Service Delivery in South Africa at a Glance

Service Delivery in South Africa at a Glance


Back in 2009, the Constitutional Court stipulated “[w]ater is life. Without it, nothing organic grows. Human beings need water to drink, to cook, to wash, and to grow their food. Without it, we will die.” [i] Fast-forward ten years and sustainable access to sufficient and adequate water is still a major concern for many within South Africa. As a result, some are forced to approach the courts for assistance.

The history of service delivery, or lack of it, in South Africa has been troublesome to say the least. A few weeks ago a general news search of service delivery or local municipalities would have revealed many articles by irate residents about the failures of their municipalities to deliver basic services. Now there is an intriguing High Court judgment in a case involving a local municipality in the North West, the Kgetlengrivier Local Municipality. Residents have finally won. [ii]

Kgetlengrivier Concerned Citizens v Kgetlengrivier Local Municipality

In a case that offers hope to exasperated residents around South Africa, the High Court of South Africa North West Division, Mahikeng granted the Kgetlengrivier Concerned Citizens control of the water and sewage works after an urgent application was launched regarding intermittent water supply and raw sewage running into the Koster and Elands rivers. [iii] The High Court found that the Kgetlengrivier Local Municipality was in breach of “its obligations to prevent contamination of the environment whilst allowing raw sewage to spill”. In addition, the Court found that both the local municipality as well as the district municipality, Bojanala Platinum District Municipality, were in breach of their “constitutional obligations for providing potable water sustainably”. [iv]

This is not the first time the Kgetlengrivier Concerned Citizens have taken control [v] but hopefully this will be the last time. An agreement was reached, and made a court order on 12 January 2021, that an implementing agent must be appointed to run the water and sewage works. [vi] In terms of this agreement Magalies Water has been appointed for the “operation and maintenance of water and wastewater treatment plants for a period of three years”. [vii]

What about residents in other municipalities?

What does this mean for dissatisfied residents in other municipalities? Some residents’ associations are considering, or have implemented, a tax diversion policy, whereby the residents withhold or refuse to pay the rates and taxes to the relevant municipality until such time as that municipality provides the basic services. [viii] One such resident association is the Umdoni Action Group, from Scottburgh. [ix]

As tempting as this approach may seem, it would be inadvisable given the Constitutional Court’s ruling in Rademan v Moqhaka Local Municipality . [x] In this case, the Constitutional Court found that a municipality may consolidate the different components of a resident’s account and as such the resident’s electricity supply may be cut where payment of rates and taxes have been withheld despite the electricity account having been paid. [xi] Notwithstanding the Court providing that “[t]here is no obligation on a resident, customer or ratepayer to pay the municipality for a service that has not been rendered” [xii] a resident would have to be able to show that no services were rendered by the municipality at all. Since the writing of this brief, it has come to the HSF’s attention with great sadness that Mrs Olga Rademan, a citizen activist who refused to stay quiet in the face of her municipality’s failures, has unfortunately passed away. She must be remembered for her commitment to standing up for what is just.

In Pietermaritzburg, emboldened by the success of the Kgetlengrivier Concerned Citizens, the Msunduzi Association of Residents, Ratepayers and Civics has indicated that they are considering their available options, including approaching the courts, given the state of degradation of service delivery in the area. [xiii] Their position may be justified. The South African Human Rights Commission launched a court application last year over the Msunduzi Municipality’s control and management of the New England Road Landfill Site being a violation of the “right to an environment that is not harmful to their health or well-being” as contained in section 24 of the Constitution. [xiv] Not to mention that the municipality has been paying the salary of 121 “employees” who are either dead or who have resigned. [xv]

Similarly, the Centre for Good Governance and Social Justice, a newly formed NGO in the North West, has tried nearly every avenue at its disposal to hold the Mamusa Local Municipality to account for its consistent failures and degradation. Frustrated with the total lack of regard that the municipality has for its citizens, the Centre has approached the President as well as the South African Human Rights Commission for assistance. It has also instituted action against the municipality to remove the newly appointed municipal manager who, despite his previous removal from the post and a legal opinion finding he was unqualified, was reappointed to the position. Not leaving a stone unturned, the Centre has indicated that it is currently considered legal action similar to that as was taken in Kgetlengrivier. [xvi]

Recently, the South African Human Rights Commission has released a 100 plus page report wherein it finds that the Emfuleni Local Municipality is guilty of violating multiple human rights in its failure to prevent raw sewage from contaminating the Vaal River and Dam. [xvii] This includes a violation of the right to dignity, [xviii] freedom and security of the person, [xix] the environment, [xx] property; [xxi] health care, food, water and social security; [xxii] children; [xxiii] and just administrative action. [xxiv] These findings, like that of the Kgetlengrivier case, indicate that there is an urgent need to address failures in service delivery.

In this report the South African Human Rights Commission recommends administration [xxv] . However as can be seen from Kgetlengrivier case, where the whole province is already under administration, [xxvi] this may not always be an adequate solution.

Local municipalities have faced a tough few weeks with findings of violations and reports of service delivery failures being repeatedly highlighted in the media. Whether other residents of failing municipalities will be able to achieve similar results is unknown, but it is not hard to imagine, given current reports, that there are other areas in comparable, if not identical, situations to those faced by the Kgetlengrivier Concerned Citizens. While it may not be as simple as merely approaching the court for an order as the precedent currently set means only the North West High Court is bound by the previous decision, but the case can definitely be considered to have persuasive value. But something needs to change. And until such time as local municipalities are able to deliver adequate services there seems little recourse other than legal action.

Chelsea Ramsden Legal Researcher [email protected]

[i] Mazibuko v City of Johannesburg [2009] ZACC 28 para 1.

[ii] See C Ryan “North West Residents Take Matters into Their Own Hands, and Get Court’s Blessing” (9 February 2021) available at; P du Toit “Friday Briefing Taking Charge: How North West Residents Took on a Municipality and Won” (19 February 2021) available at

[iii] The Kgetlengrivier Concerned Citizens were, in terms of the court order dated 18 December 2020, entitled to take control of the water and sewage works if the local municipality failed to rectify the sewage spillage and provide potable water within ten week days of the order. The Kgetlengrivier Concerned Citizens took control on 7 January 2021.

[iv] Court order dated 18 December 2020 paras 4 and 13 respectively.

[v] Ryan note ii above that provides that urgent court orders were obtained in June 2018 and February 2020 granting the community control of the plants until they were up and running again.

[vi] Court order dated 12 January 2021 para 2.

[vii] Statement of MEC Mmoloki Cwaile on Kgetlengrivier Local Municipality Court Order (14 January 2021) available at

[viii] C Ryan “The Revolt of the Ratepayers” (10 February 2021) available at

[x] [2013] ZACC 11. See the HSF’s previous brief by K Premhid “Service Delivery: What Does the Constitutional Court Say?” available at

[xi] Rademan paras 32-3.

[xii] Ibid para 42.

[xiii] T Magubane “Msunduzi Ratepayers Threaten Legal Action Over Poor Service Delivery” (2 February 2021) available at . See also Ryan note vii above.

[xv] T Magubane “Msunduzi Council Haunted by More Than 100 Ghost Employees” (25 February 2021) available at

[xvi] C Ryan “Another Citizen Group Takes its Local Municipality to Court” (26 February 2021) available at

[xvii] Final Report of the Gauteng Provincial Inquiry into the Sewage Problem of the Vaal River (17 February 2021) available at

[xviii] Ibid para 11.3.1. See the Constitution, section 10: “Everyone has inherent dignity and the right to have their dignity respected and protected.”

