objectives of a research study

Educational resources and simple solutions for your research journey

What Are Research Objectives and How to Write Them (with Examples)

Table of Contents

Introduction

Research is at the center of everything researchers do, and setting clear, well-defined research objectives plays a pivotal role in guiding scholars toward their desired outcomes. Research papers are essential instruments for researchers to effectively communicate their work. Among the many sections that constitute a research paper, the introduction plays a key role in providing a background and setting the context. 1 Research objectives, which define the aims of the study, are usually stated in the introduction. Every study has a research question that the authors are trying to answer, and the objective is an active statement about how the study will answer this research question. These objectives help guide the development and design of the study and steer the research in the appropriate direction; if this is not clearly defined, a project can fail!

Research studies have a research question, research hypothesis, and one or more research objectives. A research question is what a study aims to answer, and a research hypothesis is a predictive statement about the relationship between two or more variables, which the study sets out to prove or disprove. Objectives are specific, measurable goals that the study aims to achieve. The difference between these three is illustrated by the following example:

• Research question : How does low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) compare with a placebo device in managing the symptoms of skeletally mature patients with patellar tendinopathy?
• Research hypothesis : Pain levels are reduced in patients who receive daily active-LIPUS (treatment) for 12 weeks compared with individuals who receive inactive-LIPUS (placebo).
• Research objective : To investigate the clinical efficacy of LIPUS in the management of patellar tendinopathy symptoms.

This article discusses the importance of clear, well-thought out objectives and suggests methods to write them clearly.

What is the introduction in research papers?

Research objectives are usually included in the introduction section. This section is the first that the readers will read so it is essential that it conveys the subject matter appropriately and is well written to create a good first impression. A good introduction sets the tone of the paper and clearly outlines the contents so that the readers get a quick snapshot of what to expect.

A good introduction should aim to: 2,3

• Indicate the main subject area, its importance, and cite previous literature on the subject
• Define the gap(s) in existing research, ask a research question, and state the objectives
• Announce the present research and outline its novelty and significance
• Avoid repeating the Abstract, providing unnecessary information, and claiming novelty without accurate supporting information.

Why are research objectives important?

Objectives can help you stay focused and steer your research in the required direction. They help define and limit the scope of your research, which is important to efficiently manage your resources and time. The objectives help to create and maintain the overall structure, and specify two main things—the variables and the methods of quantifying the variables.

A good research objective:

• defines the scope of the study
• gives direction to the research
• helps maintain focus and avoid diversions from the topic
• minimizes wastage of resources like time, money, and energy

Types of research objectives

Research objectives can be broadly classified into general and specific objectives . 4 General objectives state what the research expects to achieve overall while specific objectives break this down into smaller, logically connected parts, each of which addresses various parts of the research problem. General objectives are the main goals of the study and are usually fewer in number while specific objectives are more in number because they address several aspects of the research problem.

Example (general objective): To investigate the factors influencing the financial performance of firms listed in the New York Stock Exchange market.

Example (specific objective): To assess the influence of firm size on the financial performance of firms listed in the New York Stock Exchange market.

In addition to this broad classification, research objectives can be grouped into several categories depending on the research problem, as given in Table 1.

Table 1: Types of research objectives

Characteristics of research objectives

Research objectives must start with the word “To” because this helps readers identify the objective in the absence of headings and appropriate sectioning in research papers. 5,6

• A good objective is SMART (mostly applicable to specific objectives):
• Specific—clear about the what, why, when, and how
• Measurable—identifies the main variables of the study and quantifies the targets
• Achievable—attainable using the available time and resources
• Realistic—accurately addresses the scope of the problem
• Time-bound—identifies the time in which each step will be completed
• Research objectives clarify the purpose of research.
• They help understand the relationship and dissimilarities between variables.
• They provide a direction that helps the research to reach a definite conclusion.

How to write research objectives?

Research objectives can be written using the following steps: 7

• State your main research question clearly and concisely.
• Describe the ultimate goal of your study, which is similar to the research question but states the intended outcomes more definitively.
• Divide this main goal into subcategories to develop your objectives.
• Limit the number of objectives (1-2 general; 3-4 specific)
• Assess each objective using the SMART
• Start each objective with an action verb like assess, compare, determine, evaluate, etc., which makes the research appear more actionable.
• Use specific language without making the sentence data heavy.
• The most common section to add the objectives is the introduction and after the problem statement.
• Add the objectives to the abstract (if there is one).
• State the general objective first, followed by the specific objectives.

Formulating research objectives

Formulating research objectives has the following five steps, which could help researchers develop a clear objective: 8

• Identify the research problem.
• Review past studies on subjects similar to your problem statement, that is, studies that use similar methods, variables, etc.
• Identify the research gaps the current study should cover based on your literature review. These gaps could be theoretical, methodological, or conceptual.
• Define the research question(s) based on the gaps identified.
• Revise/relate the research problem based on the defined research question and the gaps identified. This is to confirm that there is an actual need for a study on the subject based on the gaps in literature.
• Identify and write the general and specific objectives.
• Incorporate the objectives into the study.

Advantages of research objectives

Adding clear research objectives has the following advantages: 4,8

• Maintains the focus and direction of the research
• Optimizes allocation of resources with minimal wastage
• Acts as a foundation for defining appropriate research questions and hypotheses
• Provides measurable outcomes that can help evaluate the success of the research
• Determines the feasibility of the research by helping to assess the availability of required resources
• Ensures relevance of the study to the subject and its contribution to existing literature

Disadvantages of research objectives

Research objectives also have few disadvantages, as listed below: 8

• Absence of clearly defined objectives can lead to ambiguity in the research process
• Unintentional bias could affect the validity and accuracy of the research findings

Key takeaways

• Research objectives are concise statements that describe what the research is aiming to achieve.
• They define the scope and direction of the research and maintain focus.
• The objectives should be SMART—specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and time-bound.
• Clear research objectives help avoid collection of data or resources not required for the study.
• Well-formulated specific objectives help develop the overall research methodology, including data collection, analysis, interpretation, and utilization.
• Research objectives should cover all aspects of the problem statement in a coherent way.
• They should be clearly stated using action verbs.

Frequently asked questions on research objectives

Q: what’s the difference between research objectives and aims 9.

A: Research aims are statements that reflect the broad goal(s) of the study and outline the general direction of the research. They are not specific but clearly define the focus of the study.

Example: This research aims to explore employee experiences of digital transformation in retail HR.

Research objectives focus on the action to be taken to achieve the aims. They make the aims more practical and should be specific and actionable.

Example: To observe the retail HR employees throughout the digital transformation.

Q: What are the examples of research objectives, both general and specific?

A: Here are a few examples of research objectives:

• To identify the antiviral chemical constituents in Mumbukura gitoniensis (general)
• To carry out solvent extraction of dried flowers of Mumbukura gitoniensis and isolate the constituents. (specific)
• To determine the antiviral activity of each of the isolated compounds. (specific)
• To examine the extent, range, and method of coral reef rehabilitation projects in five shallow reef areas adjacent to popular tourist destinations in the Philippines.
• To investigate species richness of mammal communities in five protected areas over the past 20 years.
• To evaluate the potential application of AI techniques for estimating best-corrected visual acuity from fundus photographs with and without ancillary information.
• To investigate whether sport influences psychological parameters in the personality of asthmatic children.

Q: How do I develop research objectives?

A: Developing research objectives begins with defining the problem statement clearly, as illustrated by Figure 1. Objectives specify how the research question will be answered and they determine what is to be measured to test the hypothesis.

Q: Are research objectives measurable?

A: The word “measurable” implies that something is quantifiable. In terms of research objectives, this means that the source and method of collecting data are identified and that all these aspects are feasible for the research. Some metrics can be created to measure your progress toward achieving your objectives.

Q: Can research objectives change during the study?

A: Revising research objectives during the study is acceptable in situations when the selected methodology is not progressing toward achieving the objective, or if there are challenges pertaining to resources, etc. One thing to keep in mind is the time and resources you would have to complete your research after revising the objectives. Thus, as long as your problem statement and hypotheses are unchanged, minor revisions to the research objectives are acceptable.

Q: What is the difference between research questions and research objectives? 10

Q: Are research objectives the same as hypotheses?

A: No, hypotheses are predictive theories that are expressed in general terms. Research objectives, which are more specific, are developed from hypotheses and aim to test them. A hypothesis can be tested using several methods and each method will have different objectives because the methodology to be used could be different. A hypothesis is developed based on observation and reasoning; it is a calculated prediction about why a particular phenomenon is occurring. To test this prediction, different research objectives are formulated. Here’s a simple example of both a research hypothesis and research objective.

Research hypothesis : Employees who arrive at work earlier are more productive.

Research objective : To assess whether employees who arrive at work earlier are more productive.

To summarize, research objectives are an important part of research studies and should be written clearly to effectively communicate your research. We hope this article has given you a brief insight into the importance of using clearly defined research objectives and how to formulate them.

• Farrugia P, Petrisor BA, Farrokhyar F, Bhandari M. Practical tips for surgical research: Research questions, hypotheses and objectives. Can J Surg. 2010 Aug;53(4):278-81.
• Abbadia J. How to write an introduction for a research paper. Mind the Graph website. Accessed June 14, 2023. https://mindthegraph.com/blog/how-to-write-an-introduction-for-a-research-paper/
• Writing a scientific paper: Introduction. UCI libraries website. Accessed June 15, 2023. https://guides.lib.uci.edu/c.php?g=334338&p=2249903
• Research objectives—Types, examples and writing guide. Researchmethod.net website. Accessed June 17, 2023. https://researchmethod.net/research-objectives/#:~:text=They%20provide%20a%20clear%20direction,track%20and%20achieve%20their%20goals .
• Bartle P. SMART Characteristics of good objectives. Community empowerment collective website. Accessed June 16, 2023. https://cec.vcn.bc.ca/cmp/modules/pd-smar.htm
• Research objectives. Studyprobe website. Accessed June 18, 2023. https://www.studyprobe.in/2022/08/research-objectives.html
• Corredor F. How to write objectives in a research paper. wikiHow website. Accessed June 18, 2023. https://www.wikihow.com/Write-Objectives-in-a-Research-Proposal
• Research objectives: Definition, types, characteristics, advantages. AccountingNest website. Accessed June 15, 2023. https://www.accountingnest.com/articles/research/research-objectives
• Phair D., Shaeffer A. Research aims, objectives & questions. GradCoach website. Accessed June 20, 2023. https://gradcoach.com/research-aims-objectives-questions/
• Understanding the difference between research questions and objectives. Accessed June 21, 2023. https://board.researchersjob.com/blog/research-questions-and-objectives

R Discovery is a literature search and research reading platform that accelerates your research discovery journey by keeping you updated on the latest, most relevant scholarly content. With 250M+ research articles sourced from trusted aggregators like CrossRef, Unpaywall, PubMed, PubMed Central, Open Alex and top publishing houses like Springer Nature, JAMA, IOP, Taylor & Francis, NEJM, BMJ, Karger, SAGE, Emerald Publishing and more, R Discovery puts a world of research at your fingertips.  

Try R Discovery Prime FREE for 1 week or upgrade at just US$72 a year to access premium features that let you listen to research on the go, read in your language, collaborate with peers, auto sync with reference managers, and much more. Choose a simpler, smarter way to find and read research – Download the app and start your free 7-day trial today !  

Related Posts

Simple Random Sampling: Definition, Methods, and Examples

What is a Case Study in Research? Definition, Methods, and Examples

21 Research Objectives Examples (Copy and Paste)

Chris Drew (PhD)

Dr. Chris Drew is the founder of the Helpful Professor. He holds a PhD in education and has published over 20 articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. [Image Descriptor: Photo of Chris]

Learn about our Editorial Process

Research objectives refer to the definitive statements made by researchers at the beginning of a research project detailing exactly what a research project aims to achieve.

These objectives are explicit goals clearly and concisely projected by the researcher to present a clear intention or course of action for his or her qualitative or quantitative study. 

Research objectives are typically nested under one overarching research aim. The objectives are the steps you’ll need to take in order to achieve the aim (see the examples below, for example, which demonstrate an aim followed by 3 objectives, which is what I recommend to my research students).

Research Objectives vs Research Aims

Research aim and research objectives are fundamental constituents of any study, fitting together like two pieces of the same puzzle.

The ‘research aim’ describes the overarching goal or purpose of the study (Kumar, 2019). This is usually a broad, high-level purpose statement, summing up the central question that the research intends to answer.

Example of an Overarching Research Aim:

“The aim of this study is to explore the impact of climate change on crop productivity.” 

Comparatively, ‘research objectives’ are concrete goals that underpin the research aim, providing stepwise actions to achieve the aim.

Objectives break the primary aim into manageable, focused pieces, and are usually characterized as being more specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART).

Examples of Specific Research Objectives:

1. “To examine the effects of rising temperatures on the yield of rice crops during the upcoming growth season.” 2. “To assess changes in rainfall patterns in major agricultural regions over the first decade of the twenty-first century (2000-2010).” 3. “To analyze the impact of changing weather patterns on crop diseases within the same timeframe.”

The distinction between these two terms, though subtle, is significant for successfully conducting a study. The research aim provides the study with direction, while the research objectives set the path to achieving this aim, thereby ensuring the study’s efficiency and effectiveness.

How to Write Research Objectives

I usually recommend to my students that they use the SMART framework to create their research objectives.

SMART is an acronym standing for Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. It provides a clear method of defining solid research objectives and helps students know where to start in writing their objectives (Locke & Latham, 2013).

Each element of this acronym adds a distinct dimension to the framework, aiding in the creation of comprehensive, well-delineated objectives.

Here is each step:

• Specific : We need to avoid ambiguity in our objectives. They need to be clear and precise (Doran, 1981). For instance, rather than stating the objective as “to study the effects of social media,” a more focused detail would be “to examine the effects of social media use (Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter) on the academic performance of college students.”
• Measurable: The measurable attribute provides a clear criterion to determine if the objective has been met (Locke & Latham, 2013). A quantifiable element, such as a percentage or a number, adds a measurable quality. For example, “to increase response rate to the annual customer survey by 10%,” makes it easier to ascertain achievement.
• Achievable: The achievable aspect encourages researchers to craft realistic objectives, resembling a self-check mechanism to ensure the objectives align with the scope and resources at disposal (Doran, 1981). For example, “to interview 25 participants selected randomly from a population of 100” is an attainable objective as long as the researcher has access to these participants.
• Relevance : Relevance, the fourth element, compels the researcher to tailor the objectives in alignment with overarching goals of the study (Locke & Latham, 2013). This is extremely important – each objective must help you meet your overall one-sentence ‘aim’ in your study.
• Time-Bound: Lastly, the time-bound element fosters a sense of urgency and prioritization, preventing procrastination and enhancing productivity (Doran, 1981). “To analyze the effect of laptop use in lectures on student engagement over the course of two semesters this year” expresses a clear deadline, thus serving as a motivator for timely completion.

You’re not expected to fit every single element of the SMART framework in one objective, but across your objectives, try to touch on each of the five components.

Research Objectives Examples

1. Field: Psychology

Aim: To explore the impact of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance in college students.

• Objective 1: To compare cognitive test scores of students with less than six hours of sleep and those with 8 or more hours of sleep.
• Objective 2: To investigate the relationship between class grades and reported sleep duration.
• Objective 3: To survey student perceptions and experiences on how sleep deprivation affects their cognitive capabilities.

2. Field: Environmental Science

Aim: To understand the effects of urban green spaces on human well-being in a metropolitan city.

• Objective 1: To assess the physical and mental health benefits of regular exposure to urban green spaces.
• Objective 2: To evaluate the social impacts of urban green spaces on community interactions.
• Objective 3: To examine patterns of use for different types of urban green spaces. 

3. Field: Technology

Aim: To investigate the influence of using social media on productivity in the workplace.

• Objective 1: To measure the amount of time spent on social media during work hours.
• Objective 2: To evaluate the perceived impact of social media use on task completion and work efficiency.
• Objective 3: To explore whether company policies on social media usage correlate with different patterns of productivity.

4. Field: Education

Aim: To examine the effectiveness of online vs traditional face-to-face learning on student engagement and achievement.

• Objective 1: To compare student grades between the groups exposed to online and traditional face-to-face learning.
• Objective 2: To assess student engagement levels in both learning environments.
• Objective 3: To collate student perceptions and preferences regarding both learning methods.

5. Field: Health

Aim: To determine the impact of a Mediterranean diet on cardiac health among adults over 50.

• Objective 1: To assess changes in cardiovascular health metrics after following a Mediterranean diet for six months.
• Objective 2: To compare these health metrics with a similar group who follow their regular diet.
• Objective 3: To document participants’ experiences and adherence to the Mediterranean diet.

6. Field: Environmental Science

Aim: To analyze the impact of urban farming on community sustainability.

• Objective 1: To document the types and quantity of food produced through urban farming initiatives.
• Objective 2: To assess the effect of urban farming on local communities’ access to fresh produce.
• Objective 3: To examine the social dynamics and cooperative relationships in the creating and maintaining of urban farms.

7. Field: Sociology

Aim: To investigate the influence of home offices on work-life balance during remote work.

• Objective 1: To survey remote workers on their perceptions of work-life balance since setting up home offices.
• Objective 2: To conduct an observational study of daily work routines and family interactions in a home office setting.
• Objective 3: To assess the correlation, if any, between physical boundaries of workspaces and mental boundaries for work in the home setting.

8. Field: Economics

Aim: To evaluate the effects of minimum wage increases on small businesses.

• Objective 1: To analyze cost structures, pricing changes, and profitability of small businesses before and after minimum wage increases.
• Objective 2: To survey small business owners on the strategies they employ to navigate minimum wage increases.
• Objective 3: To examine employment trends in small businesses in response to wage increase legislation.

9. Field: Education

Aim: To explore the role of extracurricular activities in promoting soft skills among high school students.

• Objective 1: To assess the variety of soft skills developed through different types of extracurricular activities.
• Objective 2: To compare self-reported soft skills between students who participate in extracurricular activities and those who do not.
• Objective 3: To investigate the teachers’ perspectives on the contribution of extracurricular activities to students’ skill development.

10. Field: Technology

Aim: To assess the impact of virtual reality (VR) technology on the tourism industry.

• Objective 1: To document the types and popularity of VR experiences available in the tourism market.
• Objective 2: To survey tourists on their interest levels and satisfaction rates with VR tourism experiences.
• Objective 3: To determine whether VR tourism experiences correlate with increased interest in real-life travel to the simulated destinations.

11. Field: Biochemistry

Aim: To examine the role of antioxidants in preventing cellular damage.

• Objective 1: To identify the types and quantities of antioxidants in common fruits and vegetables.
• Objective 2: To determine the effects of various antioxidants on free radical neutralization in controlled lab tests.
• Objective 3: To investigate potential beneficial impacts of antioxidant-rich diets on long-term cellular health.

12. Field: Linguistics

Aim: To determine the influence of early exposure to multiple languages on cognitive development in children.

• Objective 1: To assess cognitive development milestones in monolingual and multilingual children.
• Objective 2: To document the number and intensity of language exposures for each group in the study.
• Objective 3: To investigate the specific cognitive advantages, if any, enjoyed by multilingual children.

13. Field: Art History

Aim: To explore the impact of the Renaissance period on modern-day art trends.

• Objective 1: To identify key characteristics and styles of Renaissance art.
• Objective 2: To analyze modern art pieces for the influence of the Renaissance style.
• Objective 3: To survey modern-day artists for their inspirations and the influence of historical art movements on their work.

14. Field: Cybersecurity

Aim: To assess the effectiveness of two-factor authentication (2FA) in preventing unauthorized system access.

• Objective 1: To measure the frequency of unauthorized access attempts before and after the introduction of 2FA.
• Objective 2: To survey users about their experiences and challenges with 2FA implementation.
• Objective 3: To evaluate the efficacy of different types of 2FA (SMS-based, authenticator apps, biometrics, etc.).

15. Field: Cultural Studies

Aim: To analyze the role of music in cultural identity formation among ethnic minorities.

• Objective 1: To document the types and frequency of traditional music practices within selected ethnic minority communities.
• Objective 2: To survey community members on the role of music in their personal and communal identity.
• Objective 3: To explore the resilience and transmission of traditional music practices in contemporary society.

16. Field: Astronomy

Aim: To explore the impact of solar activity on satellite communication.

• Objective 1: To categorize different types of solar activities and their frequencies of occurrence.
• Objective 2: To ascertain how variations in solar activity may influence satellite communication.
• Objective 3: To investigate preventative and damage-control measures currently in place during periods of high solar activity.

17. Field: Literature

Aim: To examine narrative techniques in contemporary graphic novels.

• Objective 1: To identify a range of narrative techniques employed in this genre.
• Objective 2: To analyze the ways in which these narrative techniques engage readers and affect story interpretation.
• Objective 3: To compare narrative techniques in graphic novels to those found in traditional printed novels.

18. Field: Renewable Energy

Aim: To investigate the feasibility of solar energy as a primary renewable resource within urban areas.

• Objective 1: To quantify the average sunlight hours across urban areas in different climatic zones. 
• Objective 2: To calculate the potential solar energy that could be harnessed within these areas.
• Objective 3: To identify barriers or challenges to widespread solar energy implementation in urban settings and potential solutions.

19. Field: Sports Science

Aim: To evaluate the role of pre-game rituals in athlete performance.

• Objective 1: To identify the variety and frequency of pre-game rituals among professional athletes in several sports.
• Objective 2: To measure the impact of pre-game rituals on individual athletes’ performance metrics.
• Objective 3: To examine the psychological mechanisms that might explain the effects (if any) of pre-game ritual on performance.

20. Field: Ecology

Aim: To investigate the effects of urban noise pollution on bird populations.

• Objective 1: To record and quantify urban noise levels in various bird habitats.
• Objective 2: To measure bird population densities in relation to noise levels.
• Objective 3: To determine any changes in bird behavior or vocalization linked to noise levels.

21. Field: Food Science

Aim: To examine the influence of cooking methods on the nutritional value of vegetables.

• Objective 1: To identify the nutrient content of various vegetables both raw and after different cooking processes.
• Objective 2: To compare the effect of various cooking methods on the nutrient retention of these vegetables.
• Objective 3: To propose cooking strategies that optimize nutrient retention.

The Importance of Research Objectives

The importance of research objectives cannot be overstated. In essence, these guideposts articulate what the researcher aims to discover, understand, or examine (Kothari, 2014).

When drafting research objectives, it’s essential to make them simple and comprehensible, specific to the point of being quantifiable where possible, achievable in a practical sense, relevant to the chosen research question, and time-constrained to ensure efficient progress (Kumar, 2019). 

Remember that a good research objective is integral to the success of your project, offering a clear path forward for setting out a research design , and serving as the bedrock of your study plan. Each objective must distinctly address a different dimension of your research question or problem (Kothari, 2014). Always bear in mind that the ultimate purpose of your research objectives is to succinctly encapsulate your aims in the clearest way possible, facilitating a coherent, comprehensive and rational approach to your planned study, and furnishing a scientific roadmap for your journey into the depths of knowledge and research (Kumar, 2019). 

Kothari, C.R (2014). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques . New Delhi: New Age International.

Kumar, R. (2019). Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners .New York: SAGE Publications.

Doran, G. T. (1981). There’s a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management’s goals and objectives. Management review, 70 (11), 35-36.

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2013). New Developments in Goal Setting and Task Performance . New York: Routledge.

• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 21 Cozy Classroom Reading Corners
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 25 Math Center Ideas for Teachers
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 25 Student-Centered Learning Activity Ideas
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 25 Game-Based Learning Activities for the Classroom

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Research Aims, Objectives & Questions

The “Golden Thread” Explained Simply (+ Examples)

By: David Phair (PhD) and Alexandra Shaeffer (PhD) | June 2022

The research aims , objectives and research questions (collectively called the “golden thread”) are arguably the most important thing you need to get right when you’re crafting a research proposal , dissertation or thesis . We receive questions almost every day about this “holy trinity” of research and there’s certainly a lot of confusion out there, so we’ve crafted this post to help you navigate your way through the fog.

Overview: The Golden Thread

• What is the golden thread
• What are research aims ( examples )
• What are research objectives ( examples )
• What are research questions ( examples )
• The importance of alignment in the golden thread

What is the “golden thread”?  

The golden thread simply refers to the collective research aims , research objectives , and research questions for any given project (i.e., a dissertation, thesis, or research paper ). These three elements are bundled together because it’s extremely important that they align with each other, and that the entire research project aligns with them.

Importantly, the golden thread needs to weave its way through the entirety of any research project , from start to end. In other words, it needs to be very clearly defined right at the beginning of the project (the topic ideation and proposal stage) and it needs to inform almost every decision throughout the rest of the project. For example, your research design and methodology will be heavily influenced by the golden thread (we’ll explain this in more detail later), as well as your literature review.

The research aims, objectives and research questions (the golden thread) define the focus and scope ( the delimitations ) of your research project. In other words, they help ringfence your dissertation or thesis to a relatively narrow domain, so that you can “go deep” and really dig into a specific problem or opportunity. They also help keep you on track , as they act as a litmus test for relevance. In other words, if you’re ever unsure whether to include something in your document, simply ask yourself the question, “does this contribute toward my research aims, objectives or questions?”. If it doesn’t, chances are you can drop it.

