social work research for dummies

Social Work Research Methods That Drive the Practice

Social workers advocate for the well-being of individuals, families and communities. But how do social workers know what interventions are needed to help an individual? How do they assess whether a treatment plan is working? What do social workers use to write evidence-based policy?

Social work involves research-informed practice and practice-informed research. At every level, social workers need to know objective facts about the populations they serve, the efficacy of their interventions and the likelihood that their policies will improve lives. A variety of social work research methods make that possible.

Data-Driven Work

Data is a collection of facts used for reference and analysis. In a field as broad as social work, data comes in many forms.

Quantitative vs. Qualitative

As with any research, social work research involves both quantitative and qualitative studies.

Quantitative Research

Answers to questions like these can help social workers know about the populations they serve — or hope to serve in the future.

• How many students currently receive reduced-price school lunches in the local school district?
• How many hours per week does a specific individual consume digital media?
• How frequently did community members access a specific medical service last year?

Quantitative data — facts that can be measured and expressed numerically — are crucial for social work.

Quantitative research has advantages for social scientists. Such research can be more generalizable to large populations, as it uses specific sampling methods and lends itself to large datasets. It can provide important descriptive statistics about a specific population. Furthermore, by operationalizing variables, it can help social workers easily compare similar datasets with one another.

Qualitative Research

Qualitative data — facts that cannot be measured or expressed in terms of mere numbers or counts — offer rich insights into individuals, groups and societies. It can be collected via interviews and observations.

• What attitudes do students have toward the reduced-price school lunch program?
• What strategies do individuals use to moderate their weekly digital media consumption?
• What factors made community members more or less likely to access a specific medical service last year?

Qualitative research can thereby provide a textured view of social contexts and systems that may not have been possible with quantitative methods. Plus, it may even suggest new lines of inquiry for social work research.

Mixed Methods Research

Combining quantitative and qualitative methods into a single study is known as mixed methods research. This form of research has gained popularity in the study of social sciences, according to a 2019 report in the academic journal Theory and Society. Since quantitative and qualitative methods answer different questions, merging them into a single study can balance the limitations of each and potentially produce more in-depth findings.

However, mixed methods research is not without its drawbacks. Combining research methods increases the complexity of a study and generally requires a higher level of expertise to collect, analyze and interpret the data. It also requires a greater level of effort, time and often money.

The Importance of Research Design

Data-driven practice plays an essential role in social work. Unlike philanthropists and altruistic volunteers, social workers are obligated to operate from a scientific knowledge base.

To know whether their programs are effective, social workers must conduct research to determine results, aggregate those results into comprehensible data, analyze and interpret their findings, and use evidence to justify next steps.

Employing the proper design ensures that any evidence obtained during research enables social workers to reliably answer their research questions.

Research Methods in Social Work

The various social work research methods have specific benefits and limitations determined by context. Common research methods include surveys, program evaluations, needs assessments, randomized controlled trials, descriptive studies and single-system designs.

Surveys involve a hypothesis and a series of questions in order to test that hypothesis. Social work researchers will send out a survey, receive responses, aggregate the results, analyze the data, and form conclusions based on trends.

Surveys are one of the most common research methods social workers use — and for good reason. They tend to be relatively simple and are usually affordable. However, surveys generally require large participant groups, and self-reports from survey respondents are not always reliable.

Program Evaluations

Social workers ally with all sorts of programs: after-school programs, government initiatives, nonprofit projects and private programs, for example.

Crucially, social workers must evaluate a program’s effectiveness in order to determine whether the program is meeting its goals and what improvements can be made to better serve the program’s target population.

Evidence-based programming helps everyone save money and time, and comparing programs with one another can help social workers make decisions about how to structure new initiatives. Evaluating programs becomes complicated, however, when programs have multiple goal metrics, some of which may be vague or difficult to assess (e.g., “we aim to promote the well-being of our community”).

Needs Assessments

Social workers use needs assessments to identify services and necessities that a population lacks access to.

Common social work populations that researchers may perform needs assessments on include:

• People in a specific income group
• Everyone in a specific geographic region
• A specific ethnic group
• People in a specific age group

In the field, a social worker may use a combination of methods (e.g., surveys and descriptive studies) to learn more about a specific population or program. Social workers look for gaps between the actual context and a population’s or individual’s “wants” or desires.

For example, a social worker could conduct a needs assessment with an individual with cancer trying to navigate the complex medical-industrial system. The social worker may ask the client questions about the number of hours they spend scheduling doctor’s appointments, commuting and managing their many medications. After learning more about the specific client needs, the social worker can identify opportunities for improvements in an updated care plan.

In policy and program development, social workers conduct needs assessments to determine where and how to effect change on a much larger scale. Integral to social work at all levels, needs assessments reveal crucial information about a population’s needs to researchers, policymakers and other stakeholders. Needs assessments may fall short, however, in revealing the root causes of those needs (e.g., structural racism).

Randomized Controlled Trials

Randomized controlled trials are studies in which a randomly selected group is subjected to a variable (e.g., a specific stimulus or treatment) and a control group is not. Social workers then measure and compare the results of the randomized group with the control group in order to glean insights about the effectiveness of a particular intervention or treatment.

Randomized controlled trials are easily reproducible and highly measurable. They’re useful when results are easily quantifiable. However, this method is less helpful when results are not easily quantifiable (i.e., when rich data such as narratives and on-the-ground observations are needed).

Descriptive Studies

Descriptive studies immerse the researcher in another context or culture to study specific participant practices or ways of living. Descriptive studies, including descriptive ethnographic studies, may overlap with and include other research methods:

• Informant interviews
• Census data
• Observation

By using descriptive studies, researchers may glean a richer, deeper understanding of a nuanced culture or group on-site. The main limitations of this research method are that it tends to be time-consuming and expensive.

Single-System Designs

Unlike most medical studies, which involve testing a drug or treatment on two groups — an experimental group that receives the drug/treatment and a control group that does not — single-system designs allow researchers to study just one group (e.g., an individual or family).

Single-system designs typically entail studying a single group over a long period of time and may involve assessing the group’s response to multiple variables.

For example, consider a study on how media consumption affects a person’s mood. One way to test a hypothesis that consuming media correlates with low mood would be to observe two groups: a control group (no media) and an experimental group (two hours of media per day). When employing a single-system design, however, researchers would observe a single participant as they watch two hours of media per day for one week and then four hours per day of media the next week.

These designs allow researchers to test multiple variables over a longer period of time. However, similar to descriptive studies, single-system designs can be fairly time-consuming and costly.

Learn More About Social Work Research Methods

Social workers have the opportunity to improve the social environment by advocating for the vulnerable — including children, older adults and people with disabilities — and facilitating and developing resources and programs.

Learn more about how you can earn your  Master of Social Work online at Virginia Commonwealth University . The highest-ranking school of social work in Virginia, VCU has a wide range of courses online. That means students can earn their degrees with the flexibility of learning at home. Learn more about how you can take your career in social work further with VCU.

From M.S.W. to LCSW: Understanding Your Career Path as a Social Worker

How Palliative Care Social Workers Support Patients With Terminal Illnesses

How to Become a Social Worker in Health Care

Gov.uk, Mixed Methods Study

MVS Open Press, Foundations of Social Work Research

Open Social Work Education, Scientific Inquiry in Social Work

Open Social Work, Graduate Research Methods in Social Work: A Project-Based Approach

Routledge, Research for Social Workers: An Introduction to Methods

SAGE Publications, Research Methods for Social Work: A Problem-Based Approach

Theory and Society, Mixed Methods Research: What It Is and What It Could Be

READY TO GET STARTED WITH OUR ONLINE M.S.W. PROGRAM FORMAT?

Bachelor’s degree is required.

VCU Program Helper

This AI chatbot provides automated responses, which may not always be accurate. By continuing with this conversation, you agree that the contents of this chat session may be transcribed and retained. You also consent that this chat session and your interactions, including cookie usage, are subject to our privacy policy .

The link between social work research and practice

When thinking about social work, some may consider the field to solely focus on clinical interventions with individuals or groups.

There may be a mistaken impression that research is not a part of the social work profession. This is completely false. Rather, the two have been and will continue to need to be intertwined.

This guide covers why social workers should care about research, how both social work practice and social work research influence and guide each other, how to build research skills both as a student and as a professional working in the field, and the benefits of being a social worker with strong research skills. 

A selection of social work research jobs are also discussed.  

• Social workers and research
• Evidence-based practice
• Practice and research
• Research and practice
• Build research skills
• Social worker as researcher
• Benefits of research skills
• Research jobs

Why should social workers care about research?

Sometimes it may seem as though social work practice and social work research are two separate tracks running parallel to each other – they both seek to improve the lives of clients, families and communities, but they don’t interact. This is not the way it is supposed to work.

Research and practice should be intertwined, with each affecting the other and improving processes on both ends, so that it leads to better outcomes for the population we’re serving.

Section 5 of the NASW Social Work Code of Ethics is focused on social workers’ ethical responsibilities to the social work profession. There are two areas in which research is mentioned in upholding our ethical obligations: for the integrity of the profession (section 5.01) and for evaluation and research (section 5.02). 

Some of the specific guidance provided around research and social work include:

• 5.01(b): …Social workers should protect, enhance, and improve the integrity of the profession through appropriate study and research, active discussion, and responsible criticism of the profession.
• 5.01(d): Social workers should contribute to the knowledge base of social work and share with colleagues their knowledge related to practice, research, and ethics…
• 5.02(a) Social workers should monitor and evaluate policies, the implementation of programs, and practice interventions.
• 5.02(b) Social workers should promote and facilitate evaluation and research to contribute to the development of knowledge.
• 5.02(c) Social workers should critically examine and keep current with emerging knowledge relevant to social work and fully use evaluation and research evidence in their professional practice.
• 5.02(q) Social workers should educate themselves, their students, and their colleagues about responsible research practices.

Evidence-based practice and evidence-based treatment

In order to strengthen the profession and determine that the interventions we are providing are, in fact, effective, we must conduct research. When research and practice are intertwined, this leads practitioners to develop evidence-based practice (EBP) and evidence-based treatment (EBT).

Evidence-based practice is, according to The National Association of Social Workers (NASW) , a process involving creating an answerable question based on a client or organizational need, locating the best available evidence to answer the question, evaluating the quality of the evidence as well as its applicability, applying the evidence, and evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of the solution. 

Evidence-based treatment is any practice that has been established as effective through scientific research according to a set of explicit criteria (Drake et al., 2001). These are interventions that, when applied consistently, routinely produce improved client outcomes. 

For example, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) was one of a variety of interventions for those with anxiety disorders. Researchers wondered if CBT was better than other intervention options in producing positive, consistent results for clients.

So research was conducted comparing multiple types of interventions, and the evidence (research results) demonstrated that CBT was the best intervention.

The anecdotal evidence from practice combined with research evidence determined that CBT should become the standard treatment for those diagnosed with anxiety. Now more social workers are getting trained in CBT methods in order to offer this as a treatment option to their clients.

How does social work practice affect research?

Social work practice provides the context and content for research. For example, agency staff was concerned about the lack of nutritional food in their service area, and heard from clients that it was too hard to get to a grocery store with a variety of foods, because they didn’t have transportation, or public transit took too long. 

So the agency applied for and received a grant to start a farmer’s market in their community, an urban area that was considered a food desert. This program accepted their state’s version of food stamps as a payment option for the items sold at the farmer’s market.

The agency used their passenger van to provide free transportation to and from the farmer’s market for those living more than four blocks from the market location.

The local university also had a booth each week at the market with nursing and medical students checking blood pressure and providing referrals to community agencies that could assist with medical needs. The agency was excited to improve the health of its clients by offering this program.

But how does the granting foundation know if this was a good use of their money? This is where research and evaluation comes in. Research could gather data to answer a number of questions. Here is but a small sample:

• How many community members visited each week and purchased fruits and vegetables? 
• How many took advantage of the transportation provided, and how many walked to the market? 
• How many took advantage of the blood pressure checks? Were improvements seen in those numbers for those having repeat blood pressure readings throughout the market season? 
• How much did the self-reported fruit and vegetable intake increase for customers? 
• What barriers did community members report in visiting and buying food from the market (prices too high? Inconvenient hours?)
• Do community members want the program to continue next year?
• Was the program cost-effective, or did it waste money by paying for a driver and for gasoline to offer free transportation that wasn’t utilized? What are areas where money could be saved without compromising the quality of the program?
• What else needs to be included in this program to help improve the health of community members?

How does research affect social work practice?

Research can guide practice to implement proven strategies. It can also ask the ‘what if’ or ‘how about’ questions that can open doors for new, innovative interventions to be developed (and then research the effectiveness of those interventions).

Engel and Schutt (2017) describe four categories of research used in social work:

• Descriptive research is research in which social phenomena are defined and described. A descriptive research question would be ‘How many homeless women with substance use disorder live in the metro area?’
• Exploratory research seeks to find out how people get along in the setting under question, what meanings they give to their actions, and what issues concern them. An example research question would be ‘What are the barriers to homeless women with substance use disorder receiving treatment services?’
• Explanatory research seeks to identify causes and effects of social phenomena. It can be used to rule out other explanations for findings and show how two events are related to each other.  An explanatory research question would be ‘Why do women with substance use disorder become homeless?’
• Evaluation research describes or identifies the impact of social programs and policies. This type of research question could be ‘How effective was XYZ treatment-first program that combined housing and required drug/alcohol abstinence in keeping women with substance use disorder in stable housing 2 years after the program ended?’

Each of the above types of research can answer important questions about the population, setting or intervention being provided. This can help practitioners determine which option is most effective or cost-efficient or that clients are most likely to adhere to. In turn, this data allows social workers to make informed choices on what to keep in their practice, and what needs changing. 

How to build research skills while in school

There are a number of ways to build research skills while a student.  BSW and MSW programs require a research course, but there are other ways to develop these skills beyond a single class:

• Volunteer to help a professor working in an area of interest. Professors are often excited to share their knowledge and receive extra assistance from students with similar interests.
• Participate in student research projects where you’re the subject. These are most often found in psychology departments. You can learn a lot about the informed consent process and how data is collected by volunteering as a research participant.  Many of these studies also pay a small amount, so it’s an easy way to earn a bit of extra money while you’re on campus. 
• Create an independent study research project as an elective and work with a professor who is an expert in an area you’re interested in.  You’d design a research study, collect the data, analyze it, and write a report or possibly even an article you can submit to an academic journal.
• Some practicum programs will have you complete a small evaluation project or assist with a larger research project as part of your field education hours. 
• In MSW programs, some professors hire students to conduct interviews or enter data on their funded research projects. This could be a good part time job while in school.
• Research assistant positions are more common in MSW programs, and these pay for some or all your tuition in exchange for working a set number of hours per week on a funded research project.

How to build research skills while working as a social worker

Social service agencies are often understaffed, with more projects to complete than there are people to complete them.

Taking the initiative to volunteer to survey clients about what they want and need, conduct an evaluation on a program, or seeing if there is data that has been previously collected but not analyzed and review that data and write up a report can help you stand out from your peers, be appreciated by management and other staff, and may even lead to a raise, a promotion, or even new job opportunities because of the skills you’ve developed.

Benefits of being a social worker with strong research skills

Social workers with strong research skills can have the opportunity to work on various projects, and at higher levels of responsibility. 

Many can be promoted into administration level positions after demonstrating they understand how to conduct, interpret and report research findings and apply those findings to improving the agency and their programs.

There’s also a level of confidence knowing you’re implementing proven strategies with your clients. 

Social work research jobs

There are a number of ways in which you can blend interests in social work and research. A quick search on Glassdoor.com and Indeed.com retrieved the following positions related to social work research:

• Research Coordinator on a clinical trial offering psychosocial supportive interventions and non-addictive pain treatments to minimize opioid use for pain.
• Senior Research Associate leading and overseeing research on a suite of projects offered in housing, mental health and corrections.
• Research Fellow in a school of social work
• Project Policy Analyst for large health organization
• Health Educator/Research Specialist to implement and evaluate cancer prevention and screening programs for a health department
• Research Interventionist providing Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for insomnia patients participating in a clinical trial
• Research Associate for Child Care and Early Education
• Social Services Data Researcher for an organization serving adults with disabilities.
• Director of Community Health Equity Research Programs evaluating health disparities.

No matter your population or area of interest, you’d likely be able to find a position that integrated research and social work. 

Social work practice and research are and should remain intertwined. This is the only way we can know what questions to ask about the programs and services we are providing, and ensure our interventions are effective. 

There are many opportunities to develop research skills while in school and while working in the field, and these skills can lead to some interesting positions that can make a real difference to clients, families and communities. 

Drake, R. E., Goldman, H., Leff, H. S., Lehman, A. F., Dixon, L., Mueser, K. T., et al. (2001). Implementing evidence-based practices in routine mental health service settings. Psychiatric Services, 52(2), 179-182. 

Engel, R.J., & Schutt, R.K. (2017). The Practice of Research in Social Work. Sage.

National Association of Social Workers. (n.d). Evidence Based Practice. Retrieved from: https://www.socialworkers.org/News/Research-Data/Social-Work-Policy-Research/Evidence-Based-Practice

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

1.1 How do social workers know what to do?

Learning objectives.

• Reflect on how we know what to do as social workers
• Differentiate between micro-, meso-, and macro-level analysis
• Describe intuition, its purpose in social work, and its limitations
• Identify specific types of cognitive biases and how the influence thought
• Define scientific inquiry

What would you do?

Imagine you are a clinical social worker at a children’s mental health agency.  Today, you receive a referral from your town’s middle school about a client who often skips school, gets into fights, and is disruptive in class.  The school has suspended him and met with the parents multiple times, who say they practice strict discipline at home. Yet, the client’s behavior only gotten worse.  When you arrive at the school to meet with the boy, you notice he has difficulty maintaining eye contact with you, appears distracted, and has a few bruises on his legs.  At the same time, he is also a gifted artist, and you two spend the hour in which you assess him painting and drawing.

• Given the strengths and challenges you notice, what interventions would you select for this client and how would you know your interventions worked?

Imagine you are a social worker in an urban food desert, a geographic area in which there is no grocery store that sells fresh food.  Many of your low-income clients rely on food from the dollar store or convenience stores in order to live or simply order takeout.  You are becoming concerned about your clients’ health, as many of them are obese and say they are unable to buy fresh food.  Because convenience stores are more expensive and your clients mostly survive on minimum wage jobs or Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, they often have to rely on food pantries towards the end of the month once their money runs out.  You have spent the past month building a coalition composed of members from your community, including non-profit agencies, religious groups, and healthcare workers to lobby your city council.

• How should your group address the issue of food deserts in your community?  What intervention do you suggest?  How would you know if your intervention worked?

You are a social worker working at a public policy center focused on homelessness.  Your city is seeking a large federal grant to address the growing problem of homelessness in your city and has hired you as a consultant to work on the grant proposal.  After conducting a needs assessment in collaboration with local social service agencies and interviewing people who are homeless, you meet with city councilmembers to talk about your options to create a program.  Local agencies want to spend the money to build additional capacity at existing shelters in the community.  They also want to create a transitional housing program at an unused apartment complex where people can live after the shelter and learn independent living skills.  On the other hand, the clients you interview want to receive housing vouchers so they can rent an apartment from a landlord in the community.  They also fear the agencies running the shelter and transitional housing program would dictate how to live their lives and impose unnecessary rules, like restrictions on guests or quiet hours.  When you ask the agencies about client feedback, they state that clients could not be trusted to manage in their own apartments and need the structure and supervision provided by agency support workers.

• What kind of program should your city choose to implement?  Which program is most likely to be effective?