[xix] Ibid para 11.3.2. See the Constitution, section 12(e): “Everyone has the right to freedom and security of the person, which includes the right not to be treated or punished in a cruel, inhuman or degrading way”.

[xx] Ibid para 11.3.3. See the Constitution, section 24(a): “Everyone has the right to an environment that is not harmful to their health or well-being”.

[xxi] Ibid para 11.3.4. See the Constitution, section 25(4)(b): “property is not limited to land”.

[xxii] Ibid para 11.3.5. See the Constitution, section 27(1)(b): “Everyone has the right to have access to sufficient food and water”.

[xxiii] Ibid para 11.3.6. See the Constitution, section 28(1)(d): “Every child has the right to be protected from maltreatment, neglect, abuse or degradation”.

[xxiv] Ibid para 11.3.7. See the Constitution, section 33(1): “Everyone has the right to administrative action that is lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair”.

[xxv] Ibid paras 12.10-11.

[xxvi] A Makinana “Government Extends its North West Intervention by Another Three Months” (15 February 2021) available at


Quick links.

research on service delivery in south africa

Service Delivery, Governance and Citizen Satisfaction: Reflections from South Africa

  • Mfundo Mandla Masuku University of KwaZulu-Natal
  • Victor H Mlambo University of Johannesburg
  • Confidence Ndlovu University of Mpumalanga, Department of Development Studies, Mbombela

This paper examines how satisfied households in South Africa (SA) are with the provision of public services by the South African government. The paper uses a secondary research approach where it uses data from a report published by Statistics South Africa (StatsSA) titled the “Governance, Public Safety, and Justice Survey,” which is meant to highlight the government’s shortcomings and understand the perceptions of citizens concerning service provision. As a theoretical lens, the new public service approach is adopted to explain the conditions of governance in SA and to determine how and what needs to be done to achieve effective governance. The paper analyses key variables that affect the fundamental indicators of good public safety and justice governance. The findings indicate that while efforts to enhance service delivery have been initiated and supported by policy, they have not changed the citizens’ perceptions of the state, e.g., there is still considerable mistrust in state institutions. Inequitable development and poverty continue to impede efficient public service delivery by limiting households’ capacity to access adequate public services, as well as by placing restrictions on the ability of local governments to extend services to high-cost informal settlements. This paper argues for promoting a holistic and integrated development plan that will guarantee inclusive public service delivery to all people, thus assisting in consolidating an environment where citizens trust the state and support it in its quest for inclusive and effective service delivery.

Abrahams, L., Fitzgerald, P. and Cameron, R. (2009). A Single Public Service for South Africa and prospects. Journal of Public Administration, 44(si-1), pp.1046-1066.

April, F.Y. and Sebola, M. (2016). A comparative analysis of corruption in South Africa and China: evidence from the application of governance theory. Africa Insight, 46(3), pp.83-100.

Arrive Alive. (2021). Minibus Taxis and Road Safety. [online] Available at: < > [Accessed 20 June 2021].

Aigbavboa, C. and Thwala, W. (2012). An Appraisal of Housing Satisfaction in South Africa Low Income Housing Scheme. International Journal of Construction Management, 12(1), pp.1-21

Beshi, T.D. and Kaur, R. (2020). Public trust in local government: Explaining the role of good governance practices. Public Organization Review, 20(2), pp.337-350.

Bohler-Muller, N., Davids, Y.D., Roberts, B., Kanyane, B., Struwig, J., Masiya, T. and Nomdo, A. (2016). Service delivery challenges in South Africa: South African Social Attitudes Survey (SASAS): compendium of results.

Bond, P. (2006). Reconciliation and economic reaction: Flaws in South Africa's elite transition. Journal of International Affairs, pp.141-156.

BusinessTech. (2019). South Africa’s unemployment rate climbs to 30.1%. Available: .

Chu, Y. and Shen, C. (2017). Civic engagement and institutional trust among South Africans. J. Soc. & Soc. Welfare, 44, p.27.

Department of corporate governance, human settlement and traditional affairs. (2021). [online] Available at: < > [Accessed 25 June 2021].

Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (2014). 20 Year Review South Africa, Local government. [online] Available at: < > [Accessed 3 July 2021].

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES (2016). [online] Available at: < > [Accessed 11 August 2021].

Denhardt, R.B. and Denhardt, J.V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public administration review, 60(6), pp.549-559.

Draai, E. (2010). Collaborative government for improved public service delivery in South Africa. Africa Insight, 40(2), pp.131-140.

Eskridge, R.D. and Key, E. (2016). Elements of Trust in Municipal Government.

Farazmand, A. (2017). Governance reforms: The good, the bad, and the ugly; and the sound: Examining the past and exploring the future of public organizations. Public Organization Review, 17(4), pp.595-617.

Free, T. (2020). Why are Black people more likely to die of COVID-19 in the US and UK? Available: , accessed 12 August 2020.

Goodman, P.S. (2017). End of apartheid in South Africa? Not in economic terms. The New York Times, 24. [online] Available at: [Accessed 30 June 2021].

Gumede, W. (2020). South Africa needs a new governance model post-Covid-19 [Online] Available at: [Accessed 21 June 2021]

Jakoet-Salie, A., Draai, E. and Taylor, J.D. (2020). Creating a virtuous cycle for increased trust in local government. TD: The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 16(1), pp.1-8.

Kanyane, M. (2014). Exploring challenges of municipal service delivery in South Africa (1994-2013). Africa’s Public Service Delivery & Performance Review, 2(1), pp.90-110.

Local Housing Solutions. (2021). What is a local housing strategy and why is it important | Local Housing Solutions. [online] Available at: < > [Accessed 21 June 2021].

Madinda, A.S. (2014). The Relationship Between Development and Corruption: The Status of England Towards the Eradication of Corruption and the Lesson for Africa. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(7), pp.177-188.

Manyaka, R.K. and Nkuna, N.W. (2014). The phenomenon of corruption in the South African public sector: challenges and opportunities. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(27 P3), p.1572.

Maphumulo, W.T. and Bhengu, B.R. (2019). Challenges of quality improvement in the healthcare of South Africa post-apartheid: A critical review. Curationis, 42(1), pp.1-9.

Masiya, T., Davids, Y.D. and Mangai, M.S. (2019). Assessing service delivery: Public perception of municipal service delivery in South Africa.

Masuku, M.M. (2019). Effective governance in South Africa: reality or myth?. African Journal of Democracy and Governance, 6(2-3), pp.118-134.

Masuku, M.M. and Jili, N.N. (2019). Public service delivery in South Africa: The political influence at local government level. Journal of Public Affairs, 19(4), p.e1935.

Mamokhere, J. (2019). An exploration of reasons behind service delivery protests in South Africa: A case of Bolobedu South at the Greater Tzaneen Municipality. International Conference on Public Administration and Development Alternatives (IPADA), 373-379.

Mkhongi, F.A. and Musakwa, W. (2020). Perspectives of GIS Education in High Schools: An Evaluation of uMgungundlovu District, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Education Sciences, 10(5), p.131.

Mkhwanazi, L., Mbatha, M. and Phakathi, M. (2019). Perception of Community Members on the provision of Low-cost Housing in Kwa-Dlangezwa Area, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. American Journal of Public administration.