Alright, enough of the fluffy, conceptual stuff. Let’s get down to business and look at what exactly the research aims, objectives and questions are and outline a few examples to bring these concepts to life.

Research Aims: What are they?

Simply put, the research aim(s) is a statement that reflects the broad overarching goal (s) of the research project. Research aims are fairly high-level (low resolution) as they outline the general direction of the research and what it’s trying to achieve .

Research Aims: Examples  

True to the name, research aims usually start with the wording “this research aims to…”, “this research seeks to…”, and so on. For example:

“This research aims to explore employee experiences of digital transformation in retail HR.”   “This study sets out to assess the interaction between student support and self-care on well-being in engineering graduate students”  

As you can see, these research aims provide a high-level description of what the study is about and what it seeks to achieve. They’re not hyper-specific or action-oriented, but they’re clear about what the study’s focus is and what is being investigated.

Need a helping hand?

Research Objectives: What are they?

The research objectives take the research aims and make them more practical and actionable . In other words, the research objectives showcase the steps that the researcher will take to achieve the research aims.

The research objectives need to be far more specific (higher resolution) and actionable than the research aims. In fact, it’s always a good idea to craft your research objectives using the “SMART” criteria. In other words, they should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound”.

Research Objectives: Examples  

Let’s look at two examples of research objectives. We’ll stick with the topic and research aims we mentioned previously.  

For the digital transformation topic:

To observe the retail HR employees throughout the digital transformation. To assess employee perceptions of digital transformation in retail HR. To identify the barriers and facilitators of digital transformation in retail HR.

And for the student wellness topic:

To determine whether student self-care predicts the well-being score of engineering graduate students. To determine whether student support predicts the well-being score of engineering students. To assess the interaction between student self-care and student support when predicting well-being in engineering graduate students.

  As you can see, these research objectives clearly align with the previously mentioned research aims and effectively translate the low-resolution aims into (comparatively) higher-resolution objectives and action points . They give the research project a clear focus and present something that resembles a research-based “to-do” list.

Research Questions: What are they?

Finally, we arrive at the all-important research questions. The research questions are, as the name suggests, the key questions that your study will seek to answer . Simply put, they are the core purpose of your dissertation, thesis, or research project. You’ll present them at the beginning of your document (either in the introduction chapter or literature review chapter) and you’ll answer them at the end of your document (typically in the discussion and conclusion chapters).  

The research questions will be the driving force throughout the research process. For example, in the literature review chapter, you’ll assess the relevance of any given resource based on whether it helps you move towards answering your research questions. Similarly, your methodology and research design will be heavily influenced by the nature of your research questions. For instance, research questions that are exploratory in nature will usually make use of a qualitative approach, whereas questions that relate to measurement or relationship testing will make use of a quantitative approach.  

Let’s look at some examples of research questions to make this more tangible.

Research Questions: Examples  

Again, we’ll stick with the research aims and research objectives we mentioned previously.  

For the digital transformation topic (which would be qualitative in nature):

How do employees perceive digital transformation in retail HR? What are the barriers and facilitators of digital transformation in retail HR?  

And for the student wellness topic (which would be quantitative in nature):

Does student self-care predict the well-being scores of engineering graduate students? Does student support predict the well-being scores of engineering students? Do student self-care and student support interact when predicting well-being in engineering graduate students?  

You’ll probably notice that there’s quite a formulaic approach to this. In other words, the research questions are basically the research objectives “converted” into question format. While that is true most of the time, it’s not always the case. For example, the first research objective for the digital transformation topic was more or less a step on the path toward the other objectives, and as such, it didn’t warrant its own research question.  

So, don’t rush your research questions and sloppily reword your objectives as questions. Carefully think about what exactly you’re trying to achieve (i.e. your research aim) and the objectives you’ve set out, then craft a set of well-aligned research questions . Also, keep in mind that this can be a somewhat iterative process , where you go back and tweak research objectives and aims to ensure tight alignment throughout the golden thread.

The importance of strong alignment 

Alignment is the keyword here and we have to stress its importance . Simply put, you need to make sure that there is a very tight alignment between all three pieces of the golden thread. If your research aims and research questions don’t align, for example, your project will be pulling in different directions and will lack focus . This is a common problem students face and can cause many headaches (and tears), so be warned.

Take the time to carefully craft your research aims, objectives and research questions before you run off down the research path. Ideally, get your research supervisor/advisor to review and comment on your golden thread before you invest significant time into your project, and certainly before you start collecting data .  

Recap: The golden thread

In this post, we unpacked the golden thread of research, consisting of the research aims , research objectives and research questions . You can jump back to any section using the links below.

As always, feel free to leave a comment below – we always love to hear from you. Also, if you’re interested in 1-on-1 support, take a look at our private coaching service here.

Psst... there’s more!

This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...

You Might Also Like:

39 Comments

Thank you very much for your great effort put. As an Undergraduate taking Demographic Research & Methodology, I’ve been trying so hard to understand clearly what is a Research Question, Research Aim and the Objectives in a research and the relationship between them etc. But as for now I’m thankful that you’ve solved my problem.

Well appreciated. This has helped me greatly in doing my dissertation.

An so delighted with this wonderful information thank you a lot.

so impressive i have benefited a lot looking forward to learn more on research.

I am very happy to have carefully gone through this well researched article.

Infact,I used to be phobia about anything research, because of my poor understanding of the concepts.

Now,I get to know that my research question is the same as my research objective(s) rephrased in question format.

I please I would need a follow up on the subject,as I intends to join the team of researchers. Thanks once again.

Thanks so much. This was really helpful.

I know you pepole have tried to break things into more understandable and easy format. And God bless you. Keep it up

i found this document so useful towards my study in research methods. thanks so much.

This is my 2nd read topic in your course and I should commend the simplified explanations of each part. I’m beginning to understand and absorb the use of each part of a dissertation/thesis. I’ll keep on reading your free course and might be able to avail the training course! Kudos!

Thank you! Better put that my lecture and helped to easily understand the basics which I feel often get brushed over when beginning dissertation work.

This is quite helpful. I like how the Golden thread has been explained and the needed alignment.

This is quite helpful. I really appreciate!

The article made it simple for researcher students to differentiate between three concepts.

Very innovative and educational in approach to conducting research.

I am very impressed with all these terminology, as I am a fresh student for post graduate, I am highly guided and I promised to continue making consultation when the need arise. Thanks a lot.

A very helpful piece. thanks, I really appreciate it .

Very well explained, and it might be helpful to many people like me.

Wish i had found this (and other) resource(s) at the beginning of my PhD journey… not in my writing up year… 😩 Anyways… just a quick question as i’m having some issues ordering my “golden thread”…. does it matter in what order you mention them? i.e., is it always first aims, then objectives, and finally the questions? or can you first mention the research questions and then the aims and objectives?

Thank you for a very simple explanation that builds upon the concepts in a very logical manner. Just prior to this, I read the research hypothesis article, which was equally very good. This met my primary objective.

My secondary objective was to understand the difference between research questions and research hypothesis, and in which context to use which one. However, I am still not clear on this. Can you kindly please guide?

In research, a research question is a clear and specific inquiry that the researcher wants to answer, while a research hypothesis is a tentative statement or prediction about the relationship between variables or the expected outcome of the study. Research questions are broader and guide the overall study, while hypotheses are specific and testable statements used in quantitative research. Research questions identify the problem, while hypotheses provide a focus for testing in the study.

Exactly what I need in this research journey, I look forward to more of your coaching videos.

This helped a lot. Thanks so much for the effort put into explaining it.

What data source in writing dissertation/Thesis requires?

What is data source covers when writing dessertation/thesis

This is quite useful thanks

I’m excited and thankful. I got so much value which will help me progress in my thesis.

where are the locations of the reserch statement, research objective and research question in a reserach paper? Can you write an ouline that defines their places in the researh paper?

Very helpful and important tips on Aims, Objectives and Questions.

Thank you so much for making research aim, research objectives and research question so clear. This will be helpful to me as i continue with my thesis.

Thanks much for this content. I learned a lot. And I am inspired to learn more. I am still struggling with my preparation for dissertation outline/proposal. But I consistently follow contents and tutorials and the new FB of GRAD Coach. Hope to really become confident in writing my dissertation and successfully defend it.

As a researcher and lecturer, I find splitting research goals into research aims, objectives, and questions is unnecessarily bureaucratic and confusing for students. For most biomedical research projects, including ‘real research’, 1-3 research questions will suffice (numbers may differ by discipline).

Awesome! Very important resources and presented in an informative way to easily understand the golden thread. Indeed, thank you so much.

Well explained

The blog article on research aims, objectives, and questions by Grad Coach is a clear and insightful guide that aligns with my experiences in academic research. The article effectively breaks down the often complex concepts of research aims and objectives, providing a straightforward and accessible explanation. Drawing from my own research endeavors, I appreciate the practical tips offered, such as the need for specificity and clarity when formulating research questions. The article serves as a valuable resource for students and researchers, offering a concise roadmap for crafting well-defined research goals and objectives. Whether you’re a novice or an experienced researcher, this article provides practical insights that contribute to the foundational aspects of a successful research endeavor.

A great thanks for you. it is really amazing explanation. I grasp a lot and one step up to research knowledge.

I really found these tips helpful. Thank you very much Grad Coach.

I found this article helpful. Thanks for sharing this.

thank you so much, the explanation and examples are really helpful

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

Research Objectives: The Compass of Your Study

Table of contents

• 1 Definition and Purpose of Setting Clear Research Objectives
• 2 How Research Objectives Fit into the Overall Research Framework
• 3 Types of Research Objectives
• 4 Aligning Objectives with Research Questions and Hypotheses
• 5 Role of Research Objectives in Various Research Phases
• 6.1 Key characteristics of well-defined research objectives
• 6.2 Step-by-Step Guide on How to Formulate Both General and Specific Research Objectives
• 6.3 How to Know When Your Objectives Need Refinement
• 7 Research Objectives Examples in Different Fields
• 8 Conclusion

Embarking on a research journey without clear objectives is like navigating the sea without a compass. This article delves into the essence of establishing precise research objectives, serving as the guiding star for your scholarly exploration.

We will unfold the layers of how the objective of study not only defines the scope of your research but also directs every phase of the research process, from formulating research questions to interpreting research findings. By bridging theory with practical examples, we aim to illuminate the path to crafting effective research objectives that are both ambitious and attainable. Let’s chart the course to a successful research voyage, exploring the significance, types, and formulation of research paper objectives.

Definition and Purpose of Setting Clear Research Objectives

Defining the research objectives includes which two tasks? Research objectives are clear and concise statements that outline what you aim to achieve through your study. They are the foundation for determining your research scope, guiding your data collection methods, and shaping your analysis. The purpose of research proposal and setting clear objectives in it is to ensure that your research efforts are focused and efficient, and to provide a roadmap that keeps your study aligned with its intended outcomes.

To define the research objective at the outset, researchers can avoid the pitfalls of scope creep, where the study’s focus gradually broadens beyond its initial boundaries, leading to wasted resources and time. Clear objectives facilitate communication with stakeholders, such as funding bodies, academic supervisors, and the broader academic community, by succinctly conveying the study’s goals and significance. Furthermore, they help in the formulation of precise research questions and hypotheses, making the research process more systematic and organized. Yet, it is not always easy. For this reason, PapersOwl is always ready to help. Lastly, clear research objectives enable the researcher to critically assess the study’s progress and outcomes against predefined benchmarks, ensuring the research stays on track and delivers meaningful results.

How Research Objectives Fit into the Overall Research Framework

Research objectives are integral to the research framework as the nexus between the research problem, questions, and hypotheses. They translate the broad goals of your study into actionable steps, ensuring every aspect of your research is purposefully aligned towards addressing the research problem. This alignment helps in structuring the research design and methodology, ensuring that each component of the study is geared towards answering the core questions derived from the objectives. Creating such a difficult piece may take a lot of time. If you need it to be accurate yet fast delivered, consider getting professional research paper writing help whenever the time comes. It also aids in the identification and justification of the research methods and tools used for data collection and analysis, aligning them with the objectives to enhance the validity and reliability of the findings.

Furthermore, by setting clear objectives, researchers can more effectively evaluate the impact and significance of their work in contributing to existing knowledge. Additionally, research objectives guide literature review, enabling researchers to focus their examination on relevant studies and theoretical frameworks that directly inform their research goals.

Types of Research Objectives

In the landscape of research, setting objectives is akin to laying down the tracks for a train’s journey, guiding it towards its destination. Constructing these tracks involves defining two main types of objectives: general and specific. Each serves a unique purpose in guiding the research towards its ultimate goals, with general objectives providing the broad vision and specific objectives outlining the concrete steps needed to fulfill that vision. Together, they form a cohesive blueprint that directs the focus of the study, ensuring that every effort contributes meaningfully to the overarching research aims.

• General objectives articulate the overarching goals of your study. They are broad, setting the direction for your research without delving into specifics. These objectives capture what you wish to explore or contribute to existing knowledge.
• Specific objectives break down the general objectives into measurable outcomes. They are precise, detailing the steps needed to achieve the broader goals of your study. They often correspond to different aspects of your research question , ensuring a comprehensive approach to your study.

To illustrate, consider a research project on the impact of digital marketing on consumer behavior. A general objective might be “to explore the influence of digital marketing on consumer purchasing decisions.” Specific objectives could include “to assess the effectiveness of social media advertising in enhancing brand awareness” and “to evaluate the impact of email marketing on customer loyalty.”

Aligning Objectives with Research Questions and Hypotheses

The harmony between what research objectives should be, questions, and hypotheses is critical. Objectives define what you aim to achieve; research questions specify what you seek to understand, and hypotheses predict the expected outcomes.

This alignment ensures a coherent and focused research endeavor. Achieving it necessitates a thoughtful consideration of how each component interrelates, ensuring that the objectives are not only ambitious but also directly answerable through the research questions and testable via the hypotheses. This interconnectedness facilitates a streamlined approach to the research process, enabling researchers to systematically address each aspect of their study in a logical sequence. Moreover, it enhances the clarity and precision of the research, making it easier for peers and stakeholders to grasp the study’s direction and potential contributions.

Role of Research Objectives in Various Research Phases

Throughout the research process, objectives guide your choices and strategies – from selecting the appropriate research design and methods to analyzing data and interpreting results. They are the criteria against which you measure the success of your study. In the initial stages, research objectives inform the selection of a topic, helping to narrow down a broad area of interest into a focused question that can be explored in depth. During the methodology phase, they dictate the type of data needed and the best methods for obtaining that data, ensuring that every step taken is purposeful and aligned with the study’s goals. As the research progresses, objectives provide a framework for analyzing the collected data, guiding the researcher in identifying patterns, drawing conclusions, and making informed decisions.

Crafting Effective Research Objectives

The effective objective of research is pivotal in laying the groundwork for a successful investigation. These objectives clarify the focus of your study and determine its direction and scope. Ensuring that your objectives are well-defined and aligned with the SMART criteria is crucial for setting a strong foundation for your research.

Key characteristics of well-defined research objectives

Well-defined research objectives are characterized by the SMART criteria – Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. Specific objectives clearly define what you plan to achieve, eliminating any ambiguity. Measurable objectives allow you to track progress and assess the outcome. Achievable objectives are realistic, considering the research sources and time available. Relevant objectives align with the broader goals of your field or research question. Finally, Time-bound objectives have a clear timeline for completion, adding urgency and a schedule to your work.

Step-by-Step Guide on How to Formulate Both General and Specific Research Objectives

So lets get to the part, how to write research objectives properly?

• Understand the issue or gap in existing knowledge your study aims to address.
• Gain insights into how similar challenges have been approached to refine your objectives.
• Articulate the broad goal of research based on your understanding of the problem.
• Detail the specific aspects of your research, ensuring they are actionable and measurable.

How to Know When Your Objectives Need Refinement

Your objectives of research may require refinement if they lack clarity, feasibility, or alignment with the research problem. If you find yourself struggling to design experiments or methods that directly address your objectives, or if the objectives seem too broad or not directly related to your research question, it’s likely time for refinement. Additionally, objectives in research proposal that do not facilitate a clear measurement of success indicate a need for a more precise definition. Refinement involves ensuring that each objective is specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound, enhancing your research’s overall focus and impact.

Research Objectives Examples in Different Fields

The application of research objectives spans various academic disciplines, each with its unique focus and methodologies. To illustrate how the objectives of the study guide a research paper across different fields, here are some research objective examples:

• In Health Sciences , a research aim may be to “determine the efficacy of a new vaccine in reducing the incidence of a specific disease among a target population within one year.” This objective is specific (efficacy of a new vaccine), measurable (reduction in disease incidence), achievable (with the right study design and sample size), relevant (to public health), and time-bound (within one year).
• In Environmental Studies , the study objectives could be “to assess the impact of air pollution on urban biodiversity over a decade.” This reflects a commitment to understanding the long-term effects of human activities on urban ecosystems, emphasizing the need for sustainable urban planning.
• In Economics , an example objective of a study might be “to analyze the relationship between fiscal policies and unemployment rates in developing countries over the past twenty years.” This seeks to explore macroeconomic trends and inform policymaking, highlighting the role of economic research study in societal development.

These examples of research objectives describe the versatility and significance of research objectives in guiding scholarly inquiry across different domains. By setting clear, well-defined objectives, researchers can ensure their studies are focused and impactful and contribute valuable knowledge to their respective fields.

Defining research studies objectives and problem statement is not just a preliminary step, but a continuous guiding force throughout the research journey. These goals of research illuminate the path forward and ensure that every stride taken is meaningful and aligned with the ultimate goals of the inquiry. Whether through the meticulous application of the SMART criteria or the strategic alignment with research questions and hypotheses, the rigor in crafting and refining these objectives underscores the integrity and relevance of the research. As scholars venture into the vast terrains of knowledge, the clarity, and precision of their objectives serve as beacons of light, steering their explorations toward discoveries that advance academic discourse and resonate with the broader societal needs.

Readers also enjoyed

WHY WAIT? PLACE AN ORDER RIGHT NOW!

Just fill out the form, press the button, and have no worries!

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy.

Handy Tips To Write A Clear Research Objectives With Examples

Introduction.

Research objectives play a crucial role in any research study. They provide a clear direction and purpose for the research, guiding the researcher in their investigation. Understanding research objectives is essential for conducting a successful study and achieving meaningful results.

In this comprehensive review, we will delve into the definition of research objectives, exploring their characteristics, types, and examples. We will also discuss the relationship between research objectives and research questions, as well as provide insights into how to write effective research objectives. Additionally, we will examine the role of research objectives in research methodology and highlight the importance of them in a study. By the end of this review, you will have a comprehensive understanding of research objectives and their significance in the research process.

Definition of Research Objectives: What Are They?

A research objective is defined as a clear and concise statement that outlines the specific goals and aims of a research study. These objectives are designed to be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART), ensuring they provide a structured pathway to accomplishing the intended outcomes of the project. Each objective serves as a foundational element that summarizes the purpose of your study, guiding the research activities and helping to measure progress toward the study’s goals. Additionally, research objectives are integral components of the research framework , establishing a clear direction that aligns with the overall research questions and hypotheses. This alignment helps to ensure that the study remains focused and relevant, facilitating the systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of data.

Characteristics of Effective Research Objectives

Characteristics of research objectives include:

• Specific: Research objectives should be clear about the what, why, when, and how of the study.
• Measurable: Research objectives should identify the main variables of the study that can be measured or observed.
• Relevant: Research objectives should be relevant to the research topic and contribute to the overall understanding of the subject.
• Feasible: Research objectives should be achievable within the constraints of time, resources, and expertise available.
• Logical: Research objectives should follow a logical sequence and build upon each other to achieve the overall research goal.
• Observable: Research objectives should be observable or measurable in order to assess the progress and success of the research project.
• Unambiguous: Research objectives should be clear and unambiguous, leaving no room for interpretation or confusion.
• Measurable: Research objectives should be measurable, allowing for the collection of data and analysis of results.

By incorporating these characteristics into research objectives, researchers can ensure that their study is focused, achievable, and contributes to the body of knowledge in their field.

Types of Research Objectives

Research objective can be broadly classified into general and specific objectives. General objectives are broad statements that define the overall purpose of the research. They provide a broad direction for the study and help in setting the context. Specific objectives, on the other hand, are detailed objectives that describe what will be researched during the study. They are more focused and provide specific outcomes that the researcher aims to achieve. Specific objectives are derived from the general objectives and help in breaking down the research into smaller, manageable parts. The specific objectives should be clear, measurable, and achievable. They should be designed in a way that allows the researcher to answer the research questions and address the research problem.

In addition to general and specific objectives, research objective can also be categorized as descriptive or analytical objectives. Descriptive objectives focus on describing the characteristics or phenomena of a particular subject or population. They involve surveys, observations, and data collection to provide a detailed understanding of the subject. Analytical objectives, on the other hand, aim to analyze the relationships between variables or factors. They involve data analysis and interpretation to gain insights and draw conclusions.

Both descriptive and analytical objectives are important in research as they serve different purposes and contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the research topic.

Examples of Research Objectives

Here are some examples of research objectives in different fields:

1. Objective: To identify key characteristics and styles of Renaissance art.

This objective focuses on exploring the characteristics and styles of art during the Renaissance period. The research may involve analyzing various artworks, studying historical documents, and interviewing experts in the field.

2. Objective: To analyze modern art trends and their impact on society.

This objective aims to examine the current trends in modern art and understand how they influence society. The research may involve analyzing artworks, conducting surveys or interviews with artists and art enthusiasts, and studying the social and cultural implications of modern art.

3. Objective: To investigate the effects of exercise on mental health.

This objective focuses on studying the relationship between exercise and mental health. The research may involve conducting experiments or surveys to assess the impact of exercise on factors such as stress, anxiety, and depression.

4. Objective: To explore the factors influencing consumer purchasing decisions in the fashion industry.

This objective aims to understand the various factors that influence consumers’ purchasing decisions in the fashion industry. The research may involve conducting surveys, analyzing consumer behavior data, and studying the impact of marketing strategies on consumer choices.

5. Objective: To examine the effectiveness of a new drug in treating a specific medical condition.

This objective focuses on evaluating the effectiveness of a newly developed drug in treating a particular medical condition. The research may involve conducting clinical trials, analyzing patient data, and comparing the outcomes of the new drug with existing treatment options.

These examples demonstrate the diversity of research objectives across different disciplines. Each objective is specific, measurable, and achievable, providing a clear direction for the research study.

Aligning Research Objectives with Research Questions

Research objectives and research questions are essential components of a research project. Research objective describe what you intend your research project to accomplish. They summarize the approach and purpose of the project and provide a clear direction for the research. Research questions, on the other hand, are the starting point of any good research. They guide the overall direction of the research and help identify and focus on the research gaps .

The main difference between research questions and objectives is their form. Research questions are stated in a question form, while objectives are specific, measurable, and achievable goals that you aim to accomplish within a specified timeframe. Research questions are broad statements that provide a roadmap for the research, while objectives break down the research aim into smaller, actionable steps.

Research objectives and research questions work together to form the ‘golden thread’ of a research project. The research aim specifies what the study will answer, while the objectives and questions specify how the study will answer it. They provide a clear focus and scope for the research project, helping researchers stay on track and ensure that their study is meaningful and relevant.

When writing research objectives and questions, it is important to be clear, concise, and specific. Each objective or question should address a specific aspect of the research and contribute to the overall goal of the study. They should also be measurable, meaning that their achievement can be assessed and evaluated. Additionally, research objectives and questions should be achievable within the given timeframe and resources of the research project. By clearly defining the objectives and questions, researchers can effectively plan and execute their research, leading to valuable insights and contributions to the field.

Guidelines for Writing Clear Research Objectives

Writing research objective is a crucial step in any research project. The objectives provide a clear direction and purpose for the study, guiding the researcher in their data collection and analysis. Here are some tips on how to write effective research objective:

1. Be clear and specific

Research objective should be written in a clear and specific manner. Avoid vague or ambiguous language that can lead to confusion. Clearly state what you intend to achieve through your research.

2. Use action verbs

Start your research objective with action verbs that describe the desired outcome. Action verbs such as ‘investigate’, ‘analyze’, ‘compare’, ‘evaluate’, or ‘identify’ help to convey the purpose of the study.

3. Align with research questions or hypotheses

Ensure that your research objectives are aligned with your research questions or hypotheses. The objectives should address the main goals of your study and provide a framework for answering your research questions or testing your hypotheses.

4. Be realistic and achievable

Set research objectives that are realistic and achievable within the scope of your study. Consider the available resources, time constraints, and feasibility of your objectives. Unrealistic objectives can lead to frustration and hinder the progress of your research.

5. Consider the significance and relevance

Reflect on the significance and relevance of your research objectives. How will achieving these objectives contribute to the existing knowledge or address a gap in the literature? Ensure that your objectives have a clear purpose and value.

6. Seek feedback

It is beneficial to seek feedback on your research objectives from colleagues, mentors, or experts in your field. They can provide valuable insights and suggestions for improving the clarity and effectiveness of your objectives.