Assuming you’ve taken a social work course before, you will notice that the case studies cover different levels of analysis in the social ecosystem—micro, meso, and macro.  At the micro-level , social workers examine the smallest levels of interaction; even in some cases, just “the self” alone. That is our child in case 1.  When social workers investigate groups and communities, such as our food desert in case 2, their inquiry is at the meso-level . At the macro-level , social workers examine social structures and institutions. Research at the macro-level examines large-scale patterns, including culture and government policy, as in case 3. These domains interact with each other, and it is common for a social work research project to address more than one level of analysis. Moreover, research that occurs on one level is likely to have implications at the other levels of analysis.

How do social workers know what to do?

Welcome to social work research.  This chapter begins with three problems that social workers might face in practice and three questions about what a social worker should do next.  If you haven’t already, spend a minute or two thinking about how you would respond to each case and jot down some notes.  How would you respond to each of these cases?

For many of you this textbook will likely come at an early point in your social work education, so it may seem unfair to ask you what the right answers are.  And to disappoint you further, this course will not teach you the right answer to these questions.  It will, however, teach you how to answer these questions for yourself.  Social workers must learn how to examine the literature on a topic, come to a reasoned conclusion, and use that knowledge in their practice.  Similarly, social workers engage in research to make sure their interventions are helping, not harming, clients and to contribute to social science as well as social justice.

Again, assuming you did not have advanced knowledge of the topics  in the case studies, when you thought about what you might do in those practice situations, you were likely using intuition  (Cheung, 2016). Intuition is a way of knowing that is mostly unconscious.  You simply have a gut feeling about what you should do.  As you think about a problem such as those in the case studies, you notice certain details and ignore others.  Using your past experiences, you apply knowledge that seems to be relevant and make predictions about what might be true.

In this way, intuition is based on direct experience .  Many of us know things simply because we’ve experienced them directly. For example, you would know that electric fences can be pretty dangerous and painful if you touched one while standing in a puddle of water. We all probably have times we can recall when we learned something because we experienced it. If you grew up in Minnesota, you would observe plenty of kids learning each winter that it really is true that your tongue will stick to metal if it’s very cold outside. Similarly, if you passed a police officer on a two-lane highway while driving 20 miles over the speed limit, you would probably learn that that’s a good way to earn a traffic ticket.

Intuition and direct experience are powerful forces.  Uniquely, social work is a discipline that values intuition, though it will take quite a while for you to develop what social workers refer to as practice   wisdom .  Practice wisdom is the “learning by doing” that develops as one practices social work over a period of time.  Social workers also reflect on their practice, independently and with colleagues, which sharpens their intuitions and opens their mind to other viewpoints.  While your direct experience in social work may be limited at this point, feel confident that through reflective practice you will attain practice wisdom.

However, it’s important to note that intuitions are not always correct.  Think back to the first case study.  What might be your novice diagnosis for this child’s behavior?  Does he have attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) because he is distractible and getting into trouble at school?  Or are those symptoms of autism spectrum disorder or an attachment disorder?  Are the bruises on his legs an indicator of ADHD, or do they indicate possible physical abuse at home?  Even if you arrived at an accurate assessment of the situation, you would still need to figure out what kind of intervention to use with the client.  If he has a mental health issue, you might say, “give him therapy.”  Well…what kind of therapy?  Should we use cognitive-behavioral therapy, play therapy, art therapy, family therapy, or animal assisted therapy?  Should we try a combination of therapy and medication prescribed by a psychiatrist?

We could guess which intervention would be best…but in practice, that would be highly unethical.  If we guessed wrong, we could be wasting time, or worse, actively harming a client.  We need to ground our social work interventions with clients and systems with something more secure than our intuition and experience.

Cognitive biases

Although the human mind is a marvel of observation and data analysis, there are universal flaws in thinking that must be overcome.  We all rely on mental shortcuts to help us make sense of a continuous stream of new information.  All people, including me and you, must train our minds to be aware of predictable flaws in thinking, termed cognitive biases .  Here is a link to the Wikipedia entry on cognitive biases .  As you can see, it is quite long.  We will review some of the most important ones here, but take a minute and browse around to get a sense of how baked-in cognitive biases are to how humans think.

The most important cognitive bias for social scientists to be aware of is confirmation bias .  Confirmation bias involves observing and analyzing information in a way that confirms what you already think is true.  No person is a blank slate.  We all arrive at each moment with a set of beliefs, experiences, and models of how the world works that we develop over time.  Often, these are grounded in our own personal experiences.  Confirmation bias assumes these intuitions are correct and ignores or manipulates new information order to avoid challenging what we already believe to be true.

Confirmation bias can be seen in many ways.  Sometimes, people will only pay attention to the information that fits their preconceived ideas and ignore information that does not fit.  This is called selective observation .  Other times, people will make hasty conclusions about a broad pattern based on only a few observations.  This is called overgeneralization .  Let’s walk through an example and see how they each would function.

In our second case study, we are trying to figure out how to help people who receive SNAP (formerly Food Stamps) who live in a food desert.  Let’s say that we have arrived at a solution and are now lobbying the city council to implement it.  There are many people who have negative beliefs about people who are “on welfare.”  These people believe individuals who receive social welfare benefits spend their money irresponsibly, are too lazy to get a job, and manipulate the system to maintain or increase their government payout. People expressing this belief may provide an example like Louis Cuff , who bought steak and lobster with his SNAP benefits and resold them for a profit.

City council members who hold these beliefs may ignore the truth about your client population—that people experiencing poverty usually spend their money responsibly and genuinely need help accessing fresh and healthy food.  This would be an example of selective observation, only looking at the cases that confirm their biased beliefs about people in poverty and ignoring evidence that challenges that perspective.  Likely, these are grounded in overgeneralization, in which one example, like Mr. Cuff, is applied broadly to the population of people using social welfare programs.  Social workers in this situation would have to hope that city council members are open to another perspective and can be swayed by evidence that challenges their beliefs.  Otherwise, they will continue to rely on a biased view of people in poverty when they create policies.

But where do these beliefs and biases come from?  Perhaps, someone who the person considers an authority told them that people in poverty are lazy and manipulative.  Naively relying on authority can take many forms.  We might rely on our parents, friends, or religious leaders as authorities on a topic.  We might consult someone who identifies as an expert in the field and simply follow what they say.  We might hop aboard a “bandwagon” and adopt the fashionable ideas and theories of our peers and friends.

Now, it is important to note that experts in the field should generally be trusted to provide well-informed answers on a topic, though that knowledge should be receptive to skeptical critique and will develop over time as more scholars study the topic.  There are limits to skepticism, however.  Disagreeing with experts about global warming, the shape of the earth, or the efficacy and safety of vaccines does not make one free of cognitive biases.  On the contrary, it is likely that the person is falling victim to the Dunning -Kruger effect , in which unskilled people overestimate their ability to find the truth.  As this comic illustrates, they are at the top of Mount Stupid.  Only through rigorous, scientific inquiry can they progress down the back slope and hope to increase their depth of knowledge about a topic.

Scientific Inquiry

Cognitive biases are most often expressed when people are using informal observation.  Until you read the question at the beginning of this chapter, you may have had little reason to formally observe and make sense of information about children’s mental health, food deserts, or homelessness policy.  Because you engaged in informal observation, it is more likely that you will express cognitive biases in your responses.  The problem with informal observation is that sometimes it is right, and sometimes it is wrong. And without any systematic process for observing or assessing the accuracy of our observations, we can never really be sure that our informal observations are accurate.  In order to minimize the effect of cognitive biases and come up with the truest understanding of a topic, we must apply a systematic framework for understanding what we observe.

The opposite of informal observation is scientific inquiry, used interchangeably with the term  research methods  in this text.  These terms refer to an organized, logical way of knowing that involves both theory and observation.  Science accounts for the limitations of cognitive biases—not perfectly, though—by ensuring observations are done rigorously, following a prescribed set of steps.  Scientists clearly describe the methods they use to conduct observations and create theories about the social world.  Theories are tested by observing the social world, and they can be shown to be false or incomplete.  In short, scientists try to learn the truth.  Social workers use scientific truths in their practice and conduct research to revise and extend our understanding of what is true in the social world.  Social workers who ignore science and act based on biased or informal observation may actively harm clients.

Key Takeaways

• Social work research occurs on the micro-, meso-, and macro-level.
• Intuition is a power, though woefully incomplete, guide to action in social work.
• All human thought is subject to cognitive biases.
• Scientific inquiry accounts for cognitive biases by applying an organized, logical way of observing and theorizing about the world.
• Authority- learning by listening to what people in authority say is true
• Cognitive biases- predictable flaws in thinking
• Confirmation bias- observing and analyzing information in a way that confirms what you already think is true
• Direct experience- learning through informal observation
• Dunning-Kruger effect- when unskilled people overestimate their ability and knowledge (and experts underestimate their ability and knowledge)
• Intuition- your “gut feeling” about what to do
• Macro-level- examining social structures and institutions
• Meso-level- examining interaction between groups
• Micro-level- examining the smallest levels of interaction, usually individuals
• Overgeneralization- using limited observations to make assumptions about broad patterns
• Practice wisdom- “learning by doing” that guides social work intervention and increases over time
• Research methods- an organized, logical way of knowing based on theory and observation

Image Attributions

Thinking woman by Free-Photos via Pixabay CC-0

Light bulb by MasterTux via Pixabay CC-0

Foundations of Social Work Research Copyright © 2020 by Rebecca L. Mauldin is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

Scientific Inquiry in Social Work

(9 reviews)

Matthew DeCarlo, Radford University

Copyright Year: 2018

ISBN 13: 9781975033729

Publisher: Open Social Work Education

Language: English

Formats Available

Conditions of use.

Learn more about reviews.

Reviewed by Shannon Blajeski, Assistant Professor, Portland State University on 3/10/23

This book provides an introduction to research and inquiry in social work with an applied focus geared for the MSW student. The text covers 16 chapters, including several dedicated to understanding how to begin the research process, a chapter on... read more

Comprehensiveness rating: 5 see less

This book provides an introduction to research and inquiry in social work with an applied focus geared for the MSW student. The text covers 16 chapters, including several dedicated to understanding how to begin the research process, a chapter on ethics, and then eight chapters dedicated to research methods. The subchapters (1-5 per chapter) are concise and focused while also being tied to current knowledge and events so as to hold the reader's attention. It is comprehensive, but some of the later chapters covering research methods as well as the final chapter seem a bit scant and could be expanded. The glossary at the end of each chapter is helpful as is the index that is always accessible from the left-hand drop-down menu.

Content Accuracy rating: 4

The author pulls in relevant current and recent public events to illustrate important points about social research throughout the book. Each sub-chapter reads as accurate. I did not come across any inaccuracies in the text, however I would recommend a change in the title of Chapter 15 as "real world research" certainly encompasses more than program evaluation, single-subject designs, and action research.

Relevance/Longevity rating: 5

Another major strength of this book is that it adds currency to engage the reader while also maintaining its relevance to research methods. None of the current events/recent events that are described seem dated nor will they fade from relevance in a number of years. In addition, the concise nature of the modules should make them easy to update when needed to maintain relevancy in future editions.

Clarity rating: 5

Clarity is a major strength of this textbook. As described in the interface section, this book is written to be clear and concise, without unnecessary extra text that detracts from the concise content provided in each chapter. Any lengthy excerpts are also very engaging which lends itself to a clear presentation of content for the reader.

Consistency rating: 5

The text and content seems to be presented consistently throughout the book. Terminology and frameworks are balanced with real-world examples and current events.

Modularity rating: 5

The chapters of this textbook are appropriately spaced and easily digestible, particularly for readers with time constraints. Each chapter contains 3-5 sub-chapters that build upon each other in a scaffolding style. This makes it simple for the instructor to assign each chapter (sometimes two) per weekly session as well as add in additional assigned readings to complement the text.

Organization/Structure/Flow rating: 5

The overall organization of the chapters flow well. The book begins with a typical introduction to research aimed at social work practitioners or new students in social work. It then moves into a set of chapters on beginning a research project, reviewing literature, and asking research questions, followed by a chapter on ethics. Next, the text transitions to three chapters covering constructs, measurement, and sampling, followed by five chapters covering research methods, and a closing chapter on dissemination of research. This is one of the more logically-organized research methods texts that I have used as an instructor.

Interface rating: 5

The modular chapters are easy to navigate and the interface of each chapter follows a standard presentation style with the reading followed by a short vocabulary glossary and references. This presentation lends itself to a familiarity for students that helps them become more efficient with completing reading assignments, even in short bursts of time. This is particularly important for online and returning learners who may juggle their assignment time with family and work obligations.

Grammatical Errors rating: 5

No grammatical errors were noted.

Cultural Relevance rating: 4

At first glance at the table of contents, the book doesn't seem to be overtly committed to cultural representation, however, upon reading the chapters, it becomes clear that the author does try to represent and reference marginalized groups (e.g., women, individuals with disabilities, racial/ethnic/gender intersectionality) within the examples used. I also am very appreciative that the bottom of each introduction page for each chapter contains content trigger warnings for any possible topics that could be upsetting, e.g., substance abuse, violence.

As the author likely knows, social work students are eager to engage in learning that is current and relevant to their social causes. This book is written in a way that engages a non-researcher social worker into reading about research by weaving research information into topics that they might find compelling. It also does this in a concise way where short bits of pertinent information are presented, making the text accessible without needing to sustain long periods of attention. This is particularly important for online and returning learners who may need to sit with their readings in short bursts due to attending school while juggling work and family obligations.

Reviewed by Lynn Goerdt, Associate Professor, University of Wisconsin - Superior on 9/17/21

Text appears to be comprehensive in covering steps for typical SWK research class, taking students from the introduction of the purpose and importance of research to how to design and analyze research. Author covers the multitude of ways that... read more

Text appears to be comprehensive in covering steps for typical SWK research class, taking students from the introduction of the purpose and importance of research to how to design and analyze research. Author covers the multitude of ways that social workers engage in research as way of building knowledge and ways that social work practitioners conduct research to evaluate their practice, including outcome evaluation, single subject design, and action research. I particularly appreciated the last section on reporting research, which should be very practical.

Overall, content appears mostly accurate which few errors. Definitions and citations are mostly thorough and clear. Author does cite Wikipedia in at least one occasion which could be credible, depending on the source of the Wikipedia content. There were a few references within the text to comic or stories but the referenced material was not always apparent.

Relevance/Longevity rating: 4

The content of Scientific Inquiry for Social Work is relevant, as the field of social work research methods does not appear to change quickly, although there are innovations. The author referenced examples which appear to be recent and likely relatable to interests of current students. Primary area of innovation is in using technology for the collection and analysis of data, which could be expanded, particularly using social media for soliciting research participants.

Style is personable and content appears to be accessible, which is a unique attribute for a research textbook. Author uses first person in many instances, particularly in the beginning to present the content as relatable.

Format appears to be consistent in format and relative length. Each chapter includes learning objectives, content advisory (if applicable), key takeaways and glossary. Author uses color and text boxes to draw attention to these sections.

Modularity rating: 4

Text is divided into modules which could easily be assigned and reviewed in a class. The text modules could also be re-structured if desired to fit curricular uniqueness’s. Author uses images to illuminate the concepts of the module or chapter, but they often take about 1/3 of the page, which extends the size of the textbook quite a bit. Unclear if benefit of images outweighs additional cost if PDF version is printed.

Textbook is organized in a very logical and clear fashion. Each section appears to be approximately 6-10 pages in length which seems to be an optimal length for student attention and comprehension.

Interface rating: 4

There were some distortions of the text (size and visibility) but they were a fairly minor distraction and did not appear to reduce access to the content. Otherwise text was easy to navigate.

Grammatical Errors rating: 4

No grammatical errors were noted but hyperlinks to outside content were referenced but not always visible which occasionally resulted in an awkward read. Specific link may be in resources section of each chapter but occasionally they were also included in the text.

I did not recognize any text which was culturally insensitive or offensive. Images used which depicted people, appeared to represent diverse experiences, cultures, settings and persons. Did notice image depicting homelessness appeared to be stereotypical person sleeping on sidewalk, which can perpetuate a common perception of homelessness. Would encourage author to consider images representing a wider range of experiences of a social phenomena. Content advisories are used for each section, which is not necessarily cultural relevance but is respectful and recognizes the diversity of experiences and triggers that the readers may have.

Overall, I was very impressed and encouraged with the well organized content and thoughtful flow of this important textbook for social work students and instructors. The length and readability of each chapter would likely be appreciated by instructors as well as students, increasing the extent that the learning outcomes would be achieved. Teaching research is very challenging because the content and application can feel very intimidating. The author also has provided access to supplemental resources such as presentations and assignments.

Reviewed by elaine gatewood, Adjunct Faculty, Bridgewater State University on 6/15/21

The book provides concrete and clear information on using research as consumers, It provides a comprehensive review of each step to take to develop a research project from beginning to completion, with examples. read more

The book provides concrete and clear information on using research as consumers, It provides a comprehensive review of each step to take to develop a research project from beginning to completion, with examples.

Content Accuracy rating: 5

From my perspective, content is highly accurate in the field of learning research method and unbiased. It's all there!

The content is highly relevant and up-to-date in the field. The book is written and arranged in a way that its easy to follow along with adding updates.

The book is written in clear and concise. The book provides appropriate context for any jargon/technical terminology used along with examples which readers are able to follow along and understand.

The contents of the book flow quite well. The framework in the book is consistent.

The text appears easily adaptable for readers and the author also provides accompanying PowerPoint presentations; these are a good foundation tools for readers to use and implement.

Organization/Structure/Flow rating: 4

The contents of the book flow very well. Readers would be able to put into practice the key reading strategies shared in the book ) because its organization is laid out nicely

Interface rating: 3

The interface is generally good, but I was only able to download the .pdf. This may present issues for some student readers.

There are no grammatical errors.

The text was culturally relevant and provided diverse research and practice examples. The text could have benefited from sexamples of intersectional and anti-oppressive lenses for students to consider in their practice.

This text is a comprehensive introduction to research that can be easily adapted for a BSW/MSW research course.

Reviewed by Taylor Hall, Assistant Professor, Bridgewater State University on 6/30/20

This text is more comprehensive than the text I currently use in my Research Methods in Social Work course, which students have to pay for. This text not only covers both qualitative and quantitative research methods, but also all parts of the... read more

This text is more comprehensive than the text I currently use in my Research Methods in Social Work course, which students have to pay for. This text not only covers both qualitative and quantitative research methods, but also all parts of the research process from thinking about research ideas to questions all the way to evaluation after social work programs/policies have been employed.

Not much to say here- with research methods, things are black and white; it is or isn't. This content is accurate. I also like to way the content is explained in light of social work values and ethics. This is something our students can struggle with, and this is helpful in terms of showing why social work needs to pay attention to research.

There are upcoming changes to CSWE's competencies, therefore lots of text materials are going to need to be updated soon. Otherwise, case examples are pertinent and timely.

Clarity rating: 4

I think that research methods for social workers is a difficult field of study. Many go into the field to be clinicians, and few understand (off the bat) the importance of understanding methods of research. I think this textbook makes it clear to me, but hard to rate a 5 as I know from a student's perspective, lots of the terminology is so new.

Appears to be so- I was able to follow, seems consistent.

Yes- and I think this is a strong point of this text. This was easy to follow and read, and I could see myself easily divvying up different sections for students to work on in groups.

Yes- makes sense to me and the way I teach this course. I like the 30,000 ft view then honing in on specific types of research, all along the way explaining the different pieces of the research process and in writing a research paper.