Mlambo, V.H. and Masuku, M.M. (2020). Governance, corruption and COVID-19: the final nail in the coffin for South Africa's dwindling public finances. Journal of Public Administration, 55(3-1), pp.549-565.

Moore, M. and Hartley, J. (2008). Innovations in governance. Public management review, 10(1), pp.3-20.

Motala, S. (2019). The terrible consequences of police corruption in South Africa. [online] Corruption Watch. Available at: < > [Accessed 7 June 2021].

Munzhedzi, P.H. (2015). South African public sector procurement and corruption: Inseparable twins?. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 10(1), pp.1-8.

Munshedzi, T.K. (2016). An assessment of the impact of the management of the social security system on access to services in Limpopo Province (Doctoral dissertation, University of Limpopo).

Pestoff, V. (2011). New public governance and accountability: some jewels in a treasure chest. CIES Centro de Investigación de Economía y Sociedad, 91. Spain

Pillay, S. (2004). Corruption–the challenge to good governance: a South African perspective. International Journal of Public Sector Management.

Piper, K. (2020). The devastating consequences of coronavirus lockdowns in poor countries. Available: , accessed 12 August 2020.

Rangongo, P., Mohlakwana, M. and Beckmann, J. (2016). Causes of financial mismanagement in South African public schools: The views of role players. South African Journal of Education, 36(3).

Rahayu, I.P. and Widodo, T. (2013). The causal relationship between corruption and poverty in ASEAN: A general method of moments/dynamic panel data analysis. Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, 15(3), pp.527-536.

Rena, R. and Msoni, M. (2014). Global financial crises and its impact on the South African economy: A further update. Journal of Economics, 5(1), pp.17-25.

Rivera, J.D. and Uttaro, A. (2021). The Manifestation of New Public Service Principles in Small-town Government: A Case Study of Grand Island, New York. State and Local Government Review, 53(1), pp.89-100.

Road Safety Report (2019). [online] Available at: < > [Accessed 11 August 2021].

Safara, L. and Odeku, K.O. (2021). CRITICAL LEGAL PERSPECTIVE OF INTERNATIONAL ANTI-CORRUPTION LAWS FOR TACKLING CORRUPTION IN SOUTH AFRICA. Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, 10(1), pp.203-216.

Sarkodie, S.A. and Adams, S. (2020). Electricity access and income inequality in South Africa: evidence from Bayesian and NARDL analyses. Energy Strategy Reviews, 29, pp.1-11.

Serfontein, E. and De Waal, E. (2015). The corruption bogey in South Africa: Is public education safe? South African Journal of Education, 35(1), pp.1-12.

South Africa Yearbook. (2017/18). South Africa Yearbook, 2017/18, Human settlements, p. 347, Government Printers, Pretoria.

Statistics South Africa. (2017). Poverty on the rise in South Africa | Statistics South Africa. [online] Available at: < > [Accessed 3 July 2021].

Statistics South Africa. (2020). Governance, Public Safety, and Justice Survey. [online] [Accessed 29 January 2021].

Wa Muiu, M. (2010). Colonial and postcolonial state and development in Africa. Social research: an international quarterly, 77(4), pp.1311-1338.

World Health Organisation. (2021). Road traffic injuries. [online] Available at: < > [Accessed 11 August 2021].

Vivier, E. and Wentzel, M. (2013). Community participation and service delivery: Perceptions among residents in Cape Town. Journal of Public Administration, 48(2), pp.239-250.

research on service delivery in south africa

How to Cite

  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

The authors when submitting their papers endorse and give permission as well to the Publisher Transition Academia Press to publish the article/paper in print and/or electronic format. Article/paper is defined as the final, definitive, and citable Version of Record, and includes the accepted manuscript in its final form, including the abstract, text, bibliography, and all accompanying tables, illustrations, data.  

If/when an article is accepted for publication, Author will be asked to transfer copyright of the article to Transition Academia Press. Transition Academia Press will retain copyright of all published material and reserves the right to re-use any such material in any print and/or electronic format. Author willing to retain their copyright from the Editors might request a fair condition, on the base of a bilateral agreement.


Most read articles by the same author(s)

  • Mfundo Mandla Masuku, Victor H Mlambo, Confidence Ndlovu, Service Delivery, Governance and Citizen Satisfaction: Reflections from South Africa , Journal Global Policy and Governance: Vol. 11 No. 1 (2022)


Journal Information

  • E-ISSN: 2194-7759 ISSN: 2194-7740
  • Abbreviated Title: JGPG
  • Frequency: 2 issues per year
  • Editor-in-Chief: Prof. Giorgio Dominese
  • E-mail:  [email protected]

article template download

Services on Demand

Related links, south african journal of industrial engineering, on-line version  issn 2224-7890 print version  issn 1012-277x, s. afr. j. ind. eng. vol.30 n.1 pretoria may. 2019, .


Diagnostic assessment of service delivery health in South Africa: a systematic literature review

O. Ajayi * , # ; M. de Vries

Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, University of Pretoria, South Africa

Access to cost-effective, high-quality and speedy public services is a legitimate requirement and expectation of all South Africans. However, despite massive increases in successive budgets and grants to the public sector, the economy continues to witness frequent unrest that is typically tagged as being about 'service delivery'. To deal effectively with this conundrum, an evidence-driven, goal-oriented diagnosis of the health of service delivery in South Africa is required. This is even more important as service delivery deficits and backlogs have continued to grow and widen since democratisation. It is therefore pertinent that a diagnostic tool with a sound and rigid theoretical foundation, and rigorously evaluated against key performance metrics, be developed as part of efforts to close service delivery gaps. This paper explores the necessary criteria for a diagnostic tool to contribute effectively in closing service delivery gaps in South Africa.

Toegang tot koste effektiewe, hoë gehalte en vinnige publieke dienste is 'n geldige vereiste en 'n verwagting van alle Suid-Afrikaners. Ten spyte van massiewe toenames in opeenvolgende begrotings en toelaes aan die publieke sektor, word die ekonomie steeds blootgestel aan gereëlde onrus wat tipies aan swak dienslewering toegeskryf word. Om effektief met hierdie strikvraag te werk te gaan is 'n doelgerigte diagnose van die toestand van dienslewering in Suid-Afrika benodig. Dit is selfs belangriker soos dienslewering tekortkominge en agterstande toegeneem en versprei het sedert demokrasie in Suid-Afrika. Dit is daarom belangrik dat 'n diagnostiese instrument met 'n stewige teoretiese fondament ontwikkel en deeglik getoets word teen sleutel vertonings-maatstawwe in 'n poging om dienslewering tekortkominge aan te spreek. Hierdie artikel ondersoek die nodige kriteria vir so n diagnostiese instrument om sodoende noemenswaardig by te dra tot die verbetering van dienslewering in Suid-Afrika.