7. Revise and refine

Research objectives are not set in stone. As you progress in your research, you may need to revise and refine your objectives to align with new findings or changes in the research context. Regularly review and update your objectives to ensure they remain relevant and focused.

By following these tips, you can write research objectives that are clear, focused, and aligned with your research goals. Well-defined objectives will guide your research process and help you achieve meaningful outcomes.

The Role of Research Objectives in Research Methodology

Research objectives play a crucial role in the research methodology . In research methodology, research objectives are formulated based on the research questions or problem statement. These objectives help in defining the scope and focus of the study, ensuring that the research is conducted in a systematic and organized manner.

The research objectives in research methodology act as a roadmap for the research project. They help in identifying the key variables to be studied, determining the research design and methodology, and selecting the appropriate data collection methods .

Furthermore, research objectives in research methodology assist in evaluating the success of the study. By setting clear objectives, researchers can assess whether the desired outcomes have been achieved and determine the effectiveness of the research methods employed. It is important to note that research objectives in research methodology should be aligned with the overall research aim. They should address the specific aspects or components of the research aim and provide a framework for achieving the desired outcomes.

Understanding The Dynamic of Research Objectives in Your Study

The research objectives of a study play a crucial role in guiding the research process, ensuring that the study is focused, purposeful, and contributes to the advancement of knowledge in the field. It is important to note that the research objectives may evolve or change as the study progresses. As new information is gathered and analyzed, the researcher may need to revise the objectives to ensure that they remain relevant and achievable.

In summary, research objectives are essential components in writing an effective research paper . They provide a roadmap for the research process, guiding the researcher in their investigation and helping to ensure that the study is purposeful and meaningful. By understanding and effectively utilizing research objectives, researchers can enhance the quality and impact of their research endeavors.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Related articles

Understanding Comparative Frameworks: Their Importance, Components, Examples and 8 Best Practices

Revolutionizing Effective Thesis Writing for PhD Students Using Artificial Intelligence!

3 Types of Interviews in Qualitative Research: An Essential Research Instrument and Handy Tips to Conduct Them

Highlight Abstracts: An Ultimate Guide For Researchers!

Crafting Critical Abstracts: 11 Expert Strategies for Summarizing Research

Crafting the Perfect Informative Abstract: Definition, Importance and 8 Expert Writing Tips

Descriptive Abstracts: A Complete Guide to Crafting Effective Summaries in Research Writing

AI Literature Review Generator: Revolutionizing Research Process with Remarkable Efficiency

Last updated 27/06/24: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings .

Login Alert

• > How to Do Research
• > Develop the research objectives

Book contents

• Frontmatter
• Acknowledgements
• Introduction: Types of research
• Part 1 The research process
• 1 Develop the research objectives
• 2 Design and plan the study
• 3 Write the proposal
• 4 Obtain financial support for the research
• 5 Manage the research
• 6 Draw conclusions and make recommendations
• 7 Write the report
• 8 Disseminate the results
• Part 2 Methods
• Appendix The market for information professionals: A proposal from the Policy Studies Institute

1 - Develop the research objectives

from Part 1 - The research process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2018

The importance of research aims and objectives cannot be over-stressed. It is vital to have a very clear understanding of what the research is about and what you are actually trying to achieve. You need to know this. And you need to be able to communicate it to others.

Carrying out a research project is rather like going on a journey. It is a linear process during which, in theory at least, you move from your starting point to your objective and then tell others the story of your journey. In practice it can become much more complex.

Once begun, there are few opportunities to retrace your steps if you get lost or side-tracked. The project develops a momentum of its own and it is often difficult to slow things down or to alter course. There are also lots of fascinating by-ways and side routes that might be interesting to explore. This is made worse by the fact that as the research – or the journey – progresses, the level of complexity increases and it is easy to find yourself in the middle of a metaphorical forest with many paths leading in different directions and no clear indication of which is the best one to take.

Assuming that you manage to find your way through all this, you still need to retain a clear idea about where you are going so that you know when you have reached your destination.

A clear, unambiguous research aim coupled with a precise statement of research objectives will provide you with an initial sense of direction. It will enable you to design the research project, selecting the most appropriate methods. It will also provide the basis for managing the research once the project is underway. It will also be an invaluable guide when it comes to analysing the results and making sense of it all.

A clear idea of what you are going to do is also an essential part of obtaining support from others, whether they be stakeholders, potential funders or subjects of the research.

Access options

Save book to kindle.

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle .

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service .

• Develop the research objectives
• Book: How to Do Research
• Online publication: 09 June 2018
• Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856049825.002

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox .

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive .

• Link to facebook
• Link to linkedin
• Link to twitter
• Link to youtube
• Writing Tips

How to Write Research Objectives

3-minute read

• 22nd November 2021

Writing a research paper, thesis, or dissertation ? If so, you’ll want to state your research objectives in the introduction of your paper to make it clear to your readers what you’re trying to accomplish. But how do you write effective research objectives? In this post, we’ll look at two key topics to help you do this:

• How to use your research aims as a basis for developing objectives.
• How to use SMART criteria to refine your research objectives.

For more advice on how to write strong research objectives, see below.

Research Aims and Objectives

There is an important difference between research aims and research objectives:

• A research aim defines the main purpose of your research. As such, you can think of your research aim as answering the question “What are you doing?”
• Research objectives (as most studies will have more than one) are the steps you will take to fulfil your aims. As such, your objectives should answer the question “How are you conducting your research?”

For instance, an example research aim could be:

This study will investigate the link between dehydration and the incidence of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in intensive care patients in Australia.

To develop a set of research objectives, you would then break down the various steps involved in meeting said aim. For example:

This study will investigate the link between dehydration and the incidence of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in intensive care patients in Australia. To achieve this, the study objectives w ill include:

• Replicat ing a small Singaporean study into the role of dehydration in UTIs in hospital patients (Sepe, 2018) in a larger Australian cohort.
• Trialing the use of intravenous fluids for intensive care patients to prevent dehydration.
• Assessing the relationship between the age of patients and quantities of intravenous fluids needed to counter dehydration.

Find this useful?

Subscribe to our newsletter and get writing tips from our editors straight to your inbox.

Note that the objectives don’t go into any great detail here. The key is to briefly summarize each component of your study. You can save details for how you will conduct the research for the methodology section of your paper.

Make Your Research Objectives SMART

A great way to refine your research objectives is to use SMART criteria . Borrowed from the world of project management, there are many versions of this system. However, we’re going to focus on developing specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and timebound objectives.

In other words, a good research objective should be all of the following:

• S pecific – Is the objective clear and well-defined?
• M easurable – How will you know when the objective has been achieved? Is there a way to measure the thing you’re seeking to do?
• A chievable – Do you have the support and resources necessary to undertake this action? Are you being overly ambitious with this objective?
• R elevant – Is this objective vital for fulfilling your research aim?
• T imebound – Can this action be realistically undertaken in the time you have?

If you follow this system, your research objectives will be much stronger.

Expert Research Proofreading

Whatever your research aims and objectives, make sure to have your academic writing proofread by the experts!

Our academic editors can help you with research papers and proposals , as well as any other scholarly document you need checking. And this will help to ensure that your academic writing is always clear, concise, and precise.

Submit a free sample document today to trial our services and find out more.

Share this article:

Post A New Comment

Got content that needs a quick turnaround? Let us polish your work. Explore our editorial business services.

9-minute read

How to Use Infographics to Boost Your Presentation

Is your content getting noticed? Capturing and maintaining an audience’s attention is a challenge when...

8-minute read

Why Interactive PDFs Are Better for Engagement

Are you looking to enhance engagement and captivate your audience through your professional documents? Interactive...

7-minute read

Seven Key Strategies for Voice Search Optimization

Voice search optimization is rapidly shaping the digital landscape, requiring content professionals to adapt their...

4-minute read

Five Creative Ways to Showcase Your Digital Portfolio

Are you a creative freelancer looking to make a lasting impression on potential clients or...

How to Ace Slack Messaging for Contractors and Freelancers

Effective professional communication is an important skill for contractors and freelancers navigating remote work environments....

How to Insert a Text Box in a Google Doc

Google Docs is a powerful collaborative tool, and mastering its features can significantly enhance your...

Make sure your writing is the best it can be with our expert English proofreading and editing.

• Defining Research Objectives: How To  Write Them

Almost all industries use research for growth and development. Research objectives are how researchers ensure that their study has direction and makes a significant contribution to growing an industry or niche.

Research objectives provide a clear and concise statement of what the researcher wants to find out. As a researcher, you need to clearly outline and define research objectives to guide the research process and ensure that the study is relevant and generates the impact you want.

In this article, we will explore research objectives and how to leverage them to achieve successful research studies.

What Are Research Objectives?

Research objectives are what you want to achieve through your research study. They guide your research process and help you focus on the most important aspects of your topic.

You can also define the scope of your study and set realistic and attainable study goals with research objectives. For example, with clear research objectives, your study focuses on the specific goals you want to achieve and prevents you from spending time and resources collecting unnecessary data.

However, sticking to research objectives isn’t always easy, especially in broad or unconventional research. This is why most researchers follow the SMART criteria when defining their research objectives.

Understanding SMART Criteria in Research

Think of research objectives as a roadmap to achieving your research goals, with the SMART criteria as your navigator on the map.

SMART stands for Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. These criteria help you ensure that your research objectives are clear, specific, realistic, meaningful, and time-bound.

Here’s a breakdown of the SMART Criteria:

Specific : Your research objectives should be clear: what do you want to achieve, why do you want to achieve it, and how do you plan to achieve it? Avoid vague or broad statements that don’t provide enough direction for your research.

Measurable : Your research objectives should have metrics that help you track your progress and measure your results. Also, ensure the metrics are measurable with data to verify them.

Achievable : Your research objectives should be within your research scope, timeframe, and budget. Also, set goals that are challenging but not impossible.

Relevant: Your research objectives should be in line with the goal and significance of your study. Also, ensure that the objectives address a specific issue or knowledge gap that is interesting and relevant to your industry or niche.

Time-bound : Your research objectives should have a specific deadline or timeframe for completion. This will help you carefully set a schedule for your research activities and milestones and monitor your study progress.

Characteristics of Effective Research Objectives

Clarity : Your objectives should be clear and unambiguous so that anyone who reads them can understand what you intend to do. Avoid vague or general terms that could be taken out of context.

Specificity : Your objectives should be specific and address the research questions that you have formulated. Do not use broad or narrow objectives as they may restrict your field of research or make your research irrelevant.

Measurability : Define your metrics with indicators or metrics that help you determine if you’ve accomplished your goals or not. This will ensure you are tracking the research progress and making interventions when needed.

Also, do use objectives that are subjective or based on personal opinions, as they may be difficult to accurately verify and measure.

Achievability : Your objectives should be realistic and attainable, given the resources and time available for your research project. You should set objectives that match your skills and capabilities, they can be difficult but not so hard that they are realistically unachievable.

For example, setting very difficult make you lose confidence, and abandon your research. Also, setting very simple objectives could demotivate you and prevent you from closing the knowledge gap or making significant contributions to your field with your research.

Relevance : Your objectives should be relevant to your research topic and contribute to the existing knowledge in your field. Avoid objectives that are unrelated or insignificant, as they may waste your time or resources.

Time-bound : Your objectives should be time-bound and specify when you will complete them. Have a realistic and flexible timeframe for achieving your objectives, and track your progress with it. 

Steps to Writing Research Objectives

Identify the research questions.

The first step in writing effective research objectives is to identify the research questions that you are trying to answer. Research questions help you narrow down your topic and identify the gaps or problems that you want to address with your research.

For example, if you are interested in the impact of technology on children’s development, your research questions could be:

• What is the relationship between technology use and academic performance among children?
• Are children who use technology more likely to do better in school than those who do not?
• What is the social and psychological impact of technology use on children?

Brainstorm Objectives

Once you have your research questions, you can brainstorm possible objectives that relate to them. Objectives are more specific than research questions, and they tell you what you want to achieve or learn in your research.

You can use verbs such as analyze, compare, evaluate, explore, investigate, etc. to express your objectives. Also, try to generate as many objectives as possible, without worrying about their quality or feasibility at this stage.

Prioritize Objectives

Once you’ve brainstormed your objectives, you’ll need to prioritize them based on their relevance and feasibility. Relevance is how relevant the objective is to your research topic and how well it fits into your overall research objective.

Feasibility is how realistic and feasible the objective is compared to the time, money, and expertise you have. You can create a matrix or ranking system to organize your objectives and pick the ones that matter the most.

Refine Objectives

The next step is to refine and revise your objectives to ensure clarity and specificity. Start by ensuring that your objectives are consistent and coherent with each other and with your research questions. 

Make Objectives SMART

A useful way to refine your objectives is to make them SMART, which stands for specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound. 

• Specific : Objectives should clearly state what you hope to achieve.
• Measurable : They should be able to be quantified or evaluated.
• Achievable : realistic and within the scope of the research study.
• Relevant : They should be directly related to the research questions.
• Time-bound : specific timeframe for research completion.

Review and Finalize Objectives

The final step is to review your objectives for coherence and alignment with your research questions and aim. Ensure your objectives are logically connected and consistent with each other and with the purpose of your study.

You also need to check that your objectives are not too broad or too narrow, too easy or too hard, too many or too few. You can use a checklist or a rubric to evaluate your objectives and make modifications.

Examples of Well-Written Research Objectives

Example 1- Psychology

Research question: What are the effects of social media use on teenagers’ mental health?

Objective : To determine the relationship between the amount of time teenagers in the US spend on social media and their levels of anxiety and depression before and after using social media.

What Makes the Research Objective SMART?

The research objective is specific because it clearly states what the researcher hopes to achieve. It is measurable because it can be quantified by measuring the levels of anxiety and depression in teenagers. 

Also, the objective is achievable because the researcher can collect enough data to answer the research question. It is relevant because it is directly related to the research question. It is time-bound because it has a specific deadline for completion.

Example 2- Marketing

Research question : How can a company increase its brand awareness by 10%?

Objective : To develop a marketing strategy that will increase the company’s sales by 10% within the next quarter.

How Is this Research Objective SMART?

The research states what the researcher hopes to achieve ( Specific ). You can also measure the company’s reach before and after the marketing plan is implemented ( Measurable ).

The research objective is also achievable because you can develop a marketing plan that will increase awareness by 10% within the timeframe. The objective is directly related to the research question ( Relevant ). It is also time-bound because it has a specific deadline for completion.

Research objectives are a well-designed roadmap to completing and achieving your overall research goal. 

However, research goals are only effective if they are well-defined and backed up with the best practices such as the SMART criteria. Properly defining research objectives will help you plan and conduct your research project effectively and efficiently.

Connect to Formplus, Get Started Now - It's Free!

• research goals
• research objectives
• research roadmap
• smart goals
• SMART research objectives
• Moradeke Owa

You may also like:

Research Summary: What Is It & How To Write One

Introduction A research summary is a requirement during academic research and sometimes you might need to prepare a research summary...

Desk Research: Definition, Types, Application, Pros & Cons

If you are looking for a way to conduct a research study while optimizing your resources, desk research is a great option. Desk research...

Subgroup Analysis: What It Is + How to Conduct It

Introduction Clinical trials are an integral part of the drug development process. They aim to assess the safety and efficacy of a new...

Projective Techniques In Surveys: Definition, Types & Pros & Cons

Introduction When you’re conducting a survey, you need to find out what people think about things. But how do you get an accurate and...

Formplus - For Seamless Data Collection

Collect data the right way with a versatile data collection tool. try formplus and transform your work productivity today..

• Aims and Objectives – A Guide for Academic Writing
• Doing a PhD

One of the most important aspects of a thesis, dissertation or research paper is the correct formulation of the aims and objectives. This is because your aims and objectives will establish the scope, depth and direction that your research will ultimately take. An effective set of aims and objectives will give your research focus and your reader clarity, with your aims indicating what is to be achieved, and your objectives indicating how it will be achieved.

Introduction

There is no getting away from the importance of the aims and objectives in determining the success of your research project. Unfortunately, however, it is an aspect that many students struggle with, and ultimately end up doing poorly. Given their importance, if you suspect that there is even the smallest possibility that you belong to this group of students, we strongly recommend you read this page in full.

This page describes what research aims and objectives are, how they differ from each other, how to write them correctly, and the common mistakes students make and how to avoid them. An example of a good aim and objectives from a past thesis has also been deconstructed to help your understanding.

What Are Aims and Objectives?

Research aims.

A research aim describes the main goal or the overarching purpose of your research project.

In doing so, it acts as a focal point for your research and provides your readers with clarity as to what your study is all about. Because of this, research aims are almost always located within its own subsection under the introduction section of a research document, regardless of whether it’s a thesis , a dissertation, or a research paper .

A research aim is usually formulated as a broad statement of the main goal of the research and can range in length from a single sentence to a short paragraph. Although the exact format may vary according to preference, they should all describe why your research is needed (i.e. the context), what it sets out to accomplish (the actual aim) and, briefly, how it intends to accomplish it (overview of your objectives).

To give an example, we have extracted the following research aim from a real PhD thesis:

Example of a Research Aim

The role of diametrical cup deformation as a factor to unsatisfactory implant performance has not been widely reported. The aim of this thesis was to gain an understanding of the diametrical deformation behaviour of acetabular cups and shells following impaction into the reamed acetabulum. The influence of a range of factors on deformation was investigated to ascertain if cup and shell deformation may be high enough to potentially contribute to early failure and high wear rates in metal-on-metal implants.

Note: Extracted with permission from thesis titled “T he Impact And Deformation Of Press-Fit Metal Acetabular Components ” produced by Dr H Hothi of previously Queen Mary University of London.

Research Objectives

Where a research aim specifies what your study will answer, research objectives specify how your study will answer it.

They divide your research aim into several smaller parts, each of which represents a key section of your research project. As a result, almost all research objectives take the form of a numbered list, with each item usually receiving its own chapter in a dissertation or thesis.

Following the example of the research aim shared above, here are it’s real research objectives as an example:

Example of a Research Objective

• Develop finite element models using explicit dynamics to mimic mallet blows during cup/shell insertion, initially using simplified experimentally validated foam models to represent the acetabulum.
• Investigate the number, velocity and position of impacts needed to insert a cup.
• Determine the relationship between the size of interference between the cup and cavity and deformation for different cup types.
• Investigate the influence of non-uniform cup support and varying the orientation of the component in the cavity on deformation.
• Examine the influence of errors during reaming of the acetabulum which introduce ovality to the cavity.
• Determine the relationship between changes in the geometry of the component and deformation for different cup designs.
• Develop three dimensional pelvis models with non-uniform bone material properties from a range of patients with varying bone quality.
• Use the key parameters that influence deformation, as identified in the foam models to determine the range of deformations that may occur clinically using the anatomic models and if these deformations are clinically significant.

It’s worth noting that researchers sometimes use research questions instead of research objectives, or in other cases both. From a high-level perspective, research questions and research objectives make the same statements, but just in different formats.

Taking the first three research objectives as an example, they can be restructured into research questions as follows:

Restructuring Research Objectives as Research Questions

• Can finite element models using simplified experimentally validated foam models to represent the acetabulum together with explicit dynamics be used to mimic mallet blows during cup/shell insertion?
• What is the number, velocity and position of impacts needed to insert a cup?
• What is the relationship between the size of interference between the cup and cavity and deformation for different cup types?

Difference Between Aims and Objectives

Hopefully the above explanations make clear the differences between aims and objectives, but to clarify:

• The research aim focus on what the research project is intended to achieve; research objectives focus on how the aim will be achieved.
• Research aims are relatively broad; research objectives are specific.
• Research aims focus on a project’s long-term outcomes; research objectives focus on its immediate, short-term outcomes.
• A research aim can be written in a single sentence or short paragraph; research objectives should be written as a numbered list.

How to Write Aims and Objectives

Before we discuss how to write a clear set of research aims and objectives, we should make it clear that there is no single way they must be written. Each researcher will approach their aims and objectives slightly differently, and often your supervisor will influence the formulation of yours on the basis of their own preferences.

Regardless, there are some basic principles that you should observe for good practice; these principles are described below.

Your aim should be made up of three parts that answer the below questions:

• Why is this research required?
• What is this research about?
• How are you going to do it?

The easiest way to achieve this would be to address each question in its own sentence, although it does not matter whether you combine them or write multiple sentences for each, the key is to address each one.

The first question, why , provides context to your research project, the second question, what , describes the aim of your research, and the last question, how , acts as an introduction to your objectives which will immediately follow.

Scroll through the image set below to see the ‘why, what and how’ associated with our research aim example.

Note: Your research aims need not be limited to one. Some individuals per to define one broad ‘overarching aim’ of a project and then adopt two or three specific research aims for their thesis or dissertation. Remember, however, that in order for your assessors to consider your research project complete, you will need to prove you have fulfilled all of the aims you set out to achieve. Therefore, while having more than one research aim is not necessarily disadvantageous, consider whether a single overarching one will do.

Research Objectives

Each of your research objectives should be SMART :

• Specific – is there any ambiguity in the action you are going to undertake, or is it focused and well-defined?
• Measurable – how will you measure progress and determine when you have achieved the action?
• Achievable – do you have the support, resources and facilities required to carry out the action?
• Relevant – is the action essential to the achievement of your research aim?
• Timebound – can you realistically complete the action in the available time alongside your other research tasks?

In addition to being SMART, your research objectives should start with a verb that helps communicate your intent. Common research verbs include:

Table of Research Verbs to Use in Aims and Objectives

Last, format your objectives into a numbered list. This is because when you write your thesis or dissertation, you will at times need to make reference to a specific research objective; structuring your research objectives in a numbered list will provide a clear way of doing this.

To bring all this together, let’s compare the first research objective in the previous example with the above guidance:

Checking Research Objective Example Against Recommended Approach

Research Objective:

1. Develop finite element models using explicit dynamics to mimic mallet blows during cup/shell insertion, initially using simplified experimentally validated foam models to represent the acetabulum.

Checking Against Recommended Approach:

Q: Is it specific? A: Yes, it is clear what the student intends to do (produce a finite element model), why they intend to do it (mimic cup/shell blows) and their parameters have been well-defined ( using simplified experimentally validated foam models to represent the acetabulum ).

Q: Is it measurable? A: Yes, it is clear that the research objective will be achieved once the finite element model is complete.

Q: Is it achievable? A: Yes, provided the student has access to a computer lab, modelling software and laboratory data.

Q: Is it relevant? A: Yes, mimicking impacts to a cup/shell is fundamental to the overall aim of understanding how they deform when impacted upon.

Q: Is it timebound? A: Yes, it is possible to create a limited-scope finite element model in a relatively short time, especially if you already have experience in modelling.

Q: Does it start with a verb? A: Yes, it starts with ‘develop’, which makes the intent of the objective immediately clear.

Q: Is it a numbered list? A: Yes, it is the first research objective in a list of eight.

Mistakes in Writing Research Aims and Objectives

1. making your research aim too broad.

Having a research aim too broad becomes very difficult to achieve. Normally, this occurs when a student develops their research aim before they have a good understanding of what they want to research. Remember that at the end of your project and during your viva defence , you will have to prove that you have achieved your research aims; if they are too broad, this will be an almost impossible task. In the early stages of your research project, your priority should be to narrow your study to a specific area. A good way to do this is to take the time to study existing literature, question their current approaches, findings and limitations, and consider whether there are any recurring gaps that could be investigated .

Note: Achieving a set of aims does not necessarily mean proving or disproving a theory or hypothesis, even if your research aim was to, but having done enough work to provide a useful and original insight into the principles that underlie your research aim.

2. Making Your Research Objectives Too Ambitious

Be realistic about what you can achieve in the time you have available. It is natural to want to set ambitious research objectives that require sophisticated data collection and analysis, but only completing this with six months before the end of your PhD registration period is not a worthwhile trade-off.

3. Formulating Repetitive Research Objectives

Each research objective should have its own purpose and distinct measurable outcome. To this effect, a common mistake is to form research objectives which have large amounts of overlap. This makes it difficult to determine when an objective is truly complete, and also presents challenges in estimating the duration of objectives when creating your project timeline. It also makes it difficult to structure your thesis into unique chapters, making it more challenging for you to write and for your audience to read.

Fortunately, this oversight can be easily avoided by using SMART objectives.

Hopefully, you now have a good idea of how to create an effective set of aims and objectives for your research project, whether it be a thesis, dissertation or research paper. While it may be tempting to dive directly into your research, spending time on getting your aims and objectives right will give your research clear direction. This won’t only reduce the likelihood of problems arising later down the line, but will also lead to a more thorough and coherent research project.

Finding a PhD has never been this easy – search for a PhD by keyword, location or academic area of interest.

Browse PhDs Now

Join thousands of students.

Join thousands of other students and stay up to date with the latest PhD programmes, funding opportunities and advice.

Frequently asked questions

How do i write a research objective.

Once you’ve decided on your research objectives , you need to explain them in your paper, at the end of your problem statement .

Keep your research objectives clear and concise, and use appropriate verbs to accurately convey the work that you will carry out for each one.