I sometimes struggle with online platforms versus in person texts to read, and this OER is visually appealing- there is not too much text on the pages, it is spaced in a way that makes it easier to read. Colors are used well to highlight pertinent information.

Not something I found in this text.

Cultural Relevance rating: 3

This is a place where I feel the text could use some work. A nod to past wrongdoings in research methods on oppressed groups, and more of a discussion on social work's role in social justice with an eye towards righting the wrongs of the past. Updated language re: person first language, more diverse examples, etc.

This is a very useful text, and I am going to recommend my department check it out for future use, especially as many of our students are first gen and working class and would love to save money on textbooks where possible.

Reviewed by Olubunmi Oyewuwo-Gassikia, Assistant Professor, Northeastern Illinois University on 5/5/20

This text is an appropriate and comprehensive introduction to research methods for BSW students. It guides the reader through each stage of the research project, including identifying a research question, conducting and writing a literature... read more

This text is an appropriate and comprehensive introduction to research methods for BSW students. It guides the reader through each stage of the research project, including identifying a research question, conducting and writing a literature review, research ethics, theory, research design, methodology, sampling, and dissemination. The author explains complex concepts - such as paradigms, epistemology, and ontology - in clear, simple terms and through the use of practical, social work examples for the reader. I especially appreciated the balanced attention to quantitative and qualitative methods, including the explanation of data collection and basic analysis techniques for both. The text could benefit from the inclusion of an explanation of research design notations.

The text is accurate and unbiased. Additionally, the author effectively incorporates referenced sources, including sources one can use for further learning.

The content is relevant and timely. The author incorporates real, recent research examples that reflects the applicability of research at each level of social practice (micro, meso, and macro) throughout the text. The text will benefit from regular updates in research examples.

The text is written in a clear, approachable manner. The chapters are a reasonable length without sacrificing appropriate depth into the subject manner.

The text is consistent throughout. The author is effective in reintroducing previously explained terms from previous chapters.

The text appears easily adaptable. The instructions provided by the author on how to adapt the text for one's course are helpful to one who would like to use the text but not in its entirety. The author also provides accompanying PowerPoint presentations; these are a good foundation but will likely require tailoring based on the teaching style of the instructor.

Generally, the text flows well. However, chapter 5 (Ethics) should come earlier, preferably before chapter 3 (Reviewing & Evaluating the Literature). It is important that students understand research ethics as ethical concerns are an important aspect of evaluating the quality of research studies. Chapter 15 (Real-World Research) should also come earlier in the text, most suitably before or after chapter 7 (Design and Causality).

The interface is generally good, but I was only able to download the .pdf. The setup of the .pdf is difficult to navigate, especially if one wants to jump from chapter to chapter. This may present issues for the student reader.

The text was culturally relevant and provided diverse research and practice examples. The text could have benefited from more critical research examples, such as examples of research studies that incorporate intersectional and anti-oppressive lenses.

This text is a comprehensive introduction to research that can be easily adapted for a BSW level research course.

Reviewed by Smita Dewan, Assistant Professor, New York City College of Technology, Department of Human Services on 12/6/19

This is a very good introductory research methodology textbook for undergraduate students of social work or human services. For students who might be intimidated by social research, the text provides assurance that by learning basic concepts of... read more

Comprehensiveness rating: 4 see less

This is a very good introductory research methodology textbook for undergraduate students of social work or human services. For students who might be intimidated by social research, the text provides assurance that by learning basic concepts of research methodology, students will be better scholars and social work or human service practitioners. The content and flow of the text book supports a basic assignment of most research methodology courses which is to develop a research proposal or a research project. Each stage of research is explained well with many examples from social work practice that has the potential to keep the student engaged.

The glossary at the end of each chapter is very comprehensive but does not include the page number/s where the content is located. The glossary at the end of the book also lacks page numbers which might make it cumbersome for students seeking a quick reference.

The content is accurate and unbiased. Suggested exercises and prompts for students to engage in critical thinking and to identify biases in research that informs practice may help students understand the complexities of social research.

Content is up-to-date and concepts of research methodology presented is unlikely to be obsolete in the coming years. However, recent trends in research such as data mining, using algorithms for social policy and practice implications, privacy concerns, role of social media are topics that could be considered for inclusion in the forthcoming editions.

Content is presented very clearly for undergraduate students. Key takeaways and glossary for each section of the chapter is very useful for students.

Presentation of content, format and organization is consistent throughout the book.

Subsections within each chapter is very helpful for the students who might be assigned readings just in parts for the class.

Students would benefit from reading about research ethics right after the introductory chapter. I would also move Chapter 8 to right after the literature review which might inform creating and refining the research question. Content on evaluation research could also be moved up to follow the chapter on experimental designs. Regardless of the organization, the course instructors can assign chapters according to the course requirements.

PDF version of the book is very easy to use especially as students can save a copy on their computers and do not have to be online. Charts and tables are well presented but some of the images/photographs do not necessarily serve to enhance learning. Image attributions could be provided at the end of the chapter instead of being listed under the glossary. Students might also find it useful to be able to highlight the content and make annotations. This requires that students sign-in. Students should be able to highlight and annotate a downloaded version through Adobe Reader.

I did not find any grammatical errors.

Cultural Relevance rating: 5

Content is not insensitive or offensive in any way. Supporting examples in chapters are very diverse. Students would benefit from some examples of international research (both positive and negative examples) of protection of human subjects.

Reviewed by Jill Hoffman, Assistant Professor, Portland State University on 10/29/19

This text includes 16 chapters that cover content related to the process of conducting research. From identifying a topic and reviewing the literature, to formulating a question, designing a study, and disseminating findings, the text includes... read more

This text includes 16 chapters that cover content related to the process of conducting research. From identifying a topic and reviewing the literature, to formulating a question, designing a study, and disseminating findings, the text includes research basics that most other introductory social work research texts include. Content on ethics, theory, and to a lesser extent evaluation, single-subject design, and action research are also included. There is a glossary at the end of the text that includes information on the location of the terms. There is a practice behaviors index, but not an index in the traditional sense. If using the text electronically, search functions make it easy to find necessary information despite not having an index. If using a printed version, this would be more difficult. The text includes examples to illustrate concepts that are relevant to settings in which social workers might work. As most other introductory social work research texts, this book appears to come from a mainly positivist view. I would have appreciated more of a discussion related to power, privilege, and oppression and the role these play in the research topics that get studied and who benefits, along with anti-oppressive research. Related to evaluations, a quick mention of logic models would be helpful.

The information appears to be accurate and error free. The language in the text seems to emphasize "right/wrong" choices/decisions instead of highlighting the complexities of research and practice. Using gender-neutral pronouns would also make the language more inclusive.

Content appears to be up-to-date and relevant. Any updating would be straightforward to carry out. I found at least one link that did not work (e.g., NREPP) so if you use this text it will be important to check and make sure things are updated.

The content is clearly written, using examples to illustrate various concepts. I appreciated prompts for questions throughout each chapter in order to engage students in the content. Key terms are bolded, which helps to easily identify important points.

Information is presented in a consistent manner throughout the text.

Each chapter is divided into subsections that help with readability. It is easy to pick and choose various pieces of the text for your course if you're not using the entire thing.

There are many ways you can organize a social work research text. Personally, I prefer to talk about ethics and theory early on, so that students have this as a framework as they read about other's studies and design their own. In the case of this text, I'd put those two chapters right after chapter 1. As others have suggested, I'd also move up the content on research questions, perhaps after chapter 4.

In the online version, no significant interface issues arose. The only thing that would be helpful is to have chapter titles clearly presented when navigating through the text in the online version. For example, when you click through to a new chapter, the title simply says "6.0 Chapter introduction." In order to see the chapter title you have to click into the contents tab. Not a huge issue but could help with navigating the online version. In the pdf version, the links in the table of contents allowed me to navigate through to various sections. I did notice that some of the external links were not complete (e.g., on page 290, the URL is linked as "http://baby-").

Cultural representation in the text is similar to many other introductory social work research texts. There's more of an emphasis on white, western, cis-gendered individuals, particularly in the images. In examples, it appeared that only male/female pronouns were used.

Reviewed by Monica Roth Day, Associate Professor, Social Work, Metropolitan State University (Saint Paul, Minnesota) on 12/26/18

The book provides concrete and clear information on using research as consumers, then developing research as producers of knowledge. It provides a comprehensive review of each step to take to develop a research project from beginning to... read more

The book provides concrete and clear information on using research as consumers, then developing research as producers of knowledge. It provides a comprehensive review of each step to take to develop a research project from beginning to completion, with appropriate examples. More specific social work links would be helpful as students learn more about the field and the uses of research.

The book is accurate and communicates information and largely without bias. Numerous examples are provided from varied sources, which are then used to discuss potential for bias in research. The addition of critical race theory concepts would add to this discussion, to ground students in the importance of understanding implicit bias as researchers and ways to develop their own awareness.

The book is highly relevant. It provides historical and current examples of research which communicate concepts using accessible language that is current to social work. The text is written so that updates should be easy. Links need to be updated on a regular basis.

The book is accessible for students at it uses common language to communicate concepts while helping students build their research vocabulary. Terminology is communicate both within the text and in glossaries, and technical terms are minimally used.

The book is consistent in its use of terminology and framework. It follows a pattern of development, from consuming research to producing research. The steps are predictable and walk students through appropriate actions to take.

The book is easily readable. Each chapter is divided in sections that are easy to navigate and understand. Pictures and tables are used to support text.

Chapters are in logical order and follow a common pattern.

When reading the book online, the text was largely free of interface issues. As a PDF, there were issues with formatting. Be aware that students who may wish to download the book into a Kindle or other book reader may experience issues.

The text was grammatically correct with no misspellings.

While the book is culturally relevant, it lacks the application of critical race theory. While students will learn about bias in research, critical race theory would ground students in the importance of understanding implicit bias as researchers and ways to develop their own awareness. It would also help students understand why the background of researchers is important in relation to the ways of knowing.

Reviewed by Jennifer Wareham, Associate Professor, Wayne State University on 11/30/18

The book provides a comprehensive introduction to research methods from the perspective of the discipline of Social Work. The book borrows heavily from Amy Blackstone’s Principles of Sociological Inquiry – Qualitative and Quantitative Methods open... read more

The book provides a comprehensive introduction to research methods from the perspective of the discipline of Social Work. The book borrows heavily from Amy Blackstone’s Principles of Sociological Inquiry – Qualitative and Quantitative Methods open textbook. The book is divided into 16 chapters, covering: differences in reasoning and scientific thought, starting a research project, writing a literature review, ethics in social science research, how theory relates to research, research design, causality, measurement, sampling, survey research, experimental design, qualitative interviews and focus groups, evaluation research, and reporting research. Some of the more advanced concepts and topics are only covered at superficial level, which limits the intended population of readers to high school students, undergraduate students, or those with no background in research methods. Since the book is geared toward Social Work undergraduate students, the chapters and content address methodologies commonly used in this field, but ignore methodologies that may be more popular in other social science fields. For example, the material on qualitative methods is narrow and focuses on commonly used qualitative methods in Social Work. In addition, the chapter on evaluation is limited to a general overview of evaluation research, which could be improved with more in-depth discussion of different types of evaluation (e.g., needs assessment, evaluability assessment, process evaluation, impact/outcomes evaluation) and real-world examples of different types of evaluation implemented in Social Work. Overall, the author provides examples that are easy for practitioners in Social Work to understand, which are also easily relatable for students in similar disciplines such as criminal justice. The book provides a glossary of key terms. There is no index; however, users can search for terms using the find (Ctrl-F) function in the PDF version of the book.

Overall, the content inside this book is accurate, error-free, and unbiased. However, the content is limited to the Social Work perspective, which may be considered somewhat biased or inaccurate from the perspective of others in different disciplines.

The book describes classic examples used in most texts on social science research methods. It also includes contemporary and relevant examples. Some of the content (such as web addresses and contemporary news pieces) will need to be updated every few years. The text is written and arranged in such a way that any necessary updates should be relatively easy and straightforward to implement.

The book is written in clear and accessible prose. The book provides appropriate context for any jargon/technical terminology used. Readers from any social science discipline should be able to understand the content and context of the material presented in the book.

The framework and use of terminology in the book are consistent.

This book is highly modular. The author has even improved upon the modularity of the book from Blackstone’s open text (which serves as the basis of the present text). Each chapter is divided into short, related subsections. The design of the chapters and their subsections make it easy to divide the material into units of study across a semester or quarter of instruction.

Generally, the book is organized in a similar manner as other texts on social science research methods. However, the organization could be improved slightly. Chapters 2 through 4 describe the process of beginning a research project and conducting a literature review. Chapter 8 describes refining a research question. This chapter could be moved to follow the Chapter 4. Chapter 12 describes experimental design, while Chapter 15 provides a description and examples of evaluation research. Since evaluation research tends to rely on experimental and quasi-experimental design, this chapter should follow the experimental design chapter.

For the online version of the book, there were no interface issues. The images and charts were clear and readable. The hyperlinks to sources mentioned in the text worked. The Contents menu allowed for easy and quick access to any section of the book. For the PDF version of the book, there were interface issues. The images and charts were clear and readable. However, the URLs and hyperlinks were not active in the PDF version. Furthermore, the PDF version was not bookmarked, which made it more difficult to access specific sections of the book.

I did not find grammatical errors in the book.

Overall, the cultural relevance and sensitivity were consistent with other social science research methods texts. The author does a good job of using both female and male pronouns in the prose. While there are pictures of people of color, there could be more. Most of the pictures are of white people. Also, the context is generally U.S.-centric.

Table of Contents

• Chapter 1: Introduction to research
• Chapter 2: Beginning a research project
• Chapter 3: Reading and evaluating literature
• Chapter 4: Conducting a literature review
• Chapter 5: Ethics in social work research
• Chapter 6: Linking methods with theory
• Chapter 7: Design and causality
• Chapter 8: Creating and refining a research question
• Chapter 9: Defining and measuring concepts
• Chapter 10: Sampling
• Chapter 11: Survey research
• Chapter 12: Experimental design
• Chapter 13: Interviews and focus groups
• Chapter 14: Unobtrusive research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches
• Chapter 15: Real-world research: Evaluation, single-subjects, and action research
• Chapter 16: Reporting and reading research

Ancillary Material

• Open Social Work Education

About the Book

As an introductory textbook for social work students studying research methods, this book guides students through the process of creating a research project. Students will learn how to discover a researchable topic that is interesting to them, examine scholarly literature, formulate a proper research question, design a quantitative or qualitative study to answer their question, carry out the design, interpret quantitative or qualitative results, and disseminate their findings to a variety of audiences. Examples are drawn from the author's practice and research experience, as well as topical articles from the literature.

There are ancillary materials available for this book.  

About the Contributors

Matt DeCarlo earned his PhD in social work at Virginia Commonwealth University and is an Assistant Professor of Social Work at Radford University. He earned an MSW from George Mason University in 2010 and a BA in Psychology from the College of William and Mary in 2007. His research interests include open educational resources, self-directed Medicaid supports, and basic income. Matt is an Open Textbook Network Campus Leader for Radford University. He is the founder of Open Social Work Education, a non-profit collaborative advancing OER in social work education.

Contribute to this Page

• University of Texas Libraries
• UT Libraries

Social Work Research

• Getting Started
• Encyclopedias & Handbooks
• Evidence Based Practice
• Peer Review & Evaluation
• Reading Scholarly Articles
• Books & Dissertations
• Data and Statistics
• Film & Video
• Policy & Government Documents
• Trabajo Social
• Citing & Citation Management
• Research Funding
• Open Access
• Choosing & Assessing Journals
• Increasing Access to Your Work
• Tracking Your Impact
• Systematic Reviews
• Tests & Measures

Getting Started with Social Work Research

• Video Tutorials
• Understanding the Libraries "Basic" Search
• The Research Process
• What is a literature review?
• What is a Research Question?
• Turn a topic into a Search Strategy
• Keyword Brainstorming
• Search Tips

The search box on the library homepage provides a basic search across library holdings.  See the guide below for an explanation of how to effectively use the basic search:

• Library Search Help

As you work toward completing your research projects, remember that the research process is NOT linear. It's usually more of a circular process and there may be many times where you jump back and forth between the stages of your research. While not everyone's research process will look exactly the same, the following model can give you a better idea of how the research process often works.

Think of scholarly papers like a conversation. A paper takes a look at what people are saying on a particular topic and then adds something new to the conversation based on their own research. A literature review is how scholars get caught up on the conversation so they will know what to say or ask next.

A literature review can be just a simple summary of the sources, but it usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis.

A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information. It might give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations. Or it might trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates.

• APA Literature Review Template Note: not yet updated for APA 7th edition

A research question is what forms and guides your literature review. It is the question that you want the literature to answer for you. A research question should be specific, focused, and concise.

To develop a research question, start with a general topic of interest to you. You'll want to do some preliminary and background research on this topic to think through what specific questions you might have.

Sample Topic: impact of social media on adolescent physical activity

Sample Research Question: Can social media serve as an effective tool for increasing physical activity among adolescents?

Need more guidance on developing your topic into a research question? Check out  this video  from the library at Northern Kentucky University.

In order to search most effectively for articles that pertain to your research topic, take a little time at the beginning of your project to plan out your search strategy.

1. Break up your topic/research question into it's primary concepts

• i.e. What impact does tobacco use have on the lung health of teenagers?
• Population - teenagers
• Problem - tobacco use
• Outcome - lung health

2. Brainstorm synonyms for your terms (see more in next tab)

• i.e. teenagers, teens, adolescents, youth, young adults, juvenile

3. Add quotation marks around exact phrases and be sure to include both singular and plural

• i.e. "young adults", "young adult"

4. Search one concept at a time using ORs to include all of your synonyms and then combine your searches with AND

• Search 1: teenagers OR teens OR adolescents OR youth OR "young adults" OR "young adult" OR juveniles
• Search 2:  tobacco OR smoking OR vaping OR cigarettes OR nicotine
• Search 3:  lung health OR "respiratory health" OR "respiratory distress" OR dyspnea OR asthma OR "pulmonary disorder" OR "pulmonary disorders" OR "pulmonary disease" OR "pulmonary diseases"

1. Save time, prepare to research!

• Break your research question into key concepts (you'll connect these in your paper to make an original argument)
• For each of these concepts, brainstorm multiple  keywords
• Try this   keyword tool  to brainstorm online and send the results to yourself.

2. Combine keywords using  AND  and  OR :

• Too many  results? Try using quotation marks around an exact phrase. Ex: "students with disabilities"
• Still too many  results? Narrow using  AND . Ex:  "students with disabilities" AND "assistive technology"
• Too few  results? Broaden using  OR . Ex: "students with disabilities" AND (campus OR college OR university OR higher education)
• Put  parentheses  around synonyms.
• The  asterisk  finds multiple endings from a root word. Ex: wom* will bring back women, woman's, wombat, etc.

3. Brush up on the  search tools  available:

• Here are  search tips for Google .
• Databases often include their own search tips. Tip: Look for a help link or a gear symbol.

Interfaces and search options vary across databases, but best practices for searching are relatively consistent across interfaces. No matter which database you choose, remember these important tips...

1) Don't search wth your topic as a single phrase!  Determine the key concepts of your topic. Then place each concept in its own search bar.  For example...

2) Use ORs to string together synonyms or related terms for core concepts...

3) Use truncation, when appropriate. Adding an * to the end of a word will catch all forms of that word. For example, teach* will return teach, teachers, teaching , etc.

4) Use proximity searches to force a relationship between two terms. This isn't always needed, but is sometimes super helpful. Completion is a common word that may come up in many context. The search below means that the word complete or completion must appear within two words of college in the article title and abstracts.