As far back as 1997, in recognition of the need to run an effective and efficient public service, the South African government adopted the White Paper on Transforming Public Service Delivery (WPTPSD), generally referred to as the Batho Pele [1] White Paper. Although this policy clearly outlines the processes, procedures, behaviours, and systems required to deliver cost-effective, high-quality public service, Mdlongwa [2] argues that the public service still struggles with the basics. That is, it is unable to map out, standardise, optimise, assess, and monitor its services to ensure consistently speedy, affordable, and high-quality services. Although his argument is not supported by any scientific methods, a study by the Public Service Commission (PSC) [3] supports his claim to a considerable extent. The PSC study, which tries to understand how well Batho Pele policy has been adopted and implemented by national and provincial governments, indicates that many public officers and users of public services do not even know about the policy. Several examples are given in the PSC study [3]: (1) At the Department of Home Affairs, 99% of users of public services do not know of any efforts by the department to promote openness and transparency; (2) 90% are unaware of value for money efforts; and (3) 86% don't know about any redress mechanisms. On a positive note, 61% praised the department's efforts on information dissemination [3].

However, this review by the PSC was a discrete event without any clearly defined metrics for each area interrogated in the questionnaire. The review was similar to the General Household Survey (GHS) [4] of Statistics South Africa (StatsSA), which assessed the state of public services such as education, housing, and related services such as electricity/water supply and sanitation. Drawing conclusions that drive government policy and decision-making on the basis of traditional statistical surveys such as these is problematic, incomplete, and non-sustainable, since Tirivangasi and Mugambiwa [5] contend that, notwithstanding the studies, service delivery gaps continue to be a problem, leading to protests that paint a negative picture of South Africa both locally and internationally.

While it may be argued that there are other driving forces in the configuration of these protests, such as the prevailing economic and political situations and the triple challenge of poverty, inequality, and unemployment, a diagnostic assessment of the health of service delivery is required to determine the extent of its contribution to the unrest, among other things. Thus this paper explores, through a systematic literature review (SLR), the criteria for such diagnosis to be effective and efficient.

1.1 Background

Having adopted its policy on service delivery improvements, government has set up and designated a few oversight departments to monitor its programmes, projects, and services. These include the Public Service Commission (PSC) [6, 7], the Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA) [8, 9], the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME) [10], and a Chapter 9 institution, the Office of the Auditor General [11]. Backed by relevant laws and many national policy frameworks, these oversight institutions adopt many tools and performance assessment methodologies to carry out their various mandates. The DPMe, for instance, is backed by the National Evaluation Policy Framework, the Medium Term Strategic Framework, the National Evaluation System, etc. Regarding service delivery, a notable and creditable effort by the department is the Frontline Service Delivery Monitoring (FSDM) programme, developed to monitor the quality or performance of service delivery at specific points of service (PoS). The programme entails using standard questionnaires like those of the PSC and StatsSA to survey certain service delivery qualitative parameters.

Apart from the wastefulness of these overlaps, duplications, and repetitions by government organs, a review of the tools and surveys reveals that they are not theoretically grounded, scientifically evaluated, or proven to lead to any improvements in service delivery. A change of paradigm, an innovative approach, and a different way of diagnosis are therefore needed, given the magnitude and socio-economic impact of these service delivery disturbances.

1.2 Problem validation and statement

Service delivery unrest has become commonplace in South Africa. While over the years government has put in place many strategic plans, policy frameworks, programmes, and systems to assess and monitor service delivery performance with the aim of improving it, unrest, arising from service delivery gaps, continues [7, 12]. Although some authors have proposed certain ways by which government might solve this problem, we believe that any solution without a proper diagnosis is short-sighted - i.e., a diagnostic tool that is well-defined, rigorously tested, and theoretically grounded is required before any sustainable solutions can be developed and applied. We agree with Makanyeza [13] that one of the ways to improve service delivery is to have a way to assess and monitor its health.

Tirivangasi and Mugambiwa [5] estimated that up to one thousand incidents of service-related unrest took place in one month during 2014, while the Institute for Security Studies (ISS) [14] reviewed 2,880 cases of public unrest between 2013 and 2015, about 34 per cent of which it ascribed to service delivery issues. On the content of this 34 per cent, Runciman et al. [15] identified issues such as electricity and water and sanitation, while ISS included housing, health, and education. Figure 1 presents Runciman et al.'s [15] inferences.

A further analysis by Ruciman et al. [15] reveals who these protests are targeted at. As shown in Figure 2 , only one per cent (1%) is targeted at private entities, which strengthens the notion that government needs to have a way to diagnose the health of service delivery that can inform corrective actions, learning, and continuous improvement.

Because of the crippling effect that service delivery gaps and associated disturbances have on our society, government and many authors have focused attention on how the issues might be resolved. It is interesting, however, that only a few studies have focused on assessing the health of service delivery in a scientific way. Of the few assessment tools available - typically, traditional questionnaires - the diagnostic metrics have not been well defined - i.e., there is no evidence of how diagnostic metrics are developed. Their theoretical basis and methodology are absent, and the validation processes that were used before accepting the metrics are missing. Yet this type of rigour is desirable for a problem of this magnitude.

Shaidi [16], Alexander [17], Thompson [18], Nleya [19], and Mdlongwa [2] all investigated the causes of service delivery failures without developing any tools or metrics to assess service delivery health on an on-going basis. Makanyeza [13], who conducted a survey that indicated that the regular assessment and monitoring of service delivery health (as an early warning system to trigger corrective actions) is desirable, did not develop any methodology or measures to do the assessment. In the same way, Sibanda [20] advocated for the quality assessment of service delivery health using International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards, international benchmarking, and balanced scorecards. However, she did not develop any quality metrics beyond a formula for calculating perceived quality.

A methodology is needed to understand what really matters in measuring and identifying qualifying key performance indicators that are appropriate to a particular service delivery context. In government, the FSDM assessment framework scores eight key performance areas (KPAs), but the metrics and ratings used are broad, vague, and subjective. One of the KPAs, for instance, is queue management and waiting times; but this KPA is not scored against any queueing model, standards, or baselines. The same applies to the remaining seven KPAs.

Taking an international perspective, the World Bank report [21] on accountability in South Africa's public services confirms that one of the major reasons for service delivery issues is inadequate assessment (including monitoring and feedback) of the health of service delivery. The reason for this, according to Pricewaterhouse Coopers [22], may be that the public sector does not easily lend itself to the kind of shareholder return metrics that the private sector is used to. There is therefore an urgent need to develop techniques and tools to assess the health of the public service in South Africa; but first, the criteria that such techniques and tools must satisfy to achieve the desired result should be clearly defined.

1.3 Research question and study objectives

A clear definition of the research question is necessary to guide the entire literature review process [23]. Based on the challenges defined above, the research question is:

What criteria must a diagnostic tool satisfy to effectively support the closing of service delivery gaps?

The SLR will explore the following three objectives:

• Objective 1: Identify diagnostic service performance assessment (DSPA) tools in general. Rationale: The existing literature may already offer knowledge about effective SDPA tools that may be applicable to the South African context.

• Objective 2: Discover criteria that may be considered for DSPA tools to be effective. Rationale: The existing literature may already provide initial criteria for selecting an appropriate DSPA tool for a particular context.

Because of the many public unrest incidents in South Africa, in which people demand better service delivery, the term 'service delivery' is now loosely (wrongly, carelessly, and erroneously) used by the press. For that reason, and given that the term is not universally defined, we acknowledge the South African context and vernacular, and define ' service delivery' as the purveying of services (intangibles), goods (tangibles), and socio-economic dynamism (amenities, infrastructure, employment etc) by government and state-owned enterprises that enable the citizenry to live sustainably and to prosper.