I will compare …

Frequently asked questions: Writing a research paper

A research project is an academic, scientific, or professional undertaking to answer a research question . Research projects can take many forms, such as qualitative or quantitative , descriptive , longitudinal , experimental , or correlational . What kind of research approach you choose will depend on your topic.

The best way to remember the difference between a research plan and a research proposal is that they have fundamentally different audiences. A research plan helps you, the researcher, organize your thoughts. On the other hand, a dissertation proposal or research proposal aims to convince others (e.g., a supervisor, a funding body, or a dissertation committee) that your research topic is relevant and worthy of being conducted.

Formulating a main research question can be a difficult task. Overall, your question should contribute to solving the problem that you have defined in your problem statement .

However, it should also fulfill criteria in three main areas:

• Researchability
• Feasibility and specificity
• Relevance and originality

Research questions anchor your whole project, so it’s important to spend some time refining them.

In general, they should be:

• Focused and researchable
• Answerable using credible sources
• Complex and arguable
• Feasible and specific
• Relevant and original

All research questions should be:

• Focused on a single problem or issue
• Researchable using primary and/or secondary sources
• Feasible to answer within the timeframe and practical constraints
• Specific enough to answer thoroughly
• Complex enough to develop the answer over the space of a paper or thesis
• Relevant to your field of study and/or society more broadly

A research aim is a broad statement indicating the general purpose of your research project. It should appear in your introduction at the end of your problem statement , before your research objectives.

Research objectives are more specific than your research aim. They indicate the specific ways you’ll address the overarching aim.

Your research objectives indicate how you’ll try to address your research problem and should be specific:

Research objectives describe what you intend your research project to accomplish.

They summarize the approach and purpose of the project and help to focus your research.

Your objectives should appear in the introduction of your research paper , at the end of your problem statement .

The main guidelines for formatting a paper in Chicago style are to:

• Use a standard font like 12 pt Times New Roman
• Use 1 inch margins or larger
• Apply double line spacing
• Indent every new paragraph ½ inch
• Include a title page
• Place page numbers in the top right or bottom center
• Cite your sources with author-date citations or Chicago footnotes
• Include a bibliography or reference list

To automatically generate accurate Chicago references, you can use Scribbr’s free Chicago reference generator .

The main guidelines for formatting a paper in MLA style are as follows:

• Use an easily readable font like 12 pt Times New Roman
• Set 1 inch page margins
• Include a four-line MLA heading on the first page
• Center the paper’s title
• Use title case capitalization for headings
• Cite your sources with MLA in-text citations
• List all sources cited on a Works Cited page at the end

To format a paper in APA Style , follow these guidelines:

• Use a standard font like 12 pt Times New Roman or 11 pt Arial
• If submitting for publication, insert a running head on every page
• Apply APA heading styles
• Cite your sources with APA in-text citations
• List all sources cited on a reference page at the end

No, it’s not appropriate to present new arguments or evidence in the conclusion . While you might be tempted to save a striking argument for last, research papers follow a more formal structure than this.

All your findings and arguments should be presented in the body of the text (more specifically in the results and discussion sections if you are following a scientific structure). The conclusion is meant to summarize and reflect on the evidence and arguments you have already presented, not introduce new ones.

The conclusion of a research paper has several key elements you should make sure to include:

• A restatement of the research problem
• A summary of your key arguments and/or findings
• A short discussion of the implications of your research

Don’t feel that you have to write the introduction first. The introduction is often one of the last parts of the research paper you’ll write, along with the conclusion.

This is because it can be easier to introduce your paper once you’ve already written the body ; you may not have the clearest idea of your arguments until you’ve written them, and things can change during the writing process .

The way you present your research problem in your introduction varies depending on the nature of your research paper . A research paper that presents a sustained argument will usually encapsulate this argument in a thesis statement .

A research paper designed to present the results of empirical research tends to present a research question that it seeks to answer. It may also include a hypothesis —a prediction that will be confirmed or disproved by your research.

The introduction of a research paper includes several key elements:

• A hook to catch the reader’s interest
• Relevant background on the topic
• Details of your research problem

and your problem statement

• A thesis statement or research question
• Sometimes an overview of the paper

Ask our team

Want to contact us directly? No problem.  We  are always here for you.

• Email [email protected]
• Start live chat
• Call +1 (510) 822-8066
• WhatsApp +31 20 261 6040

Our team helps students graduate by offering:

• A world-class citation generator
• Plagiarism Checker software powered by Turnitin
• Innovative Citation Checker software
• Professional proofreading services
• Over 300 helpful articles about academic writing, citing sources, plagiarism, and more

Scribbr specializes in editing study-related documents . We proofread:

• PhD dissertations
• Research proposals
• Personal statements
• Admission essays
• Motivation letters
• Reflection papers
• Journal articles
• Capstone projects

Scribbr’s Plagiarism Checker is powered by elements of Turnitin’s Similarity Checker , namely the plagiarism detection software and the Internet Archive and Premium Scholarly Publications content databases .

The add-on AI detector is powered by Scribbr’s proprietary software.

The Scribbr Citation Generator is developed using the open-source Citation Style Language (CSL) project and Frank Bennett’s citeproc-js . It’s the same technology used by dozens of other popular citation tools, including Mendeley and Zotero.

You can find all the citation styles and locales used in the Scribbr Citation Generator in our publicly accessible repository on Github .

Crafting Clear Pathways: Writing Objectives in Research Papers

Struggling to write research objectives? Follow our easy steps to learn how to craft effective and compelling objectives in research papers.

Are you struggling to define the goals and direction of your research? Are you losing yourself while doing research and tend to go astray from the intended research topic? Fear not, as many face the same problem and it is quite understandable to overcome this, a concept called research objective comes into play here.

In this article, we’ll delve into the world of the objectives in research papers and why they are essential for a successful study. We will be studying what they are and how they are used in research.

What is a Research Objective?

A research objective is a clear and specific goal that a researcher aims to achieve through a research study. It serves as a roadmap for the research, providing direction and focus. Research objectives are formulated based on the research questions or hypotheses, and they help in defining the scope of the study and guiding the research design and methodology. They also assist in evaluating the success and outcomes of the research.

Types of Research Objectives

There are typically three main types of objectives in a research paper:

• Exploratory Objectives: These objectives are focused on gaining a deeper understanding of a particular phenomenon, topic, or issue. Exploratory research objectives aim to explore and identify new ideas, insights, or patterns that were previously unknown or poorly understood. This type of objective is commonly used in preliminary or qualitative studies.
• Descriptive Objectives: Descriptive objectives seek to describe and document the characteristics, behaviors, or attributes of a specific population, event, or phenomenon. The purpose is to provide a comprehensive and accurate account of the subject of study. Descriptive research objectives often involve collecting and analyzing data through surveys, observations, or archival research.
• Explanatory or Causal Objectives: Explanatory objectives aim to establish a cause-and-effect relationship between variables or factors. These objectives focus on understanding why certain events or phenomena occur and how they are related to each other. 

Also Read: What are the types of research?

Steps for Writing Objectives in Research Paper

1. identify the research topic:.

Clearly define the subject or topic of your research. This will provide a broad context for developing specific research objectives.

2. Conduct a Literature Review

Review existing literature and research related to your topic. This will help you understand the current state of knowledge, identify any research gaps, and refine your research objectives accordingly.

3. Identify the Research Questions or Hypotheses

Formulate specific research questions or hypotheses that you want to address in your study. These questions should be directly related to your research topic and guide the development of your research objectives.

4. Focus on Specific Goals

Break down the broader research questions or hypothesis into specific goals or objectives. Each objective should focus on a particular aspect of your research topic and be achievable within the scope of your study.

5. Use Clear and Measurable Language

Write your research objectives using clear and precise language. Avoid vague terms and use specific and measurable terms that can be observed, analyzed, or measured.

6. Consider Feasibility

Ensure that your research objectives are feasible within the available resources, time constraints, and ethical considerations. They should be realistic and attainable given the limitations of your study.

7. Prioritize Objectives

If you have multiple research objectives, prioritize them based on their importance and relevance to your overall research goals. This will help you allocate resources and focus your efforts accordingly.

8. Review and Refine

Review your research objectives to ensure they align with your research questions or hypotheses, and revise them if necessary. Seek feedback from peers or advisors to ensure clarity and coherence.

Tips for Writing Objectives in Research Paper

1. be clear and specific.

Clearly state what you intend to achieve with your research. Use specific language that leaves no room for ambiguity or confusion. This ensures that your objectives are well-defined and focused.

2. Use Action Verbs

Begin each research objective with an action verb that describes a measurable action or outcome. This helps make your objectives more actionable and measurable.

3. Align with Research Questions or Hypotheses

Your research objectives should directly address the research questions or hypotheses you have formulated. Ensure there is a clear connection between them to maintain coherence in your study.

4. Be Realistic and Feasible

Set research objectives that are attainable within the constraints of your study, including available resources, time, and ethical considerations. Unrealistic objectives may undermine the validity and reliability of your research.

5. Consider Relevance and Significance

Your research objectives should be relevant to your research topic and contribute to the broader field of study. Consider the potential impact and significance of achieving the objectives.

SMART Goals for Writing Research Objectives

To ensure that your research objectives are well-defined and effectively guide your study, you can apply the SMART framework. SMART stands for Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. Here’s how you can make your research objectives SMART:

• Specific : Clearly state what you want to achieve in a precise and specific manner. Avoid vague or generalized language. Specify the population, variables, or phenomena of interest.
• Measurable : Ensure that your research objectives can be quantified or observed in a measurable way. This allows for objective evaluation and assessment of progress.
• Achievable : Set research objectives that are realistic and attainable within the available resources, time, and scope of your study. Consider the feasibility of conducting the research and collecting the necessary data.
• Relevant : Ensure that your research objectives are directly relevant to your research topic and contribute to the broader knowledge or understanding of the field. They should align with the purpose and significance of your study.
• Time-bound : Set a specific timeframe or deadline for achieving your research objectives. This helps create a sense of urgency and provides a clear timeline for your study.

Examples of Research Objectives

Here are some examples of research objectives from various fields of study:

• To examine the relationship between social media usage and self-esteem among young adults aged 18-25 in order to understand the potential impact on mental well-being.
• To assess the effectiveness of a mindfulness-based intervention in reducing stress levels and improving coping mechanisms among individuals diagnosed with anxiety disorders.
• To investigate the factors influencing consumer purchasing decisions in the e-commerce industry, with a focus on the role of online reviews and social media influencers.
• To analyze the effects of climate change on the biodiversity of coral reefs in a specific region, using remote sensing techniques and field surveys.

Importance of Research Objectives

Research objectives play a crucial role in the research process and hold significant importance for several reasons:

• Guiding the Research Process: Research objectives provide a clear roadmap for the entire research process. They help researchers stay focused and on track, ensuring that the study remains purposeful and relevant. 
• Defining the Scope of the Study: Research objectives help in determining the boundaries and scope of the study. They clarify what aspects of the research topic will be explored and what will be excluded. 
• Providing Direction for Data Collection and Analysis: Research objectives assist in identifying the type of data to be collected and the methods of data collection. They also guide the selection of appropriate data analysis techniques. 
• Evaluating the Success of the Study: Research objectives serve as benchmarks for evaluating the success and outcomes of the research. They provide measurable criteria against which the researcher can assess whether the objectives have been met or not. 
• Enhancing Communication and Collaboration: Clearly defined research objectives facilitate effective communication and collaboration among researchers, advisors, and stakeholders. 

Common Mistakes to Avoid While Writing Research Objectives

When writing research objectives, it’s important to be aware of common mistakes and pitfalls that can undermine the effectiveness and clarity of your objectives. Here are some common mistakes to avoid:

• Vague or Ambiguous Language: One of the key mistakes is using vague or ambiguous language that lacks specificity. Ensure that your research objectives are clearly and precisely stated, leaving no room for misinterpretation or confusion.
• Lack of Measurability: Research objectives should be measurable, meaning that they should allow for the collection of data or evidence that can be quantified or observed. Avoid setting objectives that cannot be measured or assessed objectively.
• Lack of Alignment with Research Questions or Hypotheses: Your research objectives should directly align with the research questions or hypotheses you have formulated. Make sure there is a clear connection between them to maintain coherence in your study.
• Overgeneralization : Avoid writing research objectives that are too broad or encompass too many variables or phenomena. Overgeneralized objectives may lead to a lack of focus or feasibility in conducting the research.
• Unrealistic or Unattainable Objectives: Ensure that your research objectives are realistic and attainable within the available resources, time, and scope of your study. Setting unrealistic objectives may compromise the validity and reliability of your research.

In conclusion, research objectives are integral to the success and effectiveness of any research study. They provide a clear direction, focus, and purpose, guiding the entire research process from start to finish. By formulating specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound objectives, researchers can define the scope of their study, guide data collection and analysis, and evaluate the outcomes of their research.

Turn your data into easy-to-understand and dynamic stories

When you wish to explain any complex data, it’s always advised to break it down into simpler visuals or stories. This is where Mind the Graph comes in. It is a platform that helps researchers and scientists to turn their data into easy-to-understand and dynamic stories, helping the audience understand the concepts better. Sign Up now to explore the library of scientific infographics. 

Subscribe to our newsletter

Exclusive high quality content about effective visual communication in science.

About Sowjanya Pedada

Sowjanya is a passionate writer and an avid reader. She holds MBA in Agribusiness Management and now is working as a content writer. She loves to play with words and hopes to make a difference in the world through her writings. Apart from writing, she is interested in reading fiction novels and doing craftwork. She also loves to travel and explore different cuisines and spend time with her family and friends.

Content tags

Writing the Research Objectives: 5 Straightforward Examples

The research objective of a research proposal or scientific article defines the direction or content of a research investigation. Without the research objectives, the proposal or research paper is in disarray. It is like a fisherman riding on a boat without any purpose and with no destination in sight. Therefore, at the beginning of any research venture, the researcher must be clear about what he or she intends to do or achieve in conducting a study.

How do you define the objectives of a study? What are the uses of the research objective? How would a researcher write this essential part of the research? This article aims to provide answers to these questions.

Table of Contents

Definition of a research objective.

A research objective describes, in a few words, the result of the research project after its implementation. It answers the question,

The research objective provides direction to the performance of the study.

What are the Uses of the Research Objective?

The uses of the research objective are enumerated below:

The research design serves as the “blueprint” for the research investigation. The University of Southern California describes the different types of research design extensively. It details the data to be gathered, data collection procedure, data measurement, and statistical tests to use in the analysis.

The variables of the study include those factors that the researcher wants to evaluate in the study. These variables narrow down the research to several manageable components to see differences or correlations between them.

Specifying the data collection procedure ensures data accuracy and integrity . Thus, the probability of error is minimized. Generalizations or conclusions based on valid arguments founded on reliable data strengthens research findings on particular issues and problems.

In data mining activities where large data sets are involved, the research objective plays a crucial role. Without a clear objective to guide the machine learning process, the desired outcomes will not be met.

How is the Research Objective Written?

A research objective must be achievable, i.e., it must be framed keeping in mind the available time, infrastructure required for research, and other resources.

Before forming a research objective, you should read about all the developments in your area of research and find gaps in knowledge that need to be addressed. Readings will help you come up with suitable objectives for your research project.

5 Examples of Research Objectives

The following examples of research objectives based on several published studies on various topics demonstrate how the research objectives are written:

Finally, writing the research objectives requires constant practice, experience, and knowledge about the topic investigated. Clearly written objectives save time, money, and effort.

Evans, K. L., Rodrigues, A. S., Chown, S. L., & Gaston, K. J. (2006). Protected areas and regional avian species richness in South Africa.  Biology letters ,  2 (2), 184-188.

Yeemin, T., Sutthacheep, M., & Pettongma, R. (2006). Coral reef restoration projects in Thailand.  Ocean & Coastal Management ,  49 (9-10), 562-575.

© 2020 March 23 P. A. Regoniel Updated 17 November 2020 | Updated 18 January 2024

Related Posts

Designing a study: 5 key components of a research goal, multiple regression analysis example with conceptual framework, confounding variables: 3 examples and 5 case studies, about the author, patrick regoniel.

Dr. Regoniel, a hobbyist writer, served as consultant to various environmental research and development projects covering issues and concerns on climate change, coral reef resources and management, economic valuation of environmental and natural resources, mining, and waste management and pollution. He has extensive experience on applied statistics, systems modelling and analysis, an avid practitioner of LaTeX, and a multidisciplinary web developer. He leverages pioneering AI-powered content creation tools to produce unique and comprehensive articles in this website.

SimplyEducate.Me Privacy Policy

What are you doing and how are you doing it? Articulating your aims and objectives.

Mar 6, 2019

Have you checked out  the rest of  The PhD Knowledge Base ? It’s home to hundreds more free resources and guides, written especially for PhD students.

How long does it take the person reading your thesis to understand what you’re doing and how you’re doing it? If the answer is anything other than ’in the opening paragraphs of the thesis’ then keep reading.

If you tell them as early as possible what you’re doing and how you’re doing it – and do so in clear and simple terms – whatever you write after will make much more sense. If you leave them guessing for ten pages, everything they read in those ten pages has no coherence. You’ll know where it is all leading, but they won’t.

Unless you tell them.

If you tell the reader what you’re doing as early as possible in clear and simple terms, whatever you write after will make much more sense. 

What are aims & objectives?

If you build a house without foundations, it’s pretty obvious what will happen. It’ll collapse.  Your thesis is the same;  fail to build the foundations and your thesis just won’t work .

Your aims and objectives are those foundations. That’s why we’ve put them right at the top of our PhD Writing Template (if you haven’t already downloaded it, join the thousands who have by clicking   here ).

If you write your aims and objectives clearly then you’ll make your reader’s life easier.

A lot of students fail to clearly articulate their aims and objectives because they aren’t sure themselves what they actually are.

Picture this: if there’s one thing that every PhD student hates it’s being asked by a stranger what their research is on.

Your PhD thesis. All on one page.

Use our free PhD structure template to quickly visualise every element of your thesis. 

Hello, Doctor…

Sounds good, doesn’t it?  Be able to call yourself Doctor sooner with our five-star rated How to Write A PhD email-course. Learn everything your supervisor should have taught you about planning and completing a PhD.

Now half price. Join hundreds of other students and become a better thesis writer, or your money back. 

Research aims

Your research aims are the answer to the question,   ‘What are you doing?’ 

1. You need to clearly describe what your intentions are and what you hope to achieve. These are your aims.

2. Your aims may be to test theory in a new empirical setting, derive new theory entirely, construct a new data-set, replicate an existing study, question existing orthodoxy, and so on. Whatever they are, clearly articulate them and do so early. Definitely include them in your introduction and, if you’re smart, you’ll  write them in your abstract .

3. Be very  explicit . In the opening paragraphs, say, in simple terms, ‘ the aim of this thesis is to …’

4. Think of your aims then as a statement of intent. They are  a promise to the reader  that you are going to do something. You use the next two hundred pages or so to follow through on that promise. If you don’t make the promise, the reader won’t understand your follow-through. Simple as that.

Because they serve as the starting point of the study, there needs to be a flow from your aims through your objectives (more on this below) to your research questions and contribution and then into the study itself. If you have completed your research and found that you answered a different question (not that uncommon), make sure your original aims are still valid. If they aren’t, refine them.

If you struggle to explain in simple terms what your research is about and why it matters, you may need to refine your aims and objectives to make them more concise.

When writing up your aims, there are a number of things to bear in mind.

1. Avoid listing too many. Your PhD isn’t as long as you think it is and you won’t have time or room for more than around two or three.

2. When you write them up, be very specific. Don’t leave things so vague that the reader is left unsure or unclear on what you aim to achieve.

3. Make sure there is a logical flow between each of your aims. They should make sense together and should each be separate components which, when added together, are bigger than the sum of their parts.

Research objectives

Your aims answer the question, ‘What are you doing?’ The   objectives are the answer to the question, ‘How are you doing it?’ 

Research objectives refer to the goals or steps that you will take to achieve your aims.

When you write them,   make sure they are SMART. 

• S pecific: talk in a precise and clear way about what you are going to do.
• M easurable: how will you know when you have achieved your aim?
• A chievable: make sure that you aren’t overly ambitious.
• R ealistic: recognise the time and resource constraints that come with doing a PhD and don’t attempt to do too much.
• T ime constrained: determine when each objective needs to be completed.

You need to be as explicit as possible here.  Leave the reader in no doubt about what you will do to achieve your aims.  Step by step. Leave no ambiguity. At the same time, be careful not to repeat your methods chapter here. Just hint at your methods by presenting the headlines. You’ll have plenty of space in your methods discussion to flesh out the detail. 

Elsewhere in the thesis you will necessarily have to talk in a complex language and juggle complex ideas. Here you don’t. You can write in clear, plain sentences.

What is the difference between research aims and objectives?

The aims of a study describe what you hope to achieve. The objectives detail how you are going to achieve your aims.

Let’s use an example to illustrate.

• To understand the contribution that local governments make to national level energy policy.

Objectives:

• Conduct a survey of local politicians to solicit responses.
• Conduct desk-research of local government websites to create a database of local energy policy.
• Interview national level politicians to understand the impact these local policies have had.
• Data will be coded using a code book derived from dominant theories of governance.

If you’re still struggling, Professor Pat Thompson’s great blog has   a guide   that will help.

Leave the reader in no doubt about what you will do to achieve your aims.  Step by step. Leave no ambiguity.

I can’t articulate them clearly, my research is complicated!

Of course your research is complex. That’s the name of the game. But   the sign of someone being able to   master   complexity is their ability to   summarise   it . Sure, you’re not looking to capture all the richness and detail in a short summary of aims and objectives, but you are looking to tell the reader what you’re doing and how you’re doing it.

If you’re struggling to clearly articulate your aims and objectives, then try the following task. At the top of a Post-it note write the sentence: ‘In this research I will…’. Then keep trying until you can fit an answer onto one single Post-it note. The answer should answer two questions: what are are you doing and how are you doing it?

Remember – whenever you write, make it as clear as possible. Pay attention to the words ‘as possible’ there. That means you should write as clearly as you can given the fact that your subject and research is necessarily complex. Think of it the other way: it’s about not making things more complicated and unclear than they need to be.

In other words, make your reader’s job as easy as you can. They’ll thank you for it.

If you’re still having trouble, get in touch to arrange a one-on-one coaching session and we can work through your aims and objectives together.

Share this:

32 comments.

The write up is quite inspiring.

My topic is setting up a healing gardens in hospitals Need a aim and objectives for a dissertation

Dis is really good and more understandable thanks

Crisp, concise, and easy to understnad. Thank you for posint this. I now know how to write up my report.

Great. Glad you found it useful.

Good piece of work! Very useful

Great. Glad you found it useful!

The write up makes sense

Great. Thanks!

I love this article. Amazing, outstanding and incredible facts.

Glad you found it useful!

Well written and easy to follow

Thank you for the comment, I’m really glad you found it valuable.

I’m currently developing a dissertation proposal for my PhD in organizational leadership. I need guidance in writing my proposal

Hey – have you checked out this guide? https://www.thephdproofreaders.com/writing/how-to-write-a-phd-proposal/

Indeed I’m impressed and gained a lot from this and I hope I can write an acceptable thesis with this your guide. Bello, H.K

Great. Thanks for the kind words. Good luck with the thesis.

Thumbs up! God job, well done. The information is quite concise and straight to the point.

Glad you thought so – good luck with the writing.

Dear Max, thank you so much for your work and efforts!

Your explanation about Aims and Objectives really helped me out. However, I got stuck with other parts of the Aims and Objectives Work Sheet: Scope, Main Argument, and Contribution.

Could you please explain these as well, preferably including some examples?

Thanks for your kind words. Your question is a big one! Without knowing lots about your topics/subject I’m not able to provide tailored advice, but broadly speaking your scope is the aims/objectives, your main argument is the thread running through the thesis (i.e. what your thesis is trying to argue) and the contribution (again, broadly speaking) is that gap you are filling.

I love your website and you’ve been so SO helpful..

DUMB QUESTION ALERT: Is there supposed to be a difference between aims and research question?

I mean, using your own example.. if the aim of my research is: “To understand the contribution that local governments make to national level energy policy” then wouldn’t the research question be: “How do local governments contribute to energy policy at national level”?

I am sorry if this comes out as completely obvious but I am at that stage of confusion where I am starting to question everything I know.

Sorry it’s taken me so long to reply! It’s not a dumb question at all. The aim of the study is what the study as a whole is seeking to achieve. So that might be the gap it is filling/the contribution it is making. The research questions are your means to achieving that aim. Your aim might be to fill a gap in knowledge, and you then may have a small number of questions that help you along that path. Does that make sense?

Thank you Max for this post! So helpful!

Thanks Anna!

Thanks so much this piece. I have written both bachelor’s and master’s thesis but haven’t read this made me feel like I didn’t know anything about research at all. I gained more insight into aims and objectives of academic researches.

Interesting explanation. Thank you.

I’m glad you found it useful.

Hi… I really like the way it is put “What are you going?” (Aims) and “How are you doing it?” (Objectives). Simple and straightforward. Thanks for making aims and objectives easy to understand.

Thank you for the write up it is insightful. if you are ask to discuss your doctoral aims. that means: what you are doing how you are doing it.