5) Look for the "peer reviewed" limit in each database. You can set this limit on the main search screen (before you search) or narrow your results after you've started your search.

6) Set date limits  as appropriate for your topic..

Writing a Research Paper

• Steps for Writing a Research Paper Step by Step instructions on how to write a research paper by the University Writing Center

Need Help? Ask A Librarian

Chat With Us

EID login required

Related Guides

• Public Health
• Counseling & Therapy
• African and African Diaspora Studies
• Disability Studies
• Last Updated: Jan 26, 2024 7:14 AM
• URL: https://guides.lib.utexas.edu/socialwork

• Subject List
• Take a Tour
• For Authors
• Subscriber Services
• Publications
• African American Studies
• African Studies
• American Literature
• Anthropology
• Architecture Planning and Preservation
• Art History
• Atlantic History
• Biblical Studies
• British and Irish Literature
• Childhood Studies
• Chinese Studies
• Cinema and Media Studies
• Communication
• Criminology
• Environmental Science
• Evolutionary Biology
• International Law
• International Relations
• Islamic Studies
• Jewish Studies
• Latin American Studies
• Latino Studies
• Linguistics
• Literary and Critical Theory
• Medieval Studies
• Military History
• Political Science
• Public Health
• Renaissance and Reformation

Social Work

• Urban Studies
• Victorian Literature
• Browse All Subjects

How to Subscribe

• Free Trials

In This Article Expand or collapse the "in this article" section Social Work Research Methods

Introduction.

• History of Social Work Research Methods
• Feasibility Issues Influencing the Research Process
• Measurement Methods
• Existing Scales
• Group Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Evaluating Outcome
• Single-System Designs for Evaluating Outcome
• Program Evaluation
• Surveys and Sampling
• Introductory Statistics Texts
• Advanced Aspects of Inferential Statistics
• Qualitative Research Methods
• Qualitative Data Analysis
• Historical Research Methods
• Meta-Analysis and Systematic Reviews
• Research Ethics
• Culturally Competent Research Methods
• Teaching Social Work Research Methods

Related Articles Expand or collapse the "related articles" section about

About related articles close popup.

Lorem Ipsum Sit Dolor Amet

Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Aliquam ligula odio, euismod ut aliquam et, vestibulum nec risus. Nulla viverra, arcu et iaculis consequat, justo diam ornare tellus, semper ultrices tellus nunc eu tellus.

• Community-Based Participatory Research
• Economic Evaluation
• Evidence-based Social Work Practice
• Evidence-based Social Work Practice: Finding Evidence
• Evidence-based Social Work Practice: Issues, Controversies, and Debates
• Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs
• Impact of Emerging Technology in Social Work Practice
• Implementation Science and Practice
• Interviewing
• Measurement, Scales, and Indices
• Meta-analysis
• Occupational Social Work
• Postmodernism and Social Work
• Qualitative Research
• Research, Best Practices, and Evidence-based Group Work
• Social Intervention Research
• Social Work Profession
• Systematic Review Methods
• Technology for Social Work Interventions

Other Subject Areas

Forthcoming articles expand or collapse the "forthcoming articles" section.

• Child Welfare Effectiveness
• Rare and Orphan Diseases and Social Work Practice
• Unaccompanied Immigrant and Refugee Children
• Find more forthcoming articles...
• Export Citations
• Share This Facebook LinkedIn Twitter

Social Work Research Methods by Allen Rubin LAST REVIEWED: 14 December 2009 LAST MODIFIED: 14 December 2009 DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780195389678-0008

Social work research means conducting an investigation in accordance with the scientific method. The aim of social work research is to build the social work knowledge base in order to solve practical problems in social work practice or social policy. Investigating phenomena in accordance with the scientific method requires maximal adherence to empirical principles, such as basing conclusions on observations that have been gathered in a systematic, comprehensive, and objective fashion. The resources in this entry discuss how to do that as well as how to utilize and teach research methods in social work. Other professions and disciplines commonly produce applied research that can guide social policy or social work practice. Yet no commonly accepted distinction exists at this time between social work research methods and research methods in allied fields relevant to social work. Consequently useful references pertaining to research methods in allied fields that can be applied to social work research are included in this entry.

This section includes basic textbooks that are used in courses on social work research methods. Considerable variation exists between textbooks on the broad topic of social work research methods. Some are comprehensive and delve into topics deeply and at a more advanced level than others. That variation is due in part to the different needs of instructors at the undergraduate and graduate levels of social work education. Most instructors at the undergraduate level prefer shorter and relatively simplified texts; however, some instructors teaching introductory master’s courses on research prefer such texts too. The texts in this section that might best fit their preferences are by Yegidis and Weinbach 2009 and Rubin and Babbie 2007 . The remaining books might fit the needs of instructors at both levels who prefer a more comprehensive and deeper coverage of research methods. Among them Rubin and Babbie 2008 is perhaps the most extensive and is often used at the doctoral level as well as the master’s and undergraduate levels. Also extensive are Drake and Jonson-Reid 2007 , Grinnell and Unrau 2007 , Kreuger and Neuman 2006 , and Thyer 2001 . What distinguishes Drake and Jonson-Reid 2007 is its heavy inclusion of statistical and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) content integrated with each chapter. Grinnell and Unrau 2007 and Thyer 2001 are unique in that they are edited volumes with different authors for each chapter. Kreuger and Neuman 2006 takes Neuman’s social sciences research text and adapts it to social work. The Practitioner’s Guide to Using Research for Evidence-based Practice ( Rubin 2007 ) emphasizes the critical appraisal of research, covering basic research methods content in a relatively simplified format for instructors who want to teach research methods as part of the evidence-based practice process instead of with the aim of teaching students how to produce research.

Drake, Brett, and Melissa Jonson-Reid. 2007. Social work research methods: From conceptualization to dissemination . Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

This introductory text is distinguished by its use of many evidence-based practice examples and its heavy coverage of statistical and computer analysis of data.

Grinnell, Richard M., and Yvonne A. Unrau, eds. 2007. Social work research and evaluation: Quantitative and qualitative approaches . 8th ed. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.

Contains chapters written by different authors, each focusing on a comprehensive range of social work research topics.

Kreuger, Larry W., and W. Lawrence Neuman. 2006. Social work research methods: Qualitative and quantitative applications . Boston: Pearson, Allyn, and Bacon.

An adaptation to social work of Neuman's social sciences research methods text. Its framework emphasizes comparing quantitative and qualitative approaches. Despite its title, quantitative methods receive more attention than qualitative methods, although it does contain considerable qualitative content.

Rubin, Allen. 2007. Practitioner’s guide to using research for evidence-based practice . Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

This text focuses on understanding quantitative and qualitative research methods and designs for the purpose of appraising research as part of the evidence-based practice process. It also includes chapters on instruments for assessment and monitoring practice outcomes. It can be used at the graduate or undergraduate level.

Rubin, Allen, and Earl R. Babbie. 2007. Essential research methods for social work . Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks Cole.

This is a shorter and less advanced version of Rubin and Babbie 2008 . It can be used for research methods courses at the undergraduate or master's levels of social work education.

Rubin, Allen, and Earl R. Babbie. Research Methods for Social Work . 6th ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks Cole, 2008.

This comprehensive text focuses on producing quantitative and qualitative research as well as utilizing such research as part of the evidence-based practice process. It is widely used for teaching research methods courses at the undergraduate, master’s, and doctoral levels of social work education.

Thyer, Bruce A., ed. 2001 The handbook of social work research methods . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

This comprehensive compendium includes twenty-nine chapters written by esteemed leaders in social work research. It covers quantitative and qualitative methods as well as general issues.

Yegidis, Bonnie L., and Robert W. Weinbach. 2009. Research methods for social workers . 6th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

This introductory paperback text covers a broad range of social work research methods and does so in a briefer fashion than most lengthier, hardcover introductory research methods texts.

back to top

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please subscribe or login .

Oxford Bibliographies Online is available by subscription and perpetual access to institutions. For more information or to contact an Oxford Sales Representative click here .

• About Social Work »
• Meet the Editorial Board »
• Adolescent Depression
• Adolescent Pregnancy
• Adolescents
• Adoption Home Study Assessments
• Adult Protective Services in the United States
• African Americans
• Aging out of foster care
• Aging, Physical Health and
• Alcohol and Drug Abuse Problems
• Alcohol and Drug Problems, Prevention of Adolescent and Yo...
• Alcohol Problems: Practice Interventions
• Alcohol Use Disorder
• Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias
• Anti-Oppressive Practice
• Asian Americans
• Asian-American Youth
• Autism Spectrum Disorders
• Baccalaureate Social Workers
• Behavioral Health
• Behavioral Social Work Practice
• Bereavement Practice
• Bisexuality
• Brief Therapies in Social Work: Task-Centered Model and So...
• Bullying and Social Work Intervention
• Canadian Social Welfare, History of
• Case Management in Mental Health in the United States
• Central American Migration to the United States
• Child Maltreatment Prevention
• Child Neglect and Emotional Maltreatment
• Child Poverty
• Child Sexual Abuse
• Child Welfare
• Child Welfare and Child Protection in Europe, History of
• Child Welfare and Parents with Intellectual and/or Develop...
• Child Welfare, Immigration and
• Child Welfare Practice with LGBTQ Youth and Families
• Children of Incarcerated Parents
• Christianity and Social Work
• Chronic Illness
• Clinical Social Work Practice with Adult Lesbians
• Clinical Social Work Practice with Males
• Cognitive Behavior Therapies with Diverse and Stressed Pop...
• Cognitive Processing Therapy
• Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy
• Community Development
• Community Policing
• Community-Needs Assessment
• Comparative Social Work
• Computational Social Welfare: Applying Data Science in Soc...
• Conflict Resolution
• Council on Social Work Education
• Counseling Female Offenders
• Criminal Justice
• Crisis Interventions
• Cultural Competence and Ethnic Sensitive Practice
• Culture, Ethnicity, Substance Use, and Substance Use Disor...
• Dementia Care
• Dementia Care, Ethical Aspects of
• Depression and Cancer
• Development and Infancy (Birth to Age Three)
• Differential Response in Child Welfare
• Digital Storytelling for Social Work Interventions
• Direct Practice in Social Work
• Disabilities
• Disability and Disability Culture
• Domestic Violence Among Immigrants
• Early Pregnancy and Parenthood Among Child Welfare–Involve...
• Eating Disorders
• Ecological Framework
• Elder Mistreatment
• End-of-Life Decisions
• Epigenetics for Social Workers
• Ethical Issues in Social Work and Technology
• Ethics and Values in Social Work
• European Institutions and Social Work
• European Union, Justice and Home Affairs in the
• Evidence-based Social Work Practice: Issues, Controversies...
• Families with Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual Parents
• Family Caregiving
• Family Group Conferencing
• Family Policy
• Family Services
• Family Therapy
• Family Violence
• Fathering Among Families Served By Child Welfare
• Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders
• Field Education
• Financial Literacy and Social Work
• Financing Health-Care Delivery in the United States
• Forensic Social Work
• Foster Care
• Foster care and siblings
• Gender, Violence, and Trauma in Immigration Detention in t...
• Generalist Practice and Advanced Generalist Practice
• Grounded Theory
• Group Work across Populations, Challenges, and Settings
• Group Work, Research, Best Practices, and Evidence-based
• Harm Reduction
• Health Care Reform
• Health Disparities
• Health Social Work
• History of Social Work and Social Welfare, 1900–1950
• History of Social Work and Social Welfare, 1950-1980
• History of Social Work and Social Welfare, pre-1900
• History of Social Work from 1980-2014
• History of Social Work in China
• History of Social Work in Northern Ireland
• History of Social Work in the Republic of Ireland
• History of Social Work in the United Kingdom
• HIV/AIDS and Children
• HIV/AIDS Prevention with Adolescents
• Homelessness
• Homelessness: Ending Homelessness as a Grand Challenge
• Homelessness Outside the United States
• Human Needs
• Human Trafficking, Victims of
• Immigrant Integration in the United States
• Immigrant Policy in the United States
• Immigrants and Refugees
• Immigrants and Refugees: Evidence-based Social Work Practi...
• Immigration and Health Disparities
• Immigration and Intimate Partner Violence
• Immigration and Poverty
• Immigration and Spirituality
• Immigration and Substance Use
• Immigration and Trauma
• Impaired Professionals
• Indigenous Peoples
• Individual Placement and Support (IPS) Supported Employmen...
• In-home Child Welfare Services
• Intergenerational Transmission of Maltreatment
• International Human Trafficking
• International Social Welfare
• International Social Work
• International Social Work and Education
• International Social Work and Social Welfare in Southern A...
• Internet and Video Game Addiction
• Interpersonal Psychotherapy
• Intervention with Traumatized Populations
• Intimate-Partner Violence
• Juvenile Justice
• Kinship Care
• Korean Americans
• Latinos and Latinas
• Law, Social Work and the
• LGBTQ Populations and Social Work
• Mainland European Social Work, History of
• Major Depressive Disorder
• Management and Administration in Social Work
• Maternal Mental Health
• Medical Illness
• Men: Health and Mental Health Care
• Mental Health
• Mental Health Diagnosis and the Addictive Substance Disord...
• Mental Health Needs of Older People, Assessing the
• Mental Health Services from 1990 to 2023
• Mental Illness: Children
• Mental Illness: Elders
• Microskills
• Middle East and North Africa, International Social Work an...
• Military Social Work
• Mixed Methods Research
• Moral distress and injury in social work
• Motivational Interviewing
• Multiculturalism
• Native Americans
• Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders
• Neighborhood Social Cohesion
• Neuroscience and Social Work
• Nicotine Dependence
• Organizational Development and Change
• Pain Management
• Palliative Care
• Palliative Care: Evolution and Scope of Practice
• Pandemics and Social Work
• Parent Training
• Personalization
• Person-in-Environment
• Philosophy of Science and Social Work
• Physical Disabilities
• Podcasts and Social Work
• Police Social Work
• Political Social Work in the United States
• Positive Youth Development
• Postsecondary Education Experiences and Attainment Among Y...
• Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
• Practice Interventions and Aging
• Practice Interventions with Adolescents
• Practice Research
• Primary Prevention in the 21st Century
• Productive Engagement of Older Adults
• Profession, Social Work
• Program Development and Grant Writing
• Promoting Smart Decarceration as a Grand Challenge
• Psychiatric Rehabilitation
• Psychoanalysis and Psychodynamic Theory
• Psychoeducation
• Psychometrics
• Psychopathology and Social Work Practice
• Psychopharmacology and Social Work Practice
• Psychosocial Framework
• Psychosocial Intervention with Women
• Psychotherapy and Social Work
• Race and Racism
• Readmission Policies in Europe
• Redefining Police Interactions with People Experiencing Me...
• Rehabilitation
• Religiously Affiliated Agencies
• Reproductive Health
• Restorative Justice
• Risk Assessment in Child Protection Services
• Risk Management in Social Work
• Rural Social Work in China
• Rural Social Work Practice
• School Social Work
• School Violence
• School-Based Delinquency Prevention
• Services and Programs for Pregnant and Parenting Youth
• Severe and Persistent Mental Illness: Adults
• Sexual and Gender Minority Immigrants, Refugees, and Asylu...
• Sexual Assault
• Single-System Research Designs
• Social and Economic Impact of US Immigration Policies on U...
• Social Development
• Social Insurance and Social Justice
• Social Justice and Social Work
• Social Movements
• Social Planning
• Social Policy
• Social Policy in Denmark
• Social Security in the United States (OASDHI)
• Social Work and Islam
• Social Work and Social Welfare in East, West, and Central ...
• Social Work and Social Welfare in Europe
• Social Work Education and Research
• Social Work Leadership
• Social Work Luminaries: Luminaries Contributing to the Cla...
• Social Work Luminaries: Luminaries contributing to the fou...
• Social Work Luminaries: Luminaries Who Contributed to Soci...
• Social Work Regulation
• Social Work Research Methods
• Social Work with Interpreters
• Solution-Focused Therapy
• Strategic Planning
• Strengths Perspective
• Strengths-Based Models in Social Work
• Supplemental Security Income
• Survey Research
• Sustainability: Creating Social Responses to a Changing En...
• Syrian Refugees in Turkey
• Task-Centered Practice
• Technology Adoption in Social Work Education
• Technology, Human Relationships, and Human Interaction
• Technology in Social Work
• Terminal Illness
• The Impact of Systemic Racism on Latinxs’ Experiences with...
• Transdisciplinary Science
• Translational Science and Social Work
• Transnational Perspectives in Social Work
• Transtheoretical Model of Change
• Trauma-Informed Care
• Triangulation
• Tribal child welfare practice in the United States
• United States, History of Social Welfare in the
• Universal Basic Income
• Veteran Services
• Vicarious Trauma and Resilience in Social Work Practice wi...
• Vicarious Trauma Redefining PTSD
• Victim Services
• Virtual Reality and Social Work
• Welfare State Reform in France
• Welfare State Theory
• Women and Macro Social Work Practice
• Women's Health Care
• Work and Family in the German Welfare State
• Workforce Development of Social Workers Pre- and Post-Empl...
• Working with Non-Voluntary and Mandated Clients
• Young and Adolescent Lesbians
• Youth at Risk
• Youth Services
• Privacy Policy
• Cookie Policy
• Legal Notice
• Accessibility

Powered by:

• [66.249.64.20|91.193.111.216]
• 91.193.111.216

• Career Resources
• Addressing Trauma in Students
• BSW Holders: Advanced Standing
• Academics FAQs
• CASAC Credentialing
• Gerontology and Palliative Care Certificate
• Application and Admissions Requirements
• Tuition and Financial Aid
• Admissions FAQs
• A Letter from the Dean
• Our Faculty
• Student Resources
• Student Support
• The Heights: Virtual Learning
• Licensing and CE
• Alumni Network

Social Work Research and Evaluation Foundations

Studying social work and its effect on societies is essential to understanding and enhancing human and community well-being. By effectively measuring and evaluating social work outcomes, practitioners can employ evidence-based social work practices and evidence-based treatments (EBTs) to provide structured approaches to addressing client needs. For example, in the case of a client with an anxiety disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and behavioral science can be applied as efficient and ethical frameworks to address communication and collaboration problems. 1

Read on to learn more about the essential role of social work research and evaluation.

The Importance of Research and Evaluation in Social Work Practice

By rigorously assessing and evaluating social work studies, researchers can better identify the most effective strategies to achieve their client’s objectives. 2 Instead of trial and error, a data-driven approach ensures researchers make better use of the resources available to them.

Evidence-based interventions result from analyzing past research findings. After choosing a solution, researchers test it to verify replicability in multiple real-world scenarios before it’s deemed successful. 3 New intervention methods are constantly being standardized across the social work field of study, letting practitioners choose from a wider range of tools and techniques suitable for their study. These are usually taught in more advanced research courses in graduate or master's programs.

For example, at Wurzweiler School of Social Work, students participate in individual research projects and learn the basics of conducting social work research . This includes learning how to use measurement instruments; logic of research design, including sampling and design selection; ethical and legal issues; quantitative and qualitative modes of observation; analysis of data; use of computers and computer programs; and research report writing.

Methodologies and Approaches for Conducting Social Work Research

Conducting social work research requires access to large amounts of data supplied by study participants, which can be historical data or up-to-date surveys. 4 Due to social work’s multifaceted nature, researchers must then use their understanding of how psychosocial factors intersect. They need to develop and adhere to strict research methodologies that are evidence-based instead of preconceived notions of a particular social issue. 5

Action Research and Participatory-Action Research (PAR)

By emphasizing the importance of direct collaboration with communities, researchers can hope to identify and address a demographic’s needs. 6

Empowerment Research

Studies, surveys and experiments aim to increase the feelings of empowerment, equality and social justice among people in communities by having them participate directly in the research process. 7

Constructivist Research

Constructivist research begins with the individual and their social contexts instead of the community as a whole. 8 It highlights the importance of perspective and social standing in shaping communities .