This study explores and extracts useful criteria for a service performance diagnostic tool in general, and specifically within the service delivery domain, by systematically reviewing the literature. The review is guided to a considerable extent by the eight-step guide to conducting a systematic literature review by Okoli and Schabram [24]. According to them, a systematic literature review (SLR) is a systematic, structured, all-inclusive effort to critically assess, extract, and integrate empirical evidence that meets pre-defined eligibility criteria in a complete, scientifically rigorous, and reproducible way. Their definition is supported by Kwan [25] and Tranfield et al. [26]. To date, no systematic review of the relevant criteria for a service delivery diagnostic tool has been published. Given government expenditure on service delivery, and the continued deficit with its consequential impact, it is timely that a considered effort be made to put together in a systematic way all works published around the subject. This study does exactly that by reviewing all published works in relevant academic journal databases and in some secondary information repositories. Table 1 outlines the steps followed in conducting the review.

The review's objectives are stated in Section 1.3 above. Although used mostly in the medical field, the P referred R eporting I tems for S ystematic Reviews and M eta -A nalysis (PRISMA) [27] checklist guided this review protocol. Table 2 summarises the protocol, elaborating on the execution of Steps 2 and 3 in Table 1 .

Table 3 shows the search scope and inclusion/exclusion criteria, elaborating on the execution of Steps 4 and 5 in Table 1 .

For the execution of Steps 6 and 7 in Table 1 , we used ATLAS.ti to extract data from the knowledge repositories and table the results in accordance with the three main objectives of the study.

A total of 2377 publications were found, of which only 64 were evaluated for eligibility. Out of the eligible 64, only 29 made it to the final inclusion stage. However, not one of the included materials deals with the focus of this research: A systematic literature review of the criteria that a diagnostic tool must satisfy to be considered effective in closing service delivery gaps. Although there is a plethora of published works on (public) service delivery in general, there is a dearth of investigations into the criteria that an assessment tool must possess for it to diminish service delivery deficits.

Figures 3 and 4 and Table 4 outline the initial counts of publications from some well-known databases, from inception to data extraction. Boolean logical operators were used to link the search terms in a way that ensures focus.

The search criteria required to address Objectives 1 and 2 of the study are:

["diagnostic tools" NOT ("health" OR "hospital")] AND "for assessing public service delivery".

Synonym phrases for "diagnostic tools" are also considered: "survey tools", "survey mechanisms", "survey models", "survey methodologies", "survey frameworks", "survey systems", "survey approaches", etc.

Some databases and search engines vary in the way that words and phrases are nested, but the inclusion and exclusion logic (the use of Boolean operators) remains generally the same. The challenge is that, to obtain the qualifying criteria of a service delivery assessment tool, the tool must have been empirically tested, evaluated, and validated by its developers (or others) for certain performance criteria. This is lacking in all but seven of the diagnostic/ survey tools covered, 13 of which focus on public services, four on the general service industry, and two on the manufacturing sector (included because of their closeness to service quality and performance assessments). Although there are many related service quality assessment tools (e.g., the ESQ model [28], the antecedents & mediator model [29], the INTSERVQUAL model [30], the DEA model [31], the IT-based model [32], etc.), SERVQUAL [33] meets the initial eligibility criteria for inclusion - first, because in addition to general quality metrics, it measures service performances; second, because it is widely applied in the public sector; and finally, because most other service assessment tools discovered are a variation or adaptation of SERVQUAL. It is deemed to be the most widely applied, followed by PETS and QSDS [34] of the World Bank Research Group. SERVQUAL, which has been modified/customised to form other assessment tools, serves as a diagnostic methodology to uncover wide areas of an organisation's quality and performance deficits. It has been applied extensively in many services sectors: public service delivery [35-43], public transportation [44-49], public and private healthcare [50-55], information systems [56-60], education [61-66], and hospitality [67-72]; and in many countries of the world: South Africa [44, 66, 73-75], Bangladesh [72], India [69, 71], Croatia [70], the United States and the United Kingdom [76], Thailand [64], Russia [63], Ghana [48, 49, 51], Malaysia [41], Egypt [37], and Cyprus [36], to mention only a few.

To ensure that the search strategy delivers quality outcomes for study objectives 1 to 3, a complementary search, using the snowballing procedure outlined by Wohlin [77], was adopted. This led to multiple iterations and the exclusion of 1135 publications, streamlining the final publications for data extraction.

Table 4 outlines the search hits by databases, duplicate counts, and the number considered to be relevant in the context of this study.

In summary, literature sources have been excluded (or included) based on the criteria defined in Table 2 (eligibility criteria) and Table 3 (timing, scope, etc.) and in Section 3.2 (quality assessment for tools eligibility).

3.1 Spread and attributes of tools

Table 5 gives an indication of the distribution and spread of the tools included, addressing Objective 1 of this study, and clustering the tools according to their methodological core (i.e., quantitative, qualitative, or both).

3.2 Quality assessment for tools' eligibility

In this section we highlight the additional quality assessment criteria that were identified to select eligible tools for the study context. A tool was only short-listed if it met all the quality criteria. We applied the following quality assessment criteria:

1. Has the tool been tested in real life? Rationale: we make the assumption that tools that have been used by practitioners will have been refined, increasing their usability.

2. Has the tool been evaluated against key performance metrics? Rationale: we assume that the process of evaluation would have helped to improve the performance of the tool before it was used to assess the health of service delivery.

3. Are the performance metrics clearly defined? Rationale: ambiguous performance metrics will have a negative effect on the reliability of the measurement outcome.

4. Is the evaluation outcome documented? Rationale: authors occasionally allude to evaluations they have conducted without publishing the full outcome. Transparent evaluation outcomes are vital.

5. Are independent persons (not only the tools developers) involved in the tool's evaluation? Rationale: the criterion should eliminate potential bias in the evaluation of the tool.

Seven eligible tools meet the above five quality criteria: ESTP (extended service template process) [86], ASPIRE (a rea for evaluation, s et goals, p erformance indicators, i nformation sources, r eport results, e valuate) [89], BSC and GEE (balanced score card and generalised estimating equation) [94], CSDA (city service delivery assessment) [93], PJM (performance journey mapping) [90], EGPE (external government performance evaluation) [91], and the MP (manufacturing performance) tool [95].

3.3 Evaluation criteria for effective tools

For Objective 2 of this study, we intended to discover criteria that DSPA tools must satisfy to be considered effective. Table 6 provides a summary of the criteria that we extracted from the literature.


In accordance with Objective 1 of the study, we identified 19 DSPA tools that may be useful for service delivery assessment. Furthermore, we identified five quality assessment criteria to reduce the list of identified DSPA tools as possible alternatives to consider in the South African context.

Addressing Objective 2, we extracted a list of 18 criteria from the literature that could serve as a starting point to compare the seven DSPA tools. The 18 criteria were clustered into two main categories: (1) Criteria related to a tool as a construct; and (2) criteria for post-diagnosis practices. The rationale for the categories is that some criteria relate to the built-in construction of the software tool, whereas others do not pertain to software construction, but rather to methodological practices that are associated with service delivery assessment. It is possible to perform a further prioritisation of the 18 criteria, based on the number of citations - e.g., Table 6 indicates that the most subscribed criterion is 'comprehensibility' (the outcome or results of DSPA tools must be easily understood, simple, and uncomplicated) - followed by 'improvement' (must not only assess, but also lead to improved service delivery).