I was totally lost and still in the woods to the point of thinking I am dull, but looking at how you are coaching it tells me that i am just a student who needs to understand the lesson. I now believe that with your guidance i will pass my PhD. I am writing on an otherwise obvious subject, Value addition to raw materials, why Africa has failed to add value to raw materials? Difficult question as answers seem to abound, but that is where i differ and i seem to be against the general tide. However with your guidance I believe i will make it. Thanks.

Thanks for your lovely, kind words. So kind.

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search The PhD Knowledge Base

Most popular articles from the phd knowlege base.

The PhD Knowledge Base Categories

• Your PhD and Covid
• Mastering your theory and literature review chapters
• How to structure and write every chapter of the PhD
• How to stay motivated and productive
• Techniques to improve your writing and fluency
• Advice on maintaining good mental health
• Resources designed for non-native English speakers
• PhD Writing Template
• Explore our back-catalogue of motivational advice

The Importance Of Research Objectives

Imagine you’re a student planning a vacation in a foreign country. You’re on a tight budget and need to draw…

Imagine you’re a student planning a vacation in a foreign country. You’re on a tight budget and need to draw up a pocket-friendly plan. Where do you begin? The first step is to do your research.

Before that, you make a mental list of your objectives—finding reasonably-priced hotels, traveling safely and finding ways of communicating with someone back home. These objectives help you focus sharply during your research and be aware of the finer details of your trip.

More often than not, research is a part of our daily lives. Whether it’s to pick a restaurant for your next birthday dinner or to prepare a presentation at work, good research is the foundation of effective learning. Read on to understand the meaning, importance and examples of research objectives.

Why Do We Need Research?

What are the objectives of research, what goes into a research plan.

Research is a careful and detailed study of a particular problem or concern, using scientific methods. An in-depth analysis of information creates space for generating new questions, concepts and understandings. The main objective of research is to explore the unknown and unlock new possibilities. It’s an essential component of success.

Over the years, businesses have started emphasizing the need for research. You’ve probably noticed organizations hiring research managers and analysts. The primary purpose of business research is to determine the goals and opportunities of an organization. It’s critical in making business decisions and appropriately allocating available resources.

Here are a few benefits of research that’ll explain why it is a vital aspect of our professional lives:

Expands Your Knowledge Base

One of the greatest benefits of research is to learn and gain a deeper understanding. The deeper you dig into a topic, the more well-versed you are. Furthermore, research has the power to help you build on any personal experience you have on the subject.

Keeps You Up To Date

Research encourages you to discover the most recent information available. Updated information prevents you from falling behind and helps you present accurate information. You’re better equipped to develop ideas or talk about a topic when you’re armed with the latest inputs.

Builds Your Credibility

Research provides you with a good foundation upon which you can develop your thoughts and ideas. People take you more seriously when your suggestions are backed by research. You can speak with greater confidence because you know that the information is accurate.

Sparks Connections

Take any leading nonprofit organization, you’ll see how they have a strong research arm supported by real-life stories. Research also becomes the base upon which real-life connections and impact can be made. It even helps you communicate better with others and conveys why you’re pursuing something.

Encourages Curiosity

As we’ve already established, research is mostly about using existing information to create new ideas and opinions. In the process, it sparks curiosity as you’re encouraged to explore and gain deeper insights into a subject. Curiosity leads to higher levels of positivity and lower levels of anxiety.

Well-defined objectives of research are an essential component of successful research engagement. If you want to drive all aspects of your research methodology such as data collection, design, analysis and recommendation, you need to lay down the objectives of research methodology. In other words, the objectives of research should address the underlying purpose of investigation and analysis. It should outline the steps you’d take to achieve desirable outcomes. Research objectives help you stay focused and adjust your expectations as you progress.

The objectives of research should be closely related to the problem statement, giving way to specific and achievable goals. Here are the four types of research objectives for you to explore:

General Objective

Also known as secondary objectives, general objectives provide a detailed view of the aim of a study. In other words, you get a general overview of what you want to achieve by the end of your study. For example, if you want to study an organization’s contribution to environmental sustainability, your general objective could be: a study of sustainable practices and the use of renewable energy by the organization.

Specific Objectives

Specific objectives define the primary aim of the study. Typically, general objectives provide the foundation for identifying specific objectives. In other words, when general objectives are broken down into smaller and logically connected objectives, they’re known as specific objectives. They help define the who, what, why, when and how aspects of your project. Once you identify the main objective of research, it’s easier to develop and pursue a plan of action.

Let’s take the example of ‘a study of an organization’s contribution to environmental sustainability’ again. The specific objectives will look like this:

To determine through history how the organization has changed its practices and adopted new solutions

To assess how the new practices, technology and strategies will contribute to the overall effectiveness

Once you’ve identified the objectives of research, it’s time to organize your thoughts and streamline your research goals. Here are a few effective tips to develop a powerful research plan and improve your business performance.

Set SMART Goals

Your research objectives should be SMART—Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic and Time-constrained. When you focus on utilizing available resources and setting realistic timeframes and milestones, it’s easier to prioritize objectives. Continuously track your progress and check whether you need to revise your expectations or targets. This way, you’re in greater control over the process.

Create A Plan

Create a plan that’ll help you select appropriate methods to collect accurate information. A well-structured plan allows you to use logical and creative approaches towards problem-solving. The complexity of information and your skills are bound to influence your plan, which is why you need to make room for flexibility. The availability of resources will also play a big role in influencing your decisions.

Collect And Collate

After you’ve created a plan for the research process, make a list of the data you’re going to collect and the methods you’ll use. Not only will it help make sense of your insights but also keep track of your approach. The information you collect should be:

Logical, rigorous and objective

Can be reproduced by other people working on the same subject

Free of errors and highlighting necessary details

Current and updated

Includes everything required to support your argument/suggestions

Analyze And Keep Ready

Data analysis is the most crucial part of the process and there are many ways in which the information can be utilized. Four types of data analysis are often seen in a professional environment. While they may be divided into separate categories, they’re linked to each other.

Descriptive Analysis:

The most commonly used data analysis, descriptive analysis simply summarizes past data. For example, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) use descriptive analysis. It establishes certain benchmarks after studying how someone has been performing in the past.

Diagnostic Analysis:

The next step is to identify why something happened. Diagnostic analysis uses the information gathered through descriptive analysis and helps find the underlying causes of an outcome. For example, if a marketing initiative was successful, you deep-dive into the strategies that worked.

Predictive Analysis:

It attempts to answer ‘what’s likely to happen’. Predictive analysis makes use of past data to predict future outcomes. However, the accuracy of predictions depends on the quality of the data provided. Risk assessment is an ideal example of using predictive analysis.

Prescriptive Analysis: 

The most sought-after type of data analysis, prescriptive analysis combines the insights of all of the previous analyses. It’s a huge organizational commitment as it requires plenty of effort and resources. A great example of prescriptive analysis is Artificial Intelligence (AI), which consumes large amounts of data. You need to be prepared to commit to this type of analysis.

Review And Interpret

Once you’ve collected and collated your data, it’s time to review it and draw accurate conclusions. Here are a few ways to improve the review process:

Identify the fundamental issues, opportunities and problems and make note of recurring trends if any

Make a list of your insights and check which is the most or the least common. In short, keep track of the frequency of each insight

Conduct a SWOT analysis and identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats

Write down your conclusions and recommendations of the research

When we think about research, we often associate it with academicians and students. but the truth is research is for everybody who is willing to learn and enhance their knowledge. If you want to master the art of strategically upgrading your knowledge, Harappa Education’s Learning Expertly course has all the answers. Not only will it help you look at things from a fresh perspective but also show you how to acquire new information with greater efficiency. The Growth Mindset framework will teach you how to believe in your abilities to grow and improve. The Learning Transfer framework will help you apply your learnings from one context to another. Begin the journey of tactful learning and self-improvement today!

Explore Harappa Diaries to learn more about topics related to the THINK Habit such as  Learning From Experience ,  Critical Thinking  & What is  Brainstorming  to think clearly and rationally.

Formulating Research Aims and Objectives

Formulating research aim and objectives in an appropriate manner is one of the most important aspects of your thesis. This is because research aim and objectives determine the scope, depth and the overall direction of the research. Research question is the central question of the study that has to be answered on the basis of research findings.

Research aim emphasizes what needs to be achieved within the scope of the research, by the end of the research process. Achievement of research aim provides answer to the research question.

Research objectives divide research aim into several parts and address each part separately. Research aim specifies WHAT needs to be studied and research objectives comprise a number of steps that address HOW research aim will be achieved.

As a rule of dumb, there would be one research aim and several research objectives. Achievement of each research objective will lead to the achievement of the research aim.

Consider the following as an example:

Research title: Effects of organizational culture on business profitability: a case study of Virgin Atlantic

Research aim: To assess the effects of Virgin Atlantic organizational culture on business profitability

Following research objectives would facilitate the achievement of this aim:

• Analyzing the nature of organizational culture at Virgin Atlantic by September 1, 2022
• Identifying factors impacting Virgin Atlantic organizational culture by September 16, 2022
• Analyzing impacts of Virgin Atlantic organizational culture on employee performances by September 30, 2022
• Providing recommendations to Virgin Atlantic strategic level management in terms of increasing the level of effectiveness of organizational culture by October 5, 2022

Figure below illustrates additional examples in formulating research aims and objectives:

Formulation of research question, aim and objectives

Common mistakes in the formulation of research aim relate to the following:

1. Choosing the topic too broadly . This is the most common mistake. For example, a research title of “an analysis of leadership practices” can be classified as too broad because the title fails to answer the following questions:

a) Which aspects of leadership practices? Leadership has many aspects such as employee motivation, ethical behaviour, strategic planning, change management etc. An attempt to cover all of these aspects of organizational leadership within a single research will result in an unfocused and poor work.

b) An analysis of leadership practices in which country? Leadership practices tend to be different in various countries due to cross-cultural differences, legislations and a range of other region-specific factors. Therefore, a study of leadership practices needs to be country-specific.

c) Analysis of leadership practices in which company or industry? Similar to the point above, analysis of leadership practices needs to take into account industry-specific and/or company-specific differences, and there is no way to conduct a leadership research that relates to all industries and organizations in an equal manner.

Accordingly, as an example “a study into the impacts of ethical behaviour of a leader on the level of employee motivation in US healthcare sector” would be a more appropriate title than simply “An analysis of leadership practices”.

2. Setting an unrealistic aim . Formulation of a research aim that involves in-depth interviews with Apple strategic level management by an undergraduate level student can be specified as a bit over-ambitious. This is because securing an interview with Apple CEO Tim Cook or members of Apple Board of Directors might not be easy. This is an extreme example of course, but you got the idea. Instead, you may aim to interview the manager of your local Apple store and adopt a more feasible strategy to get your dissertation completed.

3. Choosing research methods incompatible with the timeframe available . Conducting interviews with 20 sample group members and collecting primary data through 2 focus groups when only three months left until submission of your dissertation can be very difficult, if not impossible. Accordingly, timeframe available need to be taken into account when formulating research aims and objectives and selecting research methods.

Moreover, research objectives need to be formulated according to SMART principle,

 where the abbreviation stands for specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and time-bound.

Examples of SMART research objectives

At the conclusion part of your research project you will need to reflect on the level of achievement of research aims and objectives. In case your research aims and objectives are not fully achieved by the end of the study, you will need to discuss the reasons. These may include initial inappropriate formulation of research aims and objectives, effects of other variables that were not considered at the beginning of the research or changes in some circumstances during the research process.

John Dudovskiy

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• v.53(4); 2010 Aug

Research questions, hypotheses and objectives

Patricia farrugia.

* Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, the

Bradley A. Petrisor

† Division of Orthopaedic Surgery and the

Forough Farrokhyar

‡ Departments of Surgery and

§ Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont

Mohit Bhandari

There is an increasing familiarity with the principles of evidence-based medicine in the surgical community. As surgeons become more aware of the hierarchy of evidence, grades of recommendations and the principles of critical appraisal, they develop an increasing familiarity with research design. Surgeons and clinicians are looking more and more to the literature and clinical trials to guide their practice; as such, it is becoming a responsibility of the clinical research community to attempt to answer questions that are not only well thought out but also clinically relevant. The development of the research question, including a supportive hypothesis and objectives, is a necessary key step in producing clinically relevant results to be used in evidence-based practice. A well-defined and specific research question is more likely to help guide us in making decisions about study design and population and subsequently what data will be collected and analyzed. 1

Objectives of this article

In this article, we discuss important considerations in the development of a research question and hypothesis and in defining objectives for research. By the end of this article, the reader will be able to appreciate the significance of constructing a good research question and developing hypotheses and research objectives for the successful design of a research study. The following article is divided into 3 sections: research question, research hypothesis and research objectives.

Research question

Interest in a particular topic usually begins the research process, but it is the familiarity with the subject that helps define an appropriate research question for a study. 1 Questions then arise out of a perceived knowledge deficit within a subject area or field of study. 2 Indeed, Haynes suggests that it is important to know “where the boundary between current knowledge and ignorance lies.” 1 The challenge in developing an appropriate research question is in determining which clinical uncertainties could or should be studied and also rationalizing the need for their investigation.

Increasing one’s knowledge about the subject of interest can be accomplished in many ways. Appropriate methods include systematically searching the literature, in-depth interviews and focus groups with patients (and proxies) and interviews with experts in the field. In addition, awareness of current trends and technological advances can assist with the development of research questions. 2 It is imperative to understand what has been studied about a topic to date in order to further the knowledge that has been previously gathered on a topic. Indeed, some granting institutions (e.g., Canadian Institute for Health Research) encourage applicants to conduct a systematic review of the available evidence if a recent review does not already exist and preferably a pilot or feasibility study before applying for a grant for a full trial.

In-depth knowledge about a subject may generate a number of questions. It then becomes necessary to ask whether these questions can be answered through one study or if more than one study needed. 1 Additional research questions can be developed, but several basic principles should be taken into consideration. 1 All questions, primary and secondary, should be developed at the beginning and planning stages of a study. Any additional questions should never compromise the primary question because it is the primary research question that forms the basis of the hypothesis and study objectives. It must be kept in mind that within the scope of one study, the presence of a number of research questions will affect and potentially increase the complexity of both the study design and subsequent statistical analyses, not to mention the actual feasibility of answering every question. 1 A sensible strategy is to establish a single primary research question around which to focus the study plan. 3 In a study, the primary research question should be clearly stated at the end of the introduction of the grant proposal, and it usually specifies the population to be studied, the intervention to be implemented and other circumstantial factors. 4

Hulley and colleagues 2 have suggested the use of the FINER criteria in the development of a good research question ( Box 1 ). The FINER criteria highlight useful points that may increase the chances of developing a successful research project. A good research question should specify the population of interest, be of interest to the scientific community and potentially to the public, have clinical relevance and further current knowledge in the field (and of course be compliant with the standards of ethical boards and national research standards).

FINER criteria for a good research question

Adapted with permission from Wolters Kluwer Health. 2

Whereas the FINER criteria outline the important aspects of the question in general, a useful format to use in the development of a specific research question is the PICO format — consider the population (P) of interest, the intervention (I) being studied, the comparison (C) group (or to what is the intervention being compared) and the outcome of interest (O). 3 , 5 , 6 Often timing (T) is added to PICO ( Box 2 ) — that is, “Over what time frame will the study take place?” 1 The PICOT approach helps generate a question that aids in constructing the framework of the study and subsequently in protocol development by alluding to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and identifying the groups of patients to be included. Knowing the specific population of interest, intervention (and comparator) and outcome of interest may also help the researcher identify an appropriate outcome measurement tool. 7 The more defined the population of interest, and thus the more stringent the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the greater the effect on the interpretation and subsequent applicability and generalizability of the research findings. 1 , 2 A restricted study population (and exclusion criteria) may limit bias and increase the internal validity of the study; however, this approach will limit external validity of the study and, thus, the generalizability of the findings to the practical clinical setting. Conversely, a broadly defined study population and inclusion criteria may be representative of practical clinical practice but may increase bias and reduce the internal validity of the study.

PICOT criteria 1

A poorly devised research question may affect the choice of study design, potentially lead to futile situations and, thus, hamper the chance of determining anything of clinical significance, which will then affect the potential for publication. Without devoting appropriate resources to developing the research question, the quality of the study and subsequent results may be compromised. During the initial stages of any research study, it is therefore imperative to formulate a research question that is both clinically relevant and answerable.

Research hypothesis

The primary research question should be driven by the hypothesis rather than the data. 1 , 2 That is, the research question and hypothesis should be developed before the start of the study. This sounds intuitive; however, if we take, for example, a database of information, it is potentially possible to perform multiple statistical comparisons of groups within the database to find a statistically significant association. This could then lead one to work backward from the data and develop the “question.” This is counterintuitive to the process because the question is asked specifically to then find the answer, thus collecting data along the way (i.e., in a prospective manner). Multiple statistical testing of associations from data previously collected could potentially lead to spuriously positive findings of association through chance alone. 2 Therefore, a good hypothesis must be based on a good research question at the start of a trial and, indeed, drive data collection for the study.

The research or clinical hypothesis is developed from the research question and then the main elements of the study — sampling strategy, intervention (if applicable), comparison and outcome variables — are summarized in a form that establishes the basis for testing, statistical and ultimately clinical significance. 3 For example, in a research study comparing computer-assisted acetabular component insertion versus freehand acetabular component placement in patients in need of total hip arthroplasty, the experimental group would be computer-assisted insertion and the control/conventional group would be free-hand placement. The investigative team would first state a research hypothesis. This could be expressed as a single outcome (e.g., computer-assisted acetabular component placement leads to improved functional outcome) or potentially as a complex/composite outcome; that is, more than one outcome (e.g., computer-assisted acetabular component placement leads to both improved radiographic cup placement and improved functional outcome).

However, when formally testing statistical significance, the hypothesis should be stated as a “null” hypothesis. 2 The purpose of hypothesis testing is to make an inference about the population of interest on the basis of a random sample taken from that population. The null hypothesis for the preceding research hypothesis then would be that there is no difference in mean functional outcome between the computer-assisted insertion and free-hand placement techniques. After forming the null hypothesis, the researchers would form an alternate hypothesis stating the nature of the difference, if it should appear. The alternate hypothesis would be that there is a difference in mean functional outcome between these techniques. At the end of the study, the null hypothesis is then tested statistically. If the findings of the study are not statistically significant (i.e., there is no difference in functional outcome between the groups in a statistical sense), we cannot reject the null hypothesis, whereas if the findings were significant, we can reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternate hypothesis (i.e., there is a difference in mean functional outcome between the study groups), errors in testing notwithstanding. In other words, hypothesis testing confirms or refutes the statement that the observed findings did not occur by chance alone but rather occurred because there was a true difference in outcomes between these surgical procedures. The concept of statistical hypothesis testing is complex, and the details are beyond the scope of this article.

Another important concept inherent in hypothesis testing is whether the hypotheses will be 1-sided or 2-sided. A 2-sided hypothesis states that there is a difference between the experimental group and the control group, but it does not specify in advance the expected direction of the difference. For example, we asked whether there is there an improvement in outcomes with computer-assisted surgery or whether the outcomes worse with computer-assisted surgery. We presented a 2-sided test in the above example because we did not specify the direction of the difference. A 1-sided hypothesis states a specific direction (e.g., there is an improvement in outcomes with computer-assisted surgery). A 2-sided hypothesis should be used unless there is a good justification for using a 1-sided hypothesis. As Bland and Atlman 8 stated, “One-sided hypothesis testing should never be used as a device to make a conventionally nonsignificant difference significant.”

The research hypothesis should be stated at the beginning of the study to guide the objectives for research. Whereas the investigators may state the hypothesis as being 1-sided (there is an improvement with treatment), the study and investigators must adhere to the concept of clinical equipoise. According to this principle, a clinical (or surgical) trial is ethical only if the expert community is uncertain about the relative therapeutic merits of the experimental and control groups being evaluated. 9 It means there must exist an honest and professional disagreement among expert clinicians about the preferred treatment. 9

Designing a research hypothesis is supported by a good research question and will influence the type of research design for the study. Acting on the principles of appropriate hypothesis development, the study can then confidently proceed to the development of the research objective.

Research objective

The primary objective should be coupled with the hypothesis of the study. Study objectives define the specific aims of the study and should be clearly stated in the introduction of the research protocol. 7 From our previous example and using the investigative hypothesis that there is a difference in functional outcomes between computer-assisted acetabular component placement and free-hand placement, the primary objective can be stated as follows: this study will compare the functional outcomes of computer-assisted acetabular component insertion versus free-hand placement in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Note that the study objective is an active statement about how the study is going to answer the specific research question. Objectives can (and often do) state exactly which outcome measures are going to be used within their statements. They are important because they not only help guide the development of the protocol and design of study but also play a role in sample size calculations and determining the power of the study. 7 These concepts will be discussed in other articles in this series.

From the surgeon’s point of view, it is important for the study objectives to be focused on outcomes that are important to patients and clinically relevant. For example, the most methodologically sound randomized controlled trial comparing 2 techniques of distal radial fixation would have little or no clinical impact if the primary objective was to determine the effect of treatment A as compared to treatment B on intraoperative fluoroscopy time. However, if the objective was to determine the effect of treatment A as compared to treatment B on patient functional outcome at 1 year, this would have a much more significant impact on clinical decision-making. Second, more meaningful surgeon–patient discussions could ensue, incorporating patient values and preferences with the results from this study. 6 , 7 It is the precise objective and what the investigator is trying to measure that is of clinical relevance in the practical setting.

The following is an example from the literature about the relation between the research question, hypothesis and study objectives:

Study: Warden SJ, Metcalf BR, Kiss ZS, et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for chronic patellar tendinopathy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Rheumatology 2008;47:467–71.

Research question: How does low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) compare with a placebo device in managing the symptoms of skeletally mature patients with patellar tendinopathy?

Research hypothesis: Pain levels are reduced in patients who receive daily active-LIPUS (treatment) for 12 weeks compared with individuals who receive inactive-LIPUS (placebo).

Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of LIPUS in the management of patellar tendinopathy symptoms.

The development of the research question is the most important aspect of a research project. A research project can fail if the objectives and hypothesis are poorly focused and underdeveloped. Useful tips for surgical researchers are provided in Box 3 . Designing and developing an appropriate and relevant research question, hypothesis and objectives can be a difficult task. The critical appraisal of the research question used in a study is vital to the application of the findings to clinical practice. Focusing resources, time and dedication to these 3 very important tasks will help to guide a successful research project, influence interpretation of the results and affect future publication efforts.

Tips for developing research questions, hypotheses and objectives for research studies

• Perform a systematic literature review (if one has not been done) to increase knowledge and familiarity with the topic and to assist with research development.
• Learn about current trends and technological advances on the topic.
• Seek careful input from experts, mentors, colleagues and collaborators to refine your research question as this will aid in developing the research question and guide the research study.
• Use the FINER criteria in the development of the research question.
• Ensure that the research question follows PICOT format.
• Develop a research hypothesis from the research question.
• Develop clear and well-defined primary and secondary (if needed) objectives.
• Ensure that the research question and objectives are answerable, feasible and clinically relevant.

FINER = feasible, interesting, novel, ethical, relevant; PICOT = population (patients), intervention (for intervention studies only), comparison group, outcome of interest, time.

Competing interests: No funding was received in preparation of this paper. Dr. Bhandari was funded, in part, by a Canada Research Chair, McMaster University.

• Privacy Policy

Home » Purpose of Research – Objectives and Applications

Purpose of Research – Objectives and Applications

Table of Contents

Purpose of Research

Definition:

The purpose of research is to systematically investigate and gather information on a particular topic or issue, with the aim of answering questions, solving problems, or advancing knowledge.

The purpose of research can vary depending on the field of study, the research question, and the intended audience. In general, research can be used to:

• Generate new knowledge and theories
• Test existing theories or hypotheses
• Identify trends or patterns
• Gather information for decision-making
• Evaluate the effectiveness of programs, policies, or interventions
• Develop new technologies or products
• Identify new opportunities or areas for further study.

Objectives of Research

The objectives of research may vary depending on the field of study and the specific research question being investigated. However, some common objectives of research include:

• To explore and describe a phenomenon: Research can be conducted to describe and understand a phenomenon or situation in greater detail.
• To test a hypothesis or theory : Research can be used to test a specific hypothesis or theory by collecting and analyzing data.
• To identify patterns or trends: Research can be conducted to identify patterns or trends in data, which can provide insights into the behavior of a system or population.
• To evaluate a program or intervention: Research can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of a program or intervention, such as a new drug or educational intervention.
• To develop new knowledge or technology : Research can be conducted to develop new knowledge or technologies that can be applied to solve practical problems.
• To inform policy decisions: Research can provide evidence to inform policy decisions and improve public policy.
• To improve existing knowledge: Research can be conducted to improve existing knowledge and fill gaps in the current understanding of a topic.