Designing Effective Evaluation Frameworks for Social Programs

Data collected from participants in a target demographic is considered raw data that needs to go through several stages of cleaning and refining before any insights can be extracted. 9 That’s why researchers need to be able to develop robust evaluation frameworks that facilitate access to the data.

Logic Models

Logic models are often used to evaluate a single program or intervention. 10 Logic models are designed to offer:

• Development approaches: Using forward logic to develop models starts from activities to predict outcomes, or vice versa in the case of reverse logic
• Framework utility: Frameworks guide the implementation and reporting of the logic model by clarifying its methodology and expected results
• Visual representation: Graphical depictions of data illustrate the connections between a study’s input, activities and outputs, showcasing the anticipated outcomes
• Components: Key elements include the problem statement, outcomes, outputs, resources and strategies

Theories of Change and Program Theory

Merging theories with logic models adds depth to frameworks by outlining the research process, mechanisms and the logic behind the expected outcomes. 11 Furthermore, theories explain the “how” and “why” the desired changes and outcomes are expected to occur in the program’s context, including factors outside the program’s control.

Furthermore, leveraging resources such as The Kellogg Foundation Logic Model Development Guide and the CDC Framework for Program Evaluation in Social Work can offer guidance and tools for constructing and utilizing robust evaluation frameworks. 12,13

Data Collection and Analysis Techniques in Social Work Research

Researchers can collect relevant data in a variety of ways , such as surveys, in-person focus groups, observations and official census reports. They can then select the suitable social work data analysis technique based on the type of data they have and the nature of the insights they’re looking for. 14 These techniques include:

• Thematic analysis: A qualitative approach that identifies, analyzes and reports patterns and anomalies
• Descriptive statistics: Mean, medians, modes and averages of datasets
• Inferential statistics: Predictive models that provide insights based on patterns

Ethical Considerations in Social Work Research and Evaluation

Ethical considerations determine the efficacy of social work research methods and evaluations. 15 Participants in the study must give informed consent to the data being collected on them without attempts to persuade or influence their answers. 16 Similarly, confidentiality and anonymity, especially when handling socially sensitive topics, are needed to ensure candid responses from study participants.

Utilizing Research Findings to Inform Evidence-Based Practice

In order to use results from past studies to inform future practices, researchers need to translate the studies’ outcomes through systematic reviews and guideline development. 17 The outcomes of earlier implementations often require constant monitoring to detect any underlying biases that can be addressed early on.

Challenges and Limitations in Social Work Research and Evaluation

Research in social work often faces numerous challenges that might impact the quality and efficacy of studies. Some of the most common ones include:

• Time constraints
• Hard-to-reach populations
• Inadequate strategies
• Financial constraints

Case Study of Successful Research and Evaluation Initiative

Despite the many complexities, many research studies can be successfully conducted in the field of social studies. One example is the study of developing new treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) patients.

First developed in the 1980s by Francine Shapiro, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing has been successful in treating emotional distress associated with PTSD. The method’s application was then expanded to include a wide range of issues from trauma and anxiety to addiction.

It’s been supported by over 30 controlled outcomes studies and has since been recognized by the World Health Organization and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) as an effective therapeutic method. 18

Deepen Your Impact Through Social Work

The intersection between theoretical research and practical evaluation in the field of social work produces solutions that make a profound impact on the quality of life of communities and individuals. 19 This is a testament to the commitment of researchers to advance the field through progressively available means, particularly technology for data collection and mathematical algorithms for Big Data analytics.

Yeshiva University’s online Master of Social Work focuses on cultural responsiveness, social justice, and human transformation. You will gain hands-on experience in the field of social work and obtain CSWE accreditation that qualifies you for the post-graduate state exam. The expert faculty will equip you with the tools to create positive change in the world. Make an appointment to speak with an admissions outreach advisor today.

• Retrieved on April 10, 2024, from hbr.org/podcast/2021/01/using-behavioral-science-to-improve-well-being-for-social-workers
• Retrieved on April 10, 2024, from researchgate.net/publication/323370072_Evaluating_effectiveness_in_social_work_sharing_dilemmas_in_practice
• Retrieved on April 10, 2024, from ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547524/
• Retrieved on April 10, 2024, from researchgate.net/publication/298697140_Big_data_in_social_work_The_development_of_a_critical_perspective_on_social_work’s_latest_electronic_turn
• Retrieved on April 10, 2024, from https://caseworthy.com/articles/why-is-evidence-based-practice-important-in-social-work/
• Retrieved on April 10, 2024, from nature.com/articles/s43586-023-00214-1
• Retrieved on April 10, 2024, from academic.oup.com/bjsw/article/51/4/1482/6202975
• Retrieved on April 10, 2024, from journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/16094069231186257
• Retrieved on April 10, 2024, from journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17456916221137350
• Retrieved on April 10, 2024, from sopact.com/guides/theory-of-change-vs-logic-model
• Retrieved on April 10, 2024, from betterevaluation.org/frameworks-guides/rainbow-framework/define/develop-programme-theory-theory-change
• Retrieved on April 10, 2024, from naccho.org/uploads/downloadable-resources/Programs/Public-Health-Infrastructure/KelloggLogicModelGuide_161122_162808.pdffrom-being-a-breeding-ground-for-threats/
• Retrieved on April 10, 2024, from cdc.gov/evaluation/framework/index.htm
• Retrieved on April 10, 2024, from nesta.org.uk/feature/eight-ways-councils-are-using-data-create-better-services/the-data-driven-social-worker/
• Retrieved on April 10, 2024, from cmsindia.org/sites/myfiles/Guidelines-for-Ethical-Considerations-in-Social-Research-Evaluation-In-India_2020.pdf
• Retrieved on April 10, 2024, from researchsupport.admin.ox.ac.uk/governance/ethics/resources/consent
• Retrieved on April 10, 2024, from health-policy-systems.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12961-020-00662-1
• Retrieved on April 10, 2024, from ptsd.va.gov/understand_tx/emdr.asp
• Retrieved on April 10, 2024, from researchgate.net/publication/8480043_Future_directions_in_evaluation_research_People_organizational_and_social_issues

Return to Blog

Yeshiva University has engaged Everspring , a leading provider of education and technology services, to support select aspects of program delivery.

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

Chapter Five: Defining and measuring concepts

This chapter is mainly focused on quantitative research methods, as the level of specificity required to begin quantitative research is far greater than that of qualitative research. In quantitative research, you must specify how you define and plan to measure each concept before you can interact with your participants. In qualitative research, definitions emerge from how participants respond to your questions. Because your participants are the experts, qualitative research does not begin with defining concepts at the level of specificity and clarity required for quantitative research. For this reason, we will focus mostly on quantitative measurement and conceptualization in this chapter, addressing qualitative research later in the textbook.

Chapter Outline

• 5.1 Measurement
• 5.2 Conceptualization
• 5.3 Levels of measurement
• 5.4 Operationalization
• 5.5 Measurement quality
• 5.6 Challenges in quantitative measurement

Content Advisory

This chapter includes information or discusses measuring depression and loneliness among residents of an assisted living facility.

Foundations of Social Work Research Copyright © 2020 by Rebecca L. Mauldin is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

Columbia University Libraries

Social work research guide: home.

• Find Articles - Databases
• Citation Management
• Cheatsheets and Handouts

Hello! Welcome to the Research Guide for Social Work. This guide will help you access materials through Columbia Libraries and beyond.

Looking for books? Use   CLIO ,  the libraries' primary search interface to find: books, databases, ebooks, journals, newspapers, and DVDs.

Looking for articles? Go to the " Find Articles " tab of this guide.

Talk with a Research Expert

• Librarians are available to assist you with  research support  in person or by video call. Please email [email protected] to schedule a research consultation.
• Instant message with the Ask a Librarian service .  A librarian will answer any questions you have in real time during chat hours ! 

General Library Resources

Library alerts for closures, emergencies, and other updates, check the  hours  of our libraries, departments and services..

• Library Workshops 

Borrowing privileges 

Course reserves, reserve study space.

• For Visitors 

Finding Materials We Don't Own

If we don't have a resource you need:

• Books from the Health Science Library
• Borrow Direct  enables you to borrow books directly from other university libraries if the book you need is unavailable or is not owned by Columbia University.
• Interlibrary Loan  is the service to for getting journal articles and book chapters scanned and emailed to you.
• Recommend a title for purchase

Video Materials for Social Work

• Counseling and therapy in video
• PsychoTherapy.net
• PsycTHERAPY / American Psychological Association
• Sage Video Psychology 
• Sage Video Counseling
• Sage Video Social Work

See the Streaming Video Research Guide for more streaming video resources.

Newspaper Access

As a Columbia University student you have access to several newspapers through CLIO:

• Financial Times
• New York Times : We recommend you use the ProQuest for PDFs, and use Factiva for: international news, web exclusive, morning & evening versions. 
• NYTimes.com : Register for a free account
• The New Yorker
• Washington Post 
• Wall Street Journal  and Directions in case you get stuck
• And more, check CLIO

The DSM in CLIO

Looking for the DSM-5-TR? Access the DSM-5-TR through CLIO: https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/16295244

• Next: Find Articles - Databases >>
• Last Updated: Dec 20, 2023 10:46 AM
• URL: https://guides.library.columbia.edu/SOCW
• Donate Books or Items
• Suggestions & Feedback
• Report an E-Resource Problem
• The Bancroft Prizes
• Student Library Advisory Committee
• Jobs & Internships
• Behind the Scenes at Columbia's Libraries

• school Campus Bookshelves
• menu_book Bookshelves
• perm_media Learning Objects
• login Login
• how_to_reg Request Instructor Account
• hub Instructor Commons
• Download Page (PDF)
• Download Full Book (PDF)
• Periodic Table
• Physics Constants
• Scientific Calculator
• Reference & Cite
• Tools expand_more
• Readability

selected template will load here

This action is not available.

7.3: Social work research paradigms

• Last updated
• Save as PDF
• Page ID 135120

• Matthew DeCarlo, Cory Cummings, & Kate Agnelli
• Open Social Work Education

Learning Objectives

Learners will be able to…

• Distinguish between the three major research paradigms in social work and apply the assumptions upon which they are built to a student research project

In the previous two sections, we reviewed the three elements to the philosophical foundation of a research method: ontology, epistemology and axiology (Crotty, 1998; Guba & Lincoln, 1994; Heron & Reason, 1997).\(^{17}\) In this section, you will explore how to apply these philosophical approaches to your research project. In the next section, we will do the same for theory. Keep in mind that it’s easy for us as textbook authors to lay out each step (paradigm, theory, etc.) sequentially, but in reality, research projects are not linear. Researchers rarely proceed by choosing an ontology, epistemology and axiology separately and then deciding which theory and methods to apply. As we discussed in  Chapter 2  when you started conceptualizing your project, you should choose something that interests you, is feasible to conduct, and does not pose unethical risks to others. Whatever part or parts your project you have figured out right now, you’re right where you should be—in the middle of conceptualization.

How do scientific ideas change over time?

Much like your ideas develop over time as you learn more, so does the body of scientific knowledge. Kuhn’s (1962)\(^{18}\)  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions  is one of the most influential works on the philosophy of science, and is credited with introducing the idea of competing paradigms (or “disciplinary matrices”) in research. Kuhn investigated the way that scientific practices evolve over time, arguing that we don’t have a simple progression from “less knowledge” to “more knowledge” because the way that we approach inquiry is changing over time. This can happen gradually, but the process results in moments of change where our understanding of a phenomenon changes more radically (such as in the transition from Newtonian to Einsteinian physics; or from Lamarckian to Darwinian theories of evolution). For a social work practice example, Fleuridas & Krafcik (2019)\(^{19}\) trace the development of the  “four forces” of psychotherapy , from psychodynamics to behaviorism to humanism as well as the competition among emerging perspectives to establish itself as the fourth force to guide psychotherapeutic practice. But how did the problems in one paradigm inspire new paradigms? Kuhn presents us with a way of understanding the history of scientific development across all topics and disciplines.

As you can see in this video from  Matthew J. Brown  (CC-BY), there are four stages in the cycle of science in Kuhn’s approach. Firstly, a pre-paradigmatic state where competing approaches share no consensus. Secondly, the “normal” state where there is wide acceptance of a particular set of methods and assumptions. Thirdly, a state of crisis where anomalies that cannot be solved within the existing paradigm emerge and competing theories to address them follow. Fourthly, a revolutionary phase where some new paradigmatic approach becomes dominant and supplants the old. Shnieder (2009)\(^{20}\) suggests that the Kuhnian phases are characterized by different kinds of scientific activity.

Newer approaches often build upon rather than replace older ones, but they also overlap and can exist within a state of competition. Scientists working within a particular paradigm often share methods, assumptions and values. In addition to supporting specific methods, research paradigms also influence things like the ambition and nature of research, the researcher-participant relationship and how the role of the researcher is understood.

Paradigm vs. theory

The terms ‘ paradigm ‘ and ‘ theory ‘ are often used interchangeably in social science. There is not a consensus among social scientists as to whether these are identical or distinct concepts. With that said, in this text, we will make a clear distinction between the two ideas because thinking about each concept separately is more useful for our purposes.

We define paradigm  a set of common philosophical (ontological, epistemological, and axiological) assumptions that inform research. The four paradigms we describe in this section refer to patterns in how groups of researchers resolve philosophical questions. Some assumptions naturally make sense together, and paradigms grow out of researchers with shared assumptions about what is important and how to study it. Paradigms are like “analytic lenses” and a provide framework on top of which we can build theoretical and empirical knowledge (Kuhn, 1962).\(^{21}\) Consider this video of  an interview with world-famous physicist Richard Feynman  in which he explains why “when you explain a ‘why,’ you have to be in some framework that you allow something to be true. Otherwise, you are perpetually asking why.” In order to answer basic physics question like “what is happening when two magnets attract?” or a social work research question like “what is the impact of this therapeutic intervention on depression,” you must understand the assumptions you are making about social science and the social world. Paradigmatic assumptions about objective and subjective truth support methodological choices like whether to conduct interviews or send out surveys, for example.

While paradigms are broad philosophical assumptions, theory  is more specific, and refers to a set of concepts and relationships scientists use to explain the social world. Theories are more concrete, while paradigms are more abstract. Look back to Figure 7.1 at the beginning of this chapter. Theory helps you identify the concepts and relationships that align with your paradigmatic understanding of the problem. Moreover, theory informs how you will measure the concepts in your research question and the design of your project.

For both theories and paradigms, Kuhn’s observation of scientific paradigms, crises, and revolutions is instructive for understanding the history of science. Researchers inherit institutions, norms, and ideas that are marked by the battlegrounds of theoretical and paradigmatic debates that stretch back hundreds of years. We have necessarily simplified this history into four paradigms: positivism, interpretivism, critical, and pragmatism. Our framework and explanation are inspired by the framework of Guba and Lincoln (1990)\(^{22}\) and Burrell and Morgan (1979).\(^{23}\) while also incorporating pragmatism as a way of resolving paradigmatic questions. Most of social work research and theory can be classified as belonging to one of these four paradigms, though this classification system represents only one of many useful approaches to analyzing social science research paradigms.

Building on our discussion in section 7.1 on objective vs. subjective epistemologies and ontologies, we will start with the difference between positivism and interpretivism. Afterward, we will link our discussion of axiology in section 7.2 with the critical paradigm. Finally, we will situate pragmatism as a way to resolve paradigmatic questions strategically. The difference between positivism and interpretivism is a good place to start, since the critical paradigm and pragmatism build on their philosophical insights.

It’s important to think of paradigms less as distinct categories and more as a spectrum along which projects might fall. For example, some projects may be somewhat positivist, somewhat interpretivist, and a little critical. No project fits perfectly into one paradigm. Additionally, there is no paradigm that is more correct than the other. Each paradigm uses assumptions that are logically consistent, and when combined, are a useful approach to understanding the social world using science. The purpose of this section is to acquaint you with what research projects in each paradigm look like and how they are grounded in philosophical assumptions about social science.

You should read this section to situate yourself in terms of what paradigm feels most “at home” to both you as a person and to your project. You may find, as I have, that your research projects are more conventional and less radical than what feels most like home to you, personally. In a research project, however, students should start with their working question rather than their heart. Use the paradigm that fits with  your question  the best, rather than which paradigm you think fits  you  the best.

Positivism: Researcher as “expert”

Positivism has its roots in the scientific revolution of the Enlightenment. Positivism is based on the idea that we can come to know facts about the natural world through our experiences of it. The processes that support this are the logical and analytic classification and systemization of these experiences. Through this process of empirical analysis, Positivists aim to arrive at descriptions of law-like relationships and mechanisms that govern the world we experience.

Positivists have traditionally claimed that the only authentic knowledge we have of the world is empirical and scientific. Essentially, positivism downplays any gap between our experiences of the world and the way the world really is; instead, positivism determines objective “facts” through the correct methodological combination of observation and analysis. Data collection methods typically include quantitative measurement, which is supposed to overcome the individual biases of the researcher.

Positivism aspires to high standards of validity and reliability supported by evidence, and has been applied extensively in both physical and social sciences. Its goal is familiar to all students of science: iteratively expanding the evidence base of what we know is true. We can know our observations and analysis describe real world phenomena because researchers separate themselves and objectively observe the world, placing a deep epistemological separation between “the knower” and “what is known” and reducing the possibility of bias. We can all see the logic in separating yourself as much as possible from your study so as not to bias it, even if we know we cannot do so perfectly.

However, the criticism often made of positivism with regard to human and social sciences (e.g. education, psychology, sociology) is that positivism is  scientistic ; which is to say that it overlooks differences between the  objects  in the natural world (tables, atoms, cells, etc.) and the  subjects  in the social work (self-aware people living in a complex socio-historical context). In pursuit of the generalizable truth of “hard” science, it fails to adequately explain the many aspects of human experience don’t conform to this way of collecting data. Furthermore, by viewing science as an idealized pursuit of pure knowledge, positivists may ignore the many ways in which power structures our access to scientific knowledge, the tools to create it, and the capital to participate in the scientific community.

Kivunja & Kuyini (2017)\(^{24}\) describe the essential features of positivism as:

• A belief that theory is universal and law-like generalizations can be made across contexts
• The assumption that context is not important
• The belief that truth or knowledge is ‘out there to be discovered’ by research
• The belief that cause and effect are distinguishable and analytically separable
• The belief that results of inquiry can be quantified
• The belief that theory can be used to predict and to control outcomes
• The belief that research should follow the scientific method of investigation
• Rests on formulation and testing of hypotheses
• Employs empirical or analytical approaches
• Pursues an objective search for facts
• Believes in ability to observe knowledge
• The researcher’s ultimate aim is to establish a comprehensive universal theory, to account for human and social behavior
• Application of the scientific method

Many quantitative researchers now identify as postpositivist. Postpositivism retains the idea that truth should be considered objective, but asserts that our experiences of such truths are necessarily imperfect because they are ameliorated by our values and experiences. Understanding how postpositivism has updated itself in light of the developments in other research paradigms is instructive for developing your own paradigmatic framework. Epistemologically, postpositivists operate on the assumption that human knowledge is based not on the assessments from an objective individual, but rather upon human conjectures. As human knowledge is thus unavoidably conjectural and uncertain, though assertions about what is true and why it is true can be modified or withdrawn in the light of further investigation. However, postpositivism is not a form of relativism, and generally retains the idea of objective truth.