An easy explanation would be that, typically, diagnostic tools are too complicated for the average user, and they are often not proven to lead to improved service delivery. Yet we propose that the criteria should rather be expanded and prioritised via a participative process, involving participants who know the particular service delivery context. Figure 5 presents a conceptual design of a decision-making process that incorporates the 18 criteria as a starting point for selecting a suitable DSPA tool.


Despite the acknowledged service delivery surveys/assessments in South Africa, service delivery deficits and related unrest continue unabated [5]. Given the magnitude of this deficiency and its socio-economic impact, a new way/technique of diagnosis, grounded in relevant theories, evaluated for appropriate performance metrics, and tested for fitness of purpose, is urgently needed. To contribute to meeting this need, this study explored the literature in a systematic way to uncover any work by authors and researchers on that topic. A total of 2377 publications were identified during a broad search driven by the criteria defined in Section 3. Applying further eligibility criteria ( Table 2 ) and inclusion/exclusion criteria ( Table 3 ), only 29 made it to the final analysis stage. Notwithstanding these 29 papers, it is interesting to note that none dealt with the focus of this study. In the final analysis, and in line with the study objectives (Section 1.3), eight DSPA tools criteria were extracted. We propose that the eight criteria should be expanded and prioritised via a participative process, involving participants who know the particular service delivery context.

[1] Skweyiya, Z. 1997. Transforming public service delivery. Pretoria: Department of Public Service and Administration.         [  Links  ]

[2] Mdlongwa, E.T. 2014. Local government at the heart of poor service delivery. Rhodes journalism review, 2014(34), p. 39.         [  Links  ]

[3] Public Service Commission. 2012. Report on the assessment of the effectiveness of the Batho Pele Policy in public service delivery. Public Service Commission publication, Arcadia, Pretoria.         [  Links  ]

[4] Stats SA. 2016. General household survey. Statistical release P0318, Pretoria, South Africa.         [  Links  ]

[6] Public Service Commission. 2014. The constitutional and legislative mandate of the Public Service Commission explained. Pretoria, South Africa.         [  Links  ]

[7] Public Service Commission. 2015. Service delivery improvement plan (SDIP): 2016/2017 - 2018/2019 financial years. Pretoria, South Africa.         [  Links  ]

[8] Pillay, G. 2016. HR challenges facing HR planning, management and development in the public sector in SA. Department of Public Service and Administration. Pretoria, South Africa.         [  Links  ]

[9] DPSA. 2016. Abridged DPSA service delivery charter 2016/2017. Department of Public Service and Administration. Pretoria, South Africa.         [  Links  ]

[10] Madale, C. 2014. DPME strategic plan 2015-2020. Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation. The Presidency, Pretoria, South Africa.         [  Links  ] .

[11] Makwetu, K. 2017. General report on national and provincial audit outcomes. Auditor-General South Africa (AGSA). Pretoria, South Africa.         [  Links  ]

[12] NPC-SA. 2011. Diagnostic Overview of the National Planning Commission. National Planning Commission. Pretoria, South Africa.         [  Links  ]

[13] Makanyeza, C., Kwandayi, H.P. and Ikobe, B.N. 2013. Strategies to improve service delivery in local authorities. International Journal of Information Technology and Business Management, 15(1), pp. 1-11.         [  Links  ]

[14] Lancaster, L. 2016. At the heart of discontent: Measuring public violence in South Africa. Institute of Security Studies (ISS) South Africa. Paper 292.         [  Links  ]

[15] Runciman, C., Maruping, B. and Moloto, B. 2016. South Africa's rebellion of the poor: An overview. University of Johannesburg, South Africa.         [  Links  ]

[17] Alexander, P. 2010. Rebellion of the poor: South Africa's service delivery protests - A preliminary analysis. Review of African Political Economy, 37(123), pp. 25-40.         [  Links  ]

[18] Thompson, L. and Nleya, N. 2010. Community activisim and protest in Khayelitsha, Cape Town. African Centre for Citizenship and Democracy, University of the Western Cape, South Africa. 4(4), p.11.         [  Links  ]

[19] Nleya, N. 2011. Linking service delivery and protest in South Africa. Africanus, 50(1), pp.3-13.         [  Links  ]

[20] Sibanda, M.M.M. 2012. Monitoring customer focused quality service delivery in Local Government: Conceptual issues and perspectives for consideration. Africa's Public Service Delivery and Performance Review, 1(1), pp. 1-20.         [  Links  ]

[22] PWC. 2013. Improving public sector productivity through prioritisation, measurement and alignment. New approaches for how the public sector improves productivity, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Australia.         [  Links  ]

[24] Okoli, C. and Schabram, K. 2012. A Guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. Sprouts: Working papers on information systems, pp. 10-26.         [  Links  ]

[25] Kwan, B.S.C. 2006. The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for specific purposes, 25(1), pp. 30-55.         [  Links  ]

[26] Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. and Smart, P. 2003. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), pp. 207-222.         [  Links  ]

[27] Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J. and Altman, D.G. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P), Systematic reviews, 4(1).         [  Links  ]

[28] Santos, J. 2003. E-service quality: a model of virtual service quality dimensions. Managing Service Quality, 13(3), pp. 233-246.         [  Links  ]

[29] Dabholkar, P.A., Shepherd, C.D. and Thorpe, D.I. 2000. A comprehensive framework for service quality: an investigation of critical conceptual and measurement issues through a longitudinal study. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), pp. 139-173.         [  Links  ]

[30] Frost, F.A. and Kumar, M. 2000. INTSERVQUAL - an internal adaptation of the GAP model in a large service organisation. Journal of Services Marketing, 14(5), pp. 358-377.         [  Links  ]

[31] Soteriou, A.C. and Stavrinides, Y. 1997. An internal customer service quality data envelopment analysis model for bank branches. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(8), pp. 780789.         [  Links  ]

[32] Zhu, F.X., Wymer, W. and Chen, I. 2002. IT-based services and service quality in consumer banking. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 13(1), pp. 69-90.         [  Links  ]

[33] Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L. 1988 SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), pp. 12-40.         [  Links  ]

[34] Reinikka, R. and Svensson, J. 2002. Assessing Frontline Service Delivery. World Bank/Development Research Group, Washington DC, 20433.         [  Links  ]

[35] Mik, W. 2001. Using SERVQUAL to assess customer satisfaction with public sector services. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 11(6), pp. 380-388.         [  Links  ]

[36] Iyikal, O.C. and Celebi, A. 2016. Investigating a quality of services in the public sector: evidence from northern Cyprus. Journal of Economic and Social Development, 3(2).         [  Links  ]

[37] Ali, M.A. and Yaseen, E.A. 2014. Service quality in public services - A study in urban Egypt. German University in Cairo, Cairo Egypt.         [  Links  ]

[38] Alexandria, B. and Adrienne, C. 2001. Service improvements in public services using SERVQUAL: Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 11 (6) pp. 389-401.         [  Links  ]

[39] Ramseook-Munhurrun, P. and Lukea-Bhiwajee, S.D. 2010. Service quality in the public service. International Journal of Management and Market Research, 3(1), pp. 37-50.         [  Links  ]

[40] Martinovic, M., Pavlic, I. and Tolic, M.S. 2017. Measurement of local Public service's quality using SERVQUAL: The case of Dubrovnik. University of Dubrovnik, Croatia.         [  Links  ]