Applications of Research

Research has a wide range of applications across various fields and industries. Here are some examples:

• Medicine : Research is critical in developing new treatments and drugs for diseases. Researchers conduct clinical trials to test the safety and efficacy of new medications and therapies. They also study the underlying causes of diseases to find new ways to prevent or treat them.
• Technology : Research is crucial in developing new technologies and improving existing ones. Researchers work to develop new software, hardware, and other technological innovations that can be used in various industries such as healthcare, manufacturing, and telecommunications.
• Education : Research is essential in the field of education to develop new teaching methods and strategies. Researchers conduct studies to determine the effectiveness of various educational approaches and to identify factors that influence student learning.
• Business : Research is critical in helping businesses make informed decisions. Market research can help businesses understand their target audience and identify trends in the market. Research can also help businesses improve their products and services.
• Environmental Science : Research is crucial in the field of environmental science to understand the impact of human activities on the environment. Researchers conduct studies to identify ways to reduce pollution, protect natural resources, and mitigate the effects of climate change.

Goal of Research

The ultimate goal of research is to advance our understanding of the world and to contribute to the development of new theories, ideas, and technologies that can be used to improve our lives. Some more common Goals are follows:

• Explore and discover new knowledge : Research can help uncover new information and insights that were previously unknown.
• Test hypotheses and theories : Research can be used to test and validate theories and hypotheses, allowing researchers to refine and develop their ideas.
• Solve practical problems: Research can be used to identify solutions to real-world problems and to inform policy and decision-making.
• Improve understanding : Research can help improve our understanding of complex phenomena and systems, such as the human body, the natural world, and social systems.
• Develop new technologies and innovations : Research can lead to the development of new technologies, products, and innovations that can improve our lives and society.
• Contribute to the development of academic fields : Research can help advance academic fields by expanding our knowledge and understanding of important topics and areas of inquiry.

Importance of Research

The importance of research lies in its ability to generate new knowledge and insights, to test existing theories and ideas, and to solve practical problems.

Some of the key reasons why research is important are:

• Advancing knowledge: Research is essential for advancing knowledge and understanding in various fields. It enables us to explore and discover new concepts, ideas, and phenomena that can contribute to scientific and technological progress.
• Solving problems : Research can help identify and solve practical problems and challenges in various domains, such as health care, agriculture, engineering, and social policy.
• Innovation : Research is a critical driver of innovation, as it enables the development of new products, services, and technologies that can improve people’s lives and contribute to economic growth.
• Evidence-based decision-making : Research provides evidence and data that can inform decision-making in various fields, such as policy-making, business strategy, and healthcare.
• Personal and professional development : Engaging in research can also contribute to personal and professional development, as it requires critical thinking, problem-solving, and communication skills.

When to use Research

Research should be used in situations where there is a need to gather new information, test existing theories, or solve problems. Some common scenarios where research is often used include:

• Scientific inquiry : Research is essential for advancing scientific knowledge and understanding, and for exploring new concepts, theories, and phenomena.
• Business and market analysis: Research is critical for businesses to gather data and insights about the market, customer preferences, and competition, to inform decision-making and strategy development.
• Social policy and public administration: Research is often used in social policy and public administration to evaluate the effectiveness of programs and policies, and to identify areas where improvements are needed.
• Healthcare: Research is essential in healthcare to develop new treatments, improve existing ones, and to understand the causes and mechanisms of diseases.
• Education : Research is critical in education to evaluate the effectiveness of teaching methods and programs, and to develop new approaches to learning.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Research Techniques – Methods, Types and Examples

Data Verification – Process, Types and Examples

Research Questions – Types, Examples and Writing...

Critical Analysis – Types, Examples and Writing...

Research Problem – Examples, Types and Guide

Informed Consent in Research – Types, Templates...

DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln

• < Previous Article
• Next Article >

Home > Libraries > Library Philosophy and Practice - Electronic Journal > 8129

Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal)

The status of implementation of radio frequency identification (rfid) technology and its awareness among library users and professionals: a study of central library of jadavpur university, kolkata.

Soma Tanti , Mahatma Gandhi Central University Follow Anubhaw Kumar Suman , Mahatma Gandhi Central University Follow Dr. Madhu Patel , Mahatma Gandhi Central University Follow

Date of this Version

Document type.

The main aim of this study is to determine the status of implementing the Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology in the central library of Jadavpur University, Kolkata; the other purpose is to increase awareness of RFID technology among library professionals and users of the library. RFID technology occurs in many areas of society, such as healthcare, marketing, libraries, etc. For this study, the users and library professionals of Jadavpur University have been selected. This study adopted the descriptive analytical research method, and quantitative and qualitative data were collected to achieve its objectives. The survey method has been used with the help of two sets of questionnaires. The first stage evolved by making a questionnaire to conduct research or gather information from users and library professionals. The second stage included the data tabulated in an Excel sheet and presented for analysis in tabular, bar, and graph formats. The study explained the outline of the RFID technology implementation status, the amount of work done in the library, and the gaps; it also explained the awareness of RFID technology among library professionals and Users and the user satisfaction level towards the library services.

Since July 04, 2024

Included in

Collection Development and Management Commons , Scholarly Communication Commons

Advanced Search

Search Help

• Notify me via email or RSS
• Library Philosophy and Practice - Electronic Journal Website
• Copyright Statement
• Instructions for Authors
• Advice for Contributors
• Collections
• Disciplines

Author Corner

• Submission Guidelines
• Guide to Submitting
• Submit your paper or article
• Libraries Website
• Library Philosophy and Practice Editorial Board

Home | About | FAQ | My Account | Accessibility Statement

Privacy Copyright

• Open access
• Published: 04 July 2024

The application of blended teaching in medical practical course of clinical skills training

• Zhicheng He 1 ,
• Qiang Wang 1 ,
• Qingming Wu 1 &
• Lili Lu 1  

BMC Medical Education volume  24 , Article number:  724 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

50 Accesses

Metrics details

Blended teaching is an effective approach that combines online and offline teaching methods, leading to improved outcomes in medical education compared to traditional offline teaching. In this study, we examined the impact of blended teaching in clinical skills training, a medical practice course.

This study involved forty-eight undergraduate students studying clinical medicine in the fifth semester at Wuhan University of Science and Technology. The students were divided into two groups: the control group, which received traditional offline teaching, and the experimental group, which received hybrid teaching. Following the completion of the 4-month course, both groups underwent the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) to evaluate their proficiency in clinical skills. Furthermore, the experimental group was given a separate questionnaire to gauge their feedback on the Blended Teaching approach.

Based on the OSCE scores, the experimental group outperformed the control group significantly ( P <0.05). The questionnaire results indicated that a majority of students (54.2%, 3.71 ± 1.06) believed that blended teaching is superior to traditional offline teaching, and a significant number of students (58.3%, 3.79 ± 1.15) expressed their willingness to adopt blended teaching in other courses. Furthermore, students in the experimental group displayed varying levels of interest in different teaching contents, with emergency medicine (79.2%), internal medicine (70.8%), and surgery (66.7%) being the most popular among them.

Conclusions

This research demonstrates for the first time that blended teaching can achieve a good pedagogical effectiveness in the medical practice course, clinical skills training and practice. Moreover, in different teaching contents, the teaching effects are different. In the content of Emergency Medicine and Surgery, which is more attractive to students, the application of blended teaching could result in a better pedagogical outcome than other contents.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The education system for clinical medicine students in China primarily follows the “5 + 3” model, with some variations such as the 8-year program. In the “5 + 3” model, students undergo a five-year undergraduate program to get a bachelor degree and then followed by three-year standardized residency training [ 1 ]. Undergraduate education can be divided into three parts: theoretical learning, apprenticeships, and internships. At Wuhan University of Science and Technology (WUST), the undergraduate clinical medical education program follows a unique 2.5 + 2.5 model. In this model, the first 2.5 years are dedicated to studying general courses and basic medical courses at the university. The subsequent 2.5 years are then devoted to completing clinical courses and clinical internships in affiliated hospitals.

In the career of clinical medical students, the acquisition of clinical skills is crucial for demonstrating competence in clinical practice. Before the internship stage, medical students are typically expected to master fundamental clinical skills such as physical examination, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), major puncture operations, and basic surgical operations. These skills will play an essential role in their future careers. For instance, proficient physical examinations can expedite the treatment process for patients with acute and serious illnesses, as well as guide doctors in conducting other necessary examinations promptly. This not only reduces the financial burden on patients but also improves the allocation of medical resources [ 2 ]. Additionally, regardless of the department they work in, it is imperative for medical students to master CPR and be able to apply it in emergencies [ 3 ]. According to this requirement, WUST has introduced the course “Clinical Skills Training and Practice” in the fifth semester to cultivate students’ basic clinical skills before they enter the affiliated hospitals.

With the rapid development of information technology, the traditional offline medical teaching mode alone is no longer sufficient to meet the evolving needs of medical education in this era. Initially, online medical education was primarily limited to recording and broadcasting courses, often spread through tapes and CDs. This traditional model, however, only catered to basic teaching needs with limited interactivity and feedback. The emergence of internet technologies has paved the way for innovative teaching methods such as online instruction and virtual simulations to gain popularity. These advancements have made teachers more engaging to students and facilitated increased feedback [ 4 , 5 ]. Moreover, the research on the utilization of ChatGPT in medical education reminds us that the evolution of medical education will progress alongside advancements in science and technology [ 6 ]. Changes in educational methods are influenced not only by technological advancements but also by shifts in students’ intrinsic needs. In today’s information-rich environment, traditional teaching methods centered around knowledge transfer alone fall short in meeting students’ requirements. The progress in technology has expanded the possibilities for educational approaches, including the flipped classroom model, project-based learning, and differentiated instruction. These innovations enable educators to focus on enhancing students’ learning experiences, increasing their interest and engagement, catering to their diverse and personalized learning preferences, and ensuring fair and inclusive access to education for a broader audience.

Traditional clinical skills training typically involves a structured presentation by the teacher, followed by the student’s practice under supervision [ 7 ]. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has boosted the development of online courses, such as ‘Clinical Skills Training and Practice’ in WUST. Multiple studies demonstrate that online medical education during this period has yielded unexpected advancements and potential [ 8 , 9 , 10 ]. In the past three years, WUST’s online “Clinical Skills Training and Practice” course has demonstrated promising results in improving pedagogical effectiveness. This prompts us to consider whether blending online education with traditional offline teaching (TOT) could be a better option. Blended teaching (BT), which combines online and offline methods, has been used in medical education since 1990 [ 11 , 12 ]. A meta-analysis comparing BT and TOT in medical education indicates that BT has superior pedagogical effectiveness [ 13 ].

During the transition from being a medical student to becoming a doctor, students need to take medical practice courses to enhance their understanding and application of theoretical knowledge [ 14 ]. Among these courses, clinical skills training is particularly challenging and crucial due to its practical nature. While there has been limited research on the use of BT in clinical skills training.

This study, conducted at the Clinical Skills Training Center of Wuhan University of Science and Technology, aims to investigate the effectiveness of BT in clinical skills training. The participants of this study were undergraduate students majoring in clinical medicine in their fifth semester. The researchers implemented either BT or TOT in their ‘Clinical Skills Training and Practice’ course. The teaching effectiveness was evaluated using Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) scores and questionnaires. It is hypothesized that students who receive BT will achieve higher OSCE scores and report a more positive teaching experience and effectiveness in the questionnaire.

The study utilized a prospective randomized controlled design and received approval from the Ethics Committee of Wuhan University of Science and Technology (Dossier number 2022151). Sample size was computed with the aim of 0.85 power value, predicated on an effect size of 0.9 and a margin of error set at 0.05. A minimum of 19 participants per group was calculated using PASS 15, resulting in the recruitment of a total of 38 undergraduate students. To address the potential issue of sample dropout during project implementation, the sample size was increased to 48 students. 48 students were recruited based on predefined inclusion criteria from the total 248 third-year undergraduate students from the Department of Clinical Medicine at WUST. The inclusion criteria included: (1) proficient communication and comprehension skills, (2) consistent attendance without absenteeism or truancy, and (3) a positive attitude toward learning. Exclusion criteria comprised: (1) refusal to participate, (2) class absence, (3) failure to complete the final test, and (4) incomplete questionnaire responses. The study emphasized voluntary participation, allowing participants to withdraw at any time without providing a reason. We employed a random digital method to create a set of identification numbers, which were subsequently placed in a box and shuffled. Participants then selected codes from the box to determine their assignment to either the experimental Group A ( n  = 24) or the control Group B ( n  = 24). The random allocation sequence was generated using IBM SPSS Statistics 27. The study was conducted from September 2022 to December 2022. Prior to the commencement of the study, none of the participants had undergone any clinical skills training.

Study design

According to the WUST clinical medicine cultivation program, the course “Clinical Skills Training and Practice” is conducted in the fifth semester. Both groups of students followed the same syllabus and were taught and assessed by the same teaching team. The objectives of this course include gaining theoretical knowledge of various clinical operations and achieving proficiency in performing CPR, the four major puncture operations (thoracentesis, lumbar, myelopuncture, and peritoneal puncture), physical examination, and basic surgical operations (Disinfect & Draping, Donning & Taking off Surgical Gowns, and Incision & Suturing). All faculty members involved in this course are part of the Department of Clinical Medicine, holding both medical practitioner and teaching certificates, and possessing extensive teaching skills and clinical experience. Offline lessons took place at WUST’s Clinical Skills Training Center. The designated textbook for this course is ‘Clinical Skills Training and Practice’ [ 15 ]. The course consists of 144 periods and lasts approximately 4 months.

Interventions

Group A utilized the online course called “Clinical Skills Training and Practice” available on the University Open Online Courses (UOOC) [ 16 ]. The course is divided into five clinical modules: internal medicine, surgery, gynecology, pediatrics, and emergency medicine. Each module consists of theoretical lecture videos, standardized operation demonstration videos, PPT resources, as well as supporting exercises and tests. The course platform also provides a discussion and exchange board for teachers and students to interact and discuss topics online. The online teaching component constitutes 25% of the total class hours (Fig.  1 ).

Before each offline class, the teacher publishes the teaching content on the platform. Students access the platform using electronic devices and independently learn the relevant material. Through platform data, teachers can monitor and adjust the offline teaching content based on students’ progress. For skills that students have mastered well, teachers will primarily guide students to practice independently during offline teaching. For skills with weak mastery data, teachers will initially emphasize the key points of skill operation and provide demonstrations during offline teaching. The approach of targeting weak areas will be more focused, avoiding redundant explanations of basic content, and offering students more chances for self-practice. Instead of traditional lectures and demonstrations, teachers guide students in practical exercises during offline classes and enhance learning through formative evaluations such as group evaluations and teacher feedback (Fig.  2 ). After the offline classes, students return to the online platform to complete tests and assignments for each chapter, reinforcing their understanding of the acquired skills. If students encounter any difficulties, they can communicate with the teacher through the online course platform’s discussion area, ensuring timely teacher-student communication. Additionally, the course team teachers utilize the discussion area of the online platform to provide high-level clinical thinking training content, such as case analysis, to cater to the individualized learning needs of students at higher levels. The specific teaching process is depicted in Fig.  1 .

Group B students adopt the TOT model, which includes theoretical teaching and demonstration conducted by the teacher (25% of class time) followed by practical exercises by the students (75% of class time) (Fig.  1 ). Additionally, student mutual evaluation and teacher comments are used to conduct formative evaluation of students’ learning effects (Fig.  2 ).

Data collection

After the course, both groups of students underwent offline OSCE assessments at the WUST Clinical Skills Training Center. These assessments were conducted by the same group of examiners. The OSCE assessment consisted of 6 examination stations, namely: physical examination, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, four major puncture operations, donning & taking off surgical gowns, disinfection & draping, and incision & suturing (Fig.  1 ).

We designed a questionnaire for students in Group A who adopted BT. We used Alpha to calculate intra-group consistency and reliability. The alpha value of the BT questionnaire in Group A is 0.941, indicating that the questionnaire meets the required reliability. After the OSCE, the teacher distributed an anonymous questionnaire to the students in Group A (Fig.  1 ). The questionnaire included two basic pieces of information about the subjects’ age and gender, 11 scale questions, 1 multiple-choice question, and 1 open-ended question. The question design is based on a Likert scale (the scale ranges from 1 to 5, indicating the degree from strongly disagree to strongly agree). We considered a score ≥ 4 as an agreement.

The primary outcome of this study was to evaluate the scores of OSCE at the end of the course for both groups of students. Additionally, the results of the questionnaire were considered as a secondary outcome.

An overview of the course design: From 248 fifth-semester clinical medicine students, 48 students were randomly selected and divided into Group A and Group B. Group A adopted BT, and Group B adopted TOT. After 4 months of teaching, both of the two groups took OSCE but only Group A took the questionnaire

BT: Blended Teaching; TOT: Traditional Offline Teaching

The formative assessment of Group A and Group B

Statistical analyses

We used the Mac 2019 version of Microsoft Excel to collect all the OSCE score data and the BT questionnaire data. IBM SPSS Statistics 27 was used to test the normality and homogeneity of variance between groups A and B. Continuous variables with normal distribution were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD); non-normal variables were reported as median (interquartile range). Suppose the data matched the normal distribution the independent samples t-test was used, if not the Mann-Whitney U-test was used. Frequency analysis was conducted to analyze the rate of students’ agreement with each question in the BT questionnaire as reflected in the count data and expressed as a percentage (%). P  < 0.050 determined that it was statistically significant.

Participants’ demographic data

The demographic data of Groups A and B are presented in Table  1 . This study comprised a total of 48 students, with 24 students in Group A and 24 students in Group B. The average age of the students in Group A was 20.08 ± 0.65, while in Group B it was 21.33 ± 0.92. The male/female ratio in Group A was 9/15 and in Group B was 12/12.

Results of OSCE

As demonstrated in Table  2 , the normality of the data was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk Test. It is important to highlight that the P  value for group A in the total score item is less than 0.05, indicating a lack of normal distribution characteristics. Notably, in studies with small sample sizes ( n  < 50), meeting the criteria for data normality might be challenging. However, if the absolute value of Skewness is below 10 and the absolute value of Kurtosis is below 3, it is acceptable to proceed with corresponding statistical analyses as if the data is normality. Subsequently, based on the outcomes of the data analysis, appropriate statistical methods are applied to different types of data. The OSCE scores are shown in Table  3 . Significant differences were observed in various skills between Group A and Group B. These skills include cardiopulmonary resuscitation (92.50(4.00) vs. 86.00(3.50), P  < 0.050), physical examination (90.04 ± 3.09 vs. 63.83 ± 7.03, P  < 0.050), four major puncture operations (77.21 ± 8.99 vs. 71.17 ± 6.42, P  < 0.050), disinfection & draping (82.79 ± 4.03 vs. 61.42 ± 12.48, P  < 0.050), donning & taking off surgical gowns (84.00(5.75) vs. 78.00(9.00), P  < 0.050), incision & suturing (68.42 ± 5.26 vs. 62.79 ± 8.30, P  < 0.050) and total score (82.13 ± 3.36 vs. 70.00 ± 5.77, P  < 0.050). These results indicate that Group A achieved higher average scores than Group B in all evaluated items at the significance level of 0.05.

Perspectives survey about online and offline blended teaching mode

Table  4 presents the experiences and opinions of students in Group A regarding BT. The questionnaire was designed with questions categorized into four dimensions: course experience, learning effect, teaching evaluation, and overall evaluation. By analyzing the responses to questions 1–4, we can assess the impact of students’ course experience. Among the students who adopted BT, a higher number of students reported an improved course experience. Specifically, the model aided in understanding the theoretical knowledge of clinical skill operations (70.8%, 4.04 ± 1.10) and facilitated faster independent learning of these operations (70.8%, 4.04 ± 1.17). Additionally, it promoted the speed of mastering skills (66.6%, 3.92 ± 1.22) without significantly increasing the learning burden, as observed under good teaching effects (70.8%, 2.79 ± 1.15). Questions 5–7 aimed to assess student learning effectiveness. The majority of students expressed that BT helped prepare for OSCE exams (66.7%, 3.83 ± 1.18), promoting self-directed learning that is not bound by time and space (62.5%, 3.83 ± 1.14), and increasing their interest in the learning process (58.3%, 3.79 ± 1.08). Students’ evaluation of teaching under BT can be assessed using questions 8–9. The majority of students expressed that both online instruction (62.5%, 3.75 ± 1.13) and offline instruction (70.9%, 3.96 ± 1.14) in BT were effective in achieving the desired outcomes and objectives. The students’ overall assessment of BT is reflected in questions 10–11. More than half of the students (54.2%, 3.71 ± 1.06) felt that BT was better than TOT, and a higher proportion of the students (58.3%, 3.79 ± 1.15) expressed their willingness to implement BT into other medical skills training. Furthermore, question 12 revealed the students’ interest in each part of the teaching content, indicating that emergency medicine (79.2%), internal medicine (70.8%), and surgery (66.7%) were the most popular choices.

Clinical skills training in clinical practice courses is characterized by a high degree of practicality and the requirement for more practice time. The TOT model is commonly used, where instructors teach the theory and demonstrate the skills, followed by students practicing on their own. However, this model often limits the duration of students’ practical exercises, which is not beneficial to the training of clinical skills. The present study aims to assess the potential of BT in practice course by integrating online courses with offline practice, developing a BT course that meets pedagogical requirements, and evaluating its teaching effectiveness in different clinical skills. The research findings indicate that students in Group A, who adopted BT, performed better overall in OSCE compared to Group B, who followed the TOT model. Moreover, the results of the questionnaire revealed that Group A students had a positive learning experience and perceived the course to be more effective in terms of pedagogy.

The OSCE is widely recognized as an effective way to judge students’ mastery of clinical skills for formative and summative purposes [ 17 ]. In terms of OSCE scores, students in Group A outperformed those in Group B in both the overall score and each individual item. The differences between all items were statistically significant. When comparing the average scores of each item between the two groups, it can be observed that Group A showed varying levels of improvement in different assessment items. The performance difference between groups A and B was more obvious in the two items of physical examination and Disinfection & Draping compared to the other items. This suggests that although BT demonstrated better teaching effectiveness overall, its strengths vary across different types of items. These two items stand out due to their extensive content but relatively simple operation. With the use of the online platform in BT, students have the opportunity to repeatedly learn and become more proficient in these operations. However, when faced with tasks that require more offline practice, such as CPR and the four major puncture operations, the performance improvement is not as significant as observed in the two aforementioned items. That means online teaching cannot fully substitute offline teaching, especially when it comes to highly practical teaching content. However, online course platforms can be utilized to enhance teaching content, broaden teaching activities, and compensate for the limitations of traditional offline teaching. The results of the questionnaire in Group A revealed that students demonstrated a great interest interest in first aid, internal medicine, and surgery skills. Additionally, Group A achieved higher scores in the OSCE at the CPR site (Emergency Medicine) and the Basic Surgical Skills-related site (Surgery). These findings indicate that when students are presented with more engaging study materials, their motivation to learn is enhanced, leading to improved learning outcomes driven by higher levels of initiative [ 18 ]. Therefore, in the next stage of course construction, it is crucial to explore the development of more course content that can effectively enhance students’ interest in learning.

In contrast to this study, much of the current research on the use of BT in clinical skills education tends to concentrate on specific skills or skill types. Amy L Halverson’s research, for example, delves into surgical skills. The findings of Halverson’s study indicate that BT has a beneficial impact on surgical skills training for rural physicians, aligning with the outcomes of our study. Nevertheless, unlike the present research, Halverson’s study relied solely on questionnaires for drawing conclusions and lacked objective evaluation metrics [ 19 ]. More studies are focusing on evaluating the effectiveness of the BT model in CPR training due to the broad audience it caters to, which includes both medical and non-medical professionals. A study conducted on 832 non-medical professional persons in Taiwan revealed that the BT model was superior to TOT [ 20 ]. Additionally, research on the application of the BT model in CPR training for underage students demonstrated a significant increase in students’ willingness to intervene during a cardiac arrest, from 56.9 to 93.1% post-course [ 21 ]. These findings highlight the positive impact of the BT model on students’ self-confidence and overall teaching outcomes. Our study further supports these results, as the group A trained with the BT model performed notably better in the OSCE at the CPR site. This study innovatively applied the BT model to various types of clinical skills training, comparing its effects with the TOT model across different skill items. Moreover, this research not only examined the differences in application effects between the two teaching models on the same skill items but also compared the differences in teaching effectiveness improvement after applying the BT model among different skill items. The findings offer a more comprehensive theoretical foundation for application of the BT teaching model in clinical skills practice courses.

In the design of the course, we offer a wealth of clinical case materials on the online course platform. These materials are available for students who are eager to learn. Our goal is to foster students’ advanced abilities through the use of relevant cases or scenarios, which can enhance their coping skills and their ability to handle emergencies [ 22 ]. Our study has shown that students in Group A demonstrate higher performance in practical projects like CPR, which require hands-on experience, through online situational clinical case training. This training method allows students to go beyond simply acquiring visual information and instead encourages them to analyze, process, and integrate the visual information. As a result, students can achieve a deeper understanding of the knowledge points, progressing from the lower levels of Bloom’s taxonomy (memorization and comprehension) to higher levels such as analysis, application, and judgment. This approach greatly enhances the effectiveness of learning [ 23 ]. According to several studies, virtual simulation has been found to be more effective in promoting the learning of skills compared to teaching theoretical knowledge alone [ 24 ]. Therefore, in future designs of BT, we propose incorporating virtual simulation teaching into the online platform. This addition aims to address the limitations of the online platform in practical training and enhance the overall learning experience [ 25 ].