These epistemological assumptions are based on ontological assumptions that an objective reality exists, but contra positivists, they believe reality can be known only imperfectly and probabilistically. While positivists believe that research is or can be value-free or value-neutral, postpositivists take the position that bias is undesired but inevitable, and therefore the investigator must work to detect and try to correct it. Postpositivists work to understand how their axiology (i.e., values and beliefs) may have influenced their research, including through their choice of measures, populations, questions, and definitions, as well as through their interpretation and analysis of their work. Methodologically, they use mixed methods and both quantitative and qualitative methods, accepting the problematic nature of “objective” truths and seeking to find ways to come to a better, yet ultimately imperfect understanding of what is true. A popular form of postpositivism is  critical realism , which lies between positivism and interpretivism.

Is positivism right for your project?

Positivism is concerned with understanding what is true for everybody. Social workers whose working question fits best with the positivist paradigm will want to produce data that are generalizable and can speak to larger populations. For this reason, positivistic researchers favor quantitative methods—probability sampling, experimental or survey design, and multiple, and well-established instruments to measure key concepts.

A positivist orientation to research is appropriate when your research question asks for generalizable truths. For example, your working question may look something like: does my agency’s housing intervention lead to fewer periods of homelessness for our clients? It is necessary to study such a relationship quantitatively and objectively. When social workers speak about social problems impacting societies and individuals, they reference positivist research, including experiments and surveys of the general populations. Positivist research is exceptionally good at producing cause-and-effect explanations that apply across many different situations and groups of people. There are many good reasons why positivism is the dominant research paradigm in the social sciences. 

Critiques of positivism stem from two major issues. First and foremost, positivism may not fit the messy, contradictory, and circular world of human relationships. A positivistic approach does not allow the researcher to understand another person’s subjective mental state in detail. This is because the positivist orientation focuses on quantifiable, generalizable data—and therefore encompasses only a small fraction of what may be true in any given situation. This critique is emblematic of the interpretivist paradigm, which we will describe next.

In the section after that, we will describe the critical paradigm, which critiques the positivist paradigm (and the interpretivist paradigm) for focusing too little on social change, values, and oppression. Positivists assume they know what is true, but they often do not incorporate the knowledge and experiences of oppressed people, even when those community members are directly impacted by the research. Positivism has been critiqued as ethnocentrist, patriarchal, and classist (Kincheloe & Tobin, 2009).\(^{25}\) This leads them to do research  on , rather than  with  populations by excluding them from the conceptualization, design, and impact of a project, a topic we discussed in section 2.4. It also leads them to ignore the historical and cultural context that is important to understanding the social world. The result can be a one-dimensional and reductionist view of reality.

• From your literature search, identify an empirical article that uses quantitative methods to answer a research question similar to your working question or about your research topic.
• Review the assumptions of the positivist research paradigm.
• Discuss in a few sentences how the author’s conclusions are based on some of these paradigmatic assumptions. How might a researcher operating from a different paradigm (e.g., interpretivism, critical) critique these assumptions as well as the conclusions of this study?

Interpretivism: Researcher as “empathizer”

Positivism is focused on generalizable truth. Interpretivism , by contrast, develops from the idea that we want to understand the truths of individuals, how they interpret and experience the world, their thought processes, and the social structures that emerge from sharing those interpretations through language and behavior. The process of interpretation (or social construction) is guided by the empathy of the researcher to understand the meaning behind what other people say.

Historically, interpretivism grew out of a specific critique of positivism: that knowledge in the human and social sciences cannot conform to the model of natural science because there are features of human experience that cannot objectively be “known”. The tools we use to understand objects that have no self-awareness may not be well-attuned to subjective experiences like emotions, understandings, values, feelings, socio-cultural factors, historical influences, and other meaningful aspects of social life. Instead of finding a single generalizable “truth,” the interpretivist researcher aims to generate understanding and often adopts a relativist position.

While positivists seek “the truth,” the social constructionist framework argues that “truth” varies. Truth differs based on who you ask, and people change what they believe is true based on social interactions. These subjective truths also exist within social and historical contexts, and our understanding of truth varies across communities and time periods. This is because we, according to this paradigm, create reality ourselves through our social interactions and our interpretations of those interactions. Key to the interpretivist perspective is the idea that social context and interaction frame our realities.

Researchers operating within this framework take keen interest in how people come to socially agree, or disagree, about what is real and true. Consider how people, depending on their social and geographical context, ascribe different meanings to certain hand gestures. When a person raises their middle finger, those of us in Western cultures will probably think that this person isn’t very happy (not to mention the person at whom the middle finger is being directed!). In other societies around the world, a thumbs-up gesture, rather than a middle finger, signifies discontent (Wong, 2007).\(^{26}\) The fact that these hand gestures have different meanings across cultures aptly demonstrates that those meanings are socially and collectively constructed. What, then, is the “truth” of the middle finger or thumbs up? As we’ve seen in this section, the truth depends on the intention of the person making the gesture, the interpretation of the person receiving it, and the social context in which the action occurred.

Qualitative methods are preferred as ways to investigate these phenomena. Data collected might be unstructured (or “messy”) and correspondingly a range of techniques for approaching data collection have been developed. Interpretivism acknowledges that it is impossible to remove cultural and individual influence from research, often instead making a virtue of the positionality of the researcher and the socio-cultural context of a study.

One common objection positivists levy against interpretivists is that interpretivism tends to emphasize the subjective over the objective. If the starting point for an investigation is that we can’t fully and objectively know the world, how can we do research into this without everything being a matter of opinion? For the positivist, this risk for confirmation bias as well as invalid and unreliable measures makes interpretivist research unscientific. Clearly, we disagree with this assessment, and you should, too. Positivism and interpretivism have different ontologies and epistemologies with contrasting notions of rigor and validity (for more information on assumptions about measurement, see  Chapter 11  for quantitative validity and reliability and  Chapter 20  for qualitative rigor). Nevertheless, both paradigms apply the values and concepts of the scientific method through systematic investigation of the social world, even if their assumptions lead them to do so in different ways. Interpretivist research often embraces a relativist epistemology, bringing together different perspectives in search of a trustworthy and authentic understanding or narrative.

Kivunja & Kuyini (2017)\(^{27}\) describe the essential features of interpretivism as:

• The belief that truths are multiple and socially constructed
• The acceptance that there is inevitable interaction between the researcher and his or her research participants
• The acceptance that context is vital for knowledge and knowing
• The belief that knowledge can be value laden and the researcher’s values need to be made explicit
• The need to understand specific cases and contexts rather deriving universal laws that apply to everyone, everywhere.
• The belief that causes and effects are mutually interdependent, and that causality may be circular or contradictory
• The belief that contextual factors need to be taken into consideration in any systematic pursuit of understanding

One important clarification: it’s important to think of the interpretivist perspective as not just about individual interpretations but the social life of interpretations. While individuals may construct their own realities, groups—from a small one such as a married couple to large ones such as nations—often agree on notions of what is true and what “is” and what “is not.” In other words, the meanings that we construct have power beyond the individuals who create them. Therefore, the ways that people and communities act based on such meanings is of as much interest to interpretivists as how they were created in the first place. Theories like social constructionism, phenomenology, and symbolic interactionism are often used in concert with interpretivism.

Is interpretivism right for your project?

An interpretivist orientation to research is appropriate when your working question asks about subjective truths. The cause-and-effect relationships that interpretivist studies produce are specific to the time and place in which the study happened, rather than a generalizable objective truth. More pragmatically, if you picture yourself having a conversation with participants like an interview or focus group, then interpretivism is likely going to be a major influence for your study. 

Positivists critique the interpretivist paradigm as non-scientific. They view the interpretivist focus on subjectivity and values as sources of bias. Positivists and interpretivists differ on the degree to which social phenomena are like natural phenomena. Positivists believe that the assumptions of the social sciences and natural sciences are the same, while interpretivists strongly believe that social sciences differ from the natural sciences because their subjects are social creatures.

Similarly, the critical paradigm finds fault with the interpretivist focus on the status quo rather than social change. Although interpretivists often proceed from a feminist or other standpoint theory, the focus is less on liberation than on understanding the present from multiple perspectives. Other critical theorists may object to the consensus orientation of interpretivist research. By searching for commonalities between people’s stories, they may erase the uniqueness of each individual’s story. For example, while interpretivists may arrive at a consensus definition of what the experience of “coming out” is like for people who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer, it cannot represent the diversity of each person’s unique “coming out” experience and what it meant to them. For example, see Rosario and colleagues’ (2009)\({28}\) critique the literature on lesbians “coming out” because previous studies did not addressing how  appearing, behaving, or identifying as a  butch  or  femme  impacted the experience of “coming out”  for lesbians.

• From your literature search, identify an empirical article that uses qualitative methods to answer a research question similar to your working question or about your research topic.
• Review the assumptions of the interpretivist research paradigm.
• Discuss in a few sentences how the author’s conclusions are based on some of these paradigmatic assumptions. How might a researcher operating from a different paradigm (like positivism or the critical paradigm) critique the conclusions of this study?

Critical paradigm: Researcher as “activist”

As we’ve discussed a bit in the preceding sections, the critical paradigm  focuses on power, inequality, and social change. Although some rather diverse perspectives are included here, the critical paradigm, in general, includes ideas developed by early social theorists, such as Max Horkheimer (Calhoun et al., 2007),\(^{29}\) and later works developed by feminist scholars, such as Nancy Fraser (1989).\(^{30}\) Unlike the positivist paradigm, the critical paradigm assumes that social science can never be truly objective or value-free. Furthermore, this paradigm operates from the perspective that scientific investigation should be conducted with the express goal of social change. Researchers in the critical paradigm foreground axiology, positionality and values . In contrast with the detached, “objective” observations associated with the positivist researcher, critical approaches make explicit the intention for research to act as a transformative or emancipatory force within and beyond the study.

Researchers in the critical paradigm might start with the knowledge that systems are biased against certain groups, such as women or ethnic minorities, building upon previous theory and empirical data. Moreover, their research projects are designed not only to collect data, but to impact the participants as well as the systems being studied. The critical paradigm applies its study of power and inequality to change those power imbalances as part of the research process itself. If this sounds familiar to you, you may remember hearing similar ideas when discussing  social conflict theory  in your human behavior in the social environment (HBSE) class.\(^{31}\) Because of this focus on social change, the critical paradigm is a natural home for social work research. However, we fall far short of adopting this approach widely in our profession’s research efforts.

Is the critical paradigm right for your project?

Every social work research project impacts social justice in some way. What distinguishes critical research is how it integrates an analysis of power into the research process itself. Critical research is appropriate for projects that are activist in orientation. For example, critical research projects should have working questions that explicitly seek to raise the consciousness of an oppressed group or collaborate equitably with community members and clients to addresses issues of concern. Because of their transformative potential, critical research projects can be incredibly rewarding to complete. However, partnerships take a long time to develop and social change can evolve slowly on an issue, making critical research projects a more challenging fit for student research projects which must be completed under a tight deadline with few resources.

Positivists critique the critical paradigm on multiple fronts. First and foremost, the focus on oppression and values as part of the research process is seen as likely to bias the research process, most problematically, towards confirmation bias. If you start out with the assumption that oppression exists and must be dealt with, then you are likely to find that regardless of whether it is truly there or not. Similarly, positivists may fault critical researchers for focusing on how the world  should  be, rather than how it truly  is . In this, they may focus too much on theoretical and abstract inquiry and less on traditional experimentation and empirical inquiry. Finally, the goal of social transformation is seen as inherently unscientific, as science is not a political practice.

Interpretivists often find common cause with critical researchers. Feminist studies, for example, may explore the perspectives of women while centering gender-based oppression as part of the research process. In interpretivist research, the focus is less on radical change as part of the research process and more on small, incremental changes based on the results and conclusions drawn from the research project. Additionally, some critical researchers’ focus on individuality of experience is in stark contrast to the consensus-orientation of interpretivists. Interpretivists seek to understand people’s true selves. Some critical theorists argue that people have multiple selves or no self at all.

• From your literature search, identify an article relevant to your working question or broad research topic that uses a critical perspective. You should look for articles where the authors are clear that they are applying a critical approach to research like feminism, anti-racism, Marxism and critical theory, decolonization, anti-oppressive practice, or other social justice-focused theoretical perspectives. To target your search further, include keywords in your queries to research methods commonly used in the critical paradigm like participatory action research and community-based participatory research. If you have trouble identifying an article for this exercise, consult your professor for some help. These articles may be more challenging to find, but reviewing one is necessary to get a feel for what research in this paradigm is like.
• Review the assumptions of the critical research paradigm.
• Discuss in a few sentences how the author’s conclusions are based on some of these paradigmatic assumptions. How might a researcher operating from different assumptions (like values-neutrality or researcher as neutral and unbiased) critique the conclusions of this study?

Pragmatism: Researcher as “strategist”

“Essentially, all models are wrong but some are useful.” (Box, 1976)\(^{32}\)

Pragmatism  is a research paradigm that suspends questions of philosophical ‘truth’ and focuses more on how different philosophies, theories, and methods can be used strategically to provide a multidimensional view of a topic. Researchers employing pragmatism will mix elements of positivist, interpretivist, and critical research depending on the purpose of a particular project and the practical constraints faced by the researcher and their research context. We favor this approach for student projects because it avoids getting bogged down in choosing the “right” paradigm and instead focuses on the assumptions that help you answer your question, given the limitations of your research context. Student research projects are completed quickly and moving in the direction of pragmatism can be a route to successfully completing a project. Your project is a representation of what you think is feasible, ethical, and important enough for you to study.

The crucial consideration for the pragmatist is whether the outcomes of research have any real-world application, rather than whether they are “true.” The methods, theories, and philosophies chosen by pragmatic researchers are guided by their working question. There are no distinctively pragmatic research methods since this approach is about making judicious use whichever methods fit best with the problem under investigation. Pragmatic approaches may be less likely to prioritize ontological, epistemological or axiological consistency when combining different research methods. Instead, the emphasis is on solving a pressing problem and adapting to the limitations and opportunities in the researchers’ context.

Adopt a multi-paradigmatic perspective

Believe it or not, there is a long literature of acrimonious conflict between scientists from positivist, interpretivist, and critical camps (see  Heineman-Pieper et al., 2002 \(^{33}\) for a longer discussion). Pragmatism is an old idea, but it is appealing precisely because it attempts to resolve the problem of multiple incompatible philosophical assumptions in social science. To a pragmatist, there is no “correct” paradigm. All paradigms rely on assumptions about the social world that are the subject of philosophical debate. Each paradigm is an incomplete understanding of the world, and it requires a scientific community using all of them to gain a comprehensive view of the social world. This multi-paradigmatic perspective is a unique gift of social work research, as our emphasis on empathy and social change makes us more critical of positivism, the dominant paradigm in social science.

We offered the metaphors of expert, empathizer, activist, and strategist for each paradigm. It’s important not to take these labels too seriously. For example, some may view that scientists should be experts or that activists are biased and unscientific. Nevertheless, we hope that these metaphors give you a sense of what it  feels  like to conduct research within each paradigm.

One of the unique aspects of paradigmatic thinking is that often where you think you are most at home may actually be the opposite of where your research project is. For example, in my graduate and doctoral education, I thought I was a critical researcher. In fact, I thought I was a radical researcher focused on social change and transformation. Yet, often times when I sit down to conceptualize and start a research project, I find myself squarely in the positivist paradigm, thinking through neat cause-and-effect relationships that can be mathematically measured. There is nothing wrong with that! Your task for your research project is to find the paradigm that  best  matches your research question. Think through what you really want to study and how you think about the topic, then use assumptions of that paradigm to guide your inquiry.

Another important lesson is that no research project fits perfectly in one paradigm or another. Instead, there is a spectrum along which studies are, to varying degrees, interpretivist, positivist, and critical. For example, all social work research is a bit activist in that our research projects are designed to inform action for change on behalf of clients and systems. However, some projects will focus on the conclusions and implications of projects informing social change (i.e., positivist and interpretivist projects) while others will partner with community members and design research projects collaboratively in a way that leads to social change (i.e. critical projects). In section 7.5, we will describe a pragmatic approach to research design guided by your paradigmatic and theoretical framework.

Key Takeaways

• Social work research falls, to some degree, in each of the four paradigms: positivism, interpretivism, critical, and pragmatist.
• Adopting a pragmatic, multi-paradigmatic approach to research makes sense for student researchers, as it directs students to use the philosophical assumptions and methodological approaches that best match their research question and research context.
• Research in all paradigms is necessary to come to a comprehensive understanding of a topic, and social workers must be able to understand and apply knowledge from each research paradigm.
• Describe which paradigm best fits your perspective on the world and which best fits with your project.
• Identify any similarities and differences in your personal assumptions and the assumption your research project relies upon. For example, are you a more critical and radical thinker but have chosen a more “expert” role for yourself in your research project?

Advances in Social Work

Announcements, call for papers: special issue licensing & credentialing.

Special Issue, Summer 2025

“The Dynamic Landscape of Licensing and Credentialing in Social Work”

Guest Editors Goutham M. Menon , Ph.D., MA, MBA, Professor, Loyola University Chicago School of Social Work Joan Blakey , Ph.D., MSW, Director & Associate Professor, University of Minnesota School of Social Work Jayashree Nimmagadda , Ph.D., MSW, LICSW, Professor, Rhode Island College School of Social Work Maria Torres , Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Stony Brook University School of Social Welfare

Submissions due: September 30, 2024

Current Issue

Summer/Fall 2023 Issue

Fall/Spring 2023 Editorial Learning to Improve in Anti-Racism, Health Care, Practice, and Education

For white social workers: re/un/discover heuristic for dual awareness in ongoing anti-racist practice, lessons learned from the cswe task force to advance anti-racism in the social work education policy and accreditation standards: praxis in a racially volatile society, teaching anti-racism to white social work students a practical approach, conceptualizing anti-racist social work pedagogy practical ideas for increasing faculty capacity, reflexivity, and ability, back to the (not so) basics of anti-racist education and practice the need for white social work students to learn how to create trust and relationships, enhancing competency-based social work skills through service learning and interprofessional education in a student-run free healthcare clinic, does where we live matter to oral health tensions between rural older adults’ concept of community and health individualism, social work boundary issues in the digital age reflections of an ethics expert, identifying indicators of high-conflict divorce among parents a systematic review, observed risks of client safety by social care professionals in finland trend analysis for 2016-2020, introducing the theory of neurosocial interdependence moving beyond the person-in-environment perspective in social work, mitigating the violence of mass immigration detention through community-based case management, post-master’s career progression of social workers a developmental perspective, learning from their stakeholders social work students’ perspectives on a university’s response to the covid-19 pandemic.

Advances in Social Work is committed to enhancing the linkage among social work practice, research, and education. Accordingly, the journal addresses current issues, challenges, and responses facing social work practice and education. The journal invites discussion and development of innovations in social work practice and their implications for social work research and education. Advances in Social Work seeks to publish empirical, conceptual, and theoretical articles that make substantial contributions to the field in all areas of social work including clinical practice, community organization, social administration, social policy, planning, and program evaluation. The journal provides a forum for scholarly exchange of research findings and ideas that advance knowledge and inform social work practice. All relevant methods of inquiry are welcome. Advances in Social Work is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original work. Articles are accepted on the basis of appropriateness, clarity, sound methodology, and utility for social work practice, research, and education. Articles are indexed or abstracted in Social Work Abstracts and Social Service Abstracts. Editor: Margaret E. Adamek, Ph.D.

Make a Submission

Information.