[41] Ilhaamie, A.G.A. 2010. Service quality in Malaysian public service: Some findings. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 1(1) pp. 40-45.         [  Links  ]

[42] Prodromos, C., Dimitrios, C., Eftichia, V. and Eleni, L. 2014. Measuring citizen satisfaction using the SERVQUAL approach: The case of the Hellenic Post. Procedia Economics and Finance, 9(Supplement C), pp. 349-360.         [  Links  ]

[43] Brysland, A. and Curry, A. 2011. Service improvements in public services using SERVQUAL. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 11 (6), 389-401.         [  Links  ]

[44] Luke, R. and Heynes, G. 2017. Measuring commuters perceptions of service quality of selected public bus services in the City of Johannesburg. 36 th Southern African Transport Conference, CSIR ICC, Pretoria, South Africa.         [  Links  ]

[45] Randheer, K., AL-Motawa, A.A. and Prince, V.J. 2011. Measuring commuters' perception on service quality using SERVQUAL in public transportation. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 3(1), pp. 2134.         [  Links  ]

[46] Muthupandian, K.S. and Vijayakumar, C. 2012. Measurement of passengers' service quality in public transportation: Servqual analysis. Business Plus, 1(5), pp. 1-9.         [  Links  ]

[47] Barabino, B., Deiana, E. and Tilocca, P. 2012. Measuring service quality in urban bus transport: a modified SERVQUAL approach. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 4(3), pp. 238-252.         [  Links  ]

[48] Ojo, T.K., Mireku, D.O., Dauda, S. and Nutsogbodo, R.Y. 2014. Service quality and customer satisfaction of public transport on Cape Coast-Accra Route, Ghana. Developing Country Studies, 4(18), pp. 142-149.         [  Links  ]

[50] Purcãrea, V.L., Gheorghe, L.R. and Petrescu, C.M. 2013. The Assessment of perceived service quality of public health care services in Romania using the SERVQUAL Scale. Procedia Economics and Finance, 6(Supplement C): p. 573-585.         [  Links  ]

[51] Peprah, A.A. and Atarah, B.A. 2014. Assessing patient's satisfaction Using SERVQUAL model: A case of Sunyani regional hospital, Ghana. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 4(2): pp.133-143.         [  Links  ]

[52] Butt, M.M. and Cyril de Run, E. 2010. Private healthcare quality: applying a SERVQUAL model. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 23(7), pp. 658-673.         [  Links  ]

[53] Kalaja, R., Myshketa, R. and Scalera, F. 2016. Service quality assessment in health care sector: The case of Durres public hospital. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235 (Supplement C), pp. 557-565.         [  Links  ]

[54] Pekkaya, M., Imamoglu, O.P. and Koca, H. 2017. Evaluation of healthcare service quality via Servqual scale: An application on a hospital. International Journal of Healthcare Management, pp. 1-8.         [  Links  ]

[55] Chakraborty, R. and Majumdar, A. 2011. Measuring consumer satisfaction in health sector: The applicability of SERVQUAL. Journal of Arts, Science & Commerce, 11(4) pp. 149-160.         [  Links  ]

[56] Leyland, F.P., Richard, T. W. and Kavan, C. B. 1995. Service quality: A measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), pp. 173-187.         [  Links  ]

[57] James, J.J., Gary, K., Parolia, N. and Li, Y. 2012. An Analysis of Three SERVQUAL variations in measuring information system service quality. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 15(2), pp. 149-162.         [  Links  ]

[58] Whitten, D. 2004. Information systems service quality measurement: The evolution of the SERVQUAL instrument. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 13(3), pp. 181-192.         [  Links  ]

[59] Landrum, H., Prybutok, V., Zhang, X. and Peak, D. 2009. Measuring IS system service quality with SERVQUAL: Users' perceptions of relative importance of the five SERVPERF dimensions. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 12, pp. 17-35.         [  Links  ]

[60] Roses, L.K., Hoppen, N., Ballaz, B. and Freire, k. 2016. Quality Evaluation in Information Systems Outsourcing. Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI)-Proceedings, pp. 268-280.         [  Links  ]

[61] Donlagic, S. and Fazlic, S. 2015. Quality assessment in higher education using the SERVQUAL Model. Management, 20(1), pp. 39-57.         [  Links  ]

[62] Krsmanovic, M., Horvat, A. and Ruso, J. 2014. Application of SERVQUAL model in high education. 11 th International conference "Standardization, protypes and quality: A means of balkan countries' collaboration", Belgrade, Serbia.         [  Links  ]

[63] Galeeva, R.B. 2016. SERVQUAL application and adaptation for educational service quality assessments in Russian higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 24(3), pp. 329-348.         [  Links  ]

[64] Yousapronpaiboon, K. 2014. SERVQUAL: Measuring higher education service quality in Thailand. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116 (Supplement C), pp. 1088-1095.         [  Links  ]

[65] Abili, K., Thani, F.N. and Afarinandehbin, M. 2012. Measuring university service quality by means of SERVQUAL method. Asian Journal on Quality, 13(3), pp. 204-211.         [  Links  ]

[66] Green, P. 2014. Measuring service quality in higher education: A South African case study. Journal of International Education Research, 10(2).         [  Links  ]

[67] Mei, A.W.O., Dean, A.M. and White, C.J. 1999. Analysing service quality in the hospitality industry. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 9(2) pp. 136-143.         [  Links  ]

[68] Al-Ababneh, M.M. 2017. Service quality in the hospitality industry. Journal of Tourism & Hospitality, 6(1).         [  Links  ]

[69] Kalotra, A.K. and Sharma, N. 2017. Measuring service quality using SERVQUAL in hospitality industry: A study of Delhi. International Journal of Emerging Research in Management &Technology, 6(1).         [  Links  ]

[70] Markovi'c, S. and Raspor, S. 2010. Measuring perceived service quality using Servqual: A case study of the Croatian hotel industry. Management, 5(3).         [  Links  ]

[71] Amballoor, R.J. 2015. Servqual model: An analysis of hospitality sector in Goa. Asian Journal of Managerial Science, 4(1), pp. 23-26.         [  Links  ]

[72] Mazumder, S. and Hasan, A.B.M.R. 2014. Measuring service quality and customer satisfaction of the hotels in Bangladesh: A study on national and international hotel guests. Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management, 2(1), pp. 95-111.         [  Links  ]

[73] Van der Wal, R.W.E., Pampaiiis, A. and Bond, C. 2002. Service quality in a cellular telecommunications company: a South African experience. Managing Service Quality, 12(5), pp. 323-335.         [  Links  ]

[74] Pitt, L., Berthon, P., Prendegast, G. and Nei, D. 2015. On the reliability and validity of the Servqual instrument in South Africa. Proceedings of the 1996 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference, Phoenix, Arizona. pp. 164-164.         [  Links  ]

[75] Simpson, A.P. and Caiitz, A.P. 2015. Adapted SERVQUAL for evaluating the provision of information as an agricultural extension service in South Africa. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension, 43(2).         [  Links  ]

[76] Lai, J.Y. 2006. Assessment of employees' perceptions of service quality and satisfaction with e-business. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(9), pp. 926-938.         [  Links  ]

[77] Wohiin, C. 2014. Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. Embedded Applications Software Engineering, Proceedings of the 18 th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, Article No. 38, England, United Kingdom.         [  Links  ]

[78] DPME. 2015. Frontline service delivery monitoring assessment framework. Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, Pretoria, South Africa.         [  Links  ]