The blend of online courses with the traditional TOT model can offer teachers a more personalized teaching environment and timely feedback. The online education platform enables real-time observation and regulation of students’ learning progress, allowing for dynamic adjustments in offline teaching content and methods to better achieve pedagogical goals. Furthermore, we designed a chapter test in the online course. According to Kromann, the inclusion of testing in clinical skills training can be effective in improving the effectiveness of learning [ 26 ]. In this study, we observed that teachers can effectively assess students’ understanding of this particular aspect of the theory through chapter tests. This allows them to provide targeted guidance and reinforcement for students’ weaker areas in the offline course. Such feedback evaluation, developed during the teaching process, plays a crucial role in improving teaching effectiveness due to its timeliness and relevance. In future course designs, we plan to incorporate various forms of accompanying tests in both online and offline sessions to further enhance formative evaluation and teaching effectiveness.

For students, blending the online course with the offline course can provide the advantages of being more accessible and flexible in terms of time and location. It has been claimed that students can arrange their learning according to their own schedule and rhythm through the online platform in the BT model [ 13 ]. A similar phenomenon was observed in our study. For instance, before each offline teaching session or OSCE, there was a noticeable increase in students accessing online platforms. This trend indicates that students are using online platforms to align with their learning or revision strategies. In the online course, we have also introduced a discussion board where the instructor posts clinical case information and related questions. This board serves as a platform for students to actively participate in discussions and answer the questions posed by the instructor. The instructor then provides feedback on the student’s answers. This interactive communication method helps to reinforce the students’ clinical knowledge and skills, while also training them to develop their initial clinical thinking skills. Meanwhile, it also can effectively promote student participation in this course. It has been reported that greater student engagement in courses can increase their positive experience of the course and ultimately improve the effectiveness of the instruction [ 27 ]. However, in the BT model, students are required to possess advanced self-management skills and be familiar with online teaching platforms. Therefore, it is essential to integrate suitable learning monitoring tools and provide adequate training as part of the teaching process [ 28 , 29 ].

In the analysis of the questionnaire, we also noticed that students were slightly more satisfied with offline education (70.9%) than with online education (62.5%). This reminds us that offline teaching still holds its irreplaceability compared to online teaching. For example, face-to-face communication in offline teaching fosters a closer emotional connection between teachers and students. It allows for more intuitive guidance in developing students’ skills and provides faster feedback [ 30 ]. Given the practical nature of clinical skills courses, it is reasonable to conclude that online teaching cannot fully replace offline teaching. However, our research indicates that a combination of online and offline instruction can produce a synergistic effect. The online component of the course expands teaching resources and diversifies teaching methods, while also overcoming time and space constraints and promoting independent learning. On the other hand, the offline component allows teachers to provide personalized face-to-face guidance promptly. By combining these two approaches, we can achieve improved pedagogical effectiveness by leveraging their complementary advantages.

Like all educational research articles, this study has some limitations. Firstly, the sample size in this study is relatively small, which may result in a larger margin of error. Therefore, in our future studies, we plan to increase the sample size to reduce the potential bias caused by the small sample. Additionally, the limited number of clinical skills items included in this research may not provide a comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of BT in various clinical skills teaching. In future research, we will incorporate more measures to assess the learning outcomes of students’ clinical skills. This will involve collecting scores from graduation operation examinations and licensing examinations to objectively evaluate students’ mastery of clinical skills. Additionally, we will enhance curriculum development by integrating more clinical skills teaching programs into the BT model. This will allow for a more comprehensive evaluation of the BT model’s effectiveness in training various clinical skills programs. The questionnaire used in this study may have limitations in evaluating the teaching effect of BT due to its subjective nature. It is more suitable for assessing students’ subjective perceptions of the BT teaching model. Future research will aim to enhance the questionnaire design to better capture the subjective experiences of both teachers and students.

The development of the times has resulted in significant changes in medical education. As educators, it is important for us to actively explore new teaching modes and methods to enhance students’ learning experiences and outcomes. This will enable us to better cultivate medical students to meet the demands of the modern era. In conclusion, the results of this research indicate that students adopting BT are better in clinical skills training than those adopting TOT. And then, BT was better at teaching content-rich but easy-to-do items (physical examination and disinfection & draping) than practice-demanding items. Finally, students adopting BT will have better pedagogical outcomes in the more interesting items (emergency medicine and surgery). The application of BT in clinical skills training has demonstrated its potential in this study, leading us to believe that applying BT to other medical skills training and courses could yield unexpected benefits. In the future, we plan to develop more courses using blended teaching to cater to the needs of the new generation of clinical medical students.

Data availability

The datasets used and analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Wang W. Medical education in China: progress in the past 70 years and a vision for the future. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):453.

Article   Google Scholar  

Zaman J. The enduring value of the physical examination. Med Clin North Am. 2018;102(3):417–23.

Dalton HJ, Berg RA, Nadkarni VM, Kochanek PM, Tisherman SA, Thiagarajan R, Alexander P, Bartlett RH. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and rescue therapies. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(9):1375–88.

Chen V, Polley C, Dunne B, Martin K. Online delivery of surgical skills teaching. Med Educ. 2022;56(11):1130–1.

Bouchoucha S, Wikander L, Wilkin C. Assessment of simulated clinical skills and distance students: can we do it better. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33(9):944–8.

Wu C, Chen L, Han M, Li Z, Yang N, Yu C. Application of ChatGPT-based blended medical teaching in clinical education of hepatobiliary surgery. Med Teach. 2024:1–5.

Byrne AJ, Pugsley L, Hashem MA. Review of comparative studies of clinical skills training. Med Teach. 2008;30(8):764–7.

Alsoufi A, Alsuyihili A, Msherghi A, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical education: medical students’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding electronic learning. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(11):e0242905.

Dost S, Hossain A, Shehab M, Abdelwahed A, Al-Nusair L. Perceptions of medical students towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical students. BMJ Open. 2020;10(11):e042378.

Mortagy M, Abdelhameed A, Sexton P, et al. Online medical education in Egypt during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide assessment of medical students’ usage and perceptions. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):218.

Mangione S, Nieman LZ, Greenspon LW, Margulies H. A comparison of computer-assisted instruction and small-group teaching of cardiac auscultation to medical students. Med Educ. 1991;25(5):389–95.

Mars M, McLean M. Students’ perceptions of a multimedia computer-aided instruction resource in histology. S Afr Med J. 1996;86(9):1098–102.

Google Scholar  

Vallée A, Blacher J, Cariou A, Sorbets E. Blended learning compared to traditional learning in medical education: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8):e16504.

Teagle AR, George M, Gainsborough N, Haq I, Okorie M. Preparing medical students for clinical practice: easing the transition. Perspect Med Educ. 2017;6(4):277–80.

Liu Y. Xuejun Zeng. Clinical skills training and practice. People’s Medical Publishing House; 2015.

University Open Online Courses learning platform. Shenzhen University Open Online Courses Education limited company. https://www.uooc.net.cn/league/union

Patrício MF, Julião M, Fareleira F, Carneiro AV. Is the OSCE a feasible tool to assess competencies in undergraduate medical education. Med Teach. 2013;35(6):503–14.

Song L, Singleton ES, Hill JR, Koh MH. Improving online learning: student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet High Educ. 2004;7(1):59–70.

Halverson AL, DaRosa DA, Borgstrom DC, et al. Evaluation of a blended learning surgical skills course for rural surgeons. Am J Surg. 2014;208(1):136–42.

Chien C-Y et al. Traditional versus blended CPR training program: a randomized controlled non-inferiority study. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):10032.

Semeraro F, Imbriaco G, Del Giudice D, et al. Empowering the next generation: an innovative kids save lives blended learning programme for schoolchildren training. Resuscitation. 2024;194:110088.

Cook DA, Triola MM. Virtual patients: a critical literature review and proposed next steps. Med Educ. 2009;43(4):303–11.

Arneson JB, Offerdahl EG. Visual literacy in bloom: using Bloom’s taxonomy to support visual learning skills. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018;17(1):ar7.

Kononowicz AA, Woodham LA, Edelbring S, et al. Virtual patient simulations in health professions education: systematic review and meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(7):e14676.

Wu Q, Wang Y, Lu L, Chen Y, Long H, Wang J. Virtual simulation in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review of recent practice. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:855403.

Kromann CB, Jensen ML, Ringsted C. The effect of testing on skills learning. Med Educ. 2009;43(1):21–7.

Hensley A, Hampton D, Wilson JL, Culp-Roche A, Wiggins AT. A multicenter study of student engagement and satisfaction in online programs. J Nurs Educ. 2021;60(5):259–64.

Lim DH, Kim H. Motivation and learner characteristics affecting online learning and learning application. J Educational Technol Syst. 2003;31(4):423–39.

Pelaccia T, Viau R. Motivation in medical education(). Med Teach. 2017;39(2):136–40.

Pei L, Wu H. Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ Online. 2019;24(1):1666538.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our colleagues in the Department of Clinical Medicine, and the Affiliated Hospital of Wuhan University of Science and Technology, for participating in the construction of the “Clinical Skills Training and Practice” online course, teaching and scoring the enrolled students.

This work was supported by the Higher Educational Teaching Reform Project of the Hubei Province Education Department (2021236); the College Students’ Innovation Project of Hubei Province of China (Hubei Province Education Department, S202110488072); Graduate Education Quality Engineering Project of Wuhan University of Science and Technology (Yjg202327).

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, P.R. China

Zhicheng He, Hua Li, Lan Lu, Qiang Wang, Qingming Wu & Lili Lu

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

ZC He wrote the draft, prepared figures and interpreted the data; H Li, L Lu, and Q Wang participated in the organization and implementation of this study; LL Lu and QM Wu conceived and designed this study; LL Lu did the critically revising work; approved the final version submitted; got the funding supporting. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qingming Wu or Lili Lu .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Wuhan University of Science and Technology (Dossier number 2022151). Participating students completed an informed consent form. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

He, Z., Li, H., Lu, L. et al. The application of blended teaching in medical practical course of clinical skills training. BMC Med Educ 24 , 724 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05730-6

Download citation

Received : 20 January 2024

Accepted : 01 July 2024

Published : 04 July 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05730-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Medical education
• Clinical skill training
• Blended teaching
• Practice course
• Teaching model

BMC Medical Education

ISSN: 1472-6920

• Submission enquiries: [email protected]
• General enquiries: [email protected]

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Author Biographies
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Assessment of environmental management performance in wineries: a survey-based analysis to create key performance indicators.

1. Introduction

2. materials and methods, 2.1. study design, 2.2. sample selection, 2.3. survey preparation, 3.1. environmental communication, 3.2. environmental commitment: policy, leadership, and roles management, 3.3. environmental planning: objectives, environmental aspects, risk and opportunities, and legal requisites, 3.4. other environmental management requirements: environmental emergency plan, document control and organization, and certification, 3.5. environmental training for workers, 3.6. integrated table and graph of the grade of progress in wineries generated by environmental performance indicators (kpis), 3.7. predictive analysis for iso 14001 certification, influence of variables and beta coefficients on iso 14001 certification, 4. discussion, limitation and strength of the study, 5. conclusions, author contributions, data availability statement, conflicts of interest, appendix a. ems questionnaire.

• Company name *
• Email address *
• S1.1 Annual production capacity

Appendix B. Calculation of the Key Environmental Performance Indicators

• Environmental Communication Key Indicator ( I e c m )
• I e c m is the Environmental Communication Key Indicator for each group of wineries according to yearly wine production;
• m is the number of wineries of the related group;
• W e c m is the aggregated communication variable for each winery, defined by the Equation (A2) [ 93 , 94 , 95 ]: W e c m = V S 23 + V S 24 + V S 25 + V S 42 n (A2)
• W e c m is the aggregated communication variable for each winery;
• V S 23 is the internal communication strategy variable of the winery, V S 23 = ∑ j = 1 6 a j , a j is each item of this multiple-choice question (yes = 0.167, no = 0);
• V S 24 is the external communication strategy variable of the winery, V S 24 = ∑ j = 1 6 b j , b j is each item of this multiple-choice question (yes = 0.167, no = 0);
• V S 25 is the stakeholder’s variable to whom the winery communicates its environmental information of the winery, V S 25 = ∑ j = 1 6 c j , c j is each item of this multiple-choice question (yes = 0.167, no = 0);
• V S 42 is the environmental policy communication variable of the winery, V S 42 = ∑ j = 1 9 d j ,   d j is each item of this multiple-choice question (yes = 0.125, no = 0);
• n is the number of variables that have been aggregated, and its value is 4.
• I e c x   is the environmental commitment key indicator for each group of wineries according to yearly wine production;
• W e c x is the aggregated commitment variable for each winery, defined by Equation (A4): W e c x = V S 41 + V S 31 + V S 32 + V S 33 n (A4)
• W e c x is the aggregated commitment variable for each winery;
• V S 41 is the winery environmental policy variable of the winery, (yes = 1, no = 0);
• V S 31 is the environmental director variable of the winery (yes = 1, no = 0);
• V S 32 measures the senior management environmental system evaluation frequency. It could take one of next four values, 1 if (at least every six months), 0.75 (more than once a year), 0.50 (annually), and 0 (never reviewed).;
• V S 33 is the environmental evaluation procedure variable of the winery, (yes = 1, no = 0);
• I e p x is the environmental planning key indicator for each group of wineries according to yearly wine production;
• W e p x is the environmental management framework variable for each winery, defined by Equation (A6): W e p x = V S 21 + V S 22 + V S 43 + V S 44 + V S 51 + V S 52 + V S 53 + V S 92 + V S 93 + V S 94 n (A6)
• W e p x is the aggregated environmental management planning variable for each winery;
• V S 21 measures the wineries’ primary environmental objectives of the winery, V S 21 = ∑ j = 1 9 e j ,   e j is each item of this multiple-choice question (yes = 0.112, no = 0);
• V S 22 is the EM specific areas variable of the winery, V S 22 = ∑ j = 1 9 f j ,   f j is each item of this multiple-choice question (yes = 0.112, no = 0);
• V S 43   is the environmental commitments variable of the winery, V S 43 = ∑ j = 1 8 g j , g j is each item of this multiple-choice question (yes = 0.125, no = 0);
• V S 44 is the life cycle aspects variable, V S 44 = ∑ j = 1 3 h j , h j is each item of this multiple-choice question (yes = 0.334, no = 0);
• V S 51 is the winery energy consumption environmental aspect variable of the winery, (yes = 1, no = 0);
• V S 92 is the legal environmental requirements variable of the winery (yes = 1, no = 0);
• V S 93 is the risk assessment variable. It could take one of next three values, 1 if (quantitative method), 0.50 (qualitative method), and 0 (none);
• V S 94 is the opportunity assessment variable. It could take one of next three values, 1 if (quantitative method), 0.50 (qualitative method), and 0 (none);
• n is number of variables that has been aggregated, and its value is 10.
• I e r x is the other environmental management requirements key indicator for each group of wineries according to yearly wine production;
• W e r x   represents the other environmental management requirements variable for each winery, defined by Equation (A8): W e r x = V S 61 + V S 62 + V S 63 + V S 71 + V S 72 + V S 73 + V 101 n (A8)
• W e r x is the aggregated other environmental requirements variable for each winery,
• V S 61 is the EEP availability variable of the winery (yes = 1, no = 0);
• V S 62 measures the kind of emergencies in the EEP of the winery, V S 62 = ∑ j = 1 6 k j , k j is each item of this multiple-choice question (yes = 0.167, no = 0);
• V S 63 measures the EEP evaluation frequency. It could take one of next four values, 1 if (at least every six months), 0.75 (more than once a year), 0.50 (annually), and 0 (never reviewed);
• V S 71 is the EMS document availability variable of the winery, (yes = 1, no = 0);
• V S 72 measures how the EMS information is recorded in the winery, V S 72 = ∑ j = 1 5 o j , o j is each item of this multiple-choice question (yes = 0.2, no = 0);
• V S 73 measures the document control frequency. It could take one of next four values, 1 if (at least every six months), 0.75 (annually), 0.50 (more than once a year), and 0 (never reviewed);
• V S 101 is the legal environmental requirements variable of the winery (yes = 1, no = 0);
• n is the number of variables that have been aggregated, and its value is 7.
• I e w t is the Environmental Workers Training Key Indicator for each group of wineries according to yearly wine production;
• W e w t is the aggregated environmental workers training variable for each winery, defined by Equation (A10): W e w t = V S 81 + V S 82 + V S 83 n (A10)
• W e w t is the aggregated environmental worker training variable for each winery;
• V S 81 is the EMS workers training availability variable of the winery (yes = 1, no = 0);
• V S 82 measures the workers training frequency. It could take one of the next four values, 1 (if at least every six months), 0.75 (annually), 0.50 (more than once a year), and 0 (never);
• V S 83 measures the number of employees who participate in environmental training courses annually. It could take one of the next four values of 1 (more than 75%), 0.75 (between 50 and 75%), 0.50 (between 25 and 50%), and 0.25 (less than 25%);
• n is number of variables that have been aggregated, and its value is 3.

Click here to enlarge figure

Appendix D. Calculation and Analysis of Prediction Model

• Selection of Relevant Columns: Identification of features relevant to the predictive analysis, including job position, annual production capacity, number of employees, and various internal and external communication strategies.
• Handling Missing Values: Implementation of a strategy to drop rows containing missing values in the target variable (ISO 14001 Certification), thereby ensuring a clean dataset.
• Data Splitting: Division of the dataset into training and testing subsets using the train_test_split function, with an 80–20 split to facilitate model evaluation.
• Target Variable Mapping: Conversion of the target variable’s categorical values (‘Yes’ and ‘No’) into binary numerical values (1 and 0) for compatibility with machine learning algorithms.
• Categorical Features’ Preprocessing: Utilization of the ColumnTransformer to apply the OneHotEncoder to all categorical features, converting them into a format suitable for the machine learning model.
• Logistic Regression
• Pipeline Construction: Integration of preprocessing and classification steps into a cohesive pipeline using scikit-learn’s pipeline class.
• Preprocessing: Application of the previously defined preprocessor to handle categorical feature encoding and any other necessary data transformations.
• Model Specification: Inclusion of the logistic regression classifier with the max_iter parameter set to 1000 to ensure convergence of the algorithm.
• Random Forest
• Pipeline Construction: Similar to the logistic regression model, a pipeline is constructed to encapsulate both the preprocessing and the classification steps using Scikit-learn Pipeline class.
• Preprocessing: The previously defined preprocessor is applied to handle categorical feature encoding and other necessary data transformations.
• Model Specification: Incorporation of the RandomForestClassifier with a specified random state of 42 to ensure the reproducibility of the results.
• Cross-Validation
• Cross-Validation Execution: Implementation of five-fold cross-validation using the cross_val_score function, where the model is evaluated on different subsets of the data. The scoring parameter is set to ‘accuracy’ to measure the proportion of correctly classified instances.
• Performance Metrics Calculation: Computation of the mean and standard deviation of the cross-validation scores to quantify the average model performance and the variability across the folds, respectively.

