that he conducted qualitative and quantitative 1-D X-ray diffraction analyses on natural and DCB-treated samples at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, therefore revealing significant mineralogical changes.
Technically, the DCB treatment effectively removed the iron-hydroxysulphate and hydrotalcite mineral groups as well as iron oxides, thus eliminating jarosite and reducing gypsum, goethite, and pyrite contents.
As Ashik concluded, “These findings underscore the importance of thorough sample preparation and treatment in accurately characterizing the mineral composition of glauconite sands, [a process] which is essential for reliable site characterization and soil-structure-interaction analysis in offshore wind infrastructure development.”
Before attending UMass Amherst, Ashik completed his M.S. Degree in Offshore Geotechnical Engineering at Zhejiang University in China and his B.S. in Civil Engineering from Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology in Bangladesh. (August 2024)
IMAGES
COMMENTS
"The world's largest academic awards programme", The Global Undergraduate Awards brings together the world's top undergraduate students, leading academics, and industry leaders.
The AP-LS Award for Best Undergraduate Paper is awarded to an outstanding undergraduate research paper that is focused on the interdisciplinary study of psychology and law. First ($500), second ($200) and third place ($150) winners are conferred annually, and winners will be be encouraged to submit their work as a poster presentation at the AP ...
The National Conference on Undergraduate Research (NCUR) is dedicated to promoting undergraduate research, scholarship and creative activity in all fields of study by sponsoring an annual conference for students. Check out the upcoming details as the event approaches, volunteer to review abstracts, and start prepping for another exciting year!
Undergraduates, now is your chance to turn your research project into a cash prize.The University of Maryland Libraries, the Office for Undergraduate Research (OUR), and Maryland's College of Information are partnering to showcase and reward undergraduate research projects.
The ACM Student Research Competition (SRC) The ACM Student Research Competition (SRC) offers a unique forum for undergraduate and graduate students to present their original research before a panel of judges and attendees at well-known ACM-sponsored and co-sponsored conferences.
Winners receive $100 in recognition of their achievement. The top three papers, irrespective of the departmental awards, will be forwarded to the Humanities Division for consideration in the Dean's and Chancellor's award competitions. Literature- Best Undergraduate Essay. A prize of $250 will be awarded to the best essay written in ...
The Global Undergraduate Awards is the world's leading academic awards programme, open to all undergraduate students in almost every academic discipline and attracting submissions from hundreds of universities on every continent. This is a unique opportunity to have your work recognised by an international panel of expert judges working in ...
The Library Prize recognizes and honors research excellence and includes cash prizes ranging from $400 to $700 across various project categories. Submissions are open to any undergraduate student or group who has completed a research paper or project — either for a course or independently — over the past 12 months. Winners will be acknowledged during an award ceremony as part of ...
This guide provides information about AU support for undergraduate research, including events, competitions and prizes, and research methodologies.
Each year, the Undergraduate Research Award honors an outstanding student researcher. Award winners receive $500, recognition at the Symposium of Student Scholars, and publication in the Kennesaw Journal of Undergraduate Research (KJUR).
Recognizes undergraduate students in North American universities who show outstanding research potential in an area of computing research.
The Undergraduate Research Scholar Awards are a one-time, competitive award made by the Office of Undergraduate Education, designed to reward the contributions and facilitate the professional development of undergraduate researchers at UT Dallas.
The University Libraries are pleased to invite applications for the Award for Outstanding Undergraduate Research. This award recognizes undergraduate students who have demonstrated excellence and innovation as part of an original course-related research project that utilizes library resources.
The University Library hosts an annual research paper award competition. Learn about how to apply and the evaluation criteria for the awards.
Entrants whose submission is selected as the best in their category are named Global Winners. Before 2016, Global Winners were called Overall Winners. Global Winners are recognised with: A Gold Medal and a Certificate of Recognition. Publication of their winning submission on The Undergraduate Library. A free ticket to the UA Global Summit.
Undergraduate Research Award (URA) Undergraduate Research Awards (URA) are granted to promote undergraduate research in a scientific laboratory setting.
It is time to consider entering the 2023 UF Best Undergraduate Research Paper Contest. Submissions are due February 28th, the submission link will open February 1st. This contest is open to all UF Undergraduate Researchers.
Center for Undergraduate Research & Engagement CURE serves as a campus hub for undergraduate students to pursue advanced learning opportunities in research, scholarly engagement, and creative pursuits. Learn about research funding awards.
Purpose Undergraduate research, scholarly and creative activities are foundational components of a complete liberal arts education. With this in mind, Brookens Library and the Friends of Brookens Library are pleased to announce the ninth annual Undergraduate Library Research Award.
ABOUT THE AWARD. Established in 1997 by the Hofstra University Library faculty, the Undergraduate Library Research Award (ULRA) recognizes excellence in academic research by a graduating senior. Three awards of $500 each will be given for academic papers demonstrating exemplary research authored by seniors scheduled to graduate in December or ...
Undergraduate Student Research Awards (USRAs) are meant to nurture your interest and fully develop your potential for a research career in health, natural sciences and engineering, or social sciences and humanities.
Awards. Awards will be given to the top submissions from each category at the Undergraduate Research Fair: Basic and Natural Sciences Clinical and Translational Research Engineering Public Health, Epidemiology, and Health Sciences Social, Behavioral, Educational Sciences, and Humanities Computer Science, Data Science, and Mathematics To enter the competition, complete the following steps ...
Congratulations to Benjamin Ream, winner of FSU History's Undergraduate Research Paper Award, and Anne Tirrell who received an honorable mention.
Announcing the NeurIPS 2023 Paper Awards By Amir Globerson, Kate Saenko, Moritz Hardt, Sergey Levine and Comms Chair, Sahra Ghalebikesabi . We are honored to announce the award-winning papers for NeurIPS 2023! This year's prestigious awards consist of the Test of Time Award plus two Outstanding Paper Awards in each of these three categories: . Two Outstanding Main Track Papers
Research awards from external sources reached a record $647.7 million, up from $613.3 million a year ago, a figure considered a high benchmark for a university without a medical school. ... Undergraduate applications and admissions. Purdue welcomed its most selective class of undergraduate students for the 2024-25 academic year. This fall's ...
Thirty-four students receive $1,000 research awards from College of Arts and Sciences. Monday, Aug. 19, 2024 . MANHATTAN — Thirty-four students in the College of Arts and Sciences at Kansas State University have received research awards from the college for summer and fall 2024. The awards aim to provide students with impactful, paid research experiences alongside faculty mentors.
Congratulations to Olivia Fortman, the recipient of the Stinski Undergraduate Research Fellowship for the 2023/2024 academic year. Established in 2013 through funds from a successful patent awarded to Professor Mark F. Stinski, the fellowship supports undergraduates conducting microbiology research.
Political science seniors—Ava Butler, Madeline Evans, and Connor Stitt —demonstrated their research prowess at the NC State Undergraduate Research & Creativity Symposium on July 26, 2024. This annual event, organized by the Office of Undergraduate Research, celebrates innovative undergraduate scholarship across diverse disciplines.
Student Exchange. Student Life Show me more results. Published on 18 Aug 2024 Outstanding Paper Award at 10th International Conference on Connected Smart Cities 2024 (CSC24) ... Peter Edwards (Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, New Zealand) have brought home the "Outstanding Paper Award" from the 10 th International Conference on Connected ...
CEE Ph.D. Student Md Ashikuzzaman (Ashik) Wins Robert L. Snyder Student Award. August 19, 2024 Student Life. ... Effects on Mineral Composition," was chosen for the XRD poster session, where he had the opportunity to present his research as part of the conference's technical program.