[79] Brettenny, W. and Sharp, G. 2015. Efficiency evaluation of urban and rural municipal water service authorities in South Africa: A data envelopment analysis approach. Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, South Africa.         [  Links  ]

[80] Steven, H. 2009. Service Delivery Index. Economic Empowerment Rating Agency, Johannesburg, South Africa.         [  Links  ]

[82] Parasuraman, A., Zeithami, V.A. and Berry, L.L. 1991. Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing, 67(4) pp. 420-450.         [  Links  ]

[83] Parasuraman, A., Zeithami, V.A. and Berry, L.L. 1994. Alternative scales for measuring service quality: a comparative assessment based on psychometric and diagnostic criteria. Journal of Retailing, 70(3), pp. 201-230.         [  Links  ]

[84] Waiiace, J.H., Seyed, M.R.I. and Shou, B. 2007. A diagnostic tree for improving production line performance. Production and Operations Management, 16(1), pp. 77-92.         [  Links  ]

[85] Siamak, T. and Xuehong, S. 2004. Inference techniques for diagnosis based on set operations. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1(1), pp. 1-8.         [  Links  ]

[86] Wiiiiams, C.S., and Saunders, M. 2007. Improving service quality in the new public sector. The Routledge Companion to Nonprofit Marketing, pp. 389-402.         [  Links  ]

[87] O'Neiii, K., Takane, M., Sheffei, A., Abou-Zahr, C. and Boerma, T. 2013. Monitoring service delivery for universal health coverage: the Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA). Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 91(12), pp. 923-931.         [  Links  ]

[88] Fogarty, G., Catts, R. and Foriin, C. 2000. Identifying shortcomings in the measurement of service quality. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 4(1), pp. 425-447.         [  Links  ]

[89] Uy, J., Lizarondo, L. and Atias, A. 2016. ASPIRE for quality: a new evidence-based tool to evaluate clinical service performance. BMC Research Notes, 9(306).         [  Links  ]

[90] 90.Höber, A., Pergier, E., Weitianer, D. and Grahsi, H. 2015. Performance journey mapping: a service performance assessment framework. The Total Quality Management Journal, 27(2), pp. 231-246.         [  Links  ]

[91] Yu, W. and Ma, L. 2016. External Government Performance Evaluation (EGPE) in China: Evaluating the Evaluations. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(1), pp. 144-171.         [  Links  ]

[92] Banomyong, R. and Supatn, N. 2011. Developing a supply chain performance tool for SMEs in Thailand. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(1), pp. 20-31.         [  Links  ]

[93] Ross, I., Scott, R., Biackett, I. and Hawkins, P. 2016. Fecal sludge management: Diagnostics for service delivery in urban areas - summary report. World Bank Group - Water and Sanitation Program, Balikpapan, Indonesia.         [  Links  ]

[94] Edward, A., Kumar, B., Kakar, F., Saiehi, A.S., Burnham, G. and Peters, D.H. 2011. Configuring balanced scorecards for measuring health system performance: Evidence from 5 years' evaluation in Afghanistan. PLoS Medicine, 8(7).         [  Links  ]

[95] Amrina, E. and Yusof, S.M. 2010. Manufacturing Performance Evaluation Tool (MPET) for Malaysian automotive small and medium sized enterprises. International Journal of Business and Management Science, 3(2), pp. 195-213.         [  Links  ]

[96] Aiexa, V., Kiss, I. and Ratiu, S. 2013. Diagnostic analysis - Tool in research and innovation. International Journal of Engineering, 11(4).         [  Links  ]

Submitted by authors 15 /Mar 2018 Accepted for publication 28 Jan 2019 Available online 29 /May 2019

* Corresponding author. [email protected] # The author was enrolled for a PhD degree in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Pretoria, South Africa


  1. (PDF) Evaluation of Service Delivery within local Municipalities in

    research on service delivery in south africa

  2. Service delivery improves overall, but with stark inequalities

    research on service delivery in south africa

  3. The state of basic service delivery in South Africa: In-depth analysi…

    research on service delivery in south africa

  4. (PDF) The e-service delivery in South Africa and the contribution of

    research on service delivery in south africa

  5. The state of basic service delivery in South Africa: In-depth analysi…

    research on service delivery in south africa

  6. (PDF) South Africa's service-delivery crisis: From contextual

    research on service delivery in south africa


  1. ANC reflects on service delivery successes and failures


  1. Service Delivery in South Africa at a Glance — Helen Suzman ...

    The history of service delivery, or lack of it, in South Africa has been troublesome to say the least. A few weeks ago a general news search of service delivery or local municipalities would have revealed many articles by irate residents about the failures of their municipalities to deliver basic services. Now there is an intriguing High Court ...


    Management College of Southern Africa (MANCOSA) Durban, South Africa. Abstract: Over the past decade, thousands of South Africans have taken to the streets in violent protest over. the fact that ...

  3. (PDF) The politics of service delivery in South Africa: The ...

    Indeed, service delivery in South Africa has been both of lower quality and unreliable at times, in which instance at most it greatly inconvenienced and endangers the local communities (Reddy ...

  4. Service Delivery, Governance and Citizen Satisfaction ...

    Masuku, M.M. and Jili, N.N. (2019). Public service delivery in South Africa: The political influence at local government level. Journal of Public Affairs, 19(4), p.e1935. Mamokhere, J. (2019). An exploration of reasons behind service delivery protests in South Africa: A case of Bolobedu South at the Greater Tzaneen Municipality.

  5. Service Delivery Challenges in South Africa - HSRC

    analysts have labelled South Africa as the ^protest capital of the world _ (Alexander, 2013). Alexander (2013) argues that service delivery protests continues unabated and that government attempts to improve service delivery have not been sufficient to address the frustration and anger of poor people in South Africa.


    ASSESSING SERVICE DELIVERY: PUBLIC PERCEPTION OF MUNICIPAL SERVICE DELIVERY IN SOUTH AFRICA t me 14 2 / y to service delivery? 201 9 nagement of the government’s performance (Mangai, 2016). Research on the drivers of satisfaction is, however, limited in Africa. Consequently, there is a growing need for scholars to contribute towards

  7. (PDF) Open Governance for Improved Service Delivery ...

    innovations in service delivery in South Africa, which are based on open governance: the Gauteng Department of Education intr oduced an online application system in 2015; the length of hospital ...

  8. Diagnostic assessment of service delivery health in South ...

    Despite the acknowledged service delivery surveys/assessments in South Africa, service delivery deficits and related unrest continue unabated [5]. Given the magnitude of this deficiency and its socio-economic impact, a new way/technique of diagnosis, grounded in relevant theories, evaluated for appropriate performance metrics, and tested for ...

  9. The politics of service delivery in South Africa: The local ...

    service delivery contextualised in South Africa Conceptual framework: Politics and service delivery Politics and politicisation Ndudula (2013:6), quoting Hanekom et al., defines politics as being the aspirations for and, more importantly, the retention of power over residents of a particular jurisdiction by certain

  10. Discourses of ‘service delivery protests’ in South Africa: an ...

    Sarah Day is a researcher at the University of South Africa (Unisa) Institute for Social and Health Sciences and the South African Medical Research Council – Unisa Violence, Injury and Peace Research Unit. She is currently involved in projects focusing on decolonality, gender, everyday resistance and peacebuilding, and public protests in ...