• For Readers
• For Authors
• For Librarians

Advances in Social Work ISSN: 1527-8565 eISSN: 2331-4125

Land Acknowledgement. We acknowledge the Indiana University School of Social Work is located on the ancestral lands of Indigenous Peoples from time immemorial. Indiana is the traditional lands of Potawatomi, Illini, Miami, Kickapoo, Lenape/Delaware, Wea, Piankashaw, Shawnee, Nanticoke, and Wyandot. We are dedicated to amplifying Indigenous voices and perspectives, improving community relationships, correcting the narratives, and making the Indiana University School of Social Work supportive and inclusive places for Native and Indigenous students, faculty, and staff. With humility and respect, we at Indiana University School of Social Work recognize and honor all Indigenous Peoples, their histories, their political rights and sovereignty and their sacred ties to the land and waters.

School of Social Work College of Social Science

Michigan state university research supports michigan bipartisan bill reform in juvenile justice system.

May 8, 2024 - Brandon Drain

On December 12, 2023, Lieutenant Governor Garlin Gilchrist signed a first-of-its-kind, bipartisan legislation transforming Michigan’s juvenile justice system and investing in diversion and re-entry services to better position Michigan’s youth for successful adulthoods.  

This reform goes into effect on October 1, 2024, and includes several changes. Such changes include requiring courts to adopt evidence-based practices -- like administering screening tools and risk and needs assessments. These changes should lead to, “more desirable outcomes, increased opportunities for alternatives to detention with more funding for community based-programming, and almost a complete elimination of juvenile court fines and fees,” said Ashlee Barnes-Lee, assistant professor at Michigan State University’s School of Social Work.  

Barnes-Lee is an interdisciplinary, action researcher whose research focuses on juvenile legal system reform, with a specific emphasis on promoting racial equity and strength-based approaches to assessing and treating justice-involved youth.   

“In my community-driven research, I partner with juvenile court administrators who are interested in co-developing strategies to reduce racial and ethnic disparities and improve outcomes for the youth they serve,” said Barnes-Lee. “This new legislation broadens my opportunity to partner with courts looking to be trained in juvenile risk and needs assessment, analysis of existing data, as well as those interested in evaluating their programs and services.”  

“This bill signing accelerates the implementation phase of a statewide collaboration that began with Lt. Governor Gilchrist’s leadership and the hard work of partners on the task force, and Michigan courts are ready for this challenge,” said Michigan Supreme Court Chief Justice Elizabeth Clement.   

One of the ways Barnes-Lee wants to better serve justice-involved youth is by implementing more strengths-based, Juvenile Risk-Need Assessments (JRNAs) for treatment and rehabilitation.   

This approach aims to strengthen the widely implemented Risk-Needs-Responsivity (RNR) model – which has a deficits-focus, as it postulates that targeting youths’ risk factors when developing court treatment plans is the most effective way to reduce likelihood of future delinquency. While risk factor detection is important and effective, many scholars, including Barnes-Lee, have criticized its overall efficacy for not placing a stronger emphasis on youths’ strengths, assets, or protective factors.   

Criticism of deficit-focused models has led to more research in strength-based models.   

“Strengths-based approaches to treatment and rehabilitation for justice-involved youth is important because it destigmatizes youth, increases optimism among juvenile probation officers, and could theoretically lead to more accurate predictions of future delinquency,” said Barnes-Lee. “Strengths-based approaches may also be particularly beneficial for youth of color, and other historically marginalized youth, who are perceived more negatively, and are overrepresented in the juvenile legal system.”  

In 2020, Barnes-Lee published two manuscripts detailing the development of a strengths-based tool called Protective Factors for Reducing Juvenile Reoffending (PFRJR). This tool was adopted by a Michigan juvenile court and has been benefiting youth on probation in that county for almost 10 years.   

The bill reform gives Barnes-Lee, and other Michigan researchers, the opportunity to partner with juvenile court administrators to provide evidence-based practices to better serve justice-involved youth.   

“Countless youth and families have unfortunately been harmed by our juvenile legal system. I believe it’s important for us to focus on both prevention and reform. I am proud of the work that Michigan lawmakers and community advocates are doing to advance justice and equity in our state. Although there is much work to be done, we are moving in the right direction.”  

Restoration of the Amur Tiger ( Panthera tigris altaica ) Population in the Northwest of Its Distribution Area

• Published: 28 December 2021
• Volume 48 , pages 1401–1423, ( 2021 )

Cite this article

• V. V. Rozhnov 1 ,
• S. V. Naidenko 1 ,
• J. A. Hernandez-Blanco 1 ,
• M. D. Chistopolova 1 ,
• P. A. Sorokin 1 ,
• A. A. Yachmennikova 1 ,
• E. Yu. Blidchenko 2 ,
• A. Yu. Kalinin 3 &
• V. A. Kastrikin 4  

511 Accesses

7 Citations

3 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

The results of Amur tiger ( Panthera tigris altaica ) grouping recovery in the North-West of its distribution area are presented in this article. An analysis of tiger cubs specially trained for wildlife and released includes: establishing the spatial structure, the ability to find and hunt natural prey, the reaction to anthropogenic landscapes, facilities and infrastructure, and reproductive relationships. The young released tigers adapted to the wild successfully, developed a specifically actual spatial structure, hunted for wild prey, did not initiate carnivore-human conflicts, females brought offspring repeatedly, wild born younglings dispersed in this part of the range successfully. Thus, in the northwest of the distribution area of the Amur tiger, where in the 1970’s this species was totally exterminated, its grouping has presently recovered and stabilized. The total grouping numbers currently amount to at least 20 individuals. The restoration of the Amur tiger grouping is based on the technology developed and used by the  Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of the Russian Academy of Sciences for orphaned tiger cub rehabilitation and training for wildlife.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Reintroduction of Tigers in Sariska Tiger Reserve, Rajasthan

Establishment success of the reinforced population of Gran Canaria Blue Chaffinch Fringilla polatzeki

Removal of american mink (neovison vison) from the uists, outer hebrides, scotland.

Abramov K.G., Conservation of the tiger in the Far East, in Okhrana prirody i zapovednoe delo v SSSR. Byulleten’ Komissii po okhrane prirody Akad. Nauk SSSR (Conservation of Nature and Reserve Management in the USSR. Bulletin of the Commission for Nature Protection of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1960, no. 5, pp. 92–95.

Abramov, V.K., The range and abundance of the Amur tiger ( Panthera tigris amurensis ) in the Far East, in Trudy 9-go Mezhdunar. kongressa biologov-okhotovedov (Moskva, sentyabr’ 1969) (Proc. 9th Int. Congr. Biologists-Game Managers (Moscow, September 1969)), Moscow, 1970, pp. 346–352.

Abramov, V.K., The tiger in the Ussuri region and its protection, in Doklady Moskovskogo obshchestva ispytatelei prirody. Oktyabr’ 1971 – iyun’ 1972 g. Zoologiya i botanika (Reports of the Moscow Society of Naturalists, October 1971–June 1972, Zoology and Botany), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1974, pp. 16–17.

Abramov, V.K. and Pikunov, D.G., Rare species of predatory animals in the south of the Far East of the USSR, in Redkie mlekopitayushchie fauny SSSR (Rare Mammals of the Fauna of the USSR), Moscow: Nauka, 1976, pp. 67–96.

Amur–Heilong River Basin Reader , Simonov, E.A. and Dahmer, T.D., Eds., Hong Kong: Eco-systems Ltd., 2008.

Google Scholar  

Badridze, Ya.K., Volk. Voprosy ontogeneza povedeniya, problemy i metod reintroduktsii (Wolf: Issues of Ontogeny of Behavior, Problems and the Method of Reintroduction), Moscow: GEOS, 2003.

Badridze Ya.K., Volk. Problemy, svyazannye s reintroduktsiei krupnykh khishchnykh mlekopitayushchikh (Wolf: Problems Associated with the Reintroduction of Large Carnivorous Mammals), Moscow: Modern, ARKhE, 2016.

Baikov, N.A., Tigers in the Far East, Okhotnik , 1927, no. 8, pp. 23–24.

Blidchenko, E.Y., Rozhnov, V.V., Yachmennikova, A.A., Sonin, P.L., Naydenko, S.V., et al., Analysis of changes in social contacts of orphaned tiger cubs ( Panthera tigris altaica ) within the first year during rehabilitation, in Proc. 10th Int. Conf. on Behaviour, Physiology and Genetics of Wildlife, Berlin 2015 , Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW), 2015, p. 33.

Blidchenko, E.Y., Rozhnov, V.V., Sonin, P.L., Yachmennikova, A.A., Sorokin, P.A., et al., Rehabilitation of orphaned tiger cubs ( Panthera tigris altaica ) in the center for rehabilitation and reintroduction of tigers and other rare animal species, in Materialy mezhdunarodnoi rabochei vstrechi po reabilitatsii i reintroduktsii krupnykh khishchnykh mlekopitayushchikh. Moskva, 25–27 noyabrya 2015 g. (Proc. Int. Workshop on Rehabilitation and Reintroduction of Large Carnivores, Moscow, November 25–27, 2015), 2015a, p. 73.

Blidchenko, E.Y., Rozhnov, V.V., Yachmennikova, A.A., Sonin, P.L., Naydenko, S.V., et al., Social contacts of orphaned tiger cubs ( Panthera tigris altaica ) development during the first year of rehabilitation, in Materialy mezhdunarodnoi rabochei vstrechi po reabilitatsii i reintroduktsii krupnykh khishchnykh mlekopitayushchikh. Moskva, 25–27 noyabrya 2015 g. (Proc. Int. Workshop on Rehabilitation and Reintroduction of Large Carnivores, Moscow, November 25–27, 2015), 2015b, p. 79.

Chistopolova, M.D., Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., Sorokin, P.A., Naidenko, S.V., Blidchenko, E.Yu., et al., Attitude of reintroduced orphaned tiger cubs to human infrastructure objects (roads, railways, and bridges), in Materialy mezhdunarodnoi rabochei vstrechi po reabilitatsii i reintroduktsii krupnykh khishchnykh mlekopitayushchikh. Moskva, 25–27 noyabrya 2015 g. (Proc. Int. Working Meeting on the Rehabilitation and Reintroduction of Large Carnivorous Mammals, Moscow, November 25–27, 2015), Moscow: KMK, 2015, p. 104.

Chistopolova, M.D., Kastrikin, V.A., Kochetkov, D.N., Antonov, A.I., Parilov, M.P., et al., Selection of the territory of the Khingansky Nature Reserve by a female Amur tiger as a habitat, in Materialy mezhdunarodnoi rabochei vstrechi po reabilitatsii i reintroduktsii krupnykh khishchnykh mlekopitayushchikh. Moskva, 25–27 noyabrya 2015 g. (Proc. Int. Working Meeting on the Rehabilitation and Reintroduction of Large Carnivorous Mammals, Moscow, November 25–27, 2015), Moscow: KMK, 2015a, p. 112.

Dobrynin, D.V., Rozhnov, V.V., Savel’ev, A.A., Sukhova, O.V., and Yachmennikova, A.A., Integration of data of tagging animals with GPS-transmitters and multispectral satellite imagery data for detailed characteristics of habitats, Issled. Zemli Kosmosa , 2017, no. 3, pp. 40–52.

Dovgal’, S.V., Yachmennikova, A.A., Antonevich, A.L., Ivanov, E.A., Koren’kova, A.A., Shteiman, A.A., and Rozhnov, V.V., Dynamics of interactions of tiger cubs ( Panthera tigris altaica ) with their mother, as well as some types of activity at the age of 5 to 45 weeks, in Teriofauna Rossii i sopredel’nykh territorii (X s’’ezd Teriologicheskogo obshchestva pri RAN). Materialy Mezhdunarodnogo soveshchaniya 1–5 fevralya 2016 goda, g. Moskva (Theriofauna of Russia and Adjacent Territories (X Congress of the Theriological Society at the Russian Academy of Sciences), Proc. Int. Conf., February 1–5, 2016, Moscow), 2016, p. 116.

Dudina, N.P., Venediktova, R.V., and Dryn’, G.M., Adaptation of the Amur tiger caught after unsuccessful reintroduction into nature to the conditions of the Rostov-on-Don Zoo, Nauchn. Issled. Zool. Parkakh , 2019, no. 34, pp. 97–104.

Dunham, K.M., Spatial organization of mountain gazelles Gazella gazella reintroduced to Central Arabia, J. Zool ., 1998, vol. 245, no. 4, pp. 371–384.

Article   Google Scholar  

Dunishenko, Yu.M., The problem of tiger conservation in the Khabarovsk Territory, in Izuchenie i okhrana redkikh i ischezayushchikh vidov zhivotnykh fauny SSSR (Study and Conservation of Rare and Endangered Animal Species of the USSR Fauna), Moscow: Nauka, 1985, pp. 62–65.

Esaulova, N.V., Naidenko, S.V., Lukarevskiy, V.S., Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., Litvinov, M.N., and Rozhnov, V.V., Helminth fauna of the Amur tiger and other predatory mammals in the reserves of Primorsky Krai, in Amurskii tigr v Severo-Vostochnoi Azii: problemy sokhraneniya v XXI veke. Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., 15–18 marta 2010 g., Vladivostok (Amur Tiger in North-East Asia: Conservation Problems in the 21st Century: Int. Sci.-Pract. Conf., March 15–18, 2010, Vladivostok), Vladivostok: Dal’nauka, pp. 147–150.

Flint, V.E., Strategiya sokhraneniya redkikh vidov v Rossii: teoriya i praktika (Strategy for the Conservation of Rare Species in Russia: Theory and Practice), Moscow: Moskovskii zoopark, 2004.

Geptner, V.G. and Sludskii, A.A., Mlekopitayushchie Sovetskogo Soyuza (Mammals of the Soviet Union), vol. 2, part 2: Khishchnye (gieny i koshki) (Carnivores (Hyenas and Cats)), Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1972.

Goncharuk, M.S., Kerli, L.L., Naidenko, S.V., and Rozhnov, V.V., The incidence of seropositive reactions to infectious diseases among small predators in the border areas of the Lazovsky Reserve, Zool. Zh. , 2012, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 355–361.

Goodrich, J.M., Curley, L.L., Mikell, D.J., Smirnov, E.N., Schleier, B.O., Quigley, H.B., et al., Social structure of the Amur tiger population in the Sikhote-Alin Biosphere Reserve, in Tigry Sikhote-Alinskogo zapovednika: ekologiya i sokhranenie (Tigers of the Sikhote-Alin Nature Reserve: Ecology and Conservation), Mikell, D.J., Smirnov, E.N., and Goodrich, J.M., Eds., Vladivostok: PSP, 2005, pp. 50–60.

Harris, S., Cresswell, W.J., Forde, P.G., Trewhella, W.J., Woollard, T., and Wray, S., Home range analysis using radio-tracking data—a review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals, Mammal Rev ., 1990, vol. 20, nos. 2–3, pp. 97–123.

Hayne, D.W., Calculation of size of home range, J. Mammal ., 1949, vol. 30, pp. 1–18.

Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., Lukarevskiy, V.S., Naidenko, S.V., Sorokin, P.A., Litvinov, M.N., et al., Experience of using digital camera traps to identify Amur tigers, assess their activity and use the main routes of movement by animals, in Amurskii tigr v Severo-Vostochnoi Azii: problemy sokhraneniya v XXI veke. Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., 15–18 marta 2010 g., Vladivostok (Amur Tiger in North-East Asia: Conservation Problems in the 21st Century: Int. Sci.-Pract. Conf., March 15–18, 2010, Vladivostok), Vladivostok: Dal’nauka, 2010, pp. 100–103.

Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., Rozhnov, V.V., Lukarevskiy, V.S., Naidenko, S.V., Chistopolova, M.D., et al., Spatially explicit capture-recapture method (SECR, SPACECAP): a new approach to determination of the Amur tiger ( Panthera tigris altaica ) population density by means of camera-traps, Dokl. Biol. Sci ., 2013, vol. 453, pp. 365–368.

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., Naidenko, S.V., Chistopolova, M.D., Lukarevskiy, V.S., Kostyrya, A., et al., Social structure and space use of Amur tigers ( Panthera tigris Temminck, 1884) in Southern Russian Far East based on GPS telemetry data, Integr. Zool. , 2015, vol. 10, pp. 365–375.

IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group, Guidelines for Re-Introductions , International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland, 1998.

Kalinin, A.Yu., Polkovnikova, O.N., Chistopolova, M.D., Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., Sorokin, P.A., et al., Long-term monitoring of a reintroduced female tiger in the Bastak Reserve, in Materialy mezhdunarodnoi rabochei vstrechi po reabilitatsii i reintroduktsii krupnykh khishchnykh mlekopitayushchikh. Moskva, 25–27 noyabrya 2015 g. (Proc. Int. Working Meeting on the Rehabilitation and Reintroduction of Large Carnivorous Mammals, Moscow, November 25–27, 2015), Moscow: KMK, 2015, p. 108.

Kapitonova, L.V., Martynenko, O.N., Polkovnikov, I.L., and Zban’, P.V., Amur tiger in the Bastak Reserve and adjacent territories, in Regiony novogo osvoeniya: ekologicheskie problemy i puti ikh resheniya: Materialy mezhregion. konf. IVEP DVO RAN, Khabarovsk, 9–12 oktyabrya 2008 g. (Regions of New Development: Environmental Problems and Ways to Solve Them, Proc. Interreg. Conf. IVEP FEB RAS, Khabarovsk, October 9–12, 2008), Khabarovsk: IVEP DVO Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2008, book 2, pp. 358–362.

Kastrikin, V.A., Parilov, M.P., Kochetkov, D.N., Antonov, A.I., Sonin, P.L., et al., Effect of the reintroduction of the tiger ( Panthera tigris altaica ) on the group of wolves ( Canis lupus ) in the Khingansky Reserve, in Materialy mezhdunarodnoi rabochei vstrechi po reabilitatsii i reintroduktsii krupnykh khishchnykh mlekopitayushchikh. Moskva, 25–27 noyabrya 2015 g. (Proc. Int. Working Meeting on the Rehabilitation and Reintroduction of Large Carnivorous Mammals, Moscow, November 25–27, 2015), Moscow: KMK, 2015, p. 130.

Kazarinov, A.P., Current distribution and numbers of the tiger in the Far East, in Zoologicheskie problemy Sibiri. Materialy 4-go soveshchaniya zoologov Sibiri (Zoological Problems of Siberia: Proc. 4th Conf. Siberian Zoologists), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1972, pp. 401–402.

Kazarinov A.P., Amur tiger, Okhota Okhotn. Khoz ., 1979, no. 11, pp. 22–23.

Kenward, R.E., Marcström, V., and Karlbom, M., Post-nestling behaviour in goshawks, accipiter gentilis: II. Sex differences in sociality and nest-switching, Anim. Behav ., 1993, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 371–378.

Koren’kova, A.A., Yachmennikova, A.A., Rozhnov, V.V., Antonevich, A.L., Ivanov, E.A., et al., Development of social play behavior in tiger cubs ( Panthera tigris altaica ) in captivity, in Teriofauna Rossii i sopredel’nykh territorii (X s’’ezd Teriologicheskogo obshchestva pri RAN). Materialy Mezhdunarodnogo soveshchaniya 1–5 fevralya 2016 goda, g. Moskva (Theriofauna of Russia and Adjacent Territories (X Congress of the Theriological Society at the Russian Academy of Sciences), Proc. Int. Conf., February 1–5, 2016, Moscow), 2016, p. 185.