• Vågsholm, I.; Arzoomand, N.S.; Boqvist, S. Food security, safety, and sustainability—Getting the trade-offs right. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2020 , 4 , 16. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Flores, S.S. What is sustainability in the wine world? A cross-country analysis of wine sustainability frameworks. J. Clean. Prod. 2018 , 172 , 2301–2312. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tahon, C.; Batt, P.J. An Exploratory Study of the Sustainable Practices Used at Each Level of the Bordeaux Wine Value Chain. Sustainability 2021 , 13 , 9760. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• United Nations 70/1. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available online: https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/70/1 (accessed on 4 March 2024).
• European Commission. Next steps for a sustainable European future. In European action for sustainability: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of the Regions ; COM(2016) 739 final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2016. [ Google Scholar ]
• European Union. Decision (EU) 2022/591 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 April 2022 on a General Union Environment Action Programme to 2030. Off. J. Eur. Union L 114 2022 , 65 , 22–33. [ Google Scholar ]
• European Commission. The European Green Deal ; COM(2019) 640 final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2019. [ Google Scholar ]
• European Commission. European Green Deal (Annex) ; COM(2019) 640 final ANNEX 2019; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2019. [ Google Scholar ]
• European Parliament. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. In EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 Bringing Nature back into Our Lives ; COM(2020) 380 final; European Parliament: Strasbourg, France, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• European Parliament. Annex to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. In EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 ; COM(2020) 380 final; European Parliament: Strasbourg, France, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• European Commission. A Farm to Fork Strategy for a Fair, Healthy and Environmentally-Friendly Food System ; COM(2020) 381 final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Baiano, A. An overview on sustainability in the wine production chain. Beverages 2021 , 7 , 15. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wagner, M.; Stanbury, P.; Dietrich, T.; Döring, J.; Ewert, J.; Foerster, C.; Freund, M.; Friedel, M.; Kammann, C.; Koch, M. Developing a Sustainability Vision for the Global Wine Industry. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 10487. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Uzman, D.; Reineke, A.; Entling, M.H.; Leyer, I. Habitat area and connectivity support cavity-nesting bees in vineyards more than organic management. Biol. Conserv. 2020 , 242 , 108419. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gilinsky, A., Jr.; Newton, S.K.; Vega, R.F. Sustainability in the global wine industry: Concepts and cases. Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia 2016 , 8 , 37–49. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ascoli, D.; Plana, E.; Oggioni, S.D.; Tomao, A.; Colonico, M.; Corona, P.; Giannino, F.; Moreno, M.; Xanthopoulos, G.; Kaoukis, K. Fire-smart solutions for sustainable wildfire risk prevention: Bottom-up initiatives meet top-down policies under EU green deal. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2023 , 92 , 103715. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Delmas, M.A.; Gergaud, O. Sustainable practices and product quality: Is there value in eco-label certification? The case of wine. Ecol. Econ. 2021 , 183 , 106953. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Summers Raines, S. Implementing ISO 14001—An International Survey Assessing the Benefits of Certification. Corp. Environ. Strategy 2002 , 9 , 418–426. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Salim, H.K.; Padfield, R.; Hansen, S.B.; Mohamad, S.E.; Yuzir, A.; Syayuti, K.; Tham, M.H.; Papargyropoulou, E. Global trends in environmental management system and ISO14001 research. J. Clean. Prod. 2018 , 170 , 645–653. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Barla, P. ISO 14001 certification and environmental performance in Quebec’s pulp and paper industry. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2007 , 53 , 291–306. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• De Steur, H.; Temmerman, H.; Gellynck, X.; Canavari, M. Drivers, adoption, and evaluation of sustainability practices in Italian wine SMEs. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2020 , 29 , 744–762. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Falcó, J.M.; Marco-Lajara, B.; Sánchez-García, E.; Gilinsky, A., Jr. The Economic, Social, and Environmental Value of the Spanish Wine Industry ; Handbook of Research on Sustainability Challenges in the Wine Industry; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2023; pp. 169–193. [ Google Scholar ]
• Marimon, F.; Llach, J.; Bernardo, M. Comparative analysis of diffusion of the ISO 14001 standard by sector of activity. J. Clean. Prod. 2011 , 19 , 1734–1744. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• ISO/TC 207/SC 1 ; ISO 14001-2015 Environmental Management Systems (EMS). Technical Committee: Vernier, Switzerland, 2015.
• Vaquero Piñeiro, M.; Tedeschi, P.; Maffi, L. Why a Comprehensive History of the Italian Wine？. In A History of Italian Wine: Culture, Economics, and Environment in the Nineteenth through Twenty-First Centuries ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 1–20. [ Google Scholar ]
• Piñeiro, M.V.; Tedeschi, P.; Maffi, L. A History of Italian Wine: Culture, Economics, and Environment in the Nineteenth through Twenty-First Centuries ; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022. [ Google Scholar ]
• Loubère, L.A. The Red and the White: The History of Wine in France and Italy in the Nineteenth Century ; State University of New York Press: Albany, NY, USA, 1978. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bartocci, P.; Fantozzi, P.; Fantozzi, F. Environmental impact of Sagrantino and Grechetto grapes cultivation for wine and vinegar production in central Italy. J. Clean. Prod. 2017 , 140 , 569–580. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Merli, R.; Preziosi, M.; Acampora, A. Sustainability experiences in the wine sector: Toward the development of an international indicators system. J. Clean. Prod. 2018 , 172 , 3791–3805. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ozbun, T. Number of Wineries in Italy from 2018 to 2021. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/786242/number-wineries-italy/#statisticContainer (accessed on 14 October 2023).
• Italian Wine Central Staff Wine Production by Region. Available online: https://italianwinecentral.com/wine-production-in-italy-by-region/ (accessed on 14 October 2023).
• Sellers, R.; Alampi-Sottini, V. The influence of size on winery performance: Evidence from Italy. Wine Econ. Policy 2016 , 5 , 33–41. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Corsi, A.; Mazzarino, S.; Pomarici, E. The Italian wine industry. In The Palgrave Handbook of Wine Industry Economics ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 47–76. [ Google Scholar ]
• Uliano, A.; Marotta, G.; Stanco, M.; Nazzaro, C. Exploring the Drivers of Sustainable Innovation in Wine Cooperatives: A Case-Studies Analysis ; University of Warwick: Coventry, UK, 2023. [ Google Scholar ]
• D’Amato, A.; Festa, G.; Dhir, A.; Rossi, M. Cooperatives’ performance relative to investor-owned firms: A non-distorted approach for the wine sector. Br. Food J. 2022 , 124 , 35–52. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Couderc, J.; Marchini, A. Governance, commercial strategies and performances of wine cooperatives: An analysis of Italian and French wine producing regions. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2011 , 23 , 235–257. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schimmenti, E.; Migliore, G.; Di Franco, C.P.; Borsellino, V. Is there sustainable entrepreneurship in the wine industry? Exploring Sicilian wineries participating in the SOStain program. Wine Econ. Policy 2016 , 5 , 14–23. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Begalli, D.; Capitello, R.; Codurri, S. Cooperatives, wine clusters and territorial value: Evidence from an Italian case study. J. Wine Res. 2014 , 25 , 45–61. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schimmenti, E.; Borsellino, V.; Asciuto, A.; D’Acquisto, M.; Di Gesaro, M.; Zinnanti, C. In The success factors of a Sicilian market-oriented wine cooperative. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference of the EuroMed Academy of Business, Kristiiansand, Norway 18–19 September 2014; Euromed Press: Palermo, Italy, 2014; pp. 18–19. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/97114 (accessed on 6 April 2024).
• Aithal, A.; Aithal, P.S. Development and validation of survey questionnaire & experimental data–a systematical review-based statistical approach. Int. J. Manag. Technol. Soc. Sci. (IJMTS) 2020 , 5 , 233–251. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ikart, E.M. Survey questionnaire survey pretesting method: An evaluation of survey questionnaire via expert reviews technique. Asian J. Soc. Sci. Stud. 2019 , 4 , 1. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gaur, P.S.; Zimba, O.; Agarwal, V.; Gupta, L. Reporting survey based studies–a primer for authors. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2020 , 35 , e398. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Connelly, L. Logistic regression. Medsurg Nurs. 2020 , 29 , 353–354. [ Google Scholar ]
• Niaz, R.; Zhang, X.; Iqbal, N.; Almazah, M.M.; Hussain, T.; Hussain, I. Logistic regression analysis for spatial patterns of drought persistence. Complexity 2021 , 2021 , 3724919. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sperandei, S. Understanding logistic regression analysis. Biochem. Medica 2014 , 24 , 12–18. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Speiser, J.L.; Miller, M.E.; Tooze, J.; Ip, E. A comparison of random forest variable selection methods for classification prediction modeling. Expert Syst. Appl. 2019 , 134 , 93–101. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Asiamah, N.; Mensah, H.K.; Oteng-Abayie, E. Non-Probabilistic Sampling in Quantitative Clinical Research: A Typology and Highlights for Students and Early Career Researchers. Int. J. Appl. Res. Public Health Manag. (IJARPHM) 2022 , 7 , 1–18. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ayhan, H.Ö. Non-probability Sampling Survey Methods. In International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 979–982. [ Google Scholar ]
• Vasantha Raju, N.; Harinarayana, N.S. Online survey tools: A case study of Google Forms. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Scientific, Computational & Information Research Trends in Engineering, Mysore, India, 30 January 2016. [ Google Scholar ]
• DeGroot, M.H. Probability and Statistics ; Addison-Wesley: Boston, MA, USA, 2002; ISBN 0201524880. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kwak, S.G.; Kim, J.H. Central limit theorem: The cornerstone of modern statistics. Korean J. Anesthesiol. 2017 , 70 , 144–156. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Hui, I.K.; Chan, A.H.S.; Pun, K.F. A study of the Environmental Management System implementation practices. J. Clean. Prod. 2001 , 9 , 269. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zorpas, A. Environmental management systems as sustainable tools in the way of life for the SMEs and VSMEs. Bioresour. Technol. 2010 , 101 , 1544–1557. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Ikram, M.; Zhang, Q.; Sroufe, R.; Shah, S.Z.A. Towards a sustainable environment: The nexus between ISO 14001, renewable energy consumption, access to electricity, agriculture and CO 2 emissions in SAARC countries. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2020 , 22 , 218–230. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Massoud, M.A.; Fayad, R.; El-Fadel, M.; Kamleh, R. Drivers, barriers and incentives to implementing environmental management systems in the food industry: A case of Lebanon. J. Clean. Prod. 2010 , 18 , 200–209. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ardente, F.; Beccali, G.; Cellura, M.; Marvuglia, A. POEMS: A Case Study of an Italian Wine-Producing Firm. Environ. Manag. 2006 , 38 , 350–364. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Cordano, M.; Marshall, R.S.; Silverman, M. How Do Small and Medium Enterprises Go Green? A Study of Environmental Management Programs in the U.S. Wine Industry. J. Bus. Ethics 2010 , 92 , 463–478. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Abascal, E.; Esteban, I.G. Fundamentos y Técnicas de la Investigación Comercial ; Esic editorial: Madrid, Spain, 2011; ISBN 9788473567473. [ Google Scholar ]
• Abascal, E.; Grande, I. Análisis de Encuestas ; Libros profesionales de empresa; ESIC Editorial: Madrid, Spain, 2005; pp. 26–29. ISBN 8473564200. [ Google Scholar ]
• Shortis, T. The Language of ICT: Information and Communication Technology ; Psychology Press: London, UK, 2001. [ Google Scholar ]
• Evans, D.; Bratton, S.; McKee, J. Social Media Marketing ; AG Printing & Publishing: Cairo, Egypt, 2021. [ Google Scholar ]
• Saravanakumar, M.; SuganthaLakshmi, T. Social media marketing. Life Sci. J. 2012 , 9 , 4444–4451. [ Google Scholar ]
• Parbat, D.; Chakraborty, M. A python based support vector regression model for prediction of COVID19 cases in India. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2020 , 138 , 109942. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tran, M.; Panchal, S.; Chauhan, V.; Brahmbhatt, N.; Mevawalla, A.; Fraser, R.; Fowler, M. Python-based scikit-learn machine learning models for thermal and electrical performance prediction of high-capacity lithium-ion battery. Int. J. Energy Res. 2022 , 46 , 786–794. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• McKinney, W. pandas: A foundational Python library for data analysis and statistics. Python High Perform. Sci. Comput. 2011 , 14 , 1–9. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pedregosa, F.; Varoquaux, G.; Gramfort, A.; Michel, V.; Thirion, B.; Grisel, O.; Blondel, M.; Prettenhofer, P.; Weiss, R.; Dubourg, V. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011 , 12 , 2825–2830. [ Google Scholar ]
• Raschka, S.; Liu, Y.H.; Mirjalili, V.; Dzhulgakov, D. Machine Learning with PyTorch and Scikit-Learn: Develop Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models with Python ; Packt Publishing Ltd.: Birmingham, UK, 2022. [ Google Scholar ]
• He, S.; Wu, J.; Wang, D.; He, X. Predictive modeling of groundwater nitrate pollution and evaluating its main impact factors using random forest. Chemosphere 2022 , 290 , 133388. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Yang, L.; Wu, H.; Jin, X.; Zheng, P.; Hu, S.; Xu, X.; Yu, W.; Yan, J. Study of cardiovascular disease prediction model based on random forest in eastern China. Sci. Rep. 2020 , 10 , 5245. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Shah, K.; Patel, H.; Sanghvi, D.; Shah, M. A comparative analysis of logistic regression, random forest and KNN models for the text classification. Augment. Hum. Res. 2020 , 5 , 12. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nishitani, K. An empirical study of the initial adoption of ISO 14001 in Japanese manufacturing firms. Ecol. Econ. 2009 , 68 , 669–679. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rahman, M.M. Environmental degradation: The role of electricity consumption, economic growth and globalisation. J. Environ. Manage. 2020 , 253 , 109742. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Napa Green Napa Green Program. Available online: https://napagreen.org/ (accessed on 14 March 2024).
• Galati, A.; Sakka, G.; Crescimanno, M.; Tulone, A.; Fiore, M. What is the role of social media in several overtones of CSR communication? The case of the wine industry in the Southern Italian regions. Br. Food J. 2019 , 121 , 856–873. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ugalde, D.; Renaud-Gentié, C.; Symoneaux, R. Perception of French wine buyers regarding environmental issues in wine production. J. Wine Res. 2021 , 32 , 77–102. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kelley, K.; Todd, M.; Hopfer, H.; Centinari, M. Identifying wine consumers interested in environmentally sustainable production practices. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 2022 , 34 , 86–111. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Burawat, P. The relationships among transformational leadership, sustainable leadership, lean manufacturing and sustainability performance in Thai SMEs manufacturing industry. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 2019 , 36 , 1014–1036. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fragoso, R.; Figueira, J.R. Sustainable supply chain network design: An application to the wine industry in Southern Portugal. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2021 , 72 , 1236–1251. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Iannone, R.; Miranda, S.; Riemma, S.; De Marco, I. Improving environmental performances in wine production by a life cycle assessment analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2016 , 111 , 172–180. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, L.; Ye, F.; Yang, L.; Zhou, G. Impact of political connections on corporate environmental performance: From a green development perspective. Sustainability 2019 , 11 , 1317. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Song, Y.; Yu, H.; Tan, Y.; Lv, W.; Fang, D.; Liu, D. Similarity matching of food safety incidents in China: Aspects of rapid emergency response and food safety. Food Control. 2020 , 115 , 107275. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Giacomarra, M.; Galati, A.; Crescimanno, M.; Tinervia, S. The integration of quality and safety concerns in the wine industry: The role of third-party voluntary certifications. J. Clean. Prod. 2016 , 112 , 267–274. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fiore, M.; Giacomarra, M.; Crescimanno, M.; Galati, A. Quality certifications’ impact on wine industry assets performance. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2020 , 26 , 257–267. [ Google Scholar ]
• Chaudhary, R. Green human resource management and employee green behavior: An empirical analysis. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2020 , 27 , 630–641. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Saeed, B.B.; Afsar, B.; Hafeez, S.; Khan, I.; Tahir, M.; Afridi, M.A. Promoting employee’s proenvironmental behavior through green human resource management practices. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2019 , 26 , 424–438. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• López-Santiago, J.; García, A.I.G.; Gómez-Villarino, M.T. An Evaluation of Food Safety Performance in Wineries. Foods 2022 , 11 , 1249. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• López-Santiago, J.; Md Som, A.; Asyadi Bin Md Yusof, F.; Mazarrón, F.R.; Gómez-Villarino, M.T. Exploring Sustainability in Wineries: Evaluating Food Safety and Environmental Management Aligning with the Farm to Fork Strategy. Agriculture 2024 , 14 , 330. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Eweje, G.; Bathurst, R. CSR, Sustainability, and Leadership ; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2017; Volume 5. [ Google Scholar ]
• Boeske, J. Leadership towards Sustainability: A Review of Sustainable, Sustainability, and Environmental Leadership. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 12626. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Technical Committee: ISO/TC 207/SC 1 Environmental Management Systems ISO 14001:2015 Environmental Management Systems. Requirements with Guidance for Use. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/60857.html (accessed on 8 December 2022).
• Zutshi, A.; Sohal, A. A study of the environmental management system (EMS) adoption process within Australasian organisations—2. Role of stakeholders. Technovation 2004 , 24 , 371–386. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zutshi, A.; Sohal, A.S. Adoption and maintenance of environmental management systems: Critical success factors. Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J. 2004 , 15 , 399–419. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cloquell-Ballester, V.; Monterde-Díaz, R.; Cloquell-Ballester, V.; Torres-Sibille, A.d.C. Environmental education for small- and medium-sized enterprises: Methodology and e-learning experience in the Valencian region. J. Environ. Manag. 2008 , 87 , 507–520. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Campos, L.M.S.; Heizen, D.A.d.M.; Verdinelli, M.A.; Cauchick Miguel, P.A. Environmental performance indicators: A study on ISO 14001 certified companies. J. Clean. Prod. 2015 , 99 , 286–296. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• López-Santiago, J.; García, A.I.G.; Villarino, A.G.; Som, A.M.; Gómez-Villarino, M.T. Assessing wineries’ performance in managing critical control points for arsenic, lead, and cadmium contamination risk in the wine-making industry: A survey-based analysis utilizing performance indicators as a results tool. Heliyon 2024 , 10 , e22962. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]

Share and Cite

López-Santiago, J.; Md Som, A.; Ruiz-Garcia, L.; Zubelzu Mínguez, S.; Gómez Villarino, M.T. Assessment of Environmental Management Performance in Wineries: A Survey-Based Analysis to Create Key Performance Indicators. Environments 2024 , 11 , 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11070139

López-Santiago J, Md Som A, Ruiz-Garcia L, Zubelzu Mínguez S, Gómez Villarino MT. Assessment of Environmental Management Performance in Wineries: A Survey-Based Analysis to Create Key Performance Indicators. Environments . 2024; 11(7):139. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11070139

López-Santiago, Jesús, Amelia Md Som, Luis Ruiz-Garcia, Sergio Zubelzu Mínguez, and María Teresa Gómez Villarino. 2024. "Assessment of Environmental Management Performance in Wineries: A Survey-Based Analysis to Create Key Performance Indicators" Environments 11, no. 7: 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11070139

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

Design parameter optimization method for a prestressed steel structure driven by multi-factor coupling

• Research Article
• Published: 03 July 2024

Cite this article

• Guo-Liang Shi 1 , 2 ,
• Zhan-Sheng Liu 1 , 2 ,
• De-Chun Lu 1 , 2 ,
• Qing-Wen Zhang 1 , 2 ,
• Majid Dezhkam 1 , 2 &
• Ze-Qiang Wang 3  

Explore all metrics

To achieve efficient structural design, it is crucial to reduce the cost of materials while ensuring structural safety. This study proposes an optimization method for design parameters (DPs) in a prestressed steel structure driven by multi-factor coupling. To accomplish this, a numerical proxy model of prestressed steel structures is established with integration of DPs and mechanical parameters (MPs). A data association-parameter analysis-optimization selection system is established. A correlation between DPs and MPs is established using a back propagation (BP) neural network. This correlation provides samples for parameter analysis and optimization selection. MPs are used to characterize the safety of the structure. Based on the safety grade analysis, the key DPs that affect the mechanical properties of the structure are obtained. A mapping function is created to match the MPs and the key DPs. The optimal structural DPs are obtained by setting structural materials as the optimization objective and safety energy as the constraint condition. The theoretical model is applied to an 80-m-span gymnasium and verified with a scale test physical model. The MPs obtained using the proposed method are in good agreement with the experimental results. Compared with the traditional design method, the design cycle can be shortened by more than 90%. Driven by the optimal selection method, a saving of more than 20% can be achieved through reduction of structural material quantities. Moreover, the cross-sectional dimensions of radial cables have a substantial influence on vertical displacement. The initial tension and cross-sectional size of the upper radial cable exhibit the most pronounced impact on the stress distribution in that cable. The initial tension and cross-sectional size of the lower radial cable hold the greatest sway over the stress distribution in that cable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Hybrid Data-Driven Machine Learning Framework for Determining Prestressed Concrete Losses

Intelligent design in continuous galvanizing process for advanced ultra-high-strength dual-phase steels using back-propagation artificial neural networks and MOAMP-Squirrels search algorithm

Combinatorial Reliability-Based Optimization of Nonlinear Finite Element Model Using an Artificial Neural Network-Based Approximation

Krishnan S. Structural design and behavior of prestressed cable domes. Engineering Structures, 2020, 209: 110294

Article   Google Scholar  

Ahmed E A, Nassef A O, El Damatty A A. NURBS-based form-finding algorithm for double-curvature cable domes. Engineering Structures, 2023, 283: 115877

Zhu Z Y, Bai G B, Zhou Z F. Force finding of cable structures based on singular value decomposition of expanded generalized equilibrium matrix. Journal of Building Structures, 2023, 44(4): 118–128 (in Chinese)

Google Scholar  

Chen L M, Gao W F, Jiang Z C, Zhang H, Liu Y, Zhou Y Y, Dong S L. Section optimization design of a cable dome structure based on robustness. Journal of Building Structures, 2021, 42(7): 104–108 (in Chinese)

Knawa-Hawryszków M. Determining initial tension of carrying cable in nonlinear analysis of bi-cable ropeway—Case study. Engineering Structures, 2021, 244: 112769

Zhao L, Cao Z, Wang Z, Fan F. Initial prestress design and optimization of cable-stiffened latticed shells. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2021, 184(2): 106759

Chen L M, Dong S L. Optimal prestress design and construction technique of cable-strut tension structures with multi-overall selfstress modes. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2013, 16(10): 1633–1644

Lee S, Lee J. A novel method for topology design for tensegrity structures. Composite Structures, 2016, 152(15): 11–19

Huang W, Pei M, Liu X, Wei Y. Design and construction of super-long span bridges in China: Review and future perspectives. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2020, 14(4): 803–838

Shishegaran A, Karami B, Danalou E S, Varaee H, Rabczuk T. Computational predictions for predicting the performance of steel 1 panel shear wall under explosive loads. Engineering Computations, 2021, 38(9): 3564–3589

Wang L X, Liu H B, Chen Z H, Zhang F, Guo L. Combined digital twin and hierarchical deep learning approach for intelligent damage identification in cable dome structure. Engineering Structures, 2023, 274: 115172

Mokhtari F, Imanpour A. A digital twin-based framework for multi-element seismic hybrid simulation of structures. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2023, 186: 109909

LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G E. Deep learning. Nature, 2015, 521(7553): 436–444

Es-Haghi M S, Shishegaran A, Rabczuk T. Evaluation of a novel asymmetric genetic algorithm to optimize the structural design of 3D regular and irregular steel frames. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2020, 14(5): 1110–1130

Shishegaran A, Khalili M R, Karami B, Rabczuk T, Shishegaran A. Computational predictions for estimating the maximum deflection of reinforced concrete panels subjected to the blast load. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2020, 139: 103527

Ma G, Liu K. Prediction of compressive strength of CFRP-confined concrete columns based on bp neural network. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 2021, 48(9): 88–97 (in Chinese)

Zhao Y N, Du W F, Wang Y Q, Wang H, Zhao B Q, Dong S L. Study on intelligent shape finding for tree-like structures based on BP neural network algorithmi. Journal of Building Structures, 2022, 43(4): 77–85 (in Chinese)

Shishegaran A, Varaee H, Rabczuk T, Shishegaran G. High correlated variables creator machine: Prediction of the compressive strength of concrete. Computers and Structures, 2021, 247: 106479

Chen K, Huang H W, Zhang D M, Zhai W Z, Zhang D M. Constrained multi-objective optimization algorithm based design method of shield tunnel. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2020, 53(S1): 81–86 (in Chinese)

Vo-Duy T, Duong-Gia D, Ho-Huu V, Vu-Do H C, Nguyen-Thoi T. Multi-objective optimization of laminated composite beam structures using NSGA-II algorithm. Composite Structures, 2017, 168: 498–509

Naghsh M A, Shishegaran A, Karami B, Rabczuk T, Shishegaran A, Taghavizadeh H, Moradi M. An innovative model for predicting the displacement and rotation of column-tree moment connection under fire. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2021, 15(1): 194–212

Karami B, Shishegaran A, Taghavizade H, Rabczuk T. Presenting innovative ensemble model for prediction of the load carrying capacity of composite castellated steel beam under fire. Structures, 2021, 33: 4031–4052

Shishegaran A, Saeedi M, Mirvalad S, Korayem A H. Computational predictions for estimating the performance of flexural and compressive strength of epoxy resin-based artificial stones. Engineering with Computers, 2023, 39(1): 347–372

Bigdeli A, Shishegaran A, Naghsh M A, Karami B, Shishegaran A, Alizadeh G. Surrogate models for the prediction of damage in reinforced concrete tunnels under internal water pressure. Journal of Zhejiang University-Science A, 2021, 22(8): 632–656

Liu Z, Jiang A, Shao W, Zhang A, Du X. Artificial-neural-network-based mechanical simulation prediction method for wheel-spoke cable truss construction. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2021, 21(3): 1032–1052

Cao T, D’Acunto P, Castellón J J, Tellini A, Schwartz J, Zhang H. Design of prestressed gridshells as smooth poly-hypar surface structures. Structures, 2021, 30(4): 973–984

Quagliaroli M, Malerba P G, Albertin A, Pollini N. The role of prestress and its optimization in cable domes design. Computers and Structures, 2015, 161: 17–30

Marbaniang A L, Dutta S, Ghosh S. Updated weight method: An optimisation-based form-finding method of tensile membrane structures. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2022, 65(6): 169

Article   MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

Soltoggio A, Stanley K O, Risi S. Born to learn: The inspiration, progress, and future of evolved plastic artificial neural networks. Neural Networks, 2018, 108: 48–67

Hsiao C H, Chen A Y, Ge L, Yeh F. Performance of artificial neural network and convolutional neural network on slope failure prediction using data from the random finite element method. Acta Geotechnica, 2022, 17(12): 5801–5811

Afram A, Janabi-Sharifi F, Fung A S, Raahemifar K. Artificial neural network (ANN) based model predictive control (MPC) and optimization of HVAC systems: A state of the art review and case study of a residential HVAC system. Energy and Building, 2017, 141(4): 96–113

Li B, Zhuang X. Multiscale computation on feedforward neural network and recurrent neural network. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2020, 14(6): 1285–1298

Ji X, Yang B, Tang Q. Acoustic seabed classification based on multibeam echosounder backscatter data using the PSO-BP-AdaBoost algorithm: A case study from Jiaozhou Bay, China. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 2020, 46(2): 509–519

Parisi G I, Kemker R, Part J L, Kanan C, Wermter S. Continual lifelong learning with neural networks: A review. Neural Networks, 2019, 113: 54–71

Lachhwani K. Application of neural network models for mathematical programming problems: A state of art review. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2020, 27(1): 171–182

Yang H, Li X, Qiang W, Zhao Y, Zhang W, Tang C. A network traffic forecasting method based on SA optimized ARIMA-BP neural network. Computer Networks, 2021, 193(3): 108102

Liu G R. The smoothed finite element method (S-FEM): A framework for the design of numerical models for desired solutions. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(2): 456–477

Liu Z S, Li H, Liu Y, Wang J C, Tafsirojjaman T, Shi G. A novel numerical approach and experimental study to evaluate the effect of component failure on spoke-wheel cable structure. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 61: 105268

Ding M, Luo B, Han L, Shi Q, Guo Z. Optimal design of spoke double-layer cable-net structures based on an energy principle. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 2020, 74(4): 533–545

Wang B, Gao L, Juan Z. Travel mode detection using GPS data and socioeconomic attributes based on a random forest classifier. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2018, 19(5): 1547–1558

Tan J, Xie X, Zuo J, Xing X, Liu B, Xia Q, Zhang Y. Coupling random forest and inverse distance weighting to generate climate surfaces of precipitation and temperature with multiple-covariates. Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 598(7): 126270

Talaslioglu T. Optimal design of steel skeletal structures using the enhanced genetic algorithm methodology. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(4): 863–889

JGJ 257-2012. Technical Specification for Cable Structures. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2012 (in Chinese)

ASCE/SEI 19-10. Structural Applications of Steel Cables for Buildings. Reston, VA: ASCE, 2010

Wang Y L, Wu Z P, Guan G, Li K, Chai S H. Research on intelligent design method of ship multi-deck compartment layout based on improved taboo search genetic algorithm. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 225(2): 108823

ANSYS. ANSYS User’s Manual Release 15, Swanson Analysis Systems Houston, 2013

Kim M K, Kim Y S, Srebric J. Impact of correlation of plug load data, occupancy rates and local weather conditions on electricity consumption in a building using four back-propagation neural network models. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2020, 62: 102321

Kaveh A, Rezaei M. Optimum topology design of geometrically nonlinear suspended domes using ECBO. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 2015, 56(4): 667–694

Zhang Q, Zhang Y, Yao L, Fan F, Shen S. Finite element analysis of the static properties and stability of a 800 m Kiewitt type mega-latticed structure. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017, 137: 201–210

GB 50009-2012. Load Code for the Design of Building Structures. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2012 (in Chinese)

Samaniegoc E, Anitescud C, Goswamid S, Nguyen-Thanhe V M, Guoe H, Hamdiae K, Zhuange X, Rabczuk T. An energy approach to the solution of partial differential equations in computational mechanics via machine learning: Concepts, implementation and applications. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 362: 112790

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 5217082614).

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China

Guo-Liang Shi, Zhan-Sheng Liu, De-Chun Lu, Qing-Wen Zhang & Majid Dezhkam

The Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China

Beijing Building Construction Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing, 100039, China

Ze-Qiang Wang

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhan-Sheng Liu .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Shi, GL., Liu, ZS., Lu, DC. et al. Design parameter optimization method for a prestressed steel structure driven by multi-factor coupling. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-024-1084-0

Download citation

Received : 30 August 2023

Accepted : 09 November 2023

Published : 03 July 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-024-1084-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• structure design
• association relationship
• performance analysis
• optimum selection
• experimental verification
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research