Koren’kova, A.A., Yachmennikova, A.A., Rozhnov, V.V., Antonevich, A.L., Ivanov, E.A., et al., The intensity of social interactions within a litter of cubs ( Panthera tigris altaica ) in captivity, in Teriofauna Rossii i sopredel’nykh territorii (X s"ezd Teriologicheskogo obshchestva pri RAN). Materialy Mezhdunarodnogo soveshchaniya 1–5 fevralya 2016 goda, g. Moskva (Theriofauna of Russia and Adjacent Territories (X Congress of the Theriological Society at the Russian Academy of Sciences), Proc. Int. Conf., February 1–5, 2016, Moscow), 2016a, p. 186.

Kucherenko, S.P., Amur tiger (modern distribution and abundance), Okhota Okhotn. Khoz ., 1970, no. 2, pp. 20–23.

Kucherenko, S.P., The reconstructed range of the Amur tiger, in Redkie vidy mlekopitayushchikh i ikh okhrana. Materialy 3-go Vsesoyuzn. soveshchaniya (Rare Species of Mammals and Their Conservation, Proc. 3rd All-Union Conf.), Moscow: IEMEZh i VTO Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1983, pp. 120–121.

Kucherenko S.P., Tigr (Tiger), Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1985.

Mikell, D.J., Kerley, L.L., Goodrich, J.M., Schleier, B.O., Smirnov, E.N., et al., Nutritional features of the Amur tiger in the Sikhote-Alin Biosphere Reserve and the Far East of Russia and the possibility of its conservation, in Tigry Sikhote-Alinskogo zapovednika: ekologiya i sokhranenie (Tigers of the Sikhote-Alin Nature Reserve: Ecology and Conservation), Mikell, D.J., Smirnov, E.N., and Goodrich, J.M., Eds., Vladivostok: PSP, 2005, pp. 125–131.

Mikell, D.J., Rozhnov, V.V., Rybin, A.N., Rybin, N.N., Seredkin, I.V., et al., Nutritional features of tiger cubs released into the wild in the Amur region, Russian Far East, in Materialy mezhdunarodnoi rabochei vstrechi po reabilitatsii i reintroduktsii krupnykh khishchnykh mlekopitayushchikh. Moskva, 25–27 noyabrya 2015 g. (Proc. Int. Working Meeting on the Rehabilitation and Reintroduction of Large Carnivorous Mammals, Moscow, November 25–27, 2015), Moscow: KMK, 2015, p. 106.

Miller, C.S., Hebblewhite, M., Petrunenko, Y.K., Seryodkin, I.V., DeCesare, N.J., et al., Estimating Amur tiger ( Panthera tigris altaica ) kill rates and potential consumption rates using global positioning system collars, J. Mammal ., 2013, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 845–855.

Naidenko, S.V., Ivanov, E.A., Lukarevskii, V.S., Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., Sorokin, P.A., et al., The use of non-invasive approaches in assessing the hormonal status of the Amur tigers ( Panthera tigris altaica ), in Amurskii tigr v Severo-Vostochnoi Azii: problemy sokhraneniya v XXI veke. Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., 15–18 marta 2010 g., Vladivostok (Amur Tiger in North-East Asia: Conservation Problems in the 21st Century: Int. Sci.-Pract. Conf., March 15–18, 2010, Vladivostok), Vladivostok: Dal’nauka, 2010, pp. 124–128.

Naidenko, S.V., Ivanov, E.A., Lukarevskii, V.S., Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., Sorokin, P.A., et al., Activity of the hypothalamo–pituitary–adrenals axis in the Siberian tiger ( Panthera tigris altaica ) in captivity and in the wild, and their dynamics throughout the year, Biol. Bull. (Moscow), 2011, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 301–305.

Naidenko, S.V., Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., Pavlova, E.V., Erofeeva, M.N., Sorokin, P.A., et al., Primary study of sero prevalence to virus pathogens in wild felids of South Primorie, Russia, Can. J. Zool ., 2018, vol. 96, no. 8, pp. 839–846.

Naidenko, S.V., Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., Erofeeva, M.N., Litvinov, M.N., and Rozhnov, V.V., Serum prevalence to nonviral pathogens in wild felids of Southern Primorye, Russia, Nat. Conserv. Res ., 2019, vol. 4, pp. 99–105.

Pazhetnov, S.V., Release of orphaned bears in the Bryanskii Les Reserve in order to restore the brown bear ( Ursus arctos arctos ) population in the Bryansk region, in Dinamika populyatsii okhotnich’ikh zhivotnykh Severnoi Evropy: Materialy III Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma (Dynamics of Populations of Game Animals in Northern Europe: Proc. 3rd Int. Symp.), Petrozavodsk, 2003, pp. 135–139.

Pazhetnov, S.V., Rehabilitation of the brown bear ( Ursus arctos arctos ) in Russia, in Zapovedniki Rossii i ustoichivoe razvitie. Materialy konferentsii (Nature Reserves of Russia and Sustainable Development, Proc. Conf.), Tr. Tsentr.-Lesn. Gos. Prir. Biosfern. Zapov., Velikie Luki, 2007, no. 5, pp. 316–320.

Pazhetnov, V.S., Pazhetnov, S.V., and Pazhetnova, S.I., Metodika vyrashchivaniya medvezhat-sirot dlya vypuska v dikuyu prirodu (Methodology for Raising Orphaned Bears for Release into the Wild), Tver: Izd. Aleksei Ushakov i K°, 1999.

Polkovnikova, O.N., Amur tiger in the Jewish Autonomous Region: retrospective analysis, Reg. Probl ., 2015, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 103–107.

Polkovnikova, O.N. and Kalinin, A.Yu., Results of the reintroduction of tigress Zolushka to the Bastak Reserve, Reg. Probl ., 2016, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 31–34.

Rakov N.V., Modern distribution of the tiger in the Amur–Ussuri region, Zool. Zh ., 1965, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 433–441.

Rozhnov V.V., The place of centers for breeding, rehabilitation and reintroduction of large carnivorous mammals in programs for the conservation of rare species, in Tekhnologii sokhraneniya redkikh vidov zhivotnykh. Materialy nauchnoi konferentsii (Technologies for the Conservation of Rare Animal Species: Proc. Sci. Conf.), Moscow: KMK, 2011, p. 51.

Rozhnov, V.V., Sorokin, P.A., Naidenko, S.V., Lukarevskiy, V.S., Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., et al., Noninvasive individual identification of the Amur tiger ( Panthera tigris altaica ) by molecular-genetic methods, Dokl. Biol. Sci ., 2009, vol. 429, pp. 518–522.

Rozhnov, V.V., Lukarevskii, V.S., Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., Sorokin, P.A., Litvinov, M.N., et al., Noninvasive approach to the assessment of activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system of the Amur tigers, Dokl. Biol. Sci ., 2010, vol. 430, pp. 57–59.

Rozhnov, V.V., Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., Lukarevskii, V.S., Naidenko, S.V., Sorokin, P.A., et al., Application of GPS-Argos satellite collars to study the space used by the Amur tigers, in Amurskii tigr v Severo-Vostochnoi Azii: problemy sokhraneniya v XXI veke. Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., 15–18 marta 2010 g., Vladivostok (Amur Tiger in North-East Asia: Conservation Problems in the 21st Century: Int. Sci.-Pract. Conf., March 15–18, 2010, Vladivostok), Vladivostok: Dal’nauka, 2010a, pp. 61–65.

Rozhnov, V.V., Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., Lukarevskii, V.S., Naidenko, S.V., Sorokin, P.A., et al., The use of satellite radio beacons to study the habitat and activity of the Amur tiger ( Panthera tigris altaica ), Zool. Zh ., 2011a, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 580–594.

Rozhnov, V.V., Yudin, V.G., Lukarevskii, V.S., Naidenko, S.V., Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., et al., Reabilitatsiya i vozvrashchenie v prirodu tigryat-sirot, in Teriofauna Rossii i sopredel’nykh territorii. Mezhdunarodnoe soveshchanie (IX S’’ezd Teriologicheskogo obshchestva pri RAN ) (Theriofauna of Russia and Adjacent Territories (IX Congress of the Theriological Society at the Russian Academy of Sciences), Moscow: KMK, 2011b, p. 402.

Rozhnov, V.V., Naidenko, S.V., Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., Lukarevskii, V.S., Sorokin, P.A., et al., Seasonal changes in the abundance of the Amur tiger forage base: experience of using the camera trap matrix, Zool. Zh ., 2012, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 746–756.

Rozhnov, V.V., Chistopolova, M.D., Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., Naidenko, S.V., Lukarevskii, V.S., et al., Space use by the Amur tiger ( Panthera tigris altaica ) during reintroduction in the northwest of the range, in Arealy, migratsii i drugie peremeshcheniya dikikh zhivotnykh: materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (g. Vladivostok, 25–27 noyabrya 2014 g.) (Ranges, Migrations, and Other Movements of Wild Animals: Proc. Int. Sci.-Pract. Conf. (Vladivostok, November 25–27, 2014)), Savel’ev, A.P. and Seredkin, I.V., Eds., Vladivostok: Reya, 2014, pp. 266–271.

Rozhnov, V.V., Yachmennikova, A.A., Antonevich, A.L., Ivanov, E.A., Dovgal, S.V., et al., Mother–cub interactions in tigers ( Panthera tigris altaica ): mutual changes in intensity and activity during early postnatal ontogenesis, in Proc. 10th Int. Conf. on Behaviour, Physiology and Genetics of Wildlife, Berlin 2015, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW), 2015, p. 166.

Rozhnov, V.V., Chistopolova, M.D., Lukarevskii, V.S., Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., Naidenko, S.V., and Sorokin, P.A., Home range structure and space use of a female Amur leopard, Panthera pardus orientalis (Carnivora, Felidae), Biol. Bull. (Moscow), 2015a, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 821–830.

Rozhnov, V.V., Yachmennikova, A.A., Blidchenko, E.Y., Sonin, P.L., Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., et al., Development of hunting behaviour in Amur tigers: analyses of orphaned tigers learning to hunt live prey, in Materialy mezhdunarodnoi rabochei vstrechi po reabilitatsii i reintroduktsii krupnykh khishchnykh mlekopitayushchikh. Moskva, 25–27 noyabrya 2015 g. (Proc. Int. Workshop on Rehabilitation and Reintroduction of Large Carnivores, Moscow, November 25–27, 2015), 2015b, p. 87.

Rozhnov, V.V., Naidenko, S.V., Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., Sorokin, P.A., Blidchenko, E.Yu., et al., Reintroduction of Amur tigers (Panthera tigris altaica) in Russia: results of the first stage of work, in Materialy mezhdunarodnoi rabochei vstrechi po reabilitatsii i reintroduktsii krupnykh khishchnykh mlekopitayushchikh. Moskva, 25–27 noyabrya 2015 g. (Proc. Int. Working Meeting on the Rehabilitation and Reintroduction of Large Carnivorous Mammals, Moscow, November 25–27, 2015), Moscow: KMK, 2015c, p. 12.

Rozhnov, V.V., Naidenko, S.V., Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., Sorokin, P.A., Blidchenko, E.Yu., et al., Rehabilitation of the Amur tiger in Russia: technology of rehabilitation and preparation for the return to nature of tiger cubs without parents and a system for monitoring released animals, in Teriofauna Rossii i sopredel’nykh territorii. Mezhdunarodnoe soveshchanie (X S’’ezd Teriologicheskogo obshchestva pri RAN) (Theriofauna of Russia and Adjacent Territories (X Congress of the Theriological Society at the Russian Academy of Sciences), Proc. Int. Conf., February 1–5, 2016, Moscow), Moscow: KMK, 2016, p. 356.

Rozhnov, V.V., Naidenko, S.V., Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., Chistopolova, M.D., Sorokin, P.A., et al., Reconstruction in Russia of a group of Amur tigers in the north-west of the range: results of work on the project of the Permanent Expedition of the Russian Academy of Sciences “Study and Conservation of the Amur Tiger in the Far East of Russia,” in Mezhdunarodnyi nauchno-prakticheskii simpozium “Sokhranenie populyatsii amurskogo tigra: itogi, problemy i perspektivy”. Sbornik materialov. 28–29 iyunya 2018, Rossiya (Proc. Int. Sci.-Pract. Symp. “Conservation of the Amur Tiger Population: Results, Problems, and Prospects,” June 28–29, 2018, Russia), Khabarovsk, 2018, pp. 18–26.

Rozhnov, V.V., Yachmennikova, A.A., Naidenko, S.V., Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., Chistopolova, M.D., et al., Monitoring peredneaziatskogo leoparda i drugikh krupnykh koshek (Monitoring of the Central Asian Leopard and Other Large Felids), Moscow: KMK, 2018a.

Rozhnov, V.V., Yachmennikova, A.A., Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., Naidenko, S.V., Chistopolova, M.D., et al., Study and Monitoring of Big Cats in Russia , Moscow: KMK, 2019.

Rozhnov, V.V., Chistopolova, M.D., Yachmennikova, A.A., Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., Sorokin, P.A., and Naidenko, S.V., Orientation of large carnivorous mammals after release into nature on the example of tiger and leopard, in Orientatsiya i navigatsiya zhivotnykh. Tezisy II nauchnoi konferentsii (Orientation and Navigation of Animals: 2nd Sci. Conf., Abstracts of Papers), Moscow: KMK, 2019a, p. 65.

Shteiman, A.A. and Yachmennikova, A.A., Social behavior of Amur tigers ( Panthera tigris altaica ) when they are combined into a group of adult males and females with a brood in captivity, in Teriofauna Rossii i sopredel’nykh territorii (X s’’ezd Teriologicheskogo obshchestva pri RAN). Materialy Mezhdunarodnogo soveshchaniya 1–5 fevralya 2016 goda, g. Moskva (Theriofauna of Russia and Adjacent Territories (X Congress of the Theriological Society at the Russian Academy of Sciences), Proc. Int. Conf., February 1–5, 2016, Moscow), 2016, p. 469.

Skripova, K.V., Metodicheskoe posobie po vyrashchivaniyu molodnyaka gimalaiskogo medvedya (Ursus thibetanus) s tsel’yu vypuska v dikuyu prirodu (Methodological Manual for Raising Young Animals of the Himalayan Bear ( Ursus thibetanus ) for Release into the Wild), Vladivostok: Dal’nauka, 2005.

Sludskii, A.A., World distribution and abundance of tigers, in Okhotnich’e-promyslovye zveri Kazakhstana (Game and Commercially Valuable Animals of Kazakhstan), Tr. Inst. Zool. Akad. Nauk Kazakh. SSR, Alma-Ata, 1966, vol. 26, pp. 212–261.

Sludskii, A.A., Rasprostranenie i chislennost' dikikh koshek v SSSR (Distribution and Abundance of Wild Felids in the USSR), in Promyslovye mlekopitayushchie Kazakhstana (Commercially Valuable Mammals of Kazakhstan), Tr. Inst. Zool. Akad. Nauk Kazakh. SSR, Alma-Ata, 1973, vol. 34, pp. 5–106.

Sorokin, P.A., Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., Lukarevskii, V.S., Naidenko, S.V., Litvinov, M.N., et al., Molecular-genetic methods as an approach to noninvasive identification of Amur tigers and their derivatives, in Amurskii tigr v Severo-Vostochnoi Azii: problemy sokhraneniya v XXI veke. Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., 15–18 marta 2010 g., Vladivostok (Amur Tiger in North-East Asia: Conservation Problems in the 21st Century, Int. Sci.-Pract. Conf., March 15–18, 2010, Vladivostok), Vladivostok: Dal’nauka, 2010, pp. 121–123.

Sorokin, P.A., Rozhnov, V.V., Krasnenko, A.U., Lukarevskiy, V.S., Naidenko, S.V., and Hernandez-Blanco, J.A., Genetic structure of the Amur tiger ( Panthera tigris altaica ) population: are tigers in Sikhote-Alin and southwest Primorye truly isolated?, Integr. Zool ., 2016, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 25–32.

Stickel, L.F., A comparison of certain methods of measuring ranges of small mammals, J. Mammal ., 1954, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–15.

Worton, B.J., Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home range studies, Ecology , 1989, vol. 70, pp. 164–168.

Yachmennikova, A.A., Rozhnov, V.V., Blidchenko, E.Yu., Poyarkov, A.D., Koren’kova, A.A., and Shteiman, A.A., Data integration for the development of a universal scale of postnatal ontogenesis of tiger cubs, Zh. Obshch. Biol ., 2017, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 40–51.

Yudin, V.G., Yudina, E.V., Tigr Dal’nego Vostoka Rossii (Tiger of the Russian Far East), Rozhnov, V.V., Editor-in-Chief, Vladivostok: Dalnauka, 2009.

Zhu Shibing, Qu Yi., Yachmennikova, A., Kotlov, I., Sandlerskiy, R., et al., Assessment of potential habitat suitability for Amur tiger in Lesser Khingan Mountains based on MaxEnt modeling, Acta Theriol. Sin. , 2020, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 317–328.

Zhu, Sh., Chiu, I., Liu, I., Dobrynin, D.V., Sukhova, O.V., et al., The structure of potential habitats of the Amur tiger ( Panthera tigris altaica ) and the assessment of its food supply in the Taipinggou National Park (China) according to the data of remote sensing of the Earth, Issled. Zemli Kosmosa , 2019, no. 4, pp. 60–86.

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The work was carried out by the Permanent Expedition of RAS for study of Russian Red Data Book animals and other key animals of Russian fauna within the framework of the Project “Study and conservation of the Amur tiger in the Russian Far East”, under the management by the A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IEE RAS) with the financial support of the Russian Geographical Society.

The authors are grateful to the Tiger Special Inspection, Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), Phoenix Foundation and International Fund of Animals Welfare (IFAW), as well as V.G. Yudin (Federal Research Centre of Biodiversity of Terrestrial Biota of Eastern Asia FEB RAS), V.B. Kuzmenko (MROO Centre Tiger), P.L. Sonin (Land of the Leopard National Park), A.N. Feoktistov (Department for the protection and use of objects of fauna of the Government of the Jewish Autonomous Region), O.N. Polkovnikova, I.L. Polkovnikov (Bastak Nature Reserve), D.N. Kochetkov, A.I. Antonov, M.P. Parilov, M.S. Babykin (Khinganskiy Nature Reserve), D.G. Miquelle, A.N. Rybin, N.N. Rybin (Wildlife Conservation Society, WCS), S.L. Bereznyuk (Phoenix Foundation) for their active participation and professional assistance at different stages of the work, A.A. Varshavsky (IEE RAS) for help in preparing a map of the historical habitat range of the Amur tiger.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071, Moscow, Russia

V. V. Rozhnov, S. V. Naidenko, J. A. Hernandez-Blanco, M. D. Chistopolova, P. A. Sorokin & A. A. Yachmennikova

National Park Land of Leopard, 690068, Vladivostok, Russia

E. Yu. Blidchenko

Bastak State Nature Reserve, 679014, Birobidjan, Russia

A. Yu. Kalinin

Khingan State Nature Reserve, 676740, Arkhara, Russia

V. A. Kastrikin

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. V. Rozhnov .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest . The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Statement on the welfare of animals . All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Rozhnov, V.V., Naidenko, S.V., Hernandez-Blanco, J.A. et al. Restoration of the Amur Tiger ( Panthera tigris altaica ) Population in the Northwest of Its Distribution Area. Biol Bull Russ Acad Sci 48 , 1401–1423 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359021080239

Download citation

Received : 17 May 2020

Revised : 19 August 2020

Accepted : 26 August 2020

Published : 28 December 2021

Issue Date : December 2021

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359021080239

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Panthera tigris altaica
• rehabilitation
• reintroduction
• restoration of population
• GPS telemetry
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research